France did not just "give" Haiti independence. Do not forget the reparations they forced the nation to pay France, setting the country up for failure in addition to other factors
@LuDa-lf1xd9 ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure ours "libertadores" in the south did the same. We got on debt, and all the new countries were full of corruption and 'vendepatrias'.
@Deus_Divinitus9 ай бұрын
And the subsequent American ‘loan’ that allowed them to de facto buy Haiti
@atilla43729 ай бұрын
Also a lot of people are also unaware that the Haitian president at the time Alexandre petion played a big role in Bolivar's overthrowing of the Spanish by providing military and financial support, I mean they'd quite literally given up until he came with the offer to help them in exchange for the abolishment of slavery.
@omarcitonunez57709 ай бұрын
@@LuDa-lf1xd It wasn't the same though. For Haiti one of the conditions for independence was to pay an insanely large amount of money that took well over a hundred years to pay, and that's with the governments of Haiti knowing that they had to put as much money off their budget as humanly possible to pay that debt unless they wanted French intervention again, which would only make things worse, and they would still have to pay the money anyways. Our countries had some similar stuff happen, heck, my country, the Dominican Republic almost got annexed by France and the US at different times and by different presidents offering for them to take over the country, and once managed to get Spain to annex it back. We had our issues with the "vendepatrias", but that was nowhere near as crippling as the Haitian debt.
@LibertyMonk9 ай бұрын
Yeah, it's super "just wasn't worth it" to fight a losing war if you can instead sell it as though you still had control or something.
@jordandino4179 ай бұрын
This man’s obsession with unification and decolonization
@Jay-jb2vr9 ай бұрын
Are you learning anything?
@HistoryScope9 ай бұрын
The decolonisation videos are part of a series. We will eventually cover the whole world and put it into one giant video.
@plesiosaurgaming4659 ай бұрын
@@HistoryScopeWell why didn't you say so to begin with if I had known I would have waited to watch all of this at once no disrespect or anything but okay
@JohnWasAPrettyCoolGuy9 ай бұрын
@HistoryScope I love videos about colinization and de-colinization. Seeing as how I'm a Western-Canadian, it makes sense. (seeing as how our only real history here is colinization and western expansion from the British, residential schools, and a few revolts by the Indians and French colonizers sprinkled in.)
@superyamky9 ай бұрын
And chocolate 🍫
@lukecash35009 ай бұрын
Best part about History Scope: This wonderful guy gives us a more sociological, geopolitical perspective on the same events that so many others tend to expound at length regarding military affairs instead.
@kingace61869 ай бұрын
I was surprised that the Spanish America decolonization section did not have any mention of the 'Libertador' Simón Bolívar, not even during the Gran Colombia part.
@jamerican_bae9 ай бұрын
I was wondering same
@TheGrindcorps9 ай бұрын
The Americas have never been decolonized. Now the USA occupies the entire hemisphere. Look at the country freaking out when anyone tries to have a socialist government that serves it’s own people. Look at how the USA is freaking out about the audaciousness of Latin American countries trying to trade with to China. The only reason the USA is not invading Nicaragua or Venezuela is that it is spread too thin!
@HistoryScope9 ай бұрын
History Scope doesn't focus on individual people. Simon Bolivar was a product of his time. If it wasn't him, someone else would have filled the role. Just as it did in other parts of the Americas. We also didn't mention of the other famous people in other videos, for example.
@kingace61869 ай бұрын
@@HistoryScope Understandable. Tho, imo I would argue that history is driven by people. Empires are made/run by people. Wars are fought by people. So, I humbly believe people should be accounted for in historical accounts (objectively & without idolization, ofc). All of this is just my opinion, of course. There are many schools of history.
@allanfrd9 ай бұрын
@@HistoryScope Don't get me wrong I appreciate the effort you put in the videoand the animation. Even if you didn't mention El Alto Peru and the last battles of Tumusla and Coragaita, when Spain renounce their Southamerocans colonies, and also you get some names of the central americans countries wrong. I wonder if it was on purpose.
@SupremeLeaderKimJong-un9 ай бұрын
Haiti didn't exactly...get independence on good terms. In 1825, the French demanded they paid 150 million francs as compensation, this was reduced to 90 million in 1838 but it put quite the dent on their development. Not to mention this forced them to take huge loans as well as the US receiving interest payments when it acquired Haiti's treasury in 1911. Haiti finally paid off the debt in 1947. The DR-Haiti border just shows the differences in their development. When you just look at the two sides, you can see that the Dominican side is much greener than the Haitian side. And this is because of many factors. There was a lot of deforestation in 1954 after Hurricane Hazel drowned many trees, and concessionaires stepped up their logging operations in response to intensified demand for charcoal on top of rapid population growth. The geographic makeup of the Island of Hispaniola is such that the mountainous regions tend to cut off the rainfall needed to grow crops and sustain livestock. The northeast trade winds that blow across the island often favor the DR. Compared to the DR, the area of flat land good for intensive agriculture in Haiti is much smaller, as a higher percentage of Haiti's area is mountainous. There is more limestone terrain, and the soils are thinner and less fertile and have a lower capacity for recovery. Haiti's semiarid climate makes cultivation more challenging. On top of this, the French destroyed the soil by aggressively harvesting the same crops over and over again. France wanted the colony to be extremely profitable. Not just sugar, but coffee too. Over the course of fifty years, a quarter of the colony was all coffee with the original forests cleared. They were also forced to export timber to the French as part of paying off the millions of francs.
@gabrielmora50929 ай бұрын
you highligthed Puerto Rico as a british colony, when it was a Spanish colony, and you didnt mention Cuba, Dominican Replublic and Cuba and Puerto Rico situation. However besides that great video
@estebanbottini51536 ай бұрын
>Spanish colony Bro , Spain never had any colonies .
@gabrielmora50926 ай бұрын
@@estebanbottini5153 province of new Spain or province of ultramar or viceroy whatever. Who the fuck cares
@estebanbottini51536 ай бұрын
@@gabrielmora5092 I do , because claiming we were Colonies is Colonialism .
@jelanibanfield663711 күн бұрын
@@estebanbottini5153 vice royalties are fancy colonies mate 🤣🤣
@jtom29589 ай бұрын
“This war started in North America when a British officer…” British officer is an understatement, it was George Washington
@denverparsons73309 ай бұрын
Lol
@HistoryScope9 ай бұрын
I did not put his name in because I think a lot of people don't know who he is, unless they had an education about the USA. I assume the people watching this had a general education not specific to any one nation. So I assume people know about the world wars but I don't assume they know important figures of individual countries. So I didn't put his name in.
@stefthorman85489 ай бұрын
lmao, most people, even of foreign countries, know about George Washington, the first president of the current hegemon of the world, i'm American and might be bias, but i believe that even people in remote countries know about him, if they had any interest in the US, which they kind of have to, if they aren't an absolute bumpkin, it's fine for them to not know stalin, mao, hitler, gaulle, ect, first leaders of "current great powers" but that's the difference between "great powers" and the one and only undisputed hegemon, the sole superpower of the modern age. not knowing about the history of "great powers" is fine if you aren't directly or indirectly involved with that country, different story for the current superpowers, who are relevant to the entire world.@@HistoryScope
@ThG16189 ай бұрын
@@stefthorman8548 sorry to break it to you citizen of the only undisputed hegemon of the world , but much much more people around the world know about Stalin , Mao and especially Hitler compared to George Washington. Not de Gaulle tho. I understand that over there you're so isolationist and learn only about your country , but sometimes its good to be given a broader view. Hope this helped for your ignorance!!!
@arisaka2339 ай бұрын
i didnt know it was george washington, that's some movie level shit lol
@thomasjohnson28629 ай бұрын
I always have a long watch later video list, but whenever a History Scope video comes out it goes straight to the front of the queue
@MrChrisRCT39 ай бұрын
Babe wake up
@dann54809 ай бұрын
I'm awake baby 😘😘😘😘
@gaymoder9 ай бұрын
i literally said this to my girlfriend as soon as i saw the thumbnail
@hundgawf95069 ай бұрын
It's another history scope episode
@ThatChristianRepublican9 ай бұрын
Wtf did I just look at
@PresAlexWhit9 ай бұрын
Carbon monoxide
@ffreeze99249 ай бұрын
Why weren't Cuba and the Dominican Republic mentioned?
@Menezarian9 ай бұрын
Dominica gained independence from the Haiti if I remember. And Cuba got forced out of the Spanish Kingdom by the americans (already in the end of the 19th century).
@eljoseljimenez26569 ай бұрын
And Puerto Rico was included as a British colony😭
@petergeramin71959 ай бұрын
@@Menezarian Dominica is a completely different country to the south of Puerto Rico
@patja899 ай бұрын
@@MenezarianDominican Republic is a completely separate country from Dominica. Dominican Republic has 3 historically recognized independences, one of them from Haiti, the second one. But given his focus was on European colonization and decolonization the other 2 were from Spain. And the history of the second independence from Spain was particularly different from the cases mentioned on the video.
@davidmaggiacomo4099 ай бұрын
New History Scope video Week has been made
@Mer_girl9 ай бұрын
"I'm going to talk about all the countries in America" it immediately glosses over central America
@ricardoortega11397 ай бұрын
And the Hispanic Caribbean too
@AverytheCubanAmerican9 ай бұрын
Something interesting to note about the Seven Years' War is while France had to give up New France to the British and Spanish under the 1763 Treaty of Paris, the British granted fishing rights to French fishermen along the Newfoundland coast, and today the islands of St Pierre & Miquelon remain a vestige of the once-vast New France. The history behind St Pierre & Miquelon is that a Portuguese explorer discovered it in 1520, but it was in 1536 that French explorer Jacques Cartier claimed the islands as a French possession. In the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht which ended the War of Spanish Succession, France ceded the islands to the UK, and a small number of American colonists settled there. Then of course the French were granted the islands again after the Seven Years' War. However, after France helped the Americans fight the UK, a British force invaded and briefly occupied them, destroying all the settlements. In 1793, during the French Revolutionary Wars, another British force landed and once again, got rid of the French settlers. The Treaty of Amiens of 1802 returned the islands to France, but Britain reoccupied them when hostilities recommenced the next year. The 1814 Treaty of Paris gave the islands back to France, though the UK occupied them yet again during the Hundred Days War in 1815. The islands were resettled in 1816, mostly by Basques, Bretons and Normans, thus why the Basque, Breton, and Norman flags are on their coat of arms. So yeah, a lot of back and forth!
@thomasjohnson28629 ай бұрын
We could have a History Scope meet-up community, and constantly make predictable jokes about how we WILL BE UNITED, which would be just as hilarious the 100,000th time we make the same joke
@arturomh45909 ай бұрын
You forgot to mention the spanish-anerican war of 1898 that resulted in the independence of Cuba and Puerto Rico becoming an US colony.
@eddie11769 ай бұрын
I love your videos. I’m always so happy to see a new one up!
@p00bix9 ай бұрын
Love the South Park reference in the Canadians' faces
@estebanmondragon67269 ай бұрын
Wrong. The Spanish and French colonial system shift was a consecuence of the 30 years war, not the 7 years war that only affected British America.
@danny91pr9 ай бұрын
My homeland, Puerto Rico, never decolonized 🥲
@stefthorman85489 ай бұрын
lmao, you belong to US
@danny91pr9 ай бұрын
@stefthorman8548 we do, and it's something that I'm grateful for when I look at the other islands in the Caribbean
@JonathanMoosey7 ай бұрын
Puerto Ricans have voted many times against total independence in their statehood referendums
@danny91pr7 ай бұрын
@@JonathanMoosey you're right. The majority of Puerto Ricans, myself included, believe that we're better off under the wing of the USA. You only need to look to our neighbors in the Caribbean to see why.
@iguanaman039 ай бұрын
"Empires dont bring prosperity, empires only bring caskets filled with friends you wish were still alive" Holy shit that gave me chills
@buzter81359 ай бұрын
They also without exception are hated by their neighbors, explicitly or not.
@that1countrieschannel9 ай бұрын
My man within the past fortnight so many cool youtubers have just uploaded after a while lol
@Miokopsgvr9 ай бұрын
You are so good at explaining things
@Bogfrog19 ай бұрын
20:09 yeah people don’t realize how HOT the Latin American independence movement was. Thanks for recognizing such an important issue!
@Shapershift9 ай бұрын
Uruguay would be worth a mention too, considering that they got their independence from Brazil.
@ericktellez76328 ай бұрын
They were created by the British, a reminder of Europe meddling after independence
@jorge62076 ай бұрын
Invaded by Portugal in 1816, annexed to Portugal (1821), then Brazil (1823), finally made an independent country as a buffer state between Argentina and Brazil, for the benefit of the British. A rare mixture of colonialism and neo-colonialism.
@jamerican_bae9 ай бұрын
This explanation removes so much agency from the Caribbean nations regarding their independence and I dont understand why
@jorge62076 ай бұрын
There wouldn't be enough run time for the US, probably the majority of views and ultimately, food on the table.
@LesRealLlama9 ай бұрын
The time has come 🔥🔥 just noticed this was uploaded today so LETS GOOOO ❤️
@9delta9889 ай бұрын
Nice, a new video to look forward to watching. Thanks :-).
@pablomeneses16339 ай бұрын
14:10 correction, chile didn’t officially declare independence until 12 of February of 1818, after the Andes army expelled the Spaniards, and in the anniversary of the founding of Santiago. In September 18th we celebrate the first time the colony organised and declared autonomy but loyalty to the captured king of Spain
@allanfrd9 ай бұрын
Is it true a british guy fought for your independence?
@DiegoES25319 ай бұрын
@@allanfrdhe also wanted to sell our ports to britain
@pablomeneses16339 ай бұрын
@@allanfrd idk about the port part, I do know that Britain actually supported Chilean independence (can’t say the same thing of Argentinian independence taking into consideration the invasions of the river plate) it had started trading with out ports in a clandestine operation way before the war, and it was one of the first countries to recognise our independence afterwards, Cochrane came to aid the building of a Navy with support from London and he was vital in expelling the Spaniards from Valdivia and the southern regions. our father of independence, Bernardo O’Higgins was of Irish descent and was educated on the revolutionary ideas in England. After the war, There was massive English and Scottish immigration to the port of Valparaiso and later to the conquered northern regions, which has anglicised the central Chilean culture(tea, lunch schedule, education, politics). We are probably the closest country to the UK in Latam, and that has shaped the way Chile developed, we could say that those good relations have made Chile way less Europhobic and less inclined on regionalism.
@allanfrd9 ай бұрын
@@pablomeneses1633 Thanks for answering. I know how England operates in the rest of the world, and I was actually curious about its dealings with Chile. In Africa and India, their 'help' seemed more like a one-sided benefit for the British. Considering Chile's numbers, especially its population, I had my doubts. Also, regarding the Falklands War, it appeared to me that Chile was more of a British colony. I was surprised when I heard the name of their liberator was O'Higgins. But thanks for clarifying that you are actually independent.
@allanfrd9 ай бұрын
@@DiegoES2531 The British pretty much use them anyway.
@lubu29609 ай бұрын
They were viceroyalties, not colonies.
@tylerbozinovski4279 ай бұрын
24:53 This is so incredibly wrong I don't know where to even begin. The 3 largest countries in the Americas are currently under left-leaning or left-wing governments, for example.
@Seicks9 ай бұрын
great video, maybe the best history explainer on youtube. can you maybe put neo-colonialism in your schedule for future videos? I would love to hear you talk about the topic.
@HistoryScope9 ай бұрын
Maybe. First I want to finish this decolonisation series. At the end I will put all the videos together into one giant video. If that is popular enough I will make a neo-colonialism video, maybe a general video of 'what happened to the colonies after decolonisation' or something like that.
@Inuzumi9 ай бұрын
Way too simplified. The wars of independence were a lot more complex than just kicking out Spain. Was about Spain becoming weak after the Napoleonic wars, Britain aiding said colonies to weak spanish influence(first by force)in the region and have new trade options worldwide. And you said you would talk about every single country but you leave out Bolivia, Uruguay, etc. Kind of disappointed to be honest, because I loved your video on italian unification. But this is just such a superficial take on history.
@The-tank-engine9 ай бұрын
New video ooraahhh! Love this channel ❤❤❤
@beyondborderfilms43529 ай бұрын
History scope love of chocolate is so relatable. 😊
@HistoryHustle9 ай бұрын
Very interesting. I am now in South America. In Colombia much squares are named after Bolívar. And also in other nations.
@HistoryScope9 ай бұрын
Wait, why don't you have the verification badge? I thought you were an imposter before I clicked on your channel :o
@levisgamingandaviationchannel9 ай бұрын
Good video. Spikes up my history loving Brain
@andrewbrown5162 ай бұрын
Excellent job. I absolutely love your content. It’s so well researched and well-produced. On another note: self-care is not reading most of these comments. Like if y’all believe you can make more accurate content then make it yourself.
@elocriativa9 ай бұрын
20:04 Wrong, his full name was not Dom Pedro I, it was actually way hotter: *Pedro de Alcântara Francisco Antônio João Carlos Xavier de Paula Miguel Rafael Joaquim José Gonzaga Pascoal Cipriano Serafim de Bragança e Bourbon* . How can you resist it?
@nobodyatall10108 ай бұрын
Thank you for this! Super valuable information.
@A_Grand_Tough_Guy_in_Miami9 ай бұрын
Love your videos, gives me a lot to learn :)
@GarrettMerkin9 ай бұрын
Another fantastic video! Thanks. Always look forward to your uploads.
@OGrandomunknownperson9 ай бұрын
My grandfather was Guyanese! The americas are my homeland
@anfeneeharry94829 ай бұрын
Hate me or not but I still call both Guyana and the U.K my motherland😂 (I’m in guyana)
@TheScottbb19 ай бұрын
This video release was a pleasant surprise!
@Vizzit7079 ай бұрын
I have to say that while I greatly enjoy these videos as they are immensely engaging and entertaining, I cannot help but notice the numerous small and sometimes major inaccuracies which I think hold the channel back. As others have mentioned, France didn't just give Haiti independence out of good will, they encumbered them with an astounding amount of debt and thus ruined the country in the long run. Another thing is about Canada and the other members of the Commonwealth, they don't "continue to gain more and more autonomy" as they are already fully independent and sovereign nations. The only thing still tying them to the UK is that they recognize the British monarch as their head of state, which is just a formality. Lastly, I would like to mention that the Europeans didn't "entirely" control the Americas as you said, because many regions were only nominally administered by the Europeans, while in reality the locals were left mostly to their own devices - Patagonia in southern South America, Most of french Louisiana, the whole Amazonian rainforest where some local tribes didn't even know about the outside world till the 20th century etc. I believe a bit more in-depth research about the topic would easily solve the issue.
@carlosveritas77919 ай бұрын
I’m sorry, but when you say nobody knows about other countries independence you should specify that it’s only english-speaking audiencies or americans. Spanish-speaking people in LatAm do know how their countries gained independence and I’d bet that there are more with knowledge on other countries independence history compared to people from non-spanish speaking countries. Good video btw.
@raimondgoossens7269 ай бұрын
Very clear and compact explaining about history wich is much more than wars. It is simpilfied but but does not lost its essence. Gewoon een knap staaltje werk om al die afleveringen te maken.🗺
@fabiano28679 ай бұрын
great video as always
@sapphirestarlight40749 ай бұрын
pretty hurtful to see the story of my country brushed off as generic 😭
@dsuperCL9 ай бұрын
Chilean national here: On September 18th, 1810 was established the first Junta, whose goal was, as you stated, to run the colony while the king Ferdinand VII was in captivity. Eventually the local elites decided to become completely independent from Spain, thus beginning the Chilean War of Independence. The Chilean Declaration of Independence was declared in February 12, 1818 following the Patriot victory at the Battle of Chacabuco, which effectively secured Chilean independence (although the war didn’t finished until April 1818 and skirmishes against Spanish Remmants continued until late 1820s).
@skydamage86799 ай бұрын
And another thing mexico wasn’t a colony it was a viceroyalty
@harku1239 ай бұрын
Am I going crazy? I could swear you were on Nebula before! Fantastic video as always though. Your recent video on slaves taught me a lot that I didn't know as well
@supergewoon9 ай бұрын
Thanks you for your amazing video’s!
@jugularSignal5 ай бұрын
The Game Dungeon sound bites are comedy gold.
@RapturesBounty9 ай бұрын
The Pope drew the worst line ever
@jorge62076 ай бұрын
As a Portuguese, I agree, he could've gone more to the West, but unfortunetaly he was bought and paid for by the Castilians.
@evanclark25329 ай бұрын
I’m not sure it counts as decolonization if the country switched from being ruled from Europe to being ruled by Europeans that live in America. Is the USA really a country ruled by people native to the land? I could make an argument that most of Latin America are colonies of the USA. I’m not entirely convinced decolonization has happened yet.
@kingace61869 ай бұрын
2:20 Wait-- The Seven Years War was what? Can we get a video on just the Seven Years War, please? I'm American and was only taught that the war occured on the North American continent. Now I am finding out it was the first true global war fought on FIVE continents. I would love to learn more on that.
@vantaplat74119 ай бұрын
Essentially it was just Britain and France fighting across every continent except Europe. In Europe it was Prussia vs Europe, and Prussia won.
@kingace61869 ай бұрын
@@vantaplat7411 Damn. And I learned that the European theater was technically still Britain vs France because GB allied with Prussia.
@vantaplat74119 ай бұрын
@kingace6186 Britain viewed saving Prussia as sort of a side objective. Britain was far more willingly to protect Hanover than Prussia if Prussia had lost the war. However thanks to the Russian Tsar dying and their replacement being a "prussian weeb" Prussia was able to defend itself. That isn't to say Prussia won easily. The situation was so bad that Frederick the Great (perhaps the greatest, and gayest, king in history) contemplated suicide on the battlefield
@poisonousabsinthe9 ай бұрын
Dude... you're the bomb. I love the Canadian character's not-so subtle nod to South Park.
@doodelay7 ай бұрын
Why are you pronouncing Haiti like it's Hawaiian? It's just Hay-tee
@santmlb7 ай бұрын
The war fought in Spain from 1807 to 1814, though technically a kind of civil war, is better known as the Spanish War of Independence. The Civil War term is used mostly to refer to the Spanish Civil War from the 1930’s, which was a full on internal conflict in Spain, contrary to the 19th century one, which had most to do with the Napoleonic Wars.
@csanfino2839 ай бұрын
Im so excited to watch I look forqard to your videos. This says a lot about my personality 😂😂 but your my favorite youtuber.
@TDenterpriser9 ай бұрын
You should do a video on the decolonization of Europe too it’s probably the most overlooked part of colonization history
@HistoryScope9 ай бұрын
We will. It's going to be a lot shorter because I've airway covered it a bit in the ussr and ottoman breakup videos. When another video turns out to be shorter than expected we'll put time into making a European decolonisation video
@RK-cj4oc9 ай бұрын
@@HistoryScopeOut of curiosity, besides the Ottomams and the USSR. Which other colonization took place in Europe? The islamic conquest of Iberia?
@dylanshaffer21849 ай бұрын
Also the Caribbean wasn’t just the British. The French, the Dutch, and the United States have territories, commonwealths, and departments.
@ramonmujica31939 ай бұрын
Puerto Rico as a British colony?
@losisansgaming26289 ай бұрын
4:59 i love the southpark reference
@matthewbob_moostachepants55635 ай бұрын
This is quite the detailed and well educated video I will admit! Only thing is, you completely ignored the Spanish-American War in which the final Spanish possessions in the Caribbean gained their independence. As someone who’s half Cuban I was a little disappointed by the fact that my country was completely overlooked.
@Austrian14929 ай бұрын
It may have been useful to mention the relationship of Denmark and Greenland to show how the Danish have control of Greenland
@Avinkwep9 ай бұрын
Haiti is not the only successful slave revolt. The Mamluks revolted successfully against Egypt! Haiti is the only successful slave revolt of the colonial era
@imdunder9 ай бұрын
It's not really comparable. The Mamluks were an elite military social caste. They had origins as foreign born soldiers that were imported because without clan or tribal ties they could be expected to be loyal to their sultan and no one else. As part of their Mamluk training they were taught Islam and legally freed because Islam forbids the enslaving of other Muslims. By the time they were actually ruling they weren't slaves anymore and it was more like a military coup than a slave revolt (and the reason for the overthrow had nothing to do with slavery or their former status of being enslaved)
@qwaz679 ай бұрын
@@imdunder I’d say it’s close enough to make a comparison if you look at the big picture, but if you look closely; the Mamluks enjoyed a level of power, enfranchisement, and legitimacy that made them a military and political force. Haitian slaves of Saint-Domingue had nothing of the sort. They started off being treated worse than farm animals and ended up with a nation.
@CalCalCal69969 ай бұрын
Yaaaaaaasss, one of the best days of the year is history scope day. And it's about my home continent!
@clownpendotfart9 ай бұрын
There was not serious fear that the British were going to free the slaves of the Americas if they remained in charge. The British continued to permit slavery in their Caribbean colonies long after the 13 colonies rebelled, and many of newly independent states passed anti-slavery laws as soon as they were no longer constrained by the crown.
@swiftlet53469 ай бұрын
Can it really be said to be decolonized when it all remained under the grip of settler-colonials and their descendants?
@tompeled61939 ай бұрын
The colonizers wanted independence because the European countries wanted them to colonize less hard. That was unacceptable. The American continent is still colonized in its entirety today.
@thepedrothethethe61512 ай бұрын
But Bolivia is a decolonized state
@tompeled61932 ай бұрын
@@thepedrothethethe6151 Why do they still speak Spanish: the colonizer's language?
@weon_absoluto9 ай бұрын
you got nearly everything wrong about chilean independence
@K0r0n1s9 ай бұрын
"How do you divide the world? According to Europeans you draw straight lines on a map." This almost made me spit out my Müsli xD Funny and sadly accurate.
@carlkussАй бұрын
Very funny and "brutaal" as they say in Dutch. Learned a lot!
@jhilal23859 ай бұрын
You missed a few: Cuba Puerto Rico Dominican Republic Danish Virgin Islands -> US Virgin Islands
@Shapershift9 ай бұрын
Uruguay too.
@ender87599 ай бұрын
🇧🇷 Brazil has the most interesting story about the independence.
@ericktellez76328 ай бұрын
Haiti’s is more impressive, Brazil simply had the royal family escape portugal and create an entirely new empire in Brazil
@jorge62076 ай бұрын
It missed a decent independence war. Taking that, it was neat as political processes go.
@dww69 ай бұрын
Is it decolonised or could you argue that the existing government is as descended from the coloniser equally as much as the modern day "home land"
@haterboy198886 ай бұрын
Bolivia kinda got decolonized with Evo Morales
@The_Kris_M9 ай бұрын
This is the first time I've ever heard Greenland be referred to as a part of North America. I mean, it is, it makes sense, it just never occurred to me and has somehow never come up.
@ericremotesteam8 ай бұрын
15:00 a Ross's game dungeon reference? Nice to see you're a man of culture as well 😌
@alexfonseca7529 ай бұрын
‘If I weren’t into guys already I definitely would be now’ 😂😂
@fiquitoyunque9 ай бұрын
Puerto Rico is a colony of the US. Last time I checked, we were only a British colony for sixteen days sometime in 1588, The video’s script implies that the US favored independence of former colonies in the Americas, most of which the US has either invaded or destabilized in favor of pro-US regimes. At some time during the 20th century, the US occupied 19% of Puerto Rican land for military bases, and absentee sugar companies controlled up to 25% of its territory. The US and it’s crony governments here are slowly applying disaster capitalism, turning the islands into a tax haven and allowing for massive property grabs. Colonialism is a piece of 💩, and it is very much alive and well in the Caribbean.
@jrob79759 ай бұрын
17:24 = Have a 5 second pause here where the next music starts ❤
@Jacob-fo1yl9 ай бұрын
Wish the US would stop their current imperialism in the old world and focus their tax revenue on increasing domestic security and quality of life instead of bombing the poor and disenfranchised. Homelessness is a bad look and isn't getting better
@dennis7719 ай бұрын
Very interesting lecture. If it wasn’t for napoleon most of latin america would had still been a colony of Spain until 1880s.
@nuke29124 күн бұрын
I came here because I thought you would mention San Martín, the guy after declaring independence here and fighting spaniards in Montevideo, crossed Los Andes towards Chile, declared independence there, then sailed to Perú and declared independence there too (I think they even offered him to govern Perú and he rejected), and finally met Bolivar in Colombia I think and retreated from his military career, Bolivar would take it from there on. But the guy was a legend throughout all Latin America.
@nicksosnowski48399 ай бұрын
16:56 El Slavador sounds like a very interesting alt history scenario.
@bennruda119 ай бұрын
Quark would be so proud
@michaelsriqui78989 ай бұрын
love the Ross's Game Dungeon reference
@jaypeepsall9 ай бұрын
Skipped Puerto Rico fully because it’s still a colony
@JonathanMoosey7 ай бұрын
Majority of Puerto Ricans don’t want independence. They’re benefiting from their colonial status.
@Cincinnatiball5 ай бұрын
well the majority of Puerto Ricans today want statehood so they won’t be much longer
@DominionOfNewfoundland9 ай бұрын
Hey History Scope. I’m a proud Newfoundlander and I was curious if you ever given thought to go over the history of Newfoundland and how it was annexed into Canada from eventual British meddling
@xaviera.59639 ай бұрын
No mention of one territory who’s never been independent at any time, Puerto Rico🇵🇷
@UmQasaann9 ай бұрын
Free Borikén 🇵🇷
@ernestocasillas21309 ай бұрын
i wish this was a more serious channel but painting puerto rico as an ENGLISH colony on a literal video about colonialism in the americas discards any false intelecualism in this video
@Midnight.19 ай бұрын
Man love your videos only thing I watch rn😅
@emiliaarancibia34355 ай бұрын
14:12 Chilean here! Actually🤓 September 18th, 1810 was the first “junta de gobierno” where a bunch of men in government positions decided that they were not going to follow the fake king (napoleon’s brother) so they might as well go for independence, that triggered the war and Chile was officially free in February 12th, 1818. We still celebrate on September tho!!
@maximilianocamposrobledano13199 ай бұрын
00:03 No. There were lots of lands where europeans never had been in. For example the Patagonia. Also, territory’s like La Araucanía were once occupied by states like Spain, but in a moment the indigenous people retook them.
@hugolxxx9 ай бұрын
This video is painfully inaccurate. To say that the Mexican independence process is the same as in all other Hispanic American countries is just laughable to anyone with a modicum of knowledge of history. I don’t know if you did it in bad faith but to leave out british and French involvment as reasons for balkanization is just disingenuous.
@lpcanilla927 ай бұрын
Argentina: fends off two British expeditions without aid from the metropoli, indirectly causes Paraguay to splinter away from the Viceroyalty, sends an expedition to (successfully) liberate Chile and afterwards Peru, fights an inconclusive war against Brazil that ends up in the independence of Uruguay. "Their story is pretty generic".
@aaronstanley69149 ай бұрын
@5:51 Canada Is fully independent of the UK (mind you it to fing long only fully severing ties fully in 1982) we just share a monarch now which has no bearing on how we run the country, the only reason we kept the monarchy is because of our own cultural identity and not to piss off the older generation, frankly the only reason we are probably going retain the monarchy going forward is it would be to much of a pain in the ass to remove it.
@kingace61869 ай бұрын
Canada is fully independent. The Head of Government is the head of the entire nation. With the Canadian "Head of State" being ceremonial. Canada's closest real ties to the UK is the Commonwealth of Nations.
@user-xp8nq5mf9y9 ай бұрын
Its funny how America Wanted to end colonies while also simultaneous helping the french with the vietnam war cause they pressure them to do it.
@SaltyCanadian9 ай бұрын
Canada has had full autonomy from 1982, but really we’ve been fully independent since the 1930’s after the Westminster statute
@laudemar-A.B.63869 ай бұрын
As you are "independent" the King of England is also head of state of Canada like other countries in the commonwealth?🤔🤡🤣🤷