It’s wild to think that some type combinations, regardless of anything else, automatically makes a Pokemon “glass” Ground/Rock sounds very thematic because of how similar Rock and Ground are, but is automatically considered “glass” because of 4 regular weaknesses and 2 quadruple weaknesses
@mesplin32 ай бұрын
Fighting/Ice could be a glass cannon type too, if it had a pokemon that had speed and power.
@afriendlycampfire2602 ай бұрын
@@mesplin3fighting ice isn’t a glass type but a type that helps a pokemon be a cannon
@dse7632 ай бұрын
While Ground/ Rock is extremely "Glass", it's also extremely "cannon" cause only 8 mons (maybe more with some levitate mons that resists Rock) can resist the combo Earthquake/Stone Edge.
@goGothitaLOL2 ай бұрын
@@dse763Now that’s a glass cannon typing if I ever saw one Another example of a glass cannon typing would be Fire/Rock, just look at H-Arcanine in UU or Coalossal in Gen 8 VGC
@Goldeneye33362 ай бұрын
@@goGothitaLOL Not really. It's not a good example. It's a bad example.
@bootortle2 ай бұрын
I felt hurt when you said 115 for attacks may seem a bit "low," rather than "high" powercreep is so absurd😭
@4ny3ody2 ай бұрын
Well setup is generally hard to pull off in VGC and intimidate is a thing so physical attackers need to either be really powerful or offer something else as well. Incineroar with its utility, Snorlax with being very slow and having bellydrum making it incredibly powerful if you can set it up. The benchmark for just high attack is OHKOing certain Pokémon preferably through intimidate without setup and 115 is cutting it very close in that regard.
@Psychomaniac142 ай бұрын
for a glass cannon it makes sense, they should have much higher offensive stats than other pokemon
@hamdepaf6686Ай бұрын
I mean if we compare the number of non "special Pokemon" between gen 1 and 9 that have attacking stats over 115 (excluding special Pokemon cuz gen 9 just has a bunch of paradox mon that would kinda skew the perspective I feel). Pokemon with physical attack of 115 or above: 1th gen - 10 9th gen - 11 (including Palafin hero form) Pokemon with special attack of 115 or above: 1th gen - 7 9th gen - 9 Paradox mon with attacking stats of 115 or above physical - 10 special - 9 [Iron Valiant is in both tho] Legendary with physical attack of 115 or above: 1th gen - 0 9th gen - 4 Legendary with physical attack of 115 or above: 1th gen - 3 9th gen - 4 (including Terapagos stellar form) Now if we look at non special Pokemon with an attacking stat of 130 or above: Physical: 1th gen - 5 (note that 4 of those are exactly 130 and one 134) 9th gen - 3 (being 135/145 and 160 for Palafin Hero form) Special: 1th gen - 2 (being 130 and 135) 9th gen - 2 (being 130 and 133) So yea, all things considered I think power-creep is pretty manageable if you ignore the intentionally overpowered Pokemon, however I totally get why people feel like it is out of control especially with gen 9. I think the current VGC meta that has all special Pokemon banned you can see very well how many Pokemon of any generation can actually still thrive there.
@ChronoflationАй бұрын
@@hamdepaf6686Yeah, if anything, a lot of power creep comes in special Pokemon, new items, and ability changes. I mean, if you think about it, Gen 2 was full of Baby Pokemon and then we got Gen 3 introducing abilities at all and getting 2 pseudo legendaries. Doesn't get much more power creep than that, lol
@elijahpark53442 ай бұрын
I think there's one more reason: two attacks. Because a Pokemon can receive two attacks in one turn, VGC is incredibly rough on Pokemon that lean either too defensively (relying on bulk rather than utility; good examples include clodsire and toxapex) or Pokemon that lean too offensively (the aforementioned glass cannon). In addition, because it's a lower level format, it's nearly impossible to one shot in VGC (save for legendary formats).
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
For sure!
@DaSquyd2 ай бұрын
It's easier to one shot at level 50 than at level 100. Damage relative to HP is slightly higher at lower levels.
@TheTwistedTreant526Ай бұрын
Yeah, even with Sash you can just say goodbye to your glass cannon
@ExcalibeonSwordofEeveelutions2 ай бұрын
Sneasler while having mild VGC usage being called bad in VGC:
@sircartier47032 ай бұрын
Mild for a reason
@GravityIsFalling2 ай бұрын
Only good cause better Pokémon are banned It’s like how a UU Mon is only good because the OU mons are banned
@ExcalibeonSwordofEeveelutions2 ай бұрын
Man, y'all act like anything that doesn't see regular usage deserves to be called bad. Sneasler's seen notably more use then the other pokemon listed.
@Goldeneye33362 ай бұрын
@@GravityIsFalling Nah, Sneasler is good. This is a bad player take.
@MeFreedyfazbeaez2 ай бұрын
There is no point of using it when chien po exist@@Goldeneye3336
@zanyludicolo2 ай бұрын
Great video! Excluding the increase in sneasler stocks in Reg H, excadrill historically matches the rough description of a glass cannon and does pretty well in VGC
@GravityIsFalling2 ай бұрын
Nah that mf bulky lowkey
@Cass-zb9nr2 ай бұрын
Exca has enough hp to be somewhat bulky with defense investment
@blakdeth2 ай бұрын
Unless it's paired with something detrimental like rock or ice, steel is too good of a defensive type to be considered glass
@ispeakcockney53872 ай бұрын
@@blakdeth I don't consider steel to be a defensive typing in vgc because ground, fire and fighting are too common. I see steel more as an offensive typing just because it has been used to counter Xerneas and Fluttermane
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
Thanks! I started making this video in August, before Reg H started, so if I made it after that, I actually may have added Sneasler to the conversation of successful glass cannons. Also, Excadrill has definitely been good but I feel that its HP is too high and its typing is too good defensively to be considered glass.
@jewii38242 ай бұрын
Definitely true in general. But the existence of focus sash made glass canons viable in many circumstances. Examples: gengar, chi-yu, sneasler, regieleki, etc. The addition of ghost Tera and covert cloak also made glass canons better since they can ignore fake out.
@jewii38242 ай бұрын
It's also important to point out you can shield your team from fake out or sucker punch or any priority moves with psychic terrain or Pokémon like farigiraf that can stop priority attacks. With all this said I just want to say that it's a little misleading to say that glass canons are not viable in vgc, or even say that they are generally not viable in vgc. Because that's simply not true. It's true that you will almost never see a team that's built almost exclusively with glass canons, but you will very frequently see 1 or maybe 2 glasscanon mons in highly successful vgc teams
@mattkase8880Ай бұрын
With the examples listed though, at least two of them don’t perfectly fit the criteria. Chi you in particular is devastating because it not only lowers enemy sp def, it has access to overheat which is a very strong spread move that’s hard to resist, and 120 special defense of its own. And as for regieliki, it played more of a supporting role in sw/sh with electroweb to lower enemy speed. Its lack of bulk also wasn’t too big of a drawback back then bc you could dynamax for double hp. It also had access to volt switch, so it could swap to a bulkier mon before anything could hit it
@jewii3824Ай бұрын
@@mattkase8880you are right, but honestly a lot of these new Pokémon like chi yu, fluttermane, spectrier, calyrex-shadow, etc. were designed to be glass canons, but their stats, abilities, and signature moves are just so incredibly imbalanced and frankly poorly designed that they are Canon but not even glass. This is why regulations banning legendaries are better and you get to see more mons being played. Glass canons are almost never viable in restricted formats in my opinion.
@hisshoes11072 ай бұрын
Here I am, with my breakfast, staring at my for you page thinking "I need something that's like ten minutes". Voila!
@evilded22 ай бұрын
Good video. It seems like having more mons on the field results in winning requiring strategies with a bit more depth than [set up → sweep with outspeed + one shot]
@leaffinite20012 ай бұрын
🙄
@chavezraul68792 ай бұрын
I was thinking "Oh, with that criteria you could do an excel or a code that filters th... oh, nevermind, good job!"
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
Thanks
@jonathanwilson1539Ай бұрын
Typhlosion:...oh well, anyway. *Eruption*
@aarionsievo2 ай бұрын
I like the analysis. It really gives me something to think about for team building and searching weaknesses in opposing teams. Nevertheless I think that another reason for the low number of glass canons in VGC is that they are more easily outclassed. If its only purpose is being fast and hiting hard, there are probably better options. This effect is also present in Smogon formats but strongly reduced my the balancing/banning policies.
@Missiletainn2 ай бұрын
Sneasler has a VGC niche, with lots of Unburden strategies using terrain seeds to patch up its defenses, and has rock slide which is very useful for it
@adriantillman82032 ай бұрын
yeaaaa glad you addressed chien pao bc the Tera Ghost Weasel is terrifying
@mystik_owl2 ай бұрын
nice and concise!
@justdominik98122 ай бұрын
Glass cannons generally do like running choice items in general, like choice band meowscarada which was a common pick due to the sheer offensive pressure it can output. Urshifu could also be considered a glass cannon although it does have decent hp and defense, it will likely fall to any special move, but I do understand why you didn't include it.
@GravityIsFalling2 ай бұрын
Urshifu is NOT a class cannon
@justdominik98122 ай бұрын
@@GravityIsFalling it's a little bulkier than most glass cannons but it's generally not going to like taking special hits. It pretty much relies on either sash or scarf in higher power formats where it can easily get KO'd, meanwhile in lower power formats it can genuinely be quite bulky.
@GravityIsFalling2 ай бұрын
@@justdominik9812 100/100 bulk is insane btw
@justdominik98122 ай бұрын
@@GravityIsFalling it's good but 60 sp. def is really low.
@GravityIsFalling2 ай бұрын
@@justdominik9812 And yet it’s often ran with bulky spreads and using mystic water It’s highs are high enough that its lows can be patched up
@DaSquyd2 ай бұрын
A more accurate metric is the square root of HP multiplied by either defense or sp. def (rather than added to them). You can take the minimum of the two as the liability.
@Outsidetheboxthinker2 ай бұрын
I thought you had 170k subs you deserve it
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
Thanks
@McC0n0r2 ай бұрын
One thing you didn't touch on is that with Doubles having more Pokemon on the field, glass canons take a bit hit when considering double targeting. Sure, you're glass canon might have a Focus Sash, but that won't save them from say, a Fake Out into a follow up attack.
@mahrii30932 ай бұрын
A glass cannon with slow speed is cacturne
@goGothitaLOL2 ай бұрын
and Rampardos
@mahrii30932 ай бұрын
@@goGothitaLOL oh yeah that too he has an insane attack stat
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
I would argue that a glass cannon with slow speed is not even a glass cannon
@M3rtyvilleАй бұрын
Gen 3 is known for slow "bulky" "mixed" attackers. Take a look at Seviper...
@willkershisnik589315 күн бұрын
@@x_bell1142trick room? Slower is better at times
@4ny3ody2 ай бұрын
I'd add another reason which is the defensive benefit of switches. For one there are less safe switch ins against two pokemon both due to more coverage and the simple fact that theres two attacks potentially coming in and even if the switch in was safe, there's still no protection for the partner pokemon outside of switching in intimidate or countering weather/terrain.
@grimmylocked2 ай бұрын
I don't think Sneasler was ever bad in VGC - it saw some use in early Reg D. Its just that Urshifu's existance is just too overwhelming to consider other fast fighting types. Like in the same vein, Palafin and Basculegion are definitely not bad mons, but Urshifu invalidated them. If Sneasler had been present from Reg A-C, I'm certain it would have had some niche usage.
@mintx1720Ай бұрын
I think it's what I call protect tax, these pokemon can't hold choice band and can't use swords dance because that slot has to go to protect in doubles. Pokemon like flutter mane can choose to not use protect since she's immune to fake out, but not these guys. I expect a frail sweeper with really good stabs to do well, so sash stabs sd protect, or simply be fake out immune.
@tb543Ай бұрын
Great video
@mesplin32 ай бұрын
Just for fun, I ranked which dual types would be the best glass cannons (good offense but relatively poor defense) imo. Top 10: Ground Ice Rock Ice Ground Rock Fighting Ice Fighting Rock Grass Ice Fighting Ground Rock Psychic Ground Psychic Psychic Ice Top 10 worst glass cannons (good defense but relatively poor offense): Steel Electric Steel Dragon Steel Fairy Flying Steel Poison Steel Normal Poison Ghost Steel Ghost Dark Normal Ghost Normal Steel
@lenlimbo2 ай бұрын
Steel Fairy hits 6 types for double damage, 10 for neutral and it's only resisted by TWO types, Steel and Fire. There is a reason why it is widely considered the best type combination in the game, specially when combined with its fantastic resistance of 8 types resisted, 1 type doubled resisted, 3 inmunities and only 2 weakenesses. IT has a fantastic offense and defense, and it's only hold back (usually) by the poor offensive stats of the pokemon with those types, and I say usually because mega Mawile, Magearna and Zacian exist. Normal Ghost, on paper, may look like a bad glass cannon, but the fact that it can hit for neutral damage to EVERY type in the game makes it a pretty decent attacking combination. No pokémon can resist its STAB moves.
@mesplin32 ай бұрын
@@lenlimbo The list is about the relationship between attack and defense. Steel/fairy is excellent defensively. That isn't to say that it's offensive prowess is lacking, just that it pales in comparison to it's defense. Steel and fairy moves are both resisted by the steel type. Neutral coverage isn't bad, but normal/ghost is only weak to dark. So in contrast with it's defense, I'd argue that it's offensive prowess is lacking in comparison to it's defensive nature.
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
Very interesting!
@DanielYuStar_Pachirisu_FeetАй бұрын
Delphox, a Pokémon i try to use on all my teams, is kinda a glass shotgun, because she can't deal that much spread damage unless it's psyspam
@paps_yt2 ай бұрын
Great video!
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@KanderUdon2 ай бұрын
Sneasler is pretty good right now
@EmbracingVGC2 ай бұрын
Required to have sash
@afriendlycampfire2602 ай бұрын
@@EmbracingVGCpersim berry Hit is with swagger +2 attack with no confusion, it consumes the berry and unburden activates, use acrobatics Basically sd and agility in the same turn
@Reginald4252 ай бұрын
@@afriendlycampfire260Unless you miss swagger with the partner mon, in which case a turn goes by where both mons are exposed and you only do a quarter of the damage you expected to do.
@HuneeBruh2 ай бұрын
@@Reginald425well that’s just the risk you take when using any not 100% accurate move
@Reginald4252 ай бұрын
@@HuneeBruh Indeed, although that is a particularly dire setback
@bulborb87562 ай бұрын
2:12 easily a mon that falls into that is Rampardos, sky high atk and pretty good HP....but all ruined by bad defenses, low speed and a rather bad defensive typing in rock being a slow glass cannon is never gonna be a working formula
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
I might even argue that being a slow glass cannon isn't even a cannon
@Unknown-69852 ай бұрын
@@x_bell1142 Me think is Waste Part Slot
@mr.sniffly52972 ай бұрын
@@x_bell1142eh, it still is, it’s just a crappy one
@unbannablebanjo37442 ай бұрын
As much as I respect VGC players, I really do hate that it's the "official" pokemon format. I don't understand why they design so many pokemon around the games' single player gameplay, and then make the official competitive scene doubles
@Tank_man2 ай бұрын
S t a l l
@GreatBlueWorldАй бұрын
Because singles is binary to an unhealthy degree. Too little room for creativity and battles using the meta mons end up looking almost the same, both terrible things for a competitive esport scene.
@a12349743Ай бұрын
Single isn’t balance enough as eSports. Singles always have to ban lots of Pokemon to make it balance enough to play even competitively, which does not happen in doubles
@GrayVMhanАй бұрын
If the pokemon company would have any balls at all then all games would be just doubles like the GameCube games. Singles is like worse chess while doubles is like a fun game to play
@robertoo4107Ай бұрын
Singles suck, that's why game freak should make everything doubles just like in SV DLC
@catv11598Ай бұрын
I'd say you should include Thundurus as one of the "successful glass cannons in VGC" (229 bulk)... in SV it's not as good as it once was, but in gens V and VI it was so obnoxiously powerful as a support Pokemon they had to nerf it to oblivion - and, even with all the nerfs, it managed to win its 3rd world championship in the last year of gen 8. Probably one of the best Pokemon of all time
@candaru_driemor3 күн бұрын
Leaving a nice comment for the algorithm :)
@x_bell11422 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@valiantchris64562 ай бұрын
Now do the flip side: The Problem With Mighty Glaciers in Singles
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
Maybe I will
@MeteorTribeАй бұрын
i agree with 115
@TheLucastran26 күн бұрын
Cool man :)
@trevhart21242 ай бұрын
I really wish Pokemon would give these Pokemon more to work with when it comes to double. Be it spread moves or better type coverage moves Or hell, better support moves
@terminawarfrance61042 ай бұрын
For fake out you can just protect no ?
@DionesGasparini12 ай бұрын
TLDR: Protect.
@m0nke132 ай бұрын
A video on tyranitar would be highly appreciated.
@ghstlingsАй бұрын
i thought flutter mane would get a mention for sure LOL
@x_bell1142Ай бұрын
I don't feel that Flutter Mane is glass enough to be a glass cannon
@samelol81492 ай бұрын
What about infernape? It's glass, but not even a cannon
@FffDddd-lp1vcАй бұрын
Galarian Darmanitan: I'm a joke for you?
@x_bell1142Ай бұрын
Yes
@crimsecretxd-ex9fb2 ай бұрын
Finally a coll end sprach bout likes 👍 also cool video
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
Thanks
@WyattBehm2 ай бұрын
Kilowattrel is considered a glass cannon even though it doesn’t fit your criteria on attacking stats
@SterlingCalmАй бұрын
It has wind power and lightning rod tbf
@DrCoeloCephalo2 ай бұрын
Alot of things you bring up really just stem from problems with Pokemon's battle system and gsme design. I like to use Yo-Kai Watch 3 as an example because many of these issues you bring up just don't exist in that game's battle system. Becsuse Yo-Kai Watch 3 has actual board movement like an actual chesss game, you can move your bulky pieces with high HP and DEF to stand in front of a glass cannon ally and Guard so their allies do not get targeted for regular physical and magic attacks. That mechanic alone lets bulky monsters focus on defense and glass cannons focus on offense. Alot more glass cannons also have ways to do consistent spread damage in that game because of Soultimate tile coverage. Jibanyan S, an S Ranked version of the mascot monster Jibanyan, for example, has a Soultimate that covers the front 2 rows of the 3x3 grid. That 6 out of the 9 total tiles unsafe for the opponent to stay on lest they get hit by a high powered multihit physical attack that exploits Jibanyan S' Skill that boosts its crit rate massively in echange for it being more prone to being crit. It also has a much faster charging Soultimate compared to most S Ranks. Jibanyan S is very much a glass cannon that can effectively play as one in its 3v3 system. It also helps that healing and revival are WAY stronger in YKW3 than Pokemon even if Jibanyan S DID get hurt. Pokemon does not have alot of perks or as much depth by comparison in its battle system, hence alot of things have to rely on Protect to play defensive and the top stuff tends to lead towards bulky offense.
@Aaa-vp6ug2 ай бұрын
So basically, for improvements, throw in some Mystery Dungeon mechanics?
@lenlimbo2 ай бұрын
Not quite. The video is ignoring the fact that redirecting attacks and using the same interruptions to make sure your glass cannons can work are strategies used. As an example, Iron Valiant, the so called not specially viable glass cannon, has a 2nd place in this year world championship, in the Masters category (the highest). Partially as a disruptor, sure, but it did also have spirit break for KOs, as it is still hits REALLY hard (also, booster energy gave it the same boost as a choice item, without losing the capacity of using other moves)
@jerseys89finest2 ай бұрын
I think the number should be redone. 4 times weakness on somethin that isnt op is bad. Only go as high as 2.5 times weak if they have two types weak to the same thing.
@itz_bahamut3822Ай бұрын
Or 3 times. Like a 4 Stage Stat Boost being 3x the stat
@nathanieljones80432 ай бұрын
Simple if you out speed and one shot everything in singles unless they have proity or another gimmick you have infinite hp in vgc you have to do that 2x or have a spread move sting enough to do that for the same effect.
@graylyhen94902 ай бұрын
Flutter Mane, Zard Y, fast Mega Gard, Iron Valiant, Talonflame, 100 more Mons. Deoxys-A was almost banned in USUM DOU. You're wrong and you're fired
@GravityIsFalling2 ай бұрын
If flutter glass why have name “bulky flutter”?
@catv11598Ай бұрын
Deoxys-A is not even legal in VGC because it's a Mythical Pokemon. Mega Gardevoir has 135 SpDef (268 bulk) and only 3 weaknesses. Talonflame's offensive stats are too bad for it to be considered a "cannon" (although it can be useful, specially before TPC nerfed Gale Wings). Also, VGC and DOU are definitely not the same thing. I hope you were being sarcastic
@willkershisnik589315 күн бұрын
Doubles ou isn’t a real format. This is about vgc
@calvinnguyen18702 ай бұрын
Flutter Mane also fits all of your stats criteria and is one of the most used VGC pokemon of all time
@flabermaber22392 ай бұрын
It's got good defensive typing and spdef
@TrulyAtrocious2 ай бұрын
It has comparable Special Defense to Toxapex
@ytbtech1142 ай бұрын
its total hp+spdef+def over 230 its 245 so doesnt fit the criterea
@Joss_star.2 ай бұрын
Flutter mane has Dazzling Gleam
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
I don't feel that Flutter Mane is "glass" enough to be considered a glass cannon. Its combined HP, Defense, and Special Defense is 245, 15 points higher than the threshold I set. It also has no 4 times weaknesses, only 2 regular weaknesses.
@KanderUdon2 ай бұрын
Nice
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
Thanks
@patricklynch4074Ай бұрын
And hen sneasler became meta
@linceed9 күн бұрын
I would recommend changing the background on your videos, as it messes with the compression algorithm and results in an image which looks, to put it one way, like shit. I like the videos tho.
@x_bell11429 күн бұрын
You mean altering it in a way that doesn't mess with the compression algorithm or changing it entirely?
@armorbearer9702Ай бұрын
I guess Intimidate cannot lower the opponents attack enough to use glass cannons.
@phineas75520 күн бұрын
thanks but i perfer my glass bow and arrows
@VGMComments2 ай бұрын
I see all these people using brittle paper bags as I call them in Tera raids since they are favorites to most people but they drop like flies, lower the team's timer and cost us the win. Do you REALLY think a Ceruledge, Charizard or Flutter Mane is going to be able to take a hit from a Tyranitar in a 6 star raid?
@DylanmeetWorld2 ай бұрын
Rillaboom 🪖 gets razor leaf, bulldoze, and eq . Btw great video good content keep it up 💯👏
@chetrickerАй бұрын
Remember when 100 base speed was considered fast 😢
@cullenringstad8702Ай бұрын
Annihilape gets rockslide
@owenconn845528 күн бұрын
Destiny bond
@noahhager11872 ай бұрын
does flutter mane count
@a12349743Ай бұрын
Flutter mane has great special defense so it doesn’t count
@pocketsycho8720Ай бұрын
your incorrect kartana doesn't have the highest base form attack that goes to Marowak Mega Mawhile and Medicham
@x_bell1142Ай бұрын
@@pocketsycho8720 First of all, *you’re. Second, Mega Mawile is not a base form, Medicham’s attack is not higher than Kartana’s even with Pure Power, and Marowak needs to hold an item which I would argue is not a base form. By this logic, Kartana could also hold a choice band and have the highest attack
@pocketsycho8720Ай бұрын
@x_bell1142 there is no downside towards marowak holding a thick club besides the fact that marowak has to hold an item but there is a downside towards kartana holding a choice band to me base form is the pokemon going out with no stat boosts or downsides so megas are included and marowak is included
@NotlostMoonАй бұрын
Rampardos has neither bull nor speed.
@ianyoung94582 ай бұрын
Not really relevant but want to note sash not really a viable item to use in singles even considering hazard control out of the lead slot too much to maintenance involved in preservation
@broidkanymore-zc4lt2 ай бұрын
i wonder wat a glass cannon is to tera grass choice band grassy glide rillaboom
@VWabhijit2 ай бұрын
I think a certain Fluttered Mane would like to talk to you about the viability of glass Canons
@buycraft911miner22 ай бұрын
135 spdef. just... 135 spdef
@evilded22 ай бұрын
It also has only 2 weakness and 3 immunities
@buycraft911miner22 ай бұрын
@@evilded2 2 of which are steel and poison, not very common attacking types so basically only ghost as a weakness
@evilded22 ай бұрын
@@buycraft911miner2 exactly, not super frail
@PingCrimson2 ай бұрын
Flutter Mane is kind of like Kartana in that its good base stats are so high (and can be boosted by its ability) that it lets you dump a bunch of EVs into its two bad stats (HP and defense). Plus it's only weak to two types that are usually more defensive than offensive (Steel and Poison).
@RuralSquirrelJuror2 ай бұрын
This is a nice comment
@x_bell11422 ай бұрын
Thanks
@stayhumble-.-2 ай бұрын
Imagine pokémon, designed to hit hard in a singles format; sucking in double battles. Crazy.
@1nkFN2 ай бұрын
nope the game is designed around the official format of VGC is which doubles. the game is balanced around doubles.
@jazzercise3002 ай бұрын
@@1nkFNyea I was about to say? They sure as hell don't balance around singles lol dynamax, gems, tera, OHKO moves, widespread access to stealth rock. All manageable or just plain bad in VGC, broken or unfair in singles.
@1nkFN2 ай бұрын
@@jazzercise300 yeah idk what he is yapping about
@KanderUdon2 ай бұрын
Stop yapping bro
@borzafror2 ай бұрын
i'd say the game is balanced with 90% casual singles in mind for the mainline games and 10% for vgc. no sane person would release zaician and calyrex if the game was balances solely around competitive doubles@@1nkFN
@basedjenny73622 ай бұрын
That intro lowered my iq 10 points
@DisxidenceАй бұрын
u is cute
@Nick-yl4qp2 ай бұрын
I don't know why doubles is the official competitive format. Singles is much more fun
@medicfdumbo2 ай бұрын
More room for strategy but yea i prefer singles
@noahthecrazy16322 ай бұрын
Nah doubles has more to offer, if it’s balanced (it’s never balanced)
@kahvimuki652 ай бұрын
Its because of time. Playing one 6v6 match on console with full animations will take 30min+ unless both players are playing HO. And if both players have a defensive team its going over an hour easily.
@TheBlur1822 ай бұрын
Hell nah
@jdrmanmusiqking2 ай бұрын
Lol SMOGON Singles is more fun. Official singles are 3v3 and nothing is banned. Sleep, evasion, moody, baton pass is all legal but the worst part is the ITEM CLAUSE This rule right here is the single biggest restriction in all of Pokemon whether official or smogon. Some pokemon just NEED to run certain items so those mon can simply never be put on the same team Official singles is just pure degeneracy and i think Smogon goes too hard on bans (like banning freakin sleep smh). But official singles is just too unhinged
@bigbigx22502 ай бұрын
Bro did NOT just explain what a glass cannon is what the hawk tuah
@evilded22 ай бұрын
A glass cannon is a character with high damage output but low durability. The term is pretty old but was popularized for use in table top games. This lead to the adoption of it in rpg video games and spreading out to many other genres.