The Historical Jesus and Ebionites were Jewish. Paul and Roman Christianity are a LIE!

Рет қаралды 1,738

Tzaddik Media

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 89

@barrylehrbaum7009 7 ай бұрын

Yeshua referred to himself exclusively as the "son of man".

@rickdavies4801 7 ай бұрын

Not true at all.please read the torah and the Tanaka.

@barrylehrbaum7009 7 ай бұрын

30 times Yeshua refers to himself as Son of Man in the Gospels. I was not talking about the TNK. @@rickdavies4801

@cosmingcosma 6 ай бұрын

@@rickdavies4801 and to understand "son of man" go to Daniel 7! This "son of man" have a throne in heaven!!!

@barrylehrbaum7009 5 ай бұрын

@@rickdavies4801 I said nothing about the Torah or Tanakh. Yeshua salls himself the "son of man" 30 times in the Gospels.

@BeckyCathell 27 күн бұрын

@@barrylehrbaum7009 man means human, so its like saying son of Mary. God created "man" in his own image male and female.

@jib7026 7 ай бұрын

Jesus quotes the oral law in all thr Gospels, even John. Even the author of Acts quotes the oral law.

@2000jbcarvalho 4 ай бұрын

It’s a never ending discussion, until all recognize Jesus/Yeshuah the Messiah.

@TzaddikMedia 4 ай бұрын

Even if he was standing in front of you, you couldn't recognize him.

@BeckyCathell 27 күн бұрын

@@TzaddikMedia every knee shall bend every head shall bow, that means you too. We will see him coming in the clouds with all His Glory! I dont think any one will have any problem knowing who he is. Especially Jews who nailed him to cross. Yep, that is what the Bible says. till next time.....

@TzaddikMedia 26 күн бұрын

@@BeckyCathell 1) your using extra-biblical books to claim that. Let's just stick with the original Bible. 2) Crucifixion was never a Jewish practice. Tens of thousands of Jews themselves were crucified by the wicked *Romans* who used crucifixion for centuries.

@nazorean 7 ай бұрын

There is a principle in the TaNaKh, if you remember, that the sign of a fulfilled prophecy is that the prophecy is fulfilled. Like: how do we know we will exit Egypt? By the fact that you will have exited it and will make a sacrifice at the mount… How do we know Yeshua is the Mashiakh? Simply by the retrospective look at the history of humanity, duh! In his name the Torah and the Mitzvot were brought to the nations - with an iron rod (sword) the nations were preached the knowledge of the God of Israel and the pagans were dashed to pieces like pottery…  The nations are at his feet - and now are ready to be handed over to the Father. Mission accomplished.

@MukbangMukbangMukbang111 26 күн бұрын

It’s interesting that Jews don’t believe in Jesus for not redeeming the world but He has definitely redeemed me and a lot of other people who were physically healed, set free from drugs, and lives completely turned around from doing evil things to doing good things.

@TzaddikMedia 25 күн бұрын

I'm so glad you're off drugs and on a wiser, healthier path, my friend. Many secular Jews have found the same healing and salvation in God. All thanks and praise goes to Him.

@BeckyCathell 25 күн бұрын

Don't forget what we have to look forward to, our new glorified bodies when Jesus returns!

@soundphilosophy 7 ай бұрын

James, the brother of Jesus, and leader of the true church after his death, was obviously an eyewitness; to say nothing in the NT is first person testimony is willful ignorance and/or intellectual dishonesty; that rushed analysis degrades the quality of this talk significantly. What are you going to say, James didn't write the letter of James?

@jib7026 7 ай бұрын

Most scholars don't believe that the letter of James was actually written by James the Just.

@soundphilosophy 7 ай бұрын

@jib7026 I've never heard that before by *anyone* speaking of James, give references please, and show it is in fact "a majority." Also was not James the Just the brother of Jesus who preached about him after the crucifixion?

@TzaddikMedia 7 ай бұрын

It's a complicated issue. The only reason we believe the canonical books are authentically apostolic and not other contemporary texts (such as the so called "gnostic" texts) is because the early Catholics say so. This doesn't mean that they were always lying just because they're Catholic but it does mean that we should approach claims of authorship with an open mind and intelligence. We shouldn't just believe their claims for no reason. That's why we need a firm foundation in kosher Torah Judaism and modern scholarship (from Jews, Christians, and seculars). Sometimes we'll find that apostolic authorship is probably the case. Other times, we find that claims of apostolic authorship are probably not true... And sometimes we just won't have certainty.

@TzaddikMedia 7 ай бұрын

@@jib7026 Most scholars don't believe any book in the NT were written by the supposed author, except a few of the epistles of Paul. With that said, "James" was absolutely written by a Jew. The Greek is considered bad and the theology is very anti-Pauline.

@hiltonchapman4844 7 ай бұрын

@@TzaddikMedia What a thorough arsehole! The liar calling the truther a liar. Typical behaviour of an arsehole. Jews, please accept Jesus as your Messiah, or else you'll be consigned to the eternal fires. HC-JAIPUR (18/03/2024) .

@Yahuahisechad 3 ай бұрын

Wouldn’t the “Lost Sheep of the House of Israel” that Y’shua said He came for, be the northern tribes of Israel before they were exiled by Assyria? I enjoyed your teaching even if I believe in the Messiah Y’shua. 😊 Shalom

@TzaddikMedia 3 ай бұрын

I have heard some decent arguments for that interpretation. However, I tend to see the "lost sheep of Israel" as pointing to Jews who are not fully Torah observant, probably a reference to the Hellenized Jews of the Diaspora or even the Sadducees.

@changhulu4922 7 ай бұрын

Hell is forever, there is literally no use in denying the messiah. So why do it? Moses and Abraham praise him every moment in heaven, you should too.

@javierr2790 7 ай бұрын

Ecclesiastes 9: 5 For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. John 3: 13 "No one has ascended to heaven but he that descended from heaven." The dead are in the grave waiting for the resurrection as in Daniel 12 and portrayed on The Day of Trumpets. Hell is not forever: Revelation 20: 14. Don't follow tradition, STUDY your Bible!

@changhulu4922 6 ай бұрын

@@javierr2790 Physical bodies will be resurrected but they will join the souls which are already in heaven, to reap their reward along with their soul, or to hell, to reap the chastisement along with the soul. Believe me, friend, hell is eternal, once your life ends the "history book" of your existence is closed and you will be judged on what you did while it lasted. And then you will be put to the left or to the right, heaven or hell, maybe purgatory, but those who go there are already saved, they will just be cleansed for a time.

@changhulu4922 6 ай бұрын

@@javierr2790 And let me tell you friend, this book is enormously complicated and not for every joe to read and reach their own conclusions. We have priests for that exact reason, these men study it their whole lives and are able to reach those conclusions. You should honor your heritage, and above all, your God, and go back to the church.

@TzaddikMedia 6 ай бұрын

Hell is uniquely Christian. We Jews don't have Hell. It's a pagan Greek concept.

@changhulu4922 6 ай бұрын

@@TzaddikMedia Disbelieving it won't make it go away. God came to save us from it, died on the cross for our sins, if we accept him we can be saved, that includes you, but not if you deny your own redemption.

@mattt21 4 ай бұрын

I hear this all the time and it is just a blatant lie... "The NT contains no eyewitness accounts of Jesus." Listen: The Gospel of Matthew was written by Matthew, a Jewish follower of Jesus, one of the 12 apostles, also called Levi. The Gospel of John was written by John, a Jewish follower of Jesus, one of the 12 apostles. The same John also wrote epistles 1st John, 2nd John, 3rd John & the Book of Revelation. Simon Peter, a Jew, also one of the 12, wrote 1st and 2nd Peter. James, the half brother of Jesus, wrote the book of James. And Jude the brother of James and other half-brother of Jesus, wrote the book of Jude. All of these men are Jews. So discounting Paul, Luke & Mark, who are also Jews (Mark and Luke were close followers of Peter and Paul respectively), that's still the majority of the NT, written by people who had followed Jesus personally. Secondly, Paul never said that Jews need to keep the law at all. I'd like to here a verse citation where Efraim thinks that is the case, because it's not there. The Church is made up of believing Jews and Gentiles who are all saved by the same means - grace through faith in Jesus Christ. Also, unbelieving Jews completely miss the point when they talk about sources, dates and reliability of NT books, in the manner of a secular scholar. Do they bring the same scrutiny to the Books of Moses? Daniel or the prophets? The Writings of the NT are every bit as divinely inspired as the works of Moses or any book of the OT. It is also *exclusively Jewish literature* and regarded by true believers in God and all Scripture, Jew and Gentile, as canon, along with the Hebrew books of the OT. To say we can't listen to Paul because he never personally met Jesus in the flesh is insane - did all writers of the Hebrew Scripture meet God? No? Then why listen to them? How far apart were those Books written? Does it matter? Yes the NT authors are critical of Jews at times. But if you want to call them antisemitic, or Roman agents, then you will have to call the prophets in the OT the same, as they were at least as critical of unbelieving or sinful Jewish people. All Israelites were once gathered around Horeb, but many disbelieved and distrusted Moses - indeed, some Jews openly rebelled and God killed them. It is no different today. All the Hebrew Scripture prophesies Jesus, and Moses is a servant of Jesus too. It was Jewish people responsible for the death of the greatest Jewish prophets in the Tanakh. There has always been a faithful remnant to the true God, and this remnant at the time of Jesus recognised Him as the Son of God and true Messiah. Efraim starts by saying Jesus never meant to include Gentiles and he was a Zealot, then before long he's quoting Rabbis saying Jesus was as great a prophet for the Gentiles as Moses was for Jews. How do you reconcile this? He reckons it's just some gentile emendations to the texts with zero evidence but his own wishes. In truth, he doesn't believe the NT and he doesn't believe the OT either. Jesus told the Pharisees, Moses will condemn you not me, because if you had believed his words you would have believed me. John 5:45-46 Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me [Yeshua]. ^ From Jewish eyewitness apostle John, Jesus' beloved disciple.

@TzaddikMedia 4 ай бұрын

The so called "Gospel of Matthew" never even claims to be written by anyone named Matthew. And the "Gospel of John" never claims to be written by anyone called John. Regarding the Yochanine Epistles, they don't claim to be written by the same author as the gospel and even the early Church debated this subject. 2nd Peter was also rejected by many in the early mainstream Church on the grounds that it was not written by the Apostle Peter. You've clearly never studied the history of this subject and it's pretty funny.

@mattt21 4 ай бұрын

@@TzaddikMedia None of the books of the Torah 'claim' to be written by anyone named Moses. Modern scholars believe Daniel was written by a group of Maccabean era Cohenite Priests, they believe Isaiah had three authors. It goes on. You reject the divinity of the NT books so you're approaching them just like many do the OT books, whose arguments you likely reject. Jesus Christ is the Living True God. You're just in rebellion, like Corah to Moses you know. This is in the NT too Stephen says in the wilderness the people rebelled and said of Moses 'who made you a ruler over us?'. So you like to cling to the writings of Moses but truth is had you been there in his day you'd have been one of the murmurers despising him. Because it's the same Holy Spirit. Of course, we were all rebels once. But you have to realise you're fighting the truth and repent and believe in Jesus. Otherwise, the lake of fire is very real... Deuteronomy 18:15-19 The LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet [Jesus] from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me [Moses]; unto him ye shall hearken; 16 According to all that thou desiredst of the LORD thy God in Horeb in the day of the assembly, saying, Let me not hear again the voice of the LORD my God, neither let me see this great fire any more, that I die not. 17 And the LORD said unto me, They have well spoken that which they have spoken. 18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. 19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him. Acts 3:22-23 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. 23 And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people. Hebrews 1:1-2 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; Psalms 2:12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him. Ezekiel 20:38 And I will purge out from among you the rebels, and them that transgress against me: I will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn, and they shall not enter into the land of Israel: and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

@Yahuahisechad 3 ай бұрын

@@mattt21 No Matt…. Y’shua was not God. You are committing idolatry for saying that. Even Y’shua quoted the Shema as the greatest of all commandments. “Hear O Yisrael. YHWH our Elohim, YHWH is ECHAD! (ONE)” YHWH cannot be housed in human flesh. YHWH cannot die. YHWH cannot be tempted. Y’shua the Son of Man, died and was tempted. He was anointed by His Father to do the work set before Him at His immersion. You should NEVER say anyone is equal to YHWH by saying He was YHWH in the flesh. Y’shua was not, is not, never has been YHWH!

@mattt21 3 ай бұрын

@@Yahuahisechad Which Book are you reading? Colossians 2:9 (KJV) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

@Yahuahisechad 3 ай бұрын

@@mattt21 first off. I don’t read the false apostle Paul’s letters. I read the Tanakh and the 4 gospels. Y’shua is the prophet like Moshe. Deut 18:18-19. When you put the Son of Man at the same level as YHWH the Creator, you are committing the sin of idolatry. Y’shua was a man, that was anointed by His Father at His immersion. You need to really ask YHWH to lead you into ALL TRUTH! The trinity is a complete LIE! Made up by Pagan Rome. It wall cause many people in the end to hear these words, “depart from Me.” Study, study and study some more! DO NOT EVER PUT ANYONE AT THE SAME LEVEL AS YHWH! Y’shua prayed to His Father. He and the Father are not the same. He knew the Father was above Him. Shalom

@nurledge 3 ай бұрын

what was the Judaism like prior to Jesus's advent? Were the Jews deviated from monotheism?

@TzaddikMedia 3 ай бұрын

@@nurledge How far back? 1200 years or 100 years? 1st century BCE and 1st century CE Judaisms were essentially the same. No, ever since the time of Ezra, Jews have been faithful to God and the Torah. The Haskala of the 1800s gave way to liberal, secular Jews but that says more about the people than the religion.

@nurledge 3 ай бұрын

@@TzaddikMedia Thanks for the reply. Awesome!

@granolabean1 3 ай бұрын

Correct words. Brilliant Understanding.

@TzaddikMedia 3 ай бұрын

I appreciate your kind feedback :D

@stephen-f9h 7 ай бұрын

The Jesus of Mark's Gospel parallels (is a parable for) Paul. Paul is the sower who went out to sow, but birds of the air (scribes - teachers of the Law) from James in Jerusalem plucked up the seed that Paul planted (Gal 2:11-12). Peter was stony ground, and quickly received what Paul said, but then just as quickly withered and fell away (separated himself like a "hypocritical Pharisee"). The things of this world (worldly ambitions of the Jerusalem church) choked out Paul's word. So the Jewish believers all fall away from Paul in Antioch (Asia). But the Gentile believers produced a hundredfold. Mark's Gospel parallels Paul coming from [Galilee of the] Gentiles on his last Passover to Jerusalem, where he is "betrayed" by the zealot Jerusalem church and the Judas Sicariots (Sicarii), who try to assassinate Paul for teaching against the Law. The Jerusalem church rejected Paul's pacifist Jesus Christ and chose instead their own Jesus Barabbas of Revelation 2:26-27 who wanted burn Rome with fire (Rev 18:8). For which reason the Romans destroyed those "wicked husbandmen", their Temple, and their city. Gustav Volkmar said in 1857 (Die Religion Jesus) Mark's Gospel is a parable for Paul and was written to counter the Zealot Jerusalem church and their gospel, the Book of Revelation. So the Gospels are mainly a polemic against the Jerusalem church which then spills over to the Jews in general because of Zealot rebellion against Rome. And from this come all the horrors that follow. Robert Eisenman has pointed out that "Pharisee" in the Gospels is probably a euphemism for those from the Jerusalem church. They are teaching separation from Paul's Gentiles who do not keep kosher. No doubt it was an embarrassment to the Gentile churches of Paul that the mother church in Jerusalem were all Zealots and rebels against Rome. Hence the need for parable in the Gospels. And it was quite convenient to blame the Pharisees/Rabbis for the war with Rome instead of too openly revealing this was actually the goal of the Jerusalem church and their coming temporal kingdom of God.

@wserthmar8908 6 ай бұрын

Mark’s gospel was likely a Pauline redaction of a Hebrew (Matthew’s) gospel. It is indicated to be Pauline by the way it erases some of the non-Pauline verses

@stephen-f9h 6 ай бұрын

Mark's thesis is that the Jewish disciples never get Jesus' mission is to be a ransom for all nations, similar to the way the zealous Maccabean martyrs had been a ransom for the sins of their nation. And that makes sense, because the Jewish disciples were mainly focused on the coming kingdom of God and liberation from Rome. But Paul thought he had a better idea to save all nations from the judgment with his mission to the nations. And so Mark is reflecting Paul, with only a kernel of the historical Jesus Barabbas, who was crucified by the Romans for insurrection. In Mark's time it would have been easier to understand the parable, because everyone knew the Romans did not allow insurrectionists to live. They crucified them.

@Ellie-hx4lu Ай бұрын

I think you should listen to Paula Fredriksen.

@TzaddikMedia Ай бұрын

I own and have read one of her books, but I'm curious as to why you recommend her work?

@soundphilosophy 7 ай бұрын

Yes Paul was a false apostle and his letters contain false teachings. But again you shouldn't have thrown shade on the Messiah by saying there are no eyewitness accounts. "...[O]ur Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty. .... [W]e ourselves heard the voice from heaven..." (2 Peter 1_16-18)

@TzaddikMedia 7 ай бұрын

Even the early Church Fathers said that 2 Peter was of questionable authenticity. We don't really know who wrote it. If the first few centuries of Christians didn't know it couldn't agree on who wrote it, certainly people today can't know.

@soundphilosophy 7 ай бұрын

@TzaddikMedia There are extracanonical writings of Peter as well (e.g., Clementine Homilies, Recognitions of Clement), do you discount all of those as well? Was not James the Just the brother of Jesus/Yeshua who preached about him after the crucifixion? Are you claiming Jesus/Yeshua did not really exist? What is the point of you exclaiming "no eyewitnesses"? And why do you discount prophecy fullfilment in a second coming? Why is eschatology somehow irrelevant concerning Yeshua?

@TzaddikMedia 7 ай бұрын

@@soundphilosophy I discount the Clementine literature as completely historically accurate, yes. I very readily concede, however, that they contain may traditions that are 1) probably original to the early Jesus movement and 2) may even be historical. I approach them like I would Josephus, Philo, the Quran, or any other piece of ancient literature. Was James the Just the brother of Jesus? Yes Was James the leader of the Ebionites and the main professor of Jesus? Yes, the evidence certainly points that way. Did Jesus exist? Yes, absolutely. I never claimed that there were zero eye-witnesses. That is Rabbi Palvanov's claim. I happen to disagree with him on this question. I'm not sure what your comment about prophecy fulfillment, eschatology, and a second coming are about. Please clarify.

@soundphilosophy 7 ай бұрын

@TzaddikMedia I thought I was talking with the speaker in this video. "Completely [100%] historical accurate" is quite the standard... you must be aware that the 10 Commandments are listed differently in Deuteronomy and Exodus, and that John the Baptist didn’t eat locust insects (locust-bean being the truth), and of Paul's contradictory Road to Damascus stories, as just 3 examples of innacuracy in "authorized" texts. The speaker discounted Yeshua as possibly the Messiah because all prophecies weren't fulfilled all at once, as if the eschatology is irrelevant, as if fullfilment at the end isn't possible or would make sense to be fulfilled then, when it’s both. Shalom.

@BrandonLee-vf1go 25 күн бұрын

Why bring Islam into y’all ridiculous argument about y’all religion that split Muslims have no part in y’all argument Ismael Pbuh was also given a covenant by god not just Isaac Pbuh leave prophet Muhammad Pbuh out of it