The Quantum Cat Experiment That Shattered Reality

[@Kyanzes]

Schrödinger brought up this idea to show the idiocy of it on our scale. No, he did not think the cat was in two states. He said, imagine if it worked like that.

[@quantum7145]

its junk from the 40's smoking reefer no tv to watch so come up with imagination

[@user-xb3td6ho5b]

It's like you are seeing because you're using your eyes. The eyes tell no lies, unless you want them too. We live in a reality of multiple realities trying to make sense of reality. The only thing we can know for certain is what we know because we know it.

[@ElvirTopčagić]

Its not about cat at all it explains what atom decay realy means

[@stephencorsaro954]

It was a sarcastic rebuttal to the idea of an observer changing the physical reality in the universe. A rejection of nihilism and self importance.

[@deborahhebblethwaite1865]

Obviously people watching the beginning of this video about Schrodinger’s cat are more accurate than the video.🇨🇦

[@CommackMark]

Misinterpretation of the Schrodinger experiment. It was to show how when quantum physics is brought up to the everyday scale of everyday physics it makes no sense.

[@AmandaMillenia]

These hackers will never learn...can't just copy and paste...you gotta fact check neeny with all this fake news floating around. Even mu Dumbledore self knows that. Oh u must be my twin! 😅

[@Frankthetank-zr5mc]

These vids would worthless without comments like yours to bring proper context. Thank you! However, even with the narrative of experts like you I think these vids do more harm than good. It’s just too easy for the uniformed (like me) to grasp a thread and assume they are informed…

[@genestippell1833]

I've always enjoyed science, now 65, but it seems to me we have reached a point of a dog chasing its tail that never catches it. Maybe homo sapien is incapable (probably true in the end) of understanding the universe. Infinity, how can you rationalize that? We've reached a point where the more we learn the more paradoxes we run into. Are we spending tons of money and time on trying to solve the unsolvable? Where is the endgame? How can there even be a beginning and end if Infinity is part of any equation. A singularity, an infinite universe, mulltiverses, leaves science in a quandary. Our eyes can only see a small segment of the electromagnetic spectrum. Maybe our brains are the same. Only capable of understanding a small portion of the universe while most of the universe is unattainable to us. Right now with dark matter and dark energy still a mystery, we only know a small fraction of the universe.

[@FrickinCherryPickin]

We're not spending enough time, and definitely not spending enough money (the low amount of money spent influences the amount of time spent as well). The amount of money space agencies get from their governments (not just USA) is so minimal compared to other things. It's incredibly offensive. We have brilliant minds forced to use technologies that are many decades old in some situations.

[@SmegInThePants]

Scientific understanding has progressed through time. At any point in the past it would have looked to have been similarly exhausted/stalled as it looks to you today. Until some enterprising person came along w/a new experiment or a new interpretation of existing data to spark a flurry of progress. Or if we wind back far enough it took not only an enterprising person but a brave person to challenge that day's cultural dogma under threat of death (heresy charges). Progress today can feel slow but it is actually lightning fast compared to the rate of progress even just a hundred years ago. There is no reason to despair over a mystery that takes decades to unravel. There have always been mysteries that have seemed impenetrable in their time. People lived their entire lifetimes w/these mysteries remaining unexplored. Entire generations living and dying sometimes before any progress was made on a subject. We are lucky to live in a time where within one lifetime we can see progress being made on a multitude of matters that were seemingly impenetrable mysteries earlier within our own lifetime. But don't get so used to mysteries being unraveled soon after they are discovered, there are still going to be some that take decades or generations even to illuminate. And the way we do so is to not give up.

[@gregwilk9951]

Very true , but I believe that our imagination could be infinite.

[@Rooln1]

I think humans tend to overestimate our abilities and don’t see the spectrum we’re on. You can’t get a cat or dog to comprehend calculus or teach a fish what water actually is. We would be foolish to think that there isn’t plenty of calculus and water out there for us to never be able to comprehend. But, we did used to think everything revolved around the earth and that Zeus would throw lightning bolts when he was mad, so maybe we should still keep trudging along 😊

[@walterfredrickson3887]

Let alone gravity.

[@ericlipps9459]

Our existence isn't _necessary_ for the universe to exist; it's the other way around. We exist in this universe because we _can_ exist in this universe.

[@WideCuriosity]

No expert, but my understanding of Bell's inequality theorem doesn't suggest clocks can't stay in step, it was to do with suggesting there were no hidden variables solving the issue of entanglement. Clocks can keep time (in practice clocks in different frames are unlikely to remain in synchronisation, but that's surely a different issue). Meanwhile have you reached the scary paradox part of the video yet ?

[@ronrice1931]

"Schrödinger wanted to critique the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which suggests that quantum systems exist in superpositions until measured, and that this superposition applies universally. By proposing the scenario with a cat, he illustrated how ridiculous it would be to think of a macroscopic being like a cat as both alive and dead until someone opens the box."

[@mosquitobight]

Quantum Mechanics says that subatomic particles don't have definite boundaries but are fuzzy in the three space dimensions. Relativity says that time is equivalent to a fourth dimension of space. Therefore it seems to me that subatomic particles and events are fuzzy in the time dimension as well. If two causally linked events are sufficiently close together in time, it may be impossible to say which event caused which.

[@AmandaMillenia]

It's so good to see my work out there. I knew ch 1 was missing from my Google drive

[@danielmclaughlin5546]

The problem with the Schrodinger's cat scenario is that the Geiger counter would have measured the radioactive decay or not detected any, and thus, the measurement would have been made and the cat is either dead or alive but not both. The idea that a human observer has to confirm the measurement is just silly egocentricism.

[@aaronburratwood.6957]

We’re all the cat in the box and I myself feel both dead and alive. I actually feel dead most of the time, however all evidence points to me in fact being alive. Which I don’t understand but maybe that’s the being dead part. I feel that I died August 2016 after a terrible fall off a house. I either passed away and this is some sort of purgatory or I moved over to some other timeline where I replaced the person I once was in this alternate timeline. In comparison to the timeline I lived in for the first 37 years of my life, this new timeline I’ve now lived in for the last eight years is very different and very dark & disturbing. I see & notice the differences daily.

[@johnjackson8709]

What messes with my head is the whole particles knowing that they are being watched thing, and change their behavior because of it. The Double slit experiment

[@tc3458]

Its a wave. Fields and waves describe particles.

[@X9Zog]

Would they even exist if not observed (by anything)? Some would say it doesn’t have to “know” it consciously, though it would be entangled in some way if it were being observed. If it’s entangled with nothing whatsoever in such a way, in which universe/frame of reference does it exist?

[@callmealex69]

​@X9Zog a guy won the Nobel prize for proving that reality doesn't locally exist.

[@SophiaOfAthens]

A lot of people misunderstand what the experiment--scientists--are saying. When not measured, particles in the experiment go through both slits at the same time causing the interference pattern we seen on the screen. When measure, we get only two strips parallel to the slits. Why does this happen? I will do my best to explain this as well as I can as it has been awhile since I've read anything on it, but remember enough to give a cursory explanation. All particles in the universe exhibit what is known as wave-particle duality. This is a concept many physicists still have trouble accepting, but it is a real thing. Due to the wave-particle duality of particles, they interfere with each other as they go through the slits. The strange thing is that the interference pattern emerges even when you fire a particle one at a time, meaning the particle goes through the slits at the same time. One has to wonder why the particles in the air don't interfere with the particles in the experiment, but they don't. However, when measured, the particles act like you would expect them to, and simply create two lines parallel to the slits. Many people hear the word "observer" and incorrectly assume it is talking about seeing with our eyes. That is not the case. An observer is any particle that interacts with any other particle and thus collapses the wave function. This is why and how we are able to see the world around us, and why the measurement of the experiment gives us the result of two strips parallel to the slits. I hope this explanation made sense.

[@davemccombs]

That isn't at ALL what that is. Particles don't "know" they're "being watched," lol. Goddamn it

[@Mfvpill]

At 3:53, triangle with dots what are those ? I can see them and few different kind floating in atmosphere.. ?

[@franciserdman]

Cool video - can u provide link to the experiment that allegedly proved information can be sent faster than light? My gut would say that it only *appeared* as if superluminal information transfer took place, but some other explanation is in fact the case, but I'd be interested to see the link there.

[@BCTGuitarPlayer]

Let us take into consideration that the cat has 9 lives...

[@LocomotiveThought]

In what feild of expertise is an in depth understanding of Quantum Mechanics required to get a supervisory or management position?

[@WsgImLj]

Okay but what happens if sound comes into play?

[@dapperwolf6034]

After a video I saw about what would happen if time stopped, I believe that the way quantum entanglement works is that when a quantum process interacts with an undetermined spin state the measurement causes the universe to briefly stop time then take a snapshot of the spin position then simultaneously create a opposite spin then resume. Quantum entanglement is instant and there's no information that's transferred my belief is that just like what would happen if time stopped no information would be transferred. One measurement would be made time would stop any other would be made during that brief period of time stopping.

[@WalterRutledge-l9i]

The catch to Schrödinger's cat is the fact that, as anyone knows who has ever lived with an actual cat, the cat itself is an eligible observer, and will notice immediately that it is being poisoned 😂 !

[@zeroonetime]

Time is illusion ~ Timing is real.

[@ryangrey]

Good point. I agree.

[@MoaadEddbali]

How does one contact you

[@johnbertrand560]

I've always been irritated by this analogy of Super Positioning! Schrodengers Cat is kinda like saying if a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound? think a far simpler example of this is a coin put on its side like a nickel and make it spin on its edge by flicking it! As it spins it is both and neither heads or tails at the same time until you stop it to look at which side is facing you! This underlies the concept the nature of the wave function! In its quantum of a single particle such as a photon until its observed or measured ìt is both a wave and a particle! Its only in the collapse of the wave function that it can be measured! However Einstein had issues with Quantum Entanglement which is not so much about the wave particle duality! But about how two Entangled particles regardless of distance by measuring one you instantly know the others state! However to entangle to particles you start by splitting them! This is debatable as to weather its faster than light communication over vast distances or merely a by product of the Entanglement and its not been tested over extreme distances only from one mountain top lab to another! That's not to say that it's not possible but extremely difficult due to the conditions needed to keep the particles Entangled! Is Quantum Computing the answer perhaps if you were able to entangle two Quantum Computers using Entangled Q-bits but now were entering into Science Fiction🤔 At least for now! One of the ways to text this theory is in reach but who's going to fund the idea of building Entangled Quantum Computers leaving one on Earth and sending the other to the moon to see if faster than light communication is even possible? Anyway I'm just a Tattoo Artist who smokes alot of Weed what do I know 🤓😁🤣

[@axle.student]

In short, rather than saying the cat is "both" dead and alive, we can say that the cat is neither dead or alive.. Like the coin.

[@frankryan782]

If somebody tries to explain anything using science they've misunderstood how big a subject existence is.. We have no idea whats going on individually , maybe all human thinking is joined up making the dream we are experiencing seem real.. There are no answers only beliefs. .

[@agriperma]

I have a problem with the statement "If it can't be measured it's pseudo science" this lends to the notion that if science is not able to measure something, then it's not real, this is arrogance at its finest. many of the things that we take for granted in science in present time, were not known in the past and were only speculated at, yet they were just as real in the past than they are now the only difference is science did not know how to measure this real phenomena. it is safe to say, that someone right now has a theory or hypothesis on something that will someday be proven/measured to be fact. so does that make that theory or hypothesis less true now ? it just has not been proven or measured yet. If a theory/hypothesis is easily debunked and found faulty, then of course it should be rejected, but if no fault can be found, then no matter how weird it is, it should not be rejected.

[@WideCuriosity]

It is the claimed notion that is incorrect. It isn't science if it can't be tested and potentially disproved. If it just happens to be true, so be it; but science won't help you prove that.

[@jamiedoe6822]

@@WideCuriosity scientist don’t explain the limits of what we can know scientifically

[@zeroonetime]

010 duality, switching on and off from Intangible to Tangible and back again in timing at no Time at all.

[@HistoricalVoyaget]

Wow wow great videos my friend

[@fexl]

Appreciate it! 😊

[@Geo_Knows_Things]

Schrodinger showed the absurdity of his own idea, not that of quantum mechanics; but it has led many a mind astray. Things at the human scale behave classically, because they are made up of trillions of particles and manifest the statistical average of, not because they would operate by a different kind of physics.

[@wessla]

It's not about the observation of a human. It's the measurement. Wo measure the state of an electron requires the use of some kind of device that interact with system containing the electrons. When this interactions occur, energy is being added to the system and the electrons state is changed. Observation is simply the measurement.

[@HowlinMadBob]

Just a thought.... If consciousness plays a roll in shaping reality, Then maybe the super advanced society that existed around 20,000 years ago collectively thought and believed things into existance? For example, you get a 100 or so people together playing horns and chanting at a certain frequency with the beleif that all of that energy would levitate a massive 5 ton rock into the air and put it in place at the top of a cliff... That collective conscious belief bends reality to make it possible???

[@zeroonetime]

Quantum Mechanics is immeasurable while mechanized to reach its potential. We cannot measure the immeasurable 010, Creation, Evolution and Entropy all switching from 0 to 1 to 0. all at 10nce. dimensions.

[@jacksonblaze423]

Can black matter be related to influence of other universes.

[@yellowrose0910]

"The cat became radioactive"...?!?

[@clubadv]

Actually, decoherence happens long before you open the box using your contraption the hammer already moved.

[@jdkeno257]

What freaks me out about this. It makes me think that an ulternate version of myself can use me as an avatar and commit crimes that cannot b spoken of.😶

[@Sebastiaan_Y]

It is simple theory, teachers teach that at schools

[@siriosstar4789]

Life is not based on observation . Observation by an observer is appearing inside of that which is awake to itsel or pure consciousness or Life .

[@MrittickChoudhury]

@17:21 _Eugene_ *WHAT?* @17:29 _friend of_ *WHO!?* 💀

[@kronoscamron7412]

my dumbass cat will surely break the poison vial so thats a 100% probability.

[@stighenningjohansen]

The fundamentals is a forward time arrow. Without it all would stop. The next is space without borders, the next is the energy keeping the space itself, a 3d space.

[@axle.student]

In this version of time you can have a bounded universe that is potentially infinite.

[@bnjm8868]

Not in all nor more than one position at once. A particles is simply moving between states more fast than understood. Once it is observed, light interacts with it, its state and position is observed as it is at that moment. Those considering superposition are not giving the motion of the particle enough consideration. They likely move so fast that they don't appear to move that fast at all. So, the wave function collapses at the moment of observation. It was never in one place or position or state at the same time in the first place. So the multiverse and many worlds theory have no foundation and make utterly no sense at all. Quantum entanglement is better understood and a reality. It is more than likely that the entangle particles do send information in signals faster than light speed. Too fast to measure currently.

[@WideCuriosity]

Many worlds. Either all options already exist, OR, reality splits on there being a measurement. Pick one, you can't legitimately claim both. Not in this reality anyway.

[@AbyNeon]

when are scientists going to understand that an observer has midiclorians?

[@LaurenBurger]

I wonder what Springfield Ohio things about Superposition with regards to Hatians . . . . .

[@asynchronicity]

SCIENTISTS ARE TERRIFIED ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED OMG OMG 🤦‍♂️

[@swil893]

What if the double slit expirement was looking into a cats eyes 🤯

[@charlesvandenburgh5295]

If the Many-world interpretation is true, this present universe began a split second ago with a false history it never had.

[@stickmanlives]

My problem with the cat in a box is this... I dont see said cat as both alive and dead , I see it being alive or dead .

[@tonyjohnson8929]

Then which is it? Can't know for certain huh? Not enough to bet your life on, right? Or if you did bet your life, maybe we can create the 'stickman paradox', which is based on the nine lives of schrodinger's cat, an introduction to string theory's additional dimensions.

[@sauroncro]

It is not both alive or death. It is either alive or death.

[@MikeFuller-ok6ok]

Lol! I don't even understand how levers work.

[@melgross]

I wish I understood what people mean when the sat that this theory will break reality. No, it won’t. Reality will exist very happily no matter what the theory is true.

[@dapperwolf6034]

Consciousness is a quantum field that arises from living organisms

[@brendanh8193]

What does the cat observe?

[@garnetnewton-wade4091]

Not sure but I'm alive and dead sat in my bath until my Wife says different.

[@johnjay6370]

There is a universe that Schrodinger had a DOG and that my friends is mind bending!!!

[@CommackMark]

Oh good... narration addresses my comment below

[@Censeo]

I might sound like some mystic here although I don't want to be viewed as such. I am in great favor of scientific development and understanding. But there seems to be a brick wall in that understanding. It seems modern conjecture is to explain what they found by envoking infinite realities. That sounds much more like a religion. Worlds outside of this world can't be investigated by science. They are only discovered through inference of this world. Now science is doing what people always have done, which is explaining this realm from a higher realm. That has been what people have believed all along and now even scientists affirm that notion.

[@axle.student]

I personally don't think multiple universes, or magic stargate wormholes to other universes, or "Bach to the future" time travel, and much of the other stuff is needed to describe our universe from start to end. If we accept one simple thing; "That the universe is irrational" it all seams to fall into place and can be described quite simply and elegantly.

[@Censeo]

@@axle.student That is the power of science. It does not need to find the world rational and can investigate and learn about it anyway. What would make everyone calm is if we all understood not to ask ourselves why we are here. I won't permit that it is a stupid question because science could never answer it. I can permit that it is an unfruitful question which we must let go of asking, because it will never have an answer.

[@olanneeson3990]

In the real world quantum realities don't exist . Carl Jung , and his Peter Pan principles , might have been able to help Schrodinger with his problem , in another universe .

[@hehelogicx]

hehe cat is also an observer ;))

[@RalphDavis-qk2xy]

Don't worry, be happy.

[@jamesomondiodhiambo]

I wonder why billionaires are still reluctant to scan the whole universes

[@diesel3694]

In any case poor cat 😸😢

[@Firey-penguin82]

Schroeder cat makes no sense. The cat can't be both. How much time has passed since it was in the box? Is this a soundproof box? If this isn't a soundproof box, then it can be assumed you would know the cat was dead by the sounds, or lack thereof,coming from the box. How long does it take for the poison to spread? This thought experiment is too broad, and it makes no sense if taken as is.

[@Sharperthanu1]

Yes and the cat is a consciousness and collapses its' own wave function

[@NYX_003]

Question everything dude, then go seek the answers.

[@luxshooter5186]

It’s just an analogy to help our feeble minds understand something that is impossible for our minds to comprehend. Of course a cat in a box wouldn’t actually behave in the same way as quantum particles.

[@antinatalope]

Most don't understand reality anyways. Besides, I doubt my consciousness would vanish for the understanding.

[@RomanGarcia-ll7kp]

I would think there would be no need to test these theories the numbers in space are so big that there are enough for every possibility

[@knutholt3486]

The principle of superposition is nothing but a statistical trick to calculate the chances of what you can find when you open the box. The cat is simply dead or alive, not both at the same time. But the principle allows to calculate further into the future and see what possibilities the situation branches into. I am sure Schroedinger made this thought experiment to have some fun with people letting the QM principles go into absurdity. But he did not predict how many stupid scholars that took it seriously.

[@svendtang5432]

Nothing terrifies scientists in physics it fascinates them every time new hypothesis come up.. it’s what is to be a science.. And observations do not entangle ment do.. you do not have an observer you have something entangling with the quant particle in superposition

[@dontveter3372]

A person sitting next to the cat box won’t know if the cat is dead or alive until the box is opened but another person elsewhere in the universe moving toward the cat will see the future where the cat is either dead or alive. Like in the Andromeda paradox where one person knows the Andromedans are invading and the other person doesn’t. People don’t like to think about the block universe where the past, present and future just are. Where it’s all fixed. The cat was dead or alive when the block universe was created.

[@raghavaggarwal8565]

not to flex, but I have created about 2 to the power of a few hundreds more universes with the choices I have made throughout the video

[@CatDad01]

I've always had a problem with that poor ass excuse of an analogy... the cat isnt both....its certainly one or the other... might as well be saying if a tree falls in the forest... WHO KNOWS. also thats a 0 or 1 problem. its a 50/50 chance... the whole superposition thing can be at literally any point in the wave which is typically depicted as a two dimensional plane but its on a x y z axis.

[@malakannagowli2350]

Quantum paradox phenomenon is a form or a module given to a system where there is a possibility of a given things in multiple forms. In the example of the cat in this case. It can be alive as well as dead till the box is opened and seen. If we open and see then only we can confirm whether the cat is alive or dead. Till the time the Box is not opened and seen we cannot say whether the cat is alive or dead. So opening of box is important to know the real status of the cat. So the main point is the the process of opening the box. If the box is not opened them we will not know the reality. So is the case of multiverse or parallel universe. If we feel that there is parallel universe then only we can see and understand the parallel universe. If we donot feel that there is parallel universe then there is no question of seeing and understanding the presence of parallel universe. For example let us assume that we are lawyers. So we continue our profession and know more about legal complications. But if we could have been doctors then we might have not understood the complications of legal process. So also if we would have been engineers then also we might have not understood the legal complications. So unless we feel the existence of parallel universe, we cannot understand the parallel universe phenomenon. So to feel anything our consciousness should be in such a position that it can feel the required phenomenon. So in conclusion it can be said that unless we 'feel' the presence of parallel universe, we cannot understand the parallel universe. Parallel universe is real and many people have 'felt' the presence of parallel universe. Some people who have not felt the presence of parallel universe do not agree that parallel universe exists. Thanks for the video. A very good logical and scientific explanation of the the phenomenon 'parallel universe'.

[@quantum7145]

the cat is alive until proven dead by opening and observing.

[@ryansav1527]

the reality is infinity ♾️

[@zeroonetime]

Multi Verse = multi words, multi languages get lost in quantized translation..

[@RomanGarcia-ll7kp]

After all it's not a theory it's a fact that we are here and we weren't here to observe ourselves from the beginning

[@RomanGarcia-ll7kp]

Hot ,cold. What does it matter. We are all stuck on the same rock together.

[@NYX_003]

So make good use of it. Check out the atmospheric pollution levels. The world is gone.

[@luxshooter5186]

Well if everyone had that attitude throughout history we would still be sitting in the forest picking fleas out of each other’s hair haha

[@swil893]

My first shower thought ever as a youngster.

[@bigd5080]

K well you guys said that it’s almost certain that we live in a simulation, so none of this is real or has any true relevance. So ……… ya.

[@RomanGarcia-ll7kp]

How juvenile some scientists can be. Are they saying that we only exist because we have been observed since the beginning?

[@Anne_Onymous]

No... People are just misunderstanding and misrepresenting things like Schrodinger's cat to make it sound more fantastical and new age-y.

[@WideCuriosity]

Beginning ? Time is surely an emergent illusion, not fundamental. It is all at once. And the universe is observing itself, as one particle or whatever needs to be in a certain position whenever something else needs it to be; so a sentient creature isn't needed as an observer.

[@MusicPlayingPeon]

Imaginary animal cruelty! Could've used a flame and a piece of paper. Poor cat. Can't see past 46 billion light years assumes big bang theory as correct.The multi ideas make no sense to me.

[@Anne_Onymous]

You people always misrepresent the Schrodinger's cat thing to make it sound fancy. It's ridiculous.

[@pick4u2]

there are no matter and energy, its all energy, get it right

[@elmolewis9123]

If you prove it with evidence, it's Science. If not, it's Religion.

[@quantum7145]

science invented a word called "theory" so science tries to explain things with a best guess a lot. do you how religion first started?

[@Anne_Onymous]

​@@quantum7145 🤦‍♀️

[@clubadv]

Oh and it's not observation that casues decoherence but "measurements". Measuring does not need an observer.

[@littlefish4270]

Observation is the key, point is where are we REALLY observing reality. We observe what we call reality cerebrally as a construct & observation includes sight, feeling, hearings, smelling etc, etc. Thus all perception or simply experience from birth to death is a cerebral experience, ie, in our brains. Yet all humans think we are interacting with a real physical reality as does anyone ready my words right now. If one takes the time to look into what is going on, one finds humans cannot touch anything, we cannot come in contact with anything as everything is simply atoms or more precisely, fuzzy energy. So our real world is not really as it is, yet it FEELS real, even to me. Thus back to the point, where are we really observing reality, understand these words & you will see discussing about reality like this clip does is fruitless until one understands what is reality.

[@berrios27lorenso]

READ MY LIPS😊

[@purplehaze2342]

What a load of theoretical bullshit

[@AishaShaw-cl6wc]

Saudi Arabia is a hot country.

[@Iknowthingz100]

😂sure is

[@Iknowthingz100]

🥵

[@NYX_003]

Quite possibly from the sulphur fumes dude, from the mining, agriculture, deforestation... its not just Saudi Arabia. Crap air floating around the atmosphere worldwide. What are you breathing in?

[@pockethat6843]

It isn’t hot unless you experience it for yourself #multiverse

[@Frankthetank-zr5mc]

Kuwait too. Especially while we were putting out the 748 oil fires…

[@margaretpepper3550]

They should stop worrying about quantum BS and get a proper job

[@AlienSpaceBum]

Makes no sense

[@lightlegion_]

That’s amazing! Let’s be friends?