I like how two separate people were able to say "Good, now I'm Rome." The beauty of medieval politics.
@fluedgoop3 жыл бұрын
The hre did have an almost legit if convoluted claim tbf
@cevq61263 жыл бұрын
Neither of which was the city of Rome ..,
@user-ud3gh8fy5n3 жыл бұрын
Yeah for some reason everyone wanted to be Rome. HRE, Russia, even Ottomans specially reign of Mehmed II who fancied himself as a Roman
@brandonlyon7303 жыл бұрын
@@fluedgoop Despite the fact the HRE consisted of mostly German people. The same group that destroyed the western part of Rome in the first place.
@onuraslanfb073 жыл бұрын
@@user-ud3gh8fy5n yeah Mehmed even called himself Caesar of Rum
@RiDeRWaTch3 жыл бұрын
"Constantinople was conquered by the Ottomans!" Europeans: Who? "The Ottomans are people from the-" Europeans: No. Who asked?
@splintercell55513 жыл бұрын
Martin Luther knew who they were, and Pushed for A crusade against them
@efecaktl54323 жыл бұрын
@@splintercell5551 its a joke
@lukad77443 жыл бұрын
@@splintercell5551 you must be fun at parties
@sviatoslavs.13053 жыл бұрын
I don't get it.
@splintercell55513 жыл бұрын
@@lukad7744 What does that mean
@madsmllerjensen69133 жыл бұрын
No one: Moscow: You know, I’m something of a Roman myself
@monkeyman3213 жыл бұрын
You deserve more upvotes.
@youneskasdi3 жыл бұрын
We always laugh about the holy roman empire not being anything of what their name suggest, but what the hell were the russians thinking by claiming the title of third rome
@denissokolov19903 жыл бұрын
@@youneskasdi Like, several reasons. 1. Russia claimed the title of "Thrid Rome" mostly for the religious reasons, not political, this is why they never took the name officialy, unlike HRE. 2. Vasiliy's son got married to the niece of last Byzantium Emperor, Constantin the 11th, thus making Rurik and Palaeologus dynaties to be raltives. 3. They simply wanted to poke Emperor, by saying something like "look, we are equals to you, you claim to inheret West, we claim to inheret East of Rome. Btw, poits 2 and 3 are also the reasons why Russia has eagle with two heads as their coat of arms.
@sweet_xylitol78143 жыл бұрын
@@youneskasdi Russians inherited the spirit of Byzantium Empire
@stuff96803 жыл бұрын
Well members of the Byzantine royal family married into the royalty of Moscow so technically Moscow then Russia could be considered the third Rome and when Russia fell to communism and Finland being the only part not communist then technically Finland is the true heir to Rome
@hiimryan23883 жыл бұрын
*crusaders litterally crippling Byzantium* *Ottomans threatens Europe Europe: i should not have dont that, I should not have done that
@gb42063 жыл бұрын
He means the crusade against the byzantines where the crusaders destroyed parts of constantinople. To be fair though, the Ottomans would’ve taken the city either way, it would’ve just taken longer probably.
@hiimryan23883 жыл бұрын
GB 420 thank you
@joermnyc3 жыл бұрын
4th Crusade: “Take that Byzantium! Wrong kinds of Christians!” Ottomans: “Thanks for softening them up for us.” 4th Crusade: “Oh...”
@Admiral45-103 жыл бұрын
,,Hey, Turks took Cons_" Polish Kingdom: *I'm in kind of a big deal*
@hiimryan23883 жыл бұрын
@@Admiral45-10 Rest of Europe: thank u but U r FoOD nOw DiE
@cartesian_doubt6230 Жыл бұрын
Its absolutely NOT true that the Venetian concern was only or primarily financial. Venetians helped to defend Constantinople when there was no Hope. Moreover, they fought the Ottomans several times after 1453 in the name of Christianity.
@CenabNagiyev3 жыл бұрын
*"Constantinople Falls"* Europe: Yeah that's Sad, Anyway...
@hawk50963 жыл бұрын
He said he caught a small case of death. Had me rollin.
@MightyMerlin13 жыл бұрын
Seems eerily similar to the Muslim conquest of France in the 2020s
@floatingf8783 Жыл бұрын
1:12 You mean "There was also some SULTAN the wound."
@alicrsi2 жыл бұрын
the reaction video everyone wanted
@oliversherman24142 жыл бұрын
I love your channel keep up the great stuff!!!!!
@matheuspinho49873 жыл бұрын
I love the fact that Venicians' reaction to this was "oh, my God, I had money there!"
@D2RCR2 жыл бұрын
Venice in a nutshell
@IslamBenfifi2 жыл бұрын
They kept their trade and money very soon afterwards so even less issues for them. They even had their own independent quarter inside of Istanbul.
@D2RCR2 жыл бұрын
@@IslamBenfifi Yeah, the Venetians didn’t cry over their lost trade opportunities for long, the Ottomans’ money was just as good as the Byzantines’, if not better.
@girlgarde2 жыл бұрын
Well, they shouldn't have sacked Constantinople in 1204 in the 4th Crusade and fragmented Byzantium thus eventually paving the way for the Turks to rise and take over the area.
@cristeromexico33662 жыл бұрын
@@girlgarde They did the right thing
@PhilipJackson033 жыл бұрын
Historians: ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT MOMENTS IN HUMAN HISTORY People at the time: *meh*
@Red_Pee3 жыл бұрын
History do be like that. Can’t wait for 2655 when historians will be like: the creation of the microwave marks the beginning of the end of western civilisation
@iteor73203 жыл бұрын
Constantinople: falls Earlier Crusaders: *shuffle feet as they had sacked Constantinople sometime earlier*
@failuretv8143 жыл бұрын
History is only exciting when you study it, living it though..... Just think about 2020
@catoelder46963 жыл бұрын
Portugal's King Afonso V raised an army to join the crusade! But since no other european king was in it, he went on to conquer northern Africa.
@coolthief83753 жыл бұрын
@loadsofbuts You can easily see it: -Muslim Empire now controls most of the ways East. And trade from the East is vital to your economy. The Muslims are enemies because the entire crusade thing. -the Ottoman Empire was expanding rapidly so it was common sense they would continue to do so. Which would lead inevitably to confrontation with the West.
@TemoKuntchulia3 жыл бұрын
Italy: "he was like a father to me" Literally everyone else: "oh no... anyways"
@Gaben383 жыл бұрын
More like Venice: "I wish it was us sacking the city"
@gamebawesome3 жыл бұрын
@@Gaben38 Also Venice: ...Oh yeah, we already did...
@nathanishungryanimations72063 жыл бұрын
lol
@nathanishungryanimations72063 жыл бұрын
@@gamebawesome Yeah, history is full of hypocrisy
@WILLIAN_14243 жыл бұрын
@@leonardodavid2842 venice had trade posts and trading cities close to constantinople, they never really cared for the city, they cared for the money
@joermnyc3 жыл бұрын
Europe: Meh Later: “The Ottomans are outside Vienna!” Europe: “Ok, now we should do something.”
@iplyrunescape3053 жыл бұрын
Fr. Karma for not helping.
@kasadam853 жыл бұрын
@Wayne Hitchcock that is the second siege
@Dorkeydaze3 жыл бұрын
@Wayne Hitchcock Poland: so I’m about to pull what’s known as a pro gamer move...
@okcydent49013 жыл бұрын
1444: Varna.
@bigboyrambo20093 жыл бұрын
You all seem to forget the crusade at battle of Nicopolis and battle of Varna
@eatingjr18053 жыл бұрын
Nobody: Every large country in medieval Europe: I'm Rome
@ElusiveTy3 жыл бұрын
@We Scotland wasn't and isn't quite a 'large country' The HRE and Francia/France were.
@joellaz98363 жыл бұрын
@No that wasn’t supposed to happen Scotland had kings named Constantine...
@turkmapping1303 жыл бұрын
lol
@lordsbully24562 жыл бұрын
well they are except the russian
@sbg0192 жыл бұрын
Even the Ottomans claimed to be the successors of Rome.
@PleaseDoNotDoThis3 жыл бұрын
Comments: 30% Genuinely analyzing the event. 20% Talking about history. 50% "Oh no.... Anyways."
@Nimish2043 жыл бұрын
You forgot James Bizonet comments
@Cybernaut5513 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Historians should put their skills and knowledge to good use.
@Mr_T_Badger3 жыл бұрын
And not one single person singing “Istanbul was Constantinople” because you’re all a bunch of uneducated heathens. 😋
@SupremeLeaderKimJong-un3 жыл бұрын
Oops, you missed a spot. Don't forget to ban Europe from the Indian spice trade.
@Veriox223 жыл бұрын
"What? That's bullshit!" Said Portugal, spiceless. Well i guess we'll have to find another way to Indiaaaa
@apexhunter9353 жыл бұрын
Sup kimmy how are those ICBMS doing
@nowhereman60193 жыл бұрын
"Oh no! Now my porridge is going to taste as bad as it looks!"
@AlternativeTelevision3 жыл бұрын
@@Veriox22 Wait! said Christopher Columbus, probably smoking crack.
@nathanishungryanimations72063 жыл бұрын
BILLWURTS YEAH!
@JaelaOrdo3 жыл бұрын
“Hey the Turks took Constantinople!” “Should we start a crusade to get it back?” “No, sounds like a lot of work. We’ll just send our thoughts and prayers.”
@SirFaceFone3 жыл бұрын
Pretty much, but replace it with "sounds expensive". Medieval politics was wild.
@redwolf9153 жыл бұрын
Lol like with Republicans and school shootings
@comradekenobi69083 жыл бұрын
"Bro last time we had a Crusade to Byzantine territory we sacked them remember?"
@khadirafarah13143 жыл бұрын
@@redwolf915 XD
@ernestov20013 жыл бұрын
@@redwolf915 Pretty much
@Professional_Dirtbag_Hippie2 жыл бұрын
Teacher: The test isn’t that confusing The Test: What Year Did Rome Fall 1) 27 BCE 2) 395 CE 4) 476 CE 5) 717 CE 6) 867 CE 7) 1204 CE 8) 1453 CE 9) 1806 CE 10) 1917 CE 11) It is yet to fall 12) All of the Above 13) None of the Above
@dorianphilotheates37692 жыл бұрын
12) All of the above.
@EfeAksoy082 жыл бұрын
1945
@KingAgniKai2 жыл бұрын
10
@sageof6pandas2332 жыл бұрын
@@EfeAksoy08 lol
@fatihthegazelle2 жыл бұрын
English occupation doesn't count because it isn't a conquest. After the 1453 İt has been Turkish place and seems they won't give back.
@Darkblender53 жыл бұрын
"Guys, Constantinople fell!" "Oh, well." "Guys, the Ottomans are banning us from the Spice Trade!" Portugal: "OH, HELL NO!"
@beypazarbagmls67913 жыл бұрын
it's called taxing, not banning.
@InfernosReaper3 жыл бұрын
@@beypazarbagmls6791 a high enough tax is effectively a ban
@beypazarbagmls67913 жыл бұрын
@@InfernosReaper it wasn't that high
@happyalltheday22753 жыл бұрын
Then war in the Ocean
@alexsiu80063 жыл бұрын
The strategy of Ottomans, on the other hand, should be greatly appreciated: Instead of conquering the city (which was extremely well protected by high wall and seawater) directly, Ottomans had purposely occupied most of the original territories of the Empire first and the Empire thus became much weaker before the final war in 1453. Since the Empire had lost control of most trade routes in Argean Sea either, the 'Romans' eventually lacked any financial and material supports outside the city during the time of siege. The victory of Ottomans was then just a matter of time.
@pridelander063 жыл бұрын
HRE: "Look at me. Look at me. I'm the Roman Empire now."
@tomchch3 жыл бұрын
Russia "Look at me. Look at me. I'm the Roman Empire now." Ottomans "Look at me. Look at me. I'm the Roman Empire now." HRE: "Look at me. Look at me. I'm the Roman Empire now."
@ecurewitz3 жыл бұрын
Russia begs to differ
@peterii35123 жыл бұрын
Eric Rogers I mean every educated Roman could speak Greek and Romans would even buy Greek slaves just to teach their children Greek. Rome was such a Greek fanboy that they took Greek gods. But I agree, Byzantines are not Romans.
@shadowguardian36123 жыл бұрын
@@peterii3512 wouldnt byzantines be romans until they stopped using latin?
@caden77453 жыл бұрын
@Eric Rogers that's a bit too broad of a statement. I mean, the Western Roman Empire was the lesser half for basically the 4th and 5th centuries, and even after the 476 fall of Rome the "Byzantines" did not experience a drastic change. Sure, they slowly evolved into something different than the 2nd century romans, but even then, the roman empire wasn't culturally stable for it's entire existence either. Also, you need to remember that for it's entire existence as a massive empire, Rome was half Latin and half Greek, so it's hard to pinpoint what "Romanised" really even means.
@martinthecarolean97623 жыл бұрын
Venice 1204: *leads a sack and takeover of Constantinople, crippling the empire irrevocably* Venice 1453: surprised pikachu face
@aryanthacker3 жыл бұрын
god damn 1204 crusade
@ethank50593 жыл бұрын
Hey if Constantinople can't rebuild after 250 years then that's on them.
@theDuke00013 жыл бұрын
@@ethank5059 the city was rebuild but the manpower never could be regained due the constant wars
@iddomargalit-friedman38973 жыл бұрын
@@ethank5059 They did. But it took them long enough just to retake the city, and they lost mosy of their other territory. It's something extremely hard to recover from. It took the miracle of both the mongols and timurlane for them to even survive that long of a period.
@faytachiMPS3 жыл бұрын
venice in 1453: how dare those muslims take constantinople!!!! ''hey didnt you just do the exact same thing 200 years prior?'' ''...shut up''
@Anonymous-uu8fw2 жыл бұрын
The Hungarians also had a pretty panicked reaction as due to their proximity they now (correctly) predicted themselves next on the Ottoman chopping block. That said, they'd already been panicking about the Ottomans for several decades at this point so it wasn't exactly anything new.
@mariusnanu7378 Жыл бұрын
They failed to aid Vlad The Impailer ‘s attempt to hold Mehmet’s army south of the Danube ! In fact all of the Catholic powers at the time failed …….greed power and profits is all they cared about at that time .
@User98272-ue9 ай бұрын
Ottomans didn’t succeed in conquering Hungary tho thanks to polish Lithuania habsburgs etc
@zgramzhnisk30368 ай бұрын
@@User98272-ueBut they did? The majority of Hungary was for around a century Ottoman clay
@itaybron3 жыл бұрын
Everyone wanted to be Rome till it was time to do roman things.
@walidechchafnaje98123 жыл бұрын
Lol
@andreamarino60103 жыл бұрын
@@Rares0101 Russia be like: light ottomans yaaaaaaa
@romanzusman28923 жыл бұрын
Damn Right!
@thespanishinquisition86173 жыл бұрын
They could not fund their crusade because James Bizenet’s trade company in Venice had just gone under
@datchisan253 жыл бұрын
I swear James Bizenet is legally obligated to keep his Patreon at this point because the shout out section wouldn't be the same anymore without him
@Tabukium3 жыл бұрын
They did a crusade like when Suleiman was sultan or something but the Christians lost once again.
@Sammie10533 жыл бұрын
They had to seek funding from the Parthia and Bologna Company The PartYBoYCo if you will
@benr.42383 жыл бұрын
Yea well if the Venetians hadn't just sat their fleet in the Aegean twiddling their thumbs, then Constantinople wouldn't have fallen in the first place.
@GameyCat3 жыл бұрын
@@benr.4238 the venetians have alot of interest fr money they dont have ANY INTEREST for war
@ChessedGamon3 жыл бұрын
The HRE was busy with internal conflicts Imagine my shock
@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser3 жыл бұрын
The HRE was busy with internal conflicts This comment is true no matter when you read it.
@blenterbl3 жыл бұрын
Ultimately it fell to an external conflict, Napoleon Bonaparte.
@j2dragon1093 жыл бұрын
You can drop the 'Holy' and it's still true.
@westproductions1003 жыл бұрын
I believe it's important to note that the fall of Constantinople also contributed to Spain and other European countries being more interested in alternate trade routes, because going through Constantinople was a major trading route and the Ottomans taking Constantinople shut down that trading route or restricted it a lot. This helped to convince Spain about 100-150 years later to go along with Columbus's suggestion of sailing west. I think it's important to also note based on this video that Columbus was also from Genoa. Given he grew up there I'm sure he was exposed to the negative reactions of Constantinople's fall and the economic impact that had on Genoa.
@davidwuhrer6704 Жыл бұрын
Spain and Portugal were looking for alternative trade routes because Europe was in the way.
@TheSwiftCreek2 Жыл бұрын
Columbus sailed 39 years later, not 100-150 years.
@pedrolmlkzk Жыл бұрын
Absolute BS, Portugal had already reached Senegal by this point, the myth that constantinople had anything to do with Atlantic exploration is absurd
@GameyCat11 ай бұрын
It grealy affected it, if your mind is open to new ideas, may I suggest there are *multiple* causes to an event? @@pedrolmlkzk
@stoyanb.16686 ай бұрын
Of course it had a big impact. The otomans started levying huge taxes on the importation of goods coming over the silk road, and while portugal had started going south along the coast of Africa, it spurred the Spanish to find another way to the east indies. Not to mention that a bit later portugal and the otomans had a huge war for access to india.
@icemanire54673 жыл бұрын
James Byzantinette was devastated.
@abloodorange52333 жыл бұрын
Lol
@somethingelse5163 жыл бұрын
I tip my hat to you
@blenterbl3 жыл бұрын
Nah he was more devastated when the crusaders looted every square centimeter of his city
@Evemeister123 жыл бұрын
Bastard, I was going to write something like that.
@AndrewPonti3 жыл бұрын
Underrated comment of the century. Uptoke this one to karma heaven, baby!
@monikhadka3 жыл бұрын
Roman empire: falls Holy Roman empire: there is another
@aminazman93113 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, when it's neither holy nor roman nor an empire
@thomasscream41793 жыл бұрын
Russian Principalities: no, there is another other Ottoman Empire: no, there is another nother other
@brandonlyon7303 жыл бұрын
@@thomasscream4179 Papacy: Uh guys I’m the one who actually controls the actual city of Rome so I don’t know why you guys are arguing about?
@Vaga-Bard3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, those are the ones who rule the world ATM..
@ukar53773 жыл бұрын
we wuz romans
@EthioMod3 жыл бұрын
This is the topic I've always wanted from you!
@darthhoovy83323 жыл бұрын
Didn’t expect to see you here! Glad to see you’re doing well!
@MMaximmachinegun3 жыл бұрын
History matters air 2
@italiangarbageposting3 жыл бұрын
holy shit
@ethanfoster59143 жыл бұрын
Tf2 air was a piece of history in of its self
@wintersoldier99233 жыл бұрын
Wheres tf2 air part 3
@OneManPizzaParty3 жыл бұрын
Constantinople: falls Vlad the Impaler: "SHARPEN. EVERY. STICK."
@Sam-wt1cx3 жыл бұрын
And then his head was cut off by an Ottoman sword.
@romanzusman28923 жыл бұрын
@K.K.Kz.z z.z.z.z buried?) I thought he flew away in his bat form))
@afdalridwan38133 жыл бұрын
@K.K.Kz.z z.z.z.z WALLACIA NEED TO BE PUNSIH!
@ALLAHwithdaughterALLAT3 жыл бұрын
timur tamerlame the sword of islam
@teaisgreat63343 жыл бұрын
"Imagine forests of corpses dripping on a buffet , you call that a nightmare I call that a Tuesday"
@ThatGuy-kz5fs3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact : The reason why Vasily II eyes were blindfolded because after he was released by a golden horde khan , a noble by the name Dmitri Shemyaka ( who had ruled over the principality of Moscow during his absence ) blinded him and send him into exile. He would later assembled his supporters and defeat Dmitri Shemyaka. Thus regained his throne.
@ThatGuy-kz5fs3 жыл бұрын
Side note : Vasily II was held captive in 1445 after being defeated by a Khan from the Kazan Khanate who had laid siege on Moscow 6 years earlier and forced him to flee from his capital.
@somerandomstudent9883 жыл бұрын
Cool. Thanks for the info
@ThatGuy-kz5fs3 жыл бұрын
@@somerandomstudent988 Much obliged my friend 😁
@TheT3MK43 жыл бұрын
thanks for fact I thought he just blindly ignored fall of Constantinople
@alfredjansa26483 жыл бұрын
@Hoàng Nguyên Đậu Because it is a way to remove your opponent from politics without killing him. In the case of Vasily II, this obviously did not help.
@rgm-96xjesta313 жыл бұрын
In a nutshell, most of Europe when like this: "Oh No! Anyways..." (Edit: Guys, other people have said this before me, why the hell do I have more likes? go Like their comments too.)
@lucinae85123 жыл бұрын
Monarch of Europe: "First thing to care about? The city of heretics is gone! What's next on the agenda? Internal conflicts! Now what to have for dinner?"
@terrypennington25193 жыл бұрын
I was expecting someone to say this in the comments and low and behold, it was the very first comment
@Zanator13 жыл бұрын
Dammit, beat me to it
@090giver0903 жыл бұрын
More like Italins: Oh noes we have to reneg our deals Rest of the Europe: Sad, but meh Muscovy: No! (Yay!)
@Gardstyle353 жыл бұрын
why u repost?
@zhouyiwei1123 жыл бұрын
French Crusaders: *Literally burnt a third of Constantinople into the ground in the late 13th century.* Constantinople a century and a half later: *falls* The French: *oh no that's sad*
@erynn99683 жыл бұрын
No good in geopolitics back then
@Hungabrigoo3 жыл бұрын
France also became one of the biggest supporters of the Ottomans later btw. Meanwhile the countries that actually defended Europe were forgotten.
@cspresimir3 жыл бұрын
Wasn't that early 13 century? 1200 + some crumbs?
@beaumontjean64183 жыл бұрын
All the crusaders were not french during the 4th Crusade
@Hungabrigoo3 жыл бұрын
@@beaumontjean6418 I know but they were one of the few countries that actively supported muslim expansion into Europe.
@gfhit75203 жыл бұрын
I think that there wasn't a great reaction because it was basically expected. By 1453 the Byzantine empire was in an advanced zombified state and surrounded by the Ottomans, so while the fall of the city was symbolic, the writing on the wall was there since some time already
@johnhanifin19523 жыл бұрын
Caught a small case of death Lmao
@howlerofthegrey93683 жыл бұрын
Never change HM.. never change XD
@Nly7373 жыл бұрын
You must be new here haha
@themysticautistic54493 жыл бұрын
Question: when did Asia learn of the americas and how did they react?
@tbotalpha81333 жыл бұрын
Oooooh, that's a good question!
@infinityarcangel59723 жыл бұрын
@@tbotalpha8133 yes yes it is
@arjusarauis99013 жыл бұрын
Good question, and if ya ask me since they didn't colonize it.... they probably thought it'd be waste of time and money to invest into that venture.
@brandonlyon7303 жыл бұрын
The Ming Empire was at least somewhat aware of it since the 1500’s since they traded with the Spanish for all the Silver they mined from Peru and there other western American colonies. Though they wouldn’t trade anything back so they sort of stock piled the Silver causing massive inflation problems in the empire, one of many contributing factors to Ming’s collapse.
@peterii35123 жыл бұрын
Brandon Lyon I thought Ming’s problem was lack of silver not abundance of it. Spain changed stopped trading silver with the Ming causing inflation in Spain and deflation in Ming.
@OneOnOne11623 жыл бұрын
1:50 - "Also, no one could argue about who was the true successor to the Roman empire anymore." *Russia has entered the chat*
@tatarramazan82023 жыл бұрын
mehmet the second said declared he is the new caesar by using title kayser-i rum,so he is the true successor of the roman empire.
@RickJaeger3 жыл бұрын
Ironically, since the Russian Orthodox culture of the modern era liked (and continues to like) to make a big deal about how flawed the Catholic church was to ape the Roman Empire and how this made Orthodoxy _special_ and _good._
@costakeith90483 жыл бұрын
@@tatarramazan8202 Mehmet was a godless heathen, as such nobody ever took his claim to the imperial throne seriously.
@tatarramazan82023 жыл бұрын
@@costakeith9048 bla bla bla
@costakeith90483 жыл бұрын
@@tatarramazan8202 Different civilizations, different standards of legitimacy. Mehmet couldn't claim the Empire of the Romans any more than the Emperor of the Romans could claim the Mandate of Heaven.
@logoncal30013 жыл бұрын
Portugal: "Constantinopla was taken? Oh, what a shame." Ottomans: Ok imma tariff spices for Europe. Portugal: FILHO DE UMA P-
@bernardo52113 жыл бұрын
Brazil: Que coisa estranha é aquela flutuando no Horizonte....
@mikhailgorbachev78513 жыл бұрын
No hàbles pòrtugàsé
@JasonDoe10003 жыл бұрын
Actually the ottomans were not involved in the spice trade at all at that time The Mamluk Sultanate dominated the spice trade till it got yoinked and taken by the Portugese in the early 1500s An effort the portugese were trying since the early 1400s by trying to find a way to India directly
@lucasferre40473 жыл бұрын
@@mikhailgorbachev7851 reeeeeeeeeeeeee
@saulofontoura3 жыл бұрын
@@JasonDoe1000 yeah, but the Portuguese couldn’t take the shortest route anymore, so even if Ottomans weren’t trading spices, the Portuguese spice trade was harmed or at least had to adapt
@Swuiddy00863 жыл бұрын
"Hey guys it's Europe and today we will be reacting to the fall of Constantinople! But before we continue this video is sponsored by Jesus!"
@mcvgs17803 жыл бұрын
Click on the link down below and get 3 months of salvation free and only a small tithe after that.
@hisroyalfatness84303 жыл бұрын
“Don’t forget to use my code “JesusLuvsU” for 15% of your next weekly tithe to the Church!”
@gutsjoestar74503 жыл бұрын
@@hisroyalfatness8430 do you feel good now, for telling the joke
@GameyCat3 жыл бұрын
@@hisroyalfatness8430 There is not going to BE a siege your fatness
@ragnarlothbrok83553 жыл бұрын
@@mcvgs1780 give all salvation to my face!
@AndasMus3 жыл бұрын
First Rome: fails Second Rome: fails Moscow: it’s show time!
@Admiral45-103 жыл бұрын
Moscow: ,,I'm Third Rome! I'm invincible! No one can beat me!" Polish-Lithuanian Commonwelth in 1614: *hello*
@AndasMus3 жыл бұрын
Patryk Podbiał ooof, I forgot about that:)
@alexbort30823 жыл бұрын
@@Admiral45-10 actually 1610-1612 and they were cannibalising each other while besieged by the russian army later. And neither they nor the tatars before nor the French later could ever understand that Moscow was just a place capturing which was just a moment of war and never a victory.
@Admiral45-103 жыл бұрын
@@alexbort3082 I know, French didn't fully take Moscow. But Poland-Lithuania sustained it for over 2 years. And remember, how Polish-Lithuanian Army was welcomed in Moscow - with flowers and cheers from local population.
@dvv183 жыл бұрын
@@Admiral45-10 Poland was, in fact, pretty popular among Russian nobility by the end of the Rurikid dynasty, and when the end finally happened, the hopes were high that Russia would have a Polish Czar, and would join the Commonwealth as the third constituent party. On one condition though - the new Russian Czar must adopt the Orthodox faith. But the Poles screwed the pooch on that one (along with engaging in other unpopular activities like Lisowczycy raids, and the Poles' general attitude towards what they called "Muscovy" as a territory to be conquered and colonized). So the anti-Polish boyar faction eventually prevailed, and that's how we got Messrs Minin and Pożarski, Susanin, and the Romanov dynasty. BTW, a certain minor German princess didn't make the same mistake some time later, became a Romanov empress, and look how well that turned out for Poland…
@prickly100003 жыл бұрын
" no attempt was ever made to retake the city" Winston Churchill: "Am I a joke to you?
@tryambaknathjha75743 жыл бұрын
Winston Churchill more like Winston churshit
@hussain64693 жыл бұрын
@@tryambaknathjha7574 Based af
@Crashed1319633 жыл бұрын
When Britain and France cut apart the defeated Ottoman Empire after ww1, Europe still did not care about getting that city back when they could have easily. Turkey ,Iran ,Iraq ,UAE and Saudi Arabia were made up by France and Britain after WW1.
@GlizzyGoblin7573 жыл бұрын
@@hussain6469 not even nearly based, hes indian
@teocharger3 жыл бұрын
@@Crashed131963 Not Turkey Mr. Obergruppenführer
@dariustiapula3 жыл бұрын
Constatinople: "You guys take your sweet time... Thanks for nothing!."
@comradekenobi69083 жыл бұрын
Europeans also sacked Constantinople, worse than Ottomans
@mikhailgorbachev78513 жыл бұрын
@@comradekenobi6908 yh
@protarngonist24493 жыл бұрын
@@comradekenobi6908 Yeah at least the Ottomans respected the Byzantine and the Roman legacy. The Genoese would be the closest to help out, while the Venetians attempted to have a redemption arc but got in too late
@protarngonist24493 жыл бұрын
@Imperator The Christian part was just an exception. They like Rome but not Christianity. Not so sure if Mehmed liked changing it, but it would’ve changed anyway since the Ottomans knew it would strengthen Islam and piss off the the Christians. Damn. . . if only the Byzantine time stopped screwing themselves over, they would’ve avoided the mess
@protarngonist24493 жыл бұрын
@Imperator As in constant civil wars. But I agree they are playing hardmode when they are surrounded by strong enemies
@tobiaserbacher55853 жыл бұрын
These moments when he says things like "caught a small case of death" so nonchalantly are why I am here.
@kylemohs87283 жыл бұрын
Let us not forget the thump that sounds after said death.
@xToTaLBoReDoMx3 жыл бұрын
I'm here for James Bizinet
@spk11213 жыл бұрын
I'm here for the skipping through fields of flowers!
@davidyoung21113 жыл бұрын
Amen
@jesusjozi19903 жыл бұрын
Yes and the signs
@phunkracy3 жыл бұрын
Actually the lack of reaction from many Catholic states could be attributed to the defeat of Crusade against the Ottomans just a decade prior to the fall of the City, in which Poland, Hungary, HRE took part. Catholic alliance of potentially interested major powers was soundly beaten and one of the strategic goals of the coalition was hampering of Ottoman expansion towards Byzantines. Once the Crusade of Varna failed, Constantinopole was pretty much lost, it just took 10 years to die.
@namvu23622 жыл бұрын
Oh I know this thanks to EU4!
@levranz10542 жыл бұрын
Actually No. The crusaders made major succession against the Turks. Turks lost way more in the war than the crusaders the main reason it was lost because both the monarchs of Poland and Hungary were killed in the war and the successors of those nation werent so interested in the war so they ordered to end the war immediately Also not to mention. Most of the time crusaders didnt even do anything, It was mostly just the hungarians recruiting peasants with no good equipment
@phunkracy2 жыл бұрын
@@levranz1054 "actually no" "proceeds to concede the entire argument" Ottomans may have lost more troops at Varna, but they could afford it, but hungarian crusaders could not and never again threatened the Ottos. How many troops is losing a king of three kingdoms worth? And the flower of knighthood? Crusaders got owned, end of story, no matter how you spin it.
@olekcholewa81712 жыл бұрын
@@phunkracy Even Polish King died in this crusade lol
@strider86622 жыл бұрын
@@levranz1054 I dont think you realize how Ottoman Empire actually functioned militarily. Larger loss of soldiers is literally irrelevant to the ottoman empire as long as they win the war as they are capable of replenishing their numbers due to how Sipahi cavarlies were provided. If you look at any war aganist ottomans that was won, its usually due to logistical issues caused by the sheer size of the armies.
@jorgeh.r98793 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention the reaction of the kingdoms in the Iberian peninsula. The fall of Constantinople was one of the major causes of Atlantic exploration, which eventually led to the discovery of America.
@zuheyrcade6239 Жыл бұрын
To the colonisation of America by the Europeans say that sir.
@gomul13 Жыл бұрын
@@zuheyrcade6239 No
@souhaibz Жыл бұрын
To the sadness of the indigenous people there
@zuheyrcade6239 Жыл бұрын
@@gomul13 why not to say ? Do you have evidence that the Europeans didn't go to there to colonise it?
@gomul13 Жыл бұрын
@@zuheyrcade6239 no, I just think it's dumb to be remarking constantly that they didn't discover it even though it was a discovery to them, and they didn't go there to colonize it in the first place, they found it by accident
@Alex_FRD3 жыл бұрын
"Time to sail west, I guess."
@crazyguy321003 жыл бұрын
The 4th Crusade: "Off to save Christianity"(Constantinople sacked by the crusaders). 200 years later: (Constantinople falls under Muslim rule), The World "Meh"
@siegfried2k43 жыл бұрын
@@jessesinclair3861 No you cannot be offensive to them. They're oppressed!!! Remember uighur!! Save palestine!!! Who cares if europe become europistan?1!!1
@alvirarahman26903 жыл бұрын
@@siegfried2k4 so u r saying that Europe is so weak that a few thousand refugees can Islamize all of Europe? Not sure if u just called Europeans weak or call Muslims super strong 🤔🤔
@justsomeguywithoutamustach56033 жыл бұрын
@@alvirarahman2690 Few thousand? have you seen London or Paris lately maybe few thousand europeans Islam is a primitive aggressive ideology that should be repressed in Europe as much as possible.
@alvirarahman26903 жыл бұрын
@@justsomeguywithoutamustach5603 give me ur address, I need to send u some tissue boxes since u r still crying
@christianbroadbent74893 жыл бұрын
@@alvirarahman2690 He doesn't want to be suicide bombed
@user-mg8fy5lr8d3 жыл бұрын
Constantinopol falls; Eastern roman empire: shit Venetians: wanna trade? Europe: meh Ottomans:yayyy Cruseders: welcome to club!
@WinterMute_03 жыл бұрын
When a muslim boi joins a flippin crusade
@demonicwillow73393 жыл бұрын
Ottomans: EZ REKT LMAO Moscow: RIP F in the chat F F F F F Europe:oh no!anyway~ Other muslim nations: pogchamp Greeks: ur baad ur so bad ill call my brother he will destroy u
@drrtfm3 жыл бұрын
The crusaders had conquered Constantinople two centuries earlier, in the fourth crusade, and held it for close to a century, so I expect there was no love lost.
@user-ud3gh8fy5n3 жыл бұрын
@@drrtfm Bruh they held it for like 50 years not close to a century
@drrtfm3 жыл бұрын
@@user-ud3gh8fy5n My bad; for some reason my brain remembered it as being 1204 to 1290-ish, but it was "only" till 1261. Not sure that it makes any difference to the point I made, though. Hey, you're an a**hole; you wreaked my capital and stole it for a century. Nah, it was only half-a-century, bruh. Oh, well, I guess that's fine then .... Doesn't really make sense, does it?
@ulyssescominghomme3 жыл бұрын
Your dry sense of humour combined with your animation and your “in a nut shell” approach makes this one of my favourite channels
@thomasrinschler67833 жыл бұрын
This does undersell what happened in England, as Henry VI slid into a catatonic state a few weeks later and was declared insane and unable to rule, thus setting the stage for the War of the Roses. There's speculation that the one-two punch of the fall of Constantinople (29 May) and the final defeat (for the English) of the Hundred Years War at Castillon (17 July) both contributed to Henry's slide into madness in August.
@Sargassian2 жыл бұрын
would happen to any true patriot tbh.
@artanisplays39822 жыл бұрын
@@Sargassian I also heard the man was quite religious
@anneneville6255 Жыл бұрын
Are you sure new travelled that fast back then? It would have taken months until the news from Constantinople reached England.
@LibertyMonk Жыл бұрын
@@anneneville6255 eh, it would only take a month and a half for word to travel from Constantinople to anywhere in France. Which, conveniently for this narrative, is when and where this battle took place. Honestly though, it's just correlation. We'll never know if bad news triggered a mental break, or if there was any meaningful cause for his illness at all. It could have just been something he was bound to develop with age.
@libertas5005 Жыл бұрын
Syphilis will do that to a man
@caffeecup53193 жыл бұрын
Constantinople: Hey guys...I know we haven't been that close, but let's just put that all behind us and- oh no! I'm having an invasion! *dies* "So now Rome's the only Christian city left..."
@gutsjoestar74503 жыл бұрын
the only christian city ruled by christians but there is still christian cities alexandria, jerusalem constaninople are still christian cities but not under christian rule even though they have strong influance there
@peasantarcher24863 жыл бұрын
@@gutsjoestar7450 no influence whatsoever😂
@gutsjoestar74503 жыл бұрын
@@peasantarcher2486 yep; they do have;, there is churches there, and major priests
Then Sulieman threatens Vienna. Ghost of Nicholas V: "You could have avoided this..."
@ovidiunicolau45993 жыл бұрын
Also ghosts of most balkan leaders.
@walidechchafnaje98123 жыл бұрын
@@ovidiunicolau4599 LOL
@MuhammadHamza-fi1lb3 жыл бұрын
Not suleiman selim the most incompetent sultan of ottomans
@orangejuice47343 жыл бұрын
@@MuhammadHamza-fi1lb Selim is the one that conquered the Mamluks and fought the Safavids, he is one of the best Ottoman Sultans/Caliphs
@MuhammadHamza-fi1lb3 жыл бұрын
@@orangejuice4734 just search selim son of suleiman he is other selim
@AverytheCubanAmerican3 жыл бұрын
Now it's Turkish delight on a moonlit night
@connorhughes82913 жыл бұрын
Nobody's business but the Turks
@luisricardolozadaamaya6703 жыл бұрын
If you have a date in Constantinople , she'll be waiting in Istambul .
@Enzo_honey3 жыл бұрын
Istanbul was Constantinople Long time gone
@luisricardolozadaamaya6703 жыл бұрын
Every gal in Constantinople lives in Istambul not Constantinople
@erdniealinik3 жыл бұрын
Even old New York was once New Amsterdam Why they changed it i cant say People liked it better that way
@admiralsquatbar1273 жыл бұрын
The Holy Roman Empire: No Romans were hurt during the making of this Empire.
@rogeriomonteiro7603 жыл бұрын
The fall of Constantinople is mainly european resposability and their fault. The ottomans just seized the oportunity.
@TheKumarImpressions3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@InfernosReaper3 жыл бұрын
Sacking the city instead of actually going on the crusade they were supposed tends to do that.
@B3RyL3 жыл бұрын
So if I take your wallet after it slips out of your pocket you'll blame the tailor or me? Or maybe you should blame yourself for sticking your slick leather wallet in a shallow pocket. Sure, Constantinople was sacked and irreversibly weakened by the European crusaders, but the attack was a direct result of a succession dispute within the Byzantine court. Alexios Angelos asked the crusaders to siege the city and return his father to the throne, promising financial aid to the crusade, and when the chain of events that followed culminated in Alexios's death, the crusaders realized they wouldn't get paid, so they sacked the city and the rest is history. The Byzantines quite literally brought this on themselves.
@InfernosReaper3 жыл бұрын
@@B3RyL Interesting. I've heard a very different account of that, where the Venetians contributed heavily to sacking the city for financial reasons Why would the crusaders even be over the first place if they didn't get dropped off there instead of going to the Holyland
@B3RyL3 жыл бұрын
@@InfernosReaper Venetians were more interested in trade than loot. Can't trade with a country you just sacked the capital of. Their target wasn't necessarily Constantinople but the trading ports along the Adriatic coastline, like the city of Zara in modern-day Croatia. The siege of Constantinople was initiated at the request of a Byzantine prince Alexios Angelos.
@ilFrancotti3 жыл бұрын
If only had Native Americans known how important that City would have been to them..
@greenboi66403 жыл бұрын
Ah yes
@MasterMalrubius3 жыл бұрын
Nah, time would eventually catch up to them. Their low population density kept conflict low and primitive. They'd not be a match for those who had to fight for land. Just postponed the inebitable. INEBITABLE!
@JasonDoe10003 жыл бұрын
@Alvaro Moran Colonialism would have occured in all likeliness anyway The Age of Exploration started already before the fall of Constantinople and was partially to find an alternative way to get spices from India and the spice trade was controlled by the Mamluks and Venice, which happened almost exclusively via naval trade while the ottomans mostly controlled the land trade via the silk road
@Reishadowen3 жыл бұрын
...I'm sorry, what? How does this make sense?
@AbdulGoodLooks3 жыл бұрын
@@Reishadowen ok, ok, so the ottomans were like *dont forget to ban europe from the indian spice trade And portugal was like *thats bullshit. Well i guess il have to find another way to India* And this guy christopher columbus said (probably smoking crack) *hey why dont we sail this way to india* And portugal was like *nah dude we already got this* So christooher went to spain and was like *Hey will you hire me to sail around the world*
@avantelvsitania33593 жыл бұрын
That’s a great topic, but your video has a couple inaccuracies 1) It wasn’t like the Italians or even Europe only knew about the situation after the city had already fallen. They were aware of the siege, but for the most part had faith in the famous walls that had defeated so many invaders. Since they were unaware of the Ottoman canons, they thought it was just another failed siege. And the Italians, include the Pope himself even sent a couple soldiers to help the Byzantines. 2) When the city eventually fell, it wasn’t ignored by Europe. At least by all of it. King Afonso V of Portugal gathered a large army and was ready to lead the crusade, but had to cancel his plans since no other major power joined and he was in the opposite part of the continent. So at least Portugal *did* react, it simply hadn’t the means to do anything alone. The Europeans were confident in the mythic Walls of Constantinople. The use of canons was something relatively new to them. They only full understood the danger of the Ottomans when Constantinople fell, and nothing could be done.
@grpanth18902 жыл бұрын
Europeans hated greeks and were amused by the fall of Constantinople .
@triumphantking85493 жыл бұрын
The Pope: Calls for a Crusade Most European Leaders: Are unable to go Vlad the Chad Tepes: Fine, I’Il do it myself
@dari15103 жыл бұрын
@@SukruBaykut He did pretty good tho
@emreustun29883 жыл бұрын
I don't know why this guy gets this much praise from people just because of his cruel methods. Ottomans conquered Wallachia and chopped off his head.
@r7ahtesham8853 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile Murad be like: Oh Vlad, death is inevitable
@dari15103 жыл бұрын
@@SukruBaykut And I would definitelly vote him if he was alive today, his actions were the result of his situation, the ottomans wanted war so they got war
@r7ahtesham8853 жыл бұрын
@@dari1510 Yes, please vote for someone who eats people's agony for dinner
@hikodzu2 жыл бұрын
Basically their reaction is the same as arab with Palestine
@armaholic59493 жыл бұрын
I know that the comments war is coming but let's both (Greeks and Turks) take a moment to recover from today's earthquake....
@marvelfannumber13 жыл бұрын
Nothing like good ol' fashioned, earthquake diplomacy. Just like the good old days.
@KmehmetA3 жыл бұрын
You sir, are diffrent. Thank you.
@ArkadiBolschek3 жыл бұрын
Wait, what? D:
@WILLIAN_14243 жыл бұрын
Where is the fun on that ?
@KmehmetA3 жыл бұрын
@@ArkadiBolschek There was an earthquake in izmir today
@Mario_16113 жыл бұрын
"They really like money" I can relate.
@berkalkan33823 жыл бұрын
Fun to see kinda comment like this from a guy who has an american flag on his profile pic lmao
And this is why the video IS WRONG - there was other reaction in Europe but since nobody care about the European countires which didnt speak French, English or German nobody bothered to look up for what their thouht. Just a few quick example: -Kingdom of Hungary (where the king had the second biggest income only overshadowed by the King of French at the time) all of a sudden stopped the almost 50 year long civil war between the Pro-Habsburg and Pro-Jagello faction, strated to strenghten the border fortress system in the southern border and started a military campaign against the Ottomans (which culminated in the Battle of Krusevac in late 1454 and aimed to push the Ottomans out of Serbia and create a safe route of communication between Hungary and Albania) -Bohemia and Poland also supported Hungary in these Anti-Ottoman endeavors both financially and with raw manpower, so their acted too - just more indirectly. -Portugal de-facto started the whole "explore the unknown regions and hopefully get India with a boat" endeavor because of the Fall of Constantinople. But all of this is not fit into the western-europe centric historical revisionism, i know, i know. We are just useful idiots who didnt do anything until the Horde come for us and beg the West to save us in the region all the time - its not like we fight against the Horde to from the getgo or anything while the "enlightened" West have the luxury of ignoring everything happening in the world. Being the Bulwark of Christendom is really a undervalued and ungrateful thing... Hundreds of Millins died to protect Europe didnt even make it into the side note and counted as "everyone had more pressing issues" or "just didnt cared". The Ottoman issue WAS the main issue since the second half of the 14th century till early 18th century in the Kingdom of Hungary - just saying.
@XenoVevo3 жыл бұрын
"So you think you could conquer the Byzantine Empire?" "Yep, said the Ottoman Turks."
@FrancescoBosco123 жыл бұрын
woops, you missed this spot
@hevnervals3 жыл бұрын
Constantinople was conquered by crusaders long before the Turks did it. However, the Turks kept the city while the crusaders mostly just looted.
@lunchingtangpua24153 жыл бұрын
@@hevnervals crusade vs slav
@pastel52883 жыл бұрын
"Nice job Ottoman Turks!"
@lunchingtangpua24153 жыл бұрын
@@pastel5288 Its time for ww1
@TeenageMutantZuckerTurtle3 жыл бұрын
Last Byzantine Emperor: *makes it his last will that Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain, a rapidly-rising kingdom in the West, inherit all his titles and become heirs to the fallen empire in hope that they will take it back and avenge him* Isabella and Ferdinand: “pass” Ottoman Empire: *bans Europe from the Indian Spice trade at some point in this time, not really sure about what comes before and after what* Isabella and Ferdinand: *screeching in Conquistador, send some guy West to find “India”.* Last Byzantine Emperor’s ghost: *am I a joke to you?* West Europe: *doesn’t care, is too busy conquering the “Indians”, inhaling chocolate and coffee, probably snorting cane sugar.* The Ottomans: *munch munch* “mmmmm yummy Eastern Europe.” Southeast Europe: “guys help” *dies* A little further into Europe: “guys help” *also dies* Austria: “guys help” Western Europe: “ask Southeastern Europe, they’ll help you” Southeastern Europe: *laughs in Ottoman* Austria: *screams in siege of Vienna* Northeastern and Northcentral Europe: “fine” *sharpens swords and lances* Ottomans: “you can’t keep using medieval warfare, that’s against the rules” Poland: *laughs in Winged Hussar* Eastern/Central Europe: “Finally, we’ve halted the Ottoman advance, no thanks to Western Europe. Now we can finally stop worrying about getting conquered. Western Europe: *shits itself in the Americas, cries in French Revolution* Eastern/Central Europe: “you good bro?” France: *shrieks in Napoleon* Eastern/Central Europe: “oh god dammit can we just relax for a few more centuries” Napoleon: *goes on vacation, comes back, goes on another vacation, dies* Europe: *sighs in relief, relaxes just a bit* Serbia: “haha Franz Ferdinand go bbrrrrrr” Germany and Austria: *decide to kick Belgium’s ass in order to kick France’s ass because France doesn’t want Germany and Austria to kick Russia’s ass for trying to kick their asses for kicking Serbia’s ass, resulting in Britain coming in to try and kick Germany’s ass, but also the Ottomans’ ass, who joined the Central powers to expand but now Britain wants their land and Japan also joins in to gangbang Germany from behind in East Asia because it wants more islands than the island it already has and then Germany, starting to feel a bit overwhelmed, decides to do a Zimmerman Telegram and tells Mexico to invade the US to keep them occupied and out of the war which just brings the US into the war which just adds more weight on the Western front and at some point in all that the Russia Empire, the German Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the Ottoman Empire all collapse because its a really bad time to be an Empire if you aren’t Britain or Japan, and then Germany gets cucked by Britain and France for twenty years.* Europe: *exhausted, confused sigh* “I’m getting real tired of this war thing, that last one was so big and stupid it will probably be the War that Ends all Wars. Good thing the Economy is good in the Wes- oh shit now we’re in a Depression, thanks US stock market.” Germany: *still upset over getting cucked by Britain and France and depressed about the Depression, elects angry mustache man who promptly throws a giant temper tantrum* Italy and Japan: *join in to use Germany’s temper tantrum as an opportunity to expand* Europe: *gets fucked up by Germany’s giant temper tantrum* USA: “not my problem” Japan: *decides to pull a Zimmerman Telegram and yeet some planes planes at US to keep them weakened and out of the war, which just brings the US into the war* USA: “now it’s my problem” *does a D-Day in Western Europe while Russia slaps Germany out of Eastern Europe with its massive Commie dick because it figured out that it has more expendable peasants than Germany has bullets. Angry mustache man ragequits the lobby and then the US yeets a couple of death balls at Japan. And also Italy... probably maybe did something somewhere and then stopped doing that and switched sides because doing stuff is too difficult.* The world: “I’m getting real tired of this war thing again, now we can relax finally” The USA and USSR: *spend the next 50 years threatening to yeet death balls at each other and get into a contest to see how many death balls they can collect and how many allies they can get, until the USSR decides to relax a little bit and then accidentally falls apart* The world: “that’s a relief, now we can finally rela- oh god dammit did someone just yeet planes at the US again?!” The USA: *Never Forgets, goes to Middle East for a short little visit, ends up staying for 20 years* China: *decides to replace USSR as the new supervillain for the upcoming Earth Cinematic Universe movie, gets even more passive aggressive and secretive, accidentally stumbles onto a virus that doesn’t exist until it does and then it’s not that bad until it is and then it won’t spread outside China until it does and then it will go away in warm weather until it doesn’t* And now I’m locked in my house bored writing this comment wondering why I’m doing this and it even started and how long I’ve been typing it and whether I should stop procrastinating and do my online homework. This has been a shitty 800 year explanation for why I’m typing this, here have a sticker, now go away.
@gametmane10933 жыл бұрын
Your comment is a gem
@balasopoulosjohn3 жыл бұрын
Damn Isabella and Ferdinand all they had to do was just take a city back
@DARTH-R3VAN3 жыл бұрын
Words can't describe the quality put in your comment. If I were you I would just spam this comment everywhere as a way to make people learn the summarized meme part of history
@KrishanDhanda3 жыл бұрын
Best i have read
@thegodfather48373 жыл бұрын
Pure Gold
@lukad77443 жыл бұрын
Constantinople: falls Rest of Europe: OH NO!! anyway...
@gutsjoestar74503 жыл бұрын
no, they simply didn't give a fuck about orthodoxe faith they cared baout catholicsm and their own internal probelms because europe was always busy within their ocuntry and leading divded kingdoms and duchies and states busy burning witches especially
@lukad77443 жыл бұрын
It's a meme...
@jmgonzaga1013 ай бұрын
I'm always saying this. If Sultan Mehmet II didn't conquered Constantinople, the world right now will be different on what it is today. The age of exploration will be delayed for 100-200 maybe 300 years since the major trade routes of Europeans is with Constantinople going to Asia. Also the second one is the Guttenberg's Printing Press. If Guttenberg didn't exist, Christopher Columbus will not able to read Marco Polo's "Il Milione" which commonly known as "The Travels of Marco Polo". Third one is Spain conquest of Granada. Spain conquest of Granada is one of turning point of Christopher Columbus exploration of funding his voyage going westwards through China. Without all of these happened, the world is in different place right now. There will be no America, Aztec and Incan Civilization still thrive on the next 200 years. No black people on the Americas since the slave trades will not reach in the Americas because of Europeans unpresent on the continent. Native American population will be drastically increased. Europe will be the center of the world not the USA. There will be no 9/11 terror attacks. So thanks to Sultan Mehmet II. Without him the world is not what it is today.
@ayslutte3 жыл бұрын
I Hate Hate Hate it when people are referring to the city as ''Islambol''. It is a false claim and it is really not cool of you to use it on your video. As many of the historians shoutout it before, the name of ''Istanbul'' comes from the Greek word Stanpoli which means ''to the City''. Even after the fall of Constantinople, Ottomans kept using the name Constantinople in Ottoman Turkish form of Konstantiniyye. However, the citizens kept using the name Stanpoli as they were using it for centuries before too. Stop this silly argument on the name of the City since it is a Greek name defended by the Turks willingly. At least let them cooperate in this issue...
@thomasfeck1883 жыл бұрын
Mimimi....
@nerosfreak3 жыл бұрын
it's bizarre to think that europe would've probably never colonised the new world if constantinople never fell to the ottomans.
@ragingsage39733 жыл бұрын
Well no, Portugal was already exploring the west coast of Africa at this point. The real goal of the explorative voyages were not just to circumvent the Ottomans but to also break Venetian Monopoly on Eastern Trade.
@nerosfreak3 жыл бұрын
well i mean yeah but i doubt they would've ever done full scale colonisation
@MrKrusten3 жыл бұрын
literally whats the connection between these two dude?
@nerosfreak3 жыл бұрын
well the ottomans took over the only way to trade with india and china for europe back then, you see that would've been fine if they didn't tax the hell out of the trade and on top of that they weren't christains, and i think we all know what europe at the time thought of non-christains.
@justacrow98473 жыл бұрын
Someone would have eventually sailed that way. It was a matter of time for someone to find the Americas, again.
@ayushgupta43763 жыл бұрын
The negligence of Western Europe to take back Constantinople has been 1 of their greatest blunders. Even when Russians were at the verge of reaching there in late 19th century, the British stopped them.
@striker8961 Жыл бұрын
I mean… we’ve been doing pretty alright. I don’t think anyone in the modern world think “man, if only we had Istanbul, then we’d be amazing.”
@dokidelta1175 Жыл бұрын
@@striker8961 We'd be a lot better
@keelahrose Жыл бұрын
@@striker8961 At least then they wouldn't have been able to turn Hagia Sophia into a f*cking mosque. They're destroying it!
@striker8961 Жыл бұрын
@@keelahrose … like physically? Or you are you crying about them “desecrating” a holy site with their own religion?
@striker8961 Жыл бұрын
@@dokidelta1175 if you say so
@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi37234 ай бұрын
If only the rest of Europe were not squealing like scared children,
@ozdemirsalik3 жыл бұрын
“Islambol” is a made up name by Turkish Islamic conservatives. It has named as “İstanbul” right after the foundation of the Turkish Republic. “İstan” means “land” in Persian & Turkish, “bul” means “find” in Turkish. “Islambol” is just a made up name meaning something like “much Islam”. In the Ottoman Empire it was called “Konstantiniye” which is basically the Turkish version of Constantinople. Please check your facts before uploading.
@dimitriosvlissides57813 жыл бұрын
IS TIN POLI TO THE CITY CITY WAS AND STILL IS THE SHORT NAME OF KONSTANTINO POLIS HENCE INSTABUL MEANS GOING TO THE CITY STOP WRITTING FIGMENTS OF YOUR IMAGINATION
@ozdemirsalik3 жыл бұрын
@@dimitriosvlissides5781 that’s how Romans named it. I wrote about how Turks named it. After the foundation of the Republic, they’ve wanted to rename the city but keep it close to its original name. So they’ve renamed it İstanbul. The naming process is well documented, just google it. In every single Ottoman document it was referred as “Konstantiniye” which means “to the city of Constantin” in Turkish. The name “Türkiye” also has the same concept to itself. But with the Republic, they’ve named the city as “İstanbul” which literally means “find land” in Turkish. And it’s not just İstanbul, all the Turkish cities renamed during that period.
@dimitriosvlissides57813 жыл бұрын
@@ozdemirsalik The Romans named it the New Rome But its people gave with the time the name Konstantinopolis as an honor to the Emperor Konstantinos the Great who was its founder Bythe years passing by in short was POLIS in greek city, As it was the only CITY in the known world ΕΙΣ ΤΗΝ ΠΟΛΙΝ ,IS TIN POLIN ,ment TO THE CITY like when one says ""I am going instinpoli " Which became Instanbul in Turkish Of course the sultanate wanted to keep the name Konstantinye as they thaught themselves inheritors of the East Roman Empire but with a diferent religion When it became republic and some years later they changed it to INSTABUL which was the quoloquial name I think your interpretation is a revisinist one with some nationalists overtone "
@sciuresci14033 жыл бұрын
Kayseri de kayısıdan mi gelmis ? Kayısı eri ? Fnfnshd kayseri nasil kayzerya(sezar diyari ?)dan turediyse istanbul da konstantinapolun halk arasindaki adi iste. Konstan istan olmus pol bul.
@Jotari3 жыл бұрын
All the names are made up.
@francesco80003 жыл бұрын
I always thought that Moscow saying they are "the third Rome" show that Vodka existed 600 years ago and Russians were already drinking too much.
@JustGeridan3 жыл бұрын
Ivan III (who ruled after the blind prince in the video) later married a Byzantine princess, Sophia Palaiologina, who brought with her the court ceremonies of Byzantium. Ivan styled himself "tsar" (caesar) and adopted the symbol of the Orthodox Roman Empire, the double headed eagle, which is still used in Russia and many nations whose territory was once controlled by Byzantium, and which symbolized the symphonia, or harmony of Church and Empire. The idea had developed during the first 500 years of Christianity that God had providentially made the Roman Empire His chosen vessel for bringing the world into the Church, and so the idea of an Orthodox Imperium became very important in Eastern Orthodox thinking. Thus Russia became the continuation of Rome's legacy as an Orthodox imperium.
@blueangel4ever3703 жыл бұрын
@@JustGeridan It's just that basically every major European power saw themselves as the successor to Rome, including Italy, Russia, Austria, Germany, France, Turkey and (Bulgaria, Serbia, Greece). Austria and Germany had a Kaiser, the modern Form of the Caesar. Anyway, it made almost everyone's claim kinda ridiculous and the only Empire where it really mattered wasItaly, since that was their excuse to grab more territory. The other European nations just saw themselves as the protector of Christians and the faith
@JustGeridan3 жыл бұрын
@@blueangel4ever370 of course, even America has pretensions of being "Roman", just look at the architecture in DC. I think the difference with Russia is 1. Continuity of faith, as an Orthodox empire, and 2. The passing down of the court rituals and Byzantine forms of government in Ivan's court and legal codes. Those other nations, like the HRE, might have laid claim to be the successors of the Roman Empire, but were their governments really reflective of it? I think it's a pretty easy case to demonstrate that the way Russia operated as an empire is the most similar to how Rome was post-Constantine. The key distinction is the view Russia (and Byzantium) had for themselves in history: as God's kingdom on Earth, protectors of the Church. In the West, there was a similar idea in Charlemagne's "Christendom" but it was wrapped up in the Papacy, and the Popes became greater in temporal power and authority than the Holy Roman Emperors. In the East, the Church remained in the spiritual realm, while emperors remained the highest temporal authority.
@blueangel4ever3703 жыл бұрын
@@JustGeridan Well, there is a difference between the eastern and western roman empire. I think the "protector of the faith" part in the English monarchy should be scratched, this title was awarded when England was catholic. I think you can look at different factors, historically, France and Italy were the last countries with a real claim, since the Ottomans granted the protection of the Christians in their empire to the French and well... Italy is just a top candidate for the succession because of the pope, Rome, etc. I actually don't think the Russians are the closest, they explicitly separated their church from the eastern Roman empire and never wanted to become similar to Greece, they have no geographically claims at all, not even a remotely similar language, and the symbols were used by many nations, including Austria
@axelpatrickb.pingol32283 жыл бұрын
@@JustGeridan The US specifically modeled itself after the Greek and Roman republics, not the Empire that came after them...
@MAXLevel-russianbarrier3 жыл бұрын
This is like oversimplified but not too childish humor and MUCH more consistent 🙌
@toast29803 жыл бұрын
Humor is subjective
@samiippotsuboku25803 жыл бұрын
And not some over repeated facts that everyone knows already
@camacaron063 жыл бұрын
I like Oversimplifed more because of the higher production value but I also like this channel a lot too
@Justanothermusicnerdxo3 жыл бұрын
I like both but oversimplified has much more thorough animation and unique scenes.
@UrsusSuperior443 жыл бұрын
@@toast2980 Yes, humor IS subjective, but in a way that different people find different things funny/humorous. Childish humor is childish, ironic humor is ironic, etc, that's not really subjective. But I don't really think that OS humor is childish though. Lighthearted, yes. But childish? Eh I don't know Either way, History Matters is waaaay better, worlds more informative
@glorifiedtoaster43683 жыл бұрын
1453 never forget :( edit: don't go to replies the Turks and Opposed are clashing
@titaniumsalmon32383 жыл бұрын
I’m American but Id join them
@Enesggoker3 жыл бұрын
@The Sacred Potat Will the french march on Istanbul with white flags? The Turks will have no mercy.
@aegeanharrier66483 жыл бұрын
@The Sacred Potat How does leveling the city to ground helps. Destroying thousands of years of history from many countries only hurts humanity itself
@amrmohamed13873 жыл бұрын
@The Sacred Potat You guys are on the wrong side, it doesn't matter if you win or lose, you are on the wrong side and you will regret it.
@Enesggoker3 жыл бұрын
@The Sacred Potat Yes we all know how France deals with it’s enemies🏳️🏳️🏳️ please, stop your delusional world. The map will not go under a major change.
@jacktomas15963 жыл бұрын
Fun fact about the fall of constantinople. The roman emperor died on his feet unlike his more western counterpart
@Ravag3rrr3 жыл бұрын
And thats why Sultan Respected him And Ordered his Burial According to his religion
@ahmetrefikeryilmaz44323 жыл бұрын
@Γεώργιος Γερακάκης in your dreams. İzmir is cold this time of the year btw, how's Greece?
@cloudpine56953 жыл бұрын
@Γεώργιος Γερακάκης lmao there is no more Ottoman Empire indeed, but there is the Turkish Republic, therefore I suggest you to stay home (corona is everywhere), and stop thinking that Constantinople will arise again, its impossible and also, would highly appreciate it if you call it by its real name, Istanbul. Oh and, please don't take this personally my friend, I have respect to Greeks and love their culture, if only all Greeks and Turks could stop insulting each other and be friends. After all, we are neighbors fir centuries now.
@cloudpine56953 жыл бұрын
@Γεώργιος Γερακάκης okay I see your level of understanding from what you just mentioned, "Islam = Arab religion"? Then i could say Christian Catholic is American religion, and orthodox, i don't even know. Islam isn't an Arab religion, and Turkey does not have an Arab culture. You really have no idea how different Turks and Arabs are right? but anyway, hearing that I could be Greek is exciting, always wanted to what it'd be like to be on the other side.
@cloudpine56953 жыл бұрын
@Γεώργιος Γερακάκης I can't say I had the best education, but I'm sure it was a pretty decent one. Qur'an is yes written and read in Arabic, Christianity however is something else. The amount of times the people have changed the words and phrases in the Bible is just so funny. I can't comment a lot about neither Islam or Christianity but what I've seen and observed is, the most disgusting mind sets originate from your religion I guess. Slavery, prostitution, dictatorships, racism etc. Anyway, you're very grumpy for what reason I don't know, but don't judge someone because of their nationality, culture and belief. Try to approach people with kindness, you won't lose anything. you guys think you're the right ones, na man. if you keep spitting bullshit and hatred against the people who try to approach with good intentions, then you are no good at all. keep your opinions to yourself.
@hanskuke34333 жыл бұрын
0:08 every Norwegian is like: “Oh look, he included us!”
@johanneskepler1 Жыл бұрын
inferiority complex
@masu5781 Жыл бұрын
All I know is that this greatly affected Lebron’s legacy.
@IAmAlpharius20 Жыл бұрын
Ayy lmaoo
@justinian-the-great3 жыл бұрын
Well, it should've added that Balkan rulers from Serbia, Bosnia, Montenegro, Wallachia, Moldova, Albania and Latin principalities in Greece were horrified, since they truly were next. Also Hungary, as one of the leading European powers, was scared that they'll have to face Ottoman invasion alone. And indeed, Balkan was fully conquered by the end of the XV century, while Hungary lost its independence to the Turks by the second half of the XVI century. Thus, when in Western Europe XV and XVI century mark the beginning of renesance and new bright age, for people of Balkans and central Europe XV and XVI centuries mark the beginning of centuries long Ottoman occupation and (both metaphorical and real) slavery!
@notisttt12403 жыл бұрын
@David Josephus Daniel Nuntius languages evolve differently from each other. Unless I'm mistaken, Italian, Spanish and French are evolutions of Latin, so talking about it like Latin died is kinda false.
@notisttt12403 жыл бұрын
@David Josephus Daniel Nuntius Thing is, Greek has evolved a lot too. Yes, the average Greek can understand some words and texts from ancient Greek but there's also many texts they cannot.
@Hungabrigoo3 жыл бұрын
Thank you thank you thank you! Actual stuff that is relevant, you should have made this damn video.
@Hungabrigoo3 жыл бұрын
@David Josephus Daniel Nuntius Not sure what is your point is. First of all, historians do not really use the term "Dark Ages" anymore, because it is misleading and unscientific. Second, if you insist to you use it, the "Dark Ages" lasted longer in the East than in the West, simply because most of all invasions to Europe came from Asia (with the exception of the Almohads.) West Europe is an extremely protected position. The East is not, so it took many centuries more to stabilize. France was prospering while it supported Ottoman rule which put the Balkans back hundreds of years. You cannot even compare the two situations
@OsedayCan3 жыл бұрын
You call that slavery? You haven't seen what actual slavery is
@shanemize37753 жыл бұрын
I'm a lifelong student of history and yet you continue to come up with topics that I have always wondered about! I don't know how you do it, but I am so glad that you pull it off. I'm always excited to see one of your videos pop up. I love your sense of humor, animation, and your pithy way of telling the story. My only complaint is that there just aren't enough of them! Lol. Thanks so much for another awesome video! Please keep the outstanding videos coming and God bless you, my friend!
@verysmartultrahuman9393 жыл бұрын
no homo, you forgot to write no homo because that was very very gay, deep and nice but still gay.
@Hungabrigoo3 жыл бұрын
Don't forget to read about the countries that were actually fighting the Ottomans at the time (and for hundreds of years), as this video just blatantly ignored them.
@onelove9791 Жыл бұрын
This is a much watered down and biased version.
@galatheumbreon68623 жыл бұрын
"Crusadeee they did many crusades, most of them almost didn't fail but at least the Italians got so sweet trade deals"
@tk5gqj5143 жыл бұрын
Some of them*
@moongrog11543 жыл бұрын
@@tk5gqj514damn , I was gonna say that
@Real_Tower_Pizza3 жыл бұрын
Bill wurtz?
@galatheumbreon68623 жыл бұрын
@@Real_Tower_Pizza yep
@kabbosarker526 Жыл бұрын
Constantinople falls.. Holy Roman Empire : Thanks God. Now I am rome Moscow : No I am the new rome. Ottoman Empire : fu*k off guys. I have the former roman capital. I am the true Rome now. The first muslim rome in history.
@content4115 Жыл бұрын
what about the seljuk sultanate of rum?
@TheBlackzman11 ай бұрын
@@content4115 that ain't Rome... It rum
@TheBlackzman11 ай бұрын
Nah Asian can't be Rome right 😂
@nromk3 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile the sultan of turkey called himself the sultan of Rome
@mightmagic38773 жыл бұрын
Yep thats true im Turkish and we Turks know mehmet the conqueror used roman empire war tactics, old Turks create a war strategies like cengiz khan - timur - attilla but in ottoman era Turks used roman empire war tactics Sultan mehmet was higly educated person he was speaking so many languages and almost all of the languages he can speak european languages, many of Turks thinking he wasn’t muslim he was an atheist really interesting person.
@عبدالرحمن777-ذ3ذ3 жыл бұрын
Where is ur proof?
@Eric.T.Cartman3 жыл бұрын
All wrong! The big question is: what was James Bizonettes reaction to the fall of Constantinople!
@walhallw74363 жыл бұрын
Who is he though?
@cringe73912 жыл бұрын
I heard he was a bit sad but not too upset
@thathistoryiscoolguy3 жыл бұрын
If only that crusade happened It would be the only good crusade
@Lichenroc4 ай бұрын
These days we have more nationalism and tribalism than in those days the idea of a nation state or protecting the "West" was not as cut and dry as we might think. Everyone was out for themselves during the Middle Ages.
@paul33453 жыл бұрын
Saying “heresy” is too strong. It’s actually “schism”, which has more to do with which authority you recognise, than “heresy”, which has to do with doctrine of the faith. Otherwise, there would not have been attempts to reunite. At times when they did call each other heretics, was more out of spite and attempt to dominate than by honest belief.
@Mechronastamuth3 жыл бұрын
There are historical records in Turkish archives that state western countries actually called those eastern christians "heretics". So what he says is historically correct
@freakrx23493 жыл бұрын
@@Mechronastamuth not just that, the rifts between Eastern and Western Christians grew because of the Teutonic campaigns to try and conquer Russia. Needless to say, the Teutonic order was unsuccessful due to the Mongols and the famous Novgorodian commander Alexander Nevsky.
@Dimitrije_Sukovic3 жыл бұрын
There are major doctrinal differences which warrant that label, such as the primacy of the pope as well as the Essence-Energy distinction solidified in the East by St. Gregory Palamas as opposed to the Augustinian and Thomistic theology of the West.
@noescape21083 жыл бұрын
Heresy usually meant schism, but the schism between Catholic and Orthodox Church was unique in that it was first solely a question on authority. There did not really exist a real schism until it began to be solidified with the failure of Council of Florence, fall of Constantinople and Russian opposition to healing of the schism. Even then it was not so clear cut, the eventual schism we know of today is a long historical process. @@Dimitrije_Sukovic Orthodox still hold to Papal Primacy, and essence energy distinction is not a ground for heresy, similar thought is found in Franciscan Theology. To not forget about Eastern Catholic Churches who venerate St. Palamas as a Saint and still mainly hold to his theology. The differences are mainly in the nature of papal authority, filioque, immaculate conception and purgatory. Emphasis on "nature of", since Easter Catholic Churches has no problem accepting these in view of their own theology that differ from the Latin thoughts of St. Augustine and St. Aquinas.
@heidis.69033 жыл бұрын
@@noescape2108 thank you for explaining (:
@aterikasedi Жыл бұрын
I live at the point where Constantinople was conquered (Ayvansaray). My house is just below the Roman Empire Palace. I get very emotional when I think of the war and conquest that took place here. When the municipality excavates any street here, the bones of people who fought in that period are still revealed. Right next to us, a 100-year-old house was destroyed and a Byzantine tomb was found under it. We live on a very large and rich history. I have endless respect for the Roman Empire, who created this history, and the Turks who preserved and maintained it.
@flamingrubys11 Жыл бұрын
the turks did neither of the last two hate to tell you but they muslimed the place up converting buildings and such tearing down artifacts oh and aalso making sure not a single citizen of constanople lived
@silentbullet2023 Жыл бұрын
@@flamingrubys11 How many book did you read about the Ottomans or the fall of Constantinople?
@Roofhack Жыл бұрын
@@silentbullet2023 The Turks when they invaded Greece purposely used the Parthenon to store their gunpowder. It blew up destroying most of it. They cared little about preserving culture or history. The only reason why Hagia Sophie stayed in decent condition is because they literally forgot that they had covered over the important artwork until the modern period of secularisation (and because the true God preserved it).
@arthurmorgan318010 ай бұрын
@@flamingrubys11you have 0 clue abt what you’re saying, the crusaders themselves did more damage to Constantinople than the ottomans, during the fall itself the city was only but a shadow of its former self at that point, the Turks renovated the city and as a whole always respected Roman archipelagos, it’s no wonder why they declared themselves the successors of the Roman Empire
@Balgore83 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention the most important part and why its largely considered one of the most important historical events in the world, is because it forced western traders to seek India via ocean routes rather than over land through the middle east, so it was because of this event that exploration teams were fast-tracked to discover North and South America.
@OfficialDenzy2 жыл бұрын
That happened a couple centuries later. When constantinople fell the Turks didn't immediately block the spice trades.
@lordofdarkness42042 жыл бұрын
@@OfficialDenzy They never blocked the spice trade, they just made it really really really expensive, which to be fair as far as most merchants at the time were concerned, it was essentially blocking the spice trade.
@__semidulce2 жыл бұрын
@@OfficialDenzy Of course not :) but this was the first event that later would lead to push the Europeans to find another routes to Asia over the ocean, especially by going around Africa.
@OfficialDenzy2 жыл бұрын
@@__semidulce Yeah I know
@rudi81922 жыл бұрын
They had already information about India and America. This the Turkish propaganda to find something good in a disaster, considering how much the Byzantine Empire gave this world in philosophy, science, education. It would be better not to have fall. Nothing good except violence and blood came from the Ottomans.
@theskeptic20103 жыл бұрын
"He caught a small case of death" LOL. I love these videos
@ahmetonal84983 жыл бұрын
Constantinople was fell and all European country like: -Don't you see i'm busy right now After 462 years, all European countries in Gelibolu: -Wait for me Byzantine i'm coming for you...
@cspresimir3 жыл бұрын
@ibrahim bozkurt "Buffering ..."
@teksinsahin24493 жыл бұрын
Its not true.
@Groveish3 жыл бұрын
In Gelibolu, Ottomans were mostly helped by German Empire, which I last checked, was a European country.
@ahmetrefikeryilmaz44323 жыл бұрын
@@Groveish Not really. There weren't any german troops there.
@Groveish3 жыл бұрын
@@ahmetrefikeryilmaz4432 The commanding general, Otto Liman von Sanders was a German
@OmneAurumNon3 жыл бұрын
Constantinople: *falls* Europe: That's no one's business but the Turks
@user-ud3gh8fy5n3 жыл бұрын
Constantinople didn't "fall" till 1920s. Name was never changed during Ottoman era
@lunchingtangpua24153 жыл бұрын
@@user-ud3gh8fy5n it fall constantinopole lost it shine after it fall
@user-ud3gh8fy5n3 жыл бұрын
@@lunchingtangpua2415 Idk what you mean by that
@lunchingtangpua24153 жыл бұрын
@@user-ud3gh8fy5n its a code only few chosen one knows it
@ramiromen65953 жыл бұрын
Byzantium: lol now that we aren't protecting the east you are doomed, what you gonna do now? Western Europe: mmmh conquer the world and have the Renaisance i guess. Byzantium: sobs
@VergilDarkslayer3 жыл бұрын
"Looks at a woman drawing" Western europe:A WITCH
@ufuker57543 жыл бұрын
Well no without ottaman empire there is no need to explore different routes so without gold from New world there is no modern West you know today
@lukat93 Жыл бұрын
Despot of Serbia Djuradj Brankovic allegedly cried for 7 days when Constantinople fell - they were close allies, and he had even in years before provided money for a tower reconstruction in the walls of Constantinople to upgrade it's defences. Serbia, being orthodox Christian, looked to Constantinople as the source of spiritual and imperial authority that had kept the imperial legacies of the Roman Empire, and they knew that with it's demise they would soon go down as well, which indeed followed for 400 years under the Ottomans. Serbia was annexed just 6 years after the fall of Constantinople.
@islammehmeov2334 Жыл бұрын
It's funny considering Mara Brankovic allegedly wes happy 😊 for the foll of Constantinople and I'ven congratulating MEHMET THE CONQUEROR
@Eagle_the_18th3 жыл бұрын
One of the most important cities in European history: Falls Venetian Traders: This will greatly affect the economy
@Tortellobello452 жыл бұрын
how Europe reacted: Basically all of Europe:idc Venice:oh no i had mone there my doge gotta suffer without his gold toilet paper Papacy:that's what you get from splitting from us Rest of Italy:bois we strong together less do an anti-Turkish alliance Muscovy:YEAH BOI I'M 3RD ROME HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEH UVVUVUVUVUVUVUVUVUVUVUVU HAHAHAHAHHA ME CHIEF OF ORTHODOXS
@richraichu40683 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention that they also blamed James Byzantine, the wealthiest guy in Constantinople, who did not help the emperor out with his wealth, rather fled to Sicily.
@failuretv8143 жыл бұрын
James *Byzantine*. I see what you did there.
@Homer-OJ-Simpson3 жыл бұрын
Q: How did Europe react? A: They didn’t
@Hungabrigoo3 жыл бұрын
Except the countries that did but we are not going to talk about them because any country east of Germany officially does not exist.