The REAL Reason why Hitler HAD to start WW2

The traditional explanation as to why Hitler had to start WW2 misses out one crucial element of Hitler's reasoning. In this video, not only are we going to spell out exactly what Hitler's reasoning is, but show why certain events - like the Autarky policy, the oil crisis and the Holocaust - were the consequence of that reasoning.
This video is discussing events or concepts that are academic, educational and historical in nature. This video is for informational purposes and was created so that we may better understand the past and learn from the mistakes others have made.
UPDATE: this video has been brigaded by Nazis and inter-Nazis who are downvoting and spouting propaganda in the comments section. Apart from my pinned comment which contains the sources, please be careful when entering the comments section.
All my sources and notes will be listed in the Pinned Comment below. Videos EVERY Monday at 5pm GMT (depending on season, check for British Summer Time).
Here’s some other videos you may be interested in -
The audiobook of Henry Hazlitt's Economics in One Lesson • Video
The MAIN Reason Why Germany Lost WW2 - OIL • The MAIN Reason Why Ge...
FALL BLAU 1942 - Examining the Disaster of German’s second summer offensive • FALL BLAU 1942 - Exami...
Hitler's Vampire Economy • Hitler's VAMPIRE ECONO...
My video titled "Concepts of History: What is History? No seriously, what is it?" • [Out of Date, see desc...
My video titled “Why I'm Passionate about HISTORY and What Got Me Into it”
• Why I'm Passionate abo...
History isn’t as boring as some people think, and my goal is to get people talking about it. I also want to dispel the myths and distortions that ruin our perception of the past by asking a simple question - “But is this really the case?”. I have a 2:1 Degree in History and a passion for early 20th Century conflicts (mainly WW2). I’m therefore approaching this like I would an academic essay. Lots of sources, quotes, references and so on. Only the truth will do. #history
Please consider supporting me on either Patreon or SubscribeStar and help make more videos like this possible. For $5 or more you can ask questions which I will answer in future Q&A videos. Thank you to my current Patrons! You're AWESOME! / tikhistory or www.subscribes...

[@TheImperatorKnight]

*SOURCES AND NOTES* Good luck trying to find information about the "shrinking markets" concept in relation to National Socialist ideology online, because it's simply not discussed (in English at least). As of the publication of this video, I don't think Wikipedia even mentions it in relation to Nazi ideology, and I'm fairly certain it's rare to find discussion of it even in the historiography. So welcome to the forefront of historical discussion! Let me know if you want me to discuss why the “shrinking markets” concept is not as well known as it should be. If I do create a follow up to this video, I’ll also endeavour to answer as many questions that you raise in the comments related to this topic, since I think this may prove to be a popular topic of discussion. Here's an alternative translation of the quote of the one I read from Hitler’s Second Book, this time from the fantastic book by Zitelmann ‘Hitler: The Politics of Seduction’ which I highly recommend - “The market of today’s world is not an unlimited one. The number of industrially active countries has constantly increased. Almost all of the European nations suffer from the insufficient and unsatisfactory ratio of their territory to their population, and are therefore dependent on world exports. In recent times they have had the Americans union added on, in the east Japan. With this, a fight for the limited markets begins automatically, which will become all the sharper the more numerous the industrially active nations become, and on the other hand the more limited the markets become. Because while, on the one hand, the number of nations fighting for the world market increases, the market itself gradually shrinks, in part due to self-industrialization under their own power, in part by a system of branch companies which are increasingly being set up in such countries out of purely capitalistic interests… The more purely capitalistic interests begin to determine today’s economy, especially the more general financial and stock market considerations gain a decisive influence, the more this system of the foundation of branches will expand, but with this also the industrialization of former markets… artificially carried out and, in particular, restricting the possibilities of export of the European mother countries… The greater the difficulties of export become, the harsher the fight for the ones remaining will be waged. And if the initial weapons in this battle lie in price structures and the quality of the goods with which one tries to compete each other into ruin, the final weapon here too ultimately lies in the sword.” - Zitelamann, P277 quoting Hitler's Second Book. Technically I should have done a Q&A video this week, but given that we’ve just had the anniversary of D-Day, I thought I’d best do something a bit more special. I’m planning on answering most of the remaining Q&A questions in the next Q&A video coming in two weeks time (it’s Courland Part 9 next Monday). *Sources* Aly, G. “Hitler’s Beneficiaries: How the Nazis Bought the German People.” Verso, 2016. (Original German 2005). Barkai, A. “Nazi Economics: Ideology, Theory, and Policy.” Yale University Press, 1990. Bel, G. "Against the mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930s Germany." Universitat de Barcelona, PDF. Birchall, I. “The Spectre of Babeuf.” Haymarket Books, 2016. Bosworth, R. “Mussolini’s Italy: Life under the Dictatorship 1915-1945.” Penguin Books, Kindle 2006. Brown, A. "How 'socialist' was National Socialism?" Kindle, 2015. Engels, F “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific.” Written, 1880. Progress Publishers, 1970. Evans, R. “The Coming of the Third Reich.” Penguin Books, Kindle 2004. Dilorenzo, T. “The Problem with Socialism.” Regnery Publishing, Kindle 2016. Farrell, N. "Mussolini: A New Life." Endeavour Press Ltd, Kinde 2015. Feder, G. "The Programme of the NSDAP: The National Socialist German Worker's Party and its General Conceptions." RJG Enterprises Inc, 2003. Feder, G. "The German State on a National and Socialist Foundation." Black House Publishing LTD, 2015. Friedman, M. “Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition.” university of Chicago, Kindle 2002. (originally published in 1962) Grand, A. "Italian Fascism: It's Origins and & Development." University of Nebraska Press, 2000. Geyer, M. & Fitzpatrick, S. "Beyond Totalitarianism: Stalinism and Nazism Compared." Cambridge University Press, Kindle 2009. Hazlitt, H. “Economics in One Lesson: The Shortest & Surest Way to Understand Basic Economics.” Three Rivers Press, 1979. (originally published 1946) Hibbert, C. “Mussolini: The Rise and Fall of Il Duce.” St Martin’s Press Griffin, 2008. Joseph Goebbels and Mjölnir, Die verfluchten Hakenkreuzler. Etwas zum Nachdenken (Munich: Verlag Frz. Eher, 1932). (English translation) Hobsbawm, E. "The Age of Extremes: 1914-1991." Abacus, 1995. Hoppe, H. “A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism.” Kindle. Hitler. A. “Mein Kampf.” Jaico Books, 2017. Hitler, A. "Zweites Buch (Secret Book): Adolf Hitler's Sequel to Mein Kampf." Jaico Publishing House, 2017. Kershaw, I. “Hitler: 1936-1945 Nemesis.” Penguin Books, 2001. Kershaw, I. “Stalinism and Nazism: Dictatorships in Comparison.” Cambridge University Press, Kindle 2003. Keynes, J. "National Self-Sufficiency," The Yale Review, Vol. 22, no. 4 (June 1933), pp. 755-769. Marx, K. “Capital: A Critique of Political Economy: Volume I Book One: The Process of Production of Capital.” PDF of 1887 English edition, 2015. Marx, K. “Capital: A Critique of Political Economy: Volume III Book One.” PDF of 1894, English edition, 2010. Marx, K. “Capital: A Critique of Political Economy: Volume III Book One.” PDF, English edition, 2010. (Originally written 1894) Marx, K. “Capital: A Critique of Political Economy: Volume III Book One.” Penguin Classics, Kindle edition. (Originally written 1894) Mises, L. "Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis." Liberty Fund, 1981. 1969 edition (roots back to 1922). Moorhouse, R. "The Devil's Alliance: Hitler's Pact with Stalin, 1939-1941." Random House Group, Ebook (Google Play) 2014. Mosley, O. "Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered." Black House Publishing, Kindle 2019. Muravchik, J. “Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism.” Encounter Books, Kindle. Mussolini, B. “The Doctrine of Fascism.” Kindle, Originally published in 1932. Newman, M. “Socialism: A Very Short Introduction.” Kindle. Luxemburg, R. “The Accumulation of Capital.” Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1951. (Originally written in 1913.) Luxemburg, R. “The National Question” 1910. Reimann, G. “The Vampire Economy: Doing Business under Fascism.” Kindle, Mises Institute, 2007. Originally written in 1939. Siedentop, L. “Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western Liberalism.” Penguin Books, Kindle. Smith, A. “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.” Kindle. Sowell, T. “Economic Facts and Fallacies: Second Edition.” Kindle. Sowell, T. “The Housing Boom and Bust.” Kindle. Spengler, O. “Prussianism and Socialism.” Isha Books, 2013. First Published 1920. Temin, P. “Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning in the 1930s.” From The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 44, No. 4 (Nov., 1991), pp. 573-593 (21 pages). Jstor. Tooze, A. “Wages of Destruction: The Making & Breaking of The Nazi Economy.” Penguin Books, 2007. Young, Adam. "Nazism is Socialism." The Free Market 19, no. 9 (September 2001). Zitelmann, R. “Hitler: The Politics of Seduction.” London House, 1999. The American Economic Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, Papers and Discussions of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting (Apr., 1911), pp. 347-354 Hitler’s Confidential Memo on Autarky (August 1936) germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/English61.pdf Deficit Spending in the Nazi Recovery, 1933-1938: A Critical Reassessment personal.lse.ac.uk/ritschl/pdf_files/ritschl_dec2000.pdf Sir Oswald Mosley | Interview | Thames Television | 1975 kzbin.info/www/bejne/fn_Ld2Vum9-Bb6s (Accessed 04/10/2018) de.wikisource.org/wiki/Reichstagsbrandverordnung home.wlu.edu/~patchw/His_214/_handouts/Weimar%20constitution.htm en.wikisource.org/wiki/Weimar_constitution www.zum.de/psm/weimar/weimar_vve.php www.marxists.org/archive/fromm/works/1961/man/ch06.htm wiki.mises.org/wiki/Inflation_in_Nazi_Germany “A nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government.” en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/state Mises "Planned Chaos" (an excerpt from "Socialism: An Economic & Sociological Analysis) kzbin.info/www/bejne/bXbReZiQjbGtisU For a list of all my books on WW2 and similar, please visit this link docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/114GiK85MPs0v4GKm0izPj3DL2CrlJUdAantx5GQUKn8/edit?usp=sharing Thanks for watching, bye for now!

[@ctrlaltdebug]

the Shrinking Markets concept seems to be the polar opposite of the protectionist "dumping" idea, where cheap foreign goods prevents the formation of domestic industry.

[@dewittbourchier7169]

Excuse me but both Evans and Tooze go on about this at length, especially Tooze, and the Nazi ideological aspect beyond simply saying 'because they're aggressive' has been talked about at length since the late 1950s. And on a mostly unrelated note, if 'Socialist' economies are so bad, why did the zenith of Social Democracy and State Socialism correspond with the fastest period of economic growth in human history - 1945-1973? And if Capitalism is so 'liberating' why can so many people not stand it?

[@Paciat]

Funny how it is often said that Germans hated commies, and how Marks was a jew, and communism is Jewish. Marks and Engels were German, Lenin learned in a German speaking university, Germans payed millions of marks to support communism in WWI. In the Vistula miracle battle Trotsky ultimate goal was to reach Berlin and unite with German commies. German tank and fighter schools in Kazan and Lipetsk were training new Wehrmacht deep in Russia. And ofc. the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

[@DoddyIshamel]

Yes I would love you to do a video on the historiography. Also, is the de-industrialisation or prevention of industrialisation prevalent in colonialism related to shrinking markets? Or was it just driven by capitalist self interest?

[@John77Doe]

TIK Why did Donald Trump start a Trade War with China and selectively ban Muslims from entering the United States?? Why is Donald Tump sending a naval armada to Iran and broke the treaty agreeing that Iran would not develop nuclear weapons? Why did Donald Trump want to withdraw all troops from Syria contrary to his military advisers?? Why did Donald Trump stop some of the further sanctions on North Korea after they did not agree to nuclear disarmament? Why does Donald Trump like the leader of North Korea so much? Why did Donald Trump want to build a wall between the US and Mexico with Mexico paying for it and then shutdown the federal government because Congress would not pay for the wall? Why did Donald Trump start to implement tariffs on Mexico over illegal immigration and then suddenly withdraw the tariffs? Why did Donald Trump claim more people attended his inauguration than Obama's despite the photographic evidence? Why did Donald Trump have his staff start an investigation to prove that he actually got more of the popular vote than Hillary Clinton, when clearly he did not? Mad men cannot come to power in modern nations. There must be an explanation like the Shrinking Economy for what we are seeing now. These can't all just be random acts of a mentally unstable world leader. That is not how things work. Mad men do not come to power. 😐😐😐😐😐😐😐

[@fancifulrat]

My grandad was responsible for 35 downed German planes in ww2. Still to this day holds the record as worst mechanic the Luftwaffe ever had

[@Blaaggarding]

Top notch

[@nerome619]

well played sir!

[@simohayho8622]

They had us in the first half not gonna lie

[@richardpech8489]

They had us in the first half, not gonna lie!

[@willypp13]

Richard Travers so we was a communist

[@laurit.5699]

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” - George Orwell, 1984

[@gta1kev]

Who have controll stays in controll

[@johnnyearl3736]

..Ignorance is strength and slavery is freedom..

[@danieldossantos5868]

@@johnnyearl3736 Ignorance is bliss, war is peace, and diversity is our strength.

[@jussim.konttinen4981]

As he said, the market was shrinking, which was partly caused by the allies. That is why, after WW2, reconstruction was done more effectively. In my opinion, the real reason was industrialization, as some historians have said. Human nature is always the same if we believe in multiculturalism. British and Germans are like Nigerians, that is, violent.

[@mikenuzzo3323]

@@strauser360 which channel do you mean this one? Can I ask you for a suggestion of where to do the history

[@MetaVita]

"Why isn't this taught." Because it's problematic to justify evil actions as logical (in the subject's mind) to people who primarily think emotionally. Which is a majority of all populations.

[@Notdjsbjj]

Chicken or the egg situation. Perhaps people think primarily emotionally, and increasingly so, because nobody is taught these logics.

[@asnark7115]

Thumbs up for out of the box thinking, but... It's even more problematic for people who don't understand the role of emotion to see portrayals of modern govn'ts as tools of multinational globalists. When people like Hitler, Mao, W. Bush, Reagan, Obama or Biden try to sell a protection scheme for the hayseeds, the first appeal isn't to emotion. It's to people who are still naive and emotionally stunted enough to think that there's a rational basis for their allegiances and blindspots.

[@Notdjsbjj]

@@asnark7115 really? Almost all politicians I've seen appeal either strictly to emotion, or rely heavily on emotion because their policies are so obviously terrible

[@franzferdinand5150]

Emotion shouldn’t be ignored when judging, it should rather be controlled.

[@user-oy9zy4ds9m]

Well they need to get the MOST votes to win… and MOST people are over emotional sheep.

[@assgrabberb]

England declared war on Germany. This whole war economy talk is nonsense. Every country has a budget for defence. And your enemies aren't always inherently evil.

[@milford8485]

I agree

[@vinceneuwirth568]

Finally. Thank you my friend for correction. People doesn't know the truth and history. It's all Zionist propaganda. Zionists started world War 2. For exchange to create Israel.

[@rhill3453]

The propaganda has the world believing otherwise. Winston Churchill conned the USA 2 join WW11.

[@manicminer4573]

Judea declared war on Germany in the 1930s, it was the headline on the Daily Mail IIRC.

[@milford8485]

@@manicminer4573 Right 👍🏻

[@antoniotorcoli9145]

The reasons why Hitler went to war are perfectly and exhaustively explained by Hitler himself in Mein Kampf

[@moguldamongrel3054]

I personally think what Hitler did to the Jews or even the concept of concentration camps as a whole is deplorable on all levels so in that sense I have no interest in reading his book but I'm not completely at odds with his rationale. When foreign people control the basic necessities of life and force you to trade or barter that's just a different kind of enslavement. I don't think even kings ever relied on others and usually the good kings generally wanted everyone to have food? I mean even if your not a genuinely nice person and a complete manipulative douche, making sure that your friends and family and neighbors are eating is kinda basic civilization building 101? Like I've never played a civilization game that starts you off from hut dwelling to trading for food? Pretty sure even hut dwellers know which plants do what, and what animals are yummy?

[@DatMammut76]

@@moguldamongrel3054 you do realize that the vast majority of people who’ve read his book read it from a standpoint of disagreeing with his actions, yes? Agreement isn’t required to gain insight into the motivations of historical figures.

[@grantjacob7327]

My thoughts,before I scrolled down to your message.

[@dopey0682]

Syphilis

[@crouchingwombathiddenquoll5641]

@@moguldamongrel3054 you do no that the British had concentration camps in South Africa during the Boer war 1899 / 1902 Many thousands of Afrikaans were starved to death.

[@ArchiduquesaMA]

There's a reason economics isnt a huge thing in schools

[@robiandolo]

That’s sad but true. But I’ll confess I didn’t give a rats ass about any of this as a young person. As an older person I find economics tied into politics to be probably the most interesting subject there is. Even sports are political and economical.

[@karhammer]

@@robiandolo Geopolitical issues are fascinating.

[@grantjacob7327]

Economists played a very big role in the rise of the Nazis. The appalling global effects of the Wall Street Crash helped to till the soil,through which the seeds of Nazism germinated.Look at the German election results before and after the Wall Street Crash.

[@robiandolo]

@@grantjacob7327 gee wonder why it was taken down.

[@grantjacob7327]

robiandolo Wall Street ,is the centre where financial share dealing is CONducted in New York,USA ,Not a brick wall.There was another Wall that was taken down,which was called THE BERLIN WALL.

[@endcensorship874]

I find it amazing that people still argue "why did Germany go to war?" When it is very clear why they went to war if you actually read his book. He outlines all this in there. My dad used to tell me, "when someone tells you who they are and what they are going to do ... believe them."

[@ues5587]

this is obviously true. it explains why hitler was actually disappointed that Munich prevented war in 1938. he was determined not to let that happen again a year later. I actually read Mein Kampf in college in poli sci 101, along with Mill, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx (I'm sure there were others, I just don't remember, it's been 40 years). stalin read it too, he underlined the passages where hitler talked about the need to conquer russia. stalin's near-fatal mistake was thinking he had more time before war came.

[@endcensorship874]

@abdennour oudjana What didn't change, tho. The concept of lebensraum, of making the vast eastern part of Europe a vassel state subservient to Germany. He detailed his war plan pretty well in his book.

[@Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry]

@abdennour oudjana The passage of time may have changed how he would go about it; it clearly didn't alter what he states in MK is his intention. The problem of shrinking markets wouldn't have been at the top of his thinking in 1925, but as the video argues, it would have had his attention in 1941, and would have provided him with added incentive.

[@johnspurrier0001]

Kind of like Obama?

[@dosran5786]

yes people shrug off too much as hyperbole nowadays.

[@danr1920]

As a kid I was under the impression that Hitler was stupid. Well, you don't take over Germany by being dumb.

[@mattg432]

Oh yes, in the 21st century, the dumb do take over.

[@johndenugent4185]

especially not Germany

[@gerrycoogan6544]

Olaf Scholz says, "Hold mein bier!"

[@johanb.7869]

Hitler was convinced he was the greatest military leader ever who always blamed others instead of himself and in the end took his own life, the coward.

[@johndenugent4185]

@@johanb.7869 it is safe to say that. Do you want another view?

[@anglishbookcraft1516]

You are missing the fact that there was a trade boycott against Germany

[@grandaddyc]

Yes and the worlds food production was inferior to today's, definitely a political consideration. the phrases "useless mouths" and gave strength to the concept of "totalitarianism" ----This is the only reason we have the population we have today rootsofprogress.org/turning-air-into-bread

[@grandaddyc]

@@siegpasta Lot of missing facts Lebensraum was used early in the twentieth century by Germans explaining a plan to colonize other countries, but the word is most strongly associated with Nazi Germany. The Nazis used the idea of Lebensraum, literally "living space" in German, as the basis of their policy for the Germany's expansion.

[@paulslevinsky580]

@@grandaddyc When someone serves 9 months for a failed coupe (instead of swinging from a gallows), ya gotta consider that they've been compromised. Hitler was an agent. He vectored the deaths of millions of Christians.

[@siegpasta]

​@@grandaddyc I know what that word means I understand german afterall. But they didnt just use that phrase for nothing, its directly correlated to the fact that they lost basically up to 45-55% of their whole former country. Germans who were still germans, were still living in these places that overnight became part of some other country. Areas such as; Pommern, Brandenburg, Posen(the provinz), Schlesien, Westpreußen, Ostpreußen. Famous cities in some of those areas: Danzig, Königsberg, Kolberg, Posen(the city). Do you see? It wasnt just some random term that they came up with. This was a term to describe the fact that they needed to reclaim what was once theirs, that of which was unrightfully taken from them. Many people In Germany at this time had family members in these areas aswell. It was about doing the right thing, not about just mindlessly using a word as an excuse to go to war. I just needed to make that clear.

[@Kaiser_Murphy]

Yeah there are a lot of facts missing from this and it's filled with non-facts.

[@TheNoodlyAppendage]

They used to say Hitler's signature diminished over time proving he was losing self confidence. As someone who has to sign endless paperwork I can empathize with him in that my signature got smaller so I could sign things faster.

[@blackcat19778]

Same here. I kept shortening my signature to the point I can't do it anymore.

[@randomuser5443]

My parents just put 2 letters

[@silverbullet2008bb]

My doctor's signature is literally a single character that he invented himself. It's basically just an upside-down capital "Q". I can remember once I had to wait 6 weeks for him to sign off on something and when the paperwork arrived and it turned out that I'd waited 6 weeks all for a very wobbly, scribbled upside-down "Q". I was speechless!

[@dmitryshusterman9494]

What? You can't be serious. Bs

[@zagorith14]

@@silverbullet2008bb In fairness, if you've ever worked in a medical setting, pretty much every doctor's handwriting is almost nonsensical scribblings like it's in an unknown language. Medical staff just learn that doctor's unique language.

[@jawbrace]

The more intelligent you become the weirder you sound to unintelligent people.

[@lalaboards]

Right ???????

[@lalaboards]

@@iwatchyoutubealot he is logarithmically smarter than your whole family lineage put together ......

[@AntonioEligius]

Someone report my comment? How could you get so offended so easily? The comment above me is offensive and mine wasn't

[@enosmajlo5984]

Yea sure tell yourself that hahaa

[@jawbrace]

@@enosmajlo5984 I guess that you think I sound weird, huh?

[@Kaspar502]

Hot take: the main reason why this isn't talked about in schools is that for high schoolers this is actually a rather complex concept

[@Kaspar502]

I actually did learn this in an advanced grade class in german high school (which I heard is not too far off from US college level)

[@samuelpo3378]

nah

[@mrdarkside4071]

Complex? You mean to teach that the German people voted for a racist intolerant austrian born crazy man, and cheered for him when he started invading neighboring countries?

[@jodiehighroller9820]

@@Kaspar502lol

[@brantdanger]

It's no more complex than any era of history, but it does take more time to explain, as it involves multiple countries, and the backstory of WWI.

[@cheapbongs]

one of the most important things ive learned as ive developed into an adult is that most people dont make irrational decisions for the sake of being irrational and evil. most decisions are rational when viewed from the relevant perspective

[@msimon6808]

Have you ever considered the "Abused Child" Theory of history? Hitler and Stalin were abused children. Putin too. They lack empathy. They are permanently angry. They crave power and control. In other words, severe PTSD. Everyone notices the defects. Most people ignore the cause. Russian alcoholism is a sign of rampant PTSD. Gangsters are almost invariably abused children, in my experience. Notice the commonality of psychology with world leaders?

[@The_GuyWhoNeverUploadsAnything]

I also love the Aha-moment when you understand why someone or some group would do something that seems completely irrational at first.

[@cheapbongs]

@Rudolf Hillers cool story bro👍

[@88mphDrBrown]

That's definitely true for "most people", but I don't think true for "most people" with effectively some sort of absolute power. It's seems extremely common for dictators, kings, really almost anyone who knows they'll face no repercussions for their actions to indulge their worst impulses. Slave owners for instance didn't have the power of a king, but they did as far as their slaves were concerned.

[@lothara.schmal5092]

@@88mphDrBrown That’s very different, both dictators and kings usually do face consequences, specially for inaptitude, all it takes is one uprising, one inefficient sector of the economy, etc. Slave owners faces no such challenge. Comparing Kings to Slave owners is ridiculous, I can respect a good king, no such thing as a good slave owner

[@zandrmandr8300]

Because his focus tree forced him to.

[@nonec384]

he could have oposed hitler then the soviets would be on the ofencive

[@zandrmandr8300]

@@nonec384 if he opposed himself he would have lost. And also, if he had won he would have the default focus tree, which is weaker compared to his regular one.

[@nonec384]

@@zandrmandr8300 i guess

[@javierdavis696]

🤣🤣🤣

[@nonec384]

@Right-Wing he only play on iron mode

[@nighthawkdutchchameleon9815]

To understand WW2 needs to understand the aftermath of Ww1 and the Versailles threaty

[@Paciat]

And how Germany whipped its ass with every single page of that Versailles treaty while UK and France did nothing. Unlike Germany, France was actually devastated by warfare, not just by its own war economy. In 1936 when Hitler reoccupied Rhineland, German officers were told to retreat if the French would fight. Hitler did things that he believed he would get away with time and time again. The main 3 reasons of WWII are: 1. British appeasement 2. Soviet cooperation 3. USA Isolationism And the Versailles treaty as the reason of WWII is mostly Nazi propaganda. Just take a look at the borders of the treaty of Brest-Litovsk or what Germany wanted to do to France. And heres a lecture supporting what I said: kzbin.info/www/bejne/paGnpqpqhL9mh6s

[@Tiberius_I]

Of course Germans would never have accepted the likes of Hitler at any other period in their history, and in the absence of WW1 and the chaos of Germany's failed democracy of the Weimar republic, Hitler never could have taken power. But after decades of war, economic depression, starvation, runaway inflation and chaos, combined with the looming threat of communism hanging over Europe like the proverbial sword of Damocles - the Nazis were (grudgingly) accepted as the lesser of two evils...notice how many tries it took Hitler and the rest of the evil cabal to gain power over the Reichstag! But by about 1930, after a decade of failed democracy, it was clear to almost all that the Hobson's choice was inevitably either Russian-style communism or "national socialism"....and by then most Germans had heard plenty of ominous stories from Bolshevik Russia to see where the former was certain to lead: Famine & mass starvation of millions in the ukraine, the terror of the NKVD and "SMERSH" ("Death to spies"), the absurd purge of the Red Army officer corps, gulags, and genocide was the story from Stalin's Russia. The proof of all that was established beyond all doubt as under covert agreement to side-step the Versailles treaty, many German generals travelled to the Soviet Union to train in secret and develop important weapons like the Panzers. And in that post-WW1 era, many of the German Generals, like Erich Von Manstein went to Russia for training and as a result, saw for themselves what life under the communist heel was all about! Von Manstein in particular, was repelled by Stalin's violent excesses, and what he saw in Soviet Russia led to a sincere and life-long loathing of Stalin, which he and the other German military commanders brought back to Germany. Certainly by 1939, the German high command was familiar enough with the communists to be collectively revolted by the Reds, and determined never to let the disease of bolshevism happen to Germany. No doubt this was a key factor (along with the German army's rampage through Russian territory in 1918) to their ultimate and easy acquiescence to Operation Barbarossa just a few years later!

[@Paciat]

@@Tiberius_I You think the situation was better in any other place in central or eastern Europe? And France was actually devastated by war, not just by its own war economy. Germany had the most telephones in the world per one man in the times of crisis and no problems with civilian housing. And Manstein saw Russia? What did he do then against the Molotov Ribbentrop pact? The Polish Relationships with Germany were good in the mid 30s. What did IIIrd Reich do to strengthen them (instead of demanding everything for free) if they saw Russia as a threat? Germans had a retreat plan in case French would defend the Rhineland. It behave like a spoiled brat that becomes worst every time you give it something. The 3 reasons to WWII are: 1 British appeasement 2 Soviet cooperation 3 US isolationism Heres a lecture to support this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/paGnpqpqhL9mhw Start watching after 14 minutes.

[@Usammityduzntafraidofanythin]

threaty eh?

[@lassekristensen385]

Exactly and also the conflict in the Danzig cooridor.. Hitler dident start WW2 .. He was helping his fellow Germans in Danzig from Polish massacre.. So Hitler made a local action against the poles which Churchill turned into a world war.

[@Armageddon2077]

“I am now fifty. I would rather have the war now than when I am fifty-five or sixty.” These were Hitler’s words to the Romanian foreign minister in the Spring of 1939

[@slakjawnotsayin5451]

Pretty sure Hitler went to war so we could have awesome war games to play for the last 40 years and well into the future!

[@bigcrackrock]

God rest his soul

[@airmark02]

thankfully the Nazi story help to keep the Hollywood film industry going for years

[@michielwerring5846]

Fallschirmjager OP pls nerf

[@voster77hh]

Name a single awesome war game on a map of Europe. I know none. Usually the fact defeats any great game concept already. It would be more fun and balanced immediately when it is either Grand Theft Horse or Grand Theft Starship.

[@kejiri3593]

Well Wolfenstein 3D is pretty awesome!

[@shdwbnndbyyt]

You do realize that many Western economists, political leaders and movements still believe in the "zero-sum" game... it is why they hate small privately owned businesses and favor the massive corporations. It is also why foreign aid to third world countries almost never produces significant foreign industrialization, but instead ties their populations more firmly in the "trading food for stuff" category.

[@UnifiedInfo]

Give a man everything and he will be dependent. Teach a man to fish. And you wont have to feed him. Strong words to live by.

[@abellseaman4114]

Former Cdn prime minister Pierre Trudeau once stated something to the effect that dealing with many small biz owners was like herding cats! Our PET Pierre made it CLEAR TO US that he preferred dealing with corporations since all CEO`s have similar goals and values thus what works to lure one will work to lure all! In additon, corporations are more likely to be unionized - and that SUITS CDN LIE-berals as well since militant union groups represent voting blocks that CAN BE BOUGHT AT THE EXPENSE of less organized small biz! After all, the union employee who is seen working against union policy - regardless of how unfair or illogical that policy is - WILL FIND IT HARD to keep a job! All too often, militant union leaders enforce polices that rank and file find offensive - such as most Cdns finding radical Muslim terrorists to be disgusting yet labour leaders support economic action designed to hurt Israel! In another case of union excess - we have to look at civil pay! NO union exec can explain why the clerk cashing your $150 water bill should get one third more pay than the clerk cashing your $150 grocery bill!

[@IggyTthunders]

Someone's a fan of Tom Woods

[@abellseaman4114]

LIE-beral politicians believe ONLY in their own power and importance! Conservatives recognize there is not much they can do that is useful in much of the world! And it is IRONIC that LIE-berals DO NOT BELIEVE the studies and statistics of Swede Hans Robling who has PROVEN the benefit of sensible global trade for improving peoples lives! There are far less people going to bed hungry on this planet than there were 20 years ago!

[@tomazlah8238]

china and soon africa says helo.

[@sumvs5992]

So in short: "If goods don't cross borders, then armies will"

[@abellseaman4114]

China does huge biz with United States and we seem to be drifting into a possible war ........ And what of Poland in 1939? They and other European countries sold FOOD to Germany and yet armies crossed the borders anyway! And what of the Cold War in which Soviets and western nations made all sorts of nasty threats and only the threat of nuclear destruction prevented war i spite of the wheat that Warsaw Pact nations bought from the West! Bottom line: Hitler trued to take what he wanted by force - trade was NOT a consideration!

[@seanbrummfield448]

Hence why European powers would venture out to the world for India after the spice trade ended after the Ottomans took the Constantinople. The motive is, "If we don't have it or much of it and others have lots of it, we'll go get it ourselves."

[@abellseaman4114]

@@seanbrummfield448 Thank you for your bigoted REVISIONIST HISTORY that INSULTS WHITE PEOPLE! Brits and other Europeans were quite happy to BUY all manner of stuff from other lands and other continents - its just TOO BAD that so many of those other continents were divided up into warring factions that all wanted access to European weapons and or wanted ALLIANCES with Brits so make their own position MORE SECURE! How could the inhabitants of a small set of islands possibly CONQUER so much of the world unless they had MANY FRIENDS AND ALLIES? Liberal propaganda meisters NEVER DISCUSS THAT QUESTION!

[@seanbrummfield448]

@@abellseaman4114Sure, you're not wrong. Like many African kingdoms, warlords, and tribes would make agreements with European Empires to protect them from enemies around them. They traded captured slaves from other enemy groups, gold, jewels, cocoa, rivers, plantations etc. with Europeans in return for protection and weapons. And even taking the natives of America. When the French and British arrived many tribes sided either Britain or France for protection, money and welfare. But, that's not my discussion being made. Like I said, they wanted to get something, and they were bound to get. No matter how. Either with agreements or war. It's been done throughout history. Where many parties have basically said, "What you have is important to me, my people, and our economies." Either if agreements went through or broke down was what gave the final answer. You even said it in your conclusion. They made agreements for what they may have found important, and if it was a fight about it, then so be it.

[@abellseaman4114]

@@seanbrummfield448 The Egyptian story is is most informative! Emperor Napoleon chose for unknown reasons to send a invasion force to Egypt and the French force promptly surrendered after Brits destroyed their fleet and supplies! The Khedive -the Egyptian ruler who was NOT ACTUALLY A KING but rather was a royal governor appointed long before by Ottoman Empire to rule their PROVINCE - saw the Brits as a way to become king of Egypt! So the Khedive made some alliances and defense deals with Britain - profitable for both as Brits got lots of trade and Egypt no longer sent tax tribute to Istanbul! But The Sudan - south of Egypt - HAD BEEN previously an Egyptian province but broke away and its people made a NUISANCE of themselves with raids and slave trading and such for many decades! In 1899. Brits had had enough and launched an army into the Sudan in part because Brits wanted to build a railway down the length of Africa to improve trade for all along the route and Sudanese raiders were blocking the way - and in part because the number of dead as a result of Sudanese raids was really piling up - and in part because of the NOBLE GOAL OF ENDING THE SLAVE TRADE! Thus a so called British army marched to the Sudan - and it was composed of one third Brit regular troops; one third Egyptian troops who had finally been galvanized into action by the sheer size and cost of Sudanese raids ; and ONE THIRD BY BLACK AFRICAN TROOPS and those blacks WERE DELIGHTED to get paid and trained and equipped and supplied so they COULD TAKE OUT THE SUDANESE SLAVERS who had stolen so many of their people! And yet LIE-beral history speaks of British Imperialism in Sudan! And is it not ironic that RIGHT AFTER Sunda got its independence from Britain - the Sudanese slave trade resumed and now in these modern times the trade includes the sale of organ harvested by force from unwilling slaves! Yet LIE-berals see ONLY BRITISH imperialism!

[@Thomk121]

Well... Lets be honest. The Jews did not create Israel, they were given Israel. Just being historically correct, im not siding with Hitler. 😅

[@bhante1345]

But he's so playful and delightful, give him a chance.

[@Bigmohammdita]

Im siding

[@theseustoo]

And, currently, it looks very much like they are destroying it... right alongside their destruction of what's left of Palestine, which, of course, is also in contravention of the qualifications stipulated by Balfour in his infamous 'declaration'. Incidentally, Hitler's signature was written (just as prominently as that of John Henry on the USA's Constitution!) on the Havaara Agreement (aka, the 'Transfer Agreement') which Israel recognises as its 'foundation document'... thus making Hitler one of Israel's most prominent 'founding fathers'! Ironic, huh? 🤔😉

[@tawandatawanda8388]

​@@Bigmohammditalol

[@Anders127]

They were given the opportunity to create Israel. No-one else but themselves did the hard work of nation building.

[@RoyceLerwick]

Too bad he didn't write a book or something explaining his world view in his own words.

[@charlespeterson348]

He did

[@RoyceLerwick]

@@charlespeterson348 Yes, it was all about eating a bad batch of saurkraut: Mein Krampfs.

[@timwilson2920]

I am waking up to the fact that collectives have a tendency to rewrite history. I guess it makes people feel okay with their dishonesty, in addition to hanging on to power. It is incredibly taboo to seek out Hitlers side. Like he is quoted, "The victor will never be asked if he told the truth".

[@stevenhaas9622]

That book is an incoherent mess of rambling rants. The grammar is so bad in places it is literally unreadable. To call it a "world view" is generous.

[@RoyceLerwick]

@@stevenhaas9622 If all you came out of it was a collection of incoherent, rambling rants, with grammar literally unreadable, I think he actually did capture his "world view."

[@Harold_Flite]

109 countries, but no one ever asks "why".

[@dookiejuju192]

neva forgets

[@ufarkingicehole]

See my comment in main comments

[@stanleyluntz3251]

It must be so frustrating to people like you (who hide behind pseudonyms) that tiny Israel just keeps on going from strength to strength!

[@Harold_Flite]

@@stanleyluntz3251 thats a strange name you have there Stanley..

[@jonnyenough1531]

@@stanleyluntz3251 You'd think they'd be bothered by their laziness but they're jews with a supremacist religion

[@reeseman1932]

“Mein führer why are we going to war” “ because if we don’t then we won’t survive the next one!”

[@cleanTron]

We can say something or be quiet forever, but if we say something they quiet us forever, ...whats the difference?

[@campkira]

Those area is classify as middle kingdom and german alway afried they going to lose the whole county.. since the hypeinflation alone almost kill them so when they expanding.. they know alot of country will do nothing since they don't had resource to take on second war.. He going after russia is the fact.. they do alway do.. attack and end it as soon as possible... they on very time limited... same with japan... they don't think ww2 is going to happen.... YEAH... they never expect it to be ww2....

[@Mineav]

All the Nazi leaders were pretty crazy. Hess was considered a lunatic by both sides, but it's patently obvious they all were, and only fellow deranged apologists would refute it at this point. Oh, and let's not forget about the drugs which fueled their crazed narcissism. Wonderful...

[@ericrose3877]

@@Mineav They were also Jewish

[@Made_In_Heavenn]

@eaglerising88 The Impartial Truth, yes i have visit that

[@dysnomia-anarchia]

Short answer: too much credit card debt

[@enlightthehermit]

lol

[@enlightthehermit]

and the anti-socialist say capitalism doesn't kill lol

[@krisvangucht5884]

@@enlightthehermit Who was stupid enough to say that something as cut-throat as capitalism doesn't kill? Capitalism is just a lesser evil compared to stuff like communism or fascism and adapted by most nations because they ain't got any better system.

[@ctazmam3857]

War burns the books

[@Laocoon283]

And to think my history teachers essentially summed all this up by saying it was all because he was a failed painter lmao. The audacity.

[@bagasitogitto.f1826]

they are not wrong, they just aren't totally right

[@AverageAlien]

Not in my school they didn't. Granted, when I did history in high school in the UK it was sometime in 2016-17, but we were taught all the reasons he went to war, the actual ideology, and various theories about whether or not he was actually responsible, etc

[@Laocoon283]

@@AverageAlien In America we are ignorant being taught by other ignorant people. The blind leading the blind over here. The school curriculum is so watered down that you can easily pass without ever learning a single thing.

[@mariussielcken]

Hitler was rejected at Vienna because he had never painted a human.

[@PedroGomes-mt3iz]

The Jewdacity!

[@jamesbetker6862]

When Germany was burning books, they specifically burned books by Karl Marx.

[@davidcollishaw2771]

on that score they were correct. Shame the germans sent lenin back as an agitator in ww1

[@rockhound3.14]

Yes yes people are so ignorant im sorry you have an open mind people will do ANYTHING to close it beware and be afraid it will help you stay ahead

[@rockhound3.14]

@Jonathan Williams mmmmm yess goddamn yes its better than sex seeing open minds for once yes

[@stephenpowstinger733]

Betker is suggesting that Germany was vehemently anti-socialist. As stated in the video, Hitler was anything but anti-socialist and nationalized whatever business resisted the party goals.

[@jamesbetker6862]

@@stephenpowstinger733 I was not suggesting that Germany was vehemently anti-socialist. After all, the Nazis were the German National Socialists (NSDAP). But they did recognize that Marxism was its true enemy.

[@SolracNexus]

"If I didn't start world war 2, then we wouldn't have world war 2 movies" - hitler, probably

[@trojanlamb909]

It was the bankers, he went after bankers and banking systems. He called their financial systems globalized slavery.

[@alexanderbarrera9140]

And the bankers are still our problem.

[@spoon6273]

and it was true

[@Anton43218]

​@@spoon6273is*

[@GiorgiNemsitsveridze]

Juz

[@gustavolobo2001]

Wow! Amazin explanation! I wonder where you got it from??

[@MadChad1640]

I have no doubt in my mind that if the US wouldn't have opened up its market to Germany and Japan as it did after WW2, there would have been a WW3. We fail to remember that the British and French had massive colonies which were essentially their markets. Germany due to its geography was unable to colonize to the extent the British, French or even the Spanish. US on the other hand a whole continent to itself besides being a massive country itself. After WW2 the US in the Bretton Woods Conference essentially force the trade around the world to be free and safe for the first time in human history. Essentially that is all the resource poor but capital rich Europeans and Japanese wanted, safe access to markets. The condition for being able to access the market was that countries had to decolonize and pick Americans over the soviets. In my opinion the British and French were the biggest losers of WW2 . They lost most of their global influence to the US and had to just sit down quietly while their long time enemy Germany traded freely with their former colonies and became the largest economy in Europe.

[@jakeharris3248]

We can’t forget that the United States dollar became world reserve currency at the Breton Woods conference, which was previously the British pound sterling if I’m not mistaken. For everything that a country or empire could potentially lose from all the destruction that is all part of war , the depletion of wealth and resources etc etc , Britain fared much better than many other countries involved that endured sustained air raids and bombing campaigns , they definitely suffered their share of the misery and damage , however , the thing that deflated their empire on a permanent basis was losing global reserve currency status. My honest opinion is in spite of the pain and financial hardships that would inevitably take place to a country and their people upon having to adapt and make changes to their economy , everyone would feel the squeeze I have to assume but once they install sensible policy and people find their way to make it and thrive within the new framework , they’re so much better off. As an American I realize the supposed advantages the country has financially speaking , especially doing business internationally etc but I don’t have any faith in those who have been allowed to have control over our money policy , bankers or politicians alike. Whether as an individual or citizen I’m sure one could argue both ways whether it benefits or has no measurable impact to me or the average person but with no doubt about it when the day comes the dollar crashes and is removed as the international reserve currency the working class and poor will definitely be among those who suffer the bulk of the negative impact. Provided that people have equal access to innovate and improve upon goods and/or services and sell their products etc on an open and equal market I have confidence Americans at large will be able to compete just fine.

[@Broodkast8]

Economically yes, but in terms of power and influence, Germany is nowhere near it could have been. For example, Germany has always been against Ukraine joining NATO and EU, but because Germany barely has any say in NATO, it kowtowed to the US at the NATO summit in 2008. Militarily, Germany is nothing. All this talk of "Hitler had to start WW II, it had no choice" is obvious bullshit, it sounds like nazi apologism. In the end, the nazis severely diminished the power of Germany in the long run.

[@shelle1even]

Agreed. Very Well Put.

[@novat9731]

@@Broodkast8 The way the video is structured, and titled. It's about why Hitler had to start WW2, and it is written, within the confines of Hitlers thought process and logic. Of course Germany didn't have to start WW2. Also, the reason why Germany's military is so weak. Is in large part due to very little political consensus within Germany, why the military even exists at all. There is broad agreement that the military should exist, but the military itself is completely aimless. The most professional militaries in the world, are the ones with a very clear goal. There is no fooling around in the South Korean military for example, everyone involved knows what is at stake. Perhaps a belligerent Russia will bring some much needed direction to Germany. What they need is an ''Admiral Fisher'' (British first sea lord 1904-1910), someone who is serious about their job. Someone who will look at Germany's military, and is willing to step on toes and toss half of it away in order to create an effective force.

[@coloradoing9172]

Ironically enough the main architects of Bretton Woods were Jewish.

[@saymyname218]

My Grandad was in WW2 ...he never talked about it ....but he did say `you will never know the truth`.

[@IZn0g0uDatAll]

Truth about what?

[@ricardosmythe2548]

@@IZn0g0uDatAll study the first half of the 20th century not just the highlights. Ask yourself why the German currency didnt devalue with so much public spending boosting there economy in the run up to ww2 as it should have done

[@ripjjjsphrbggsk6292]

@@IZn0g0uDatAll world has history. the viewpoint is base on what is the reality of the world today. as someone say in the comment that George Orwell write - "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."

[@haltdieklappe7972]

This is bullshit lol

[@thetrumpnewsnetwork7503]

Because the military kept creating propaganda to convince the grunts to keep their mouths shut threatening them and their families if the spoke about it.

[@subswithoutvids-dw6dv]

I read his biography. He thought expanding Germany's territory was necessary to secure a great Germany. And he felt the international banking system would destroy Germany's economy. He was wrong about expansion but right about banking. For example, America destroyed Japan's economy through Plaza Accord. Aren’t America and Japan allies?

[@ronnieriveros6067]

why do u think.. japan got fucked.. they were becoming a great asian power. then the us got their oil.. and that was it. the us.. new the japanese would do something hasted that is why they sent the whole fleet to hawaii.. planted the attack.. just like they planted the plans for ukraine for this kid.

[@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0]

What's plaza accord?

[@alvinsoehendrywijaya]

@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 try google it.

[@CDang-ms6dc]

There is really no evidence that the Plaza Accord was made intentionally to destroy Japan's economy.

[@scottmaclaren4695]

He was also right about the Jews

[@giannagiavelli5098]

Totally wrong. It was Danzig which is historical Prussia where Germans were raped and murdered. Poles stalled talks for three yrs before Hitler said enough

[@felixklauk4410]

That explains why Germany marched into Poland and occupied it? Think again

[@Michael-st9ky]

Ligers are half infertile. Two ligers cannot make a liger but a tiger or lion can mate with the liger

[@ThomasDoubting5]

No ligers are fully infertile.

[@Michael-st9ky]

@@ThomasDoubting5 some sources say otherwise

[@Michael-st9ky]

@Rudolf Hillard source "trust me bro."

[@Michael-st9ky]

@Rudolf Hillers yes

[@Michael-st9ky]

@Rudolf Hillers the science says Female Ligars are fertile and the males are sterile

[@duncanself5111]

Germany ended up running Europe in the end. Third time lucky I guess!

[@michaelcollins1196]

Greece entered the chat

[@davidtrindle6473]

Germany does not run Europe. That’s ridiculous. Ask the French, Brittish, Russia, Spain, Italy...etc etc They don’t believe they’re ruled by Germany or anyone else.

[@Pontidenvresige]

David Trindle beliefs and facts are 2 different things. Russia aint the EU either lol.

[@anjetabreymann7179]

If that's true, why are we overrun with "Refugees"? I live in Frankfurt, where "GERMANS" are now 40% of the total population!!!!!!!

[@Nitroat-xo4tj]

@@anjetabreymann7179 Frankfurt has NOT only 40% real Germans. Don't lie here, or try to get real sources first! Typical brown AFD tinfoil hat "alternative facts".. In the thinking world we call it populist bullshit lies to get some votes.. But hey, if you think that's true you are too stupid to check your sources!

[@KAZVorpal]

Is the starting of WWII really the invasion of Russia, not either the invasion of Poland or the declaration of war by France and Germany?

[@ninjasheep7492]

“KZbin will demonetize...” You have “Hitler” in the title this video was never monetised

[@BrockNessMonster1991]

NinjaSheep - JewTube*

[@schlongy2dope]

it's ok. the guy is very wrong anyway. and doesnt deserve monetizing

[@CollectorCarPeed]

@@schlongy2dope What did he get wrong? The process he explained seems very logical

[@smac5861]

Yes, explain yourself. How is he wrong? By saying Hitler wasn’t crazy? If he was crazy, wouldn’t he require psychiatric treatment instead of punishment? You can lock him up in a hospital if you want, but I think he deserved a bullet.

[@seraphina985]

@Manuel Camelo Indeed, severely lacking in critical thinking skills certainly but if that was all it took to be considered insane half the population would be in psychiatric hospitals.

[@ironclad4288]

The East: (makes food) Hitler: *Give me the plant.*

[@erwinrommel6561]

Dang not again Hitler

[@trickydick2909]

@@erwinrommel6561 Dammit Rommel, shut up and accept the infallible strategic genius of a corporal!

[@jed-henrywitkowski6470]

@@trickydick2909 Lol!

[@이동연-c6d]

TheDoughboy Soviet don't have any crops because of the one idiotic scientist.

[@bubblegumgun3292]

lol east having food what a fool

[@JC-xt4ds]

2019 " People don't follow a leader that's insane." 2021 the US. " hold my beer"

[@piperian3962]

Nobody is following Biden, that’s the problem.

[@dalehammers4425]

@@piperian3962 People still voted for him because Orange Man bad though, so same thing. Reason isnt as important as effect.

[@Dslayer066]

Both are fucked up biden and trump!!

[@stefanmolnapor910]

@@Dslayer066 yes, both are just emblems on the nasty fat government!

[@Caligula420]

What do you think of the theory that Hitler got intel that Soviets are planning to eventually attack West, and Hitler coming into conclusion that attacking first is Germany's best shot?

[@SongoftheSkyPacers]

German Intelligence never found indication of a possible attack, and at that point the USSR's army was not prepared for large offensive operations. The USSR attacking first would've been the best case scenario for Germany

[@user-db2vx8fd4c]

Yeah thats the "Präventivkriegsthese", which sounds quite good, but is highly critizised from a lot of Historians - from all of the spectrum

[@dragooll2023]

The USSR was suffering from internal party conflict, famines, and a shortage of good army officers. I highly doubt Stalin would have deemed an attack of the West a good idea, specially when Japan also threatened the Soviets from the East.

[@swee2251]

10:33 This is why we need to learn history in detail. It helps us understand why the tragic major events happened and helps prevent another tragedy like those from happening again. Many people mistakenly believe that the people who study tragic events such as WWII are weird. Many of them even assume that we support the wrongs that were done during that time. Or they think we enjoy it as if we enjoy war movies. I know because I got accused of being weird in middle school for reading history books of various tragic events. The reality is that we can't prevent another tragedy from happening if we don't know the signs.

[@megauser8512]

Exactly!

[@bobwhite2]

Another tragedy is most likely unavoidable.

[@colbyzur4642]

But in learning about history we kind of realize this is inevitable, the wheels of history are turned by the uneducated

[@ryucartel351]

Because you're weird is why it will happen again

[@creamchoco]

People who don't learn history get manipulated by dishonest politicians and ignorant debaters.

[@vii7031]

In my university i've always wondered why do we need an economics course, turns out if you don't pass it you'll become the next Hitler.

[@chalsfo]

Or socialist... and now you know why they are innumerable

[@dking6021]

Oh yeah not like Marx spent years if not decades of his life in the British museums studying economics and statistics. There is getting an education and just going to capitalist propaganda school

[@gibhacker8121]

@@dking6021 yet he never worked a day in his whole damn life

[@trickydick2909]

@@chalsfo Well, the Nazis were socialist like North Korea is a democratic republic, for the people, that represents all of Korea. Especially once the more socialistic elements of the party were killed during the Knight of Long Knives. Also, econ 101 typically pushes unrestricted free market fundamentalism. It's only in the upper level courses that you get to experience something resembling nuance...

[@chalsfo]

@@trickydick2909 go read up.. start out with what nazi even means.. Then go on with their welfare system.. Dont spreed feelguments

[@mikealexander1935]

Hitler embarked on a war economy upon coming to power because the country was in a depression. He was essentially a Keynesian and ended the depression way earlier than the Allies did. This was one source of his popularity.

[@Peakfreud]

He achieved that vicariously on two continents . It had the same effect on the U.S economy

[@DutchGuyMike]

The depression was already slowly being fixed whilst Hitler came to power, Hitler just took the credit.

[@DustinDonald-cz9ot]

False by all the data, even at the height of the war the budget of the military was only about 30% of the GDP. America got out of the depression by forcing a military economy Germany did not.

[@AnthonyAnthony-tk4ye]

The villain of the story never sees themselves as the villain

[@gireeshan-bd6hi]

Who is hero

[@bjung8858]

Thank you for providing a more balanced view of history. I have always suspected that the current presentation about Germany was biased. You would get attacked or laughed at by most for even questioning it. Thanks again.

[@krisvangucht5884]

The historical presentation of Germany at that time was created by their enemies after they lost the war. It being 'biased' is not even a real question just a cold hard fact. More importantly - if you question the narrative of the Germans being the baddies, then you are *also* questioning the narrative of the allies being the good guys and thus will be inevitably attacked by the allies' supporters who will not tolerate you questioning their or their predecessor's accomplishments regardless of what may or may not have been the actual situation back then.

[@ShipWreck68]

As the Japanese have said, "All war is born out of a poverty." I believe the Japanese also had similar feelings about how the world economics would go if they didnt take action. So I don't think this concept was not too hard to understand. But it is odd that this reasoning has probably been covered up through most history teachings. Probably because it did not fit a political agenda for those who want to teach history. It makes the bad guys...too human.

[@SpynCycle57]

The "Japanese went to war because oil exports to them were limited/restricted" has been taught. But it is treated as if the only reason Japan needed the oil was to keep the war machine running. Somehow Japan did not have any meaningful industry, but no one can explain how a non-industrial country managed to wage a wide scale war for more than 10 years before the attack on Pearl Harbor. Did all the ships and planes just magically appear?

[@GilmerJohn]

Well, the post war advances by Germany and Japan demonstrated that had they forgone territorial ambitions they (& the world) would be in a better place.

[@ioannisimansola7115]

A war is an extremely expensive business

[@ShipWreck68]

@MrMorphicus Totaly disagree. Some people might get into a pissing slap fight over personalities...but no nation would go to war over it.

[@ShipWreck68]

@MrMorphicus My God you a too naive to even talk to, you bluttering idiot. Go look at the economic states of those countries you just described, just before those wars started. And did you not just listen to what this video described as to what was the REAL reason Germany went to war. Maybe you were not paying attention but there was a world wide resource grab going on. Why?...because they were starving. Thats called Poverty.

[@alfredpullan1457]

One must remember that Britain at the time was an empire where the sun never set. No wonder Hitler was thinking that the whole world would be lost for resources for consumption.

[@GodofWar5371]

Funny is how the whole Europe and Britan were all nazis!!😂😂😂😂

[@campkira]

He on time limited... he had to follow certain rule and he found that it better to attack first and negotiation later.. most RTS gamer would relized what he doing...

[@jennyomalley7634]

When god was asked " why does the sun never set on the british empire"?? He said, " because you can't trust the english in the dark " !!

[@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714]

@@GodofWar5371 What?

[@GodofWar5371]

@@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 ?

[@Smog_007]

If National Socialism was bad, how did it bring Germany such a formattable army and wealth from a once tattered WW1 loss?

[@RedGottie]

Because the Nazi’s stole land, wealth, businesses and property from Jews, then others and gave them to German Aryans. When he ran out of stolen resources he invaded other countries to steal their resources.

[@ACF1901]

@@RedGottie Oh but I thought Jewish power in Germany was an antisemitic myth? If they weren't powerful there would be nothing much to "steal" to get powerful.

[@JS-wp4gs]

'turn your silver into bullets' So....we're fighting werewolves now? damn, the germans weren't kidding when they put together those underground werewolf units

[@TheImperatorKnight]

Lol. Take a heart

[@Ralphieboy]

Remember "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter"?

[@ancienthyperboreanfutapeni9268]

There are plenty of stories about jews doing blood libel which got them labeled as vampires...therefore silver makes sense in a way

[@dansmith1661]

Silver kills diseases in the body. Silver spoons in children's mouths and all that.

[@Jordan-Ramses]

Germans have no sense of humor.

[@Digueirazz]

tbh, some things hitler said are happening rn, after ww2 the poor nations got industrialized and had a population boom because first world countries traded their machinery, in the last 40 years we saw a major influx of immigrants in europe and US, and right now all major countries in europe and the US are polarized much like a class-war he refered to.

[@user-pn3im5sm7k]

I disagree with some of what he said (Although you never know if he actually said these things) but for the most part he was right. He was honest, unlike 100% of modern politicians. I do not know a single honest politician in the Democracies. They are authoritarians with bad intentions and the worst part is, is theres no accountability - we do not actually know who runs the show, these are all puppets.

[@concretehippogaming]

The wrong side won and history is written by the victors this is a very dark and precarious timeline for Europeans. We lost. The Future is very Grim indeed

[@xhago605]

The " class war " happened because the us wanted Iraq's oil. And it's not relevant in the majority of the world.

[@krisvangucht5884]

Hitler went too far in one direction, later politicians went too far in the other direction.

[@manicminer4573]

100%

[@ghosthunter184]

Dangerous topic for KZbin. Glad you are looking at things logically instead of thru the lenses of 1940s proproganda.

[@scottessery100]

but why doesnt the spartan have any underpants on? 7:55

[@millsbuckss]

Dangerous? Why

[@ghosthunter184]

@@millsbuckss Content strikes, demonitization, ect.

[@brit1066]

The Starcraft N00b He is looking at those events through the lens of his own twisted eye sight.

[@millsbuckss]

Science-is-Truth Mostly yes but itsTIK’s hypotheses

[@ericmartindale4835]

Actually Karl Marx was raised as a Lutheran, and he personally was never a Jew. His father has Jewish origins (Marx), but upon marrying a Lutheran, the family rose their children as Lutherans.

[@johndenugent4185]

OMG, you swallow that? Conversion was skin-deep and tactical.

[@flare9757]

Germany could have gotten off very well by militarizing like we saw, then taking those weapons, and selling them to other nations. Very profitable situation.

[@pbmaic3291]

The issue is that their main trading partners would of been again, nations aligned with them: Japan, Italy, Hungary, maybe Bulgaria, Finland and the USSR. The Western Allies were generally uninterested in stockpiling weapons before 1938 as they had the memories of the Great War in mind and their economies and policies were heavily based off peace in mind. So, it would necessarily only be profitable towards a select few nations.

[@flare9757]

《 Imperial》 Nice to meet another Imperial. Also, good point...

[@pbmaic3291]

@@flare9757 Heh, the names common I suppose.

[@giupiete6536]

@@pbmaic3291 And other places were doing it better, it's hard to say that Germany produced the best or cheapest of anything at all.

[@pbmaic3291]

@@giupiete6536 Oh of course

[@whatsmyfuckingname]

The Third Reich was trading vast quantities of grain from Soviet Union (as a form of appeasement) right up to the eve of Barbarossa and this doesn't jibe with your theory.

[@benjamindover7399]

Oil too.

[@raphaelr.5904]

If the soviets have less oil and food, they will not industrialize fast enough and they needed it.

[@KaoticReach1999]

Doesn't jibe, doesn't disprove at all just a variable

[@ricklogan7889]

There's an elaborate mythology built up around this subject. An attempt at a real world analysis is refreshing. Thank You.

[@realitymatters8720]

It is not a real world analysis, its a exercise in ignoring reality. Was there also economic motives, ofcause, but there was plenty of other reasons in DNSAP´s dillusional ideology. Its a realy lame attemt at a conspiracy, where none is needed, all we have to do is to asume that asholes will act according to their nature !

[@ricklogan7889]

@@realitymatters8720 i still think your take on this makes more sense than most of what I've seen on the subject. Thanks.

[@realitymatters8720]

@@ricklogan7889 I have come across the argument that he was forced into the war before, mostly by free market dimbats, using it to try and discredit Keynesian economics. Dont get me wrong, it has its flaws, but nowhere near the reality denying sociopathic Ayn Rand inspired "Free Market"

[@LordVader1094]

@@realitymatters8720 Except the economic motives is directly mixed with the DNSAP's ideology. It wasn't necessary for them to stop trade, but they viewed it as such because they thought it was making the East stronger.

[@fritzderblitz1707]

It is called NSDAP, not DNSAP

[@GerardVaughan-qe7ml]

“Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.” - Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934 (also quoted in his book "The New Holy Alliance"). “We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany.” - David A. Brown, National Chairman, United Jewish Campaign, 1934

[@davidnoone3254]

"You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people" Churchill.

[@AgendaFiles]

Fake quote alleged by Churchill, you must try better otherwise mindlessly repeating what you have read online will expose yourself as-shown here.

[@AgendaFiles]

@@elbuggo archive.org/details/judea-declares-war-on-germany-debunked

[@michellearmstrong7903]

Wanker

[@MrManueleh]

I assumed it was to impress Jodie Foster.

[@ExecutiveCounsel]

Snaggle Toothed was this comment really necessary?

[@bradleysmall2230]

anyone encountered a line at end of aqua aerobics class when all the old women head to the hot tub after class for a while- even though they move slow they are ahead of you.. They arrive very early and stake out a spot near the exit to get in hot tub early. My comical solution is: If ever you wait in a line to enter a jacuzzi or pool like after a class just say.. PLEASE GET IN QUICKER AS I HAVE TO PEE ...

[@krisvangucht5884]

@@bradleysmall2230 Sounds like a great way to have security escort you out of the building really?

[@Gilmaris]

"[Hitler] went to war in 1939, and made his war economy in 1933. That's six years on a war footing before the war. Really?" Yes, really. Building up a military from nothing - especially when you weren't even allowed to - takes time. Why not implement the war economy in the late '30s, say '38 or '39? Because then he wouldn't be able to go to war until the mid '40s. A battleship takes three years to build. Even a submarine takes almost a year. And troops need training, and just a couple of years is shaving it uncomfortably close. If you're planning for a major war where you don't enjoy massive superiority from the inception, preparations take years. It took Hitler six years _with_ a war economy to be _somewhat close_ to being well enough prepared. Without a war economy? Even if there would have been more money to put _into_ a war economy by '38 or '39 (there wouldn't - Hitler didn't really have any economic plans of his own, he was mostly riding projects of his predecessors), the time it takes to build and train isn't shortened. And Hitler wanted to go to war while he was still comparatively young, and - not least - still in power.

[@robiandolo]

I think part of what TIK was saying is that despite having the bulk of the war infrastructure (planes, tanks etc) he didn’t have the fuel to run them for the time needed to achieve his goal. That’s what makes invading Russia even more stupid. Basically he was in Vegas snd bet his house on a pair of 3s.

[@blahdyblah3387]

The US didnt have a war economy, how did they build an army?

[@3dcomrade]

@@blahdyblah3387 Murica have. Because of the improved transition to war economy with lessons of the failed mobilization of WW1. It is seamless, the biggest sign of it is the lower amount of CUSTOMER cars produced from 1942-1945 vs 1938-1941. Said factories for said kind of cars produces military trucks, jeeps etc instead during the war

[@Rampart.X]

War is inevitable when ego races against the clock.

[@sylvainprigent6234]

@@blahdyblah3387 also the USA was an absolute juggernaut in terms of industry and natural resources production. USA had it all They have the technological potential, they have food, steel, and OIL, they have the industry to use these ressources, and the manpower to make use of it. The us knew in the late 30s that they had to prepare for war so they started preparation. They helped Britain, giving them tanks and oil and food.. When Japan struck, it was total mobilisation.. and two years later in 1943 they were ready to tackle fortress europe

[@justinhaase8825]

As an American who has looked into history, few folks realize how tribal Europe is. Also the over the top punishments after WW1 were a BIG factor for most normal folks in Germany leading up to WW2. Germany has minds, but few resources to survive within their own country. When populism meets a struggling but traditionally well off place you get some very dramatic results

[@Jay-hc4lz]

Could you go in detail what you mean by how tribal Europe is?

[@drpepper3838]

​@Jay-hc4lz he probably think we still live in houses made of straw.

[@Jay-hc4lz]

@@drpepper3838 typisch amerikaan

[@emanuelpetre5491]

Yea we’re tribal because europe used to be made up of nations rather than being a gathering of mutts like the USA. Unfortunately the global American empire mongrelized europe and remade it in its image out of spite.

[@shinigummyz]

Think op meant something more akin to "hierarchical" rather than "tribal".

[@oh_its_wylie5521]

" EUROPA- the last battle " tells a story worth listening to

[@islatalviharju3709]

on part 5 atm

[@zvonkocvitkusic8070]

Is it possible to find it somewhere, i watch it when it was on YT but no where to be found now

[@islatalviharju3709]

@@zvonkocvitkusic8070 watch it on archive.org or bitscute

[@gsxrfreak666]

Read the book of stalin there u will find the real underlaying reasons hitler whas an left ideologic socialist globalist

[@lizd3548]

@@zvonkocvitkusic8070 Bitchute

[@bigboyblue7181]

My father was a World War II veteran and I did 18 years in the Infantry. I have studied the war for as long as I can remember and as of late I started to look at it from a different perspective. For what it is, another big lie and a version of the truth told by the Victor's.

[@edstar83]

oy vey

[@edstar83]

www.bitchute.com/video/QtLvxZ9d0yEY/

[@matro2]

Oy vey, indeed...

[@Tysca_]

@@omega0195 you need some history man. It's tragic that your grandfather fought against such a dangerous, oppressive, and reprehensible enemy, only for one of his descendants to willingly spread that enemy's propaganda against his own country.

[@dennisdaniel1208]

@THE FBI "the national socialists were bigoted and hateful" and this is how i know that you are defective.

[@outdatedtank4542]

TIK- hitler was trying to save the world... KZbin- *calls f 15s to strike TIK's house* TIK- in Hitler's logic

[@davidskeeterskeeter1835]

The Worldconquer Respect,👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻✊✊✊🇬🇧

[@StopFear]

your comment is so stupid

[@alessandrocwilliam]

Love World Conqueror 2, best Android and iOS game

[@StopFear]

Not sure if this is an actual claim that TIK claims that. He does not.

[@geoeconomics3067]

{ who rules eurasia } { commands the world } - *mackinder*john*Halford* this is the base of everything so what ? so its imperative that no eurasian challenger emerges capable of dominating eurasia and thus of also challenging america - zbignew brzezinski

[@jeanbrown8295]

And we still hear people say the war was a mistake,you put it very well

[@freemanlowell5437]

"Germany has avoided a war since the second world war." Thanks?

[@warrenlehmkuhleii8472]

Freeman Lowell I Believe that was a typo.

[@samfisher2306]

Lol

[@andreewert6576]

@@warrenlehmkuhleii8472 not a typo. It's not like germany had a chance of *deciding* to go to war, being under allied control, but by the 70s or 80s they would have had the power to invade say denmark or norway for oil and gas. Being the main benefactor of free trade in europe, germany soon understood that it was the country to lose the most by another war in europe. That's how peace is made, by realizing it makes no economic sense to fight a war.

[@andreewert6576]

You're welcome.

[@mattg432]

German force are sent into stupid NATO wars since the mid 1990s. Against Serbia to split off Kosovo. Afghanistan quagmire. Africa.

[@NYG5]

This makes their term national socialism make more sense

[@jean-louispech4921]

This is not socialism there is no real collective power owned by peoples and workers ( or democracy ) , just a hierarchic elitist power, this is the antagonist of socialism. Socialism is internationalist, Nazism is nationalist. Socialism is about equality, nazism is abut hierarchy. Nazism is socialism only for the propaganda, but it does not stand political analysis. Peoples believing that nazism is socialism are just peoples without political knowledge and critic mind about nazi propaganda.

[@DF-ss5ep]

​@@jean-louispech4921 Same as in communism. There is no collective ownership of anything under communism (except maybe in rare cases like in the spanish civil war), yet it's called communism. What happens in practice doesn't have to match logically with any theories, all that is needed is that it sounds good on paper and that useful idiots on the other side of the world are invested enough emotionally to ignore evidence.

[@jean-louispech4921]

@@DF-ss5ep LOL by definition communism is about collective ownership, common ownership and power, then "communism". You are speaking about false communism, that is just a false label for selling a fraudulent product (stalinism, maoism, etc... ).

[@deathtdow]

@@jean-louispech4921 no he is speaking about the fact that communism is based on flawed principles and as a result always becomes a tyrannical totalitarian hellspace (and always will do the foundational ideas themselves are to blame).

[@isitover9010]

Debt based economies are the problem people figure it out already I mean 500 years of debt based currency 5 world trade currencies and they have all failed well the US dollar is about to fail look at the housing market bubble… It’s all backed by debt based economy… you all had to learn how debt based economies worked, you’d naturally have to learn how positive based economies work… it’s not rocket science.

[@richardschaeffer3204]

Start with the 45% export tax for reparations for WWI as will as an embargo .... then take a history lesson on it.

[@davidhaaijema4521]

Are we going into the revision part where basically Germany pays off it's debt via some funds who controls the reparations based off American loans so the Entente could pay off the American debts for material ? Or did your history book stop conveniently there ?

[@jmanakajosh9354]

*Why dont you just trade for food when you have no money* Litterally TIK Its as bad as when Ben Shapiro told people to sell houses to Aquaman

[@davidhaaijema4521]

@Rich "ema", Frisian surname. go google what Frisian is you dult..... Maybe you shouldn't be so concerned with peoples names and race....... Let me guess, American, saw the "ij", never been around the world and going off a certain stereotype ?

[@Animusical216]

@Rich Haaijema is a dutch name....

[@skelejp9982]

@Rich Last name is typical Frisian, many Frisian last names, end on -a..

[@mrm8818]

TL:DR - Shrinking market summary; "It is the idea that the market for an industrialized nation's goods tends to shrink as other nations become equally industrialized. The reasoning is that those other nations will also be able to service the same market."

[@listener523]

Now I want to read an alternate history book where instead of going to art school Hitler was an econ student....

[@sionlim1]

that is a great comment ! so much dry humour in it, very english.

[@lostsaxon7478]

You mean like all the high IQ econs today who are utterly confused of why importing third world workers and sending jobs to third world countries is having negative effects on our own country? Hmmm, quite fucking odd why that would be the case. Also, might want to do some research into Hitler and the Bolshevik Revolution before, during and after before trying to dUnK. MIGHT give you an idea of things.... Just might give you a clue of why some influential leader who was against Marxism would declare war against a genocidal Marxist regime. Or maybe not.

[@gregorymalchuk272]

@@lostsaxon7478 We in America are on the verge of our own Bolshevik revolution and Red Terror.

[@sfu4028]

@@gregorymalchuk272 no.

[@sfu4028]

he did not do any of this.. he wasn't accepted by art school.

[@alexandros1948]

TIK: Hitler wasn't mad after all... Also TIK: proceeds to ramble on about Hitlers batshit, crazy ideologies, paranoia, psuedo-science, conquests, etc etc

[@TheImperatorKnight]

"TIK: Says Hitler wasn't mad after all... Also TIK: proceeds to ramble on about Hitlers batshit, crazy ideologies, paranoia, psuedo-science, conquests, etc etc" But Hitler's ideology, paranoia, psuedo-science etc are all logical consequences of the initial flaws in Hitler's understanding. If you believe economics is a zero-sum game, you come to logically wild and silly conclusions.

[@AdmiralTypeZero]

@@TheImperatorKnight also his theories arent so mad for its time. Avarage person would be even less educated than todays avarage. Of course this pseudo science made sense to whole country.

[@janriha3956]

@fireson23 that may be true for the top intelectual elite. Most regular people (workers, farmers, shopkeepers) were generally less educated and had far less opportunity And time to educate themselves. Information was hard to get. Nowadays I can learn how nuclear reactor works just by watching a KZbin video (that is why internet is the most important discovery since the printing press, maybe even longer...it is already changing human society on a funddamental level). Back then you would have had to visit technical library in your capital (if nuclear reactors existed back then that is).

[@LongNightsInOffice]

@Alexandros to support what @TIK says: The German population was highly disappointed with liberalism/ capitalidm, because it lead in the eyes of Germans to about 20years of consistent economic crisis in Germany. And the Jews were the personification of the structure that lead to this suffering despite the efforts and hardships that Germans went through to improve their situation. Also I am not convinced that people thought of the marking as shrinking, but were looking at it from a mercantile perspective=> Limited resources for a growing amount of players/ world population

[@AdmiralTypeZero]

@fireson23 My theory is based on uneducated people making the majority. BTW i have to mention that reading books and graduating univercity doesnt make someone educated. I personally know many basic thinking people with college degrees. My theory is that in those days when international relations were still pretty local, People could easily think of shrinking markets as viable theory. Many people today even think of this. Cheers for the answer!

[@nottiification]

Ligers are generally infertile. There have been a couple of isolated cases of fertile ligers, but these are a very very rare exception.

[@tipi5586]

Maybe he meant to say Tigons?

[@tipi5586]

@KA- BOOM!!! Ligers and Lion male, female tiger. Tigons are male tiger, female lion. OR, it's the opposite. Or, i'm wrong, i'm being half committed in bringing it up, purely for the sake of the argument.

[@tipi5586]

@KA- BOOM!!! Apparently, the differences involving the fertilisation of the eggs produces different, consistent results. As far as I know.

[@speedomars]

Not true. Ligers are fertile.

[@marisakirisame3670]

That is just a bad example. Tiger and Lion are different species, and cross species breeding mostly dont work because species is defined basically as 'group that can breed'. However, all human are one species, and Hitler's idea will only make sense if he is trying to human breeding with monkey. A better example will be 'dog mix breed all the time' - they are all a single species.

[@mxblyxky]

Those who built America were not a "diversity" of people as you claimed. It was the English and their descendants, whose origins are the Germanic peoples of the Angles, Saxons and Jutes who migrated to Britain. They were the pioneers who expanded America and determined the values ​​to be followed. Later, other European immigrants from ancient civilizations appeared in cities such as New York and Chicago and more recently there has been a large invasion of people from Central and South America whose origins are mostly indigenous. And other peoples from Asia and the Middle East, all taking advantage of the ready-made nation. And so we can already see signs of accelerated decline in the richest nation in the world. And if you want to go further, which are the richest and most developed in the world countries? They are the European countries with populations of Germanic origin: Scandinavian countries, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Holland, Belgium and those colonized by England: USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealandia.

[@dittmannrudolfrohr2149]

A lot of Germans came in the war of independence, the famed Hessian.

[@scratchy996]

"Hitler was not crazy." A few minutes later... "So here are the batshit crazy things Hitler believed...".

[@darkalan7736]

ok NPC

[@San_Vito]

True... he was batshit crazy about the influence of jewish people.

[@minerat27]

There's a difference between the kind of schizophrenic insanity of illogical decisions that some people say about Hitler, and starting with a false base premise, but following sound logic from there.

[@honeyv6020]

😂 Exactly i was thinking.... But that time many mainstream biologist, scientists believed in many race theory... Especially in Europe...

[@garywheeler7039]

He mixed up the idea of two species interbreeding with the idea of the same species with new blood from within the species. New blood is sometimes called hybrid vigor and is a good thing. It promotes health and vigor but the blonde hair which is a recessive gene tends to go away. Not necessarily a bad thing in a warming climate where more sunlight gives you skin cancer if your skin pigment is too light. Remember that perfectly unique albino gorilla that died of skin cancer several years ago? Some of Hitler's psudoscience did not work out well for him. In management of government affairs, he kinda liked departments to fight with each other rather than cooperate, thinking it was more Darwinian. That often wasted resources in his new reich. Your theory of shrinking markets makes a lot of sense. And the timing of the war had to do a lot with competition for oil which is another story. And the fact that Stalin was also preparing for war with Germany, just expecting it to happen two or three or more years later according to Stalin's timetable. As the USSR was rapidly industrializing. And the story was that a lot of its industrial machinery west of the Urals was built on skids. In case of war. Another fault in Hitler's thinking though, is that trade is a zero sum gain. Economics shows us that it is not. Capitalism encourages economies to work to their individual strengths, and that diversity of strengths leads to cheaper goods and services on both sides of these equations. An efficient farm economy working in tantum with a country with an efficient manufacturing economy working with a country with an efficient natural resource extraction economy, benefiting all in a synergistic way. If tariffs and transport are not a problem. Some artists do not understand economics and think trade involves one person stealing from another in some way.

[@hhs_leviathan]

I suppose the main lesson not learned from WW2 is that conspiracy theories can kill millions.

[@neuralvibes]

Indeed. Today we have the Russia collusion conspiracy theory which might well lead us to nuclear war just because of some alleged Russian Facebook ads against Hillary Clinton. It's McCartyism on steroids but the left and right are both in on it this time...

[@slavenrasic2204]

There is a difference between theories and practise

[@Endremael]

yeah, well what about the millions killed during Holodomor? nobody includes them in the millions count.

[@meilong2338]

The winners write the history, that explains everything

[@ralphbernhard1757]

WW1 and WW2 was one struggle which roots go back a 1,000 years: the battle for continental supremacy between France and The Holy Roman Empire. WW1 and WW2 was simply another "30 years war" with the difference being that Atlanticists (the naval powers) stepped in and supported France as the "favored nation" as a proactive divide-and-rule strategy of intended global control and domination.

[@mortentefre7760]

In the early eighties I studied «history of ideologies» in school. And all of the points you lay out, including the idea of «shrinking economy», were taught. However the class was a new concept to see if there was any great interest from students and teachers. Sadly it was later halted. To see your video today is a reminder of best teaching I ever had when I was a young student.

[@marcusgarvey9933]

“You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.” ~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

[@jeankutzer1556]

The Treaty of Versailles after WWI did not allow Germany to recover quickly. Someone like Hitler was inevitable after that. If America had minded its own business and stayed out of WWI the war would have ended in a draw. And over 100,000 Americans would not have been sent to prison for protesting entry into the war. Some people ask the German people could stand by and do nothing, becoming deciples. After witnessing the events worldwide in 2020-2022 no one needs to ask that question anymore.

[@JoostEurovisionFans]

If you believe in the evolution theory, than you believe the people of color are less developed. And the more white you are, the more evolved. Therefore, the arian is the most evolved species. Therefore, the evolution theory is a KEY FACTOR in understanding H1ters view. And you (my friend) have not even mentioned this like... AT ALL. What do you have to say about that?

[@noahedelson3618]

its irrelevant. He hits his blameshifting drum plenty hard over and over and over again in Mein Kampf. To pretend some bullshit obscurantist motive was a play is deceptive. His ideas were not original- they came from General Ludendorf, Kaiser Wilhelm II, Martin Luther, Henry Ford, whoever wrote the Protocols (it was a police chief of Tsar Nicholas II around 1905ish), Teddy Roosevelt, and Neville Chamberlain mostly. August, too- but I don't think many bad ideas from him. He got alot worse after his niece "killed herself"- she was having an affair with him, and also maybe a Jewish guy.

[@Thx1138sober]

"If a nation was industrialized it wouldn't have enough food for itself," the USA says "Hold my beer".

[@deriznohappehquite]

“Hold my obesity crisis”

[@nottoday3817]

Well, Hitler was a long time thinker. Also, food should be taken with a bit of schepticism and in a larger sense. If you want to make things clearer: food means 'total energy and material resources' , while indusry means turning those resources in something else through technological processes. Despite not being officially theorised, even US would go to war from time to time for resources or, better said, control of resources, mainly oil and gas, as influencing the market solely based on own resources and extraction capabilities would lead to a fast depletion of their own deposits. Second US and USSR were mostly exceptions at the time. (Altough US was the bigger exception due to food problems in USSR). Through nations, he was talking perhaps about France or England (They were still ahead of US as Industrial powers, shortage of resources and bombings during the war as well as the foreign debt of the UK quickly turned the tides) France and UK, as I pointed out in an individual comment, were the main ones to implement the ideea of Lebensraum. Their colonies were the equivalent of the territories Hitler wanted to Anex. Mainland would stay industrialised and keep developing, while the colonies would produce only what was strictly necessary. Further autonomy was given to some of them, like Australia and Canada and they developed a bit of industry due to distance and optimal population density. (Mostly british, unlike India where the british were minoritary and occupiers)

[@Thx1138sober]

@@xfrosty9119 Dude, we are talking about historical events between 1939 and 1945. If you want to talk about current politics and events, I don't know, but there may be a few places on KZbin where that is possible.

[@George-cr6jq]

America had its own lebensraum which allowed to get access to the resources it needed

[@klausbrinck2137]

usa has made more wars than hitler, in order to secure its resources!!! and still does...

[@andrewhinson4323]

I was always under the impression that it was his fear of what Russia could do given time that caused him to "jump the shark", so to speak, and attempt to work Russia over before they were able to mobilize against germany.

[@callumloader8713]

He thought Russia was an embarrassment

[@Laocoon283]

That's not what jump the shark means lol but yea I think he wanted to attack first instead of waiting to be attacked.

[@miniaturejayhawk8702]

@@callumloader8713 that too. But the fact is: people think WW2 wouldnt have started without hitler but japan was and independent actor that happened to side with the germans while the soviet union was planning to take over the world and become a universal union (yes that would have been its actual name), all of that while italy wad trying to recreate the roman empire. If Hitler hadnt started WW2 then either Mussolini or Stalin would have. And even without them there would still have been conflict because japan had to expand to industrialize while russia had to export its revolution to survive.

[@JoanneGuelke]

If you listen to some of his speeches - there were ethnic Germans being massacred in Poland - that was a final straw. There were multiple efforts by Hitler to meet with Churchill to avoid going to war. Hitler wanted back the land Germany lost after WW1

[@andrewhinson4323]

@@JoanneGuelke yes, yes, turns out insurrectionists get killed when they fight. Thats what happened in Poland. Allow me to correct your description/perception. There were multiple efforts by Hitler to keep Britain from going to war with Germany YET. It wasn't a desire for peace. It was a desire for victory by keeping one of the largest local threats to the blitzkrieg pacified, until Germany consolidated its hold through to the atlantic. Or do you really expect anyone to ignore the fact that Hitler communicated the need for, and his intent to create within his lifetime, complete and total global hegemony under the 3rd Reich?

[@smangy5442]

D&D writing world war 2 "while Hitler kinda forgot about the Allies and the Soviet Union but they certainly haven't forgotten about him"

[@DivePlane13]

The road to hell is paved by good intentions

[@ludwigvanel9192]

That's why you should only judge government policy by its results not its intentions

[@MrPeabody67]

Well said. Still, I think there's enough evidence to suggest that the Nazi's antisemitic platform was based on mid-1800's ideology. The concepts of aryan racial purity and Jewish ingroup preference predates Mein Kampf by, at least 40 years. Basically, I'm saying that this didn't just come from 'naive good intentions'. Hitler's philosophy was likely based on older pseudoscientific ideology. You are right, Hitler probably started off with having the best intentions for the people he considered 'Aryan'. BUT, his thoughts on eugenics was, most likely, based on older ideas; Thus paving the way for the atrocities that followed.

[@Jonjs99]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/r56beIFmg7qLedE

[@Americansikkunt]

Think about it How is judging the results bad?

[@speakeasyofficial825]

From everything I have been taught about the war, Hitler did not expect the invasion of Poland to start the massive the war that it did. He had seen how Chamberlain had given in to him on multiple occasions and thought that the invasion of Poland was just going to be another smaller step before the larger war would begin.

[@Blaze-hr2pk]

Yes, exactly! Thank you!

[@dutchschultz3076]

Hitler also wanted to deport the Jews to Palestine and Madagascar, the havara agreement, but the international Jewish committee in new York said no and declaring war on Germany and to boycott German goods.

[@hitardo]

1:41 That makes sense on the Japanse perspective of WW2. Meaning, Japan invaded multiple China, Korea, and smaller islands in order to gain access to raw materials, which were essential in its War effort, namely rubber, oil, and metal. Moreover, these countries were less evolved in technology as Japan, which gave it a significant advantage on the War. This effort was to gain influence in the region, have access to all its resources, in order to rule the Pacific - over the USA, which was a major power in both industrial and resources. A Japanese general said, after Pearl Harbour attack something along these lines: "Only a person which have not seen the vast oil fields in Texas, and the gigantic facilities in Detroit, can say that the USA has no capacity. With Pearl Harbour we have 6 months to gain terrain [resources that is]. After that, we shall be prepared". They knew quite well. The issue was: a) On the day of the Pearl Harbour attack, the bigger US Navy ships were in a training mission; b) The various islands ended up being more difficult to conquer than anticipated; c) The US Military broke the Japanese message encryption. All this to say: You ruling out that idea is not correct. I am not saying that was the strategy of Hitler! I am saying that this was the strategy followed by the Japanese Empire Army. Hitler, to be honest, was governed by: 1) His desire to revenge the Germany shame in the treaty signed after WW1 - and it was this what lift him to power, in a democratic election; 2) His belief that Jews were taking Germany jobs and money away; 3) His belief that Slavic people were inferior; 4) His belief that German discipline, intelligence, power, and Nazism would take Europe to the forefront of advancements in Humanity.

[@feartheturnip]

War is always about money, resourses & profit, thats why NATO and the US especially are escalating Ukraine to a possible Nuclear war, their empire is declining, they want resources (the natural resources there, as well as the other things we are not allowed to mention on youTube). The scary thing as no declining empire has ever had Nukes, what will they do in the death throws to try to keep power?

[@christiandelorme5324]

Another reason why I'm a fan. Well thought out, well reason and well researched!!

[@TheImperatorKnight]

Thank you sir! I have put a lot of research into this particular video / topic

[@ziri9613]

@@TheImperatorKnight I am a National socialist and I appreciate this thought provoking content, thanks sir.

[@TheImperatorKnight]

"@TIK I am a National socialist and I appreciate this thought provoking content, thanks sir." If you are a National Socialist, please see the Henry Hazlitt video in the description and try to understand what he's saying. I think you'll find it most enlightening.

[@ivanmonahhov2314]

It is based on a rather disputed concept of that leader is unque indvidual in the nation , this is opposed by the idea that leader is actually represents common ideas. A true dictator is impossible due vunrability of a such pyramid. ( Kill Hitler in 1938 and all this is stopped ? ) . Opposite idea is that Hitler was put in place by industrialists which rose to the top during times of successful conquests by Prussia and WW1. The peace treaty after WW1 was not very harsh to anyone , except to those that were producing weapons. And so they wanted to bring back those nice margins.

[@indrekkpringi]

Christian Delorme Research???????? Everything he stated is not only not true but can be proven to be a lie and debunked. Unless you study history, you won't know that, and obviously you haven't. There a BILLIONS of you idiots now on the internet and not one of you know anything about history.

[@gandalftheblue6353]

I hope this never gets deleted by KZbin.. so People can wake up from beiing brainwashed...

[@GigaNietzsche]

@@nunyaefinbiz you’re calling him the fool for taking an actually reasonable approach as to how so many people and even the upper divisions of Germany were motivated to go to war?

[@bovellois]

@@nunyaefinbiz actually it's "Fly, you fools!" ;-)

[@MrNiceGuyHistory]

@@GigaNietzsche He is just playing on his avatar

[@larryhats4320]

it's a brainwash in itself, yet he is actually red pill (defined as: understanding all angles including those that are purposely suppressed because they don't support a narrative and can lead you to become anti-narrative or go further down a rabbit hole of truth) so in a way so i can't complain. But the regime actually discouraged the violent pogroms, unbeknownst to most mildly informed idiots, if only because of the negative attention that drew from New York Times and Britain's 200000 refugees from Germany, who were instrumental in shaping Britain's public opinion. Moreover, from the start, Germany was financed by corporations and persons who wanted to sink their teeth into the Soviet Union (former royals of Russia, expellees and emigres from Russia, companies like Royal Shell, etc.), and believers in a one Europe concept much like the EU. Remember that Napoleon invaded Russia not because "muh invincibility, muh master of Europe" but to bring Russia into participating in the Continental System because Napoleon had no control of the seas and was limited to Europe and its resources. Sound familiar?

[@temsedgwick9494]

@@larryhats4320 I think you’re leaving out some things that regime did, aren’t you? Or are you just intentionally downplaying the worst of what that regime did?

[@kabakaprime5127]

Getting to know more about the fault in the shrinking markets concept would be really interesting. Would love to see a video by you about this!

[@DF-ss5ep]

Simple answer: - Economy isn't a win-or-lose game. You can be a small country trading with a big country and you don't get poorer because of that, both countries get richer. So Hitler had an unfounded fear. - You don't have to be self-sufficient. Lots of countries today produce very little food and are instead providers of services. They use the money they get from selling services to buy food from abroad.

[@sporegnosis]

@@DF-ss5ep Ahhhh but here's the thing, not all nations have a competitive advantage in an industry, and in most cases that advantage can be copied. Meanwhile, the large nations in the world do have everything they need: usa, china, russia, either because of colonialism or conquest.

[@HowToSandAFloor]

You say the idea that hitler was insane is not plausible, but replace it with the idea that he’s as thick as shit. That doesn’t really make sense to me either

[@johanb.7869]

He thought he was the greatest military strategist ever, but he obviously wasn't. He was good in blaming others, but himself.

[@Lcr38]

yeah and churchill didnt want competition for the bank of england

[@fancifulrat]

Paul Eddington War is a racket.

[@MrAndersJensen]

The Bank of England is not owned by the UK

[@ceciljohnrhodes4987]

Inbreds.

[@thebestofallworlds187]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y6GnpZqNitmXi68

[@thebestofallworlds187]

@D J kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y6GnpZqNitmXi68

[@grzegorzwolsztyniak6233]

Just one note - a nation can exist without a state. For example Kurds nowadays and Poles between 1795 and 1918.

[@davidtuttle7556]

Shhh Camerade. Uncle Joe will hear you. Pole is not a race, or nation. Uncle Joe say Pole is disease, and Holy Mother Russia is cure. Come stay in his gulag for your wrong thinking. 😜

[@elbuggo]

...and the nation of Judea for 2000 years.

[@grzegorzwolsztyniak6233]

@@elbuggo exactly my point.

[@davidtuttle7556]

@Ajb Ajb Then please explain Katyn.

[@davidtuttle7556]

@Ajb Ajb The political murder of tens of thousands of Poles. And when the Polish Home Army rose against the Germans, He ordered the Red Army to stand down, airdropped weapons without parachutes so that they broke upon impact. Then there was Stalins persecution of Marshal Rokossovsky.

[@millsbuckss]

After the crop failures of 1934 and 1935, the reserves of grain and other foodstuffs became low and the foodstuffs import dependency of Germany was seen by Hitler as one of the decisive factors leading to defeat in the First World War. Indirect military investment included broadening the industrial base by means of investment in capital goods or assuring quick convertibility of consumer industries for war production. In October 1936, Hermann Goering became the head of the new ministry responsible for the Plan and a new phase in Germany’s economic history began. ​

[@BOSSDONMAN]

9:32 well they have a nation based on taking from other people's homeland so...

[@jensdanbolt6953]

That economic "theory" about shrinking markets sounds like a board game economy. It's not even close to accurate about real economies, even back then in the those days of high trade barriers. First of all, the whole premise of cities+industry vs. food surplus is completely wrong. Cities are the result of having food surplus in the first place, and crucially the access to efficiently transport it to the city. A city in the middle of 19th century Russia with fields all around, had worse food security than London, thanks to the bottleneck of transportation by wooden cart on muddy "roads". When the area immediately around the city had crops failure, it was extremely expensive to push in enough food from miles and miles away by muscle power on uneven roads, often leading to rationing and famine. Meanwhile London can efficiently transport in food from whichever place has a season of abundance that month. France, USA, Argentina (which was rich back then) and other Western countries were among the top food producers as well. It was the poor, under-developed countries that struggled with famine, not the other way around. I have yet to see a country industrialize effectively by primarily selling food or other base resources. The tools bought back tend to be for continuing to make those same resources. Own industry is developed by own creation (slow), or by creating economic incentives for others to invest in your production capability.

[@marcellotrull1092]

Jens Danbolt they didn’t have the benefit of watching ISI fail Latin America

[@KnightofAges]

"Shrinking Markets" was not the reason why Hitler did things (Germany had an embargo was was really not trading with most nations; it had to barter to manage to get deals with South American nations despite western allied pressure). It was though, in a way, the reason for the Kaiser going to war in 1914, though - back then all expected Russia to overtake Germany in a few years.

[@eeej6199]

That's what happens when you let the artist make the decisions.

[@ludwigvanel9192]

@Ring-a-ding-ding baby That happens with socialists - a lot.

[@ludwigvanel9192]

It sounds likd you're criticizing TIK for the faulty theory of shrinking markets, but it was Mr H who held that theory, not TIK

[@dutiot2326]

Germany is one of the richest country's on earth now.

[@herrboritooriginal9670]

But not the people in Germany

[@mattg432]

@@herrboritooriginal9670 The people that come to Germany are made richer.

[@davidrendall2461]

Hitler Timeline: 1890: Austrian imperial infant 1900: Non-German German-nationalist 1910: Struggling Bohemian artist 1914: Avid Bavarian volunteer 1918: Bitter veteran apologist 1919: Confused street fighter 1920: Political gadfly 1921: Emerging mob boss 1923: Gobby dynamo 1925: Supercharged anti-communist 1929: Supercharged anti-capitalist 1931: Successful spin merchant 1933: Successful totalitarian 1938: Successful gambler 1941: Lucked out punter 1943: Paranoid emperor of ruins 1944: National arsonist 1945: Suicidal Wagerian Everything else was bluster, spin and justification. The idea he was ever one thing; anything that didn't serve immediate purpose or even that clever is absurd. He is more easily defined by what he hated than what he thought, instinctive not intelligent, a product of multitudes not a single event. Too often our perspective of history is a series of absolute events, like tectonics and volcanos. But his inevitability was not absolute, his chance came only at the confluence of millions of variables. We have made him a repository for all that was evil and set him adrift from the human world as a monster. The truth is shrinking markets, imperial markets, blood eugenics, superiority of 'civilised' peoples in naturally forming 'nations', spiritual destiny through popular culture - it's what most late 19th Century Europeans and Americans thought about the world. Thats why so many enabled Hitlers rise, willingly or not.

[@whatthe6532]

Nice summary

[@jeffmoore9487]

David Rendall: Your description seems to fit Trump better than Adolf, but both also. I've always thought (to myself anyway) that Adolf always believed himself and had a consistent madness along the lines of Mien Kampf (Jews, blood, Aryans, Bolshevism, war.........). He seemed to live in a compartmentalized way but the nature of his logic regarding Germany (however you describe it) held steady from 192? to the end. Tik is good at bringing new detail to WW2. He may be good at this "inner logic" of Hitler thing - I may just read enough that he's suggested till I'm either convinced one way or another or too tired to go on.

[@sdcair]

I seriously recommend "Churchill, Hitler and the unnecessary war" by Pat Buchanan. It's a must-read on this topic.

[@callummurrayofficialyoutub1369]

Out of the 142 German divisions that went east only a handful were motorised or panzers Wehraboos want to know your location

[@Jordan-Ramses]

When you have a severe oil shortage mechanized units only make things worse. Fill those trucks full of horses because they aren't going very far.

[@admontblanc]

Yeah, if only a certain corporal wasn't indecisive about wether wanting soviet oil or middle eastern oil...

[@bryanskscion2229]

@@admontblanc They didn't really have the forces or the supply lines to fully secure either anyway.

[@bryanskscion2229]

lol

[@admontblanc]

@@bryanskscion2229 for the eastern front they could have easily established a supply line, heck even from the middle east, they would've been able to fly it back to Germany, would have been less efficient than ship or train transportation but possible none the less. If they weren't so good and effective, why did it take a coalition of 4-5 different nations, including the major producer of fuel with a 70% production share back then, to defeat them?

[@mgtowp.l.7756]

Canadian Here.. Soon The U.K. And Canada Will Join The "CANZUK" Free Trade Agreement..

[@edbenti5007]

And I thought it was a violent reaction to the draconian sanctions visited upon Germany by the Treaty of Versailles. Gosh, I was wrong all this time. Hyper-inflation, massive poverty and a despairing populace had nothing to do with Hitler and the Nazis.

[@edmundblackaddercoc8522]

Funny how this point gets covered isn't it!?

[@user-jq2iz9zn4p]

The Germans did not believe they lost WW1 and wanted to try again。

[@pyromania1018]

The sanctions weren't that draconian, and those that were designed to be were quickly deprived of their teeth due to excessive whining.

[@f1ah]

turns out he didnt start ww2