The New Chinese Stealth Fighter is in Service!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Go to ground.news/millennium to get 50% off unlimited access to the Ground News Vantage plan. This is their best deal of the year, available for a limited time only, so be sure to use my link!

[@黃海恒]

What you called a joke is NOT a 6th gen plane! Its actually a model of "Baidi"(White Emperor), a spacecraft in Chinese Sci-Fi "Project Nantianmen". The idea that that thing could be taken to resemble anything in the real world is indeed quite funny.

[@NesconProductions]

Changes in the Chinese military in the last 30 (especially the last 10) years is nothing short of astounding. While the USAF touts their new F-15EX which can carry a lot of missiles is still a 4+ gen fighter (a step back from the F-22 a true 5th gen). Meanwhile China is building 5th gen air superiority fighters in mass. See the J-35 design as matured F-22 / F-35 design (with a touch of Su-27+ in the rear & looks very capable. I'm sure China has long since had the plans for 5th gen American aircraft (plus the 4+ Russian in their current inventory) and took the best of all the designs & came up with an even better aircraft. Also (with a big assist from Russian technology) China seems is now the world leader in thrust vectoring engines & why the engines of the J-35 are spaced farther apart (than Western twin engine fighter designs). Seems Western engine designers collectively are way behind in thrust vectoring technology. Note single engine Western aircraft (such as the F-16 or Gripen) could certainly benefit from such as the Chinese J-10C now has equipped. Side Note: the "White Emperor" 6th Generation Chinese fighter maybe a dream mock-up but looks incredible (like a Transformer character & hear is just a artist sci-fi concept design) 😘. Thanks to our host & Otis for both providing such well-grounded information ☺. PS: Hope a flying drone finds it's way into the Millennium7 family 😁!

[@ethericbliss23]

You're joking with that title. Right?!? Can they even give these things away?? They'd might as well just built this around an old F4 air frame, engine, and controls and screwed together with Phillip's head screw, too. It would be MUCH more concerning and it's radar cross-section would be much smaller, too. XD The only thing that'll change are the amount of targets that need downed. IF even that. XP But I guess SOMEone's gotta try and make it look good though. XD C+ for effort. ; )

[@gorebello]

Is crusex 2024 interesting enough for a video?

[@AmjadKhan-cm5sm]

Does J-35 A have a gun?

[@Kayzef2003]

Chinese manufacturing output is simply out of this world. They are building Destroyers, Aircraft Carriers, Stealth Fighters, Submarines and drones at an unmatched rate...and still have enough capacity to build mega projects like Dams and Ports across Africa and Latin America.

[@donaldlee8249]

Think of America prior to ww2 and britain in the early 1900s, China today has the similar percentage of global industrial output as america back then

[@Kayzef2003]

​ @donaldlee8249 No. China's might is sooo much larger. USA or Britain NEVER had a hard-working population of over 1.4B people.

[@patrickweaver1105]

Except so much of it is defective.

[@Kayzef2003]

@@patrickweaver1105 You tested Chinese weapons? The VAST majority of tech used in the west (From 4G/5G infrastructure to Subway trains) are build in China. DJI drones are even used by US law enforcement. Are they defective?

[@dduay]

And still overcapacity😢

[@irfanhafizhbuntoro3772]

this airshow is a gift for military aviation fans. So many new stuff.

[@TwoThreeRight]

Yeah Chinese clown show of a ‘6th gen’ aircraft was entertaining to say the least 😂

[@Antiwesternthug]

@@TwoThreeRight womp womp

[@MuneerA-xg2fq]

​@@TwoThreeRightplease don't cry 😂

[@voidtempering8700]

@@TwoThreeRight China didn't present a 6th gen aircraft, what are you talking about?

[@optimalp2844]

​@@TwoThreeRight If you actually read the description of the plane, it's a concept for some project in the 2040s or smth not some 6th gen aircraft

[@scroopynooperz9051]

imo the finest military aviation channel on all of KZbin. keep up the great work mate

[@alessiosem2238]

Subscribed to this channel. Finally an unbiased military channel, a breath of fresh air.

[@你看个锤子你看]

Everyone is discussing the J35A, J15T, and J15D, which are the aircraft that made their debut. I think the strategic significance of the HQ19 BMD system is no less than that of the J35A. According to official statements, the KKV warhead is a terminal anti-missile system, and it has certain mid-course anti-missile and anti-HGV capabilities in the atmosphere. It feels similar to the secret THAAD ER in the United States. Back to the J35A, it is definitely not a "cheap" version of the J20 in the Chinese Air Force system. It can be deployed on a large scale, with a combat radius of more than 1,200 kilometers. It can replace old fighters such as the J7, J8, and the early J10, J11A, and Su-27. The J20 now has an annual production capacity of nearly 100 aircraft, which may allow the Chinese to expand their new fleet, making the Chinese Air Force no less organized than the United States.

[@你看个锤子你看]

Chinese Internet comments said that unless China brings out the legendary H20 strategic bomber next time, it will be hard to have more discussion than this year's Zhuhai Air Show. Because this Zhuhai Air Show, I didn't expect so many equipments to be there. In addition to the previous three musketeers of the Chinese Air Force, there are also J35A, J15T J15D YY20, J15D HQ19 BMD system, unmanned combat vehicles ，Drones and unmanned ships, and Russia's Su-57……If J10C hadn't shown off its beast mode mount, no one would have paid attention to it this time...………😂😂😂

[@shalashaska5851]

Until China can catch up on air refueling and transport they will remain a second rate Air Force compared to the US. A regional power only with an inflated reputation.

[@henli-rw5dw]

I think hq19 is a far more serious threat. When china tested df-31ag there were two smaller missile trailing right behind df-31, likely the hq19. Looks like certain kill on ICBM.

[@ravenloopwong5148]

别喂猪吃满汉全席，它们吃不明白的。你居然还给猪介绍上了。哈哈哈，美国人的文明只有200年，两代人首尾相加。你指望他们的思维方式跟我们一样吗？

[@AirRBnpc]

To be honest, one of the overlooked systems that made its debut on the 珠海航展 is the anti-drone jamming system, since as shown in many cases in the Russo-Ukrainian war, drones dictate the fate of a tank, so to prevent tanks from being useless in usual combat such as personnel support, this system is necessary.

[@asimjabbar8445]

Thanks for the video. Any Chinese equipment content is welcome. They aren't covered much on the internet by non Chinese unbiased experts.

[@jasonl3254]

The difference between this channel and many others, is the depth of analysis. The people who say the J35 is a copy of the F35 lack understanding of aircraft design and critical thinking.

[@superskullmaster]

Dude they are literally naming the plane the same thing but with a J instead of an F.

[@mijmijrm]

@superskullmaster .. do you believe things with similar names must be copies of each other?

[@mokondoenak3706]

​@@superskullmaster haha proof of lack of critical thinking.😂

[@billclark834]

@@superskullmaster Saab J35A:😢

[@CNSPACE2030]

There are very few youtubers who don’t have the arrogance and prejudice to appreciate China’s high-quality products.

[@stevencher9968]

There are few channels that would prompt me to subscribe, this one really impressed me with the objectivity and openness to new possibilities without bias. Good job and keep it coming. 🎉

[@olisk-jy9rz]

And no clickbait thumbnails or titles

[@thabo.s_archives7756]

I started watching your videos and it's a fresh to biased American content creators holding them back to being subjective. Thank You M7

[@Dannyvas3]

The amount of biased USA aviation content on KZbin is insufferable. It makes sense though. It brings US views which generates the most ads revenue.

[@ASpyNamedJames]

@@Dannyvas3 Also this website originates as an English language project, and where do most English speakers live?

[@martinwilkinson7939]

@@ASpyNamedJames It's not just that. pro-American BS gets pushed by the algorithm constantly.

[@DrVictorVasconcelos]

I got shadowbanned from a snowflake US pilot's channel because I asked if calling aircraft loss a "mishap" was an idea of the Ministry of Truth 😂 My first comment on the channel, instant shadowban. C. W. Lemoine is his name.

[@Dannyvas3]

@@DrVictorVasconcelos they're so fragile

[@kngharv]

best video on J-35 on the net, including those in Chinese

[@你看个锤子你看]

yes

[@roro-v3z]

to be fair, there are some really cool stuff on J 35 on Chinese internet, even Chinese channels on youtube. But in English, yes this is the best

[@jasonj3599]

@@roro-v3z Actually, Binkov’s previous episode was pretty good, but the problem is that everyone in his comment section knows that many people are brainless trolls. I even suspect that the people in his comment section didn’t even finish watching his video.The problem with sandbox is that many of the data cited are wrong. For example, he said that the F35 radar is much stronger than the J35. The data he gave is KLJ7A, but KLJ7A is for light aircraft such as Jf17, with a very small array, and its detection range is definitely not as good as APG81. And it is a technology from ten years ago. However, this radar has not been purchased by the Chinese Air Force, and J10C does not have this radar, so the J35 radar can only be more advanced than the J10C. So there are big errors in his argument

[@westjohnson5740]

@jasonj3599 ☝️🤓 Correct me if I'm wrong; A knock off Will always get outperformed by the original, specially if I was build by a country known for reliability issue problem.🤡

[@kngharv]

@@jasonj3599 But I don't drill on this kind of details, simply because radar comparison is very tricky and difficult to proof.

[@walhdamaskus2408]

Everyones laugh to the chinese untill they need to go ro contain and ban the chinese from the competation. Everyones admires the US military power untill they have to witnessing how the american are kicked out from the afganistan like a beaten dog. 😂

[@eliasmai6170]

it doesn't matter how advanced your weapons are, if you enploy bad foreign policies or have incompétent people creating military doctrines and stratégies, no amount of advanced weaponry can save you.

[@Hystericall]

afghanistan, syria, iraq, ukraine, vietnam, korea. I grant them Iraq 1 but then Dubya fucked that up with Iraq 2

[@mrbrisvegas2]

The only successful war the US has fought in the past 80 years was the invasion of Grenada in 1982.

[@asimjabbar8445]

In my opinion J-35 is ideal to amass 5th gen fighter numbers in PLAAF. J-35 could be deployed in western command bordering India and can also be used to counter whatever Taiwan or other threats close to the Chinese mainland. While J-20 would be kept mostly for long range sniping missions to keep the enemy imbalance. There would also be quite a few exports as well because there aren't much options available of 5th gen fighters ready to be delivered in the export market. It's a perfect high low combo of J-20 and J-35. J-20 is long range more capable fighter like the J-16 and J-35 is short legged highly potent fighter in its own right like the J-10B/C. And may be they would operate in similar grouping J-16 (non stealth missile/bomb truck) supporting the spearheading J-20 in long range missions. While similarly the J-10C supporting the J-35 closer to the border regions.

[@asimjabbar8445]

J-10CE is shown with multiple rack PL-15s in this airshow. So now the J-10 can carry more BVR missiles and ground attack munitions to support the 5th Gen fighters.

[@westjohnson5740]

0 capabilities 🤡

[@Chris-f4n5r]

None of China's neighbors are threatening them. Maybe pockets of right wing warhawks In any number of nations like the magats of usa threaten China verbally. But there is no physical threats nor entire nations that wish war on their neighbors. It's one faction of one political wing that exists in most all nations.

[@subasthapa8323]

​@@westjohnson5740certified bot

[@westjohnson5740]

@@subasthapa8323 👉🤡👈

[@jiokl7g9t6]

Please cover the complete set of PLA munitions in a video!

[@JLu-yd8rw]

Thanks!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Thank you!

[@MGZetta]

I heard some westerners say this is the plane which they wanted f35 to look like.

[@dr.j5642]

No the J35 looks way cheaper and of a lower quality. No one in the West says we wish the F35 looked like the J35 lol

[@liu3gz]

@dr.j5642 The west really love the obesity, both human body and airframe, lol.

[@Godsmustbecrazi3]

@@dr.j5642so you rate quality on spending too much? Typical Americans with no brains, you can see from the j35 are of well built quality and it was done far cheaper which shows that American military contractors are scams, inflated prices that a selected few gain from

[@calangel]

The skin on the F-35 looks better, ​@@dr.j5642, not the plane itself. The lines are cleaner on the J, no doubt. I personally love the F-35C, but have to admit that the plane could definitely be sleeker. When it comes to the basics of air superiority and fighter jet-ness, the F-35 family is severely lacking.

[@Gyyghhhhjjjkk]

@@liu3gz the fat airframe was only a joke for the B variant which is a svtol aircraft to begin with. A and C variant are long wings and decently thin body though. J35 also decided to be equipped for airforce first hence why its a lot thinner as well. Don't know why its not for carrier though.

[@jasonchen5994]

I ram bilingual in English and Chinese, but I am tired of both kinds of channels, which are either heavily biased pro Chinese or poopoo Chinese. This channel has the objectivity and knowledge that I appreciate.

[@JJ-yg1sf]

换位思考一下，假如把珠海换成美国加州展，这些装逼都是美国拿出来展出的，你想世界会吹成啥样。

[@hillbillysceptic1982]

The F35 has proven to deliver ordinance on targets protected by modern radar systems like S400. How is it biased to say aircraft that have actually performed the the capabilities they’re designed for, should be taken more seriously than aircraft whose abilities are only supported by assumption and opinion and not acheivement in combat?

[@jasonchen5994]

@@hillbillysceptic1982 Not only F35 has not proven to defeat S400, on the contrary, there has been a recent incident, as reported by SOFREP, that F35 was locked on by a Russian/Iranian radar at a long distance that forced the Israeli to abort an airstrike. You seem to only want to receive information that fits your preference.

[@FangtaoZhao-gw3vy]

所以你看见偏向西方主人的你心里才舒服

[@M16_Akula-III]

@@hillbillysceptic1982 So, comparing one aircraft that did combat to another that hasn't entered anykind of combat due to being.. There isn't any combat the country maker is in. This whole comparison is stupid. Using your idea, WW2 submarines are better at ASW than modern submarines, because subs had sunk subs in WW2. See how stupid it is? And again, the RUS. didn't want anykind of war with Israel, nor does Israel want to as well.

[@jcarvalho1500]

I was waiting for this sober analysis! Thank you! Winds of change are coming.

[@shmeckle666]

I’ll say it again, China was been COOKING at Zuhai this year. What a treat

[@Media-009]

This J35A is promising. It's seems a solid jet

[@MGZetta]

Yes, please do videos of those chinese weapons since I'm too lazy to translate it myself. 😂

[@你看个锤子你看]

Chinese here, even if you are on the Chinese Internet, you have to spend a lot of time looking for papers and some blogs related to the CCP system to get a rough idea of ​​Chinese weapons. Some media like to overestimate, some like to underestimate, or just talk nonsense. Unlike Western weapons, for many things, you only need to go to the official websites of Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing to find them.

[@farrukhbilal6988]

Pakistani pilots are in china flying prototype J-35, not only for training but also helping chinese to refined J-35. Since Pakistani pilots trained like western pilots and they are very good at that, Air exercises with Pakistani pilots is very valuable for chinese.

[@marvinfok65]

Pakistan is definitely be the first country outside China to fly the J-35 due to the close relationship between the 2 countries.

[@Chris-f4n5r]

Let me guess your a Pakistani? So Predictable. Just like western patriots. All so similar all so easily led and controlled.

[@Bytional]

Pakistan pilots were invited because Shengyang air corp need clients, back that time it was clear PLAAF won't buy it, so they need to find other clients to fund this project.

[@Darko-kn6il]

​@@Bytionalno other country has funded the J-35 fool

[@thespeedracer5772]

I hope Pakistani pilots enjoyed their western training. I do not foresee those opportunities available to them anymore.

[@munavvarulmillath]

You notice things that others fail to appreciate.

[@moroboshidan7960]

The greatest advantage of China, independent of the quality, is production capacity. Even if their jet is worse than the counterparts (and I'm not saying it is, I don't know), they can produce more and faster.

[@ABaumstumpf]

I mean for the pilots we can only hope that the quality is not as bad as the quality of the rest of their military equipment. And the military already has the advantage of not having the tofu-dreg that the normal people have to deal with.

[@你看个锤子你看]

@@ABaumstumpf It is common sense that the accident rate of military equipment is higher than that of civilian products. Just as the accident rate of jet fighters is much higher than that of passenger planes, the accident rate of armored vehicles is also higher than that of civilian cars.

[@你看个锤子你看]

@@ABaumstumpf If you want to talk about quality...the F16 crash rate is not low...😢

[@ABaumstumpf]

@@你看个锤子你看 " It is common sense that the accident rate of military equipment is higher than that of civilian products." I am not talking about accident-rate. And no, ruggedness is one of the main characteristics of military equipment. If a machine breaks down before the solder first using it is in his grave it is crap.

[@你看个锤子你看]

@@ABaumstumpf You may not know much about the military, you can drive a car to travel hundreds of kilometers, but if you drive an armored vehicle, you may not be able to drive that far, you will face problems

[@ijoseluis]

Thank you very much for your video. Again deeply grounded and prudent. Wise.

[@NCM-xy8ow]

I am awaiting to see it demonstrate its agility, maneuverability, power etc. Way more than what was shown at the Zhuhai airshow

[@Zayn._gnx]

Agility and maneuverabilty dont mean shi today, its all about stealth and range

[@yaoypl]

"Producing a lot of stuff cheaply, quickly, and of high quality is what the Chinese do best." Amen👍

[@Chris-f4n5r]

Cheap and high quality? Sounds like an oxymoron. Saying Amen to China is a yet bigger contradiction bc as communists; religion is not allowed. Science substitutes religion in the party CCp! Imagine using logic, instead of superstition? In some cases religions are suppressed with ruthless military authority. And im not even against that or Marxism tbh. But I am against ignorance and contradictions or untruths.

[@yong88888]

@@Chris-f4n5rGoogle it, how many beliefs in China.

[@Wvk5zc]

​@@Chris-f4n5rthe irony. Because clearly you don't know shit about the truth in china

[@jetli740]

@@Chris-f4n5r talk about china when you know nothing about china...amazing

[@turtlesoup8134]

@@Chris-f4n5r cheap and good is impossible? thats why your country can't compete with China. You are doing a good job of dragging your country's feet. There is a reason why the western companies are being outcompeted by chinese company. Religion not allowed in China? LOL. no wonder you don't understand cheap and well made. Ignorance and untruth is ironically describing who you are.

[@directxxxx71]

J means Jian Mie (殲滅（Traditional Chinese) 歼灭( Simplified Chinese), which literally means "destroy or annihilate" in English. So J 35 could be meaning "destroy the 35 or annihilate 35"😂😂😂

[@wokekkk]

Chinese names always go hard

[@Hystericall]

basically a Destroyer.

[@EthanX1ao]

So if J35 is destroy F35 then what is F11 or F10 or F7 or F6 or F20 or F12?

[@nickz7771]

歼＝歼击机 意思为空中优势战斗机

[@AtlantisStuart]

Nope that doesn't make any sense for all other Chinese fighters named with J. Sure it does mean Jian Mie (destroy / annihilate; and it's actually Jian Ji = 歼击, which I personally believe that comes from Russian / Soviet naming system as they call their fighter jets the same way, according to Wiki) but that's because of its role as air superiority fighter. There were some other aircrafts like JH-7, of which JH means Jian-Hong or Jian Ji - Hong Zha, literally Fighter-Bomber (multirole). The only difference is that currently most advanced multirole fighters in China are simply named with J (e.g. J-16) rather than JH.

[@cbhlde]

Hi Otis and his human! :)

[@ReineDedeurwaerder-Sulmo-rz9cz]

😂❤

[@LP18888]

Everyone is focused on the J35A and J20 fighters, I am more amazed at the "Jiu Tian" Drone carrying drone and the robotic wolves. If China is showing you those I can't imagine what other robotic tech they already have. That is the future of warfare.

[@adamwu4201]

If we show 1.0， it means we are developing 2.0，thinking 3.0

[@goodluck-mo8dr]

都是仿制印度的，1个印度士兵可以打败3个美国士兵或者5个韩国士兵和10个中国士兵！我们以追赶印度为目标😊

[@uconnjames]

As always, a great video! Thanks for sharing!

[@RightWingNutter]

Yes! A rundown on Chinese air launched weapons would be very interesting.

[@mukhtarullahsiddiqi9795]

China knows better than anyone to customise j35 for naval purpose. I don't know why did you laugh at multiple platforms presented at Zhuhai airshow specially at Drone which look extremely lethal. This reflects the same mentality of US and India who often declare easily that Chinese Tech is not reliable but infact China has progressed more than anyone in every department

[@erdongchen0823]

Is it possible that the high tech industry in the United States has been commandeered by Indians?

[@calebschoonraad6810]

I always enjoy your honest, unbiased content.

[@golmgolm]

My friend's dad worked at Гражданские Самолёты Сухого on SSJ-100 (just SSJ at the time) and he had the same gift of making complex engineering problems sound simple as you do. I really love your videos

[@cuoresportivo155]

It's a sign of actually understanding the matter 👍

[@philipdavis7521]

I find it interesting that every airforce seems to go through a process of finding they have too many different types of aircraft, then focusing on building one or two ‘do everything’ airframes, find that this doesn’t work, and goes back to a multiplicity of types, no doubt for the whole process to go around again in a 30 or so year cycle.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

Seems more to be a question of the respective airforce‘s size and mission set. If you operate aircraft carriers or have a large land area to cover, that’s pretty divergent requirement sets for a single type of aircraft to fulfill effectively. If you have the budget, getting specialized solutions for different mission types can be worth the increased cost. For example the only reason Germany is getting F-35s is the lack of nuclear strike certification for the Eurofighter, but would have been perfectly happy to have Eurofighter take on every role of the retiring Tornado instead of every role but nuclear strike.

[@Hystericall]

Probably more a function of limited economic resources.

[@dgvsscf]

除开经济技术原因就是战斗机飞机寿命设计一般三十年左右，该换新飞机了，你不会想继续用三十年前的老飞机是吧。

[@mikes.4136]

Excellent analysis!

[@emperor_sunshine]

I vote yes on that scientific video. Thank you for making this video!

[@justatiger6268]

6:40 Yes, please! The scientific (nerd) videos on aircraft design are PURE GOLD!

[@WmRowe-yx8iq]

Been waiting for this video since the first pics of the j35 came out

[@MouradMokrane]

As always, a BRILLIANT, very informative video! Thank you!!

[@Native_love]

You sir are like a fine wine, you only get better with time! I can't believe I am getting up so early just to watch your video! ❤🎉🤝

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Morning!

[@Gustav_Kuriga]

The important of commonality isn't solely in production lines however. It also comes into play when talking about spare parts, many of which aren't structural. Having greater commonality will make the logistics of repairs and ensuring ready rates stay up MUCH easier, even if the planes require two different production lines to actually assemble.

[@cmaxxen]

The missile breakdown from the show would be great!

[@Kobyhandsome]

Sometimes I’m not interested in a type of a particular topic you might touch to explain but because of your unbiased in-depth analysis I enjoy paying attention to your analysis. 😍

[@DavidGamersChannel]

Wow, you are very professional and you are basically well-reasoned, so I like to watch your videos, instead of other bloggers calling him imitators because they don’t understand military affairs.

[@jasonj3599]

Sir, thank you for your analysis. I am thinking about a question. Among the fifth-generation aircraft, heavy or medium is more suitable for large-scale equipment? J20 Advantages: Long range, larger radar sensor size, thanks to its huge body, its two-seater version can be used as an air combat command node to command drones and electronic warfare. There is no need to worry about the problems encountered by the F35 upgraded to TR3 (such as heat dissipation problems) J35 Advantages: Cheaper, better stealth than J20, theoretically faster construction speed than J20.

[@你看个锤子你看]

Depends on your budget. But given the situation between China and the United States in the Western Pacific, I feel that the J20 production is higher. Just like the production of China's Flanker series is slightly higher than that of the J10 series.

[@jasonj3599]

@@你看个锤子你看 Yes, Shenyang is under great pressure to continue producing J16/D, upgrade J11B to J11BG, and J15/D, as well as J35 fighters.

[@你看个锤子你看]

@@jasonj3599 There are nearly 400 J16s now. I estimate that the final number will be around 600 by the end of the year after next. The United States now has more than 200 Strike Eagle +EXs in its inventory. After completing 15EX orders, the total number will not exceed 300. J11B can be upgraded slowly. China has only three aircraft carriers now. Liaoning CV16 has completed the replacement of J15T and J15D, mainly Shandong CV17 and Fujian CV18. However, these two aircraft carriers do not need too many J15T/D, and the total number does not exceed 60.

[@jasonj3599]

@@你看个锤子你看 The J16 is still a good ground-attack force, and its air combat capability is also strong. If the J35 is equipped in large quantities in the future, it can focus on being a bomb truck, or launching Pl17 to attack targets such as early warning aircraft. China has extended the service life of the JH7A, and has cracked the Su-30 fire control, allowing the Su-30 to carry China's domestically produced ground-attack ammunition. But at present, or before 2030, China's J16 still cannot be fully used as a full-time bomb truck, because in addition to the F35 F22, the United States also has many fourth-generation and a half aircraft, such as the Super Hornet F15E/EX, and the J16 fleet still has to deal with these things. It still has to help the J20 J35 share many air control combat tasks. And the PL21 is not in service, only the J16 can mount the PL17 to strike early warning aircraft and other targets at a long distance.

[@你看个锤子你看]

@@jasonj3599yes

[@afankhan4666]

PAF video has the statement 70% water an 30% land. ;) On Pakistan has made some major purchases of Chinese aircraft recently, J10C purchase and delivery was about 18 months. Its possible PAF will get a handful of aircraft initially and use them as a base to train crews for future larger tranches. That happened with the F16, JF17 and J10C. You saw a handful delivered and then a gap of a year or two for the rest

[@你看个锤子你看]

Has Pakistan purchased more J10Cs?

[@HimanshBishnoi]

Ya I think so​@@你看个锤子你看

[@HimanshBishnoi]

​@@你看个锤子你看by selling donkey

[@afankhan4666]

@@你看个锤子你看 Yes. They got 6 in spring 2022, a year after the deal was signed (so almost certainly from diverted J10 batch) and then newer batches in summer 2023 onwards. Over 20 now.

[@你看个锤子你看]

@@afankhan4666OK，thanks your information

[@shutaozhang9827]

What a great video, unbiased and clear

[@mep867]

And thank you very much for making the video, love your work.

[@greedyinvader9462]

J35 considered same level with f35 when it have the submerge and automatic eject the pilot capabilities like F35 just like starliner have the capabilty to prolong the astronaut to stay in iss

[@angelosasso1653]

There is potential for a big shift in arms exports outside the NATO space with China now. Formerly those states would almost exclusively buy from Russia. Now comes the controversial part: China seems to start running circles around Russia in terms of technology and while some aspects such as engine development did have some major problems, a lot of other stuff looks very promising from the outside. Take for example the current Flanker variants. China wasn´t happy with the Russians not giving in on their demands for a more capable variant and so China actually built it themselves. Now they are introducing their second 5th gen fighter jet, something Russia hasn´t even done yet. In other areas it is the same story: Russia is still stuck with 30-40 year old technology like their cancer spreading toxic waste heap they call an aircraft carrier and the Chinese are operating pretty solid designs. I´d argue in terms of aviation Russia is still a bit closer to China than anything else and even there I personally lack years behind what the Chinese put out, both in quality and quantity.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Russian aerodynamics, structures and propulsion with Chinese systems (at least some of them), but it's changing quickly.

[@angelosasso1653]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech Apart from maybe the J-20 I think their aerodynamics and structure have deviated a lot from the Russians, albeit you can see some Flanker influences from the top rear on the J-35. But the J-10 doesn´t seem to have driven any noticable influence from the Russian side. In fact I´d argue it´s much more influenced by European designs and a bit of F-16 flair. As far as I know, the J-10 also was influenced by an Israeli approach on fighter jets, which by itself was said to be influenced by European programs.

[@justacomment1657]

thumbs up for another great video :) technical detailed videos are always welcome :)

[@Mianaly20]

Pakistan has a experienced airforce which always select good aircrafts if you look at the record. they selected F16 platform in 1980s when it was new. Pakistani pilots flew many aircraft and passed the F16 in valuation and performence and now they are going to buy J35 5TH GEN after proper valuation of the platform. J35 already has a customer which is Pakistan airforce

[@subasthapa4839]

Definitely one of the least biased western commentor

[@williamho1976]

No, he is biased to the CCP for calling J(unk)35 good.

[@soakedwaters]

ı love unbiased information

[@bobbysuazjFhvcfgh]

This is not it. 😂😂

[@Van1illia]

@@bobbysuazjFhvcfghif itss not unbiased information then im the santa clause

[@plushieevie5699]

everything is bias cuz they get this info in "china info" which is we known its alrdy bias as real data is from real tested or much better: admitting the faulty and we havent heard any failure attempts from ccp. Edit: Tho ofc ig this is much better than the russians...well they overly lie their capability and i hope...(tho they are still US enemy and im in side to US cuz well my country is beside of china which is i hope they fail) that they are telling the truth but based on US stationed that their J20 fly well tho there still no fully analysis but it WORKED.

[@accountantthe3394]

​@@bobbysuazjFhvcfghSo which is?

[@Ncs-Charlie]

One day that J35AE will be flying in Pakistani colors ❤

[@Rukh_3547]

Another great video 👍

[@martinabowm1786]

It seems that only the USS Enterprise and Spock are missing there!😉 I like your enthusiasm and energy, especially for a rainy Monday morning!

[@Qiushishuo]

Actually, some US company joined.

[@Wwy-l9b]

Thanks for everyone who likes j35, from Chinese point of view, we are really proud of our air force. Expecting more surprises from PLA. Love you China

[@lovice]

The Chinese company made that model has never claimed it's a 6th gen fighter. And China as a country has not made such a claim, either. Could you please stop claiming it's a Chinese 6th gen fight on behalf of the its maker and China as a country? I don't know who started it. But this is getting ridiculous now...

[@traveler8052]

They always like to put words in china's mouth and mock it . they try to make themsevel look like smart .

[@Hystericall]

The new J35A is fast becoming my new favorite. Slick!

[@markxfarmer6830]

Yes on a video covering PRC guided air-launched weapons.

[@cihan1015]

For RCS, is it better to have flat surfaces like J-35's or curved like F-35's underside fuselage?

[@你看个锤子你看]

Different RCS from different angles

[@wshawn6817]

​@@cihan1015F22=0.01，F35=0.1，Su57=0.4，J20=0.01，J35

[@ortnerendre4197]

It's good to see how serious, big, dominant countries spend their money on important things...on a planet that we are just starting to properly destroy. What could be wrong? The video is great, as always!

[@tren133]

TBF at least the Chinese also spend shit tons of money on other things like high speed rail, EV and its requisite supply chain, new generation nuclear power, and a bevy of green energy tech such as solar/wind/hydro, none of which get anywhere near the funding or support here in the US.

[@ortnerendre4197]

@tren133 True. Absolutely true. However, they are forced to do this, they started from such environmentally polluting foundations.

[@douginorlando6260]

I wonder how long before a 2 ship or 4 ship mission has one aircraft different than the others … instead of radar in the nose, a large aperture objective lens with high resolution & high sensitivity for visible, IR and laser. Since all aircraft share sensor data, there is no need for them to all be identical.

[@akosyoutub]

I just watched in amazement when channels on the internet that presented themselves as "serious and professional" started seriously analyzing the Chinese anime airplane model...🤣

[@Pantsir-S1M]

Here We Go!!1

[@paultsjan6047]

You are a joke for calling other countries especially China's aircraft fighter a joke. All is not well with the Lockheed Martin F-35 costing $109 million per aircraft that is suppose to be the ultimate multi-role fighter aircraft in actions. When the Israel F-35 dare not enter into Iranian airspace to attack and offer air support in attacking Iran with the US and Israel dare not expose the “so-called” game changer aircraft on the mission fearing that the F-35 would be destroyed and its reputation in tatters. China conceptual sixth generation fighter jet is progressing ahead in a steady and continuous manner. The aircraft, “White Emperor B Variant,” is designed to fulfill dual mission roles and is an evolution of previous stealth aircraft concepts by China. The inclusion of artificial intelligence (AI) elements and enhanced data fusion capabilities is likely a priority in the development of this fighter. These advancements would enable better integration of information and seamless coordination with unmanned aerial systems, which is a hallmark of sixth-generation aircraft concepts. China’s ambition to keep pace in the race to develop sixth-generation air capabilities, potentially alongside developments in other countries, such as the United States’ Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program and Europe’s Future Combat Air System (FCAS). China’s strategic vision is to build an aerial combat capability that not only meets the demands of current conflicts but anticipates the challenges of future warfare.

[@xnz6525]

白帝战斗机是个科普项目

[@paultsjan6047]

@@xnz6525 The White Emperor B Variant is a conceptual sixth-generation fighter jet unveiled by China’s Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) at the Airshow China 2024 in Zhuhai. This advanced aircraft is part of the Nantianmen Project, a research and education initiative focused on future technology. The White Emperor B Variant signals a bold new chapter in China’s aerospace ambitions, aiming to dominate not only the skies but also the space beyond. Reports indicate that a test model could be ready by next year, with the final version expected to achieve a top speed of Mach 6 (six times the speed of sound). The development of this fighter jet is part of China’s ongoing efforts to enhance its air power and establish itself as a major player in the global aerospace industry. The development of this fighter jet is likely a response to the US Air Force’s Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, with China seeking to create a similar “system of systems” framework for air combat. The White Emperor B Variant’s advanced capabilities and space-based operations may influence the global aerospace landscape, potentially leading to a new era of competition and innovation in fighter jet design.

[@hunterbijukujo8937]

I guess he meant "prank", just guessing, could be wrong

[@xnz6525]

@@hunterbijukujo8937 不能等同恶作剧，不知道你们国家的词汇能不能准确描述这种情况，将一种可实现但未实现的科学构想，不单止出现在小说中，而是以各种计划，实体模型，展览看板，精细的文字描述，严谨的逻辑结构展现给青少年面前，激发他们科学研究的兴趣，也许正在参观的小朋友们就是真正开发它的人。

[@hunterbijukujo8937]

@@xnz6525 兄弟，我猜咱俩一国家的。我当然知道白帝的目的是什么，也希望他能上天。只是我觉得这大哥的视频在油管已经很客观了，而且他明显不是英语国家的人，有可能会用词不当。当然也有可能是我把别人想得太好了。

[@byhyew]

J35 was not the loser of the 4th/5th gen competition in China. The company was, and their proposal was something that looked like a low observable SU35. The FC31 was their attempt at staying relevant and busy after losing to the J20, and it was kind of a stealthy JF17, even the engine was the same. Then the Chinese navy probably decided to pick up the project a decade later, due to the J20 not suitable for carrier operation. They enlarged the airframe, developed new engine for it and put in the tech they had for J20 and there we have the J35.

[@phelansa23]

Great video. Thank you. Random thought…. But if you look in the context of BRICS, J20-J35, Su 57-SU 75…. Looking like a very interesting hi-lo mix. Brazil and South Africa with the Gripen, India’s Rafale’s….. I would think that South Africa, India ne Brazil would make very good customers for the Russians and the Chinese.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

The question is to a large extent, whether South Africa, India or Brazil want to align themselves with Russia and the PRC or the West. Currently they’re playing both sides as they haven’t yet been forced to pick a side. Russian exports had already started to decline before Russia started its war, so as long as this trend continues, we likely won’t see a lot of Su-57 and Su-75 exports.

[@sgt.grinch3299]

Thank you for a wonderful briefing of the platform. ✌️✌️🙏🙏Sir.

[@Mandom007]

the 6th grn proto is just a promo for a game

[@MM-wt2oo]

Good video, def interested in more videos and more technical analysis on j35 etc

[@Wvk5zc]

They even keep the '35' in their model name. Its like the chinese purposely flexed their hacking superiority and spite the americans 😂

[@suberchen3604]

su-35 mig-35

[@MGZetta]

They changed from 31 to 35 for a reason. 😂

[@thenecessarygood]

I assume you are American because of your arrogance ​@MGZetta

[@YSKWatch]

j35 means kill (f) 35.

[@mab2187]

In all honesty it fits the looks, J-31 or FC-31 doesn't have a nice ring to it. BTW just the neck portion and intakes look similar to the F-35 not the rest of the body.

[@VOTANIDITI]

This is a rational discussion

[@mikael5938]

Please make a video about china new stealth bomber H20. Its very intresting whut carrier killer missles it will have

[@你看个锤子你看]

The H20 is not that fast, and it is impossible to simply copy the B2. It is estimated that it has to take into account the ability to launch long-range hypersonic missiles and node capabilities similar to the B21.

[@hfdole]

Could not get a ticket this year as they were sold out by the time I heard about the airshow and did not want to pay a scalper. Maybe in two years for the next one. Thanks for your commentary.

[@Splattle101]

Not a perfect analogy, but the PLAF probably 'needs' the J35 the same way the USAAF needed the F-16 when they had the F-15.

[@joelau2383]

Not exactly. J35 is more like a hybrid between 4th gen multiple role attacker and 5th gen fighter instead of 5th gen multiple role fighter like F-35. The problem of multiple role stealth fighter concept is that fighter weapon bay is too small to carry effective ground attack weapons. F35 is a classic example that it's weapon bay can barely carry 2000lb JDAM without gliding wing or small missile like NSM. This capability is too bad comparing to low cost and risk of a stealth UCAV having larger weapon bay. J35 most likely only carry air to air missile in weapon bay and carry heavy weapons externally to perform attack mission like J-16, F-15E or Su-30. The difference is that when J-35 is intercepted by enemy fighter, it can drops externally weapons and becomes stealth fighter hunting the incoming enemy fighter.

[@Splattle101]

@@joelau2383 You're reading too much into my comment. I was merely pointing out that the J35 looks like a less capable, less expensive plane than the J20. The PLAF (and others) will be able to afford more of them. It's complementary in a similar way to the F-15/F-16 pairing. Regarding weapons bays and other capabilities of the J35, nobody has the specifications so discussion of what it can and can't carry is not even speculation, it's mere conjecture at this stage.

[@humanbeing9079]

A delight watching your video as always, information dense yet engaging.

[@silentone11111111]

Great vid . Please more on Chinese weapons in another vid. ❤

[@Mohika881]

Another very interesting presentation. Thank you.

[@aquilarossa5191]

When you were counting the number of China's modern fighter jets, it made me think of something the West should be having a serious think about. The USA has surrounded both China and Russia with hundreds of military bases, plus fleet deployments, submarines, and missile installations etc. This policy of containment is pushing Russia and China closer together. They have stated that they have a strategic partnership, but they are not formal military allies, i.e., an attack on one will not require the other to join the war. But for how long? If the USA continues as it is the Russians and Chinese could change their no formal military alliance policy. Then the number of fighters total would be Russia's and China's combined, plus all the nukes and advanced air defences Russia has etc. Considering the US economic situation and their $36 trillion debt, Uncle Sam looks like he is biting off more than he can chew. I doubt that will change much after elections either. The focus might, but the USA will probably try to continue its overall policies of containment and what they call 'full spectrum dominance' (of the globe). P.S. Both Russia and China do have formal military agreements to defend North Korea. I do not believe Korean troops are in Russia to fight though. There is zero evidence supporting that claim coming from the West and UKR.

[@ThePorkchop1787]

The Ruskies are spent. They have lost 700k soldiers, 350+ aircraft, 9000+ tanks and IFV's along with a lot of other equipment. It will take decades to recover. Did you forget the US also has alliances in the region? South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Philippines, Australia, NATO etc...

[@vampirepilot623]

​@@ThePorkchop1787Projection with a heavy dose of copium

[@protato911]

@@ThePorkchop1787 Source, Trust me bro, my Uncle work in the CIA.

[@HeidiKernstad]

⁠​⁠@@ThePorkchop1787This is false. Their verifiable Russian KIA is at around 79,000. This is counted by Mediazona (U.S. funded Russian opposition) and the BBC via obituaries, grave registries, social media posts, etc. The actual KIA figure for the Russians is obviously a little higher because it is unlikely that permanent MIA and PMCs would be included in this number. An educated guess of actual Russian KIA would be about 100k. Your inflated figures are coming from the Ukrainian and Western intelligence agencies. Russia has lost nothing close to 9000 armored vehicles. “OSINT” sources like Bellingcat and Oryx who give these figures are heavily pro-Ukraine and there is strong evidence out there that they are linked to British intelligence. That said, there are 2 things to bear in mind regarding armored vehicle losses as calculated by these pro-Ukraine OSINT NGOs. 1) Just because a armored vehicle gets hit by a drone and temporarily abandoned, it does not mean it is a “loss.” Russians have a habit of recovering these “losses” at night when drone activity is minimal and then towing them back to the field repair station. Despite this known fact, Oryx, Bellingcat and these other OSINT NGOs misleadingly count these drone strike on vehicle videos as “losses.” 2) With regard to “photo confirmation” of losses, due to Ukraine and Russia using the same types of armored vehicles, anybody can paint a Z on a wrecked Ukrainian T72 or BMP and call it a Russian loss. There is no way to verify if it is actually a Russian vehicle or if it is just a Ukrainian one with a Z on it. Early in the war, when most of Ukraine’s arsenal was Soviet, they used to do this with a passion, and these OSINT NGOs just counted Ukrainian losses with a Z painted on it as Russian losses because they have a vested interest in doing so. Finally, if you think Japan, Australia and South Korea are going to war with their largest trading partner (China) because of U.S. geopolitical interests, you are living in a fantasy world. 😂 Why would they crippled their economies and send their sons to a watery grave because the U.S. wants world domination?

[@eliasmai6170]

​@@HeidiKernstadJapan, South Korea and Australia are allies of the US. You are forgetting India. Japan and China have historical beef to settle. South Korea would rather team up with Japan. Australia doesn't like to be dictated to by China.

[@mrbrisvegas2]

Numerous fighters specifically designed for naval use have been operated as purely land based fighters. They include the A4, F-14, F-18 and Harrier. Half a dozen air forces operated F/A18s. Australia currently operates leased standard USN Super Hornets complete with tail hooks.

[@JinKee]

Once they get into a WVR head on fight due to bad ROE, they are gonna have a hell of a time avoiding friendly fire the airplanes look so similar

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Good point

[@HeidiKernstad]

This won’t be a problem. I once got the opportunity to wear a mock up of an F-35 helmet and try an official F-35 cockpit simulator at a LM event for women in STEM (lowkey recruitment event for LM and the USAF). The F-35 helmet displays in real time all *detected* aircraft in the battle space into the pilot’s field of view with color coded markers and abbreviations showing the altitude, distance, est. airspeed, heading and aircraft type. This is advertised as augmented reality. Pretty sure that the Chinese, who make excellent augmented reality headsets, have something similar on their aircraft.

[@JinKee]

@@HeidiKernstad well i guess the point of stealth is if you can’t avoid getting detected, try not to be identified or tracked

[@hsjawanda]

Not only am I interested in knowing the difference in the designs of naval aircraft vs. those meant for an air force, I'm also interested in learning what is the effect of the trailing edge sweep of an aircraft's wing. Russian designs (Su-27 vs. F-15 and MiG-29 vs. F-16) have a sweep to the trailing edge of their wings, the American aeroplanes do not. What's the reason?

[@crumcon]

At this rate, it's better for Russia to buy Chinese J-20 and J-35A. In the meantime, they should tweaks Su-57M design to be more stealthier. China could deliver 78 J-20/J-35A for Russia in 24 or 36 months, which is mindboggling.

[@peteseed5383]

Stealth is becoming less useful considering the compromises needed to achieve it and the advances in detecting Stealth as well as some roles now replaced by drones. Su57 and many others are focusing on advanced long range detection of Stealth and takedown before they get in range while maintaining supercruise and mission objective.

[@cuoresportivo155]

@@peteseed5383 Agreed, I don't think the SU-57 needs more stealth, it needs the new engines and increased numbers.

[@suberchen3604]

J-20 is not for sale

[@peteseed5383]

@cuoresportivo155 from what I understand, increased numbers with upgraded engines are already produced ,just intelligently no public announcement till mid January.

[@cameronhomes5948]

You also need to give credit to Qian Xuesen aka Tsien Hsue-shen, who was critical to aerodynamics and engineering cybernetics and was a leader in his field in 1936 onwards through 1955 when he returned to China after being held hostage for 2 years in the USA as a Chinese National

[@user-uc7kg4wp7c]

PLA Land Forces: Ah, the Air Force and Navy have new equipment, but I have to continue using the Type 99A for another ten years, the Type 99B has been cancelled, and there is no news about the fourth generation tanks. Now I can only play with $1,000 robot dogs and FPV to provide funding for the Air Force and Navy.😢😢😢

[@Kayzef2003]

DF-27 QBZ-191 Directed energy weapons Swarm Drone Launchers. Cry more😂😂😂

[@user-uc7kg4wp7c]

@@Kayzef2003 DF27 is for the Rocket Force, the Army only has tactical missiles, launched by the 191MLRS system. As for the latter ones, they are also small things.

[@MarvinChenFantasy]

Tons of interesting stuff on wheels.

[@user-uc7kg4wp7c]

@@MarvinChenFantasy However, the wheeled vehicles on display were not purchased.

[@haumakaa]

great video, as usual. gracias como siempre

[@nathanzhang9872]

I think the real reason behind the the decision of plaaf purchasing j35 is all about maintaining the production line of j35. China has only 1 catapult capable carrier and it could at most carry around 24 of j35s, and China is not going to deploy another one very soon. So you only have about 24 J35 naval variant to produce in quite some time. You can't just shut down the production line after producing these 24 aircrafts and reopen it when another carrier is like half-finished because it's going to be very expensive. And counter-intuitively making an aircraft smaller ( j35 is not really that small though, it's almost as big as f22) doesn't necessarily make it cheaper when it comes to the 5th gen fighters. As we can see, many of those modern 4++ gen fighters are not really cheaper than 5th gen fighters, let's take the example of su35 and f35, the fly away cost of f35a is almost the same as the su35 which is around 80million dollars. They reason behind this is that the real stuff making a 5th gen fighter so expensive are the advanced avionics and electro-optical devices onboard and they will cost the same if not higher when you are putting them on a 4++ gen fighter (considering the development costs for intergrading them onto 4th gen fighters). And the same holds true for developing a smaller 5th gen fighter. To make things worse, because the limited space onboard compared to larger aircraft, the size of those devices have to be shrunken to fit into the smaller one, causing the cost of them going even higher. The low price of f35 is all because of the economy of scale, the massive quantity of its production. And I don't think there are that many potential buyers for j35 to help out. The global south just can't afford it, they can barely afford the daily use of 4th gen fighters and I don't think they will be buying j35s any time soon.

[@你看个锤子你看]

鬼扯，J10早期 J11A 苏27 J7 J8这些飞机都是要J35替换的。他和F22一样大是错觉，起飞重量和F35一个级别。而且辽宁号 山东号也会部署J35

[@nathanzhang9872]

@@你看个锤子你看 想啥呢，j35有17.3m长，f22 18.9m长，f35才15.4m长，你这长度确实比侧卫家族还有j20那超过21m长的的长度要小不少，但是也不小了，很接近f22了。然后起飞重量还和f35差不多，这就是为什么网上这么多黑沈飞的。

[@9190-j8g]

I mean, reducing radar cross section requires pretty specifically made angles to be used on the airframes. It makes perfect sense that aircraft are gonna look the same if the goal is reducing RCS. Not a whole lot of room for creative design lol. Why would the Chinese not use the best design just because the Americans did it first?

[@mab2187]

Nice to see another new bird taking to the skies. In terms of design, I like the Gyrfalcon more than Fat Amy, she is slimmer and slick looking, vs the Fat American Barbie. Hope the Chinese gave the Gyrfalcon a gun, and hope its not the typical Gsh-23 with low velocity. And lastly I don't see lines on for sidebays so idk if they have it or went with just an underbelly bay... I hope it has sidebays for totaling to 6 missiles.Brings my aviation heart much joy. Oi! 0:13 that supposed 6th gen is actually looks really cool, don't diss my Ace Combat fantasies!

[@cljesseng1716]

Google didn't quite mentioned the date for Chinese Air Show..".funny ".

[@arthurchu4491]

If you know how Chinese military does things, you will not count the 6th gen jet as a joke as you should do to their west counterpart, if the Chinese show you a model, they probably got it going on for a while, here is how you don't know their culture, they don't talk loud with big words but work quietly.

[@potter3050]

Does the 20 or 35 carry an internal cannon? I honestly don't know.i think guns are still useful on aircraft and whether they have one is something I'd like to know

[@savahn80]

Yes, I am interested in any and all content you create :D it is interesting point of view and worth just listening to.

[@aquilarossa5191]

Correction. Increased weight for carrier aircraft is not mostly due to more robust landing gear etc. It because the pilots need balls of steel to make that short deck landing on their carrier (stopping only a few meters before ending up in the ocean as per the clip in this video).

[@MrTommy0201]

Great job,,,,Again

[@vilx1308]

That's not a 6gen its literally a scifi art work