The Biblical God YHWH Was Well-endowed

Рет қаралды 76,046

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 926

@kcl6627 4 ай бұрын

She has a PhD in this field, and is a professor. She knows her stuff. She not only reads it in the original language, but also in its original context and cultural lens. People that only study the Bible, but not other ancient religions, won't see the parallels the same way. It's comical yet sad that so many came here to correct her when they don't have a smidge of the knowledge on this subject that she has. People are so scared to question the validity of their beliefs that they will argue without even giving it some real study or thought. Of course, people double down and have all the confirmation bias there is. I am so grateful to not be Christian anymore. It messes with one's logic, and they would rather believe a book that has a talking snake in it is God's word over considering the possibility that the ancient Hebrew god, Yahweh, was just another god made up by people. It's sad because this is the same god that told people to wipe out entire villages, including children. It was totally accepted by Yahweh to take young virgin girls into captivity and "marry" (aka assault) them. Have your Yahweh. Yuck.

@johnmario3795 4 ай бұрын

Do not spread misinformation about God of bible with your half knowledge. You should know theologians and biblical scholars translated the scriptures into thousands of languages from ORIGINAL text. God is supernatural. n Nothing can be compared to him. We DIDNOT create Him. He created us. God in the bible ordered Israelite to retaliate the enemies ex: sihon and og. Sihon and og attacked Israelites when Israelites asked them permission to pass through and even purchase food and water. Amelekites first attacked Israelites when they were helpless. God ordered Israelites to marry slaves captured in war and treat them fairly. Read scriptures before you comment.

@kcl6627 4 ай бұрын

@@johnmario3795 thanks for proving my point 😂😭💩

@ASMRyouVEGANyet 3 ай бұрын

@@kcl6627i used to be just like you and only thought of Christianity as this ancient religion that stole from other religions. I'm glad I'm not that person anymore. I'm glad that Jesus Christ spoke to me and told me how much he loves me. I only wish for everyone to know him.

@duncanbryson1167 3 ай бұрын

@@johnmario3795 Let any deities speak for themselves IN PERSON.

@robertcoe9960 3 ай бұрын

To be fair, I consider myself a Christian, as my brother Jesus visited me in a dream, and I knew, and as soon as I accepted, I was brought to the Father, and he showed me all.... In The Beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth.... as above so below, as we are conceived I. Our mothers womb, so too is the Universe we are in, in a cosmic womb.

@Steve-hu9gw Жыл бұрын

The major lexica (BDB, _DCH,_ _HALOT,_ e.g.) consistently associate the term in Ezekiel 1:27 with מָתְנַיִם, most specifically with the translation “loins.” Among the meanings of the English term _loins_ is “the reproductive organs,” as in the phrase “fruit of my loins.” The implications in the case of a male deity are obvious. Whether a scholarly consensus exists for such a reading at Ezekiel 1:27 is another matter, but there seems nothing crazy or incompetent about the notion. The ancient Mediterranean gods had bodies, with genitalia, whether in ancient Mesopotamia, Canaan, Egypt, Greece, or Rome--that includes ancient Israel.

@dcogent1 Жыл бұрын

And...among the English interpretation of the word is Hips, or lower part of the back. How convenient of you to leave that out. A spirit being, who is self Described as eternal, has no need for a dick. Lmao.

@Steve-hu9gw Жыл бұрын

@@dcogent1, you apparently missed the context of the statement, as in the rest of the post. Ancient gods in the region had bodies, including genitals. These ancient gods were not purely spiritual beings, including Yahweh/El/Baal. That’s why the ancient temple had a throne for him. It wasn’t any metaphor. Gods as purely spiritual beings is a much later development in the history of religion of the region.

@dcogent1 Жыл бұрын

@@Steve-hu9gw You confuse YHWH, the Elohim of Israel with Baal, the diety of the Canaanites. Furthermore you conflate your understanding of said Diety with what he actually reveals about himself. Therefore, I'm simply more inclined to understand what the patron Diety of the children of Israel revealed about His person, character, and attributes...than someone pontificating about things they don't completely understand. Which is why it's quite convenient you left out the APPLICABLE definition of the word in relation to Ezekiel 1:27 for the definition that supports your narrative. All that to say, I didnt miss anything, I highlighted what was pertinent. You simply chose to talk around that.

@Steve-hu9gw Жыл бұрын

@@dcogent1, you obviously understand nothing about biblical studies or scholarship. I was never addressing how Ezekiel 1:27 should be interpreted, nor am I now. My point was to clarify that there is nothing crazy or academically incompetent being proposed in this video. FYI, I spoke in terms of Yahweh/El/Baal because the god of ancient Israel is precisely such an amalgamation. I didn’t make that up. That’s the longtime scholarly consensus. In fact, everything I’ve been saying is consensus scholarship. (Though note with precision what I have and have not been saying. You’ve demonstrated considerable problems in that regard.) I know. I have a degree in this stuff.

@dcogent1 Жыл бұрын

@@Steve-hu9gw - “I have a degree in this stuff” - That’s great..yet, that makes you no more a scholar in this than my degree in Genetics makes me a Geneticists. The difference between you and me, is that I actually know the Bible, live the Bible and Know YHWH as my patron Diety. You simply pontificate about what you think you know, behind the auspices of your degree… much like the Sunday Christian pastor who has no idea what he is talking about much of the time when it comes to the same. For example: You stated that "...there was a throne in the temple.." My man… there was no throne in the damn temple. There was a throne ON THE ARK OF THE COVENANT. If you have evidence to the contrary...provide it. What this should show you is: Just because you think you know what you’re speaking of, doesn’t mean you do. Ok, so what....You may not have been speaking of how Ezekiel 1:27 should be interpreted… BUT I WAS. Lol. What part of that don’t you understand. Furthermore, YHWH has NOTHING to do with the patron Diety of the Cannanites… nothing. If you studied the bible, instead of relied of what you’ve been inseminated with, you’d know just that. Unlike Baal, and the plethora of Heathen dieties, YHWH has NEVER had a image constructed of Him, and as a matter of fact He spoke at length about the difference between him and the dieties of the surrounding Canaanite tribes. I mean what, in your mind becuase YHWH is translated Lord as is Baal the two can be conflated? You can’t get past the first of the 10 commandments (Exodus 20) without knowing that is folly. And, Since you went there, The REASON why this position expressed in the video is PROBLEMATIC is because: 1. not only does it fly directly in the face of everything the Torah, the Nabim and the Ketuvim reveals about YHWH, the Spirit. 2. It, like you, actually ignores the CONTEXTUAL USE OF THE WORD in question. Case and point… YHWH is clearly SPIRT, not a flesh and blood being… as told by that one individual who knows better than you, me, or the people who taught you… that being Yeshua Ha Mashiach. “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.” ‭‭John‬ ‭4‬:‭24‬ ‭KJV‬‬ Let’s take that one step further: “Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.” ‭‭Luke‬ ‭24‬:‭39‬ ‭KJV‬‬ Again… why would a Spirit, a NON FLESH AND BLOOD BEING… have need for a damn penis… make that make sense. So, good for you, you have a degree I'm sure your parents are proud. But you’re knowledge of the patron Diety of the children of Israel and how he presents HIMSELF to HIS prophets and HIS people via HIS WORD aka THE BIBLE.... is severely lacking.

@GodlessCommie Жыл бұрын

omni potent taken to a whole new meaning

@godstimedineni7414 8 ай бұрын

😅😂😂

@John-qn6ex 10 ай бұрын

VIRILITY is a particularly masculine attribute. Regardless of how often or how commonly people misuse language (I don't care if everyone says it wrong), fertility is something that only women have. Women are fertile, and men are virile. You wouldn't call a seed fertile as well as the field it grows in, you would call the seed viable. Pollen and sperm have virility or a lack thereof. They completely lack this fertility you speak of. So do men.

@ivanc9087 8 ай бұрын

True. Virility comes from the word vir which is man in latin. Fertility is a female attribute

@thousendbell6404 3 ай бұрын

Thank you for those precious words. ❤❤❤

@StarlightXvoid 2 ай бұрын

Fertility and infertility can be applied to both male and female as they both can be fertile and infertile. And I don’t get why the word “fertility” being attributed to males is a problem or why it matters. It’s just a word used to demonstrate the healthy state of the reproductive system or something of the sort. What does it matter exactly? Male and female can be referred to as fertile since it all really means the same thing for both males and female to be fertile (which again, insinuate the healthy state of the reproductive system).

@saddadinc.3867 2 ай бұрын

@@StarlightXvoid it matters bc people use words incorrectly.. which, after a while of this causes our language to get more or more meaningless/stupid. Also, with a large amount of our younger generations getting dumber bc of social media/technology, etc. ... they already use words so grossly incorrect that we shouldn’t add to that. & last point is that when researching ancient/religious history it helps a lot to understand what words actually mean to find clues into what they were trying to say/tell us, etc. weird that you sound offended that he pointed out some facts. Almost sounds like a gender theory argument lol

@StarlightXvoid 2 ай бұрын

@@saddadinc.3867 I was just pointing out that the word “fertility” can apply to both male and female. It does not matter whether they are deemed either of the words, it all implies the same thing. They were speaking as if there is some grave distinction between the two. It should not matter in the modern age. And I was not offended. I was merely pointing out that it doesn’t matter whether Male is described as fertile, because it in-tale the same meaning if a female were called fertile. That is why there exist male fertility gods in many other myths. It simply doesn’t matter.

@youknowho4439 Жыл бұрын

"You shall not make idols or set up carved images, or sacred pillars, or sculpted stones in your land so that you may worship them. I am the LORD your God."

@ridhimalifestyle100 Жыл бұрын

That is what a dictator would say

@youknowho4439 Жыл бұрын

@@ridhimalifestyle100 If God created humans, I'm sure He has the right to rule over them. I mean, who could be more fair than God? I'd rather serve Him and have unbreakable peace of mind and soul.

@KillBasix Жыл бұрын

@@ridhimalifestyle100God is not the dictator, God is the one trying to free you from dictatorship and evil that has plagued the world. The Bible (God’s inspired word written by man) is not a rule book, everything he commands of us is for our protection and completely for our benefit. God would not make himself into a man (Jesus) and endure torture and persecution on our behalf in order to save us from spiritual death if he did not greatly care about our well being. The statement that God is a dictator contradicts all of human development and history. God is the literal embodiment of love itself, the Bible is not a rule book it is the greatest love story ever told. God’s love affair with the human race.

@andred7684 Жыл бұрын

@@ridhimalifestyle100 Exactly! This is what Kim Jong Un says in North Korea. I don't see the difference between the Kim dinasty and the Christian god.

@elibonham4388 Жыл бұрын

@@ridhimalifestyle100 facts

@duncanbryson1167 Жыл бұрын

Someone made this observation: Why did artists show Adam and Eve with belly buttons? 😳 No umbilical cord would have existed so another example, by extension, of creating "God" in OUR image.

@darlalathan6143 Жыл бұрын

They must have worked with models, lol!

@DomoZorroOorroZomoD Жыл бұрын

Good question

@naxel37 11 ай бұрын

I have a belly button !!!!!!!

@SirManBossDudeBroGuy 9 ай бұрын

Amazing question

@RCSNIPER34 8 ай бұрын

We don't actually know if they did have belly buttons, they could have not had one. Considering we have no actual photographs of them, we'll never know.

@naxel37 11 ай бұрын

She is correct. Jesus was packing big... I mean bigggg. He was use to carrying large wood, hard and heavy things. Not just the cross 😮

@fintonmainz7845 5 ай бұрын

she's talking about his daddy

@caleb2507 4 ай бұрын

@@fintonmainz7845Yahweh was not Jesus “daddy”. He even said as much himself to the Pharisees in John 8:44. There were 2 “gods”. The OT and the NT. The creator of the physical and the true and unseen god of the spirit. Jesus was the “manifestation” (allegedly) of the 2nd. Yahweh was evil and served only to create the physical realms.

@ASMRyouVEGANyet 3 ай бұрын

@@caleb2507 yaweh was evil? Wtf

@CivilKane Жыл бұрын

No. The word in Hebrew used for the description of the Lord from the waist down in Ezekiel 1 is "אֵשׂ" which from the strongs exhaustive concordance means, "A primitive word; fire (literally or figuratively) -- burning, fiery, fire, flaming, hot." And is translated in English "of fire" in reference to the appearance that He had from the waist down. In Ezekiel 1, the only reference to wings is made when referring to the wings of the living creatures that were described in the beginning of the vision, that were distinct from the Lord, according to Ezekiel.

@Thebibleguy96 3 ай бұрын

Anyone quoting the Strong's Concordance certainly doesn't know what they're talking about.

@kavisbreaker1946 2 ай бұрын

❤

@alchemygal3285 2 ай бұрын

@@Thebibleguy96wdym? Can you explain? I want to know what he’s quoting and why you say what you say.

@GnaReffotsirk Жыл бұрын

"Behold, son of man, my glory!" Sir, that is lewd.

@Cuban20 5 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Scott-et4kd 15 күн бұрын

Oh man -- perfect.

@grit1679 8 ай бұрын

So why am I having trouble finding this in Ezekiel 1?

@ASMRyouVEGANyet 3 ай бұрын

Because it's horse 💩

@GoogleAccount-wy2hc 3 ай бұрын

And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.

@donharris8846 9 ай бұрын

First, her evidence that “God’s loins were exposed” didn’t justify her claim that he was “certainly well endowed”. Second, why the hell would a God need a penis? Who is it intercoursing with, and why? This begs the question - does God also have sperm, which are cells? Does God have other cells and do those cells comprise a physical body like ours? If so, where is that body?

@ASMRyouVEGANyet 3 ай бұрын

Needs to be pinned

@allaware1971 Жыл бұрын

The real God is unseen

@TheOnlyYared Жыл бұрын

"Christ is the visible image of the invisible God. He existed before anything was created and is supreme over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He existed before anything else, and he holds all creation together. Christ is also the head of the church, which is his body. He is the beginning, supreme over all who rise from the dead. So he is first in everything. For God in all his fullness was pleased to live in Christ, and through him God reconciled everything to himself. He made peace with everything in heaven and on earth by means of Christ’s blood on the cross." [Collosians 1:15-20]

@TheOnlyYared Жыл бұрын

@andrewwebber6073 Well I guess it's not as entertaining as believing the universe randomly self-spawned in, GTA style😂 The tooth fairy is more believable.

@anthany4719 11 ай бұрын

Except for when he came in physical man form to tell Abraham about burning Sodom lol and when he came down to wrestle with Jacob 😅and some people argue that Melchizedek was a Christophany and if you’re a oneness believer it would in turn mean God was also present through the physical form of Melchizedek lol

@allaware1971 11 ай бұрын

@anthany4719 Those were angels... Except melchizidek who was immortal. Also, I don't think that a burning bush is exactly a human...

@TheOnlyYared 11 ай бұрын

@allaware1971 The Angel of the LORD who appeared on the burning bush in Exodus was called God. Are you calling God an angel? Who did Jacob wrestle with? Was it an angel? Didn't Jacob himself say he wrestled with God?

@BestAndLocal Жыл бұрын

Hmm I thought I posted the niv version Ezekiel 1:27 New International Version 27 I saw that from what appeared to be his waist up he looked like glowing metal, as if full of fire, and that from there down he looked like fire; and brilliant light surrounded him.

@aprilk3705 Жыл бұрын

Well alrighty then.

@jemiahthesaiyanproductions3207 Жыл бұрын

Imagine walking around believing in this stuff. Crazy

@lorettawilson7264 Жыл бұрын

Lol..!!😁

@ao4514 Жыл бұрын

She clearly has misinterpreted the passage in EZekiel!

@aeronblitz9347 Жыл бұрын

"Now above the expanse that was over their heads there was something resembling a throne, like lapis lazuli in appearance; and on that which resembled a throne, high up, was a figure with the appearance of a man. Then I noticed from the appearance of His loins and upward something like glowing metal that looked like fire all around within it, and from the appearance of His loins and downward I saw something like fire; and there was a radiance around Him. As the appearance of the rainbow in the clouds on a rainy day, so was the appearance of the surrounding radiance. Such was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I saw it, I fell on my face and heard a voice speaking." (Ezekiel 1:26‭-‬28)

@daltonadams4672 Жыл бұрын

@@ao4514Please give your interpreted

@BestAndLocal Жыл бұрын

It says from the waist down he appeared as fire.

@MidlifeCrisis82 Жыл бұрын

But what if it actually meant itchiness.

@joelcraig9803 Жыл бұрын

Thats what the ladies say about me.

@aeronblitz9347 Жыл бұрын

Heres the passage she completely perverted: "Now above the expanse that was over their heads there was something resembling a throne, like lapis lazuli in appearance; and on that which resembled a throne, high up, was a figure with the appearance of a man. Then I noticed from the appearance of His loins and upward something like glowing metal that looked like fire all around within it, and from the appearance of His loins and downward I saw something like fire; and there was a radiance around Him. As the appearance of the rainbow in the clouds on a rainy day, so was the appearance of the surrounding radiance. Such was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I saw it, I fell on my face and heard a voice speaking." (Ezekiel 1:26‭-‬28)

@tealx8462 Жыл бұрын

@@aeronblitz9347 😏😏

@tealx8462 Жыл бұрын

@@aeronblitz9347 Yes, she’s using conjecture!

@ElderYarah 9 ай бұрын

Wow! She butchered the verse in Ezekiel 😮

@Thebibleguy96 3 ай бұрын

No, she really didn't.

@Scott-et4kd 15 күн бұрын

State a valid argument, instead of third-graders' "It's not true -- so there!"

@ElderYarah 15 күн бұрын

@@Scott-et4kd The Bible verse that states "God is a spirit" is John 4:24, which continues, "and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth". Spirits don’t have genitalia! It’s called anthropomorphism look it up! God is also anthropomorphized as a woman. Isaiah 42:14: God says, "For a long time I have held my peace, I have kept still and restrained myself; now I will cry out like a woman in labor, I will gasp and pant". So, yes she completely butchered Ezekiel 1 and it understanding in cultural context! HOW’S THAT!

@Scott-et4kd 15 күн бұрын

@@ElderYarah Sir, respectfully, you only stated "begging the question fallacies," and "appeal to authority fallacies" (Google). A valid argument MUST stand on its own, independent of persons/place/time, like 2+2=4. Otherwise, you can't transmit valid information, on which rational choices can be made. Furthermore, your beliefs can't be justified.

@ElderYarah 15 күн бұрын

@@Scott-et4kd Sir, Begging the question is not considered a formal fallacy. She used a Bible verse out of context to support a false premise that ancient Israelites believed God had genitals or specifically a penis. There are clear verses in Bible that debunks her premise. Example, Numbers 23:19 King James Version 19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: As Jesus tells us elsewhere, “a spirit has not flesh and bones” (Luke 24:39). There is a big difference between being a spirit and having a spirit. Jesus says that the Father is a spirit, not that the Father has a spirit; this means that he lacks a body entirely. She fails at understanding the cultural context of Ezekiel 1 which is to Gods preeminence over the Israelites worship of Egyptian idols, Mim or the Greek god Priapas. She attempted to cherry pick and isolate a single text in Ezekiel without reading the rest of book which clearly Ezekiel 23. 20 She remembered her lover with the penis like a donkey and a flood of semen like a horse. It’s against idol worship SIR

@wprandall2452 Жыл бұрын

The real Yahweh prohibited the worship of graven images.

@Cuban20 5 ай бұрын

And yet he allowed the creation of Angel images on the Ark of the Covenant, the images of Stars of David and Menorah candles, and eventually the Cross and the Crescent used by Muslims. Oh! And that one time that he had Moshe/Musa (Moses) create a bronze serpent idol to cure people from a snake plague he unleashed on them for being assholes. Yeah......of course he was against Graven images 😂

@wprandall2452 5 ай бұрын

@@Cuban20 Graven images had to be images of idols. Nothing you mentioned pertains to that. Jesus was the union of God and Man, so the Cross represents salvation.

@emailvonsour 5 ай бұрын

@@wprandall2452 "You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above or that is on the earth beneath or that is in the water under the earth." That rules out snakes and cherubim. And yet...

@wprandall2452 4 ай бұрын

@@emailvonsour the snake on the pole represented the Cricifixion. The Ark of Covenant was not a likeness of God. It was a means of speaking to God.

@andrewsmith3257 4 ай бұрын

@@emailvonsour he would hate the celebrity worship of today for sure

@minifox3603 9 ай бұрын

Genuinely. May God bless you and may He have mercy on us all.

@kylehenderson8569 Жыл бұрын

When you don’t understand the Bible origins so you believe in the King James Version 😂😂😂😂

@Dashuyan88 8 ай бұрын

You are talking about this lady or angry people in the comments?

@dimitrioskalfakis Жыл бұрын

the essence of biblical religions ;-)

@darlalathan6143 Жыл бұрын

"Essense?!" Like in "purity of essence?" Lol!

@jedrashidul6952 3 ай бұрын

If u know u knowww😂😂😂

@thebuff1611 Жыл бұрын

This is nearly blasphemy!

@joycesky5041 Жыл бұрын

I love blasphemy

@Somebodyuprobsknow Жыл бұрын

This is blasphemy

@joycesky5041 Жыл бұрын

It’s hilarious! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@joycesky5041 Жыл бұрын

@@Somebodyuprobsknow It’s hilarious! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@AlbenianKomrad Жыл бұрын

these pepole are lost

@ashleyerin7069 Жыл бұрын

God came inside me and filled me with his love

@Tybold63 Жыл бұрын

Gross, lol

@ashleyerin7069 Жыл бұрын

@@Tybold63 I'm just thankful he was willing to share his recipe for creampie with me..🥰

@Tybold63 Жыл бұрын

@@ashleyerin7069 🤣 Gotta admit your response was pretty good although YHWH is just imaginary.

@ashleyerin7069 Жыл бұрын

@@Tybold63 Yeah I know...I wouldn't worship the God of the bible even if he did exist

@Tybold63 Жыл бұрын

@@ashleyerin7069 ☺

@Dashuyan88 8 ай бұрын

Yes. Thats the masculinity we need more in modern world ✊️✊️✊️

@ASMRyouVEGANyet 3 ай бұрын

No we don't, the world is already over sexualized and pornified. 🤢

@wonderwen 5 ай бұрын

Who is speaking in the video? I wanna watch the full video that this is taken from.

@bobmusil1458 4 ай бұрын

Her name is Francesca Stavrakopoulou

@BestAndLocal Жыл бұрын

Ezekiel 1:27 New International Version 27 I saw that from what appeared to be his waist up he looked like glowing metal, as if full of fire, and that from there down he looked like fire; and brilliant light surrounded him.

@sheepinwolfesclothing Жыл бұрын

Exactly wtf is she talking bout

@3pendont4 Жыл бұрын

@@sheepinwolfesclothing She is probably into new age, wica, or some form of paganism. She clearly sounds like she doesn't read the Bible much.

@absurdhero144 Жыл бұрын

You're reading from the NIV. Read the original Hebrew and make sure you read the meaning of the Hebrew words.

@lukesutton4135 Жыл бұрын

Non-thiests love making up stories in attempt to prove themselves right. She's made up another story about how Jehovah*(can find God's name in the Bible still) and Ishtar are the same. Some joke about how someone in that resurrected in that religion, claiming Jesus was a knock off. Never knew an actual person(no one denies this, not even the self denying Non-thiests) could be a knock off that essentially put an end to the Roman Empire, moved a Boulder from his tomb, etc but hey! They said a one thing that was similar.

@atomicphilosophy Жыл бұрын

@deyronherrera6239 2 ай бұрын

This is wrong Reason - Loins isn’t used to be that at all the Hebrew word is מָתְנַיִם translate to māṯnayim or H4975 It’s hip and also the used 3 other times in the text and it’s not used as P&n look for yourself Ezekiel 47:4 It’s disrespectful even though I know you probably genuinely tried to research but yea it’s really easy to fact check this stuff now.

@gilmarjunior7700 2 ай бұрын

yeah

@hailsagan8886 Жыл бұрын

I'm definitely not a god by her standards

@ao4514 Жыл бұрын

She clearly has misinterpreted the passage in Ekekiel!

@republiccooper Жыл бұрын

This is the part she's talking about in Ezekiel, where you get "clear allusions to [God's] genitals": "Above the vault over their heads was what looked like a throne of lapis lazuli, and high above on the throne was a figure like that of a man. 27 I saw that from what appeared to be his waist up he looked like glowing metal, as if full of fire, and that from there down he looked like fire; and brilliant light surrounded him. 28 Like the appearance of a rainbow in the clouds on a rainy day, so was the radiance around him."

@StannisHarlock Жыл бұрын

Gives new meaning to Luke 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, “The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee. Therefore also that Holy Being who shall be born of thee ...

@c.guydubois8270 Жыл бұрын

Yeah that sounds like consent to me....

@StannisHarlock Жыл бұрын

@@mama-nono3652 That was the whole point of starting my original post with the phrase, "Gives new meaning". I was already aware of what the text was saying. What the text in that scripture doesn't tell you is that the same god it's talking about in the new testament is depicted with human reproductive organs in earlier writings.

@KnuttyEntertainment Жыл бұрын

You know the whole purpose of that passage is that Mary conceives as a virgin, so the context that God has a package is a moot point. It’s almost like the fact that he doesn’t use it is the whole point. Also, the Holy Ghost is, you know, a Ghost. He doesn’t have a physical body to do the deed with anyway.

@StannisHarlock Жыл бұрын

@@KnuttyEntertainment You know I was being facetious, right.? The whole fact that the Gospels disagree with each other over several matters means they aren't word of god. You know that, right? So if god is portrayed with a penis ... not the most serious of matters at all.

@gwaaiedenshaw8310 Жыл бұрын

My Hebrew is pretty rusty, so I’ll just take her word that it means loins, which conjures up quite an image. Essentially it’s this “loin” floating in the centre of a ball of fire. But is the god that Yahweh (sp?) is drawn from a fertility god? I thought it was a war/storm god? But then there was some other that was stirred in? It doesn’t sound like there was anything in Ezekiel that specifically says that gods halowed unit is particularly girthy, but is there more in the mythows that he evolved from?

@BestAndLocal Жыл бұрын

Ezekiel 1:27 King James Version 27 And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.

@ao4514 Жыл бұрын

She clearly has misinterpreted the passage in Ekekiel!

@undrwatropium3724 Жыл бұрын

@@ao4514 funny how interpretation changes from person to person. There's 45,000 denominations of Christianity globally and you can't even agree with each other so how do you expect me to believe?

@BestAndLocal Жыл бұрын

@@undrwatropium3724 Have faith in God.

@shqipebelgjike1274 Жыл бұрын

@@undrwatropium3724 the bible talks about Jesus Christ dying for our sins, and that Jesus is the only way to the Father and His Kingdom

@ao4514 Жыл бұрын

@@undrwatropium3724 You've made a fair observation and i respect that but salvation is a personal journey which we will all give account for!

@psychedsage4990 5 ай бұрын

Yet 1st and 2nd temple does not have any statues.

@jebinj7413 Ай бұрын

Even when examining the **original Hebrew text** of Ezekiel 1:26-28, there is no indication of anything like what that woman is describing. The Hebrew text is focused on the **radiance, fire, and glory** surrounding the figure, and these details are metaphorical, representing God's holiness and power. In the Hebrew, the word used for "waist" in **Ezekiel 1:27** is **מָתְנָיו** ("motnayv"), which literally means the "loins" or "waist," referring to the midsection of the figure. The description is of **fire and glowing brightness** coming from this area both above and below. The original language emphasizes the brightness, fire-like appearance, and the majesty of the figure, not any literal exposure of the body or genitals. It's possible this woman encountered misread or misinterpreted the text, as there is no reference in the Hebrew to anything about uncovered body parts or genitals. The passage is about God’s **radiance** and **glory**, metaphorically using light and fire to communicate His divine nature, not a physical, human-like portrayal.

@kyt-dev6496 22 күн бұрын

Yes, most people say that she is right because she has studies and all that. I have heard some of her arguments and the ones that I have heard, I can say clearly that she has no idea what she is talking about.

@irrelevant_dog Жыл бұрын

Taken sky daddy to whole new level

@mmccrownus2406 Жыл бұрын

@lordzaboem Жыл бұрын

thank you

@netherite-- Жыл бұрын

Bro what is that glowing metal please reply

@mjt532 Жыл бұрын

What verse(s) is she referring to in Ezekiel 1?

@georginab2830 Жыл бұрын

1:27

@tbishop4961 Жыл бұрын

big fail And I saw as the colour of electrum, as the appearance of fire round about enclosing it, from the appearance of his loins and upward; and from the appearance of his loins and downward I saw as it were the appearance of fire, and there was brightness round about him.

@mjt532 Жыл бұрын

@@tbishop4961 My translation didn't mention "loins." 😀

@mnm8818 Жыл бұрын

King James Version has the loins word included, which could be the decent term for genitals, as even now we use slang names for it and so they did back then. i mean to even mention it is a bit full on back then I'd think, thats why it's removed in other versions. but I'm guessing she's implying that the fire/ molten metal or whatever centre, start from the loins as implied by the verse. And either the loins or human figure had brightness around it (doesnt state him btw). you could counter argue he ate magic mushrooms, as most religious leaders did back then and still do now ritualistically, as it's nature from god/s

@tbishop4961 Жыл бұрын

@@mnm8818 the word is מָתְנָיו . Do yourself a favor and use a concordance to find other instances in tanakh and their context

@Wide2point1x3bets 5 ай бұрын

That’s the Greek god Priapus

@averageskyfatherworshipper9342 Жыл бұрын

“Hear O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is hung.”

@lilSenDog Жыл бұрын

Makes sense big nose big hose

@felixalonzo2847 9 ай бұрын

😅😅😅😅😅

@GoogleAccount-kw1mz 11 ай бұрын

The funny thing is people thinking yhwh is the real god and not just the demiurge - Jesus Christ is the way to the true god - which isn’t the same as yhwh (just meditate on this and don’t close your mind yet - the characteristics described by Jesus doesn’t align with yhwh, but instead describes yhwh as the adversary - this is why they crucified him for blasphemy).

@morbrakai8533 Жыл бұрын

God is in spirit. Not flesh. He desires no flesh. God is disgusted at the desires of the flesh. Flesh is of the world. God is above all idols. God is greater.

@TheBackyardProfessor 11 ай бұрын

Is Jesus God? Then there ya have it...

@morbrakai8533 11 ай бұрын

@@TheBackyardProfessor i was refering to the father, not the son

@TheBackyardProfessor 11 ай бұрын

@@morbrakai8533 So was I. When Philip told Jesus to show them the Father, Jesus said if you have seen me you have seen him. Jesus was a physical man during that time, if the Bible is to be believed.

@morbrakai8533 11 ай бұрын

@@TheBackyardProfessorMatthew 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit

@jerryoshea3116 Жыл бұрын

This Prof appears to have done some real extensive research on this topic&is totally convinced and satisfied with her findings!

@jessicamaeromero1667 Жыл бұрын

Actually, that is not accurate at all. Loins are not the genitals, first of all. Loins are either side of the back above the butt. Nice try, though. Anyone who wants the truth can look into Ezekiel themselves. Analyze the Hebrew. It is not referring to that part of the body being the only visible part at all. The text is describing the height on his body to which the fire appeared to be. More accurately translated to "waist". The same word appears later in Ezekiel, in chapter 48 and it talks about wading up to water to the knee and then the water getting deeper and wading up to his "loins" or waist. Look up the meaning and origin of "gird your loins". People back then we're actually living lives full of threat and danger. There are some very vulnerable organs back there. The "loin" guard did indeed cover the genitals but it was pulled all the way up to the middle of the back to protect one's actual LOINS from being vulnerable to attack. I am calling confirmation bias. It's such a stretch. 😆. I can't be arsed to watch the whole video. Does she actually have any other examples of the Abrahamic covenant God having been a fertility god? Or is this it? Sincerely.

@Erimgard13 Жыл бұрын

I supposed it depends on how we're defining "fertility god," but almost every major female character in the Bible has a story in which they are infertile, they appeal to god, they pass some test of faith, and then god grants them fertility. I think that's a pretty strong case for his role as a fertility god, but it says nothing about him having literal genitals.

@ndeamonk24 Жыл бұрын

@@Erimgard13 great point

@jellis270 Жыл бұрын

@Erimgard13 "almost every female character in the Bible has a fertility issue"?😅 I can think of 1, Sarah, the wife of Abraham...

@jellis270 Жыл бұрын

@Exjwfactor because Jesus has always existed he had to be born from a virgin birth. So I don't understand what you are implying?

@shelbyguitarmusic 11 ай бұрын

If you are serious about understanding Dr. Stavrakopoulou's position, read her book "God: An Anatomy." She not only covers Yahweh's fertility god status in depth, but explains the cultural context of male fertility gods, as well as countless other interesting things about God's body in the Bible. But you couldn't even demonstrate sufficient intellectual honestly and good faith to finish this ridiculously short video, so I mark your chances of reading her book slim. Your interpretation of "loins" in this context is flat wrong, and the evidence is laid out quite clearly in her book.

@gilmarjunior7700 2 ай бұрын

According to her knowledge (she's PhD 🥶) let's reinterpret those verses Exodus 12:11 "And thus shall ye eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste: it is the Lord's passover." Isaiah 11:5 "And righteousness shall be the girdle of his loins, and faithfulness the girdle of his reins." Isaiah 21:3 "Therefore are my loins filled with pain: pangs have taken hold upon me, as the pangs of a woman that travaileth: I was bowed down at the hearing of it; I was dismayed at the seeing of it." - ouch 🤕 Daniel 5:6 "Then the king's countenance was changed, and his thoughts troubled him, so that the joints of his loins were loosed, and his knees smote one against another." See how the context matters? Deuteronomy 4:15-16 "Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the Lord spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female."

@trentlytle7289 Жыл бұрын

I see the staff/wand as being an extension of the phallus. With gods like Dionysus it's explicit (google Thyrsus). But when you look at the stories associated with the staff of Moses/Aaron, I believe the euphemisms hold true

@darlalathan6143 Жыл бұрын

So, that's what "Moses held out his rod upon the waters" means?? LOL!

@trentlytle7289 Жыл бұрын

@@darlalathan6143 even hitting a rock with his rod will make it squirt

@lilchristuten7568 Жыл бұрын

-.- "in the ark was the staff of Aaron that had budded".

@trentlytle7289 Жыл бұрын

@@lilchristuten7568 from an almond tree, it had nuts.

@lawrencewells2131 11 ай бұрын

I would say this discussion is well beyond her grasp, yet in reality she has two hands and we all know that any human female worth thier salt and has two hands she knows what to do with them.

@JosephineElect Жыл бұрын

Why do humans have to home in a sexual organs. Such a shame this is all we can up with 😌God is a spirit being the creator of all. No respect left for the creator who made the flesh and body parts you are describing 😢. All praises to you father through the name of the son Yeshua /Jesus of Nazareth 🙏🌠🙏. Forgive them father they know what they do 😢

@samconduct1356 Жыл бұрын

I think they do know what they do and they're doing it on purpose.

@ASMRyouVEGANyet 3 ай бұрын

I feel you. This was so disgusting. It really highlights how lost she, and everyone else accepting of what she's saying, really is.

@OuiVayy-xj8ot 7 ай бұрын

The hell is going on? She having fantasies about this

@shanecallaghan3200 Жыл бұрын

But they are not gods. They are just advanced beings your talking about. This has nothing to do with god.

@robmcdonagh8367 4 ай бұрын

Actually YOU have no idea what you are talking about and this is a scholar of this texts, francesca stravrakopoulou, and she knows far more then you ever will

@shanecallaghan3200 4 ай бұрын

@@robmcdonagh8367 I never said she does not, all I said was they were not gods. They were just normal people who were more advanced. God is not a person. God is an energy in my opinion. He certainly was no man with a large penis.

@Mauricesirjones 7 ай бұрын

Suddenly, at all makes perfect sense. Salaam shalom 🙏🏾✨

@annemariededekind6271 Жыл бұрын

Well....God had a son!!!

@samthesomniator Жыл бұрын

Yeahr. But his mom was a virgin. 😅

@aeronblitz9347 Жыл бұрын

But not the way we think. He wasn't like zeus. He spoke the universe into existence, you dont think He can speak and Jesus would be incarnated? She totally perverted the passage: "Now above the expanse that was over their heads there was something resembling a throne, like lapis lazuli in appearance; and on that which resembled a throne, high up, was a figure with the appearance of a man. Then I noticed from the appearance of His loins and upward something like glowing metal that looked like fire all around within it, and from the appearance of His loins and downward I saw something like fire; and there was a radiance around Him. As the appearance of the rainbow in the clouds on a rainy day, so was the appearance of the surrounding radiance. Such was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I saw it, I fell on my face and heard a voice speaking." (Ezekiel 1:26‭-‬28)

@kcl6627 4 ай бұрын

@aeronblitz9347 , so funny you mention the rainbow. In ancient cultures, the rainbow was also a symbol of male genitalia, so that gives even more credit to what she is saying. She says this and more in the full video. This is just a short. She studies ancient cultures and is qualified to say the information she states. She doesn't do it to degrade the Bible etc, but to give an honest view into ancient views and even what the Hebrew Bible would have meant in nor just its original language, but also its original context and cultural lens.

@KingOfAssyria_IIVI 10 ай бұрын

And that, ladies an gentlemen is why satan takes what is Gods an corrupts it. He sent his fertility Gods and stories that resemble the real story. An left it for you to find.

@ASMRyouVEGANyet 3 ай бұрын

Needs to be pinned

@chalinofalcone871 Жыл бұрын

""... its striking resemblance to the 'Theogony' of the Greek poet Hesiod. There the Earth (Gaia) gives birth to Heaven (Uranos); then Uranos and Gaia together become the parents of Kronos and the Titans. Uranos hates his children and seeks to prevent their birth, but Kronos, incited by Gaia, emasculates his father with a sickle, and out of the blood which flows comes forth the Erinyes (Furies), the Giants, and the Melian nymphs, while Aphrodite is born from the foam what's arises when the severed member falls into the sea. Kronos and his wife Rhea then beget the Olympian gods, foremost among whom is Zeus. Kronos swallows all his children except Zeus, who is saved by the substitution of a stone which Kronos swallows instead of him. Zeus, on growing to manhood, forces Kronos to spit out the gods whom he has swallowed, and the stone, which comes out first, is set up as a cult-object at Pytho (Delphi). The poem ends with the Battle of the Gods and Titans and the final victory of the Olympians. Hesiod's sequence Uranus-Kronos-Zeus is matched in the hittite version by the sequence: Anu (Sumerian 'an'= heaven)- Kumarbi, father of the gods,- Weather-god, though Alalu in the Hittite version represent a still older generation unknown to Hesiod. The emasculation of the Sky-god occurs in both myths, though the motif of the swallowing and spitting out seems to have become attached to a different incident. In the broken part of the tablet there is some reference to Kumarbi eating and to a stone which may possibly correspond to the Pythian 'omphalos' of Hesiod's version; & it is probable that the Hittite myth ends with the victory of the Weather-god. These points of resemblance are enough to establish a strong probability that both versions derive ultimately from the same Hurrian myth. The 'Song of Ullikummi'...""

@roddyboethius1722 Жыл бұрын

Well said

@aeronblitz9347 Жыл бұрын

Except she totally perverted the passage. This is what it actually says: "Now above the expanse that was over their heads there was something resembling a throne, like lapis lazuli in appearance; and on that which resembled a throne, high up, was a figure with the appearance of a man. Then I noticed from the appearance of His loins and upward something like glowing metal that looked like fire all around within it, and from the appearance of His loins and downward I saw something like fire; and there was a radiance around Him. As the appearance of the rainbow in the clouds on a rainy day, so was the appearance of the surrounding radiance. Such was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I saw it, I fell on my face and heard a voice speaking." (Ezekiel 1:26‭-‬28)

@Mayan_88694 8 ай бұрын

@@aeronblitz9347she didn’t pervert it, it’s what your book of Bronze Age fairytales actually says

@Mayan_88694 8 ай бұрын

@@aeronblitz9347no she didn’t, it’s what your book actually says, makes you mad doesn’t it?

@aeronblitz9347 8 ай бұрын

@@Mayan_88694 Did you even read the passage?

@dharma_mane Жыл бұрын

“Potent” that bit did me in 🤣

@InfoArtistJKatTheGoodInfoCafe Жыл бұрын

Makes sense. Manly, powerful, strong, potent, virile, big, thick, confident, satisfying. Scary and attractive at the same time for women.

@aeronblitz9347 Жыл бұрын

She is sinful and must repent for her blasphemy. This is what the passage she perverted actually says: "Now above the expanse that was over their heads there was something resembling a throne, like lapis lazuli in appearance; and on that which resembled a throne, high up, was a figure with the appearance of a man. Then I noticed from the appearance of His loins and upward something like glowing metal that looked like fire all around within it, and from the appearance of His loins and downward I saw something like fire; and there was a radiance around Him. As the appearance of the rainbow in the clouds on a rainy day, so was the appearance of the surrounding radiance. Such was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I saw it, I fell on my face and heard a voice speaking." (Ezekiel 1:26‭-‬28)

@saltysaints7125 Жыл бұрын

If she is referring to Ezekiel 1, it never references loins at any point. It talks about the waist up and that point down, but never anything about loins.

@librulcunspirisy Жыл бұрын

Thanks 👍

@aeronblitz9347 Жыл бұрын

@y11971alex Жыл бұрын

Interestingly, Exodus doesn’t seem to like the comparison of the god to a bull, which I am led to think is also a symbol of fertility.

@mamborickyclassicalmusicac4733 Жыл бұрын

WTF... too funny

@aeronblitz9347 Жыл бұрын

@mariaglass2968 11 ай бұрын

I came here for the comments. They didn't disappoint me. 💩

@baronallstars 4 ай бұрын

Does he ever get to talk about the garden?

@elierouhana9812 Жыл бұрын

"For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him."-2 Corinthians 5:21

@m.-9615 Жыл бұрын

I thought Jews didn't believe God to be a human like figure with human attributes...?

@fredericorodriguez808 Жыл бұрын

I read that verse . Doesent say anything about his genitals . It just says there was a fire from his upper loins to his bottom loins . Loins is a general area were you cover . There just trying to make it seem like the fire around the loin area is similar to other gods genitals . While in this verse no genitals are involved

@joygibbons5482 8 ай бұрын

Why would anyone need to cover the lower part of the torso unless they were covering the genitals? The angelic beings surrounding the throne are doing the same. Lions is being used as a euphemism for genitals, nobody needs to cover their waist.

@fredericorodriguez808 8 ай бұрын

@@joygibbons5482 scripture is not saying there’s genitals . Or should he have just been naked instead . Without anything ?

@edwardmiessner6502 Жыл бұрын

Slightly OT but there's a crucifix where Jesus is sporting a footlong-plus standing high and proud!

@jfintex43 Жыл бұрын

Actually no.... not even close. In Ezekiel 1:27 he is not saying he sees God's dick. He's saying from the loins up and from the loins down were covered. Same as saying waist up and waist down were covered. Complete ignorance

@OverlyHonestGaming 9 ай бұрын

AGREED

@theroyalcapra 7 ай бұрын

Why so fixated on the loins then?

@rationalsceptic7634 6 ай бұрын

Not in Greek and Hebrew

@rationalsceptic7634 6 ай бұрын

She an Oxford PhD and Professor of Ancient Religions...you are not

@fintonmainz7845 5 ай бұрын

oh you can read ancient Hebrew

@michaelmacias8 11 ай бұрын

And just like that she begins to talk about Lucifer

@codydupont3000 6 ай бұрын

This seems dishonest given the context and the actual Scripture she is referencing. From His loins up (loins or hip area) there was a vision of burning metal or amber. From His loins down, burning fire radiating down. Anyone from that time who saw this vision wouldn’t think YHWH was flashing them, but that the top half of His appearance was more of a solid, molten fire, and His bottom half has radiating fire. By the logic she is using, the “wheels” in this same vision should be some type of orifice, right? Wrong. This is a cheap and poorly constructed attempt to cheapen the truth of Christianity by lumping YHWH together with mythical deities.

@generator6946 Жыл бұрын

We are just poor monkeys on a ball of rock whirling through eternal space.

@k-3402 10 ай бұрын

Apes. Aside from that, yes, I agree. All the explanations we've cooked up for our origins are... interesting, to say the least

@ibrahimkevinlagosarias3986 Ай бұрын

She is soo right in this I love her

@myoneblackfriend3151 Жыл бұрын

This god is on fi-yerrrrrrrrrr!

@whitefox998 Жыл бұрын

That RuPaul allusion had me dying!

@aaronhunter5403 Жыл бұрын

Isaiah 14:20-23 [20]Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned. [21]Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities. [22]For I will rise up against them, saith the LORD of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the LORD. [23]I will also make it a possession for the bittern, and pools of water: and I will sweep it with the besom of destruction, saith the LORD of hosts.

@fatimasandrakasan6977 Жыл бұрын

Revelation 22:18-19 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll. If anyone adds anything to them, GOD will add to that person the plaques described in this scroll. And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, GOD will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City which are described in this scroll. Proverbs 12:12-13 The wicked desire the stronghold of evildoers, but the root of the righteous endures. Evildoers are trapped by their sinful talk, and so the innocent escape trouble. Proverbs 13:15 The righteous hates what is false, but the wicked makes themselves a stench and bring shame on themselves. Proverbs 13:16 All who are prudent act with knowledge, but fools expose their folly.

@ThetennisDr Жыл бұрын

The book u just quoted has been alrrady added. Now is up to us to know which one is from.the hidden fake god satan who used to be in pergamo turkey by revelation but now he is running out of time. Yet he allowed bibles to tey to win. Yaweh is satan

@rylands4289 8 ай бұрын

The music was SUPER extra 😂

@ao4514 Жыл бұрын

She clearly has misinterpreted the passage in Ekekiel!

@TomSkinner Жыл бұрын

Are you translating from the Greek (septuagent) or the Hebrew texts?

@ME-hw1pg Жыл бұрын

@@TomSkinner she did and does many things purposefully. One she never actually opens up the Bible and reads to the audience. She just states it as facts because she is the one with a degree. No hermeneutically use of the Bible. She also just attacks the Bible not the QUARAN for example and that suspect

@johnmario3795 4 ай бұрын

God in bible is supernatural. You cannot make graven images or contain Him in a form. He is beyond description. Nothing can be compared to Him. Prophet Ezekiel saw a fraction of His glorious majesty. He is Holy God. No one is allowed to enter naked or revealing clothes in His presence. One should even cover their head to enter His temple.

@NeptunesLagoon Жыл бұрын

"God is not male or female" Nope... he was well hung... he made a man, and the woman was to be adams wife... Schwing! it takes a man to make a person or everything around you... for a woman. and he only spoke of caucasians...

@WayWalker3 3 ай бұрын

Can't wait for the second coming.....

@Lpettro Жыл бұрын

Fake news. If you look at the verse, it doesn't describe his loins AT ALL. It is just saying the way the upper part and lower parts of his body appeared. It doesn't say "he had huge loins" or anything of the sort. Francesca being sensational again.

@lynnestockil7033 Жыл бұрын

Francesca Needs to Read The King James Bible for herself and THE TWO BABYLONS by ALEXANDER HISLOP to get the Story Straight! The Disrespect and Disregard she has for YAHVEH our Creator is UNBELIEVABLE! Regardless of what Denomination one is part of, our Salvation is on the Line when we Entertain Piffel like this!

@azman1186 Жыл бұрын

but why should it mention his loins at all? he could have mentioned the waist

@Lpettro Жыл бұрын

@@azman1186 To make this kind of argument, you would have to know the Hebrew words and know with precision how they divided up the body. And some of this may have been lost to time. For example, we know that their concept of the "hands" also included the wrists and forearm. But we would never "hands" in this way. So unless we can say with confidence what "Moten" means, we cannot make such arguments.

@matthewmurdock4875 Жыл бұрын

@@lynnestockil7033 fvck yahweh. He isn't worthy of respect.

@Notmebutyou853 11 ай бұрын

Spirit- God is a spirit lady😊

@Ramu-bw4ub Жыл бұрын

I think she is craving

@chalkgesso2305 9 ай бұрын

What is the point in saying such things? Do we think that because we pretend to know the truth we can utter it at the four winds? Every idea is true in itself but not every idea is the truth. Therefore we should not go in search of idiotic ideas, told by people who lack sensitivity and any form of understanding, but we should stop scrolling and go outside, in the real world in search of the truth in his pure essence

@eew8060 Жыл бұрын

Anyone can get a PhD these days... 🙄

@yohan7782 11 ай бұрын

Why don't you go get one on fake stories

@eew8060 11 ай бұрын

@@yohan7782 What makes you think I don't have one?

@yohan7782 11 ай бұрын

@@eew8060 sorry bro i didn't know you were anyone like her. Have you wrote a book like her too?

@eew8060 11 ай бұрын

@@yohan7782 Yes..

@joshuaswart8211 9 ай бұрын

I see no reason to think she didn’t earn one. This is a very bizarre comment.

@Christian-hc2xo Жыл бұрын

And somehow all the believers got it wrong exactly the same way, and that is not faith.

@DeesmanO Жыл бұрын

One thing she hides is the fact that Abraham's father an idol maker was challenged by Abraham concerning their false idols but God was watching When people first come to know yahweh they asumed he was just one of the man made gods so they tried to give him a wife and put him in a pantheon Yahweh even at one point said No longer call me lord or (baal) but husband because he is married to israel He knew he was being confised with baal whos name means lord Baal statues always have left foot forwarded wit right hand raised holding things or pointing up Same as bafomet Baal idols are always found with a female statue Ishtar, inana, aphrodite She is always related to sexual immorality of all kinds, intoxication and gender roles flip She is the mother of harlots Yahweh challenged every false god that stood up to differentiate him from the idols. This woman is a false teacher. Catholics took that ancient form of Babylonian paganism and renamed it all to look Christian so this form of false religion is still active today Americans dont realize we are headed down a bad path These false god demons are the cause of every collapsed society on earth Youll see they prospered, they go perverse and sexually immoral then they die in one day. These demons have limited abilities They must ask God permission to do anything so if God gives us personal choice and we choose to worship a demon that wants harsh torment for man then you die by whatever that demon chooses then you go where they go Hell The evidence of the most active demons show everywhere American Christians have grown in a country where the signs of ishtar and baal are everywhere but overlooked Christians unknowingly take part in rituals to demons and fallen angels Not to say they knowingly do this The oversexualizing of women and children The false holidays=Christmas Halloween eostre or easter These exact days are on a witches calender Even the days of the week are named after pagan gods Catholics changed sabbath to sunday Its always been saturday Saturday is named after sator, saturn or satan An ogre such like shrek comes from Og in the bible The sons of Og were giants who ate human flesh and had sex with human and animal Alike Alot of what disney has made cute and snuggly are actually evil demonic beings from antiquety The world went full pagan and God wanted to bring the people back because of his love for us because for him to not do this means youve been given up to your own devices and he would rather have mercy than sacrifice

@rupertchappelle5303 Жыл бұрын

YHVH means WAVE - oscillation. God oscillates it.

@-Melkor- Жыл бұрын

BLASPHEMY!

@samthesomniator Жыл бұрын

The Bible? 🤨

@samconduct1356 Жыл бұрын

Yes it is blasphemy.

@joshuaswart8211 9 ай бұрын

Okay? Who cares?

@gaetzwarren8146 2 ай бұрын

Many times in the old testimate jehovah took a portion of the plunder of every battle which always included virgins. Hmm

@b1ak1ant3rn6 Жыл бұрын

So I come for a GOD!?! 😂😂😂😂

@nicholas50 7 ай бұрын

I wonder if SHE knows what to do with one. One can only imagine

@Somebodyuprobsknow Жыл бұрын

How was His loins revealed when his bottom half was covered what you said is not there! Blasphemy and lies judgement is at your door

@lordzaboem Жыл бұрын

Covered with fire is not the same thing as a three piece wool suit, now is it? If you sit in front of a campfire, are you telling me that you cannot see the logs because the flames are in the way?

@dcoleman4444 4 ай бұрын

Also, what about the rampant drug use?

@Lollololplolpllplpl Жыл бұрын

🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️

@JesusChristislord99 Жыл бұрын

Boy when I say people need to read there bible more they do and pray for understanding cause this is not it I’m sorry but it’s not

@Lebone_Bona-fide Жыл бұрын

I'm about to block this channel from my recommended but I look forward to people trying to use her arguments on me and I will watch their reaction as I dismantle their arguments

@emanuelpacurar1169 Жыл бұрын

Clear allusions to genitals in Ezekiel? Come on, that is extremely misleading! Looked up through all Ezekiel 1, nothing even remotely close, and in the verse she is referring to, Verse 27, the word translated Loins is mothen (H4975 - look it up), the middle part, the place where one would girdle himself. I expected more from this chanel, I really did... :(

@nicholaskarlsen1550 Жыл бұрын

Lol. Just read it in context. What would be the point of Yahweh covering everything above and below his belt line, but leaving only his belt line exposed? It’s not just a ridiculous image, it’s also pointless. On the other hand if Yahweh is exposing his genital region, that’s also a ridiculous image (to modern people) but it does have a point: to show what a fertile creator god Yahweh was.

@emanuelpacurar1169 Жыл бұрын

@@nicholaskarlsen1550 With due respect, the text says nothing about covering. It describes the vision of the man as being surrounded by something shiny (like a substance resembling fire - a kind of metal or amber, the word is hard to translate), and goes on to describe the way the "fire" is localized, going from the waist up and from the waist down. That is why I believe the context is rather pointing to Yahweh being engulfed in fiery glory rather than the fact that He exposes his parts.

@emanuelpacurar1169 Жыл бұрын

All I am saying is that there are explanations that fit the verse better than reading pagan fertility imagery into it. I found misleading her alternative translation of the word "loins" (not supported by far, she calls is "straightforwardly"), and the eisegesis of the idea of covering everything except the loins. But I will read her book, maybe she goes more in depth there. I wonder what other evidences she presents there.

@emanuelpacurar1169 Жыл бұрын

Ezek 1:27: "I saw as it were glowing metal, as the appearance of fire within it all around, from the appearance of his waist and upward; and from the appearance of his waist and downward I saw as it were the appearance of fire, and there was brightness around him."

@emanuelpacurar1169 Жыл бұрын

@@theespjames4114 Thank you! Before I provide my answer, Is this from her book, or is this your opinion?