The Moon Landing - World's Greatest Hoax? | Free Documentary History

[@miskelproducts41]

I'm just saying if they did it 50 years ago with 50 yr old technology, shouldn't it be easy to do today???

[@TheRoughStar]

Still not easy. But less difficult than before. Although still monumentally costly though for no valuable reason.

[@douglasbachman3990]

No because we never went to the Moon why because if you read God's word in the beginning then you know the truth? Look up Firmament, Circle, and Ends then you what those words mean and that my friend will tell you the truth.

[@miskelproducts41]

@@douglasbachman3990 You believe the Earth is flat?

[@STAR-RADIANCE]

Easier but not cheaper.

[@douglasbachman3990]

@@miskelproducts41 not as I believe it's Flat but I know that it is true! There's a lot of Bible verses in God's word that prove that it is Flat!

[@tonkatruck1968]

I am 55 Years Old.I remember my Grandfather stating that he was highly skeptical of the moon landing .I was young and found his distrust of the Govt disturbing and thought How sad to be so distrustful of our good govt. He had served in the war..I wish I had appreciated his insights more.Nothing has changed .Governments are corrupt

[@Tim22222]

Perhaps, but faking something as massive as the moon program is far more than the matter of the "guvmint tole us." Hundreds of THOUSANDS of people worked on it, and literally millions of astronomers & scientists around the world - some in countries that were adversaries - confirmed the landings. We *WENT.*

[@joestitz239]

They happened. Nasa was not government, gov funded is not gov run, nasa people made it happen over 400,000 total around the world involved; and anyone today can point a good telescope and see the landing platforms.

[@wildboar7473]

Ofelia Legar I remember my uncle saying. “They didn’t go to the moon, they are filming everything on earth. At the time, I thought he was so wrong and was naive. Not knowing, that I the one who was going to college, WAS THE NAIVE ONE. Sapa Holliday I was 15 and watched with my dad and he slid down from his armchair onto the floor laughing. I really wish he could have seen this, it's the best I've seen on the subject. We need to remember that the whole world was duped in '69. American Moon (English Version)

[@JoJo-kw2lr]

​@@wildboar7473 haha classic response from your dad!

[@wildboar7473]

@@JoJo-kw2lr I wish my sheeple Dr dad did, copypaste of Others :( Bill Clinton in his 2004 autobiography ‘My Life’ recounts how an old carpenter had told him he didn’t believe in the moon landing for a minute and that “them television fellers” could “make things look real that weren’t”. :)

[@ryanhegseth8720]

When someone doesn’t believe me they are a skeptic but when I don’t believe, I’m a conspiracy theorist.

[@rockethead7]

No. Skepticism is a method of analysis. Somehow, that word has gotten butchered into meaning (to some people) "blind rejection." No, blind rejection isn't skepticism. Being skeptical means to use a specific set of rational rules to analyze the data and come to a conclusion, rather than basing belief on emotions or predetermined conclusions. You're not skeptical. As for the term "conspiracy theorist," well, what would you call someone who holds a theory that the moon landings were a conspiracy?

[@jimsmith7212]

Maybe it's not them, maybe it's YOU.

[@jdl1276]

@@rockethead7 and then you got rockethead who is going to try and school you on it... halolhalol... oh the irony

[@jerper8963]

1969 - 600 million people watch the moon landing live (most watched event ever at the time). Four years later 1973 - 1.3+ billion people watch Elvis landing in Hawaii live. Shows what is important.

[@stusue9733]

"The figures for total viewers proposed by Presley's manager were questioned, as critics pointed that the sum of the total population of all the countries targeted by the broadcast was roughly 1.3 billion with the actual viewership ranging from 150-200 million."

[@therealzilch]

​@@stusue9733 Thanks for tracking that down. 1.3 billion Elvis viewers is obviously wildly inflated. Back then, everyone I knew, including myself, watched the first Moon landing, and I never even heard of Elvis landing in Hawai'i.

[@stusue9733]

@@therealzilch "I never even heard of Elvis landing in Hawai'i." Ditto. yw

[@jdthecrazy]

Everyone that thinks that it would take too many to cover up something on this level, only needs to look at Covid.

[@jdthecrazy]

People will go along with whatever.

[@thetraveler1182]

Amen

[@autumnlover5784]

I havent seen anything questioning covid yet? What is the conspiracy or purpose of it?

[@maggiemae7539]

@@autumnlover5784seriously??

[@darylhoskins5696]

@@autumnlover5784🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@AliceBowie]

The point they seem to miss is that when you look back on the last 122 years, or more, people can see that the US govt, and the media, military, industry, and advertising, has told so many lies, or covered so many things up, that it becomes impossible to just trust what we are told. If you've been caught showing a pattern of lying, don't act offended when people don't believe you even when you tell the truth.

[@J82FLH]

Exactly

[@chasejohnson5963]

ABSOLUTELY!!!! Dead on!

[@romithromith]

We're offended you forgot to include conspiracy theorists, who top the list of liars.

[@jeannemarcinek4575]

And you were there 122 years ago? You believe or not.

[@jesusislordsoontoreturn2178]

Exactly 💯%

[@fgarrison2910]

Marcus Allen's British wit really makes this such a fun watch. He tickles me.

[@robertbolding4182]

Finally a Englishman from across the pond will put the rest the the question of whether the Americans landed on the moon

[@waltercrosby6110]

We did not go to the moon

[@lonnieanderson4233]

It is easier to fool someone than to try to convince someone that they have been fooled

[@109sssss]

i think they know the moon is artificial and had to fake a landing so that no one would think about going there in the future.

[@marksprague1280]

And moon conspiracy freaks are living proof of that statement.

[@rudinieuwenhuis4700]

Spoken like a true follower of dale bowman

[@tibodeclercq2131]

quote from Mark Twain (credits)

[@bargeman100]

I watched the first moon landing on TV when I was ten years old. I believed it was real till about ten years ago. When you start looking into it there's just too many anomalies.

[@jairochama6694]

My mother once told me that when you lie, you will have to come up with a thousand lies in order to defend your initial lie. But when you tell the truth, you will not have to defend it.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

Just FYI to anyone reading this: the user I’m replying to is a bot. It’s not a real person.

[@casandrala8370]

But government loves us and would never in a million moon landings lie to us.😂🤣

[@omegala1]

Tell that to Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and Judy Mikovits.

[@jonnie106]

Abraham Lincoln was attributed to have said, "Telling the truth means never having to remember what you said"

[@Godscountry2732]

@Jairo Chama Your mom is right. NASA has never publicly defended the hundreds of conspiracies directed against it. A few examples include fictitious moon landings, fake Shuttle crashes, fake International Space Station, fake Mars rovers, and many more. Most NASA conspiracists are scientifically illiterate, making it impossible to convince them of anything logical. NASA did respond to NBA star Stephen Curry on Twitter after he questioned the moon landings. NASA tweeted "Yes we did" . Curry retracted his statements after NASA invited him to visit the lunar lab. Celebrities in sports, movies, and music should stick to entertaining their millions of fans, not playing lunar scientists, etc..

[@joeyjoe7155]

For me , if first time being in OuterSpace , and they say theres no Air. I would be very very careful not to be Jumping around doing Kangaroo Hoppings , trip and fall and crack my helmet, or tear a hole on my Suit , can jump on a sharp rock , trip and fall face down on a rock. And would those helmets first time in a " no air space " actually hold on ? It just reminds me of that small submarine that had the implosion. Just my wondering. 🤔 thoughts

[@therealzilch]

Funny, most Moon landing deniers make the opposite complaint: that in the lower gravity of the Moon, the astronauts should have been jumping much higher than they did. And of course the space suits were thoroughly tested in a vacuum chamber on Earth beforehand.

[@stusue9733]

" And would those helmets first time in a " no air space " actually hold on ? It just reminds me of that small submarine that had the implosion." Do you have no idea of the pressures you are talking about in each instance? And do you not understand the difference between the two instances?

[@rockethead7]

The astronauts understood their suits and equipment better than you do.

[@body_improvement_road]

Your "wondering thoughts" had me in stitches laughing at 4 am. You might not have meant to be funny but those are great points and the way you worded them is hilarious. Thank you!

[@mjsalem922]

The shadow argument fails because the pictures on the moon weren't all by a camera shooting a picture in the same direction as the parallel shadows, which would converge. There are pictures of camera shots perpendicular to the non-parallel shadows, which were not parallel. Also, why no sand/dust on the capsule's footing and there was no dust being cleared wasn't explained. The greatest jet air pressure is when capsule is just about to land. It doesn't turn off the engines near the ground. That was not true. I never believed the moon landing was fake, but given the credibility of our government & the totality of the circumstances, I now believe there is a possibility the moon landing was faked.

[@rockethead7]

"There are pictures of camera shots" Yet, you offer no catalog numbers? "why no sand/dust on the capsule's footing" Congratulations on repeating silly lies told to you by conspiracy videos. Not a single person in history who has actually looked at the photo archive for themselves has made that claim. But, the makers of conspiracy videos know that none of their followers EVER fact check a single thing they say. They eat it up like Christmas dinner, and then regurgitate the same lies. If you scrutinized those conspiracy videos you love so much... as much as you're pretending you're scrutinizing Apollo... you'd find out really quickly who the real liars are.

[@rockethead7]

"there was no dust being cleared" Same answer. You haven't looked for yourself. You blindly trusted a conspiracy video that lied to you. How about AS11-40-5921? There's nearly zero dust remaining, because almost all of it has been blown down to the compacted regolith and rock. You even see radial striations from the rocket blast. But, a conspiracy video shows you a couple of low-res photos from bad angles, and they have full confidence that you'll never actually look at the archives for yourself to see how wrong they are.

[@rockethead7]

"It doesn't turn off the engines near the ground." Well, on Apollo 11 and Apollo 14, you'd be correct, they didn't actually shut the engines off until after they touched down. But, the correct procedure was to shut the engine off about 5 feet above the surface, and fall the rest of the way. The other 4 landings did exactly that. "I now believe there is a possibility the moon landing was faked." Based upon what? "I don't understand it, therefore it's fake"? Nothing you've said has been even remotely correct, dewdrop.

[@rockethead7]

"The greatest jet" A rocket isn't a jet, dewdrop. Sorry, but if you don't know the difference between rockets and jets, you're in absolutely no position to have an opinion.

[@rockethead7]

"greatest air pressure is when capsule is just about to land." No, dewdrop. It's the exact opposite. Do you really think they could land that thing at 10,500 pounds of thrust? You don't think it would be shooting straight upward if they ran at 100% throttle while landing?

[@bigusdicus73]

The most compelling part of the argument is why can't we repeat it 52 years later. Didn't they write down how they did it?

[@youtube-ventura]

We can but we need to re-engineer all the materials and systems. Are you going to pay for that?

[@notallowed337]

@@youtube-ventura because they never did it

[@pjcouture5203]

No, they destroyed all the technology lol

[@pjcouture5203]

ROFL @3.9 billion years

[@canadaeast8358]

Exactly. And how did they go through the Radiation belt that will kill you and Wasn’t even discovered until years later

[@IndependentMind115]

I love how we had all this technology in 1969, but we can NEVER replicate it today.

[@jojoaja6106]

They destroyed telemetry data, they cant show a clean images of what they left with today tech , even the mountain was waiving in some videos 😂😂😂

[@stevelounsbery3481]

We do we just don’t hear about it. Area 51 was the testing facility for much of the Air Force and rockets

[@hieverybody4246]

The Chinese went to the moon a decade ago, by exactly copying our Apollo rocket and lunar module, down to the rivets.

[@IndependentMind115]

@@jojoaja6106 Exactly.

[@IndependentMind115]

@@hieverybody4246 The people landed on the moon? Or just a rover? Because all the articles I ever see are about non-human landings or orbitals. _No one_ has ever landed on the moon again, so far that I can see online. We can replicate orbitals and other things that can be tampered with AI and CGI, but can we replicate an actual human landing? And if we can, will we be able to see the real moon? Or will it all be CGI? We're getting to the point that AI can generate images, videos, and songs that look so real that not a lot of people can detect the difference. In the near future, all of our stuff might be fake or faked to where the simulation theory might not be too far off.

[@paultaylor7947]

all there is left to assume is that there is not the know how to construct pyramids nowadays as they were built in Egyptian times

[@therealzilch]

So I guess the Pyramids are faked too. Wow.

[@GrammerAngel]

What if Nasa knew they could put a man on the moon, but didn't know if they could broadcast the moon walks? They could test the mission, but not the video proof. Perhaps Nasa had a contingency of filming a "mock" moon walk, that they could broadcast in the event of moon transmission failure?

[@stusue9733]

Then you would think they would have done a better job.

[@lovetoclearclouds7017]

“How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again!” -Mark Twain

[@lovetoclearclouds7017]

@@user-wf7nq2rc6w One of Nikola Tesla’s few friends.

[@stevenstair1068]

Trump meet Mark Twain....

[@LewDanLascivious8276]

@@lovetoclearclouds7017 "Antisocial behavior is a trait of intelligence in a world full of conformists" - Nikola Tesla

[@LewDanLascivious8276]

"It's easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they've been fooled" Isn't that how it's supposed to go?

[@Vendelta]

@@LewDanLascivious8276 And My Opinion on the Moon Landing:⤵️ Just because 500,000 people took part in the Moon Landing Program, (that doesn't necessarily mean that 500,000 knew it was Fake). PLEASE, JUST THINK ABOUT THAT. ↓↓↓ It was in the middle of the Cold War,/ JFK was eliminated,/ the Vietnam War spawned protest against the War,/ the citizens of the united states, plus the allies hated the US Government. So What would have been better at this point in Time, than a planned Moon Landing, (but under no circumstances was it allowed to Fail????) They built the rockets, they built that...well..., Let's just call it (SpaceshipFoil) Apollo 11, the Rocket launch was real, no doubt on that. But after that Rocket launch, (it was all Hollywood)!!!! NASA supposedly destroyed the technology, and they muddied the Telemetry Data and lost it??? The Moon Landing was THE GREATEST achievement that mankind has ever fulfill, till this day. But still, they want us to beLIEve, that these important achievements like Telemetry Database have been lost, and they destroyed the technologies? Oh man, my Smartphone, Iphone14ProMax, or my S22ULTRA are way more capable then the Technology back in the 60th, I just need a good 🚀 to shoot my Smartphone up to the Moon 🌙 Don't forget, by now it's common knowledge that we can only move in (Low Earth's Orbit), WE CAN'T GO FURTHER THAN LOW 🌎 ORBIT..... Oh boi... SMH I mean, (it's impossible that they went there), don't forget the ('Van Allen Belt' didn't allow it in the first place with that high deadly Radiation☢️.) They could at least sent an unmanned Rover to the MOON, BUT THEY DIDN'T. INSTEAD of doing this, THEY SENT IT TO MARS.... Wake up, c'mon man 🤣😜

[@RonTimmonsM1]

After COVID and knowing what was involved in that, there is nothing I don't question anymore.

[@stanrix]

I basically searched for your comment. I doubt everything we’re told now due to the health “emergency”

[@bushmanphotos]

under rated comment... until covid I believed in the moon landing... now I doubt everything the Govt tells me

[@wmw3629]

Your hero, Trump, lied about Covid & caused over 300,000 unnecessary deaths!

[@humanbeingscanb2evil]

You lot should look up all the different operations the cia did,all the false flags,all the projects,I will start with the first two I learnt about after awakening back at the end of 2017,first was operation paperclip and the second was operation mockingbird,then there’s project blue bird,then a watched a really cool documentary called a confession of an economic hitman,then Whitney web just recently released her two books. Me now I don’t trust anything msm says more so if the mass majority of msm are parroting it,I only trust doctors that the msm and powers that be are trying to destroy by smear campaigns,like saying they are spreading misinformation or these doctors are fringe or the name calling ,I’ve now researched modern day medicine and I say hell no to rockerfella or gates so called medicine. I don’t trust the climate change narrative cause again the same ppl involved in lying to us about the vaccines and deadliness of COVID are the very same ppl trying to control us in the name of saving the planet,yes we are a problem in the sense of a throw away society and we do pollute our waterways and seas and the land but all of those things are fixable but co2 ,well let’s just say without co2 we all die,plants die,animals die,we die. Lastly anyone who says I am the science or the science is settled is someone you should never ever in a trillion years listen too. As for moon landing well I wasn’t there so who knows As for JFKs murder yeah well that one I believe there was a good few groups that wanted him dead and gone from the military to the cia and fbi to the mafia and mob groups,also the cia and Italian mafia and the Jewish mob during ww2 actually all got into bed together,if you want to know about that then look up one of the many interviews that Whitney web has done lately then google each of the operations the cia did that she mentions about in these interviews,yip it’s all there on google. So no I don’t trust anything anymore more so when it’s all one sided and the other side is getting censored or smeared that just makes me question it even more. Boy have I had a massive education since awakening/ red pilling.

[@andysmith1996]

@@bushmanphotos You shouldn't be proud of your stupidity.

[@podcastdude]

‘One man was already skeptical.” Cut to a sleeping cat!

[@EvilSnipa]

This is why everybody isn't a rocket scientist. Just because they did then don't mean they can go right now.

[@bradmccoy7996]

How in the world can anyone trust anything our Government says at all.

[@unownyoutuber9049]

well the government says murder is wrong, better go kill my wife because we cant trust that government on anything!

[@bradmccoy7996]

@@unownyoutuber9049 better to trust God, than Government

[@MathieusTheWalkingWitness]

"Government lies but not about the earth" --diet woke mofo P.s. Earth is flat and motionless like your senses tell you

[@unownyoutuber9049]

@@bradmccoy7996 I'm an atheist, and if so in the bible it says slave ownership is ok so I'm off to buy some slaves see you later!

[@fu_247]

@@bradmccoy7996 religion is a mental illness. Question your faith, I dare you.

[@steelermia]

one thing that doesn't sit right with me is how they lost all this footage and other important data about the missions .. one of the most impressive incredible feats in human history .. should've been under tight security at some museum .. but no, they were totally careless with it as if it was something unimportant and disposable and ended up losing it .. that's a massive red flag

[@therealzilch]

So exactly what did they lose? Be specific.

[@aemrt5745]

If they lost all the footage, how is this video possible???

[@BenDover-ut4cj]

I remember watching on tv, I was 14 and still believe it.

[@randyschissler5791]

"one thing that doesn't sit right with me is how they lost all this footage and other important data about the missions " Are you really that ignorant, or just lying, because what you are saying is totally false.

[@johnstonejaxfldoxmebitch7388]

@@aemrt5745 The original tapes, which was a recording of a tv monitor.

[@freddycass1790]

How would you carry the fuel to go there and back, after all you would need about three or four Olympic swimming pools of fuel That's Very H E A V Y

[@michaelstillman1171]

There are several variables whose values you would need to know to make such a statement. Care to list these variables and values? How about explaining your thought process? Did you discover the smoking gun that you believe will somehow disprove what all space agencies, friendly and not, have concluded? It sounds like you think you've discovered something the experts have all missed...yet decided KZbin is the place to declare this.

[@Tim22222]

Sounds like you've crunched the numbers on this. Care to show your math? 😂😂😂

[@AM-rd9pu]

The three stages of the Saturn V had a combined fuel volume of a bit shy of a million gallons. An Olympic swimming pool holds about half a million gallons. So we’re looking at about two Olympic swimming pool’s worth of fuel. That’s objectively a lot of fuel and it was very heavy. That’s where rocket stages come in handy. Once you’ve spent all the fuel in a stage, you drop that stage so you’re not carrying dead weight.

[@matthewparker2254]

I'm pretty sure they used gravity.

[@mewrongway]

What fuel? Gasoline?

[@JohnPaul-gh1fh]

Oh come on... Many of these same people who claim that we never possessed the technology to launch a rocket into orbit, also believe that the Earth is Flat too!

[@JohnA-bear]

You are correct. Most of us were indoctrinated and asleep but chose to take the red pill. We were not scared to be uncomfortable with what we may find. Personally I found out the rabbit hole goes deeper than I ever thought. Think about it, the rulers who run this world from behind the screens had thousands of years, from generation to generation, to develop ways and systems to eventually have total control of this world. The advancement of technology especially in computers and communication makes the world smaller in a sense. That gives the most powerful more control. Basically that's what it is all about...control and power. They want to be like gods.

[@MalcomXrp]

Far from true the flat earther movement is a fairly new movement. People have been questioning the lunar landings for a very long time.

[@DB-gn6fc]

It’s easier to fool someone than convince someone they have been fooled Mark Twain

[@michaelstillman1171]

His head would spin if he spent an hour reading here!

[@peanutbutterisfu]

Only if their is no evidence

[@deanhall6045]

Luckily, we can't fool AI. So American AI just called all the Chinese probe photos genuine. The same AI just called all Apollo photos that it was shown, FAKE!! The moon photos, fake. Luckily, that's the end of this charade, even Mark Twain would agree

[@dont.ripfuller6587]

*Samuel Clemmins said that.

[@azrienstewartenasen1508]

​@@peanutbutterisfuyou just proved the point of his comment lol

[@waynejennings7046]

When NASA said they lost the tapes of the moon landing and would have Hollywood recreate them, I stepped off the train,

[@hilmarschacht7611]

Haha love that comment

[@tinamarie0701]

Me.too

[@michaelz4239]

😂 epic

[@PabloGonzalez-hv3td]

They never said that. They were talking about masters that were never intended to be permanent.

[@waynejennings7046]

@@PabloGonzalez-hv3td Are you their public relation person?

[@BigIrvB]

“Those who voice prohibited truths are always more hated than those who spout obvious lies."

[@BourbonBabe1]

Nice quote. Who said this?

[@JohnLaMonte]

Of course it’s real, just look at all those stars! As well as all their reflections on everything! Why would Nixon lie? Next thing they’ll say is that Trump lies…….

[@ITILII]

"The further a Society departs from Truth - the more it will hate those who tell it"; If Freedom has any meaning at all, it means that you can tell the people exactly what they do not WANT to hear" - George Orwell

[@CSDonohue11]

😂 FR People are so blind They were making phone calls to POTUS from their dune buggies to the moon 😆

[@mischaschmitz7660]

Yo. Iam too. I think . Its al not Real.greats Mike

[@samoyedsnowdog]

I can't decide which is more amazing. That we DID travel to the moon, or that we DIDN'T travel to the moon.

[@critthought2866]

It would have been more amazing for them to have faked it.

[@ValMartinIreland]

@@critthought2866 The moon surface is reddish brown, silvery grey black and white. Not one of the six Apollo missions showed reddish brown at all. NASA thought it was mono chrome, they were wrong.

[@JessicaJLandi]

Truly, BOTH are amazing for, of course, completely different reasons. 😂

[@critthought2866]

@@ValMartinIreland I have addressed this with you on other comment threads. Why do you keep repeating the same wrong things? And how do you know that the surface is those colors? Where did you get your information from?

[@michaelstillman1171]

Apollo 17 geologist Harrison Schmidt stumbled upon some orange-tinted soil. I believe it had beads of volcanic glass in it.

[@ThatsNotVeryFunnyLol]

It's tough for me because we put out technology in the 60's or 70's or whatever time it was back then, that is still out in space today, with the Voyager probes. They had the technology and "skills" to make things that far exceeded any possible expectations. So to believe we could go to the moon, is very believable. I'm not even 30 yet however, so I wasn't alive anywhere near this time period. I could ask why we haven't been back to the moon if that's the case, but then again, we also had Felix Baumgartner free fall for 40 kilometers over 10 years ago and nobody has ever done anything remotely close since then and that would be way easier than reaching the moon.

[@stusue9733]

Money. It cost so much they didn't use 3 Saturn V's that where pretty much finished.

[@critthought2866]

The Baumgartner jump is a great example. Another is when Piccard and Walsh went to the bottom of Challenger Deep in Trieste in 1960. Nobody went back for 52 years. And that didn't have nearly the costs that Apollo did. Sometimes things are done once and not repeated, or not repeated for a long time, especially when it's a race to be the first. (well that and the race was also part of an international p*ssing contest between the U.S. and the Soviet Union)

[@MikeCanestaro]

Sometimes, there's a reason you are an old man living alone with a bunch of cats.

[@landoblack4874]

Exactly 😂like your clearly crazy I dont even think you believe what you saying ...I didnt believe nun he said nutcase

[@nicolem5626]

You a man that likes cats ?

[@1USAUSA]

yep... That's what happens to you when you go AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT at any level. YOU CANNOT SAY an OUNCE of word against the ESTABLISHMENT WHETHER they are RIGHT or WRONG or telling the TRUTH or LYING through their TEETH... LOL... "Too many people were involved... There is no way they all kept their mouth shut..." It is CRAZY to think that. Isn't it, Mike and Black?... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@mewrongway]

Ya its called women!

[@1USAUSA]

yep... That's what happens when you go against the ESTABLISHMENT. You can't even say an ounce of word against the ESTABLISHMENT or something like this will happen. However, you openly and without missing a beat agree with everything they say YOU WILL GO PLACES and all the DOORS in your LIFE will be OPEN for you to choose. i.e. Bill Kaysing vs. "Dr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson." Tyson is all over the MEDIA from prints to radio to television to the INTERNET telling the world GREAT LIES... I mean STORIES..🤣🤣🤣. However, he doesn't EVEN KNOW the shape our planet EARTH. He has to SECOND GUESS right on CAMERA. "Ummm ... Earth is.... Ummm ROUND! but... not... EXACTLY! It is Pear Shaped!" ROTFLMAO!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@casanova1925]

“It’s foolish to wonder if a habitual liar is telling the truth.” ~ Rusty Eric

[@MariaMartinez-researcher]

So, you are assuming that NASA is an habitual liar, therefore you are not foolish because you aren't believing anything. Despite all the physical evidence, many of it kept in museums, thousands of testimonies by everybody who worked in the projects plus their families that often appear commenting under Apollo videos, all the contemporary footage, all the radio amateurs who heard the talks between astronauts and ground control, and, the vigilant eyes of Russia, which had all the motivation and all to win ridiculing the capitalists for their fakery. And now, the Chinese and the Indians, who have also launched probes to the Moon. Nobody who really knows anything about these missions deny them; only people with zero knowledge of astronautics, engineering or astronomy do. You know what it is said about to assume, don't you? Just in case you want to watch things more detailed than this video, I have a very long playlist called Apollo; there are videos from multiple sources explaining and answering to any question you have - if you have stopped assuming. My current fave is by VFX artists who explain exactly why it is impossible to simulate the images from the Moon with current FX, and absolutely impossible with 60s tech. Good luck.

[@UpperDarbyDetailing]

So… name one lie put out by NASA? Or explain how pictures were faked that were IMPOSSIBLE to fake in 1969? I notice the people that think it was fake never know anything at all about the projects.

[@politicalfoolishness7491]

I agree but there are many liars.

[@lantanonlesiba6556]

HABITUAL LIAR = NASA

[@deanhall6045]

Hahaha CIA.

[@glennogborn4692]

At the time of the first moon landing both my grandfathers were alive. One, was born in 1880. He was 32 when he saw his first automobile. He watched the landing and was amazed. My other grandfather never believed it happened. He had been stationed in Hawaii during the war and firmly believed that it was filmed on one of the island volcanic regions.

[@maxfan1591]

Did he notice how flat and featureless the terrain around the Apollo 11 landing site was? Are there such locations in Hawaii?

[@glennogborn4692]

@@maxfan1591 He claimed he had been in areas that were identical. He said he recognized them. I do not know.

[@massatube]

@@glennogborn4692 Well he's a ninny

[@maxfan1591]

@rainforest walker "van allen belt" Yes, it's a thing.

[@paulinegallagher7821]

Oh well if your GRANDFATHER doesnt believes it, you know, your NON geologist, non scientist grandfather, then he must be right. Jesus

[@falcorthewonderdog2758]

Who took the picture of Armstrong as he came down the ladder and stepped on the moon for rhe first time?

[@stusue9733]

Congratulations on being the second person today to not know what a selfie is. True genius.

[@kevinskinner4986]

Nobody took that picture. The pictures of the astronaut coming down was Aldrin taken by Armstrong The video of the first step was from an unmanned camera attached to the ship.

[@ovalhunter488]

@@kevinskinner4986 Bravo!

[@wolf44875]

​@@stusue9733😂

[@monk4ever]

The cameraman did. 😊

[@deanvasquez8591]

The astronaut said they could not see the stars with or without pictures. How do you explain that?

[@michaelstillman1171]

First, I'd ask what the heck "with or without pictures" means. But that's not what they said, was it? But since my afternoon schedule is blowing up, I'll ask you in the meantime how they used star charts?

[@tubecated_development]

Daylight

[@Bestillivoze]

Stormy weather on the set.

[@thepurplepumpkn]

same reason you cant see the stars in the middle of the day. The brightness of the moon washed out the stars

[@shawnstuart7]

Read the Apollo 8 transcripts and search in page "Stars". When you read them you'll see that they didn't go to the Moon by the stars but by points on the Earth named after Stars. Why would they do that? Why wouldn't Saudi Arabia just be Saudi Arabia? We only see reflections off of objects. If you go into space you cannot even see the sun. Though it would burn your eyes out.

[@freedomfighter6413]

This is what I wanna know. When a former astronaut/NASA employee was interviewed recently he said we lost the technology to go to the moon. What does that even mean? How do you lose the technology to do something,let alone something that important? You don't!!

[@atlas8827]

It means the machinery was disassembled and repurposed.

[@PM-qp5he]

Information wasn't on a USB drive.

[@CRAZYHORSE19682003]

You would be incorrect, technology gets lost all the time. For example, nobody knows how the Romans made concrete that technology is lost. Nobody knows how Stradivarius made his musical instruments, that technology is lost. Damascus Steel, nobody knows how it was made, that technology is lost. A more modern equivalent is battleship armor plate. We don't know how to make class A armor plate anymore. The technology was lost.

[@freedomfighter6413]

@@CRAZYHORSE19682003 the Romans were thousands of years ago man and another country. We didn't lose it we never had it. I'm talking about the most important technology to date from 50 years ago in our own country. Sorry but you don't lose that.

[@CRAZYHORSE19682003]

@@freedomfighter6413 How about Class A armor plate made for battleships. It was made in the 1940's and we can't make it today.

[@C_and_C...]

With regard to the 400000 people that worked on the apollo program, it's worth noting that the Manhattan project had 130000 people working on it but very few of them had any idea what they were working on other than it being top secret. If there was deception at NASA, only a few at the top would know the full details.

[@apolloskyfacer5842]

Wow! You certainly have the 'goods' on the 'truth' that NASA is a fraudulent setup. Perhaps you could fire off a few letters to the mainstream News Papers and Broadcasters. Inform them of the dastardly deception. Present them with definitive proof of all the devious fakery. You could be well rewarded with lots of money for your exposure of this deception. You'd become famous. Just think about that !

[@therealzilch]

Er, you forgot that the secret of the Manhattan Project was compromised within two years, despite much higher security than NASA ever had. Stalin knew about the bomb before Truman did.

[@unownyoutuber9049]

and somehow the soviets got a working nucellar bomb in 1949, so the Manhattan projects "secrecy" was a great success then!

[@C_and_C...]

​@@unownyoutuber9049 The Soviets, along with Germany & Britain had been working on it for most of WW2, the U.S merely confirmed it could be done.

[@-First-Last]

@@unownyoutuber9049 The janitors new exactly how to clean after the "moon landing".

[@nethervvoid]

Dude... even with today's supercomputers, space x is having a hard time figuring out how to create a ship and landing craft. Good luck in 1960.

[@stusue9733]

Dud spaxeX are a bunch of rednecks.(Well at least their boss is)

[@1USAUSA]

When it comes to NASA, COMMONSENSE does NOT APPLY, my friend. And if you do force your thought PROCESS on others in regards to NASA, you will be SEVERALLY PUNISHED by their NASA POLICE. ROTFLMAO!!! 😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@rockethead7]

Well, that's because SpaceX is a clown show of a rocket company, and should never have been chosen. NASA seems to have realized that mistake, because they've already contracted Blue to build a different lander. Hopefully, we only lose $3 billon by that blunder. But, we'll see, because I have zero faith that they'll cut off SpaceX altogether, and that Blue will do it for only another $3 billion. My best guess is that it'll cost us more like $12 billion total between Blue and SpaceX, instead of just $3 billion to SpaceX.

[@rockethead7]

Oh, and dewdrop, what happens today has no relevance on what happened in the 1960s. If you have a beef with the Grumman lander, express it directly. Just saying, "today's clowns don't know how to build landers, therefore Grumman didn't build a lander" doesn't make sense.

[@critthought2866]

@@1USAUSA I am really curious, just how do you know how many emojis is the right number? Or is it a secret that only you and your fellow children can know, and you can't share it with adults?

[@TURNKEYiNK]

I’m curious as to how Film at near absolute zero, was able to capture any image. I was an amateur photographer (once upon a time), and remember that cold-film had to be allowed to warm before use.

[@dansv1]

What film was exposed at near absolute zero?

[@TURNKEYiNK]

@@dansv1 film inside the camera the astronauts wore.

[@dansv1]

@@TURNKEYiNK It was nowhere near absolute zero. During Apollo 11, the temperature was measured to range from -23°C to 7°C (-9.4°F to 45°F) on the lunar surface. You’re getting bad information somewhere.

[@TURNKEYiNK]

@@dansv1 I was under the impression that Space was a few degrees above zero. I didn’t realize that the moon was that warm.

[@stusue9733]

@@TURNKEYiNK Have you seen what they had to use on the JWTS for "cooling"(I say cooling but I guess for the most part it's to stop heating)?

[@prasadganesh5804]

As a engineer , It takes me a year to do something new , but takes week to do it again .. Go figure ...

[@michaelstillman1171]

How many half-century breaks have you had?

[@aemrt5745]

Between 1967 and 1973, they launched 13 Saturn Vs. Nine went to the moon. Took six years from start to first flight. When the funding was on, the production lines running, and the supply chain established, they made about 2 per year. Pretty straight forward engineering. Go figure....

[@aemrt5745]

...and let's look at the 11 month period between May 1969 and April 1970. In eleven months, there were four flights to the moon. So, as an engineer, what is your experience with large scale, low volume / high cost manufacturing? Seems they had a pretty good repeating production rate, especially in the 11 months mentioned.

[@occhamite]

@prasadganesh5804 And how long might it take you "to do it again" if management stopped paying you after the first completion?

[@rockethead7]

What EXACTLY do you "engineer"? An outdoor sprinkler or something? In aviation, for example, it took from 1995 to 2021 to engineer the new F35 and get it into production. This is despite the fact that airplanes had existed for almost a century. Spare the world your "go figure" comment, when Apollo was shut down 50 years ago, and none of its systems are relevant today. How did you think this was going to work? Do you think they kept those 1960s IBM mainframes in service for 50-60 years now, just waiting to guide another Saturn V to the moon? Radar and old analog communications systems... 1960s era... you think we could even communicate with a Saturn V today?

[@karenstrong8887]

Even as a child I wanted to know who was filming from outside when they opened the door.

[@brittjuergens2660]

A very small amount of research in about 5 minutes can answer your question. It’s not hard to find all this info. Just because you guys are incredulous about it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. I see about 95% of the people that don’t believe we went to the moon base their thoughts solely on ignorance and their own incredulousness.

[@timothynorton5255]

Isn't it amazing that as a child you were able to pick up on a big discrepancy like that and NASA didn't NASA has what I call educated idiots intelligent people who don't have enough common sense to get out of the rain LOL love your comment

[@paulinegallagher7821]

1 frames ps

[@cyphaborg6598]

What makes you believe the first one out was filmed?

[@cyphaborg6598]

What makes you think the first step was filmed by a human being?

[@IgnacioAlvarez]

It's intriguing how many individuals who express skepticism or disbelief regarding the Apollo missions often subscribe to other unconventional beliefs. For instance, while they question the reality of the moon landings, they might also espouse the idea that the Earth is flat or endorse various conspiracy theories, such as the existence of giant skulls in Egypt. What's particularly striking is the confidence with which they assert these beliefs, often claiming to possess an exclusive grasp of the truth amidst a sea of misinformation. It's a curious paradox - doubting one widely accepted historical event while embracing alternative narratives that lack substantial evidence. This phenomenon underscores the complexity of human cognition and the diverse ways in which people navigate information and construct their understanding of reality.

[@rockethead7]

That's a lot of words. Let me simplify. They're idiots.

[@rockethead7]

Oh, and that's not what skepticism means, by the way.

[@AM-rd9pu]

The characteristics required to be susceptible to conspiracy theories are pretty universal. Also, conspiracy theory groups are a positive feedback loop that only drive people further down the rabbit hole.

[@gives_bad_advice]

Yes, conspiracy enthusiasts (as "theorist" implies some rigor) wear their beliefs as badges of honor that set them above ordinary "sheep" as they like to say. So why be satisfied with just one badge? Why stop with the moon landing when you can reject the validity of the election and be they only over on your block who really understands the evils of vaccines?

[@RNP69]

And you feel for the covid narrative ...............

[@onrycodger]

Wow! That's Heavy and Far Out there brother.🚀

[@kfeder76]

I think the fact we haven't been back in 50 years tells us alot. The idea that we are going to be able to go to the moon in the next decade also says alot. How with all the technology we have today not just jump on a shuttle and go right back tomorrow?

[@mariestreeting4213]

Hey there, I just Googled it and it said they landed on the Moon five times in total. But ‘they’ can tell us anything, I trust no one 😆

[@festivalflightcrew2895]

Well the funding isn’t there for the most part. No one cares about going to the moon anymore. That’s all they cared about back when we went. We spent billions getting there.

[@jelink22]

You have the brains of a cherrystone clam----a SPED cherrystone clam at that. You confuse "technology" with funding, launch vehicles, earth-based engeinnering talent, and the rest. Free clue: we can't jump on shuttles because (a) they are no longer operational and (b( they were never designed for anything more than low-earth orbits. DERP

[@delfinacabagui2260]

How dare they are making us all fools..!!

[@dwc4343]

Well, get ready for the return to the moon. Artimus has already been test launched. In 2024 it's going back to the moon for a test run. Next time it goes back, we will land on the moon again.

[@blazinalldayson]

9:10 - Let’s show those Conspiracy theorist it wasn’t filmed in a studio, by re-inacting it in a studio 😂

[@martinhill2583]

Watch Stanley kubricks film apollo 18 There you will see how it's done in a studio. Not saying yes or no on the landing but just answering your question. Cheers 🙋‍♂️

[@njbigfoot5835]

How about we actually go to the moon "again" to prove that we went there the first time.

[@ezradaiquiri11311]

​@NJ Bigfoot how about we get footage of earth's curvature that's not from a wide angle lens or cgi. There is no "outer space" to go to, let alone the moon. Whatever is up there is of another level of consciousness. Look up the first independent space rocket. Why does it just stop mid air and what does it hit? We live in a spiritual level plane made up of 99.9% empty space. What came first, the chick or the egg - consciousness or material? This stuff runs deep. Heaven and hell for all eternity are here in earth's realm, and the choice is up to us. Live in heaven the simulation, or hell the matrix.

[@alemdevp2048]

@@njbigfoot5835 We will, in 2024 with the Artemis II mission.

[@michaelstillman1171]

@@martinhill2583 Did you perhaps mean Ron Howard's "Apollo 13" movie?

[@justinstumpf4243]

The one thing i guess i cant wrap my head around is that once you enter high orbit and the vacuum of space the earth loses it hold on you and its rotating around the sun at 67000 mph, so wouldnt the earth start rapidly moving away from you once you got far enough away from it?

[@critthought2866]

No. Conservation of momentum doesn't work that way. You still have the same momentum as when you took off. You're just moving away from the earth, but you and the earth are still moving the same speed around the sun. The earth doesn't lost its hold on you in the sense of that momentum, you've just overcome enough of its gravity to move away from it. Try picturing this: WWII bombers had waist gunners. Let's say the plane is flying at 250 mph headed due North. The waist gunner shoots due East, 90 degrees from the plane's path. How will the bullet fly? It will be flying away from the plane to the East, but it's still traveling to the North at 250 mph. (we're ignoring air resistance to make it more analogous to space travel) It would start to drop toward the ground, of course, due to gravity, but in terms of it's "forward" speed it would be the same as the plane's since it was traveling that fast while still in the barrel of the gun. "Disconnecting" from the plane doesn't change that. Hope that helps.

[@AM-rd9pu]

Due to the conservation of momentum, you never lose that velocity. Since the moon also has that same velocity around the sun, you can focus just on the earth-moon system.

[@bruceboome]

Conspiracies become harder to conceal the more people are involved- and NASA had a host. As far as I know, no one from NASA has broken ranks. The only conspiracy that I would entertain, is that it's possible that Kubrick was hired to make a backup film as a cover, in the event of a breakdown in communication. But my opinion (like everyone else's) is just speculation.

[@rad1930]

43:39 The one thing that gets me is how the Apollo 11 crew after they landed back on earth are just walking around fine like they haven't been in zero gravity, when the Soviet astronauts got back to earth after a few days in space they had to be carried around for a few hours before they could walk by themselves & there's the Apollo 11 crew being filmed walking fine by themselves into the contamination capsule??.

[@rockethead7]

Apollo 11 = 8 days. Soviet missions that caused atrophy to the muscles = 6 months to a year (and sometimes even longer).

[@rad1930]

@@rockethead7 I'm talking about the early astronauts that only went around the world for a few days.

[@rockethead7]

Are you under the impression that the early ones had problems walking when they came back down after only a few days? What's wrong with you?

[@christiancharron1283]

@@rockethead7 especially when "they were going around the world" means that they were in orbit and still subject to gravity lol.

[@oliviajohnjohnolivia8142]

After making love I could hardly walk in one hour.

[@outdoorswitderkit9636]

I love how the narrator keeps calling everything a conspiracy theory. Why is it so bad to question the reality we are presented with?

[@casanovafrankenstein4193]

Because when you ignore the answers to the questions there's no better way to describe it.

[@coalman1351]

@@casanovafrankenstein4193 lies as answers are not valid. 53 million dollars a day, NASA's Budget must be protected.

[@daleknight8971]

The cia invented the term conspiracy theorists.look it up.

[@casanovafrankenstein4193]

@@coalman1351 Lies? Prove one lie. Just one would be fine.

[@Katrielible]

@@casanovafrankenstein4193 the answers have to make sense.

[@palpaladin315]

Real, but probably a bit of both. - You can see it is real; you can also see where its not. - and vice versa. Which tells me its been handled at different times. Yet I have seen several renditions of the various footage. Over decades. Its definitely getting post work done, now and then. Not that surprising. This was a marvelous human achievement, and real act of courage most of us can't really fathom. I'm sure NASA are always looking to present it, as best as possible, whilst preserving the original moment for posterity. Screen viewing has changed so much in 30yrs. I first saw the Moon landing footage on a Rank Arena in the early 70's, as a small child and I never forgot. So the question then is: "If thats all it is, why wouldn't they just tell us?" - and I'd say, probably because they don't wanna get into it. I mean, if its being brought up then, that automatically means theres issues; and they're just avoiding what to them, seems like time better spent on other things.

[@19kibster46]

Maybe it was Charlie Chaplin in that space capsule…

[@vitaleonis1196]

I knew right away that when the narrator kept saying "conspiracy theorists," they were immediately creating this video trying to prove that it did happen. The title of this video is highly misleading

[@ronaldgreene5733]

. . A question mark is also a strong indicator . . bait people and then try to make them feel foolish while promoting label oriented thought processes. Labels come with a lot of assumptions designed to do your thinking for you as well as generate fear of thinking clearly for oneself and remaining open to new and different ideas and perspectives. The word corruption is very generic without the load of assumptions attached to the word conspiracy. Normalization rather than conspiracy is how influence and corruption create and take precedence, so that awareness is hostage to the needs for anything other than ourselves to define what is real and acceptable -- the need for any form of consensus to rule us unaware, lest we ever accept responsibility.

[@SurvivorCow]

Thanks for this. I was suspicious and didn't want to waste my time on a video trying to convince people of yet another lie. I figured the title was misleading.

[@tedbenning8697]

😂😂🤡

[@lynnjervyn3748]

Here's an interesting fact. No human has ascended above the earth past the 400 miles mark in 49 years. (The radiation belt begins at around 400 miles.) The last times they flew to 380 they experienced the spots of radiation in their eyes and and had to descend quickly. So sure , humans went 238000 miles to the moon and back 50 years ago. Many times. But zero since ?

[@BajaInsider]

The radiation belt is NOT a sphere circling the globe. Radiation levels can be tolerable with limited shielding and quick passage. For all you Landing deniers there is one word y'all forget. Soviets. They had the tech to know what was going on and would have loved NOTHING more than t embarrass the USA. If you had ever watched a Saturn 5 take off as I had, you'd know the next 240,000 miles was a piece of cake. My dad worked on hardware for the moon shot and in 1977 took enough BS from a denier he turned around and broke that MF's nose.

[@tinamarie0701]

It was one hell of a movie script though! The lighting and fake rocks were spot on...

[@CeCe-fs9ed]

@@tinamarie0701 do you know I think the new generation has lost its mind long ago to this this was faked is pure insanity. Doesn’t your generation talk about trust the science? My degree is in applied science and you’re very wrong and sound sincerely ignorant

[@dikpretty]

Nailed it

[@petronellamerrick740]

Very good point

[@kiranjoshi5267]

Considering in such advanced technological stage in 2024 two moon missions ( one us and other japanese ) have miserably failed, there is valid point in this documentary.

[@stusue9733]

And that some how proves others have not failed?

[@kiranjoshi5267]

@@stusue9733 All are assumptions as at public levels we can only speculate, guess, doubt and argue. On one hand there are moon rocks on the other theories. One has to conclude based on the proven scientific evidence provided by technology at that time

[@WilliamMann-co8un]

The failing of some current Lunar missions and other uncrewed space probes is due mostly our modern technology. Apollo was more a mechanical system controlled by the crew with some computer aid. The current craft are mostly or all computer controlled. The problems have mostly turned out to be software issues.

[@stusue9733]

@@kiranjoshi5267 So why do you accept the claims that two moon missions failed this year? What technology did they need that they did not have in the 60s?

[@rockethead7]

Short answer: they don't make unmanned probes to the same standards that they make manned craft. Manned craft fail also, sure. But, unmanned craft are (in spacecraft terms) made to be cheap and replaceable if they fail. There's not the same level of redundancy and testing in unmanned craft. This isn't a "technology" issue. This is a matter of priorities. And, don't mention the word "evidence" if you're not actually going to look at it.

[@mikegs7704]

As far as going back ,we are missing one thing Von Braun

[@stusue9733]

You mean he did it all himself? You know LOR wasn't his idea? He needed a much bigger rocket!

[@mikegs7704]

@@stusue9733 basically , yes

[@stusue9733]

@@mikegs7704 So you know if we had done it his way we might not have got to the moon?

[@cliffcampbell8827]

Buzz Aldrin was from a different time. A time when if you were to publicly call another man "a coward," the person saying the insult should expect to take a fist to the face.

[@jimziemer474]

I think Aldrin has punched a few people in the face.

[@Godscountry2732]

@@jimziemer474 You mean he punched a few ignorant people in the face.LOL Aldrin earned a Phd ,Doctor of Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), for his 311-page thesis “Line-of-Sight Guidance Techniques for Manned Orbital Rendezvous.” So he was a pretty smart guy.

[@carlwalker3557]

Wrong. It was wrong then to punch back, and it’s wrong now. And I’m from that era dude

[@jamescarrington5521]

Yeah....and assaulting another person is just as reprehensible now as it was then, so what's your point? Seems to me, he acted just like the cornered RAT that he was.

[@cliffcampbell8827]

@@jamescarrington5521 ...and the actions of that person, who never met Buzz before, standing on the flimsy-est of "evidence" didn't just insult him, he was blocking Buzz from wherever he was trying to go. Buzz made several attempts to go around him...or didn't you see that? Want to try a little experiment? Get in my face like that, prevent me from getting to my car. I'm not sure how things will play out but if I was a betting man, I'd bet that I wouldn't wait for your insult me before I pinned your nose to the back of your empty head. I won't, however introduce you to the business end of my Smith&Wesson .357 Magnum (with hollow points) because it's not my EDC (barrel is too long). It makes an entry wound a little bigger than the circumference of a number 2 pencil and an exit wound the size of a frozen pot pie. What do you say tiger, up for a brief social experiment? Just between you and I.

[@codyroberts4511]

The flag was not moving... except when it was being manipulated by the astronauts

[@rockethead7]

Well, in this video maybe. But, it moved without being touched several other times. Mostly, when that happened, it was due to off-gassing of the suits/backpacks/craft.

[@MrBeetsGaming]

I knew what the final verdict was going to be because of the amount of times they said the phrase conspiracy theorist.

[@topneorej]

I can smell a hitpiece from miles away XD

[@anonymike8280]

@@topneorej Yeah, well so what? If you're watching videos like these you have nothing to do anyway. Either that, or your screenplay is sitting cold inside your computer.

[@somatotrophin1535]

@Yolanda Kirchner Shut up

[@rickdee67]

somatotrophin1 Nah let the moonbat talk . Exposes the nuts 🥜 in the crowd. 😉

[@fjb855]

Hope there wasnt a vote on that

[@glenpoland4210]

Well I was four years old at the time so I don't remember it but all of us that are disbuting this we're not there with the astronauts just seeing pictures. But Neil Armstrong, Mike Collins, buzz Alden. Where all astronauts question is were they being honest or not ? Buzz Alden being the only one still with us. Still says that he was on the moon. And so did the other two until they passed away.

[@user-oq2ne4qh2g]

Most skeptics of Moon Landing are also flat earthers. Frankly, I don't understand how you can have a moon landing with a flat earth. The JWST is a bigger achievement than the moon landing.

[@TheZooman22]

As a landscape photographer, one of the biggest issues I have with the photos taken on the moon is the apparent distance between the subject to the horizon, and the lack of background details. The depth of field is too short.. This would be consistent with the idea that this was fabricated on a set in Hollywood.

[@atlas8827]

There's barely any depth of field at all

[@casanovafrankenstein4193]

I think the issue with your analysis is that you have no idea how far away anything is. There is no frame of reference for determining distance. On Earth we have trees and cars and houses and telephone poles and so on to use to judge distance. There isn't anything like that here, so you really have no idea.

[@SSran-iv4lu]

@@casanovafrankenstein4193 Furthermore, distance can be judged on Earth by atmospheric haze. The further something is, the greater blue tint and haze it would have. Of course, on the Moon there is no such thing.

[@casanovafrankenstein4193]

@@SSran-iv4lu good point.

[@nickrose8733]

You do realise the moon horizon is only 2.4km compared to the 5km on Earth?

[@paulmark8347]

I was born in 1950.......lots of people were skeptical that long ago. Now covid ......lies lies and more lies. Nothing ever changes.....sheesh. May God bless all who may read this. Peace and Love is what I need!!!!!!!!!!

[@justinpennington7682]

People will believe anything on tv

[@chadmichaels6590]

Amen

[@thetwogardens6048]

We will never get peace in this world with the Devil and his foot soldiers running this world until JC makes his Return !

[@solar_warden81]

You Bible thumping weirdos love to discredit American milestones and accomplishments

[@abird2931]

Lies lies and more lies, yep that's the bible!

[@jasonhurley1293]

Buzz Aldrin punch is highlight.

[@AdmoreMethod]

I don’t blame him. That guy was literally pushing every button Buzz had. I’d have done far worse to him.

[@Meinstein]

I understand Buzz's frustration.. but would'nt it have been easier for him to simply put his hand on the bible and swear the landing to be true?

[@normanpellington7971]

With our current advanced technology, why can't they prove conspiracy wrong?😢

[@stusue9733]

They can and they have. Of course if you are just going to call "fake" to everything that doesn't agree with you then anything is possible. Like the world being flat and space being fake.

[@michaelstillman1171]

To whom, though? The global scientific community and most of the general public doesn't question the Moon landings. Attempting to 'prove' science-based expeditions to people unwilling or unable to understand the science seems the ultimate fool's errand, and there's important work to be done.

[@aemrt5745]

The landings were never disproven and the theories always had zero merit. I am part of the Engineering community and we view the conspiracy theories are a pathetic joke with zero credibility and deserving no credence.

[@1USAUSA]

they can't ... how do you prove something that you NEVER did in the first place? EXACTLY... They tried NASA did. You heard of Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)? If you never heard of it, go look it up... That's the proof they showed us that they went actually went to the moon... It is completely and totally LAUGHABLE... lol... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@theebarajanramasamy279]

Let's get them to do again so that NASA can put full stop to the controversy 😅

[@michaelstillman1171]

Try to keep current.

[@marksprague1280]

It won't matter. The nut cases will simply call everything FAKE and cling to their delusions.

[@deanhall6045]

AI just put a stop to it alright. All fake, all of those moon photos. Same AI said Chinese ones were real, yours, not even close, it highlighted where they were fake, like, the whole thing. Enjoy your awakening.

[@deanhall6045]

@@michaelstillman1171 this is current, last weekend at the world AI convention, the moon photos were all called out by American AI. All of them. Enjoy your awakening.

[@dominiclaporte8040]

@@deanhall6045 Yup, proof that they are all fake and no one went to the moon.

[@benjaminsoans7335]

Thank God the Internet came by, or else by now they would have landed on the sun as well.

[@pelocitdarney5718]

Evidence?

[@therealzilch]

I've heard that NASA is planning a manned landing on the Sun. In order to avoid the heat, it will of course take place during the night.

[@pelocitdarney5718]

​@@therealzilchLove it, realzilch! Haha!

[@sebastians783]

And they would make everyone believe it by saying, oh yeah we landed on the Sun when it was winter time there, when it's much cooler 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@wingchun-simplekungfu7584]

Didn’t they already do that. I heard it was night time. It was much cooler then 🤣

[@Mike-19940]

I love the objectivity, showing both sides. Raising important questions with rebuttals

[@yoharve]

what was the lunar temp? how much solar radiation was the camera and astronauts exposed too? the camera film was not affected by exposure to the radiation?

[@critthought2866]

The measured surface temperature during the Apollo 11 surface mission was between −23C and 7C. The average skin dose on Apollo 11 was 0.18 rad. As for the film, there are a number of shots that show some spotting that suggests exposure to radiation. However, the film was in a silvered canister, which helped, and there are no indications that it was subjected to high levels of damaging radiation.

[@therealzilch]

Good question, good answer.

[@michaelstillman1171]

I'm sure an expression of gratitude is forthcoming.

[@therealzilch]

@@michaelstillman1171 Should I laugh or sigh?

[@Rodrigo-tk2fm]

The gold aluminum foil wrap on the craft is hilarious. Looks like my kids gift wrapping skills.

[@rockethead7]

How would you have done it instead?

[@michaelstillman1171]

Ever think maybe it's not aluminum foil? Nah, sure looks like it so it must be, eh? 🙄

[@illustration7090]

It wasn't Aluminum Foil... it was many layers of thermal protection.

[@DavidFlanagan89690]

Fake Moon landing claims debunked No stars: No stars because it was daytime Flag waving: It was not waving it was just wrinkled. 3. They got past the van Allen belt because they had protective shields on the rocket.

[@nunyabidness4946]

I like the hairsprayed hairdos in the International Space Station as well. And the escaping air bubbles during spacewalks

[@uplinkx1126]

I still find it difficult to imagine a 15KN engine wouldn't at least kick up a cloud of dust. Even if you cut the engines before you hit the surface, you still need to be close to it.

[@critthought2866]

It did kick up dust. Listen to the audio of the landing and/or watch the video that was shot from inside the LM and you'll hear/see it.

[@randyschissler5791]

You can't have a cloud of dust on the moon, because there is no atmosphere on the moon to elevate dust. The dust was blown to the sides.

[@uplinkx1126]

​@@randyschissler5791The rovers kick up dust.

[@randyschissler5791]

@@uplinkx1126 You weren't asking about the rover, but yes the rover kickup up dust, that fell straight back to the ground.

[@uplinkx1126]

@@randyschissler5791 Indeed, but I bring them up for obvious reasons. If you look the the footage, you will see significant clouds of dust being kicked up pretty high. Also... I though the moon had some sort of really thin atmosphere... aka it's exosphere.

[@angusdog22]

There is NO WAY that many people could keep that secret. NO WAY

[@ojawall]

it is not a question of did people go to the moon but a question of which videos did we see or not see

[@therealzilch]

Really? That's not what most Moon landing deniers claim.

[@ojawall]

@@therealzilchi am just stating my opinions, i do not think a lot about what other people think

[@rockethead7]

You can drop "about what other people think" off of that sentence.

[@ojawall]

@@rockethead7did they go to mars?

[@williamtm1965]

There's one sure way to put all doubts away - to take high resolution photos of Apollo landing site. Not the blurry photos Nasa is showing us, but the high quality photos. Modern equipment is powerful enough to show every little detail of the items that should be still sitting on the Moon - lunar module, footprints of the astronauts, the flag, and other items. That would be great opportunity for Nasa to end theories once and for all.

[@michaelstillman1171]

I don't disagree with your logic, except that it would only convince some of the deniers. They won't be satisfied about authenticity until they're somehow physically transported to a landing site or two...maybe not even then. In 2 +/- 1 years, the manned Artemis landing will "settle" this. Again, many still won't believe it.

[@apolloskyfacer5842]

Yeah right. And would that convince any of you who have decided not to believe any of this. Of course not. You'd just 'shift the goal post' and say NASA has faked it all again. Sadly for you Mr William, Modern History is what it is. NOT what you think or wish it to be. And the SIX Apollo Moon Landing Missions are a series of astonishing events in that history. Best you get used to the Reality of that.

[@cliffordbernard7663]

@@michaelstillman1171 True. Conspiracy theorists are unaffected by facts. Everything can faked in their world.

[@brucey5585]

The real question is how we havent gone back to the moon again. Think about whoever get on the moon first claim the moon. Also we could put a satellite on the moon and watch china or russia from space and wont get shut down.

[@Cello69.]

@@michaelstillman1171just like flat earthers they will always find something. You can’t reason with folks w emotional damage.

[@dalebowman6502]

It is easier to fool people than to convince people they have been fooled

[@CristinavdfV]

Well said

[@stevenw4549]

Mark Twain said that.

[@theconstitutionalist6305]

Absolutely true. I even have close relatives who refuse to see or accept some evidence clearly presented to them. I mention the evidence for their benefit, not to be hurtful in any way. People can become completely attached to a belief system that is based on manipulated perceptions. I admit that I have been deceived in the past, surely more than once. An open mind can be helpful.

[@stevenw4549]

@@theconstitutionalist6305 We should always seek the truth. Be it good or bad.

[@theconstitutionalist6305]

@@stevenw4549 One hundred percent in agreement.

[@robertshorthill6836]

I think the computer technology was a fraction of what a basic flip style cell phone was when they came out. I had one of those phones. They were a joke in a couple years, but one could call someone, then the battery would die.

[@stusue9733]

Nice story bro. Did you have a point?

[@randyschissler5791]

Yeah, and the computer technology was even less, when Oppenheimer and his crew built the atomic bomb. Must have been fake, too.

[@stusue9733]

@@randyschissler5791 No way the designed computers with out computers. Computers are fake!

[@michaelstillman1171]

Were you heading towards "they couldn't have landed in 1969 because their computers were so primitive compared to later"? One thing about those flip phones: They could go for a week or so between charges.

[@berlindamoustafa1887]

⁵​@@stusue9733

[@stuartbarrett592]

Whats this "Van Halen belt" all about? Eddie had nothing to do with NASA. At least that i know of.

[@MrOzwald777]

I love how they’re trying to disprove the conspiracy theorists but then just proved you could take identical pictures on earth 😂😂

[@nickv4073]

No need to disprove anything. Ignoring you is much easier.

[@scienceworksinmysteriouswa9463]

@@nickv4073 said the people who made this video and constantly put out protector memes

[@lifewithlouie420]

@@nickv4073 but you already acknowledged his existence by replying to his comment.

[@davidrhenley]

EXACTLY. They're comparing bowling balls and apples.

[@warrenallen2599]

Already has been done

[@runnikcatti5997]

Kudos to the cameraman that got to the moon first to film Neil's first step on the moon

[@critthought2866]

Congratulations! You're the 10,000th person to write that same tired comment.

[@anthonymorris5084]

Aren't you aware that NASA secretly invented Gopro cameras in 1969? They just simply made 40,000 employees keep it a secret.

[@motherearth1147]

😂😂😂

[@crashtastic342]

Do you like money and lattes?

[@Herkimer_Snerd]

The cameraman was Armstrong. The subject was Aldrin. You're a gronk.

[@pierrebeausoleil5885]

THEY NEVER BEEN TO THE MOON,BUT THEY HAVE BEEN TO THE SUN AT NIGHT

[@stusue9733]

NOT HEARD THAT ONE BEFORE< BUT THEN I AM ONLY 3 DAYS OLD.

[@michaelstillman1171]

​@@stusue9733At least YOUR shouting makes sense!

[@MasonWeston415]

yeah but look at that ufo/government cover up video called "the other phoenix" posted right here 👉 @anotheradventureithink now that video is crazy

[@gives_bad_advice]

The sun shines on the back of my head, and it is nighttime on my face.

[@herculydia]

We all know we landed in the sun years before we landed on the moon. The film taken to the Kodak film developing drive-thru kiost, found the film had solar radiation damage.

[@michaelstillman1171]

We went at night, right?

[@johangouws8855]

Strange how they could send 6 successful missions in the late 60’s, yet can’t even get the latest rocket in the air.

[@bobatesomemayo]

Rockets are VERY complicated, and you shouldn't judge em just by scrubs. After all, the space shuttle's first flight had many cancellations before launch, and look how successful that was.

[@libbyhicks7549]

@@bobatesomemayo You mean the space shuttle that blew up on live TV ten seconds after lift off? That space shuttle or?

[@bobatesomemayo]

@@libbyhicks7549 The absolute FIRST launch. Judging by your logic, If i fail once, instantly im horrible and should quit.

[@libbyhicks7549]

@@bobatesomemayo This is not a character judgement. Gas lighting the facts is a common tactic for those whose argument has little substance. I too felt tricked when I finally realized that the clear conclusion was that this moon landing was theater. If you critically look at all the evidence, it all points that fact. We were in a cold war with Russia at the time and hoped to 'out do' them by performing a great feat. That was the motive. Also, NASA has been able to siphon tons of taxdollars into this pseudo science. So, it was a money laundering venture as well. It is a testament to the marketing abilities of our govt that they have so many believers even at this late date.

[@terryritter7065]

@@libbyhicks7549 clear conclusion? I would argue you aren't critically looking at the evidence if you come to a conclusion that it was faked. Your "motive" is clouding any criticality. Just like the attempt to bring up one point to take down the whole validity of the concept, there are a host of things that could only exist if we went to the moon. How can you critically look at the "evidence' and miss that?

[@i-am-that-what-i-am]

As an amateur photographer who had an active interest in photography as a hobby during the era of emulsion film, the question i would welcome anyone to answer for me is: given that during lunar daylight the moon's surface temperature can reach 260 degrees Fahrenheit (127 degrees Celsius), and the night-time temperature can dip to minus 280 F (minus 173 C)... How did the film in those Hasselbrad cameras survive that?

[@atlas8827]

They landed during the lunar morning, long after the super low temperatures and before the super high temperature. Also, how would the heat make it inside the camera? Explain that.

[@i-am-that-what-i-am]

@@atlas8827 It's an aluminium cased camera, it's hanging from the front of the person, it's completely exposed and not even insulted, how it could heat up internally seems quite obvious to me. The same cameras are mounted externally on the craft. The idea the times of exposure were not in alignment with the elements at "favourable" times seems a little contrived to me.

[@atlas8827]

@@i-am-that-what-i-am Aluminum reflects a lot of infrared. There's no way enough heat would have made it inside the camera. Vacuum is an insulator, after all.

[@nickrose8733]

Same way humans survived those temperatures

[@wimkuijpers1342]

1. There is no convection because of the vacuüm. 2. There where there in the moon "morning".

[@michaellucht6351]

"three men can keep a secret if two of them are dead". Bengamin Franklin

[@joemurphy2177]

Over 400,000 involved in the project and not one person came forward to say it was fake in nearly 60 years. There's your answer

[@snatchhog]

That's your delusion.

[@dougieh9676]

No..... Compartmentalization.

[@mirandaroney3751]

My thoughts exactly. The idea that it has to be true because so many people were involved is ridiculous. Nasa is a corporation and just like all corporations everyone is utilized to serve the same purpose but only a select few fit behind that curtain

[@goldeneddie]

Do you imagine that all 400,000 were in one big room with equal access to every level of Classified Information? Or is it possible that, for example. some of the scientists working remotely at a nearby university just doing mathematical modelling never actually saw, touched or experienced anything beyond their own little bubble of research?

[@ovalhunter488]

And humans are completely incapable of keeping secrets.

[@carlivandenis]

The most unbelievable thing in this entire film is the claim that the CIA tried unsuccessfully 3 times to kill the same man.

[@occhamite]

yeah, a solitary old man in the desert.

[@kentuckyproproductions1624]

They tried to kill Castro over 200 times

[@goodbonezz1289]

Was thinking the same thing.

[@docprune9922]

The ludicrous thing is you believe such rubbish.. If the CIA wanted him dead, he'd be dead. First time.

[@jeannestjohn4250]

God knows the truth! He can't quit laughing 😂Biggest show on Earth! 🦖🧎👻👏💁🌜🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀✈️🌝💰💰💰💰🙈🍌US Republic 🍌 goes to the moon, gets told off by AI 🤖 who live on the dark side 🦾🗣️"Don't ever return!"

[@EM-ig7ib]

" That's one small step for Hollywood . . . One Giant Leap for This Administration!" ~Richard M Nixon - POTUS in 1969

[@therealzilch]

Nixon hated NASA and was instrumental in getting the Apollo program shut down. So, no.

[@occhamite]

@EM-ig7ib Nonsense. Nixon didn't even take office as POTUS until late january, 1969, after Apollo 8 had already orbited the moon. Apollo was due to the Democrats, and LBJ in particular. If Apollo had bee faked, Nixon would have nailed the Democrats with the gigantic scandal the second he took office.

[@badactor3440]

Nixon never said that

[@EM-ig7ib]

@@badactor3440 LMAO... Really??? I think he should have ...LOL

[@betsyduane3461]

MORON

[@Balharbor28]

With so many people involved, it would be difficult for a a cover up, unless their lives were in danger.

[@AM-rd9pu]

What’s your implication? That the 400,000+ people involved with the Apollo program were under threat from the government?

[@rockethead7]

Yeah, because those military guys who risked their lives for a living would really respond well to being threatened.

[@michaelstillman1171]

I hope we've learned not to reply to they who crave attention by deleting and re-posting.

[@stusue9733]

oh I don't know, gave me something to do in while drinking my morning coffee lol

[@michaelstillman1171]

​​@@stusue9733I guess that's something, but I felt like an enabler whenever I did it previously.

[@John-zc4rz]

I always was wondering who beat them to the moon to film the landing. Great job Stanley, your small film crew should of got a Oscar.

[@ronmann2755]

My thoughts exactly. How can a camera film you landing at a place you've never been?

[@elatomala1976]

Oh my gosh that's hysterical. However, I have read Russia landed there first to begin with. Maybe, they filmed the arrival LOL Hey did you know that Apollo was the first flight and now Artemis is having a hard time getting off the ground They are the twin son and daughter of Zeus. Apollo represents the sun and Artemis is the moon.

[@steved7872]

he did!!! 2001 A Space Odyssey🤣🤣

[@IJustFiguredThisOut]

What part of the landing are you referring too?

[@cn8299]

What are you talking about? No one filmed them landing.. The only footage of the first step on the moon came from the Lunar module itself as it recorded Neil Armstrong and then Neil set up cameras to catch Buzz Aldrin's descent.

[@sheilalunn5298]

I'm still waiting for the technology to be revealed of how Nixon got such a clear phone signal from his oval office land line to Neil and Buzz up there on the moon. Nice little chat they had.

[@SVW1976]

Its called radio. You can stop waiting now. 🤣

[@richardsuarez2146]

are you a millennial ?

[@SVW1976]

@Salvadore Orozco Yeah so? What's your point?

[@Midwest621]

@@SVW1976 explains a lot.

[@turk3088]

With no delays a miracle

[@kasandrabeckett8578]

Thank you Bill for everything

[@michaelstillman1171]

Gates? He was okay, I guess. 😉

[@andyleblanc1564]

Seems like you appreciate his insights now. Isn’t it funny as we get older how things get clearer. I bet your grand kids and mine will have answers to your grandfather’s questions.

[@JoSpring]

I think creating peace on this planet would be the biggest achievement of mankind.

[@Jay-og4yb]

As long as anyone has more than someone else, there will always be envy and hatred. Therefore the only way for your magical fairyland to exist is if everyone literally had identical lives and possessions. All human conflict is "I want more, imma take yours"

[@rationald6799]

That is a nice thought. But there have been wars continually down through history. All the time. Wanting peace is a good thing. The trouble is that. There are people who don't want peace.

[@bizobloka8872]

Peace on this plane

[@user-uo5kp8nr7p]

Nice warm fuzzy thought.... but it will never happen... Evil exist in this world and it would never allow it... sad but true

[@tombolo4120]

Raygun said it ...we need an out side alien threat to bring us all together in peace. So lets have a war in space instead ...with a vastly superior species ... it'll be fun!

[@joshuamorrison8332]

This documentary raises a lot of questions that there are clear answers for. You get what you pay for I guess.

[@brucefulcher953]

At 15:38 one can clearly see an insect fly near knee level from left to right... Hmmmm.

[@innerfire9211]

How to explain the unhappy faces of the astronauts at the press conference right after the moon landing? It was so weird as if they were doing something wrong.

[@libbyhicks7549]

They did look so guilty and nervous..just like criminals. Not at all like heroes.

[@patrician2398]

With so many people involved, someone would have been a whistle blower.

[@ziggyschumann5284]

@@patrician2398 Sure, go ahead and expose the lies, as long as you know that you, and your family members will be eliminated or ruined.

[@libbyhicks7549]

@@patrician2398 That is the mystery.

[@Monkeyboysdontknow]

The only troubling thing is your inability to understand that people can get tired after 8 days of intense mission performance, 2 weeks of quarantine, and then being questioned for hours by the press over things they had already debriefed NASA on several times over.

[@shrikantwad204]

If the landing technology was developed in 1969, why is it not used in the Mars landing?

[@stusue9733]

Because Mar isn't the same as the Moon. Well that was easy.

[@lorenzorodriguez8031]

TOWER OF BABEL IT WILL NEVER WORK BECAUSE MAN WANTS TO BE HIGHER THAN GOD ALMIGHTY 😮

[@jaredchampagne2752]

Mars is 100x as far, if not more, comparing apples to oranges.

[@sambeauchemin8417]

Mars is way more far, has a bigger gravity pull than the moon and has an atmosphere.

[@unai_asecas9070]

It’s a 6 month travel. You would need fuel to accelerate to escape earth then decelerate by 5km/s to land and then speed up to 30km/s. It can be done but it’s not worth it.

[@jeffrobodine8579]

Did anybody ever interview Majors Anthony Nelson or Roger Healey?

[@stusue9733]

Who? Why?

[@rockethead7]

@@stusue9733 "I Dream of Jeannie" (1960s TV show).

[@stusue9733]

@@rockethead7 Wow now there is a blast from the past. Once you said that I went "well of course" lol

[@critthought2866]

Only Dr. Bellows

[@robchesley4591]

I love a good conspiracy but i dont buy this one. There is no clear undeniable and unexplainable smoking gun. Most of the moon conspiracy claims i can reason through easily. Im not bias, i was quite intrigued at this idea at first.

[@stusue9733]

They don't even have a pointed stick much less a smoking gun.

[@144k_Kingdom_Living]

A person would think that after 53 years, it would be possible to do it again.

[@bman6502]

Kingdom, why would we want to spend billions to return to the moon??? Who’s willing to pay for that???

[@144k_Kingdom_Living]

@@bman6502 You are under the impression that "money" (dollars/euros/pesos etc) are real. The only real things in this world are natural resources and labor. If you come to that realization you will start understanding the Matrix.

[@bman6502]

@@144k_Kingdom_Living God is real,,, I hear many pastors say they have spoken with him..

[@144k_Kingdom_Living]

@@bman6502 Unless you have spoken with Him yourself, there is no way you can know for sure.

[@BrotherLove486]

They lost the technology

[@davidrogers2085]

Anybody remember the crew's body language at the post mission presser ? Talk about your depressing ?

[@vincentlussier8264]

To me they looked subdued, unsure lacking confidence, answers to the press were blunt and short, they slouched on their seats and they were clearly bullshitting!

[@davidrogers2085]

@@vincentlussier8264 Is it any wonder why Armstrong remained a recluse they rest of his life and Aldrin turned to the bottle ?

[@randyjohnson6845]

David when I watched it over 10 times I'm seeing brainwashing or whatever you want to call it...those men didn't go to the moon.

[@davidrogers2085]

@@randyjohnson6845 You got it brother.

[@mattiescreations]

Intentionally miss leading the entire public they did something they didn’t have any ability to do and for no benefit to anything or anybody