The Hart-Fuller Debates on Morality and Law

[@darenmcleod2003]

I'm convinced that clarity is a gift with this lecture, much thanks.

[@amandaskinner3940]

0

[@indigo7748]

Sir, you've just saved my grade in Philosophy of Law this year. I've been struggling for ages with Hart's article and comprehending his many, many thoughts on positivism. You've summed everything up so well and I truly owe you for the hours of frustration and fear you've saved me. I wish you nothing but happiness.

[@melonv.1862]

true expertise is when you can discuss these topics in a way that is simple and clear to understand. ive been in a legal theory course for 4 months but have never understood the subjects as well as i did here. you are amazing! thank you so much.

[@AndresEduardoMacGaul]

Amazing master class. Thank you so much.! Greetings from Argentina!

[@zamanrajab2339]

Clear and comprehensive explanation of Hart and Fuller's theories and debates. Appreciate your lecture Pro.

[@tracy-leesorangedasilva4526]

Finally English explanation, thank you so much!

[@frankiedirk1099]

Very well done! This thread was a godsend (no pun intended) ... was havign some trouble understanding

[@richardfrimpongy8571]

Thank you sir, for the clarification

[@yangsteven7839]

My professor spent 6 hours on lectures to teach us the debate between Hard and Fuller and Im still confused. While this dude used 30min to explain what's going on and I understood it perfectly, amazing.

[@hasibarian3588]

Where can i find all his lectures on Philosophy of law? His KZbin channel has some videos, but not all that i'm seeking

[@dushime252]

Clear and concise. Correction: HLA Hart actually rejected Austin's command theory.

[@jiesun2840]

God bless you!

[@sachabloke]

Great lecture thanks

[@OzaiJr]

wow the debate between medieval morality grounded in the transcendent and the argument of enlightenment thinkers (of a morality grounded in the natural world).

[@anupriya4003]

Brilliant explanation

[@havenbastion]

You can't have law without having ethics first and ethics is formalized morality. Law is just more formalized because it includes bureaucracy and scale, and less ethical because it includes entrenchment and cronyism.

[@rajnigupta3187]

Why we are dependent on western theory more for Indian jurisdiction except that is international law.

[@Universe774]

I am with Fuller

[@evansjohnarek2271]

This Professor, the Law of Jurisprudence flows in his blood. aman with the smartest brain of Law.

[@Jay_Raps254]

Why won't all lectures be this simple?

[@blenm5037]

how does the proceeding legal events to the holocaust compare to the legal events after the end of British rule in India, Africa and many other "colonized" countries in which millions and millions of people were killed?

[@jemapellerajus3356]

🎾

[@guruprasadsingh1759]

Firstly, Fuller talks about morality is something outside the legal system... Next he says there is inner morality... Clarify Anyone

[@mohammedhassan4799]

Hart could rather be termed as ‘Soft Positivist’.

[@nme-bp7cf]

Lol legal positivism makes no sense, what a dumb concept

[@lola13802]

So glad I ran into this channel. This topic is on my mind everyday.

[@se8928]

Hart did not justify the Austinian command theory, he rejected it

[@karandhami4385]

Wow, you made it so much easier to comprehend both sides of the debate! Thank you!

[@stevealper2860]

Thank you, five-star presentation--excellent.

[@prativakhatri5982]

This lecture is much clear and very much useful that everybody who wants to understand hart fuller debate should go into it. :)

[@PrinceDarkness94]

Thank you for the video. Really helpful to further improve my understanding in Jurisprudence subject. I'm a law student from Malaysia anyway.

[@damaliemartha3417]

Thank you. You're so clear and precise.

[@anandbissoon4448]

What a great discourse. This clears up a lot for me, thanks👍👏

[@k4smscallsbackup162]

Thank you! Have a jurisprudence exam later this evening. This is sooo good to listen to.

[@vincentbanta510]

I LOVE THIS LECTURE THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PENUMBRA AND YOUR INSPIRATION.....THANKYOU!!!Scooter Goldwing

[@MegaMOUNDS]

Very good presentation, the most clear and concise explanation of the Hart-Fuller debate I've seen.

[@maameadom8173]

Thanks for throwing more light on this

[@roslyndrayton6716]

Vidya your presentation is very clear and concise. I will be dropping in more often to hear your presentations as I am a student. Thank you again

[@suvanshitjaiswal9495]

Roslyn Drayton ' Vidya' is not a person here, it literally mean 'knowledge' in Hindi( indian national Language) These video are uploaded as a program by Government of India, through Ministry of Human Resources Development, to provide education to those you can't afford college due to finance or any other problem.😃

[@anandbissoon4448]

His name is A. Singh Rathore

[@Mahan1372]

Thanks a lot.

[@ziyasajohardeen2909]

Thanks a lot... a nice presentation with very clear explanation. Found useful.

[@rubenringelmann1541]

Thank you

[@JackadullBoy1]

A very clear lecture, though you have misstated the meaning of “penumbral” in this context. The problem of the penumbral case is that of the meaning of a term in borderline- shadow- areas, that is, those that are disputed or undefined, not determined by the law as it is, in which judges must exercise discretion.

[@iziziziziziziziziziziz]

Thank you, you are the best. This helped me so much for my exam YOU ARE AMAZING

[@keziaansah5624]

I love this lecture. Thank you very Sir.

[@clintonnyamongo9638]

Very very enlightening.

[@ByronFWhite]

Thank you.

[@JKVTrucking007]

Thank you!

[@billwilliamson1506]

Excellent and clearly worded lecture!

[@HiImPete]

So good. Cheers!

[@paulobrien3348]

Great stuff. More please. 😁👍

[@philip9838]

Excellent! Just about to do an exam on legal philosophy, really helped , Thanks!!

[@priyankasharma1273]

SAME

[@ruekayz7074]

Thank you.very helpful

[@jesskelly2931]

Is there a transcript for this I could have?

[@farazkhan7035]

Thankyou very much

[@nuraguyo7645]

perfect presentation...

[@herryndulunga6429]

it is nice one and helpful to my side...

[@vladgavrilov3875]

Fantastic video!

[@ivanten1940]

Well done man! Great content

[@AakashSinghRathore]

Thanks for the kind words. In addition to the videos, you can see my books on diverse topics at my author page: amazon.com/author/aakash I will have 4 new books coming out this year, and lots of new videos!

[@ArunAllen1]

Aakash Singh Rathore Hi Aakash, you phrase Hart's minimum content of natural law as a minimum content of morality, but is this not a conflation which Hart did not intend? Why (and how) must a common human desire for preservation of life infuse morality into law? Is it not a purely descriptive (not normative) statement?

[@AakashSinghRathore]

Hi Connor. I'm not sure that Hart was too clear about that. But the word 'morality' is quite opaque here. This video gets a lot of views, but I have to tell you that it is problematic at several points. I like your analysis in this and other comments.

[@linahlebisi7415]

Thank you this was helpful

[@christopherbelfield9512]

Great Video

[@prakashgajendragadkar5227]

very nice presentation.

[@kutkut2809]

Amazing

[@jyotishgupta7191]

superb

[@obeychitowamombe6288]

Insightful

[@bagtygulnurberdiyewa1213]

what the main difference between H.L.A. Hart and Lon Fuller’s theoretical positions in respect of the distinction law/morality as applied to Nazi immoral laws.

[@monumeerut516]

Good discussion and relatively clear also

[@lumumbanyaberi4016]

Best exposition

[@se8928]

The grudge informer case- No the husband did not face death in the end! incorrect information

[@geofreynoah1882]

SUPERB LECTURE

[@shaniasampson7921]

I thought it was the Hart/Devlin debate

[@PhilosopherPrince]

I found this while writing a semester project about this. Soooo helpful.

[@thinleyom6949]

Hi, on what topic did you do your project

[@ArunAllen1]

32:50 the text is wrong I think. It says would not, instead of would.

[@AakashSinghRathore]

You are right.

[@anandbissoon4448]

Its a typo, listen to what was said by the lecturer

[@neilmukherjee5666]

Make.This.Guy.Famous

[@nadirjamal7631]

Plz provide notes of ur lecture

[@genius13254]

This was fantastic. Philosophy is panned for being esoteric, but here it is as accessible as arithmetic.

[@onyedinachibright1566]

nice , i like it

[@elmacavcic7451]

Theoretically very beneficial. However, more practical examples would be kindly appreciated.

[@elmacavcic7451]

Thank you. :)

[@aarren2]

what happened to your accent?

[@pranshuljoshi8371]

At 19:29 he calls Nazi SS officers , Stormtroopers lol. May be the force be with you sir

[@desimunda2314]

Waow!!!! Fake accent