the results of this film shocked me ... you have to check out lomography 100

[@mkshffr4936]

I remember when ASA 100 was standard speed. 50 and 25 were low speed and 200 and up was high speed.

[@ribsy]

hah yea, those were the times

[@NunoAlmeidaPhotography]

I shoot Lomo 100 a bunch and I love it, especially in 120!

[@ribsy]

same same!

[@_buttertigers]

Lomo 800 is definitely best of the bunch. If you get a chance give that a try. Not only does it handle all sorts of exposures amazingly, it also pushes to 1600 clean. Great for moments where you need more light, or depth of field in images.

[@ribsy]

thanks for the recommendation! will def hunt some down

[@gilbertleon5607]

I have used Lomography 100 in 35mm and 120. Both looked great, the color looked great, exposing at box speed. 35mm I used a Canon AE-1 50mm lens. 120 used a Rolleicord IV. I was not disappointed at all. I'm located in Southern California, plenty of sunshine.

[@MARKLINMAN1]

I will def order this for my HASSY 501CM, thank you for this. I literally just received a film order from BH this morning, I live in the Boogie down so free shipping and FAST! Thank you for this Video.

[@ribsy]

nice! i usually do pick up haha

[@DCaldwellPhotography]

I've recently shot some Lomo 100 on 35mm & was very surprised by the results. Definitely different from the Lomo 400 & 800 I've used before. Great video dude.

[@ribsy]

thanks for watching

[@exploring_analog]

I absolutely love lomo 400 and it will forever be one of my go to films. and like you, I don't tend to reach for 100 speed films unless it's a super sunny day, cause I mainly do street photography and they're just not quick enough for me... so I've been avoiding the lomo 100 for a while now. But I gotta say, your video makes me want to go buy a roll right now haha! great shots, and you're right, the quality looks like professional grade film!

[@ribsy]

Yea really amazing quality

[@davidellinsworth3299]

Ive been tempted by some of Lomos films but 100, 400 and 800 are all priced very similar to their Portra counterparts here in the UK. I do really want to try Metropolis though because its so unique looking. That said, these were great images Ribsy

[@ribsy]

Thanks! That’s a shame that the price isn’t any cheaper

[@Minolta_Gal]

Wonderful shots as always! I absolutely adore Lomo 100 & 400. I haven’t tried 800 yet. Of course I love Lomography so I might be bias.😂

[@ribsy]

Haha I like lomo too, any of those options will def be good

[@MakersTeleMark]

Shhhh. The L 1,4,8 Kodak stocks are amazing, priced right, and most always in stock. Don't blow 'em up.

[@ribsy]

It’s not a secret

[@reallybadtracking]

Can't wait to watch another Ribsy Banger 🔥

[@ribsy]

thanks for the support!

[@timothyplatt6053]

That Film looks like what I always want Ektar to look like

[@ribsy]

Yea true!

[@AlexOnStreets]

I shot all my film photos last year in NYC on Lomo 400. I wanted vivid saturation, especially reds and blues to be strong and thats what I got. A lot of film street photographers in nyc are shooting portra and have a similar look to each other. So for me it's a good way to differentiate yourself from others to shoot this stock. I also shot Lomo 100 last week on my Pentax 67 and at 6:52 I noticed you scrolled through and found my photo! 🍻 The guy sleeping on the ground. My exposure came out perfect for me.

[@ribsy]

Oh nice! I’d love to see more of your photos with this stock

[@Poverello2001]

Nice photos. I’ll have to give this a try in medium format.

[@ribsy]

Def should!

[@mp3remix171]

Low key my new go-to… hopefully the prices and availability won’t change after this! Also hahah my mind got triped up because I live on the west coast of Sweden and shot a lot around here, didn’t expect to see that on here 😂

[@ribsy]

hah yea! i go there alot, every year

[@scottplumer3668]

Looks great! I kinda gave up on Lomo because it was just too lo-fi for my tastes, but I might actually try the 100.

[@ribsy]

thanks!

[@SiggyPony]

I use all 3, but normally in 120 format. Lomo 800 is my most favorite and the film stock I shoot the most for 120, the colors are so beautiful and being a very sensitive film it works well with Pentax 6x7 Lenses that are often f4 or f4.5

[@evertking1]

Yes!! Lomo 800 is amazing

[@ribsy]

I’ve heard so many good things about

[@focustiltphoto]

I love Lomo 100 in 120. I bought 5 rolls at my local lab about 3 months ago. The only reason that I didn't buy 6 rolls was because they only had 1 three pack and 2 extra rolls. Had never used any and thought I would use some on a little project that I had in mind. The results were amazing.

[@ribsy]

Very cool. Can I see the project somewhere?

[@focustiltphoto]

@@ribsy I haven't put anything out there from it yet, but hopefully I'll get some of it up in various spots online at the end of the summer.

[@Goalieswede]

Sweden photos had some great color, really accurate to how it felt

[@ribsy]

Yea Sweden has some great light out west

[@xander1052]

I feel the real reason for that Swedish holiday may have been a nice little CLA for the Hassy at it's birthplace ;P

[@ribsy]

haha i wish

[@aglassbrightly]

So many good shots in this video! Maybe I need to give Lomo another try. A friend gifted me a roll of Lomo 800, but it curled so badly that it was difficult to scan on my Epson V600. Also, the colors looked strange, so I had to edit to keep the skin tones looking natural. Not sure what happened.

[@ribsy]

Interesting - I’ve only heard good things about lomo 800. You should try a different scanning method or maybe the development was messed ip

[@aglassbrightly]

@@ribsy You're probably right. I'm currently saving up to get into DSLR scanning. That Easy35 device you featured a couple months ago looks legit, but I'll wait until they make one for 120.

[@erichartke4331]

I've been impressed with Lomo 400

[@ribsy]

yea same!

[@andrewbarnum5040]

Lomography gives you what you wished Kodak provided. Since Kodak makes their 100, 400 and 800 film... Which Kodak films did they slap lomography's name on?? Just guessing but 100 is most likely Pro Image, 400 is Ultramax and 800 is Portra 800 or Gold 800?

[@ribsy]

I wouldn’t be surprised it if was the same as existing 35mm Kodak stocks

[@caw25sha]

The Lomography website is the best place to see photos filtered by film, not just their own. Is there a Lomography store in New York? There were at least two in London but they've closed down ☹

[@ribsy]

nope no lomo store in nyc as far as i know. but they do have a corporate office here

[@lrochfort]

The real question is what is it, really?

[@caw25sha]

I was wondering that. I assume they don't have their own r&d and factory, but is it just another film "badge engineered" or custom made?

[@randallstewart1224]

@@caw25sha Lomography has never made a roll of film. As with Cinestill, they just buy long rolls from others and repackage them under their brand name. In the case of Lomo, that has meant that the same film name has been used for different films acquired over time (Lady Grey). That doesn't mean that a particular film is good or bad. It does mean that they do not control the supply, and a particular film may just be packaged from a couple of old, frozen master rolls pulled from a warehouse somewhere. When it's gone, there is no more. I envision Lomo's film department opening shop every day with a question: :What fell off the back of the truck yesterday?"

[@kapitanbofrost914]

The Lomo color negative films are probably Kodacolor VR 100, 400 and 800, the same film family that Color Plus 200 belongs to. If you compare Colorplus and the Lomo films, it is relatively obvious. The only thing that is officially known is that the film is made in the USA. The 35mm film is even sold in Kodak canisters. Also, the film is most likely not old stock, Eastman Kodak can only sell motion picture film under the Kodak brand, but they can continue to produce film for other companies who in turn distribute it under their own brand. Like Cinestill or recently Fuji.

[@ribsy]

Who knows

[@AdrianBacon]

I strongly suspect that Lomo 100 is the same emulsion as Kodak ProImage 100.

[@ribsy]

Yea I heard this theory elsewhere. Wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the case

[@Esoxhunt]

Looks a lot like Kodak Pro Image 100, is the lomography 100 is estar based?

[@ribsy]

i hear that alot. i don't have the facts to compare

[@Stealther]

I’m assuming you shot this at box speed? Have you tried overexposing it?

[@ribsy]

All shot at box speed. I assume over exposure will give more of that Kodak pastel look

[@shamikchoudhury5924]

The new classic film in your site cost $4.21 whereas in your partner site it costs $9.99. I want to try this film, but to me this is not acceptable. And shipping is limited in your site. Hope this will be fixed.

[@ribsy]

Consider it a going out of business sale - that is why the price is very different. Also I am Shipping from the USA and cannot ship everywhere unfortunately

[@diegogarciamedina6363]

Hi, is it old stock tested kodak film?

[@ribsy]

it is not old stock. this is fresh film, made by kodak

[@diegogarciamedina6363]

@@ribsy it´s kodak gold?

[@thomasa.243]

​@@diegogarciamedina6363probably yes. But up to ISO 800 which you only get in Kodak disposable cameras. The price is however high where I live. 3 rolls for 50€ which is comparable to Portra really...

[@jealius4340]

stop sharing the secrets ribsy! Lomo looks banger and is cheep! lets keep it that way 🤫🤫🤫

[@ribsy]

haha fair

[@moot6794]

I am not a fan of this stock in 135. Always get depressing results.

[@ribsy]

Interesting

[@senoralecthompson]

Beardy guy in your photo needs a tongue scraper

[@ribsy]

Lol yea maybe

[@ale_s45]

oooo

[@ribsy]

😀