The Most HIGHLY ANTICIPATED Update To Star Citizen | Alpha 4.0 Features

[@Libertas_P77]

As one of the few players to have made the jump to Pyro so far, it was one of the most mind blowing experiences for me.. and it worked back in March this year. Jump technology seems to be easier than a lot of the other tech changes we’ve seen, so for me it’s mostly about ensuring the meshing is really solid. I’m expecting more Evocati testing to commence on that really soon, and am personally itching to spend some time in Pyro exploring before the place gets super lawless and hostile.

[@Hav0k]

I really can't wait to traverse a jump point. That will really be an amazing experience

[@sambitbose2407]

Pyro will not come this year, they will bring it in PTU this year and make more ship sales, then next year at May they will release it. Just like last time’s 3.18

[@Greg99rock]

i have given up, been here since 2015, im done

[@bathelomue]

@@Greg99rock So glad I offloaded my 2012 account to a whale back last year. Paid for a new engine!

[@Terran0va_Plays]

Ya you’re probably right

[@middleagedbaldguy6774]

@@bathelomue Sold mine after they implemented(and let us know its what we are stuck with) the lukewarm oatmeal that is MM. 9th gen civic bolt ons. Intake, fuel rail, injectors, exhaust, dyno, etc. Woke me up to just how much money I blew on this trash. Store Citizen is more apt.

[@thesilver3794]

Tbh 4.0 should just be server mesh, then 4.1+ the content

[@dtrjones]

I don't think progress works that way LOL. Remember a lot of stuff needs to be updated to be server meshing compatible. So they are not going to do that with code they setup in 2021 for example. They have a gamedev branch, similar to a master branch in git, a lot of stuff gets chucked into that branch for general game development and then they create a release from it which means culling and refining the features they want to be included, so I don't think it's possible to just do a server meshing build as it's been in development for years - you would have to go back to a really old build of the PU, this is why the most recent server meshing test was done with a relatively recent version as it's needed for the 4.0 release.

[@poposterous236]

@@dtrjones "I don't think progress works that way" my dude this is SC, it doesn't progress. It just changes a bit.

[@vulcan4d]

First release of 4.0 with Evocati on Dec 30, 2024

[@Terran0va_Plays]

And it wont work. Then they’ll talk about how they hit all their major goals this year lol

[@thedeathkeeper23]

2025

[@shaunthomas9792]

@@vulcan4d it’s kinda like their trying to make a crazy game never done before and even adding brand new technology never seen before! wowee what a embarrassment am I right!

[@holy8782]

​@@shaunthomas9792 That doesn't excuse the constant inability to keep a promise.

[@spb7139]

Years from now people will be getting excited about patch 11.0. This game will never be finished.

[@bighorn6964]

Rdr2 took 10 years and only a few states and a an amazing story to come out. Star citizen is going to be several systems and squadron 42. U have to be very sad to not understand this.

[@alexandrobr2762]

@@bighorn6964 Otario

[@dtrjones]

Brilliant polished video. Love it. Star Citizen is a very ambitous project that has it's critics but offers something quite unique in the gaming world. I've been very excited to folllow this since 2012 and I'm really looking forward to the 4.0 release. Will also be at Manchester this year!

[@fmartingorb]

What is important about 4.0 is that the tech foundation of the game is done. So they will have a framework to build on. 4.x is about adding the last functionality, stabilise the game and move to Beta

[@mayoluck]

Word of advice, keep the content coming and dont get bother by us that rag on CIG. Its a Chris Roberts thing not you. But yea its all talk till we see it. Soon. TM

[@Hav0k]

I appreciate that. I get what you mean. I'm right there with you in many regards. CR loves to sell his dream and as a dreamer myself I can respect it, but he also needs to back up his talk with action.

[@dudu4535]

In early 2014, over 10 years ago, I began my relationship with Star Citizen. One of the main reasons I got involved in this relationship, spending several hundred dollars to purchase a few spaceships, and thoroughly enjoying the graphics and imagination that this project offered to its fans, was because it served as a driver for my imagination and my love for everything related to space. Another aspect of this relationship was the promise made by the project leaders that VR would also be integrated into the game. "Oh my God," I told myself, "this will be amazing!" As of today, after more than a decade, when every self-respecting game is also presented in VR, only Star Citizen lags behind and disappoints a large portion of its fans. Tell me, please, is there any game in the world today with more potential for VR than this one? Look at DCS, look at MSFS 2020, and soon MSFS 2024. What is happening with the leaders of this project? Surely, they see what is happening in the world today. A huge disappointment, missing out on an enormous potential for new customers. It's truly a shame.

[@Hav0k]

The thing about Star Citizen is that its much more vast than the games you mentioned. It has a lot of potential and honestly it will be one of those games that will constantly be added to, much like Eve Online. I think it's important to have patience, as much as it hurts. I've got my own issues with DCS that drive me up a wall. They've been talking about dynamic campaigns and a world map for longer than Star Citizen has been around, and they still don't have anything to show for it.

[@Bubblegum_Ronin]

As always, slick video Hav0k!

[@Hav0k]

I appreciate it! Glad you enjoyed the video!

[@kazzix83]

I think they need to make medical gameplay priority after 4.0. Medical missions included

[@Hav0k]

I would like to see this as well. But there's also repair and refuel that need work too

[@SolarWindsRider]

"Pyro, dynamic weather, jump points and more in 2020" - citcon 2019.

[@Hav0k]

Indeed. We've been waiting for too long

[@middleagedbaldguy6774]

But look at all the store inventory you can buy...Thor over at Pirate Software said it best- if they focused on functionality with the same ferocity they put into the store the game would have been done four years ago if not sooner.

[@BGIANAKy]

Been here since 2013 and .23 is the first time I’ve ever felt the project is going in the wrong direction.

[@Star-bp5jj]

What do u see with the project thats going wrong way? Ive been here since 2013 too and see it go wrong many many times.

[@BGIANAKy]

@@Star-bp5jj master modes is a complete slap in the original vision and every iteration of the flight model since. All of the little tedious tasks as well as just not fun. I implore anyone to go on the RSI website and look at the “flight model and input controls” article from CR that was written in 2013. This was what I pledged for. CR and CIG have completely shit on us and the next step is them going and announcing a console release.

[@shaunthomas9792]

The addition of server meshing and a new star system is the wrong direction?

[@Star-bp5jj]

@@shaunthomas9792 Are you serious you mean we are 4 years over due on server mesh and a new Star system and you turn a blind eye to that? Where is this addition exactly? Shall I share the other countless deadlines that have been extremely late or still waiting on? Edit: Yes wrong direction if its years over due. Like many other countless deadlines

[@middleagedbaldguy6774]

Master modes reminds me of the upright arcade games I played in the 90's. Its a two dimensional, boring, dogs breakfast and it looks like we are stuck with it. Zero desire to bother with it. Ill play a top down shooter without a bunch of time sinks if I want phone app gameplay.

[@themelon7112]

They should probably stop making the game even bigger and start polishing and fleshing out what is already there

[@Hav0k]

At this point it's too late. They've kinda sealed their fate

[@sirbonobo3907]

Remember its early days so expect nothing to work. And i cant wait for 1.0 release after 4.24 in 7-8 years guys! I waited 12 years now and can wait another 12 if i am a alive by then :D

[@Winterx69]

Remember how it's the early bird that catches the can of worms... and before you know it, CIG opens a fresh one.

[@Stigglitch]

What year is this???? I'm waiting for 3.24

[@poposterous236]

4.0 is going to make 3.0 feel like a nostalgic romp. Its going to be so broken you won't be able to even walk anywhere.

[@Hav0k]

I doubt that given that Pyro worked without server meshing. And Server Meshing has been largely proven to work

[@BigBobBlazer]

Do you realize how many content creators have said this since 2019? Ridiculous. “4.0/Pyro is imminent”. In 2019, Chris Robert’s announced that 4.0/Pyro would be released in 2020. Pyro wasn’t even half built yet, the jump gates weren’t built, the law system wasn’t worked out and server meshing didn’t exist at all. Nothing. It was a flat out lie. Fast forward to 2023/2024, jump gates still aren’t done, server meshing isn’t complete, Pyro still isn’t finished and according to the devs in the most recent SCL, the implementation on the law in Pyro hasn’t even been decided. Pyro is not coming imminently.

[@kishkin8743]

I know right. I backed in 2013 and it's sad to see new backers take CIG at their word. 4.0 got delayed, so......here we are again.

[@tyr6t6r27]

the only thing highly anticipated is actual gameplay and not a tech demo. Round and round we go...

[@icedragongaming]

ya i will believe it when i see it running.

[@pyroguy828]

Good video, thanks Havok

[@Hav0k]

My pleasure! Glad you enjoyed the video!

[@Zeeves]

Best space game ever. The 4.0 updates will send this game into the stratosphere, very exciting

[@BLACKSYNTH]

As long as it addresses The basic Broken current state of things like Ai which let's be honest is worse than trash, along with the wildly inconsistent performance no matter what specs you have. But I've heard it all before. I've played bits since 2015 and played solid since 2020, I can only imagine 4.0 will bring more bugs without fixing the old basic ones, and also performance will be even worse. Both my blazing fast 4090 systems can hit 140fps and also drop to 25 fps with lows of 8fps.

[@poposterous236]

fixing the AI would be a monumental task that they simply aren't up for. It has fundamental problems that can be traced back to the shit AI in the Crysis series.

[@Hav0k]

Not sure if you've played recently, but the AI is pretty dangerous especially when the servers are doing well. Especially during FPS gameplay.

[@evildude2135]

I'm pretty sure the AI is mostly awful because of the servers. When the servers are doing good (pretty much never, lol) they actually work pretty well. My hopium is telling me that means with server meshing most of the issues will be fixed but it remains to be seen whether server meshing actually fixes the server issues.

[@Battletech_Emily]

I've honestly got pretty high hopes for 4.0. We'll see what it brings, though!!!

[@CaspCic]

That's not the most anticipated thing about SC for me. The most anticipated thing is the quantum economy system, where AI ist flying around and create, alter and reacts to economics in the game. Including trading, gathering, crafting and piracy. With this there it's completely unimportant, how many star systems or contested combat zones or whatever there is.

[@nydabeats]

4.0 will probably just be jump gates and pyro... all the other features will be 4.1, 4.2 ect.

[@Hav0k]

And Server Meshing. But we'll see

[@okami803]

Been in the verse since 2019.. They'll HAVE to start proving themselves soon

[@Hav0k]

I completely agree with you!

[@Sixth-Venom]

@@okami803 2019 hahaha you are lucky that only so little time has passed

[@mayoluck]

@@Sixth-Venom yea im setting close to 10ys so anything CIG says i know is bs. Proof is in the pudding.

[@mayoluck]

Also 10yrs later an the OG hangers are better than now... wtf

[@surject]

Welcome to Star Citizen o7 :) ...2013 here.

[@bentwing7397]

Sorry heard this line since 2.0

[@poposterous236]

That thumbnail is going to age like fking milk

[@csdigitaldesign]

You heard that 4.0 was coming that year since 2.0? Really? You sure about that? Lmao

[@Bronwyn031]

Tier 0 Static Server Meshing to Live by end of 1st quarter of March or April of 2025 and it will be jank AF for the remainder of the year. Which means EVO MIGHT get it by December of 2024. They will probably do the "experience play sessions" again for CitCon on a limited number of attending players sponsored by AMD.

[@Hav0k]

I'm not sure how much you've looked into prior tests, but the last few tests have been largely successful. To include successful shard transfers via jump point traversal and server authority transfers. So, this is somewhat of a disingenuous statement that doesn't pay much respect to the hard work done so far.

[@Bronwyn031]

@@Hav0k If you mean Quantum travel, missions, player parties and server recovery not persisting over server boundaries you would be absolutely correct. Perhaps you are choosing to ignore the patch release cadence of CIG. A build moves from EVO to Live across 6-8 weeks. To have 4.0 go live before the end of the year means getting the EVO build out by the end of this month, and we haven't even gone into Wave 2 of 3.24. This means if we're lucky, we get Live 3.24 by the first week of September and hopefully an EVO build of 4.0 by mid or late September. That means 4.0 in EVO hands during CitCon or if the Gods are favorable, into Wave 2 during or shortly after CitCon. I think they are shooting for EVO 4.0 by the Ship Expo sale in December or more than likely right before the 2 week break during January, which would still put LIVE 4.0 by late February or mid March of 2025. Now comes the 9000lb elephant in the room... when has CIG ever hit a deadline and released a stable build? Server meshing is literally STATIC server meshing and TIER ZERO. Meaning the build will be bug laden and jank at minimum. You gotta take the rose-colored glasses off once in while so you can see straight. If I'm wrong, I will come back to this post and acknowledgment I was wrong... but... ehhh... I've NEVER been wrong with my predictions. They literally have 2 weeks to get 4.0 into EVO hands to even have a shot at a late 2024 4.0 Live build, which will be barely working Tier 0.

[@Hav0k]

@Bronwyn031 I'm not choosing to ignore anything. CIG is known for missing deadlines. I just said your timeline didn't acknowledge that it's already proven to work; albeit with plenty of issues. But the Replication layer also had plenty of issues when it was first implemented. I honestly hope you're wrong, but you're correct that they still have yet to get 3.24 to wave 2 and they have until October 1st to get 4.0 out for many of us to consider it released in Q3 of this year. Sadly, the likelihood of you being wrong based on prior history is extremely low. Which I wholeheartedly acknowledge.

[@TheFuzzywhumpus]

This project is like erotic literature. Our imagination does the heavy lifting. Hope I'm wrong someday soon :) dreams are fun:)

[@Hav0k]

LOL You're right about that. That makes a whole lot of sense.

[@thoms6982]

For a regular player with not that much time, i hope they make the funfactor a bit better. The fires on ships sound like another step that can keep you busy. Sure fun the first 5 times, but after 10 times its just annoying

[@poposterous236]

Fun was never, NEVER a priority for this game. That is a long wait for a train that ain't coming.

[@Silverhawk-u2f]

@@thoms6982 The way they talked about it sounded more like it's the kind of thing that happens very rarely or when your ship is alread, going to explode soon anyway. It also sounded that you would have more than enough time to take care of it, but if you don't, well it won't end well. You also always have the option to temporarly cut off the O2 to put out the fire quickly everywhere. Sounds like some tasks for engineering gameplay or a copilot, so like multi crew gameplay other than turrets

[@LucidStrike]

@@thoms6982 It's more that not every game is for everybody. Like, DCS isn't for folks who just want a simple flying experience, SC being complex is kinda the whole point. It's for the people who like these sorts of things. For everyone else, there's Arena Commander.

[@thoms6982]

@@LucidStrike that would be a shame, i really like the game. the make money aspect to buy better ships, do some coöp missions. i like the tension of have valuable cargo, hoping not to meet any pirates. but hee maybe you're right. maybe its only for people who do have hours a day to spend.

[@CitizenLarente]

Thanks!

[@GeneOh]

This has never been done before (Server Meshing), I'll believe it when I see it working.

[@Bubblegum_Ronin]

Agreed. With that said, apparently they actually had it working in their tests BUT I'm not dancing any happy dance until I see it working live. I do believe they're going to pull it off though, not that everything will go smoothly at first, but they're going to get server meshing done. Unfortunately we won't truly appreciate the tech until dynamic server meshing is in. Once server meshing is in, they need to optimize before switching to dynamic server meshing which I think will be one of their easier implementations.

[@Hav0k]

Incorrect. It has been done and was pretty successful in the tech previews so far. But yes, the live servers will be the true test. I completely agree with you though, @ea4857 they definitely need to get it optimized as much as possible.

[@jasoncatano3634]

If you've played MMOs before, you've experienced server meshing (since the late 90s).

[@GeneOh]

@@jasoncatano3634 Your wrong. Apparently you don't know what it is.

[@GeneOh]

@@Bubblegum_Ronin When I say "Server Meshing" I mean the whole tech, that includes it being dynamic. Although I would be satisfied with just seamless server meshing. Maybe AI will play a part though.

[@f.ferenc88]

Few more years and I might try the game...

[@Hav0k]

So I have to reply to this, because it's honestly kinda gives me the belief that there are actually people that are cautiously hopeful for the game that just want to quietly wait on the side lines and see what Star Citizen makes of itself when it releases. If there are more people like in the world, then this game could be pretty huge IF Star Citizen is even remotely successful delivering on many of their promises. I really hope that things happen quicker from here on out, because it will be a pretty great experience to have a ton more players in the game.

[@tonythegreat4275]

Wait i thought Pyro was released like 2 years ago!

[@Hav0k]

You mean 5 years ago? "Pyro coming q4 2019!" 🤣😅

[@_m3kh170]

3:58 what ship is that?

[@Hav0k]

That's the C1 Spirit

[@_m3kh170]

@@Hav0k thank u

[@HeyyItsNick]

I am not excited for anything for Star Citizen anymore, I just want to see the game work and be functional and as bug free as possible, they can add what ever they want but until I see it with minimal bugs/crashes/performance issues then I am just not interested in what they had. Great video though and glad you are looking forward to the update.

[@TachyonRift]

Star citizen is the type of game that's fun to WATCH people play. Not fun to actually play.

[@callumgibbs6406]

Saw a clip were 1 grenade sets of a fire when boarding a ship which is meh no one would use it as it would just catch up to u later on

[@agamerandyou9854]

will they fix the issue of falling through the floor in 4.0? if not then nothing changes..

[@Hav0k]

There's a lot I hope they fix

[@blixx2374]

4.0 doesn't even get us closer to moving from pre-alpha to alpha, so yeah......excited......

[@Hav0k]

The game hasn't been in pre-alpha for a long time. It's been in alpha for most of it's lifetime.

[@blixx2374]

@@Hav0k Not by industry standards and not by CIG when they miss a hard time. Disco Lando is quick to call it a pre-alpha when something doesn't come out or work properly. In order for it to be in Alpha per industry standards then 95% of gameplay features must be at tier 0 or higher. We are not there. I know CIG calls it alpha, but that's their spin, which doesn't match reality. I like your content though. I was just pointing out a fact.

[@Hav0k]

I get what you're saying. When something doesn't go well they like to redirect by saying it's an alpha. And you're right, the game still has a ways to go for sure. I hope it's not too far from now though.

[@Frenchieeeee]

game needs major optimization... if i can't get 90fps at 4k with a 4070 ti super then it's a problem.

[@Hav0k]

90 fps at 4k on a 4070 ti Super is a tall order.... 4090 is possible though

[@Frenchieeeee]

@@Hav0k yeah but this game is over 10 years old and it's still unplayable even with next gen GPUs...

[@Hav0k]

@@Frenchieeeee The graphics have progressively gotten better over the years and the game has gotten larger. It's not the same game it was 10 years ago considering if I was to use my old system (GTX 970 and I5 2500k) it wouldn't even run lol For example, WoW is almost a 20 years old game now and you can't run it nowadays if you had your old system as well. Games that last longer progressively have their graphics and size increase over the years to coincide with constantly evolving technology.

[@supraeric]

I love the game I want it to all happen but I feel we are not gonna see meshing in 24/25 and sadly without meshing nothing else matters

[@Hav0k]

We've already seen it work. And successfully too.

[@operator9858]

I tried going back and playing recently but the flight model is so bad that i wont be back until they fix it even if they someday add meshing. Why bother?

[@Hav0k]

I've seen all of their previous flight models at this point. I'll be honest when I say I still don't understand the perspective that master modes is the worst. It's definitely not in the best state, but it isn't the worst flight model we have had. I can think of other flight models that caused a lot of problems earlier in the project. I know that they have always been wanting to make it like WW2 fights in space, but I also think we definitely need to get the flight model squared away so the game feels unique and has its own identity. I remember playing Diaspora Shattered Armastice and thinking how much I hope SC is similar. We'll see what happens with the MM changes in 4.0

[@sennemaa59769]

Right around the corner only 2 years more belive me... 😂 Fun byside i'm in for 10 years entering with 29 in a few months i turn into 40...

[@Eric-un2oq]

Urban legendary maybe. It's a myth. There in no santa cl..., i mean 4.0.

[@brandonhalcyon6984]

Another great video, thank you.

[@Hav0k]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@fatherrussell5303]

Hey Havok, long time no see

[@aventus2140]

great vid keep it up you realy deserv more subs

[@Hav0k]

I appreciate it!

[@Brendanlikesthis]

These videos get me so hyped. Until I log in and find I can't get out of my hab 😂.

[@Sumgui119]

The "Star Citizen Community" AKA "The Ever-Faithful" 😂

[@belislemathieu2061]

Is people that are playing the game now will have to start over when the game release?

[@Hav0k]

No. They intend to no longer wipe the game if they can prevent it

[@Winterx69]

We are not even in actual Alpha yet. We are still barely stuck in pre-Alpha, and it is far from being in a good place. So yes, expect wipes and definitely a full progress wipe before release (if and when... and if) - and do not believe CIG's community management sweet talk. Not even the "100% promise" is an actual promise. And words like "try" carry no weight at all.

[@Hav0k]

@Winterx69 the game isn't in pre-alpha. It's in alpha. And per CIG they have no intention of wiping progress unless there are bugs that are causing issues with long term persistence databases. This has been their stance since PES was added in 3.18

[@Winterx69]

@Hav0k Parroting Jared doesn't make you wrong about what 'they' say. It's just that it doesn't matter at all what they call things or what their stance is. That's merely what is on their wishlist, and has as such always been "subject to change." Technically, SC never left pre-alpha, and neither have CIG been able to live up to whatever their stance has been, whenever it has met with technical reality. That's their constant uttering of the term "change" for you and I. Marketing tells us that development may well be trying not to wipe for the time being, but that doesn't mean anything with all the crucial tech that yet remains to be implemented, such as, Pyro, the economy, maelstrom, etc. Not only from a development standpoint, but also from a gameplay stance, it is disingenuous to entertain the thought that there are no wipes to come.

[@Hav0k]

@Winterx69 I'm not parroting Jared. I've been on SC since the beginning. It has been out of its pre-alpha stage for some time. And CIG have been consistent in sticking with not wiping as much as they can.

[@zman_o7]

😎👍

[@Flyright07]

Great vid.

[@supersasquatch]

How exactly do you transfer gear to another player

[@Hav0k]

Put it in a container and they take it and put it in their hangar.

[@tonythegreat4275]

Been following this game for years, but still never played it.

[@Hav0k]

Nothing wrong with that. I'm actually somewhat envious of that, to be honest.

[@tonythegreat4275]

@@Hav0k why.

[@Hav0k]

@@tonythegreat4275 cause then I'd be blissfully ignorant lol 😆

[@tonythegreat4275]

@@Hav0k is the game still unplayable glitchy?

[@dougchurch9626]

Wish they would fix the game! I bought it and at the game loading at the end! Crashes back to desk top!!! Im pissed! Waste of money!!!!

[@terry7342]

Dynamic server meshing patch 5.0

[@kishkin8743]

And it's delayed. No changes in the game when 4.0 comes out.

[@dtm4trix]

I'm sorry....I'll believe it when it's playable. CIG has a bad reputation for poor execution. They should actually fix and start over with 3.24. That thing is a shit show.

[@Henning-i4l]

@@dtm4trix 👍🏻

[@TUROCK320]

Nope. You have the "propaganda fanboys" and the old veteran who know the tricks, the ips CiG use. yup new features but no rework on the GAMEPLAY. The game is litterally empty x) It is boring to play SC

[@BGIANAKy]

12 years in. They go and completely ruin the flight model

[@Loopyllu365]

@@dtm4trix well maybe don’t buy into a game that’s in alpha?

[@paulmorley9894]

Dont buy the game then ..

[@louhartin4483]

Gave ya the sub bro

[@Hav0k]

Thanks for the sub! o7

[@Alfredo-ys7cw]

When?

[@Hav0k]

At this rate, things aren't looking great. Maybe before Oct 1st, maybe before they go on break in December. Either way, it's a big patch that's full of potential that will keep people busy for quite a while. Especially if they have actual, tangible rewards in the game that can't be bought. All we can do is constantly remind them of their deadlines and hope they get it out soon.

[@brucegasson553]

Where or when will VR appear on the road map? ICIG can get that in then I will be a happy citizen

[@Hav0k]

You can kinda get it to work right now, but yes native support would be nice to have. We'll probably have it around 1.0

[@mayoluck]

VR works now, but its a slop chop job of getting it there. Its the program that forces VR in games. Im not sure what its called but ive seen it in use. I use eye tracker feels pretty badass.

[@-_Nuke_-]

Its "comming" = it will take about a year.

[@Hav0k]

Let's hope not for everyone's sake. 6 years later we're still "almost there"

[@innarik1]

*4.0 wooooo new system! *Reality: cows

[@slybericic4691]

Walk around ships. So they fixed the issue of my ships spitting me out into space if I dare leave my seat? That would be nice.

[@Hav0k]

Pretty sure this has largely been fixed. It may occasionally still happen, but it's very uncommon.

[@bob-rg7vo]

I believe it won't be tell next year I believe rsi when they stop giving false promises.

[@captainharlock3998]

Star Citizen is MUCH more enjoyable once you stop playing it. it's a complete and utter shitshow, nothing implemented is worth talking about beside some pretty ships, and everything is still "right around the corner" since 2016. Things won't change. However once you stop playing and hoping for literally anything good to happen, then it becomes something fun to follow, and see if what they say is going to become true, or like literally every itteration of everything they did : be implemented as the absolute simplified version of something that was said to be deep since the start.

[@yoyshop7688]

lol until the next one ....with SC streamer it s always the next update!!!

[@lsmttos]

your voice is so sexy... great content!! i cant play right now cause 20fps is terrible. But im watching all the news and who knows i come bask soon

[@cryshot8071]

Get ready for 1.0 in 2031

[@Hav0k]

That's at least the most respectable timeline I've seen from any commenter yet. Lol

[@Gh0stCurse]

yes it big SOOO Good .. if it worked lol

[@Kino_Chroma]

Not holding my breath

[@MaurizioCrd]

No it's not.

[@Luciphell]

Yeah. It's going to be legendarily buggy, bad, and broken. Not to mention tedious and boring as hell.

[@eastend6695]

This video as got me really excited , thank you HavOK /

[@Hav0k]

Glad you enjoyed the video!

[@Terran0va_Plays]

Just stop lol. How can ppl still be so delusional about who the maker of this game is. I’ll beleive it when i see it. Great video, but i would definitely make sure my channel had a few different major sources of content because i am finally, after a few years, leaning toward scam/this game will never be fully realized. I want this game to win more than most ppl probably. I’ve “invested” al lot of money jnto it. But there is just barely any evidence that they will be able to deliver what they said they want to.

[@Hav0k]

I respect your view point even if I disagree. I'm not delusional by any means, just hopeful even though things seemingly keep happening with not releasing many of the features we want. But I get what you mean.

[@Terran0va_Plays]

@@Hav0k delusional meaning they keep doing the same thing to the fans every year and the fans keep expecting them to do something different lol

[@Hav0k]

Yeah I'm really not expecting much different. Just hoping that things will finally change. Generally when I write these I try to keep it neutral. But usually my comments are more unfiltered.

[@operator9858]

Did you really just use the term 'game changer' man? Thats perfect. Star citizen is the ukraine of development and funding. Just a black hole to nowhere 😂😅😂

[@Hav0k]

I'll admit it's quite the buzzword to use, even if KZbin basically forces you to use buzzwords to garner clicks. But it will change a decent amount once it comes out. At least if it delivers all that they claim. But I definitely understand that it definitely seems like it's a black hole.

[@daveroles3783]

This didn’t age well…..

[@Hav0k]

No surprise. Can't win 'em all.

[@krimsonfunk]

This is going to be a royal mess

[@ivanpeso6280]

Sorry not this year. Future tense is too much in use when talking about this game. Based on decade of backing CIG. Only 3.24 and few new ships for earning money. Maybe some 4.0 in evocati that is broken.

[@asiftalpur3758]

Man I get it you need views and your up against one of the most soulless news channels covering sc out there and that you've recently come back to make content and some of that has been absolutely great. But you've started huffing and puffing insane amounts of copium and really, your just saying what boredgamer/smb/space tomato says but in a different tone. Make real content. you are fumbling this one.

[@Hav0k]

I appreciate your comment. While this may just be yet another coverage of 4.0, there are plenty of topics I have reserved for the future that I'm working on. Given that I have a full time job, 4 kids, a wife and other miscellaneous things I have to take care of, this is just another video that is in the queue of the work having already been done. Also, I'm a positive person that firmly believes that you have full control over your state of mind. If you focus on positive things, you will inherently be positive. Trust me, these types of videos aren't for views (considering I am a small channel and get very few). I would much rather do other big projects that have seen more success on my channel, but ultimately I'm sadly limited on time given that I can only get out 2 videos a week while others do this full time and get 1-2 videos a day out.

[@Hav0k]

Additionally, maybe keep your eye out for the next video in a few minutes that breaks away from Star Citizen.