The Current State of AI: Scams, Plagiarism, and Deepfakes

[@Seekthetruth3000]

Whenever I see a picture or a video, the first question I ask is, "Is this real or fake?"

[@mickelodiansurname9578]

What do you do when you can't tell...? like I work in AI and some things I just can't tell... I can guess maybe... but thats not exactly a reliable measurement. Some things I see I can tell are AI produced, but when I tell others they insist I'm wrong... mostly cos they really want it to be real. So this danger is not so much in the realm of whether distinctions can be made, rather in the consensus on the distinction itself right? A good example was yesterday I seen a rather famous person pushing a book they clearly did not write themselves... when I pointed out "That voice is not X!" I got "Yes it is you think everything is AI!" and I replied... "Ummmm no both me.... and this audio Audacity package, insist this is an AI voice, its not human!"... and again was "I don't think so...." ... and that was my wife disagreeing despite knowing I've worked in IT for 40 years. You can see the danger right?

[@andybaldman]

Exactly what a picture or video should do!

[@DeconvertedMan]

Me: a man and a woman have to get across a river with a boat what do they do ChatGPT: This type of puzzle often has various versions and solutions depending on the constraints. Could you clarify any specific rules or limitations for the puzzle? For example, are they the only ones crossing, or are there additional factors, like the boat only fitting one person or needing both to operate it? Me: The man and woman can both fit in the boat. ChatGPT: If both the man and the woman can fit in the boat, they would simply both get into the boat and row across the river together. Since there are no restrictions mentioned beyond that, this is the most straightforward solution! Is there a twist you're considering for this puzzle? ^_^

[@Corteum]

Meanwhile, others are using it to make money lol

[@jeffersonianideal]

1:08:16 Dr. Shermer, a former libertarian, is misrepresenting libertarianism to the point of parody. I support his inalienable right to do so.

[@aminomar4002]

I noticed something else that is no less dangerous: some videos were modified without KZbin putting a date for the modification, but rather those videos kept the same date of the first publication, and in some cases the video was replaced with another video entirely without adding any indication of that. You may not be able to know how dangerous this is, but it threatens the credibility and rights of all videos that have been and will be published on KZbin. I did not say the above without evidence (there is all the necessary evidence that cannot be refuted).

[@michaeljfigueroa]

I often think my dogs are training me

[@derrick9635]

They are, 10 thousand years ago they knew humans could use them , intelligent co dependency 😅.

[@daheikkinen]

I married a Russian woman and when I went to meet my future father-in-law in Russia, the first thing he asked me is if I had any chickens. 🐓

[@aminomar4002]

I mean every word of what will be mentioned here: About five years ago 2019-2020 I was writing on the Closer to the Truth channel on KZbin, and there was a curious person who read everything I wrote and commented (in a state of shock and denial), but later after about three years I went back to the same video ( I usually take a screenshot of the comments and the video in the same date of publishing that video including my own comments ) , so I went back to the video) and what I found was shocking, some of what I wrote was removed and the publication dates were changed so that what I wrote had a new date different from the date of the other person’s comments and all of his replies to my comments disappeared in a way that completely contradicts the content of the screenshots and the video that I kept (a short video of the video and my comments), the video kept the same date and title while the content of the comments changed completely!

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

how is the prediction and anticipation of AI learning different than trial and error open instinctiveness of conscious human learning?

[@TomiTapio]

Human thought mechanism seems to be more complex and flexible than LLMs. Might be more supervisory systems, and different associations triggering.

[@dustyfairview9062]

That's too many commercials straight up.

[@rayfighter]

what is commercial 😂 (premium here, cancelled Netflix and voila)

[@andybaldman]

Use the Brave browser. No more commercials.

[@aminomar4002]

By the way, this 100% correct: I was commenting on closer to truth KZbin channel in the same day of the published videos (maximum 1 hours after posting the videos), but later I have noticed something so strange! the publishing dates of the videos are not the same posting dates of my comments anymore (the difference could become more than one year!), but later I made sure that KZbin did that purposely (the KZbin channels can’t do that themselves without getting help from KZbin to commit such a crimes), do you know what does the date of the publication means?! be aware you can’t document your work on KZbin (I made sure that they manipulated the dates of some videos), not only that, I have noticed that they re-edited some of the comments I have published (I mean each word). I would say that if I am not 100% sure (I had to check some snapshots, videos and notes those I have documented), by the way all my watches and calendars are accurate (no chance for mistakes).

[@aminomar4002]

all the KZbin users must be aware and be careful that the dates on KZbin are inaccurate (you can’t rely on KZbin for documenting your videos “your work in general “).

[@millax-ev6yz]

Terrific interview, thank you!

[@homewall744]

We don't need the AI to declare plagiarism (and then say if it's 85% accurate it's no good), just to present likely ones and let a person do the rest. Then 85% is a huge benefit compared to having to look yourself at all of them. And presumably 85% will improve over time.

[@edcatt9196]

AI and it's current negative applications is, ironically, a reflection of human nature.

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

what if the computer logic of AI without becoming conscious gets better at dealing with physical reality than human consciousness, even though not as satisfying to human consciousness?

[@DeconvertedMan]

What came first AI or the chicken? Neither! It was the rooster! The rooster came first! :D

[@aminomar4002]

KZbin channels will not be able to change their publishing dates on KZbin without KZbin's help. Either KZbin itself is involved or someone has the ability to act as an administrator with authorization from KZbin itself.

[@AnnaLoxley-ft3bb]

Which LLM are you referring to.... if I ask Chat GPT 4 (paid for) abt contemporary politicians. Consistently correct.

[@jedser]

Marcus and Chomsky have been right about this all along

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

for AI to become conscious, might have to develop subjective experience of causation?

[@stevenmyers6291]

Very good conversation. By the way, I teach Driver's Ed. I could give some input on self-driving cars and road safety!

[@homewall744]

But Boeing is highly regulated, and still cuts corners. In reality, their reputation matters, and if unfit, the legal costs will be very high.

[@kenrobinson1188]

Software isn’t government regulated yet it is the least fraudulent.

[@Moochie007]

What will the world look like when the number of jobless people far exceed the number economists plan for?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

if AI in news a lot, why not discussed much in election? maybe voters will be considering AI even if campaign and candidates not address?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

computers / AI process language logically, not make language conscious?

[@MiaNoble-w6c]

AI is a tool to to enhance jobs and make some processes more efficient/effective. Some jobs involve way, way too many variables for AI to completely take over. AI is just not that good, consistent or dependable. Let's be realistic. If an employee errors as much as AI does he/she would be fired.

[@boydhooper4080]

Great Balanced conversation

[@DeconvertedMan]

With ai cars - IF you had a city planed for it, and had all cars running in (X) way all the time... wait you could just use trains and do that! But... if you wanted it to be cars... it could do that maybe - as long as no human can get on the roads.... hmmm.

[@ga8846]

Comments are being shadowbanned.

[@TomiTapio]

Or downvoted, because are of low quality.

[@Seekthetruth3000]

Who does that, a person or AI?

[@retromograph3893]

This guy sounds like Steven Pinker!

[@jedser]

Gary’s got the puns

[@DeconvertedMan]

42:45 did they though? :/ hmmm.

[@davidhudson4230]

Beautiful

[@MiaNoble-w6c]

Stochastic prediction machines..

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

regulate AI by training on God free will sovereignty for divine central authority unity?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

does human mind project conscious instinctiveness onto AI?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

AI prediction can match human consciousness on closed physical system, like chess; not match human consciousness on open conscious systems like language?

[@DeconvertedMan]

33:53 well OKAY but only for science!

[@LynnColorado]

We have a Tesla and it self drives just fine.

[@jacobenade4622]

Any comments on o1 strawberry

[@Utoko]

ye it is wired how he talked about scaling the models has limited effect. Completly ignoring that o1 just came out with scaling the inference time which has great effect.

[@angloland4539]

👋❤️☺️

[@aminam9201]

I think this is easier to understand: if humans were able to reach other planetary systems that had life, for example, similar plant and animal structures to those on Earth, then humans would not be able to feed on those organisms from other planetary systems (a different coding system built those organisms), but since humans would not be able to reach those planetary systems without advanced technology, they might find something more important than having them on their lunch table! Basically, until then, humans would have to improve their metabolism first!

[@atheistbushman]

Rock bands were not diverse - mostly white men - how can you portray realistic presentation as biased? Note the actual bias of Marcus - he did not lament the lack of Asians

[@Corteum]

What's wrong with it is that you dont know how to use it properly. Lol

[@michaeljfigueroa]

Humans bread dogs. I love my dogs more than most people. They eat better than most people

[@michaeljfigueroa]

Also I wonder occasionally if I'm training them or if they're training me

[@tonymoto1188]

bread dogs? .........hot dog roll?

[@michaeljfigueroa]

@@tonymoto1188 yes exactly!

[@aminam9201]

This does not apply only to humans, all other species of irrational animals group together and build their imaginary reality within that group, and do not forget the groups of other species in the jungle, but they will forget the presence of humans as intruders and exceed their mental capabilities. Some animals will try to escape from humans and some will try to attack, but they will remain in their view just intruders in their environment, and animals will not deal with the presence of humans in the same way they deal with other species of animals, whether prey or competitors from other species of predators. To summarize: humans do something similar (humans are also irrational animals and are only partially different), this is just to simplify, organisms from different planetary systems do not feed on each other (they are completely different biologically).