The History of Mongolia: Every Year (-215~2023)

(The videos of mine are can be use for everywhere but, you have to leave a Channel link.)
This video shows the history of Mongolia.
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
0:04 Xiongnu Confederation
2:27 Xianbei Confederation
3:56 Five Xianbei clans
4:13 Five Barbarians
4:25 Rouran Khaganate
6:34 Turkic Khaganate
7:28 Chinese Occupation
7:58 Turkic Khaganate
8:30 Uyghur Khaganate
9:30 Yenisei Kyrgyz
10:00 Khitan Empire
11:48 Kara-Khitai
12:24 Mongol Unification
12:34 Mongol Empire
13:33 Fragmentation of Empire
14:10 Successor States Period
14:18 Timurid Empire
14:35 Northern Yuan-Four Oirats
16:53 Reformation of Dzungar Khanate
17:50 Kalmyk Khanate
17:56 Mongolia under Qing rule
18:36 Bogd Khanate
18:42 Communist era
19:14 Present-day
19:29 End of the video
19:36 Outro
Musics:
Mongolian historic epic follk-music.flv ( • Mongolian historic epi... uploaded by John Smith)
Total War Attila - Main Menu Music (Hun Theme)
Mongolia Theme - Medieval (Civilization 6 OST) Pastoral Song; Urtin Duu
Epic Middle Eastern War Music- Escape From The Hell
Medieval 2 Total War Middle Eastern Adventure Music
Mongolia Theme - Atomic (Civilization 6 OST) Pastoral Song; Urtin Duu
Powerful Mongol Battle Music - Sacred Banner
Domog - Borte
Sources: docs.google.com/document/d/1M...
#Mongolia

[@Anwoo]

Correction/오류사항: 1. Laoshang chanyu ruled Xiongnu from 174-161 BCE 라오상* 선우는 흉노를 기원전 174~61년까지 다스렸습니다. 2. Kalmyk Khanate borders are incorrect 칼미크 칸국의 국경이 명확치 않습니다. 3. 일리그 카간 -> 일테리시 카간

[@shareem1779]

Thnx anwooo for making this video downloable on my device!!!

[@CostasMelas]

Very ambitious and hard work. Well done!

[@spaghettiking7312]

Oh, now I know this will be incredible. Thank youuuuuuuuuuuu!

[@WarDestinyMapping]

Finally!! Really a qualified work 19 min video... Thank you for your dedication

[@MongolianMapper1]

In the last part, it is possible to show not only Inner Mongolia but also Buryatia

[@user-tc7lm9yg3m]

very well done..now I will have to rewatch it multiple times to read the side notes

[@Anwoo]

The Google Doc. web version of lists of thr historical events is in the description.

[@user-mh9bk2ju6u]

수고하셨습니다

[@Anwoo]

감사합니다!

[@MongolianMapper1]

You're so hardworking🎉

[@NgocMinhLeHoang]

This a great video

[@markshin7918]

영상 잘 봤습니다. 이런 멋진 영상은 어던 프로그램 이용해서 제작하는건가요?

[@Anwoo]

Photoshop 2023, MS Paint, Premiere Pro 2023등으로 사용하고 있습니다.

[@ZachRULES96]

8:04 that Turkic leader smile

[@90210sleekkeels]

Anwoo you created a eye opening video on the history of qatar. Can you please make a video on yemen/ethiopia/ Eritrea region pretty please!

[@Anwoo]

Later...

[@90210sleekkeels]

@@Anwoo thanx

[@user-hm1kl5cz2j]

요나라의 실질적 영토가 작았나요? 연한 색은 간접지배인가요?

[@user-bz2nu3jt7o]

14:26 티무르 제국 간접지배영역까지 포함하니까 교과서에서 봤던 것보다 2배 이상 크네요 ㄷㄷ

[@biscolataman]

Shimunek, Andrew. "Early Serbi-Mongolic-Tungusic lexical contact: Jurchen numerals from the 室韦 Shirwi (Shih-wei) in North China". Philology of the Grasslands: Essays in Mongolic, Turkic, and Tungusic Studies, Edited by Ákos Bertalan Apatóczky et al. (Leiden: Brill). Retrieved 22 September 2019. quote: "Asdemonstrated by Ratchnevsky (1966: 231), the Shirwi confederation was a multiethnic, multilingual confederation of Tungusic-speaking Mo-ho 靺鞨 people (i.e. ancestors of the Jurchen), the Meng-wa 蒙瓦 ~ Meng-wu 蒙兀, whom Pelliot (1928) and others have shown were Proto-Mongolic speakers, and other groups. The dominant group among the Shirwi undoubtedly were ethnolinguistic descendants of the Serbi (鮮卑 Hsien-pei), and spoke a language closely related to Kitan and more distantly related to Mongolic."

[@kenanhasan9784]

👍👍👍👍

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

The name Mongol appeared first in the eighth-century Chinese records of the Tang dynasty, but only resurfaced in the eleventh century during the rule of the Khitan. At first, it was applied to some small and insignificant nomadic tribes in the area of the Onon River. In the thirteenth century, however, the name Mongol grew into an umbrella term for a large group of Mongolic and Turkic tribes united under the rule of Genghis Khan. It is not clear what the Mongols called themselves in their own languages. In fact, the specific origin of the Mongolic languages is unclear. Some linguists have proposed a link to languages like Tungusic and Turkic, which are often included alongside Mongolic in a hypothetical language group called “Altaic languages”, but the evidence for this is rather weak.

[@EchoVortex713]

I see you like everywhere on video about Mongolian history and spreading fake infos 😂

[@EchoVortex713]

Mongol was term first used for Mongolic tribes but soon Mongols pushed Turkic people further to the west . Naiman , Kereit are Mongol tribes so you’re mistaken .

[@EchoVortex713]

😂 You’re just miserable, commenting on every video about Mongolia . Go find a job , instead of writing nonsense . Anatolian Turks are not Turkic genetically but just Anatolian natives who were assimilated by their Turk rulers .

[@EchoVortex713]

Origin of Turkic language is unknown

[@NgocMinhLeHoang]

You can help me make video of Казанкое хатсново

[@freddymapping]

Brilliant video but I have to point out mistakes, you forgot to make Kazakhstan no longer a socialist republic and let Uzbekistan gain some land after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, but overall, I like the video :D

[@MongolianMapper1]

Well done

[@RealMrStreets]

14:30 finally someone show's Timur's Peak Empire at it's true thiccness

[@ZachRULES96]

4:46 what makes you think the rouran had anything to do with the Huns?

[@mercurespla7727]

와 첫 몽골 배경음악 진짜 최애 노래 중 하나인데 혹시 진짜 이름좀 알려주실 수 있을까요? 외국 원본 영상에선 걍 몽골 히스토리 송이라고 밖이 안나와서..

[@Anwoo]

저도 원본 영상 밖에 모르는 바람에 'Mongolian historic epic follk-music.flv'라는 이름으로 링크만 설명란에 추가해 놨습니다...

[@mercurespla7727]

@@Anwoo 그래도 답글 감사합니다..ㅠ

[@user-nk1py3jo8k]

혹시 역사학자신가요 ? 전체적인 세계사 흐름을 다 아시는것 같네요 ...

[@nenenindonu]

Pannonian Avars weren't Mongols but Turks. The Buyla inscription which is the only attested epigraph in their native language was also identified as Oghuric making their Turkic origin a reality in the academic world

[@Tokyo2905]

There were Ughur Turks within the Avar confederation, so it is difficult to ascertain the origin of the Avars.

[@user-ru3nq1ti9t]

We can't certainly differ between turks and mongols they are close realted

[@edsheeranahmet6572]

I think it just shows the most powerful Steppe peoples' empires of the time. It shows some barbarian Chinese dynasties and the Gokturks as noted.

[@user-dt3me5nc8i]

❤

[@user-hf9my6nm5l]

알탄칸은 어딨죠?

[@user-mh9bk2ju6u]

알탄 칸은 몽골의 대칸이 아닌 몽골 투메드부의 칸이기 때문에 대칸만을 표시하는 이 영상에는 나오지 않은 것 같습니다..😅

[@kllermen5554]

Kazakh khanate was 3,5 million km

[@Cecilia-li1vb]

A good history of map development ! but there are still some mistakes. The Mongolian system is more similar to the European feudal dynasty system. Each khanate has a high degree of autonomy, and the same is true for the enfeoffment khanates within their khanate; and, the fact In fact, the Mongolian Empire was united for a period of time after the death of Kublai Qa'an. Strictly speaking, it was not until the disintegration of the Il-khanate in 1335 that the Mongolian Khanates began to gradually abandon the unity of the empire: 13:30-13:48 (1303-1334) Let me start with the place where the autonomy is strong: In reality, within the Mongol empire there existed a number of regional powers at various levels. It is in fact difficult to clearly distinguish which of these powers was a ‘state’ or a ‘regime.’ They formed one system in its entirety. Traditionally, the Mongol empire has been regarded to have ‘dissolved’ into ‘four khanates,’including Dai Yuan Ulus, under the great qa’an. However, in fact, all we can say is, at best,that it was divided into four loose groups. If someone claims that it was ‘dissolved,’one should also count orda Ulus, Ariq Böke Ulus and otchigin Ulus among them. The idea of the ‘division into the four khanates’ seems to be a reflection of a [preconceived] image. 【Hodong Kim(2009).The Unity of the Mongol Empire and Continental Exchanges over Eurasia,pp.20】 Unity of the empire: Kaidu’s sons and a number of other princes of the houses of Ugedey and Jagatay agreed to recognize Timur’s suzerainty and to settle all future interprincely conflicts by negotia-tion instead of war (1303). This important agreement was supple-mented by making the il-khan of Persia a party to it. Upon the death of the Il-Khan Gazan in 1304 Timur dispatched a grand embassy to Persia to install Gazan’s brother Oljaitu as the new il-khan and to inform him of the pacification of Central Asia. The khan of the Golden Horde, Tokhta, also supported the new agreement. Charac-teristically enough, he in his turn summoned his vassals, the Russian princes, to an assembly in Pereiaslavl, Suzdalia, where his envoy announced the decisions taken by.the leading Mongol rulers.The success of Timur's policy was indeed impressive and the Mongol Empire may be said to have reached the apogee of its power during his reign. All this amounted to a restoration of the unity of the empire in the new form of a pan-Mongol federation presided over by the great khan in Peking. 【Vernadsky, George (1953). The Mongols and Russia, p.82.】 In the Jaghatu valley according to Vaşşâf,that he received the ambassadors of the Great Khan Temür,the grandson and successor (1294-1307) of Qubilai, accompanied by those of Chabar, the son of Qaidu, and Du'a, the son of Baraq: the object of this composite mission was to apprise the Il-Khan of a pact that had put an end to the longstanding quarrels between these branches of the House of Chingiz-Khân. From Marâgheh, where he installed Aşil al-Din, the son of Naşir al-Din Tusi, in the observatory founded by his father, Öljeitü made his way to winter-quarters in Müghân, halting en route at Tabriz to pay a second visit to the Gunbad-i'Âli.In Müghân, on 9 December,he received the ambassadors of Toqta, the ruler of the Golden Horde, who presumably made some allusion to the reconciliation of the princes of Central and Eastern Asia,of which Toqta also had been informed. T o this development, ap­ parently betokening the restoration of the Mongol world empire as it had existed under Mongke, Oljeitu refers in a letter addressed to Philippe le Bel, which has been preserved in the French national archives. He begins this letter, written at Ativan (Barzand) in Mughan on 5 April 1305, by affirming this desire to maintain the traditional ties of friendship between the Il-Khans and the "sultans of the Frankish people". He then proceeds: " . . . We , Temur Qa'an, Toqta, Chabar,Du'a and others, the descendants of Chingiz-Khan, after recriminating one another for forty-five years down to these recent times, have now,protected by Heaven, all of us, elder and younger brothers, reached a mutual agreement, and from the land of the Chinese, where the sun rises, to the sea of Talu [the Caspian, or perhaps the Mediterranean],our states joining with one another [i.e. re-establishing communi­ cations],we have caused our post stations to be linked together." 【J.A.Boyle (1968). The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 5: The Saljuq and Mongol Periods, p.399】 The collapse of the unity of the empire: A holistic approach is necessary for several reasons. first of all, the Mongols themselves did not give up the notion of imperial unity until the 1330s and 1340s when regional uluses began to crumble down. for example,up to that time in the entire Mongol world there was only one qa’an or qaghan, and other rulers used the title of khan or qan. They were all well aware that one was the title of supreme sovereignty over the empire and the other was of a subordinate ruler under his authority.This practice was basically unchallenged till 1364, when the empire ended with the collapse of Mongol power in China.so it was not just a symbolic gesture but an institution that continued to exist for more than one and a half century. It was a reflection of the Mongol world order. 【Hodong Kim(2009).The Unity of the Mongol Empire and Continental Exchanges over Eurasia,pp.19】 😄😄🥰

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Title should be History of Eurasian Nomads 😅

[@Anwoo]

Maybe, I could remake "The Central Asia" out of this.

[@Raidon8537]

But there are only Turkic and Mongol nomads.

[@jodhsinghjathol1155]

Still waiting for sikh misls, you can find sources regarding them in kushwant singh history of sikhs and hari ram gupta history of sikhs

[@Goodbye.NO_Naoro]

16:09 카자흐칸국 그외

[@fryadbabani9398]

Taimur empier 🔥🔥💪💪

[@jinagnes1176]

한몽 통일이 해답!!!~ㅅ.ㅅ~

[@suleimanthemagnificent1494]

Xiongnu, Göktürks, Avars, Uyghurs, Kyrgyz Khaganate, Timurids and Gurkanid("Mughal") Empire out. Not Mongol. Nice video without that.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

🐦

[@suleimanthemagnificent1494]

@@papazataklaattiranimam 🐸

[@yadamjavdugerjav2770]

Xiongnu is a Turco-Mongol state. So it still counts. But others are agreeable.

[@enesbeter9815]

The history of Mongolia was shaped by the Turks 🇲🇳

[@Arialovessyou]

Silence cockroach

[@Mongolian_Lhagvasuren]

History of Turks was shaped by the Mongols 🇰🇿

[@Timurid1370]

@@Mongolian_Lhagvasurenwe shaped thr histories of each other

[@El_primo573]

Sorry to tell you that but mongols have nothing to do with Turks they are their own ethnic group

[@RESTITVTOR_TOTIVS_HISPANIAE]

@@El_primo573 we all know one of the main characteristics of the steppe is ethnic segregation.

[@BerkoEdits]

Xıongnu Confederation was Turkic, not Mongol

[@Anwoo]

I said "Mongolia" not "Mongolian History"

[@shaver2599]

Xiongu not mongol

[@temuulenidk2114]

It is mongol

[@kumasa3798]

But Mongol area

[@seljukkaganat8588]

​@@temuulenidk2114mongol is xianbei donghu

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@temuulenidk2114Oghur Turkic origin

[@omerfaruk6082]

Xiougnu were Turks, not Mongols.

[@Nastya_07]

The video includes non-Mongolic states, you can see that the Gokturks and the Orkhon Uyghurs are also included.

[@igidi4424]

Xiongnu is mutli-ethnic Empire. That is why it is Xiongnu "Confederation". It is a union between multiple steppe tribes

[@omerfaruk6082]

@@igidi4424 All empires are multi ethnic. But the founding elit class are always one single ethnicity. We cannot call the british colonial empire , a scottish or irish empire for this reason.

[@igidi4424]

@@omerfaruk6082 Still, Xiongnu is predecessor of the Mongols and that is where most of their family tree comes from. But beyond than just that, Mongolian genes are mysterious to the researchers and historians same as Korean and Japanese genes that have mysterious ancestry. I am saying that the most earliest known ancestors of the Mongolians are Xiongnu. I am not saying the leader of Xiongnu (Mete Han) is Mongolian because we never claimed he was.