The Particle Situation is Crazy

Рет қаралды 5,075

Flammable Maths

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 42

@maxmusterman3371 Ай бұрын

There is no way that Fingringhoe exists.

@PapaFlammy69 Ай бұрын

@pseudolullus Ай бұрын

I bring bad news. It totally does, it's right next to Colchester

@pseudolullus Ай бұрын

They're all real, I just checked 😂

@maxmusterman3371 Ай бұрын

now solve metric tensor if position and momentum are uncertain under heisenberg relation

@bigchungus7327 Ай бұрын

you actually did derive the conservation of momentum in your video on the rocket equation.

@PapaFlammy69 Ай бұрын

oh shit, I already had a feeling that I must've derived it before, given the nature of my channel... Thanks for the reminder! But it doesn't hurt to have a separate video on it anyways :)

@mr.inhuman7932 Ай бұрын

That was very intriguing and easy to follow!

@MeepMu Ай бұрын

The plural of pmomentum is pmomenta (the p is silent like in pneumatics)

@kartikgkalita Ай бұрын

lural

@oldstory678 Ай бұрын

4:57 Not all cases When you have a wall or the mas is infinity and acelleration is 0 you can't use it

@WILLIAMDRISH Ай бұрын

If you don't mind my saying so, you are a super math teacher.

@PapaFlammy69 Ай бұрын

@qm_turtle Ай бұрын

Lowkey I was hoping to see Noether theorem and translation invariance as a starting point, but F = am and actio = reactio is fine too :)

@PapaFlammy69 Ай бұрын

hehe :D

@aweebthatlovesmath4220 Ай бұрын

0:06 how dare you

@Yellowboxable Ай бұрын

Momentum starts with p… I was hoping for a German word to explain this 😂

@Bani5710 Ай бұрын

Papa I would love a video on how to compute the location of Lagrange points in the Solar system

@Vengemann Ай бұрын

Yeah I definitely agree that the word momentum starts with p 😁

@HoWeiTeTe Ай бұрын

Klugscheiss: p stands for the latin 'pellere' - thanks to Wikipedia ;-)

@PapaFlammy69 Ай бұрын

:^)

@MauriceL2006 Ай бұрын

Nice to see you making videos again and you are now teaching physics 😱! That reminds me one of your collaborator some year ago who makes physics joke. The trick part of momentum transfer is when it is 2D, the algebra is annoying.

@fniks12northboy31 Ай бұрын

The situation is situationing so hard rn

@PapaFlammy69 Ай бұрын

so fkin hard, it's crazy

@vitowidjojo7038 Ай бұрын

Now i wonder... How about 2 dimensional momentum, or 3 dimensional?

@capnbug Ай бұрын

KZbin drama ass title lmao

@ZubinTongia Ай бұрын

Fappable day?!?!!

@johnboze Ай бұрын

During REAL NATURAL COLLISIONS some of the collision energy is transferred to angular momentum of the distributed mass throughout the 2 or more particles themselves. So before the collision there is an both an INITIAL LINEAR AND ANGULAR MOMENTUM and after the collision there with be a FINAL LINEAR AND ANGULAR MOMENTUM... Please do this 'same' video again ASAP but include all transfers of linear AND angular momentum of the particles given it's Inertia Distribution and shape! First video can be for a sphere of given internia with large surface friction causing transfers of linear momentum into rotational momentum and Angular back to Linear depending on the particlular collision. In NATURE like a Billard Ball that Rotates before and after collision! THIS MOMENTUM MUST BE CONSERVED! Please include all momentum transfers to AND from angular momentum exchanges along with linear momentum changes. In Nature HALF the energy of ALL PARTICLES is internal momentum meaning angular momentum of the mass throught the particle! This subatomic particle inernal angular momentum and energy can be converted quickly when colliding Uranium. Much internal angular momentum is quickly converted into linear energy aka BOOM! E=mc^2. Peace Out... If you do the video I will let you into @FiringRoom1 for a once in a lifetime illumination... In FIRING ROOM 1 we are Launching Humanity into the Future! We are on KZbin @firingroom1

@brandonklein1 Ай бұрын

There was no angular momentum in the collision considered here.

@danielc.martin Ай бұрын

Great!

@abhijithcpreej Ай бұрын

I thought you were going to do this by Noether's theorem

@darshiladhav4325 Ай бұрын

Wake up babe , nerd filthy frank just dropped

@GeodesicBruh Ай бұрын

You can do even better, let's say we have n interacting particles. We can represent the force between the i and j particle with a matrix (of vectors) , f_{ij}, newton's third law just tells us that this little boy is antisymmetric. This implies that it has to be traceless (no particle exerts a force on itself) . In particular if one considers the sum of all forces, Sum of (f_{ij}) over its indices, this gives out a big fat zero because we're summing out a fucking antisymmetric quantity bruh. ( Calculating the sum on the f_{ij} corresponds to summing all the forces on a body from other bodies, and then, for all bodies, summing up said forces) Then given that dp/dt=0 it's QED baby.