The Myths of the 1619 Project

Debunk the 1619 Project-and Learn Real American History-with One of America’s Leading Scholars
You’ve heard about the 1619 Project, right? That radical revision of America’s history by the New York Times?
How should conservatives respond? How can you debunk the 1619 Project’s erroneous claims eloquently and effectively?
You’ve find the answers in this episode of Conservative Conversations with ISI. Here to guide you is renowned author and scholar Peter Wood, president of the National Association of Scholars and author of the new book 1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project.
You will come away with a better grasp of American history-and the knowledge you need to debunk the claims for your friends and loved ones.
Recorded December 10, 2020.
Interested in more events like this? Get involved with the Intercollegiate Studies Institute at isi.org/join-community/?....

[@carlroberts4540]

Did.the.development.of.america.stop.after.1616.

[@rochellecaffee3267]

The “weaponization Of guilt” was a comment made by Jordan Peterson

[@rochellecaffee3267]

Any time we generalize about a people or idea, we run the risk of general deceit

[@rochellecaffee3267]

Thank you guys, for your work to expose these lies.❤😊

[@rochellecaffee3267]

Did Nicole Hannah Jones claim to be a Christian or some other religion?

[@user-ev9to4xx2o]

America.history.opening of the west

[@TheManySHO]

You mean lies

[@michaelfalsia6062]

Because we have the greatest founding documents in human history, second only to the establishment of Nationsl Israel, we are held to such a higher standard than native Africans or other nations and empires who practiced slavery for centuries before America. In that sense, we bear greater guilt than others. Slavery in America was most certainly not more inhumane and cruel than that which was practiced by Rome China Islam and native African tribes and empires. This is where the sham of the 1619 project lies along with the leftist liars, which produce this distortion deliberately for personal and political gain.