The 2023 Cadillac CT5 3.0T Is The Ultimate Driving American Sports Sedan

The term ultimate driving machine has always been used by BMW, but the #CadillacCT5 has always been the American version of that phrase. The #CT5 traces its lineage to the #CadillacCTS from over 20 years ago and the latest model is still one of the best driving sport sedans on the market.
We're also on:
Instagram: / redline_reviews
Facebook: / liketheredline
Twitter: / tweettheredline

[@dtay8913]

This would be darn near perfect if they'd just give it some different interior colors and give it the new single screen set up like in the Escalade and lyriq

[@bobbowie9350]

The styling is god awful though. Look at that budget cpillar and the rear. 5:59 huge gap with the taillights and the trunk lid. Just awful

[@Stressless2023]

@@bobbowie9350 I kind of agree about the C pillar behind the rear door glass but it isn't as offensive to me anymore as it was when this car first debuted, especially in darker colors. I think the styling and proportions of this look pretty good overall personally, just the overall interior is crap, although in lighter/two-toned colors it looks slightly better at a glance, but still too down-market.

[@mybro727]

@@bobbowie9350 the c pillar looks great, y’all always trying to push that narrative like it’s a fact that it’s “cheap looking “. That’s just your opinion. I personally love the side profile of this car, it isn’t the same boring DLO found on Germans, japs, and Lincolns.

[@wazgoodjj]

@@bobbowie9350 beauty and style is subjective. I thinks its a gorgeous exterior

[@rickjohnson2859]

2024 the CT5 will get a new interior that will feature the Escalade widescreen.

[@christianstylezinc9224]

Part of Cadillacs charm is the simplicity when it comes to things like the seats and what not…. Luxury doesn’t have to be over the top goddy and tasteless… luxury isn’t always grandeur

[@michaelminster9239]

It's gaudy and this interior sucks.

[@DiamondsRexpensive]

Words mean things. Simple isn't luxurious.

[@Historicallygamified]

I sat in one. All of the materials feel great and at this price point, nothing beats it.

[@sl0907]

Simplicity? Coming from the company that literally threw gaudy plastic chrome in all their interiors for the past few decades? They are selling u a bigger premium car at 3 series price so obviously corners were cut when doing the interior. This also doesn't sell anywhere as well as it's competitors so not as much budget/effort is put into the details. U go look at the new escalade and tell me that looks "simplistic". No the design, tech, and materials are far more impressive and actually competitive even with vehicles above its price range. U can obviously tell they spent more time and effort as it's one of their big sellers.

[@mybro727]

Sorry Soyfan, what’s silly is how reviewers have not gotten over the very simple nomenclature from Cadillac, but you make no mention of how silly it is to name something the “BZ4X” or the “RX450h”. You never say _anything_ about these ridiculous “names” from the Japanese or even Germans. What’s so “silly” about the power output in newton meters? A universal and simple way to display a measurement of power for both ICE & EVs. Please, cut it out! Your personal taste is fine with me - but at least be consistent in your criticism. The Genesis G80 isn’t attractive to everyone. Cadillac got the design and proportions correct here while the G80 looks too long in the rear, too long in the front, and resembles a canoe 🛶 traveling down the road from certain angles. From the front Genesis appear to be *unfinished* with their Cadillac crest shaped grilles. Lol. You’re very nitpicky whenever you’re in a GM product though, and it’s weird since GM is who HMG loves to get design cues and styling inspiration from.

[@coxgaspoweredtether]

Just picked mine up. Crystal white tricoat, light beige interior makes it! Yes that plain black interior is ng. Gotta order it right... Twin Turbo all wheel drive V6 10 speed auto, roof, bose, loaded up, and w semi autonomous drive called super cruise, awesome car! Uses AI on super cruise for auto passing and driving, on hiway....Last of a breed!

[@mrreginator]

Any issues so far?

[@coxgaspoweredtether]

@@mrreginator 12k, No issues. Got PPF protective film on the front nose and ceramic coating...Car does 13s in the quarter mile and the ride is perfect, smoith and quiet.

[@woody7155]

​@@coxgaspoweredtether thank you sir 🫡

[@wazgoodjj]

​@@coxgaspoweredtetherlol. 12k?? It better have no issues. Let us know if it makes it to 100k. 😊

[@reallyfijateperocomocono1131]

I prefer a Cadillac it’s American made unlike the favored Mercedes or genesis… I have my 2020 ct5 sport fully loaded, and just got my Escalade same way loaded, but understandable Cadillacs are not for everyone even reviewers.

[@rahimi4762]

Acura TLX is American made

[@reallyfijateperocomocono1131]

@@rahimi4762 Acura is a Japanese brand and yes you are correct is American made. I don’t recall speaking about Acura though but good info.

[@sl0907]

​​it's a Japanese brand that was created for the American Market tho. Most of the r&d and manufacturing is in America. They don't have Acura branded cars in japan at all.

[@mr_gamble_good]

This is definitely a beautiful car and a great review. I wish Cadillac offered a model or series that appealed to someone who remembers old school Cadillacs. Namely, softer leather and a softer ride. CT5 D'elegance sounds great to me lol.

[@gregkramer5588]

I can sympathize with that. But, those type of cars just do not sell.

[@gesalbte]

Nobles of the early Ottoman Empire preferred sofa beds because they lived a toilsomely active lifestyle. In the last days of the Ottoman Empire, they favored watching horse racing to pretend they were brave. Before the 1960s, Americans were physically prepared for war and spent their leisure time in hunting, so they needed the cushy and restful Fleetwood or Eldorado. Nowadays, the American elites favor the so-called "luxury sports cars," so to pretend they are into racecar driving.

[@evanwatkins6902]

Looking forward to the facelift. Expecting updated exterior styling and a curved display

[@CKPHH]

I would want one if it come with the new Info system

[@MercOne]

Will there even be one?

[@CKPHH]

@@MercOne if only we know 😬

[@evanwatkins6902]

@@MercOne There have been spy photos of them, you can look it up.

[@MPDLR]

Drove nothing but GM for 27 years - usually GMCYukon Denali and Cadillac Escalades. Just got badly burned by GM warranty. The Dealer even secretly showed me what GM said to him and what GM rules were. I admit - I like this CT5 but I now am worried about GM warranty service. It costs more but I'm thinking MDX--S or E450. Safe motoring to all, enjoy.

[@stapletonwill]

Crazy how domestic brands like GM, Ford etc. have the best customer loyalty in the industry but don't care.

[@re14437]

I have the E450 and love it. You CANNOT go wrong with it. Spec’d with Air Suspenstion, Acoustic Comfort Package and some other goodies. Best interior in the class.

[@MPDLR]

@@re14437 Thanks! Retired - 1st kid in college 3 years from now. Love the E450 but hoping to fall in love with the new CX-90 or something like that.... that tuition thing is quite a thing :)

[@dextersmithbsee]

Carl Bonroy, I would avoid them all together and shop other brands. GM service and warranty has gotten better over the years, but as a previous (I emphasis previous) owner of 2 GM vehicles, both of which were nothing but junk, I will not be shopping for a new or used GM vehicle anytime soon.

[@joetaylor2038]

You can tell he doesn't like this car. He refers to it as silly multiple times.

[@Stressless2023]

He seems to be more indifferent - You can tell he liked pretty much everything about the driving characteristics but that didn't quite seem to outweigh the overall depressing interior.

[@Lionsheartification]

If it isn't German or Italian he won't like it or he'll refer to it as "good for an American car"

[@bitkahuna]

no, he really likes the chassis / handling but doesn't like the interior (justifiably).

[@Stressless2023]

@@Lionsheartification He mostly only buys American branded cars so he's clearly not biased. He just had a Mustang Mach-E and just bought a new Wrangler.

[@mybro727]

@@Stressless2023 That’s because Americans make the best EVs and that’s undisputed. We’re not saying he’s delusional, I think folks are saying Soyfan likes to push his personal preferences onto the viewers by telling us what “looks” better to him.

[@LAY_OUTKING]

Just got this car And I love it I do prefer this more small screen then the big screens in the class Great review as always.

[@LafemmebearMusic]

Can I ask what made you get this vehicle given that for the price the interior seems just not to meet the competition and no I don’t just mean Germans. If we just go based on Korean and Japanese luxury vehicles which are also better made and last longer, what made you make this choice? Real question just curious.

[@LAY_OUTKING]

I got this car cuz its just a simple but I did want a luxury badge thats why its been the best Luxury car too me I just get in and I know how to use everything.

[@DietBajaBlast]

@@LAY_OUTKING tell us one thing about the car he didn't mention.

[@mybro727]

@@LafemmebearMusic Well first you have to be willing to accept the fact that you’re wrong. The build quality of materials used in the CT5 are on par with its German rivals and the Koreans who wish to be them. Soyfan, like other reviewers, will complain when a vehicle isn’t ultra luxuriously wrapped in stitched leather from head to toe. Well Cadillac kept their prices down and that’s why you see slightly less expensive materials mixed with higher end materials like the piece of plastic underneath the infotainment screen that’s designed not to show fingerprint. Cadillac prioritizes usability, conservativeness, comfort, and intuitive functionality over bling and attempting to be gaudy/flashy. You would need to get out of the house and go test drive one and then you’d know why Soyfan _also_ choose this over the Genesis G70 it competes with last year during that head-to-head.

[@jackd232]

using wireless carplay and compalning about the resolution.....plug your phone with cable you see better resolution, it's the same with all new cars......I don't know if you're professional reviewer or not at this point........

[@grfd600]

A few corrections here = The fuel for this 3.0 TT is premium gasoline as a requirement NOT as a a recommendation, so those of you looking at this car, please keep that in mind. The 4 cylinder version of this car can burn either and premium is not required as it is in the 3.0 V6. The front grill dose have an air curtin intake toward the bottom of the grill - so there is some functionality, not just "looks". Also, the "these are not fog lights - they are an accent light when the headlights are on" is partially true. Yes, they are not fog lights. False that these are 'accent' lights. They are cornering lamps that turn on at low speeds when the turn signal is on and turning the steering wheel. These do not come on automatically when the headlights are on. This is a great value for what you get. As stated in the video, this is a good competitor to others in the segment that cost thousands more. Maybe not as luxury, but this is more sport and performance than luxury. Good to see that Cadillac still makes a 'full size', RWD longitudal 'big engine' sedan. It has to after all; it's the only domestic offering of this type from any manufacture. Everything today is in cross-overs, SUV's and trucks. Like station wagons in the 60's, full size vans in the 70's, mini-vans in the 80's, big SUV's in the 90's and now cross-overs, each segment of vehicle comes and goes during the course of time - hopefully this will stick around for awhile.

[@RLTtizME]

Do you have to have a formidable bald spot and white shoes and belt to own this?

[@gregkramer5588]

@@RLTtizME Why, are sport sedans in for old people while young people are infatuated with rugged looking minivan substitutes known as crossovers?

[@gesalbte]

SUVs are for the stupid, ugly, and vain. Coupes and sedans are timeless and forever.

[@pbtrey8]

The front of the cadillac used to be so bold. Love the new rear lights, but man they should have kept the vertical style front headlights

[@dandykema1090]

Make it reliable as a Lexus and it would be a hit

[@latino914]

Malibu looks different these days

[@bamac2008]

😂😂😂😂

[@Erin-Thor]

It sure I like the car, but I loved your review. How you can remember all that info on each specific vehicle is amazing. 👍🏽😎

[@paulpierce21]

Thanks for educating and entertaining us for so many years.

[@lions208436]

I've driven this car a few times..The car has presence in person and styling that I personally think looks better against it's actual rival the TLX. The G70 is a little smaller, but for the money I'm definitely getting the G70 3.3t

[@rahimi4762]

TLX inside and out looks way better

[@gesalbte]

The TLX arguably has more reliable electronic components, but the CT5 with V6 is just a superior car overall.

[@lions208436]

@@gesalbte you're probably right. I had three GM cars. A 2011 Malibu LTZ, 2016 ATS and 2017 Volt. The volt was a piece of 💩, so I won't count that one. However, the Malibu and ATS were solid, but when both hit over 50k miles I started experiencing some electrical gremlins with both of them. The Caddy had the cue replaced once and never had an issue again, got rid of the Malibu at 125k miles because the hydrologic steering went to trash

[@jbm0866]

Other than the seats which don't look very supportive for enthusiastic driving, I'm not really seeing the cost cutting and sub par build quality in the interior? I mean there is nothing about it that's unique or has a "wow factor" like Mercedes and such, but sometimes simple, attractive and functional is what you want, and this seems to fit the bill. I even like the body styling as well, but once again...no wow factor and pretty much looks like what Caddy has been doing for a while now. I've never been a Caddy fan, but this thing has a great powertrain and suspension...meaning if the price difference vs the competition is significant, this would definitely be something to at least test drive for someone looking for a midsize sports sedan. Since I live near the Toyota headquarters (and Toyota/Lexus has always been popular down here) I see tons of IS, LS etc as well as Acura, BMW and Mercs everywhere...this would actually be a unique choice. Who am I kidding, the mid size sedan aspect alone makes it unique these days😂

[@mybro727]

So in other words, Cadillac knows this market *better* than Genesis. I can’t say I’m shocked. 😂 Too many reviewers push the narrative that if you’re not ultra and gaudy in terms of luxury that you’re failing. Sales numbers would beg to differ. The reality is not everyone has the same priorities - and that’s why reviewers should stop forcing their personal preferences into viewers. The build quality is great. The technology is top tier, and the intuitiveness of the interiors make them a WIN compared to the CTS of yesteryear. Cadillac may add more luxury later, but they will never be the wannabe Mercedes-Benz alternative which Genesis has become. Genesis is becoming the new Lincoln - an old man’s brand. That’s usually what I see driving the G80 around and it’s fitting. Cadillac builds products for *all demographics* to find a happy place somewhere within the lineup and you can be 16 or 60 and look at home in a CT5. *Timeless design.*

[@scottsnothome5649]

Unwatchable. I mean he contradicts himself with nearly every sentence uttered.

[@chudson4500]

He literally has the most bias reviews, It's so annoying

[@jeffwilliams6374]

This is one of the best cars I have ever driven.

[@uncledamfee2347]

It’s a shame because Cadillac is a legendary name - The car itself it stunning, and looks fun to drive. The engineers made a beautiful car. But boy does the interior fall flat, it looks and feels like a $25,000 cars interior. It’s such an eyesore. I would even say it’s fair to call it embarrassing. That eyesore of an Infotainment with fat bezels, cheap plastics, it just screams cost cutting everywhere. Like an amalgamation of 3 different Chevy models interior parts thrown together a la Frankenstein. The Seats and carpets specifically look pretty bad in this car. I sat inside of a Nissan Rogue around the same price range..it’s a family car compact SUV and the interior is leaps and bounds nicer, and more luxurious than this Caddy and it’s a freaking Nissan…not even an infinity.

[@divides_by_zero]

I am cross shopping this class of cars right now for my next car, and this review is spot on. I do think GM has a valid point that this competes with the 3 series/A4/TLX/G70/C300 because of price. I prefer the size of the CT5, 5 series, A6, etc., but the prices on the imports gets painfully high with some options added on. The 4 cylinder versions of the other cars are good for the budget minded. However, the 4 cylinder CT5 is awful. Just drove the 6 cylinder CT5-V and it is a huge improvement. Alas, the interior quality will likely take this off my list. That is a shame because the chassis is great.

[@noahh1997]

This is a midsize car, it would compare to a 5 series, A6, TLX, Mercedes E350, Genesis G80 or even the Lexus Es350, The Ct4 would compare to a C300 and a lot of those other cars you listed other than the TLX. The es is also a very nice sedan with decent power and is very reliable and has good tech for 2023 with the new Lexus/Toyota new interface.

[@mybro727]

@@noahh1997 When did you hear Cadillac state that? Lol. You’re wrong. The CT5 does not compete with the E-class, A6, or a 5-series. The OP is correct in the regard to what this vehicle competes with which is a BMW 3-series, Audi A4 or Lexus IS.

[@noahh1997]

@@mybro727 in size yes it does compete, it’s a midsize sedan, like I said a ct4 would compare to those other cars since it’s a compact sedan. Why would a ct5 compare to a 3 series 😂, even if Cadillac stated that I wonder why, because size wise is doesn’t compete.

[@coxgaspoweredtether]

Check out the lighter color interiors..mine is light beige w crystal white tricoat exterior.. that finally sold me. Performance is awesome and with nice options still $ 10 to 15 k less than competitors...plus cadillac presence the front view is beautiful in my opinion...

[@bobbowie9350]

The interior looked dated at launch. It's just embarrassing now.

[@Stressless2023]

Yeah I like the exterior styling quite a bit but this interior would make me pass on this car - Even in lighter/two-toned colors it still just looks too basic inside, especially when paying Blackwing money.

[@hellkitty1014]

Yep, even mainstream cars have better execution. This would've been acceptable on a Malibu, but not a Cadillac.

[@jefftrimm7806]

My 2019 CT6 Sport with the 3.0TT and AWD is also 4000lbs, except you get a full-size sedan at the weight. It underscores how remarkable the CT6’s Omega platform was. It’s a damn shame they only built one car on it and discontinued the billion dollar Omega architecture… 😞

[@ibrahimriaz248]

biggest gm disappointment ever the ct6 was amazing

[@sl0907]

Sad that it's home market doesn't recognize the potential. Ironically it was the Chinese market that appreciated the ct6 and it is still surviving in China and going into a second generation model.

[@8VD80Y]

I agree Sof. Cadillac definitely dropped the ball with the interior. Had not for the Cadillac badge on the steering wheel I would’ve thought you were driving a Malibu. Maybe a cream/mocha interior and pano roof to make it look less plain.

[@vernonpaigejr.1517]

The CTS interior feels way better.

[@mybro727]

Then you’ve also never been inside of a Malibu. Y’all just be talking for the hell of it.

[@TheBikemaster94]

AutoZone seat covers should fix that

[@mybro727]

Also, you’ve basically said Cadillac “dropped the ball” simply because this particular CT5 550T isn’t in the color configuration that _you’d_ prefer? What a logic. Lol

[@8VD80Y]

@@vernonpaigejr.1517 I agree

[@chrisbarnes9438]

Stupid 550T badge. I would lose it.

[@joedidit3233]

Great review as usual. I do agree that Cadillac needs to upgrade their interiors to feel a bit more luxurious. I currently drive a 2017 Buick LaCrosse that I bought new. Although not super luxurious, it does give a more luxury oriented feel than the current Cadillac, which is a shame. Honestly, I wish Buick had continued selling sedans here in the U.S. and had swiched over to the alpha platform with rear wheel drive. Adding the 3.0 twin turbo would have been a plus if they had decided to revive the old Buick "Wildcat" or "GS" or "Super" models. I'm ready to trade in my six year old LaCrosse, which incidentally never had even one problem for something newer. The 3.6 liter in the LaCrosse was quick. Spirited and lively. About 5.7 seconds to 60. But the Cadillac CT5 is looking like something I'll be interested in upgrading to. However, I think Cadillac has somewhat abandoned it's luxury roots, judging by the fact that they're difficult for their old customer base (senior citizens) to get in and out of. Seventy and Eighty year olds won't be able to easily slide out of the seats and get easy footing on the ground, or vice versa. But Cadillac does need to give the CT5 an interior that unmistakably lets you know you're in a Cadillac as soon as you settle into the drivers seat! Gotta love the performance of the 3.0 twin turbo CT5!

[@Homebuilder777]

Cadillac's best car was the 2019 XTS!!! They have been going down hill ever since!!!!

[@nobunaga-oda]

Caddy 😍😍

[@noahboy6349]

The CT5 as shown is not worth $60,000. The interior is very cheap looking. I would spend the money on an Acura TLX instead.

[@chudson4500]

The TLX exterior looks nice but it's outdated. I can't get over the fact that it doesn't have a touch screen or a digital gauge display when the Honda Accord does. No thank you

[@solidsnake5614]

I prefer the new genesis g80

[@mybro727]

The Genesis G80 is hideous from all angles and wants to be a Mercedes-Benz E-class so badly. The cheap man’s Bentley look is better suited on their SUVs. Cadillac isn’t trying to be Mercedes or Bentley, they know who they are and it shows in the way their products drive. It’s also proven within the styling - very unique and sleeper. Soyfan is biased towards flashy, gaudy, overly gimmicky luxury cars that like to remind you every square inch that you overpaid for it.

[@mtanyctrainatlantamartatra7164]

​@@mybro727 agree 👍🏿👍

[@edwardyoung522]

I don't recall asking for your opinion.

[@callancollins7708]

Would like to see this head to head with the TLX

[@rosasantos4717]

Acho que esse CT5 3.0T é um luxo

[@ronalddimitri2477]

Really nice to see GM upping their game. I am impressed with what Cadillac has to offer here.

[@MercOne]

What?

[@ronalddimitri2477]

@@MercOne just a stupid bot scammer

[@ryb2189]

The biases are easily seen in the reviews.

[@ALightInTheForest]

I agree on the interior - my biggest disappointment with current Cadillac sedans and SUVs.

[@jsfbay1]

Wow, it really seems like you've soured on the CT5 compared to your review where you had the 2020 G70 and the 2020 CT5-V. I guess the competition has really stepped up their game, while Cadillac has not stepped up their interior quality (and they were a bit behind as it was in 2020.) I guess you just have to decide whether the clearly superior luxury experience available in the Genesis and German competitors is worth that extra cash. I think I could live with the discount interior to get the V6 experience.

[@MegaRetr]

Thanks for educating and entertaining us for so many years.

[@wbwayne8887]

Some have to have the snap, crackle, and pop to affirm an appealing exhaust note. To me, that TT V6 is just about a perfect sound for a daily driver. For a weekend play toy on the other hand, give me an LFA or Z06 please. I wish they put that engine in the CT4. Would definitely be the sweet spot.

[@JasonYergin]

It's not bad

[@InvestBetter.]

I like the style of the CT5. IMO, it looks far better generic 5-Series and E-Class The CT5 550T and Lexus IS350 are smart buys in this segment, if you want a nice car under $50k

[@devlad]

Makes me sad to see sports sedans disappearing

[@chiemekaa]

When will the Escalade's interior appointments start trickling down to the rest of the Cadillac lineup? There is virtually nothing premium looking about this CT5 Premium. I was expecting at least 400hp for the V, but I guess I was confusing it with the CTS V-Sport.

[@hellkitty1014]

I hope the Lyriq's setup start to trickle down.

[@Stressless2023]

I think the exterior looks fairly premium and distinctive but agree about the interior needing major help, but doubt GM will invest much more into this car with EV's and electrification on the horizon, this and the CT4 always felt like stop-gap cars even when they first came out.

[@99-Zulu]

Despite the power disparity from the CTS V-Sport. This car is just as quick in a straight line and noticeably quicker on the track. At least in the V model.

[@hellkitty1014]

@@99-Zulu I agree. That 10-speed trans is world's better than the old GM 8spd. I believe this car is also more aggressively geared than the old CTS V-Sport. The CT5 is almost as quick but even better handling. It is also not as claustrophobic on the inside.

[@00ABM]

The XT4 is getting the Escalade/Lyriq style interior for 2024 refresh I've seen the spy shots of the interior. Should be released in few months, hopefully they'll refresh the CT5/CT4 before the kill the sedans altogether for another unfortunate crossover.

[@jsfbay1]

To me, this is still a gorgeous sedan! I may just have to get one - I wonder if there are any deals to be had these days :-)

[@lryoung17]

I agree, I think the TLX also kinda competes in that space where you get the same amount of car but for the price of a size class below but similar in size to a 5 series, A6, G80 etc.. Then the Integra & CT4 are similar in size to 3 series or G70 for a couple grand less.

[@lryoung17]

@FacundoRolexRollsGonzalez You're not telling me anything I don't know. I'm going off of comments the reviewer made. I'm talking about the size you get for the money sir not why you feel like what doesn't compete with what. I've seen older people cross-shop the CT5 with the E class several times. They aren't cross-shopping it with the 3 series. It's the size of the vehicle it is quite a bit longer than a 3 series aside from the price which is the point I was making. Also, the CT4 is bigger than the vehicles it competes and it's built on the ATS platform so people will cross-shop them with bigger vehicles same with the TLX & Integra, this was purposely done to capture a wider shopping audience. Thank you for your opinion.

[@viddbeav]

I find america manufacturers generally give bad interior compared to german or japanese

[@1227Masher]

Or Korean. Even my Stinger GT2 has better materials. I crossed shopped these last year and went with the Stinger. Better equipped for the money and more enjoyable to drive.

[@hartfischer5509]

I have a 2014 Cadillac CTS. I very much love it. But. Just give me the software upgrade to let my car do lane-centering, and I won t need Supercruise at all. But no, no software upgrades. And even buying a CT5 won t fix that, because Supercruise only works on certain freeways. That means I will need to switch to Tesla in 2034, to get FSD, when I buy my next car. Cadillac just needs to give us a Autopilot1 upgrade, I would gladly pay $2000 for it. please, just give it to us. Free revenue to Cadillac, just software.100s of thousands of CTS and ATS and XTS that could use this software. Pleeeease.

[@PresidentJackBauer]

Any screen larger than 10 inches is over kill.

[@Aschoolbusandsimulatorfan2219]

This will be my first car to afford it Sofyan.

[@spinedoc893]

I've been shopping this category for a new car for my wife and we've been very impressed with the CT5 but my only major complaints are the base 2.0L is not nearly enough power for a car this size and price and that the 3.0L is not available with the sport trim which I prefer over the luxury premium trim. Seems odd that GM has the 325hp 2.7L in its engine line up but doesn't use it as the base engine or at least as an option on the CT5. The 3.0 is a smoother quieter engine but the 2.7 is probably lighter, cheaper and would have similar performance and likely better mileage.

[@kristopheraknight]

That interior is total trash. Especially for $59,000.

[@billhickman7903]

This is a class leader.. period

[@daveed4475]

I’d consider this car if I could be “out the door” for $38k. I imagine it will depreciate very rapidly. I do like the way it looks.

[@oicfas4523]

This looks great. American cars have really improved in styling and interior design. They've always had a big cost advantage vs. competitors, but now they're something I'd actually want to drive too 😊.

[@frankiexv4533]

Worth noting GM is currently testing the refreshed model which will certainly have a better interior.

[@Combatives813]

Shame in Cadillac! That car looks plain and basic af! No quality or facy woodgrain. Just the same cheap plastic as the cheaper cars. I'm so disappointed. Might as well buy a new Toyota Camry.

[@Stressless2023]

I like the "underdog" nature of this car but unless it was "significantly" cheaper than its competition then I think I'd choose any of its competitors over this car frankly - I like the driving characteristics and the impressive 3.0T performance and I even think the styling looks pretty good from most angles but this interior 100% sucks to my eyes, that alone makes this a hard pass for me.

[@jbm0866]

@Stressless2023 I honestly think some decent sport seats and color contrast is all the interior needs to elevate it a bit, but that's just me. There is nothing inside that's going to wow anyone, but then again most BMW interiors are the same way imo.

[@Stressless2023]

@@jbm0866 I think even my 13 year old 535i interior looks nicer and simply more interesting than this - The dash design and screen size are boring and terribly outdated by 2023 standards. But I did read that these are getting a heavy interior refresh for 2024 and a mild exterior refresh so I'll be holding out for that - Might park one in my garage and get rid of my antique Bimmer if the price is right and GM doesn't botch it.

[@spinedoc893]

These are really nice cars for the money. Complaints like interior material quality don't make a ton of sense to me. One the interior of these is very nice and two in order to be significantly less money than the competition you have to give something up and to me the difference in the interior materials of the Cadillac interior vs the more expensive imports is not a big deal and certainly not big enough to warrant the price difference. Something else to consider is the significantly better warranty with Cadillac vs imports and at least here in Canada you get the first 8 oil changes and tire rotations for free.

[@baroneleve1196]

That's one lousy INTERIOR. A complete ZERO. And Cadillacs obsessed all black interiors is nauseating

[@williamshappley2106]

Isn’t a TLX Type S a competitor? 0-60 about the same or a little better, V6 turbo, and $55,000 dollars similarly equipeed?

[@JDubbs07]

Yes, but not quite the car in the video. For that you need the CT5-V, which has the performance add-ons this one does not. Also worth mentioning that Cadillac reps were very clear in that the CT5's AWD system was not engineered with performance in mind, but just for all weather traction

[@JohnnyUtah9173]

@@JDubbs07this non V is faster than the tlx type s

[@luptonpittman6520]

Beautiful car, but how is Cadillac’s reliability these days?

[@TheMybulls1990]

I don't understand why he complains about cheap materials what is the cheapest model car though

[@elliottmanning4116]

3:55 That’s a cornering light.

[@nicholassmith7048]

Should be a fog light, though.

[@James7796ify]

The interior is flat out embarrassing. You buy a caddy and get what looks like a rental car.

[@GODWITHUS0712]

ThisKZbinr channel looks like it was pulled out of a Chevy Sonic

[@kingmiller1982]

I just watch his videos for tge complaining entertainment.

[@joshb6382]

Just heard one of these today with (what sounded like) a cat delete and it was nastyyy bro the grey suits these lil sedans so good

[@kevinmcmahon7182]

He keeps saying Mercedes is better then says but Cadillac is much less expensive

[@chardelraconner7324]

sprung circumference ; not HRE at ALL

[@chardelraconner7324]

what size smoother ride ; uneven

[@chardelraconner7324]

tire depth traditional vogue

[@90MVtv]

Cadillac must’ve hired lexus old designers. Horrible exterior

[@createdinHisimage1]

Great review! How does this stack up against the 2023 Lexus ES 350 in your opinion?

[@gregkramer5588]

I see no one responded. IMO they are opposite ends of the sedan spectrum. One is a front drive car with a bit more luxury, soft ride and uninspiring handling and performance. The other is a rear drive performance sedan that is quite mediocre in regards to luxury. The CT5 is really only for people that want the extra sport factor IMO.

[@createdinHisimage1]

@@gregkramer5588 Thank you for responding. 👍🏼 Being that I've had the opportunity to test drive both. I fully agree with you.

[@Samsroomofrequirements]

I have a 2022 ct5 and a 2023 Lexus es350 for my husband. I have to say, ultimately I love driving the Cadillac for the handling. But the Lexus is just so smooth! Refined! Everything seems to work better such as heated and cooled seats, windows soft close, more roomy

[@brianheffernan5434]

I wish the people at Cadillac would watch your videos.

[@DSRQ1]

An average effort, and rare as hen's teeth in the affluent area where I live. A lot of Audis, MBenz, Lexus, BMWs, with Genesis sedans coming on strong. Would be a good value at $50K, but not at $60K like this one. Maybe the oddly spelt Lyriq will save Caddy.

[@bobbowie9350]

4:36 the c pillar looks so cheap with the blacked out "triangle". Chevy does that. Remove the triangle, it turns into an old Lumina. The rear lights are awful too. The huge gap between the light and the trunk part line looks like an after thought. Just awful

[@Realtor1983]

Yes, I noticed the average looking interior 🙄

[@johnoehrle5973]

Why would you ever brake torque a car? Are you trying to break it?

[@ilikealotofthings731]

I'm sorry but this literally looks like a Mazda 3.

[@rightlanehog3151]

Why didn't they send you a manual?

[@johnnyedify]

The all black interior is quite uninteresting to me.

[@eddyeroyal6024]

I saw this, so i will keep my 2011 DTS w/V8 300 HP

[@gregkramer5588]

But the handling difference would be huge!

[@ra-di2wu]

​@@gregkramer5588And this car is rear drive and way faster.

[@TonyKimtheamusementparkfan]

Cadillac kinda needs to improve their interiors, because to me, they all look the same, and nothing really differentiates Cadillac vehicles from other GM vehicles anymore. Again, that's just me, and I'm sure some people think differently~ The Escalade is really the only Cadillac vehicle that has an interior that is impressive to me.

[@gladdy02]

I wonder if these are reliable?

[@hellkitty1014]

I just don't get how Cadillac designers thought this interior was appropriate. I can't think of another car in this class that has a worse environment. The thing with this class is it is all about comfort and luxury. A Chevy-grade interior just isn't going to cut it. That said, in terms of performance, this may be one of the best bangs for dollar. It undercuts the 540i and especially the E53 considerably, and even manages to outperform and undercut the Genesis. And that is before you even get into the even better V6-grade V-Series. Luckily, as we've seen with the Lyriq and Celestiq, Cadillac is at long last advances their interiors after 4 decades of delivering subpar spaces.

[@mybro727]

A “Chevy grade interior” that outsold the Genesis G80. Apparently Chevrolet is doing something better than Genesis. Y’all love to compare anything from Cadillac to Chevy - although this shares absolutely nothing with a Malibu - *NOTHING.* 😂

[@hellkitty1014]

@@mybro727 if Cadillac is the "standard of the world", why compare it to a start up luxury brand??

[@Bae-w6u]

I would buy this over a German 'premium' car.

[@norwegianblue2017]

I had no idea you could option the turbo six for the base model. Hoping to snap one up on the used market down the road. The 2025 models have some great colors!

[@evenbetterthantherealthing92]

Watching this review made me even more disappointed than I already was that my dad is buying an AWD sport instead of an AWD V6 premium luxury he test drove. The sport had a slightly higher sticker, as the V6 was kind of a rare bird with no additional options besides climate package and 20" wheels (he's paranoid about scuffing up the rims if he got the 20" wheels).

[@kenoharley1]

I just replaced my BMW 540i with CT5, premium luxury. This video is spot on. Car is FUN to drive. V-6 ONLY!!

[@bullocksbailey732]

Car body exterior literally looks like a fancier version of the 2023 honda accord. All these car brands are starting to look the same. Very plain and boring.

[@fashowallday4073]

My 9 year old Impala finally got 100k miles 😢. Now I find you have to spend so much more for the same amount of car.

[@jesustsa1]

Have you ever considered getting some of these cars on a lift so we can see under them? Suspension bits and such. I think GM would sell more of these if they built more.

[@kobbycrentsil2859]

They wouldn't though, not when for the same price they can get premium E-class, 5 series, G80 etc. It doesn't do well against them

[@MDKN22]

That's more savagegeese than Redline Reviews. Redline is more about oozing over the features and stuff, Savagegeese oozes over mechanical stuff. Not necessarily a bad thing that Redline doesn't go super in-depth mechanical.

[@riverexplorer]

I got bored with this interview when what is supposed to be a Cadillac quickly became a Chevrolet. The car is boring to look at, has a very mid-pack interior, and does not live up to the Cadillac catchphrase “Standard of the world”. I realize this isn’t the top spec, the incessant references to that fact also became boring. However, for a high end car I expect a much better vehicle. Even the lower spec should be inspiring and this thing just reminds me of a mid-spec early teens Chevrolet Cruze with pleather. Cadillac, you can and must do better. Make the cars special (even the low spec) and less like older GM economy cars. While you’re at it, the alpha-numeric soup names are getting old. Bring back names that create a cache of prestige…these current “names” sound cheap and poor.

[@Mack11721]

I can't believe it doesn't have a sunroof.

[@whatchis1120]

most do that are for sale, this is one of those weird press optioned cars 60k for no sunroof, platinum package, or nice wheels. All the ones in my area are around 55k awd and the right options.

[@mauriceldisgreecanadahaspr9560]

I think from all these companies like Lexus and Acura and infinity there are two many SUV they have 5 to 6 SUV to many. Build some sedans.

[@chrisbarnes9438]

Cadillac is not "luxury".

[@michaelsera746]

Any owners of the 2.0t run on regular gas. Manual says 91 octane min but funny that other cars using same engine such as Buick and Chevy models allow for 87. This is for my daughter and paying the extra for super gas is a deal breaker. Thx

[@chadc1017]

I believe Cadillac nailed it with the CT5/4... Power, performance, handling and sporty feel!!! I'll happily give up on luxury to save thousands and still have all that tech... Great design GM

[@uik99]

The only thing that holds Cadillac back is it comes from GM LOL they charge premium for not premium vehicles