The American Stealth Drone that May or May Not Exist (The RQ-180)

  Рет қаралды 260,692

Megaprojects

Megaprojects

Күн бұрын

Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to keeps.com/MEGA... to get a special offer.
Got a beard? Good. I've got something for you: beardblaze.com
Simon's Social Media:
Twitter: / simonwhistler
Instagram: / simonwhistler
This video is #sponsored by Keeps.
Love content? Check out Simon's other KZbin Channels:
Biographics: / @biographics
Geographics: / @geographicstravel
Warographics: / @warographics643
SideProjects: / @sideprojects
Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
TopTenz: / toptenznet
Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
Business Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373

Пікірлер: 474
@megaprojects9649
@megaprojects9649 Жыл бұрын
Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to keeps.com/MEGAPROJECTS to get a special offer.
@marcbeebee6969
@marcbeebee6969 Жыл бұрын
Our Favorite shiny head you tuber 😂😂😂
@LordMephiston40k
@LordMephiston40k Жыл бұрын
Yeah, yeah you can narrate....but can you whistle though?
@ThePixelated_kris
@ThePixelated_kris Жыл бұрын
⁠@@LordMephiston40k yeah Simon if your last name really is whistler why dont you ever whistle? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
@j7ndominica051
@j7ndominica051 Жыл бұрын
The Keeps apparently didn't work on your. Lol.
@ThePixelated_kris
@ThePixelated_kris Жыл бұрын
@@j7ndominica051 he didnt have it by the time he did have it he lost his hair
@Olliethesnowman
@Olliethesnowman Жыл бұрын
My favorite shiny headed KZbinr😂😅😊🎉🎉😅
@hansolowe19
@hansolowe19 Жыл бұрын
Who's your second favourite?
@SnkobArts
@SnkobArts Жыл бұрын
Same 😂
@marcbeebee6969
@marcbeebee6969 Жыл бұрын
😂
@PolskiKrajowa
@PolskiKrajowa Жыл бұрын
Vsauce
@TheJudge_Carls_Junior_Rep
@TheJudge_Carls_Junior_Rep Жыл бұрын
Micheal Here
@justinpaul3110
@justinpaul3110 Жыл бұрын
Ive had a very hard time believing that the USAF would've gone over 30 years without replacing the capabilities that the SR 71 was providing.
@julianweidner8387
@julianweidner8387 Жыл бұрын
What if they didn’t replace the sr-71. Could modern tech complete the mission objectives of an sr-71? Until super recent, I believe the answer is yes. I’m not committed to that opinion. It’s just a thread
@liddz434
@liddz434 Жыл бұрын
Well that’s why they said that U2 spy planes and satellites have been doing it.
@Strykenine
@Strykenine Жыл бұрын
Two words: Spy sattelites.
@justinpaul3110
@justinpaul3110 Жыл бұрын
@strykenine7902 spy satellites can be tracked and their orbits are predictable. This became apparent after the retirement of the Blackbird. Having a high flying, hypersonic spy plane can theoretically be anywhere within a matter of hours and cannot be tracked and planned on like a satellite can.
@texasthib2029
@texasthib2029 Жыл бұрын
@@Strykenine satellites aren’t an end all be all dude to their revolution around the earth stealth drones could have a near 100 percent up time due to air refueling
@flyer037
@flyer037 Жыл бұрын
You've forgotten a possibility of WHY they may have been spotted. Not necessarily because they want to "tease" the existence, but if they have been flying for 10+ years and they have been spotted 3 times, it is possible that these were "unscheduled" appearances. If there was an in flight emergency and the aircraft had to be diverted during a flight, it would appear in places at times it was not planned to be, and therefore seen.
@ignitionfrn2223
@ignitionfrn2223 Жыл бұрын
3:00 - Chapter 1 - What we think we know 7:45 - Chapter 2 - What we suspect 11:35 - Chapter 3 - What it might be doing
@static2430
@static2430 Жыл бұрын
The X-47B Drone (looks identical but slightly smaller to this RQ-180) has been around for a while now in the US Navy and has been operating off of carriers.
@johno1544
@johno1544 Жыл бұрын
They only built 2 of those for testing and they have already been mothballed. They considered sending them to a air museum
@ianj3735
@ianj3735 Жыл бұрын
They were retired in 2015 having met the objectives set for their development. The gained knowledge is notably being used with the MQ-25 program currently
@static2430
@static2430 Жыл бұрын
@@johno1544 ah, I didn't know that. Thanks for the info.
@ameritoast5174
@ameritoast5174 Жыл бұрын
@@static2430 ya to my understanding those were basically test platforms and very expensive. The tech and knowledge to be used in future programs.
@jeremyholland4527
@jeremyholland4527 Жыл бұрын
It was used as technology demonstrator and it’s tech and what was learned was put into the ghostbat loyal wingman and stingray refueling drone.
@mtgdreamer
@mtgdreamer Жыл бұрын
Suggestion: Do a video on the Patriot Missle system. A video on a system able to hit a missed with another missle at supersonic speed sounds fun
@LRRPFco52
@LRRPFco52 Жыл бұрын
An actual Patriot senior leader instructor has already posted a bunch of videos on the Patriot system that far exceed anything you'll see on this channel.
@mtgdreamer
@mtgdreamer Жыл бұрын
@@LRRPFco52 I would like to see him do it. I was a Sargent in a Patriot battalion.
@dominicbeltz9057
@dominicbeltz9057 10 ай бұрын
@@mtgdreamer habitual line crosser is the expert of the patriot system on this platform
@l.b8896
@l.b8896 8 ай бұрын
@@LRRPFco52you talkin about my boy HLC? I love Mr. LineCrosser
@LRRPFco52
@LRRPFco52 8 ай бұрын
@@l.b8896 👍
@JustRootsAndLeaves
@JustRootsAndLeaves Жыл бұрын
I'm old enough to remember what the F-19 Stealth Fighter most definitely looked like after all the leaks by the pentagon and various credible bread-crumbs. Each bit of information confirmed the last and comprehensive picture of the F-19's shape and capability seemed to be agreed upon by all of the "experts"... until the F-117 was revealed.
@pkt1213
@pkt1213 Жыл бұрын
I few so many F-19 missions.
@troydspain1099
@troydspain1099 Жыл бұрын
Frisbee
@oxcart4172
@oxcart4172 Жыл бұрын
All those various "F-19s" looked so much better than the real thing!
@matthewsutton5946
@matthewsutton5946 Жыл бұрын
Lol the F-19 design was intentionally made to be as far from the actual stealth as possible to confuse potential adversary nations. I remember it too. I built a model of it once along with another model that was supposed to be a Russian Stealth
@joesikkens158
@joesikkens158 Жыл бұрын
I’ve been seeing either the RQ170 or RQ180 here in the Antelope Valley, CA: love right next to Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Skunkworks. Never knew the name till now. Looks amazing flying!
@jtek2259
@jtek2259 7 ай бұрын
Try to take pictures if you can! It would be amazing to see more pictures of these bad boys, though I know that threatens your own safety
@bee5440
@bee5440 2 ай бұрын
That's the RQ-170! I've seen it too, Lockheed takes it out to fly every once and a while out of the regional airport. Definitely not the RQ-180
@cluisdotorg
@cluisdotorg Жыл бұрын
You are in fact my favorite shiny headed youtuber Simon. Thanks for that. :)
@MJ-zo5gb
@MJ-zo5gb Жыл бұрын
Mine is Scott Manly! 🤣
@Jayjay-qe6um
@Jayjay-qe6um Жыл бұрын
Once its existence is confirmed, I can't wait to see the RQ-180 in action, in Ace Combat 8.
@MrDalisclock
@MrDalisclock Жыл бұрын
Didn't ace combat 7 already do the drone thing pretty heavily?
@royduenas1192
@royduenas1192 Жыл бұрын
Awesome video, as always! I'm from Guam and know that there's a lot of strategic operations carried out from Anderson Air Force Base. The intelligence stated in this video coincides with how little information is known about the military reaction to China's presence in the waters near Guam. Our country may be guilty of a lot of things that are frowned upon, however, many don't understand the necessary steps that are needed to ensure our freedom and to sustain our way of life.
@Yuki_Ika7
@Yuki_Ika7 Жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@Justin_Ebright
@Justin_Ebright Жыл бұрын
That's why we avoid signing deals that ban weapons and such. It's not that we don't support the spirit or won't avoid using said weapons, it's just so we don't handcuff ourselves if an enemy nation does. If they aren't worried about a like-kind attack they'd be less likely to hesitate using them themselves.
@mutantryeff
@mutantryeff Жыл бұрын
One of the U-2 landing flight paths into Beale AFB is just slightly to the east of my house. I'd guess that it is no higher than 10K feet when heading north to Beale.
@e.s.5529
@e.s.5529 Жыл бұрын
if the platform is operating in broad daylight over the United States and Guam and can be filmed and photographed easily ...then there are probably two to three other platforms that are radically more advanced and secretive, that's a guarantee. There are more than likely 4th and 5th generations of the TR-3b ISR airframe attached to the N.R.O.
@SPCv4
@SPCv4 Жыл бұрын
Evidence?
@goldenhate6649
@goldenhate6649 Жыл бұрын
Not necessarily. SR-71 flew over the US, so did the B2, so did the F-22. Just because it can be seen visually doesn't mean its not "the most" advanced. The things still have to fly long distance during testing and missions.
@Yuki_Ika7
@Yuki_Ika7 Жыл бұрын
Yup, or at least in development
@Istandby666
@Istandby666 Жыл бұрын
If it's flying, then it's old technology.
@Istandby666
@Istandby666 Жыл бұрын
@@goldenhate6649 The B-2 is a 1982 design. The F-22, is a 1988 design. My biological father worked on these program's.
@mattywanders
@mattywanders Жыл бұрын
Could you do an episode on the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel in Virginia? It's got to be the most terrifying bridge in the United States!
@patrickkelly8095
@patrickkelly8095 Жыл бұрын
I love that bridge.
@mattywanders
@mattywanders Жыл бұрын
@@patrickkelly8095 Wouldn't it make for a great episode?!
@CrisMind
@CrisMind Жыл бұрын
Is it terrifying? I always love driving it
@justinpaul3110
@justinpaul3110 Жыл бұрын
Are you kidding? That is the coolest bridge in the USA! The toll sucks though.
@patrickkelly8095
@patrickkelly8095 Жыл бұрын
@@mattywanders it would.
@ValkyrieofNOLA
@ValkyrieofNOLA 2 ай бұрын
What has always blown my mind is that the aircraft that enter service publicly have been in development for decades at least… For instance, the F-22 Raptor was initially conceived back in the late twentieth century, like before cell phones, high speed internet and wireless networks were even a thing! Yet it’s the most advanced and powerful air platform ever built for air dominance!
@erasmus_locke
@erasmus_locke Жыл бұрын
I'd love a video on that stolen RQ-170 in Iran
@10p6
@10p6 7 ай бұрын
Flying wings 'DO NOT REDUCE DRAG', they leverage lift in and reduce weight in a slimmer unibody.
@batboy-xf3ki
@batboy-xf3ki Жыл бұрын
:::USAF::: "Awe, Simon! You love us!!!You really love us!" Jim Carry reference.
@thudthud5423
@thudthud5423 Жыл бұрын
Is it called the RQ-180? Good question. The original stealth fighter was long rumored to be designated the "F-19" and it turned out to be the F-117.
@justinzak5025
@justinzak5025 Жыл бұрын
And wasn’t a fighter
@Xenomorphine
@Xenomorphine Жыл бұрын
Rumours persist that the F-19 (whether purely in design or also in designation) existed and was separate to the F-117. There was also ASTRA and a number of others out there.
@thudthud5423
@thudthud5423 Жыл бұрын
@@justinzak5025 True. It should have been designated "A-11", "A12" or "A-13" (I'm not sure where it would have fit in. It was given an "F" designation, probably for misleading purposes, I'm thinking. But, why was it "117"? I think there is an actual explanation, but I've held two personal theories (one is probably the answer): 1. For misleading purposes, it was given an engine designation. So, it would have a paper trail for accounting purposes, but those not in the know would think that funding was funneled into its program for engine development and not for an entire aircraft program. 2. Its in the "Century Series" of US military aircraft that included the F-100 Super Sabre and the F-111 Aardvark. As I recall, there are "F-112, F-113, F-114, F-115 and F-116" aircraft designations given to "borrowed" Soviet fighters in the US inventory whose squadrons are flown out of Groom Lake. It makes an awful lot of sense that the Stealth "Fighter's" designation would follow in the same series as its an "Area 51 Child" as well.
@georgewright3949
@georgewright3949 Жыл бұрын
@@thudthud5423 well the F117 had a role not dissimilar to the F105 and F111 both were light bombers
@nathancroke9602
@nathancroke9602 Жыл бұрын
Nothing to do with the actual video content, but as a fellow shiny head, I've recently learnt that beards are harder work than a full head of hair!
@nicklindberg90
@nicklindberg90 Жыл бұрын
Best sponsorship on KZbin
@EmillioMelendez
@EmillioMelendez Жыл бұрын
Your everyone’s favorite shiny headed KZbinr!
@jrtstrategicapital560
@jrtstrategicapital560 4 ай бұрын
I can't wait for your review on Lockheeds alien reproduction vehicles...👌
@Fubblin
@Fubblin Жыл бұрын
The F-35 has filled some of the persistent ISR requirements by its mere presence in a battlespace due to its network system integration capabilities of enhancing awareness.
@patrickkelly8095
@patrickkelly8095 Жыл бұрын
Until the Chinese hack the system and down all of the planes.
@Yuki_Ika7
@Yuki_Ika7 Жыл бұрын
True, but the RQ-180 might be able to go even higher and into more dangerous territory all while risking no Americans in the process (unless you count thier jobs if they crash the thing or leak it's specs or something other of the sort)
@tonymobbs7738
@tonymobbs7738 Жыл бұрын
there is also plant 42 that has a strong history with spycraft (and skunkworks). keep an eye on google maps occationally they will update and a spy craft of some sort will be out in the open
@sojolly
@sojolly Жыл бұрын
i heard many weird sounds in the night when i lived in east Palmdale.....
@ValkyrieofNOLA
@ValkyrieofNOLA 2 ай бұрын
Plant 42? Do tell…
@SilvanaDil
@SilvanaDil Жыл бұрын
China: "We shot down a satellite in the past two years. It was sloppy, but we did it." USA: "We're not impressed given that we shot down a satellite -- cleanly -- over 15 years ago."
@dianapennepacker6854
@dianapennepacker6854 9 ай бұрын
Try nearly 40 years ago! A F-15 shot one in the mid 80s. It wouldn't surprise me if we had ways to destroy a satellite without causing a debris field in space. Pretty interesting stuff honestly.
@davepitts4479
@davepitts4479 Жыл бұрын
Flash thingy time!
@Istandby666
@Istandby666 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for bring up the B-21 and the RQ-170 and going in to public domain information to clarify your information.
@hnd450
@hnd450 Жыл бұрын
Chicagoooooooooo!
@angelosasso1653
@angelosasso1653 Жыл бұрын
If it should fly faster, wouldn't it be better to have a more arrow like wing? I would think, the design resembling the B-2/B-21, endurance and maybe height is the name of the game.
@paulmurgatroyd6372
@paulmurgatroyd6372 Жыл бұрын
With the thin air up at 80-100k/feet, it might be more useful to have the longer wings for stability. It probably isn't going as fast as an SR-71.
@angelosasso1653
@angelosasso1653 Жыл бұрын
@@paulmurgatroyd6372 Exactly, longer wings for higher endurance and greater altitude but for speed, this alignment is not optimal, I would guess it is flying subsonic. As pointed out in the video: It is most likely a replacement for the U-2 with added stealth and unmanned.
@joedufour8188
@joedufour8188 Жыл бұрын
KZbin experts.... people who can't do simple long division but think they figured out what literal geniuses and experts didn't.
@paulmurgatroyd6372
@paulmurgatroyd6372 Жыл бұрын
@@joedufour8188 Miserable bastards... people who just make comments to moan at everyone because why not.
@JohnJohnson-dj2dv
@JohnJohnson-dj2dv Жыл бұрын
Nice that you used an old project jet for the slide photo that I worked with years ago...that would be the Northrop-Grumman X-47B. Awesome demonstration project and the awards we got were well deserved - IMHO!
@Youtubeuser1aa
@Youtubeuser1aa Жыл бұрын
Do you know Aaron?
@jameswhitehead6758
@jameswhitehead6758 Жыл бұрын
Love the intro and the self-deprecating humor Simon.
@paulkeenan2691
@paulkeenan2691 Жыл бұрын
With the expansion of the Aurura Project- perhaps TRB3 or the more latest edition TRB 10+ could make a mention.
@dolphin265
@dolphin265 Жыл бұрын
@@cancermcaids7688 well, rotodet engines are real even if the "aurora" isnt
@paulkeenan2691
@paulkeenan2691 Жыл бұрын
@@cancermcaids7688 yeah and John Lear and Bob Lazar were the agents of reverse thinking
@zanemccune8759
@zanemccune8759 10 ай бұрын
I've seen... something like this flying over Colorado, I live near Buckley Space Force Base. It was so high it basically blended into the sky, my eyes could tell the shape far better than my camera.
@Amen6magi
@Amen6magi Ай бұрын
RQ180 :god pls not anerica RQ180 birth:doctor where am i Doctor:your in iran😂
@cr0ss0ut
@cr0ss0ut Жыл бұрын
Interesting! I was on a flight from Sacramento to San Diego looking out of the window at the ground below. Then I saw a really fast moving aircraft shaped EXACTLY like the rendering at 16:00 it was black on top and absolutely hauling ass flying eastward about 1000 - 2000 feet below us before passing under the plane i was in. i thought i had a pretty clear view of it. unfortunately i was too quick for me to whip out my phone for a picture tho i did try.
@spencerstevens2175
@spencerstevens2175 Жыл бұрын
I'm sure they flew this highly secret plane in the direct path of your known flight path
@danielwhite8838
@danielwhite8838 9 ай бұрын
Uh. 12:45. Satellites have been giving real time high resolution imagery and data for decades. And the U2 platform/program is roughly 70 years old.
@zmblion
@zmblion Жыл бұрын
I swear ive seen this a few yrs ago but idk i could be wrong but it was pretty similar. The air force does have a base not far away so idk.
@logicalsnuffleupagus1822
@logicalsnuffleupagus1822 Жыл бұрын
Hey Simon, it would be really cool if you narrated a full-length Attenborugh style nature documentary. If my wife's huge knockers could speak they'd have your voice. I've been watching you since ancient times. Always believed you'd make a great nature documentary. Respectfully requested. 🙏
@giacalonebuilding4443
@giacalonebuilding4443 Жыл бұрын
Lol wtf 😂
@HemiDude100
@HemiDude100 Жыл бұрын
The Ucav? *bf4 flashbacks intensify*
@OdyTypeR
@OdyTypeR Жыл бұрын
I worked on F-16's back in the day, which had it's challenges, but I would hate to be a maintainer on one of these - having to take a knee and bow your head all the time...
@TomThibodeau-z8z
@TomThibodeau-z8z Жыл бұрын
You think about doing a megaproject video on the USS Monitor/ CSS Virginia
@brianv1988
@brianv1988 10 ай бұрын
So it's kind of like the RQ ghost bat but that's a unmanned wingman the Australia is making ?...I really like the rq 170. Didn't even know there was another one then you have the global hawk and the mq4c- Triton was the replacement for the global hawk I could be wrong though
@emjackson2289
@emjackson2289 Жыл бұрын
Just remember the D21 . . . . launched from the back of the A12, so dodgy to launch that they launched them from the B52 but then they realised the SR71 was simply better than the D21.
@angelosasso1653
@angelosasso1653 Жыл бұрын
The D-21 has a special place in my heart. It was also ahead of its time. Sadly didn't have the success its mother had...
@SuperpowerBroadcasting
@SuperpowerBroadcasting Жыл бұрын
Such an awesome aircraft!
@nephalos666
@nephalos666 Жыл бұрын
WE LOVE YOU, SHINY HEAD MAN WHO ENTERTAINS US WITH HIS 20-SOME CHANNELS!!!!
@raymidway624
@raymidway624 Жыл бұрын
Their base might be where the RQ-170 operates as well. The area around the base is called Area 52. Same location where the F117 were stationed
@yeee17
@yeee17 Жыл бұрын
Aurora aircraft, tr3b black manta plane, RQ-180 plane, the US are the masters of classified aircraft Legends
@wesselgroenewegen59
@wesselgroenewegen59 Жыл бұрын
The speculation that it might be able to go supersonic seems to be rather contradictory to it's shape. It has a too long wing to be able to go supersonic (drag) and be structurally stable when going supersonic.
@pipinghotpizzarolls
@pipinghotpizzarolls Жыл бұрын
This model is probably more focused on developing radar and thermal stealth. Knowing them, the supersonic model isn’t so easy to spot
@shinkicker404
@shinkicker404 7 ай бұрын
Could it be possible that the wings sweep back further in flight to allow it to go super sonic like the B-1 Bomber?
@m1t2a1
@m1t2a1 Жыл бұрын
Jack Northrop would love this.
@coadypurchase923
@coadypurchase923 Жыл бұрын
The usaf has a rich history of admitting to to its assets once they’ve become obsolete. I love the anxt they create by toying with us
@TheAslakVind
@TheAslakVind 7 ай бұрын
Just noticed a very public SOME post by the Air Force, retiring one of its U-2 Dragon Lady rec planes. I was curious, why that was made. Maybe it is not chained up to this new drone. Maybe the airframe just had it. But still..
@CVSoprano
@CVSoprano 21 күн бұрын
Airframes are good until 2050. Shiny new toys motivation.
@benkenobi7800
@benkenobi7800 Жыл бұрын
Do the Lockheed Martín Cornorant next please!!!
@Heretic44
@Heretic44 4 ай бұрын
Love the videos but the adverts are funny!! Keeps… yeah hows that getting on for you bulbshine? 😂 why would i buy it when it clearly isnt working your scalp hahahhahah
@Cheiff117
@Cheiff117 Жыл бұрын
Shiny head , dashing beard
@martinstallard2742
@martinstallard2742 Жыл бұрын
2:57 what we think we know 7:38 what we suspect 11:32 what it might be doing
@JIJO333
@JIJO333 Жыл бұрын
Loved the AD, a bald dude talking about & advertising hair lose preventing shampoo. The proof? look at his head!
@PATRIOT_Acronym69420
@PATRIOT_Acronym69420 Жыл бұрын
@13:39 Those are not Global Hawks, they are USN MQ-4C Tritons.
@finscreenname
@finscreenname Жыл бұрын
Seems like stealth could be overcome by having a satellite overhead and radar on the ground. These planes reflect radar away from the broadcaster's receivers but those waves have to go somewhere and the satellite could pick up the big hole in the sky. Also these planes may have a radar signature the size of a bird but what bird flies at 40,000 doing a couple hundred mph?
@apolloaero
@apolloaero Жыл бұрын
That's not how radar works. When giving RCS values equivalent to birds or insects, it's just to give you an idea on how small the RCS is. It doesn't mean you can see everything or that you're tracking millions of insects in hopes of catching one going 500 mph
@TheRealWilliamWhite
@TheRealWilliamWhite Жыл бұрын
Even then it's more likely that the radar malfunctioned then that there is something there
@TheNanotag
@TheNanotag Жыл бұрын
RCS isn't a single number; it varies based on multiple factors - frequency, angle relative to radar, and polarization.
@Arenesz
@Arenesz 10 ай бұрын
IT DID FLY NOT LONG AGO!! YAY!!
@dunatyphon5416
@dunatyphon5416 7 ай бұрын
HA! The RQ-170 wasn't "TAKEN OVER"..... it was hand delivered! 🤣🤣🤣
@Insectoid_
@Insectoid_ Жыл бұрын
There are far more aircraft although many are test craft. Michael Schratt does some great presentations
@BV-fr8bf
@BV-fr8bf Жыл бұрын
Wing span of 170 feet? That almost as large as a B-52!
@cheyennekline9674
@cheyennekline9674 Жыл бұрын
Definitely exists, I saw it flying over the Rocky Mountains when I was about 13. The military was doing some sketch shit in Colorado.
@_KaiTheGamer_
@_KaiTheGamer_ Жыл бұрын
Omg he really is my favorite shiny-headed youtuber
@jamesrochon2195
@jamesrochon2195 Жыл бұрын
Almost a Million!!🎉
@kevinmccarthy8746
@kevinmccarthy8746 11 ай бұрын
Yes expencive, that is why the USA and England need to and I am sure they are trying to work together, hopefully.
@MarcinKryszak
@MarcinKryszak Жыл бұрын
Nice sweater Simon
@MidgetRacer8192
@MidgetRacer8192 Жыл бұрын
too many comments to dig thru, so I have not seen it mentioned yet... but do not discount space-based weapons have replaced the SR71 & such. That has been in talks & "tests" for years, and the official creation of Space Force (despite the laughs at the name) may be a small sign of that tech being in place.
@pat8988
@pat8988 Жыл бұрын
“Conduct electronic warfare attacks”. (10:10). That would be one sure fire way to destroy your stealth.
@Youtubeuser1aa
@Youtubeuser1aa Жыл бұрын
You don’t know
@everypitchcounts4875
@everypitchcounts4875 Жыл бұрын
The RQ-180 has been in service. It was used in Afghanistan, along with the RQ-170 Sentinel. XQ-58 Valkyrie & X-47b were operated by the US Navy. Keep an eye out for the new MQ-25 Stingray, ghost bat, loyal wingman, Hermeus, Aurora flight sciences CRANE X-plane & Gambit drones.
@craigme3014
@craigme3014 Жыл бұрын
stuff the head hair treatment! go for the beard! disclaimer i do not have one. nice jumper change!
@pipinghotpizzarolls
@pipinghotpizzarolls Жыл бұрын
Thanks chrome dome 💚
@MrAbraxus666
@MrAbraxus666 Жыл бұрын
*does the DiCaprio pointing meme* That's the Batwing Folks...That's the Batwing.
@carlstanland5333
@carlstanland5333 Жыл бұрын
Shikaka! 🛖🦇
@Overneed-Belkan-Witch
@Overneed-Belkan-Witch Жыл бұрын
Remember, stick with Trigger. And you'll make it.
@RonnieRawdawg
@RonnieRawdawg Жыл бұрын
I've seen one of these before there's one at my local airbase
@Alpha_Joe
@Alpha_Joe Жыл бұрын
it's reminded me of the mq101 "where's the arsenal bird"
@lilpaper3718
@lilpaper3718 Жыл бұрын
question what do you use to clean your beard
@dominicmillns5856
@dominicmillns5856 Жыл бұрын
You’re favourite shiny headed youtuber here! - Babish has entered the ch - Vsauce has entered the ch - FACT BOI HAS ENDED THE CHAT.
@Cyberdemon11120
@Cyberdemon11120 Жыл бұрын
The Advanced UAV form Call of Duty MWII.
@gunnerroo6514
@gunnerroo6514 Жыл бұрын
Friendly Advanced UAV entering the AO.
@gwizdolby
@gwizdolby Жыл бұрын
True story. I along with most of our Hockey team shaved our heads in solidarity when a team mate of ours who was diagnosed with leukemia. Long story short. I liked the look and I kept bicing my head in the shower every other day for 5+ years. I went bald without ever knowing about it. You might think this is BS but for what ever the word from a random commenter on KZbin is worth.
@jcdefrancis
@jcdefrancis Жыл бұрын
More like 2nd favorite. Babish #1!
@happygolucky143
@happygolucky143 Жыл бұрын
6:47 i think i heard EQ Hawkeye 🤔
@handfulofjohnson
@handfulofjohnson 10 ай бұрын
Ace...Adventurer? Ace Ventura my dude.
@kkeliipio
@kkeliipio Жыл бұрын
A-12 turned into the sr71. AF not acknowledging its existence could be because it is for another agency... Just a thought!
@tedsmith6137
@tedsmith6137 Жыл бұрын
"....a clearly defined pointed tail....."? 4:50. So why is that not drawn on the sketches?
@JDFloyd
@JDFloyd Жыл бұрын
"It's Aliens!!!"
@Pavel_Poluian
@Pavel_Poluian Жыл бұрын
The first approach to this secret technology appeared 100 years ago! Pitts Sky Car - the device is an ancestor of contemporary flying saucers. This umbrella plane looks funny, but it is unlikely that the American inventor spent money on making the machine just for fun. The flight principle based on generating compression under a vibrating plane is no worse than the flight principle of traditional airplanes. When the device was being created, engineers realized that it would give a higher lifting force. Step by step it turned out during the tests that the device could perform a flight if the oscillation frequency was measured in megahertz and the amplitude of oscillation in millimeters. But at that time there were no technologies to get the total power of vibration and achieve supersonic frequency. The aircraft-?building company of Chance Vought cooperated with the Naval Department. The Skimmer flying saucer that appeared after WWII was a result of the cooperation. It is believed to be an experimental variant of a propeller-?driven airplane, however it is not ruled out that Chance Vought made the model especially for running tests of the aerodynamic lift of electrokinetic engines. In the late 1940s, first flying saucers appeared in the US. They resembled telephone loudspeakers: impulse electromagnets made one or several huge membranes beat the air at a megahertz frequency. And a streamline top part of the device provided the difference of drag forces on the top and on the bottom. But still some facts pertaining to the strange device remained unclear. A flying saucer could not generate any lifting force until it threw something off the way rockets did. This is a ring whirl: it does not leave vacuum to intake a flying saucer. It is necessary to keep a saucer on the ring whirl just for a couple of microseconds, the period within which a new whirl is generated. Flying saucers with impulse electromagnets were heavy and could not cover long distances. So, Americans had to use submarines to deliver them to the Soviet shores that gave rise to stories telling that UFOs emerged from under water. Later, new devices appeared where no electromagnetic field was used to shake a propelling membrane. The bodies of such devices were made of piezoceramic, and vibration appeared thanks to the piezoelectric effect (we know that piezoelectric tweeters make the sound in electronic alarm clocks and mobile phones). The new generation apparatuses were no longer saucers but spheres, ellipsoids and other three-?dimensional figures haloed with ionized gas. The USSR got UFOs of its own in the 1960s-70s. Once, Soviet Academician Shklovsky asserted in the popular informational program Vremya (Time) that there were no other creatures besides earth dwellers in the Universe. It sounded like an official statement of the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party saying that no aliens ever existed, and all reports alleging that people witnessed UFOs were misinformation. Special committees immediately started censoring newspaper publications and deleted everything that could be connected with UFO visits and aliens. At that very period Americans already had the third generation of flying saucers, dark objects with just few zones on them glowing. Those were whirl activators: the glow on the bottom to make the object fly and the glow on the side (so-?called illuminators) to make it move to the sides. Now used motor panel. They are arranged as a plasma TV screen. But the cell arresters is the tube of the rail launcher in cities. Plasma sparks popping up with great speed thousands of times per second - this creates a toroidal flux rings, which propel the apparatus.
@ioanbota9397
@ioanbota9397 Жыл бұрын
I like this powerful drone
@jacobylandskov6787
@jacobylandskov6787 Жыл бұрын
How do we know those “spottings” weren’t just the B-21?
@douglasm3310
@douglasm3310 Жыл бұрын
Because it’s a different shape the b21 has a completely different wing to fuselage ratio.
@tamer1773
@tamer1773 6 ай бұрын
When and if the AIr Force confirms it's existence that will mean they're already planning it's successor.
@StrawHat83
@StrawHat83 9 ай бұрын
Looks a lot like the X-47B project that was defunded... allegedly.
@ZayahFeaster
@ZayahFeaster Жыл бұрын
Simon, please do a crossover with Babish Cooking University 😭😭😭
@soulesslemming
@soulesslemming Жыл бұрын
There’s footage of 2 of these flying east of Colorado Springs Colorado at extremely high altitude.
@benjaminjay3933
@benjaminjay3933 4 ай бұрын
Plz send one to "TABAS" desert in Iran 😁
@miduv82
@miduv82 Жыл бұрын
You'll find out if they exist when China or Russia tries something then these aircraft will emerge. This aircraft was probably developed 15 years ago and they're currently working on better ones.
@vincentas1
@vincentas1 10 ай бұрын
dude iran captured one 10 years ago
@AdventurerAnthony
@AdventurerAnthony Жыл бұрын
I’ve seen one in Palmdale.
R&D Deep Dive: The Next-Gen Fighter Planes You’ve Never Heard Of
17:55
Пришёл к другу на ночёвку 😂
01:00
Cadrol&Fatich
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Players vs Corner Flags 🤯
00:28
LE FOOT EN VIDÉO
Рет қаралды 54 МЛН
Northrop Grumman X-47B: The Billion Dollar Drone
13:57
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 367 М.
Project Mayhem: The US Hypersonic Bomber
14:19
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 547 М.
Russia's Unstoppable Supercavitating Torpedo (VA-111 Shkval)
13:18
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 570 М.
MCAS: The Silent Killer on the 737 MAX
19:45
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 445 М.
Moskva: The Doomed Destiny of Russia's Grandest Warship
18:13
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
The Shocking Plan to Nuke the Moon (Project A119)
11:37
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 101 М.
The Lockheed U2: Spying Before Satellites
21:41
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 703 М.
The Ferdinand: WWII’s Most Overrated Tank Destroyer?
15:50
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 105 М.
Best Vacuum? $60 vs $500 Dyson? Let’s Find Out!
23:12
Project Farm
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН