You have a guaranteed view from me every time you upload. Thank you for your channel. Viva Christo Rey
@imisschristendom52932 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, Viva Christo Rey
@clarekuehn43722 жыл бұрын
@@imisschristendom5293 The heretics were not Catholics in two ways, sometimes one or another or both: the structure and the beliefs. Donatists, for example, were not Catholics by structural reforms, but not Catholics by beliefs.
@mitchellosmer12939 ай бұрын
@@clarekuehn4372 #1--Where in the Bible does God REST on the first day of the week to make that day special? #2--Where in the Bible does God BLESS the first day of the week to make that day special? #3Where in the Bible does God SANCTIFY the first day of the week to make that day special? #4--Where in the Bible does God give a name the first day of the week to make that day special? #5--Where in the Bible does God DECLARE the first day of the week as HIS HOLY DAY to make that day special? (Sunday keepers don’t realize that when they keep Sunday holy they are making a day holy that man ordained, not God, by doing that they have violated the 2nd commandment by making an image, they also violate the 4th commandment and the 9th commandment by lying about the Sabbath being changed to Sunday. I’m sure you could find a few different commandments that are broken by keeping Sunday. That’s why the Bible says if you break one commandment you break them all. Please open your eyes brothers and sisters that keep Sunday before it is to late!) #6--Quote the Holy Bible that says Mary prayed to/with beads. #7--Quote the Holy Bible that says Mary went to/ will go to heaven. #8--Quote the Holy Bible that says Mary is an mediator/intercessor. #9--Quote the Holy Bible that says Mary remained a virgin all her life. #10--Quote the Holy Bible that says Mary did not sin. #11--Quote the Holy Bible that says a mere man is Head of the church. #12--Quote the Holy Bible that says there are popes in God's kingdom. #13--Quote the Holy Bible that says we are to confess our sins to a priest. #14--Quote the Holy Bible that says there is an "one holy Apolistic church? #15--Quote the Holy Bible that says the seventh day is not the Sabbath. #16--Quote the Holy Bible that says Rome is where Jesus will have His headquarters. #17--Quote the Holy Bible that says Peter was in Rome. #18--Quote the Holy Bible that says Mary is the Ark of the covenant. >>>FACT: I have asked OVER 100 supposed experts on Catholicism to reply to those questions. All I have received are out of context quotes, told to watch this or that video, or no reply at all!!! Will you answer them???? At least the first 5 basic questions FROM THE BIBLE.
@KarenSmith-r3z7 ай бұрын
John the Baptist did not found a church; he prepared the way for Jesus.
@NazriB6 ай бұрын
Lies again? Bio Perine USD SGD
@gagemullis3132 жыл бұрын
This channel has been absolutely instrumental in introducing, and informing me and my friends of many church teachings as we are on our way to becoming confirmed into the church, thank you
@imisschristendom52932 жыл бұрын
Thats Awesome, glad you guys are entering the church. And glad I could help
@katanatac11 ай бұрын
Confirmed? If you will believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ and repent from your sins, ask God to forgive you of your sins, you will be born again and made part of Christ's true church.
@gagemullis31311 ай бұрын
@@katanatac clearly you haven't watched this channel enough
@katanatac11 ай бұрын
@@gagemullis313 How much more do you need to see the truth?
@bestKaffir.underTheSon9 ай бұрын
@@imisschristendom5293 He joined your Egg-laying Easter Bunny Church.
@matthewbell20328 ай бұрын
Good video. Nice and concise and to the point. I’d really like to see a video on each of the core contentions between Protestants and Catholics such as the real presence at the Eucharist, baptismal regeneration and the sacraments
@floogelhornzzz47703 ай бұрын
Jesus atoned for our sins fully on the cross and declared, "It is finished." John 19:30. The debt is paid. Infinite God paid the infinite price; you don't repeat or multiply infinity. _One_ infinity will suffice. And He said from heaven, "I am he that liveth, and was dead; and behold, I am alive _for evermore,_ and have the keys of hell and of death." Rev. 1:18. The "real presence" of the eucharist heresy says He dies repeatedly. How can He be alive for evermore if He keeps dying millions of more times? Catholicism is a false and pagan religion pretending to be a Christian church. Rev. 17:4-6, 9. Its leader is the Antichrist (in the place of Christ), the son of Satan. Blasphemous titles claimed for the pope have been embellished and enlarged over the centuries. But a few of these boastful claims appear in an ecclesiastical (Roman Catholic) dictionary, by Lucius Ferraris, entitled _Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica,_ Vol. VI, pgs. 438, 442, article "Pope." _The Catholic Encyclopedia,_ 1913 edition, Vol. VI, p. 48, speaks of this book as "a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge," and "a precious mine of information." "The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God." "The pope is of such lofty and supreme dignity that, properly speaking, he has not been established in any rank of dignity, but rather has been placed upon the very summit of all ranks of dignities. . . ." "He is likewise the divine monarch and supreme emperor and king of kings." "Hence the pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions." "So that if it were possible that the angels might err in the faith, or might think contrary to the faith, they could be judged and excommunicated by the pope." "The pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief king of kings, having plenitude of power, to whom has been entrusted by the omnipotent God direction not only of the earthly but also of the heavenly kingdom." "The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man but of God." The above quotes are from _What's Behind The New World Order?_ Go to CatholicNewWorldOrder.com and click on the top link. ---------- "The Pope has power to change times, to abrogate laws, and to dispense with all things, even the precepts of Christ." _-Decretal De Translat. - Espiscop. Cap_ "I am all in all and *above all,* so that God, Himself and I, the Vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do ALMOST ALL THAT GOD CAN DO . . . What therefore, can you make of me but God?" -Pope Nicholas, quoted in _Antichrist_ by Ian Paisley, pg. 54. "You know that I am the Holy Father, the representative of God on the earth, the Vicar of Christ, which means I am God on the earth." -Pope Pius XI, April 30, 1922. The pope calls himself God, i.e., "Lord God the pope," "another God on earth." "We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty," Pope Leo XIII said in an _Encyclical Letter,_ June 20, 1894. "The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ Himself, hidden under the veil of flesh," the _Catholic National_ said in July 1895. And every priest is an "Alter Christus," Another Christ. So every priest is Jesus. Plus, during the Mass the priest transubstantiates the bread into the literal, "real presence" of Christ. In other words, man creates God. He is "the creator of his Creator. . . . 'The power of the priest,' says St. Bernardine of Sienna, 'is the power of the _divine person;_ for the transubstantiation of the bread requires as much power as the creation of the world.' . . . As the Word of God created heaven and earth, so, says St. Jerome, the words of the priest create Jesus Christ." _-The Dignity and Duties of the Priest_ by St. Alphonsus de Liguori, Ch. 1, Part IV, pg. 11. How is any of this _not_ blasphemy?! Christianity teaches that the pope is the Antichrist. The proud pontiff's official title is Vicar of Christ, meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ translated into Greek is Antichristos, in English Antichrist, also meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ and Antichrist are the exact same word in two different languages. Vicar of Christ in Latin is Vicarius Filii Dei, meaning Vicar of the Son of God, or Vicar of Christ. VICARIVS FILII DEI. Add up the 11 Roman numerals and you get 666. Rev. 13:18. angelfire.com/on/3angels Revelation 13. 1 I . . . saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns . . . and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2 And _the _*_dragon (Satan)_*_ gave him (the beast) his power, and his seat,_ and great authority. 4 And _they worshipped the _*_dragon_*_ which gave power unto the beast:_ and they worshipped the beast . . . 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies . . . 6 And he opened his mouth in *blasphemy against God,* to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, *_Come out of her,_** my people,* that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Rev. 18:4, 5.
@KingBaboonTarantula7 ай бұрын
I am catholic, thank you for uploading this video, I respect it very much and I respect you for coming forward with the proof you have!! God bless you have a great day❤❤❤📿
@tony16854 ай бұрын
did God's church in the Bible, pretend the 1st day was now the Lord's day or keep Holy the 7th day Sabbath? did God's church pray to other humans, even dead like 'Hail Mary' -- or pray to God Alone? just trying to inspire some thinking, roy.
@robertweidner24803 ай бұрын
@@tony1685actually, yes, the Early Church did switch to Sunday for worshipping, and they did pray and venerate the martyred saints. I’ll pray that you study history some more, give up your man made heresies, and come home to the only Church that counts, The Catholic Church.
@christafarion93 ай бұрын
Why do you hate the Word of God?
@tony16853 ай бұрын
@@robertweidner2480 no friend, the early pagans did that -- not the Christians. this is why you can't show me in Scripture where it's done -- God's people worship 24/7, but always keep the Lord's day Holy. and try to understand, a heresy is defined in Scripture and one who isn't following God's Word -- catholicism isn't Christianity, but heretical.
@bobbcarpenter703110 ай бұрын
Beautiful opening shot of the (very) First Baptist Church in Providence, RI...the city where I was born. Fifteen years ago, after studying genealogical records, I came to understand that my first ancestor came in 1627 with Roger Williams and participated in the establishment of the First Baptist Church in Providence. I was born Roman Catholic and am finally back on track in my returning to her. I am looking forward to future uploads. Peace of Christ be with you all.
@savannahsmiles17977 ай бұрын
you were born a child with CHOICE, not into a religion.
@pmlm15716 ай бұрын
I am glad you are returning to the rich heritage your parents prepared for you in Christ. Welcome Back Home, my brother.
@dravendfr7 ай бұрын
As a Southern Baptist, I’m surrounded by people who do not adhere to this thinking, but I think it is due to the lack of desire for historical evidence. Hearing people make jokes or question Catholic faith makes me cringe. I urge those people to take pause and at least show respect to people who take insults all of the time yet maintain their faith. I think we Protestants have it easy because when we have controversy, people blame a splinter of a splinter of a church denomination. We leave for simple reasons, and set up shop somewhere else on a whim. When the Catholic faith suffers controversy, people like to blame the whole church. Anyone who knows the history must acknowledge the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Catholic churches for their practice and history. I admire and respect you all. God bless.
@ICXCNIKA.7777 ай бұрын
Thank you for remembering to say Orthodox Catholic. ☦️❤️🔥🙏🏻
@willys27427 ай бұрын
I think you would be happy as a Catholic. Please come home to the only church that Jesus founded the Catholic Church.😊
@jmjorapronobis13287 ай бұрын
Come home to One Holy Catholic Apostlic Church
@charlescamand95967 ай бұрын
As a Catholic I must say you are very respectful to the Catholic Church.Thank you for that.Many blessings to you and to your family.I respect your faith too
@somebodyu.usedtoknow7 ай бұрын
Jesus was insulted, humiliated, mocked, beat, spit on, killed why would we think the same wouldn’t happen to us. Honestly, I use the same words as Christ, “forgive them Father for they know not what they do.” If we’re insulted for Christ it is assurance of our position. I understand what you’re saying… but count it the cost to being on the path.
@me-ds2il7 ай бұрын
The first Biblical[1] reference to the word is found in Acts 9:31 when speaking about “the church throughout [all] Judea, Galilee, and Samaria…”. The words “throughout” and “all” are καθ (κατά) and ὅλης (ὅλος) respectively in Greek, which together come to form the word καθολικός. The first Christian churches within the Roman Empire, therefore as a whole were Catholic but NOT *"Roman"* Catholic only
@wms727 ай бұрын
The book of Acts ends with the Church in Rome
@me-ds2il7 ай бұрын
The Book of Acts is mainly about the introduction to the Holy Spirit and the enabling power of the Spirit in the lives of believers. It's *NOT* about Roman domination
@SomeBody-rm6hf7 ай бұрын
The term "Roman Catholic" was coined by the Church of England, which calls/called itself Catholic, despite being founded in the 16th century.
@me-ds2il7 ай бұрын
The terms "Romish Catholic" and "Roman Catholic", along with "Popish Catholic", were brought into use in the English language chiefly by adherents of the Church of England.
@me-ds2il7 ай бұрын
The terms "Romish Catholic" and "Roman Catholic", along with "Popish Catholic", were brought into use in the English language chiefly by adherents of the Church of England.
@nl3962 жыл бұрын
Thanks again for speaking against heresy. I can't begin to explain how hard it is to get protestants to understand the early Christians were of the Catholic Church, especially to charismatics.
@imisschristendom52932 жыл бұрын
Trust me I know.
@corylittrell21092 жыл бұрын
I've tried explaining these things to Oneness Pentecostals, they just throw out-of-context passages from the book of Acts at me
@jasons59042 жыл бұрын
Does salvation come from works, or grace, or a combination of both?
@dpawankumar64722 жыл бұрын
Convince them by showing the scriptures, where the Author of Hebrews says that the bishop And the saints died for their sins and they intercede for them to the father Show the verses where Jesus, Paul, Peter all command them to pray to the saints Please help me find references in the word for above, so that I can convince my protestant friends
@jasons59042 жыл бұрын
For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God,not a result of works, so that no one may boast.For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them. Ephesians 2:8-2:10
@no42arak-st-floor443 ай бұрын
Great explanation and thank you!
@MaryMacElveen8 ай бұрын
I just subscribed to your channel because you masterfully laid out the historocity of the Catholic Church. Though your research using highly credible sources you proved it is The One True Apostlic Catholic Church which is the original Church that came from Jesus Christ.
@floptaxie689 ай бұрын
Protestant Bibles had the Deuterocanonic books till the 19 century, they were called “apocrypha” and labelled as “good to read, but not for doctrine”
@VynylFantasy7 ай бұрын
The douay-Reims is the only ‘Bible’ worthy of the name.
@floptaxie687 ай бұрын
@@stephenash777 it did
@YankeeWoodcraft6 ай бұрын
Protestant Bibles used only Catholic books in all their bibles! There isn't one Protestant book in any of their bibles. 😊
@juanisaac51722 жыл бұрын
The Baptists claim they come from John the Baptist. So they are the real church. I laughed when I heard that.
@a.d.marshall2748 Жыл бұрын
Laugh all the way to hell, sprinkling babies and kissing the feet of idols.
@juanisaac5172 Жыл бұрын
@@a.d.marshall2748 Ok dood all real biblical right there. Have fun waiting for the rapture.
@moneymakershq-y1q Жыл бұрын
That is not right either but you must be careful to laugh out loud. Only the devil laugh.
@Poodle_Gun Жыл бұрын
Funny as that is, it doesn't sound like a mainline view at all. I think Baptists tend to argue that they have a better grasp on the "spirit" of the Apostolic age than other churches, but they don't say most of the other churches are heretical, just that they don't know the full truth. In the South, you'll have some weird splinter of splinter groups that come up with crazy stuff like what that guy said to you.
@veronica_._._._ Жыл бұрын
The Christian hating gnostic sect Mandeans who taught heresy to some western esoteric groups over the millennia (when they were much more powerful) claim they came from John the Baptists. The Baptists need to learn a great deal of history it would seem.😉
@shredder95367 ай бұрын
This is a very good video. I'll watch this again and again
@christianmaestas44352 жыл бұрын
Have you considered doing a video on true devotion to Mary, and the consecration to Our Lord through Her? Your way of explanation is lovely and this topic would do well by your treatment, just like you did on indulgences.
@imisschristendom52932 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much. Thats a good suggestion. Im planning on tackling " Catholics worship Mary" so that would be a good angle of explanation.
@clarekuehn43722 жыл бұрын
@@imisschristendom5293 Cover the claims that "Mary is Isis/Jesus the Sun" in art (except as likening, which they are affiliated in art). Please watch these claims carefully, though the people , to do a real rebuttal. (Donatists were not Catholic; only as structures not as orthodox Roman Catholicism: heresies.) Thanks.
@ICXCNIKA.7777 ай бұрын
Mother of God is our Holy Marry, we pray trough her sometimes because it's teached and she prays for us. Every Christian (Catholic) prays to marry. Orthodox-Catholics and Roman-Catholics Protestants don't sadly, but they left the Church.
@donreinke58637 ай бұрын
Ah yes , the cult of Mary. The scheme of the early church to attract Mithra (and other female deity worshippers) into the church, replacing their deity with Mary. NOT sanctioned ANYWHERE in Scripture. The Catholic church once SOLD indulgences to make even more money, even though it was already incredibly wealthy. I believe I read something about Jesus throwing moneychangers out of the Temple.
@donreinke58637 ай бұрын
@@ICXCNIKA.777 Jesus spoke of prayIng to the Father. NO INTERMEDIARIES NECESSARY. The origins of the Catholic cult of Mary are well known, and the Protestants rightfully reject that practice.
@nardforu131 Жыл бұрын
Great videos! Keep up good work.
@Gid-J7 ай бұрын
You are forgetting the Coptic Christians which still exist which broke off about 500 AD. Also the early church wasn't really Catholic as we use the word today to mean "Roman Catholic", it was just the Church. Your description is better than the title, but still misses Coptic Christianity.
@gloriakattouah81536 ай бұрын
Agreed - the original followers of Christ and their followers (known as the early church fathers), became the Orthodox Church. They have not changed since the days of the disciples and apostles. The Roman Catholic Church split off and made changes to the original Orthodox beliefs regarding the nature of Christ. In the end, it is a shame that all Christians cannot unite as “the Church.” Christ doesn’t want his bride to be split - that was the work of Satan and it’s getting worse and worse.
@kwhon97936 ай бұрын
True but they have now been united.
@catholicman81356 ай бұрын
St Ignatius of Antioch used the word "Catholic" to describe the church in a letter circa 107 AD. He was a disciple of Peter and John. The way he used the world Catholic shows that it had been around for some time as he didn't have to explain it. There is even a chance that St. John may have used it first to coin it as the Catholic Church and Ignatius was the first to write of the early Church as Catholic.
@cheese98796 ай бұрын
@@catholicman8135 Amen Brother! These "Historians" need to read the Early Church Fathers. Clement of Rome was ordained by Peter and was the fourth Pope (Bishop of Rome). I like how people say well this group broke off and so did this group so the Catholic church is wrong. I say, read the bible and study the history of the Church. It wasn't Protestant or Baptist it was and still is Catholic. The Catholic Church has the writings of the Early Church Fathers, Padre Pio, St Faustina, the Eucharist, and a long history, 2,000 years of history. No matter what people in the church as well as outside of the church have done to undermine it, she still stands just as Jesus said it would.
@bestKaffir.underTheSon6 ай бұрын
@@catholicman8135 John wrote in Hebrew and it would be very unlikely that he wrote Catholic. John would have more likely used "olami" [עולמי = universal].
@Reid-yy5nw7 ай бұрын
Acts says it was at Antioch that the first followers of Christ were simply called CHRISTIANS, and none of the above. Denominational church names like Catholic, Orthodox, Baptists, etc were yet to be dreamed up.
@kenxplayer35637 ай бұрын
The catholic term was first mentioned in the first century, when Apostle John was still alive.
@71Fenderv227 ай бұрын
@@kenxplayer3563 Evidence?
@kenxplayer35637 ай бұрын
@@71Fenderv22 Ignatius of Antioch, who wrote around A.D. 107, while being taken to Rome for execution. Just search it bro
@princeramesesbadana23987 ай бұрын
@@71Fenderv22 The church father St. Ignatius of Antioch's first known use of "Catholic" was in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans (circa 110 AD). Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Catholic". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 5 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 532.
@apr54587 ай бұрын
@@71Fenderv22 It makes more sense that protestants are what they're just because they have a huge lack of knowledge about true christian faith, but don't let ignorance take advantage of you
@ICXCNIKA.7778 ай бұрын
Thank you for the title of the video! It is true Our Orthodox church is Catholic Apostolic without a broken line of succesion.
@timh83246 ай бұрын
Really? What about when there were 2 popes?
@marisolcollazo77426 ай бұрын
Thank you for these teachings I needed this🙏🏼
@johnflorio35769 ай бұрын
Our Lord gifted us a perfect Church. Why, 1500 years later, did sinful man try to change this?
@Dienekes6789 ай бұрын
Satan corrupted Martin Luther, may God forgive him.
@sarco648 ай бұрын
If the sinful Pope Leo X were still alive, you could ask him why he decided it was OK to send representatives throughout Europe to tell the peasants that if they paid a certain amount of money, they could buy their (or their deceased loved ones) way out of purgatory. A conscientious priest by the name of Martin Luther knew that this was obviously not in accord with the basic teachings of Christianity, and he dared to challenge Leo on this.
@Dienekes6788 ай бұрын
@@sarco64 and the same Martin Luther, a very mentally unstable man, proceeded to throw the baby out with the bath water. In doing so leading millions away from the church founded by Christ.
@geoffjs7 ай бұрын
The 1st of the attacks on the CC 1517, Freemasonry 1717 & Communism 1917, none of which have succeeded against His One True Church Mt 16 18-29
@Dienekes6787 ай бұрын
@@sarco64 and Martin Luther proceeded to throw the baby out with the bathwater. The poor man couldn't deal with his sinful nature, didn't have enough faith in Gods mercy on the sinner, and duly brought into the world the sola fida lie.
@BZman7 Жыл бұрын
The response I get from a pastor(s) is "those are false doctrines." 😂 I ask them their source, they say got questions. That's when I realized there was no reason to even use logic with the pastor, he sounded like a child just making up lies to win or something. History is important.
@Poodle_Gun Жыл бұрын
Each seminary is going to teach *only* their viewpoint. This is how he was taught to argue. Catholics would do well to teach better ways of arguing to their Priests and laypeople, instead of focusing on preaching to the choir. I saw an Orthodox convert from Protestant responding to "that's not in the Bible" with, "okay, but can you tell me who made the Bible?" That's a great way to start out.
@user-lh5li8ll7i Жыл бұрын
Protestantism literally shuts down a persons ability to think logically
@Darth_Vader2589 ай бұрын
@@Poodle_Gun Every Catholic Priest studies Philosophy and Theology in the Seminary.
@Hilaire_Balrog7 ай бұрын
@@user-lh5li8ll7iSin darkens the intellect.
@Gio-ce8ob7 ай бұрын
Maybe point out to him Protestants removed seven books from their Bible, partly because it contradicts Sola Scriptura. Also James 2:14-26 refutes Sola Fide and they have James in their Bible.
@winstonbarquez95382 жыл бұрын
Only the Catholic Church can trace herself back in history to the Church established by Christ in Matthew 16:18, which latter became Catholic because of its universal mission in Matthew 28:19.
@Poodle_Gun Жыл бұрын
The universal mission to me is the number one reason I'm leaning toward Catholicism over Orthodoxy.
@seminoleboy96 Жыл бұрын
Orthodox Church
@christophersalinas272211 ай бұрын
@@Poodle_Guneastern orthodoxy has absolutely failed the great commission.
@marvalice345511 ай бұрын
@@christophersalinas2722it sure seems that way to me
@bestKaffir.underTheSon9 ай бұрын
You just shot yourself in the foot. Mt28v19 was not in the original text. It was added about 400 years later. The Catholic Church was started in 325AD.
@nongwadbniah226211 ай бұрын
Apart from the catholic ...all others denominations are self man made... Christianity itself is Catholic...even though am not a believer but a researcher and an agnostic thiest .... I appreciate this channel ... It speak the truth
@johnm.speight798310 ай бұрын
I am an OLD cradle Catholic, (baptized Aug 30th ,1938) I got goose bumps when I read your text - Not sure what getting goose bumps means but I thought you should know. PEACE my Friend !
@brandonedwards11819 ай бұрын
how can one be atheist and a agnostic at the same time lmao? So you believe in a God but you don't?
@bestKaffir.underTheSon9 ай бұрын
@@johnm.speight7983 Catholics don't have the baptism that Yeshua taught His disciples.
@nongwadbniah22629 ай бұрын
@@brandonedwards1181 not submit to believe in any religion because we cannot prove which religion is true base on their knowledge about God. So I am still in the process of searching which one is true.
@bestKaffir.underTheSon9 ай бұрын
Self-made? Good Friday is a Catholic creation. Making the Last Supper the Passover is a Catholic creation. Why did the Catholic Church remove the Passover and replace it with the pagan Easter? Lent is pagan. God's festivals were removed and pagan festivals were introduced. And the pagan feast of Oanus is now called Nativity of John.
@RPlavo7 ай бұрын
Well, in the early Church, clergy were married, people stood during the Eucharist, drank from the cup, there was no Filioque, and no private revelations were introduced into the liturgy
@clempat47 ай бұрын
Clergyman were married lol give 20 examples from contemporary sources
@NJLev7 ай бұрын
@@clempat4 …..you realize Peter was married, right? The people Catholics claim was “the first pope”.
@Scotchism7 ай бұрын
Celibacy among priests is a matter of discipline, not dogma. It can always be changed. Eastern Catholic priests may marry.
@NJLev7 ай бұрын
@@Scotchism It is required in order to be ordained a Catholic priest. You can say it isn’t dogma but if it’s a requirement with no exceptions (I’ve never met a married Catholic priest and I was a Catholic for more than half my life), it might as well be.
@wms727 ай бұрын
Emperor Justinian put his hymn to the Only-Begotten Son in the Divine Liturgy.
@CatETru7 ай бұрын
The most persecuted Church is no other than the True Church. "If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you." Jn 15:20.
@NhamshahSpah-ky-id6jo7 ай бұрын
Oh please! The Vatican is NOT christian. And stop with the projection. The Vatican burned christians for the “heresy” of translating the Bible into a language that the people could understand.
@chadmeidl11404 ай бұрын
Who instituted the Inquisitions?
@NhamshahSpah-ky-id6jo4 ай бұрын
@@chadmeidl1140 The VATICAN
@CatETru3 ай бұрын
@@chadmeidl1140 Heresy was pervasive and the Church was under threat from satan, something needed to be done.
@chadmeidl11403 ай бұрын
@@CatETru JOHN 16:1-3 These things have I spoken unto you, that ye should not be offended. 2They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service. 3And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me. MATTHEW 11:12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force. REVELATION 17:6 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 4And *the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour,* and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: 5And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. 6And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration. What are the colors of the Cardinals and Bishops in Rome. Does Rome have seven hills?
@Nidhogg139 ай бұрын
That event in 1517, I call "The Protestant Rebellion."
@geoffjs7 ай бұрын
The first of the attacks on Catholicism, followed by Freemasonry in 1717 & Communism in 1917. The fact that all these satanic attacks have failed is proof of the divine origin & protection of His One True Church. Other than the Orthodox, all others are heretical pretenders with the confusion, division & scandal of 000’s of sects caused by personal interpretation, which is not of Jesus who willed unity Jn 17 11-23. Protestantism should be ashamed of causing the scourge of relativism resulting from many “truths”
@Solrac9247 ай бұрын
how about Protestant Revolt?
@Pablo-gl9dj7 ай бұрын
They revolted from the revolting errors of Rome
@Nidhogg137 ай бұрын
@@Pablo-gl9dj My suggestion to you is that you get to know what the Catholic Church actually teaches. As Fulton Sheen said, you can't find ten people who hate the Catholic Church, but you find millions who hate what they think is the Catholic Church.
@simonslater90247 ай бұрын
It was a satanic revolt against the mystical body of Christ on earth the holy Catholic Church. Please read my other comment
@TSmith-ns457 ай бұрын
Correct, only if “catholic” means universal (as in one body) and NOT the Roman bureaucracy!
@bridgefin7 ай бұрын
No, it is the identity of the only church established by Jesus. In the first century it was headquartered in Rome and it still is today.
@YankeeWoodcraft6 ай бұрын
Actually, if you read the writings of the students of the Apostles, they "literally" stated that the name of The Christian Church was "The Catholic Church" as a name, not a verb. This is documented Christian history. Have you ever read The Apostolic Fathers?
@AlexSanchez-dk3kf7 ай бұрын
The early church was NOT CATHOLIC, NOT BAPTIST, NOR PROTESTANT. The early church was CHRISTIAN. Read ACTS 11:25-26 Then Barnabas went to Tarsus to look for Saul, and when he found him, he brought him to Antioch. So for a whole year Barnabas and Saul met with the church and taught great numbers of people. The disciples were called CHRISTIANS first at Antioch. (The Word DOES NOT say: "The disciples were called catholics"). Christians ARE NOT protestants. Catholics call them "protestants" just because they do not agree with catholicism. Christians are christians = followers of Jesus Christ (THE WAY, THE TRUTH and LIFE) JOHN 14:6 GOD bless🙏
@imisschristendom52937 ай бұрын
St. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrneans 8:2, AD 107. Let no one do anything of concern to the Church without the bishop. Let that be considered a valid Eucharist, which is celebrated by the bishop or by one whom he ordains [i.e., a presbyter]. Wherever the bishop appears, let the people be there, just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. St. Polycarp, The Martyrdom of Polycarp, 8:1, & 16:2, AD 156 And certainly the most admirable Polycarp was one of these [elect], in whose times among us he showed himself an apostolic and prophetic teacher and bishop of the Catholic Church in Smyrna
@AlexSanchez-dk3kf7 ай бұрын
@@imisschristendom5293 Ignatius of antioch letters NOR Polycarp letters are God's word. Catholics believe ALL these letters/encyclicals (which are by the hundreds or thousands at this point) from catholic bishops, archbishops,popes. That is why they call themselves "christian catholics" CHRISTIANS follow Jesus Christ teachings and the scriptures in the old testament, that Jesus himself read (at the synagogues) and quote to the crowds. God bless.
@diego15907 ай бұрын
@@AlexSanchez-dk3kfso why should you even consider the Bible as an authority considering that these were the people who decided what was canon and what wasn't...
@adude8497 ай бұрын
@AlexSanchez-dk3kf Ignatius and Polycarp are actual students of the Apostles John and Peter Wdym? In fact Polycarp are one of the 72 disciples
@AlexSanchez-dk3kf7 ай бұрын
@@adude849 now we are going to learn from students. Adding, twisting or even ignoring God's word to accomodate to doctrines of men. Matthew 15:7-9 7 You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you: 8 “‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. 9 They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules. God gave us His word through the profets (old testament), Jesus His only begotten Son and Jesus apostles (new testament) God bless.
@GGM200005 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the video!
@gregsmith74286 ай бұрын
I was brought up RC. I don't regret leaving. The only saviour is The Lord Jesus. No man or group of men speak for Him.
@SolusChristus126 ай бұрын
Absolutely, Holy Spirit is the Vicar of Christ, the earthly representative of Jesus, says Jesus himself!
@jaimieoxford82127 ай бұрын
CORRECTION: The early church was neither protestant nor Roman catholic, as described in the book of acts it was in Jerusalem so composed almost entirely of JEWISH believers.
@bridgefin7 ай бұрын
Who were all Catholic in mission and soon in name.
@jaimieoxford82127 ай бұрын
@@bridgefin Right, what is the definition of catholic then ?
@bridgefin7 ай бұрын
@@jaimieoxford8212 Jesus gave the apostles the mission to preach the good news to the entire world. The word used to describe that mission was catholic, a Greek word meaning "through the whole". So we could say that their mission was to preach "One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism" to the whole or universal world. They were preaching ONE THING to EVERYONE.
@manuelsanchezdeinigo39592 ай бұрын
HaDerech The Way Acts 24:14
@notsureyou7 ай бұрын
The early Church was in fact CHRISTIAN, since they were followers of Christ. The term Catholic wasn't used until circa 110 A.D Which simply meant "Universal Church".
@markopace9747 ай бұрын
What you are getting wrong here is that in the beginning there were individual parishes/communities scattered across the lands which later evolved into one church, the holy apostolic Catholic Church
@jamesnovick49197 ай бұрын
Not to be rude. But please go back and watch the video and then comment. Your point is invalid
@aber29127 ай бұрын
Terrible point. The church always existed, it was just named the Catholic Church, and still adhered to Jesus’ institution of a Church.
@notsureyou7 ай бұрын
@@markopace974 "The term Catholic wasn't used until circa 110 A.D Which simply meant "Universal Church"."
@notsureyou7 ай бұрын
@@jamesnovick4919 The original followers of Christ were referred to as: "Believers" "Christians" "Saints" (even though they were not dead but in fact living people) "Apostles" "Those who are in Christ /faithful brethren in Christ" "ministers" "servants of Christ" Etc (for any that I have missed) Which is why if someone is a follower of Christ, Whatever denomination they are in, They must first identify as a CHRISTIAN. NOT "I'm a Catholic" "I'm a Baptist" And so on, Our identity is IN CHRIST
@Poodle_Gun Жыл бұрын
I really like your videos, and they've been really helpful on my faith journey. I'm no longer Protestant. I left for different reasons, but I don't think I'll go back, because they lied about the Bible. I want to help people understand Protestant beliefs, since I was Protestant for three decades and I know what I'm talking about. The only Protestant church I've noticed claiming to be "the One True Church" has been the Pentacostals. They're very quickly growing, and are probably going to go the route of completely heretical. I will say on the good side, Christians with legitimate gifts of prophecy don't have a place to go. This is somewhere they feel comfortable with their gifts. But they will have to move on eventually, so pray that they find their way to a non-Protestant church, even if there's just one person there with a legitimate prophetic gift. I believe Catholicism but s accepting of prophecy, although I could be wrong. I don't believe the Orthodox are. Another group who thinks they're "the One True Church" is the Church of Christ. They're popular in the South, but have some strange views. You're right about the trail of blood being an extremely fringe, almost cult. It's sort of like a church that broke off of the Duggar family church or something (hypothetically). It's almost in snake-handling territory. The vast, vast 99% majority of Evangelical/Baptist-type believe that every church (Protestant, Catholic, the Orthodoxes, Churches of the East) are "The One True Church." They don't count Mormons or anything like that. Conservatives don't count liberal mainline churches. They also don't count churches that are way off the deep end, such as Westboro Baptist. These Protestants still think that other churches are in error, and many still try to convert non-Protestant and liberal Protestants to "better" theology. I'm admittedly still trying to decide if I'm going to be Orthodox or Catholic, and would like prayer for a sign. It might take a little time for me to decide. Catholic vs Orthodox and the Schism reads like Hatfields vs McCoys to a Protestant. I can't make heads or tails about who's right. I'm reading each side's arguments, and I'm at the point where I have to stop, because it's stressful and confusing. I want to add that, although I don't think I'll ever agree with you on every point, I'm not one to punch right, and the bottom line is that you've done a lot of good. I can't thank you enough!
@msakat1 Жыл бұрын
Good luck in your discernment of Catholicism and Orthodoxy. I see you are looking for a sign from God. Look also to reason. God gave it to you and it is what separates us from the animals. What is true by faith must be true by reason. What is true by reason must also be true by faith. There is no getting around the fact that orthodoxy accepted the office of the pope for 1000 years, and then rejected it. Truth cannot contradict itself or it is not truth. That is the 'principle of noncontradiction' in action. IMO orthodoxy is just a way for protestants to have sacraments and liturgy and still feel good about rejecting Rome.
@jimmalloy72799 ай бұрын
Read Mat 16 and Isaiah 22. "The keys to the kingdom" means the Royal Steward, or the Prime Minister to the King. Orthodoxy is just a different form of protest.
@m.chavez44317 ай бұрын
I will pray for you to become Catholic. Its the one true church of Christ, and Christ placed Peter as head and his successors to guide his church, its biblical. The Orthodox ignore the pope, who Christ put in place. I understand some, because in history we have had some bad popes, but Jesus always surrounded himself with the worst sinners. The orthodox broke off of the original church from Jesus.
@Procopius4647 ай бұрын
Before you go Roman Catholic you should try LCMS (Lutheran). Unlike Baptists and Pentacostals, our church is not a reboot or an attempted reboot. We retained all the customs and practices which were not contrary to God's word, but jettisoned those that were. We still make use of the liturgical style of worship (divine service), and believe in the real presence during communion. We are the western Catholic church purified of the papacy and it's corruption. You should at least try LCMS before going to these other systems. However, if you don't like that, then I recommend Orthodoxy. I think Oriental Orthodoxy is better than Eastern, but if you are white/European you might find it easier to assimilate into Eastern Orthodoxy, as Oriental is mostly middle eastern, Indian, and Ethiopian. But I do think the theology in Oriental Orthodoxy is better and more on point. I don't know why anyone would want to join RC Church, especially with Pope Francis in charge. They embrace all matter of heresy, such as evolution, global warming, and now they are trending towards the gay things.
@kirkmulhearn79316 ай бұрын
Great and concise presentation, ty
@RylanSmith-dc1pf7 ай бұрын
First off both the eastern and orientalist orthodox churches have equally convincing historical claims to be the first church. Secondly, you are correct. The problem is the Catholic Church is a Theseus’ ship of the original church, An actual Hersey that contradicts scripture.
@cyberlizardcouk7 ай бұрын
Not so. The early church was primarily a Jewish sect which accepted gentiles. It kept sabbath and for the most part kept the pascal feast on the 14th of Nisan. Indeed they were still arguing about it until the late 4th century.
@Roze_Mari2 ай бұрын
Where can I find this history? Plz let me know, I'm looking into all this for answers.
@cyberlizardcouk2 ай бұрын
@@Roze_Mari the book of Acts mainly, but if you google, quartodeciman controversy you'll find lots of information.
@randym.72387 ай бұрын
Neither JESUS nor Any of the Apostles ever taught Mariology in the Holy Scripture. They taught JESUS was and Is the only way for Salvation by Faith in HIM and that HE is the only avenue of prayer to GOD, not Mary or anyone else.
@ateam3887 ай бұрын
Mariology is awesome! God bless
@Castropher7 ай бұрын
I beg to differ, Mariology is very much present in the scriptures. First obvious one is beginning of Luke, theology of modern Catholics/Orthodox relies heavily on this account. Mary is called highly favored/full of grace (depending on how you interpret the original Greek). And during her visit to Elizabeth, she is called "Mother of my Lord", which is wear the title "Mother of God" comes from: Jesus is God, Mary is the Mother of Jesus. Then Mary says her "soul magnifies the Lord" and "all generations shall call me blessed", when Catholic pray the Rosary, we call her blessed, which is the fulfillment of this prophecy from Mary herself.... Then on the cross Jesus tells John to "behold your mother" and Mary to "behold your son", which we believe means that Jesus intends for Mary to be the mother of all Christian disciples... And finally Revelation 12, even protestant Christians understand this woman to be Mary. John had a vision of her wearing a "crown with 12 stars". The stars representing the 12 apostles and 12 tribes of israel, and she is wearing them as a crown, which means God has proclaimed her as Queen of all MEN!
@randym.72387 ай бұрын
@@ateam388 It may be awesome, but it’s still not taught in Scripture.
@randym.72387 ай бұрын
@@Castropher The only people that interpret Revelation 12 as being the Mother of all men is those of the Catholic Faith. The Woman is Israel from whom Jesus was born. the 12 stars are the twelve tribes of Israel and the Sun represents the glory of Israel being God’s chosen people. This has nothing to do with Mary or the Roman Catholic Church. Jesus gave John the responsibility to take care of His mother. To believe that that verse means Mary is the Mother of us all is preposterous. But when did the RCC ever let facts get in the way of their narrative?
@Castropher7 ай бұрын
@@randym.7238 We read and refer to the same texts of the bible and have completely different interpretations. You claim your interpretation is a fact that the RCC denies, when it is just your interpretation that I'm guessing you heard from someone else's commentary. This discussion here is proof that Scripture Alone is not sufficient in understanding the Christian Life and an authority to teach the bible is needed. The Bible demonstrates this in Acts 8: "Philip ran to him and heard him reading Isaiah the prophet and asked, “Do you understand what you are reading?” And he said, “How can I, unless someone guides me?”. So when a Christian attempts to arrive at the correct interpretation of a passage in scripture, the question becomes, who can I trust to guide me? I'll take the bishops and priests who claim "Apostolic succession" and the early church fathers who wrote about Mary being the "new Eve". Veneration of Mary is very much intrinsic to the Christian faith throughout history. Even protestant founder Martin Luther venerated Mary and called her the Mother of all Christians
@scriptedbeauty17 ай бұрын
I was Catholic until I was a sophomore in high school. I had to write a an essay defending the Catholic Church. But when I started doing my research - and actually reading the scripture - I realized I had been following a false religion. That’s when I became born again. I have since gotten rid of all of the church props and paraphernalia, such as rosaries, crucifixes, pictures, holy water, etc. I highly recommend the book THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ROME.
@siena4ever7517 ай бұрын
Oh dear. You read the wrong research.
@Mythmx7 ай бұрын
Oh boy ur lost
@AaronLKinney7 ай бұрын
@@siena4ever751 Scripture Was The Wrong Research? There's A Reason Why The Catholic Church Teaches That Only The Catholic Church Has The Authority To Interpret Scripture And Anyone Who Is Catholic Cannot Interpret Scripture On There Own. Because It Would Only Expose The Catholic Churches Lies, Deception And Blasphemy.
@AaronLKinney7 ай бұрын
@@siena4ever751 Doesn't The Catholic Church Teach "Pride" One Of The Seven Deadly Sins? Yet, They Proclaim Them Selves The Only One True Church? Is It Not Prideful To Proclaim Such A Thing? Doesn't The Catholic Church Also Teach "Vanity" One Of The Seven Deadly Sins? Yet, They Adorn Themselves With Robes And Gowns For All To See? Is That Not What Only Hypocrites Do? Go Against There Own Word? God Is Not A Hypocrite. Nor Is His Church. The Catholic Church Has Deceived You.
@plum3327 ай бұрын
And you're probably having nightmares aren't you?
@aljohnson56017 ай бұрын
First, what do you define as the church? It is not a building, nor is it an organization. It is the group of all professing Christians. A true Christian is one who is trusting in the finished work of Jesus the messiah for his salvation. Notice, it is the work of the messiah, it is not our works. Sorry, but this eliminates most Catholics. By the way the term Catholic from the beginning simply meant universal - which included all believers. Sorry again, but by this definitions most Catholics fall under the “Catholic religion” but are absolutely not the universal “Catholic” church. You’ve been deceived by the gospel of following the law thinking this will earn salvation. How dare you to think you can ever meet God’s standard of righteousness by your “good works!” Listen to Isaiah 64:6 “And all if our righteousness is as filthy rags.”
@popdetailers5457 ай бұрын
I'm just a follower of Jesus. That's it. Too many clubs and cults saying they know the right way. It's easier just to read the Bible yourself and follow the teachings of Jesus.
@ApolloLeRoux7 ай бұрын
Wrong! Nowhere in the Bible does it say that the Bible is the ultimate source of authority. The normative authority was given to Christs Apostles who by in turn through apostolic succession gave that authority to the bishops of the Church which is the Eastern Orthodox Church. 2 Thessalonians 2:15 says, "Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word or our Epistle. There was no Bible during the time of the Apostles they held to oral tradition as so did the early Church fathers. The Bible in itself is only apart of a liturgical tradition within the Church and you cannot understand the entirety of it without the context and history of those who gave you the scriptures. You cannot live by scripture alone! As this is something no one in the Church believes.
@popdetailers5457 ай бұрын
@ApolloLeRoux you do you. I walk with Jesus, he's never lead me wrong. God bless
@jackrobinson83286 ай бұрын
The WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIFE. What else do you really need. Churches are for fellowship with common believers.
@jenniferraymond9766Ай бұрын
Then why did you come to this channel? And what gives you the authority to interpret Holy Scriptures?
@honurapanui5 ай бұрын
It was catholic but not roman catholic. The origin of the church is in Isrsel, not Rome.
@Kitiwake4 ай бұрын
💯
@prateekantonyАй бұрын
It was Catholic and 24 Catholic Churches make up the “One Holy Catholic Apostolic Church”. Roman Catholic just refers to the Bishop of Rome having the primacy over the Catholic Church. There are still 23 Eastern Catholic Churches. They all still fall under the final authority of the Bishop of Rome - the Pope.
@DannyLoyd10 ай бұрын
Romans 16:16 " the Churches of Christ salute you". Gal 1:22 " I was still not known by sight to the CHURCHES OF CHRIST IN JUDEA". The Churches of Christ started on the day of Pentecost, Acts 2. So, where is the Catholic Church mentioned in scripture? why would the bride of Christ wear the name Catholic?
@bradyhayes79119 ай бұрын
The Bride of Christ might wear the name Catholic, meaning universal, because Christ's final priestly prayer before the crucifixion in John 17 was that all believers might be one. In fact, He believed that the unity of believers would be a testament to the authenticity of the divine revelation of Christianity. For this reason, the Church has always pursued oneness, or universality - Oneness is one of the four marks of the Church, and always has been. Why would the bride of Christ be founded alongside hundreds of denominations in the 16th century or later as the product of schism and protest? Also, by the way - Where is Sola Scriptura mentioned in Scripture? (No, it's not 2 Tim. 3:16)
@geoffjs7 ай бұрын
The fallacy of sola Scriptura which 2 Peter 1 20-21 rebuts. The words bible, trinity, purgatory, Protestant are not in the bible you hypocrite, can’t you see how flawed your cornerstone is. The bible can’t interpret itself. Jn 20 23 says that not everything is in the bible which is why Sacred Tradition, which existed from the time of Christ complements Sacred Scripture which wasn’t mass printed until the 16th century & most people couldn’t read until recent centuries making sola Scriptura unworkable!
@AlexSanchez-dk3kf7 ай бұрын
@@bradyhayes7911Oneness is IN CHRIST ONLY (the way, the truth and life). Not in catholic religion. Catholic religion DID NOT pay for our sins on the cross.
@bradyhayes79117 ай бұрын
@@AlexSanchez-dk3kf What does it mean to be one in Christ? What do you think the Catholic Church teaches about salvation?
@AlexSanchez-dk3kf7 ай бұрын
@@bradyhayes7911 to be ONE IN CHRIST, read the Bible. The Holy Spirit will reveal to you what you need to know at any specific time. 1 Corinthians 1:18:31 28 God chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things-and the things that are not-to nullify the things that are, 29 so that no one may boast before him. 30 It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God-that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption. 31 Therefore, as it is written: “Let the one who boasts boast in the Lord.” "It is because of Him (God) that YOU ARE IN CHRIST JESUS". It is NOT because of catholic religion. God bless.
@gbuffaloe16 ай бұрын
Thank you for this teaching.
@markevans80546 ай бұрын
The Early Catholic Church was a joke... selling indulgences, nuns getting pregnant, praying to Saints LoL 😂 didn't want the Bible written in local languages, pitiful. Thank you Martin Luther. Glory to God ✝️
@Lukarikasos7 ай бұрын
Thank you for your great video. I'm on my way to becoming Catholic, and my pentecostal friend isn't taking it well. I need information how to defend myself if it goes to it
@jlouis44077 ай бұрын
Yay, Catholic convert here as well, one of the best things I ever did.
@limpingnad81007 ай бұрын
Go to Catholic answers they are a good source of Catholic info
@ICXCNIKA.7777 ай бұрын
As a Orthodox Catholic I can tell you. You don't have to defend yourself, you will carry your cross and be persecuted as a Christian and still Thank our Holy Lord for this honour as a sinner and unworthy servant of Him. Tell your pentecostal friend about the love of our God Jesus Christ and his holy Mother, Mother of God. Tell him what Catholicity means and how the first Church was Catholic and always was. And splitted into Roman-Catholic and Orthodox-Catholic. All others denominations left the Church. Invite him home to either one.
@patrickpelletier9298Ай бұрын
There are so many good podcasts about the Catholic faith.
@barnabaspark7 ай бұрын
Earl y church had no priest, no pope, no statute, no indulgence, etc to name few. “I can definitely relate. After about 7 years of wrestling, I came out of the RCC about 3 months ago. It was an incredibly difficult decision, but I realized I couldn't keep sitting on the fence. I was stuck. Eventually I realized that regardless of whether some of the things the RCC teaches are true or not, if it requires me to commit even one idolatrous act or affirm one thing that is untrue, then I couldn't be a part of it. Something I just realized in the past couple of days is that the RCC has a different Gospel than the one I believe, and I'm not talking about the usual Protestant argument of faith vs works, etc. The RCC teaches that you have to accept all of its dogmas. As I understand the gospel, it is the simple truth that if someone repents of their sin and believes in Jesus they are saved. In effect, the RCC gospel is repent and believe in Jesus, believe in the Immaculate Conception, sinless life, and bodily assumption of Mary, believe that the first Pope was Peter and that there is a successive line of bishops who are infallible, believe in Purgatory and that your own merits and the merits of others can shorten or eliminate your time there, believe that forgiveness is only through a priest, and believe every other part of Cannon Law put forward by the Church. If you don't affirm any one of those beliefs you are anathematized according to the RCC. That's quite the burden if you ask me. It reminds me of the religious leaders in the time of Jesus, who had added so much to the Law that people were being crushed by it. I will pray that you get some clarity because I know what it feels like to be in that state of limbo. It's like you want to be fully on board and on fire for Christ, but how can you do that if you don't even know what you believe yourself. At least that's how I experienced it. Either way, don't be afraid. If you are seeking with all your heart, God will direct you. Shalom.
@plum3327 ай бұрын
What you believe does not matter. The gospels are what Christ taught and therefore the one and only truth.
@imsotumelo8 ай бұрын
The Early Church was none of the denominations.
@geoffjs7 ай бұрын
Jesus founded His One True Church Mt 16 18-19 that became known as Catholic or Universal by Ignatius in 107, codified your bible in 382. His Church is the pillar & foundation of Truth 1 Tim 3:15 & has existed, in spite of sinful men, for 2000 yrs, proof of its divine origin. The fruits of sola Scriptura & personal interpretation, confusion, division & scandal of 000’s of sects when Jesus willed unity Jn 17 11-21. Try combining Sacred Tradition, which existed before the NT, from the time of Jesus with Sacred Scripture under the unifying authoritative interpretation of the magisterium, the balanced three legged stool, far more rational & objective
@kkkkkkkm6 ай бұрын
So you are affirming that Jesus lied to Peter?
@lionheartmerrill10696 ай бұрын
The Rock is Jesus
@florinelenaradamilea6 ай бұрын
The Earliest Church was & is God Jesus not some man made denomination.
@kkkkkkkm6 ай бұрын
@@florinelenaradamilea I do agree, the catholic church isn't man made. Matthew 16:18-19
@tylergermanowicz57565 ай бұрын
You do good work. I am a fan. Thank you.
@patrickmccutcheon93617 ай бұрын
The Catholic Church that Protestants broke away from was not the same as the early church. The reason for different forms Protestantism was the deviation from the Catholic Church from the early church and a desire to go back to the roots of Christianity. By the 1500s the Catholic Church had evolved into an institution of political power with centuries of man made rules.
@diego15907 ай бұрын
They returned to traditions so hard that they denied apostolic succesion, removed 7 books accepted by the early church and dont have divine lithurgy.
@NicholasLaua7 ай бұрын
Prove your facts, don't make assumptions. I might also want to learn from you.
@sgt.grinch32996 ай бұрын
Only the Holy Catholic Apostolic Church has 100% of the Christian Faith.
@alhilford23455 ай бұрын
Absolutely!
@athanasiusofalexandria4304 Жыл бұрын
It was and is One Holy Catholic and Apostolic. And this Church has existed in two halves of the same Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church since the schism. Both are Holy Catholic and Apostolic, and I pray they may once again be United.
@peterzinya111 ай бұрын
Jesus has 7 churches Rev 1-3, and none of them are in Rome. Why is that?
@Everykneebows10 ай бұрын
The first church was neither Protestant Baptist nor catholic. The first church, the way, the church, Nazarene church for the first two decades were heavily Jewish influenced. As years went on denominations perverted the word, 200 yrs after Jesus it was lost, only to be completely lost by Constantine. The first church was in Jerusalem and James was in charge. RCC church is so far gone past the first church it’s sad.
@athanasiusofalexandria430410 ай бұрын
@@Everykneebows I’m sorry, but to say Constantine destroyed the Church or perverted the Church and it’s teachings is a slap in the face to those Bishops and priests and laymen who came to Council of Nicea in 325 called by Constantine. Many of these men were missing body parts. Some were missing eyes and tongues that they had lost during the extreme persecution they had faced because the would NOY DENY the Lord and his Gospel. They had endured sacrifice and many of them literal torture for Christ and his Truth. Do you think they would all all of a sudden just come in an rubber stamp a bunch of false doctrine? Never! Constintine called the Council but had zero influence on the decrees that came from the Council. The decrees/doctrines were proclaimed at the Council of Nicea in 325 by the successors to the Apostles themselves guided by the Holy Spirit, just as was done in the Book of Acts when their was a dispute over what would be required of the Gentile Christians. Again, to say that those men allowed Constantine to take over the Church and change its doctrine spits in the face of men who were wiling to do anything and accept any torture for the cause of Christ and refused to dishonor Christ and his Church.
@bobizzle16059 ай бұрын
@peterzinya1 And you think this is relevant, why exactly? If Jesus rejects Rome, then explain why history proves his top apostle and essentially right hand man was a bishop in Rome who was martyred in Rome. Kinda strange that Jesus wouldn’t rebuke his top apostle for setting up a Church in Rome if Jesus rejected Rome, don’t ya think?
@bobizzle16059 ай бұрын
@Everykneebows lol give one shred of evidence that Constantine started the Catholic Church. You have absolutely none, stop watching the DaVinci Code my guy. Even credible secular scholars laugh at the notion that the Catholic Church was started by Constantine and completely went against the Church already established by Peter and Paul in Rome. James led the Church in Jerusalem, that wasn’t the only Church established and Paul even mentions that Cephas(Peter) was head of the elders in his letters.
@hikingsteven76657 ай бұрын
The early church was not catolic nor babtist nor protestant. The early church was simply Jeshua followers the pope is not in the Bible
@MarkBerg-tk8js6 ай бұрын
2nd letter of Peter, V20 “no scripture for private interpretation. Read the 33 church doctors. Or the book of the church fathers, all pre bible! Wake up, Jesus left one church, not 34 thousand
@Jugglingtedchannel7 ай бұрын
Thank you! I wish you could have included even more statements from the early Church Fathers as further evidence building up makes the case stronger, but this is a good start!
@rmp74009 ай бұрын
We may add: "The original Church IS (and has always been) Catholic (=universal)."
@nils7407 ай бұрын
No. Never it says that in the bible. The Word church is not a building and is derived from ecclesia wich means to call together, call out. Congregation is a perfect and correct word for followers of Christ; the building or facility is not of great importance, but what we, the believers do together in Christ! God be with you in Christ Jesus. Amen.
@sandyriver47057 ай бұрын
@@nils740technically it is not a building at least applied at that era. But all christians at the time were under the guides of the disciples which were under the seat of peter. At first Christ followers were called christian for the first time in Antioch. However laters there came so many heretical teachings, that christian church labeled themselves as catholic/orthodox church to separate themselves from those heretical teachings
@YahushaisYahuahssalvation7 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡
@YahushaisYahuahssalvation7 ай бұрын
@@sandyriver4705🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡 they were called Natsarim, but your anti messiah pope and idol worshipping Romans changed the word in translation.
@NJLev7 ай бұрын
Lowercase catholic, which means universal. Ie in the apostles creed, they weren’t referring to the Catholic Church as we know today. They used the word catholic to refer to us all being unified under Jesus.
@wadestewart550410 ай бұрын
Great video!!
@warrenchrisitan7 ай бұрын
You can’t fool people, the earlier church was apostolic church, which turned into Catholic Church then the meaning of Catholic means universal not an idol worshipping denominations. 😅
@danabegley35506 ай бұрын
The problem is these fundamentalist Christians. One of whom I know who insisted on this exact claim. He is a Southern Baptist and insisted that the baptists were there from the beginning. Just like this video says that they do. It's great to talk about. The early church fathers, but it doesn't do any good if someone like that does not read or care about the early church fathers, so that's not an argument that's going to work for people like they completely truncate that from their belief, and that is how they continue to maintain. The belief that they have. They do not accept or read. The early church fathers why because they claim that they're not part of the Bible, so that argument is not going to convince people that are fundamentalist. Protestants, I've tried, it doesn't work with them. They automatically do not accept it even people that. Are not fundamentalist but that are Anglican. I have asked them. Why don't you read or accept? The early church fathers, his answer to me was we are aware of them. We just don't cair. Our attitude towards them is so what again? That argument does not work if peoples minds are closed and they automatically set the entire group of early church fathers aside. Because in order to convert to the one true church, which is the Catholic Church, they must read the early church fathers. They will never convert if they don't accept them to begin with.
@gregorylittle14617 ай бұрын
The Church started to go “off the rails” shortly after the death of the apostles. The scriptures were put aside in order to set a church government and doctrine not inspired by the Holy Spirit, but by man. The Reformation tried to bring the Church back to the holy scriptures, but this also failed. The troubles the Roman Catholic Church is experiencing today are self-inflicted.
@ElessarofGondor7 ай бұрын
So was Jesus a liar when he said the gates of Hell wouldn't prevail against his Church? There is no historical proof of a "great apostasy". Rather we see the Church Fathers unpacking scripture almost in the same way a flower bursts into bloom.
@siena4ever7517 ай бұрын
'The views you state did not exist before 16th anti Catholic propaganda. On the other hand, what did Jesus say? 'Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church' The words of Christ are eternal Truth and everlasting, not temporary, not intermittent. 'And the gates of hell will not prevail'. Attacks will come from outside and from within, but the Church established by Christ lives on forever. God bless and Viva Cristo Rey.
@plum3327 ай бұрын
No they are the work of the devil. The church will never die. Only men are corrupted not the bride of Christ.
@YankeeWoodcraft6 ай бұрын
What troubles exactly? The Church is being hated on for running pedos & corrupt clergymen out. How is this a bad thing? Remember the "troubles" Judas caused Jesus? Or the "troubles" the Apostles caused when they abandoned Christ? The true Church will always have troubles because Satan doesn't need to attack other churches who are doing bad all on their own and who do his work leading others away from The Church. Satan attacks the Church that draws people away from him; The Catholic Church and good Protestant churches too.
@Reid-yy5nw6 ай бұрын
@@siena4ever751 Nope! Christ said His church (meaning people who believed in him--not an institution) would be on the faith of Peter, and not the spineless man Peter himself who later denied Him! Poor excuse for any church head!
@GeorgiosLeo7 ай бұрын
It was,it is and it will be Orthodox.☦️
@gloriakattouah81537 ай бұрын
Amen!
@mariomt12767 ай бұрын
Amen!
@Awtv23566 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@danbos74656 ай бұрын
Yes it was orthodox, but since corona virus, now is called the wilderness church, away from mainstream orthodox churches.
@danbos74656 ай бұрын
The church is in big heresy.
@SwoleSlim7 ай бұрын
The early Church was Orthodox Catholic. Not Frankish papist. ☦️
@r.e.jr.11527 ай бұрын
The early church was neither.
@notsureyou7 ай бұрын
@@r.e.jr.1152 100% my brother or sister IN CHRIST :-)
@SwoleSlim7 ай бұрын
@@r.e.jr.1152 Then the early church is gone? The gates of hell prevailed over the church? Simply put you don’t believe anything that early church fathers did except what you want to pick and choose.
@SwoleSlim7 ай бұрын
@@notsureyou Orthodox means correct teaching ☦️
@SwoleSlim7 ай бұрын
@@r.e.jr.1152 Also for clarification so you don't say this in the future. Catholic means universal, and Orthodox means correct teaching. One of the first usages of Catholic in the early Church was from St. Ignatius of Antioch in AD 110
@leebarry51815 ай бұрын
The word catholic means universal. Orthodox means conforming to established doctrine. So, why did they split? Which one is right, or are they both wrong? Was it sin that caused the split? Why don't the Orthodox churches accept the authority of the Pope?
@alhilford23455 ай бұрын
My question exactly!
@geoffjs5 ай бұрын
Rejecting papal authority doesn’t make the Orthodox justified, rather they have similar views to Catholics but lack the essential charism of authority & have accordingly splintered as they have no Orthodox leader, not unlike the fractious Protestants who reject Jesus’ desire for unity Jn 17 11-23
@rickdavis27107 ай бұрын
Was Mary still a Virgin after giving birth to Jesus ? Matthew 1: 24 Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife: 25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS ( Yeshua in Hebrew). ( this verse says that Joseph did not know Mary sexually until after the Virgin birth of Jesus. Notice it says first born Son. If she stayed perpetually a Virgin then why does the Scripture say first born, that indicates after Jesus, Mary had other children with her husband Joseph). Matthew 12:46 While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, wanting to speak to him. 47 Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.” ( Matthew speaks of Jesus’ Mother and brothers here. The word Adelphoi is the Greek word here for brothers which says “ from the womb” meaning all from the same womb indicating blood brothers and not cousins). Matthew 13:54-57 (Jesus had Sisters too.) When He had come to His own country, He taught them in their synagogue, so that they were astonished and said, “Where did this Man get this wisdom and these mighty works? 55 Is this not the carpenter’s son? Is not His mother called Mary? And His brothers James, [a]Joses, Simon, and Judas? 56 And His sisters, are they not all with us? Where then did this Man get all these things?” 57 So they were offended at Him. ( the people hearing Jesus were offended by what He preached to them. I am sure that Jesus’ family was also looked down upon and not welcome and may have caused problems in Jesus’ family too). For Psalms 69:8-10 ( Speaks of the cross) 8. For I have endured scorn for Your sake. Disgrace has covered my face. 9. I have become a stranger to my brothers, a foreigner to my mother’s children. 10. For zeal for Your House consumed me- the insults of those who insulted You have fallen on me. ( Jesus Messiah was scorned and hated and disgraced by many. That to the point He became a stranger to his brethren. They would not acknowledge Him and kept away from Him and became as a foreigner to them. Mary His Mother it appears was not the same as her children. It is obvious that Jesus’ family was insulted and looked down upon because of the preaching of Jesus. Take note that when Jesus was Crucified only His Mother came from His family. Perhaps that may be why Jesus before His death gave care over to John the Apostle of His Mother. For John was the only Apostle there , all the others had fled or were in hiding. Mary was there to witness the Crucifixion , only her from the family of Jesus was there. No brothers or sisters). Mary and Joseph when married had Jesus as the Virgin born Son of Mary. In Israel it was important to have many children in the marriage. It would help support the parents especially when in old age. So Mary and Joseph had many children after Jesus. Gods commandment was for married couples be fruitful and multiply with many children. This is Biblical. Some groups say Mary stayed a Virgin her whole life but this is contrary to what Scripture says. Shalom! ‘Halelu Adonai' (הָלְלוּ אֲדוֹנַיִי).
@richardredmond14637 ай бұрын
The early church (30-150ad) was none of these, it was Christian. There were certainly no priestly garb, no general celibacy of leaders, no overall primacy of Rome, no praying to dead believers for help, no adoration of Mary, no indulgences, no building of or veneration of statues, no purgatory, no archbishops and of course, no Pope. Rewriting church history in favour of Roman Catholicism is delusional and more importantly dishonest. I hope you get that.
@savannahsmiles17977 ай бұрын
It wasn't "christian" as much as it was Messianic. Followers of MESSIAH...not Christos-Greek. Most early followers were not speaking Latin, might have spoke Greek. And none of the rites, rituals that the Roman Empire imposed on adherents to their created religion.
@jimmalloy72797 ай бұрын
You've obviously never read the Bible or the Church Fathers from the beginning. Was Jesus celibate? What did Paul say about it, and how did he live his life?
@DadoMac7 ай бұрын
What sect or denomination you belong to? Be honest. Don't just say you're a 'christian'
@kahokukomohana15057 ай бұрын
There was a succession of Popes, all from the First Pope - St. Peter.
@richardredmond14637 ай бұрын
@@kahokukomohana1505 There was never a succession of Popes. Paul outstripped Peter within 30 years of Christ's resurrection. We know this because most of the "camera action" from the middle of the Book of Acts onwards, moves to what Paul was doing, saying and teaching and Peter is hardly mentioned again. This appears to be because Peter and the other disciples were given a commission by Jesus to "go into all the world and preach the gospel" but they seemingly disobeyed this and stayed in Jerusalem instead. God raised up Paul to do what they refused to do. This shows that God puts more value on actual obedience than in theoretical succession. If there ever was such a concept as papal succession in God's mind, it was broken so many times by disobedient and at times degenerate popes, that He has long since abandoned the idea. 🙂
@dahdladla3839 Жыл бұрын
I listened to your videos every time, they're very much informative. Keep on sending out the information about our faith. Can you please get the information about Jehovah's witness 144 000 people.
@Poodle_Gun Жыл бұрын
It's usually better to not try understand crazy people, because it will make you go crazy! 😂 There are ex-Jehovah's Witnesses on KZbin who are great at covering the basics, if you want to evangelize to a Jehovah's Witness. I can't remember any of their names, unfortunately! 😅
@conorolaf17626 ай бұрын
The first church was Messianic Jew.
@user-hr5of7pi3j6 ай бұрын
No, look at the Council of Jerusalem, Acts 15 speaks about it Judaizers are heretics
@kennethprather96337 ай бұрын
Until about 350 the Church followed the Bible and was Orthodox like many Protestant Churches. Always look for a Church without False doctrines. Calvinism, Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox, ect all have tons of false doctrines. And make sure the Church it Trinitarian and believes Jesus is God and Man. Be careful many bad choices out there.
@SabbatarianCalvinist7 ай бұрын
Ah yes… I remember that part in Acts when the Apostles urged the Saints to confess the Marian Dogmas or they would be damned lol.
@Deadman621446 ай бұрын
Nlt there
@lilythomas8696 ай бұрын
And you believe in predestination the most absurd thing
@lilythomas8696 ай бұрын
You really don't understand Mariology to comment
@larrybedouin29216 ай бұрын
@@lilythomas869 Mary is not part of the Godhead. She is dead, so let her RIP until the resurrection.
@lilythomas8696 ай бұрын
@@larrybedouin2921 please study Mariology you really don't know what you are saying.
@arturorivas452011 ай бұрын
That 1600 or 1800 year (depending on your particular denomination) blank spot on the map is one of the biggest hurdles for me in taking Protestantism seriously as an option.
@AlexSanchez-dk3kf7 ай бұрын
Christians are christians. Not protestants. Protestantism is the way catholics refer about christians who dont accept catholic religion beliefs regarding teachings that come from catholic saints, popes, virgins, etc. All those man-made traditions and dogmas that are not clearly supported by God's word (the scriptures). God bless.
@bradleymosman83257 ай бұрын
Protestantism was a mercy extended to Holy Mother the Church. It was the mirror to aid Her in making a badly needed examination of conscience.
@blueeyes4027 ай бұрын
Luther became a pimp leasing out fallen nuns to dignitaries... some mercy! Libido and broken vows is the engine that pulls the reformation train... KIng Henry imposed compound interest and money lenders on his people and now the English think they were the crusaders...after burning down and looting their own church and clergy...and re tweaking the Bible... Oliver Cromwell was a puritan up there with Stalin/Mao...some mercy! And queen victoria showed no mercy! Protestantism is known globally as a shallow hate filled version of Christianity except of course in dueish america
@amerphillips7 ай бұрын
The early church was apostolic (trinitarian) practicing healing and miracles not catholic
@Paddymayne47387 ай бұрын
This statement is correct, however, it doesn’t state the fact that Catholicism derived from Judaism, Protestants came about when old Henry wanted things his own way. John the Baptist was Jesus cousin and a disciple of Jesus and was beheaded. The The Old Testament passages of the Catecism follows Judaism from Egypt right through to Easter. The last supper was in fact Passover.
@donaldbush11827 ай бұрын
Such poor scholarship here. It’s difficult to even pick a starting point. Even modern Catholic scholarship admits the church was not united until the late fourth century, there were hundreds of “holy books,” thousands of versions of those books, there were only hand copied versions of books full of mistakes. Reading at the time was rare, especially amongst the poor. There is nothing original anywhere. Just copies of copies of copies of copies of copies for centuries. The version of Catholicism practiced today would be absolutely foreign to anyone even in the fifth century. What this video creator imagines is simply a comforting nostalgic daydream based on a few hours of watching KZbin videos and google searches.
@jean-paullemaire85967 ай бұрын
There’s a hint of truth in what you say but no where near the degree. There were not “hundreds” of holy books, their were quite few manuscripts that were translated in to many different languages but they were all from the same texts. Also these texts were spread not just through reading but through oral tradition. Most of the Old Testament was known by memory and most early Christians, definitely the apostles, were able to pull from those scriptures by memory. Originality for documents does matter when you have copies of the original, they were good copies and scholars today agree that there weren’t many errors except for a typo there, a missed word here, but that’s form recovering paper 100s of years old….You still haven’t refuted the premise of the video which is Catholicism is the one true, historic, apostolic church, and you can never refute that because it’s just historical fact.
@physiocrat71437 ай бұрын
The Orthodox liturgy can be traced back to St James.
@somebodyu.usedtoknow7 ай бұрын
Crickets 🦗
@jean-paullemaire85967 ай бұрын
@@physiocrat7143 orthodoxy is so beautiful! Hopefully East and West can come together as one in the near future. East and West make one whole and complement each other.
@jacquesviljoen20897 ай бұрын
The early church spoke in tongues, baptized in the name of Jesus, believed in salvation through the blood of Jesus, didn’t pray to saints or Mary, did miracles, had no pope. Denominations didn’t exist. Read the Book of Acts. I don’t see the Catholic church at all.
@jacquesviljoen20897 ай бұрын
@@ErcolePontecorvo Thank you for your concern over my soul. Answer me this kindly, would the disciples deliberately disobey Jesus' command that you quoted, since all the examples in Acts where they baptized new believers, they baptized in the Name of Jesus. Jesus commanded, the disciples obeyed, they baptised in the Name of Jesus. There is no error. "The baptismal formula was changed from the name of JESUS CHRIST to the words Father, Son, & Holy Ghost by the Catholic Church in the second century. Everywhere in the oldest sources it states that baptism took place in the name of Jesus Christ." ~ BRITANNICA ENCYCLOPEDIA 11TH edition, Vol 3, Pg 365-366
@peterhenryzepeda34843 ай бұрын
The Catholic Church speaks in tongues, believes that salvation comes from the blood of Jesus, and has several miracles done by its saints. The Trinitarian formula goes back to the Dideche which was created by Christians who knew the apostles. The first written prayer to Mary is from 250AD, and we know that it had to be prayed sometime before it was written. The Bishop of Rome, and successor of Peter, had primacy, that’s called the office of the Pope. Yes, denominations didn’t exist that’s the point.
@jackm7253 ай бұрын
speaking in tongues just means speaking many languages. not some made up babbling. found the pentecostal
@jacquesviljoen20893 ай бұрын
@@jackm725 From the Thayer dictionary: of a new kind, unprecedented, novel, uncommon, unheard of… I recommend you really read every New Testament scripture regarding speaking in tongues. St. Paul even said you can pray in an unknown tongue and with your understanding. I know you are not open to learn. But at least you can’t say you didnt know. ✌🏻
@livingpurgatory32 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU!
@seanochroidheain6 ай бұрын
Eh, the earliest Roman records from the time of the Apostles show that there was a Catholic Church. Roman reports to Rome about Christians and Christianity continuously refer to the church as the Catholic (Universal) Church.
@winterheart19847 ай бұрын
Catholic church sets up came.300.years after the death of Jesus, the romans have been busy persecuting the small.churches prior to that and the set up of early believers church are like that of the protestant churches today... read the book of acts
@jabohabo38217 ай бұрын
No...they simply followed christ. The word you take from "katholikos" simply means Universal or all the churches. As it was used in acts to describe the churches they had set up so far. It was never the brand for the churches it simply described the many of them. As for the veneration of mary, the saints and angels! Let's go over them one at a time with scripture not opinion. Luke 11:27 27 As Jesus was saying these things, a woman in the crowd called out, “Blessed is the mother who gave you birth and nursed you.” 28 He replied, “Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and obey it Also let us not forget when his mother and brothers were trying to simply get his attention to come in and speak with him. He instead told the crowd that any who follow his father's will is his mother, his brother and sister. As for the saints, let's not forget the many times people attempted to pray to or through the saints instead of christ. Take paul for example, happy that he had only baptised a few for their wrong teachings and belief. For some were claiming they followed under paul or Apollos He then went on to exclaim it is not he that they should follow but christ and God, that there is only one intercessor, christ. Same thing whenever anyone tried to worship angels. Only 3 angels were ever named in the bible yet the catholic doctrine names many...and relies on them for protection via amulets, same with saints. Patron saints of protection, patron saints of the lost etc etc etc. Relying on a graven image to save you, which said saints openly admonished. 1 timothy 4 1The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. 2Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron. 3They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth. 4For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, 5because it is consecrated by the word of God and prayer. 6If you point these things out to the brothers and sisters, a you will be a good minister of Christ Jesus, nourished on the truths of the faith and of the good teaching that you have followed. 7Have nothing to do with godless myths and old wives’ tales; rather, train yourself to be godly. 8For physical training is of some value, but godliness has value for all things, holding promise for both the present life and the life to come. 9This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance. 10That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe
@bikesrcool_19586 ай бұрын
Uh, the first verse you presented says nothing on veneration of the saints, it’s clearly showing that anyone can be in relation to Christ when they follow him, it’s not a VIP pass to commune with him.
@bikesrcool_19586 ай бұрын
I mean come on? Is Christ making a teaching point or denying his family right there?
@jabohabo38214 ай бұрын
@bikesrcool_1958 I'm sorry for your denial.of scripture perhaps you would provide the verse saying to pray through saints? But I ask you be careful because if you choose a cherry picked verse I will include all surrounding context with it. Nowhere does the word say to venerate saints. It says that we are to be saints however. That all are to be saints who follow the word. Everyone should take notice how.they offer opinion not scripture. Never scripture in context
@cheese98794 ай бұрын
@@jabohabo3821 I'm sorry for your denial, perhaps you can provide a verse saying the Bible alone?
@jabohabo38214 ай бұрын
@cheese9879 the entirety of it says no other doctrine. You have displayed enough of what I just said that it's unneeded. Making a claim that the word needs another doctrine goes so starkly against the word. Goodbye
@grimmevol43442 жыл бұрын
do you think Jesus cares about man-made religion and it's many rules that are not biblical? he cares about your heart and if you accept his gift of salvation or not. End of story
@imisschristendom52932 жыл бұрын
This is what Im hearing from you. MY INPRETATION OF THE BIBLE, TRUMPS HISTORY
@johnyang1420 Жыл бұрын
You mention the bible….super! Who told you what the bible is? Catholic church did in 4th century. Why do you deny that authority now? Jesus started Catholic church. Protestant churches started by men.
@WilliamFlemming-gk3cn5 ай бұрын
@@johnyang1420 Roman church founded by men with a desire for power on a false doctrine.
@petewaterfield7467 ай бұрын
The early church was Christian, not catholic, orthodox or Protestant.
@samuelnoha4907 ай бұрын
Well Said!
@gloriakattouah81537 ай бұрын
The early church was and is the Orthodox Church until Satan divided it and Catholics split off into their own religion.
@siena4ever7517 ай бұрын
Please research the Early Church Fathers. Opinions are fine. Facts are better.
@goodcook4646 ай бұрын
That is why you are mislead, you are so ignorant. May the ligth of Christ shine on your heart and open your eyes to the truth, and the truth will set you free.
@geoffjs6 ай бұрын
Jesus founded His One True Church Mt 16 18-19 that became known as Catholic or Universal in 110 which codified your bible in 382. His Church is the fullness of Truth 1 Tim 3:15 & has existed for 2000 yrs, in spite of sinful men, proof of its divine origin No organisation, such as Protestantism can survive without hierarchy & a unifying authoritative interpreter, the fruits being confusion, division & scandal of 000’s of sects, resulting from personal interpretation, which is not of Jesus who willed unity Jn 17 11-21 No Protestant has ever been able to explain why personal interpretation, if guided by the Holy Spirit has resulted in 000’s sects proving that either the Holy Spirit is wrong or more likely, Protestantism! There are none so blind as those with a darkened intellect which the Holy Spirit obviously isn’t enlightening! Consider the damage caused to society by relativism, caused by there being many “truths” of Protestantism which have resulted in contraception, which until 1930, all denominations prohibited until the Anglican broke away in 1930, abortion, IVF, divorce, SSM, LGBGT, transgenderism etc. Protestantism has a lot to answer for!
@arasstudiosproduction24227 ай бұрын
The Catholic Church was not the first church. The Catholic Church was started by a pagan king.
@Kitiwake4 ай бұрын
No it is the early church in it's fundamental practices and structure.
@arasstudiosproduction24224 ай бұрын
@@Kitiwake no it isn’t. The early church wasn’t called the Roman Catholic Church. The first church was in Antioch. The Church never had a name due to the persecution. They had to meet in secret. The Romans were the ones that persecuted the early Christians which consisted of Jews, Greeks, some Romans, Asians, and even Africans. The Roman Catholic Church would come later, during the reign of Constantine I in 500 ad. Constantine was a Roman pagan before converting to Christianity, it was through his reign that the founding of the Roman Catholic Church emerged.
@dartheli74005 ай бұрын
The early church was catholic, not Roman Catholic. Big difference.
@He_who_lives_forever5 ай бұрын
Peter and Paul founded the church in Rome ❤
@dartheli74005 ай бұрын
@@He_who_lives_forever Sure they did (not so sure about Peter, but for argument‘s sake), just like the Apostles founded churches in Jerusalem, Antioch, Ephesus, Galatia, etc.
@geoffjs5 ай бұрын
@@dartheli7400Those Churches that the apostles founded are still Catholic today with different cultural rites all loyal to Rome.
@dartheli74005 ай бұрын
@@geoffjs Prove it.
@geoffjs5 ай бұрын
Proof is that they exist. Google 23 Catholic cultural rites.
@WilliamFlemming-gk3cn4 ай бұрын
Early church also wasnt roman.
@robertweidner24803 ай бұрын
It was when Sts. Peter and Paul were martyred there.
@NeuSatz727 ай бұрын
The Church is still Catholic but NOT ROMAN CATHOLIC. It is called the ORTHODOX CHURCH. Rome was excommunicated in 1053 AD by the ONE HOLY CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH over the heretic introduction of the "Filioque" in the western patriarchate of Rome. From then on the Catholic Church calls itself Orthodox and the church of Rome calls itself roman catholic, that is according the new teaching/dogma of Rome. From this fallen part of the Church many heretic movements errupted, most well known the protestent "churches" as a form of protest against the misconduct seen in the roman catholic church.
@darryldavis43610 ай бұрын
This sounds like a lot of Catholic quotes from ancient Roman Catholics. The early church started in Jerusalem, by you can guess it, THE JEWS. Jesus and the Apostles was Jews. Christianity evolved from there. In time, Christianity grew and grew, The early Christians was beat, arrested and killed, by you can guess it, the Romans. The early Apostles went out from Jerusalem and taught about Christianity, they were brave men and women willing to die for what they believed in, they believed in Jesus and Christianity. Rome was a bunch of pagans, worshipping idols, for a long time until the ruler Constantine made them become Christians and he was influenced by his mother, Thank God for mothers. Some where in time the Roman Catholic Church grew and grew, and a lot of denominations branched off or out from Catholicism, they protested the Catholic Church because they{the Catholics} were not going by the Bible, they had created man made doctrines and traditions, and some of them resembled the pagan rituals. Now we have a lot of denominations, but look at it on the good side IF they are Christians, the that is a Good thing. Catholics want to say they were the first, But Why is the word Catholic Not in the Bible, No mention of a Pope, We are All in the same boat of Christianity, trying to get to heaven and have eternal life, some just worship differently.
@janhenderson67747 ай бұрын
Spot on. Look what the Catholic church did to people. The early Catholics wasn't even allowed to have a bible.
@wms727 ай бұрын
You certainly have amassed a lot of ignorance
@darryldavis4367 ай бұрын
@@wms72 I Am amazed at the fact that a church does Not go completely by the Holy Bible and teaches their members to bow down to graven carved images, something God commanded man Not to do. A church that claims a wafer is Jesus, but has No power of Jesus. Claims to be responsible for establishing the Bible, but No mention of their church in the Bible.But YES, they are Christians because they accept Jesus as the Savior, the believe in Repentance and doing the will of God. So really who is ignorant, such a harsh unchristian thing to say.
@darryldavis4367 ай бұрын
@@wms72 I am amazed how some Catholics don’t know their Bible and don’t read it and just accept what the church teaches them like sheep.
@tasiaflynn35497 ай бұрын
@darryldavis436 I feel you hate the Catholic Church
@toyvillageandtrains.24207 ай бұрын
The institutionalized " Church " evolved into a highly structural, sophisticated and eventually run like a multinational corporation that is highly profitable and powerful. The original church has no " registered name ". It was neither " Roman Catholic " nor " Eastern Orthodox". These names came only after The Great Schism. There were always independent minded congregation who doesn5 2an5cto be connected with this Empires pretend8ng to be religious or churches.
@blairzettl39336 ай бұрын
There are at least two exceptions to your assertion: the Syriac Rite was founded by St. Thomas in 52 AD . and, though you mentioned it, the Coptic Rite founded by St. Mark did not come into communion with the Church until the 18th century. They are now, but they weren't for a 18 centuries.
@johntondre61706 ай бұрын
God is very "SPECIFIC" about how he commands mankind to worship him. That is the Catholic Church and Mass period end of story. When other religions mock the Catholic faith they are mocking God himself. I pray for their conversion. I fear the living God and worship him as Jesus instructed us at the Last Supper.
@AaronLKinney6 ай бұрын
The Catholic Church Has Deceived You.
@alhilford23455 ай бұрын
@@AaronLKinney: The Catholic Church is the Mystical Body of Christ on Earth. Christ would never deceive anyone. That's Satan's game!
@Goliad_Respector7 ай бұрын
Why don’t you state YOUR case? It’s like you’re ALL terrified people will actually read their Bibles? It’s getting ridiculous. Who was Paul railing against his entire ministry?
@RutilioNamaziano1 Жыл бұрын
"(Credo) Ecclesiam UNAM, Santcam, Catholicam et Apostolicam. "
@joffryvangrondelle6 ай бұрын
That's why the protestant reformed confession says'; ''We believe all in one Holy Catholic Apostolic Christian Church.''
@garryrecamadas15486 ай бұрын
Praise to you, Lord Jesus Christ...Amen!!!
@emmanuellebediat1653 Жыл бұрын
Many protestants heresy are gnostics idéologie
@Procopius4647 ай бұрын
The Protestant idea of heresy is anything that contradicts the Bible, whereas the RC idea of heresy is anything that contradicts the Roman fiat declarations.
@MarkBerg-tk8js6 ай бұрын
All words in singular, Jesus left us one church, and the mass.
@nodrtbike6 ай бұрын
The mass is not in scripture and you are lost.
@kanieraliapeng72427 күн бұрын
@@nodrtbikeyoure the lost one buddy
@loveispatient08087 ай бұрын
“Catholic “ as defined as “universal “ NOT “Roman Catholic “!!!! Period.
@DadoMac7 ай бұрын
And your sect or denomination can not be revealed because if you reveal your sect, we will find out that is a fake church. Ok, seriously, if you're honest christian, what sect or denomination you belong to? Don't be deceitful, telling us simply bible believing christian. You got your own congregation. What is it?
@Ryan_Christopher7 ай бұрын
“One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church,” says the Creed. Not, “One, Holy, Universal, and Apostolic Church.”
@landondugas60566 ай бұрын
@@Ryan_ChristopherCatholic comes from a Greek word that means universal.
@joerodriguez60436 ай бұрын
This is correct
@didoburns6 ай бұрын
The term "Roman Catholic " is a protestant innovation.
@camerapasteurize72157 ай бұрын
The early church was *not* Roman Catholic. This is deceitful. Roman Catholicism did not exist in the form it is in now until almost 400 years after Jesus, when Christianity became the official religion of Rome and began adopting the hierarchical structure it has now. Even then it took many generations to adopt many of the traditions it has now. If anything, the very early church resembled non-denominational churches in terms of organizational structure more any others, with many smaller independent churches scattered across the known world, keeping in touch with and supporting each other, but not creating a rigid, overarching authority system.
@GuyWillson-bu6nz7 ай бұрын
The Roman Catholic church was NOT instantaneous! It was OT scriptural in NT setting. After AD 100 the persecutions mounted up and the NT canon complete evidenced by general usage of the scriptures that make up our Bible today (not apocrypha) in Greek. After 325AD the bishop of Rome began to assert seniority and also they and other bishops (church pastors and leaders) like the two Eusebiuses accepted Constantine influence allowing some Roman pagan imput into Christian practice. By 500AD Roman Catholicism was established and the see of Rome took central stage and asserted rights of dominion over Christian's. The Celtic congregations in England calculated Easter on the Jewish calendar but at the Synod of Whitby in mid 600sAD the Celtics were forced to accept Romish supremacy including their Easter calculation. Roman Catholicism found its fullest expression in the Medaeval period until 1350s to 1550s when Biblical Christianity began to rise up in England, Bohemia, Germany and the Netherlands. This began the North/South spiritual divide in Europe. Eastern Catholicism continued from Constantinople and went North to Russia and Easter Europe but was wiped out of North Africa by Islamic invasion. Despite some similarities of style, the Early Church was NOT Roman Catholic and Peter was not the first pope.
@dovonovich7 ай бұрын
Two things I’m fond of saying: 1) The Reformation happened for a reason. 2) Don’t pray to dead sinners; they can’t hear you.
@mil-ns3rc7 ай бұрын
Didn't Jesu say before Abraham I AM. ABRAHAM WANTED TO SEE HIS DAY(JESUS), AND HE DID ??
@ElessarofGondor7 ай бұрын
1. The reformation had largely political motivations for occurring. Luther wouldn't have gotten started on the path he did without politically minded German princes. 2. The book of Revelation seems to contradict this, as does early Christian graffiti in the catacombs.
@LadyCathryn7 ай бұрын
According to secular history the Catholic church was founded in about 330 AD by Emperor Constantine who declared himself by the title Pontifex Maximus which was adopted by popes.
@JustfineinChicago5 ай бұрын
You actually have the right answer! If one studies history carefully, the early church kept the 7-th Day Sabbath. It was not until Constantine, in the first century, had what he thought was a vision of seeing the cross in the sky, during an epic battle, did he make a ruling that Christiandom would keep Sunday as Sabbath.
@LadyCathryn5 ай бұрын
Contrary to your belief thye early church did not meet on the Jewish sabbath.Paul gave the gospel to Jews when rejected he went to the Gentiles who met on Sundays
@JustfineinChicago5 ай бұрын
@@LadyCathryn: You should study your church history again. The early church didn’t keep Sunday sabbath! Scripture is also very clear in the old testament and new that Saturday sabbath shall be kept in the new heaven and new earth. After all Jesus is still a Jew
@PabloVelasco-hr3ko4 ай бұрын
wrong Constantine never called himself the Pontifex Maximus cry more satanist
@oldmah62417 ай бұрын
The early church in the UK was Celtic, not Catholic or Protestant.