Why do you people continue comparing the mighty Russian weapons with American paper tigers that are unable to even stop Iranian primitive projectiles?
@cloud.architect.115 күн бұрын
Iranian missiles are far from primitive
@sumailagodswill142615 күн бұрын
Am still surprised people still think United States has good weapons
@alispeed509515 күн бұрын
@@cloud.architect.1 Compared to the cutting edge? They are primitive. I mean, lets be honest, its easier to defend against an iranian missile than it is a Russian or American. These two are simply superior in missile tech. Facts are facts
@bond184415 күн бұрын
And IRAN wants a Refund.
@Mystalo15 күн бұрын
Usa weapons are mid but expensive and countries buy them because they have to
@nelsonpalraj16 күн бұрын
S 400 cannot be compared with THAD , the deployment time for S400 is 5 min where as THAD need more than 20 min . S 400 has the capability to fire missiles in 360 deg but THAD need to be repositioned every time
@KamBar202015 күн бұрын
Can SS00 and THAAD Fend Off Hypersonic Missiles owned by 🇨🇳❓
@pik692115 күн бұрын
@@KamBar2020 S 500 can interdict hypersonic munitions....
@Testio2616 күн бұрын
THAAD is having a very difficult time shooting down Hezbollah missiles that’s all you need to know!!
@HMG211916 күн бұрын
💯 🤣
@Ulises-Gonzalez-313116 күн бұрын
Also the houties´s ballistic and hypersonic missiles, specially the ones changing trajectories mid air.
@taesakabaw16 күн бұрын
😂😂😂
@davidmartwick542016 күн бұрын
Sure...
@andreww122516 күн бұрын
That is a complete lie 😂
@bernarddeham478716 күн бұрын
7:43 THAAD has proven results in only one case in Saoudi Arabia while S400 has proven records in real combat situations...And by the way it has an improved version with the S500..
@mtf_savage_beasts25658 күн бұрын
From what I heard S 500 is different than S 400 and more like THAAD.
@evgen-cy6so4 күн бұрын
@@mtf_savage_beasts2565 S 400 - 400 km S 500 - 500 km S 600 - 600 km S 700 - 700 km - developments have begun. and in general the US is behind Russia in rocket engineering by 15-20 years and also in hyper sonics and radar ALSO BY 10-15 YEARS
@ogochukwuemmanuel458916 күн бұрын
S400 is better
@OFFENDYOU36516 күн бұрын
Definitely
@targetaps16 күн бұрын
For sure, just like the T14, SU-57, T-72, and especially the greatest weapon of all the s-70. Nobody can compete with the s-70.
@yiannis.demetriou969616 күн бұрын
Is this a trick question? S400 has zero competition.
@GegeDxD16 күн бұрын
@@targetaps Yes. Be careful, Iskander M is coming and your Patriot is unable to protect you.
@KamBar202015 күн бұрын
Against Hypersonic Missiles owned by 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 In Real Life❓
@MY_GAMETUBE16 күн бұрын
S400 is better. THAAD has no explosive warhead and rather utilizes the hit-to-kill method which means that a very slight deviation by a few inches could result in the failure of interception.
@aneurindavies59434 күн бұрын
S400 is one in a series of sophisticated weapons.
@jwills839616 күн бұрын
How hard was to say, the S400 is better?
@someday291016 күн бұрын
Israel's airstrikes on Iran failed because Iran deployed S-400 air defense systems that locked on Israeli F-35 stealth jets. On the other hand, Israel had a THAAD radar deployed, but it failed to intercept Iran's missiles.
@niweshlekhak964616 күн бұрын
THAAD was deployed after Iranian strikes not before.
@eduwino15116 күн бұрын
yeah in the fantasyland that you live in
@someday291016 күн бұрын
@@eduwino151 The Israeli F-35 was lock on the S400 and fled with 70km left on the Iranian border. If what I'm saying is a dream, then show me the evidence to refute it.
@eduwino15116 күн бұрын
@@someday2910 satelite pictures exist of destroyed iranian radars and bases stop doing drugs and inventing your own fantasy to cope🤣🤣
@someday291016 күн бұрын
@@eduwino151 The satellite images released by Israel are blurred and cannot be clearly distinguished. They are clearly of poor quality compared to the images released when the attack on Lebanon was successful.
@jgllrd45416 күн бұрын
In Ukraine , Russia has demonstrated without a shadow of a doubt their superiority in their approach, technically audacious, , tactically adept to adapt to change. Russia has demonstrated outstanding intelligence, creativity, resilient production capacity, logistical adeptness. NATO spent a trillion dollars, conservative figure, 20 years in Afganistán and yet could not defeat them. In Ukraine the west has failed, yet again.,
@halfevilhalfgood220616 күн бұрын
Because Taliban hide 20 years compared to Ukrainians.
@yusufolatayor538316 күн бұрын
S400 far better
@slawomirfryszkowski228816 күн бұрын
@@yusufolatayor5383 specialy s-500
@VOLK4542215 күн бұрын
That's why Russia Lossing several S-400 in Crimea and facing criticism to the Russian Official even Russian telegram channel has been confirmed it.
@bestcyborg88915 күн бұрын
Ukraine is training the Russian crews once in a while. Every lost S-300\400 means learned lessons, and better AA systems in the near future.
@John-h5i2q16 күн бұрын
The god of Fire aka promethus aka S-500🎉🎉🎉
@Ulises-Gonzalez-313116 күн бұрын
Yea, and comparing THAAD with an S-400 is like comparing the caliber between a tank and an armored personnal carrier's gun, when the S-500, the S-550, and the newer A-235 Nudol system, or even the old A-135, are superior.
@davidmartwick542016 күн бұрын
Hahahahaha what, all 3 of them they've built?
@John-h5i2q15 күн бұрын
Russians are integrating the captured so called HIMARS in to their MLRS and locomotive radar. 😂 but most funniest thing russia has surpassed the hypersonic race and started buildings hypersonic killers. S600,700 are coming too soon as Demitri Peshkov said it.
@arvindynr16 күн бұрын
S-400 is already deployed in India.
@cobracommander.195816 күн бұрын
Alll america misile defence systems are hot launched which minimises its defence envelope all Russian systems are cold launched giving 360 degree coverage also s400 takes 5 mins to setup and thad needs a week to set up😂😂😂😂😂
@ayo-v1p13 күн бұрын
If you think S-400 is badass you should see the S-500 satellite killer. God, Russians are the doctors(PhD) of weaponry
@nazirbala672616 күн бұрын
5-400
@stewmaker398316 күн бұрын
S400 any day.
@Sauvé3316 күн бұрын
S-400 is better
@KrishBB16 күн бұрын
S-400 Is Outdated Already. Lets talk about S-500 and Dream about S-600
@ishmaelbento574516 күн бұрын
S400 not yet outdated until the patriot becomes outdated too😂
@vinnievalentine42116 күн бұрын
You're a clown, an ignorant one
@Ulises-Gonzalez-313116 күн бұрын
@@ishmaelbento5745 yea, and comparing THAAD with an S-400 is like comparing the caliber between a tank and an armored personnal carrier's gun, when the S-500, the S-550, and the newer A-235 Nudol system, or even the old A-135, are superior.
@davidmartwick542016 күн бұрын
More RU garbage...
@АлёшаАлёшин-ф8п16 күн бұрын
@@davidmartwick5420Я идентифицирую себя как Ка-52, тебе конец пиндос, я вылетаю
@vinnievalentine42116 күн бұрын
Saudis are not supposed to interfere with Houthis missiles. Because they will take our Saudi Arabias refineries
@agapic44516 күн бұрын
bro we took down 400+ ballistic missiles and 800+ kamikaze drones from 2015 to 2021. we had only PAC-2 and Skyguard. Now we do have M-SAM II, PAC 3 , Silent hunter, VL MICA NG, Mistral 3, ADRIAN, Pantsir S1M and soon 7 THAAD batteries. so calm down kid.
@brianlusengeli101416 күн бұрын
S 400
@shankarchakkere244816 күн бұрын
Cost comparison?
@jeremiehimalao857015 күн бұрын
I'd rather choose S400
@arvindynr16 күн бұрын
S-400 should be compared to Patriort. Thaad should be compared to Pantsir.
@jozseftoth936816 күн бұрын
First of all, they are for different purposes, THAAD exclusively for anti-ballistic missile defence and struggles to shoot down lower altitude targets S-400 is more universal
@alispeed509515 күн бұрын
After the Izrael x Iran debacle, we all know how good these western AD systems are lol
@rigorocks2315 күн бұрын
you have to see the video circulating of the s700 testing. the speed is unreal 😮
@shelukindo16 күн бұрын
S 400 is better by far. No contest
@abhiksarkar382916 күн бұрын
S400 of course that's why India had imported s400 & s500 is on the way
@andreww122516 күн бұрын
S400 is more comparable to patriot THAD is just for long range ballistic missiles but obviously you didn’t know that 😂
@alpejohnson49116 күн бұрын
Patriot is mid
@stomper_shrimp16 күн бұрын
@@alpejohnson491nah, patriot is long-range. Modernized versions are able to hit the target 100 kilometers away
@alpejohnson49116 күн бұрын
@@stomper_shrimp Same ones that fail in ukraine getting destroyed by khinzel missiles?
@jozseftoth936816 күн бұрын
@alpejohnson491 well that does not imply they cannot have 100km or more range, does it? They are unable to touch the Kinzhal, but they can still have the range.. to hit something slower
@jozseftoth936816 күн бұрын
@@stomper_shrimpthey can even reach 160km ranges The S-400, on the other hand, can reach over 300km
@vedprakash201916 күн бұрын
India already has S400
@davidmartwick542016 күн бұрын
Bet they're regretting that decision after seeing them getting schwacked by 1990s era ATACMS...
@alpejohnson49116 күн бұрын
@@davidmartwick5420 you don't know how saturation of air works plus many us weapons are from the 90s only with modernizations so thats not really the smartest thing to say also you only saw the video of the them getting destroyed not anything before that if anything its pretty rare for it to happen so I can only assume that they shoot down more atacms than they lose to which is a way better ratio than the over priced patriot yes keep praying to your weapon contractors that don't pay you at all
@davidmartwick542016 күн бұрын
@alpejohnson491 according to your boy Pootie, nothin' gets by em!! And oh btw I was a US Marine for years so yeah I kinda know a few things.
@pik692115 күн бұрын
@@davidmartwick5420 ATACMS stopped working after they were jammed about a year ago...
@vedprakash201915 күн бұрын
@@davidmartwick5420 Not regretting, but learning about its short comings. And that's why India has developed its own anti missile-drone system.
@davidcollishaw277116 күн бұрын
THAAD was deployed to replace the system at nevatim destroyed in april which was Israels best radar.
@Abcdefg1226ytytyrt16 күн бұрын
Russia air defense has been proven to be the best in the world in real combat
@jerrymiller903916 күн бұрын
No it has not. Israel just defeated Irans rissian bought system and the russians themselves dont have air superiority in Ukraine
@nesseihtgnay941916 күн бұрын
Yea sure like how Israel f35 went over Iran SAM S-400 and they couldn't detect it 😂
@HMG211916 күн бұрын
@@nesseihtgnay9419no fighter jests ever entered Iranian air space, they’re turned back immediately after entering Syrian airspace and fired stand off weapons. They came across anti air defences they did not know existed or were facing a possible loss of multiple aircraft, decision was made to fire and leave area.
@joe_tipakuah488016 күн бұрын
@@nesseihtgnay9419 Fake.The Israeli F-35 had been detected by Iranian Radars and turned itself away.Hence the Israeli attack Iran using Arrow missile from a great distance,means it have the ballistic capability.The Iranians on the other hand had been researching the technologies that the west or Israeli had and inventing solutions to counter it in any cost.
@davidmartwick542016 күн бұрын
Not really...
@kibo_nbgd16 күн бұрын
Both are powerful !
@OFFENDYOU36516 күн бұрын
Nope, s400 is better
@SPaul-n2d16 күн бұрын
Where did Thaad prove that it is powerful??
@Thraun2416 күн бұрын
S-400 is tested in iran
@Zazooouser2415 күн бұрын
S400 much better
@andrewsansom479816 күн бұрын
just a few thoughts, THAAD should be compared to the S500 as they are both for the same role. Hyper-sonic missiles can not be tracked by radar, they create a plasma barrier as they fly that hides them. ballistic missiles are tracked in the stage of the flight outside the atmosphere where there is no plasma barrier, this works great with simple warheads, but missiles with a warhead that can change course are not easy targets. the software is as important as the hardware, we saw in Ukraine when the hymars were used, in the beginning the S400 had problems, but once the software had been updated with the right flight data they are now stopping nearly all hymars missiles.
@sumailagodswill142615 күн бұрын
Nicely said
@alispeed509515 күн бұрын
Yeah, we nolonger hear much about himars... or the storm shadows yet they were effective in the early days. This as you say tells us that the software has been updated. They are nolonger effective.
@targetaps13 күн бұрын
@@alispeed5095 This didn't age well. Storm Shadows and ATACMS are clapping Russia today. 😆
@sickotwist980215 күн бұрын
Thadd and s-550are for same defensive purposes! Not s-400!
@alinili556916 күн бұрын
Never mind how good S400 is, Russia proved Very unreliable long delays to deliver costumer service
@williamolekson911316 күн бұрын
Maybe because they're at war? You wouldn't prioritize foreign orders over your own troops would you? Would they?
@SPaul-n2d16 күн бұрын
That's a stupid argument, I rather a long wait for a better system than getting rubbish over night.
@bestcyborg88915 күн бұрын
Russia isn't a pizza store, have patience.
@kushagramisra141813 күн бұрын
amazing video
@Military-TV13 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@johnroberts992214 күн бұрын
The THAAAD and the S-400 are not comparable. They have different stated goals. The proper comparison is the Patriot system to the S-400.
@Msoja813 күн бұрын
The S400, of course. But consider the S500.
@alcidesambriz666515 күн бұрын
Russian are the kings of war period, USA its taking a huge beat down!!😂😂😂😂😂
@7subba16 күн бұрын
S400 is far better than thaad. Russia is far ahed of USA for everything. Best of Russia.
@f-35lightningii615 күн бұрын
no, Russia saying 13+ S-400 destroy by Ukraine ATACMS, Storm missile.. S-400 very expensive $3,000,000,000.00 too biggest to failed.. 13 X $3,000,000,000.00 = total $39,000,000,000.00 waste taxpayer..
@andrew681515 күн бұрын
Apples and oranges. My understanding is s500 would be the closer equivalent to thaad as it is specifically an anti ballistic missile system and not intended for traditional air defense from things like aircraft and (edit: non ballistic) missiles. I would think Patriot and S400 would be the apples to apples comparison.
@kkmardigrce15 күн бұрын
The choice has nothing to do with "specific needs". It is very clear that S400 is a far superior option. But countries still need to make a choice and that usually depends on politics alone.
@dr.rogers820416 күн бұрын
Russia better
@clarenceedwards286613 күн бұрын
S400 hands down
@REAPER1236RYYITITII6 күн бұрын
India and Turkey already operating s 400 .
@jimfast59213 күн бұрын
/s400 better but s550 will blow everything away
@gift723311 күн бұрын
S 400 is best of best.
@catalanmart161212 күн бұрын
A prefer... THAAD
@nyinyilin-qc5wu9 күн бұрын
All people in the world know S400 is better .
@MusaLoum-gv9bi16 күн бұрын
THAAD is just a garbage
@aruvsehgal410816 күн бұрын
Russia
@JonWick-ir6qx14 күн бұрын
Us❤
@ssg.derrellbrock642516 күн бұрын
* HEY!!…You know we also live in America so “ENOUGH!!” of the kilometers will ya we deal in “MILES!!” so why in the world don’t you have measurements in miles as well?. Hmmmm? you would think with your resources you would know this but we see that you don’t so…(FIX IT!!).
@JOHNNYCARROLL-f9e16 күн бұрын
i couldn't agree more.
@sophalmey354716 күн бұрын
Ilov,s,400,
@yambungangom82552 күн бұрын
S400 is far better.
@jimfast59213 күн бұрын
That’s what happens when you constantly challenge you develop better weapons and skills and USA and nato want to fight Russia 😂 my money on Russia
@shahwazirafridi79117 күн бұрын
But why Ukraine has destroyed multiple S400 systems?
@omujalmark46802 күн бұрын
How many sir?
@shahwazirafridi79112 күн бұрын
@omujalmark4680 Ukraine has claimed more than 20 s-300 and s400 air defence systems
@sasandadashzadeh-x8h14 күн бұрын
Which one is better? Depends on are you russian or american😂
@Ulises-Gonzalez-313116 күн бұрын
Comparing THAAD with an S-400 is like comparing the caliber between a tank and an armored personnal carrier, when the S-500, the S-550, and the newer A-235 Nudol system, or even the old A-135, are superior.
@Flcpcpc7 күн бұрын
Sometimes Russian missiles like S400 or ballistic missiles etc fire in 90 degree projectile will end up like fire crackers in the sky with debris dropped back to the earth 🌍and harm the personnel within the range. However, they need to stand very far from the firing sites when firing. How far not sure ask putin😢😅 it’s better safe than sorry. However We watch parental guidance (PG)movie not x rated 😂 need censorship 😊
@syddiesel842016 күн бұрын
Theres! no dought about it,Russia makes the best stuff!
@JeanM-n4z16 күн бұрын
Horse and donkey comparisons
@yuto-2-zw16 күн бұрын
Nijedan 😨🤢
@f-35lightningii615 күн бұрын
Russia saying 13+ S-400 destroy by Ukraine ATACMS, Storm missile.. S-400 very expensive $3,000,000,000.00 too biggest to failed.. 13 X $3,000,000,000.00 = total $39,000,000,000.00 waste taxpayer..
@theorigonalb.a15 күн бұрын
the s400 has already had a minimum of 2 command posts and 4 radars and 16 launchers destroyed, no thad has been destroyed
@ammarmangala981416 күн бұрын
S-400 = Patriot S-500 = Thaad Thats a better comparison
@GhostRider-hp3te16 күн бұрын
You = not very bright
@Sauvé3316 күн бұрын
Lol
@BornfaceMchenga16 күн бұрын
😂 Your ignorance is amazing
@guitaristteacobouy16 күн бұрын
Not smart
@malkuwon869114 күн бұрын
It is very different in statem S-400 Trimuph is should be vs with Patriot S-500 Prometheus is should be vs with THAAD The System S-400 and Patriot are design for all aerial target Fighter jet,Drone,Cruise missiles and others aerial vehicle etc … S-500 Prometheus and THAAD are design for the Anti-ballistic missiles. They are to be intersect the ballistic missiles in the exo-atmospheric region in the space not in the earth
@lawerancedodd69015 күн бұрын
S400 didn’t do shit to help Iran lol
@prilep1816 күн бұрын
S-400🤣
@andreww122516 күн бұрын
THAD is better
@JJ-hi4gh15 күн бұрын
But S-400 miserably failed against US's ATACMS missiles
@omujalmark46802 күн бұрын
This folk might be part of the woke media, where do you get your news from? 😂
@abiodunwilliams913616 күн бұрын
How did the Isreal military manage to take out all the Iranian S400 without any casualty?
@josiahbowman318116 күн бұрын
S300
@SPaul-n2d16 күн бұрын
Stop chatting rubbish 1 s300 radar is all S400 nonsense.
@guitaristteacobouy16 күн бұрын
😂Please
@vishitokinny692715 күн бұрын
Hey dude, go back to Pluto. You don't know what's happening on Earth.
@muhizichristian683616 күн бұрын
THAAD is better than more
@vinnievalentine42116 күн бұрын
🤡
@akcobra541816 күн бұрын
You’re a disgrace for us Africans please don’t comment nonsense! The s 400 has always proven to be the best
@Ulises-Gonzalez-313116 күн бұрын
@@akcobra5418 yea, and comparing THAAD with an S-400 is like comparing the caliber between a tank and an armored personnal carrier's gun, when the S-500, the S-550, and the newer A-235 Nudol system, or even the old A-135, are superior.
@muhizichristian683616 күн бұрын
USA First 🇺🇸 ❤❤
@saghirahmad96348 күн бұрын
S400
@FireTheHoker15 күн бұрын
S400 is FAR superior not to mention the Russians have like 56 S400, on the other hand the u.s. has only 7 thaad system which are very inferior, i think the s300 is better.
@hnaj441215 күн бұрын
Thad can’t defeat any hyper sonic with manoeuvres capability and war head manoeuvre’ capability not only thad any air defence system for another two decades to come because America built these types of air defence systems long time before missiles became hypersonic and with manoeuvres capabilities