The Only Way to Go Interstellar: Faster Than Light Propulsion

Faster Than Light Propulsion - The Only Practical Way to Go Interstellar? | #fasterthanlight #asteronx #spacetravel #timetravel #quantumtunneling #wormhole #warpdrivers
Become a patron at Patreon: / asteronx
The Eos Project: asteronx.com/projecteos.html
IRIS-AsteronX & The Eos Project
Website: www.asteronx.com
Credits
Special thanks to all our patrons and volunteers!
Thank you for your support!
Blender
For all their hard work in making an amazing and
professional program,
Scientists all over the Globe For providing much scientific data
and working hard to give all of us a bright and amazing future
Music:
All songs are from the KZbin audio library
/ @asteronx
KZbin audio library
Positive Fuse by French Fuse
Press Fuse by French Fuse
Lanius Explore
Free music by Scott Buckley
www.scottbuckley.com.au/
(What we don't say) by Scott Buckley
(Titan) by Scott Buckley
(Soar) by Scott Buckley
(Red) by Scott Buckley
(Machina) by Scott Buckley
released under CC-BY 4.0
www.scottbuckley.com.au
www.scottbuckley.com.au/
www.scottbuckley.com.au/library/
/ scott buckley - topic
Freemusicarchive.org
Meydn - 10 - Story by Freemusicarchive.org
Purchased from Bandcamp.com
Big Giant Circles - Legacy - 03 Faster Than Light
Big Giant Circles - Legacy - 09 Nova Siberia OC ReMix
Research papers:
The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity
by Miguel Alcubierre
arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0009013
Introducing Physical Warp Drives
by Alexey Bobrick, Gianni Martire
arxiv.org/abs/2102.06824
Hyperfast Interstellar Travel in General Relativity
by Serguei Krasnikov
arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9511068
The quantum inequalities do not forbid spacetime shortcuts
by Serguei Krasnikov
arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0207057
The Possibility of FTL Space Travel by using the Quantum Tunneling Effect through the Light Barrier
by Takaaki Musha
www.tsijournals.com/abstract/...
Comment on "Fractional quantum mechanics" and "Fractional Schroedinger equation"
by Yuchuan Wei
arxiv.org/abs/1607.01356
Same paper on HAL: hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-...
A `warp drive' with more reasonable total energy requirements
by Chris Van Den Broeck
arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9905084
Warp Drive With Zero Expansion
Jose Natario
arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0110086
Introducing Physical Warp Drives
Alexey Bobrick, Gianni Martire
arxiv.org/abs/2102.06824
The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity
Miguel Alcubierre
arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0009013
The quantum inequalities do not forbid spacetime shortcuts
S. Krasnikov
arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0207057

[@j.heseklon5168]

NICE! Updated information about faster-than-light travel and a jump drive! Thank you

[@asteronx]

Indeed this video contains new information. Thanks

[@ProfessorJayTee]

Now if we only had one scrap of data showing that these ideas are plausible. Right now they are merely mathematical curiosities.

[@scottishadonis]

Yeah that’s not going to happen as they are full of s**t!

[@gueropalma6649]

A round trip wouldn't necessarily cause you to time travel to before you left. You have to consider the movement through space of the object you depart from. You will at most, return to it at the exact time you left.

[@neilruedlinger4851]

You could manage the return journey so you arrive a few hours after you left.

[@boots4yew]

It doesn't matter if you returned or not after your jump out time. Just your arrival at your destination at FTL (or any interim point where you were traveling at FTL) would alter the spacetime at a point in time that is, at best, coinciding with your departure. Your arrival would interact with that locality and ripple out as gravitational waves, reflected or radiated photons, and anything else that travels at the speed of light. It would propagate in an expanding sphere, at the speed of light, and eventually reach whatever point you left from at a time from at, or before, you left (depending on whether or not it was instantaneous transit or just some multiple of light speed) and create a paradox by not being the same as what you were able to observe before you jumped to FTL. Those outgoing ripple effects may not be detectable by our instruments, but they would still interact, at a quantum level, with fundamental particles. So, maybe, you could travel to, by FTL, to new universes, under the quantum multi-verse theory, but you could never come back to this one. Every time you engage your FTL/wormhole drive, you'd be jumping to a completely new quantum-state universe.

[@RandomYT05_01]

This is the next great barrier. Now let's break it. Like we always do. We have not failed before. We won't fail this.

[@Aaro4ify]

We have broken the sound barrier before but not the light barrier.

[@RandomYT05_01]

@@Aaro4ify in the past they thought that breaking the sound barrier was impossible... Then they broke it. WE WILL BREAK THE LIGHT BARRIER!!! AND ONCE WE DO, THE UNIVERSE WILL BE OURS!!!

[@Aaro4ify]

​@@RandomYT05_01 Maybe we will oneday we would have to overcome certain technological hurdles.

[@davidtatro7457]

None of the previous barriers humans have broken required breaking the limits of reality itself, though. Not saying it can't ever be done, but we're many orders of technological magnitude away from even achieving one percent of light speed right now.

[@chrisloUSA]

@@davidtatro7457 The technology to reach several percentages the speed of light has existed for decades, see nuclear pulse propulsion. Some engineering hurdles surely exist but the main enemy of such propulsion methods is funding, regulatory and perhaps lack of drive. But current technologies would allow for upwards of 5% light speed if developed.

[@andrewreynolds912]

AsteronX I would love you guys to get more colorful or something with your awesome videos like kurzgesagt or something to get more channel views and such but it's just my opinion because you guys deserve more, also nice work!!! Keep it up.

[@arnabsarker3774]

wow, the concept of the quantum ramjet is interesting. 😵

[@scottishadonis]

It’s also nonsensical!

[@AshtonCoolman]

I like that the soundtrack is from the game FTL. Nice touch.

[@asteronx]

It's not from the game FTL but thanks just the same.

[@wombat9793]

@@asteronx Lanius Explore...

[@FlameMammoth]

​@asteronx the opening track to this video is indeed from FTL: Faster than Light

[@Focus_20SF]

We back!

[@flexabigg1]

Simply mind blowing!

[@ernstellert229]

The spaceships at the beginning look like they came from the Perry Rhodan series. In this series there were or are two spaceships with this special shape: The SOL and the JULES VERNE. The SOL first appeared in the novel 700, published in 1975.

[@anth123ish]

Sir loved your video thank you for trying to educate us I will be watching this video a few times to try and understand everything you have talked about

[@waynesworldofsci-tech]

Damn. You’ve got a new subscriber. Fascinating stuff. I love science, I’m studying Anthropology, but it’s all just so fascinating.

[@asteronx]

Love reading papers? In 2020 we published a paper about our very large space-based optical interferometer telescope called the Planet Seeker. Here is a link to it: hal.science/hal-02870885

[@waynesworldofsci-tech]

@@asteronx Thanks, I love this stuff. I intend to cover paleoanthropology on my own channel. At least if the invasion of Ukraine ends. Right now I’m doing geopolitics.

[@scottishadonis]

Yes if you believe in magic!

[@waynesworldofsci-tech]

@@scottishadonis Belief is stupid.

[@Gerald.S.Williams]

Thank you for the consciousness download.

[@quantumac]

If this type of travel is truly possible, think about the implications. We probably aren't the first intelligent species to evolve. There are undoubtable other intelligent species from other star systems which have been around a lot longer than ours, maybe even on the order of millions of years older. So if this kind of travel is possible, others have likely accomplished this feat, which means they might already be here. Perhaps some UAPs are evidence of their presence. This isn't a big leap of logic. To me it seems like a natural conclusion from the hypothesis.

[@kiedranFan2035]

These so look like uaps and all warp ships too. Hmmm

[@tomato2796]

Just look at the huge number of UAP sightings documented by military and other credible sources, imho there are tons of evidence for those "visitors", wherever they're from. And there has to be some kind of technology at least behind parts of the phenomenon.

[@ankhenaten2]

Other beings are billions of years older then humans and have billions of times higher tech then humans and they made humans and the entire galaxy

[@arthurking1830]

And those who would take us to the stars..By facial expression if that's a present guidepost..worn and weary of and by those who thrive on suits . Wearing down anyone gifted to the point of continuous distraction

[@Cyborous]

I completely agree there very well could be more evolved species out there. It’s funny because I was watching race to witch Mountain the other day, and they were asking the children. “How did you get here so fast?” and they were like we got here by wormholes. I completely agree with your sentiments on us probably not being the first and if we achieve this kind of technology application, someday being big.

[@CrimsonA1]

Neat stuff! Could you please post the links to the studies you mentioned in the video? I'd like to learn more!

[@asteronx]

We have added the links in the video description, thank you for asking.

[@CrimsonA1]

@@asteronx Thank you for the quick response!

[@CrimsonA1]

I'm a bit aeronautic-ignorant of this subject. What you posted was great, but I'm wondering how many NASA scientists have contributed to such works? Is there any way you could label them in a future video? I only ask because many common viewers like myself need to see that credible people have worked tirelessly on concepts such as Warp-drive. Personally, I want the human species to reach the stars one day. I only ask that you provide all the details and data that point to a realistic possibility of everyone reaching the point where we can reach other star systems in a peaceful way. I'm all for you, I only ask that you present evidence that our wishes can become true

[@asteronx]

@@CrimsonA1 Would you like to chat about this topic over Discord? If so, email us your Discord name and we'll send you a friends request. Our email address is on our website or here on our about page. Cheers

[@scottishadonis]

@@CrimsonA1 Studies 🤣🤣🤣 the “physics” described on this channel are more fiction than science. No Nasa wouldn’t give the producers of this channel the time of day! It’s all complete nonsense! What would I know though, I only have 2 masters degrees, one in physics (applied) and one in electronic engineering. But by all means believe this nonsense.

[@mikel4879]

The relative positioning of one universal aggregation from another is in many specific cases faster than light speed. So, the simple, precise, and concise answer to your question is this : the relative aggregated positioning.

[@billvinson7859]

Good video. Keep up the research. We need warp drive to move out of the cradle before it’s too late. ❤

[@asteronx]

Exactly, we cannot stay in the cradle forever. :)

[@CorvinusIratus]

Sabine Hossenfelder's recent discussion of FTL (and why some arguments against it may not be as solid as was once assumed) is a good follow on video to watch.

[@JohnLee-bf2ux]

Also Dialect too.

[@JohnLee-bf2ux]

also Dialect

[@scottishadonis]

No she actually said below the sped of light warp drive may he possible but it’s very unlikely and if it was to be achieved it won’t be anytime soon!

[@scottishadonis]

Sounds like you cherry picked what you wanted to hear, I watch her KZbin videos all of the time and not once has she said FTL was possible!

[@CorvinusIratus]

​@@scottishadonis What is it about people on the internet wanting to quibble about every piece of inconsequential minutiae just to try to impress the rest of the monkey troop? Ok, fine - she didn't once say FTL...how about 'effective FTL'? does that appease your pedantic sensibilities? Feel better now? Marvelous!

[@juan.2438]

Amazing! Hi from Spain

[@louisbarasa5741]

Another good channel to watch is Alien Scientist, they talk about all this and more. If you want to create a warp drive or simply like free energy/vacuum energy topics this is a channel I would highly recommend. Also Rex Research has some very good materials.

[@seagie382]

you didn't mention issac arthur???

[@emilaviles6703]

Other planet civilization top7 very nothing to go war !!! All friend enemy to none HITECH advance technology, ,,,,, lower than top1 lower HITECH it's go to war, why??? Because , little learning is dengeros think, not HITECH, one little bit invented HITECH mind set ,,, concared" god know doing,,bud attitude nothing goal,,,

[@neilruedlinger4851]

I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but a vacuum (or in a plasma, gas, atmosphere, liquid or solid; but they're ignored as a theoretical simplifying assumption, to help focus the hypothetical/theoretical discussion) the space-time is permeated by an electro-magnetic (em) field, so a vacuum is not really empty from an energy perspective. This is why photons can travel through a vacuum because they can be thought of as em energy fluctuations in the em field. In Classical em Field theory, mathematically formulated using Vector Calculus by James Clerk Maxwell, the em field is continuous through which radio/light/X ray/Gamma ray photons propagate at the speed of light. Each photon consists of oscillating electric and magnetic fields (oriented in the direction of the photon's travel), at an angle of 90° to each other, or to put it another way the oscillating electric and magnetic field orientations in the direction of the photon's travel are orthogonal to each other. In Quantum Field Theory, the em field permeating the space-time vacuum is quantized and fluctuates all the time with discrete energy levels, as quantized photons propagate through it. Some Quantum Physicists visualize the Quantum (em) Field as something similar to the foam that sometimes covers the sea, and refer to the quantized em field as a Quantum Foam. One consequence of Quantum Field Theory, is that virtual particle-antiparticle pairs spontaneously emerge out of the Quantum Foam and at time scales of femtoseconds to picoseconds annihilate each other in a flash of Gamma ray photon pairs. I read somewhere that one theoretical consequence of an Alcubierre Metric warp field is where the space-time distortions are the strongest, virtual particle-antiparticle pairs emerge from the Quantum Foam at concentrated levels, and there could be a Gamma ray hazard to a planet if the starship is facing the planet when it arrives and the warp drive is switched off to allow the starship to enter orbit. The hazard to the planet could be avoided by the starship trajectory pointed at a tangent, to its stable orbit, so the Gamma ray stream is directed away from the planet's surface and atmosphere. I have wondered if these virtual particle-antiparticle pairs could be somehow harvested separately, as additionally sourced zero point or vacuum energy to sustain the Alcubierre Metric warp drive.

[@E.G.Jungle]

@@neilruedlinger4851 WTH did u just say 😂

[@narrativeless404]

@@neilruedlinger4851 Yeah, imagine getting matter out of virtually nothing

[@kayakMike1000]

Going 99% of the speed of light...you'd blue shift all photons coming at you. Without quite a lot of shielding that's going to irradiated you.

[@narrativeless404]

Well yea, we always have to deal with dangerous side-effects anyway

[@HTX_Metal_Head]

Awsome video

[@RedcoatsReturn]

One of the best channels for explaining complex science without being superficial but still being sober and accurate in real science! 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏😊👍👍 I start to think those tic tac alien vessels were using tachyon tech and “fueled” using quantum zero space energy 🤔😉

[@rebeccaswiderski6247]

"Pleiadians" Crafts

[@kelleren4840]

It's actually pretty misleading in some pretty significant ways... :/

[@jamesfrancom8100]

awesome graphics

[@DennisSantos]

It's like every Sci-fi plot device ever written or screened, known to us for decades, has coalesced into possibility.

[@narrativeless404]

Wasn't it always like that tho? Things we once considered an impossible fiction we can only imagine, into a modern reality, in one or another way Internet is a great example of this

[@maretranquillity]

You skipped pretty lightly over the use of vacuum energy and especially the process for extracting it. How is it done? Can we do it? Has it been done here on Earth? If not, why not? Perhaps we should figure out how to clean up our world by using vacuum energy before we go gallivanting around the Universe for the recreational value of same. Good program, I enjoyed it quite a bit.

[@asteronx]

State of the Earth and the Sun: asteronx.com/state-of-earth-and-sol.html

[@macbuff81]

Awesome!

[@srb20012001]

Nice CGI (thanks to Blender and your artists)!

[@chefscorner7063]

Assuming you could build a device that spins in place FTL, would you experience time dilation if you were inside the device as it was spinning FTL? My underlying question is, Do you need to travel from Point A to Point B going FTL in a linear fashion to experience Time Dilation or could you experience it inside my proposed stationary device?

[@WolfeSaber9933]

Truth be told, we still don't know the speed of light and how the universe can effect the true speed of light.

[@alvarofernandez5118]

An instant jump eliminates collision risk but only along the trajectory. If you jump blind a lightyear away, there is no way to know whether an object has moved there in the year it took the light to reach you. You'll need to send an unmanned scout, also equipped with a jump drive, ahead; have it record, return, confirm it survived and the ambient properties, then do the big jump. This could be automated and I envision the scouts being made as small as possible. But it would reduce the distance traveled per unit time, and the total distance every jump covers - unless you're willing to risk "overshooting" your unmanned scout.

[@narrativeless404]

Can't we just use the same methods to try and accelerate the information FTL, so the spaceship could just scan potantial destination for nasty stuff that could be there?

[@rmarias338]

Mr I am a big fan of all your videos and I follow them closely, Also admire your work as well. I had never written on your channel, but recently I have been thinking about the theory of relativity and questioning the always assumed to be as it is todays stated, what I think it is not the absolute description of nature. Then on this video I listen to you going directly accepting it as a fact, where the time dilation has not been proved at "long scale", sincerely I think it is missing something fundamental before basing nature and the modern calculations on the "dilation" of time developed only mathematically and pushing it to the edge using theory, Theory is not the description of nature, we will approach as much as we can to a description using theory. I think when we achieve very fast travel if we achieved it and I believe we will the time "dilation" will not be as it is told by relativity theory, time might be independent even from space if something is missing in the middle of the description before applying the Lorenz transformation. I think we must not be so much concerned about the time dilation when developing faster travel, more than that on what is space and if really it could be stretched or deformed, or if it is just the framework where energy propagates and can not be deformed, or if relativity theory as beautiful as it is is just a very complex mathematical description of the influence of gravity on space all over all objects and mater and time was included to enriched it after a experimental result and theoretical experiments also of what would happen in presence of a gravitational field or accelerating fast, I think time is independent even at high speeds or in a gravitational field, I think all the development of the theories used on this developments could be executed considering time absolute

[@v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096]

If you had a YT channel I'd be glued to it.

[@eamonminges1541]

Are you guys ever going to address the issues that FTL travel creates for cause and effect?

[@nil981]

The way the ftl works here is that a jump drive ship effectively moves instantaneously thus bypassing causality entirely.

[@superevolvedshinamalgamleo8168]

@@nil981 true

[@torg2126]

Be very careful to not arrive before your start time? If nothing else, you could always "chill" out in interstellar space via cryoststasis for a bit, whenever your current time is coming too close to your start time.

[@kelleren4840]

There are no issues with cause and effect because matter with mass cannot move faster than light speed. But if we simply move non-matter around us faster than light speed, we will experience no causal effects whatsoever because we aren't moving. That's actually one of the major issues with this channel/many others; they will oversimplify and say that any motion causes time dilation which is false. We are already moving faster than light speed when compared to objects at the other end of the universe. But time has not frozen for us because relative motion compared to any random point alone doesn't matter.

[@chrisloUSA]

I am glad that realistic ways of faster than light travel are being discussed, even going mainstream with departments of NASA like the Eagleworks Laboratory researching it. A decade or two ago the scientific community would crucify scientists from going down this path of research. What are your thoughts on why we haven’t run into intelligent life using such technology? That is the one thing that concerns me about the long term prospects of FTL travel, as we cannot find any solid evidence of non Earth based intelligent life visiting our solar system. My personal opinion is that several Fermi Paradox explanations come into play. 1) Intelligent/technological life is rare. 2) Such life is very far away, we may be the only intelligent/technological species in our local cluster of galaxies. 3) The universe has only recently began to spawn intelligent life and we may be one of the first, my favorite theory as we may end up being an intelligent elder race someday and get to witness the evolution of other intelligent creatures thanks in part to technology discussed here.

[@Aaro4ify]

Well theres could be a issue with the Fermi paradox though it doesn't explain everything.

[@fisherforrest]

Can we cojoin jump and warp drives where do we learn these engineering dynamics

[@ioanbota9397]

Realy I like this video its so so interestyng

[@terrydaniels9126]

Like amazing video subjects

[@thomaswall4285]

Hello, If you were moving 99 percent the speed of light would it take 101 percent of say earth time to travel to a 18.77 light year distance? with you experiencing 3 mo of time? and then for the return trip the same? with your original departure point experiencing 37.54 years? with you experiencing 6 mo? assuming round trip with no variations in speed. have i got it right? Thanks :)

[@quecheese7631]

In the future everything is made out of polished stainless steel

[@edgoyette8756]

302,304,316 or 440

[@TheMaxthesis]

Let's go!

[@chrisMthepoet]

We need three vital things to travel in space. 1. Faster than light speed by 10. 2. Shielding. Without shielding a pea hitting the spacecraft at those speed would destroy it. 3. Artificial gravity. Without it we will just turn to jelly on long voyages.

[@wtchtower]

I just happen to stumble on one post that is a compilation about Gravity and anti-gravity, when I refresh the main page it displayed more topics such as this, when in fact, it was so very hard to find a post that talks about Anti-gravity years ago. And now, I'm glad that they are allowing someone to freely post i presume, any discussion, topics, explanations on space travel and non rocket propulsion engines. No more IF POSSIBLE OR NOT arguments. So, with all the different recorded footage that are happening in our sky plus this, could this possibly mean that these are a form of a Soft or Indirect disclosure of a long overdue Technology that's been kept secret? ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) has been obsolete sine the 70's or earlier.

[@raycar1165]

Soft disclosure gets my vote. I have a section dedicated to alternative propulsion and antigravity research. Let me know if you find anymore good channels to follow.

[@Muuip]

Keep wondering!👍👍👍

[@rebeccaswiderski6247]

Many Entities in various Dimensions throughout many Galaxies in Our Universe. "We Are As One" with the "Best Yet To Come"🥰👍✨️

[@sParadox999]

First of all, I loved your presentation. As you surely know we did manage to create antimatter. The microns of it are hard to contain. Creating a an AM-fusion could wipe out a galaxy as we know it, but it would be a perfect power source for FTL(black, shadow,...). Well not really FTL but sub-through subspace drive. Still need to create shield technology. With our current even micro meteors are damaging our space station daily. Wouldn't like my ship to fail because space dirt. Time dilation is whole other thing. We can't even touch that, just theorize.

[@amazingrace.]

Yes Possible ❤

[@faustobernal1857]

Wherever

[@kerbal666]

So if I left earth and got to tau ceti for work on time I've ecentially gone back in time?

[@wulphstein]

You have to realize what spacetime is made of in terms of quantum entanglement. Then you have to store gravitational potential energy in the entanglements which leads to a warp field.

[@CP-nt4qx]

If I understand this correctly, then it sounds like the entire universe could also be a giant spaceship traveling inside another universe.

[@MrTryAnotherOne]

23:30 The energy supplied by Quantum Vacuum sounds like a bomb makers dream come true. It's a also a catastrophy waiting to happen. FRB?

[@wastelesslearning1245]

Yeah ramming the outside of your ship or double through a interstellar trajectory worth of radiation and particles “in a instant” probably means wherever your wind up has to content with all that undisposed energy about to react in a instant in front of you ship…

[@research1747]

If you are travelling at or more them the speed of light how do you see what is in front of you ? How do you avoid collisions ?

[@asteronx]

This is how: kzbin.info/www/bejne/il7We62Fg5WgoK8

[@khantroll7351]

what happens when my space ship is in the middle of a great void and I bring my ship to a compete stop zero what happens to my volume, my mass and my time??

[@srb20012001]

Isn't the putative "time quantum" the Planck Time (10^-43 sec.)?

[@MacarthurLouissaint-rz7tl]

ANY NEW VIDEOS??

[@trevorjenkins1976]

What about obstacles planets Sun's any debris in space how would you avoid them?

[@asteronx]

Starship bumpers (deflection array): kzbin.info/www/bejne/il7We62Fg5WgoK8

[@CustomJ]

It's seems likely given the share scale of the universe, that others mastered this tech aeons ago. Perhaps some of those lights in the sky are them just passing by for a visit, in transit to parts unknown.....

[@chadwickallison6277]

It's all about the Quantum Field and Frequency.

[@andrewreynolds912]

Hey astreon x 13:24 did you guys ever posted that vid?

[@asteronx]

Not yet but we're slowly striving towards it and many more topics. It is very important that we publish that video. Thanks for asking.

[@andrewreynolds912]

@@asteronx thanks for the response

[@stevenfaber3896]

Move to call Slower than light travel (STL) now Point C travel, to cause less confusion in conversations? Plus it now makes C the slowest we can go! Just a thought.

[@szpflyer4367]

I enjoyed the presentation, and felt that it expanded my knowledge of issues of interstellar propulsion. However, I found the music a distraction, thus begging the question: Was the purpose of this work to inform? Or merely entertain? It would seem that modern audiences are inclined to ignore documentaries that lack orchestral accompaniment. Thank the gods for Mute buttons and Closed Caption.

[@nathanryweck3137]

Is the smallest unit of time Planck Time? Or something smaller?

[@JustATakit]

That's the smallest unit of measurement, a plank length.I think don't quote me on that.

[@peterfusco2596]

Is the technology available to build these engines??

[@manfredgebhardt6562]

Gut

[@Aurumk1]

I myself have tried many things but thats a really really tough problem to solve. Quantum tunnelling and wormholes look like the closest thing we have to actual ftl drives.

[@isaacsacco4496]

I have see some space craft like this 1996 very bright lights they dispirited in splits seconds

[@gregniel]

All you need is a very peculiar reactor and a massive amount of fiber optic cable.

[@basic48]

Wow

[@AdamosDad]

We should travel at the speed of thought.

[@Kj16V]

Not the speed of my thought. We'll never get anywhere!

[@robbie8142]

Oh boy! Yet another history lesson. Wake me up when something new happens . Cya out there Space Cadets! 👻🚀

[@benabrahamrocah6995]

Another more elaborate accelaration could de possible with antigravity system, creating proton and antiproton aceleration, Could be possiblem

[@bugstomper4670]

Where does Space Time flip/invert? Inside a black hole.

[@Aurumk1]

If we could ever warp time I thought you could just stick matter in a chamber and send it from one time to another then once it has been through time sufficiently it will age into antimatter and we would have a large quantity seemingly instantly. Would require a time mirror to bounce the matter back and also I can't solve for the fact that where and what is time and how to travel through it and probably a wormhole. I also thought if you had a micro black hole and as it was travelling you could latch onto its gravity and or electric charge follow it up to the speed of light then it would expire if you could stay out of its event horizon. Also if they are binary pairs which is ridiculously complex they might be able to be followed like a "chariot." However also as you approach the speed of light time slows down so I don't think it will hit the speed of light but it would likely be retardly fast.

[@n.g.s1mple29]

The statement about interstellar travel being impossible without faster than light travel is just not true, reaction drives can take you to other star systems.

[@jeffcooper4246]

soo how will you stop

[@21EC]

Theretically speaking you could even write a message onto another planet from one distant planet to the other faster than light speed using a very primitive way, by having a drawing tool connected to a very long rode that also has a drawing tool on its other ending part as well...then (theoretically) when you would write something the message will kinda transfer instantly at the same time to that other distant planet in what considered as faster than light speed since it would be instant at the very same time but obviously in order for that to happen you would first have to build the long rode all the way to the other distant planet and that would take much more time and obviously it is not realistic to do so in any way but its an interesting idea and so simple yet in theory at least it is able to be faster than light.

[@griseld]

Not really, you would have to send a signal through the rode to get the machine to write on the other end. On earth it's instantenous, kinda... Because of the short distance. But writing something on Proxima Centauri would take 4 and something light years because the signal can't get there faster than light.

[@21EC]

@@griseld That's the thing with my simple idea..is that it would not have to use any type of electornic signal, it would all be completely mechanical in nature.

[@hisoverlorduponhigh90]

It would seem, in order to achieve greater than light travel, the first step is to transform matter into non- mass.

[@bradleyanderson828]

Time

[@abvmoose87]

We’ve been putting all of our eggs in the same basket for 80 years. Sure hope it’s the right basket..

[@Aaro4ify]

Well there is a saying that goes "don't put your eggs in the same basket" though.

[@frankmccann29]

Got ideas myself. What gers me is that Physics is changing so fast.

[@asteronx]

Once you've gained the necessary initial knowledge base (Internet as your resource for self education), the changes are not difficult to track and learn.

[@barriewright2857]

Absolutely fantastic and fascinating. As he explained the theories of warp drive. Space exploration and travel became real for me fantastic.

[@Pedro8k]

Who know if this will ever be possible and also the unknown physical effects it may have on the occupants of such a space ship you may end up lost somewhere maybe even in another dimension

[@Aaro4ify]

Wouldn't getting lost in a other dimension be unlikely tho? and btw the occupants would remain uneffected.

[@madwlad799]

@@Aaro4ify depends on the acceleration/deaccelaration rates , should be something about a year for both at 1g to reach c to not crush the crew.. also, light in front of the ship is going to blueshift into hard radiation, killing anyone inside at a certain speed or length of the trip ☢

[@Aaro4ify]

@@madwlad799 warp drives would have no acceleration and deceleration it would be instantaneous the occupants in the spaceship wouldn't experience any outside influences or any g forces.

[@calebromo1]

Please, watch Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal, and Salvatore Pais. Take a closer look at the math. "Its not new physics, its a new perspective on old physics."-Pais The Pais Effect is real. Get excited people!

[@apocraphontripp4728]

I don't know how to make a warp drive but I know how you figure it out. Substitute water for space and figure out how to make it work with water, then the rest will fall into place. Have a few ideas.

[@ikaeksen]

Who was his pronounciator teacher? 11:08

[@LetsTalkAboutIt24-7]

The scientific community's accepted theory is that Time and Density are linked specifically referencing the variation of time recorded with atomic clocks placed at separate altitudes and another conducted by placing an atomic clock in the pyramid of Giza and the other a short distance away. The results revealed the clock in the pyramid to be slower and thought to be caused by the sheer density of the pyramid.......So if time is altered based upon Speed AND/Or Density......could you also conclude that Time alters speed and Density?

[@dextermorgan1]

Ftl travel isn't the only option. If we can find an energy source that's powerful enough to make it possible, that same energy source should be enough to open a Rosen Einstein bridge(a wormhole) to go from point A to point B instantly. There would be no need to go so fast if you can take a shortcut through space. Think bigger people!

[@Swanlord05]

Star Trek is one heck of a drug

[@brandonsheffield9873]

I still think we are alone, but no harm in exploring the many types of planets and stars. I can't wait for giant Space Cruise Ships where thousands of passengers can explore. I think we would need materials from asteroids and other planets, mainly so we don't reduce the mass and density of our planet and moon. Because who knows the negative effects that would cause. This would have to be constructed in space.

[@Aaro4ify]

I think it's very unlikely that we are alone in the universe the universe we live in way too big for us to be only intelligent life to exist Intelligent life existing elsewhere is actually possible I think it's likely we will encounter alien life if we were to explore the cosmos.

[@rayjasmantas9609]

Something to work on: Since heat is based on inertia, it must behave like gravity to wanting to stay in place. And with heat in Space being radiation. heat will not want to go faster then the speed of light, without the research of making the heat energy frictionless with any holds on it as radiation's build is heading toward.

[@rayjasmantas9609]

So is constant motion maintaining logic without the need of energy to maintain the constant motion state, gives this question: How is constant a meaning of frictionless strength?

[@rayjasmantas9609]

Thus the atoms reaching the speed of light would not need extra energy support to maintain their speed, thus avoiding to become energy itself again, or not needing to be losing its body.

[@rayjasmantas9609]

The logic of how to extract the energy that would accelerate mass to and passed the speed of light would be to research how another's star's atoms sense and cooperate with our solar system's gravitational exchange, at the atom levels. {Frictionless exchanges by the presents with/of inertia support of one another.}

[@rayjasmantas9609]

Plus note the fact of the atoms sensing power between stars distances, has the atoms of the other stars generating the light we see showing them to be present.

[@kayakMike1000]

Gravitons are probably not a thing. Isn't gravity not a force, but a bent piece of space time?

[@mrnobody.4069]

How exactly do you know where your going or where your going to stop with a jump drive, if I had my own starship I would prefer a non instant FTL drive but you would probably need complex sensors that could detect things the size of pepels along the span of many light years and that and nav defector would be important I think at FTL speed, oh could a jump drive jump inside an object ether by accident or on purpose like a wall or a planet and what would happen!?

[@madwlad799]

crashing with FTL speed sounds like the end of the universe in terms of kinetic energy

[@mrnobody.4069]

@@madwlad799 probably not Universe ending but you would imagine that traveling at FTL speed you would need some way of knowing your surroundings and knowing where you're going and that would be very important to especially for exploration and you already have something that could reduce your thoughts or prevent them of crashing into something if the odds weren't already low enough but you would still need it anyways.

[@Aaro4ify]

That would only happen if you miss plot your destination to the target star the chances of that happening is very low because there would be an ai on board the ship.

[@mrnobody.4069]

for non instantaneous FTL ship he would still have many ways of preventing collation I would imagine different side of a system and tracking where other things are around you and yourself at FTL speed you're going to need some really advance shielding and sensors though, going in a system you would probably need a combination of non FTL and FTL maneuvers perhaps in a way could you Jerry rig a warp drives effect with a combination some other technologies to create some deflector shield...maybe IDK, but when you're in a spaceship that can go faster than light you would never be flying blind or unprepared.

[@Aaro4ify]

@@mrnobody.4069 Idk about that crashing into something is very unlikely even if it did happen it would of destroyed a solar system the spaceship would have an on board nav computer tho the spaceship would slow down to the speed of light once it reaches it's destination the jump drive would be used alongside a conventional warp drive there's no risk of collision with a instantaneous jump though.

[@iamanempoweredone6064]

Sooo… faster that light means time goes backwards? So you send something out and it comes back yesterday?

[@bugstomper4670]

But as you approach light speed your mass infinitly increases. Thus even all the fuel in the universe is not enough to make your ship reach the speed of light. Einstein claims that. Even at CERN this is shown by the particles that they accellerate having the mass of a freight train, just beffore they smash together.

[@dkk1404]

How do you avoid slamming into an object in space traveling at light speed.

[@asteronx]

There is more to it, for now take a look at this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/il7We62Fg5WgoK8

[@ronaldwhite1730]

Thank - you . ( 2023 / June / 08 )

[@kevanhubbard9673]

It creates paradoxes either going faster than light or finding a way around it so it's probably not possible and as space is so big it would mean that meaningful interstellar travel might not be possible either.

[@Aaro4ify]

Things are only impossible until its not. finding away around the speed of light the light isn't impossible tho that's just a way of bypassing causality the warp drive itself doesn't really exceed the speed light because the space around the ship is carrying the ship along Which seems like aparrent ftl or effective ftl speeds it doesn't create paradoxes because it doesn't really Brake causality because the ship itself isn't really travelling faster than light it's the space around it.

[@LetsTalkAboutIt24-7]

If a "force field" around a craft that eliminates any and all types of interior Force applied that doesn't mean that while traveling through an atmosphere it won't make any noise....if the craft is moving just faster than the speed of sound the force field around the craft would be pushing the atmosphere aside at the same rate......thus causing a sonic boom!

[@griseld]

I think that more than that, creating some kind of force field also implies that whatever is inside it is taken outside of space time, with the ability to move freely in any direction unbound to any physics law. Like UAPs who move in strange ways defying physics.

[@johnraynor5095]

Tell me how you will resist the friction of partical mass in space. Faster then light would be like traveling through a solid mass of particals.

[@asteronx]

This video explain it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/il7We62Fg5WgoK8

[@gypsycruiser]

Space friction , dust and micro particles will destroy anything travelling ‘ through’ space ..even photons are affected unless in a perfect vacuum.

[@benabrahamrocah6995]

The actual advances in a Phisical Quantic could be posible now.