Who is ready for next weeks review with AVGN!!! Support this weeks charity - www.youcaring.com/tubbsfirevictimssantarosacommunity-976726 Check out James' video on the original Mummy - cinemassacre.com/2007/10/06/the-mummy/ Grab a signed IT (2017) Nostalgia Critic title card here - theawesomestore.com/index.php?dispatch=products.view&product_id=30000
@jlrh16127 жыл бұрын
Channel Awesome You guys are awesome!!
@kimaniwilsonhunte7 жыл бұрын
Channel Awesome Spoopified! 👍🏽👻🎃💀
@jahlondurosseau13377 жыл бұрын
Channel Awesome I think the black and white version one is cool
@LegoMelonz157 жыл бұрын
Channel Awesome AM I RIGHT BOIS
@LegoMelonz157 жыл бұрын
Channel Awesome I didn’t even watch this version and the 2017 one is worse
@DarknessPrevails7 жыл бұрын
I've gotta disagree - ONLY Brendan Frasier could and should have played that role.
@sleepbaby177 жыл бұрын
I agree
@graciegj637 жыл бұрын
Darkness Prevails Isn't Brendan Fraser banned from being in movies? 🤔
@jd27927 жыл бұрын
Gracie J nohe is not
@murciadoxial80567 жыл бұрын
hoestly... kurt russell and bruce campbell are legit great choices for that role
@ShadowDiamond24927 жыл бұрын
Bruce campbell? Yes I agree.
@hellonurd89576 жыл бұрын
I don't care what anyone says, nobody but Brendon Frasier could've pulled off this role. Not even Bruce Cambell/Kurt Russell.
@vickybracken84445 жыл бұрын
I totally agree. I havent even seen the the new one. I didnt like the last movie because Rachael wasnt in it. But I still watched it because Brendon was in it
@austinfahrenbrook1235 жыл бұрын
yeah no one dose
@zeroa695 жыл бұрын
ash's persona is basically what they modeled fraiser character im sure bruce would have done just as the role justice.
@DemonicRemption5 жыл бұрын
@Hello!Nurd Yeah you're right... Bruce Campbell was too awesome for it, and I'm not sure about Kurt Russelll, but Brandon Fraser? Yeah, his teetering between hokey and serious acting was perfect...
@boromir00624 жыл бұрын
Campbell would be awesome but to goofy for it
@rj_ay81727 жыл бұрын
I don't get the thing with Brendan Fraser. Personally, I just don't see this movie working with anybody else
@pixelman61937 жыл бұрын
Zadok the Priest me too IDK it just works with Brendan Fraser Tom Cruise was just too serious
@thefox19017 жыл бұрын
Maybe it is because I grew up with it, but I cannot imagine this film without Brendan Frasier. He has this perfect mixture of the handsome, charming rogue and acting goofy to lighten the mood.
@ShumaiAxeman7 жыл бұрын
Have John Carpenter Direct and Get Kurt Russell in it. Do a kind of Big Trouble in Little China thing with it. Would've been pretty cool I think :p
@zeroa695 жыл бұрын
bruce canbell would have been a natural fit as well
@shawncleary34504 жыл бұрын
I love brendan in this movie but I think the issue with him isn't that he sticks out in this movie but he doesn't seem like he's trying as hard. His delivery is funny but this doesn't seem like he's giving his all.
@elijahjarman28375 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: during the hanging scene, Fraiser actually did do the stunt, something went wrong, and he was nearly killed and revived because the failure
@kryptism4 жыл бұрын
Same in Back To Future 3 with Mike J Fox. Also a Universal film!
@elijahjarman28374 жыл бұрын
@@kryptism I honestly forgot about that! Michael J Fox needed extra pay for that
@SunaNoWafer4 жыл бұрын
@@kryptism so they should avoid that kind of scenes for their movies. It seems like they was cursed or something.
@Blokewood34 жыл бұрын
Hangings seem to be very dangerous to fake.
@elijahjarman28374 жыл бұрын
@@Blokewood3 indeed
@Lassenissen6 жыл бұрын
The Mummy 1: A great adventure film The Mummy 2: A good adventure film The rest: wew lad...
@masterpenguin84726 жыл бұрын
Yeah, Dragon Emperor and Mummy 17 were just awful.
@andreamiller35786 жыл бұрын
I guess I'm a heathen. I actually liked the third a bit better than the second one. Jonathan's funny lines felt more forced to me in the second one and the reincarnation thing with the O'Connells just came out of nowhere. I missed Rachel Weisz but still didn't hate the third one.
@Jmgjgdjd56 жыл бұрын
what about Scorpion King?
@SaurianStudios12076 жыл бұрын
None of them beat the 1932 mummy
@julianjuj94316 жыл бұрын
Andrea Miller I’m not saying that you can’t have an opinion, but I feel like Jonathan’s lines were twice as forced in the third one. But how can I say that when number three has such comedy gems and treasures like, “my ass is on fire”
@FlameOfUdun967 жыл бұрын
Current Brendan Fraser just breaks my heart. Can someone just give that poor man a hug?
@MVRGlol7 жыл бұрын
*cuphead is the new dark souls of bloodborne*
@LegoMelonz157 жыл бұрын
Flame of Udun NO! Herb, you ding dong...
@wilderfox27 жыл бұрын
Lol why do you say that? Whats wrong with him?
@dcung88337 жыл бұрын
Nathaniel Strangman breaks my heart can we just give him a cyberhug?
@MantraMan20777 жыл бұрын
Has he reached the 'Crazy' stage of the disease known as 'Celebrity' yet?
@gageperuti55197 жыл бұрын
I love this movie. I loved it as a kid, and I still love it as an adult. I don't consider it a guilty pleasure. I consider it a legitimately good movie. The sequel, on the other hand, I do consider a guilty pleasure. The third one sucks. Hard.
@ReveiwKing9996 жыл бұрын
Which third one? The Scorpion King or Tomb of the Dragon Emperor?
@elishawilson14296 жыл бұрын
ReveiwKing999 the scorpion king isn't a prequel nor a sequel it's it's own film
@anonymousanonymously54396 жыл бұрын
Gage Peruti There's a third film?
@gageperuti55196 жыл бұрын
ReveiwKing999 Dragon Emperor. I don't remember Scorpion King that well, but I remember liking it.
@marcellosandoval29746 жыл бұрын
Really I like the third one
@josepholvera74395 жыл бұрын
So much hatred about the CGI yet for the time it was pretty damn good, and this film is a fun film overall, I still love watching it whenever it’s on
@x-raystudios68265 жыл бұрын
Seriously? 80s have much better effects
@mariobadia45535 жыл бұрын
for the time but now it's hot fucking garbage
@mariobadia45535 жыл бұрын
@TheUmbrellaCorpX7[エヴ] this shity ass CGI does not hold up in any way.
@zacharyheller13135 жыл бұрын
This is one of the few movies I can see myself never tiring of!
@simla54 жыл бұрын
Of course it doesn't hold up today, it's 20 damn years old ffs, but it doesn't look half bad for its time... His ranting about the effects is way overdone...
@Chandasouk7 жыл бұрын
Brendan Fraser is a national treasure
@leguan2787 жыл бұрын
Chandasouk no, Thats nicolas cage...
@Miketendo937 жыл бұрын
His 90s bod was a national treasure 😒
@gamewiz7207 жыл бұрын
Chandasouk He is Hollywood's walking punchline
@kylegathright7 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry, but you've seem to misspell "Chris Pratt".
@Whinterfell7 жыл бұрын
Lets Pretend, Oh thank you so much for that. I was hoping someone had said that.
@kirbymarchbarcena7 жыл бұрын
Brushing aside the cgi,this one's got a better storyline than the new 2017 movie remake that no one asked for.
@bonkai686 жыл бұрын
kirby march Barcena except studio executives.
@smartboy2016 жыл бұрын
WELL they were hoping to do a Monster Cinematic Universe, they just... tried starting with something they should've left alone. ... Wouldn't have minded a Wolfman or Frankenstein movie, myself.
@D0ug19976 жыл бұрын
There was no storyline to the 2017 movie. It was just hyping up the other movies that will never happen.
@DraculaTepes4206 жыл бұрын
kirby march Barcena I agree, the tone for 2017s the Mummy is all over the damn place, the 1999 version is better no doubt but I treat the 2017 version as a different entity tbh, and as such I LIKE it's modernized take on the tale even if the Brendan fraiser one is the superior film.
@dylankaiser55466 жыл бұрын
he's probably going hard on this one because the 1932 version starring the legendary Boris Karloff was better. but that doesn't mean this was bad in any respect it was a fun indiana jones style action adventure film with some horror elements.
@Redstar26136 жыл бұрын
"Of course, having half your crew killed and your life threatened doesn't mean you can't get smashed the exact same night" That's what I'd wanna do. Why would I want to be sober after something like that?
@hackman6696 жыл бұрын
Having a fire are close by also comes in handy.
@change0235 жыл бұрын
Rachel Weisz is adorable in the first film and stunningly beautiful in the 2nd.
@ph897875 жыл бұрын
Richard_22_ And non-existent in the third film.
@rockywilliams84332 жыл бұрын
the mummy 3 was horrific without her..i said what i said
@BarryHart-xo1oy Жыл бұрын
Very true.
@frankforttheorangee2produc110 Жыл бұрын
She was also useless in the second film.
@Tank50us7 ай бұрын
@@frankforttheorangee2produc110 I dunno... Her and her Brother make those Enfield's work in the pigmy scene
@andreww.20186 жыл бұрын
My theory is that Brendan Fraiser fooled around with Nostalgia Critics girlfriend at some point...
@ellnats5 жыл бұрын
critic has a girlfriend??
@ellnats5 жыл бұрын
@@achikahola that makes sense
@gigoman-hu5hm5 жыл бұрын
if the angry video game nerd can have a wife and child then it's possible the nostalgia critic has a girlfriend.
@LegendPurpleDragon1525 жыл бұрын
Andrew Viewtieful Tachibana Critic is married
@randomguy25185 жыл бұрын
She probably just forgot te wipe her browser history....."Brendan fraser,loincloth" "Brendan fraser abs", "Brendan fraser pumping hips GIF" ....that kinda thing
@KlairedelysArt7 жыл бұрын
The brother is one of my favourite characters, he cracks me up! I've watched this film easily hundreds of times, and I still enjoy it.
@black-lungmorgan83437 жыл бұрын
KlairedelysArt Omg! You watch Nostalgia Critic.
@kapilsharmaWorld_uncensored7 жыл бұрын
Remeber the scene from returns when he got the Bus after breaking the key. lol Epic.
@SuperBarny1237 жыл бұрын
Watched it "hundreds of times" but still dont know that his name is Jonathan. Seems legit....
@QoMSoL7 жыл бұрын
"Hundreds of times"? Too much spare time much?
@Dalle897 жыл бұрын
He plays batiatus the only reason I watched Spartacus in the first place. He is a really good actor imo
@MegaSoulHero7 жыл бұрын
I personally don’t think the CGI is THAT bad. It’s not great, but it’s not horrible either.
@benwasserman82237 жыл бұрын
Maybe, but the Scorpion King in The Mummy Returns... dear god that stuff was worse than Catwoman
@MegaSoulHero7 жыл бұрын
Ben Wasserman I agree
@Tadicuslegion787 жыл бұрын
No...and surprisingly it holds up relatively well, not all the time but just enough so it's not totally dated like some other CGI
@admech5907 жыл бұрын
Oh no, that reward goes to the mummy returns.
@Tadicuslegion787 жыл бұрын
Yeah the Scorpion king is hot garbage, which sucks because the design is fine, though perhaps it should have been more monster and less Rock, it was the execution that was awful
@xraystudios36934 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: The actor who played Mr. Henderson auditioned for the role of Rick but failed, although the director liked his acting so he created the role of Mr. Henderson for him.
@DepressyDuck2 жыл бұрын
Like Vaas is Far Cry 3.
@NightmareTroubador6 жыл бұрын
What I like loved about this and the Mummy Returns is both movies actually used the real Ancient Egyptian language. Granted as it is a dead language the pronunciation may not be correct but the fact they researched and had the actors using it is impressive. No they're not perfect but I enjoyed them and the music is amazing.
@patrickbuckley72597 жыл бұрын
Lets be clear the Boris Karloff Mummy was the original Horror The Mummy, while the Brandon Frasier Version was the original action adventure The Mummy. The only thing unoriginal about the Brandon Frasier film was its name. They are completely different films in completely different genre's, and the Tom Cruise the Mummy failed spectacularly as remake or reimagining of both.
@adrian723007 жыл бұрын
well said
@bfish89ryuhayabusa7 жыл бұрын
I mean, they both have the same plot, other than the reincarnated princess thing, which the sequel used.
@j.g.25436 жыл бұрын
Nope, This is the Second remake, With the Karloff Version, the Hand of the mummy series, then Frazier version
@ihatefacebook311846 жыл бұрын
Patrick Buckley i heard the 2017 version was complete ass
@danidellamendes87726 жыл бұрын
Patrick Buckley well nostalgia crtit(?) isnt wrong tho the boris one IS the orignal film the 1999 one is just a remake even if it changed everything expt the plot and name its still a remake
@ohyeayea687 жыл бұрын
LOOKS TO ME LIKE YOU'RE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE RIVERRR!
@hansbendixen54306 жыл бұрын
looks like we have all the horses... wait this is in reverse.
@-Thunder-Warrior-6 жыл бұрын
... Bye Benny.
@bandicootsauce45694 жыл бұрын
"If you did your job well, we wouldn't have a movie." Oh, man, the list of movies that line applies to is endless.
@badasscomedy51264 ай бұрын
The Mummy, Indiana Jones: The Last Crusade, Freddy vs Jason, Resident Evil, X-Men 2, Percy Jackson, Jupiter Ascending, The Matrix, Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man (pick one), Transfomers sequel you forgot you saw. Just to name a few.
@mrzoohasaninn7 жыл бұрын
What is Doug's beef with Brendan Fraser? He was super charming in this movie. He was purposely supposed to be the lovable rogue, and, in my opinion, he delivered. I still find the main characters in general pretty great. I love Jonathan. I love Evelyn. I love Rick. I love Ardeth. I even love Beni. The movie in general is still really enjoyable and entertaining. I've never watched this looking for a serious film. I first saw this when I was 10 and it's still a ridiculously amazing, campy, nostalgic ride. People have already complained about Doug's constant criticism of the bad graphics, which arguably is annoying. However, Doug also seems to forget what the graphics of that time were and acts like they were already great. Yeah, this was the year the Matrix came out, but it was also the year the Phantom Menace came out. Also, The Haunting came out that same exact year (which yes, did get referenced in the movie, but not really in the context that they were this close together) as well as like, Idle Hands. The graphics and the design of 1999 was kind of all over the place. Even The Matrix, arguably the best one in that list, has stuff in it that doesn't really hold up to the test of time (for example, the random ending where Neo decides to Superman out of there), but people still love it. Like, we get it, you adore the originals, and that's fine, but this review ends up feeling like you just were forced to do this remake and therefore didn't really give it much of a chance at all. This movie was never trying to be the original or even the original remake. It never made that claim. And Doug acted like he understood that, but then still insisted on comparing them. It just felt really mean spirited and bitter.
@Anonymous-js5zn7 жыл бұрын
From what I've gathered, he feels like he never really goes all the way with a character. He feels like he only delivers what's needed and never really makes them his own. Besides, he has more problems with Matthew Broderick. Even in The Lion King, which he actually finds very overrated (watch his Disneycember review of it), he doesn't like him, finding him piss poor bland.
@wahmaster27886 жыл бұрын
Gi don't think Brendan Fraser has ever been charmnf
@Mislav246 жыл бұрын
+TheWahMaster Keep your stupid comments in your pocket.
@Seth6556 жыл бұрын
NishaWinchester And scumbags like you don’t respect people’s opinions
@AikanaroSauron6 жыл бұрын
I agree that the strawman direction Doug has taken with this review acting as if anyone has ever viewed the film as an attempt to do a proper serious remake is disappointing to say the least. It's a perfectly self-aware adventure comedy, and it does an astonishing job at keeping the viewer entertained.
@hansbendixen54306 жыл бұрын
Fun fact this franchise made dwayne the rock johnsons career as an actor.
@LewysC5 жыл бұрын
xD
@jamesgatz44904 жыл бұрын
@Guy Incognito ok boomer
@ExistencialistaAntiHumanista4 жыл бұрын
@Guy Incognito you have not power here
@ryanmiller30054 ай бұрын
And Black Adam may have killed it
@weighttrainingguide6 жыл бұрын
Sorry, Critic, love ya but you got it wrong on this one. This is a very good movie. It's fun and funny, and there's nothing wrong with the CGI. Fraser and Weiss are great, as is the guy who plays the brother and the funny guy who serves Imhotep. I also love the music.
@LeonStephan6 жыл бұрын
Doug hates everything in an attempt to seem smart.
@runefaustblack5 жыл бұрын
@@LeonStephan The Nostalgia Critic is a critic, his job is more or less hating things. (And being serious, the guy can have his opinion and you can have yours.)
@ragemonkey1175 жыл бұрын
@@runefaustblack not only that, the Critic is a character.
@1100001166995 жыл бұрын
Weight Training Guide no just no
@leob44035 жыл бұрын
@Sinjin Smyth the movie was shit in 1999 and it's shit now
@jadedjaws49525 жыл бұрын
"SHUT UP AND WATCH SOMETHING BLACK AND WHITE!!" "NNNNNNEVERRRRRR!!!" I laughed so hard because it's like trying to get my partner to watch my favorite Vincent Price with me. It's so sad what good films he and others are missing because they can't handle no color.
@dancingcarapace4 жыл бұрын
Hey, if you want them to see Vincent Price, he's in Edward Scissorhands
@me1collector7544 жыл бұрын
that made me crack up too
@3katfox4 жыл бұрын
Ooo! Which Vincent Price is your favorite? House of Wax and House on Haunted Hill are my favorites of his horror movies But I also love him in Laura
@dancingcarapace4 жыл бұрын
@@3katfox I personally love House on Haunted Hill. It holds a special place in my heart since it's the first Vincent Price horror my mom showed me
@randomguy25184 жыл бұрын
It's not the lack of color... Honestly most of the actors/actresses back then are a bit too....Shatner-ish in they're line delivery and hammy acting.. then there's the ones that started the grand tradition of non acting...like Bogart I honestly can't tell his movies apart...he's ALWAYS just Humphrey Bogart,no character exists, just like Sean Connery's thankfully retired ass.
@angeloflove375 жыл бұрын
This movie jumpstarted my interest in Ancient Egypt, for that it will always be my favorite. was surprised to find that the real Imhotep was a really cool guy though.
@mitsvanmitsvanio61064 жыл бұрын
Having the same name doesn't mean they are the same person, Imhotep lived in the 27th century BC and the mummy Imhotep lived during Seti I time in 1290-1279 BC. Imhotep is just a name like Nick or Steve or Ptahhotep or Amenhotep or Sobekhotep. By the way Imhotep means "The one who comes in peace" and in particular hotep means among others means peace.
@jinhunterslay16383 жыл бұрын
I believe it's the same for a LOT of us 90s kids. The same way that video games of the 80s made everyone want to be a ninja, this movie made a lot of us want to visit Egypt
@dbzgal043 жыл бұрын
The real Imhotep was even deified after his death, which was extremely rare for a non-royal.
@Jarod-vg9wq2 жыл бұрын
I agree Imhotep was a interesting dude back then.
@sammylane217 жыл бұрын
When Benny started preying in every single religion and he used that funny voice,I just laughed my ass off.
@eliaslopez86917 жыл бұрын
Sammy Lane I still love that part
@joeywalker20617 жыл бұрын
Sammy Lane its actually really clever showing what a bullshiter he is.
@ReluctantWarrior7 жыл бұрын
Sammy Lane I think the joke is that he never tried preying in Kemeticism (Egyptian Paganism), which likely would have worked at least somewhat.
@Xeacons7 жыл бұрын
Benny's obviously one of these New Age nuts wit decals to a dozen different religions and a "Coexist" bumper sticker!
@Blueflag047 жыл бұрын
i keep replaying that part
@s.r.86326 жыл бұрын
This movie is pop corn fest of fun. It's a good kind a cheese.
@butterflyeffect58425 жыл бұрын
Brendan is amazing for this role. He gives it his own additions. He is great and i love these movies and i love him
@CK-mb2hx6 жыл бұрын
Doug, if you like the 1932 version better, that's fine. but saying the 1999 version is bad cuz it's action adventure and not horror is just wrong and very narrow minded.
@VampireFan-rf5kb5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, at least in the 1999 version, it was good ol' action horror entertainment fun, unlike the reboot with Tom Cruise, despite Russell Crowe being the only saving grace of the reboot.
@theonlyweasle19995 жыл бұрын
Also saying the 1999 one is the original is quite equally narrow minded
@VampireFan-rf5kb5 жыл бұрын
@@theonlyweasle1999 What do you mean by "equally narrow minded"? Is it a good thing or a bad thing?
@VampireFan-rf5kb5 жыл бұрын
@Mad Maxwell Oh, I see it now. Thanks. :)
@juggalox10005 жыл бұрын
@Mad Maxwell Opinion masquerading as fact
@colinmartin97976 жыл бұрын
Rachel Weisz was my first major crush.
@issacflores20105 жыл бұрын
Colin Martin same here. Shame she wasn’t in the third one but judging how bad it was, she made the right decision.
@LewysC5 жыл бұрын
Ayep
@JamieKingZang4 жыл бұрын
The Eagle which movie?
@larsstraner26634 жыл бұрын
Same here
@cannibalbunnygirl4 жыл бұрын
Arnold Vosloo was mine
@sassysally29956 жыл бұрын
Brendan Fraser was perfection in this movie 💦the chemistry with Weisz was incredible and basically it's going to be a classic in 20 years so whatever 🤗
@leob44035 жыл бұрын
The pacing and plot isn't nearly as good as Indiana Jones. It felt like a poor Indiana Jones substitute to be honest.
@NCMonefaith5 жыл бұрын
Hasn't it been 20 years now?
@asifmetal6665 жыл бұрын
Bruce Canpbell is another actor who i think was perfect for a film like this. Brendan Fraser is awesome though.
@TequilaToothpick5 жыл бұрын
@Sinjin Smyth Indian Jones? Lol
@RedneckSith5 жыл бұрын
Agreed. The lack of that chemistry is what brought down the third movie, IMO. Not that it was BAD per se, just... missing something.
@MrWisdom74 жыл бұрын
I hate when critics crap on old movies for having poor special effects. For god's sake, they did a good job with the technology they had at the time. It's like crapping on the 1981 Clash Of The Titans for using stop motion animation.
@Ineedgames4 жыл бұрын
Even a technical Marvel like Jurassic Park has it's bugs.
@elijahjarman28374 жыл бұрын
Or wizard of Oz for using Very Obvious painted stages
@adamdavis17374 жыл бұрын
Yeah but Jurassic Park was made 6 years before this film and looks way better The CGI does not ruin the fun of this film upon re-watching but it definitely looks horrible
@JordanWeberMusic4 жыл бұрын
Regardless of whether it looks bad now, it was a stepping stone for creating more realistic effects now as mows visual effects will be for the future.
@nitram-oi2mq4 жыл бұрын
The story and adventurous comedy is golden, the cgi is gorgeous, why does every critic want perfect realistic effects but ignore that the movie is the most fun movie made in the last couple years.
@sharosudo7 жыл бұрын
dude these effects were so ahead of its time in 1999, they made their own cgi sand program. i think the effects still look pretty awesome
@UltimateEnd07 жыл бұрын
I don't understand, he should know this. He is like 35 right?
@elizabethtrudgill99007 жыл бұрын
He does say that the CGI is pretty.
@VolrinSeth6 жыл бұрын
In a sarcastic they're-bad-but-pretty sense.
@James-rm4dp7 жыл бұрын
I think this is the first time I have really disagreed with Doug. Is it an Oscar winner? No, but what it is, is a really fun 90s film that I think really holds up in terms of effects and acting. If you wanted to review a bad movie he should have reviewed the sequels!
@Anonymous-js5zn7 жыл бұрын
I've seen worse. There's one KZbin critic called Animat (he reviewed Where The Dead Go To Die) who bashed Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs, a movie I really loved as a kid and still do, though not as much, but he acted like it was worse than Jack and Jill. My thought was, "Jesus man! What's your problem?!"
@manusorourke35756 жыл бұрын
Lmao this film is fantastic. He just dislikes the effects.
@hackman6696 жыл бұрын
To be fair the Mummy Returns was watchable and is still better than the cringy 2017 remake. The other sequels are still better than Twilight!!!
@anshumandeshmukh7806 жыл бұрын
Yes this film's cgi was actually brilliant. The Mummy was first fully cgi character with full human anatomical details.
@teacherfromthejungles66716 жыл бұрын
@@hackman669 if you compare every shitty movie with Twilight, they all become not so shitty
@fupaking77175 жыл бұрын
The mummy: Good movie The mummy returns: interesting for what it was Third mummy: No 2017 mummy: Not even gonna say anything.
@DemonsRun873 жыл бұрын
Then why did you say something
@aye19723 жыл бұрын
2nd Mummy with Dwayne Johnson 3rd Mummy with Chinese
@apollorock3r2443 жыл бұрын
Would still watch Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (a guilty pleasure of mine) rather than the 2017 reboot.
@Wade_Fucking_Wilson3 жыл бұрын
@@apollorock3r244 same
@Dr.YehudaBenNachmanFriedburg2 жыл бұрын
The mummy and mummy returns were both amazing movies. The trequel and the 2017 reboot HELL TO THE NO TO THE NO NO NO
@DebatingWombat5 жыл бұрын
Actually, messing with ancient corpses in Egypt at the time the movie was set in (roughly 1920s) would not be that weird. Okay, perhaps those in the museum would be a different matter, but in general, before the Egyptian tourist industry began, most Egyptians wouldn’t have cared for ancient, heathen corpses. Mummies were even ground up to be used in medicine and paint (which was also exported to the West, btw).
@antonfredricson92054 жыл бұрын
Great comment but please do not Call Them heathen corpses
@DebatingWombat4 жыл бұрын
@@antonfredricson9205 I’m using the term heathen to reflect what I consider the likely attitude of the people at the time and thus why mummies would probably not have been seen as particularly valuable in and of themselves, not as an indication of my own value judgment.
@antonfredricson92054 жыл бұрын
@@DebatingWombat Ah ok
@johnbones34552 жыл бұрын
Before that people used grounded mummy flesh as a cure-all. I die a little inside whenever I think of that.
@BarryHart-xo1oy Жыл бұрын
Thank you for pointing that out.
@KH12foreve7 жыл бұрын
So the main criticism is that the CGI is old. So what? The movie is from the 90's and not made by Steven Spielberg. It used what it had at the time. And besides, you keep beating the CG from this movie into the ground while there are plenty of movies that came out that same year or later with visuals that looked much worse. We can watch sophisticated shit sometimes, but other times we want to enjoy a nice popcorn flick. It's far from perfect, but damn if it isn't fun.
@dislike_button336 жыл бұрын
Spaghetti-Spider I love that you act like Spielberg doesn't count, because he does.
@MrDanAng16 жыл бұрын
An old film have old CGI effects. Who could have ever guess? A movie that have effects from the time the movie was made! 🤔
@dylankaiser55466 жыл бұрын
seriously the phantom menace came out the same year and in comparison The Mummy's effects look like the tiger in Life of Pi
@jongon08486 жыл бұрын
The cgi from this one doesn't even look that bad, sure I've seen better in other films but here it looks decent. The Mummy Returns on the other hand...
@witekm21527 жыл бұрын
I think that the 1999 "Mummy" was a really good adventure movie. Of course it is not a masterpiece but it's climatic, well acted and the soundtrack was pretty awesome too. I was impressed as a 8 years old boy when it came out. It has not aged that bad, seriously. I like some of NC reviews but I don't find this one particularly funny. Too much forced humor. He's not convincing at all.
@anthonydelorme27977 жыл бұрын
I can't be the only one who thinks Rachel Weisz was so goddamn beautiful in this movie. Growing up with this movie she was one of my biggest crushes. Still is but her smarts and attractiveness in this movie...
@ghost_anna_reads7874 жыл бұрын
To be honest, the mummy was some of the first CGI I ever saw and it convinced me for years he was real.
@CmdrShepard952 жыл бұрын
The fact that I had nightmares as a kid about the mummy because of these movies should show you how well they convinced me, at least as a kid
@EnclosedPoolArea2 жыл бұрын
Man, you must have been one dumb child.
@joshbutcher94627 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite guilty pleasure movies! I have to respectfully disagree with you opinion on Fraser in this movie though, half of the reason I think I enjoy this schlockfest so much is because of Brendan's very corny delivery. HEY O'CONNELL HEY O'CONNNNEEEELLLLLLL LOOKS TO ME LIKE WE GOT ALL THE HORSES!!! HEY BENNY! LOOKS TO ME LIKE YOU'RE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE RIIIVERRRRRR!!!
@johntumahab3237 жыл бұрын
I won't even call it a "guilty pleasure". I like it. It's a fun movie.
@markchang29647 жыл бұрын
Not sure if this criticism is forced or intentional. It was a cool action movie, and as for the effects, there were much worse things in the 1990s.
@grimwolf59486 жыл бұрын
Yea like mortal kombat even though I love that movie
@luckyDancer1006 жыл бұрын
Yeah actually the CG still looks pretty good considering it was like 1999. I think the criticism is pretty nitpicky considering a) the sequel's CG is wayy worse, and b) the reboots CG isn't any better.
@lavenderrosecosplay56397 жыл бұрын
I actually think it would be really interesting if Nostalgia Critic actually did review some older black and white films.
@nicoleheart167 жыл бұрын
I think that you would enjoy his review of Reefer Madness
@filmfangirls91637 жыл бұрын
Kindred Scribbler Id love that too!!
@Emberilliance7 жыл бұрын
Well, he WAS planning to do a review of "Niagara" when he went to a convention in Niagara Falls, but then the audience demanded he review the Third Animated Titanic Movie instead.
@ElNingyou7 жыл бұрын
I wanna see him cover more pre-90’s stuff in general. I’d love to see NC do movies like Earthquake and When Time Ran Out.
@carlotta4th7 жыл бұрын
That would be fun to do for a month like he does with Disneycember and such. ...Maybe "black history month"? XD
@maggieplummer29504 жыл бұрын
Not gonna lie this movie will always hold a special place in my heart. Brendan Fraser was my first big celebrity crush and this film is a big part of the reason why.
@DrDolan2000 Жыл бұрын
Great choice for a first celebrity crush. Underrated leading man!
@cyhewit127 жыл бұрын
Hey O'Connell looks like we've got all the horses!! Hey Bennie, looks like you're on the wrong side of the river!
@Cationna7 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain this joke to me...? So what about the river?? Can't they just... idk... cross it right then and there if they've just crawled out of it alive?? Never could get this :(
@jimberjamber85407 жыл бұрын
No doubt my favorite part. RIP Brendan Frasers acting career.
@Dargonhuman7 жыл бұрын
Cationna They crawled out of the shallow sides of the river. Most rivers, especially old, wide ones like the Nile, generally have a pretty significant dropoff a few feet from the banks and the beds can go down quite far. Without knowing exactly which part of the Nile that is, we can safely assume it's one of the deeper parts.
@kucrescent72927 жыл бұрын
Cationna Part of the problem is that it's quite likely that the river they're supposed to have been in would be the Nile. Not only is that river wide but is also home to dangerous animals like hippos and crocodiles. Both are known man killers.
@BenEd27 жыл бұрын
Cationna because horses tend to be terrified of water (an instinct thing probably, since their ancestors had to be wary of crocs). It can be hard to lead a horse through an ankle deep stream, let alone the River Nile which has actual crocs in.
@EGeorgev7 жыл бұрын
Nostalgia Critic goes full CinemaSins on this one.
@1100001166995 жыл бұрын
Emil Georgiev not really
@kevrayne5 жыл бұрын
I agree. forced shitty humor and nitpicking.
@gandalfthegrey25925 жыл бұрын
@@kevrayne what a sh*tty critic. I am not going to call it a masterpiece, but this guy can't bring up any constructive criticism
@jetsetatrophy677 жыл бұрын
Kinda of sad to see the opening scene CGI be bashed as a complete cartoon when in fact it was a mix of practical models and CG.
@babyyoshi30997 жыл бұрын
+Psycho Magalor Except there was no practical effects in Jurassic World. The only practical effect was the brachiosaurus. Which they only put in so they could say they used practical effects.
@miserymourningstar46805 жыл бұрын
The reason the curse on Imhotep will make him the most powerful creature of the world is because the curse makes him never die completely and he is meant to be tortured for eternity
@ArkhanTheMack4 жыл бұрын
Pretty late reply, but I'm not entirely sure that's true. Another part of the curse makes it so that he keeps summoning the different plagues from the story of Moses, such as when it starts raining fire on the city they're in, and he's shown to have other weird ass magic powers, such as creating massive sandstorm and moving things with magic powers.
@randomguy25184 жыл бұрын
@@ArkhanTheMack yeah.... WE CURSE YOU WITH ETERNAL LIFE AND THE ABILITY TO BE A WALKING W.M.D., don't really seem like all that bad of a deal in the long run
@MastarNinja3 жыл бұрын
@@ArkhanTheMack Could just by side effect of the main curse which was meant to torture him for eternity. Probably didn't have a long list of curses that would let you live forever. I imagined it went something like this: Guy #1 : "You sure you want this curse boss? If he ever get out he's gonna be nearly unstoppable" Guy #2 : "What other choice do we have? That's the only curse that will make sure he never die from being eaten very slowly by the bugs maaan" Guy #1 : "So about the very slowly eaten part...."
@Exl62433 жыл бұрын
@@randomguy2518 I mean, I think the curses are supposed to prevent human interaction. I mean, would YOU want to be with a guy who can curse you with boils and plagues? The mummy will be forever hated by humanity because all he does is bring about death and destruction. Of course though, once he gets his hand on his jars and restores himself and his lover, that's a different story...
@anormalguy93207 жыл бұрын
This reboot is not a masterpiece. But compared to the Tom Cruise one, it is.
@joserobertosolismerlin55277 жыл бұрын
At least had heart
@Jeffrey3141597 жыл бұрын
This The Mummy from 1999 was based on the 1940's remake and its sequels, which ripped material from the 1932 original
@lesterramos64687 жыл бұрын
The movie was good fun. Which is what I was aiming for at least. The current one, I felt the arrogance of it so much that it left a very sour taste
@cheezdoodle967 жыл бұрын
+Jeffrey314159 I get where you're coming from, but I wouldn't really call _The Mummy's Hand_ a remake of the 1932 film (even with the shameless reuse of the flashbacks, which actually felt strangely uncomfortable to watch. It felt like it was just shitting all over Karloff's legacy, which I'm positive wasn't Universal's intention, but watching those few scenes with Tom Taylor awkwardly trying to pose as Boris Karloff still felt weird to watch), but rather just _another_ Mummy film, 'cause they're so different (I mean, they're great films, don't get me wrong), with more comedy and everyone walking around with revolvers and rifles, which are, as you say, a lot more reminiscent of the Brendan Fraser films.
@KTF07 жыл бұрын
I keep forgetting this was a remake of the original. Totally different vibe and it's trying to be its own movie. I mean it doesn't hold a candle to the original, but doesn't seem like it's trying to.
@Greywarden51297 жыл бұрын
That "...Man" and "Ya know" joke fell flatter than a pancake without baking powder
@franky_saint7 жыл бұрын
Greywarden5129 Agreed. Like, wtf Doug? You couldn't find something better to mock other than Fraser even existing or a man with a particular accent??
@jongon08486 жыл бұрын
Agreed it's one of Doug's worst and laziest jokes
@purplerobin926 жыл бұрын
well.no. Actually in the 18th people had no respect for mummies. They left them in open tombs where anyone could tamper with them. So...no, actually he would not be put in prison for joking with a mummy... back then they had much less respect for artifact, unless they were jewels. unless they were creepy private mummy collectors.
@1Thunderfire6 жыл бұрын
Not to mention that mummies were once used for a variety of things such as paint ingredients, firewood, medicine, etc. It was pretty much an industry.
@victoriagarcia30785 жыл бұрын
I just recently saw this movie for the first time, and I really enjoyed it, yes it's kinda silly, and yes some it's effects haven't aged well, but it's still really enjoyable.
@GojiSwag997 жыл бұрын
For someone who complains about outdated cgi and bad comic relief, he sure loves using outdated memes and forced humor
@ACHU-DETE7 жыл бұрын
*Insists THOSE DARN KIDS!!!* - uses Rick and Morty cancer to try to win kids back - Shit was pathetic.
@quantran90287 жыл бұрын
ikr , what's up with the cartoon clip , the're not funny at all.
@s.g.75727 жыл бұрын
I smell Fraser fans
@shady80457 жыл бұрын
when is the rick and morty cancer
@RavenousMedicine7 жыл бұрын
oh! someone hit a nerve, lol!
@owlstagawn11067 жыл бұрын
At least we can all agree that the "original" 1999 film is better than the 2017 remake.
@Godzilla-tu2cd7 жыл бұрын
owlstag awn yes we can good sir
@allanavalos43797 жыл бұрын
owlstag awn agreed
@dom._dom7 жыл бұрын
The original 1930 movie is a masterpiece and the 1999 was supposed to be a remake but took much more influence from the 1930-1940 mummy sequels witch were very much like slasher films so 1999 movie is basically a remake of the campy mummy sequels but the 2017 movie is just ass
@xavierclifford65347 жыл бұрын
The 2017 tom cruise one has a different plot in places
@HelgaCavoli7 жыл бұрын
Easily.
6 жыл бұрын
Man, I'm sorry, but this movie is fantastic.
@leob44035 жыл бұрын
Nope
@benm59704 жыл бұрын
Leo B He’s probably just another 2000’s kid
@benm59704 жыл бұрын
Jimb0 I know there is and I fully accept that, I’m just saying that most people who like this movie and are mad at Doug for criticizing it seem to just be 2000’s kids who say it’s good solely because they grew up with it
@akufromthefuture71595 жыл бұрын
I would've GLADLY watched a Bruce Campbell mummy film. Benny's actor was also in van helsing. He played Igor in it. Not that my opinion matters.. But i love Brenden Fraser. His 90s/early millennium films are all imo decent
@The_RedVIII7 жыл бұрын
Criticising the effects of this movie seems like a far stretch to find some more flaws. The effects are actually pretty good for 1999, and hold up well enough. Besides, this movie is still a fun, entertaining action adventure.
@TheDorianTube7 жыл бұрын
Uhm?! Here's a quick list of movies that came out around the same period (2 years after and 2 years before) with greater CGI quality that raised the bar to a certain standard (Not necessarily good movies): Titanic (1997) The Fifth Element (1997) The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) Starship Troopers (1997) Star Wars the Phantom Menace (1999) The Matrix (1999) Harry Potter and the Sorcerer Stone (2001) Jurassic Park III (2001) Shaolin Soccer (2001) (Yeah, I said it, lol) The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)
@Hollyclown7 жыл бұрын
Jurassic Park
@jacobottesen52797 жыл бұрын
TheDorianTube ...Would you believe that the effects were done by Industrial Light and Magic? Btw, I agree that the effects were good for the time. Nothing amazing like LOTR, but good like the Matrix.
@Hollyclown7 жыл бұрын
Jurassic Park
@The_RedVIII7 жыл бұрын
TheDorianTube Titanic and matrix were technological masterpieces back in the day, of course they hold up. But many of the other movies on your list either have just as "bad" effects than the mummy or they came out years later, and the technology advanced pretty quickly at that time. And, like I said, the rest of the movies on your list were technical masterpieces of their time, so it's a bit unfair to compare the mummy to those movies.
@brazwen7 жыл бұрын
Honestly, this movies was just fun to watch. It didn't need to be serious.
@li-limandragon92877 жыл бұрын
Nope Bruce Cambell, Kurt Russel and even goddamn Orson Welles would've sucked as Rick O'connell. *Brendan Frasier is the best choice.*
@juliebradwell74357 жыл бұрын
I would have Kurt Russell play the mummy just so I can hear him say, "HELL'S COMING WITH ME YOU HEAR! HELL'S COMING WITH ME!"
@810wasaninsidejob96 жыл бұрын
Frasier was fantastic, I loved his character when I first saw it 15 years ago and I still do today.
@evenflow54916 жыл бұрын
HOW DARE YOU SURRY THE GOOD NAME OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOUR BRUCE CAMPBELL!!!!!!! Who TF do you think you are......
@bromodragone84056 жыл бұрын
Orson Welles was long dead
@ssjichigo6666 жыл бұрын
I honestly could see sam raimi remaking the mummy in a tongue and cheek way, with bruce campbell as rick o'connell, and just like in the evil dead trilogy, raimi would have so much fun fucking with campbell
@emperorreign61544 жыл бұрын
Sorry Doug, but I couldn’t disagree with you more on this one. I think it works great as an action adventure film personally 🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
@vinnyc.12654 жыл бұрын
It's almost like his channel does comedy.
@masonallen39617 жыл бұрын
19:46 "Faster." "Patience is a virtue." "Not Right now it isn't." I'm I the only one who liked that line.
@19thunderchild7 жыл бұрын
No the movie is great. Doug is just venting I reckon.
@Raxel14477 жыл бұрын
My favorite movie quote of all time
@MarioMoreno-tt3hr7 жыл бұрын
It's a fantastic line. This movie is a solid film
@Jackie-McCann7 жыл бұрын
You’re definitely not the only one. Personally I love this movie!
@JAM927 жыл бұрын
I liked that line too and the movie itself, it's a fun time!
@LilJay036 жыл бұрын
The cgi is only had by today's standards. If Doug were to ever review the original then, he'd have to bring those same criticisms with him.
@diegobareno58205 жыл бұрын
I don't know what NC's talking about, the CGI really isn't that bad.
@borisammerlaan74085 жыл бұрын
The CGI isn't that bad. Yeah, those effects might be what B-movies are using *now*, but that's just because those only have the budget to use effects from 20 years ago. The effects, which were done by ILM, were actually kinda praised at the time.
@zeroa695 жыл бұрын
which is a bad argument considering this movie was made in the 90s and was considered top of the line at the time until matrix hit
@pjdougherty64426 жыл бұрын
When he says “This is all a cartoon!” I just want to say, “That’s why we love it!!”
@travishughes72214 жыл бұрын
Since the CG is so bad. He should show us that he could do better since he is ripping on it so bad. Lol
@bloodarcher78412 жыл бұрын
@@travishughes7221 his job is to be a critic.. don’t like it? Don’t watch
@gameplaysolotheblade2 жыл бұрын
@@bloodarcher7841 You mean character, not job, xD
@fuckthisstupidasshandleshit9 ай бұрын
@@gameplaysolotheblade No, it's his job.
@fuckthisstupidasshandleshit9 ай бұрын
@@travishughes7221He probably could.
@josephineczykoski6663 жыл бұрын
I love the Boris Karloff movie to the point where even Doug Walker's reenactment of it gives me chills.
@DigiDestined135 жыл бұрын
This movie to a 13 year old me was both scary and hilarious. And I still really like it. Granted, it's not perfect, but no film is.
@mitsvanmitsvanio61064 жыл бұрын
To me when I was 8 back in 1999 was terrifying and I didn't wanted to watch it until 14-15 then it become one of my favorite movies and made me want to learn even more about ancient Egypt (I was a history enthusiast even before learning to read, by having my parents narrating to me history books or watching pictures and illustrations from history books)
@rkochamp073 жыл бұрын
@@mitsvanmitsvanio6106 I first saw it at 8 years old to. I remember freaking out during Anck-su-namun’s first resurrection scene that my mom had to leave the theater with me. Today i love this movie and the second one
@crowz62477 жыл бұрын
Relative to most Hollywood reboots, The Mummy is one of the smartest and most creative films ever made. They knew not to attempt a recreation and they focused on making a fun movie. The original Fraser Mummy is still one of my favorite movies. Weird how in 2017 we're still getting lazy and soulless reboots, when in 1999 some people said, "fuck it, let's have Fraser fight CGI," and it actually worked both as a film, and as a financial investment.
@DarkOverlord96 Жыл бұрын
The opening shot wasn't CGI. It's a miniature, ergo, practical effects. Whoops.
@1deviousmama3337 жыл бұрын
Can we just appreciate the fact that every review Doug does a charity shoutout! That is very noble of you and I feel like that doesn't get appreciated as much as it should.
@egyptfrazier7 жыл бұрын
I still love the Brendan Fraser's version.
@izzy12217 жыл бұрын
REVIEW THE SEQUELS! REVIEW THE SEQUELS! REVIEW! THE! SEQUELS!
@westonrose23207 жыл бұрын
shhh wait for sequel month: the... threequel idk
@stephaniewozny38527 жыл бұрын
I think there should be a Brendan Fraser Month. Between this, Monkeybone, and a few other movies I can think of, there's certainly enough material.
@westonrose23207 жыл бұрын
Yeah, like The Mummy Returns, and The Mummy: The Third One and.... yeah
@buffalosoldiers88747 жыл бұрын
THE. ANIMATED. SERIES.
@westonrose23207 жыл бұрын
yeah that too whoops
@Pitmanmeetandgreet5 жыл бұрын
Man I love when NC and AVGN get together. Mutual respect between actors, mutual disrespect between characters. Cracks me up every time. 25:36 "Here's the link!" DONT ADVERTISE YOUR CHANNEL ON MY CHANNEL!
@doctortabasco7 жыл бұрын
The Mummy's Soundtrack is just so Awsome!!
@MarioMoreno-tt3hr7 жыл бұрын
Sirdavitian it is an incredible soundtrack. My favorite Jerry Goldsmith score.
@doctortabasco7 жыл бұрын
Is the best!! I used to ride horses in Colombian fields listening this music...
@jp38137 жыл бұрын
The sequel's score by Alan Silvestri is also awesome.
@edgarbanuelos64727 жыл бұрын
Undeniably
@Ryzen7767 жыл бұрын
You know NC is unfairly bashing the movie when he doesn't mention the soundtrack once.
@raptorus77737 жыл бұрын
Love this movie. It is one of my childhood movies
@noirangel64167 жыл бұрын
Raptorus77 Same. This and Jurassic Park, and Terminator 2.
@uscman7 жыл бұрын
Yes
@Godzilla-tu2cd7 жыл бұрын
Raptorus77 yeah but it's not the 1932 movie but it's way better than the 2017 movie
@bryansuminski75437 жыл бұрын
I still watch it every now and then.
@jordangates76837 жыл бұрын
Thats some good engrish
@akirealamub6 жыл бұрын
"Well if it aint my little buddy Benny..." I love this movie so much.
@thebandit0256 Жыл бұрын
I think kill you*pulls out a gun*
@rodolforodriguez4447 Жыл бұрын
Who came back after watching him win best actor so we can say to the critic “That’s academy award winning Brendan Fraser to you!!!”
@rebeccabecbeku6 жыл бұрын
The Prince of Egypt was my childhood. So to see that tiny joke made my day.
@Maioly7 жыл бұрын
the effects are NOT that bad, specially for the time but its the EASIEST joke he can reach for, so of course he goes for it every time.
@rain82227 жыл бұрын
What happened to our homie Brendan Fraser?
@ΣπυρίδωνΚατραμίδης-η2σ7 жыл бұрын
A Random soul from Chicago Illinois i
@LordMoonshadowGaGa7 жыл бұрын
He's directing stuff now.
@BORISTIMUS7 жыл бұрын
He died
@leoechoirl94127 жыл бұрын
A Random soul from Chicago Illinois Alimony happened
@phillytheflyerable7 жыл бұрын
fucked over by another woman
@MononokeLynn3 жыл бұрын
Brendan’s “derp” makes this movie pure gold.
@goddessofchaos77547 жыл бұрын
Don't lie. I can't be the only person who watched this movie series a lot growing up.
@theeccentrictripper38637 жыл бұрын
I adored Ancient Egypt as a child and these were some of my favorite movies; it was cool to have an action film that focuses on Egypt, even if it's not very historical (obviously lol). I try to forget about the third one though, it ranges on a scale from meh to pretty bad depending on how judgmental I'm feeling.
@810wasaninsidejob96 жыл бұрын
Yeah this movie and the 2nd were both solid IMO, I enjoyed them both a lot growing up.
@gmailaccount35616 жыл бұрын
Me too !!! I will love forever this movie!!! I fallen in.love with history.and Egypt thanks this
@johanliebert67856 жыл бұрын
My gosh this was supposed to be a nice quick action adventure not a monumental oscar favourite. The CGI looks totally standard for that time. I really don't get your hate against fraser, he was perfect for the role and why would you want a much older Russell play Evelins love interest. My gosh sometimes I have the feeling when you don't like a movie because it was just not your taste you try everthing to make it look bad in your review.
@alfa01spotivo6 жыл бұрын
Opinions
@BerryBabaBear6 жыл бұрын
@@alfa01spotivo yeah opinion that was majority in the comments, that totally don't show how lazy this review was.
@LordMoonshadowGaGa5 жыл бұрын
Royles Pika So standard. I mean, it’s not like there was a film 90% CGI that would blow it out of the water oh wait Star Wars Episode 1.
@silentjohnny49885 жыл бұрын
Every movie has flaws and the purpose of this channel is to point them out, as well as what makes it great. All the comedy is aimed at the flaws but he always gives credit where it's due.
@defeqel65375 жыл бұрын
The mummy CGI was quite spectacular for the time.
@Гденашареальностьчувак7 жыл бұрын
You know the movie is good when all critic is saying for 30 minutes is " BAD CGI! BAD CGI! BAD FRAISER! BAD CGI! ".
@Derl307 жыл бұрын
Yup.
@billybarnett95187 жыл бұрын
I'm sure someone who truly hates this film could come up with more material.
@asaelperez1887 жыл бұрын
Glad I'm not the only one
@alfa01spotivo6 жыл бұрын
then you havent watched the review
@matthewmuir88844 жыл бұрын
"I'm a stuntman! Have you seen those Mummy movies? I'm in them more than Brendan Frasier is."
@TokuBoyStudios7 жыл бұрын
Should we tell him there's a sequel?
@incitossol7 жыл бұрын
Toku Nation but that means seeing the Scorpion Rock. No one deserves that pain.
@SomeRandomJackAss7 жыл бұрын
There are two and about 3 or 4 spinoff movies.
@EyeOfArgus7 жыл бұрын
nah let's save that for next year
@LilyZerep7 жыл бұрын
He'll find out in due time.
@dillon94057 жыл бұрын
Should we tell him about the Scorpion King movies?
@DarthBoardBVE7 жыл бұрын
This is a lot of fun, but I honestly don't get Doug's beef with Brendan Fraser.
@Anonymous-js5zn7 жыл бұрын
Oh trust me, he beats on Matthew Broderick worse. Even in Ferris Bueler's Day off and The Lion King (watch the Disneycember review of it), he still doesn't really like him. He's the actor that Doug just has a personal disgust for.
@DarthBoardBVE7 жыл бұрын
Anonymous Yeah, that’s one I’ve never understood either! Most people seem to think both of them are good actors who have made a lot of bad movies, but the Critic just HATES them!
@Sky1ceb3rg7 жыл бұрын
I've watched this movie as a kid and i loved every second of it. I actually think effects are still looking good..
@snowlondon86427 жыл бұрын
Sky1ceb3rg SAME i loved this movie as a kid
@tonyjoestar26327 жыл бұрын
I agree, I think Doug is comparing them to modem day graphics, which might not be fair, but makes for some good jokes
@noirangel64167 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@AlexFurry7 жыл бұрын
Preach!
@HarleysCompass4 жыл бұрын
Rewatching and 3:12 when he shouts "Shut up and watch something black and white!" and Tamara responds "NEVER!" reminds me of an interaction myself and my little bro would have XD
@jackhealy33287 жыл бұрын
Despite all of the cons Doug points out in this movie (even the really pointless shit), none of that stops this from being one of the greatest popcorn action flicks of the past 20 years. The writing is perfectly corny and slightly self-aware, Brendan Fraser's performance alone carried this whole movie, the effects were pretty damn good for 1999, the stunt choreography is rock solid and the soundtrack is right on point for the whole movie. With all due respect Doug, this movie is fucking awesome and no amount of "BRENDAN FRASER DERP FACE LOL" can bring it down.
@billybarnett95187 жыл бұрын
That's an opinion you stated, not a fact.
@Rodan167 жыл бұрын
Yeah the Derp face lines are great because of how he delivers them. It's basically the nicer version of "Oh fuck me."
@ldallas83157 жыл бұрын
I agree, if this movie took itself seriously I think it would be unwatchable (but I guess nobody told Universal that when they decided to do the newest remake). It knows it's ridiculously cheesy and just rolls with it. Which also makes it the perfect movie for Brendan Fraiser. I've never seen the guy in an truly serious role, and it wouldn't suit him at all.
@LobsterOfDeath7 жыл бұрын
About the CGI. No, it's really bad. Come to think of it, Episode I released that same year, and it holds up surprisingly good, despite how bad the rest is. Actually, Critic states one good point: Ep I doesn't look like a b movie even now, while The Mummy sure does.
@psychodrummer15677 жыл бұрын
LobsterOfDeath The Mummy WAS a B movie. That was part of the charm. Episode I might have good visuals that have aged well, but acting-wise and story-wise, it is unwatchable, save for Duel of Fates.
@FlickorTreatProductions7 жыл бұрын
I think I took Brendan Fraser for granted. I think a lot of people did. The guy is a genuinely good actor and has definitely entertained me over the years. Whether it's Airheads, Encino Man or George of the Jungle, with the right film and role, Fraser works well. It sucks that his career spiraled out of control with his box-office flops and his ex-wife being a terrible person taking all his money. I've read that he signed on for two new tv shows next year. Hopefully he can make a comeback. I'm going to go ahead and say it... I miss Brendan Fraser.
@manuelalbertoromero95287 жыл бұрын
We all do man. We all do. We need a Fraser in our life.
@FlickorTreatProductions7 жыл бұрын
I'm willing to check out a lot of the well-acclaimed movies he was in. Gods and Monsters, School Ties, The Quiet American, and Crash. Hell, I'll even see "Ink Heart" and "Journey to the Center of the Earth."
@dannyhuskerjay7 жыл бұрын
When school ties came out everyone thought he would become the star. But Matt Damon did and Ben affleck who's not as good did more. Reason they played there cards right and were in great movies . Fraiser sadly took his talents to b action movies
@EvanSol9195 жыл бұрын
Honestly I love this movie. It's fun and sometimes that's all you really need.
@ensm21217 жыл бұрын
At least The Mummy (1999) makes a kick ass ride at Universal Studios!
@LiveNiceness146 жыл бұрын
ensm2121 at least it will stay in universal...instead of the amazing DARK UNIVERSE version.
@stampede2747 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: The giant hamster wheel was an early treadmill. They were originally invented as a form of punishment for prisoners until being banned for being cruel and inhumane, and being repurposed as exercise equipment for the general public
@stephaniewozny38527 жыл бұрын
Lucky Stampede , seems fitting.
@Ugly_German_Truths7 жыл бұрын
+Lucky Stampede There is no "originally" in your sentence.. ORIGINALLY they were invented as "motor" for cranes and pulley systems to move stuff, pull ships along canals and whatnot... having a wheel JUST so that prisoners can run in circles makes no sense, as Critic noted with "it is not even connected to anything"... Even the Conan horizontal thing had more thought behind it than just having a thing in the background that does nothing.
@ranakin90007 жыл бұрын
I'll never understand his hatred for this film. The only conclusion I can come to is it was made in the 90s and to Doug that's sin against humanity.
@jayw9006 жыл бұрын
Doug never said that he hated the movie, did you even watch the review numbnut?
@davidortiz30945 жыл бұрын
@@jayw900 His review of it was awful. This movie was great. Period. So was the second one. Not many can make it fun, action packed, comedy & enjoyable to watch regarding Ancient Egypt & Egypt in general. Great fuckin movie. So was the second one
@LordMoonshadowGaGa5 жыл бұрын
David Ortiz See the Boris Karloff one and actually see what real great cinema was.
@alexsherry12385 жыл бұрын
@@LordMoonshadowGaGa But not every film needs to be some timeless "work of art". It can be just.... Fun. There are plenty of movies that are like that, that plenty of people would rather watch than a "masterpiece" that is less entertaining to watch.
@benm59705 жыл бұрын
Because he isn’t blinded by nostalgia like a lot of the people defending this movie are
@Lucifer-yr9qf3 жыл бұрын
Wanna know where he grabbed that gold from? Cinema Sins already told us: "Imhotep literally pulls gold out of his ass". 🤣
@badrequest55967 жыл бұрын
funny fact about the scene he mistakes evelyn for anaksunamun or whatver her name was. the mummy took the eyes from the guy with poor eye sight just after he broke his glasses. so he now has bad eye sight too and his vision was all blurred. it wasn't very obvious but it's there.
@tristankemp77407 жыл бұрын
Bad Request so he can create massive sandstorms, raise mummies from the dead, regenerate to full health but god forbid a little eyesight problem. Don't be stupid
@WillcraftAnimations7 жыл бұрын
Tristan Kemp Did you miss the entire sideplot in the first part of the movie where he's absorbing people to make himself whole again? Yes, he can't fix an eyesight problem just like he can't fix a "No skin, missing organs and an overall shortage of flesh" problem. If he could, that whole thing wouldn't be there. First thing he'd do would just be to restore his body immediately. Don't be stupid.
@tristankemp77407 жыл бұрын
Willcraft all it would require is to strengthen the eye muscles just altering a small bit of biomass where as repairing tissues not there would require some to consumed
@elementalcobalt17 жыл бұрын
Exactly... but it's enough to assume that he might have thought of that in the first ten seconds after getting eyes. I like Bad Requests theory, it makes the scene slightly more charming.
@WillcraftAnimations7 жыл бұрын
Tristan Kemp Well, there's no indication he can do that. The fact that he can regenerate wounds suggests it, but could be limited to restoring his body to its current state. So, say his legs are paralyzed and he's missing one foot, and they sustain a lot of damage. He can regenerate the damage, but only to their original, paralyzed and foot-missing state. However, that is getting into the exact specifics of what his magic can do, which is difficult territory since you can mostly speculate. I just wanted to point out that the power to create sandstorms, raise the dead and even regenerate his body doesn't necessarily mean he can cure blindness. Superman can fly and do other neat stuff, but he can't turn lead into gold.
@yamibrian30997 жыл бұрын
The Mummy 1999 is based off the the more action packed Mummy films of the 1940's. The Mummy's Hand, The Mummy's Tomb, The Mummy's Ghost, and The Mummy's Curse.
@freakyvlogs90657 жыл бұрын
This was not the strongest review. Its like Doug struggled to find actual faults in the movie to make fun of. I love when he rags on my fav movies, it's something done in good fun, but this was legit weak as far as NC reviews go.
@codysonic16 жыл бұрын
My guess he had to delay the tom cruise one so he did this one on rush
@user-dr2yz8um3d5 жыл бұрын
The movie turns 20 today! Still one of my dad’s favorites But I love the sequel better
@wjzav19717 жыл бұрын
The movie was a riot. It was funny, silly, self aware, adventurous and while it was never really scary it did have a certain atmosphere.
@andiran237 жыл бұрын
It didn't try to be scary, it was meant to be a fun adventure B-movie with a slightly creepy mummy
@billybarnett95187 жыл бұрын
Okay, just understand that not everybody likes that sort of thing.
@yugoxgc7 жыл бұрын
WJZAV ... you're paraphrasing what he said at the end, right? Thats what you're doing... right?!
@ianr.navahuber21957 жыл бұрын
i was used to be afraid of this movie. now i saw the clips...........if you really want to see really scary shit read the uzumaki manga. i just read summaries of it and it was a messy thing