The Mystery of Empty Space

[@davidsabillon5182]

I've watched many lectures on this subject and this is probably the easiest to understand for a laymen like myself. Thanks for the upload.

[@michaeldanson2717]

david sabillon JUST WATCH MY COMMENT FROM ABOVE !!! OK???!!!

[@Au.9999]

This is all make believe pseudoscience! - If you want to watch 'real' science which is much easier to understand watch 'TheThunderBoltsProject' The Electric Universe.

[@aisyakamila]

Couldnt agree more......

[@razif7798]

Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiu0uiuiuuuiiiipiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiipiuiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiuiiipuuuuiuiiiiuiiuiuiuuiuiiiiiiiuiiiui

[@razif7798]

U

[@MrKmanthie]

I like the way he explains things. He isn't so up in the clouds that he assumes everyone else there understands all the complicated points. With an ability to speak on the subject in a way that one can understand it w/o being a grad student or post-doc. in particle physics, his info comes across to those who need a push to get started and into the realm of more complex areas, such as the kind of lectures that Leonard Susskind delivers. But, to understand Susskind, you have to really be on your toes, or you'll miss something and that one thing you may blink and miss may be the road block which keeps you from "getting" the wider picture Susskind is painting, with eloquent words.

[@toreibjo]

What a bliss to listen to this man, physicist, not at all full of himself - but really telling it right out - in plain English. THAT takes a true genius.

[@vkoptchev]

Loved it! There is no actor's play here, just a pure genuine physics, presented passionately.

[@michaeldanson2717]

Heptagon JUST WATCH MY COMMENT FROM ABOVE!!!

[@dwaynestammer5568]

This was an outstanding presentation. I've heard about dark energy for years, and I had no idea what anyone was talking about. This guy talks for 30 min, and I finally understand the general concept. I would gladly listen to every talk he has ever recorded.

[@doronron7323]

Kim Griest is so full of energy, it takes a while before you realise that every broken sentence he utters is full of fascinating information. He's talking so fast, as if he expects to be shot at any moment. He exudes the meaning of 'mind blowing'. He's so full of conviction and energy he could boil off into the 'ether' before your very eyes. But, I've yet to see someone else explain a fraction of what Kim blurts out. He's a true example of a 'mad' scientist; yet it's clear he believes every word. My take is, he's right.

[@Paddyllfixit]

Michael Faraday had little to no formal education. He was essentially self-taught, visiting libraries and institutions and reading as much material of the time as he could, becoming one of the most influential of scientists.

[@AlecBrady]

He started out as a bookbinder's apprentice. Later he became Humphry Davy's lab assistant.

[@mbabcock111]

Formalized, institutional education is not the only approach to enlightenment.

[@clivewells7090]

Paddy Theosophist; Hail fellow theosophist! I think it was Faraday who married his best maths student and she solved most of his maths problems. Kept very quiet apart from some frank letters to collaborators. Don't spose you know how old this lecture is. I'm thinking early 90's..?

[@giovanniandreani2124]

People like Kim Griest are moved by a passionate heart! It is a pleaser yo attend his lectures.

[@User58747]

This guy is absolutely brilliant at putting complex ideas into simple English.

[@kurtbjorn]

I agree... but public speakers of excellence should minimize the number of "OK"s in a lecture. Drives me nuts.

[@roman2011]

User58747 yup. The best explanation of the higgs boson ive heard to-date.

[@francisco9999]

He is a brilliant scientist that can also communicate with sufficiency. The numeber of "OKs" are not the matter here

[@damiion666]

KurtB oh ok

[@berthaimona6909]

Kurt.....Next you'll be wanting flowers on your grave...

[@yardg14]

Spot on, I have not been able to grasp this theory previously. This is indeed the best introduction I have seen so far into Higgs fields etc. I am reading a lot of hate and anger in the comments. Keep in mind that even if this is wrong, its only going to lead to more research. Profit or no profit, mankind will strive for this knowledge as knowledge is power and power might keep you on the mortal coil for another year/hour/second (which is a priority for most of us!)

[@nmarbletoe8210]

Kim Griest is one of the highest level speakers i can understand. Awesome talk!

[@michaeldanson2717]

N Marbletoe JUST WATCH MY COMMENT FROM ABOVE!!!

[@phweman]

for the record, the double-slit interference effect was first achieved with ELECTRONS, and that's what made it such a groundbreaking piece of experiment: electrons, which were, after all, "MATTER particles", we seen to exhibit the same wave-particle duality as photons. wave-particle duality was hard enough to swallow for light, much less for all MATTER. and, importantly, the idea that A SINGLE ELECTRON INTERFERES WITH ITSELF was the real kicker. nothing to do with aether, though!

[@antmanbee100]

Just found this channel. This guy is great. He really wants you to understand this.

[@galaxia4709]

If only he would have been more "exact" about the Belgian theoretical physicists Englert and Brout... I think this guy is great, in some sense (I've listened to way greater people, like Nima Arkani Hamed :)

[@SupernovaA-dj8dh]

Galaxia Belgium is weak!

[@galaxia4709]

Supernova1987A Your problem...?

[@SupernovaA-dj8dh]

Galaxia "Belgium is weak."is a satire on a Seinfeld line"Ukraine is weak!"Inside joke if you've never seen the show.Belgium is a fine country.

[@kambizshahri1504]

I really appreciate this video. The presenters enthusiasm levels are stratospheric.

[@jamescombs2118]

He is communicating his thoughts so well here. Beautiful

[@gouravjarwal2473]

The way he teach things is incredible .he really wants us to understand things. Fall in love with this guy want to meet Kim , can do anything if it was possible

[@thrunsalmighty]

The quote from Faraday is incomplete. When asked about the utility of electricity, Faraday told Gladstone that one day he would probably be able to tax it

[@zapfanzapfan]

Yeah, I thought the quote lacked something.

[@Xandros999]

@@zapfanzapfan "On the internet people make up quotes" - Alexander the Great

[@michaeldanson2717]

thrunsalmighty JUST WATCH MY COMMENT FROM ABOVE!!!

[@WarpedDimensions]

One application of the understanding of empty space: If we understand what space is and how it can be manipulated. And through the manipulation of space, show that matter can move faster than the speed of light, we can build deep space propulsion systems which can propel people to the stars in reasonable times.

[@miltonwhorle9765]

Is anyone else a little creeped out by the off center, unblinking, stare of the chappie at the very beginning? My eyes are watering in sympathy, and yet I dare not blink and take my eyes off of him for a moment; there is a confidence in that sinister spectacle that tells one that the barrier presented by the screen are held in pitiable contempt by whatever amphibian like alien race he belongs to

[@johnathonvought7407]

I finally understand string theory and the Higgs boson field. I also finally understand that there remains another field to discover. Really good, solid, explanations here.

[@zz0mfgz]

No you don't. You just don't understand it well enough to understand that you don't understand it. You can't say you understand it if you don't understand the math. Sorry, but that's physics... It's not a verbal subject, it's a mathematical one.

[@jaroslavhrubik3448]

zz0mfgz Bravo!! Mathematicians can say smething about physics. Mainsream is physics it has SOME USE and much money....

[@EobardFerguson]

zz0mfgz And you don't understand it well enough that you can tell someone else they don't. Interesting. Math or not, reality must, by definition, be understandable without math. Isn't that a bitch?

[@johnathonvought7407]

I do computer animation. Recently some computer animators applied some serious math to create that black hole for the film "interstellar." They were not Einstein level math people, but they are able to use his math in a practical way. Same here. Give me the concept in a way I can understand like physics, then give me the formulas. I can run with it.

[@marcioviotti1639]

And the circle is complete. The Higgs field is science discovering the ancient philosophical conception of Ether. As some say : there is nothing new under the sky.

[@marcioviotti1639]

@Raymond Mustafa Using petty comments to teach things that only bad people want to know. Remember, you always get what you give.

[@marcioviotti1639]

@@alfreddean4208 Mustafa forgot to say that you always get what you give.

[@possumverde]

Maybe try looking at it like this. As a mechanic you've likely performed the same maintenance procedure on something many separate times. Most of the time there wasn't a problem but maybe once something went wrong later. Knowing that you've done the procedure many times successfully gives you good starting points when trying to figure out what went wrong this one time (faulty part etc). Repetition in science helps weed out weaknesses in the tests etc from useful data.

[@justinharmann710]

He is used to teaching. When he says, "okay" he is looking at people's faces for understanding, or confusion. Let people teach.

[@michaeldanson2717]

Justin Harmann PLS WATCH MY COMMENT FROM ABOVE!!!

[@jimkeller3868]

I like this kind of top-down lecture. It starts with giving an overview..a good one. I can now make sense of some of the minutiae, the details, and the particulars of particle physics. Conversely, most lecturers start with the detail and particulars....which don't serve so well in gaining an understanding of the big picture. At least to my mind.

[@endrevigeland2112]

VERY good lecture!

[@GianfrancoFronzi]

For all the comments that have a question , it's all answered by Galileo at the very beginning . He from another time answered what quantum anything can't . A real genius at work . Who's words in that quote should never be forgotten . It's language will never be understood by humans .

[@danielfahrenheit4139]

I don't understand how some people cant understand that all branches of science are unified by one universe and universal plot. There' s one science no matter how unrelated different fields might appear.

[@ElearningDigest]

Science is a human construct. The Objective Reality they attempt to describe is "unified".

[@johnmosha]

I have watched this video for over a Dacade now, can’t get tired of it.

[@millerrp1989]

The Higgs Boson particle does exist. It has a mass of 125 GeV/c2.

[@michaeldanson2717]

Bob Miller PLS WATCH MY COMMENT FROM ABOVE!!!

[@purplepick5388]

Every person should see this stunning video. Wealth of information . Excellent.

[@Pyrophoro]

Imagine having this man as your neighbor. Barbeque 🍺🍖 and listen to his random thoughts.

[@octart]

"this is weird but it's true" - I just love physics!

[@My1stYouTube]

Kim was a smart man.It is sad that he is gone.He contributed some many great knowledge to the field of physics.

[@everettpadgett734]

mathematics can support any theory.

[@cryptohustler6418]

I theorize that this theory is probably b.s.

[@gorgig9136]

Yes, Mr Everett, with Math You can make Square to be wave, or infinite numbers of waves to be Square.The Theoretical Physics is not Science, it is Illusion, because People like Illusion

[@oldkidsjonge5378]

My theory is that when you have one apple and you slice it in half, you have three halves. Can mathematics support that theory?

[@everettpadgett734]

Oldkidsjonge if y = 3 then apple = 3/2

[@totowolf9716]

Everett Padgett nice

[@NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself]

It's cool to hear about this stuff from over 5 years ago now that the Higgs boson has been confirmed. I still don't really know what all this stuff means, but it's fun to listen to.

[@vkoptchev]

Re: David Jeffrey Spetch Since you have disabled replies, I'll address some of the confusion that abounds in your amusing post, here. Some of it stems from the analogy of the Higgs being a resistive media, or because you are not familiar with basic facts about nature. In any case it is silly to label things you do not understand silly. The Higgs is not a resistive media (it does not stop moving things), it's a field that exists in all space, no matter if it is empty or not. Not every particle interacts with it, only those that do acquire mass. Photons move at the speed of light because they do not interact with the Higgs. Like it or not the big bang did occur, there is evidence all around. The Higgs was turned on as a result of spontaneous symmetry breaking. As the universe expanded and cooled down the energy density reached a certain threshold causing it. THink of it as a ball standing on top of another ball in the gravity of the earth - the state is symmetric but not stable, the upper ball spontaneously falls to one side breaking the symmetry (because the ground state is not symmetric). It is a mathematical analogy, don't take it literally. The universe is expanding, as opposed to matter moving in existing space, in fact due to the expansion some parts of it move faster than the speed of light relative to others, which is impossible for objects moving in space. It does not expand into anything - it is actually easier to grasp than imagining infinite space, there are no infinities in nature. "Theory" is just a word, don't make any assumptions from it, classical mechanics and electrodynamics are also theories, and the whole technical revolution is based on them. "looking out in space is looking back in time" is not a theory but a simple fact resulting from the finite speed of light. Sun rays don't take time to reach the earth (in their reference frame), for them the distance to earth (or to anywhere) is 0 - it's called Lorentz contraction. That's what relativity is about, it's a property of space-time - when you move faster the space for you shrinks relative to a "stationary" observer, while for him the time for you ticks slower. GPS would not work if relativity of time was not taken into account, so belive it or not, you are probably using that theory. Supernovae are being observed every day, is there anything in science that that you believe in? lol. Planets have not been stars because they do not have enough mass to start the nuclear reaction in their cores, and planets like earth do not even have enough mass to retain the hydrogen necessary for nuclear reaction. In thermonuclear bombs the fusion reaction is triggered not by gravity compression but artificially with a fission bomb. The Higgs by the way was found about a year ago. According to the theory predictions. The string theory is still not proved, as was clearly noted by the speaker. It is at this point a speculation. What is worse - it may never be proved directly, meaning that if another theory emerges that describes the world equally well, there would be no experimental way to determine which (if any) is actually happening. In conclusion, your largest problem is not that "people are disillusioned to think these mere theories are actually fact..." but your ignorance on the subject. It's good that you have the curiosity though.

[@michaeldanson2717]

Heptagon PLS WATCH MY COMMENT FROM ABOVE!!!

[@mjusiqtube]

Continueing my comment. This guy is on a mission or something. Trying to keep up with the speed of light. Learning people of this complex subject. And hus brilliant. Tanks! Will see it a third time. Well worth the time.

[@scin3759]

Theoretical mathematicians stopped asking long ago if their discoveries would ever be of use outside mathematics. By the way, nice talk. Fortunately, since this talk we know now Higgs Bosons are real.

[@SimberLayek]

Crazy how science works~

[@michaeldanson2717]

S Cin PLS WATCH MY COMMENT FROM ABOVE!!!

[@anonimofied]

the reason that emptiness is mystery is because of the limitation of our language.,emptiness is not really empty, we calls it empty because we dont know what it is, i know this may looks far fetch but nothing is actually something, it is our language and knowledge that fails to describe these entities in details. in other words we are confusing ourself with the limitations in our language and knowledge.

[@jomen112]

***** " _Just because we have a word called "nothing" doesn't mean that nothing actually exists_. " There is nothing, no pun intended, in physics that prevent a nothing from "existing".

[@anonimofied]

jomen112 we means we, our means our and it doesn't means anything more than that. is this difficult to understand?

[@AGMK]

So now we should have a new word for space with zero energy, in real empty there is no distance by the way

[@nmarbletoe8210]

jomen112 "There is nothing, no pun intended, in physics that prevent a nothing from "existing"." An approximate or average nothing can exist, but not an exact nothing (bcs of uncertainty principle).

[@lsb2623]

I think this quote is apropos to your theme of opening windows. "Enough is Enough! I've had it with these motherf***ing snakes on this motherf***ing plane. Everybody strap in! ...I'm about to open some f***ing windows." - Samuel Jackson

[@FACEgod_]

Dude vanished before our very eyes. Next level shit. ✨💫

[@melfslf9077]

@@FACEgod_ space Time and matter. We are multidimensional beings that is with the 3rd dimension space time and matter is the 3rd dimension

[@FACEgod_]

Melf Slf there’s only one dimension. The Now. But I get what you’re saying.

[@melfslf9077]

@@FACEgod_ nahh there are multidimension

[@FACEgod_]

Melf Slf where???

[@marcotai]

What is actually an " empty space'? if we imply that an empty space is some portion of space which is void of any energy, well we still need to define what the boundaries of that "portion' are actually made of. but at the same time if you are trying to define "boundaries" in a kind of space, well you need to conceive a larger space where you can define those kinds of perimeter. I'm afraid that we can't possibly define what space actually is until we define what OBSERVATION actually is.

[@ShriRameducation13]

Why not higgs field gives mass to photons?

[@larscp]

The Higgs field can't see the Photons

[@ewmegoolies]

could you shed some light on that ?

[@Xandros999]

The Higgs field doesn't interact with everything and not all mass comes from Higgs interactions. As far as I know it's mainly electrons.

[@beargiles4062]

​@@Xandros999 I thought it was only particles sensitive to the weak force but I may be confusing this with something else. That's not all particles... I think it excludes leptons (eg electrons) with right-handed spin but I wouldn't bet any money that I'm not misremembering it.

[@MrKorrazonCold]

"It always takes time for light waves to propagate from one place to another photon by photon. A light ray always moves at one unit of space per unit of time from wave field to wave field - in a sense, they are on the edge between space and time. Light is space divided by time and nothing else. That implies a strict equivalence of time and space with light as a constant conversion unit between the two."

[@Pico_Farad]

I have a theory. Without the Higgs field, all particles would not just travel at speed c but at infinite speed. Not only massless particles like photons but everything. Could it be that the Higgs field does impact photons after all?

[@FluidH2O]

Interesting concept and i wonder what would happen. Moving at the speed of light means time has come to a hold. Photons don't decay because there is no time for it to decay. Moving faster would theoretically mean they would move back in time?

[@Pico_Farad]

Maybe this determination is caused by the Higgs field?

[@FluidH2O]

Guy De Vos But a photon is massless...it is not affected by the Higgs field...maybe only space itself can move faster...

[@unholygod4895]

i like it

[@unholygod4895]

to somethinjustaintright how the fuck can you say NO like you have the answer bullshit i like guy de vous answer you've commented with BS

[@billswingle2672]

Pico seconds after the big bang the Higgs field "turned on". How fantastic!! This sounds like an apologetic to me! WOW

[@gunterra1]

It makes me wonder how useful such 'knowledge' rally is to anyone? Seriously, why would anyone with both feet firmly on the ground want to know what happened Pico seconds after the 'big bang'. I am not against spending money on scientific research. But in this case I think that certain people have their priorities screwed up regarding what really needs to be done to advance our Earth civilization.

[@DeneF]

If this man had better hair he would have Brian Cox's job. Great communicator. Thanks.

[@wundermax1993]

Funniest comment I read so far! The thing is, you are right about this:)

[@markmd9]

He speaks to fast and maybe to advanced for ordinary people, many won't understand and loose interest.

[@galanonim9863]

I find him more interesting and he does not speak to people as they were school children

[@craigwall9536]

No shit. @Castlegrad

[@craigwall9536]

@Castlegrad No, they're too far down the shitter to come back. Welcome to subject status- you could have been citizens if you hadn't bought into that "dole" notion...

[@JohnFHendry]

I spoke with one of the scientists who worked on the Manhattan project and he could not "get" the understanding of "Life" associated with the inertial frame of reference but he certainly knew it was there and held the key to understanding time and space. Some things are so simple they are blinding in a complex structure. The 4 forces have been unified, that's how the asy of the weak force was discovered to post it on Nature's Forum to show what caused CERN's neutrino's @ v-c/c=2.48e-5 in 453.6mi

[@clieding]

I am not normally a „nit picker“ but I feel compelled to comment on the glaring error in the graphic at 3:30... The block of ice is broken into water molecules that are represented as two larger oxygen atoms bound with a singular smaller hydrogen atom: O2H ?! Instead of H2O. How could this go unnoticed?

[@RastaYOYOify]

Cuz its a screen play bro. Its bolshit. Water isnt h2o go find out for yourself. You added a catalyst. The salt is whats breaking down not the fuckin water. DERP

[@MrKorrazonCold]

"I do agree that the energy is eternal. And since energy must be conserved then even the visible spectrum is a ratio between opposite vectors. Light is space divided by time and nothing else. That implies a strict equivalence of time and space with light as a constant conversion unit between the two."

[@Moleanimationchannel]

I wish they put a photo of my ex’s brain to hammer home the idea of empty space.

[@gjroldan21]

This comment is egregiously underrated

[@Magnesius]

plus i really want to know where you see things with such uncertainty, its the best thing we honestly have in terms of explaining one basic model of atomic structure. and you refute it based of the fact that it was written to the extent that they cant 100% guarantee you a boson. they can't capture it on film for you, but they can certainly delve into statistical knowledge and find that it truly does exist.

[@farceadentus]

And they call Mystics crazy... Sheeeesh

[@rstrosah]

It may be crazy but it’s also experimentally verified…

[@RastaYOYOify]

You personally have verified the experiments? Hmmm. Interesting. I once heard from a wise dude that the simpler explanation is almost always the right one.

[@PhilthCollinz]

How the fuck they expect the universe to reveal all its secrets by smashing shyt??? Sounds very childish to me

[@MrKorrazonCold]

I've read countless books on OBEs, NDEs, Hypnotic regression and the afterlife. And by combining the collective imaginations from the many subjects. I would say that even the one momentary soul observer is in a mere flux of perpetual transformations as the waves of information come forming the zero point field, even light at rest is in motion! And as a soul observer tries to reach light speed the harder it becomes and the slower time seems to run only ever forward within a 3D centred ref-frame.

[@AlexanderHL1919]

Ok mr stringman, tell me, what are those ''very small'' strings made of ? What is the mechanism which decides the specific dimensions of the various strings and if there is such a mechanism, how do those strings, whatever they're made of, keep a constant length as to maintain a consistent particle ? String theory just has too many 'holes' in it if you get my point. I'm an armchair physicist but I can tell that this just doesnt cut it. Please stop wasting time speculating about wild fantasies and work on answering the simple questions. What is energy made of? If 'empty space' is kept from co collapsing onto itself by 'stuff', and nonetheless its actually expanding, what is it expanding into? What is beyond the border of spacial expansion? What are we expanding into ? Nothing? What is nothing ? Where is it and what is it made of? Where is our universe? Nowhere? In the middle of nowhere ? Just how far can we go in one direction ? Forever ? What is the universe contained in and what is that made of and how and why? What is a magnetic field made of? What is a force? Answer the simple questions before you go on a wild-goose chase and may we all sleep better tonight.

[@Brammy007a]

I don't know if string theory is correct, but there are indications that it is on the right track. I refer you to Brian Greene's books. But whether it is the correct answer or not, it is a good question to pursue and not just abandon as you would suggest. As for you questions such as "what is space expanding into" and " What is beyond the border of spacial expansion" , I suspect that you are either very limited in your exposure to cosmological theory or have some other agenda (I might suspect a religious agenda but based on your subscriptions, I suspect you are an atheist... good on ya, mate.... Ramen). For starters, have a look at any number of KZbin videos entitles "what is the universe expanding into" and also numerous videos which talk about the "finite universe". Some of your questions are not currently answerable but some (like What is a force?) are very answerable. You might try cracking open a high school or entry level college text book for the answer to that last one.

[@martinzitter4551]

Good for you. Every question you ask is worth pondering. Knowing the questions, you may be prepared to provide some answers. Please respond here with details of your research.

[@Brammy007a]

Martin Zitter Hi Martin, to whom are you responding? Alexander or me? I assume it is Alexander.... and I too look forward to seeing his research.

[@martinzitter4551]

Brammy007a Yes, Alexander. The man with the questions.

[@Brammy007a]

Martin Zitter I suspect we will not hear from Alexander. He is one of those people who's brain stops working when confronted with an unknown.

[@JohnFHendry]

Well said. E is a unit measurement of one non-moving wait state in time so you cannot logically say "before time" because a unit measurement of time (Mass) exists within a true still non-moving Mass based inertial frame of reference. What we experience as time is a ratio of the whole unit of measurement because we are observing light being created by Mass oscillation within the weak force creating the speed of light because E cannot just disappear and must maintain E as a constant >

[@lostsynapse]

I hate how he presents the idea, okay? I do not know why he talks like that, okay? so they put on the new machine, okay? its irritating! okay? :))

[@freethebaseiliesse4126]

am an old switzerland student in electric Genie orientated in nuclear physics and made my Diploma in nuclear chemie by the PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) in 1993. At this time we began to studie Quarks, but we just learn the name of the known new fondamental bricks. For the first time, i see a documentarie which explain me perfectly how quarks are and much more. i don't know why a lot of people are saying the same as you like "I hate how he presents the idea, okay? I do not know why he talks like that, okay? so they put on the new machine, okay? its irritating! okay?" i loved how he explained the subject with simple examples which make me understand the hole subject very clearly

[@bryan3dguitar]

Makes you wonder if he's aware of it. Should view/critique his own videos for things like OK, Uhm, Ah, Right and speech that is so rapid that it sounds manic. Toastmaster experience/practice/feedback would help most public speakers. Mastery of the subject matter is a good thing of course, but it's not enough to prevent his OK's from becoming really annoying after a very short while.

[@freethebaseiliesse4126]

Bryan Dempsey I watched the video a second time an i must agree with all : YES, YOU WERE ALL RIGHT WITH HIS NO ENDING "OK" during his complete presentation., but I was so fascinated from his explkication which gave me answer to a huge of things i

[@lostsynapse]

Nic mémé The ideea is great! only the okay is irritating (reminds me of southpark m'kay?) (:

[@freethebaseiliesse4126]

azi nuamid He should count how many "ok's" per hour he told through his presentation, maybe he will discover a new theorician physicist constant called "Griest Constant" giving the amount of time wasted with compulsives words per hour. DON'T FORGET THE EXPRESSION "Time is Money", it could help for example to estimate how much money is wasted in the world each year caused by these human compulsive words... (LOL) It was a very relaxing discussion which gave me power for a good working evenning

[@JohnFHendry]

"Its more real than most people want it to be." That also describes adventure sports of great excitement like surfing big waves. And that's all we are doing so look alive to react. Mass drops in first. Respect that phase and thanks to the harmonic commas space is open to travel through with almost unbelievable distance ability that exposes long deration wait states in time we don't notice because now is a constant relative to the observer, and we are not the only observer, showing how O=T ime.

[@manishgor3499]

I think ever since Einstein has happened to humanity, theoretical physicists have lost it. They are going stupid and stupid day by day.

[@oldkidsjonge5378]

You do realise they've found the higgs-boson by now, don't you?

[@manishgor3499]

If I take a mic out and scream x=90, some random combination on imagination, physics and mathematics can prove me right. But do you believe x=90 is wrong? or is it right? If you think its right then give me the answer, why? if not, I will prove you how x=90.

[@manishgor3499]

***** That's true... I am not a big fan of doing that.

[@RamNarayan-kj7rf]

I got that from what stand point you are making this statement ..... good thing is these post Einstein murmurs last till new one to come soon ... actually I'm personally not happy still hanging around to understand what Einstein put into theory 100 yrs ago...

[@ashishnandgaonkar7377]

Lecture delivered 13 years back, seen it today ....its simplest way I could absorb than others ....the dark energy

[@THINGLEADER]

My dude explained the Higgs Field and Boson so succinctly... props, and cheers to science my friends.

[@MrKorrazonCold]

"I am at centre of my region of universe and you and every other individual is at centre of their own region relative to their own energy constructing another version of external reality within their own brain,so now are as many universes as are cosmologists and each individually contructed as waves of information come overlapping so we can interact, send messages over the net. But as spacetimes become farther apart we share less of a common Hubble universe, less energy exchange with distance."

[@Geo877]

A great presenter, It's surprising we don't see him more! He would do a great job communicating science to the world

[@JohnFHendry]

"I'm just a little tired of hearing people say the universe exploded into existence all in one magical moment." I hear that. That's what people who cannot figure out time and believe in missing dark matter see happening. The Universe is created one atom at a time but time dilation and the octave structure of space and what happens to the atom as it enters the strong force hides it. Deuterium levels and location holds the key with neutron's space in use to understand how heavier atoms form.

[@MrKorrazonCold]

Everywhere we look we see objects of broken symmetry, if you draw a line down the centre in your minds eye, then one side looks similar to the other, is because, "One Mass Plasma field vector of the universe determines the mass of the other." From finger prints to snow flakes, no two are the same centred ref-frame. The wave function seems to form an infinite diversity and variety of possible shapes and angles forming the potential to spiral out at every point of space and at any moment of time.

[@MrKorrazonCold]

Time is inverse multiplying+/-dividing like frequency and wavelength. In the two slit experiment, as one sends the high wave amplitude wave+centre moves through one slit, its pilot-wave moves through the other at same time forming an interference pattern on screen. Then when one turns on a light from a detector adding energy compression at each point of space forming only bands on the screen. Then when one turns off the light, then time will keep expanding an interference pattern on the screen.

[@JohnFHendry]

DM shows space is a harmonic octave structure. G is a ratio of time created by two harmonic commas, the 2nd bigger than the 1st and the difference in size is the force of gravity just as Feynman showed before calling it a coincidence and dumping the cosmological constant he was pointing out for the second time in history. The further back in time you look the stronger E, and therefore G is relative to the octave level in that area of time. So all the matter and energy is there and not missing.

[@FluidH2O]

If everything is vibrations or waves, then it is not necessary to speak of matter or energy, then Creation is fundamentally based on this concept of vibration. The primeval vibration (before the limitation) can be described as infinite in time, infinite in all its aspects and possibilities, infinite in frequency and amplitude and existing in all time directions (omnitime). Unchanging, timeless and powerful to all limited vibrations in every bound power. It is the omnipotent definition.

[@phukew2]

Often these lectures are presentations to folks already in the know. This one is for the rest of us. Bravo. If the info is going to be shared on youtube this is how it is done. Otherwise leave it for Science and Nature. JMO

[@stevenos100]

The pure proton - A positive static charge with no mass 1) expand collapse back to core 2) expand orbit event 3) expand eject negate

[@MrKorrazonCold]

"One Infinite Wave Universe of Only Motion Exists and Reality came as our brains evolved to interpret these vibrations from the inward absorption and outward emission of the light. The Collective unconscious or world belief patterns gain validly enfolding over time, and what latter generations experience as physical reality they become rigid and domineering. It is as if millions of people who have preceded us have already determined what we experience on this physical plane now as time unfolds."

[@QuahChoonHuat]

What can be learned is that: what is apparent is not always what is real, what is real is not always what is apparent. The only thing real to us are the things we can practically use and the things that has an effect on us..

[@d60944]

My understanding is that the Higgs mechanism gives rise to the masses of fundamental particles, whereas the mass of composite entities like protons, atoms and his arm are given rise to overwhelmingly due to the binding energy of the particles involved, and the Higgs mechanism gives only a tiny fraction of that mass.

[@FluidH2O]

If we observe the law of conservation of energy we could state that counteracting forces always equal to zero...From the point of infinity nothing ever changes...

[@MrKorrazonCold]

Energy dose fluctuate between existence and non-existence within a ref-frame. It is an inward absorption and outward emission process within a ref-frame. The energy dose not disappear from reality but rather absorbed and re-emitted from and within object's from one atom to the next, photon by photon or moment by moment. Emission is a process by the way of which a higher energy quantum mechanical state of a particle is converted to a lower one through a photon resulting in the production of light

[@MrKorrazonCold]

JJ Thomson discovered the electron in 1897, showing for the first time atoms had smaller constituent components. To account for the atom's overall neural charge, Thomson theorised -in his 1904 model -that the negatively charged electrons must sit in a regular pattern within a uniformly positive charge, like raisins in a plum pudding. All motion is spiral, all direction is spherically curved. Sinusoidal spherical wave fronts of periodic or harmonic motion forms Einstein's curvature of spacetime.

[@davet11]

Best description of the Higg's Field I've ever heard.

[@JohnFHendry]

and it too has a transfer space. The WF asymmetry is a combination of two harmonic commas creating the transfer space needed on both ends of Mass oscillation and the second harmonic comma is transferring the graviton's comma. Because the graviton's phase arrow in time is reversed to the forward arrow of time, the graviton's comma cannot move from the space it is forced into and forms a well of "compressed gravity" so to speak maintaining a reverse symmetry with space of reduced Mass E density>

[@gerrynightingale9045]

"All of the energy and matter that existed still exists. Matter does not create energy of itself. The actions of matter enable energy to become manifest".

[@MrKorrazonCold]

"See: E2=m2c4+p2c2 sixty symbols. Radiation c2 is the normal death principle. Everything slowly dies by radiating away its heat. Radioactivity an explosively quick death principle. Atomic fission helps vibrating inertial ref-frames (p2) of matter to explode c2 expanding instantly, instead of decaying over long periods. Space is a division 2pi of solidity M into entropy C2 the second law of thermodynamics, but also 4pi R2= a multiplication of Volume at the expense of gravitational potential c2."

[@ForOdinAndAsgard]

Very good question. Theoretically yes but the power needed will be near infinite from our perspective at this moment. You never know what will happen though.

[@NeedsEvidence]

The talk was given in the good old times when particle physicists have become exited about the few Higgs boson candidate events seen with the ALEPH detector (corresponding to a Higgs boson mass of around 114 GeV) and then became frustrated because the run time of LEP (the predecessor of the LHC) was not extended to confirm the signal. In the retrospect it was a wise decision since we know since 2012 that the ALEPH signal was statistics and the Higgs detected at LHC is more than 10 GeV heavier.

[@JohnFHendry]

I see as did Mr. Jasitus who worked on the Manhattan project that metaphysics and physics must be joined and understanding time and the inertial frame of reference needed to set the Universe's clock is the key to doing that. It came as no shock to him that I changed overnight because I discovered consciousness was creating everything we see, but he was surprised I was focusing so heavily on what constitutes a true inertial frame of reference. Although I pointed out Ohm's law was in control of >

[@MrKorrazonCold]

A quote from Paul Dirac. "It is not entirely satisfactory to describe the 'vacuum' using an infinite sea of negative-energy electrons The infinitely negative contributions from the sea of negative-energy electrons has to be cancelled by an infinite positive 'bare' energy and the contribution to the charge density and current coming from the sea of negative-energy electrons is exactly cancelled by an infinite positive 'jellium' background so that the net charge density of the vacuum equals zero."

[@JohnFHendry]

The weak force and the strong force move E as a constant back and forth doing the "moon dance". But you must add the "missing" graviton's 4th Mass oscillation phase in time (called the "hole" right next to the electron) to the atom's oscillation cycle to have all 4 oscillation phases needed to show how it works. In a Universe where space is relative to time anything that oscillates must have 4 phases in time. The weak force is a SOL clock and WF asy adds time needed for time & motion in the SF.

[@JohnFHendry]

> reference frame of the electron/graviton moving phases. But relative to the proton/neutron phase frames in sync with the first non-moving state of Mass (the inertial frame of reference time is relative to) the intermediary space (neutrino) is not moving. It only moves if you use the 2nd and 4th phase moving frames of the atom (electron/graviton) as your still frame of reference. We observe in motion from the middle of the weak force Mass oscillation cycle so see the neutrino go through matter>

[@JohnFHendry]

Using a set weight for pressure used in the analogy of an electric current flowing via Ohm's law @ V=IxR as it really is has a problem as a scale because it's not V=I/R as the analogy would indicate as Pressure=Volume/Weight. It needs the inward octave forming space added to explain why it's not simple division. And since electrons flow backwards to the analogy - to +, it needs the strong force shown in opposite phase to the weak force where the analogy of pressure creating a direction works

[@wizardoflawz]

the fundamental mistake is the belief that light "wants" to go at light speed, simply because it has no mass. I believe it is the Higgs field itself that travels at light speed, which explains its huge mass. Light photons are just riders on the Higgs field. As are neutrinos. This explains why they both travel at the same speed. anyhow it makes no sense to suggest you can push a light photon, which has no mass.

[@cormacphillips2585]

I think this is great. I love his enthusiasm. 'check the maths" I'll leave that to the professionals.

[@MrKorrazonCold]

To perform a computational operation physicists shine pulses of light of appropriate frequency, duration and intensity -known as pi-pulses-on the atom. If the electron begins in the 0 state, it will end up in the 1, and vice versa. Sending pi/2-pulses sends an electron from 0 or 1 state into a combination, or superposition, of both known as qubits two states have different energies, and it is the energy that determines the bit value. This new operation gives quantum computers their immense power

[@wizardoflawz]

The Higgs field travels at the speed of light, which explains why objects have mass, even when they are at rest. Gravity is a reversal of the process, the absorption of Higgs particles into objects with mass. Since the Higgs are absorbed by the massive objects, the other Higgs must follow, as if falling into a whirlpool, much like Einstein described it. Under my theory, the "law of entropy" goes away. Massive objects don't suffer entropy because they are always absorbing Higgs items.

[@CandideSchmyles]

What was notable to me was that there was no admission that every tested prediction of supersymmetry has failed to find any evidence for it. This is a glaring omission given the weight applied to it.

[@JohnFHendry]

"and still held true by measurement" WITHOUT understanding the measurement that cannot be challenged. CERN said it was a "loose cable" before I pointed out Somerfield's findings that go back to the 40's connecting the neutrino to the photon. One other person saw the match too but not CERN. That's a longg loooose cable because it got to FIRMI Lab's neutrinos too (before CERN). Yes but its E=m+{a}c2 relative to the strong force as E=mc2 is still relative to the weak force's unit of measurement.

[@gypsycruiser]

Dated lecture but very informative and beautifully simplified

[@MrKorrazonCold]

"E=mc2 relative to solids, liquids, gases and plasma. Only difference is Volume. Time is inverse multiplying+ and -dividing like frequency and wavelength. Generation of any information exceeds radiation during first half of its cycle. Radiation then exceeds generation for second half of the cycle. That's why its E=mc2, because the constant outward momentum of EMR repelling like charged wave centres absorbing+/-emitting energy densities from previous levels forms an inward force called gravity."

[@MrKorrazonCold]

Just like dropping a pebble into a pond, the polarization of the expanding crest and troughs will remain same for the entire surface of that light sphere, so objects continuously reacting and expanding with each other, their light spheres superimpose, or amplify the inward absorption causes them to resonate together towards the same moment of time, or the greatest energy or mass, because it has the shortest rate that time flows oscillating from Planck's constant now is the moment of emission C2.

[@crazy8sdrums]

The mystery becomes much less so when you realize that the empty space is far less empty than the stuff we believe is not empty, that being mass. The mass is more empty than the vacuum. Start thinking in those terms and so much confusion and mystery goes away and many of the ideas that seem so incoherent become much more focused. The secret is in Light. It is very simple but not so easy to understand.

[@JohnFHendry]

"There is no universal time because time moves from the future to the past within an individual ref-frame with its own energy." What you are seeing is true as Mass is oscillating taking time with it in two opposite directions. But look close starting at the beginning and notice an initial direction that came before the reverse Mass oscillation going backwards giving us what we call the forward arrow of time but is really an upward arrow connected to gravity and relative to the observer.

[@JohnFHendry]

"is a ratio " yup.... Time = Energy. And like energy time must be conserved and that's where the 2nd arrow of space comes in. But you can and must also say E=T+{a}. You can only say T=E once at the beginning and from there you throw away the = sign and replace it with {a} because of asymmetry (of the weak force). {a} tells you exactly how many atoms there are AND where they are to be found even their parts all mixed up....but the math is deep so sometimes dice can come in handy as long as you

[@JohnFHendry]

Mass oscillates in 2 directions creating 2 waves, the electric wave & the gravity wave to create the forward arrow of time. It take the time of 2 Mass oscillations to create 1 instance in 3D. Time is relative to the observer, so is the direction of gravity in spacetime. The 2nd Mass oscillation wave harmonic comma is bigger that the first comma and the difference in wave length is exactly the size of a proton. It's added length is responsible for the force of gravity AFTER the 2nd oscillation.

[@MrKorrazonCold]

Great comment!!! Waves of the Ocean seem to traverse the Seas, but they only appear to do so, for waves are pistons in the Universal engines and pistons operate up and down. Sinusoidal wave pistons of light or of the Plasma Ocean, reproduce each other from wave field to wave field of space forming input+0/1-output wave chain reactions from planes of zero curvature which bound all wave fields act as mirrors as each pair becomes what the other was reflecting light from one wave field into another.

[@MrKorrazonCold]

"The Lorentz contraction of space+time linked with Einsteins equations for 'rest mass energy' gives the atom or group of atoms enough energy to expand EMR, projecting their own space-time (time) at the square of the speed of light. This is why the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers and is not relative to the movement of the observer. This is why we have the measurement problem because spacetimes are continuously contracting reacting and expanding with each other."