The BEST Compact Camera EVER Made? | Sony RX100vii in 2024

[@HenryTurnerphoto]

Thanks for watching! What’s your go-to camera for travel or big outdoor adventures where weight needs to be kept to a minimum? I’d love to hear your thoughts! Drop your comments below! 👇

[@bpalotas]

I was really torn between the Sony RX100 VII you review here and the Canon G5X II or G7X III. I got the G7X in the end (found a great deal on a display model from a store nearby), and I love it for the same reasons you do. Compactness, does great video too (better than my Fuji, whose audio recording is terrible!), and I love the portraits I can do with what I call the "Canon colours" and the f/1.8-2.8 lens.

[@sdrtcacgnrjrc]

Panasonic GF7 (one of those tiny m43 models with 16mp and minimal IS). If i bring 24-200mm equivalent, it's tiny compared to APSC or full frame, but still way bigger than the Sony compact.

[@ratgirl13]

The Sony RX100vii. It is a very good camera and pocketable, and has so many fun to use features.

[@metalmick99]

If I had to really keep the weight down but wanted to retain maximum versatility, then the Sony RX10 IV: weathersealed, 24-600mm zoom, video at speeds up to 1,000fps, rapid autofocus, full manual control, and up 24 fps continuous shooting... but at a weight impost of 1,100 grams; slightly lighter would be my OM-1 and I'd lash out for the 12-100 F4. 😛But if weight was really critical, it would be hard to go past the pocketable Sony RX100 VII.

[@NetvoTV]

Hi Henry, my name is Johnny and I'm a freelance logo designer, currently I'm looking for more works, do you love to have a logo for your channel's branding to have a memorable graphic based monogram logo to help your audience recognise and follow your channel easier? I would love to design a photography themed logo inspired by your direction for you! Let me know if you interested to make it happen! :-)

[@KenJJamesK]

I have sold all my DSLR gear in the last 3 months and purchased one of these as a walk around camera. Think I'm silly? Nope, I'm 82, had a stroke and have balance problems. Any of you around those years will understand. I still miss my DSLR but this little beast is pretty darned good. My style of photography has always been colour and contrast, not like Henry and his love of mist and mood, so, basically I'm a sunshine bloke. For that use, it produces very sharp RAW photos. I bought the $19.95 stick on grip from Sony to make it easier for me to hold....brilliant! Sure it is not a DSLR but it rings my bells. Ain't that what photography is about? Ken from New Zealand

[@MrWozzafive]

I'm with you, Ken. I also sold all my large format gear after my stoke 3 years ago. I love the portability of my RX100VII. I'm looking forward to using it when I come over the ditch in November to travel on the Northern Explorer and the Coastal Pacific trains. Regards Warren from Sunbury Australia

[@setnistone]

My exact story... just a tad younger.. last month I missed my Fuji XT3 so much I rented on with a zoom lens and after one day of carrying it around, I sent it back, I'd rented it for a week, Quickly a no go for me... I too have the RX but the M6.

[@KenJJamesK]

@@MrWozzafive G'day Wozza. take a look at the TranzAlpine Train from Christchurch to Greymouth & return. Going to do that one in October when we go down to the South Island for a couple of weeks from our hometown, Napier

[@MrWozzafive]

G'day Ken . Thanks for your suggestion regarding TranzAlpine. The wife and I travelled on it back in 2017. Great experience. Have a great weekend. Regards Warren

[@ricoman7981]

I agree. I’m 67 and just don’t want to carry all my heavy full frame gear anymore. Additionally, photography is a solo sport. My wife doesn’t enjoy it when I want to set up a tripod and play with the settings, etc. Most of my photography is just on vacations with my wife so no more gear. I bought the RX100 V when it came out and was really pleased with my results. When the VI came out with the 200mm equivalent I thought seriously about it but couldn’t justify the cost. Then the VII came out and I went through the same dilemma, is it worth the cost. In 2022 I broke down and bought the VII. I’m very pleased with the decision even though I have yet to sell my original A7 and the 24 X 135 G lens. Having said that, I can’t remember the last time I took the A7 anywhere. Last thought, the VII’s longer range and higher quality sensor is great but personally I think that in many cases the V give slightly sharper results, especially in low light when I’m not zooming so much anyway. Just my thoughts.

[@ronp4529]

I've bought and sold this camera 3 times. Always enticed by the size and focal range, and I have taken shots that I really like... But too often I end up disappointed with the image quality. One thing to keep in mind with a 2.7x crop factor is that shooting above f/5.6 you may notice image quality is affected by diffraction. Keep the f stops low, f/4 is basically f/11 on full frame! I think a m43 point and shoot with a 24-120 might hit a sweet spot in size and capability.

[@ohnoflicks]

Tried to love this camera and just couldn’t do it. Sold it after 6 months. Issues similar to yours as far as image quality. Have many other cameras, so no big deal. But maybe just a bit of a warning to people who have over the top expectations. This camera is not the DO ALL piece of kit that some may think it is.

[@kwdav]

Why don’t try GR III?🤔

[@ronp4529]

@@kwdav they should make a zoom version. Even a 24-50 2.8 equiv would be better than a fixed 28 or 40 to me, especially since that lens pops out anyway. Or just make it 35mm, weather seal it and don't have the lens go in and out. All the wrong compromises for my intended uses.

[@ohnoflicks]

@@kwdav Internal dust issues. I was just hoping for something truly pocketable that was good quality. I went back to my little Canon Elph for pocket fun. I bought the Sony in part because so many raved about it. Yeah I’m a bit of a gear junkie. The camera was just not for me though, and that’s ok. I hope those that do like it continue to enjoy it.

[@FernandoC]

Yes, make it slightly larger with a slightly larger sensor but keep the existing features and it's golden!

[@sigurdrille9693]

Thank you! Finally someone who appreciates this wonderful, albeit expensive, little camera. It has been my travel companion since 2021 and I have taken wonderful shots around the world with it. So versatile, so compact and pocketable, going with me just about everywhere. Too bad Sony does not evolve on it.

[@markjones127]

The RX100ii has been my go to for fell running for about 8 years now, I keep it in a sandwich bag in the front pocket of my bumbag and it been through -17c snow blizzards on Foel Fras and even been used in light drizzle a few times and still works perfectly. It has a hotshoe which is handy, it was the one which came with an eye wateringly expensive EVF sold as an attachment which I only finally bought a few years ago in a nice cheap deal on ebay, but I love this little thing, it takes beautiful images, I love hiking and wild camping with my Fuji mirrorless gear but will always have an RX100 for running and when I want to go ultralight on a wild camp, I live just up the road from Tryfan, such a beautiful mountain!

[@3456korea]

This camera is still very popular in Korea. A new camera costs $1240. Many people can't buy a used camera even if they want to. People don't sell it. This is one of the cameras I really want. I subscribed to your channel because it was really helpful. Thank you.

[@Stallzyx]

yeah it's only moderately cheaper than new here in the UK to get a used one and so I had to borrow some money but it was important because I needed it in time to capture some important concerts and my sister's graduation. such a good camera and I don't even know if it makes my 750d/700d redundant

[@washingtonradio]

I think the issue with even the best point-and-shoots and bridge cameras isn't that their images unacceptable but that once you have been spoiled by a DSLR or mirrorless with some excellent lens your standards are higher, possibly too high, and you might not realize the photo is actually quite good overall.

[@vin424242]

Cameras now have to me are soulless, i have an OM1 and 3 pro zooms i got for a retirement present to me, do i like it ? yes but i dont love it, my favorite camera is my old E3 i got with a pro zoom not long after cos it was cheap and its a joy to use

[@pentagramyt417]

@@vin424242 wait a minute.. people with modern full-frame as A7-4, Canon R5 and so on, move to the OM1 saying it's more fun and they love it for functionality, very cheap, and light-weight, and you say you go even further for older cameras saying it's cheap and its joy to use?

[@Tharrel]

Nah, for many people it’s the other way round. I had 2 Fuji bodies with 4 nice lenses. No I moved on to Fuji 100vi, and it’s just so nice not having to carry and change lenses. I keep one Fuji body for work, but for hobby I will only use the 100vi

[@cine-ish]

@@vin424242 speak for yourself, fujifilm have soul and resolution

[@m4rcin847]

​@@vin424242You just need a toy, not a camera.

[@williamruffell3135]

I have the RX100 V1 and l had the same reaction to it, as you have had. I also have a Pentax K1 which with lenses is so heavy that it pulls me over, whereas the Sony can be in your trouser pocket. I am 92 and can't walk far. The Sony has made me able to continue my photography without sacrificing quality. JR

[@mark-h3g5w]

I have had the RX100vii since launch and love it. I have won photo club print competitions (500 x400mm) and digital competitions with images I have shot on it. People assume I have used a DSLR. I love low light shots, and people often say this is a weakness of the camera. I don't think so - I just run them through Topaz Denoise AI. Sometimes images can be soft straight out of the camera - I then use Topaz Sharpen AI. When I crop massively the images can be a bit small and pixelated - then I use Topaz Gigapixel AI. To me there is a workaround for all the issues. And one other thing, the image stabilisation is brilliant. I can hand hold 200mm equivalent at 1/15 second. As Henry says, pixel peep and you can criticise, but for real world use it is brilliant!!! But just my opinion obviously.

[@muhammadraahil5172]

I complete agree with you. This is what made me love this camera again. When I bought it the first time, I didn’t use it properly and I hated the image quality and I sold it off. I gave it another go, did Denoise and sharpening in Lightroom, oh boy, I might have found my favourite camera

[@mikesmith3957]

Thank you for reading my comments and an opinion. I think the rx100 is a great little camera that punches well above it's weight. However I watch a lot of your videos and have purchased some of your excellent photos etc. To me your take on things is honest and keep aiming high to hit the middle. I think you are one of the best bloggers or tubers to have sprouted in the last few years and being yourself is where you'll always excel. Being someone with integrity who imparts great wisdom to newer photographers and remotivates us older ones. Cheers.

[@KenJJamesK]

Totally agree Mike, I have been following Henry for some time now and like his channel. Also, he came to New Zealand and took some wonderful photos of some of my favourite beach scenes on Auckland's West Coast. You are always welcome back Henry😁

[@lukapogo]

I have a rx100M5a. To me, the 1.8/2.8 aperture was much more important than the 200mm reach. Great camera, carry it everywhere

[@dkbaghel123]

same here, 5yrs back had option to buy m5a/vii went ahead with m5a faster 1.8 lens, 3x zoom is good enough for taking personal pics kids stage show or in playground, 200mm is for shooting random people/animal in far away places....quality is good enough to print 3x3 feet large photo frames..something you cannot achieve from cellphone

[@trishf29]

The Sony RX100vii was the p/s I always wanted, but was stuck with a Lumix equivalent, where I had to sharpen nearly every image. Instead of buying the Sony I bought into the Olympus system, and quite honestly, have never looked back. My iPhone 14 gives me sharper images than the p/s Lumix, so I use that instead, although rarely! Glad you had fun with a point and shoot! They are not very obtrusive in public areas.

[@loumason-walsh2062]

I have recently added the RX100 vi to my kit. It goes everywhere with me. I have a filter adapter for the lens so I can take the minimum amount of kit with me on my daily walks and also for street photography. I love the feel of the camera and I have grabbed so many shots I would not have got without it. Having realised that I prefer a camera to my phone.

[@dutchmanager]

Years of scaling down made me sell camera gear that I never took along. My last camera was a fixed lens fuji APSC. (x100F) and though it was a tremendous camera with great film simulations I hardly ever took it along. So I sold that one too and bought myself a Sony ZV1. Yes it is a camera of which they promote it for vlogging, but it has the same 1 inch sensor as the RX series and it has the 24-70mm equivalent zoom which covers the range I need. Now I actually take the camera along again and shoot photos again. What about image quality? Yes as you said once you compare to full frame and you zoom in big way you surely see differences. I did another attempt: In my little home studio I shot a self portrait using a tripod and 1 flash. Next I printed it on A3 size paper. It is razor sharp. and that is all I care for. I do not have the need to go bigger than that. I am very happy with my 1 inch sensor type camera. this same is valid for the similar sized RX100 mark 7. Since my range was 24 to 70 I could save myself a lot of money, but if you need more you could go for the RX100 Mark 7.

[@boutthere3374]

I bought the RX100m7 instead of another lens for my big cameras. I figured it was smarter money considering what it can do. It quickly became the first thing I'd reach for when packing the kayak/packraft/backpack. Fearing the end of the RX line I just bought another new one at a local store(backup) when they somehow got 3 new ones in. I do hope Sony comes out with an M8. Awesome video.

[@watkinsphoto]

Great review. I have had this camera for a couple of years (my "regular" cameras are Sony a7iv and a7cii). The RX100vii is incredibly useful for travel. One thing you did not cover is its absolutely incredible burst mode. I found that amazing for shooting wildlife on a cruise around the Kenai Fjord a couple of years ago and got some amazing photos of Orcas with the camera. It does have limitations. On a recent trip to the UK, it just would not produce usable photos in a cathedral in Liverpool which had challenging lighting conditions (harsh light coming in through the windows into a dim environment). In that situation, I switched to my iPhone 14 Pro. I think it would be great if Sony developed the RX100 series with computational photography. That would be amazing. That said, it is a great little camera and the focal range is very useful.

[@Benjamin_Jehne]

For my private images I clompletely switched to 1". I use to work with an A7RIII but in 2019 while job in Norway I experienced how nice these little 1" cameras are. Back then it was an Canon G5X MKII which I still love. The quality of the lens is not on par with the Sony but a 24-120mm F1.8-2.8 is really a nice thing to have. I bought the Sony RX100 VII in 2021 and since then, these both little cameras are my go to cameras. From my perspective the Sony has such a nice grade of details. I really enjoy this lens. Since we got all the nice AI stuff in Lightroom last year, you can push the files to an amount, where I don't get the feeling to miss out on something.

[@bwest6275]

I say this about every single rx100 after the ii: Sony, please bring back the mi shoe. I’m still using my RX100ii because it works amazing with my flashes off-camera. Would love to see the mi shoe come back to the rx100 series and a modern sensor. The rx100 and a few flashes are the perfect travel package.

[@cunningba]

I have a Sony RX100 (original mark 1 if you will) I bought in 2013. I modified it with a after market grip and covered it with Glock pistol grip tape to improve the hand feel and hide the branding. It and my iPhone are still my go to cameras for traveling. I’m 76 and there are a lot of situations where carrying heavier gear would be too exhausting or too much of a hassle taking on a plane. In those cases the comparison between the RX100 and a heavier camera is between having a great many good to very good images vs. having none or only a few larger less noisy images. You’re younger and stronger, so your trade offs will be different. But they should be factored in when doing comparisons. If you can get an images with a small camera in a situation where using a larger camera would be difficult or impossible, the image quality of the larger camera is irrelevant. I’ve found the RX100 to be a excellent camera, with some obvious limitations to be sure. It is sharp - small lettering in signs is reliably readable when shooting in RAW, as I always do. I have taken many huge panoramas handheld with using just the screen level on the display for alignment. For shooting group portraits I find it an excellent choice because I don’t have to pay a lot of attention to it while I’m herding people.

[@colinfoyle1856]

Great to see someone else using an RX100M7. My big rigs are the OMDS OM-1 and OM-5, if I am just off for a walk, I'll take the RX100M7. For filters take a look at NISI, they have a device that will just slide onto the end of the lens, and can provide packages with ND, Graduated, and Polarising filters. Better than a stick-on thread in my opinion. Nearly every time I use the RX100 I am bracketing, just to make sure I don't blow out highlights from using Aperture Priority and Auto ISO, but with 5 image bracketing, I can also pretty much eliminate any noise. Walking around my home city of London (UK) this little guy is ideal, and doesn't scream "Pro Camera". The lack of weather-sealing is a concern for me. That's when I either then reach for the OM-5 or the Olympus TG-6. But then the TG-6 has an even smaller sensor. I figure the difference in the sensor size of 1 inch compared to Micro 4/3rds, isn't that different. To be honest, I reach for the RX100 more than I do the OMDS cameras quite a bit. That might be because I am getting older, and don't want to carry weighty cameras all day long any more. Loved the video.

[@nevvanclarke9225]

This camera is a great little camera. I actually have two of them. I teach Photography here to young people as a way of coping with stress and mental illnesses and I've been collecting the base models and some of the earlier models. I've got three of these cameras now and they're great for teaching Photography but they also produce great image quality look there's not a major difference from the earlier models to the later ones to be honest that pretty much the same sensor .... Thanks for the video. Once again I always get inspired by your photography.

[@jA.78194]

I love how you are telling the good and the bad even though you like the camera. As a beginner what would help me would be to compare it to other cameras like a phone (like the Samsung Galaxy s24 ultra or an iPhone with zoom lens and a full frame camera with more megapixels to see where it goes in between.

[@thatsamshow]

I use the original Sony RX100 M1 and it's my favourite camera. Now, is it the _"best"_ camera out there? Of course not! The specifications and technology in the latest cameras are mindblowing. However, as someone who has used the camera for nearly a decade, I know everything there is to know about the camera, have everything set up how I want, and have created a ton of shortcut keys and menu modifications, etc. I love walking around with it through the countryside where I'm lucky to live, knowing I have a very adequate camera tucked away in my pocket. I've done portrait, street, landscape, macro, and astrophotography with it-the lot! For me, it's all that I need.

[@zeframHood]

For me it’s the Panasonic LX15, had it for years and very happy with it.

[@trevorbrooks813]

When conditions are good the 1" sensor can rival M4/3 and even apsc results for use on social media. It's when conditions become challenging like they were in those mountains with the light and the haze playing a big part in the end result, that the smaller sensor comes a bit unstuck. For most of us non-pro shooters I suggest a phone and a small 1" sensor camera with a long zoom make a great pairing. Great video, thanks for posting.

[@adrongoddard7479]

I was tempted to buy one of these, but then I sat down and had a good chat with myself "No more cameras" was the conclusion of that discussion 😊. I would say that this camera is probably for someone who would like to go beyond the mobile phone snaps, and wants to explore photography a little further, without the bulkiness of an SLR and lenses. The size and portablity are excellent, and dare I mention it, the image quality is acceptable (as long as you're not looking to blow up the images too much).

[@anthonywilliams7686]

I gave most of my Sony full-frame gear to my daughter. I had the RX100 V as a backup camera. But in 2023, I bought the RX100 VII. I had used the Lens Mate 52mm filter mount on the V, s I I naturally bought another one for my VII. It is small and unobtrusive on the camera. A great addition gives you the versatility of the full frame kit but without any of the bulk and weight. To keep the overall kit size and weight to a minimum, I found the perfect full-featured min tripod from Ulanzi that is only 25cm when folded. This is my standard onto kit now. RX11 VII 5 52mm filters including a CPL and the mini Tripod. The total weight is less than my former 70 - 200 f4 lens. The back appreciates this for sure

[@rs779]

I initially got the RX100M3 after water damage to a Panasonic P&S. Loved the portability, Raw capability, and plethora of features - most that you have noted. Added the Sony stick on grip - recommended. We travel a lot and as an amateur I only want IQ good enough to create travel books and 11”x14” prints max. But I found the zoom limiting and 3 years ago added the Sony RX10iv. A great addition that is more travel friendly than most options with the need for multiple lenses. The similar menu system was a consideration. We don’t check bags, so carry-on only for trips up to a month. Add a laptop, iPad and miscellaneous electronics and even this setup gets challenging-but doable. While iPhones have improved (have an iPhone 13Pro) I would say the RX100 offers more shooting flexibility over just P&S with a great size factor. Editing in LR but Topaz helps for some shots on both the RX100 and RX10 regarding IQ and this combination works great for me. I prefer the RX100 for walking around towns but often carry all three. Love your channel and used your guide when we visited the Lake District and Wales last spring. Keep up the good work - love watching your work and humour.

[@paulbonge6617]

One more comment Henry, I'm sorry but you're blown away? I just don't see it at that price it's not up to par with any images you've posted before! That last image was by far the best however, I think you had to really WORK for it. Is it really worth the price to "Just pull it out of the pocket?"

[@stayuntilforever]

People pay double for a smartphone

[@paulbonge6617]

@@stayuntilforever I agree however, a smartphone is now considered a staple of our modern existence, so we'll acquire one before we'd buy a point and shoot camera that can't access our e-mail or surf the web. I don't disagree with Henry so much as I make the argument that if you're a somewhat serious photographer to begin with, then why would you make another investment of 1.200 USD in a point and shoot, just to pull it out of your bum-bag/fanny-pack, when you already have a smart phone that fits in your pocket?

[@peterchinchen2394]

Hi Henry. Great video. Let’s be honest most of us amateur photographers hardly ever print an image beyond A3, if at all, so the little Sony would more than satisfy our needs. It’s a cracking camera that’s why it’s on series 7. However, as much as us diehard photographers, accept perhaps, sports, wildlife photographers, like it or not phones are catching up and will overtake cameras. Humans are naturally lazy so who wants to carry 10 kilos of gear up a mountain when a 500gram, 80mb, waterproof, IBIS, GPS phone will take the same pictures. Finally, cost. Leica were considered a luxury brand. £5k now seems the entry level for most “pro spec” cameras from Canon and Nikon. Crazy!. Cheers Mate keep up the good work. Pete

[@michaelreid2143]

Had my Nikon P7800 for 10yrs now; 12mp, 28-200 zoom, full manual if I need it: just like a mini dslr without the bother of changing lenses. Fits in with my other Nikon cameras a treat & can slip it in a pocket. Always have it with me for everything from macro to zoom all in one light, portable and compatible tool: and the images aren’t half bad neither!

[@Robert-cd5zr]

Whoever comes out with a compact camera with this hardware plus advances in smartphone image processing are going to bring stand alone pocket cameras back in a big way, with better low light, real depth of field and zoom / background compression than flagship phones.

[@Dwyeb73]

Totally agree.

[@richardlevesconte7952]

Hi Henry. I bought this camera and love it for street photography. The image quality is great. I also bought a polariser and neutral density filter kit for the Vii from NISI. The one thing to watch with the filter kit is it will fall off of the lens closes.

[@ShaunTaylor-bw7jr]

Had different iterations of this camera and been pleased with them all. It has its place and exceeds in the areas designed for. I added the optional stick on Sony grip to support hand held photography.

[@ronboe6325]

I was not sure just what you meant by image quality not up to snuff, and it's a bit unfair to try and judge from a youtube video but they seemed a bit grainy/noisy. :shrug: I'll add that for grand landscapes like that you have the wrong tool so you're playing against its' strengths. That said, we have a fellow in our camera club that shoots with a similar pocket camera (don't recall the brand much less the model) and he is an absolute mad man with stitching shots together. Up to around 30 at times! And he gets very good results. His priority is taking shoots he will then do a water colour in so he really does not have an interest (or maybe the funds) to upgrade. That said, his results at times put many of us to shame with much better kit. I also wonder it upscaling (basically through editing software at it!) to see what you can leverage - and try stitching!

[@dhodges1911]

I currently have the rx100v, but IMHO the rx100iii was the best to me (from a pure camera perspective).

[@frstesiste7670]

I bought the RX100 VII a couple of years ago for pretty much the same reason as you. Wanted a small camera that I could bring everywhere and a step up from the cell phone - and a built in EVF. I also bought an adapter that allows the use of filters but wouldn't put anything heavy on that lens and I only have a polarizer for it. I've found that shooting at ISO 100 it's hard to see noise at all even when pixel peeping at 100%, but if I lift the shadows then it's clearly visible. Same happens with some other functions like clarity and sharpening. To get the most out of it I try to stay at low ISO and be careful and apply noise reduction locally where it's needed. A little more work in post than with a bigger sensor and the RAW file can of course not match a FF shot when it comes to DR and noise, but still very usable. My biggest negative with the RX100 is actually not image quality but handling. I love that the EVF is there, but the RX100 feels fiddly - of course compared to a much bigger mirrorless or dSLR, but also compared to some other compact cameras I've used. Maybe it's just me but I also find the Sony menus less than ideal.

[@magdalenaohisea5403]

You really nailed some important points, I have one more problem I can not solve with this camera: the battery drain (while the camera remains off). Every time I leave the camera unused for a few days, the battery gets empty. The only way to prevent that is to have plenty of spare batteries and take out the one that is inside the camera to save it. But this is really lame performance from a 1200€$ hi-end camera. I haven’t figure it out how to stop that. Any tips? Cheers 🖖

[@frstesiste7670]

I've also noticed battery drain, but not to the extent you describe. I always bring one spare and that seem to be enough. It's irritating though to turn on the camera and it's just a few percent left in the battery when it was close to 100% last time I used it.

[@magdalenaohisea5403]

@@frstesiste7670 In the a6300 it was the eye sensor that was working even if the camera was turned off - Simply disabling it solved the problem. With the rx100VII I cant figure it out, cheers!

[@buning_sensations5437]

Menu's: That's why I use and customise the Fn button to get to what I want to change really fast.

[@jongseokbak1384]

I bought this camera twice. I bought it in 2019 and used it, and then disposed of it in early 2021 after hearing rumors about the RX100 VIII. However, the rumored new model never came out. Since I often needed the portability and telephoto range of this camera, I bought it again in late 2022 and have been using it well so far. I use it well when traveling. Even if I carry a full-frame, it is very useful as a camera that can assist with the telephoto range in a small size. It is a pity that a successor model has not come when this model is almost complete, with stable 4K video, microphone input support, etc. It would be perfect if a new model with a new processor, menu system, and 10-bit video shooting was released.

[@bobv7753]

Great review! I've been using this camera for a couple years. Am very satisfied with the performance for all of the reasons you & followers mentioned. For the size benefits it has been my go to for grab, go and very acceptable results. Thanks for your content.

[@ziph3326]

I purchased a Canon G9 many years ago, but haven’t upgraded since getting an iPhone. I am seriously considering the Sony RX100 M7. It appears to be an excellent combination of quality,size, and features. Certainly more than I am used to!

[@nigelwest3430]

I usually shoot with a Canon R & R3 and a range of RF glass but my "carry around" camera is my little RX100 mkiii that I've had for about 9 years and I love it, sits in your pocket and produces great images.

[@TicaHikes]

Hi Henry. I own 2 cameras and funny enough, they are the Sony rx100 m7 and the Nikon Z 7ii with the 24-200 lens. I love my 7ii but when I go multiday hiking and either have to carry my camping kit or have to carry a lot of food (or both), I often choose to take the Sony RX100 m7. I bought the thread kit and can use a polarizer and ND filters. I also use the RX100 for street photography because people don't get annoyed when you are pointing such a small thing at them. I've had several of the RX100 models. I have sold them and had seller's remorse and either bought the camera back or bought the new version. It is a very expensive camera but it dies everything I want and the lens is very good.

[@user-pk9hg7rr5v]

I've had the same experience and thoughts. I have a Nikon D 850 and a Sony Rx 100 V6. For the reasons you rightly point out I have been a bit disappointed at times with the images from the Sony. Having said that in the right situations it has given me some of my best images and you can't beat it for mirroring the majority of the functionality of a DSLR all in your pocket. Fantastic for travel and those situations when you can't take your full kit. NiSi also do a mini filter set which is compatible with the camera if you want to go that far.

[@kencox2267]

I bought the VI for many of the same reasons as others have mentioned. It is slightly less technically advanced as the VII, but it is a fantastic companion to my a6600. I get the same menus and have become very comfortable with using both…in the right situation. As always, thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts with us. Your videos are certainly motivating!

[@segercliffhanger]

I understand your disappointment about having a slightly below-par visual experience with this camera, but it takes you from 7:30 to 12:10 to quantify it (it's small, but it's there), while the actual qualification leaves a lot to interpret; it's 'grainier' than your Nikon or Olympus. Please don't be offended :). I always have problems getting to the point myself. That's why I don't run a YT channel. Otherwise, thanks for digging into this camera. I'm looking into getting one to complement my Nikons. Every piece of professional information I can find, such as from this very nice in-depth review is truly useful. Keep them coming!

[@yuanjieliu4578]

When I was in college, I bought the first generation of rx100. Nine years later, I bought a fifth generation camera in good condition this year. In my opinion, it is small enough and has a viewfinder, which can give me more creative opportunities. I have a6400, but I prefer to take the rx out for travel.

[@benbentley26]

Nice to see you looking at my camera brand. I use the Sony A7r3. Love it, best camera I've owned..... so far

[@AnthonyJohnson1]

Think you summed it up perfectly. The portability of this camera means it goes with me pretty much everywhere. The image quality is excellent for such a dinky camera. The viewfinder is great too. Will definitely be a great companion for you on those long hikes when you don’t want to carry all the extra weight. Definitely get what you mean with the full frame comparison though. It is hard to get away from that at times

[@didierroubinet4610]

I really enjoy mine for years. Image quality is so good for such a tiny camera and its versatility is outstanding. Thank you for your much appreciated videos ;-)🙏

[@thisamazingworld1]

They do have a filter attachment. I also recommend the little rubber thing for the left side for carrying around. It's an awesome travel cam and most of the images will have a better something than just a phone camera no matter how good they get.

[@t.breeze8659]

I've owned this camera for several years. It's really compact it's it's durability is also impressive. For video, my cellphone has caught up with it in some ways. The iPhone 15 Pro Max has better image stabilization and built-in mic. Because that gap has narrowed, I'm not sure that I would spend as much on the Sony but I'm glad to have it.

[@aaronjamesguevarra]

I still have my mark IV and can’t let it go even after all these years, such a compact beast the RX line is!

[@jethrowingnut13]

Agree 100% Bought one of these about a year ago for our trip around Tasmania. Used Video if not more than Photo. Fantastic results. Great for Timelapse's as well. Not as automatic as your phone, but well worth it.

[@CrescentRollCarl]

I wish the manufacturers hadn't turned their back on the pocket sized point and shoot. Only Ricoh is doing it now it seems. I have the GR IIIx, which I absolutely love, but wouldn't mind also having a little zoom lens that takes decent video like this one.

[@lsdustyrhodes]

Hi Henry. I share a lot of your attitudes regarding this sort of camera. For the past five years or so I've owned a Panasonic Lumix ZS100 compact camera. Very similar specs to your Sony: 1" sensor, 20mpx, RAW imaging, 4k video, Leica lens with 35mm equivalent zoom range from 25-250mm, view-screen and EVF... all in all a very nice pocketable package - and it goes with me almost everywhere I go. That said, I almost never use it, even though it performs quite admirably. I call it my "flying saucer camera" - the one I have just in case a flying saucer shows up. And, as I said, it takes quite decent images. But, if there's any chance I expect to do any photography, much less going out with that specific intention, I'll lug my complete outfit: either a DSLR kit with my flagship Canon 5DS R and a bunch of lenses, or my other mirrorless outfit, Canon R6 II and Canon R7, also with a different bunch of lenses. So instead of carrying ten ounces of gear, I'm lugging either a twelve or twenty-four pound outfit, plus tripod. But with that, I've got much more versatility: ultra-wide perspective (as wide as 9mm) out to 600mm+; extreme macro capability, fast apertures with according narrow depth-of-field, and of course bigger sensors, more resolution, and better dynamic range. These little pocket cameras are highly capable, but they are a compromise, and all things considered I'd rather lug more weight to get optimum results. My little Panasonic is the camera of last resort. Nice to have just in case, but not my first choice. After all, nobody cares what gear you use; all that matters is the quality of the final image.

[@blainemitchell]

I read your list of camera gear and saw that you use the DJI Pocket 3. If that's what you were using to shoot this in that wind, it sounded fantastic! I know you kept trying to shield the mic, but really, you didn't need to. Was the Pocket 3 the camera that did the panning and time-lapse?

[@davidjensen41]

Although my "big bag" contains a Fuji GFX100s, I have used a Sony RX100 Mk5 for several years and it is great for when I don't want to carry a full bag. As far as durability, I ran mine over with my car while it was in a padded case and it still works. The view screen is shot, so I use the EVF. Most of the time, I keep it in my truck for those moments that pop up and I need a quick shot.

[@tomsviewphotographyadventu2514]

A few years back, I was looking to lighten my load for landscape photography. I was shooting with a Nikon D810, 24-70 f/2.8; 16-36, and a Sigma 150-600. I bought a Sony RX10iv because it was the equivalent of 24-600 mm lens, permanently attached, no sensor dust spots, and a pretty compact (albeit bigger than your RX100 obviously) .... and I loved using the camera... hated the results. They required so much post-processing, pushing the sliders.. to come close to what I got out of my D810 straight out of camera. I'm back to Nikon, Z7ii, and some nice glass and enjoying those results way better than the RX10iv. I was really hoping Sony would release a RX10v... but no such luck. I just think we're asking too much out of the smaller sensors.

[@Iandreid]

The most recent improvements to noise reduction and sharpening by Adobe and ON1 make this my go to camera these days. It even does sport well with amazing focus tracking and frame rates. For travel I take the RX100 and iPhone and leave my big cameras at home.

[@destinationwaleswithskylar9575]

When there’s a review like this with cameras I prefer to watch more sample images from the camera not just talking.

[@Transterra55]

So glad to see images of Wales, one of the most beautiful places I’ve visited… I look forward to visiting again. Some serious wind!

[@boldbearStudios]

Besides my Canon 80D and Sony Alpha 6700 both with fancy lenses, I still got an RX100iii (M3) from 2016. It has a 24/f1.8 - 70/f2.8 mm lens (full frame equiv.) and even a viewfinder. What can I say: I still prefer this camera on vacation for the same reason that Henry mentioned: portability! The lenses are fast and sharp and the RAW images look excellent. Love it. Of course, don't expect wonders in low light situations...

[@ianslingsby3415]

Love my RX100VII. The shots are as good as my full frame. I can always have it in my pocket it's expensive but quality costs. The lens as you said is versatile. And the view finder made it a must.

[@garonkiesel1646]

If you had told me that 18:03 was photographed using a full frame or medium format sensor, I would have believed you. Unfortunately, camera manufacturers have fooled us into thinking that bigger is better when in fact maybe... Bigger is just bigger and ultimately, more expensive.

[@shattered115]

I've owned one for 4 years and never leave home without it. Many exhibited prints from this little power house. I even carry in my pocket when I have my DSLRs with me. When I am at gallery and talking to other photographers we all reach into our pockets and pull one out.

[@NSXTypeRGTRLM]

I have a first generation Sony RX100 and when it focuses correctly it makes some great images!

[@danneukirch4486]

I could relate to how you felt about the RX100. Years ago I bought the mark 3 version, mainly for hiking / camping like you were doing. But I just wasn't that happy with the image quality. The noise and dynamic range were actually solid and what I expected but the lens sharpness wasn't there. So I ended up instead doing my big overnight hike with 5kg of camera gear and regretted that lol. I sold the RX100 which never got much use.

[@russellgoodwin1652]

Thanks, Henry, for your honest review of the Sony RX100.vii; it was evident that it pained you to be critical of the camera's IQ, and if I had paid full price for the camera (even current second hand prices) I would feel pretty short changed by the performance. That is not to deny the camera is a pocketful of wizardry, capable well beyond its size has any right to be. After a great deal of comparison and consideration I eventually concluded that the Mark VA was the sweet spot ~ it was the last in the series to feature the f1.7 lens, and its autofocus technology better than preceding models, ideal for those unexpected grab shots. In terms of image quality, I don't think there is much to distinguish it from almost all the previous models ~ any model from the Mark II to VA would be capable of similar output. The greater reach of the VI & VII is undoubtedly attractive, but by all accounts at the expense of sharpness and light gathering. I have kicked myself on a few occasions when I have had to make do with my phone walking in the small hours in the City around London Bridge, or some landscapes I'd been excited to capture only to be disappointed on close inspection on the computer. I can't stand the thought of being caught short like that again, so one of these days I probably will pick up the Mark VA. When I cycled up the Outer Hebrides, I packed a Nikon 1 V1 with a couple of lenses, whilst my friend had his RX100.ii in a pouch no wider than the top-tube of this bike, always ready to hand. I ended up using my phone more than the Nikon and again regretted it when I got home. I even tried a Lumix LX100, a lovely camera, but still not pocketable like the RX100, so I sold it. My casual walk around kit is now an Olympus OM-D E-M10.iv with Lumix 12-32 pancake zoom, 35-100 f4 tiny telephoto, and a fast prime in the M.Zuiko 17 f1.8 in a small Billingham Hadley Digital grab bag, with room for a Laowa 7.5mm f2 if I anticipated I might need it. Would be happy to throw that kit around my shoulders in almost any situation, especially hiking, but if doing anything more serious, then the E-M1.iii and a clutch of larger lenses though a good deal heavier and more bulky. I think I will pick up the RX100.VA eventually, but I'm pretty content with what I've got, and there's always still the phone if I really must... Perhaps one day it will be possible to have one system that does it all, which will have to wait until they declassify some of the exotic tech that remains under lock and key, but for now I am happy that I have been able to build alternative loadouts for specific needs. I don't recall the last time my full frame Canon took a shot, and that is despite all the animosity directed at anything less than full-frame sensors over the years. Almost all my Canon lenses have been sold to fund the various m43 loadouts I have from Olympus and Panasonic. Thanks for confirming for me, Henry, that the Mark VII is probably a step too far ~ a disagreeably expensive mistake to have made, but also that there is still a valid place for the RX100 line. I hope Sony continues developing it.

[@DMProductions]

Great video mate! Which part of North wales was that

[@diegoe.4639]

I basically told myself that, if i want a sharp picture i would use my mirrorless camera. if i want a good picture in heat of the moment i would use my phone. The sony rx100 didnt have a big impact when i used mine for a couple of months. I still recommend it for people without a camera.

[@zero2espect]

I have an earlier model with the faster fstop, and it's still on my belt every day. The best photos are the ones you take, and having something with that quality with you all the time...well. You nailed it with the brackets, the smaller sensor gives you a lot when you stack it in light room - the brackets give you the freedom to not stretch the capability of the sensor. As you will have seen the colours in the video capture side of the camera is also simply beautiful. The only real negative is these things are simply not coming down in price......

[@2cats1guy]

I’m sold. I’d rather have this than an iPhone. iPhone is so over processed and only good for taking selfies and stuff in dark situations. But this camera gives natural results.

[@ashstubbings2603]

Hi Henry! I've just been reading the other comments before I make mine. I think a comment by someone called @washingtonradio makes a lot of sense. I agree, we get a bit spoiled when we've been using our DSLR's or our Mirrorless cameras. Don't forget that the RX100vii is just a little point and shoot. Granted, it's a very good and quite expensive one, so you do want it to perform, but at the end of the day it's 'only' a point and shoot. 😊😊

[@waterolife]

Henry, any sensor less than 24 mp full frame is, for me, unacceptable. It's the actual size of the pixel that matters. They are "buckets" that fill up with light. 24 mp in a one inch sensor results in lousy resolution. This is data no one is talking about, especially from the camera seller. This is why 20-24mp is so good in low light - they're bigger than 47 MP. I recently got out of the Olympus system and got the Nikon Zf for this reason. And this camera is amazing!

[@MattTaggart]

I picked up this compact for travelling light. I agree w remark about filter threads and weather sealing. This was a concern going in and out of A/C in humid Caribbean conditions. I picked up a 3rd party Ever Ready case. It makes this little compact feel more robust in my big hands. It is a plenty powerful camera and makes images worth printing.

[@peterc2248]

Still got my RX100II - it's a bit clunky now but the images are awesome.

[@CurlyForest]

If this camera and the DJI Pocket 3 had a baby, I think that would be a travel camera that is hard to beat

[@martinr5362]

Henry, I just wish you had also taken the shot with the Nikon for a true comparison.

[@vacation_generation]

Great video. Honest but pragmatic review. I'm sure the Sony camera product would be more than enough to meet the needs for most typical hobbiests and vloggers

[@stuartcollins82]

I bought an RX100 VII and an E-PL8 at the same time. I find myself using the EPL all the time. The RX is great, don't get me wrong. It's smaller and lighter too. However, it just feels like taking a photo with an phone, with less wide angle. I found it useful in business events where I wanted a quiet electric shutter, but other than that, the photos feel a bit sterile. [edit: I kept both, as the place where the RX wins, is video. The video quality is great!]

[@skesinis]

I have this camera for a few years now. I’m really happy with the results I’m getting, even though I have a Canon pro system too. It definitely has its place, especially for travel photography. The only thing I was surprised by was when I was trying to process its RAW files with Luminar AI. It looks like Luminar didn’t have the lens corrections Sony applies to the internal JPEG preview in the RAW file, or what Adobe Camera RAW applies when you open one of its files. At 24mm, Luminar would give me a heavily distotrted photo, almost fisheye like, with a vignetting that bad, the edges of the sensor would be completely black. This in my opinion means that at 24mm the lens is not filling the 20MP sensor, and the Camera’s software internally applies a crop, reverses the vignetting, and straightens the barrel distorted lines, wihch I think is the reason why the image quality isn’t there in the wide angles. It was consistent with all my photos with Luminar, which made me turn into Lightroom for editing. At every different zoom level, Luminar required a separate lens correction, and apart from being a pain to do so, I couldn’t even get close to the non distorted JPEG files of the camera. It would instantly show the JPEG preview when you’d open a RAW file, and then revert to the actual RAW data, with all the distortions, vignetting etc. Lightroom on the other hand or even my iPad, would open the RAW files and display them exactly as they’d show up in the back of my camera.

[@martinhommel9967]

Thanks for your video. I believe their is a space for compact cameras, convenience, capturing the moment. The image quality is usually good enough if you don't spent too much time pixel peeping. I use them myself. Nice pics as always.

[@davidfrost3770]

No doubt the compact camera is great for traveling light and you just proved that image quality is great (your last shot was quality, did you have to do a lot of post on it), but until i get too old and fragile to carry a camera bag around, i will stick to my trusty canon 6d mk2 which i still have lots to learn about it. Looked a great trip out with Ian. Better conditions than your last wild camp😂

[@davidfirth1]

You alluded to it. We're spoiled by high megapixel cameras, and the RX100 line wasn't ever meant as a full replacement for those. So, it is wrong to compare it to those. The RX100 was meant to be the top of the line for point and shoot cameras. It is still near the top to this day. What is the compromise for portability when you don't want or need to carry a larger kit? A bit of IQ, sacrifices to low light capability, and less battery life. A type 1 sensor, given some light or with added light, is a good enough solution for many use cases. I have the VII, as well as two of the video-centric repackaging of it as the ZV1 for my AV side gig. They're good units.

[@deheiligebron]

11:00 thanks for the honesty here. This camera is for much of what it is: splendid!

[@brianbeattyphotography]

I've looked at this one a number of times. definitely a compelling super lightweight option

[@ElectronInc]

Hi Henry. My go-to camera is my OM-D E-M10 MkII because of size and mostly, because of the FUN it brings me, I cannot explain why. I have nothing but haste and joy when I have it in my hands. I do have an E-M1 MkII too, but for some reason, my heart always leans towards the E-M10...

[@uppitysquirrel]

Consider trying the rx100 va version. It's a refresh of the v model. FF focal length range is 24-70 but the lens is much faster. Zooms covering very wide ranges usually suffer in IQ. It would be interesting to see how you feel the va suits you compared to the vii.

[@bobbymcdonald4365]

Hi Henry, I tried this wee Sony out, but as you say it is not water sealed. A bit of a blow for backpacking days when the weather isn’t behaving itself. I found that the zoom capabilities for my capture of the moon, isn’t that great either. Any recommendations for this type of photography that isn’t going to break the bank. Yet can capture rolling hillscapes and river crossings in full spate? Great video you shot there, I saved it to watch again in case I missed something first time around. Oh no subbed too.

[@chod54]

I have the Sony rx100 mark 3. A short lens 24 to 70. I use it mainly for low light indoors and around London at night. I have had some great images from this camera. I use it with my Fuji gear, and I have an adapter to add filters and I also have a close-up filter. It is from lens mate. I have also used it on a Scotland trip in my van instead of taking my fuji gear. Great to see you trying it out, maybe you should keep testing it out and see if you feel differently in a week or so.

[@greycrag]

I have a Z7 and can agree with you on the weight/size to image quality ratio. I'd be tempted to buy a RX100vii for the portability but I find Sony's colour coding to be too 'blue' and diffuse for my style of work, a trade-off would be to get a Z50+16-50mm lightweight lens that has a similar sensor resolution without sacrificing the quality.

[@JonathanDowe]

Really enjoyed the video, I have had this camera for a few years now and think your comments are fair. I have a thread adaptor on mine to take filters and when I am hiking the only worry is the lack of weather seal. I would love to upgrade but feel for posting on social media the extra quality is probably not needed. Cheers again for the video.

[@donaldgould9074]

The 1" sensor is s compromise and we just have to accept the quality it offers, still better than phones. I bought the ZV1 which does not have evf and is 24-70 equivaldnt. Same sensor and image as RX 100 but wad about half the price. It is intended as a vlogging camera but suits me as I just use it to keep in my bag so it is always with me.. I normally use Oly E M 1mk3. Quite happy with the Sony for my intended use.

[@markhamadventures]

LOVE the image at 15:43! Well done!!! I’m currently hauling a Z8 with a 24-120 for my backpacking adventures. Heavy, but I feel it’s part of my enjoyment of the activity itself - the physical work it takes to get the images.

[@Htbaa]

I bought one in April this year, brand new. Already have an A6400 with some nice lenses but the portability of this RX100 is amazing. I don’t like the JPEG’s much from the Sony cameras so I’ll always shoot RAW, even with the RX100 VII. The quality of the photos of a processed RAW is much better than the out of camera JPEG’s. Sony’s default noise reduction for JPEG which you can’t turn off is too aggressive for my taste.

[@martin32694]

For anyone who is considering the RX100vii. I've been using it for 5 years since launch and love this camera . But hear me out, there is major problem. It doesn't do well in low light or dark envoirment. The noise is so heavy that editing will make it even worst. It will either turn muddy or scattered. Sometime you question is it better than iPhone or not. The shinnying feature is the optical zoom and not digital. I recommend trying to shoot in 200 as much as possible and you will get good details+compressed look.

[@frankcosgrove9958]

I have 3 of them, RX100 mk4 for rough hiking where and scuba diving inside a case. Mk5 for landscape and portrait shots when hiking , I also use it as a B cam for video. Mk 7 i being everywhere and used a lot of sports where I need the reach , it’s also a great video camera and I use it with external Mic

[@ian_worth]

Awesome video mate, great to see your photos from a brilliant morning, what a trip 👍👍

[@martinshephard6317]

I love this camera, I’ve also got MkVA which I’ll sell eventually. I use mine as a highly flexible note book and but I’ve also taken some great shots (in my opinion) of kite surfers in Cornwall and street shots where I can fold out the screen so it’s horizontal and shoot from waist height. The pop up view finder works well too, it’s not too obtrusive and is there if you want it. It has a very fast motor drive for a camera its size too, a bit too fast sometimes! I use it on manual but allow the asa to set itself most of the time. I think a grip is essential unless you’ve got tiny hands, £20 quid ish on Amazon. If you can borrow one, give it a go and buy it 2nd hand like I did otherwise it’s really a bit expensive.

[@rudolffamiev2188]

Hi Henry, I agree with other comments that comparison with FF cameras does not play well with this small sensor ones, but this is not that obvious when you consider not just cameras - but with addition of software. Since I moved to MFT recently - I also switched from LR to DxO PhotoLab - I was blown away with their NR option there (as you know the MFT sensor is not that great with high ISO). I would suggest you to try (it is 30 day free trial with 100% functionality) DxO PhotoLab (or just PureRAW converter) to process the same images from RX100vii - to see if this will do something to that comparison...