Telescope Tips- Episode 14. Eyepieces. Memphis Astronomical Society

[@emadmoussa2576]

Great video, guys. But would it be possible to do it without the constant background music next time?

[@rdelpozo]

Agree annoying too loud

[@Jay_J]

Between the music and the bird tweeting, I could barely understand them!

[@timwilde4200]

@@Jay_J Agreed! :) The music is totally unnecessary and a distraction - I thought I'd left another KZbin window open.

[@ruchem71]

Valuable information, difficult to follow with the music.

[@TheStevecas9860]

I agrre the music is louder than their voices a bit annoying!

[@billwilson3220]

Great discussion! How about a follow-up with the technical details of the different designs--Plössel, Erfle, orthoscopic, etc.--and the good and bad points of each?

[@JeremyVeldman]

Very good suggestion! We'll get to work on it :)

[@TheAmericafuckyeah]

Background music was too loud

[@horaciodortona574]

Awesome video, I've been an active amateur astronomer since 1976 when my parents gave me a Criterion RV-6. I can never get enough of telescopes and eyepieces and make make my yearly pilgrimage to the NEAF convention in Rockland County. It was great fun hanging with you guys I enjoyed it so much I subscribed! Wishing you Clear Skies.

[@williamferreira5798]

I wish I was part of a group like this. Cool video.

[@2.88milemushroom7]

Horrible too loud background music.

[@kellytaylor3915]

Very good presentation Lowering the volume on the background music will help. You next talk should include exit pupil of telescopes and eyepieces. Also the human Eye is not a Camera. The human needs it’s own set of parameters. Having a 6 inch F/15 refractor to view the planets with is a game changer. We also have installed a 6 inch F/15 refractor at a Observatory and it is fast becoming the preferred scope for Planets and Lunar and Solar using a Lunt white light solar filter. The detail on solar sunspots is amazing as is the moon. Routinely powers of 480 are used. When Purbach’s X around first 1/4 moon at 478 power is awesome

[@MM0IMC]

For a laugh, put on the auto generated subtitles/closed captions.

[@Jay_J]

Tried that because the music and the bird chirping drowned out the dialog, but it was totally butchered!

[@wanderrancanti]

I liked everything about this video, including the birds singing.

[@andymiller2485]

good video love ricks old school Naglers, I Have all 3 type 2s and the 9 type 1

[@ShinesMonkey1]

Very informative! Thanks - Bob Knight

[@andymiller2485]

Rick, have you tried the 20mm type 2 eyepiece., it's still a phenomenal eyepiece.

[@pandoraefretum]

spoken with experience... thx guys

[@patrickmcmullen1190]

I have an old Coulter F4.5 Telescope with an 8" mirror. It came with a 27mm eye piece. Would getting a wider eye piece such as a 32mm be TOO wide for this scope? Their is a maximum field of view depending on the telescope, i believe.

[@GaryCameron]

I would start with low power an work my way up. Currently have a Panoptic 41, Nagler 31, Panoptic 27, Ethos 21, 17, 13, 10, 8 with my C9.25 I've only had cause to pull the 8 out once.

[@petershortsleeves3981]

Good information but the background music is too distracting.

[@gofastpulluphard7799]

Clicked on it because of the Masonic hand gestures

[@SvenM.Ekeren]

Hi guys. I'm about to get a set of 9mm eyepieces for my APM 70 ED and APM 100 ED binoculars. And I wonder which you would recommend of the Tele Vue - 9 mm Nagler and the Baader Morpheus 9mm?

[@_stardust62]

Cool music video 🤷‍♂️

[@ziggyfrnds]

Thanks for the very informative video! What do you think about the Baader zoom mark iv? I am an astronomer with an 10 inch f5 dob. I only have the most basic of eyepiece collections and I want to get one that can give me a range of magnifications......should I consider it? Thanks in advance!

[@deadandburied7626]

My first was a Vixen 32mm Erfle, still have it.

[@PuneetBanga26Aug]

Hi, Wanted to know, is Orion E-Series 7-21mm Zoom Eyepiece is better then individual plossl eyepieces. And please let me know eseries eyepiece are plossl, means crisp image as delivered by plossl eyepieces.

[@dedskin1]

you might want some Pro sound on your vids , im a old school producer , bout 15 years in it , will work for EP's :) i absolutely will

[@JeremyVeldman]

Pavle Pavlovic I’m looking for a professional producer for my videos- editing, music, anything. Would be interested in hearing more about what you would offer...

[@dedskin1]

@@JeremyVeldman yeah, cleaning , editing , mixing even producing original scores , i used upwork and other sites up until recently ,now im making my own site , but its under construction you can contact me on my private artistic mail dedskin at gmail that is fine as well and i can explain , see what is needed .

[@dedskin1]

@@JeremyVeldman I forgot to say , i like your videos , i like astronomy , as i understand its Memphis astronomical society , im from rural parts unfortunately there is no big astronomical society around for me to hang with , so i hang around ,watched a lot of presentations and vids here , i see some down to earth interesting ppl so i hang around

[@krista96]

I really like listening to you guys . . the background music was awful and unnecessary though

[@thomjmoore]

How about a video on cleaning the lenses in a telescope? My Orion manual says to clean them once a year but I really don't know how. Would love to see how the 'experts' do it.

[@helthuismartin]

Skip the music next time please.It very difficult now to understand what the guys are saying.

[@dokuzbirdebucuk]

So noisy with the background music.

[@timwilde4200]

Guys, with all due respect, I'm five minutes in and I'm giving up - I just cannot watch this all the way through - the music is way too distracting and difficult to hear over. Is it possible that you could put it back on here without the music track?

[@weedshoes5089]

Fedora and cargos.

[@retrogaminggarage2241]

please lose the music

[@malcolmlewis6014]

Spoilt by the background music , no need for it.