2024 Renault Symbioz Iconic E-TECH Full Hybrid 145 | Test Drive & Real-World Fuel Efficiency

  Рет қаралды 7,883

TEST DRIVE FREAK

TEST DRIVE FREAK

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 41
@SorryNotMyPrime
@SorryNotMyPrime Ай бұрын
Könntest du mal ein Seat tarraco testen am besten 2021 muss aber nicht 2021 sein
@Troll_messe
@Troll_messe Ай бұрын
Echt… besser als solche Autos!!
@TESTDRIVEFREAK
@TESTDRIVEFREAK Ай бұрын
leider sehr selten, hatte einmal als mietwagen. schau mal hier haben wir 2019 Tarraco: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fKSVZWxud5eNd5o
@SorryNotMyPrime
@SorryNotMyPrime Ай бұрын
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK dachte ich mir schon weil habe nur dieses Video bei dir gefunden trotzdem danke
@user13-43
@user13-43 Ай бұрын
Renault Capture has versions with all-wheel drive, but apparently they forgot to retrofit it or neglected it
@Kot-Kater
@Kot-Kater Ай бұрын
Хороший обзор без болтовни! Ещё бы добавить осмотр днища...
@anzman911
@anzman911 Ай бұрын
I don't get it what is the point of hybrid vehicles. They consume more gas/diesel than 15 year old diesel cars from 2010. LOL
@TESTDRIVEFREAK
@TESTDRIVEFREAK Ай бұрын
hybrid is only good in city and country road with village etc. at highway and more than 120 kmh cruise need more fuel, because its SUV and with hybrid is much heavier
@jmk9065
@jmk9065 Ай бұрын
​@@TESTDRIVEFREAKIt's true that SUV body affects consumption on the highway, but you're wrong about the mass. Symbioz comes in e-Tech variation only, but we can use the Captur as an example - e-Tech 145 hp version is only about 70 kg heavier then the comparable 140 hp MHEV. And even if it was much heavier, mass only affects rolling resistance in highway cruising and that is dwarfed by aerodynamic drag anyway. Hybrids do not have worse fuel consumption on the highway than equivalent gasoline-only cars, and from there it only gets better in lower speeds.
@danielp5260
@danielp5260 Ай бұрын
u dont know what are you tlking about ! please stay at diesel and cars with 15-20 years !!
@anzman911
@anzman911 Ай бұрын
I know what I am talking about. It costs more it is more complicated prone to failures and it cost more to run. And you call me an idiot? For me progress is sub 3 l/100km consumtion. Everything else is not worth the upgrade.
@jmk9065
@jmk9065 Ай бұрын
@@anzman911 Which specific diesel car from 2010 are you referring to? And that magical 3l/100 threshold applies to what kind of a car, of what mass and aerodynamics?
@AlbertSchneiderausNürnberg
@AlbertSchneiderausNürnberg Ай бұрын
Нужен дизель
@6.2v87
@6.2v87 Ай бұрын
10 years ago we joked about having a tablet in the car, now we quite literally have an iPad sticked to the dash …
@ahronsumar5075
@ahronsumar5075 Ай бұрын
I don't mind them personally,but some brands make their screens obnoxiously big especially Chinese brands, but other brands are following the trend it seems.
@enfantterrible4868
@enfantterrible4868 Ай бұрын
VWs interiors are the worst, the new Passats look like they have a giant TV slapped on the dash
@ahronsumar5075
@ahronsumar5075 Ай бұрын
@@enfantterrible4868 yeah fair, definitely copying the Chinese, though parts of their interior are appealing but yeah the older versions are a bit classier.
@Seba03111976
@Seba03111976 Ай бұрын
Boring car.
@sliwka621
@sliwka621 Ай бұрын
Bro leave some oxygen for the rest of us.
@ocriaf
@ocriaf Ай бұрын
:D
@TheFunkyair
@TheFunkyair Ай бұрын
What is this
@Roberto.Gouveia
@Roberto.Gouveia Ай бұрын
👎🏻
@Mr11ESSE111
@Mr11ESSE111 Ай бұрын
another expensive hybrid garbage with abnormal consumption! 10 ,2 liters on 160kmh and even on low speeds nothing special!! its higher then most of normal ICE vehicles
@jmk9065
@jmk9065 Ай бұрын
Which specifically?
@Mr11ESSE111
@Mr11ESSE111 Ай бұрын
@@jmk9065 which not?check hybrid tests here on this channel and compare then
@jmk9065
@jmk9065 Ай бұрын
@@Mr11ESSE111 First of all, you said "normal ICE vehicles", I'm assuming that's non-hybrid. Then I check the first ICE car tested on this channel and comparable in terms of power and size to this one - the sightly smaller VW T-Roc 1.5 TSI 150 hp. And you know what? At 100/120/140/160 kph it sips respectively 4.5/6.0/7.1/9.4 l/100 km while Symbioz goes with 4.1/5.7/8.0/10.2. Seems pretty comparable to me. And that's not even taking city driving into account, in which Symbioz would destroy T-Roc in terms of efficiency.
@Mr11ESSE111
@Mr11ESSE111 Ай бұрын
@@jmk9065 symbioz costs much more and all normal ICE cars basically consume less then any hybriid cars no matter how much hp
@jmk9065
@jmk9065 Ай бұрын
@@Mr11ESSE111 You know, you can always provide some data or examples to back up your theories. Please do, I'm really curious 🤨
Renault Symbioz E-Tech full hybrid 145 | 2024 | POV test drive
15:06
HELP!!!
00:46
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 66 МЛН
*2025 Dacia Bigster: The Future of Affordable SUVs*
2:49
Renault Symbioz E-Tech 145 full hybrid TEST Baby Scenic! [4k]
12:50
Renault Symbioz, simplement évident !
19:06
La Pause Garage
Рет қаралды 18 М.
Renault Symbioz driving REVIEW of the new compact SUV
26:41
Autogefühl
Рет қаралды 50 М.
Renault Captur 2025 Review
22:00
carwow
Рет қаралды 671 М.
HELP!!!
00:46
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 66 МЛН