The 2021 Mazda CX-30 Turbo is a screaming value!

[@jjchockey]

Wow these comments. What are you guys smoking? This car is an absolute BARGAIN. You would have to spend 40-45k for an Q3 or X1 to get all of the features that this thing gets standard for 32k. You can save even more and get the base engine which is enough power for most peoples needs. Then there are people saying why would you get this over a CX5? Maybe because it is 4K cheaper, has a nicer interior, is lighter, has better handling, better acceleration, and better efficiency.

[@yordan826]

I totally agree with you and I expressed the same opinion on a CX-5 review, I would definitely get this over the CX-5 and the difference is not actually 4k if you compare the same trim is a little more, the CX-30 turbo fully loaded is 35k but the CX-5 also fully loaded with the AWD system (which comes standard in the turbo CX-30) is a little over 40k, so yeah.

[@Digitalfiendscom]

I got the CX-5 instead. I really dislike the massive plastic fenders on the CX-30; the rear seats and trunk are a bit cramped compared to the CX-5; and the interior on our CX-5 Signature is great. Nothing wrong with the CX-30, but there are trade-offs. You can’t go wrong with either one.

[@NierAutomata2B]

The top trim of CX-30 is more expensive than a turbo CX-5 Carbon Edition, right? I would probably get the CX5.

[@khronin]

@@NierAutomata2B If you get the 360 radar package etc the CX-5 is like 42k and the CX-30 is 35k

[@MirageTactics]

Your relationship with Dave makes every Mazda review so much better.

[@MotoManTV]

Thanks, Matt!

[@IamJay02]

@Manuel Landon Ah of course another bot comment promoting a scam

[@zadokmotorfreight2423]

@@IamJay02 what's the scam!

[@IamJay02]

@@zadokmotorfreight2423 It was a bot pretending to be motoman promoting a scam

[@zadokmotorfreight2423]

@@IamJay02 Ahh gotcha

[@jamesdavis6036]

Just purchased a 2022 CPO Turbo Premium. After filling up twice with Sunoco 94 octane, I put it throgh its paces. 0-60 in 5.76 seconds. The car has only 2,460 miles so I expect that might get better as it breaks in. I then took it upstate NY on Route 6. A six mile stretch downhill of a winding mountainous road. Some areas speed limit drops down to 35 MPH. In sport mode, I never dropped below 65 & as high as 80. As the vehicle leaned into the turns, I felt the powertrain favoring one wheel then another as it fought against gravity. It felt & sounded like a German luxury sports car with no turbo lag. Stability was true & solid. A real thrill! On parkway coming home at a steady 80 MPH it was quiet as a church. The Adaptive Headlights along with the auto-highbeams at night is amazing. Everywhere I went the road lit up like Yankee Stadium during a night game. Should be mandatory. Would save many lives. The Bose sound is real quality however I would of liked a sub-woofer volume button. For the money, you can't beat her!!!

[@Kelveron]

Love the dash design of the current generation of Mazdas. Classy looking analogue dials and tactile buttons, instead of distracting, finger smudged, multiple menus touchscreens.

[@BoopSnoot]

Mazdas screens are too recessed for average female height, too widescreen (not good for Waze), and its NEVER a good idea to remove options from users. The best systems are those that allow you to use controls on the steering wheel or center console, but also just let you touch the screen as well if desired. The uConnect 5 on the Durango is by far the best system I've tested to date. Mercedes is the best looking, but too complicated, and the Mazda is much too basic and small.

[@BoopSnoot]

Also, digital dashes are the future, and analog gauges are on their way out as they just aren't as configurable for obvious reasons. Even cheap cars like the Jetta have them now. Mazda may be so laser focused on driving dynamics that they've dropped the ball on tech.

[@jjchockey]

What? Mazda is not focused on driving dynamics. They are more focused on refinement and Luxury now. There cars gave gotten less fun in the last 5 years.@@BoopSnoot

[@Kelveron]

@@BoopSnoot My point isn't to remove options from drivers. I'm not anti-touchscreens, I just don't like to see all the controls being put on touchscreens. Touchscreens have their place for some functions, like GPS, some vehicle settings etc. So, it's not a case of either/or. My first point is that,, analogue dials look nice and classier for functions like the speedo, tacho, fuel etc. Second point, what happens when in a vehicle that has most (if not all) of its main controls on one screen (as in Tesla Model 3) and the screen fails? How are you going to operate the car then? Third point, buttons, knobs, switches and controllers are tactile, easier and safer to operate. You don't have to take your off the road to make sure you are hitting the right icon, as you do with touchscreens. Nor do you need to go through multiple menus to get some functions. So at least for those often used functions, a few short-cut buttons are definitely welcome as far as I'm concerned. I do agree with steering controls point. That is a good idea, but with controls as buttons, not the touch things, which some makers seem to be going with

[@kevinW826]

@@BoopSnoot not on the Jetta. A friend of mine has a 2019 Jetta and it’s all analog.

[@mikeredmond1000]

I've had several Mazda's in my life, always loved Mazda products

[@ernestbenoit1919]

Hey from PEI Canada! Thanks for the great review. I pick up my 2021 CX-30 GT AWD Turbo today. Excited! I liked the machine grey metallic so much that I bought it. What I didn't like; the non turbo version engine noise, the distortion in the front windshield on both versions, I can't place my golf clubs across the trunk, the speed limit not changing on the heads up display and chiming because it hadn't switched from the last lower school zone speed limit. What I loved; the little details like the position of the cup holders, the power seats/lumbar support/heated seats (I would have paid for cooling seats too), the power option of turbo that makes me smile with it's instant gratification of a younger version of myself, it's handling and composure if you push the thing, it looks beautiful no matter what color you choose (Kudos Mazda...or should I say Kodo), I really don't mind making the infotainment adjustments before I drive because small adjustments can still be made once I set off using the knob, this thing looks as great on the inside with it's browns and blacks as it does on the outside, parking the CX-30 is a breeze and I love the alerts and back up camera, the clearance for obstacles, it's easy to get in/out of and load cargo with a tired Veteran's body, the headlights turn into the corner to show you more of what's around that turn, I do not mind that I have to use the control knob on the console and that the screen is non touch-screen, I'm 5'-6" and 150 lbs so this vehicle is perfectly Smurf sized to fit me. I just turned 50 this month. So for my next midlife crisis purchase I will be buying those beautiful five star rims that Mazda sells in machine grey when spring rolls around. Cheers!

[@ejohnson3131]

I’m so glad they put cup holders on the engine cover for when I’m working on the car!

[@MrNemo721]

Love Dave Coleman's insight. I had a question on the 91 octane for a while and glad he could clarify that!

[@IceDree]

Always a pleasure to have Dave back.

[@MotoManTV]

FYI: Dave is also NOT a fan of the E65:)

[@bradbwh]

Excellent. As a 15-year MX5 driver (2 NBs), I love the final wish-list item: 2.5 Turbo engine in the Miata. That would push me straight to ND ownership.

[@jameswolfe8065]

250hp and 320ft-lbs would make a Miata a monster

[@staciecarverd8136]

Nice review! My second time seeing a review with "the Mazda guy." I appreciate this simple and colorful explanations, simple terminology, and story about how things came about to improve the brands performance.

[@gerardjoaquino8856]

Motoman: Can we have the 2.5T in a Miata? Miata Forums: Sure. How deep are your pockets? 😝

[@zoner__]

Dave Coleman, ask for a raise. I wish Mazda had the resources to make a 400hp sports car. That would be a world beater. Probably 8/10ths of a Porsche at 4/10ths of the price.

[@infamousrx8960]

heck yea Dad Coleman

[@effa114]

As others have said, you are the best source for Mazda content as you give us such great interviews with Dave.

[@jbm0866]

I do agree Mazda needs saddle brown option for their seats, but maybe a shade lighter than the trim in the CX 30 interior. That would look killer I think...but only Mazdas I care about are the Mazda 3 turbo and MX5.

[@jeffsteiner9053]

Is it just me...or does Dave Coleman sound and feel like Jon Stewart’s long lost brother?! Either way he’s fascinating and a pleasure to listen to. I learn something new every time he goes into depth on how certain vehicles or technologies came to be.

[@angelicaink3795]

On my way today to pick up the CX-30 Turbo!! :-) Glad to know I made the right choice.

[@frankenmizer828]

My plain ole normal CX-30 is plenty quick. I can only imagine the Turbo version..and COLEMAN! Did I mention I love the CX-30? :-}

[@rembo183]

The new 2022 Mazda 3 Turbo AWD is even better in my opinion. Great driving dynamics and nicer styling.

[@DMSparky]

That looks like a vehicle Alpha Romeo wishes they could build for that price.

[@felixli5279]

And at that quality and reliability level( i.e. Consumer Report's latest ranking)

[@LordBass]

So the Mazda 3 turbo hatchback is not fun or sporty, but the CX-30 turbo is kind of fun? Does not compute.. Always great to see Coleman.

[@kheldaryt]

don't like the CX-30 but think this point is kinda valid... Mazda 3 turbo under performs vs expectations/class and CX-30 turbo performs vs expectations/class.

[@leeraymer166]

This seems like a big improvement over the first gen CX-30. Great job Mazda! As far as putting this engine in the Miata, that would be great, but ask Coleman if it would actually fit the current ND Miata. I suspect they would really have to get creative to shoehorn this engine into that vehicle, but I’m always hopeful that they find a way.

[@darrell9616]

Very much appreciate having Coleman on this. It's great hearing the engineering behind the product. My only knocks against this car are the IMO excessive cladding and the need for a Signature trim that would make it a true competitor to the luxury brands. It's a very compelling package as it, but, with just a little more work, it would be outstanding.

[@kurtbilinski1723]

We just got one of these. I'm totally going to send this to my brother-in-law, a die-hard Land Rover guy. It'll drive him him crazy :) Regarding "techno-nannies", be sure to check your insurance rates first. That's because some "nannies" have proven to prevent some accidents, resulting in lower insurance claims, so even though the car may cost more up front, the cost of ownership over the years may actually end up less.

[@ChrisAllendestroysall]

What about turbo wear? Wouldn't premium gas be beneficial just to help prevent knock altogether?

[@yordan826]

Great review man!!!!, and an absolute beast of a car for the money, I'm torn between this and the Mazda 6 carbon, can you give me your professional opinion? Will mean a lot and thank you in advance.

[@jeffcobb8151]

I recently bought the CX-30 in the UK. I got the second highest spec with the 2L Sky Active X engine and its brilliant. I was looking at Mercedes A Class, A3 and similar things like that and I just couldn’t move away from the spec on the mazda, nothing came close. It is super comfy and has everything you need for not much money. My only gripe is the length. If it was slightly longer it would be great. Boot space isn’t really any different to the aforementioned cars and the space in the back isn’t great for anyone over 5ft 10 but for me (6ft 1) up front it is spacious width ways. People moan about the power but its fine and I don’t get why people moan about the speed. You don’t need, nor are you buying, a speed demon for this price. The handling on this thing is phenomenal though, can really chuck it around. No doubt the other Mazda is just as good. Go and sit in some and drive to try see whats best but Mazda have nailed the CX30

[@yordan826]

@@jeffcobb8151 Thank you so much for your insight.

[@felixli5279]

I owned both the 1st and 2nd gen 6 and the 3rd, current gen on skyactiv platform is even better. However, it has been on the market for over 8yrs and we all know the next, 4th gen on a brand new RWD platform with inline 6 cylinder compression ignition engine(i.e. skyactiv-x tech) will debut within the next 18mths. So I wouldn't invest in any new Mazda6 right now...even the cool carbon edition.

[@CorruptIgnition8]

Currently looking at buying one of these. The one thing they don't tell you is the cheap one has leatherette seats not leather seats. To me its Worth the little bit extra to get the premium trim for the seats alone. The premium PLUS package... I agree totally not worth the value.

[@jorgbrouwers5099]

Agreed the mx5 has been in need of a powerful engine for very long! I am thinking a lot about which cars are reliable and properly build which you would dare to buy new, for me that is either Mazda, Honda or Toyota. Mazda hasn’t got the model yet that would fit for me. Don’t like baby-buggies, need something of a BMW 5 series size preferably an all-road/cross country 4 wheel drive like the ones Audi/Volvo and Mercedes build, preferably with a 6 cylinder petrol. Mazda can do it, the designs of especially the concept cars are amazing! I love that Coleman takes the factory cars off-road and takes the effort to make them work 👍🏼 we need more engineers that do that

[@MotoManTV]

You should see what he does with his Cayman!

[@DazdnCofuzd]

Far as cx-30, I like to see them reduce that black cladding to maybe half, I see it in a lot of smaller crossovers and it just isn't visually appealing. I also think it needs a little wider tires/wheels to compliment the awd. And yes to the 2.5L turbo in the Miata.

[@williamcallaway2228]

Always straightforward and informative MotoMan! Just bought the 2021 CX-30 AWD Select trim. Love it!

[@MotoManTV]

Great car!

[@spenky]

I wish Mazdas would get the same love for the european markets. I would love the trail mode and the 2.5 Turbo engine! Instead we are getting the auto braking, the suround cameras and the lane keeping stuff that I couldn't care less about.

[@cedb7115]

Mazda should put this engine in the Miata. Please tell him

[@GianniBuroni]

A low rev-ing turbo with a diesel-like torque curve out of an SUV doesn't belong in a sports car. A Mazda version of Honda's FC20 displacing 2.5L and with a 9k redline would be a better idea. But then, the Miata becomes something else other than what it traditionally has been.

[@jae9843]

Such an underrated channel.

[@matthewwakefield9058]

I'm getting one on monday. For the Premium package, turbo, we settled on 31,500. Looking forward to it!

[@robertsoncatorce]

Is that out of the door price excluding the interest if paid monthly?

[@matthewwakefield9058]

@@robertsoncatorce Yes, includes the customer loyalty bonus tho since we have a CX-5. without it, 32,250. But you may be able to negotiate better than me. The base trim is only slightly cheaper and i didn't need the top trim since the middle trim has so much unless you really want the 360 camera view

[@matthewwakefield9058]

@@robertsoncatorce also, 0.9% on financing right now, not too shabby

[@robertsoncatorce]

@@matthewwakefield9058 the 0.9 financing depends well on your credit score which must be not less than 720.So it means you saved at least a 750 bucks having another mazda but i know most just gives 500 as loyalty.

[@matthewwakefield9058]

@@robertsoncatorce yeah, my credit is great so I hope you'rs is as well

[@richardbestii]

Finally, a reviewer willing to criticize the two-tone interior. I just don’t understand the choice of blue and brown. I love the black, and would love the all black interior. If you’re going to add brown or blue, then make the seats coordinate better. It’s just an odd choice. Maybe looks better in person, but in every review and picture it just looks so awkward. Otherwise love the vehicle, trying to figure out how I get myself into a 2.5 turbo right now, ha ha.

[@georgeharalambou6707]

Hey, love the car. I agree suspension is a little stiff. Also, I would have liked to have some height adjustment and adjustment to the passenger seat, a low windshield washer warning on dash, and a USB in back and under dash as on European models. Also maybe power retractable mirrors.

[@workharddieproud]

I’ve watched MANY reviews on the CX-30 and they’re all very positive.

[@chigasaki06]

I wish they made the Mazda 6 with Awd!

[@stanwesterlund2038]

I think Mazda made a mistake in trading out the Bose system for a sunroof in their Preferred package from 2020. I found that I rarely used the sunroof in cars I've had with them, but I listen to music every time I drive. I don't want a sunroof and I don't want to by their top of the line model to get the Bose sound, so as much as I like their products I won't be a customer.

[@MotoManTV]

Yes, I'm a sunroof guy, so a bit biased but here's a stab in the dark as to why: Resale. Cars with Sunroofs are valued higher and if two of the same car are sitting on the same lot, the buyer always chooses the car with the sunroof. Same cannot be said about ANY audio system.

[@digitaldoc100]

Not sure the Miata has room for a 2.5T. My question is why we can't get a turbo on the 2.0 that Mazda makes?

[@spike238]

The Asian spec CX-4 without the excessive plastic cladding looks amazing ,

[@michaels999]

Yup they should have just sold that everywhere instead of this

[@msalvag]

But Dave, what can I get with 94 octane?

[@tungol00]

I'm glad I'm in Canada I bought my cx-30 2.5T GT (premium plus in the U.S.) for $42 cad or $32,600 USD.

[@clayz1]

How come you cant get the turbo in a cx-30 Preferred package?

[@johnspooner4128]

I've seen some reports that the quality control in Mexico is not as good as the cars made in Japan, is that Bs what do you think?

[@tommoore2572]

Great video and it was a pleasant surprise to find Dave Colemen rides dirt bikes. He must also tow them there with the CX-5 as it sounds like he has it with him when he rides. I ride bikes too and my next vehicle will have to have towing capacity as I want to be able to head south from Canada in the winter. So far it looks like the CX-30 is not rated for towing and I can't understand why, especially with the beefed up suspension and turbo engine. The CX-30 Turbo will be my next vehicle if it has towing capacity.

[@MotoManTV]

Speaking of Canada, check out our friend and frequent guest host, @brianmakse and his take on the same car in the snow: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qWfFcqunq7-eZtU

[@eleanormassaro5195]

I thought I saw on another KZbin video that it had a 2000 pound towing capacity but not sure on that

[@tommoore2572]

@@MotoManTV Great advice. I already follow Brian, but didn't know he had done a review yet. Now I am subscribed with you too.

[@stuartkennedy4202]

Can we have this turbo edition for the U.K. please there is very little difference in emissions or in the MPG and I feel it would sell so quickly.

[@whatthe6532]

So true on the saddle coloured seats.

[@jimsteinway695]

I bought the CX 30 for $31,000 has most of the stuff you have here outside the Bose and traffic assist

[@joeytoribio2035]

Best cx 30 turbo review on youtube. FYI A JB4 piggyback flattens the torque curve to 5500rpm as you wished for. All for $500. Almost 400ft/lbs of peak tq at the crank.

[@richardmichael59]

And voids your engines warranty.

[@joeytoribio2035]

@@richardmichael59 what's your point?

[@richardmichael59]

@@joeytoribio2035 its not obvious? It VOIDS the warranty.

[@joeytoribio2035]

@@richardmichael59 All modifications void your warranty. Again. What's your point? I'm talking about modifications not warranties.

[@omgitsme435]

Tons of plastic cladding, Torsion beam rear, Made in Mexico..lots of cost cutting in that value.. I'd still take the larger, Japan made CX-5.

[@extraordinarywolf320]

Made in Mexico.... Thanks but no for me.

[@kheldaryt]

agree just can't see any argument for this vs CX-5... unless you're part of the ~1% that likes the look/size, don't see the point

[@jjchockey]

Maybe because it’s 5K cheaper when you get the Turbo, has a nicer interior, is lighter, better handling, better acceleration, better efficiency. If you don’t need the extra space this is clearly a better value.@@kheldaryt

[@kheldaryt]

@@jjchockey john, ha well not sure the price difference is that much but the main thing is I think people who are going SUV probably do need the space.... you did make me consider though that it's probably a better buy than the Mazda 3 turbo.

[@pabblackberry]

I agree. I just bought a premium 2021 cx 30 at the end of 2020 before the turbo was released and although I would like some more power, I can't just justify paying the extra $5,000 to get a turbo engine. If I wanted to pay $36+k on a cuv, I would have bought the Mercedes CLA.

[@felixli5279]

But a $36k MB GLA will be at base trim without features like 360 camera, adaptive cruise, real leather, adaptive headlights, upgraded bose sound sys, nav, HUD, and even really basic stuff like a heated steering wheel. At the same trim level, cx30 turbo is only about 2-2.5 grands more than a non turbo at MSRP. But Don't just take my words for it, check Mazda website if u don't believe me.

[@tonystormcloud8937]

I love my 2021 CX-30 so much I find myself looking for excuses to drive it like driving to Kroger for milk. Thank you for the Sport Mode and the beautiful interior.

[@phillm156]

Instead of the turbo 2.5 in the Miata. How about the 2.5 NA with 230-250 HP? And an 8k rpm redline.

[@bucketfootbaseball]

Exactly, given the torque curve I absolutely would not want this engine in a Miata.

[@MsCdngrrl]

Help me. About to get one of these. Turbo or not. I live downtown in a big city.

[@alexandrudicu5212]

Best looking and very reliable car.

[@jamiehalifax4954]

Has the direct injection carbon build up on the back of the valves been solved or do you still have to get the walnut blasting every so often.??

[@psewgobind]

Advantage of primitive suspension, is ease of performance add-on. Comparatively, the more complicated Kona system (designed by Magna on multi-link rear suspension) does well in extreme snow and doesn't need traction control to be safe (assuming capable driver). If Hyundai AWD system can handle the 'N' power...it'd make for a great comparison...however, stupid buyers think bigger is better.

[@jamiehalifax4954]

I love my super mini cx 3 !! Its a blast . The smaller the car the faster you feel your going !. Have fun without getting a speeding ticket and get a cx3. If you find it too cramped. Lose weight!!

[@grandpuba3831]

I agree but... add the $4k VT supercharger kit ... looking hard at popping it in my CX-3 AWD...an interesting option to get some Zoom Zoom happening...

[@billmic9039]

OMG!!! Please Dave Please put this motor in the Miata!! I will trade in my 2019 in a heartbeat!

[@MotoManTV]

Don't ask him. He uses is own money to stuff motorcycle engines in Miatas.

[@nemo7061]

Hi Motoman I have a qeustion i thought it would be nice if u did that q&a thing u did in the past where we can ask qeustions/observations to coleman cause i got several. 1- one of a most heard complaint about mazda is that intterieur packaging is terrible why doesnt mazda do something about that ? if u are going to make a sleek design and sacrafice space for looks atleast try to get the most out of the available space u have! look at the luxe germans bigger cars with rwd they make the dashboard as slim as possible so it doesnt stick out to much in the interiuer ergo everythign can be placed more forward and u have more space combine that with thin seats like volvo does and u have a very useable interieur space. I have noticed that in the new mazda 3 range so hatch sedan and cx30 the dashboard sticks out to much in the interieur and the seat back also are kinda of thick despite the cutout. I would suggest to do something about that with model year update or facelift i know the mazda 3 sales arent doing well added space might help with better sales. also maybe do someting about about the suspension make it softer atleast in the rear to compensate for that damned torsion beam if u go over a a speed bump u will know what i mean... 2- why isnt there a signature trim for the mazda 3 range ???? in the netherlands where i live all the mazda models have an signature trim at the top of the range even the b segment mazda 2 and cx 3 but not the mazda 3 range wich tops out at the luxury trim strange... to come back to the ridiculous 4 grand extra for the plus package u mention at the end of the video i think if u made that trim as a signature with nappa leather all that fance stuf that price i think would be more justified. 3- why wont mazda update the auto transmission in terms of speed of shifting i know the auto shifts 0,4 seconds slower then the manuell transmission its not hard to do there are tunening companys that offer software to do just that makeing the auto a nicer to drive with. also do something about the flippers they shift slower. 4- pannoroof or glass roof for the 3 range get more light in the dark intirieur and have more head room (much heard complaint for the 3) win win. 5- adding feateres that are avalable in the luxury segment and not the whitegoods cars to give it a more luxe feel forexample add ventilated seats in the 3 range with heated and cooled cupholders like mercedes does and heated/ventilated seats in the back also quad zone climate zone rear airvents heated/cooled cupholders rear rear sunshades usb ports..heres a couple and u could offer them all in a signature trim. could justify the higher price. 6- how about a 2 plus 2 configuration in the mazda3 just like the kai concept 7- how about adding the clubsport trim to the mazda 3 range just like the mx 5 billstein dampers,brembo brakes,bbs rims,recaro seats front and rear 2 plus 2 configuration add the steering wheel out of the mx5 and gear selector would be cool. not a qeustion but i always wonderd why mazda didnt offer the frameless door windows like on the kaiconcept i think this would really set it appart. I am probally just talking to myself here but motoman please pass these on to mr coleman maybe they will listen to him. I am not critisizing or anything i just want mazda to succeed and do better they are the last car manufacturer that i stil like. They want to play with the big boys like they are saying they want they gotta go all in and not cheap out instead of not adding something just to keep the price down just add it price increase and all if not u will just get shit on by so called car journallist to complain about it. Also sorry for my bad english Kind regards Nemo

[@MotoManTV]

Hey Nemo! Thanks for the good feedback. Can answer the point about the Signature trim. Simple answer: Cost. This one we drove was already US$36,000 . . . Signature would bring too close to US$40,000. Kind of the same answer to the frameless doors. As for Q&A, you will see that make a return is a slight different form shortly. Thanks for watching!

[@inctru]

Turbo is overkill (IMO), guts MPG, & creates a significant new potential failure/problem point for the engine. I test drove both & was perfectly happy with a 2022 CX-30 CE-Preferred (standard 2.5L non-turbo engine) instead. Great little Crossover - easily the best in its price range segment & then some. Also, zero issues/problems to report after one year thus far.

[@hewer1953]

Per your suggestion, I’m a expat in Cancun Mexico. Needed a new car , wanted a CX-30 . Saw in my news feed we have now a 2.5 turbo model. Goodie , let’s go see . The Mazda store had two in the showroom. We don’t have the five levels of trim here . We have a El cheap o and a Turbo AWD , Touring model . That was the one we liked. They can have us one in 30 days . How much ? $27500.out the door . No extras are permitted in Mexico. That’s still $556,000 Mexico pesos so it’s not cheap . We picked it up last Week. Been raining all week , so we have kept it home and drove the old RAV4 since then but a road trip is in our future. We kinda got your wish . I don’t need 12 speakers , 360 degrees camera, heated seats , blah blah . I got turbo

[@pascalparent3137]

What are the other options at 36k$ exactly?

[@MotoManTV]

Keep in mind, at US$36,000, options are not just CUVs. Here are some: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bZfOZ36ri6aMlbc kzbin.info/www/bejne/inqwaqOkrdRopMU kzbin.info/www/bejne/hIike5eoetlompY (NOT the First Edition) kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpzXm32mnrCBjbs US$5K more and a MUCH more fulfilling package: kzbin.info/www/bejne/m3fHk6pjqdVle5o Base only - no options if one needs a badge: kzbin.info/www/bejne/noPReHptZ8-ejpY And US$3K more for BASE - which is very well equipped: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fnWxaqKto7OoaMU

[@joebledea]

I'm not sure why you're so surprised by the cost of accessories. Toyota and Honda do the same, and sometimes even more expensive, plus these two brands are not trying to go upmarket like the Mazda. You expect all season floor mats for free, just because it has AWD? It would be nice, but from a business standpoint does not make sense. The one area where they cut cost is certainly rear suspension, interior volume, and mediocre tires. I would pay extra and get the CX5 base turbo trim.

[@Phirozdavide]

Excellent review. Excellent SUV. Excellent Mazda.

[@MarkRVillano]

Tuners shoehorn five liter V8s into Miata's every day, so I can't see how that 2.5, even with the turbo would be a problem.

[@EARLandPEARL-c3i]

the wheel black wells are a big dealbreaker for me...I would get it in black if it came with a tan interior

[@ricrodriguez6114]

How do you compare cx-30 to the the Cx-5 turbo which is on my shortlist this year?

[@BoopSnoot]

You should probably ask yourself first what your goals are. Will a CX-5 turbo fit in your garage? If so, its not that much heavier, maybe 250lbs max, it will have a longer wheelbase that helps ride quality without sacrifice, and it will have more interior room. In a drag race, you aren't likely to notice any difference between the two, so you have to ask why you want the smaller vehicle and if it makes sense to make those sacrifices if the price isn't that much different either.

[@ricrodriguez6114]

Thanks. Currently have a v6 cx9 and Mazda3 in the garage and was curious in driving dynamics. Most passengers are surprised by the v6 cx9’s ride.

[@MotoManTV]

Both good cars, but quite a bit more money for the large CX-5.

[@BoopSnoot]

@@MotoManTV Not really. CX5 Turbo Carbon Edition = $31,935. CX-30 2.5 Turbo = $31,720.

[@10tenman10]

I would get the CX5 turbo. Four wheel drive.

[@maryannkarlvalois7597]

hi: Love your videos!!! Would you buy a Mazda 3 or a Mazda CX-30???

[@cusebike5391]

It depends on your priorities. I own both. The 3 is more fun to drive and gets decidedly better gas mileage. The 30 is more practical. They're both very good for they're intended purpose.

[@darrellyelity3648]

A Mazda Miata 2.5 turbo with a 6 speed manual.

[@diydrivenGA]

I need to see this compared to a Kona N

[@VitoC.]

Brian brought me here

[@MotoManTV]

@brianmakse is a good man!

[@ryanlin1299]

91gas can get 250hp?

[@nls8520]

Nice looking crossover. But...big beefy 2.5 liter lol

[@cueballB]

How is 36000 dollar too much for a 250 hp, full option compact suv, that is arguably as premium dressed as an Audi or bmw of 45000 to 50000 dollar?

[@khronin]

I just bought one--and plus it has 320 lbs of torque down low.I paid 35k out the door for one that 6k miles on it.Car prices are high right now--just sold my stinger for way more then I paid for it.So I own this CX-30 outright and was able to pocket several thousands of dollars.I rent Q3 on business trips and this Mazda is at least equal with that and is easily 10 to 15k less.This Mazda feels faster because of the torqu down low.These little performance CUVs are the way to go.They are as fast as sports cars were a generation ago and have modern features and you can even go offroad.I owned a Mustang 5.0 in the early 90s and this CX-30 would eat thats cars lunch in every aspect--so when you put things in perspective--this is a fantastic value.BTW toyota 86 and new civics--subraru imprezas and even a golf GTI is in this price range.This mazda is a combination of all those cars and can go offroad--btw they dragged the AWD Turbo mazda 3 and it beat a new GTI in the quarter mile--and this thing is within .1 of that==so this has better performance then a GTI.My neighbor has an X1--a 2020 and my CX-30 is better in every way--looks performance and was 7k less then the bimmer. My Brother has a new honda HRV and there is no comparison.He even asked me today why I get cars with performance--I told him wait till he drives it in the next few days.

[@Closertotruth2]

Just buy a Miata, put your stuff in the passenger seat and drive alone. Much more fun.

[@lyntongardiner598]

Every car design involves compromise. My leased ‘21 CX30turbo ticks enough boxes to make it a satisfying all rounder for me here in Miami. 15:01 Likes: Style, quality build, torque and speed, and excellent driver position/front seat comfort. Dislikes: mediocre fuel economy, choppy ride on uneven pavement, poor outward visibility and excessive centerline steering sensitivity at highway speeds. Overall for my needs, it’s a great little whip. If you need more interior space, get a CX5. Again compromises.

[@babaker48]

Unfortunately in Canada the Turbo only comes one way. Loaded with all the extras Still a great value though. Now If you just hadn't mentioned the saddle brown seats. I won't be happy until I can get them.

[@felixli5279]

Not true. Mazda canada offers precisely 2 trim levels on the cx30 turbo: base and with premium package. And that base trim(e.g. real leather seats) is not really basic at all....especially when comparing with the base trim of a MB GLA or BMW X2(e.g. both leatherette seats)

[@babaker48]

@@felixli5279 not sure where you are located but here in Ontario the 2021 Mazda CX-30 Turbo only came one way - loaded which is fine bc its worth every penny. ps I have had mine for 2 weeks.

[@donr2670]

Any chance a 6'4" driver can find enough head room?

[@MotoManTV]

Coleman is not much shorter and he fits without issue.

[@migy5031]

Factory Turbo Miata! 👍👍👍

[@sandsmarc]

I didn’t want safety nanny bits like blind spot monitoring. Until I drove a CX-30 that had them. The heads up display actually lights up when someone is in either of your blind spots. It’s fantastic and makes me a better driver. You can drive faster and more confidently with the safety bits. Sorry, I like them and they are worth $4,000. I will have them in my 2022 CX-30 Turbo Premium Plus.

[@BlackNAVYAmericanVET]

Tell Ken WE NEED A MANUAL please ! 👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼

[@gordongt1272]

Would you buy it if it had one? If you say you`d think about it, that explains why Mazda won`t make it. We all think about it, but there aren`t enough of us to support a market for manuals. If the automatic is a deal breaker, I`m afraid you might be missing the boat on this outstanding vehicle.

[@zlatkozivkovic8694]

love my mazda cx 30 turbo awd...

[@kristy77a]

Fine car and am seeing an uptick of them in my urban/residential neighborhood. But ... CX-5 still a better value and utility. And if it's Zoom-Zoom one wants, I'm still leaning VW GTI Mk8 when I put Queens NYC in the proverbial rear view mirror for a new return to my ol' life in the Golden State.

[@MotoManTV]

Slightly off topic: DON'T come back to the Kalifornia Republic! We are in a mess . . . wait and see if things turn around.

[@dg7438]

What other options do you recommend for 36k? Something SAV/SUV like w/ the power, etc

[@fredmiller6038]

Please review Subaru Outback XT Touring

[@MotoManTV]

We do not feature Subaru on the show.

[@Simulera]

Nah, buy the blower or buy the family van. They’re both fine. (Buy the blower, they’re not lowering the price, come on. Maybe be wheels are too high. Ok that.)

[@skuzzyj]

Radar cruise + lane keep should just be standard equipment. Make the 360 camera and radar parking doodads each an option. And, I don't know if that's the case on this car, but can we get away from having optional forward lighting? You shouldn't have to pony up big bucks to have headlights that don't suck. I've driven modern cars with worse forward lighting than the old 1980s 55w sealed beams in my first car. Come on, y'all. Let's stop doing this.

[@jjchockey]

What? The 22k base model comes standard with full LED lighting front and rear as well as radar cruise control and lane keep assist.

[@skuzzyj]

@@jjchockey Cool. I'm saying, do that all across the whole board. Every make and every model.

[@jbm0866]

Screaming value? If it stickers for a single dollar more than the Mazda 3 turbo, its not a value at all. The 3 is slightly faster, handles better...and heres the truly "shocking part"...has nearly 2 cubic feet more cargo space with the rear seats folded. Literally the only thing you're getting with CX 30 is slightly higher ride height, a little more rear seat headroom and of course those gawdawful plastic wheel spats. Lol

[@steve9377]

People value things differently. Some people don't care if the Mazda3 is slightly faster or handles better. Some people value the higher ride height, more headroom and being able to take it on a light trail. Funny thing is Autoblog did a cargo capacity test on the Mazda3 Hatchback vs. CX-30 and the CX-30 was able to carry more despite having slightly less cargo volume. The CX-30 had more usable space.

[@felixli5279]

Re the rated cargo volume of 3 vs cx30, it's often about the shape of the cargo area rather than the absolute volume measurement. That's why people often hv the perception of suv/cuv having more cargo space than their lower-height hatchback car equivalents despite actual volumetric measurements say otherwise.

[@jbm0866]

@@steve9377 That may be true, but anyone who needs every inch of cargo space on a regular basis should probably consider something other than the Mazda 3/CX 30.

[@jbm0866]

@@felixli5279 That may be true, but how often would anyone use all the available space on either one of these? If its often..should probably look into a mid sized crossover. Having said that, I do appreciate the fact Mazda gives us variations of the same car, but that used to be done by offering a wagon version, something I wish were still a thing.

[@khronin]

@@jbm0866 Yep--I bought a crosstour years ago while married and we never even got close to filling the hatchback--even when we had bicycles--if you need anything more then these can carry--you need a small pickup.I just bought a CX-30 and can fit an ebike in the back of it--and can go up to the mountains and offroad to get to trails.I just sold my stinger--made more money on it then I paid for.The biggest relief right now is sitting up higheer and not worying about my rims or front end getting scraped up.In the year and a half i owned my stinger i never went to the mountains once because if a road turned into a trail or a badly maintained road--that was it.A mazda 3 is the same--you are sitting barely off the ground and visibility is awful.Visibility in the CX-30 is way better then my Stinger or a Mazda 3.

[@tacc24]

Dave. This is a beautiful vehicle. Can you tell me why none of these vehicles are available in a coupe 2 dr. I'm not an off road guy, and this would be my sports car. I'm in my 70's, and I now drive a a stick Mustang GT. I like sporty cars, with 2 doors. Why don't you beat out other car companies, and build a coupe. I will immediately place my order for one...if it had 2 doors. you would sell TONS of these, and others vehicle you sell in the Mazda line. I'm not interested in the Mazda sports car. Thanks

[@vaporm0nkey92]

35k for a quarter of the exterior covered in hideous plastic. one of the ugliest things I've ever seen. Great video as always!

[@dioseolo]

Back seats are way too uncomfortable for my taste.

[@MotoManTV]

Agreed.

[@ohcanadaeh]

I will spend a few more dollars and get the CX5 turbo, more value for the price you pay.

[@JasonSmith-vp6vl]

@Paul Attard Damn, the socialist colonies are a ripoff. You're closer to Japan and yet its way cheaper in the US. CX5 Turbo here goes for around $30K USD, or $38K Dollorydoos. The real winners are Koreans buying Korean cars in their own country, waaaay cheaper than anywhere else in the world.

[@felixli5279]

CX5 appears as a better value today but on an older platform(basically dated from 2012) and tech architecture(that screen interface provides a big clue) than cx30. Nex gen cx5 on a brand new platform will debut within the next 18months.

[@AndyDufresne4]

It’s a 4cyl single turbo. Not really much of a shoehorn

[@BlackNAVYAmericanVET]

Needs a manual ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@gordongt1272]

Mazda would be lucky to sell 100 of these with a manual. The Type R or Miata needs a manual. Almost nothing else does.

[@tousshong9438]

Great to have the more pony but 8K more then the regular CX-30....it's not going to sell well just like the Toyota Rav4 V6 in the days. Toyota finally figure it's not worth it and chop it. I can see this one is heading toward the same fate.

[@felixli5279]

The one 8k cheaper contains far, far, far less equipments, features and at much lower specs. Smart consumers never judge solely on price. Must see what exactly Mazda is charging that 8k for.

[@snarkranger]

Count me as a CX-30 Turbo owner who wouldn't have bought one otherwise. Just having modestly more room and a newer platform wasn't worth upgrading to a CX-30 from my CX-3. But add a factory turbo engine with 70% more horsepower and 100% more torque? Sold.

[@ltkwok]

Stuff it in the MX5!

[@armyandblink47]

Based on rumors, Mazda and Toyota will be merged. Toyota has a new Yaris gr powered by a turbocharged 3-cylinder engine and it’s potent. Unfortunately, we are not getting the Yaris gr in the US. How about implant the turbocharged 3-cylinder engine to mazda miata. What do you think? The Mazda CX 30 is a nice vehicle but the plastic cladding ruins the beauty. I think it’s perfectly fine if the cx30 doesn’t look similar to mazda 3. With an impressive performance and plastic cladding is not a good combination at $35,000 in my opinion. Anyways, I am looking forward for the new Mazda turbocharged I6 engine. When will it be available on the rear wheel drive biased awd CX9?

[@MotoManTV]

Kumo and I definitely want to try out the Yaris GR!

[@armyandblink47]

@@MotoManTV , Thank you so much for your response. I really appreciate it.