Nice to watch interviews with people who are competent, know what their talking about, can answer details and are concise. Good job Erika and Shawn!
@NihonKaikanАй бұрын
English much?
@shazam6274Ай бұрын
@@NihonKaikan OK, ya got me! Should be: "are competent and know what their talking about, and provide details in a concise manner." Better yet: "are competent, detailed and concise" I knew what I meant and was in a hurry, so no proof reading it. Domo arigato, for catching this. Konbanwa.
@fullthrottle7985Ай бұрын
Omg really !!?? She doesn’t have a F#%*ing clue !!!!
@shazam6274Ай бұрын
@@fullthrottle7985 Examples?
@HarbourAirSeaplanesАй бұрын
Thank you for stopping by for a visit!
@MunroLiveАй бұрын
Thanks for having us!
@jeff119990Ай бұрын
I've been following this since it was announced and it is great to see all the progress. Its gonna be amazing once it is certified and in regular use. And this will only push battery tech forward for longer flights.
@JoeCool-l7hАй бұрын
I live nearby and look forward to booking a flight as soon as it is flying!
@_electricvehicleАй бұрын
As a Vancouverite, so cool to see this on Munro Live!
@foreststewart1968Ай бұрын
So impressive to see what the company is doing to navigate the technology & the regulatory process. This peek into their efforts made my day!
@feandil666Ай бұрын
Respect to the lady for delivering her full spiel very efficiently while not being annoying. Exciting actually.
@38whitcombАй бұрын
As a retired pilot it's nice the see someone that can speak with a good command and knowledge of the subject
@nicholasmurrell7904Ай бұрын
'Nice Beaver!' 'Thanks! I had it stuffed with batteries last year!'
@TonyGrayCanadaАй бұрын
Everybody assumes electric aviation means fancy carbon fiber airframes. I love that these guys are making it work with tough as nails old bush planes.
@GerhardiumАй бұрын
@@BillericaBunnies You must be a Joe Rogan fan being such a contrarian without anything to add to a discussion you simply aren't equipped to take part in.
@MashDaddyАй бұрын
Thumbs down the Troll 👿
@MsSomeonenewАй бұрын
Well it's all about how much you want to carry, if the base plane is lighter then you get to carry more weight per flight, or in turn have more batteries for greater range. An all carbon Beaver could very possibly get to double load capacity.
@carholic-sz3qvАй бұрын
of course they dont do long distance flights, composite materials have made modern aircrafts significantly way more efficient
@carholic-sz3qvАй бұрын
they might almost double their range if they uses more modern and lighter composites.
@davelariviere682Ай бұрын
Wow, this next generation power package is going to be quite the build. VERY EXCITING.
@lesbendo6363Ай бұрын
Amazing technology! Thanks for sharing Sandy! 🇨🇦
@carholic-sz3qvАй бұрын
how exactly is it an amazing technology? its just like evs
@lesbendo6363Ай бұрын
@@carholic-sz3qv one difference, if it stop working it falls to the ground.
@1voluntaryistАй бұрын
For extra safety, a "free wing" (control wing) design would have been better.
@Dusty0116Ай бұрын
@@carholic-sz3qv Well for one thing, if a EV car's battery fails in use, it just rolls to a stop. In a EV aircraft they don't have that luxury. The reliability requirement's for EV Aircraft certification are a lot higher and more stringent. In the case with Harbour Air they are building a EV Aircraft motor system into an old airframe. Basically abuilding a new motor and battery system to meet the specs of that aircraft. They don't have the luxury of off the shelf motors or battery systems. Each one is unique and the costs are much higher.
@abelincoln3261Ай бұрын
As many may know, The Philippians has about 2,000 inhabited islands The Philippines is an archipelago consisting of approximately 7,641 islands. These islands are grouped into three major regions: Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao Interestingly, only about 2,000 of these islands are inhabited... they run a lot of small commuter planes there everyday... imagine the savings in fuel pollution and noise...
@fredhinck9685Ай бұрын
How is their power produced ???? Hydro or coal. Remote pollution
@LeftCoastStephen13 күн бұрын
The Salish Sea, where Harbour Air is based is much the same. I’ll miss the sound the old radials made!
@ShahryarSaigolАй бұрын
The problem with electrifying an old plane especially a utility plane like the Beaver is that the plane is heavily built to withstand the vibration and weight of a radial piston engine plus the airframe is overbuilt with a very high service factor to make it more rugged. If an electric plane is designed from the ground up, it will be much lighter and more streamlined, needing much less power to fly and therefore have a longer flight time. Since the wings are not carrying fuel they can be thinner and lighter too.
@gregrippКүн бұрын
Pilot could loose some weight too!
@krakken-Ай бұрын
So cool to see options like this and the Regent Air Seaplane electrifying flight.
@brainworthyАй бұрын
Erika Holtz is very knowledgeable and it was interesting to hear her explain the details of going electric. Watching the float planes in Coal Harbour in Vancouver take off and land is fascinating to observe. Thanks for sharing your knowledge. Well done.
@marcusmcqueen799623 күн бұрын
A Twin Otter with electric engines would be fantastic. I could definitely see a fleet of Electric twin otters doing work in the Caribbean. Perfect for island hopping
@brianb-p65865 күн бұрын
The DHC-2 Beaver was produced from 1947 through 1967. C-FJOS is Beaver serial number 1030 as Shawn said and the Canadian aircraft registry confirms; it was built in 1956... 68 years ago and midway through the production run.
@MichaelCuthbertson-zl6inАй бұрын
A GREAT presentation! Thanky'all!👍🏾
@mikegilkeyАй бұрын
It will be so great to see where this goes in the future. Hope Sandy and fly in one
@brianb-p65865 күн бұрын
Regarding the comment about Joby's props at 8:34... all practical propellers have tip velocities below the speed of sound. Tips need to be well below the speed of sound to avoid excessive transonic effects. And no, Sandy, an original Beaver prop was not made of cast iron, even if it had cast iron hub components (which is unlikely). As you know, it had wooden blades.
@andreasnewitsch59Ай бұрын
Nice to see sandy here in Canada!
@JoelSappАй бұрын
"It was so nice seeing your Beaver"
@Jojo-o6o6wАй бұрын
@stickynorthАй бұрын
That joke gets old here because it's so common a phrase here... Just you wait till you here about our big Regina!
@KevinT3141Ай бұрын
@@stickynorthThe city that rhymes with fun.
@larrybremer4930Ай бұрын
The Beaver being a bush plane is almost as funny as Viagra being made by Upjohn.
@JoelSappАй бұрын
@@larrybremer4930 hahaha!!
@CajunGreenManАй бұрын
2:50 TBO. Time between overhauls.
@douglasatkinson2476Ай бұрын
Nice to Vancouver as your back drop. I really enjoy your talk talks Sandy.
@michaelpaczynski941Ай бұрын
I’ve been following this for years. Hats off to Harbour Air to pursue this dream. I’m left with some questions… How many cycles per year? If operated 10 flights per day at 20 minutes each day with 30 minutes to charge…2000 charge cycles/10 flights per day = 200 days. Looks like the battery gets replaced approximately every 10-18 months depending on usage and remaining tested charge capacity. If so, this explains the need for updates to the supplemental type certificate(STC) as battery technology evolves. Further explains why there isn’t a huge cost saving over combustion fuels, but should be a big saving over sustainable aviation furls. Good thing they are quieter and shift their energy source to hydro. This will be fascinating to see how it pans out. Excellent program.
@TomokosEnterprizeАй бұрын
One of a kind. I have always known and flown a Beaver and can atest to its strength and manoverability. They will be around for a very LONG time yet.
@deepgroove1000Ай бұрын
So cool.. glad Munro come to Vancouver for a visit.
@glike2Ай бұрын
I worked on R-985 and R-1340 one summer in the late 80's. But happy to see progress needed for the climate, and safety.
@tonymazelon3400Ай бұрын
Sandy is checking out the beaver
@IndaloManАй бұрын
0:56 Erica smiled when he said the 'B word'....
@MrbfgrayАй бұрын
@@IndaloMan She doesn't get as much beaver attention as she craves.
@ralphrietveldАй бұрын
Ooh nice beaver.
@jinpingthebear110Ай бұрын
I doubt this braver is that great.
@williamscoggin1509Ай бұрын
Don't tell his wife! 🫣
@jup52Ай бұрын
I really would like to see even a small demonstration and hear the motor running, but still fascinating , battery planes.
@sandmehligАй бұрын
It is a bit far away and thus not optimal. kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZjPmqyZj6yHopI
@jamesphillips2285Ай бұрын
@@sandmehlig Also they played music over the takeoff run to avoid tripping ContentID from background music.
@johnarnold893Ай бұрын
All you have to do is look, there are numerous videos of it.
@jup52Ай бұрын
@@johnarnold893 I have looked at some, but they are usually from a distance and don't show how the plane feels and sounds inside ( or close to the plane ).
@mpoulter54Ай бұрын
I think this is valuable from a research standpoint. They are sure depending on a lot of technology improvements by 2027. May make sense in some limited markets. For widespread use, still a lot of work to do to make this economical and practical.
@-LightningRod-Ай бұрын
YES !!! i am so Excited to see this,...
@titussteenhuisen8864Ай бұрын
Thank you the world needs this development
@mrkzed709Ай бұрын
Love Sandy talking to such an expert. Great technical details. They are discovering why we love electric cars! Better performance all around (as long as within range):)
@carholic-sz3qvАй бұрын
nope they arent! a giant chevy suburban diesel has up to 800 miles of range on standard fuel tanks, litteraly doubling the range is super easy with a replacement bigger fuel tank
@leoyoung7547Ай бұрын
I remember studying mediation at the school beside Balwf's monstrosity. Sometimes, when the wind was just right, they would warm up and take off from right outside the school. The fumes were the stuff of nightmares. So toxic. I am so happy that they are going electric - the first company in the world to start the process. So, I am quite proud of them.
@MikeKisilАй бұрын
No end in sight for beaver impressive men and woman and their flying machines what can be done .
@Dusty0116Ай бұрын
Welcome to Vancouver, Canada Sandy. Nice to see you up here!
@leftcoastcorrieАй бұрын
Great Video, great interview! Well done! Harbour Air is one of my favourite local companies. Best....Corrie
@flwiАй бұрын
Soo cool! All the best with the certifications! I've seen those yellow planes live from an AirBnB we stayed in when we had our road trip through Canada. Such a beautiful place.
@budgetaudiophilelife-long5461Ай бұрын
🙋♂️THANKS SANDY,ERIKA ,SHAWN AND MUNRO ,FOR THE UPDATE 😎🔋🔋🔋
@warrengee-f9lАй бұрын
Old school Beaver fan .....love what you are doing
@jamesdillon3320Ай бұрын
Great stuff Sandy!! All the best to the amazing "TOMATOE PICKER"!! Greetings from the sandy shores of Lake Huron!! Ontario, Canada!! GIDDYUP!!
@jimmykelly2809Ай бұрын
Sandy asking a lady about her beaver is peak internet
@stickynorthАй бұрын
The future of aviation right there, if only for a few niche applications to start... The Vancouver to Victoria run for example...
@comment8767Ай бұрын
The future if they can find a breakthrough technology. There is not guarantee that things get better over time. Have coal powerplants gotten better? Gasoline engines? Nuclear reators? Sure, at little bit. But not 100% better ... more like 20%. The laws of physics still apply, even to EVs.
@rhwing5095Ай бұрын
@@comment8767 The sane take.
@MichaelHBallardАй бұрын
Interesting. Great to hear how much more efficient things are coming down the battery tech pipeline.
@tonyguarino3594Ай бұрын
Wow so cool, game changer for short haul flights
@alexcook4851Ай бұрын
Very excited about this new plane!
@aaronpops4108Ай бұрын
All that money for an 82km range. crazy.
@SteveRiddel-iz3cyАй бұрын
Flight from Vancouver to Bowen island are great!!!
@harriettanthony735220 күн бұрын
For this writer alone; this is sheer amazing. He flew these A/C in the Viet-Nam War and now sees them enter the electric aviation era! Such is progress!
@nathanbanks2354Ай бұрын
Neat. Was wondering when I'll be able to take an electric flight to Nanaimo.
@CoyotehelloАй бұрын
Terrible decision from Harbour Air to discontinue the route between Vancouver-Salt Spring-Maple Bay. Destroying the communities that have supported Harbour Air for over 30 years is, to stay polite, disappointing. With a 14 day notice. I hope they will reverse that decision. That being said I am hoping to be trying this electric plane as soon as possible!
@dmacpherАй бұрын
Oh that’s too bad, loved the maple bay route
@CoyotehelloАй бұрын
@@dmacpher Please consider writing to Harbour Air asking the route not be cancelled. There are entire communities who will suffer from that decision: Hotel, restaurant, marinas, families with relative in Salt Spring and Vancouver. Thank you.
@haileyr.s8107Ай бұрын
In reality it flys for 30 minutes with 15 minutes of backup power. What a piece of garage
@davidelvin1380Ай бұрын
Brain of a dinosaur 🦕
@rhwing5095Ай бұрын
@@davidelvin1380 To be honest, the plane really is a glorified piece of garbage (for now), which is why it's going to be employed sparingly for some short scheduled hops, carrying half the passengers and load, over 10% of the distance of a normal beaver, manufactured 75 years ago. It will take many years before the new paradigm gains any real traction, and it may not get beyond short island-hop type of environments (which would probably already be seen as a staggering success for electric flight). When it comes to electric technology replacing dino fuel, the name of the game is energy density.
@trentdabs5245Ай бұрын
@@rhwing5095 Wow a intelligent person Nice to know they still exist
@armandbourque2468Ай бұрын
If every electric vehicle now in use died right now, the world economy would crash. They are EVERYWHERE, and a necessary com0onent to most industry. And in some environments, they're the ONLY safe choice. For air travel, just like ice powered air travel, we're still in the infancy of the sector. Nobody would fly a ww1 plane as a passenger vehicle these days, even if you would be allowed to. Or use a model t as a daily driver, or any kind of work vehicle.@@rhwing5095
@DrKnowNothing122 күн бұрын
Maybe with battery pack swaps it could be a great trainer? Or maybe it’s allowed to land on lakes that ban gas-powered vehicles? At least it’s nice and quiet…
@markrusk2870Ай бұрын
Need a video of it running/flying
@tizio5103Ай бұрын
This is very exciting. Perfect application for the short-hop flights in the PNW. I can't wait until we get a lighter battery chemistry that will allow us to slash the battery weight and get truly amazing range out of these things.
@tizio5103Ай бұрын
@@BillericaBunnies No magic required. We may be many years out, but I am certain we will continue to discover new battery chemistries that have > 1kwh/kg Materials don't have to be heavy to hold a lot of electrons. It's not wishful thinking, it's materials science.
@markadler8968Ай бұрын
Unless you increase the price of flights several times over and increase the size of your fleet multiple times these will never work. The extended model has 1/10 the range of a gas powered version and has to spend endless hours charging to achieve the same distance.
@tizio5103Ай бұрын
@@markadler8968 80mi range is enough for their longest scheduled route out of Seattle. If you require enough juice for a round trip, you can fly from Orcas to any of the island ports and back.
@jasonhurdlow6607Ай бұрын
Power density of batteries is still light years away from what plain old gas has. This will be shackled to short routes. Won't fly in places like Alaska.
@lewispaine4589Ай бұрын
It'll be even better when solid state batteries come into use.
@bobgraham303Ай бұрын
Great video. It won't be long before solid state will be pushing well north of 500wh/kg with smaller form factor, safer cells, lighter weight etc. Perfect for a business like this.
@mike5695Ай бұрын
Really wanted to hear it running next to an internal combustion engine one to compare the difference.
@tazeatАй бұрын
Been following this project for a while now, fascinating to see what's going on just a few hours north of me.
@TekNullOGАй бұрын
Crazy coincidence. Took my first Harbour Air flight today. So cool to see how they’re investing in battery electric motors.
@ryuuguu01Ай бұрын
I have used Harbour Air, and I hope I can ride on one in a few years.
@felixaudet5860Ай бұрын
This will become more practical as battery tech evolves.
@allancrow134Ай бұрын
I've been following the development of this plane since it was announced. I wish I had the $$ to buy some stock. Eventually, this is going to be huge. Harbour Air is blazing the trail.
@michaelbartell1166Ай бұрын
❤ wonderful thanks😊
@McCanicScot420Ай бұрын
Canada, leading the world in aviation.
@andrewashmore8000Ай бұрын
1 hour flying. On full electric that's cool.
@markadler8968Ай бұрын
Hardly, it is a complete joke. A gas powered version can fly 10 times the distance without refueling and doesn't have to spent literally days charging to go that distance.
@andrewashmore8000Ай бұрын
@@markadler8968 frankly I thought it would be less than one hour. But 1 hour is useful for alot of small regional flights, so not too bad.
@markadler8968Ай бұрын
@@andrewashmore8000 But you did not acknowledge the huge amount of time wasted charging. These planes will spend far more time charging than in the air which makes the beyond impractical and nothing more than a novelty
@andrewashmore8000Ай бұрын
@@markadler8968 yeah , well that's where good design comes in , you know it's possible to swap batteries in seconds in need a super quick turn around. But in the video , the operators talk about charging in 30 mins , and that's about the same time as a turnaround time also.
@markadler8968Ай бұрын
@@andrewashmore8000 Sure they going to swap batteries on a floating airplane that weigh several hundred if not over a thousand pounds on a dock on the ocean.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣You are hilarious.
@kisssys5414Ай бұрын
It needs a sound system inside that plays R985 sounds, the best sound of any engine and would give total confidence to the passengers.
@jasonneugebauer5310Ай бұрын
I think it is pretty good that they were able to get the electric airplane to a cost competitive cost of use. The elelectric aircraft development field is starting to produce usable airplanes which is a huge step forward. I'm not sure if there will be many use cases for electric air transportation beyond short hops of two hours or less. Unless you start talking lighter than air, which will probably do well with electric propulsion.
@brianb-p65865 күн бұрын
Takeoff is at 100% of _rated_ power, but the magni500 Electric Propulsion System (engine) is substantially derated for this application, to match the original 450 horsepower (331 kW) P&W engine in the DHC-2 Beaver. The magni650 will be used at an even lower fraction of its capability. So electric cruise requires 41% of 331 kW which is 138 kW (185 HP), compared to the gas original of 52% of 331 kW which is 175 kW (234 HP). Earlier in the flight test program, they were assuming 150 kW at cruise.
@DouglasJMarkАй бұрын
Awesome video! Thank you very much. Oh dear, not another FAA story?😭😭😭
@dansbrown1313Ай бұрын
Hello Sandy, nice to see you.
@duncanjames914Ай бұрын
I love this! It's the ideal aircraft for electrification given its STOL capabilities and intended usage. This is the future.
@ButterfatFarmsАй бұрын
@@duncanjames914 no it's not the ideal airplane for an EV is one that's designed from the get-go to be an ev. Retrofitting something like this is always going to be a half-ass solution that's less than ideal for many reasons.
@markadler8968Ай бұрын
130 km range is basically nothing and that is on the extended model in ideal conditions. Not to mention this plane will spend far more time charging than in the air. This is nothing but a gimmick with a fancy paint job.
@BruceBusbyАй бұрын
@@markadler8968Exactly!
@AlbertZonneveldАй бұрын
@@markadler8968 There are many short haul targets you could cover with short haul ePlanes. Think of coastal islands that often have regular or even irregular services. Installing a battery and solar panel on those islands could makes charging to extend the range easy. Not sure a seaplanes is the best option as it does not seem to be a very energy efficient plane
@axelzilm778Ай бұрын
Wow 82 kms that is amazing AF better just stay near water
@Barskor1Ай бұрын
I wish Sandy could mass produce his airplane with updated tech and materials it would rock!
@vvvciАй бұрын
FANTASTIC! To see the first "real life" EV aircraft be a DeHavilland eBEAVER mod! I've long thought that the Beaver is one of the very top aircraft candidates for a new, carbon-fiber generation _(I believe someone has made something similar in a 4-6 place, also STOL, even more capable, but expensive turbine powered ac)_ - but to see this super versatile, super reliable aircraft be one of the first to be fitted with a production EV battery powered electric motor is great. IF these do work out, go in to production, and prove reliable... then you can bet the AEROSPACE community will jump in, THEN there will be EVEN MORE DRIVERS for those developing the next gen of lightweight, high power, super reliable EV batteries.
@brianb-p65865 күн бұрын
Pipistrel has had multiple battery-electric models, including one which has been certified since 2020 and in use by flying schools. Harbour Air's goal is the first battery-electric aircraft in commercial passenger operation - they may make that.
@urbanstrencanАй бұрын
Great to see aircraft EV resto mods 😂😂❤❤
@Vagabond1209Ай бұрын
Electric MOTOR! Engines have pistons
@meofnz2320Ай бұрын
Not all engines have pistons!😂 I think you’re right about the difference though: motors convert energy directly to mechanical force, whereas engines convert fuel to energy to mechanical motion. But it’s hard to find an authoritative definition these days and they overlap in some cases.
@hughwaller6789Ай бұрын
Tranpprt Canada and mos t likely the FAA insist on "Engine"@meofnz2320
@toddfleury7324Ай бұрын
Do motorcycles have pistons? Motorboats?
@Vagabond1209Ай бұрын
@@toddfleury7324 meofnz2320 is correct. Think of Wankel engines. The engineering perspective is that engines convert exploding or expanding gasses to pressure (energy) to move a mechanical device. Either way, thanks Sandy and the Harbour Air team for this experiment in electric motor propulsion. We will never get to the end goal without taking these steps
@ParkourBrianАй бұрын
FORD ENGINE COMPANY doesn’t even understand this!! 😡 makes me so angry I could shit myself. Terrible people and damned straight to hell, the lot of them! 100% agree with you, vagabond
@marcschouten3527Ай бұрын
Canadian beavers are the best beavers!
@hybridstoatdragonАй бұрын
Im impressed
@charlesmarsh9608Ай бұрын
Good luck
@brianb-p65865 күн бұрын
This is the first time I have heard an explanation of the battery packing of the first proptype and of the planned final design from Harbour Air. The total volume of battery packs in the nose, belly, and rear cargo area will be less than that of the battery in the first prototype.
@blackdice42Ай бұрын
Very cool
@williamcrowley5506Ай бұрын
The haters really don’t get it, this whole thing is pretty damn exciting. Ice vehicles are horribly inefficient, the engineers and all involved are driving energy efficiency and capacity. The next 10 years are going to be fascinating
@bozosplayhouseАй бұрын
I wouldn't call them "haters" as maybe a few have been around aviation for a while.. that said, I would consider them as being merely cautious. My father was a bush pilot from the early 70's in the arctic and northern Canada.. Beavers and otters were a mainstay in every operation of your day. Now if you could ask one of those pilots if they would replace it with an electric one, you would lose the conversation hands down. They know these aircraft and what they're capable of like a slide rule and a bag of books.. contingency plans and operational safety are welded into their operation as a "safe" aircraft.. nothing spared! Replace their near 500Nm range power plant with an iffy at best bomb in the back seat that requires esoteric care and temperature management and flies for a small fraction of the IC engine's time.. where are the margins for contingency or just a bad day?.. a 10 minute reserve?.. 5 minutes? That may work for a trip out to the spit and back. Then there's the new CARS amendments for this technology that are still being written and not to mention STCs before it ever goes into regular commercial passenger service. I've seen that some of this has been "fast tracked" because it's a new technology and the BC government wants the feather in their cap for their green initiative. This being called a perfect fit by Harbor Air has it's questions.. I've flown to victoria many times on floats from the YVR float base, some days it's nice, but most it's not so nice.. and to be quite honest, having a full tank of fuel is a piece of mind.. even in a 60 year old cessna. What about an "emergency" situation? Li-ion technology really doesn't like water, especially salt water and prone to violently erupt if they meet. So landing on water is inherently a dangerous task in itself.. flip the bird or tear open a float and your ultimate failure point has been attained.. a Lithium battery fire that won't go out, a haze of heavy toxic smoke that bubbles to the surface for hours if not days. A tank of avgas or kerosene just doesn't have the same urgency or peril. Your EV starts puffing a bit of smoke and you can just pull over and let it cook off.. a flight battery maintains flight and without it, you cease to fly.. after that point there will be a battery fire in the water and your raft has burst into a chemical fire. Harbor Air is a landmark along the river on the south terminal of YVR, I've flown with them several times over the years and probably will not try their electric service until there's significant improvement in the technology.. call me paranoid or a 'hater', but some would call me cautious. The waters of the pacific northwest eventually took my father and others I've known over the years in various aviation accidents, every one of them 100% avoidable.
@williamcrowley5506Ай бұрын
@@bozosplayhouse I am talking about the electrification haters. The ones whining about renewable energy and electric vehicles
@bradkubota6968Ай бұрын
You mean "the haters" sorry realists the KNOW electrification CANNOT happen as there is not enough COPPER. The isn't. Stop pretending there is. We have long since exhausted the high grade and easy to get to copper ore bodies. The remaining ones are at 14,000 ft or remote and often pristine locations. Some are in countries in Africa being corrupted by China to secure. There is no substitute for copper. Future demand is near TRIPLE of projected supply. Just EVs will more than double the power GRID needed. That's all COPPER. Everywhere you see a transformer you will need another big can of copper. B.C. dark rainy and mountainous is totally unsuitable for efficient wind and solar. The pristine river valleys are pretty much all dammed. So where are you putting the Nuclear plants? Better get on that. Now add in home heating by electricity. Delusional. Won't happen.
@billhanna2148Ай бұрын
Also aviation gas is STILL leaded gas and has been since the 50's and removing it should be a priority.
@williamcrowley5506Ай бұрын
@@billhanna2148 it makes me scratch my head why people would want to cling to gasoline when it is toxic, and requires a whole ecosystem of other toxic crap to help turn it into motion. How have we grown to hate m innovation so much that we would harm our lives to cling to an arbitrary thing
@geirmyrvagnes8718Ай бұрын
I am watching all of this just for the opening outtake. 😆
@brianb-p65865 күн бұрын
This (at 2:06) is the first time I've heard a battery-electric aircraft builder clearly define the battery energy density assumed by their hoped-for performance specifications. Note that while MagniX has promised 300 Wh/kg (at the whole battery level, not module or cell level) they have not yet delivered this, so even Harbour Air's second conversion (now being built) will not achieve the stated payload and range.
@williamscoggin1509Ай бұрын
TOO COOL 😎
@lifeaccordingtobriАй бұрын
You can't beat a good beaver. It's nice to see a beaver upgrade available now. Soon you'll be able to have a fresh beaver.
@Jojo-o6o6wАй бұрын
yawn
@comment8767Ай бұрын
I'm thinking about upgrading to blonde.
@willm5814Ай бұрын
Would be great to hear the difference in noise level
@MrAdopadoАй бұрын
It will still be pretty noisy ... prop noise will remain significant.
@daviddenley3512Ай бұрын
Great Stuff...electric flights at last,
@randallmauger5659Ай бұрын
Cool!
@jairokgАй бұрын
Cut!!! Lunch time
@garbizwalАй бұрын
Motor. Motor. Motor.... MOTOR! :) She should know this.
@hughwaller6789Ай бұрын
She does. TC and FAA don't!
@dmacpherАй бұрын
@@hughwaller6789yup!
@PabloGonzalez-hv3tdАй бұрын
She's not wrong.
@brianb-p6586Ай бұрын
She knows what terms are correct... but apparently you don't.
@davefroman4700Ай бұрын
With how far battery recycling has come today? I can foresee a time in the very near future where the cost of purchasing the new battery will be weighed against the material value of the old battery you are trading in. Think of it like a core charge on your alternator or water pump today, only much more valuable. Its already cheaper to recycle and reclaim materials in batteries today, than it is to mine, ship and refine new materials.
@swecreationsАй бұрын
With time cycle life will continue increasing so operating cost will go down.
@FlintStone-c3sАй бұрын
The de Havilland Beaver, the aircraft that refuses to die.
@rossr6616Ай бұрын
great Solar Impulse connection!
@treynolds94Ай бұрын
How do you measure the battery dagradation over years of flying and environmental changes. Flying 86 kms max depending on weather winds ect. at 100% maybe okay for a couple years but how do you know when 100% is no longer getting you as far when you crash.
@prestontucker1687Ай бұрын
Hopefully Twin Otter is next!!!
@jimkitt2128Ай бұрын
It sounds like they still have some proprietary technology going on with the motor and battery, but did they share with you whether or not there's a gearbox on that motor? They could easily increase the mechanical advantage by as much as 14% if they did, and your mention of a 5-blade with a similar disk area should certainly help with performance as well. The added prop blade may be an efficiency tradeoff with the gear reduction, but that could be a worthwhile trade. I see there are a few more videos of this same plane, so I'll check them for any mention of a gear reducer. I'm pretty sure Archer went to a gearbox on their eVTOL a while ago and in the end, the right prop tech with a gearbox will probably be what the endgame looks like for STOL too. The math certainly suggests it.
@brianb-p6586Ай бұрын
The motor (or engine) is the well-known MagniX design. Like most aviation electric motors, it is direct-drive for reliability. The motor is designed to suit the desired propeller speed.
@dmack1827Ай бұрын
Besides Vancouver-Naniamo, where is an 87 km range going to get you? What is the turn time on battery charges?
@brianb-p65865 күн бұрын
Most of Harbour Air's routes are within that range... which is why they are pursing this technology.
@davydatwood3158Ай бұрын
Well, if their timeline holds I'll have to try and book a flight next time I visit family in Victoria.
@NaughtyGoatFarmАй бұрын
Tell us about your beaver....
@dalel3608Ай бұрын
MagniX is also working with NASA on their multi-engine eTransport; so hopefully they'll be able to certify a few different motors and battery packs to choose from for aviation.
@CWK0912 күн бұрын
These should follow the track of byd and scout trucks where you use a gas generator for extended range. It would nice to know what battery size is in this. 50 miles seems way too short no?.