This just felt like this was going to be some generic kids film featuring other animals, but the producers got the rights to Garfield last minute so they edited him into it in post.
@islesofforeignrails79177 ай бұрын
I will like to add in the original concept arts, Jinx had tall feline bodyguards instead of henchdogs, Garfield's father was going to be alligator food in an abandoned mall, for not getting the cream for his boss in favour of payment, and Jon's dad was originally going to appear in the film (but they cut him out, meaning that there was no B-plot about Jon finding his missing two pets out in the open) So much wasted potenial, despite those three original drafts tend to have Garfield as his smart mouthed and sardonic self (even if it doesn't work with Chris Pratt during 2023) and the film's shift in tone.
@TayoEXE7 ай бұрын
"There's not a whole lot we know about Garfield." ... There's like 40 years worth of daily comics from the original creator. Several Tv shows. Movies. Games.
@Firestar-TV7 ай бұрын
I guess he meant that we know not much about his Past before he got adopted by John. He could've definitely worded it better if that's what he's actually meant
@TayoEXE7 ай бұрын
@Firestar-TV Actually, we do. Off the top of my head, the comic explains he was born in an Italian restaurant, and he meets his mom in the same restaurant later. He loved eating the lasagna there, and his distaste for mice is because of this. His family were stray cats who were mousers, good at catching prey. Garfield is like the opposite, which is why he loves the pampered lazy life at Jon's house. Jon adopts Garfield from a pet shop later. His dad is mentioned as being a mouser, but his only depiction was on merchandise. Yeah, I'd say that technically his father's story was not known much about if that's what he was trying to say, but it's obviously not that important of a point as Garfield has never related to his parents (but loves his mom at least).
@Firestar-TV7 ай бұрын
@@TayoEXE good to know. I guess the other Movie Adaptation also got it wrong then, because if I remember, in the other one, he got him from a Breeder
@TheMagicRobot7 ай бұрын
Reminds me of how KK said Star Wars doesn't have any extended media to draw from.
@hypnotised-clover7 ай бұрын
Garfield as a character has existed since 1976, but we know nothing about him at all, we don't even know if he likes mondays or not.
@fishjones46187 ай бұрын
Walt Disney famously said “I don’t make kids ‘ movies. I make movies. Because the kids don’t buy the tickets. The parents do”. The worst movies, like Golden Films or Goodtimes, tend to underestimate kids and make crap like this.
@rclark7777 ай бұрын
The weirdest part is that the whole "orange cat reunites with their long-lost criminal father" thing is taken from... Heathcliff. Yeah. The only one of Garfield's parents I remember being mentioned in the original comic was his mom.
@monsterguyx7 ай бұрын
Oh yeah... I remember Heathcliff's dad was always pictured in prison stripes lol
@gracekim19987 ай бұрын
Hmm 🤔 I see
@TransistorBased7 ай бұрын
'Catflix' Bruh, was 'Petflix' too hard for these writers?
@islesofforeignrails79177 ай бұрын
In the original drafts, it was intended as a KZbin spoof, for Odie controlling the remote, making Garfield claim it's voice operated and says some words like a detective, and it only lasts a minute. I guess Petflix sounds more clever.
@CanIswearinmyhandle7 ай бұрын
The way Garfield says "Jon's gonna put me on a diet now and I don't want to go on a diet" in that game really cracks me up
@phelous7 ай бұрын
It's so bad, I love it.
@limalepakko60747 ай бұрын
Is it better or worse than the Grinch game
@UJEvans7 ай бұрын
This proves that the science of adapting classic characters has gotten "eeeven laazier..."
@ALLINE8357 ай бұрын
its a good movie tf
@jlev10287 ай бұрын
@ALLINE835 No it's not. You just lack standards.
@gracekim19987 ай бұрын
@@jlev1028ok calm down 😅 there’s nothing wrong with enjoying it 🤷♀️ also there’s no reason to be rude
@gracekim19987 ай бұрын
@@ALLINE835I enjoyed it too. Just keep in mind we all have different opinions and technically a lot of the people here are pretty big Garfield fans 😅 which is fine🤷♀️
@kaylemathewcomendador69647 ай бұрын
Weirdly fitting for a character like Garfield 😂🤷♂️.
@cameronstone44957 ай бұрын
The worst promo they did for this movie was a whole Jeopardy category, hosted by Chris Pratt, about US President James Garfield. You could just feel how flimsy the justification for this every time Pratt read out a clue.
@MarcAquino10957 ай бұрын
That’s Sony synergy for ya.
@masterfarr82657 ай бұрын
Chris Pratt probably doesn’t know a goddamn thing about Garfield. Like how he doesn’t know a single damn thing about Mario. He just probably read a wiki article on both.
@Spawn3X57 ай бұрын
Jeopardy died with Trebek
@Cdr20027 ай бұрын
@@masterfarr8265Mario at least had a decent script that could carry his lack of knowledge
@Phantomsangel7 ай бұрын
Good lord how much did they spend on advertising for this and whyyyy!?
@PapaTaurean7 ай бұрын
This feels more like a Heathcliff movie than Garfield.
@Boonehams7 ай бұрын
That's actually an excellent point.
@mikekz44897 ай бұрын
From the description, it’s like making a Peanuts movie, except Snoopy is a regular dog, Lucy is nice to everyone and Charlie Brown never worries about anything.
@sakunaruful7 ай бұрын
That sounds like an alternative universe. I’d say the animated Tintin movie from Spielberg and Blue Sky’s Peanuts Movie are more faithful to the comic source material. RIP Blue Sky Studios.
@wstine797 ай бұрын
The movie has broke Phelous and Allison to the point where they'd rather goof off with the Bootleg Garfield toys than continue to talk about the Garfield 2024 film.
@markiangooley7 ай бұрын
Allison is learning from Phelan. It’s so charming!
@theoneguyoverthere7 ай бұрын
I mean, I wouldn’t you?
@Rebochan7 ай бұрын
I mean I think 90 minutes of a camera pointed at Allison and Phelous playing with Bootleg Garfield would be a more fun experience than watching any of the actual Garfield movies
@punkysnarks7 ай бұрын
At least this movie has the ballsy and original storyline of Garfield getting separated from Jon! ...Well, except for these: -Here Comes Garfield -That episode of Garfield and Friends where he gets kicked out of the house and goes with a little girl -Garfield On The Town -That comic arc where Garfield and Odie get lost and end up in the circus -The first Garfield movie -Garfield Gets Real -Garfield's Fun Fest
@ShayLaLaLooHoo7 ай бұрын
You know the storyline they _should_ adapt in a Garfield movie? Garfield investigating Jon's basement.
@1000huzzahs7 ай бұрын
yeah but other than THOSE...
@itsjayden80025 ай бұрын
Chris Pratt as the ghost of Lyman's inner monologue
@monsterguyx7 ай бұрын
The main problem is that studios just don't seem to get the appeal of Garfield. They see that this property is a cartoon, so they try to force Garfield into the "standard kids' movie" box, when Garfield has never really been made strictly for kids. Even the most iconic "I hate Mondays, I love lasagna," jokes were more aimed at eliciting chuckles from adults than appealing to children. Also, the Garfield strips have never been particularly plot-driven; their character-based humor has always been about one-liners and quick sight gags. The setting almost never leaves Jon's house, and the humor is found in simple day-to-day interactions, not wacky adventures. Also also, it seems they want to avoid the fact that Garfield is, actually, kind of a jerk. I mean, he is basically a self-centered, egotistical character at heart. And if they don't understand how a character can be lovable while also being kind of a jerk... Well then, it's clear that they've never had a cat like Garfield.
@Ozymandias2x7 ай бұрын
"We changed a bunch of Garfield's personality traits because it's 2024. On a related note, I like pasta because my house is made of bricks."
@nearandfarexplorers51257 ай бұрын
I love how the review morphed into Phealous and Allison playing with Garfield toys!
@roarkthehalf-orc65987 ай бұрын
Who asked for garfield to have a long lost dad plot?
@nobodyinparticular96407 ай бұрын
Nobody, but suppose the writers forced to work on this with a tight deadline couldn't think of anything better. Or they simply didn't give a crap, that's another possibility *shrug*
@billybarnett95187 ай бұрын
I think they were trying to do Garfield On The Town, much how like the original movie took inspiration from Here Comes Garfield.
@josephchambers20007 ай бұрын
How did they get it THIS WRONG? How did they misunderstand the point of the character THIS BADLY? Like, the Bill Murray movies are Oscar worthy by comparison, and they were not that great to begin with.
@derekshropshire25137 ай бұрын
Chris Pratt, a heist, lost father? Star Lord? Garfield of the Galaxy?
@culwin7 ай бұрын
and his sidekick Wabuu Waccoon
@derekshropshire25137 ай бұрын
@@culwin yes! Also for some reason Fryer Tuck from Rocken Robin and Goron are there for diamonds. But they get wet and useless.🤣
@Dim43237 ай бұрын
Yeah Vol 2 idea
@snukastyle7 ай бұрын
@@derekshropshire2513 The diamonds? My God!
@EpicJasonX90007 ай бұрын
Blue The Velociraptor is embarrassed! XD
@ruggiebuggie31957 ай бұрын
It’s just a generic animated pet movie with a main character that just so happens to look like Garfield.
@MWaser7 ай бұрын
From watching this movie and especially seeing you play with the garfield plushies, I essentially just realized that Wabuu was basically a character variant of Garfield all along.
@masterfarr82657 ай бұрын
Lorenzo Music will always be Garfield.
@BladeAllen6667 ай бұрын
💯%
@spinballpac-man4 ай бұрын
Fun Fact: There was a shop in one shot of the movie called “Lorenzo’s Music” ……..Have a feeling that he’d of hated that, seeing as Garfield isn’t himself here
@wstine797 ай бұрын
Phelous and Allison, thank you for reviewing the second movie to feature a Chris Pratt character dealing with a father who abandoned him.
@ladypool14047 ай бұрын
Mario's father didn't abandon his son; he didn't believed in him at first THEN realised how brave Mario is and saw him saving the town. Vic the cat left his son ALONE in an alley while he could search food with him. Also, him observing Garfield everyday is more creepy than cute. It's what a stalker would do, not a father 😠
@jknicholson7 ай бұрын
Thank god for James Gunn. Honestly.
@trevingrayek16717 ай бұрын
Hell, even in The Lego Movie,the world his character lived in was influenced by his creator, a kid who had issues with his dad
@masterfarr82657 ай бұрын
talk about a one trick pony.
@kevinpierce97807 ай бұрын
That might have been the plot of jurasic world 3, but no one watched that movie so (Professor X appears) We will never know…
@ebwarg7 ай бұрын
In the “Garfield Loves Everything” comics, I imagined him voiced by Dave Coulier.
@ShadyRK97 ай бұрын
Fun Fact: it took them YEARS before they FINALLY gave Garfield an Olive Garden ad! Like, HOW?! GARFIELD AND LESGUANA GOES WELL TOGETHER! HOWS WE NEVER HAD AN PROMOTION OF GARFIELD WITH OLIVIA GARDEN UNTIL NOW?! 🍝
@billybarnett95187 ай бұрын
He did mention Olive Garden in the first live action movie. "Olive Garden? For you, Jon?".
@setsers17 ай бұрын
HA!
@ShadyRK97 ай бұрын
@@billybarnett9518 yes. But only as a 5 second mention. Not a full promotion like they're doing now.
@billybarnett95187 ай бұрын
@@ShadyRK9 Probably because the director was apparently a huge fan of Wendy's, so Wendy's won the tie in. Wendy's was plugged yet again in one of the director's other films, Zoom, except even more blatantly.
@benamisai-kham58927 ай бұрын
I was really excited until I seen it's no longer going :(
@landsverkchristian7 ай бұрын
The fact that the film has a farm in it and it isn't the farm from U.S. Acres is such a missed opportunity
@phelous7 ай бұрын
They probably avoided that because of Orson. China hates talking pigs or something. It caused them to cut a cameo from him out of The Garfield Show.
@PetProjects20117 ай бұрын
@@phelous Then... can't they just do a U.S. Acres joke that doesn't have Orson? I dunno.
@nicholassims98377 ай бұрын
@@PetProjects2011yeah why not use Roy , Wade , Booker or Bo ?
@MissAshley427 ай бұрын
How in the world are we still getting kids movies tarnished by out-of-touch execs when they involve properties more than old enough to have decision-makers who actually grew up with the properties call the shots?
@smadcore7 ай бұрын
I'm not sure kids cared about Garfield when the Bill Murray movies came out, let alone kids 20 years later.
@gracekim19987 ай бұрын
@@smadcoremate, that movie introduced me to Garfield!🤣
@matthewhunter11937 ай бұрын
Real sad day when the live-action Bill Murray movies appear to be more faithful to the source material than an animated adaptation released 20 years after the fact.
@1000huzzahs7 ай бұрын
To quote a certain man, the writing for this Garfield movie is “eeeveennn laaaziiieerrr”…
@morningblue845 ай бұрын
The problem with Garfield is that anything beyond 23 minutes he's just not engaging enough of a character to work with (9 Lives was the sole exception to this, but that was more an hour-long episode of Garfield and Friends without US Acres). He's fun in small doses, but can't carry a whole movie.
@BrettDMaynard7 ай бұрын
More evidence that I NEED a series of Phelan just performing skits with his toys.
@kingvulturo7 ай бұрын
I can't wait to go to Walmart and pick up a deluxe copy of "Garfield teaches you the Carlyse Jig."
@trevingrayek16717 ай бұрын
Even during the trailer I thought “Why not just bring the mom back? That’s a character that’s at least been established”
@supermariof05217 ай бұрын
Because then they couldn't slap Samuel L. Jackson into it.
@trevingrayek16717 ай бұрын
@@supermariof0521 Probably the most important aspect when you think about it
@supermariof05217 ай бұрын
@@trevingrayek1671 Then again if they did reintrodce Garfield's mom, they'd probably need to get a celebrity for her.
@trevingrayek16717 ай бұрын
@@supermariof0521 Oh not need but I know they’d sadly want to. Feels bad man
@supermariof05217 ай бұрын
@@trevingrayek1671 I feel like Illumination's adaptation of Dr.Sues's "The Lorax" started the trend of "Lets make these adaptations bad on PURPOSE.". Because that adaptation went out of its way to water down the source material and then market the shit out of it. As if to say "The kids have spoken! They want ZERO effort!!"
@norbertovalle79287 ай бұрын
My cat Mew Mew (named after the cat from Lion & the King) just had babies this morning, & now this review,… sweet lol
@deltaprime35097 ай бұрын
You think Chris Pratt will voice a certain ghostbuster in animated form after this?
@markiangooley7 ай бұрын
Janine, I hope. Or Slimer. Not strictly Ghostbusters but whatever.
@joekearon13367 ай бұрын
Chris Pratt voicing Venkman will complete the Unholy Trinity of Ruined Cartoon Icons from the 80s that Phelous Likes.
@williamgregory78877 ай бұрын
Chris Pratt would have played a better John than Garfield, but the most insulting casting choice to me is Odie not being voiced by Gregg Berger and instead yet another big celebrity name. That would've been a nice cameo for the diehard fans and it really shows where their priorities where while making this film.
@gRinchY-op5vr7 ай бұрын
Ving Rhames voiced Otto the Bull, NOT Odie! Odie was voiced by Harvey Guillen
@williamgregory78877 ай бұрын
@@gRinchY-op5vr Whoops, I'll correct that, ty
@williamgregory78877 ай бұрын
@@gRinchY-op5vr corrected, point still stands they went with yet another big name celebrity rather than something Garfield fans would appreciate.
@gRinchY-op5vr7 ай бұрын
@williamgregory7887 no worries! Only other thing I can recall seeing Harvey Guillen in was the dog in Puss in Boots The Last Wish, which he played well...doesn't mean he should play every animated dog role though!
@Davethe3rd7 ай бұрын
The worst part, to me, is that I KNOW Chris Pratt knows better. He grew up with the Lorenzo Music version of Garfield! He knows what Garfield is supposed to be. Like, he doesn't have to be Frank Welker and do a Lorenzo Music impression, but he has to know the character. And I know he can do voices. He did voices in The LEGO Movies and Super Mario Bros. Say what you will about the performances, but they weren't just Chris Pratt walking into a booth and talking as himself. Maybe THAT is him being Garfield: Not giving a single fuck about his performance...
@NebLleb7 ай бұрын
Chris Pratt's performance in The LEGO Movies as protagonist Emmett is his best role and I will happily die on that hill.
@kiwibro64547 ай бұрын
@@NebLlebI agree, his super generic voice acting suits a character like Emmett, who is supposed to be a regular Lego construction worker. Honestly if they made Pratt be the voice of John, that would actually make sense! But nahh
@titangirl1617 ай бұрын
"There’s no a lot whole we know about Garfield." -he loves to eat, lasagna is his favorite -he loves to sleep -he hates mondays -he loves his stuffed bear Pookie -he likes to abuse odie -he finds Nermal incredibly annoying -he tends to be nasty to Jon -deep down, he does truly love the above three That's just off the top of my head. I didn’t even go into specific comics or arcs. WE HAVE OVER FORTY YEARS OF COMICS
@Twin_Takoyaki7 ай бұрын
Since the trailer dropped I was basically convinced that maybe I just hated Garfield now, because the people around me were like “oh wow it’s an animated Garfield Movie! Look how cute he is! This is how you do a Garfield movie!” and I thought the trailer was painfully generic and corporate. It had been awhile since I had watched or read anything Garfield, so I remember thinking “was Garfield always like this?” After watching this video I’ve realized that I didn’t actually hate Garfield, I just hate this “new and improved” Garfield that’s barely anything like the actual Garfield.
@phelous7 ай бұрын
I'm glad we could remind you of the real Garfield, lol.
@Shades147 ай бұрын
I'm of the opinion that if you have a story to tell with an established franchise, then there shouldn't be a problem with making it. But soulless movies like this, The Smurfs and Alvin and the Chipmunks, have no story to tell. They're just a recognizable IP that the studio can try to cash in on.
@TheUNlucky00137 ай бұрын
I remember once someone said that there was a big missed opportunity with this movie, where instead of Chris Pratt it should’ve been Jon H. Benjamin as Garfield. I never been more upset at such a horrible miscasting and such a missed opportunity…
@EvilRobotChicken7 ай бұрын
Love that this became a Bootleg Zones sketch post-credits
@ALLINE8357 ай бұрын
its a good movie tf
@gracekim19987 ай бұрын
@@ALLINE835 mate, remember: everyone has different opinions and that’s ok. I enjoyed it, you enjoyed; there’s nothing wrong with that but also try to respect other’s’ opinions where possible (as long as they’re not rude about it)
@fusionspace1757 ай бұрын
You want to say it's not a trend of "Here's this recognizable thing you loved, only everything you liked about it was actually bad and wrong, and you're wrong for having liked it, now buy this new thing and forget your values", and then they go and make Garfield nice. I was out as soon as he said he and Odie were always best friends, and it wasn't a joke that he's just using him as a stepstool to get food for himself.
@paladinjones18337 ай бұрын
Phelous should have been Garfield's voice
@gracekim19987 ай бұрын
To be honest I’d be delighted if that happened 🥹
@elegantdisarray7 ай бұрын
That would actually be a pretty great casting 👍
@KATC7 ай бұрын
Not me getting an add for the movie claiming it's the number one movie right in the middle of this roast...
@loneshewolf747 ай бұрын
I feel like I committed blasphemy because I bought a Baby Garfield plushie at Walmart. I just couldn't resist how cute it was. He's sitting next to the drunken Garfield knockoff plushie I got from Amazon.
@ShayLaLaLooHoo7 ай бұрын
Garfhood is a spectrum. Inside you, there are two Garfields.
@gracekim19987 ай бұрын
I mean there’s nothing wrong with liking his design 🤷♀️😅
@StarTrekChimera7 ай бұрын
Phelan does a better Garfield voice than Pratt.
@Neon_talons7 ай бұрын
Those two offbrand plushies are my new enemies-to-lovers otp.
@171QA7 ай бұрын
The only thing interesting about this movie is that it was directed by the same guy who directed Cat's Don't Dance, The Emperor's New Groove, and Chicken Little.
@DieHardAlien7 ай бұрын
It’s also written by one of the screenwriters of Emperor’s New Groove and Finding Nemo.
@mrlaz90117 ай бұрын
man, talk about a low point.
@Kiroisawesome057 ай бұрын
Did they lobotomize him beforehand??
@1000huzzahs7 ай бұрын
@@DieHardAlien was Mark Evanier just not available??
@Tareltonlives5 ай бұрын
You could have definitely fooled me-those movies were great with actual personality and humor!
@miahthorpatrick10137 ай бұрын
You said it Phelan: Pratt was a terrible choice for Garfield. He was likely only cast because he voiced another famous character last year in the 2nd highest grossing movie of 2023.
@islesofforeignrails79177 ай бұрын
Not really, the companies want the star power from public advertising.
@masterfarr82655 ай бұрын
he was a terrible choice as Mario too.
@kramermariav7 ай бұрын
This is reminding me how much I loved the animated specials as a kid. The Halloween one especially
@thomaspalazzolo59027 ай бұрын
Ironically a Garfield Minus Garfield movie would be closer to Garfield than this.
@phelous7 ай бұрын
I thought this was the Garfield minus Garfield movie.
@internet-drifter7 ай бұрын
I love how Chris Prat didn’t even try with his voice 😂😂😂
@masterfarr82657 ай бұрын
he didn’t try in Mario either.
@Lavenderbutterscotch7 ай бұрын
He doesn't have to, they want him for his name not any talent or effort
@Santoryu907 ай бұрын
@@masterfarr8265He was fine in that
@masterfarr82656 ай бұрын
@@Santoryu90he wasn’t great either. (I never wanna hear that godforesaken mushroom line again)
@Santoryu906 ай бұрын
@@masterfarr8265 Whatever still a better performance and was just a better than this.
@47Jaspers7 ай бұрын
"Eeeeven laaazier" isn't going to be as memetic as "stomping.... koopas," but its more versatile. We'll definitely see it in all subsequent Chris Pratt movie reviews.
@mathieuleader86017 ай бұрын
Arbuckle got his hands on a time travelling toaster this is how this incarnation of Garfield was so odd.
@sneakyskunk17 ай бұрын
Phelan's exasperation over the idea that it is okay for children's entertainment to be garbage means he will be a great father(should he choose to pursue that route). Also, they both have Garfield themed clothes. That is pretty awesome.
@StarTrekChimera7 ай бұрын
Your plush toy battle is more accurate.
@EpicJasonX90007 ай бұрын
I completely agree. ^-^
@diegodankquixote-wry32427 ай бұрын
Jimmy Davis finally had a chance to cast Jack Nicholson as Garfield and he let the opportunity slip through his fingers. What a shame. It will probably never happen now.
@mokinokaro7 ай бұрын
Nicholson is not well enough to even voice act nowadays sadly
@cameronstone44957 ай бұрын
Well he's a bad pratt, a tool pratt, everybody's fool pratt, Well look out, 'cause here comes Lamefield!
@markiangooley7 ай бұрын
Really a Pratt-fall here.
@cameronstone44957 ай бұрын
@@markiangooley Lou Rawls would not approve!
@Tareltonlives5 ай бұрын
If I had a nickel a movie studio completely missed the point of Garfield as a character I'd have two nickels, which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice.
@brentparker73597 ай бұрын
There was a "we replaced your regular coffee.." reference on "Garfield and Friends." (Roy replaced Lanolin's regular coffee with Fernman's crystals...Fernman's makes soap crystals.)
@Tareltonlives5 ай бұрын
What.....you son of a bitch...YOU GOD DAM SON OF A BITCH.....(unstoppable hulk rage)
@Weirdanimalboy7 ай бұрын
How am I just finding out now that this *_wasn’t_* an Illumination movie 🧍🏾♂️
@shwahgamer7 ай бұрын
I thought it was too at first.
@BrettDMaynard7 ай бұрын
“AS JOHN AS MY WITNESS!!!”
@JThom5297 ай бұрын
So this Garfield is basically furry Starlord (especially with the mannerisms and apparent daddy issues?)
@JadenFox97 ай бұрын
sounds like they tried copying the Mario Movie with Garfield but missed the plot because they didn't have enough Garfield and likely forget it was supposed to be one
@Santoryu907 ай бұрын
The plot of the movie alone didn’t feel like Garfield and I don’t know if they were hoping it will get sequels but it didn’t really seem first movie material.
@berrypie117 ай бұрын
Watching you two sit there playing with plushies and genuinely having a blast is so wholesome. Reminds me a lot of myself and my husband. We sometimes do stupid bits with my plushies, and end up cracking up over our antics. 😆
@cartoonkelly79247 ай бұрын
Oh, we’re the ants who ruined your movie. We’re always here to mess up any joy. When we’re around everything feels like a cash-grab. Our only motivation is to sell… crappy toys!
@myrrmur7 ай бұрын
My mom still references that ants song 30+ years later, which only goes to show how memorable the old series was. My spouse and I watch the holiday specials every year, and I still have a bunch of the older books. I can't help but wonder at the alternate time line where Touchstone made the Garfield's Judgement Day movie back in the early 90s. He can still be a great character with a charming story around him if you put in the effort. But that requires, y'know, being a little less lazier than Garfield.
@Tareltonlives5 ай бұрын
(standing ovation)
@bloodmooncomics22497 ай бұрын
An odd thing thar bugged me was the whole thing they do when even as an adult they will make a character shorter than their parent. Like hey made Garfield way shorter than his dad like how huge is the dad and Garfield in like a middle age cat so he should be the same size as his dad.
@CanIswearinmyhandle7 ай бұрын
The hugeness of Garfield dad really bothers me. Like garfield characters are cartoony but they're kind of the right size and then this cat is almost the size of jon
@MrDarksol7 ай бұрын
To this day I still question what is the point of this new Garfield movie in 2024. Like just because you have Chris Pratt voice Garfield does not mean that he fits the character. Seriously at this point I'd rather have either Lorenzo musics when he voiced Garfield or Bill Murray when he voiced Garfield. Hell I'd rather take also that guy who voiced him in that 1 new series that was on TV because at least he did a good job at being Garfield. All I hear from Chris Pratt is literally Star lord and nothing more with this movie just being unneeded.
@rogue77237 ай бұрын
He even had daddy issues, it’s like they didn’t even try to make him different from other Chris Pratt performances.
@MrDarksol7 ай бұрын
@@rogue7723 Which by the way considering that you mentioned that this Garfield has daddy issues really remind me of Star lord with what happened in the second guardians of the Galaxy movie. They really did not try.
@CanIswearinmyhandle7 ай бұрын
Considering all the marketing I think the point was to sell toys. Lots and lots of toys.
@MrDarksol7 ай бұрын
@@CanIswearinmyhandle Yeah but Garfield? Only VERY hardcore fans would be still talking Garfield and even they would dislike this movie, merchandise or not. Not to say you are not wrong but if that was the case, then whoever greenlit this movie was VERY stupid to not tried this years ago when Garfield was relevant at the time.
@Scatscar19857 ай бұрын
I hope someone somewhere shouted "YOU'RE NOT THE VOICE OF GARFIELD! LORENZO MUSIC IS THE VOICE OF GARFIELD!"
@MisterDayDream7 ай бұрын
Out of all the product placements associated with this movie, the Pop Chips is by far the most bizarre to me. The biggest selling point for Pop Chips is that it has 50% less fat compared to potato chips. And as we all know, Garfield is definitely the kind of character who is very concerned with his calorie intake.
@kevinpierce97807 ай бұрын
How am I going to reconcile my desire to never know anything about the new Garfield movie out of spite, and my desire to see Allison and Phelan riff on another bad cartoon? Probably by watching the video.
@ShayLaLaLooHoo7 ай бұрын
I was having a rough time and knew this video would cheer me up. Thanks, you two 💕
@phelous7 ай бұрын
Glad it helped!
@TransistorBased7 ай бұрын
Crisp Rat needs to stop getting voice acting roles. I swear he's as interesting as tap water
@Crazy56U7 ай бұрын
This movie was doomed from the start when they announced Chris was voicing him.
@Feed_my_Frankenstein7 ай бұрын
If it's not Lorenzo Music voicing him, it's not Garfield. Sad thing is, even if Lorenzo was still with us, Chris Pratt would still get the role because... he's a celebrity. RIP Mr. Lorenzo Music.
@DeltaWaving7 ай бұрын
The whole stuffed animal segment killed me. I love you guys so much. 😂
@tomboyangel787 ай бұрын
Took my 9 year old nephew to the movie, as we both love Garfield. Even he was disappointed. Let me repeat. A member of the "target audience" thought this movie was a letdown.
@wstine797 ай бұрын
The animation is the only saving grace for this movie. It actually looks like the comic strip. Too bad this movie was "even lazier" than the Bill Murray films.
@Twin_Takoyaki7 ай бұрын
It definitely has one of the tastiest looking pizzas that I’ve ever seen in an animated movie, that’s for sure.
@nobodyinparticular96407 ай бұрын
It's basically like the majority of modern triple ay videogames: all focus on dem graphics, but the rest is garbage. Guess you can consider the advertising and merchandise as the aggressive and intrusive monetization.
@mkdemigodzillawarrior7 ай бұрын
Yeah...this was so far from Garfield as you can get. He wasn't even that lazy!
@robertanderson94472 ай бұрын
One reason I hate this movie is that for a lot of people, it reinforced the idea that Garfield is an inherently dull character and property. Garfield can absolutely work when given to people who understand the character and have creative ideas. This movie was not handled by such people. Garfield has a very particular kind of sass. Dry, sarcastic, spoken with low energy but hits like a brick. He's not supposed to be all cocky and in-your-face like an MCU character.
@StillAlexander7 ай бұрын
Can't believe they didn't bring in Dave Coulier to voice Garfield. He's got tenure replacing Lorenzo Music and/or imitating Bill Murray, after all.
@phelous7 ай бұрын
He was too busy loving Slimer to find room for Nermal
@MandVersusNature7 ай бұрын
I’d love to see some light content showcasing collections of stuff you have like these Garfields.
@phelous7 ай бұрын
I do plan on some Garfield collection videos in the future.
@halomek_31547 ай бұрын
When Gazorpazorpfield is more accurate to Garfield than this movie, that's a problem.
@LegionIscariot7 ай бұрын
I feel the only reason they casted Chris Pratt for this is because he is big right now, so they put him in the Mario movie they put him Garfield. Jim Carrey as Eggman thats good casting.
@gRinchY-op5vr7 ай бұрын
You can tell because he was just okay as Mario Illumination decided lets get him back for Garfield that'll be great again...but atleast as Mario he TRIED giving us a Brooklyn Italian accent. As Garfield he gave zero fucks 😂
@mikemccann9787 ай бұрын
I didn’t like him as Mario at all.
@markiangooley7 ай бұрын
The late great Bob Hoskins tried to earn his paycheck playing Mario!
@billybarnett95187 ай бұрын
Will Forte sounded nothing like Shaggy in Scoob, almost makes you wonder if the studios are telling these actors to just sound like themselves instead of the character.
@Emplordxiii7 ай бұрын
He was casted because the director of the film, Mark Dindal, specifically wanted him for the role. Sad that film wasn’t in the same level as his previous films: Cats Don’t Dance and The Emperor’s New Groove.
@thedarthmj947 ай бұрын
I got an ad in the middle of this video. For Garfield. The "Number 1 movie in America" (I don't recall if it actually cited any metric as part of that claim). And I'm one of those people who don't get Garfield on most days. But Geeze. Phelan, I am so sorry.
@daydream51207 ай бұрын
I had the same ad. It was the weirdest thing ever
@diegobareno58207 ай бұрын
When I read the title I was like “Didn’t you already review thi-Oh I already forgot about the new one”
@CandyCane20047 ай бұрын
Is there…actually a way to translate Garfield into a genuinely good movie? It almost feels like a Tom and Jerry case where it works well in short form but just doesn’t translate well into a long form media.
@AztecCroc7 ай бұрын
I mean, they made a bunch of TV episodes and specials back in the day. So he clearly works on things up to an hour.
@phelous7 ай бұрын
I don't think the format is the issue, it's both times they've done this they've watered Garfield way down and don't really feel like they understand the characters... which really shouldn't be that hard.
@mr.vidjagamez98967 ай бұрын
Live action and focus on Jon living as a lonely man who talks to his pets.
@tylerbertram70657 ай бұрын
Um Fast and the Furry anyone
@billybarnett95187 ай бұрын
Jim Davis almost made a Garfield movie but the story was kinda insane, Garfield's Judgement Day.
@v.m.91983 ай бұрын
This movie feels like Garfield was a hated billionaire like elon musk and wanted a movie to make him look better so he had odie to make it so he wouldn't have to pay him
@vigorthecharacter43965 ай бұрын
Garfield Fans - I don’t smoke kids - got a light?
@CinnamonGrrlErin17 ай бұрын
I think the problem is that the more they try to add to Garfield, the less "Garfield" he becomes, he's not a Snoopy or a Heathcliff type of character. And original cartoon and specials aside, I think he's always been funnier in the flat, 2d comic strip format.
@GhostofKittyKatDawg7 ай бұрын
They should have just focused on Jon and Garfield and just how difficult Jon's life really is just like the comic rather than doing another garfield goes missing again. Or they could have just not made a movie 🤷
@limalepakko60747 ай бұрын
I don’t have an issue with the ”Garfield is jealous about Jon” thing from the 2004 movie, Garfield’s kinda just taking Jon for granted and probably would react that way if Jon started being less attention to him
@desmondmalone4387 ай бұрын
7:08 John:(singing)I used to have Garfield all to myself
@KirbyIsCute7 ай бұрын
As a Garfield fan, yeah I'm skipping this movie. The father plot confused me - I thought maybe if they did that kind of story they use the mother instead since she actually made an appearance before. And being told there's a huge lack of Jon in the movie... heck no, this guy is my favorite! There needed to be more Jon and Garfield interactions, those are fun. And while I do like the rare heartwarming bond between the two - yeah, that needs to be done better than making Garfield some happy go lucky, loving cat. I'll stick to Garfield and Friends show...
@weirdkitty077 ай бұрын
Apparently that one clip from the 1982 special nailed it. 'Odie, you're not gonna live past your next birthday. You know that don't ya.' LOL even 42 years later. The dry sarcasm of that Carton the Doorman type voice. He doesn't give two licks about anything. He was ahead of his time. In the 90s, that type of attitude fit. The new one doesn't get Garfield one wit.
@Alucard-A-La-Carte7 ай бұрын
I feel like Lorenzo Music as Garfield is like Raul Julia as Gomez Addams: it's almost unfair HOW WELL he fits the character and every subsequent performance will be unfairly compared to him. But that is not an excuse to NOT EVEN TRY!
@BioFactory17 ай бұрын
I think the overall joke Bill Murray was doing to the Garfield movies was that if the voice actor is going to make his Ghostbusters character seem like Garfield then he's going to make the character that voice actor is best known for largely act like Bill Murray. Let's face it, Bill always does what he does best and that's pretty much being himself.
@transientdaydreams7 ай бұрын
me, going into the movie: I should go into this remembering that it's not made for me, it's made for kids me, coming out of the movie: okay, but kids should at least get to know Garfield, not whoever the heLL THIS WAS--
@stapler9427 ай бұрын
There's something about this video that's so orange, it's like, how much more orange could this be? And the answer is none. None more orange.