The incident of ifk - Dr Sayed Ammar Nakshawani

English Lecture 10 Titled 'The incident of ifk' recited by Dr Sayed Ammar Nakshawani on 24th November 2012 / 10th Night of Muharram 1434 at Masjid al Husayn Leicester.
To Order the Full Set of 13 Lectures for £10 per set, Contact Br Aliabbas Rajani on [e-mail] or 07726007864
Efforts to: www.mksileicester.org
Copyright: MKSI Leicester

[@FUppl]

Syed Ammar is one of the best lecturers i have ever heard in my life! He is indeed one of the greatest Islamic Historian and proves it every single lecture!

[@eldeen555]

I don't know how Rasool Allah put up with the ignorant arabs of his time... He was a blessing onto mankind indeed.

[@SpickeyMomme]

May Allah bless Seyed Ammar, and may ALlah put Seyed Ammar in the same area as the prophets and the Imams!

[@user-uz3xe1gy1y]

786 Shukar Mowla for letting you enlighten us in this way, Sayed!!! What an awesome lecture! What a detective you are, Sayed!!! What a memory you have!! Mash'Allah!! Bravissimo!! May Allah keep you safe, Sayed! Aameen!

[@FUppl]

Excellent analysis! Very interesting perspectives to look at this incident.

[@user-uz3xe1gy1y]

To MKSI Leicester, my heartfelt thanks for still allowing comments to be entered!!

[@afgmo10]

AMAZING lecture! jazakAllah

[@afgmo10]

May Allah bless you for this lecture! Open your eyes Muslims!

[@mukhlisitech3945]

Thank you So much Syedinaa,I have tralselated your pracious words in Urdu...InshaAllah will share it with other people.

[@gulzarali1128]

Please do share with me dar

[@mukhlisitech3945]

@@gulzarali1128 o.k...your full g mail name?

[@MariamRasoul]

May Allah bless you Sayyed Ammar

[@kesyip]

Put this incident of ifq away i do not believe any of the wives of the prophet commited adultery in any way.Does that make Aisha a great person ?NO WAAAYYYY her sins are far graver than adultery she is the cause of the deaths of tens of thousands of companions of the prophet,open the quran read the first 5 ayahs of the surah 66 these ayahs are revealed about Aisha and Hafsa this is unanimously agreed upon by all scholars of the quran sunni and shia.You ll be shocked when you read the first 5 ayahs of the surah 66.Her fighting against Imam Ali is a bad enough sin given the hadiths about the Imam even in the sunni hadith books

[@Final_Turn]

Salams, Can anyone tell that what does IFK means which is referred in Quran?

[@allyriastark3508]

Kk - slander, it's reference to slander against Mariya Qibtiyya who was blaming of adultery and her son Ibrahim was claim to be another man's son

[@yourmomshouse8993]

Very well put

[@faizanmohsin3685]

excellent brother

[@majeedmlp]

Very gud analysis

[@Blackpink_12360]

tooo awesome!!

[@abdelqadir5227]

The best women /ladies in islam as per Rasoul's words Sayyida Khadija, Sayyida Fatima, Asya and Maryam. Periodt!

[@TheAdem320]

@SuperJAGGA1 , listen to the lecture to why the wives of the prophet had that title. Secondly, the uml moemineen was so wise and great, explain to me why she fought against the caliph of her time. Explain why she defied the command of the prophet when she left her home. Again. If u cant answer these questions then don't bother commenting with insults. It makes you sound ridiculous.

[@abdelqadir5227]

Great in evil I suppose, her list is so long bro,

[@afgmo10]

You call us Rafidhi but you praise Muawiyah (may Allah curse him) even though he fought Imam Ali (AS) and killed Imam Hassan (AS)

[@stephanadam4670]

Who killed imam Hussain? Imam ali worked with muawiyah..

[@Thuglife1000]

@@stephanadam4670 most ignorant thing I have heard all year

[@stephanadam4670]

@@Thuglife1000 you guys are confused bunch of people just embarrassed muslims all over the world beating yourselves in public.

[@stephanadam4670]

@@yunis1175 did this mutah loving nakshawni teach you this? I suggest you open a book that has solid sources and learn something! Not books written 400 years later with unknown sources. Now go slap yourself I know your a professor at it

[@Thuglife1000]

@@stephanadam4670 by the way, is beating oneself the only thing you think of? Obviously you are ignorant if that and mutah are all you know. Perhaps you are the son of mutah yourself, which would explain your blatant hate. Although you could be the son of Muawiah too... I guess we'll never know LOL

[@habibehalikhan6961]

Ali Ibn Abi Taleb would never beat a woman who was a slave. The law for the treatment of slaves is straight from the mouth of Abi Taleb, they're to be treated far more leniently than free people. This is in my Quran's commentary. This is a lie.

[@saidkhan5086]

Share your Qur'an commentary pdf to us, if it's available?

[@husseinchaytou8337]

And what is the immediate verse that follows? 9:101: And from among those who are round about you of the dwellers of the desert there are hypocrites, and from among the people of Medina (also); they are stubborn in hypocrisy; you do not know them; We know them; We will chastise them twice then shall they be turned back to a grievous chastisement

[@husseinchaytou8337]

'Allah' condemns them in the Quran. Why are you saying "so you mean?" History, Hadith, and Quran attests to the conduct of the wives of the Prophet Muhammad saww. I personally don't have the motivation to reference books and verses to you. You are dilettantish in your word. I am not Shia. I am a Muslim that believes Imam Ali is and was the true successor of the RasoolAllah. I follow the Ahlul Bayt of the RasoolAllah after Imam Ali. I follow who the RasoolAllah wanted me to follow after him saww

[@allyriastark3508]

I am surprised to learn Ifk was thought to be about Aisha ? I thought everyone knew it was Mariya that was accused I didn't know who might accuse her until I have come across a Hadith of Aisha saying she was jealous of Mariya !

[@abbasawan6753]

I don’t know where you live but here in my country Pakistan, there are some people who call Yazeed paleed as Ameer ul Momineen Yazeed R.A and call Syed ul Shohada Imam Hussain A.S to be a power hungry misguided prince. So, considering that, people fabricating the reference of the incident of ifk is not anything surprising.

[@husseinchaytou8337]

The Quran condemns certain wives of the Prophet. The Quran tells the wives that Allah can replace them with better wives than them if they don't desist from troubling the Rasoolallah. Allah says that He will back up the Rasoolallah, and that Angel Gabriel will back up the Rasoolallah, and the Angels, and the Righteous Believer amongst the believers (66:4) The wife of Prophet Lut is termed as wicked in the Quran. Only wives that bear a prophets child successor is pure (like Sara bore Isaac)

[@dailyhindustan5843]

Hussein Chaytou verse 3also

[@kunfayakun8676]

Prophet Luts wife bore him two daughters 🤦🏾‍♂️

[@RavenWrath01]

اروحلك فدوة سيد عمار سيف علي المسلول

[@sosa7586]

The verse was not about aisha but Maria kzbin.info/www/bejne/q5SqfGeFiseCjNU -problems with aisha story kzbin.info/www/bejne/l6nOf4uDisllsK8 -was ifk about maria or aisha kzbin.info/www/bejne/bYqUfpyger9ln9k - Dr sayed ammar 1 hour khutba totally destroying the theory

[@ibrahimharith9878]

Allahuma Swali Ala Muhammad Wa Ala Ali Muhammad...Read ,Read ,Read don't be like what the Quran condemns the polytheist,'We follow what we found our forefathers doing ,(Worship )

[@omorealism]

The Quran is clear that 24:11 praised the personality of the accused while 66:4-5 condemns 2 wives of the Prophet (s) which everyone agree were hafsa and aisha. Therefore, how can both verses be revealed about the same person? "Then do they not reflect upon the Qur'an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction. 4: 82. Only a jahil or an oxymoron would believe 24:11 was revealed about aisha

[@prophetnozza4150]

We have found contradiction in it its FULL OF IT!

[@coronateststation241]

@@prophetnozza4150 go on

[@ihsanbajwa3974]

واقعہ افک کی بابت آیات سورت النور میں ہیں ۔۔۔۔۔۔کیا یہ معلومات درست ہیں

[@AfghaNang]

And its tafsir*

[@faizanmohsin3685]

ayat of ahlelbait has called male gender or plural. Ummahatul mominin are all female . this shows how sunni ulema tell lies to sunnis. using male ayat for only female. hahaha

[@badarnazkhattak3261]

then what about the daughter she was a female too

[@zednes2065]

Badar naz Khattak The daughter didn't need to be part of the Ahlulbayt'.. to be pure, love! She IS already pure .. and the lady of paradise. And the ONLY beloved daughter of Muhammad' s.a.w who was the mother OF the only grandchildren, who were the Ahlulbayt'. The other children were from Khadija previous marriage) and/or was adopted from Khadija sister. Again you'll have to look into history to examine age of children, where they came from, etc.

[@starley_]

@@badarnazkhattak3261 The number of males is higher than the number of females so the male verb is to be used

[@srigunapati]

the baby part kills me

[@anwardollar6046]

WY U DON'T 2BATE ANAND RASHID

[@yourmomshouse8993]

Why doesn’t Mike Tyson box me? Because I’m not on his level. Rashid is a park debater and you want Dr Sayed Ammar Nakshawani to debate him? You’ll see Rashid try to over talk him or run like Umar in uhod

[@kanizeraza]

so you said that wives of Prophet Mohammad SAWW are infallible right? so why Hazrat Aysha made so many mistakes? that means according to your statement quranic verses are wrong, is that you what want to prove ????

[@Evelyn-vh1ex]

Prophet Nuh's wife was not fallible.

[@Ali-kv3uu]

now the sunnis will go and change the dates in their book and spend money to circulate these books LOL! wallahi...

[@yourmomshouse8993]

lol exactly

[@BareClause]

Salam. While it probably is more likely that the the ifk incident was about Aisha, it still isn't a 'big blow' to the Shia, or so to speak. The Quran only defends her from sexual indecency, that's all. Also, you must nor forget, that while the Qur'an does defend her from sexual indecency, she is still condemned in Surah 66.

[@kubrab2617]

Brother yes Quran does praise Aisha(r.a) in one verse for her chastity and in other verse it warns Aisha (r.a) that if she is not obideint to her husband (s.a.s) Allah will make divorce with Prophet, Tell me where is the contradiction in Quran ? If in one place quran says Aisha (r.a) is chaste women and in other place if says no she is not chaste women, it would have been contradiction. Do not forget in Quran Allah even warns Prophet (s.a.s) on many occations, then what will u take from it?

[@softpebbles]

kubra B in which ayah is Allah warning the prophet ? Pls post the ayahs on here thank you

[@humanitypeace]

Brother, for this verse and its details kindly refer to Sahih Muslim Book 031, Number 5955. Also, kindly read Surah Tahrim with its tafseer. Insha Allah you will get your answer. To all brothers and sisters: Kindly avoid accusing and insulting each other while discussing religion. Religion is a very private matter to every individual. All are Muslims who are trying to attain nearness to Allah(SWT). Understand each others heritage and respect it.

[@osamarawal9315]

I think you follow some other religion Islam is not a private matter.

[@humanitypeace]

@@osamarawal9315 Sure you can go public when you are certain about your own beliefs. Under any circumstance, abusing is not allowed. And that my friend, is a part of Islam.

[@badarnazkhattak3261]

not shia. explain rawfiz . we know all

[@mikezandi2756]

This Guy Khan Majeed is promoting hatred here just spam him

[@gamernplayer]

Habibi it only means Aisha was not perfect. Do you think she was sinless and perfect? Do you know what else the Quran says about Aisha and Hafsa? His (Ammar's) speech is based on history, rational thought, and logic. Whats yours? All I can see is emotion.

[@mxhsvn_b7866]

Ammar nakshawani is a great scholar but he's always complaining about everything. I find it annoying. Sometimes he says during an interview oh yeah the noise and organisation in Iraq isn't gonna fix for the next 1000 years while he is sitting in karbala. Then he says this air conditioning is gonna kill me today. This guy is too cranky

[@Nazbaz6]

bruh out of all things you could have said from this lecture you gonna bring out the last 2 seconds.

[@AfghaNang]

The Shiite people bring up this verse to prove their imams are infallible: And abide in your houses and do not display yourselves as [was] the display of the former times of ignorance. And establish prayer and give zakah and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah intends only to remove from you the impurity [of sin], O people of the [Prophet's] household, and to purify you with [extensive] purification. But what about this verse, i will post in next comment:D

[@zednes2065]

AfghaNang Who are the Imams? The holy Prophet made it clear that following him there would be twelve successors, all from the Quraysh, and that their leadership would bring glory to Islam. Jabir Ibn Samarah says, "I heard the Prophet (a.s) say, 'Islam will always be honored under these twelve successors.' Then he said something that I did not quite hear. I asked my father what the prophet said; he answered, 'The prophet said that they would all come from the Quraysh.'[1] In the history of Islam, there can be found no twelve successors guarding and preserving the honor of Islam except the twelve Imams in whom the Shiites believe, because it is only the twelve successors mentioned by the prophet who were all introduced as his immediate vicegerents. Now, let us see who these twelve Imams are. If we exclude the four caliphs immediately following the holy Prophet (whom the Sunnites call 'the Rightly Guided Caliphs, the Rashidun', the other caliphs did not bring any honor to Islam, as is evident from the history of the Umayyad and the Abbasids. But the twelve Imams of the Shiites were paragons of virtue and piety in their own time, and about whose knowledge and trustworthiness historians have given clear proof were the guardians of the Sunnah of God's Prophet and were in the center of attention of the Companions and their followers as well as of the Muslims of later generations. These twelve Imams are: 'Ali Ibn Abi-Talib Hasan Ibn 'Ali (Mujtaba) Husayn Ibn 'Ali 'Ali Ibn Husayn (Zayn al-'abidin) Muhammad Ibn 'Ali (Baqir) Ja'far Ibn Muhammad (Sadiq) Musa Ibn Ja'far (Kazim) 'Ali Ibn Musa (Rida) Muhammad Ibn 'Ali (Taqi) 'Ali Ibn Muhammad (Naqi) Hasan Ibn 'Ali ('Askari) Mahdi (Qa'im) about whom successive traditions have been quoted from the Prophet calling him the promised Mahdi. To obtain further information about the biography of these great leaders, whose names have been mentioned by the Holy Prophet (a.s), see the following books: Tadkirat al-Khawass Wafiyyat al-A'yan A'yan al-Shiah (the most comprehensive of all). [1] Sahih Muslim (Egypt edition), Vol. 6, p. 2.

[@yourmomshouse8993]

Our imams are relatives and come from the blood of the prophet. They are not some fake political leaders. What motivation do we have to make this up. They have the same blood in them as the holy prophet. I rather follow them then some former pagan.

[@AfghaNang]

O wives of the Prophet, you are not like anyone among women. If you fear Allah , then do not be soft in speech [to men], lest he in whose heart is disease should covet, but speak with appropriate speech. 33:32. Which is the next verse? 33:33 which u Bring up to improve that the wives of the prophet are not Ahlul bayt. And ur imams are infallible.

[@AfghaNang]

@HA C, so you mean the wives of the prophet were vile women, or? U shias Bring verses about the wives of nuh and lut AS to prove that Aisha and Hafsa were bad women.

[@vivaspin]

AfghaNang you are doing great man keep up the work you are doing. You are forgetting the 2 most important things our prophet had left for us: Quran and Ahlul bait. You are forgetting what you need to hold on to. You are lost man

[@AfghaNang]

Allah does not intend to make difficulty for you, but He intends to purify you and complete His favor upon you that you may be grateful. Quran 5:6 Here, Allah talks about a believer, is he infallible now, because Allah says that He intends to purify you. Does this verse make a believer infallible? Loll

[@AfghaNang]

The Prophet is closer to the Believers than their own selves, and his wives are their mothers. Shia Rafidha explain this!

[@abdelqadir5227]

Mothers meaning we simply can't marry them, the best ladies of this Ummaj are Maryam Asiya Khadija Fatima someone plz explain, oh Rasoul how about your beloved wife aka humayraaa

[@bigbothoee8617]

Bias history much

[@ideasthatmakesense]

By the way at 52 minutes the use of the lights, echo in the microphone, and baby on the lap was a cheap use of theatrics, but I guess for your flock it works.

[@ideasthatmakesense]

LOOOOOOL wallah you are sick!

[@mastaf006007]

have you ever watched a sad movie? have you ever listened to the music in the background? i it is called setting the mood brother. listen to the qur'an with a normal voice, and then listen to abdul basit. which touched you more? abdul basit of course. this is not about theatrics, like a i side it setting up the mood and to actually put you in the shoes of the person in the incident i hope that clears it.

[@hr7769]

igiujgj he said 'flock'. We are the true Muslims and you call us a 'flock'. Good luck with judgement day

[@arthurdduda8233]

I'm sorry I disagree, too much theatrics, my heart is always melted with the story of karbal, the echo and change in his voice is to much, it cheapens the tragedy, I'm not at all saying the speaker isn't sincere or that the audience isn't sincere, but in trying to illicit a response they go overboard, I enjoy this speakers lecture very much and have learned a lot from him, but I'd rather have my own genuine release of my emotions then to have them pried out of me, it's hard to be reflective and meditate on the gravity of what happened there with so much volume and noise abdu echo coming at you, maybe I'm just old fashioned, I don't even like so much echo when some do the adhan, it's distracting. the Christian evangelicals use many theatrics and they are some of the worse of the worse in their behavior and theology, they use Jesus and the crucifixion to evoke emotions in people, to get them to let their guard down, and then lead them into much falsehood, my brother I do not accuse this speaker of it and pray to ALLAH all praise to him, that it never happens in Islam, I'm saying be warned their is a line, and in my opinion truth and love are enough you do not have to go overboard with theatrics, the truth and love of ahlubayt can stand alone and above all just fine.

[@Nazbaz6]

@@arthurdduda8233 it isnt haram. this is just personal preference by the sound of it.

[@badarnazkhattak3261]

lol

[@AfghaNang]

Prove* not improve

[@highfields8122]

A Shia like this speaker naturally spins to create doubt to the companions

[@yourmomshouse8993]

For what purpose? These events took place 1400 years ago what does he gain. It’s his interpretation of history from books you can disagree if you like.

[@ZainAli-st6sh]

No he just tells u the facts ur too scared to admit to

[@strengthofislam]

This guy only appears to know what he is talking about. Not only is he completely lying about this, he messes up even his other facts. In Kitab al-Kafi (a major shia source) by Imam Ja'far, it is said that Said ibn al Mussayib was a loyal and trusted companion of Imam Zayn al-abideen.

[@rafranchini266]

+masal where does it say in al kafi ibn musayb was a companion of zainulabideen show me pleaze.

[@courseworkdue]

+raf ranchini LOL good luck waiting for a Bakri to bring you any proof

[@strengthofislam]

+raf ranchini My pleasure. It is hadith 1272 in chapter 119. Go take a look. Abu abdillah (here, in reference to imam as sadiq) tells Ishaq bin Jarir that ibn al mussayib, al Qasim bin muhammad bin abi Bakr and al Khalid al kabuli were from the loyal companions of as sajjaad. But know my friend that this is but a small issue of many issues that you are confused about.

[@strengthofislam]

+Big Bad Wolf take a look my jahil friend

[@strengthofislam]

+Big Bad Wolf good luck waiting for a bakri, huh? you sound like you're in some kind of cult. why don't you read a book.

[@soulja1123]

you're funny, do standup at your local sunni joke of a mosque cheers

[@ideasthatmakesense]

This lecturer is clearly a conspiracy theorist. Almost every single lecture of his he is dedicated to somehow picking apart sunni sources and does it in the most disingenuous of ways. Are we to believe Ibn Kathir, Imam Abu Hanifah (who's teacher is Jafar al-saddiq), Al-Qurtabi, Imam Shafi, Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Imam Malik, Imam Bukhari, Imam Muslim, Tirmidhi, Imam Shawkani, and I can name 100s of the golden age scholars all got it wrong? All of them conspired? This man is a salesmen preaching to his flock and could never stand up to a muhadith like Sheikh Yasir Qadhi. I dare him to Challenge the likes of Yasir Qadhi to a debate on the story of Ifk.

[@rafranchini266]

+igiujgj I never saw a yasir qadhi speech about ifk besides that you should take in the lecture open your mind. He picked apart in an incredibly logical way he didnt even need 50 minutes sayed ammar proved his point 30 minutes in already.

[@aliqasim9157]

+igiujgj Yes they could be wrong bcoz the final source from which all the people u have mentioned in here took this incident is Banu Ummayya... If u listen the whole video carefully, speaker has clearly explained the political roots of it..and by the way u have mentioned Imam Jafer Sadiq (AS) in here too. He knew the true incident. Ammar Nakshawani's lecture is in line with the understanding of Imams of Ahlul Bayt. Apart from this incident, just search about the explanation of Imam Jafer Sadiq and his views in context of the first six verses of Sura Tahreem in which Allah has clearly rebuked Aisha and Hafsa for their evil scheme which RasoolAllah (PBUH) came to know...Look and search what was that...? Go and search in Bukhari too what was being put into the mouth of RasoolAllah (PBUH) on his death bed and in his final moments and what did he say?.. Thanks.

[@aliqasim9157]

Brahim D Exactly..

[@mxhsvn_b7866]

IdeaSlayer if you've got better arguments then bring them forward we have the Quran for evidence what do u have?

[@AA-kt8ei]

The Misguided misguiding the misguided...may your tongue be rectified