this video has the best explanation so far, hats off to sal
@helencardrick10484 жыл бұрын
You realise you have issues stay up to midnight watching this stuff
@jasonc.carilla5041 Жыл бұрын
That's true bro
@Peugot308 Жыл бұрын
HAHAHHA YEAH THATD ME😂😂😂
@luce92642 жыл бұрын
A little explanation to why positive-charged ions fill in 3d first than 4s: In neutral atom, energy level is as followed by Aufbau principle. In this case: 3d has higher energy level than 4s. However, once the 3d orbital is filled in with electrons, 3d energy level is reduced to lower than 4s. This happens in cations. For this case, 4s has higher energy level than 3d. When removing electrons from atoms to form cations, electrons of higher energy level is removed first. Because in Sc atom 3d is already filled in, its 3d subshell is lesser energy to 4s subshell. Thus, 4s is removed first. tldr: Sc atom has [Ar] 4s^2 and 3d^1, but Sc cation removes 4s subshell first then 3d subshell
@loshankosi31192 жыл бұрын
now i understand this much better ..thank you so much
@chloeyhs3 жыл бұрын
thank u I finally understand this :)
@rishitakhan28312 ай бұрын
I was just middle in the pond, now I can understand, thank you.
@zack_120 Жыл бұрын
You should've continued 😀
@angellagman91154 жыл бұрын
I got dis thanks 😊❤️
@sciencenerd76393 жыл бұрын
it was helpful, thank you
@PoloML4 жыл бұрын
for Sc why did you write 3d before 4s? was it intentional or does it not matter?
@A_nobody_forever4 жыл бұрын
It really doesn't matter. He just represented the orbitals in the order of principle quantum number. It really doesn't matter, all it matters is in which energy level the electron actually lies. But plz don't confuse it when u create an atom from an ion by adding the electrons.(as he mentioned @ 4:54)
@dharmeshlal78192 жыл бұрын
FIRST OF ALL I WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND YOU TO WATCH PHYSICS WALLAH AUFBOU PRINCIPLE LECTURE. ITS A SHORT LECTURE . IT WILL JUST TAKE TEN minutes. ITS REALLY HELPFUL
@Noornoor-vd9ydАй бұрын
Thanks bro but that last d-block talk was confusing 😅
@luckedout98684 жыл бұрын
thaaaaank you so much
@zenbelt65064 жыл бұрын
In calcium why did'nt we put the two electrons in 3d? Please give answer
@kratos76923 жыл бұрын
I'm way too late but its because 4s has lower energy than 3d
@nakitacoleman133 жыл бұрын
@@kratos7692 does that mean we fill in the ones with lower energy first???
@kratos76923 жыл бұрын
@@nakitacoleman13 yes
@nakitacoleman133 жыл бұрын
@@kratos7692 thank you so much that was helpful :)
@sarvagyajain20973 жыл бұрын
but pls tell me that if it goes to 3d first so why we study that electron in 4s
@aadityasuralkar52104 жыл бұрын
Can anyone tell the electronic configuration of Magnesium (Mn)`