nah word why am i getting recommended to this too tho
@C10_WN Жыл бұрын
Or gaijin actually listened to spookston?
@Stunfill Жыл бұрын
Yes
@cnlbenmc2 жыл бұрын
I would love it if Spookston would talk about the M1 AGDS; it is basically what you get when you put an ADATS and a Flakpanzer Gepard into an Abrams turret and Chassis.
@FatherGrigori2 жыл бұрын
Yes, I'd like to see it too
@sway_hybird49842 жыл бұрын
Yes that would be a great video
@lechendary2 жыл бұрын
he has talked about it
@tobymassoom2 жыл бұрын
In said video it's mentioned in the intro, then it's section starts at 3:11.
@SuwinTzi2 жыл бұрын
He has a video on it 2years ago
@joelnord4699 Жыл бұрын
Little did spookston know this would be coming to war thunder in 2023
@creepei518 Жыл бұрын
It would be amazing if the LOAST would come into the game. Maybe with an event.
@adszpw3885 Жыл бұрын
It did yknow?
@Miller_Davus Жыл бұрын
@@adszpw3885 r/whoosh
@leogunt Жыл бұрын
@@adszpw3885 hes being sarcastic
@creepei518 Жыл бұрын
@@adszpw3885 Yeee I know ;D I just wanted to be funny.
@EQUAL_Thundered Жыл бұрын
"LOAST" 💀
@dragoneye09792 жыл бұрын
Stuff like this is why Im convinced that after the most modern MBTs we'll see late cold war prototypes in war thunder ground
@casematecardinal2 жыл бұрын
Maybe for Russia. Then after that we might get modern American mbts. I still wouldn't hold my breath though.
@georgethompson14602 жыл бұрын
@@casematecardinal Russia will get T-14 while america gets a slightly better abrams. also abrams gets nerfed.
@TheKenji22212 жыл бұрын
@@georgethompson1460 Well tbf, the US hasn't made anything since the Abrams... Over than another Abrams version
@cheyannei59832 жыл бұрын
@@georgethompson1460 Russia doesn't even have the T-14 lol, there's no evidence that the parade vehicles aren't just sheet metal on top of a T-80 or 90
@Glebasik1482 жыл бұрын
@@cheyannei5983 wtf
@l.bakker75632 жыл бұрын
I think the most overkill missile put on a tank is the Pluton. Might be a cool vehicle to make a video on.
@GENERICNICK-kj4lm2 жыл бұрын
Or the is2 SCUD launcher
@aynersolderingworks70092 жыл бұрын
It’s a literal nuclear missile lmao
@firstduckofwellington68892 жыл бұрын
@@aynersolderingworks7009 Not “overkill” at all
@xsonohx79612 жыл бұрын
@@GENERICNICK-kj4lm sheesh
@valian89852 жыл бұрын
@@aynersolderingworks7009 well u know its kinda hard to aim after havin drinked some wine, even tho yes it was designed as an anti tank missile / anti infantry
@Snp20242 жыл бұрын
Americans really missed on anti-everything system like 4th time already.
@csbr752 жыл бұрын
Gotta spent all that tax money somehow
@alexanderschulte82482 жыл бұрын
Well once the cold war ended there wasnt any need and the military budget was slashed
@honkhonk80092 жыл бұрын
Not really. Even nowadays, the army rarely uses hardkill APS systems on the Abrams purely because it would destroy any functionality it would have with troops. Same reasy why they dont use ERA aswell I think, and instead went for composite armour. Soviet tanks in the 80s would use APS systems purely as a cost saving measure. In reality, ground clutter, mountains, buildings, and various other stuff would severely limit the APS radar. Basically outside of lab conditions, it was mediocre. The radar would also have to be able to track a target for a few seconds, before being able to make an actual firing solution. Theres a reason why the only APS the Americans were thinking of fielding, was developed in the 2000's, and was a severely limited version that would only be able to shoot a material directly downwards onto the incoming warhead, instead of intercepting it like Trophy APS would. Although even that was considered unreliable, even though it was modern day USA with genuinely good radar systems. The thing is, a 20% failure rate in Russia would be a ground breaking improvement, while in litterally everywhere else, it would be infeasible and would kill a program. TLDR: Russia puts shit into service even when its borderline unusable, while Americans would get publicly lambasted by congress for having a 10% failure rate. The Moskvas recent service records seem to support this.
@nooblangpoo2 жыл бұрын
I think they're holding off on the anti-everything so that the enemy won't just copy it so that when the war comes, the american MIC just churns it out.
@darcgibson50992 жыл бұрын
@@honkhonk8009 completely false, the last paragraphs. And the first claim is inaccurate.
@jamesharding34592 жыл бұрын
Speaking of high velocity missiles, I'd like to go on a short tangent about the Nike Sprint air-defense missile. It was an American Cold War-era ABM system, that involved launching a megaton-range warhead at incoming ICBM's on an extremely high-speed rocket -- accelerations exceeded 100G's during the boost phase, and speeds of Mach 10 were reached in under 5 seconds. The heat on the body was so intense a special ablative coating had to be developed. In test footage, it looks like it been sped up but no, that actually how fast it is, and you can see the missile body glowing white-hot.
@CoreStarter2 жыл бұрын
Sprint is the most out there wild fucking thing ever made by man, up there with SLAM
@GalacticTommy2 жыл бұрын
@@CoreStarter what’s SLAM?
@deathdragon22832 жыл бұрын
@@GalacticTommy it’s also called project Pluto. It stands for Supersonic Low Altitude missile. It was a nuclear powered missile capable of flying around at mach 3 at roof top level for weeks on end, spewing radioactive decay products out its exhaust and delivering 14 nuclear warheads with megaton yields
@CoreStarter2 жыл бұрын
@@deathdragon2283 fucking open cycle nuclear ramjet, the us in the 50s was fucking wild
@yoda10372 жыл бұрын
My grandpa was on the Nike hercules system he assembled them
@theimperialcombine Жыл бұрын
Spookston: The Most Overkill Anti-Tank Missile "Then Gaijin Fucks it up"
@michaeljoachim4189 Жыл бұрын
I find it strange how this video gets recommended to me now.
@zhdasd Жыл бұрын
same
@Drakey_Fenix Жыл бұрын
I like how KZbin recommended me this now, that the vehicle is being added
@lebruh6010 Жыл бұрын
holy fart they actually put it in the game
@Beltorchika12 Жыл бұрын
I was wondering why Spookston wasn't showing any gameplay of the LOSAT. Turns out this video is a year old but it just got recommended to me, lmao.
@asllen3310 Жыл бұрын
Well-well, the snail puts it Spooks, the snail did it.
@BlackjackN7 Жыл бұрын
Moment I saw the news I started looking for the video curious if somebody else remembered it :D
@HEATSEEKR2 жыл бұрын
oh my god the AGM-166 LOSAT is a beast. I hope they add this on the humvee chassis for war thunder. Finally a reason to add the humvee to the game.
@Chastity_Belt2 жыл бұрын
While in real life this missile probably can destroy literally everything, i can bet in war thunder it will stuck in fuel tanks and tracks and make no damage to light tanks and helis, just because WT can't really simulate kinetic damage properly.
@casematecardinal2 жыл бұрын
@@Chastity_Belt its American, there is no way it would be faithfully represented. Just like the tow2b, stinger, and maverick.
@cloaker28292 жыл бұрын
nah the snails hate boner for the us is too strong
@cookiecracker22 жыл бұрын
Frik you please no. Don't make the game less fun than it is.
@HEATSEEKR2 жыл бұрын
@@cookiecracker2 why not? War Thunder is painful why not make it a little more?
@TheT-90thatstaresintoyoursoul Жыл бұрын
Like how this was recommended after the LOSAT is being added.
@GnougnouA102 жыл бұрын
This video in a nutshell "so they made this missile that was really good. But it was never adopted x3. So anyway here is the Javelin".
@marcogenovesi85702 жыл бұрын
Well Javelin is kind of still OK for current russian armor so all turned out fine I guess
@MrPojopojo2 жыл бұрын
Technology advanced past the need for missiles like this, top attack and tandem warheads in tanks and handheld devices have proven more than capable.
@elmanco68852 жыл бұрын
Every cancelled military project in a nutshell
@Blue-mr7fe2 жыл бұрын
There is no profit if the threat goes away too easily
@michaele15642 жыл бұрын
The big miss with this is that it's not affected by active protection systems. Hellfire, javelin etc struggle with these systems where losat did not. The other issue is time of flight. Modern air defense systems would love for helicopters to be unmasked for the entirety of the almost 30 second time of flight. As opposed to losats 4 second time of flight.
@rizzyjonkler56 Жыл бұрын
Spookston, you are not gonna believe this.....
@LilKittyKat-C Жыл бұрын
Bruh, this just got added as well and I am getting recommended this.
@yordobelps Жыл бұрын
Same 😂
@JuanofthePorch Жыл бұрын
Man predicted the future 💀
@ShawnF6FHellcat8 ай бұрын
He did indeed predict the LOSAD - Line Of Site Anti Dirt, being added to the game. There's something about your name... something familiar... something that makes me feel... hurt and confused......... I wonder what it could be...
@m.a.6020 Жыл бұрын
Well, this aged like fine wine, didn’t it?
@StillGrillby2 жыл бұрын
Would be cool to see Spookston talk about some of the Yugoslav projects and even production vehicles.
@GENERICNICK-kj4lm2 жыл бұрын
Lotta cool stuff like the t34 85 with 10 degrees of depression
@bickboose93642 жыл бұрын
@@GENERICNICK-kj4lm I need all the _no-depression_ Soyviet tanks yugoslavicized then.
@lector-dogmatixsicarii15372 жыл бұрын
The one time T-34 actually had gun depression and the Ma Deuce airplane edition. Also the "And on the sixth day, God made the Hellcat, and saw it was good" slap a stereotypical seat cover on it, people.
@Existor106 Жыл бұрын
Welcome back to this video as LOSAT is being added now
@timothygoodwin3287 Жыл бұрын
And now LOSAT is coming to the game
@Happy_Tog2 жыл бұрын
I don't think the humvee version would be too bad for war thunder think about it. GOD tier speed like the Type 93 for japan with all the gimics of light tanks (Spotting and now scout drone) BUT, AND HERE ME OUT. *Literally cannot do CQC.* This is because these missiles require distance to speed up and acquire penetration power. This means they have the oddity of having abysmal penetration at close range compared to other weapons. The penetration power would increase as long as the motor is still burning until it stops. Only then would penetration power once again decreases with distance. TLDR: It would only be usable at long ranges.
@Zorro91292 жыл бұрын
I would love to see missiles bounce off in close quarters.
@casematecardinal2 жыл бұрын
It would also fly hella fast meaning that it would be able to outshoot apfsds rounds
@bickboose93642 жыл бұрын
@@casematecardinal Some of them, but there's faster ones in-game.
@yawamz96122 жыл бұрын
The Humvee variant also doesn't even have a turret unlike the Bradley and CCVL variants, meaning it is even more useless at anything less than 1 km (the missile goes way too fast to correct its flight path under 1 km if you aren't looking straight at the target)
@quench89 Жыл бұрын
well well well. Spookston knew all along huh
@pilopuha Жыл бұрын
BRUH i just saw this video after gajin anounce the new event vehicles
@kaige498 Жыл бұрын
it's coming
@vizender2 жыл бұрын
You should talk about the ACRA system. In war thunder it’s an 8.0 tank, but in reality it should have fought earlier tanks that we can see at around 7.3-7.7
@honkhonk80092 жыл бұрын
But then Russia/Germany mains would cry about their 100% dominance being even remotely challenged. Russia/Germany can have ultrafast ATGM vehicles with HEAT cannons at 7.3. But God forbid America gets the Sheridan at the same BR, despite it being worse in practicaly everyway. God forbid France even gets to stay competitive. Playing Russian games is fun as long as you play whichever side has the most propaganda supporting them.
@valian89852 жыл бұрын
@@honkhonk8009 shh dont tell them the AMX 50 is 7.3 , that shit is super mobile (just got buffed by losing 7ton of weight,) and slap moms
@ryssa24092 жыл бұрын
Just like t64s are supposed to fight m60s and leopard 1s?
@lector-dogmatixsicarii15372 жыл бұрын
@@valian8985 AMX50 is 1949/1950 (add time to extrapolate what if production) firing solid RNG though. It's no where near as painfully misplaced as a lot of other stuff like BMP-1P 1974, 1979 Marder A1 at 7.3br, 7.3br Leopard 1 1965, 1965 Object 120 7.3br, 1965 RU251 7.0br, 1964 AMX-13-90 7.3br, 1976+ Ratel at 6.0 and 6.7br, 1965 AMX 105 gun Sherman somehow at 6.0, 1967 plus Strv-103 cancer, 70's lazy ranger IKV90 at 7.0, 1967 ammo Su-122-54 at 6.7, 7.7br 2006 PT-76E in its range. Bad example. This time traveling compression shitshow is really bad otherwise.
@jaylencoats26102 жыл бұрын
@Hagmire84 they nerfed the commander sight, it can’t do it anymore(even though it should), they included it with a nerf to a bunch of other tanks that were also firing missiles but guiding from the command sight
@chephalonkappa92822 жыл бұрын
Real shame we didn't get to see any of this leave the prototype stage. A hypersonic kinetic anti tank missile sounds fucking awesome.
@NotVeryUwUofYou Жыл бұрын
The man fucking predicted the future, what have you done mate!
@jbhop904 Жыл бұрын
youtube knows what to recommend time to see this in war thunder
@grandmoffrex Жыл бұрын
Who’s here after this thing was announced for the crafting event
@Intern_-qv3ls Жыл бұрын
Well, look how this has aged.
@45atanner Жыл бұрын
No fucking shot u made this video a year ago and it just popped up for me today when the tank is a being added
@Alguien644 Жыл бұрын
X2
@shuriken2505 Жыл бұрын
aged like fine wine
@TheWhoamaters2 жыл бұрын
Imagine being able to make a company pay out the ass to develop shit like this and then just saying "naw don't want it"
@MrPojopojo2 жыл бұрын
Government contracts are the jackpot though, once you're in, you're *in*
@TheWhoamaters2 жыл бұрын
@@MrPojopojo If they buy.
@Zorro91292 жыл бұрын
The guy who made the Pancor Jackhammer went bankrupt because of it.
@TheWhoamaters2 жыл бұрын
@@Zorro9129 Exactly
@jeffreyskoritowski41142 жыл бұрын
Defense contractor: Seriously !!!! Half of this programs budget came out of our own pocket. This is all you don't even try blaming Congress this time. Dept. of Army: ( shrugs)Sorry Homie. Contractor: Could we at least sell it to someone else? The Israelis are looking for something like this? State Department: Naw fam. This has that super secret technology that you funded yourself. We can't risk it getting into the wrong hands. Besides we're pissed at em this week. Contractor: We'll see these procurement officers like explaining to Congress why that on budget program just went over by 50 percent. How I think these things happen.
@KR-ql8gl Жыл бұрын
little do you know, after a year the vehicle is coming to the game
@vikkij5221 Жыл бұрын
KZbin recommending me this video, when War Thunder is about to get LOSAT... coincidence? :D
@fire3042 жыл бұрын
KE missiles have a problem though, they all have a minimum range in order to get the penetrator up to speed, and that was several hundred yards. This meant that in urban and heavy forested encounters they would be worthless against armor.
@Derek-je6vg Жыл бұрын
Uhh no - minimum range tests were conducted - and a missile as hot as the KEM was really didn’t have a minimum range issue lethality wise.
@LordOfChaos.x7 ай бұрын
Its purpose was not close combat. It was developed to act as a tank destroyer when nothing else would work
@Albert_Weiss_Fuchs Жыл бұрын
This video got recommend after the announcement of LOSAT on warthunder
@shvaknjoyer Жыл бұрын
well well well guess what's being added
@starguy96 Жыл бұрын
This video aged well
@Alguien644 Жыл бұрын
I only know about it because of warthunder, and it just got announced and this got recommended
@ALegitimateYoutuber2 жыл бұрын
Having explored this idea about a decade ago with a few others, we called them KAT (it should be obvious what that means). But we just for fun wanted to see if shoulder fired was viable. And depending on your definition of viable, it is. But as you can imagine weight and size is a problem along with back blast. Also range, not long range, short range. Because it can't really do shit if it hasn't built of any speed. Though would love to explore stuff like that again if I could form another independent research group (pretty much just a think tank). because I'd love to built a stealth drone, since the equations are public info and thanks to improved GPU's you can simulate a lot now. One interesting rough method is using ray tracing, which I had brought to my attention when talking about submarines. Which is super clever, since you can use to to see how waves impact an object. All be it not a perfect sim of radar.
@levgorlov3566 Жыл бұрын
Spookston predicted the lo-sat in war thunder
@tikityler1386 Жыл бұрын
Well, looks like its being added as an event vehicle. Should be interesting.
@kalek2007 Жыл бұрын
hey spookston from 1 year ago, guess what they added, losat as an event vehicle
@OzzyTheWild Жыл бұрын
I’m pretty sure he already knows it
@kalek2007 Жыл бұрын
@@OzzyTheWild i said this as an joke
@Watch-Mun2 жыл бұрын
Basically, what if had an APFSDS shell… _but rocket powered?_
@kane-1112 жыл бұрын
I think you're onto something
@thepeacockk2 жыл бұрын
Confused starstreak noises
@swedhgemoni80922 жыл бұрын
Always comes down to cost with these.
@benjaminmyers5299 Жыл бұрын
Accuracy would be a problem, already an issue as they are fired from smoothbores.
@darkninjacorporation Жыл бұрын
Damnit Spookston you did this to us!
@BrenBrenMartin2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if these sorts of missiles will start popping back up as active protection systems become more capable.
@cheyannei59832 жыл бұрын
Unquestionably, kinetic missile weapon systems beat APS
@g.williams20472 жыл бұрын
Throwing a meter long rod of tungsten at Mach 4 seems to be an excellent way to overcome APS.
@lector-dogmatixsicarii15372 жыл бұрын
Nike Sprint in anti-tank format, but it's a 2ton depleted pointy brick zooming in at speeds in excess of Mach10. Step into the locker dyslexic cHeMiCaL nerds, the king has returned.
@TheTrueAdept2 жыл бұрын
@@cheyannei5983 only if the missile is going at speeds to create a plasma sheath... which is the same reason why modern ABM systems have a hell of a time in countering ICBMs, because the only real way to counter an ICBM is at the boost phase, as reentry has that plasma sheath involved... ... and the only way to _hit_ such an object is, simply put, using a UV-wavelength pulse laser. The reason being? This tiny tiny little thing called 'wavelength transparency'. Basically, non-opaque materials are transparent to certain wavelengths, like quartz to infrared/heat (which is why it's a popular option for a 'nuclear lightbulb' rocket... which is basically vaporized fission material undergoing fission contained in a 'lightbulb' which is then used to heat up propellant (and due to the fact that this is stupid hot, you can use _water_ as the propellant!) for thrust). Plasma is transparent to two wavelengths: UV (specifically near-vaccum and vacuum wavelengths) and X-Rays. Due to just how energetic this sheath is, you'll need to use a pulse laser (basically a laser that has rapid, short duration beams, essentially a weaponized strobe light) to get effective damage... ... you can see where this is going.
@cheyannei59832 жыл бұрын
@@TheTrueAdept APS systems do not have the benefit of time, space, or distance to create speed. Kinetic missiles can thus be faster than an active protection system's hard countermeasure. Were anyone to make such a countermeasure, it could be made larger and faster as the warhead on such an anti-tank missile.
@tobi2233 Жыл бұрын
Well well well , I wonder why this got recommended to me🤔
@kubasjtCZ Жыл бұрын
this aged well
@paladin06547 ай бұрын
Little did we know that all we needed is a $500 quad copter drone.
@bismarkeugen68812 жыл бұрын
Speaking of unguided rockets for anti tank use, the CRV-7 had several variants similar to the mentioned Spike Hyper-Velocity Missile.
@loxachi12912 жыл бұрын
I think one of the bigger drawbacks cited for not adopting it was its effective minimum range. Since the missile needs to accelerate it would have no to a lessened effect to armored targets within 500 meters. at 500 meters it reached its maximum velocity, If I remember correctly, though it may have been more.
@Derek-je6vg Жыл бұрын
Uh no - at close range the motor has not burned out so unless you want a massive KE dump AND the explosive equivalent of a 100 lb go bomb going off in your face when the unburned propellant explodes short range is not an issue - it was tested.
@Endermann111 Жыл бұрын
Spookston can see into the future confirmed
@sway_hybird49842 жыл бұрын
Testing is always differnt to use in a conflict
@CptHalbsteif Жыл бұрын
Well, well, well, look what we now have here.
@crimson.1105 Жыл бұрын
They actually added it !!
@banyanyas839 Жыл бұрын
well what do you know, they adding losat as crafting reward this year spooks gonna love this thing
@joanfayoscastells9926 Жыл бұрын
I would love to see you play it on WT
@darkdevotion9506 Жыл бұрын
This aged well.
@Eristotle2229 ай бұрын
I really love videos like this. I came for the wt, stayed for the interesting prototype tech content.
@jobogin5679 Жыл бұрын
Good timing, it just came to the game.
@MRFreakbob814 Жыл бұрын
It’s crazy we actually getting this
@RevyTempest6 Жыл бұрын
1 year later it's here ! XD with the LOSAT
@FraxinusYT Жыл бұрын
Look where we are now. its being added to the game
@M4_Sherman587 Жыл бұрын
well… this will either age like fine wine or milk
@yordobelps Жыл бұрын
Well well well, how the turn tables
@yssing2 жыл бұрын
"And a distinct lack of tanks to shoot" That is just brilliant :)
@sam-bf4lt Жыл бұрын
Bro can tell the future
@davidoiu562 Жыл бұрын
funny how it got recommended right as this came to war thunder
@kingofwild1002 жыл бұрын
2:19 did he say vought the company that made super heroes 👀👀👀👀👀👀
@deltab97688 ай бұрын
The HEAT version of the Maverick is an even better example of “brute force.” ERA works well against small HEAT rounds but not so much when it’s a ~25cm diameter 60kg HEAT warhead.
@chadofchads7222 Жыл бұрын
It's weird to see this added to war thunder
@ZETH_272 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see a video going into depth about the very weird but interesting Starstreak missile used by the Stormer HVM and the British Apache helicopter.
@grikkajunior2 жыл бұрын
It can also be used in manpad form I think
@ZETH_272 жыл бұрын
@@grikkajunior It absolutely can, but that form is not present in the game.
@williewilson22502 жыл бұрын
@@ZETH_27 bf4 is the only game to ever use it as a battle pickup lol
@Queue36122 жыл бұрын
It makes sense why they went with the javlin, it's an infantry usable at weapon, as opposed to a vehicle mounted one
@Derek-je6vg Жыл бұрын
But there armor schemes javelin won’t handle - to include good active protection - no I won’t go into details
@GrOuNdZeRo77772 жыл бұрын
I had the LOSAT in my Total Annihilation mod for a while but when the program was canceled I had to replace with a more sedate TOW HMMWV.
@ragingassassin66592 жыл бұрын
I read the title and for whatever reason it made me think about the new swedish atgm carrier they put in WT that gets top attack missiles with 500mm of pen. Like that not alot compared to a javelin but 500mm in WT is WAY more than enough to kill anything that isn't soviet.
@zv_cx2 жыл бұрын
wait until you hear about 1200 mm pen ATGM
@kireta212 жыл бұрын
I thought it's about Spike NLOS, camera-guided anti-tank missile with 25km range. With this much range they could perform precise strikes at enemy air defense, artillery and command vehicles, that would normally only have to worry about airstrikes. Dedicated carrier for these missiles, Pereh, was build on M48 chassis, and featured a fake gun to look from distance like a normal Magach tank.
@Zorro91292 жыл бұрын
Let me guess, 6.3?
@bickboose93642 жыл бұрын
CV9040 (BILL) also has it.
@ragingassassin66592 жыл бұрын
@@zv_cx I'm aware of those monsters, I just thought the idea of a top attack atgm having 500mm of pen was a bit crazy
@Whatismoo2 жыл бұрын
Hey Spookston, @ 2:52 you say a 9" rocket is smaller than a Zuni, Zuni is a 5" diameter rocket. Perhaps you were thinking of the 11.75" Tiny Tim? EDIT: I am apparently deaf, you said 9cm, which means you were correct at 3.5" or so vs 2.75" for FFAR and 5" for hydra. Damn unit conversions. Either way, interesting video about a dead-end concept. NLOS Fly Out and Update (FO&U) ATGM like FOG-M and EFOG-M (also Tamuz/Spike-NLOS) turned out to be the better idea. It was just a big pain in the ass to get around the weight issue. You need a big rocket to get a KE penetrator fast enough, even with some of the spicy RDX-base propellants or Boranated stuff.
@TremorLLTS Жыл бұрын
This video aged so well!!! XD HERE COMES THE REALITY SPOOKSIR
@INFStiff Жыл бұрын
I wonder what he's thinking now
@Hack3r_Dapp Жыл бұрын
who’s watching this after it’s now been announced for the war thunder event lol
@n.a.42922 жыл бұрын
Sounds like something you'd use for space combat
@RandomGgames2 жыл бұрын
Why is it that when you talk about these random things I've never heard or cared about, I always love and want to know more about it? Keep up!
@Gwydion_Wolf2 жыл бұрын
"There is no such thing as overkill. More you are simply ensuring that the target is no-longer there."
@warhorse038262 жыл бұрын
back in the late 1980's I kept hearing rumors of a laser-guided ramjet round for the 106mm recoilless rifle. it was longer than a regular round, it had a tungsten core and a hybrid propulsion that was half solid rocket and half airbreathing ramjet. the conventional firing sequence would get the ramjet up to operating speed.."extremely fast" was all I could get. the laser was supposed to be mounted where the spotting rifle would normally go, and be operated using the existing firing controls for the spotting rifle. the whole project dropped off the map when the US reserve units finally retired all of their recoilless rifles around 1990 or so. it may have been a private venture to get the US military to buy recoilless rifles again, or to arm less capable nations with a high lethality kinetic tank killer.
@xilano Жыл бұрын
Too bad the LOSAT is totally bugged right now. It should fly perfectly straight out the tube, but right now it drops straight into the ground. Very stupid, considering that plenty of very slow missiles in the game don't have any drop after launch
@araynortassadore30562 жыл бұрын
The fact we have tech thats OP asf...but don't use it due to "lack of targets"....is kind of comforting.
@CSStevens2015 Жыл бұрын
With the announcement today i hope it lives up to Spookston's expectations
@MurkyShallows Жыл бұрын
The prophecy is true
@kerbalspacepolice24682 жыл бұрын
They also apparently wanted to fit it to the M270s chassis, as it was to be a APC/Command/MLRS/Hopsital/AntiAir multi role chassis, though im unsure if there are any pictures at all of even drawings for that.
@gamerwiz012 Жыл бұрын
hey @Spookston what are the lottery numbers a year from now?
@MrWooaa8 ай бұрын
I like your military history talks.
@spool6167 ай бұрын
They invested heavily in in the generals pockets and instead of ERP got ERR - non-Explosive non-Reactive Rubber
@V1P3RZ3R0 Жыл бұрын
Hey spook its in game now
@V1P3RZ3R0 Жыл бұрын
I am scared to play WT now
@Kumyar Жыл бұрын
Its not that good actually
@hipstrf0x937 Жыл бұрын
Welp, looks like it’s finally here :)
@mrdestructoo Жыл бұрын
It’s coming to the game today spooks-ton
@comradeboris23352 жыл бұрын
hearing vought mentioned as a weapons manufacturer is incredibly wierd after just finishing the boys lmao