The 'Great Moon Hoax' that fooled the world - BBC REEL

[@kheelsWRLD]

How did we have the technology I'm the 60s and 70s but we don't now. In 2022

[@marksprague1280]

We had the Saturn V rocket in the 60s, the only rocket ever built capable of lifting an Apollo-sized spacecraft into lunar orbit. Congress killed the Saturn program when they shut down Apollo, and diverted funding to such things as "studies of left handed monkeys and their effect on Berkley campus life", with a pittance left over for the shuttle and othe NASA programs. Without the Saturn or an equivalent, NOBODY is sending men to the moon or beyond.

[@kitcanyon658]

You going to strap yourself into a 60 yr old machine? Enjoy...

[@thechroniclegamer4285]

We do have the technology, we just didn’t have a Need and then the technology at the time became outdated

[@thechroniclegamer4285]

@s 3 what do you mean?

[@macalister8881]

​@@thechroniclegamer4285 nope the moon dust is highly magnetic , very toxic and radioactive any zipper would jam , the dust would have got inside the craft in their eyes and caused major irritation , watering eyes and blisters that is just 1 type of equipment they still need to this day

[@Chemical_Ali]

The irony of the BBC calling out fake news.

[@Itjaylamarie]

Is not fake

[@alchemY.420]

@@Itjaylamarieit is but remain in the dark if it suits your denial of reality better.

[@wildboar7473]

HA HA indeed! Impression they are the biggest Whinos about APOLLO Deniers, like UK scam, Some do say They (Banks) still control USA... (or Freemasons).

[@Zee-i4e]

@@Itjaylamarieit is

[@Bizarro_world2.7]

The news lied so much in the 60s

[@rolandeden1021]

So the media has been lying for nearly 200 years (probably longer) and we still believe them 🤣!

[@manuqtix8874]

You know what the messed up thing is? These people unquestionably believe in a book written by primitive desert dwelling goatherds as being factual But approach the moon landing with the most amount of skepticism ever The irony is overwhelming

[@drillatrillaofficial8069]

King Selassie I is the only one who appears in the moon even a week ago we ave withness it in Jamaica yr 2023

[@CaptainCajun]

@@drillatrillaofficial8069 what are you talking about lol

[@drillatrillaofficial8069]

@@CaptainCajun many call only few are chosen (humans being) to see things beyond the Earth atmosphere the world is on my Right hand if you look on my birth mark it shape like Africa

[@CaptainCajun]

@@drillatrillaofficial8069 bro your nutts 😂🤣 your not special, your crazy… chill

[@billleyland128]

I will bet my life that these fakers never did, nor ever, will land on the noon. I will be delighted to be proven wrong.

[@steviewonder7495]

Well Putin will soon prove to you soon, that America ran like kids from Vietnamese villagers and lost the war That Americans sobbed about the twin towers for ten years solid That when Putin unleashes his 6500 hypersonic nuclear warheads on you then you will get to the moon in a few minutes.

[@maxasaurus3008]

Not sure how one could land on noon but don’t worry: we’re all a little crazy.

[@maskonfilteroff3145]

No you won't be. You'll dismiss it and pretend it never happened, as you likely already have.

[@billleyland128]

@@maskonfilteroff3145 I do not ''pretend'' it never happened, I have weighed up the evidence, seen all the footage, listened to the pros and cons, and arrived at a logical decision. I have been called a conspiracy theorist when the real conspiracy theorists are those who subscribe to the biggest conspiracy theory of all time, the one perpetrated by NASA on the people of the world. Would you be willing to bet your life on the promise made by NASA that they will ''return'' in 2025?? I think not.

[@white_heat.truth76]

You will never be proven wrong. Men cannot land on a source of light. Chances are the crooked USG had top secret missions to orbit the body in order to collect data which they do not want the public to know. NASA is a black budget operation which collects taxpayer money to finance secret air & military operations. Operation Fishbowl was all the proof needed to confirm man cannot exceed a low Earth orbit, so in other words we're trapped within the friendly environs of the firmament. To this day no one knows the dimensions of this place. I estimate it's a whole lot bigger than what is being peddled. I'll wager there is other land masses which are clearly off limits in accordance to the polar treaties. Captains Franklyn & Cooke charted over 44,000 miles of Earth before they had to turn back for obvious reasons. The data returned from the floating ice stations of the 1800's are still top secret to this day. Admiral Byrd left us some clues aside of the disastrous Operation High Jump, but the lack of available data & insufficient evidence leaves the case wide open.

[@sam-fc9ky]

same free masons different time

[@marksprague1280]

Yawn. The usual BS from an ignorant conspiracy freak. Out of the entire corps of astronauts, 10 were masons.

[@rodrigozauli6573]

Jews

[@alchemY.420]

@@rodrigozauli6573jesuits

[@doob.]

@@rodrigozauli6573Exactly

[@person6768]

​@@rodrigozauli6573 no, but I'm sure there are some communist who are happy you think that

[@kratosgodofwar4584]

Next on BBC: THE "GREATER MOON HOAX" OF 1969

[@JohnOlson-y8p]

I want you Apollo program deniers to crawl back under the rock you crawled out from under. Your ignorance pollutes the internet.

[@zarstar1576]

Never went.

[@joeferraro5495]

@Ricardo_Lima35can you prove we did? Because I’m convinced we didn’t

[@joeferraro5495]

@Ricardo_Lima35 so we can’t go now and you really believe all the bs. All of the videos pictures look phony as hell. Elon said it would take 8 fuel trips to go to the moon but that wasn’t necessary in 1969 for some reason. Do a little investigating

[@joeferraro5495]

Sure can’t be enough of the facts speak massive fraud

[@manueldeabreu1980]

@@joeferraro5495 There were 14 Apollo missions from 1961 to 1972. 6 missions landed on the moon. 2 other missions were to orbit around the moon and the latter to orbit around the moon and dock and undock from the lander. So they spent 11 years faking 14 missions. Here is how we know the US and the Soviets went to the moon. 1) The Soviets tried to steal the Apollo thunder by landing first, but their rover crashed into the moon a day before. 2) The Soviets landed multiple rovers on the moon with their Luna program. It lives on today with NASA. When the Soviet Union collapsed the Luna scientists were hired by NASA. All the rovers on Mars are the grandchildren of the Soviet Luna program. They even use the same independent 6 wheel design. 3) The most recent theory that the Earth is a 2nd or 3rd generation planet is because of the Apollo and Luna programs. The rocks brought back and studied by scientists over the world show the moon and the Earth share the same chemical makeup. This is only possible due to collision. The latest theory is a smaller planetoid hit the Earth at a high angle. It knocked off the outer crust and made it molten. The Earth had a ring, like Saturn, until the debris reformed as the moon. 4) The European space agency, Chinese, Japanese, Russia and NASA have sent missions to map the moons surface and to identify mineral deposits. ALL of the Apollo landings show up in the pictures.

[@thaisbakker6846]

@Ricardo_Lima35 Can you prove that? That's not his business either Einstein. Fitting for someone who actually believes a man stepped on the moon, very limited processing power.

[@renleedativo1679]

this is why I doubt the American constitution.

[@michaelbruns449]

NASA produced Stanley Kubrick directed.

[@GwenArlene8181]

Yes, Walt Disney and Werner Von Braun were co-workers. Look up pictures of them standing next to a model rocket, just a grinnin' away at the hoax they were about to play on the ENTIRE WORLD! And us suckers BOUGHT it, hook, line and sinker, but we're slowly waking up to the truth! Still, there are many more of 'them' than there are of US! Hopefully, not for too much longer!

[@Gauchothedog]

7 times?haha

[@GwenArlene8181]

@@Gauchothedog He didn't say that, YOU did! Walt Disney WAS involved. Go ahead, google "Image, Werner Von Braun and Walt Disney." BINGO!

[@harpfully]

But Kubrick was such a stickler for realism that he insisted on filming on location.

[@Eplays5528]

@@harpfully that is the funniest response ever to a comment like this. keep it up

[@John-zc4rz]

The moon landing reminds me more of a Stanley Kubrick movie, several questions come to mind 1) would you feel safe traveling to the surface in a lander that looks constructed with what appears to be foil and aluminum. 2) when the lunar lander was taking off who was left behind with the camera to pan up keeping it in focus. 3) when walking around on the moon why do the shadows keep changing. 4) if the moon has this thick dust like surface when landing on the surface and taking off there should of been massive dust, now that’s a studio production. NASA= not a space agency but a financial coup for the military industrial complex, how much money have they extracted.

[@kevinskinner4986]

1. The Apollo astronauts were professional test pilots they joined NASA, an extremely dangerous profession that killed many of their colleagues. Doing things that a sane person would not feel safe doing is literally their job. 2. The rover has a camera turret on it the can be controlled via remote. You can see it spinning around with nobody behind it (because they have mirrors on their faces) for much of the footage in the later missions. 3. Probably because the ground isn't flat. Shadows become longer on a downward slope and shorter on an upward one. 4. Dust clouds don't form in a vacuum. Without air to hold the particles up, it'll immediately settle at the same speed as a ton of bricks. The fact that dust clouds swirl when then the ship lands in 2001 is one of many clues that give away that it's phoney baloney. Also, if you think the moon landing reminds you of a Stanley Kubrick movie, then might I suggest you actually sit down and actually watch Kubrick's work first. I know that 2001's more boring than watching paint dry, but if you actually watched it, you'd know it doesn't resemble Apollo in the slightest.

[@marksprague1280]

R.E. Mote, the cousin of Kilroy of WWII fame manned the camera that streamed the live views of the Apollo liftoff from the moon, under the able direction of Ed Fendell from Houston. Like his illustrious cousin, R.E. has been everywhere. He's been at the bottom of the ocean, into nuclear reactors, on the moon, Mars, and Venus, toured the outer planets and beyond. He turns on the light in your refrigerator, and in your car.

[@marksprague1280]

This reminds of all the other vague, ignorant queries put forth by scientifically-illiterate conspiracy freaks.

[@maxamahnken7325]

False

[@paulag7634]

1) _"would you feel safe traveling to the surface in a lander that looks constructed with what appears to be foil and aluminium."_ You said it *" **_appears_** to be made of...."* Yes, the pressure hull was made of aluminium alloy, just like airliners are made of an aluminium alloy. The pressure difference between the inside of an airliner cabin and the outsides pressure at 40,000ft, is about 9psi; the pressure difference between the inside of the Lunar Module and a vacuum was only 5psi. No problem. The "tinfoil" was a metalized Mylar sheet to reflect solar infrared radiation, it was not structual. 2) _"when the lunar lander was taking off who was left behind with the camera to pan up keeping it in focus."_ Really? You can't even grasp the idea they had remotely operated cameras in 1970? It took a bit of practice to get the timing right because of the delay, but the technology was commonly available in the late 1960s. 3) _"when walking around on the moon why do the shadows keep changing."_ Total nonsense. The shadows do *exactly* what would be expected. A more difficult question to answer is "Why would they keep moving if it was filmed in a studio?" If there were, as many moon landing deniers claim, multiple light sources then each object *must* cast multiple shadows. They did not. What we saw was that each object cast one and only one shadow, a wide angle camera or a panning video can make this look a little strange but what we actually saw was exactly what we would have expected to see. 4) _"if the moon has this thick dust like surface when landing on the surface and taking off there should of been massive dust"_ A little more complicated to explain, but there are several reasons why there would not be a massive dust cloud. Firstly the both the descent and ascent motors were designed to work in a vacuum, therefore the exhaust jet spread out in a wide cone, and with no atmosphere to constrain the exhaust cone the pressure on the surface would have been extremely low. On landing the descent engine was throttled down before touch down. On take of the Ascent Module the Descent Stage was in-between the ascent engine and the surface, shielding the surface from the blast. Finally, with no atmosphere, what little of the lunar regolith was disturbed very quickly fell straight back down, and did not billow up to form a cloud. In 1969 Neil Armstong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon. Get over it.

[@DavidJones-we2ex]

“But the media said it was true, so it must be.” -Every idiot ever

[@doob.]

It all started in school, especially science teachers teach theories and calculated assumptions as FACTS.

[@wildboar7473]

"One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've (Sheeple norm) been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.(event con)😎 We're no longer interested in finding out the truth.(self thinking) The bamboozle has captured us. It's simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we've been (Nasa) taken (School programming). Once you give a charlatan (Gov) power over you, you almost never get it back." ― Carl Sagan the Apollo faith

[@riko11096]

​@@doob.Because... they are facts? Try to prove the law of cosines as something other than a fact.

[@kingisback1995]

But media is all about lies all the time.

[@willismartin9196]

Jack Nicholson in The Shining 😊

[@thomashall9182]

One question has always puzzled me regarding the ''moon landings'', how could we, in 1969, with less technology than that which is now contained in a modern phone and relying on Buzz's slide rule and the stars, travel 250,000 miles into space and place 12 men on the moon while today, over 50 years later and with a multitude of scientific aids we have never traveled higher than 40 miles and lost 14 astronauts? All the answers I have been given seem rather weak and lacking in substance, am I missing something?

[@kevinskinner4986]

The space shuttle lost 14 astronauts over 30 years in TWO accidents out of about 130 missions, 10x the number of manned missions Apollo ran. One of those was to cold weather that was completely preventable and the result of negligent mission planning, and the other because it hit something that damaged the heat shield. That's a 98% success rate, and neither of those have anything to do with the "technology in a modern phone". By the way, the major Apollo calculations were calculated on Earth using mainframe computers, the data from which was transferred up, and nobody's going to go higher than low orbit until we return to the moon because there's nothing between them but empty void.

[@thomashall9182]

@@kevinskinner4986 130 missions to where??? The ''moon landings'' are the only major groundbreaking event in the history of the world that has never been replicated or bettered. It is equivalent to Bleriot crossing the channel in 1909 and airplanes today not getting any further than the end of the pier!! I have a friend who is an interrogator with the police, after viewing the astronauts' first press conference following the ''moon landings,'' he said that these men would definitely be remanded for further questioning as their guilt was quite apparent. I will state here and now, without fear of failure, that they will not, as promised, land on the moon in 2025. I hope I am proven wrong, but I am certain I will not be. We will wait and see...

[@sauldemize9998]

@@kevinskinner4986 so you think the Natzi scientists did the calculations on earth to send a trash can 240,000 miles where a pod separated and landed perfectly on the Moon 1st try with out stiring up any dust so they could make a perfect foot print picture. then it took off again to reconnect with the other astronaut who was orbiting the moon at 3,157 miles an hour perfectly 1st try. All while having crystal clear communication with no delay on a walkie talkie. sorry dude! but let me know when they have high Def pictures of the items that were left on the moon. that technology exists even though the technology to get to the moon does not. their words not mine

[@carolmaz8675]

Same way they could never film + 500 degrees . To minus 500 degrees with the sane Kodak camera and film .. same way astronauts could not take pictures with huge gloves on .. sane way they could not pass through the van Alan belt . Same way they could not transmit shandy gritty footage of the moon landing when it could have been clear ..same way there is no way on this planet or the next a professional organisation like nasa would lose all the original tapes of the most important filmed event in history . Same way Stanley Kubrick s wife testified he was threatened if he didn’t make the movie . Enough said

[@4yoursoul]

there is an interview with one of the actual engineers that took part in the so called moon landing and believe it or not his excuse was "we lost all the equipment and documents" . so they actually treat everyone like a bunch of silly kids.

[@elizajayne2888]

Media’s on media’s lies and illusions is hilarious... One group of liars investigation of another group of liars ...

[@jedsteelwell2354]

If we walked on the moon we'd have a space station with people living there by now

[@marksprague1280]

Are you kidding? People today complain about the cost of the ISS, and that's a drop in the bucket compared to what a station on or in orbit around the moon would cost. With the possible exception of water, EVERYTHING required for life would have to be ferried up: food, air, fuel, etc. There is no way that the general public would have paid the long-term costs.

[@marksprague1280]

@HammerTruth It stopped the Apollo program.

[@marksprague1280]

@HammerTruth You obviously didn't live through the 60s. People were absolutely nuts about the space program. Every launch and recovery was a major media event. People saw Guss Grissom almost drown when the hatch on the Liberty Bell blew prematurely.

[@Ruda-n4h]

@HammerTruth Basically once Apollo 11 had returned from the Moon and President Kennedy's goal had been achieved, cutbacks began under Nixon during a widescale retreat from technology projects due to competing demands e.g. Vietnam War, 70’s recession, public apathy and of course, Nixon never liked Kennedy and didn’t want to prolong his legacy. It was also extremely dangerous; out of 12 manned Apollo missions, including a ground test, there was one catastrophic failure (Apollo 1) and a mission failure (Apollo 13), that’s a terrible ratio and it was not economically sustainable. Each mission cost one billion dollars to put two men on the surface for a maximum of 3 days! There was/is no political imperative to go back to the Moon as there was to get there in the 1960’s Cold War, which was a completely different time. Even Apollo astronaut Frank Borman said. 'Any idea that the Apollo programme was a great voyage of exploration or scientific endeavour is nuts. People just aren't that excited about exploration. They were sure excited about beating the Russians.’

[@Returntonature145]

Moons gravity is very weak for humans to survive even with oxygen

[@hermespsychopompos8753]

There's no way in 60s man step foot on the moon AND made it back in one piece. No way. Imagine how many little things needed to work perfectly, especially back then. No way. I could perhaps believe somehow made it to the moon, but... That would be it.

[@TheFracturedfuture]

@@user-rm3cn7vr1n It's way easier and cheaper to make a film than it is to actually go to the moon. How the f*** is actually going to the moon going to be cheaper than faking it?

[@marksprague1280]

@@TheFracturedfuture Because you would have to find a way to fool not only the 400,000 or so who worked on the project, but the million or more third party people who observed, tracked and eavsedropped on each flight, plus the thousands of scientists, engineers, and other professionals who analyzed the returned results.

[@TheFracturedfuture]

@@marksprague1280 400,000 who worked on the project lol. You mean the 40 people who worked on the movie.

[@marksprague1280]

@@TheFracturedfuture Why do you clowns have to continually lie? Are your lives truly that payhetic?

[@TheFracturedfuture]

@@marksprague1280 Clown + pathetic = You

[@08aoc]

There is no telemetry hard data of the Apollo 11 mission as NASA lost it 😂

[@perkins1439]

Maybe they didn't really lose it maybe there was nothing there to lose

[@VivekanandaKF]

"Telemetry data is essentially the information transmitted from the spacecraft to Earth, providing details about various aspects of the mission, such as the spacecraft's status, navigation, and scientific measurements. The telemetry data from Apollo 11, along with subsequent Apollo missions, was carefully collected, analyzed, and archived by NASA. In recent years, there have been efforts to digitize and preserve the original Apollo mission data to ensure its long-term accessibility and availability for scientific research and historical purposes. The statement that NASA lost telemetry data from the Apollo 11 mission is a misconception and not supported by historical records or the wealth of information available about the Apollo program."

[@justingammon1163]

Imagine Ferdinand Magellan comes back from finding the Pacific passage and circumnavigating the globe... Then he says "Trust me bro" and burns all his charts😂 If nasa really went to the moon all original prints would be sitting unmolested in a vault. They would NEVER "destroy the technology" that got them there.

[@VivekanandaKF]

it's not true that NASA lost telemetry hard data from the Apollo 11 mission. The telemetry data from Apollo 11 and subsequent Apollo missions were indeed recorded and stored. However, there have been some misunderstandings and misconceptions about the telemetry tapes. One primary issue is that the original telemetry tapes were recorded in a format that became obsolete over time, and the equipment needed to read them became scarce. Additionally, there were efforts to reuse tapes due to budget constraints in the early days of space exploration, which led to some tapes being erased and reused. While there were challenges in accessing and preserving the original telemetry data, NASA and other organizations have made extensive efforts to recover, digitize, and preserve as much of the data as possible. Significant portions of the Apollo telemetry data have been recovered and are available for analysis and research.

[@wombat5534]

​@@VivekanandaKF Thank you for sharing this, I wish this was explained more often to the 99% of skeptical dumbasses out there.

[@sisterkesler9876]

My husband fights with me over this. He is dead set on believing the lies and can't imagine a world where everything we have been told just isn't true.

[@AL-tv4ht]

HE WILL FIND OUT THE TRUTH REAL SOON

[@steviewonder7495]

Your husband isn't a conspiracy theory nut like you.

[@marksprague1280]

He has a paranoid idiot for a wife.

[@eduardorubio3031]

Looks like he married a very dumb person.

[@willywantoknow2563]

Watch 'the trueman show' with him

[@GotoAmar]

No man has ever landed on moon

[@redjack7296]

Nice Grammer

[@maxamahnken7325]

Man ----- landed upon the Moon

[@Roxasamico]

@@redjack7296 it's spelt Grammar if you're going to get petty.

[@redjack7296]

@@Roxasamico Spain, Britain, and Australia confirmed a signal from the moon. What's the excuse for this one.

[@Roxasamico]

@@redjack7296 You've just ignored everything I said. They confirmed a signal? What do you mean? I already alluded to why whatever they're confirming can't be taken at face value. Do you get conned often? I imagine you're an extremely easy mark for scams.

[@hnlr7385]

SIMPLY A LIE

[@globe_atheist81]

Science is a religion. People will believe whatever they're told by authority

[@tompostepski5106]

Its not a religion my guy. People who know, know.

[@Markus-hq1gh]

That's an interesting viewpoint. Here's why science is different from religion: Evidence-Based: Science relies on evidence gathered through observation, experimentation, and data analysis. Theories are constantly tested and refined based on new evidence. Religion often relies on faith and beliefs that may not be provable through scientific methods. Open to Change: Science is constantly evolving as new discoveries are made. If evidence contradicts a theory, scientists are willing to adapt or even discard it. Religion often has established doctrines that are not easily changed. Repeatability: Scientific experiments can be replicated by others to verify the results. Religious experiences are often subjective and not easily replicated. Questioning: Scientists are encouraged to question and challenge existing ideas. Religion often discourages questioning core beliefs. Authority in Science: While scientists may be respected for their expertise, science doesn't rely on blind faith in authority figures. Evidence and logical reasoning are central to scientific progress. So, while science can seem complex and have experts, it's driven by a desire to understand the universe based on evidence and a willingness to change ideas as we learn more.

[@TheSateef]

science is reproduceable by anyone on this planet or any other and the results area measurable and verifiable. religion is what ever some group of people say it is

[@us3rG]

The pagan religions are using science. Scientists are easy to manipulate

[@starseed_Wanderer]

​@@tompostepski5106The Earth science cult;

[@rezazulaa]

Most of people don't know about fish bowl operation, that the sky cant be crushed and Penetrated even by nuclir

[@kevinskinner4986]

But your fake Flat Earthers claim that the sun is 3,000 miles high, but inside the dome, so they apparently bombed thousands of miles away from it????

[@marksprague1280]

Most people actually graduated from high school.

[@3dsmaxrocks699]

Jet fuel cannot melt the flat earth!!!!!!!

[@ribosome1681]

@@marksprague1280 Utterly roasted.

[@huckstaunfiltered8200]

​@@marksprague1280 That's the problem, high school brain washing, perhaps look into Operation Fish Bowl, before uttering your indoctrinated 12th grade education 🤡

[@MrCarpen7er]

Stanley Kubrick filmed it. He told us by making the kid in The Shining wear a sweater with Apollo 11.

[@tatie7604]

Good tip

[@harpfully]

You actually believe a sweater on a movie is a confession of faking the moon landing. You sure are some kind of special.

[@tatie7604]

@harpfully There were SIMULATIONS done. (It's a deliberate hint on the sweater- no mistake in costuming.) SIMULATION is printed in white letters on the screen of some of the footage of the "astronauts". You know what simulation means?

[@User-vt5hp]

You're telling me they could figure it out on how to land on the moon in 1960 but is still struggling to land a spaceship on earth?

[@tamaralombard2916]

I was ten years old when we watched the landing on live TV. And I remember looking at my parents and thinking, " we're doing THIS now?" This was after finding out the b.s. about Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the tooth fairy!

[@TimeMasterOG]

Yeah except those 3 things are actually fake and the moon landings aren't...

[@aok4418]

@@TimeMasterOG The Moon landings are fake. Unless you believe the footage and still photos could survive the radiation and extreme temperatures. Did the plastic cameras convince you? 🤔

[@josephmorin8941]

Tamara, what are you saying?!😳

[@tamaralombard2916]

@@josephmorin8941 even a child can see through the lies. That's what.

[@josephmorin8941]

I love you Tamara! We are on the same team! You do know I was just trying to be funny in that last reply.....don't you? If not, well, you know it now.

[@hannacarter1352]

The moon is made of plasma. Pure electrons. It's a luminary remember. And luminaries make their own light.

[@marksprague1280]

Yawn. Another flat earther. Another indictment of modern "education".

[@garethaustin3137]

Well, if you call it a luminary, then, yeah, it must be.

[@hannacarter1352]

@@garethaustin3137 God did, not me.

[@hannacarter1352]

@@marksprague1280Ah it looks like someone learned a new word and couldn't wait to use it. Prescious. Another ignorant, not a child of God here. Jesus Christ is the Savior and the bible is the Word of God. Just saying

[@marksprague1280]

@@hannacarter1352 Sorry, freak. I limit my conversations to sentient beings. Bible thumpers don't qualify.

[@robertgotschall1246]

So he single-handedly discovered his equivalent of the internet and the net-loons that inhabit it. I feel the pain.

[@Noble570]

why Neil Alden Armstrong never took a lie detector test still puzzles me to this day

[@marksprague1280]

Why should he have? At the demand of a taxi-driving felon? I don't think so.

[@Noble570]

@@marksprague1280 rather because it was all staged i believe. No way in the world with all these advances in technology we are celebrating when an unmanned craft safely lands on the moon and returns home like in the case of India or more recently China but we are supposed to have sent people there years ago...did we suddenly forget how to do it??? THINK!!!!

[@marksprague1280]

@@Noble570 What do you think was the driving force behind all these technical advances? Without the lunar landing effort, you'd likely be posting your drivel on a BBS, using an Apple 2E with a 100 baud audio modem.

[@mike.j3913]

You should know why That lie detector, would have pinged out saying lying lying lying lying

[@marksprague1280]

@@mike.j3913 Proof of your claim? I didn't think so. Just another grade school dropout with a big mouth.

[@DirtyTalkTv]

If u believe we landed on the moon ure living in a dream world

[@ribosome1681]

If u had good grammar u might seem like ure slightly less of an idiot.

[@maxamahnken7325]

Humans went to the Moon

[@ohwhatfunitistowalk]

@@maxamahnken7325 No proof whatsoever. And why didn't/don't we build a base there?

[@maxamahnken7325]

@@ohwhatfunitistowalk Humans went to the Moon circa 1968-1972. I don't give any Moon Landing Deniers any credibility nor ------- would I waste my time with them. To some of them may even think that the Earth is flat.

[@ohwhatfunitistowalk]

@@maxamahnken7325 Keep dreaming, troll. Some day you may wake up.

[@hydrolito]

Unicorn means one horned there are one horned rhinoceros in India, Nepal and other parts of Asian in Latin it was called Rhinoceros unicornis.

[@PatrickFoley-vf3lr]

Two shuttle disasters in low earth orbit and all those trips to the moon with old technology and nobody died???

[@SharlLegrerg]

and also there have been countless other times shuttles and other devices worked. Also have you ever heard of the Apollo 1 disaster? Or the Apollo 13 disaster?

[@Blue-jn1ph]

Yes, people have actually died trying to explore space. Are you dense? We were just fortunate enough that many things went right with the Apollo 11 mission.

[@SharlLegrerg]

@@Blue-jn1ph yeah he so dense he's about to become a black hole 💀

[@Pang_Yau]

​@@SharlLegrerg he didn't say disasters he said nobody died which is true ?

[@SharlLegrerg]

@@Pang_Yau people died in the apollo 1 disaster 💀💀💀 go back to school. Also 3 people almost died in the apollo 13 disaster. Many Soviet cosmonauts perished during the space race too

[@robertdanos805]

We sent a man to the moon over 250,000 miles but did not send a rover to check it out first yes ok NASA.

[@michaelfuchs]

Nasa landed 5 spacecraft on the moon before the Apollo landings. They were called Surveyor. Please learn a little bit about the history of spaceflight before making a comment about the history of spaceflight.

[@yoskarokuto3553]

@@michaelfuchs never go back to look the greastest legendary mission of mankind at " apollo landing site " ???

[@marksprague1280]

​@@yoskarokuto3553Why bother? You mindless fools would simply label it fake, just like you have the the photos taken by the LRO AND those taken by probes from China and India.

[@carcinogen60yearsago]

It's embarrassing a simple Google search that will prove you wrong, but you just refuse to do any research. Ironic, because you people always love to say do your own research.

[@EzekielHarau]

​@@michaelfuchs😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@InsiteG]

If we had the technology in the 60s there would be a 711 on the moon today 😂

[@youwishyoucould12]

we have the technology problem is whos going to fund it? it costed 255 billion dollars for the apollo missions why spend it on going to the moon when you can make money back using that money for wars

[@DroneWorldbelo]

Not only did we not go to the moon that day. We never EVER went to the moon.

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

You have neglected to provide any evidence to back up your claim. Is this because you do not have any? Take care

[@Ilikeformulaone]

Did we set foot on the moon maybe. But you have to be an absolute idiot to think that we have never landed something on the moon.

[@maxamahnken7325]

Man travelling to the Moon from 1969 to 1972.

[@badtuber1654]

@@maxamahnken7325 tesla blew up third rocket this year trying to do the same, with 500,000 times more advanced tech.

[@maxamahnken7325]

Man went to the Moon ------ circa 1969-1972.

[@sophiaerling7714]

If I had been to the moon and back several times, I would just speak about that, develop programs, publish articles, videos,.... Do you deeply understand what that means? Humanity went to the moon! I mean, it was in 1969 for the first time. WOW... I am so excited as I was born in 1972 and missed the first landings on the moon; My parents told me about this and all my childhood was filled with science and books on blackholes and space and I even won a prize for a speech I made about the discoveries of universe; Now I am in my 50's and I cannot wait to see it with my eyes. BUT I am sorry but... I feel soooo puzzled by the situation as years go by; When I took my son to the space museum in Washington, he told me: "Mom, it is a joke, this looks like a school project in middle school" speaking about the capsule. And then I started to question myself a lot. So now I cannot wait to prove to him that yes, men walked on the moon in 1969... But I do not know anymore. Even when I read the articles and all the scientists speaking about temperature, dust, making special equipments, testing this and that... It ois the first time in history of science that an achievement did not turn into progress. I mean... Why not just go back there like in 1969... we know how to do it, right? So let's go and then let's make improvements... but no... every 3 or 5 years... there is something that delays the process...And you know what? I think we are 30 pc to believe it did not happen and another 30 pc who do not dare to say they feel it never happened. And the other 30 pc are like me and wait for it to happen again...before they die...

[@kristianlavigne8270]

NASA have said they lost all the telemetry data and all the technology. Unfortunately. Who would have thought 😂

[@steviewonder7495]

Did you know that the Apollo 11 rocket was 363 feet tall. A shuttle is 184 feet tall. The rocket was a one way ticket with a boost and gravity return and two space shuttles one on top of the other in height just to get there and fall back down. The statue of liberty is 151feet tall from ground to torch.

[@dboydboy1000]

Your son hasn’t been mind-f#%ked with 5 decades of NASA BS, Government miseducation, Disney/Hollywood propaganda, so he can see the obvious a lot faster than you can. I took my 9 nephew to Griffith Observatory and he called out multiple lies. The more you look into NASAs programs, the more they just don’t add up. Your mind has to be open, for the majority, this is near impossible.

[@steviewonder7495]

Why go back to a nothingness? People don't go back up mount Everest even though the scenery is the best in the world. Why would you go back it would cost a billion in today's money just to scratch around like they are doing on Mars using machines to test everything. So why go to Mars?

[@maskonfilteroff3145]

@@kristianlavigne8270 Stop lying.

[@jamierobinson2466]

Maybe in another 55 years someone might actually get there .

[@neilpike6758]

if the properties of a vacuum change and the sun stops heating the moon up then men could go outside of our protective cover and stand on the hot moon.

[@kevinskinner4986]

@@neilpike6758 .... but the temperatures on the moon are only about 250F radiant. Suits for working in industrial kilns are resistant to radiant temperatures of over 2,000.

[@neilpike6758]

@@kevinskinner4986 thanks for the information. At 110c how many minutes do you think a human could survive?

[@kevinskinner4986]

@neilpike6758 Depends on the suit? You can have suits that reflect 90% of the incoming energy (that's why heat hazard suits are either white or silver) and they have a cooling system in the backpack. Probably quite a while since radiant resistance is the easiest form of heat to mitigate and there's no convection in a vacuum.

[@neilpike6758]

@@kevinskinner4986 yes I agree that there is no convection or conduction of heat in a vacuum. In his sealed suit his cooling system in the backpack would throw out heat, and as there is no convection or conduction in a vacuum, he would be boiled in his sealed suit...never mind the constant body heat trapped inside his sealed suit. Considering this science, do you still think there was a man on the moon?

[@stop-the-greed]

In the UK they were called penny dreadfuls because they printed any old bolocks

[@lee111000]

no one has been on the moon , so yes it was fake news in 1969, but we already no this

[@maxamahnken7325]

Men ----- went to the Moon.

[@saintblades]

Man-bats? More like fallen angels.

[@marlinwicks3500]

Man bats? More like skin flutes.

[@marlinwicks3500]

Man BATS? More like BAT mans.

[@donatoiacovino6968]

​@@marlinwicks3500lol

[@ceedee873]

Good catch, definitely a play on the whole "heavenly host" narrative.

[@ceedee873]

​@@marlinwicks3500That made me giggle.

[@9Dan22]

I'm now in 2023 if I go to my bedroom I completely lose mobile and Internet Signal. Can someone explain TO ME how did nasa 50 years ago when there was barely mobile phones travel to a distance 30 times larger than the distance of earth yet still managed to make calls to the earth

[@marksprague1280]

Easy. Do you have a 200 foot diameter parabolic dish as your antenna? NASA did, along with an absolutely clear line of sight to the transmitter.

[@000aysh]

Exactly @Nature Breeze. Particularly using an old wired dial telephone

[@9Dan22]

@@000aysh but I didn't say they kept in touch with earth phone. I meant some sort of a signal machine. There is no evidence they went apart from an edited clip been circulated. Oh, they lost the evidence. That's correct

[@9Dan22]

@@marksprague1280 so they claimed they had no proper camera to take photo of the full earth back then. But they had all the signalling tools that and technology to the moon that aparantly you can't get now anymore 70 years later

[@marksprague1280]

@@9Dan22 Idiot. Ham radio operators have been bouncing messages off the moon for decades, using home grown equipment. Just how hard do you think that straight single leg communication is, given NASA's budget and world wide facilities access?

[@Wypipo]

This should be called “the first great moon hoax”

[@boojiboy584]

Oh Lord, The lies are coming undone! It's a lot of fun though to watch the men behind the curtain freakout!

[@gives_bad_advice]

What is one of the lies you're talking about?

[@JohneeTruther]

There's nothing quite so powerful in this world as an idea who's time has come.[Victor Hugo] There's nothing quite so powerful in this world as a lie who's time has ran out. [Me]

[@gives_bad_advice]

@@JohneeTruther You have special knowledge that the masses lack And someday the axe will fall you and your wisdom will be recognized, your beliefs vindicated, and everyone who doubted you humiliated. That's what you feel.

[@JohneeTruther]

@@gives_bad_advice FACT!

[@marksprague1280]

​@@JohneeTrutherMembers of the Flat Earth or the Landing Denial Cults wouldn't know a fact if it punched them in the face.

[@johnd1466]

Watch the Documentary “a funny thing happened on the way to the Moon”.

[@marksprague1280]

I guess that you could consider that a documentary, if you ignore all the lies that taxi-driving con man told.

[@johnd1466]

@@marksprague1280 Anything said by anyone is dubious A certain mr neil A Said @ the Whitehouse of all places Wilbur Wright note "the only bird that can talk was a parrot, and he didn't fly very well" So I'll be breifer than both Blah blah blah "Removing one of truths protective layers" What could Neil himself meant?

[@marksprague1280]

@@johnd1466 I'd take Armstrong's word over that of a convicted criminal and proven liar any time.

[@Ruda-n4h]

@@johnd1466 I think he was being poetic.

[@scottabc72]

NY Sun is still around today and I could see them running something like this story again

[@mslondoner185]

They're doing crazy stories now, and people are still believing them.

[@ashtonbradshaw5276]

i can see it to😁

[@sigmasix3719]

Ukraine is winning 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Lmfao

[@scottabc72]

@@sigmasix3719 Dear bot, why did you decide to make a comment about Ukraine when the video and the comments you responded to said nothing about Ukraine? Please explain.

[@madamnoire7464]

Software on my android smartphone has better technology than that of 60's & 70's computers NASA had. How did that ancient camera survive the radiation of the van allen belt?

[@marksprague1280]

IIRC, NASA had one of the first Cray supercomputers. How did the camera survive? Quite easily.

[@Ruda-n4h]

The Van Allen belts are very narrow, occupying a fraction of the path between the Earth and the Moon. The Saturn V trajectory took the rocket through the thinnest part of the outer belts in about 90 minutes, so the dose of radiation was within safety limits. Each mission flew a slightly different course in order to access its landing site, but the orbital inclination of the translunar coast trajectory was inclined to the Earth’s equator by about 30°. A spacecraft following that trajectory would bypass all but the edges of the Van Allen belts. Low energy electrons are the ionising particles in the outer Van Allen belts and not electromagnetic waves e.g. ultraviolet, infrared, gamma etc. Electrons can pass through living tissue without creating much damage as they are very small. The command module’s outer hull was made of stainless steel and the (upper) heat shield from epoxy resin, which along with the fibrous insulation between the inner and outer hulls was a very effective form of shielding against protonic radiation.

[@Ruda-n4h]

@HammerTruth The Orion Mission involves taking a much longer time to travel through the Van Allen belts and modern spacecraft are controlled by very high-density computers, that are far more vunerable to particle radiation than the Apollo computers, which used low density integrated circuits and magnetic core memory, both of which are extremely radiation hard. So a new solution needs to found to two different problems than in 1969-72.

[@hybriddunce]

@@marksprague1280 sick

[@mrsbradyoldlady2523]

Even if you believe all that, and the camera survived, no one will convince me that the film would have survived, even negligible radiation would have rendered the film unprintable

[@davidfognini8526]

The only way NASA can go to the moon for real is asking China for a ride when China go to the moon.

[@white_heat.truth76]

Have you seen their footage? Confucius Say you're off your rocker!

[@Par590ty42]

Let me get it straight: you will never believe in the Apollo missions, no matter how many proofs of their veracity exist, just because they were made by the USA. But if China ever does a manned moon landing in the future, you will believe it blindly just because it was made by China? This is the most moronic and hypocritical thing I've ever read.

[@Par590ty42]

Let me get this straight: you will never believe in the Apollo moon landings, no matter how much evidence there is in favor of them, just because they are American, but you will blindly believe in a future Chinese moon landing with humans, simply because it is Chinese? This is the most idiotic and hypocritical thing I have ever read!

[@Par590ty42]

If you believe blindly in the Chinese mission but still deny the Apollo moon landings, you're a hypocrite!

[@hopefulperson9622]

People, let’s be a realistic. In a response to Gagarin’s success, Kennedy launched a Moon project, he himself stated that within 10 years America will reach to the Moon. And it happened - 3 American astronauts Aldrin, Collins and Armstrong reached the moon in space ship Apollo 11, and Armstrong was the first man to step on the Moon. That was reported by the soviets too, for for the long time they also did their best to reach the Moon in the very hot phase of space race. Even US’s enemy admitted that fact. So be brave everybody and admit it - US won the race of Moon project. And the next target is Mars.😎

[@hydrolito]

There is an Ambras Syndrome which causes hair on most of the body so if you see any extremely hairy people it could just be someone with this condition. It is extremely rare estimated to happen to about 1 in a billion people so there could be about 8 in the world. The story of beauty and the beast may have been inspired by Pedro Gonzalez later renamed Petrus Gonsalvus a Latin version of same name he married Catherine a daughter of a servant of member of a royal family which was arranged as a joke by the queen they had marriage of 40 years.

[@SharlLegrerg]

ok

[@queentrinitywombeast6472]

Being hairy is natural... we are half beast

[@johnd1466]

@@queentrinitywombeast6472 when are the other apes, gorillas, Simeon's, chimps etc gonna evolve?

[@queentrinitywombeast6472]

@@johnd1466 they're not! They're what they are for a reason

[@Affliction99]

True

[@wdfghjkl]

God damn everyone in the comment section denying the moon landing are about as dense as a collapse star.

[@aok4418]

Or, they are educated and not easily duped.

[@heyitsmeurcat6951]

no for real what does the moon landing even have to do with this video bro

[@TaxingIsThieving]

Nope, just no need for heroes.

[@BilalCan-59]

Stanley Kubrick deceived you, we never went to the moon.

[@therealzilch]

Wonderful and terrifying. Nice job as usual, BBC.

[@muhdaqil2932]

BBC is the most trusted media in the world right.🤣🤣

[@jamiekeeper6204]

The air conditioning in the suit is IMPOSSIBLE imagine the battery power?? imagine been in a oven ? How long would you last ? I don’t care how heat resistant your suit is,why more people don’t talk about this is beyond me ?

[@marksprague1280]

What do you think that the surface temperature on the lunar surface were while the astronauts were there? Have you ever bothered to look for an answer?

[@jamiekeeper6204]

@@marksprague1280 whatever temp ? Have you looked at the capacity

[@marksprague1280]

@@jamiekeeper6204 Translation: The conspiracy nut didn't bother to check and is speaking from an abyss of ignorance. Sonny, relative to the sun the moon completes one revolution per month, so every 26 hours on the moon is the equivalent of one hour on the earth. It is very easy to select a landing place and time that is the equivalent of early morning on earth, and that is exactly what NASA did. When they landed, the surface temperatures were at about the freezing point of water, and they left 75 hours or less later, long before temperatures became uncomfortable, much less dangerous.

[@yoskarokuto3553]

130 c at light side and they have only water cooling system ( water only ) 😂

[@marksprague1280]

@@yoskarokuto3553 Yes, lunar surface temperatures do get that high IN THE EARLY LUNAR AFTERNOON, over 100 hours after the astronauts left the surface. Remember that the surface temperatures during the lunar night drop to over -100c. It takes time to heat the surface.

[@suparpawarindaioksaar3951]

BBC trying hard

[@eyeball2eyeball]

The Vatican has been collecting data for more than 200yrs then NASA tells you it lost the data yeah right😂

[@daryllect6659]

As if a human has ever been on the lunar surface. Laughable.

[@marksprague1280]

Proof? Otherwise, you're just another ignorant loudmouth.

[@daryllect6659]

@@marksprague1280 🤭No, YOU are making the claim, therefor, the onus is on YOU to provide the proof.

[@marksprague1280]

@@daryllect6659 So typical of you lying freaks. You made the original post, intimating that the landings were fake, and now you are trying to dodge the fact that you have no proof.

[@daryllect6659]

@@marksprague1280 Hey! Sparky! A negative cannot be proven.

[@marksprague1280]

@@daryllect6659 Translation: You are just another pathetic liar.

[@DrDavidThor]

__ When they didn't get to the moon they had all this failed rocket science to dispose of so they invented leaf blowers. --Thor

[@wendyhughes2234]

So glad to see another who is awake enough to see the lie. [And the whole {globe} thing is a lie, even though few people can see it.

[@BadAtTeaDude]

"I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is, we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it is a painful process to build it back again." Don "Full of 💩 " Pettit

[@marksprague1280]

I see that you are still shoveling the same tired old bullshit. It appears that you lack the wit to dream up any new lies.

[@carcinogen60yearsago]

What do you think that quote means, you use it so much?

[@BadAtTeaDude]

@@carcinogen60yearsago 💤 😴

[@carcinogen60yearsago]

@@BadAtTeaDude You can't answer the question?

[@BadAtTeaDude]

@@carcinogen60yearsago I did stupid

[@morrisuddin3634]

The only people that EVER went to the moon were Tintin and his team, and there are 2 books based on these trips, Destination Moon and Explorers on the moon

[@pete401]

We’re all on a prison planet folks! No one can leave, plain and simple. We keep coming back living life after life after life.. Btw the moon is satellite. There was a time when it wasn’t there. It was put there.. Chew on that.

[@queentrinitywombeast6472]

It's a hologram lol

[@pete401]

@@queentrinitywombeast6472 holograms don’t cause tides my dear. It’s very real. It just isn’t what people think it is.

[@queentrinitywombeast6472]

@@pete401 the moon never caused tides honey lol that's just what they told you!!!

[@GodOfPlonkers]

@@queentrinitywombeast6472 then what does 😭 you’re both wrong but at least peter acknowledged that the moon affects our tides

[@queentrinitywombeast6472]

@@GodOfPlonkers lmao it does not and what you believe will never change my beliefs. That thing is a hologram like everything else in the sky. In the beginning the only light source we had was our sun. But I bet y'all believe we live on a globe and there's a curvature or that gravity has us spinning through out the galaxy lmao I don't argue with your kind because it's like arguing with Kindergartens. Lmao good day!!!

[@AchimEngels]

Keine Lüge kann groß und schlecht genug sein, dass sich nicht Menschen finden, die sie glauben wollen.

[@ahmett9207]

Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said: يٰمَعْشَرَ الْجِنِّ وَا لْاِ نْسِ اِنِ اسْتَطَعْتُمْ اَنْ تَنْفُذُوْا مِنْ اَقْطَا رِ السَّمٰوٰتِ وَا لْاَ رْضِ فَا نْفُذُوْا ۗ لَا تَنْفُذُوْنَ اِلَّا بِسُلْطٰنٍ  "O company of jinn and mankind, if you are able to pass beyond the regions of the heavens and the earth, then pass. You will not pass except by authority [from Allah]." (QS. Ar-Rahmaan 55: Verse 33)

[@Stellaaahhh]

Poor Locke

[@WesleyAtkinson]

IT'S OUR DESTINY JACK

[@slsvly]

“… later admits it was a piece of chorizo”. Enlightening indeed.

[@noelenegreebe4313]

I always believed it's a hoax. Flying to the moon and back do you know how much fuel would be needed for a trip like this?! 😂😂

[@redjack7296]

Well they did weird how even Russia confirmed they picked up the signal from the moon

[@ribosome1681]

Ever heard of inertia bucko? Oh and yeah it did take allot of fuel.

[@Roxasamico]

​@@redjack7296 we can definitely trust Russia

[@redjack7296]

@Roxasamico ok Spain, Australia, and Britain confirmed it too. What's the excuses for this one?

[@Roxasamico]

@@redjack7296 lol so will you finally stop saying this "Russia would have blabbed" nonsense? You don't give a second thought to the drivel you're spouting, you just jump from one idiotic justification to the next without a second thought. If you think the governments of the world are interested in keeping you accurately informed about anything, you live in a childish fantasy world. Russia's space programme was as phoney as NASA's was. Britain and Australia's space programmes partner with NASA too. You could follow the money and find all sorts of connections between the individuals that founded these agencies, where the funding came from etc. You aren't interested in understanding anything you just want to mindlessly defend what you were taught as a child. You're an embarrassment

[@faizalfaiz7154]

Thousand involved when 3 astronouts went to the moon and you saw the photo of the rocket. But how come they went back to the earth with only 3? No one help. No photo of the rocket when they was about to go back to earth. Like on the earth. Because if they fake it again on 'moon' , people will question them..

[@vasimmukaddam]

The Earth needs to look 10 times bigger as it should be from the moon.... But NASA forgot this and in the pic taken from Moon Surface it looks the same size as the moon as we see from earth.... 😂😂😂

[@kevinskinner4986]

Conspiracy theorists "forgot" to tell you that wide angle lenses cause objects in photographs to shrink.

[@marksprague1280]

You really need to take a course in basic photography.

[@Paul-nj5cr]

flat earthers havent yet discovered how cameras work

[@TaxingIsThieving]

Moon hoaxers actually blaming it on a wide angle lens 🤣

[@juangalvan914]

ON THE MOON !! why always the same background??? are there camaras on the other side ????????????

[@vcare4893]

Sudio door.

[@CP-nt4qx]

Ok, there’s no unicorns or fornicating lunar man bats on the moon. But there’s definitely aliens! Yes, aliens are real and are behind flying saucers. How could we be duped again? It just makes sense, right? 😂

[@TT-zo6px]

Man-bats? Sounds like demons

[@physicalivan]

hoax forever

[@fredsalfa]

This is just adding fuel to conspiracy theorists

[@heatheraskew2949]

I Just saw space x blow up I’m not so sure

[@born.to.rage.against.it.]

Hear me out. They saw him see them and moved to the far side of the moon.

[@josephsolowyk7697]

Think what they can convince you of now.

[@DavidKingMFN]

You know what rhymes with BBC and Jimmy Saville? Protection

[@SkullyTheHypnoSkull]

Elon Musk will never land on the moon. The best he can do is put a car in orbit. Jeff Bezos could afford to go to the moon, but he can't so he didn't.

[@marksprague1280]

Whether or not Musk ever makes it to the moon, he has already accomplished a major feat by successfully injecting private enterprise into spaceflight. This will have a more lasting effect on history than another landing on the moon.

[@mike.j3913]

But Elon Musk has more money than Bezos and Elon is much more smarter in space exploration than Bezos

[@marksprague1280]

@@mike.j3913 Neither has a rocket with the capability of lifting a manned craft into lunar orbit -- yet.

[@Ruda-n4h]

@@marksprague1280 Saturn V, 1969-72.

[@marksprague1280]

@@Ruda-n4h RIP Saturn V. You served honorably.

[@karicummings9229]

Not A Space Agency!!!

[@wendyhughes2234]

@karicummings9229 Astro-Nots ◄ 5378. nasha ► Strong's Concordance nasha: to beguile, deceive Original Word: נָשָׁא Part of Speech: Verb Transliteration: nasha Phonetic Spelling: (naw-shaw') Definition: to beguile, deceive NAS Exhaustive Concordance Word Origin a prim. root Definition to beguile, deceive NASB Translation come deceitfully (1), deceive (8), deceived (3), deluded (1), utterly deceived (1).

[@ForelliBoy]

I CAN'T BELIEVE THE WEEKLY WORLD NEWS WAS RIGHT :y

[@ShevetteJackson]

Lol

[@youdontseeanoldmanhavinatw4904]

So silly to think no human has ever been on the moon.

[@Interstellar2123]

Even unmanned missions to moon and mars had many failures with todays technology and here comes human missions to moon using 50 year old technology with 100% success rate for 6 times straight 😂🤣

[@therealzilch]

You might want to look up Apollo 13. And NASA's budget during and after the Apollo years.

[@shortscut7614]

You are forgetting about trial prior to mission and the death of two men

[@EmbraceBoredom-pr7rt]

I live on the moon 🌙 My name is Mr Bigfoot!

[@alltimeklazzikz]

Yeah Sure! They can not Travel to the Deepest Point on Earth the Mariana Trench, which is just around 11km in depth! but can Travel so Freakin Far Away in Space! doesnt the People use their Brains ??? wtf hilarious stpd funny stuff going on, no words!

[@kevinskinner4986]

.... they went to the Marianas Trench in 1960, 9 years before the moon landings. James Cameron filmed an IMAX down there about ten years ago.

[@alltimeklazzikz]

@@kevinskinner4986 🥱but not with their own Physical Body!!!

[@kevinskinner4986]

​@@alltimeklazzikz .... um, yes? They took a submersible. Unless you mean... like... swimming.

[@alltimeklazzikz]

@@kevinskinner4986 of course swimming!!! Your Body gets Squeezed & youll Die. Imagine what happens in Space?? Radiaton?? Enormous Minus & Plus (degrees) Temperatures!? Micro Meteorites which instantly kill a living being ?? I mean if its a Spacesuite or Swimmsuite doesnt matter our Physical Bodys arent evolved enough to conquer these steps yet!!! I used to believe the Media & so on....right now i trust no one anymore.

[@alltimeklazzikz]

@@kevinskinner4986 you can do a self experiment put just one of your fingers in a legit Vaacume Chamber, you can cover your finger with the same material which the Spacesuits are made of, guess what happens ??? I leave you to the conclusion pal... do a little Research... possible effects of Vaacume Compression on a Living being (depending on amout of time & materials used for covering!) Are these: Bone deformation, Blood is boiling lol, Cells are dying, the nerves gets stretch'd, immune system gets weaken, etc...

[@MrOptimusheath]

With all the planes crashing, I don`t want to go to the moon thanks. Count me out lol

[@sasquatchmindcontrol]

I got a good video on the moon hoax

[@Bird_McBride]

Russia has an orbiter orbiting the moon with HD cameras aboard. We'll see what's what pretty soon.

[@chaliwen7217]

There is life on the moon. Just not beavers walking upright, they are 'water bears' Tardigrades - often called water bears - are creatures under a millimetre long that can survive being heated to 150C and frozen to almost absolute zero. They were travelling on an Israeli spacecraft that crash-landed on the moon in April. And the co-founder of the organisation that put them there thinks they're almost definitely still alive.

[@daryllect6659]

"...almost definitely ..." absolutely might ? positively maybe?

[@bexleydragon5294]

It's those bear necessities 😀

[@thechroniclegamer4285]

Tardigrades dont live on the moon, they just hibernate in space for a while but then will die shortly after

[@steviewonder7495]

All Americans are off their nuts.

[@marlinwicks3500]

Israeli tardigrades crash landed on the moon?!?!? So these Israelis were cruising around in space in their rocket ship, just looking for a place to release their adorable cargo when they experienced trouble and happened to be close enough to the moon for a crash landing. That's breathtakingly hilarious hahaha!!!

[@ugenegareth9339]

I answered and said, "If I have found favor in thy sight, O Lord, show this also to thy servant: whether after death, as soon as every one of us yields up his soul, we shall be kept in rest until those times come when thou wilt renew the creation, or whether we shall be tormented at once?" 76 He answered me and said, "I will show you that also, but do not be associated with those who have shown scorn, nor number yourself among those who are tormented. 77 For you have a treasure of works laid up with the Most High; but it will not be shown to you until the last times. 78 Now, concerning death, the teaching is: When the decisive decree has gone forth from the Most High that a man shall die, as the spirit leaves the body to return again to him who gave it, first of all it adores the glory of the Most High. 79 And if it is one of those who have shown scorn and have not kept the way of the Most High, and who have despised his law, and who have hated those who fear the Most High -- 80 such spirits shall not enter into habitations, but shall immediately wander about in torments, ever grieving and sad, in seven ways. 81 The first way, because they have scorned the law of the Most High. 82 The second way, because they cannot now make a good repentance that they may live. 83 The third way, they shall see the reward laid up for those who have trusted the covenants of the Most High. 84 The fourth way, they shall consider the torment laid up for themselves in the last days. 85 The fifth way, they shall see how the habitations of the others are guarded by angels in profound quiet. 86 The sixth way, they shall see how some of them will pass over into torments. 87 The seventh way, which is worse than all the ways that have been mentioned, because they shall utterly waste away in confusion and be consumed with shame, and shall wither with fear at seeing the glory of the Most High before whom they sinned while they were alive, and before whom they are to be judged in the last times. 88 "Now this is the order of those who have kept the ways of the Most High, when they shall be separated from their mortal body. 89 During the time that they lived in it, they laboriously served the Most High, and withstood danger every hour, that they might keep the law of the Lawgiver perfectly. 90 Therefore this is the teaching concerning them: 91 First of all, they shall see with great joy the glory of him who receives them, for they shall have rest in seven orders. 92 The first order, because they have striven with great effort to overcome the evil thought which was formed with them, that it might not lead them astray from life into death. 93 The second order, because they see the perplexity in which the souls of the unrighteous wander, and the punishment that awaits them. 94 The third order, they see the witness which he who formed them bears concerning them, that while they were alive they kept the law which was given them in trust. 95 The fourth order, they understand the rest which they now enjoy, being gathered into their chambers and guarded by angels in profound quiet, and the glory which awaits them in the last days. 96 The fifth order, they rejoice that they have now escaped what is corruptible, and shall inherit what is to come; and besides they see the straits and toil from which they have been delivered, and the spacious liberty which they are to receive and enjoy in immortality. 97 The sixth order, when it is shown to them how their face is to shine like the sun, and how they are to be made like the light of the stars, being incorruptible from then on. 98 The seventh order, which is greater than all that have been mentioned, because they shall rejoice with boldness, and shall be confident without confusion, and shall be glad without fear, for they hasten to behold the face of him whom they served in life and from whom they are to receive their reward when glorified. 99 This is the order of the souls of the righteous, as henceforth is announced; and the aforesaid are the ways of torment which those who would not give heed shall suffer hereafter." 100 I answered and said, "Will time therefore be given to the souls, after they have been separated from the bodies, to see what you have described to me?" 101 He said to me, "They shall have freedom for seven days, so that during these seven days they may see the things of which you have been told, and afterwards they shall be gathered in their habitations." 102 I answered and said, "If I have found favor in thy sight, show further to me, thy servant, whether on the day of judgment the righteous will be able to intercede for the unrighteous or to entreat the Most High for them, 103 fathers for sons or sons for parents, brothers for brothers, relatives for their kinsmen, or friends for those who are most dear." 104 He answered me and said, "Since you have found favor in my sight, I will show you this also. The day of judgment is decisive and displays to all the seal of truth. Just as now a father does not send his son, or a son his father, or a master his servant, or a friend his dearest friend, to be ill or sleep or eat or be healed in his stead, 105 so no one shall ever pray for another on that day, neither shall any one lay a burden on another; for then every one shall bear his own righteousness and unrighteousness." .....2 Esdras 7:75 //////////////

[@marksprague1280]

Just what we need: fairy tales tossed into the midst of a technogical discussion.

[@ugenegareth9339]

@@marksprague1280 it won't be fairy tales, when your life on earth expire Hebrews 9:27 And inasmuch as it is apportioned to men to die once, and after this, judgment,

[@marksprague1280]

@@ugenegareth9339 Run along, Bible thumper. Leave thinking to the sentient.

[@bruceflora8975]

People who believe we went to the moon all wore mask and got a booster 😂

[@KPL400]

how would know what they wore in 1968-1972 ? ....idiot...

[@jaqua7732]

🤣🤣🤣 Well there's at least some validity to that statement, because I don't believe anybody ever went to the Moon, I did not wear a mask and refuse to be vaccinated 🤣🤣🤣

[@josec439]

Manbats fornicating with no womenbats?

[@khongking9794]

your talking about NASA as good at soace travels? and during 1960s ? and they got whooped by SpaceX? 😅

[@marksprague1280]

Thus far SpaceX's expertise is limited to launching satellites, something that NASA has been doing for 60 years.

[@scott21784]

If this was true, why did the world never land on the moon after? 😂😂

[@gives_bad_advice]

They went back five times.

[@saradis8163]

Because it never happened all Fake and Recorded like making Movies.

[@DemiCape]

@@saradis8163we did not have good enough practical and cgi effects to make something look real enough to fake a moon landing. It was simply impossible to do that. If you look at special effects and practical effects in old movies, none of them were believeable and and looked real.

[@JesusChristIsMyGodAndTheGod]

​@@DemiCapemaybe not the general public, but one of the largest companies on earth that's funded by the government and gets direct taxes could easily have that technology. you said "we" didn't have the technology, but I'm certain you realize that a multi billion dollar industry that has existed for a while now could've had the funds to make a cgi film like that.

[@ChosingGod]

If we did not go, Russia would have called us out, they were watching closely, and they have not been the friendliest of friends.

[@masterchief8085]

Yeah and somehow they did once but decided never to do it again 😵😵

[@marksprague1280]

​@@masterchief8085 Actually, they did it 6 times and had several more planned when Congress pulled the plug.

[@ChosingGod]

The reason it is taking so long to go back to the moon is because of money and no way to take the resources back and forth from earth and moon and vice-versa without a large amount of amount of money that would offset any profits that may incur.

[@itstheLittleThings9]

@@ChosingGod that is bullcrap. Take all of oprah winfreys money and you have the money, guaranteed. This is one of the reasons why people are choosing communism, communism might just take us outside our planet after all.

[@Dvenchy]

No. They have their own space hoaxes to worry about.

[@kathrynoneill5862]

Why haven't we ever gone back? That seems strange.

[@laurivaltter]

its kinda obvious why. but we honeslty have more important problems right now

[@VendeurSv]

We never had the technology to land on the moon 😅

[@budbud5377]

Unbelievable! People are so stupid! They did land on the Moon

[@samdaniel4879]

Nice Edit... Kristy & Joe

[@JamesHawkeYouTube]

People actually believe that men could fly to the Moon and walk around on it. 😅

[@youwishyoucould12]

you think you actually can get women people know thats false

[@Ali1986Koksal]

The time/era this happened in HAS to be factored into rhis stories context. In 1835 neither computers or the Internet existed and also most people wouldn't of had access to a telescope powerful enough to see what was happening on the moon. Put simply people generally took whatever newspapers printed at face value and belived things/rumours that were circulating because there wasn't a way to disprove them nearly 200 years ago.

[@lalobarenquev7318]

THEY WASTE OIL... TO MUCH FIRE... THATS UNREAL

[@ianglass8156]

Sorry about the ads!