I will never trust a gun review done by journalists who don’t know the basics of a gun
@kousy007Ай бұрын
Anything made by govt psu can’t match the quality of private companies. Sig is a far better weapon. Also remember, making few and in bulk is whole different ball game. Design wise even insas is a great weapon but just manufacturing with right quality control, govt psu could not do it. I am a big supporter of self reliance but it should not be at the cost of soldiers life.
@be572Ай бұрын
True'
@Cobra313456Ай бұрын
Lol 80% of exports are done by PSU. INSAS was the most unrealistic GSQR given to PSU but PSU should be given credit for they made it working THIS TYPE OF GSQR ARE NOT ACCEPTED BY FOREIGN COMPANIES especially Americans. Ex DM Parikar himself said Army makes its GSQR by reading MARVEL COMICS
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
True
@sudip_curiousmindАй бұрын
Agreed on PSU products but it doesn't have to be PSUs. The technology can be licensed to an Indian vendor with quality parameters and operational SLAs
@Cobra313456Ай бұрын
@@kousy007 80% of exports are done by PSU. INSAS was the most unrealistic GSQR given to PSU but PSU should be given credit for they made it working THIS TYPE OF GSQR ARE NOT ACCEPTED BY FOREIGN COMPANIES especially Americans. Ex DM Parikar himself said Generals makes its GSQR by reading MARVEL COMICS
@AlphaSierra380Ай бұрын
Thumb nail is Misleading. Through out the video you don’t show any graphic/data related to the comparison.
@AshishSingh-ut6fk22 күн бұрын
We Indians don't understand that research and development is a continuous process and the first rendering of any project is bound to underperform on many accounts and after making many tweaks and improvements in their next renderings the same project can be worthy enough to deliver more than the optimum results and should never be made discounted for future considerations.
@sk8899Ай бұрын
Never understood the need for developing URGAM when OFB could've easily developed a modernized version of SLR like done by USA's DSA Firearms for FN FAL. OFB's obsession with Long-stroke piston systems doesn't makes sense if it really wants to compete against Weatern Systems.
@siddhantmedpalliwar6860Ай бұрын
True, it should be so hard for them to reverse engineer, develop a working prototype, test and validate a proven rifle, but no they always want to develop from a scratch, back to square one.
@theoakatsukiАй бұрын
Long stroke were traditionally considered more reliable hence the insistence on long stroke. Besides DRDO has worked mostly around long stroke making them experts in that
@udaynjАй бұрын
SIG has been global superpower in firearms. They produce real world rifles that have worked for decades in combat and tough field conditions. It would be insane for the Indian military to accept unproven Indian rifle from a company which has zero prior experience in manufacturing a battle proven rifle (unless someone is getting paid crores in bribes). Why not give the Indian rifle to CRPF and test in other smaller conflicts than to screw the Indian military with another potential INSAS rifle
@linkme2dnetАй бұрын
small batches can be easily ordered and tested in the zehaddi infested frontier regions
@sohanpanigrahi2673Ай бұрын
They should consider SSS Defence P72 and others
@rajeshbobba3851Ай бұрын
Desi weapons should be our Raksha mantra.
@manh9105Ай бұрын
anything where OFBs are involved would be crappy
@XD_Legacy_XDАй бұрын
SSS defence should be in priority
@MaheshYadav-kg7ox4 күн бұрын
Upgram upgram bol rahe ho abhi tak servis me aya ki nahi ak saal ho gaye use hota h ki nahi
@uniqued605018 күн бұрын
Superb
@mimi7a247 минут бұрын
Please consider,Good citizen of india deserve good quality of weapons for self defence at reasonable price ,
@sheshadramathurАй бұрын
The anchor's dexterity of deflecting when the speaker pointed out the problems were resolved after 2014(modi in power) vs previous times is admirable 😂
@PrakashBaripalАй бұрын
They can't accept the truth 😂😂😂😂
@prashanthb652117 күн бұрын
This means the efforts were put in before 2014. The gun did not become good magically after 2014. You guys will not miss any opportunity to do aarthi for your supreme master even if it needs manufacturing fake interpretations of information.
@NorbuWangmo-h6z17 күн бұрын
Sig is superior
@KalyanChandrayadav17 күн бұрын
762 has better stopping Power
@100merijungАй бұрын
SIG Saur is known for combat proved firearms. Be it Ukraine, Africa, UNPKF, Taiwan, SIGs have seen combat. Ranging from pistols, PDW/CCW, compact, assault rifles, DMRs, LMGs they are one of top 3 preferred firearms industries even by US for their service firearms. An industry known for innovations and goes toe to toe with H&K. IMO, I'm glad someone here finally understands why american. I'm not completely against our indigenous firearms but clearly if they didn't reach our jawaans then obviously, something through quality perspective things didn't work out as expected. Hence we had to select a better option. Russians are outdated, chinese can't be trusted, germans refuse to sell anything above MP5, israelis have provided enough and belgians are simply overpriced. UGRAM may need to go through many more tests. Until then, 716 is a good, effective and lethal primary pick.
@xxxx4xyx2 күн бұрын
Is it insas 2... I prefer sss defence
@vishalnayak3966Ай бұрын
To all those saying ugram is outdated, genuine question to you all..HOW?? is the firing rate low, or is the accuracy low, is the quality low? Facts pls
@NormalPerson053Ай бұрын
Long stroke piston heavier recoil. Cleaner then di of sig but best system is short stroke system. Sub par quality of parts by Indian government industry quality of parts have always been questionable. Bad repo and corruption of these psu can not be just disappeared. No mlock. Heavier. Biggest flaw no plans for optics and accessories to make a battle rifle accurate and deadly to 800-1000 yards. Because all the buzz about these battle rifles in usa sig spear and our ugram is to have a 308 rifle that can shoot to mid to long ranges because gwot shown 5.56 has draw backs and 7.62x39 has drawbacks. It's just a gimmick. Ak 47 is ok and our country has no problem of less soldiers our tactics is fucking USSR 1970 to 1990 tactics throw enough soldiers at threat encircle them and have special forces contacted eventually it will get neutralized the catch soldiers will die but no problem we got enough to replace . Nothing will change 😢. Our soldiers regular ones are still in 90s . Most conflicts they will face with outdated tools.
@linkme2dnetАй бұрын
@@NormalPerson053 the solution to your conutries trouble is not conventional.
@deltron9524Ай бұрын
Please keep making such videos
@Cameron-x1rАй бұрын
"nothing works like an indigenous firearm" The SA80 was an indigenous firearm design and it didn't work frequently.
@asithota10434 күн бұрын
We have to take care of our private industries so that they can compete with mnc like bae, raython..
@skengeneАй бұрын
I think its unfair to compare so soon. Ugram has not seen combat test yet. It needs more time in actual combat . Sig has seen lot of combat n therefore underwent lot updates. Let ugram grow first.
@tstanmoysamantaАй бұрын
Still, Indian Army would not buy an Indian Gun..........
@manojd2120Ай бұрын
UGRAM so outdated
@Sted164Ай бұрын
???
@be572Ай бұрын
True
@skengeneАй бұрын
Video game boy , u kno more than soldiers?
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
@@skengene then tell me what do u know ?
@sagansahoo5847Ай бұрын
Indian public sector rifles sucks except private sector
@GreyHound8Ай бұрын
I think individual soldier should have option to choose weapon.
@availablehageАй бұрын
Do think of servicing ammo and training
@AbhijeetDolai-eo6ibАй бұрын
How come the UGRAM developed by DRDO as per specifications and Inputs from the Indian Army does not get selected by the Army itself ?
@narain1433Ай бұрын
why not SSS defense p72
@letkholalhaokip592621 күн бұрын
If india product arms can defeat foreign SIC rifle. today media information is in danger.
@be572Ай бұрын
UGRAM is 70s Based Weapon Model. Sig is Truely Modern Latest Gen Weapon. No Comparison Between Two.
@skengeneАй бұрын
Sig did not become modern in 1st attempt. It is because of people like u tat indian arms have not developed properly.
@chandlerminh6230Ай бұрын
@@skengene what has random people in the internet got to do with this? sig become modern after 150 years of legacy. are saying we should wait 150 years for the military;s next battle rifle so than Indian companies can be promoted? you dont even buy a smartphone designed by an Indian company then why should the military take risk just to promote local?
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
@@skengene so indian army soldiers should die with lack of equipment for next 150 yrs? No hard feelings buddy but please think before commenting
@skengeneАй бұрын
@@chandlerminh6230 Ugram has to b promoted. In war if usa stops supply of sig, will u fight with stones then? Read history first , usa has denied tech to india during kargil war. Dont comment wit half knowledge.
@skengeneАй бұрын
@@chandlerminh6230 brainless people lik u think it will take 150 yrs. Ugram is already in trials.
@AM-zk7pjАй бұрын
The indian design is based on the Kalashnikov pattern its a better design when in trench and mud..
@pk979974 күн бұрын
Hv u seen the recoil of Ugram...stop propogating as though Ugram is better than Sig...dont make it sound as though our armed forces are wrong by not chosing Ugram..
@shankramma.kshankramma6682Ай бұрын
Do firing comparison
@abhisekdas4605Ай бұрын
Jai Hind Jai Bharat Jai Mahakal Sir please compare and make a video on Sig sauer 716, and G3 H&K. G3 is used by Pakistan army
@Hhsin23-b6mАй бұрын
Ak 203
@anamwangsu134118 күн бұрын
Kia hathiar thora chota nahi bana sakta hai kia like..M4 ....insas or Sig ka cocktail lag raha hai 😂😂😂
@snehashischowrangi6016Ай бұрын
can you share previous previous Ugram episode
@availablehageАй бұрын
Ugram can be given to police
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
Hey lets be honest here indian armed forces inducted an gave order to ASMI machine pistols. This proves that if indian weapons are world class then our forces are th happiest forces in the worl an they r willing to accept and order the weapons but if they are not good enough they reject it even though the weapons are indian. So please you guys before makin a video or commenting take these actions into consideration. As far as SSS defence i aggree that weapons are good but maybe they r not upto the mark thats y the army dint purchase them, if they were good then army had taken those weapons in consideration like ASMI
@siddhantmedpalliwar6860Ай бұрын
You test these on range not comment who is better
@BILLU_BADMASH1Ай бұрын
💐💐💐💐
@snehashischowrangi6016Ай бұрын
your Ugram video delete ?
@Olive_ChapАй бұрын
Sig was supposed to be interim one time rifle for frontline troops.. but repeat order of same is travesty to Make In India.. Ugram or anything else by DRDO/ARDE is crap because of production capability of OFBs.. Instead DRDO know how should be transfer to willing small arms private player in India & kind of ergonomically sound SSS produce.. It should be from day one be chooses for this tender or future IA variant of 6.8mm round..
@mukundha7621Ай бұрын
Sss defense
@SanjayKumar-d1g8oАй бұрын
Why 2014 . Is it that u want to make it UPA vs NDA. Dirty minds
@কাঙলাখেদাওАй бұрын
Forign company give huge commission thats why our babu hasitate to purchase indigenous products. And its true
@parthasrivastava4011Ай бұрын
India is producing one of the best small firearms what a joke
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
Not today I accept it but surely it will in very near future
@thegreatestofalltime777Ай бұрын
How hard is it to make just a simple rifle!?
@be572Ай бұрын
For DRDO It MIght Take 40 More YEars. XD Imagine Pioneer Research Institution is nOt Competent to Develop State of Art Riflt. XD What a SHame.
@recon17Ай бұрын
they are not trying to make a 'simple rifle'.
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
@@be572we need more private firms in this. Drdo is a good designer but it is not a quality manufacturer. You know asmi it is indian machine pistol o uzi which is designed by drdo in record time but manufacturing is done by private firms moreover indian army col was also involved with its design so he made sure that the design and quality is perfect which should match reqts of army so it is a gr8 success now. It is not that drdo don't have potential and talent it is just that it is a govt institution and u know govt institutions r dumb and constipated. If drdo was a pvt company it would have developed 5th gen fighter by now and flew it.
@MohitSharma-sv5dpАй бұрын
I think ugram need more modifications and it's need meet army requirements and has to pass all test across nation terrains
@abhimanyusinghchauhan334524 күн бұрын
Copy of g3 .308
@tridibpanjaАй бұрын
Sig is Sig , others are trash
@Robdua1968Ай бұрын
Just propaganda video. No one believe in this new rifle.
@biswanathlaishram8393Ай бұрын
Ugram vs sig. ???😅😅 still india can't produce a world class asualt rifle like ak Or m16.. From where this ugram comes.. Is that field tested gun . If u ask ur soilder to choose one gun between two they will choose sig... It's very early to make comparisn.. Only two countries had made world class assualt rifle till now that's US and Russia. Those isreali made tavor come after reverse engineering.. They studied both AK and M16 for more than 15 years. To make tavor.
@hemantchoudhary1160Ай бұрын
Sss defense is better
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
No it is like comparing Nokia Android phone (sss defence) with apple(sig) but it will be in near future.
@bathiniumesh7212Ай бұрын
Ugram that up dated insas rafil but this ugram copy Ak gas operated system and also insas same better rifil. Sig 716
@prashanthb6521Ай бұрын
What about P72 from SSSDefence ? This is what kills entrepreneurship in India. Its all match fixing. Genuine entrepreneurs cant win honestly.
@Hhsin23-b6mАй бұрын
For me sig is not good rifle.
@pandibbarmanАй бұрын
Then you don't have knowledge about rifles in general
@Hhsin23-b6mАй бұрын
@pandibbarman it looks good when you see but when we fire, this rifle has high recoil in which it lacks accuracy... High caliber rifle useless though it has longer kargar range than Insas and Ak 47... And it's sights omg its breaks so easily when it fells down....
@foodietour8313Ай бұрын
@@Hhsin23-b6m First of all bhai ji No gun comes without a muzzle breaker which fires 7.62*51 except Sig 716. It doesn't have a Muzzle breaker so its recoil will be high. It is the problem of the Armed forces and the govt. that they are purchasing a Gun of 80000+ rs. Per unit and can't spend 5000 rs. On muzzle breaker. 2nd mountings of guns are made in India by Indian pvt. Companies so if it breaks during fall then it should be improved not Rifle. Thanks
@Aditya0227Ай бұрын
may be they can sell ugram to other countries no point in India now
@skengeneАй бұрын
It wil replace sig one day buddy
@Aditya0227Ай бұрын
@@skengene lol our army like imported maal dont you know
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
@@skengenenot probably ugram but much better rifles then ugram designed by us.
@rajkumardiamondtonАй бұрын
Both fail on ground go with the Hecklers
@peggandwhiskeyАй бұрын
Nothing compared to kalashnikov series . Their reliability is next level
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
@@peggandwhiskeynahhh hk is on another level
@srim72816 күн бұрын
Thanks, why is there a maximum range difference between Sig and Ugram if they have the same caliber, what's the change, I hope you ask the right questions to get the right answers rather than reporting what they have said or done. Secondly, can you please let us know the difference in metallurgy of the two guns, are they using steel or and any other kind of alloys? What is the difference in both the rifles from a mechanism perspective, and what are the advantages or disadvantages?
@likewise_a_realist25 күн бұрын
Same maal colour change karke UGRAM.. wohi INSAS jaisa.. Yeah babu log kuch nahi karte sirf tankha lete hai.
@SangramKeshariDeoАй бұрын
Indian army should go for ugram
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
If indian army should buy ugram then first stop buying international smartphone like oppo, vivo apple, Samsung etc and buy indian Micromax. You don have any right to critisize others when u r doing the same. If u can buy ur phone best phone suiting ur interests for communication, gaming, entertainment and use. Then why can't army buy international weapons from private firms for protection of the nation suiting their interests.
@SangramKeshariDeoАй бұрын
@sanjayhiremath9297 dear friend weapons and smartphones are 2 different things..our army needs weapons to defend our country and it cn not risk to have a supply difficulty at a time of conflict..american govt cn not be trusted blind floded
@sanjayhiremath9297Ай бұрын
@SangramKeshariDeo my friend u r right in ur supply chain and trust points I agree on them but we have to note that we can't use ugram as our primary service rifle. I guess we should drop both the rifles and go with indian ak203 as our choice, it is good rifle.
@isleephungryАй бұрын
Global hunger rankings 105 😂🎉
@Priyanshu1988-u3dАй бұрын
Source - western countries
@powerrangerofchrist591Ай бұрын
@@Priyanshu1988-u3dso what’s your source then ? I wanna know !? …… better stop blaming west for your own failures!!!
@Shivay...................278Ай бұрын
U know it's propaganda when Pakistan and Uganda are ahead of you in hunger ranking😂😂
@dragonstormdipro1013Ай бұрын
@@powerrangerofchrist591 What failure? Should we drop the ball and run like cowards like Americans in Afghanistan?
@recon17Ай бұрын
So?
@tsewangc9403Ай бұрын
SIG 716 Better than AK-204 why not sig 217 for army?