The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction - Michel Foucault - Full Audiobook

[@troyjensen8184]

when the homies hand you the aux

[@viggohoejer5972]

Yo thats kinda funny

[@MiegalBostickk]

😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊​@@viggohoejer5972

[@tangerinesarebetterthanora7060]

People that say that Foucault's writings lack substance are only listening his books without asking questions themselves that his analysis can lead to. "Postmodern" thinker's in general aren't going to hand you answer.

[@nimahanna1709]

his answer is pedophilia thats why he can't say it

[@enlightenedanalysis]

05:32:10 the last 20 mins is the most important section of the entire work. Everything comes together and begins to make sense.

[@GrayYeonWannabe]

i feel like thats foucault's style lol

[@becauseicareawholelot2122]

I greatly needed to hear a rare individual from the past who I now know would side with me, though few would openly now otherwise. I needed to hear such to further embolden me in my own work! I am indebted to you for uploading this fantastic work.

[@aWomanFreed]

Commie sicko

[@drbrainstein1644]

Nah, it’s the other way around bud! 👍

[@dapv144]

You need to embolden someone to put you on a watch list. This guy is so deeply engulfed in sexual escapades that he forgets the social aspects of humans and how sex is misused for pleasure regardless of its utility and harm. Poetic justice is he was taken by a sexually transmitted disease.

[@julianayagyu6088]

Thank you so much for uploading! I was having a hard time reading it myself. You're a lifesaver!

[@purplespottedkangroos9956]

Bookmark(s): 1:56:00 3:52:00 4:00:00 4:27:13 4:47:00 5:32:00 (IMPORTANT!) 5:43:00

[@enlightenedanalysis]

Thank you for uploading this. Makes the reading of it a lot easier.

[@andrewdong3875]

** This translation is by Robert Hurley, first published in the USA & Canada in 1978.

[@synthetic_paul]

Your work is appreciated!

[@afreenazim8839]

Yay! Thank you 🖤

[@hasmikarakelyan256]

does the guy readings this have a PO box? I wanna send him a twix bar or smt

[@madeleinebennett9115]

Thank you! Legend 💪

[@3arabawy]

I shared it in Twitter. Keep up the great work 👍🏽

[@rilachan2062]

Thank you for uploading!

[@selviskk]

This is very impressive and appreciated

[@A.G.130]

Amazing work thank you infinitly

[@andromedanwildflower3383]

Thank you!

[@mrigyavarma]

same

[@mrigyavarma]

we meet again

[@andromedanwildflower3383]

@@mrigyavarma OMG hahahaha😂😂😂

[@andromedanwildflower3383]

Hello there. His philosophy is going over my head lol

[@mrigyavarma]

Ritika Nair dude literally same I’m failing this class no cap

[@freudianslip2534]

Do you plan on covering the other volumes at some point?

[@missy7619]

thanks for this :))

[@Kharisma1980]

Would you be willing to read HoS II and III?

[@kevingalt6658]

For the YT engagement

[@whatcanisay3862]

Thanks ❤

[@asadraza3608]

1:47:17 Part 3

[@sunnydva]

God bless you

[@denizcantulan4024]

3:44:00

[@wolveskriegfeuersturm1297]

If only the liberation Foucault had hoped for would have occurred, many of us are still cast aside and deprived of even mentioning our attraction lest we be uprooted from society, while those who have found acceptance still have tremendous hills to climb. There are those bold others who live dancing outside the greater eye of the system so as to find mutual bliss, yet such are not free from the system still destroying that they have so lovingly built... While others have gone somewhat mad in pursuit of that denied them and entered into perhaps a new response to love being deprived them. I do not consider myself part of any "LGBTQ+" alliance simply as I view such as another vehicle for such to be controlled while offering the illusion of progression while playing into politicians hands, (though I am sympathetic to their struggle.) Unfortunately the cries of those being metaphorically castrated are much vaster, something Foucault was not ashamed to illustrate here. This is where I reside if not made obvious from my first remark. I thank you for sharing this, and thank Foucault as well. I have started my own works and hope to at least leave a few devastation's to this foundation's tyrannic claws in the form of Literature and Art that would make Michel Foucault proud. A mixture of metaphysics, poetry and scathing attacks on that we are raised to believe when such beliefs are but barriers carefully being erected in its invisible prison to remove all forms of even communication that does not coincide with our cultures cruelties. Perhaps if this sounds of interest to you when finished I will have something at least some will remember. Can't imagine finding a publisher... All the best my fellow vexed undesirables! ~/V\~

[@aWomanFreed]

Oh puhleeze. This is a scam

[@lucasritter2291]

Well. NOW I know. Thank you for your clear, indeed unambiguous message. If I weren’t a fan of “foucault’s” work, consider me a convert. It seems love is the answer.. And was the whole time :) the brilliance continues to.. let’s say “amaze but not surprise,” as they say 😌 the relief of certainty is.. words are laughably inadequate. At least the universe has a sense of humor :) I feel the love. Thank you.. just. Thank you. - |_

[@lucasritter2291]

@@aWomanFreed LOL 😂 Omg. Perfection. The artistry.. the good humor.. the skill. The dedication. Is. Staggering. It is my honor to now seek to apply this lesson for the rest of my life wherever I possibly can. Bless you.. 🥰🥲🙏🏻

[@aWomanFreed]

@@lucasritter2291 yeah, pedos always label their twisted ideas as “love”.

[@addyrevolution1745]

WOW!⚘

[@shannonm.townsend1232]

Is it a human reader

[@nicogrande6583]

Engagement.

[@sheenam4886]

5:02:37

[@LawrenceMabel-y8y]

Anderson Matthew Davis Maria Thomas Betty

[@dethkon]

How many of y’all like sex?

[@rhythmofheaven1489]

So, sex is not a sin, Mr. Foucault. I’m not sure where you got this idea from. Sex is only a sin when it’s without boundaries. Like driving is not illegal until you’re not driving appropriately.

[@chasesaladino6669]

And what are these “boundaries” you speak of? Likewise what are the criteria for “appropriate” driving? Seems like your analogy is presupposing a simple correspondence of illegality and inappropriateness, but illegality is dependent on various contingent positive laws and statutes that may or may not overlap with your vague, intuitive sense of “appropriate”. Likewise, the “boundaries” defining “sin” have changed throughout history even among societies drawing on the same biblical sources. The whole point of Foucault’s work is to look at the changes in how those “boundaries” are drawn, and what factors influence why they’re drawn one way or another.

[@rhythmofheaven1489]

@@chasesaladino6669 Inappropriate per current laws and regulations. Was that too hard to imagine for you?

[@zchularoceribfjan]

I must know that you didn't listen to 5+ hours of compact philosophy and come back with this lame-ass status quo reaction 😂😂😂. Please tell me it isn't true 😂. "Um, but, my youth group leader said sin is only sin because of going outside boundaries." Who f*ck*ng cares 😂😂🤣?

[@bradsummers389]

yeet

[@theoryaudiobooks9635]

Thanks brother

[@nieverstthrax5657]

This is an unbelievably shallow analysis. I expected much more from Foucault, since he is such a big name. There is very little actual history in this book, to say nothing of ontology, and a lot of bile, resentment and maniacal desire to destroy. Nothing is good! History, humanity, nature, the world - everything should be damned and burned! And that passes for truth with some!!

[@dannytrejo1359]

This comment reeks of the right wing cowardice and traditionalism that slaughters my people by the hundreds of thousands, with or without coronavirus. You're a pussy who refuses to address modern issues out of your desire to keep the peace.

[@stephanieamanze6763]

@@dannytrejo1359 You put it perfectly my friend. That comment gives of very evangelical fundamentalist American Christianity/Theism.

[@pantalaemon]

Nowhere and never does he say 'western society bad, discard and start over pls.' Everywhere - if you can read/listen at, say, a tenth-grade level - does he say "we have a suspiciously simple relationship with our history that needs closer examination if we are to understand our position and how we got here." I find it funny that you call his analysis superficial while missing his point or else seriously misconstruing it.

[@NoahsUniverse]

Or perhaps you are a shallow reader

[@NoahsUniverse]

@@stephanieamanze6763 he is an evangelical Christian, and he is on Quora as well, where he consistently misconstrues any philosopher that reiterates in any way the flaws of Christianity.

[@peterlast3200]

A load of garbage. No substance.

[@sirliridon.4419]

Everyone thinks they’re an expert on everything, today.

[@beastebeat4956]

@@sirliridon.4419 I'd argue that there has always been an amount of people believing their own opinions are the best one but the internet just allows people to express it more.

[@kennethmorrison7689]

And that's why Peter is last...

[@jodyponce2204]

Thank you!

[@PiggieGamez]

Thank you!

[@sarabouamrane7150]

5:35:00