The Pixar Theory - DEBUNKED!

[@plecoshark5933]

My Pixar theory they're all movies made by Pixar.

[@thejedisonic67]

W R O N G. The mongols actually made Cars 2, betcha didn't know that

[@erdemkara4143]

Coincidence? I think NOT!!!

[@connerayden9090]

I realize it's pretty off topic but do anybody know a good site to watch new tv shows online ?

[@anthonygarrett3926]

@Conner Ayden Try Flixzone. Just google for it =)

[@nicolaseugene3746]

@Conner Ayden i watch on Flixzone. You can find it by googling =)

[@jacob810]

This was also officially debunked by Pixar directors just by saying that this isn't true.

[@mrvoice3436]

But apparently what the creator says means shit

[@luishernandezsoto]

@@mrvoice3436 Care to explain why you think it's shit?

[@cameroniacobucci]

When did they say that?

[@tfordham13]

@@luishernandezsoto he made a joke

[@luishernandezsoto]

@@tfordham13 It's kinda hard to tell it's a joke or not.

[@LeafRazorStorm]

I feel like Pixar wrote "The Good Dinosaur" *specifically* to distance themselves from this timeline. "Look, guys! It's an alternate universe where none of our movies ever happened because dinosaurs were ruling the whole time. Please shut up."

[@Bobsheaux]

And look! There's the Pizza Planet truck making its cameo appearance as one of the asteroids! Someone explain why Boo would want to leave THAT clue floating out in space where no one will see it. -_-

[@thejedisonic67]

Boo can break the fourth wall now. She know's us, she feels us According to this dumb theory, Boo is god

[@ARCtheCartoonMaster]

"Boo can break the fourth wall now. She knows us, she feels us."--TheJediSonic, 2018

[@parker-boy98]

You're right

[@parker-boy98]

@@Bobsheaux Wait, what the hell?

[@PHXFINESTLOCO]

I just think they're easter eggs. I don't really think they're all in one universe and all connected

[@9thlevelgaming]

Can't be considering a bugs life merchandise is seen in toy story 2. That ruins the timeline!

[@OliverKH1]

You're right!

[@SuperSwordman1]

I like to think there are some that share worlds.

[@a.t.m873]

agreed

[@nostalgiaworks5999]

Wow. Just wow. Before I heard about the Pixar Theory, I thought it was that all the kids in the Universe have toys that move while they are not around, and every kid had a monster. A Bug's Life was going on at the same time in continuity, just in the grass. Finding Nemo was happening underwater as well as in Australia, superheroes also existed but all these movies came out during the time period that superheroes were banned back in the beginning of the Incredibles. Cars is non-canon, Ratatouille was going on in France during this time period, Wall-E takes place in the far future, Up also takes place sometime during the timeline of superheroes being banned. Brave takes place in medieval Scotland in the same universe, and everybody in the Pixar universe have five different emotions inside of their mind, which leads to Inside Out taking out in the same universe. I think the way I originally thought it was going to be is far superior than the actual theory.

[@Bobsheaux]

+Nostalgia Works Hang on to your theory. It's far less damaging than this one.

[@mr.k2085]

No just no. Don't bring yourself into the category of " far superior ". It's not for you.

[@JammerRammy]

Makes waaaay more sense

[@R4tti]

Nostalgia Works your version. I like it.

[@jesusramirezromo2037]

Yhea, i always tougth thats what pepole meant.... Not whatever the hell it really is...

[@emma-uj6iw]

Why is everyone always so determined to connect all movies together? Sure, I understand making theories about movies and games, but these theories are always so stupid. Do people really think Pixar is going to bother going around trying to connect all their movies together?

[@XanF03]

Day Dreamer i do believe They Are trying to connect there movies together... because they Are to be fair some connections Are a bit of a stretch but i mean some Are obvious for example the Jessie doll in monsters ink or the lotso Bear in up

[@felicityguillen]

Day Dreamer yes.

[@second3455]

Day Dreamer no, people just find it fun to theorize. That’s a simple answer

[@Jake-js2ct]

Has everyone forgotten that this is PIXAR we're talking about?

[@XWierdThingsHappenX]

Im fine with a few movies being in the same universe like Tangled and Frozen . Or like A Bug's Life, Ratatouille and Finding Nemo. But damn no not all of them are in the same universe. Way to many holes appear when you do that.

[@professormultipurpose5244]

Wow look at that Like to Dislike ratio... I always thought the Pixar theory was a bunch of bullcrap that made no sense and destroyed the optimistic endings to so many of Pixar films, and I think you did a good job of finding all the mistakes present in it! I just wish more people could appreciate the work went into this instead of getting butt hurt...

[@DrawtoonzStudio]

Man, I never realized how many people got butthurt over your debunking of this theory.

[@Bobsheaux]

Drawtoonz Studio That's the really scary part; so many people are fighting tooth and nail in its defense because they REALLY WANT to believe it. They WANT to believe that humanity dies out not long after the uplifting end of WALL-E. They WANT to believe that everything made by humanity is conspiring against them. They WANT to believe that the sweet, tear-jerking end of Monsters Inc. didn't happen, and Boo's descent into madness eventually killed the entire human race. Why do you people want to believe THAT??

[@DrawtoonzStudio]

Bobsheaux That's a very good question.

[@RavenFoxAudio]

Bobsheaux It's DEPRESSING! Can't we just enjoy the Pixar movies? What's all this garbage about searching for deeper meaning in a bunch of CARTOONS? I might be dating myself here but I remember back in the day when kids' movies were just FUN! XD

[@DrawtoonzStudio]

Raven Fox Audio Yeah, you can also say the same thing about people who look for illuminati symbolism. I've been watching animated movies all my life, and I'm not some sort of brainwashed slave!

[@DrawtoonzStudio]

Raven Fox Audio Well said. Very well said.

[@moonman375]

Even people at pixar refused the idea, saying "it would be too complicated to fit everything in a single universe"

[@tonykoslowski5010]

The theory completely lost me when it started connecting Cars to the other Pixar movies.

[@Marylandbrony]

Tony Koslowski And at least the incredibles have a totally diffrent technological and cultural delveopement. At least implied by the movie.

[@that2Kguy]

Yeah, this is among one of the stupidest theories I've ever heard concerning Pixar. I've heard of JFK conspiracy theories with more legitimacy than the "Pixar Theory". Glad to see your nitpicking skills came in handy here, Bob!

[@thejedisonic67]

Alex Jones makes more convincing theories than this one

[@jeffreygao3956]

@@thejedisonic67 Really? A KKK member?

[@thejedisonic67]

@@jeffreygao3956 It's an exaggerated joke

[@martynkerslake8118]

why did this get so many thumbs down ? i guess alot of buthurt people actually believed the theory without thinking about it

[@Bobsheaux]

+martyn kerslake Because I'M somehow destroying peoples' childhoods with this. Not the theory itself, which has to destroy the movies for it to work.

[@MrRight-ej4or]

Monster's University was originally supposed to be called Monster's Universe and would confirm this theory. That's my theory and it's 100% true because I just thought of it.

[@tuttirrerteyur2265]

well you can't argue with a person who is literally called mr right

[@MrRight-ej4or]

Tuttirrerte Yur Exactly. You're a smart man.

[@thatvideojacob]

+Mr. Right fair enough

[@Pandas4thewi]

+Mr. Right No That's Wong

[@unnecessaryyoutubechannel8585]

+Mr. Right haha its funny cas n 1 gets the joke the joke is that he is like every over conspiracy theorists

[@jeresjolly7224]

Dang look at that dislike bar. This is going to be a treat, I hate the stupid pixar theory

[@Your-1839]

Jeres Jolly It’s only 744, where the Like bar is 1.7 thousand.

[@ThePhrog714]

@@Your-1839 still a much higher ratio than most videos, almost 60/40

[@redjirachi1]

Here's my take on the Pixar theory: * The Incredibles-A comic book series produced in the Pixar world * Cars-An imaginary story that Andy is having while he plays with toys * A Bugs Life-A movie within Toy Story * Toy Story, Up, Finding Nemo and Ratatouille-The present of the Pixar universe * Wall-E-The future of the Pixar Universe * Brave-Either the past or a folk lore story in the Pixar Universe * Monsters Inc-A parallel universe running co-current with the Pixar universe There, all Pixar series linked together. Prove me wrong bitch

[@Bobsheaux]

+John Porteous I don't have to or WANT to prove you wrong, because your theory doesn't rely on ruining ANY of the movies for it to work. Kudos to you, sir! :)

[@redjirachi1]

Thank you. I figured they're all connected, but that some would be fiction in the universe of others. So: * Up, Toy Story, Tatatouille, Finding Nemo and Wall-E: Shares the same universe * Cars, The Incredibles, A Bug's Life: Fiction within that universe * Monsters Inc: A parallel universe that interacts with that universe * Brave: Take it or leave it

[@tonykoslowski5010]

Makes a lot more sense than the actual Pixar Theory.

[@grantkelly8696]

At least your theory doesn't ruin these amazing films and actually makes sense both on a basic and technical level.

[@Bobsheaux]

+Annie Luo "The way I always saw the Pixar Theory was something that was fun to think about, but that very few people actually took seriously." If you take a look at the comments, hopefully you'll know better. Apparently legions of people think a huge story of genocide and despair is fun, and they take it so seriously that any remarks made against said story is enough to warrant some of the ugliest insults imaginable. "it didn't profit, demand anything from people, or hurt anyone. It wasn't a scam, or even a dumb kickstarter" Didn't profit? The creator of this theory is selling a BOOK outlining the theory in every minute detail, and it demands (and convinces!) people to completely turn off their brains and blindly accept it as irrefutable fact. THAT is hurting people. "What I saw was similar to a kid going up to a group of other kids playing around and adamantly insisting that the floor isn't lava and that it's idiotic to think so." If those kids were so terrified of the floor that they couldn't even leave their beds INSTEAD of regarding it as a simple game, then yes, I'd say something to reassure them that they're perfectly safe. "Instead, you basically express incredulity at how anyone could believe in this or that, using a tone that insults anyone who might believe in the Pixar Theory but wanted to watch your video for a different view." I'm sorry you interpreted it that way, but all I'm doing is pointing out how this theory doesn't make sense. Nowhere do I insult anyone for believing in this theory. "You make a point to talk about how someone would need to really reach for some of these events, but behind you is a wall of comic book covers - many of which feature storylines containing time travel, evil technology, super intelligent mutant animals, and magic in the same universe." Yes, and everything you just mentioned has actually been ESTABLISHED in those stories. The Pixar Theory only works because its creator had to IMAGINE things that, as far as the movies themselves are concerned, don't exist. But if anyone wants to try to make up some ridiculous theory that links all of my comics of various locations, time periods, and universes together and if they successfully fool millions of people into thinking that it's the truth INSTEAD of a piece of fanfiction, I just might rebutt against that too. "You mock any holes in the theory, but also don't take any time to point out anything that does make sense or fits to you (something they teach us in any basic English and Speech class when making a presentation)." And if NOTHING in the theory makes sense or fits to me, then there's nothing for me to point out, is there? "Also just plain unnecessary, ( though I'll watch an unnecessary video that presents its points in a balanced way before I watch a video that's completely relevant but also arrogant and patronizing as yours)" You yourself opened this conversation with expressing how you don't subscribe to the Pixar Theory. I could easily argue that you speaking out against something you AGREE WITH is unneccesary, arrogant, and patronizing simply because you disagree with the tone I took. "I agree with you, but this video's pointless because you didn't say it nicely enough!" -_-

[@GeeMannn]

+Bobsheaux wait... he's publishing a book on a broken theory??? my god i can publish a book about a theory right now! America I s Illuminati america has 7 letters america was formed in 1777 there are 3 7's in 1777 there are 3 sides on a triangle the Illuminati is also a triangle. america=Illuminati confirmed.

[@Bobsheaux]

+George Emdin Yeah. You could TOTALLY write a book about that. lol

[@GeeMannn]

Bobsheaux 1 letter per page. it'll be 3 chapters: the random thought, the investigation, and conclusion. it'll be a best seller for sure.

[@wazuponthebusmanderson2823]

+Bobsheaux wow you commented on a video that is 1 month old

[@carbootstudios2459]

+Bobsheaux Don't them get at you. :)

[@Tekrothebountyhunter]

I'm actually starting to get sick and tired of cinematic universes. Not only does each set of cinematic universe movies struggle to stay in continuity, they constantly bash you over the head about how they're in the same continuity and it leaves us with an overall lack of complete and closed-circuit stories. There are no longer movies that have a beginning, a middle and an end; they all just keep beginning, and instead of ending they give us another reminder that some other movie is connected. It's all just a massive gimmick!

[@TheBonkleFox]

I thought Marvel did (and is doing) it pretty damn well. I'm kinda hyped for the Infinity War.

[@aidantaylor7846]

Thats mostly cause Disney-Marvel actually properly planned and they know what they are doing.

[@carbootstudios2459]

Like anything, it can b done really well or really poorly.

[@maymay5600]

but the pixar timeline had been around since the 80's and 90's

[@carbootstudios2459]

+May May XD You serious?

[@ILoveStemi]

At first I liked the Pixar theory. I thought that it was cool and entertaining. But no matter how many times I looked at it, the ending was always stupid to me. It doesn't make sense how monsters got children's screams/laughter if they didn't have energy in the first place.Where did they get the energy to build Monsters, Inc.? Or the energy to time travel? By the Pixar theory's logic, the monsters are using energy they don't have in the first place to get energy that they need to power a city that they shouldn't have because they never had the energy to build it in the first place! The whole Boo being a witch thing is ridiculous. Where did she learn how to time travel if she lives in the early 21st century? According to the theory, Boo planted all of the easter eggs in the movies. Can't easter eggs just be easter eggs? After watching this video, all of the theory sounds stupid to me. I choose not to believe it because it makes the lighthearted Pixar movies of my childhood look post-apocalyptic and it's depressing to me. I won't be able to look at A Bug's Life and Monsters, Inc. the same ever again.

[@Bobsheaux]

+ILoveStemi WHY would Boo have planted the easter eggs? What's her connection with ANYTHING aside from Monsters Inc.? " I choose not to believe it because it makes the lighthearted Pixar movies of my childhood look post-apocalyptic and it's depressing to me." I find it even MORE depressing that that's not the COMMON reaction to learning this theory. :(

[@Teag_Brohman15]

if the doors used by Monsters Inc. to collect scream energy are actually Time Machines, shouldn’t there be more noticeable changes in the present? In the words of Abraham Simpson “If you ever travel back in time, don't step on anything because even the tiniest change can alter the future in ways you can't imagine.” if the Scarers are using Time Travel to collect scream energy, how come they aren’t inadvertently altering the present while they do this?

[@moproodu]

that would only be true if the universe doesn't work on 'stable time loop' rules, wherein changing the past is impossible since you end up causing the present (eg, you go back in time to stop someone dying but end up becoming the cause of their death)

[@Teag_Brohman15]

@@moproodu also, none of the Pixar Films ever wrote about Time Travel, so there's no way of knowing for sure what rules this "Universe" works on.

[@anth636]

@@Teag_Brohman15literally the only instance of time travel in Pixar is in one of Mater’s self-insert fanrasies

[@chameleoncove]

When you make a theory, it has to make sense. You need enough sources to make the theory work.

[@Bobsheaux]

+Carla Vidal Exactly.

[@dante_0962]

Or reasonable evidence.

[@eve123princess9]

The super smash bros theory about all of the characters being toys as a part of an child's imagination is more plausible than this.

[@ruyekahatori3073]

Well the very first Smash Bros game does kinda imply it. When you start the game the opening cutscene is in a bedroom and all the smash charactes are figurines, and I believe once you complete the game/get a game over and decide to not continue, your character falls over like a figure "dying"

[@tarponpet]

That's becasue that is canon though.

[@CrazyRiverOtter]

Props, Bobsheaux, for absolutely DESTROYING this theory. It's one of those things that has a free pass because it got so popular, and that's pretty much it.

[@valerielopez7485]

*just like r e l i g i o n*

[@legoroan9866]

True Cocoa couldn't agree more

[@DeepEye1994]

Honestly I can *kinda* see how Toy Story, Monsters Inc, UP, Bug's Life, Ratatouille, Finding Nemo and maybe WALL-E could be set in the same universe (it wouldn't be necessary, but there's nothing wrong with that idea), but The Incredibles, Cars and Brave are definitely set in other dimensions/alternate realities, they're their own thing.

[@Optimegatrongodzilla]

DeepEye1994 I don't know why "The Incredibles" and "Brave" couldn't be set in the same universe as the first 7.

[@DeepEye1994]

optimegatrongodzilla Brave has magic in it (sure, Toy Story has toys coming alive but it's never explained why, same with the doors from Monsters Inc) and The Incredibles not only has a style that doesn't really seem to match the other films, it's clearly set in some kind of alternate reality with superheroes. They're not seen or mentioned in any other film... Why not if they're so famous and they returned? This is at least how I see it.

[@ElOchentero]

I think all the films about animals may happen in the same universe: Bug's Life, Ratatouille and Nemo for example,as they all show sentient animals. Toy Story might be in the same universe of Brave and yes the witch's magic could be behind the toys' sentience, but that's it. Cars and The Incredibles are clearly separate universes from the rest impossible to connect. We see animals in Toy Story and they don't seem sentient, so do the animals also fake around toys that they're not sentient? and how is Lotso or Barbie a machine? the theory doesn't work when you include all the movies in it.

[@ilikacake]

I honestly don't know how this video has so many dislikes, Bobsheaux does a relatively good job going through and pointing out all the leaps in logic necessary to get this theory to work. As a huge fan of the Pixar library of films I couldn't help wondering why so many jumped on board this theory considering all the plot holes. I think fan theories can work when they are offer clever logical points that in the end strengthens the existing material but when you start seeing what you want more than what you know then it becomes problematic. Sweet Vid Bobsheax, I appreciate your willingness to call this theory out on its insanity despite its popularity. Keep up the good work.

[@Bobsheaux]

There are so many dislikes because this theory has somehow convinced people that the idea that Boo is responsible for the death of humanity is a GOOD thing. I don't get it...

[@Astraldragon0]

I don't get why people are so upset about this. It's entertaining to think about, but it's ultimately just some guy's fanfic. Gritty and dark, but I've read and enjoyed gritty and dark versions of upbeat properties. It's entertaining, nothing more.

[@michaeldorsey9231]

"this guy has no concrete evidence that it couldn’t happen." Except for this entire video which explains in detail why certain ideas don't work.

[@carbootstudios2459]

+Dillon Somerville You serious?

[@jeffreygao3956]

@@second3455 I have a fine line between "having imagination" and "lying."

[@TheLightningDragon42]

I think people only like this theory because they think it makes them look smart, but they don't even bother to dig deeper into it.

[@insertgenericallyironicnam601]

TheLightningDragon42 True that! Pseudo-intellectuals, if you will.

[@TheLightningDragon42]

Dawn [insert last name here] Yep.

[@grantkelly8696]

Agreed.

[@ink1931]

Why is every theory related to Disney completely stupid?

[@AstroTom]

Never liked the Pixar Theory, thank you so much for debunking it. The Cars being set after the humans left earth thing always irritates me because of the lack of pollution in Cars, for example.

[@ChaseMC215]

It's like the whole Burnout Paradise theory where DJ Atomika, the DJ for Paradise City's Crash FM, happened to be the last human alive after the car revolution, with the SSX reboot being a prequel shere Atomika was still DJ for Radio Big.

[@chewchewtrain]

I say the entire thing is proven wrong by the ending of Monsters Inc.

[@DeepEye1994]

The dumbest headcanon in history of everything.

[@GatsbyCioffi]

I could believe several of the movies being in the same timeline (Andy from Toy Story having a letter from Carl and Ellie Fredrickson on his desk, the matching RV in Bugs life and Monsters Inc, etc). But there's no way that ALL of them could be connected. Also, if Boo was the witch, why did she have a Pizza Planet Truck carving, rather than a Sully carving? How would she have even known what a Pizza Planet Truck was?

[@GatsbyCioffi]

Andrew .Fralinger Oh, I guess the witch does have a Sully drawing. Still, though, it makes little sense, especially since Sully and Boo do indeed reunite at the end of Monsters Inc

[@infinightmoon6268]

Andrew .Fralinger Jonnegroni argues that the Sully's visits were only a temporary thing, which would kind of make sense, as we wouldn't expect him to keep visiting until she was all grown up.

[@NebLleb]

Now THAT'S what I call a debunking! From the moment I heard "The Pixar Theory", I knew something was up. Overriding the Happy endings to many of Pixar's movies just to link them was complete bullshit, and it's awesome to see someone go up against it. The only way for any of this to make sense is to remove certain films from the Theory: The Incredibles, Cars, Cars 2, and (most importantly) Brave. Apart from that, it is mean-spirited, confusing, and absolute Bullshit.

[@NebLleb]

Oh, and I heard you like Cars 2. I personally didn't, but that's okay.

[@annienthetoon8941]

this is the craziest cartoon conspiracy theory ever that doesn't make any sense and full of logical fallacies

[@infinightmoon6268]

Mugen Sprites lover And yet, the one who made the theory actually wrote a book to explain it.

[@robinson52d]

Wow it's funny how people legitimately argue over fictional stories.

[@Bobsheaux]

+Michael Sanford "Did you even watch the Pixar films?????" It'd be a little hard to cite the Pixar films and the evidence contrary to this theory if I DIDN'T see them. "Explain the BNL batteries in Toy Story 3, or several subtle Easter eggs scattered through everything?" I don't need to explain anything more than I already have, because YOU just explained it all away yourself; EASTER EGGS. They're nothing but nods and visual jokes. "Also, Wall-E does care about humanity that keeps him working and motivates him." And what is that claim based on? All we see in WALL-E is his dedication to his job, curiosity over what humanity has left behind, and desire for a friend. That's all. "you constantly steal traits from other and better reviewers, such as: the wall of cult icons from Chris Stuckmann, the unnecessary loud voice of Linkara, and the zany adventures from many Channel Awesome reviewers." Never heard of Chris Stuckmann, I could do a MUCH better job of doing Linkara's voice if I so desired, and the closest thing to ripping off a zany Channel Awesome adventure was my storyline for Star Wars month (not a lot of room for a constantly in there). If you're gonna complain about something, pick something more legit. "You are worse than WatchMojo!" WatchMojo has almost 10 million subscribers and averages over 1 million views a day. Calling me worse than a channel that has their head THAT in the game isn't really that biting of an insult.

[@anamericangrizzlybear8315]

Looks like someone deleted their comment ¯\_(^ ͜ʖ^)_/¯

[@AmishParadise27]

+Bobsheaux I will say that the batteries in Toy Story 3 COULD be evidence that the Toy Story series and WALL-E are linked because MAYBE BNL started as a battery company before slowly becoming everything over the next 800 years. Also Rex makes a cameo in WALL-E's home. I am not saying they are connected, I'm saying they MAY be connected.

[@Bobsheaux]

+AmishParadise27 (AKA: Tyler) And that's totally fine, because Toy Story's connection with WALL-E like that is completely harmless.

[@tonykoslowski5010]

You should watch some of Chris's reviews. He's a great reviewer.

[@BonJoviBeatlesLedZep]

I bet you know about Chris Stuckmann now! Guy's blown up in the past year. He's awesome.

[@shadowfry8724]

The reason I hate the Pixar theory is that it turns a franchise that is mostly aimed for kids (while adults can like it too but kids are the main audience) into a dark lore where every character you have came to love from Woody to Miguel. mr Incredible to Arlo just to be a small part about how animals supposedly take over humans and Machines (the characters from Cars) take over then die out while insects come back and then evolve into monsters the theory is taken WAY TO SERIOUSLY OVER movies that are by Disney and are aimed for KIDS.

[@Bobsheaux]

+LeoOtakuAR “Leo” USA "thats just an easter egg, nothing more nothing less" You can't pick and choose. How can everything else be a hint that these movies are all connected, but THAT'S just an easter egg, nothing else?

[@austinperkins6044]

Bobsheaux seriously, your a grown ass man worried about disproving a theory that doesn't effect you at all

[@Bobsheaux]

Austin Amazing Seriously, I'm a grown ass man worried about disproving a theory that's affecting WAY more people than it should.

[@aname6388]

And you care Bobsheaux about a theory effecting people I don't

[@monsterjambrony]

Actually A Bug's Life is taking place AFTER Wall-E

[@monsterjambrony]

The other connection is that Boo has a Jessie doll

[@johnalogue9832]

I keep seeing Pixar theory videos recommended to me, this video is how I stay sane.

[@WobblesandBean]

I really do hate this theory. I thoroughly enjoyed you tearing into it.

[@nathanielrincon7907]

Several PIxar employees have responded to the Theory, politely stating that wasn't true, that if it was there'd have to be something more consistent than easter eggs, and that meetings about movies would be so much more complicated, than they already are (let's add more steps to what is already a difficult, process.) by making sure that the films connect. The Author has since added "The Good Dinosaur" to the theory as the NEW beginning, then threw a fit when someone made fun of said movie.Also if this is the *PIXAR THEORY* why is *PLANES* in it? Planes wasn't made by Pixar. The theory is so poorly put together it's sad. The Author also gets REALLY hurt if you point out where he went wrong, or mock something he likes.

[@RAAM9001]

HE PUT *PLANES* IN IT? WAT WOT WAHTUFJKC

[@nathanielrincon7907]

RAAM9001 That about sums up my reaction to it too!

[@RAAM9001]

Nathaniel Rincon What a fucking joke. :T

[@nathanielrincon7907]

RAAM9001 Yup.

[@gatst7680]

Nathaniel Rincon Wait, wait, when did they say it?

[@chugiron4698]

I like the Pixar theory a lot but the one thing I hate about it is that it's called the pixar *theory* . I think it works so much better a game of sorts, seeing how people can fit them together but still acknowledging the fact that its obviously just a fanon project with no intention of being true. I think if people just viewed it like this then it would reduce misinformation as well we open up the door for other similar collaborative fanon projects

[@blazerona1329]

I knew the theory was kind of "eh" the moment I realized that Boo and the witch don't even have the same color eyes.

[@jeffreygao3956]

Contact lenses?

[@maskpenn9443]

Bob has a point, when I first heard of this theory I found it really confusing. Yet people are still trying to defend it, All I'm going to say is, Can't we all just let a movie be a movie, we don't need to bring in a bunch a pointless theories just to figure out the history of a fictional world.

[@Bobsheaux]

Mask Penn Especially when those theories only RUIN the movies. Seriously, what is the point in making BOO responsible for humanity's extinction? :(

[@grantkelly8696]

Bobsheaux Agreed. It's just depressing and overall just makes you empty with this theory.

[@nickytembo4112]

Bobsheaux yeah the Pixar Theory is just like saying that cloudy with a chance of meatballs and Hotel Transylvania take place in the same universe cause they’re made by the same company which isn’t true because they’re animations are different

[@jeffreygao3956]

Analysis is exercise for the brain.

[@riddlemethis13]

My Pixar Theory: They're all movies

[@Bobsheaux]

+EchoTheKoopa Good theory. :)

[@grantkelly8696]

My Pixar theory: John Ratenburger(very sorry if I a misspelled it) voices a character in every Pixar film.

[@seanherrington3290]

Dude when you played You've got a Freiwnd in Me during the credits, I started crying. It gave me so much Nostalgia. I havn't seen the original Toy Story in a long time. Thank You.

[@julianadutra1713]

Finally, someone who understands me, someone who speaks English, someone who thinks. Finally! An American that can lead! Gather 'round everyone, vote Bobsheaux, 2016.

[@mattwolf7698]

I never liked this theory, I think some of it works though, I like the idea of all of the smart animals being in the same universe (though I don't buy them knowing each other like the Ratatouille to Up "connection") but that's it. Car's has flashbacks to the 1950's/1960's when The Incredibles was taking place and there's no humans and their world is clean, there's no way to connect that universe even with a ton of mental gymnastics. Toy Story toys appear in Finding Nemo, did they not come to life there or did the fish just not care that toys would have been wondering around the waiting room? It's possible that there could be several universes though and that WALL-E works in all except Car's but there's still not enough proof. Animators love putting in Easter Eggs. Car's and the Monster world are their own universes, it's possible that the others could maybe be one universe but I doubt it. The Monsters are definitely going into at least one parallel universe though so they could be going into any except Car's.

[@somegingerguy4242]

Finally, someone taking apart this theory. While I like the idea of fan theories (like the ash coma theory or this one), I generally dislike people who take it as canon and ignore the ACTUAL canon so their belief in the theory holds water to them. Seriously, these are a group of kids movies made by the same guys with Easter eggs of the other films in them. Why does that warrant them all to be set in the same canonical universe?

[@pixelcat5159]

Glorious work, Bob! It goes to show that common sense almost always prevails!

[@AmishParadise27]

I always thought the Pixar Theory was untrue because how did Boo grow up to cause the events that happened in the theory if the events had already happened before it occurred. Also, I wonder how Inside Out would work into the theory.

[@Bobsheaux]

***** It's a common paradox of time travel theory. Like how Fry from Futurama went to the year 1947 and was given strict instructions to not do ANYTHING that might upset the spacetime continuum, but it turns out he was destined to be his own grandfather. lol

[@personmcpersonstein3571]

(spoilers for Futurama: Benders Big Score) Or how it turned out that Lars from the first of the four movies was actually Fry!

[@birdiejohnson8502]

Maybe Bonnie from toy story 3 is the mom from inside out! Grown up of course.

[@AmishParadise27]

Huh... they do look similar, but I am not sure if the time frames would work both movies look like they take place around the same period of history.

[@ZeldagigafanMatthew]

***** Have you heard of the Bootstrap Paradox, where certain information has no real origin? A common example is a king goes back in time to read a book about the numerous languages of the world. By the time he finishes reading, the book is old and so he writes another copy putting the new one where the old one was. Only this time, someone is going forward in time to cause the events.

[@YourPrivateNightmare]

So somebody made a theory that uses vague hints and arranges as them in a way that allows for a very specific interpretation with a lot of holes in it....and because it sounded so nice people jumped the bandwagon and go ballistic when somone dares to point out the flaws. I think this is how a religion starts

[@Bobsheaux]

+YourPrivateNightmare If it sounded NICE, at least that would make some kind of sense. Insisting that the human race died out because a little girl misses her kitty is downright HORRIBLE. :S

[@claudiaalvarez1043]

Dude, the theory may be acepted, but it was debunked by Pixar itself. However, you are just wrong in the time travel part. Not defending the theory or anything, but when you travel to the past to scare a child (as this so called theory suggests), gatter their energy and then travel to that exact time to scare that same child, you would find yourself scaring the child and not take its place, so you can't get unlimited energy the way you're explaining. That time travel idea seems to be pretty comon, but it's not true; kind of reminds me to Back To The Future. Sorry for my bad english.

[@jimmyhopkins6876]

Lie!!!!! It never was debunked by pixar, if anything they were fascinated

[@X_Gon_Give_It_To_Ya]

Jimmy hopkins Keep that nose clean boy or I'll do it myself.

[@jimmyhopkins6876]

This is the face I make when I orgasim Who in the world are you? You literally said the samething my principal said to me on my first day of school!!!!

[@GeeMannn]

+Jimmy Hopkins jalopnik.com/pixars-jay-ward-responds-to-the-unified-pixar-movie-th-822973346 check yourself before you rek yourself

[@MrJustinArt]

Didn't make any sense. And no, a soft-voiced narrator doesn't make it any more plausible. ... Actually, maybe with Morgan Freeman. Still an implausible theory, however.

[@BENDROWNED33]

People should stop making fan theories unless they make a 100% sense, not a 5-10%

[@Bobsheaux]

BENDROWNED33 Agreed.

[@OGTabsterFM]

Bobsheaux Double agreed.

[@RPPIII13]

Is the debunking the Pixar theory

[@akinschalkwyk8998]

BENDROWNED33 "To Infinity and Beyond!" I AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@keegster7167]

Agreed, but something that makes sense to one person does not make sense to another. If we can't agree on what makes sense, then fan theories that don't make sense to you will be made.

[@invaderzak11]

I never heard of this theory until this video. Good job in showing how every part of this theory makes no sense.

[@GeeMannn]

Prepare for headscratching? i slammed my head on my desk.

[@Shades14]

This stupid theory makes my head hurt, not just because of how many times I hit my head on the table but because you need to really, reallllly NOT think in order to accept any of this. None of these theories make any sense. Game Theorist, the guy who made this theory is not.

[@NinjasXtremez]

The Shady Reviewer he didn't make the theory so this clearly shows you have no facts straight what so ever

[@Shades14]

***** I was talking about the original theory. His debunks are perfect but the Pixar theory itself is idiotic.

[@Shades14]

***** I apologize if you took it as me saying Bob's debunking made no sense. My bad on not being clear with my words.

[@Absolia24]

I highly doubt Game Theory started the Pixar theory. You're confused.

[@Shades14]

Absolia24 I said the guy who started the theory was NOT Game Theorist.

[@belewgm]

I mean you can still say some are connected, but not others, mainly cars.

[@taylorboney1089]

I can see some of the movies taking in the same universe like some of the movies could’ve happened in the past, present and then future on the same earth.

[@dante_0962]

There’s nothing wrong with theories or believing them but if they completely change the real premise or something then there’s something wrong.

[@DarksideEXE]

honestly I think the only reason people assume this theory is correct is because of the Toy Story toys and Bugs life characters making cameos in other Pixar movies (and Toy Story 2's blooper reel).....that and House of Mouse proving every Disney movie and cartoon exist in the same universe.

[@AmishParadise27]

Next up will be the DreamWorks theory. Imagine how insane THAT will be.

[@Bobsheaux]

ZC-Infinity Reviews Ouch. lol

[@AmishParadise27]

ZC-Infinity Reviews I am not sure if you actually saw How To Train Your Dragon 2 because that was one of the best films of 2014 in my opinion.

[@carolinethompson6446]

***** Please make us a "spoof" Dreamworks theory, THAT would be fun to read

[@carolinethompson6446]

ZC-Infinity Reviews I can't think of any I like aside from How to Train Your Dragon.

[@jeffreygao3956]

@@ZC-Infinity No, Dreamworks has been flying high since Kung Fu Panda.

[@moonkingdomify]

I have to agree. We've reverted to "because it's convenient" as a way to explain our theories. I mean I use "because magic" to explain things in my novel, but at the same time I explain how magic works and how not everybody can use it.

[@Bobsheaux]

+Ditto, Master of Disguise And I'm sure what you're justifying with your use of magic is A LOT more worth the effort that what this theory says.

[@moonkingdomify]

Bobsheaux I am. I also explain how magic can't send you back in time, if it could then history would be anarchy and what you remember wouldn't actually be what happened. Or your memories and present self would be completely changed. There's too much to take into consideration when talking about time travel that I don't think anybody but a master of a genre should tackle it.

[@princedonovaughn1182]

It's the same thing as people who preach the Frozen/Tangled/Little Mermaid/Tarzan theory. A fun little idea but most of the movies already debunk them. I mean personally I like thinking all the Disney character know of each other but I also know that isn't Canon to the story and or possible.

[@AmishParadise27]

This officially holds the record of the most disliked Bobsheaux video in history. Gosh!

[@Bobsheaux]

+AmishParadise27 And why? Because I took something "fun" and revealed it as the nihilistic horror that it really is. I'm sorry, everyone, but disliking the video doesn't make it any less true.

[@AmishParadise27]

+Bobsheaux Of course. I am of course with you in the minority that think this theory is bogus. Like I stated before, how could Boo become The Witch from Brave if the events that The Witch caused had already happened? That was the biggest question mark I had when I first read the theory.

[@Bobsheaux]

+AmishParadise27 I don't have a problem with time paradoxes like that. No, MY problem is the implication that Boo had to lose her mind to come to the conclusion that THIS was the only way she could see Sully after what must have been a REALLY HARD separation, and worst of all, she NEVER achieved what she set out to do. THAT'S why I can't let the Pixar Theory go without at least TRYING to undo the damage it's done; because it's a testament to madness, hopelessness, and futility. Is THAT what the Pixar movies are supposed to be about?

[@AmishParadise27]

Exactly. Well you won't see me complain about how you were wrong. The theory is bogus. And you're right. Pixar films bring out the best and not the worst. I kinda hate it when people make negative implications or dark, adult theories to stuff that is mostly carefree "children's" mediums (like I'm a really big fan of Winnie the Pooh and get really offended when people affiliate the characters with sex and violence when that's *NOT* what the characters stand for). I don't blame you for getting angry, I would too, as I am as much a Pixar fanatic as you are.

[@thejedisonic67]

One of my pet peeves is people taking easter eggs and treating them like some sort of evidence or something for their theories. It goes beyond grasping strays; it's grasping for atoms basically

[@nickytembo4112]

And not to mention Easter eggs were used to prove the Frozen and Tangled connection like Rapunzel and her husband attending at Elsa’s coordination even they are just Easter eggs, they are not canon. That is just like saying that Mickey, Donald, and Goofy can breathe underwater just because they are seen in the concert in the Little Mermaid and besides Rapunzel was born in the Medival Times while Elsa and Anna weren’t born until the very early 1800s so Rapunzel would be a skeleton during the time when frozen takes place

[@metademetra]

Are people actually ANGRY? You all know this theory is just that right? A THEORY. (Not the SCIENCE definition of "theory", the average everyday definition) I do like this theory, but if someone wants to poke holes in something that ultimately has no effect on the world, they are allowed to. Also, I dunno, If you wanna make the argument with everything from Toy's Story to Wall-e belonging in the same universe, that would make more sense since after the release of Toy Story, the main executives at Pixar came up with the basic ideas for their later movies up until Wall-e all at once. But including Brave in it and just adding movies in as they come out just does not make sense. Especially since there recently was a movie that took place in prehistoric times. That fact pretty much launched a flaming arrow at the entire theory's base.

[@Bobsheaux]

+metademetra Thank you for liking this theory and NOT hounding for my blood. lol

[@metademetra]

Bobsheaux I can't hound for something that is going to grow more and more holes as more movies are made.

[@TheOswards306]

+Bobsheaux Of corse! Also, another online critic/seleberty name Animatt fines the Pixar theory stupid.😊

[@ElOchentero]

I always thought the theory was dumb to begin with. Yes, some parts may work, I can see for example Ratatouille and Finding Nemo been in the same universe, or Toy Story and Brave, or Wall-E and Cars, but other are imposible, The Incredibles clearly live in a world with superhumans, somehting that isn't mentioned in ANY of the other movies, and both Inside Out and The Good Dinosaur totally destroy what was left for the theory

[@user6337]

inside out takes place in the universe I believe

[@gunmunz]

I think the worse fan theroy I've heard is the 'Ash coma theroy' basically it says that the reason why Ash from pokemon doesn't age or win a championship is that he's been in a coma since episode 1.Which is debunked if anything by the simple fact that in 20 years of the show no real hints to this have been dropped.

[@ozfan6477]

9:30 If they traveled into a point in time they had already traveled to, they would run into themselves and cause a paradox.

[@christiancorley4309]

The whole movie using time travel would be a paradox

[@ozfan6477]

@@christiancorley4309 Causal Loop

[@southparkfirefly]

People just read too much into things :/ This is how conspiracies are born...

[@gatst7680]

I just don't even care. People constantly look into things WAY too hard. I remember reading a theory that Luigi was dead in Luigi's Mansion because of that Hanging Shadow Glitch in the Telephone Room. Oh, it's a confirmed glitch by the way, the same thing happens in The Baby Boss Fight.

[@Trike71171]

Honestly how in the hell do people think that all these movies connected

[@cynthiautz6702]

I actually didn't mind the Pixar Theory when I first heard about it, however. since I've watched this video, I couldn't agree more. Next time if someone gets to make a fan theory on something please make sure it makes 100% sense! Maybe that's why most people are hating MatPat from Game Theory...

[@ARCtheCartoonMaster]

Thank you for tearing apart the Pixar Theory! I never got why people make up these stupid "theories" that make no sense - it just messes with your mind, and there's tonnes of plot holes that make no sense. Honestly, people claiming certain characters have autism have more credibility than the Pixar theory.

[@monsterjambrony]

12:05 I bet that white car is thinking: THIS DUDE DOSEN'T LIKE PIXAR!!!!????

[@troin3925]

This is why it should’ve been labeled as a _headcanon_ and not a theory. I get _why_ it started though, with all the cameos and references in each movie. Also, once, MatPat said that he’ll talk about this “theory,” at some point since he likes it and finds it interesting. Considering his IQ decrease and not learning from his “Sans is Ness,” video, I’m not surprised.

[@TheKoolman89]

If any one really wanted to make a theory for the Pixar movies, the best food for thought would be that all the movies are just a kid playing with his toys. Or maybe not just one kid but different kids each with different sets of toys making different stories up at playtime. This would make a way better theory than whatever this whole Pixar Theory nonsense is.

[@AnonymousDuckLover]

Do you want to know what bothers me that wasn't covered in this video, the tree that appears in Bugs Life is also the tree that appears at the beginning of Up and in Jesse's song in Toy Story 2, just on a hill. By that logic the Toy Story Trilogy and Up take place after Wall•E.

[@FrenkTheJoy]

The only "Pixar theory" I believe is that the toy repair guy from Toy Story 2 is Geri from the short before Bug's Life (I mean, it's obviously the same guy; I think it's even the same voice actor), and Geri was playing that game in the park where the ant colony in A Bug's Life lives (the two locations look especially similar). But I hate that Pixar Theory you talk about in this video. It takes a lot of leaps in logic and makes unfair assumptions, and the idea that movies must take place in the same universe because of Easter eggs is silly.

[@NitroIndigo]

...Because the two characters literally use the same model.

[@joldsaway3489]

Banjo Peppers I kinda like the theory that Sid is the garbage man in Toy Story 3, but it's so small that it doesn't really matter whether it's true or not

[@ianhawke2203]

@@joldsaway3489 It isn’t a theory, it’s literally canon. He’s listed as Sid in the credits and is voiced by the same actor

[@DrPlumberMan]

Boo being the witch from Brave is the biggest reason I disliked the Pixar Theory... Feels so good to know that someone else agrees this theory is bonkers.

[@RAAM9001]

It'd be important to admit that while some movies do take place in the same universe others do not. What's interesting is the fact there is more reasonably 2 or 3 universes in the Pixar films. The one where animals 'talk', and the one where robots have pseudo-sentience. Nemo remains in the animal universe and cars exists as its own fantasy thing. The problem ultimately is the easter eggs in Finding Nemo and Ratatouille. Which...arn't...'easter eggs'. Simply because in Finding Nemo a kid is reading an incredibles comic book while in Ratatouille someone is wearing Incredibles brand underwear.. I shall attempt to link together the movies in 3 universes as...reasonable as possible. Animal talk Universe - The Good Dinosaur, Finding Nemo, Ratatouille, Brave, and the Incredibles, Cars Universe - Cars, Cars 2, Planes, and Planes 2 "Greater" Pixar Universe - Toy Story 1, Toy Story 2, Toy Story 3, Monsters Inc., WALL-E, Up, Monsters University, and Inside Out, A Bug's life. I truthfully can believe and get behind the theory that Pixar films can be connected to each other. But I do not believe -all- of them are connected to one another. The short listings above are the..most reasonable ones for each Pixar Universe. The Incredibles technology-wise runs in line with Ratatouille as well as Finding Nemo. To top it off there is an Easter egg in each movie which points directly back to the Incredibles in a *reasonable* way. That being of course Incredibles brand underwear and a comic book. The hardest to fit in for each Universe would be the Incredibles and Bug's life simply because Bug's life -should- be in the Animal talk universe while Incredibles in the "Greater" Universe. The problem with that is the Incredibles has two massive easter eggs which throw back to two movies while Bug's life has numerous throw backs to Toy Story as well as the lack of magic in Bug's life on top of that.

[@eartianwerewolf]

A lot of these theories are not even smart enough to address

[@Bobsheaux]

+eartianwerewolf I totally agree, except that too many people believe them whole-heartedly. :/

[@nayruofthezoras1458]

In my case only a few of the movies could be connected. The rest are pretty much their own thing. This theory clearly makes no sense. I mean Boo being the witch seen in Brave? How is that suppose to make any sense? Great work debunking this theory. I never heard of it before, but it sure sounds far fetched.

[@carolinethompson6446]

Nayru of the Zoras I'll have to read the book before I decide anything.

[@nayruofthezoras1458]

Good point.

[@TheCharnstar]

The most annoying thing about this video is the fact that it needs debunking... God, people ACTUALLY believe this fan theory? I mean, yeah, it's a fun idea, but if anyone thinks about it for more than 3 seconds see how ridiculous...

[@TangmoMopet]

Thanks to reference Gertie the dinosaur!

[@liamjay6844]

I don't quite see the appeal in this theory, there are far too many leaps in logic to give it an plausibility. Also feel it devalues many of the films themselves.

[@jamescook2142]

I believed this at first, but that ending tho.

[@infinightmoon6268]

James Cook Yeah, I don't buy the whole thing with Boo being the witch.

[@WTheeZ]

7:44 Is it weird I was expecting a Thanos snap joke/reference at this part... around 3 years before Infinity War came out?

[@HusbandofLois]

There is actually a very good explanation as to how the pixar films are related in the same universe. All of the characters are actors working for pixar, which explains how there are references and jokes relating to other films, and also explain post credits sequences showing 'outtakes' from the film. The animators at pixar have actually created these entire worlds for each film, and they are aware of each other and recognise the animators as the crew of the films in the same way real life actors do. The only difference between this theory and the main theory is that mine is kinda fun to think of and the other one is a giant fucking stretch

[@warioland523]

You know a theory is bad when even Disney themselves can the theory as bullshit.

[@Bobsheaux]

warioland523 And despite their calling it bullshit, somehow Pixar inviting Negroni to a free-screening of Inside Out makes it irrefutably true. :S

[@MissJazzDaFunk]

Awesome. When I first heard this "theory", I wanted to flip a table... It was that stupid.

[@ZeroTheHeartlessKing]

THANK YOU, this theory annoys the hell out of me XP nice to see someone take it down a notch lol

[@lightningfastrc]

I don't care if it's wrong, I still like the idea of the theory.

[@everestcanyon5647]

I like to think that the PIXAR movies take place in the same Universe (except for Cars and Cars 2), but I don't usually see them as really important to each other like Marvel Cinematic Universe tends to be.

[@DivineSpiritual1989]

I agree. I never got the Pixar theory especially when they said Boo is the witch from Brave. It never made sense. It makes me wonder why people would grasp at straws just to think this theory is legit. But then again, we are living in a world where people nowadays grasp at the tiniest thing, make it a headcanon, and act like it's fact just for their own gain. It's freaking sad.

[@montanac2554]

yeah I gotta agree with Bobsheaux. This theory is so bizarrely contrived that it just... doesn't make sense. smh

[@Bobsheaux]

+Love Hagerberg I've seen all that I need to see. Nothing has been able to shed more light on the legitimacy of the theory, or make it less damaging to the films.

[@redbolt4155]

I LOVE this theory, but you did an excellent job debunking it! Great job! :) I still love this theory because, come on wouldn't it be cool if all the Pixar movies were connected!? XD

[@Bobsheaux]

Red Bolt I can admit that it would be cool if all the Pixar movies were linked, but not like THIS. I'm sorry, but BOO is responsible for the downfall of humanity? No!

[@redbolt4155]

Haha, yeah.

[@infinightmoon6268]

Red Bolt I think it could still work. Just make Cars and Monsters Inc. into their own separate universes and move Brave up about 5,000 years in the timeline (in order to explain the Sully and Pizza Planet truck carvings in the witch's shack). That takes care of the biggest holes in the theory.

[@darkhelmet87]

The world of cars isn't the apocalypse of pixar earth. It's the pixar universe's version of cybertron! Its just all the robots are stuck in their alt modes for some reason. Say what you will about mater, he'd make a better autobot than skids and mudflap!

[@Bobsheaux]

+mysterysoup productions You're VERY welcome. :)

[@XWierdThingsHappenX]

I always despised the pixar theory. I agree some of the movies are probably in the same universe. Like bugs life and finding nemo and rattoutoui. But holly hell sticking as of them together is stupid. Not to mention just flat out depressing.

[@newbiegamelover4767]

I think this is the video that introduced me to your channel.