That was a good episode. I liked it. Something I'd not really thought of before with a very interesting tangent. Extra History is absolutely your strength guys, keep at it.
@aniellord70886 жыл бұрын
I'm kinda late here but. Hi SovietWomble! I also love your videos! Hahaha
@troglodytes30416 жыл бұрын
Badgers
@raviothethief82926 жыл бұрын
SovietWomble where did you come from!
@AGenericAccount6 жыл бұрын
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaait. Amazing.
@jeffrykristianto51256 жыл бұрын
Wtd
@LittleJimmy8358 жыл бұрын
The vending machines on the island of Yap must be ENORMOUS!
@Max-bg7oo4 жыл бұрын
Lol
@riegerthome88324 жыл бұрын
You are so right
@kzrockstar97174 жыл бұрын
Just think of the size of the gumball dispensers.
@Chinaball-fx7gi4 жыл бұрын
@@kzrockstar9717 Huge coins, small balls
@va9604 жыл бұрын
Pfff... those crustaceous cheapskates......
@FailedPoet4448 жыл бұрын
Fun fact, the Chinese character 貝 that means something precious are part of a lot of compound characters related to trade and finance like 賬 "account" 資 "capital" 財 "wealth" 賦 "tax" 費 "expenses" 買 "to buy". And what is 貝 exactly? Well, it's a stylised image of a cowry shell, the jagged lines of the shell's opening having turned into straight lines throughout the millennia. So in the very written language, we can see that cowries were indeed a precious commodity in ancient China.
@m.m.13015 жыл бұрын
The use of cowrie shells was so wide that the word "money" comes from latin "moneta" which indicated a type of cowrie
@marloyorkrodriguez99755 жыл бұрын
The more you know
@r7ahtesham8854 жыл бұрын
No wonder China is still Capitalist.
@jp44314 жыл бұрын
@@r7ahtesham885 no one will ever say no to less money
@juanlu39584 жыл бұрын
STFU
@BuddyWhite6162 жыл бұрын
The fact they counted the stone at the bottom of the ocean is awesome
@papagaiofilmes6642 Жыл бұрын
They shouldn't. It is Mr. Krabs' first penny now.
@amellirizarry9503 Жыл бұрын
The most interesting part is that's cases like this, of people using intangible credit arrangements for transactions are not rare at all in the anthropological record, some argue that historically they've been more common than commodity based systems, You should check "Debt the first five thousand years" by David Graeber, he was an American anthropologists and in that book he describes a lot about cases like this, and argue for some interesting alternative monetary theories
@brycevo5 жыл бұрын
I mean, some people drink their paychecks away, but this takes it to a new level
@leonardocleaningllc19524 жыл бұрын
I pay people sometimes in beer.
@jxc16403 жыл бұрын
I've heard of some people in USSR/Russia being paid in alcohol, kind of doubt that but then again it's Russia so maybe it's true
@michaeltnk11355 жыл бұрын
Isn’t there a spongebob joke about Mr Krab’s first dime being a giant limestone coin
@bigshoelmfao4 жыл бұрын
yeah
@kingofthings79293 жыл бұрын
He’s been in business a long time.
@lilperidot87833 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah... it's all coming together...
@imveryangryitsnotbutter8 жыл бұрын
4:14 - 4:19 "This is a dime??" "I've been in business a long time, boy."
@duckquack85625 жыл бұрын
Lol that took me a second to figure that out
@liamweaver29444 жыл бұрын
Yay! I’m not the only one who noticed! “LISTEN YOU CRUSTACEOUS CHEAPSKATE! SQUIDWARD’S BEEN LIVING AT MY HOUSE DRIVING ME CRAZY. AND YOU’RE NOT GONNA HIRE HIM BACK ALL BECAUSE OF A STUPID DIME?!!!"
@liamweaver29444 жыл бұрын
@Age Restrictions What's that?
@adamblakeslee53018 жыл бұрын
If I remember right, many early societies would actually use credit for their neighbors and friends. People would keep track of who owed what and simply trust that they would pay when they could. Outsiders were the ones that paid up front.
@RiotGearEpsilon8 жыл бұрын
Yes!
@charx2258 жыл бұрын
This. The idea of a barter society bringing about a currency-based society has existed for a long time, but doesn't really have too much supporting evidence. The idea that a fisherman can't gift food to a farmer, expecting to one day be compensated, is ignoring history.
@garethsmith30362 жыл бұрын
***cough**thisvideoshaftedavidgraeber***cough****
@shakiMiki2 жыл бұрын
The video has got it wrong. Money was developed as a way of storing debt not to deal with the problems of bartering. Debt: The First 5,000 Years of DEBT by anthropologist David Graeber published in 2011 is the seminal study.
@Nemo_Anom Жыл бұрын
@@shakiMiki I've been meaning to read that book. The idea seems odd to me: how does money (something with value) store debt, instead? Could you give me a brief summary? Thanks! :)
@seafoamtaide5 жыл бұрын
The stone circle system sounds like an amazing story and I love it, especially because it puts such a spin on money that makes me go 'wait why is this weird paper stuff our currency again?' It's great.
@mmmirei5 жыл бұрын
Salt was money. The more salt you had, the richer you were, cause salt was really hard to find. The word salary came from salt.
@tomlxyz4 жыл бұрын
A time when being salty was a good thing
@henrygustavekrausse74593 жыл бұрын
Not in most places only the saltless ones.
@agiri8913 жыл бұрын
@Hell Fire3 he just asked for a source lol
@WebDiice3 жыл бұрын
Dude.. I could have been a millionaire by now... damnit
@icraftcrafts86853 жыл бұрын
and there's a saying “worth its weight in salt" for the value of something, related to your info
@DragoniteSpam8 жыл бұрын
James talked about this one right after the South Seas story, and I have been waiting for it ever since. It is finally here. (Oh yeah and the Walpole ties should be good, too.)
@timothymclean8 жыл бұрын
I wonder if they'll only do the one.
@robertwalpole3608 жыл бұрын
They always are. ;)
@hanoufnouf52786 жыл бұрын
Who's walpole
@Duke_of_Lorraine8 жыл бұрын
I have my own theory about why we switched to paper money : you cannot roll gold to form a straw to take cocaine.
@Necrapocalypse8 жыл бұрын
Sounds like the mentality of a quitter
@wahlex8418 жыл бұрын
Well, if you try hard enough ...
@RoberttheWise8 жыл бұрын
That sounds frighteningly plausible.
@Necrapocalypse8 жыл бұрын
I mean, pure gold is pretty malleable right?
@Ergogre8 жыл бұрын
If the gold was completely pure you actually could, but then you can't really use it as coinage. Also it would be confusing for what good to cut for half and sell on.
@soulless4664 жыл бұрын
"I will trade you 10 cows for.... your whole country, your life, your wife(s), 50 cows and ofc a link to never gonna give you up" Me: "Hmmmmmmmmmmm you sir have got yourself a deal"
@GoogleAccount-sk2ry Жыл бұрын
1:48 I laughed out loud at that "if I don't want you stupid food". It was so unecessary and out of nowhere hahah
@spogansamsamsamsamsam54804 жыл бұрын
To expand on: Coincidence of wants (or lack thereof) only really becomes an issue in trade driving the necessity of an intermediary good of established value when the groups of people trading with each other become too large to all share intimate relationships. Within the realm of up to, say, 200 people, possibly slightly less but likely a fair bit more, each individual is indebted to many others within the community. eg "It's not an issue that George won't have grain to pay for my fish until the harvest season, because I know George and he's not going anywhere. So for now, I'll share my fish with George, and when the harvest comes George will share his grain with me." Trade systems only require an established staple when traders can no longer share close relationships and trust with each other. (When trade systems begin to expand beyond smaller communities) Thanks so much for making some awesome educational content, I love all this team's work so much! Ps to my etymologically inclined friends, you know why George is the farmer here!
@extrahistory8 жыл бұрын
It's awesome to see the questions about barter coming up. I'm planning on talking about this in Lies, but how goods exchange worked before commodity currency is...contentious. And it doesn't help that Adam Smith sort of made up "Barter" since he comes with all sorts of baggage in the academic world. From what I've read, basically "gift exchange with haggling" seems like the most like origin point for exchange of goods, but that whole debate is waaaaay more than I had time to get into here. To give you another preview of Lies...when we get to the last episode you'll probably notice that this series ends right before the point in time where we'd be talking about the idea of the petrol-dollar...which is hugely important in the ongoing argument about whether we have a true "fiat" currency...and so also going to be covered in lies ; ) -JP
@JonathanWJ8 жыл бұрын
For the record, I would be just as interested, if not more interested, in the development of the petrodollar than the development of paper money. Really interesting subject.
@larspeloquin64938 жыл бұрын
Respectfully, I think you should consider the research of the Cambridge anthropologist Caroline Humphrey who tried and failed to find any real-world examples of barter economies. She wrote: “No example of a barter economy, pure and simple, has ever been described, let alone the emergence from it of money. All available ethnography suggests that there never has been such a thing.” That includes the ancient Greeks, Indians, and Chinese who independently invented coinage. And the idea that the Sumerians had a barter economy is inconsistent with your video on the origin of writing. I think it would make more sense to say that debt, credit, and a variety social and prestige currencies all existed on a continuum of what we today call money. And until any evidence of a barter economy arrives, we should consider it to be a myth.
@Timberhawk8 жыл бұрын
Sounds like someone may've read "Debt: The First 5,000 Years". :D
@dangime8 жыл бұрын
I'd worry more about how it currently looks like you're promoting fiat currencies as a method of stealing purchasing power from people to fight larger wars? Let's face it most wars aren't good vs evil, and anything that kept them smaller, like people not wanting to waste their money on them, would be a good thing.
@mkvenner28 жыл бұрын
+Frank JohnsonIn war you fight to win and you use any means at your disposal to do so including money.
@fgregerfeaxcwfeffece8 жыл бұрын
I think the anime "spice and wolf" did a good job at explaining this economy stuff.
@kinghumanity8 жыл бұрын
S&W went more in depth about stock trading and manipulation, and currencies was just mentioned in-passing. Still, a very good show that's worth watching.
@erichouser24348 жыл бұрын
It did an even better job of illustrating reverse sexism too.
@awdrifter33948 жыл бұрын
The anime C also touched on some of these concepts.
@MrTooawesomeforaname8 жыл бұрын
Still waiting for season 3..
@DDdreamer908 жыл бұрын
@Eric houser: Reverse sexism? Isn't that just plain ol' sexism anyway? xD In any case, what exactly are you referring to. I'm a big fan of S&W myself and don't quite see what you're getting at.
@rmsgrey8 жыл бұрын
Barter-system == video-game fetch quest
@AegixDrakan8 жыл бұрын
Where a Yoshi Doll you won at a crane game is eventually worth as much as a new magic sword. ...Or something like that. I might be confusing my Zelda games here.
@Theraot8 жыл бұрын
Yoshi doll to Magnifying Lens, that would be Links Awakening. The Noble Sword is the Oracle games, from a Cuccodex in seasons and from the Poe Clock in ages. No, I didn't remember either, I looked it up.
@GeneralLuigiTBC8 жыл бұрын
My thoughts exactly.
@AegixDrakan8 жыл бұрын
***** Thanks for reminding me. It's been around 7 to 10 years, I think, since I last played the Oracle games. XD
@kimarous8 жыл бұрын
I'll hatch the egg to get the cucco to trade for a blue cucco to wake the man to bring the mushroom to be turned into powder that will be traded for the saw that will be exchanged for the broken hilt that cannot be fixed unless you bring the prescription to get the eyedrop frog that gets turned into eyedrops so the smith can recreate the sword in three days.
@Argastel2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I love your content. I hope you get to offer it in spanish someday soon!!
@extrahistory Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your support! I'm happy to tell you we have a plan to offer Spanish dubbing soon!
@Argastel Жыл бұрын
@@extrahistory Amazing news!! Much needed.
@kevindowney52566 жыл бұрын
Just gotta say, EC is a really fun series. You do a great job at creating a not-as-simple-as-it-sounds narrative by addressing just the right points.
@Silverraptorvideos8 жыл бұрын
This brings me back to my economics class. Except much better told, well done!
@dr.zoidberg86668 жыл бұрын
I was surprised that they didn't address people's solution for the coincidence of wants before intermediary 'currency' started to exist. Just so everyone knows, people didn't sit around starving for thousands of years because they couldn't trade a fish for a corn in the winter. No, instead people developed a kind of credit system. So, a farmer who wants fish from the fisherman but doesn't have their harvest in yet would instead do favors for the fisherman which they would both agree amounted to the value of a fish. In fact, people would do these favors in advance, & simply keep track in their head who had done favors for who. So, maybe I need a fish & I had helped you rebuild your hut a few months ago after it was knocked down in a particularly bad storm. I could call upon the value of that favor & cash it in for a fish.
@RiotGearEpsilon8 жыл бұрын
Yes!
@DxTr98 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Bartering as a precursor to currency is mostly a theory developed in the 18th century in Europe, with no actual evidence in the real world. Bartering became more common when Europeans traded with distant people in distant places that didn't have currency (or didn't accept gold/silver as currency).
@michaelpattie92488 жыл бұрын
On a side note, the bartering in North America basically treated the beaver pelt as a unit of exchange. Not a currency, but a common commodity to be measured against, so a lantern might be worth 3 pelts and a rifle worth 2. If I were trading you a lantern, I would expect more than just a rifle to account for that third pelt. Granted, when most people came into a frontier trading post on the Canadian frontier, they came to trade fur for supplies, so the rifle for lantern example wouldn't come up much.
@DarkarDengeno8 жыл бұрын
This is just what I was thinking of. In fact, I remember seeing an anthropologist use this fact to set a hard limit on the size of pre-writing communities: if you can't personally know everyone you trade with on a regular basis, you can't remember who owes you what.
@dr.zoidberg86668 жыл бұрын
Darkar Dengeno Was that in a KZbin video? If it was, would you please link to it? I'd like to see what they have to say.
@user-ws9ko1pu1y6 жыл бұрын
"How did humanity come to accept rectangular pieces of pulped trees as something to spend eight to ten hours a day working for?" When you put it that way..
@AatiNiiranen4 жыл бұрын
well i mean like uuhh
@n.rinaaa4 жыл бұрын
to pay bank's debt and pay you bills
@ahmedace49114 жыл бұрын
Best intro everrrr !!
@imarginacionmxd4 жыл бұрын
I like your content
@iron45173 жыл бұрын
Ah yes a video about money
@abbynady3 жыл бұрын
who doesnt
@memolano1005 жыл бұрын
“You could literally drink your paycheck” 🤣
@jetboy_4 жыл бұрын
dude i was looking to see if anyone else has been gotten by that, i had to stop the video until i was finished i was so hysterical.
@starleighpersonal4 жыл бұрын
liquefied assests
@starleighpersonal4 жыл бұрын
@Rayan Assouli wowwowwowdfx
@starleighpersonal4 жыл бұрын
@Rayan Assouli you send the request if you want to firend
@Derekivery4 жыл бұрын
You could literally piss away your bonus
@Kapuist18 жыл бұрын
I think it's great that you guys focus on these slightly less glamorous aspects of history, or histories of ideas, technologies, etc. rather than just the usual stuff (wars, battles, and the like). It's good to have some balance.
@jirijindra71215 жыл бұрын
I want to say thank you! You really helped me with the outline of my uni assignment. I had to use some books too, but your video kick-started my work. Great video, keep up the great work!
@preoklenthe8 жыл бұрын
Is it just me or that picture of Dan with a formal hairstyle looks really neat?
@WannabeCanadianDev8 жыл бұрын
He looks Dapper.
@robin-vt1qj8 жыл бұрын
thats brave in dutch
@WannabeCanadianDev8 жыл бұрын
robin van Sint Annaland The language that's so hard even Germans are like "Fuck no."
@blake-818 жыл бұрын
If you remove Dan's bow, he looks surprisingly similar to Kraft Lawrence from Spice and Wolf.....
@WannabeCanadianDev8 жыл бұрын
Blake 81 That would be amazing.
@calijones60237 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to say that I'm taking a macroeconomics class and I watched your video long before I took this class. I find it really awesome that you use the exact terminology and make something that I probably would have had a problem conceptualizing into something easily digestible for me. THANK YOU!
@jaeyounglee54106 жыл бұрын
I did a dbq yesterday and it was about silvers political and economical effects on the world and i talked about inflation. I feel smart now
@sarahgill83278 жыл бұрын
Hey, great episode as always. There is something you may want to look into for the "Lies" episode for this: the barter system, described by Adam Smith and used in many Economics classes to describe the history of money, may never have existed. For instance the esteemed anthropologist Caroline Humphrey wrote: "No example of a barter economy, pure and simple, has ever been described, let alone the emergence from it of money; all available ethnography suggests that there never has been such a thing" (Humphrey, qtd in Graeber, p.29). Graeber, David. (2011). Debt. New York: Melville House Publishing Humphrey, Caroline. (1985). Barter and Economic Disintegration. Man, 20(1), 48-72.
@rngwrldngnr8 жыл бұрын
Hilariously, according to Wikipedia the Rai Stones (Yapanese currency) started as much more portable beads. They go so large when trade was established with outsiders and common metal tools made excavating the beads far too easy. So it was a way to stave off hyperinflation.
@monkeydetonation8 жыл бұрын
Why let bankruptcy get in the way of a good crusade?
@chloechin34126 жыл бұрын
lol
@niccatipay3 жыл бұрын
Ikr, just print more money. ~ Federal reserve
@melimel42756 жыл бұрын
I’m so happy to have found this channel! I’m going to be using these in my homeschool lessons. These look a lot like Spirit Science. I love it!
@Pastshelfdate7 жыл бұрын
Again, TARDIS - thanks! And the cowrie shell: I would have guessed a precious metal, also. I guess the cowrie was wider spread, but still sufficiently difficult to acquire. I'm glad cowries weren't hunted to extinction. And always I love the art, including the reference to Marvel's Havoc. :)
@OctopusWilson8 жыл бұрын
This episode is why I love Extra History
@deldarel7 жыл бұрын
"and no, it's not gold" Haha, I'm smart. I know it's salt. "It's the cowrie shell" WHAT?
@Donutgames008 жыл бұрын
So that's how mr.krabs got his 1st dime
@Monkey-l8s5 жыл бұрын
Donutgames00 lol
@Atratzu8 жыл бұрын
I haven't thought about this aspect of economics in forever! This was fantastic, great video!
@hmelnyczuk3 жыл бұрын
You should read Debt by David Graeber, he refutes the prehistory of money being based on bartering since there is basically no historical evidence that societies worked on the strict satisfaction of coinciding wants until after the invention of money and coinage.
@justmovedin8 жыл бұрын
This helped me a lot since I just started studying Economics! Thanks Extra History!
@hagamapama8 жыл бұрын
On the subject of odd currencies -- my native New England was the source of one. Nutmeg. We weren't a source of nutmeg of course, but we were a source of Yankee peddlers, called Nutmeggers, large groups of itinerant wanderers plied the American backwoods trading small items and exploring, and always with a small package of the valuable spice tucked somewhere in their luggage. Early American cooks used nutmeg for everything so nutmeg seeds were in enough demand that a Yankee peddler could usually count on being able to trade them for the supplies he needed to continue his travels, or for a roof over his head if the weather turned bad. However, like with anything else, there was a problem, and the problem was counterfeiting. It says something about how valuable nutmeg was back then that there was a problem with counterfeit nutmeg, but there was -- nutmeg seeds carved out of wood, passed off to unscrupulous people who don't do their due dilligence on the good they're trading for. Eventually that, combined with some financial chicanery on the East Coast that's a story all by itself, was enough to collapse the nutmeg market, but because he happened so early in our history, the Yankee nutmegger still lingers around in the back of the national consciousness.
@EGV888 жыл бұрын
Awesome idea to put a Smaug reference there!
@vjjoshua838 жыл бұрын
SO CUT AND CLEAR IN THE EXPLANATION.. SO GOOD FOR ANYONE TO UNDERSTAND
@JoeMazzolaTheFirstPersonCook8 жыл бұрын
I'm normally too poor to care about economics but you guys are entertaining enough that I'll keep watching
@pinkdogroslyn88325 жыл бұрын
I love how you use RDR to represent a “lawless land”
@johnmyers45557 жыл бұрын
I had a test this spring about the development and use of money and so, I sought out videos to try to help myself make sense of the big picture. I'm so glad I came upon this video because now, I've watched every extra history series you've put out.
@Noelle8088 жыл бұрын
Oh no, I can hear the gold standard people rushing in already.
@AgusSimoncelli8 жыл бұрын
Aaaaaaaand they're here
@Theraot8 жыл бұрын
Why let a little shortage get in the way of a good gold standard?
@abyssaljam4418 жыл бұрын
No... Sliced bread Standard's where it's at!
@Thraim.8 жыл бұрын
I love them. They refuse the idea of giving imaginary value to pieces of paper in favour of giving imaginary value to pieces of metal.
@ShneekeyTheLost8 жыл бұрын
The high value on gold is arbitrary. It has actually very little intrinsic value, mostly in electronics and wiring. It is a poor tool metal, comparable to lead, has a high density and so weighs far more for comparable volume, meaning cumbersome and awkward to carry around. The only reason gold has such a high value is because people assign it a high value as a commonly traded third-party commodity, which is no different than assigning a high value to a piece of paper for the same reason. The only difference USED to be that you can always print more paper, but you can't just print gold. However, when devaluation became a thing, that argument went out the window.
@yash-js9lv Жыл бұрын
एश्वर्या खूप सुंदर video zala aahe Thank so much tu aamhala बोलवले khup chan vatle❤
@Peptuck5 жыл бұрын
I loved the fact that the infographic at 3:13 used teeth as an example of possible money. Makes the Ork fan in me proud.
@Jembii8 жыл бұрын
"Oh, how will I pay? I've got one donut rock at the bottom of the sea. It's your's now"
@rossmallo8 жыл бұрын
4:46 - 4:54 Well, that just made shell-collecting in Animal Crossing make a lot more sense all of a sudden.
@theperpetual83488 жыл бұрын
"join us next as we-" AAAARGH MUST I WAIT?!
@nicolasdunaway94158 жыл бұрын
As a kid, I always wondered why we use money. Then I learned exactly this when I grew up. Keep up the good work fellas, can't wait for our next delicious piece of history
@nicolasdunaway94158 жыл бұрын
And it's kool to know what started money
@deepakgurung56725 жыл бұрын
Animations on every presentation on this channel is so much to the point that it requires no imagination and it's self explanatory.
@Znes978 жыл бұрын
Que buen vídeo, me sirvió un montón!!, que bueno que esta en español y la traducción esta excelente.
@jimmynyarlathotep68578 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure about the early part on Coincidence of Wants. Historic consensus for a goodly while (Based on anthropological research of contemporary groups) has shewn that 'barter trade' as discussed only existed between two sets of foreigners, or in situations where mistrust had occurred. the bulk of trade in 'primitive societies' used favours, debts and other forms of social capital as 'money'. Monetary tokens as described in the second part (after 3:20) were the eventual quantification and simplification of this complex favour-nexus.
@grfrjiglstan8 жыл бұрын
My question is, how do you make change for a shell? For coins, you can just make a smaller coin for a lesser denomination, but with shells, you're stuck with a single denomination for each. Same with cattle - do you make change in calves?
@thetruerift8 жыл бұрын
Carried credit, actually. Crash Course did a piece on credit and barter in their second world history series
@timothymclean8 жыл бұрын
I'd imagine that either change would be made in lesser goods ("I'm not willing to give up a whole cow just for that nice dress...throw in that necklace over there and we're good") or just ignored. A good number of pre-currency societies were composed of a small number of people who all knew and (hence) trusted each other, in a way that tribes and cities with population in the tens of thousands couldn't.
@Slash-XVI8 жыл бұрын
This problem basically persists until you include electronic currency. There always will be a smallest possible unit of currency, whether that is a cattle, a shell or a penny, if you wanted to purchase something which has less value than that, you are gonna have some problems. Sure if you do have coinage of sorts you could make a smaller unit but at some point it starts to get unreasonable (not enough use cases, too heavy for its worth, too expensive to produce). Think of something you need to buy nowadays that is actually very cheap (per unit): Electricity. You can get a Joule of electrical Energy for less than a cent, so how do things work: you just pay for the larger amount of electricity you need for a year. The same principle could be applied to different trades aswell (though I am not a historian,so I am not certain what the actual practice was)
@Slash-XVI8 жыл бұрын
TheRezro "No. Electronic replaced paper as data storage but it is still this same." In theory there is no problem in paying 0.00001 cents in electronic currency, in fact most cases of interest are calculated way more accurately than to the cent, they are then rounded. Electronic currency does solve the problems of having distinc money sizes, because it is both easy and inexpensive to portray a smaller amount of money. In the second part I was trying for a parallel between, I need potatoes, but all I have is a cow and something that is a more usual comparison with modern monetary means. As you have pointed out the advantages of electronic currency do show. I never intended to suggest electricity as an alternative form of currency (it would be aweful at that)
@RoberttheWise8 жыл бұрын
Not exactly. Electronic currency still has limited precision as you don't have proper Real Numbers in a computer but just an approximation to a certain degree of precision. The problem is the same as with regular currency, gold backed or not. You have to break it down small enough that nobody cares. It is only that doing so by increasing the precision of your number representation in the accounting software is much more easier and cheaper than making smaller physical currency units. But modern currencies are actually already subdivided to much for the most use cases. In both € and $ the single cent coin denominates less than the production costs and is too much hassle to use for people to care. Hence the initiatives to abolish pennies and round up to the next 0,05 $/€. Electronic currency gets away with higher precision but there is also a practical limit at which the rounding errors are just let be.
@__________________________93678 жыл бұрын
I recommended you guys to my social studies teacher and he has not got back to me but I know he'll enjoy
@paulpeterson42168 жыл бұрын
The "barter" economy described in the opening section of the video never really existed, because of the problems described. What did exist is now called a "gift" economy. I have these fish and I give them to you...later you have that grain and you give some to me. Ultimately the medium of exchange was status. If I give more than I get, I am seen as higher status. Paul Ryan would call me a "maker." However, status only counts among people you know, so there is a need for a medium of exchange that would be recognized across a wider group.
@SurmaSampo8 жыл бұрын
So you are arguing that deferment of payment, often according to terms set at the time the barter transaction is made, makes it not barter?
@zayag35438 жыл бұрын
No he didn't say that.
@SurmaSampo8 жыл бұрын
Isaiah Gilliland I am pretty sure he did and that the "we" he refers to being a part of aren't economists, but more likely anthropologists. For the purpose of the exchange the status of being seen as wealthy enough to be able to wait for payment is a by product of the exchange and not an intrinsic element of it. A true "gift" economy would allow you to gift the fish to the farmer and then have other people then gift to you in recognition of your generosity in turn without expecting payment. A trade involving the exchange of goods and services for a transfer of social status.Like being able to use up votes and likes to buy a car. This is better known as philanthropy and for a number of reasons isn't a sustainable economic model.
@paulpeterson42168 жыл бұрын
Surma Sampo "Gift economy" is what the sociologists call it. It's not something I made up. The "Barter economy" is something that 18th century economists assumed must have happened; however, currently available evidence suggests that there never really was such a thing. Also it was not philanthropy, it was more on the order of incurring a debt/someone owing you a favor. It's really not all that hard to keep track of within a fairly small group of people. And if you are a net provider, then you gain status, which has a value all its own. You can assert that it isn't a sustainable economy, but it seems that it managed to sustain for thousands of years.
@keiyakins8 жыл бұрын
And they mention that offhand. In small communities that works, but it doesn't scale.
@josephattwell10068 жыл бұрын
6:31 Don't you mean DEflation? Inflation is when the value of any unit of currency goes down, normally from the supply of money being higher than the demand. Deflation is when the value of any unit of currency goes UP, normally from the supply of money being lower than demand.
@ShaiM1828 жыл бұрын
there is so many things wrong here... it's hard to focus just on one thing.
@Kridr18 жыл бұрын
______/ Move feet away
@pallingtontheshrike63748 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure inflation because they're making so much alternate money like paper money to where inflation occurs
@MyTomServo8 жыл бұрын
Of the gold/silver in the coin or the commodities they were intended to buy? Inflation of the gold/silver, deflation of the everything else bought with it.
@Skooteh8 жыл бұрын
+ShaiM182 do you mind elaborating? I'm legitimately interested. All their content suffers from oversimplification but I haven't caught anything (else) that's wrong. I definitely don't know much about this stuff though.
@HypnotizeCampPosse6 жыл бұрын
7:33 wow, this is the first time i have ever heard someone acknowledge this fact
@Grizabeebles8 жыл бұрын
Finally! Now I'll have a convenient answer for all those people who want to switch the dollar back over to gold! Best link ever!
@Twisted_Code5 жыл бұрын
Yap's monetary system is quite remarkable. Thanks for educating us about it!
@DroidFreak368 жыл бұрын
I always thought that the "cowrie shells" used as currency in Mata Nui Online Game 2 were just some made up currency. Turns out some clever designer knew about real life cowry shells. :P
@alexiswilliams44894 жыл бұрын
When he says that so much silver ended up in China, it caused inflation in Europe, shouldn't that be deflation?
@kryptonianguest19034 жыл бұрын
Only if the Europeans were using silver as money.
@kot1pelto4 жыл бұрын
You, my friend, are asking the correct questions. I enjoy this channel, but I still verify all content.
@ElNeroDiablo8 жыл бұрын
Allonsy Extra History! :D
@markmayonnaise11638 жыл бұрын
I would like to donate a hyphen
@montylemon94458 жыл бұрын
+Mark Mayonnaise and ill buy a vowel
@markmayonnaise11638 жыл бұрын
LevelUpGaming Why? And I would like to donate an apostrophe.
@Patrick-ud3vu3 жыл бұрын
Lol @ the dragon sitting on the gold because it's a draconian concept. 😂
@djprogramer9735 жыл бұрын
Don't know why but I watch this whole series atleast once every few months
@sofer22308 жыл бұрын
3:47 Mr. Krabs's first dime!
@truetrash51648 жыл бұрын
Sometimes I hear paper money and I'm like "what? We use plas- oh, right I'm Canadian.
@Desintyx28 жыл бұрын
True trash same for us in Australia
@TheOhgodineedaname8 жыл бұрын
Alright I give you one twentieth of my cow for your hat and i'll save up the other part of the cow for future purchases! It might have been nice if the video mentioned how coins made of precious metals are easily dividable and how the stamp on it is a government guarantee of metal content.
@justkubo3 жыл бұрын
The fact that you can makr a whole series is even better
@mayamayhemmusic8 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you guys decided to do this episode. The current monetary system is broken, and it's broken everywhere. Looking back on exactly how it came to be is an important step in trying to fix it.
@jayson53913 жыл бұрын
If we are all equal from the beginning of government, why does some people call themselves the government and not see everyone as equal ? These set of people who call themselves the government make citizens work for money, and they (government) just get the money whenever they want . Have you asked yourself this simple question ?
@Archgeek08 жыл бұрын
3:34 -- why is that guy burning the filter of his cancer stick?
@nathanbrown86808 жыл бұрын
The better to get cancer from it.
@wu1ming9shi8 жыл бұрын
probably drawn by someone who doesn't smoke. XD
@Ibushi8 жыл бұрын
Maybe it's the type that you burn on both ends and have the ember in your mouth? My great grandmother used to smoke them (She lived to over a hundred. Take THAT, surgeon general!).
@HeatherMcNabb8 жыл бұрын
You guys caught me- not only don't I smoke, but don't even know anyone who does so...mistake there
@wu1ming9shi8 жыл бұрын
Heather McNabb haha, i didn't imagine the animator herself would comment on this. Anyway you're doing aa great job here, with some minor errors like this one. But hey, see it as something personal. An animator can only draw what he or she knows right?
@briapryor17095 жыл бұрын
When you already knew about this stuff because your a history nerd, and you accidentally found stuff about money and just kept going.
@seinen03 жыл бұрын
I loved this video. The way you explain and draw You're amazing. شكراً 😊 🤝🏻 ♥️..
@djprogramer9737 жыл бұрын
You know that you're making great content when you start to crave educational videos
@mounne138 жыл бұрын
4:02 Mr. Krabbs's first dime he earned was a limestone donut. that's cool
@brokenrecords1238 жыл бұрын
"Is that (toilet)paper?" LOL
@bennani44318 жыл бұрын
can you do a video on the history of banking pleasee !! it's just the whole process of banking is blurry in my mind
@MonzennCarloMallari8 жыл бұрын
Listened to the episode a week late, was concerned that the barter system was discussed without the context of the credit system, but then saw the responses and James' response as well. Wasn't disappointed :)
@evanrudibaugh87723 жыл бұрын
I love the idea of people in Yap arguing about the value of physical stone circles and semi-imaginary underwater fiat stone circles.
@neeneko8 жыл бұрын
Hrm. I always got the impression that the 'barter economy' thing was more of a modern myth/retcon and currencies were something that came about in order to facilitate taxation.
@SurmaSampo8 жыл бұрын
Their imagination. The easiest example for most western people to find is in the Torah where taxes where paid to the church in goods. Also there are many documented instances of standard commodity currency like cows, shells, grain, salt, etc, that feature in numerous barter systems. Fun fact is that writing was invented to track and manage taxes, that's right human created writing so that reliable tax accounting could be done, not to keep histories or facilitate artistic expression.
@DemagogueBibleStudy8 жыл бұрын
The Illuminati did it! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!
@neeneko8 жыл бұрын
Well, one pop science example would be: www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/02/barter-society-myth/471051/ Over the years, pretty much every anthropologist I have talked to has been annoyed at how wrong the common images of early civilization are. The image of the 'barter economy' came out of people pushing capitalistic systems wanting to contrast their improvement yet highlight how fundamental the thing they are addressing is. It was the economic equiv of the raw food or paleo diet.
@SurmaSampo8 жыл бұрын
neeneko So, I hate to tell you but all the descriptive tools used to explains systems of trade or exchange in econ 101 are crude models. Economics doesn't care about the various cultural trappings around the exchange and the "gift" economy or status economy is a feature of communism or communal ownership of production. The fisherman gives the fish because that is his role within the community to be able be part of the community and benefit from it's collective efforts. It doesn't matter if barter only occurred between communities rather than within them or if there where rituals involved. Also the idea that transference of debt isn't a feature of barter is nonsense. Anthropologists in this article are presenting a straw man because they don't unde4rstand the discipline, and it should be noted that barter still occurs today, even between large corporations.
@neeneko8 жыл бұрын
Speaking as someone who works with economic models for a living, I found their understanding to be just fine for the narrative they were addressing.
@nastrael8 жыл бұрын
3:36 almost made me puke. Only smokers will know why.
@Obe4ken8 жыл бұрын
I don't smoke, but I know which end the filter is on.
@Nemoticon8 жыл бұрын
...we've all done it (smokers) at least once, lol. It's enough to make you give up altogether (though it likely won't) xD
@twogoatsofdoom8 жыл бұрын
There exists a counter argument that credit has a longer history then commodity money.
@cajamafcatrina20696 жыл бұрын
I Have Learn More Watching This Channel Then In All The Year Of School I Have Been To
@Jamum1008 жыл бұрын
Yapese stone money! It was the first thing that popped into my mind when you were introducing the tangent lol. Being from there, it brings warm fuzzies to see us mentioned :)
@spartanx92935 жыл бұрын
0:07 they didn't they accepted linen as a something to work for (u.s money is partly made of linin)
@kebabremoveth52577 жыл бұрын
2:11 wait... Did you just punch me in the face! Grrr...
@jarehelt6 жыл бұрын
Gold is money, dollars are debt
@Т1000-м1и2 жыл бұрын
Alright so I went from oversimplified to fun stories to fun bureaucracy to fun things in science to actually important things to here. Man, hoi4 opens up so many opportunities
@alfredpardoe37958 жыл бұрын
I am always real suspicious of these types of videos. Usually the people struggle to speak clearly and flow in their thoughts, and the animations are terrible. But I have to admit, I actually quite enjoy these videos mate. You have yourself a follower :)
@Tarik3608 жыл бұрын
6:30 You meant Deflation right?
@somecomrade20985 жыл бұрын
sorry but no
@joehoe2227 жыл бұрын
7:15 the gold inflation in Spain myth is debunked a decade ago. Yes there was an inflation, but not at such a big scale.
@damianpenston65888 жыл бұрын
Oh dear. I was afraid that the barter theory of how trade used to be conducted would come up. Recent research has shown that credit was used rather than barter for early trade ("you give me fish now and I'll give you apples in autumn"). Even worse you tried to define money, which is something on which economists can never agree, and used the definition that money is "a third good that doesn't spoil and that we all agree has value." If people accept that definition, then they'll struggle with understanding today's money. It would be better to say that money is an information system for tradible claims on wealth."
@billybob82573 жыл бұрын
Favorite series so far
@kentuckycrittercamera94076 жыл бұрын
I love your work, it’s very informative and entertaining.