The 61 US Advanced Naval Vessels which are under construction

The United States Navy has over 490 ships in both active service and the reserve fleet, with approximately 60 more which are under construction, and also few more which are in the planning stage. These vessels which are under construction are expected to be very advanced and will enter service in the foreseeable future. Let’s check out the list of all these upcoming vessels.
List of US Naval Vessels Under construction
• Aircraft carrier - 3
• Amphibious assault ship - 2
• Amphibious transport dock - 3
• Attack submarine - 13
• Ballistic missile submarine - 1
• Destroyer - 14
• Expeditionary fast transport - 3
• Expeditionary mobile base - 2
• Frigate - 1
• Littoral combat ship - 10
• Replenishment oiler - 4
• Towing, salvage and rescue ship - 5
Credits:
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/
hum3d.com/3d-models/
www.globalsecurity.org/jhtml/...|||Mobile%20Landing%20Platform%20[MLP]
www.globalsecurity.org/jhtml/...|||T-ATS(X)%20towing,%20salvage%20and%20rescue
www.globalsecurity.org/milita...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
hum3d.com/3d-models/uss-freed...
www.3dhorse.com/products/3d-i...
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email [e-mail].

[@Lukos0036]

Finally an Enterprise in the fleet again.

[@kristoffermangila]

Fun fact: out of the Block V Virginia class subs that are named for famous WW2 subs, only one has a predecessor sub that still exists: USS Silversides, whose predecessor is now a museum ship over in Muskegon, Michigan.

[@andrianicendali]

I live in San Diego..and I work in shipyard and currently working on ESB7 AND TAO 4

[@FerretJohn]

Personally I wouldn't mind it if the Navy built a couple new Hospital Ships. We currently have two, the Comfort and the Mercy, aging ships that are really repurposed San Clemente-class oil tankers, we could use some new ones built from the keel up to be hospital ships.

[@MikeS309]

The new flight of EPF’s are designed to be able to be quickly converted into a hospital vessel. So there will be some capability there.

[@jerryalbus1492]

I hope they built more Hospital Ships, not just for military but also for civilian and humanitarian aid overseas.

[@benthere2667]

OK. I'll get right on that.

[@jeffshriber6120]

Ironically whats needed for the navy is 2 brand new hispital ships, 10 dsrv's, some floating dry docks, no zumwalt destroyed and more lcacs.

[@GermanGreetings]

Simply impressive...

[@dwwolf4636]

Except for the LCS money and manpower pit.

[@bimbo-yw6ny]

@@dwwolf4636 i doubt is updated

[@FunnyQuailMan]

​​@@dwwolf4636 the Freedom-class ships certainly have earned the Little Crappy Ship title. The Independence-class is, surprisingly, turning out to be a pretty decent ship, now that the deck issue is nearly finished being fixed across the class, the mine counter-measures (MCM) module is finally certified (and is actually performing extremely well), it's role is shifting to focus on MCM and is replacing the Avenger-class as a much, much more capable ship for the MCM mission & within the fleet.

[@dannywainwrightq7828]

61 is a generous number...

[@mgmg-sb7ze]

Be strong US Army ❤❤❤

[@davehue9517]

Well done 👍🇺🇲🇺🇲

[@Dreadwolf3155]

we need more ships and we need them faster.

[@alandavis7987]

We need less ships! Russia and China have very weak and/or obsolete navies. Who do we need more submarines for? We could cut our submarine count in half and still have naval superiority against any potential foe. Need better cyber defense, anti-missile capabilities and tighter border and port security.

[@Dreadwolf3155]

@@alandavis7987 Well lets define what you mena by weak. China's navy is on balanc less advanced an dhas shorter range but they outnumber us in hulls, and bost a greater overal tonnage. Quantity has a quality all its own, especially when you consider the turnaround time of modern ships that need to be rearmed in a port after every major engagement.

[@malcolmtudor8039]

@@alandavis7987 There is an expession among members of the Navy submarine forces: "There are two types of ships: submarines and targets." That is why we need submarines.

[@cooldudecs]

@@Dreadwolf3155 anytime you talk about USA you must include Japanese navy as well

[@Dreadwolf3155]

@@cooldudecs That is a very fair point.

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

Happy Lunar New Year everyone 👋👋👋🎉🎉🎉

[@gaius_enceladus]

Good to see a new USS New Jersey and USS Iowa, even if they are subs rather than battleships!

[@noelpura4223]

💯🤯

[@lisaroberts8556]

I didn’t realize the Kennedy has already splashed down. I thought she was still under construction. 🚢🌊🇺🇸⚓️🇺🇸

[@markcorbett9916]

All American Submarines are built in Newport News Shipyard in Newport News, Virginia and General Dynamics Electric Boat Division in Groton, Connecticut (NOT Rhode Island).

[@ravshan_buronov_usarmedforces]

Always, USA No.1 and alone leader in the world 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪✊✊✊✊✊✊✊⚔⚔⚔⚔⚔⚔⚔

[@vicbanks9079]

Hey what's happened to those the polar security cutters?!

[@christopherhanton6611]

👍👏✊

[@ericclausen6772]

How about a fast transport of Army Armored divisions to move them where needed quickly as possible

[@scottgalbraith7461]

Wasp class assault craft.

[@patrickmccrann991]

@@scottgalbraith7461 Nope, they are not capable of hauling but a few.

[@polduseri909]

Even do the US Coast Guard is a separate institution still under the US Navy, and they have ordered several ships too

[@venatorclass9334]

So let me guess based on what Trump said It's probably gonna take 35 years to build and get everything ready right ? honestly our fleet industrial capacity is non existent unlike before

[@DJ-bh1ju]

@Tylerrr324 And now the navy (the entire military, really) is trying to figure out how to define gender and avoid offending every special interest Leftist group they can find...

[@joeykirkpatrick224]

I wish that we were getting new Battleships too, then our Navy would be Complete

[@janusjones6519]

That’s like saying ‘I wish the army could get some muskets so they would be complete’

[@joeykirkpatrick224]

@@janusjones6519 considering that Battleships are something that a lot of people want Battleships in our navy again, it's just something that I thought I would say: and I don't need your Smart Assery

[@michaelcharette8509]

@@joeykirkpatrick224 Maybe you should think a bit more before you say.

[@scottgalbraith7461]

I think the best we get now are light cruisers. Sigh. I guess we'll just always be a 2nd class naval power.

[@asiseeit2041]

More firepower in a destroyer today than ever was in a battleship. Plus when you consider the whole infrastructure to both produce large caliber guns and ammo is defunct, it would be extremely impractical. However I agree, seeing a battle wagon cruising is an awesome sight

[@minhchaudo9704]

The building ship rate of the US Navy is slower than the PLA. The PLA also have a lot of anti ship missiles.

[@gabecarrick]

Slower by a factor of 100

[@huddystone7994]

The PLA is using fishing trawlers and patrol boats. Easy picking for an Destroyer, Cruiser, or even the 4 recommissioned Battleships

[@gabecarrick]

@@huddystone7994 that might have been true in the late 90s and early 2000s, but the modern PLAN is absolutely not a force that should be underestimated. Modern warships with proper radar and anti ship capabilities are being produced en masse.

[@huddystone7994]

@@gabecarrick their “modern” ships have a small operating range. Not to mention the lack of carriers. The 7th fleet alone has more carrier than all the other pacific rim nations combined, and don’t even get me started on sub power, the Seawolf class could destroy anything the PLAN has in an office day and not even be seen.

[@gabecarrick]

@@huddystone7994 if the theatre of combat for their Navy were true blue water combat vs the straight of Taiwan I would agree with you. Their aircraft carrier production will rapidly outpace the United States over the next two decades. Their submarine fleet does still seem somewhat behind, though raw quantity will likely pose challenges in the future.

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

I am seeing they are spending lots of money for many decades in the future to modernize the Navy

[@thomasmattson2389]

I hope that the LCS are not being built. The procurement money should go to the frigates.

[@scottjackson5173]

The Virginia class subs are fine as that goes. Still, there needs to be a smaller, easily mass produced submarine optimized for antisubmarine warfare. There also needs to be a similar submarine optimized for ship killing. Ultimately the ability to mass produce ships in coastal shipyards needs to be quickly expanded. Especially in states outside of California. Keel laying to commissioning for aircraft carriers time needs to be cut by at least 50%. A redesigned version of the Zumwalt hull for larger and more capable ships is a must. All contracts being canceled and carefully rewritten to avoid past issues. Ship yards currently building Little Crappy Ships, should be repurposed for construction of the new frigate design instead. Ship yards capable of mass producing blue water hulls of up to 4000 tons. Should be built to mass produce corvettes and frigates. Both for convoy escort duty, and anti-saturation battle group duties. Should also be built as soon as possible. Given the nature of the threat posed by an aggressive Chinese government. Changes to US Industry and Naval policy are necessary. Unless you're willing to entertain the idea of defeat on the high seas, and the invasion of the Americas by China.

[@AnthonyMiller-xe2jr]

China couldnt invade the US if they had Russia's help. GET REAL!!!

[@thomasmattson2389]

Procurement is what matters. The US at best builds 1.5 subs a year, so bigger is better. .

[@scottjackson5173]

@@thomasmattson2389 Procurement is what matters. Numbers count. How many torpedoes in the water can one submarine dodge? Quality only gets you so far, before the numbers catch up. Three submarines a year aren't good enough. Especially since we are not well maintaining the submarines we have! China has demonstrated there is no technology we have they cannot steal. So they are catching up quickly, with each new boat.

[@thomasmattson2389]

My point is exactly what you said. There seems to be a huge lack of capability. 34 active subs, and the rest waiting to be fixed. It's all pathetic.

[@scottjackson5173]

@@thomasmattson2389 The policies of Obama and Biden have devastated our Navy. It's not just the politically motivated removal of the best motivated and loyal commanders. It's the critical loss of HOUSING for shipyard workers. No affordable housing, means no workers to perform critical jobs.

[@jerryalbus1492]

Imagine having 6 Aircraft carriers and 12 Escort Carriers (Landing Assault Ships) in a world where the second strongest navy only has 2 Aircraft Carriers

[@cooldudecs]

We have 23 aircraft carriers

[@tdawg5742]

Now imagine that carrier fleet is also supported by land based aircraft from HUNDREDS of air force bases worldwide.

[@ramesseum3188]

And 72 Guided missile destroyers

[@patrickmccrann991]

We only have 12 carriers. The LHA/LHDs are not carriers and not even close. No CVEs in service either.

[@DJ-bh1ju]

Except that the Chinese have way more ships, sailors, bases, etc... and aren't afraid to use them.

[@sharkk127]

Wait the new jersey name is being used again, nice, though odd its now on a sub

[@TheDuckman02050]

I cannot believe they are still building Littoral Combat Ships. They are junk and are being decommissioned even as new ones are rolling out. Can't give them away as they're too expensive to operate. Insanity.

[@tanksoldier]

In fairness, the current ships supposedly are being decommissioned to make room for news ships with the problems solved. We’ll see.

[@donaldcake1]

cheaper to finish building then scrap them, then to just scrap them

[@TheDuckman02050]

@@donaldcake1 I am certain you are correct. Federal contracting is an odd business.

[@patrickmccrann991]

All Freedom class LCSs will be decommissioned. 15 Independence class are being retained to replace the Avenger class MCMs, which are reaching the end of their service life. Those LCSs already paid for will be completed.

[@johncraig1431]

With the exception of a couple of these ships. I have no idea what the rest do

[@ericclausen6772]

Better get it done quickly

[@josephbrands6303]

Littoral Combat ships are a huge waste of money & resources for how they are performing. Did anyone else notice the FFG looked alot like the Perry class Frigates of old?

[@DJ-bh1ju]

Too little, too late, I'm afraid... The Chinese are building way more and won't be afraid to use them.

[@bradjohnson4787]

Subs are built in Connecticut.

[@davidleethompsoniii8263]

The USS Volusia... We should honor our victors... It should be called the US George Patton. 5 star : General.

[@IsraelMilitaryChannel]

Military Tier list: S: USA(All of their wars were fought more than 10,000km away crossing oceans. King of logistics. Largest air force in the world, power projection, largest fleet of carriers in the world, the most advance military on the planet. The US military is the only military on earth which is capable of bringing it's army to any part of the world to wage war). A: UK(Finest soldiers, well trained, naval power projection), France, Israel(Lacks Navy and size, but Israeli technology is on a different level because of innovation. Arguably the best fighter pilots in the world, The Israeli Air Force has a historical kill ratio of over 19:1. The Israeli Air Force has shot down almost 600 enemy planes (including 5 Soviet MiGs in one 3-minute dogfight with zero losses. Israel ran war games about 20 years ago with an American carrier and just plain wrecked the US Navy. Out of 240 dogfights, the Israeli F-16s downed 220 F-18s, and lost only 20 - for an 11:1 kill ratio. Israel could possibly beat the UK or France in ground and aerial war if hypothetically they were beside one another but will very likely lose in naval battles. UK and France have power projection, they have the capability to wage war far and beyond their region while Israel is only regional.) B+: Russia(If we consider Russia's nuclear stockpile, they belong to second only to the US in terms of overall military power. Lacks power projection), China(Manufacturing power, large army, lacks power projection), India(Large army, mountain warfare, lacks power projection), Japan(Treaty restriction, technology prowess), South Korea(Their technology is to be reckoned with.) B: Turkey(Probably belong to lower end B+), Taiwan, Poland, Greece, Germany(Potential of being higher), Australia(Military size is small, but well trained and equipped with advance weaponry), Canada(Well trained army but lacks the size), Italy, Brazil, Spain C: Ukraine(Bravery10/10, S tier. Currently has the best guerilla warfare), Finland(Fought the Soviet and loss only 25,904 troops while the Soviet loss 126,875-167,976 troops), Sweden(Known for their silent diesel-electric submarines), Pakistan(Here only because of nukes should probably be higher for the same reason. Without nukes they belong to D) D: Iran(Iran is durable, war of attrition will favor them in long drawn out wars.), Egypt, Saudi Arabia E: Vietnam(King of Jungle warfare), Indonesia(Formidable jungle warfare), Philippines, Malaysia

[@IsraelMilitaryChannel]

@@markcooke5270 Well you could argue that their opposition sucks, but the Israeli air force pitted against Soviet pilots in Operation Rimon 20 and down 5 Soviet pilots without any losses. I also stated that Israel did war games against the US and downed as many as 220 F-18s but loss only 20 F-16s for an 11:1 kill ratio. Also to note Israel does bomb runs almost on a weekly basis, Israeli pilots are the most experience in the world. Name me another nation who has as much experience? It's almost a daily thing for Israel, it's their norm, they fly on bomb runs like having day to day breakfast. You might argue that Syria is defenseless, but it wasn't always the case, there are videos of Israeli jets destroying Russian air defenses attempting to fire at Israeli jets. Israel's widest point is 115 km in width. Israeli pilots are trained to defend against that lack of strategic depth. Not to forget Israel's dangerous long distance bombing of Iraqi nuclear reactor of about 1,000 km while navigating and avoiding surrounding enemy states. However the best feat of the Israeli air force is that of 1982, Israel downed 86 Syrian fighter jets in a dogfight and loss none of it's fighters, added to that 29 Russian air defense systems were destroyed in the process.

[@neolan2565]

@@IsraelMilitaryChannel S for Surrender? 😂😂😂😂😂

[@IsraelMilitaryChannel]

@@neolan2565 What do you mean?

[@neolan2565]

@@IsraelMilitaryChannel Just trying to figure out what does "S" mean in your comment. Is it to mean "Surrender"? "Substandard"? "Submissive"? "Second rate"? "Sub par"? "Stupid"? Judging by its performances and behavior in the Korean War, the Vietnam War and Afghanistan War, I think all of the above applies. LMFAO!!

[@neolan2565]

@@IsraelMilitaryChannel Yes. Confirmed sub par substandard second rate super denial united snakes armed forces. LMFAO! Super big S for the united snakes. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@olddog103]

Mean while the Chinese kick out ships a 3 times the rate we do

[@cooldudecs]

Of what quality? The soviets did the same and were mangled

[@aarondigby5054]

They'll/they're losing them at ten times the rate.

[@paulkersey2179]

They should name a ship after me. I have done much more for the Navy than many of those who have ship named after them.

[@donfreeman8920]

USA 🇺🇸 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@gamedayswede]

Looking forward to see the new Destroyer class that will replace the Arleigh Burke class.

[@ulikemyname6744]

Several things are known including: Larger size - possibly 12,000 - 13,000 tons fully loaded 128 VLS cells Larger SPY-6 radar compared to the SPY-6 on the upcomming Flight 3 Burkes Combined electric propulsion significantly longer range And ofc future-proofing. The new destroyer will have spare space for larger VLS cells for more complex missiles, close range laser defenses and much more

[@timrobinson4337]

It's arleigh burke still just much better now

[@fredsanke4070]

Buyers welcome....

[@user-vx1bu6yg2g]

Good video Bazz thank you But as I saw, 2 Columbians were built

[@edwardgilmour9013]

This is out of Date. haven't the USN stopped the LCS program ?

[@matrempit2885]

Boustead Naval Malaysia 🇲🇾 laughing seeing this video...! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@garyevans3051]

Unless we upgrade our shipbuilding capability and manufacturing base we are done for unless we destroy china on the first battle. If not we cant keep up with them in replacing lost carriers and other assets. That is known on both sides

[@leeswecho]

Yes and no - at the pace of modern warfare it is unlikely either side is going to be able to start new ships fast enough to enter service before the war would be over. Even in WW2, the Essex class carriers that were started after Pearl Harbor finished too late to take part in any of the major battles of the war. (that said, this is not true of smaller consumables like shells and missiles, and drones)

[@GTOGregory]

I don't see any ice breakers listed. Both Russia and China are planning to build some. The Arctic Circle is the reason why.

[@cooldudecs]

Russia is a third world country and so is China..

[@benthere2667]

Meanwhile, China has 203 warships under construction...

[@xfilevirusxrubberdickie2494]

But low quality 😂😂

[@ericclausen6772]

Great I'm glad they are naming it after a black soldier that won the medal of honor

[@philthai99]

Yes indeed. All the US Submarines under construction are nuclear.

[@mijilstylz]

Its going to take 3yrs or more..just to floatout..so 5,6 years.

[@lawrenceralph7481]

Well. Let's do some simple life cycle arithmetic. If the US has 300 warships and warships last 30 years, in steady-state, it will replace 10 per year. If construction takes 6 years, it should have about 60 being built at any time.

[@zackakai5173]

Gotta keep the CEOs of those defense contractors rich somehow!

[@theamericanpotatonamedphil4306]

Yeah it's not like the navy is actually vital to national defense or anything

[@DJ-bh1ju]

Putin and Xi thank you for that.

[@steveburke7675]

Great......Swedish AI lady again.

[@mtsquad]

Not RI... Connecticut

[@pradeepshishodia2628]

Please made a video on upcoming missiles of India .

[@NewmaticKe]

That's a 3 seconds vid

[@Darkie1873]

@@NewmaticKe I don't know why all western guys hate us .

[@Americaisgreat12]

@@Darkie1873??? I'm Americas I don't know why you talking about hate see what they say about 🇺🇸 we love y'all over here🇺🇲🇮🇳♥️♥️

[@NewmaticKe]

@@Darkie1873I am not western

[@Darkie1873]

@@NewmaticKe from where

[@stevinharper3551]

I'm so confused I thought littoral class and zumwalt were discontinued cause cost wasn't worth what they were made for. Can someone fill me in?

[@georgekraus9357]

Me too, I'm in agreement with Mr. Harper

[@Kishanth.J]

The third Zumwalt started being built before the US Navy canceled the primary weapon (if I am not mistaken). As for the Littoral Combat ships I don’t know, maybe the contract for their construction was already signed and payed for.

[@randygravel2057]

I’m starting to think not everything on KZbin is legit.

[@dbyers3897]

Contracted vessels scheduled or under construction can't be cancelled without reimbursing the ship yards for their costs. Some vessels were cancelled. Zumwalts were to include 32 hulls originally. 29 were cancelled. The LCS program was cancelled & the vessels are to be decommissioned this year (2023) as ineffective in any of their designed roles. They frequently experience breakdowns & failures. Several foreign navies have expressed interest in acquiring some modified vessels as they plan to employ them for coastal defense, ie, Taiwan & Saudi Arabia. So no, Mr Harper, you're not confused.

[@stevinharper3551]

@@Kishanth.J thank you

[@aarondigby5054]

You've forget about our(USA) underwater nuclear powdered submarine capabilities.

[@mikeedmonds7772]

?

[@dongill9718]

Why would you report this even if wrong

[@josephnoneofyourbeeswax8517]

I noticed there are no new ice-breakers under construction according to this video. I hope the video is wrong.

[@scottgalbraith7461]

The current trend is: there is no new ice, hence, no new icebreakers.

[@josephnoneofyourbeeswax8517]

@@scottgalbraith7461 I am not sure if you are writing tongue in cheek are you are badly misinformed. The politicians (not scientists) selling the global warming hoax have not been honest with people. You do know that more ice is appearing in the Antarctic than is disappearing from the Arctic right? Also, you may want to consult with the Navy or the Canadians regarding the need for ice breakers. The current trend is the US is falling behind in the race by the Russians and Canadians in the search for oil and other resources in the Arctic. Further, if you read the US Naval Institute's Proceedings you would know that Ice Breakers are instrumental for our national security and maintaining the right of free passage through the northern pass in the Arctic. I suggest you diversify your sources of information and run away from anyone who uses the words "global warming", "climate change" and "new ice age". If all your news is from CNN you will only become more dumb.

[@scottgalbraith7461]

@@josephnoneofyourbeeswax8517 I'm 52. I've watched it change locally and globally. I know we have less to do with it than politicians and some scientists say, but that's beside the point. Fossil fuels? Really? You can scream about being lied to all you want but being behind Russia and Canada while looking ahead to other energy sources sounds like the plan. I was goofing off but it sounds like you have a peculiar axe to grind with someone else.

[@josephnoneofyourbeeswax8517]

@@scottgalbraith7461 Sorry if I came across too strongly. I am 57 and have additionally lived overseas. I have a degree in engineering and you are right. I have an axe to grind with many other people so I was not fair to you. Fossil fuels are the single biggest blessing to world outside of our Lord and Redeemer. We have misused fossil fuels as is to be expected and we are certainly wasteful but there is no replacing fossil fuels. The energy content per volume is too high, short of nuclear power, there is very little like it that is as safe and available. I like nuclear power, fuel cells and hydrogen power but wind mills and solar panels are as dumb as plastic grocery bags and I called that one early too.

[@LSmoney215]

The artic ice is melting.. scientist says by 2030s the artic will be ice free

[@dougreimer2912]

For every US naval ship built China builds 5, merchant marine 10 to 1...Shows like this are really about the US slowly trying to catch up after falling asleep at the wheel....the Zumwalt has become a joke.

[@codtygray3830]

Anyone else find it suspect the narration is from a Chinese women?

[@scottgalbraith7461]

Yeah but really none of this is secret so at least the Chinese get some views and likes.

[@RT-mm8rq]

Glad I wasn't the only one that noticed.

[@globalvillage423]

Imagine if all tanks are painted with pink color.

[@lisaroberts8556]

What an embarrassment. Democrats will bring us that low. Shameful the woke crap they push on the military. Who needs Russia & China as enemies? We damage and disgrace our selves.

[@phantomvmfa122]

Why is the Navy wasting time with the LCS?

[@scottgalbraith7461]

Marines need a ride.

[@gregweatherup9596]

@@scottgalbraith7461 I suspect you’re thinking of the LCAC acronym, not LCS. (“Landing Craft, Air-Cushioned” vs “Littoral Combat Ship”)

[@loricproject6878]

The contracts for them can't be backed out of for some reason

[@Dweller415]

We currently can’t keep up with China.

[@Joshua-dt5vi]

You mean there destroyers with only 64 vls?

[@schoppepetzer9267]

Isn't it strange to name a navy vessel after a city in a foreign country? Who likes to serve in (on) Falluja? 😂

[@MikeS309]

It is named after a battle

[@aarondigby5054]

​@@MikeS309thanx, a battle that the USA won?

[@ayayoutuber]

If China think they have a chance on sea, they need to think again.

[@aarondigby5054]

China better stay their a## inside that damn wall.

[@Richard-ue3gx]

Harvey milk? I'm sure no one wants to serve on that ship. In memory of a colorful freak...

[@mineralmedia888]

When it comes to peer to peer warfare it doesn't matter how many ships you build if you build the wrong ones. Going forward I would stress less budget eating missile magnet super carriers and more $ spend on destroyers and subs. Some of the savings could/should also be spent on life extension programs for the Ohio's and Seawolf classes. If the Zumwalt's do in fact work and work as well as I hope they do then reactivating the program might make sense. In the age of hypersonic anti-ship missiles this makes much more sense than more and more carriers. At least to me.

[@zawnggempa]

I am 412nd viewer & 1st comment...

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

OK 👍👍👍

[@markcorbett9916]

Aircraft Carriers should, generally speaking, be named after Presidents (not all are) and Destroyers are often named after sailors or other military personnel, usually marines, who win high medals. USS Lyndon B. Johnson should be an Aircraft Carrier and USS Doris Miller, who won a Navy Cross for his heroic actions during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, should be named after a Destroyer.

[@MikeS309]

Nah. Fuck the presidents. They should go back to names like Yorktown, Lexington, and enterprise

[@violettmusician862]

Just gonna throw this out there. Save you some time and money. Anything with any sort of VPN can be tracked and traced by an advanced civilization. Didnt realize you were playing flashlight tag in broad daylight did you? Carry on lol

[@drbendover7467]

Under the current administration, more ships are alercatered for decommissioning than ships to be built:)

[@texaswunderkind]

In that case, it is a good thing "alercatered" isn't a word.

[@charlesb3101]

there is a good reason for that. The ship's being decommissioned are trash or useless

[@TennesseeHomesteadUSA]

Narration needs to be by someone who knows what they are talking about !!!

[@milomateer6565]

Imo they aren’t getting built fast enough. China is outpacing us so bad they basically make the same tonnage as one of our allies navy’s every year. I don’t know the exact numbers but it is bad

[@JohnDavis-wg9zh]

0ppp

[@lettermaniac1]

China 🇨🇳, Iran 🇮🇷, Russia 🇷🇺, North Korea 🇰🇵, Syria 🇸🇾, Venezuela 🇮🇷, and Belarus 🇧🇾. Be prepared for your navy's demise. be prepared

[@LSmoney215]

All them poor ass countries 😂😂

[@albertmarsh1796]

The ship uss harvy milk was a queer shot and killed in san fransicko what and insult to the men who serve on it i served on uss oxford agtr1 and uss Halsey powell dd 686 2nd class gunner mate 1966 1968

[@SynchronizorVideos]

It’s not USS, it’s USNS. It’s a support vessel that will be operated under Military Sealift Command. It’s a Navy ship, but not a fighting vessel.

[@ross82]

US navy vs 500 hypersonics 😂

[@slipdigit]

Learn how to pronounce 'littoral'

[@Knox122771]

Zumwalt and Liittoral Combat waste of money combat ships.

[@FunnyQuailMan]

Um, excuse me, it's the Little Crappy Ship. The LCS has earned its name; we should all respect that 😉

[@Knox122771]

@@FunnyQuailMan LMAO. I am sorry I forgot there proud nic name. I just thought they were taking the meaning of tin can a bit to serious. We put a lot of recycled illuminum cans to make them.

[@abdulmalek5462]

Where is USS George Floyd?

[@LSmoney215]

🔥🔥

[@Homoprimatesapiens]

I am waiting for the USS Barack Obama a.c.c. as well as the USS Donald Trump a.c.c. Maybe they will skip the last one and built the USS Joe Biden a.c.c.

[@niweshlekhak9646]

That’s not how it works it is named after someone who has done something in the Navy with Washington and Kennedy being the exception. HW Bush, Ford, Eliensenhower, Truman and Nimiz all served in the Navy.

[@joevicmeneses8918]

@@niweshlekhak9646 Eisenhower wasn't Navy he was Army, so was Truman. they named the two because they were former President's.

[@MM22966]

@@niweshlekhak9646 Kennedy was in the navy, too. CO of PT-109.

[@mikes7504]

@@niweshlekhak9646 I didn't know Lincoln served in the Navy?

[@niweshlekhak9646]

@@mikes7504 I mean the military, he didn't serve in the Navy.

[@JPmaxlevel]

advance ship? please... everything so far was a failure, f35, zumwalt ship, the new aircraft carriere.. please stop spending money iin shitty project. or project who will be good only in 10 years minimum and for 5 times the budget lol europe is shaming us!

[@dave8599]

doris miller? who is that?

[@AH-ve9iz]

Try picking up a history book

[@lengthao8424]

By the times these ships finish build....!!!!!!! China have quadruple the total US build already......!!!!!!!

[@andrewj9831]

quality over quantity.....

[@grimreaper318]

Your right because almost half of chinas fleet are small patrol boats. Those patrol boats inflated Chinas total number of naval ships.

[@texaswunderkind]

China's shit navy doesn't have anything remotely close to the American nuclear submarines or aircraft carriers. They could never conquer Taiwan because they don't have the ships nor aircraft to land a sufficient force on the island to do it.

[@ravshan_buronov_usarmedforces]

Always, USA No.1 and alone leader in the world 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪✊✊✊✊✊✊✊⚔⚔⚔⚔⚔⚔⚔