So the fifth crusade was the fourth crusade but without changing course and sacking constantinople
@redhussar14364 жыл бұрын
And with hungarian boys :D
@forickgrimaldus83014 жыл бұрын
If anything the 5th was the reverse of the 4th while the 4th suffered from poor Oeganization and Logistics on the level of Dashcon, the 5th was a Failure in the tactical sense as the Crusaders picked a flood prone area of the Nile.
@Outlaw89083 жыл бұрын
@@forickgrimaldus8301 That and not taking that deal offered. It was not a terrible one considering the state of the sultanate.
@forickgrimaldus83013 жыл бұрын
@@Outlaw8908 but they were beaten by then so they really had no choice by then.
@Gatorfan12e9 жыл бұрын
What a heart breaking disaster for the crusaders. Pelagio really fumbled the ball there at the end.....
@R9D6xC296 жыл бұрын
I thought the fifth crusade was desrupted by the Mongol invasion...
@feras83115 жыл бұрын
sth up no it is victory for muslims
@noman84125 жыл бұрын
They were willing to give you Jerusalem!? Why didn't you take it!?
@someguy-cv9jd3 жыл бұрын
Its fortifications were destroyed so was impossible to hold
@MANGO_BANGO_roadto1k6 ай бұрын
@@someguy-cv9jdthey were willing to repair the forts
@DrRockefeller3 ай бұрын
The crusaders also thought that they could get better terms without surrendering
@anthonyhargis68558 жыл бұрын
Surely being a Cardinal equates with being a General, no? Yeah, I didn't think so.
@melisende11059 жыл бұрын
Dear Real Crusades History: I just came back from my annual pilgrimage to Jerusalem. My great interest in Crusades and Templars History is enriched by physical presence of what they left behind. Anywhere you go in Jerusalem and the surrounding areas you see the physical evidence of their dedication, love and faith. Throughout many years I had been looking for Baldwins' relocated tombs. Also I am desperately looking for Baldwin III and Amalric's tombs which according to some historians were moved to Virgin Mary's church in Kidron Valley. I am granted an exclusive permission to stay in Virgin Mary's church by myself (the priests lock the doors and let me to pray there all alone for 3 hours). I know each stone, each arch, each corner of the church. I can provide you with detailed photos of the church. The only possible location I found for the reburied remains of two brothers is the wall next to St. Joseph's tomb. Please, if you have any information help me to locate them.
@justinian539 жыл бұрын
You lucky man
@melisende11059 жыл бұрын
justinian53 Thank You for the comment. I am a woman, who is very much involved in religious affairs of Christian Orthodox Church and love so dear to me Catholic church. I am truly blessed with a privilege of an exclusive grant to spend hours by myself in the Christian holiest cites in Jerusalem and in Bethany at St. Lazarus' church. I am going to share some pictures from my pilgrimage on my facebook: Mona Oganesyan
@RealCrusadesHistory9 жыл бұрын
melisende1105 I wish I had information on that, unfortunately I do not. But congratulations on your journey! That's wonderful. Love your user name as well. Melisende is a main character in my upcoming novel.
@righ-naalba67159 жыл бұрын
Brilliant as always thanks again.
@jonathandubbs23959 жыл бұрын
Awesome video! Though didn't the Templars also support Pelagio's decision to not make the deal?
@AFROJOE23234 жыл бұрын
he literally offered jerusalem and Pelagius didn't take it. wow, the greed of the church never ceases to amaze
@RealCrusadesHistory4 жыл бұрын
It's a bit more complicated. They didn't take the offer because he wouldn't also give the hinterland fortresses that protected Jerusalem. Basically, his offer was empty.
@AFROJOE23234 жыл бұрын
@@RealCrusadesHistory OOOhhh ok I understand now, thanks! Your channel is awesome by the way
@RealCrusadesHistory4 жыл бұрын
No problem thank you!
@RealCrusadesHistory9 жыл бұрын
@RealCrusadesHistory9 жыл бұрын
***** Thanks my friend!
@paulbard96389 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't it be a great student resource to have all the student histories on one dvd?
@tommyodonovan38837 жыл бұрын
The key to Jerusalem is Egypt.
@bassault9 жыл бұрын
Yay! One of my favorites.
@RealCrusadesHistory9 жыл бұрын
Frankish Knight Hope you enjoy it man!
@bassault9 жыл бұрын
Real Crusades History Of course I will, because most of your videos are splendid.
@crismarkflores64855 жыл бұрын
Pls reply me if I am right.. back to third crusade did crusade lost to Saladin? Or just lost by financial/army problem?
@RealCrusadesHistory5 жыл бұрын
The Third Crusade was successful. The Third Crusade defeated Saladin, taking territory from him. kzbin.info/www/bejne/oaSVgqujl7KHd7s
@mashfiqhossainalvi49354 жыл бұрын
They got only a little amount of territory.....they didn't get jarusalem completely
@RandomAccessMemory4 жыл бұрын
They won battles, but were unsuccessful in their main aim to get Jerasulem.
@Emad0ElDin2 жыл бұрын
@@RealCrusadesHistory as long as they couldn't fulfill the goals of the 3rd crusade then they had failed with no doubt!!!
@thecrusaderhistorian98203 жыл бұрын
Very good video! I can't believe they wasted several opportunities! Wow!
@tracybalboa78342 жыл бұрын
Nice job
@jbearmcdougall16466 жыл бұрын
What sort of numbers are we talking about... Size wishes...!!
@mohamedhamed-we9no3 жыл бұрын
Hey guys i,m from mansoura and this battle is noted in a big banner hanged in the city gates
@kristijanmehun23827 жыл бұрын
Wait, wait.... Why is the Third Crusade a Christian victory? I tought it was a draw
@RealCrusadesHistory7 жыл бұрын
Because the Christians conquered territory and the Muslims lost territory. It was a Christian victory and a Muslim loss.
@kristijanmehun23827 жыл бұрын
Real Crusades History ...ok...but wasn't the point to take back Jerusalem?
@RealCrusadesHistory7 жыл бұрын
No. The point was to 1) recover the Kingdom 2) stop Saladin's war effort. Richard specified these aims in his communications.
@porkchop23253 жыл бұрын
1st crusades sack of jerusalem christian victory 2nd crusades christian defeat 3rd crusades christian victory 4th crusades christian victory 5th crusades christian defeat 6th crusades christian victory 7th crusades..... Idk...
@abzyy97423 жыл бұрын
@@porkchop2325 the fourth is more like a civil war Lol
@MrJarth9 жыл бұрын
3:30 that is pretty fucking cool.
@MrJarth9 жыл бұрын
Ah what a shame. Al-Adil was a smart man though.
@OmegaStudios3218 жыл бұрын
Is the exact date of Damietta's surrender to the Muslims known? I've seen sources that place the dates 5th and 7th of September just after the crusaders defeat, (albeit those dates are attributed to the same event, so there is some contradiction there). Great video though, I really like these concise overviews.
@UncleWigz Жыл бұрын
John de Brienne is my ancestor
@diegorobles76544 жыл бұрын
According to Wikipedia the hungarian king didn't engage in much warfare beacause the siege weapons didn't arrive on time, is that true?
@laciihasz47344 жыл бұрын
The hungarian king took a huge cavalry force,they prefered open battles rather than sieges. They defeated the local forces in open battles, but did not engage in siege warfare.
@arshkhannn6 жыл бұрын
what was the cause of the 5th event plz TELL ME
@justabitround36036 жыл бұрын
*DEUS VULT*
@jadadra37298 жыл бұрын
Nice Video :)
@hotpaprika678 жыл бұрын
The most disciplined army was Hungarians, as the disgusting failure of the Fourth Crusade had demoralised Christians the most trusted of all the Kings was Andrew II of Hungary who was respected even by his enemies as the most noble of the Kings of Europe.. Also he lead the biggest Army ever in the history of the Crusades, this you fail to mention..
@RealCrusadesHistory8 жыл бұрын
I didn't mention that because it's not true. Andrew II did not lead the largest army in the history of the Crusades. Frederick Barbarossa, for example, led a considerably larger army than the Hungarian contingent of the Fifth Crusade. The idea that he was "the most noble king in Europe" is a matter of opinion, and you're welcome to it, but that's all it is. Also, there's not a shred of evidence that the Fourth Crusade had "demoralized" Christians.
@hotpaprika678 жыл бұрын
Many historians believe that this is an exaggeration, however, and that the true figure might be closer to 15,000 men, including 3,000 knights. Hungary never even took part in the Fourth Crusade as it was corrupt campaign, after this massacre of Christians the most honourable King the Pope found worthy to lead the Fourth Crussade was Andrew II.
@RealCrusadesHistory8 жыл бұрын
You're not making any sense.
@hotpaprika678 жыл бұрын
. Frederick Barbarossa Many historians believe that this is an exaggeration, however, and that the true figure might be closer to 15,000 men.
@Joetheshow4455 жыл бұрын
Crusaders don't get enough cred for what they were able to accomplish, they practically won here and Jerusalem was surrendered to them, soooooooooooo close. And lets not forget how successful and swift King Richard the Lionheart's military campaigns were, and most of all the greatest crusade, the 1st one where they conquered and first established the Latin Christian Kingdoms.
@aliyaser76982 жыл бұрын
Jesus and the result of Richard's war What is nothing Saladin benefited