The False Definition of Objectivity (Part II) - Facts Don't Change

[@chrisnaaden3496]

25:45 eureka!

[@Mokinono45]

36:19 Objective refers to the "Thing in itself" it is also called the neumenon, See E. Kant. The subjective refers to the phenomenon which is the thing for the being experiencing it. This is why the paradigm is Objective/Subjective and why it is very limited. You and the GF have already pointed out that things constantly change, thus the black and white reality of this empirical juvenile system should be tossed out. The objective/subjective paradigm is specifically an enlightenment concept and presupposes the faith of Lutheranism or Anglicanism, (and nobody ever points this out because it's only implied) to round it out. Also, yelling at your GF isn't content.

[@military_snake]

yeah... i've got a raised voice problem. we rectified it afterwards, and i apologized.

[@validcorp.8670]

Regarding your section on good vs bad writing, aren't the theories of good writing derived from our knowledge of human psychology, like how the theories of humor such as the incongruity theory (how we find confusion when the punchline doesn't match the expectation we did have is funny)?

[@military_snake]

I believe it's a combination of knowledge of human psychology AND, interlaced with that, certain themes, tropes, story archetypes, and models that are best for a person to see and desire to model their life after. When all people had back in ancient times were stories, these were how the great plays and folklore really began. Humor evolves from that later on. I was rather brief with it, and while I think I explained it better in Part I, I really don't give it as much time as I would have liked to... but that might just have to be for another time.

[@validcorp.8670]

@@military_snake thank you for the response and honestly I agree on you with such a strong topic about objectivity of philosophy (something that you can so easily claim is that facts of the universe and an impossibly large project that will continue till the day of judgement when we will meet our lord) you need to spend the time to make something because you are going is a concept large than a simple refutation of UFR. Take that time because you will need it, also remember to remove your Christian beliefs from such a widespread topic, at the end of the day our religious beliefs are beliefs, they are the historical evidences we see and believe that as the truth that the universe will show us, everyone is running to find it and all of them. Realize that religion is also as much a perception we are all moving.

[@Mokinono45]

35:20 Kant, Locke and Hume were 200+ years ago. Again, you're out of your element here. You're literally making things up.

[@military_snake]

ah... gummed up my facts again. darn it.