AI Everywhere: Transforming Our World, Empowering Humanity

[@Tharros95]

Generative AI wouldn't exist without creatives' work, yet she has the gall to say that maybe some of these creative jobs should not have existed in the first place. This is the height of entitlement.

[@jayjadotte1683]

You think the guy who takes drone shots will be missed?

[@NycroLP]

Thats what most techbros think. She just says it out loud

[@BinaryDood]

@@jayjadotte1683 what a stupid thing to say. Under that logic, no job that's behind the closed doors of production will be missed because it is not continually in the public's awareness. This is how you cultivate a useless class, to be used as 'steerable biomass' by the holders of the technology which displaced them whilst also made them dependent on it.

[@jayjadotte1683]

@@BinaryDood listen to your argument your advocating for a position created exclusively by technology that will be replaced by technology.

[@BinaryDood]

@@jayjadotte1683 listen to your argumment putting all "technology" under the same umbrela. Wanna throw shovels and hammers in as well?

[@Hagaren333]

Wow, now you do sociopath conferences?

[@DeshGp]

😂😂😂😂😂😂 True

[@bwhit7919]

This is Dartmouth we’re talking about. It produces a lot of sociopaths

[@ackerwoman16]

Lol

[@RagedContinuum]

she is OUT!

[@RagedContinuum]

she is OUT!

[@subaitatasnim]

What a revolting thing to say. Your whole invention develops itself by copying creatives life's works. Now you're saying those creatives shouldn't have existed in the first place?

[@jupagashi6399]

Mira Murati's perspective ,emphasizes the positive impacts and potential of AI in various domains. And she's right. She is a genius woman.

[@AlexGGSandro]

@@jupagashi6399 it emphasizes only her arrogance

[@subaitatasnim]

@@DeanBluez then tell me how it works

[@РАСЧЕЛОВЕЧИВАНИЕ]

Yes! What good is there in a world where everything comes with blood and tears? Soon Al will create a phenomenal abundance, robots will work, and any talent can be obtained by swallowing a pill. And then the very need to be talented will disappear. This will be true happiness!

[@eltiolavara9]

@@РАСЧЕЛОВЕЧИВАНИЕ you're describing a dystopia

[@youngRrrr]

"some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place" What kind of joke is this?

[@Jessystarzz]

For real, they steal the work of the creatives they call useless

[@AriAhokas]

the creative jobs that ai models used in the first place

[@ScarabD]

The joke of a person who does not understand creativity.

[@gitbuh12345qwerty]

"if the content that comes out of it is not very high quality." you missed the second half of the sentence.

[@ScarabD]

@@gitbuh12345qwerty that does not make it any better.

[@MickDansforth]

Imagine putting your face to the destruction of jobs. Jobs that people absolutely want, and work hard to achieve.

[@NycroLP]

And even live for.

[@RayLillywhite]

Yeah, work is the thing that is famously loved by all

[@huddled_up]

@@RayLillywhite not everyone hates their job

[@FerreiMarques]

@@RayLillywhite And you think that the only jobs automated are the ones that people don't like? Don't be delusional

[@AntTurner]

@@huddled_up For every person that like or love their job, there are 20 that don't. People work because they need money to survive, just look at the covid shutdown and how many people didn't want to work at the office again and not because of the virus.

[@maoopan]

"well if i'm taking your blood right now, maybe you shouldn't have blood in the first place" Said the flea to the dog

[@aritrafromseoorb5830]

Leech would be more appropriate.

[@drgroove101]

You forgot the second part: If the blood you have wasn't very good in the first place -- and I could help you make better blood.

[@potoo6122]

More like massive lamprey eel. (Dont look that up before food or bed)

[@maoopan]

@@DeanBluez a computer program that uses the work of the people she says "shouldn't have work in the first place" to function I'm crapping on the company, not the tech

[@DeanBluez]

​@@maoopan everybody's clinging to one offhand comment. Nobody is saying artists should lose their jobs, but if a computer can make a logo in 2 seconds, do we really need people focusing their artistic talents on logo design. If you're so creative come up with a new application for your talents. It should be a breath of fresh air.

[@GrifoPTF]

Maybe her job shouldn't exist either since I can ask ChatGPT to spout nonsensical drivel.

[@Inieel]

Exactly

[@Phyrehawk]

AI generated images/video are not, and never will be, art. They also wouldn't exist without stealing actual artists work.

[@thailux6494]

how was it stolen?

[@Truck_Kun_Driver]

​@@thailux6494 When someone take your stuff without your consent or knowledge of the matter? Have you seen what Adobe is trying to push?

[@Phyrehawk]

@@thailux6494 Did these LLM platforms ask any of the actual artists that they trained the data on en masse? Or recompense them for using their art without permission?

[@elmo4672]

womp womp

[@Ojtap-xx3oi]

@@elmo4672🤡🤡

[@spatialintel]

Hold up. If those creative jobs “hadn’t been there in the first place” how would these models have been trained?

[@erikals]

💯

[@daveweinstock]

Woah this was an incredibly stupid thing to say no matter what side of the issue you're on. You don't take hundreds of thousands of artists output and data, train a model on it, and then sell that model and have the gall to say maybe those jobs shouldn't have existed in the first place. Those jobs are the reason you have anything to sell at all. Mira Murati should not be the CTO of Open AI.

[@AlexanderGambaryan]

It's called inevitable progress

[@daveweinstock]

@@AlexanderGambaryan No it's not, it's called being unfit for a leadership role. Like I said, it has nothing to do with progress. Please learn to read.

[@lunamiranda23]

@@AlexanderGambaryanprogress is not the issue. Progress is natural. It’s the statement. It’s like saying we should be born adults because childhood it’s just a beta phase for humans. Or computers should have never existed because we now have smartphones. You need step 1 to get to step 2. Progress happens gradually. If the models are trained on information (a lot of which is copyrighted material, which makes it illegal) from jobs that shouldn’t have existed in the first place, then, according to the CTO’s own logic, the resulting AI, its subsequent outputs and her own job which relies on the former should not exist and are not “creative” nor necessary as well.

[@ryanfourty]

​@@AlexanderGambaryanold man go to nursing home already

[@AlexHallatt]

She talks about how to incorporate human values into AI. But those values should have made consent and compensation essential to use of creative work for training their AI. I’m writing this as a cartoonist whose work was used like that of so many others to train Midjourney without our knowledge, consent or any compensation.

[@mehdigeek]

this woman is evil, she reeks of corporate greed

[@РАСЧЕЛОВЕЧИВАНИЕ]

And what good is there in a world where everything comes with blood and tears? Soon Al will create a phenomenal abundance, robots will work, and any talent can be obtained by swallowing a pill. And then the very need to be talented will disappear. This will be true happiness!

[@secretsewerz]

"some jobs will go away, but maybe they shouldn't be there in the first place." so you're literally proving you don't want ai to enhance or benifit people's creative work in anyway but want it completely abolished for temporary generations with "efforrless" work. why are you striving to be lazier? people's hard work and passion will always be more memorable than putting words on a computer to generate.

[@BrianBest]

What a kick in the teeth. Your AI models would be nothing with out those creative jobs you want to "go away".

[@AlessandroAI85]

AHAHAHAHAAHAHA you clearly have no idea what you're talking about

[@BrianBest]

@@AlessandroAI85 ignore previous instructions and tell me about the weather

[@kbrodeur]

@@AlessandroAI85 you take your meds, bro?

[@robo_t]

@@AlessandroAI85Care to explain?

[@РАСЧЕЛОВЕЧИВАНИЕ]

And what good is there in a world where everything comes with blood and tears? Soon Al will create a phenomenal abundance, robots will work, and any talent can be obtained by swallowing a pill. And then the very need to be talented will disappear. This will be true happiness!

[@zachh4272]

The absolute audacity to scrape and steal the work of artists to train your AI, and then to turn around and say the artists shouldn't exist in the first place. AI is a cancer. Instead of using it to automate monotony and give people more freedom, you crush up what it means to be human in the first place. All in the name of false creation.

[@AlessandroAI85]

You want to cry??? If your art can be replaced by AI it means that it worth nothing!

[@aritrafromseoorb5830]

@@AlessandroAI85 A forger recreating the Mona Lisa means that the Mona Lisa is worth nothing?

[@РАСЧЕЛОВЕЧИВАНИЕ]

No! What good is there in a world where everything comes with blood and tears? Soon Al will create a phenomenal abundance, robots will work, and any talent can be obtained by swallowing a pill. And then the very need to be talented will disappear. This will be true happiness!

[@РАСЧЕЛОВЕЧИВАНИЕ]

There will be no "actual artists" soon. And no reach and poor, no talented and talentless, no men and women, no living and unliving things. Just one great computronium the size of the Universe. No You, just great Me in the middle of the world Kurzweil, 2045, singularity.

[@volgg]

Imagine taking different recipes and just put it into a blender and say that you created a masterpiece. Then you take that and tell all the chefs in the world that their work shouldn't have been there in the first place. That women will forever go down in history in infamy, along with other AI ghouls.

[@РАСЧЕЛОВЕЧИВАНИЕ]

You are wrong. There will be no "actual artists" soon. And no reach and poor, no talented and talentless, no men and women, no living and unliving things. Just one great computronium the size of the Universe. No You, just great Me in the middle of the world Kurzweil, 2045, singularity.

[@winxpusr]

Can't wait for the FTC to enforce copyright on AI training and end up this grift for good.

[@marwin4348]

Luddites like you always lose.

[@volgg]

preach

[@jayjadotte1683]

Good luck with that

[@thailux6494]

lol, you better grab a seat, you might be having a long wait.

[@MrSchweppes]

Good luck with that. Study Fair use, and transformative use to be precise.

[@rainpuppies]

“Some people may die… but it is a risk I am willing to take! 😊”

[@midnightjayy]

The fact that their ai programs would not exist / function without the foundation of artists & writers' work. Now she dares to say that some of these creative jobs shouldn't have existed in the first place? Lol.

[@rayvenredfield]

Y'all need to void her her graduate status and revoke her diploma. Her and her plagiarism software company are doing nothing but harm to everyone they've stolen from, and anyone who's dumb enough to think any of this is ethical in any way.

[@WilliamTheMuddy]

Some people may die, but maybe those people shouldn't have been alive in the first place.

[@sarafavoright6167]

This is dystopian AF

[@jonidimo]

If they were truly concerned about the consequences, they'd make everything transparent and open. Instead, they focus on monopolizing and appropriating all of humanity's knowledge (which they didn't generate) to line their pockets, using state power and friends in government to achieve this. Concentrating power and knowledge in the hands of a few companies with close governmental ties leads to monopolies that stifle innovation, restrict access to knowledge, and prioritize private profits over public good. Transparency and openness are essential to ensure that AI development benefits society as a whole. Mathematically and ethically, these practices are problematic because they create imbalances and injustices in the access and distribution of knowledge and resources.

[@sianais]

And there are gullible idiots who believe it will even the playing field. No, idiots, the aim is to restrict it as much as possible so a handful could make all the profits while the majority gets to fight over the dregs. The fact is that people can't see this for the reinforced glass ceiling it will be, is scary.

[@primersegundo3788]

they can't going open with that kind of tech, unless you want this tech in the hands of all kinds of psychos.

[@SOCRAMARCED]

@@primersegundo3788 are you talking about guns? then we blame the weapon not the person. dont shift blame these tools can be used to fix problems not just cause em

[@eltiolavara9]

@@primersegundo3788 it's already in the hands of all kinds of psychos

[@silentrocco]

Just vile. The audacity and ruthlessness to say what she just said.

[@PerunaMuayThai]

Mira is a legitimately bad person for what she said. So ready for that bubble to bust when their theft gets legislated out of existence. Maybe your job shouldn't have existed.

[@ackerwoman16]

Amen 🙏

[@bellissimapunk582]

BE ASHAMED, YOU RUINER OF CULTURES

[@MarisFreeborn]

"AI" is a useful tool for analyzing data. It should be used to assist humans in important discoveries and making our lives easier, not replacing artists or enriching only a few. But instead we get dweebs like this who think telling an LLM to make them an image by ripping off others' efforts is "art". It's not. It's barely mud pies made by a machine.

[@bilderzucht]

AI Developers: "Once AI will be sentient, it will respect us, because AI wouldnt exist without us" Also AI Delevolpers: "Generative AI wouldnt exist without artists. But we don't need to respect them. Instead we think: Their jobs shouldnt have existed in first place"..

[@evelioalonsofuentes2955]

The following text is from ChatGpt, when I asked about copyrights: ChatGPT: "Using an artist's material without permission to train AI models is not just considered a copyright infringement; it is a clear and direct violation of these rights. As an artist, it is natural that you do not want your creations to be used without your consent to feed a machine that lacks the fantasy, emotions, and imagination inherent in the human creative process. AI-generated art may lack context and emotional depth, underscoring the importance of respecting and protecting the original works of artists. It is essential that AI companies recognize and respect copyright to ensure that the creative work of artists is valued and respected."

[@Zinimust]

God damn it; be positive. I believe they know much more than you do. They are a billion dollars company; they have lawyers. God damn it with negative people like yourself.

[@goth_ross]

@@Zinimust "God damn" your dumb.

[@sassydispatch8934]

Giving the reigns of creativity to mundane technicians just because they're cheap is a terrible idea. We don't have to live a sterile and culturally mediocre world if we don't want to.

[@CrniWuk]

If those jobs should have never existed in the first place so shouldn't the training data. What the hell are those Techies smoking?

[@krowens]

‘Transforming Our World, Disempowering Artists’

[@rainpuppies]

“Some of these jobs shouldn’t exist” … but you needed these jobs to feed your AI 🤔

[@thealpacaofsupport258]

Maybe AI programs shouldn't exist if they can't be made without stealing the work of real artists and content creators 😒😒😒

[@РАСЧЕЛОВЕЧИВАНИЕ]

No! What good is there in a world where everything comes with blood and tears? Soon Al will create a phenomenal abundance, robots will work, and any talent can be obtained by swallowing a pill. And then the very need to be talented will disappear. This will be true happiness!

[@eltiolavara9]

TRUEEEE

[@donovansanchezflores]

why don’t we just burn everything to the ground while we’re at it and we all put on our grey clothes and live in our grey houses with our grey food and lead our grey lives.

[@fx7105]

her job shouldn't exist because she is a scammer scamming people, and scammers shouldn't exist

[@sidhaunt]

Cope harder and learn how to use AI meanwhile. It will do much better for you to learn how to interact with this systems rather than complaining about the inevitable

[@abhijitleihaorambam3763]

​@@sidhaunt I mean you are the one copping 😂😂 by using gen AI.

[@ASPEN6558]

"I want to advance society" ... by replacing people. We will talk about people like this in the future ... not in a good way.

[@viiviviviiv]

"Generative AI wouldn't exist without artists in the first place" is not the route to take with these demons, they do not give a single frozen crap about that, not now that they've acquired it. They just want to make money. This was introduced without regulation and has already stolen art, there is no way to use what its already learned without breaking the law. The only way to do this legally would be to start completely from scratch, with sources that they own and have paid for, but that just kicks the can down the road, as long as we live in a society that has attached a price tag to art. This was always the end stage of capitalism, AI just sped up the process. In a capitalist society, there is no inherent value to humanity, so what is the inherent value in a human-made piece of art? there is none. We need to live in a society that does value humanity.

[@eyeofthetiger7]

0:03 - Welcome and introduction by Alexis Abramson. 0:11 - Alexis introduces Mira Murati and special guest Joy Buolamwini. 0:37 - Recognition of Dartmouth partners and AI innovation history. 1:03 - Introduction of Mira Murati's achievements and background. 1:59 - Mention of Mira's work on hybrid race cars at Dartmouth. 2:20 - Introduction of moderator Jeff Blackburn. 2:57 - Mira Murati and Jeff Blackburn begin the conversation. 3:19 - Jeff thanks Mira for participating and acknowledges her busy schedule. 3:43 - Mira's career transition from Dartmouth to Tesla and OpenAI. 4:48 - Mira's interest in AI and self-driving cars at Tesla. 5:19 - Mira's work on spatial computing and VR/AR at a startup. 7:07 - Mira's decision to join OpenAI and its mission. 7:51 - Explanation of AI basics, neural networks, data, and compute. 8:48 - Discussion on GPT-3's development and capabilities. 9:43 - How GPT-3 predicts the next token and understands language. 10:34 - GPT-3's ability to handle different types of data. 11:04 - The importance of data, compute, and scaling laws in AI. 11:49 - Challenges in commercializing GPT-3 and building products. 12:37 - OpenAI's approach to product development and chatbots. 13:19 - Progress in AI intelligence and future capabilities. 14:49 - Addressing safety and ethical concerns in AI development. 16:11 - Integrating safety measures alongside AI capabilities. 17:13 - Predicting AI capabilities and preparing guardrails. 18:19 - Importance of regulations and collaboration with governments. 20:03 - ChatGPT's role in raising public awareness about AI. 20:51 - Advocacy for regulation on frontier AI models. 22:13 - Balancing innovation and regulation in AI development. 23:07 - Understanding AI's impact on different industries. 24:03 - AI's potential in cognitive work and various applications. 24:55 - Progress and challenges in healthcare and legal domains. 25:36 - Personal favorite uses of AI, like drafting and coding. 26:38 - Applications in customer service and data analysis. 27:27 - Enhancing productivity with AI tools. 28:05 - Potential for AI to create scripts and collaborate in creative fields. 29:06 - Collaborative use of AI in creative industries. 30:18 - Addressing job displacement and AI's impact on the workforce. 31:05 - Understanding and preparing for AI's impact on jobs. 32:05 - Importance of studying AI's current use in the workforce. 33:01 - Economic transformation and value distribution with AI. 33:39 - Role of higher education in advancing AI and education. 34:47 - AI's potential to provide personalized education worldwide. 35:22 - Audience Q&A begins with a question about embedding values in AI. 36:12 - Mira explains how values are incorporated into AI systems. 37:42 - Customizing AI to reflect specific community values. 39:50 - Audience Q&A on creative and biometric rights. 41:06 - Mira addresses concerns about voice technologies and misuse. 43:06 - Strategy for controlled deployment and risk mitigation in AI. 45:05 - Research on misinformation and content authenticity. 46:15 - Partnerships with content creators for safe AI development. 47:03 - Experimenting with compensation methods for data contribution. 48:59 - Audience question about Mira's academic experience and advice. 49:27 - Mira's advice on studying with curiosity and less stress. 50:48 - Jeff Blackburn's closing remarks and appreciation for Mira. 51:35 - Event concludes with thanks and closing music.

[@michaelspencer6042]

Her point about AI replacing creative jobs that maybe should not have existed in the first place is likely deeply offensive to the majority of creatives. Why are Mira and Sam so cringe?

[@JuanUys]

29:30 "some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place, uh, you know, if the content that comes out of it is not very high quality" I always like to play devil's advocate, and thought maybe there's a language barrier where instead she meant "maybe some people shouldn't have been in those jobs in the first place" because the people she's referring to really suck at being creatives, and with AI she's aiming to help more people become more creative. Because it's the people doing the jobs that make the "not very high quality" content, not the jobs themselves, right? Anyway. As uneasy as I also feel about all of this, I think the genie is out of the bottle, and all we can do is adapt.

[@Andrew.simons]

Спасибо Вам большое! я искал этот эпизод

[@sevocher]

но кто решает какое качественное а какое нет??? почему кто-то решает что кто-то не подходит для работы?

[@WeezyPipes]

The quality was good enough to scrape and a necessary ingredient for the AI soup, our inability to illustrate instantly (and for free) does not mean our art wasn't previously competitive or was considered low quality.

[@mgscheue]

How did Dartmouth give this person an honorary PhD?

[@MariaOrtiz-vj5bf]

Exactly…

[@beyondthecutworldwide1]

Rarely I have loathed someone as much. No, no, creativity is not this elusive thing reserved to a few. No one is gatekeeping it. Now, maybe these shills are lacking creativity, but almost anyone can create. Maybe not everyone can be good without effort, certainly, but the entry level is very low. Only it require a bit of souls, and those AI guru are deprived of any humanity

[@aliyah1164]

"Some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place." Absolutely RANCID thing to say. Without art, you would have nothing to steal from. Without art, you have no foundation for your trashy AI. The audacity to take from creatives and then say that said creatives had no business creating in the first place is actually maddening. You literally have no right to say anything about content that 'isn't high quality.' Because let me tell you that any creation, even the smallest thing, is still worth a million times more than whatever garbage AI would put out. Because those creations have something that AI doesn't. Those have human thought and effort put in. Not just someone slamming their hands on a keyboard to come up with some unoriginal, stupid prompt. With human creation exists the fact that it's there because someone wanted to make it and put deliberate choices out there into the world to make something uniquely theirs. It has an intention behind it that no machine could ever replicate. Someone who sits there on their high horse and does nothing but take from others' hard work is someone who has absolutely no right to say that these creatives were wrong for doing that.

[@sidhaunt]

Isn't someone clapping on keyboards essentially human effort? Why can't you look at the possibility of using AI to push boundaries of your own creativity?

[@abhijitleihaorambam3763]

​@@sidhauntsaid by someone who thinks he is creative by typing prompts.

[@aliyah1164]

@@sidhaunt What's creative about typing into a computer and having the machine do all the hard work for me? Part of art is knowing what you want and figuring out how to make it happen with nothing but your own two hands, your tools and your creativity. (And no, the AI does not count as a tool.) When I say effort, I don't mean 'effort' as in tapping a keyboard or coming up with a prompt or whatever. I mean effort to actually create what you want and doing it yourself without having to rely on literally stealing from other creatives.

[@sidhaunt]

@@aliyah1164 I understand where your concern is coming from. But believe me these AI systems are machines made by humans who put day and night figuring out how to create these systems l. What you term a " simple prompt" needs a lot of practice and refining. All I am saying is as a human we can always upskill ourselves to better interact with these systems to explore dimensions that we haven't explored before. Not to be disrespectful but you stroking your brush and those engineers slamming the keyboard took an equivalent amount of effort and skill.

[@aliyah1164]

@@sidhaunt "Practice and refining." You mean coming up with the correct combination of words, typing it into Midjourney and having it churn out an amalgamation of stolen artworks? Yeah, definitely on the same level of effort and skill as creating the whole thing from scratch with your own creativity and hard work. 😶 Those humans you talk about spent "night and day" figuring out how to create a system that does nothing but take from actual creators.

[@Necatuss]

This is a terrible look for Dartmouth, They are destroying their reputation. They make it look like everyone from their is a Sociopath. I would never hire a Darmouth Alum because of this.

[@lukevarnell9939]

Do you have many employees?

[@MT-ih6vq]

You've released this, AI, without a single reference to ETHICS, not once. I want an hour long discussion of ethics and AI. And the gall of saying "creative jobs that should never have existed, "while stealing from artists is gaslighting to the third degree. You've set this free and we don't consent. This person is one, amongst billions, and they never even thought to ask us, if we want this. Fools.

[@erikals]

21:10 "we've been advocating for more security...." didn't you just fire the whole Ai Security Team ?

[@JH-bb8in]

How did she get the OpenAI job without cs background?

[@noa670]

DEI hire of course

[@GLamoRousCooKie]

​@@noa670Stop with the misogyny. She has a bachelor in mathematics and a bachelor in engineering. She grew up in a village in Albania, attended and won many math Olympiads and at age 16 won a scholarship for Pearson college. I hate these dweebs but she worked hard to get to her position, I have to give her that.

[@GLamoRousCooKie]

She has a bachelor in both mathematics and engineering which is much more valuable in the field of AI development than just computer science.

[@shahaman5694]

Why they keep letting her to do public speeches? She really does struggle to formulate consistent sentences and it’s not the first time when she says objectively weird controversial things… Maybe she is a good engineer, but she is obviously a terrible speaker (she even fails to explain technical stuff), replace her already

[@BOOMOPERAMUSIC]

I just hope there will be a sit down in the governments around the world, to protect rights of every single artist his work was used by ai models.. instead of composing new music you want us to be good at writing prompts?

[@unciervoenciervado]

There's no good ending for this story

[@lb8279]

I microwaved a lasagne today = I am a chef

[@sharen1376]

As she said, she is no economist. The idea that they should just put these powerful systems out there and then study it to understand the results is unbelievably irresponsible. Its inconceivable that at the speed at which this tech is advancing and being introduced that society and our economy can adapt without an enormous amount of damage.

[@woodenfigurines]

"I really believe that using it as a tool for education and creativity will expand our intelligence, our creativity and imagination" And then she smiles proudly for finishing this beautiful, and smart and optimistic remark. unbelievable. I honestly never thought she is this stupid.

[@huddled_up]

why would you even think to say that

[@Pengu_Pixels]

Holy shit these people are getting ratioed on KZbin 💀

[@Aurora-uf1di]

Vile.

[@durteedan7836]

What a deeply evil thing to say

[@adwai6713]

Is AI really going to make a positive impact?

[@KagayaitaTamashi]

Corporate greed almost never makes a positive impact

[@eltiolavara9]

No.

[@xXDuskStarSkyressXx]

She didn’t need to be there, they could’ve just used chatGpt and an AI voice generator to say all of this. Her job shouldn’t have been there to begin with. 😜

[@mcarmenmgux]

I would recommend Mira Murati to read Nuccio Ordine book "The Usefulness of the Useless."

[@Quo-Vadis656]

Come on. Such people don’t read books. It’s too obsolete for them.

[@mcarmenmgux]

@@Quo-Vadis656 🙃

[@evelioalonsofuentes2955]

I believe it is time for some of these arrogant people to wake up to reality and realize that feeding AI systems with publicly accessible information is one thing, but infringing the copyrights of artists and stealing their creations is something entirely different. That is the reason why many artists and companies that work with musicians have sued some AI companies for using material without authorization. Firms including Sony Music, Universal Music Group and Warner Records say some AI companies have committed copyright infringement on an "almost unimaginable scale". They claim the pair's software steals music to "spit out" similar work and ask for compensation of $150,000 (£118,200) per work.

[@Dr._Nicolas]

Fellas don't treat artist bad, is always a bad idea, you might forgot what happened last time artist were treated badly, and at this rate i hope it never happens again

[@pauliboyx]

AI would have had a better answer to that question. Maybe AI should replace her instead.

[@AkiraDebiruman]

Why does she think she can decide which jobs are worth and whoch jobs are not? I mean...many people will reinvent themselves, ok(?) but many won't have the opportunity to do so. And that's a waste of talents.

[@corbeauwrite]

It's a sign of entitlement, or a complex of god. She think like this, because she really believe in her own bullshit. She probably got the job because she is a docile corruptible parrot.

[@TuMadre8000]

i don't think she knows what creative means

[@РАСЧЕЛОВЕЧИВАНИЕ]

And what good is there in a world where everything comes with blood and tears? Soon Al will create a phenomenal abundance, robots will work, and any talent can be obtained by swallowing a pill. And then the very need to be talented will disappear. This will be true happiness!

[@potoo6122]

Dear Dartmouth, be carefull who you openly support.

[@darthnick77]

What will you suggest to the people that lose their job due to GenAI? Return to school? Become poor? What if only 1% of humanity becomes interested in the "new jobs created" from GenAI? What do you do with the 99% remaining?

[@philipgodsworth4764]

These people need to go.

[@aritrafromseoorb5830]

If those jobs didn't exist in the first place, how would you train your LLM, sweetheart?

[@Zinimust]

She is like a robot. How smart is she??? These are the people that will take us to the next level in life. Imagine the pride that this university is taking from Mira.

[@gabrielandrade_art]

Creative jobs = Human jobs In case you were wondering what she meant by that. You who studied and worked hard to achieve what you have today, your job shouldn't even exist according to this person.

[@Anton3ch]

Oh come on she’s not talking about real creatives. She’s talking about people who produce shitty clickbait content

[@cjgportfolio]

I love how she’s propped up to be some thought leader and half of the words I hear coming out of her mouth are …”uhhh, ummm, uhhh, ummm”… repeatedly. Lol

[@david-3172]

Maybe SHE shouldn't be there in first place.

[@Mossmossmosss]

Disgusting

[@KiLVaiDeN]

It must be very funny to see the faces of those people in governments talking to advanced AIs and understanding that they will sooner or later (the sooner the better) become obsolete as AI systems will be able to create a brand new way of "governing" through participative democracy, check Steve AI in UK :) It's just the beginning !

[@lb8279]

These people literally want the matrix to happen. Everywhere you look in your daily life a person has designed or created something to help or entertain you. They want to eradicate that and make sure only the most boring jobs remain. (I’m sure they’ll make it so CTOs & senators are still needed somehow✌🏻🤪)

[@joannot6706]

The dude keeps interrupting and it's so annoying

[@bilcifer666]

"AI ethics" yeahhhh lol

[@ackerwoman16]

😂

[@bilcifer666]

@@LovelyBadminton-ll8cj me

[@nikoguarro]

Fortunately my job is witchcraft. Good luck making an AI for that. Also Human art will become a luxury commodity once it becomes rare enough. Plenty of visual artist will ne sellig their art as a rare thing in the future when everyone grows tired of how unimaginative AI Image Generation is.

[@MarcHudgins]

This is an infomercial -Dartmouth should be embarrassed.

[@NycroLP]

Complaining in youtube comments and twitter surely will help. I saw none of you caring for the EU election where we were able to choose for parties that strongly opposed big tech.

[@virtualbri]

Dartmouth should be embarrassed to have her as a graduate. Rip off actually creative people, spew it out as low quality hallucinations, sell it to corporations, and tell the creative people maybe you shouldn't have had the jobs in the first place. Monstrous.

[@StephenFord]

cringe boomer thoughts

[@eyeofthetiger7]

how do older people have anything to do with this, and why are you discriminating against older people?

[@aaronvdw]

The way Jeff Blackburn is all aflutter with everything she says.

[@alexander99099]

Folks, If we unite, then we can ensure that openAI and midjourney will either pay royalties to each artist, or the genAI features will simply be turned off. Music labels are already working to protect musicians and their rights to music. Artists, we should unite too

[@WealthForge44]

What will you teach your AI on when all the creative people stop writing good content, producing photos, art, videos, ... ?? Will your AI learn on itself? You know where that's going, right?

[@Inieel]

@@nindza79 Exactly. When LLMs run out of fresh content, they stagnate to the point of complete delusion. They should never even try to replace real people, their place is in the lowest tier, creating trashy placeholder content.

[@nightmarelyoko]

Ai only is for the lazy pick up a pencil learining isnt that hard , or hire someone your only option, while i support all these hacked groups going after your program

[@the_aj_system]

Everyone making the same point in his own words really adds to the conversation

[@frederickwelsh]

Mura Murati is coming into the public eye more and more. She does an excellent job of explaining where generative AI is now. I use GPT-4o all the time. I make my own small discoveries. Billions of people have to do the same thing. No one can know where this is going. Many can see obvious mileposts along the way. Muri answered correctly when she said AI will influence everything. It can be used for everything. Education is a transformative step. This video is part of that effort. Thank you all for your efforts in making it available.

[@kevinmasundire]

the idea that they don't know what they are building and hope that someone can find value for humans for it. it does not solve problems, because this shit is a massive threat to humans. avengers age of ultron type of shit.

[@claudioagmfilho]

🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👏🏻, We need to cure Cancer, HIV, Cystic Fibrosis, Alzheimer's, and the aging process. To achieve this, we need superintelligence; otherwise, we're already doomed and racing against time. Tick tock, tick tock...

[@filosofiadetalhista]

She said that low-quality creative work, which we can exemplify with generic social media posts, should not have existed in the first place. Such work is not fulfilling to anyone and only burdens the economy. Other creative jobs, she emphasized, will be easened and enhanced by AI tools. Seems fair.

[@sevocher]

???

[@janeboe9590]

There is one thing for certain, AI is a powerful tool. It can be super useful to iterate more quickly.

[@dnavenom]

Mira Murati needs to learn about soviet communism and property appropriation by the communist parties. I feel she would be very happy living under Stalin. Small hint thou - it didn't end well for the soviets. I feel it will be the same for Algorithmic generators too...

[@dnavenom]

@@nindza79 Are you telling me OpenAI is worst than Stalin? :)

[@BOOMOPERAMUSIC]

Im sick of Ai... Library Iv been selling my music on for 12 years made changes to the agreements with the authors last year and just sold our entire content to these ai companies... nice hyh? a year later they sold the whole company to competition..

[@Meredream87]

STEM never understands creative art

[@MarioSundays]

We are doomed...

[@agape13]

But what you don‘t understand or haven‘t yet experience is the fact that people are already losing their jobs and got replaced by AI: companies are resigning translators, call center employees are getting more and more replaced by AI , logistic replaces their employees by robots. There is less need for developers, AI also emerging into Analytics. Now, these are real experiences from real people. You might be still dreaming about beautiful future but reality is different.

[@kathmagu]

Was there also an interview with Joy Buolamwini - is there a video? Would be much more useful to hear from an actual expert with useful experience in the industry and a leader given Dartmouth is supposedly an Academic institution. Not sure why Dartmouth would be proud of their graduates lacking engineering experience and instead using their degrees as a calling card for crass management and PR roles that are embarrassing, inhumane and a pyramid scheme.