The Levels of Scrutiny

[@HugoScavinoUSA]

Your talk is a beautiful way to understand a complex topic. I have a difficult time reading and then understanding. But when you explain these topics almost mathematically, your style helps me understand unlike reading a textbook.

[@PGJ326]

Thanks for this video, it helped me a lot to understand the concept of scrutiny and the levels. Hope you keep posting more videos.

[@drywallmuncher]

This is literally so helpful, thank you. I have my polisci final in two days and I was struggling with this concept

[@NewYorkCityBoxing]

Excellent explanation - is she writing backwards?

[@andyf8805]

I believe they do it so they write regular and just flip the image for us so it's regular again

[@annabellemoore4214]

Strict - Suspect Class: Race, religion, national origin, show compelling reason Rational - No suspect or quasi suspect class, legitimate reason Intermediate - Quasi suspect, Important reason

[@BillHustonPodcast]

Just what I needed. THANK YOU!

[@idontevenknowlolhahahah]

rip to the dead right earbud.

THANK YOU FOR EXPLAINING THIS AND I DID LEARN SOMETHING 👍

[@nwpandp6896]

You are good

[@kendrickoyola4290]

Recovering drug abuser are part of a protected class under the Rehabilitation act, so it should be strict; correct?

[@Everything2A]

So basically what you’re saying is with this New York concealed carry case that just went to the Supreme Court… it involves the fundamental right under the Second Amendment therefore it is going to be strict scrutiny and the state of New York has a very high burden to prove they have a compelling reason to treat permits relating to firearms differently.

[@maxrubin9540]

This aged very well. But even better. Bruen ruled that only decisions based on text history and tradition is the basis for the second amendment. Not means end scrutiny.

[@brunopruhs3291]

How did you make this video? As in make it look like you are drawing on the screen? Looks very interesting - thanks!

[@adamrichter1143]

She just writes everything backwards and is really good at it.

[@nikahssni]

livesaver thank you!!

[@woloabel]

marvelous exposey of the standards and, also, a legitimate way to expose the docency but better than most....Southern Georgia.

[@AntonGerami]

Excellent!

[@TheEnforcer777]

Ok Im sorry but your example used to explain the difference in Scrutiny is not very good. Heres why, the question of Drug use may indeed be applicable to any or all the classes. What if part of a religious tradition included the use of the Drug, or what if the national orgin used a Drug to deal with some genetic alteration needed to survive. What if the enforcement against the Drug use was not equally being applied to people of a particular race. These are only some issues with your example and I didnt even point out that your analysis completely fails to consider that drug usage can be considered a 9th Amendment Unenumerated Right so maybe you should use a better example next time.

[@alilahooti1511]

Thanks, its helpful.

[@wesleytipton2582]

kinda hot at the end

[@christophergomez5131]

Why would Brown v entertainment merchants association use strict scrutiny then

[@JESS-vz5gu]

When you start realise signing up for AP Gov wasn't such a good move 🧍‍♀️

[@eden3116]

Thanks. This helped

[@NoName-eq4fc]

Missing the means analysis.

[@johnjohnson5814]

volume too low