The Round That Almost Broke Survivor

Everyone knows that, at Tribal Council, someone HAS to go home. But, what if everyone was immune? How would that be possible? Let's find out!

[@Roachn8r]

I’ve seen a lot of similar comments about a possible solution for this problem that I completely overlooked. That being that they would actually let the contestants go back to camp unscathed and then they would do a double-elimination round like how they did in Redemption Island and South Pacific. That was something that I didn’t even think of at the time, but that does seem like a logical thing for them to do. I went into the video with the assumption that whatever solution they came up with would have to be resolved at that specific Tribal Council, but the double-elimination is probably closest to what their actual plan is. I also just wanted to say thanks to everyone for engaging with the video. It really means a lot!

[@SierraGolfNiner]

There is a really simple solution you missed. No one goes home. It’s like when there is a medical or non-tribal withdrawal, there is no tribal. Because it’s one person per day out. So if everyone is immune no one goes home….that day. And the next day? Double tribal. A mechanic we’ve seen plenty of times. It would make for great TV to have the tribal where no one goes home…you couldn’t rocks or clean sweep…everyone would hate that. They’d talk about the no departure tribal for years to come. But tomorrow the end result is the same, two people go home restoring the departure rate.

[@XanderMatthews-nv9zf]

That would be a really shitty solution, everybody basically just wastes their idols and advantages and then just nothing happens That would be so shit

[@SierraGolfNiner]

@@XanderMatthews-nv9zf Incorrect. Something would happen - everyone would get to go back to camp for the night and have survived another day. The goal of all the immunities has always been to get you through one more vote, make it one more day. They're not some assurance to stay in the game forever or even a few days, just one more day. So you can wake up and say "I made it to Day 22!" (or whatever) in your confessional. My solution allows for that. If their immunity was made moot because everyone was immune? That would be shit as it'd be a waste. No one would get to say "I played this idol right and made it one more day", it would be the ultimate in wasted idol play.

[@AsraliaX2]

This would be the lamest scenario in my opinion

[@JimmyVermeer]

@@XanderMatthews-nv9zf It wouldn't be a waste. Had any one of those people not played their idol, they would have been eliminated.

[@scorpionhdkid8972]

Well, no elimination can be fine right? It has been done in a Dutch tv show similar to what this one is. Multiple times. Never has been an issue.

[@wilfredfizzlebang5012]

Plot twist: if they’re all immune, then everyone is instantly eliminated and the crew has to take over the tribe for the rest of the season. Each eliminated crew member has to go back to work. The tribe members who were eliminated in the purge now become members of the jury, no matter which stage of the game they were eliminated in.

[@bencalebrod]

Had everyone been immune I actually think that tribal would've been cancelled and they would've just made the next round be a double elimination cycle, either making the next reward challenge instead be the first immunity challenge or have an impromptu immunity challenge and vote at the next tribal after the first vote similar to what they did in Redemption Island/South Pacific.

[@Roachn8r]

@@bencalebrod That definitely could work. That seems the most logical way to do it.

[@lerdog]

That's my theory too and I was surprised it wasn't mentioned since it seems like the most plausible workaround

[@sirken2]

i mean this seem like the most audience grabbing outcome for ratings and just overall talking about the show like a once in a life time outcome

[@BanditSurvivorContent]

I think Survivor are deathly afraid of everyone being immune at tribal council. Thats why at the 42 split tribal they only got Tori to play her shot in the dark rather than Tori and Lindsay who could have both been immune. Jonathan (Individual Immunity) Maryanne (Idol) Drea (Idol) Tori (Successful Shot In The Dark) Lindsay (2nd Successful Shot In The Dark)

[@Roachn8r]

That's a good point, Bandit! I always wondered why they didn't debate more on who would go home between Lindsay and Tori, but that makes a lot of sense.

[@gadelampe]

Do we know if the 1/6 chance of immunity is shared? As in, there are 6 scrolls to choose from and if one player uses their shot in the dark, then the next to do it only has 5 scrolls. It's still technically a 1/6 chance and fixes the issue of multiple people landing it. Though, this doesn't really work if more than 6 players decide to do it, unless they then have another identical jar of scrolls handy.

[@BanditSurvivorContent]

@@gadelampe it's a bag of 12 scrolls where 10 are not safe and 2 are safe. If my maths checks out Tori had a 22% chance to be safe that tribal council (remember all of Zach, Marya and Swati already tried to be safe and failed) so 2/9. Then Lindsay would go up and have a 1/8 chance to be also immune. 2/9 x 1/8 is about 3% chance for immunity so while unlikely there was a legitimate chance for everyone to be immune.

[@joltkip7079]

I don’t think that’s how shot in the dark works. I’m pretty sure that’s it always a 1/6 at the start of a tribal council and there is only 12 scrolls with 2 safe if there are more than 6 people at a tribal since there’s a possibility that more than 6 people try to play it

[@BanditSurvivorContent]

@@joltkip7079 "The Shot in the Dark existed in both seasons as a last ditch chance to save yourself from elimination through a game of chance. Every player in the game was given one “shot in the dark die” which provided a one in six chance of a last minute immunity at tribal council, *with the odds increasing each time someone else played it*." here's my source: www.goldderby.com/article/2022/survivor-knowledge-is-power-shot-in-the-dark/ Additionally it would be a bit weird to not just have it be 1 safe scroll 5 non-safe scrolls every tribal if they replenished comparative to 2/12.

[@jomarcentermjm]

7:24 the production might just extend a day or two since this kind of scenario is super rare and TBH it will really raise the rating by a lot

[@CamoFlage907]

if this did happen, i think jeff should’ve still read the votes, and the 2 people that got the most votes would go into fire making

[@Roachn8r]

@@CamoFlage907 That is actually an interesting idea that kinda makes sense. Those 2 players (let’s assume Sami and Cassidy) would definitely not be thrilled at that prospect, but, hey what can you do?

[@cblazerc]

but at this tribal, only 1 player received votes (Sami). what happens then?

[@CaptainWizard3000]

I’m assuming Sami didn’t vote for themselves??

[@cblazerc]

@@CaptainWizard3000 Sami didn't vote. He played his Shot in the Dark, which requires him to forfeit his vote to play it.

[@CaptainWizard3000]

@@cblazerc gotcha! Sorry, I missed that detail

[@the1-upclub98]

I played an ORG once and there was a challenge where everyone could choose Immunity, an advantage, or a point for their tribe. Everyone on the losing tribe was immune so the hosts just had 'em draw rocks. XD Went on to be the best ORG I've ever played.

[@hot-sy2yd]

what org? and on what platform

[@tyrone-dg9my]

Is it Angevivor?

[@the1-upclub98]

For those wondering. The ORG is Angevivor 6: Birthday Bash on Discord.

[@tyrone-dg9my]

@@the1-upclub98 yes I played in that org and I got 13th. I’ve placed higher in other orgs, and it’s still the best org I’ve ever played. 🥹

[@jakobthiesse4775]

@@tyrone-dg9mywas that the merge XD

[@JimmyVermeer]

I think there needs to be a change to the way idols are played. As it currently stands, when Jeff says "If anyone has an idol and wants to play it, now is the time to do so", players can one by one come forward with their idols, and then when another player sees this, it prompts them to also play their idols (Notable examples of this are Keith Nale and Troyzan Robertson). The change I would like to see is that players are given a white stone and a black stone and all must reveal at the same time whether or not they are playing an idol, so they cannot base their decision on what someone else has done.

[@LucianDevine]

It's an ever-evolving game of information. That's the whole point. From the moment the group sees each other for the first time until the jury votes are cast, the game is on. It's on you to read the signals and make your decisions.

[@TheDerpySmiler]

Actually it’s possible that as the game rules are set, they’d adhere to those rules that were set as diverting from those rules could leave a sour taste and potential rigging up in the air. What they could do and is more likely to be the case is say “congrats you’re all safe” and next episode boot 2 players in the same tribal council. This would add more suspense and a twist to the episode and could still help them stay on schedule

[@LucianDevine]

I think that's exactly why they couldn't eliminate an immune player. Immune is supposed to be immune, not immune unless everyone is immune. I think there was a situation one season, where the smoke from a fire was blowing into one player's eyes during an immunity challenge, and he threatened to sue, off camera of course, because it was interfering with the game. The players, and thus producers agree to certain things when the contracts are signed, and I don't think the ability to eliminate an immune player is one of them.

[@elitettelbach4247]

Cool idea for a video. It is wild that this was actually a possibility. I don’t really like the idea of immunity tiers. Immunity is immunity regardless of how it was achieved. I feel like the fairest thing to do would be to let it be a non-elimination round, then in the next round still with the final seven only allow one person to win immunity from the immunity challenge instead of three lol. To keep schedule on track after the final seven vote just have them do another immunity challenge at tribal council and then go right into another vote.

[@rogerdodger1984]

No way they would take away peoples safety. That goes against the core of the game. My guess is you would have two rapid fire immuntiy challenges into tribals in the space where there would usually only be one challenge and one tribal. It takes away from the fundamentals of the game to take away immunity.

[@hansrenlund]

I think if they were all immune, the show ends. The survivors actually survived :>

[@siraan5642]

Thing is, they could actually have a "noone goes home tonight, see ya!" All the idols are used up now, the dice roll is done as well. To compensate for the fact that noone left in one tribal council session, if they have a strict time schedule (e.g.: no. of episodes/recording time/time allowed on the island to do the filming/etc), they can do a "down the line" series of shorter time frames in-between immunity challenges and tribal councils (hypothetical - they do a tribal every 7 days. Instead, they do one every 5 days for a stint, catching it up over time). They'd just need to come up with one additional immunity challenge.

[@ihavekalashnikovyoudomath9275]

My solution: The host gets eliminated and the contests have to run the show on their own

[@matthewdivoll3453]

I think they would probably just void the round and indeed, contrary to what you said, nobody goes home, then do what they could with the remaining days to run an extra round. I also think it would serve as a wake-up call to the producers that modern Survivor has too many idols, twists and advantages.

[@jgathas]

If your in Sami’s situation, you can’t play your shot in the dark. Since everyone is immune, sami cannot vote for anyone. Therefore, he has no vote to risk to play the shot in the dark.

[@Roachn8r]

@@jgathas You may be right. I’m not entirely clear on the rules of that, but if that’s the case, then maybe there’s a scenario where Sami plays his shot first, and Jesse and Karla play their idols after Sami’s Shot lands.

[@worthplayingfor2197]

Well that's not true because u can vote for someone and then have that person play an idol

[@glow255]

Well idols are played after the votes are read, so not everyone is immune yet.

[@MathewRYF]

There's also the possibility that they fudge the die roll for the shot-in-the-dark. I wouldn't put it past the showrunners to have that as a contingency.

[@Marnie843]

Interesting concept, I think there are different forms of immunity here! Winning individual immunity means you are immune and you cannot be voted for but this is not how idols work, Idols simply negate any votes you get at tribal council (same as sitd as well i guess). So after the smoke clears those who have immunity will still be safe but those who negated the votes against them will technically then be tied with 0 votes, this then leads to a revote, fire making, open discussion or rocks depending on what production decides. great vid :)

[@timothyboleratzky7158]

I think what would be interesting is if they completely skipped that round, and made it a final four. Rewarding the contestants for all being safe. I think it would be unique, and provide strategy for future seasons.

[@ChampSiggi]

woah, cool video! you have great editing skills and made a good and engaging script! You deserve this many views (:

[@Roachn8r]

@@ChampSiggi Thanks, I really appreciate it! I’m glad that so many people have been enjoying it.

[@robertqld]

What if everybody is immsune? Well I guess, Cirie still goes home

[@cobusvanderlinde6871]

The reason someone has to go home at tribal is because they have only so many weeks of of episodes scheduled and each episode ends with a tribal and elimination. A simple sollution presents itself, why not let everyone stay, but there will be two contestants eliminated at the next tribal council, with all the immunity idols and things being played this time, it should not be possible for enough people to be immune the next time for the game to be unable to drop two contestants. At the double council we can easily resolve a number of situations. If all votes go to one candidate, that contestant is eliminated and a second vote is held to determine the other eliminee. If votes on the first vote are split the two with the most votes go home. You need a fairly unlikely three-way tie before we need a firemaking challenge to determine which contestant gets to stay. If by some unthinkable disaster where they were irresponsible enough to allow enough immunity that only one contestant can be eliminated at the following tribal council, they kick the extra elimination on to that tribe's next tribal council. Everything works out fine, the players and audience get incredible spectacle, the show still meets its production schedule, and mostly have to accomodate having one more contestant around to feed and manage for that week.

[@adleranderson6797]

My mom suggested the possibility of letting everyone go back to camp with everyone being immune, and then at the next challenge, have it be an elimination challenge, where the last player to finish is eliminated on the spot, and everyone else still goes to Tribal Council afterwards to keep their schedule.

[@Taxmt]

Honestly they'd probably send the person with the shot in the dark home. They recently had a tribal council where everyone voted for one guy, but he lucked out with his shot in the dark. But because they have to send someone home, they had everyone vote again except he couldn't use shot in the dark again and I think he just got dog piled again

[@daindreska8206]

That doesn't seem fair. The immunity should have been carried over.

[@JKSSubstandard]

I think there's an obvious solution not talked about. Nobody goes home. Next tribal, 2 people go home

[@EleosAnim]

i felt like this happened in our philippine series. (not sure) but yes the next elim they would do it twice. just to make up for the immune last round.

[@greywater57]

Tbf, by that point in the game I don’t think Karla would have ever played her idol for Cassidy - I’m not even sure Jesse plays his second one for Gabler considering the fact that his second one was a secret - so I don’t think this would have realistically happened even if Sami’s Shot in the Dark had worked. Nonetheless, it is a very interesting possibility and a major oversight on production’s part that so many people could have been immune so late in the game.

[@Destiny87]

No one goes home, but next tribal is a double elimination.

[@src6339]

Based on what other elimination shows have done it the past, id say that they'd accept that everyone is immune that week, noone would leave and they'd throw a big party, playing the whole event for feels... Then, the next week is a double elimination with no immunity rewarded for tasks the entire week.

[@MewtwoStruckBack]

Firemaking? Clean slate? Rocks? Nah...each and every one of them wins $1,000,000.

[@gregtrahan1973]

That shot in the dark would have been a NONE in six chance at immunity

[@patrickperot6296]

Although I agree that the show most likely made a contingency plan for this, especially after they introduced the shot in the dark, I don't think they necessarily NEED one. They can let everyone be safe and make up the time somewhere later in the season, or have two people voted out at a later tribal council, among other options.

[@JMoney615]

Nice video. If they put a bunch of advantages and the shot in the dark in season 50, I could see a similar situation happening.

[@ValetinoLovebird]

I believe Sami's shot in the dark, regardless the roll, becomes not safe due to need someone to go home

[@hhannahh7835]

Survivor 35 also had an "everyone immune" possibility, if all 3 original tribes had their idols found and end up together on the swap tribe, then went on to lose the 3 immunities, you couldve had a 3 person tribal with 3 idols, making everyone immune.

[@ashykins]

obviously the only real solution here is that jeff goes home as the only one on screen without immunity. then ofc one person becomes jeff each episode

[@Boonslayer]

Other people already pointed out the whole non-elimination followed by double elimination (they probably keep an extra double elimination round in their back pocket for when they need to do something like this), but the way that Cirie's default elimination was handled may give away part of how it would work; it could be based on the order played. This does mean that an idol might be the *least* safe form of immunity from something like this, as you basically have to beat the other people with idols to the punch, since Shot in the Dark is played during the vote, and something like Cody's Choose Your Champion at worst would be played at the beginning of vote-reading (if not technically played before/during immunity)

[@Kokonutzlz]

I thought double elimination on the next round would be the standard for tournament-style shows

[@SlayerEndX13]

Just do a second elimination round. Someone still goes home, but because nobody went home in the first round, a second elimination round is held immediately after to resolve the issue.

[@CrypticCobra]

I don’t see why they would not just say everyone is immune, go home. And then next tribal just force 2 players out.

[@artinallforms7220]

Another couple options are the next event is automatically double elimination, or someone volentarily steps down for a lesser prize.

[@pokemonmanic3595]

I remember I did an ARG once and this very situation happened. We had no idea how to resolve it so we ended up just having everyone with advantages/idols do a tiebreaker.

[@StoneC0ld5345]

My option for resolving a situation where everybody is immune for one reason or another: I would just accept such a "Survivor moment" and rule that nobody gets voted out because everybody is immune. However.... A future tribal council will become a double elimination, in order to "catch up" to the production schedule.

[@lazyreaps]

The problem here is that NOBODY can be voted out for 1 night. Solution: double elimination the next day

[@SP.007]

I would introduce a "no more advantages & Idol" advantage. (firewall, looks like a flame idol ) So advantages & idol becomes dormant for the rest of that tribal council. It can be used two ways 1) in front of the tribe, before the vote This can allow you or an ally to use an advantage/idol before before hand. Or 2) toss it in the urn after your vote. Jeff will walk out of the voting booth with flame idol in his hands, to gauge the reaction. The first two season, we'll see the confused faces. -Your use is anonymous -no one can do anything -if someone used an idol or advantage, before the vote, they might get blamed for it, and cause trust issue. ---- The positive for someone that played their shot in the dark. If you make it through, you have shot in the dark for next tribal. You won't have to sacrifice a vote, becasue you already did. And Of course, if you're still here, they spared you from using it.

[@bennitori4]

I honestly think either every is no longer immune, or everyone builds a fire would be best. If everyone was immune, it would show they were all equally savvy at the game. And since they've all matched each other, it only makes sense that they be equal in terms of elimination as well. So it makes mass immunity a double edged sword. On the off hand chance it ever happened, it would be a bad thing. Which would incentivize future players to not aim for it.

[@jakechambers3755]

I mean there is always a possibility that they could just let them go through and do a double Elimination down the line

[@clarkkent7049]

I think they would basically reset tribal and say if you had immunity before you came here tonight (IC winners and Cody) are still immune but the idols and shot in the dark are removed basically resetting tribal but taking the idols away

[@darthjarjarbinks2480]

I feel like the clean sweap is the most possible if evryone is no one is

[@robwi7369]

Yeah, I got a better idea. Let the immunity stand and have a double elimination next week.

[@charliehustle86]

I think their contingency activated. Even though shot in the dark is supposed to be fair I don't think it was.

[@TBM7777]

I host an extremely twist heavy ORG and rounds with everyone immune do occur from time to time. My system is to void all immunities, except the individual immunity necklace(s) and have all the original votes count (though if you have yet another idol on hand, you are free to play it and get your immunity back)

[@Dewald]

They likely would have done a double elimination in the next episode to even things out.

[@Louigi36]

I feel like anything they would do to throw someone out at the council would be quite unpopular because it seems like they're breaking the rules. Just from a purely emotional stanpoint, the idols and such would lose a lot lf their symbolic significance if you could simply break their sacred immunity whenever it's convenient. Instead, if the schedule needs to be maintained, I think it's best to find a way to eliminate an extra person at one point. They could eliminate 2 people at the next council, or do a simple bonus elimination game, or maybe have them draw lots, but I think it has to be on another day. At the council, everyone is immune, and they should respect that or else they risk undermining the aesthetic they were going for.

[@KeyanCarlile]

What’s interesting about shot in the dark is that, hypothetically, couldn’t every contestant at a tribal play one successfully and be immune? Or am I misunderstanding it? Are there 6 scrolls per player or only a collective six scrolls? If that’s the case, what happens if more than 6 contestants play a shot in the dark?

[@celestialmaddie]

There's a collective six scrolls in the premerge, and a collective twelve starting at mergatory (Jeff offhandedly mentions this at the mergatory of 41). This means that a maximum of two players could be immune at any given tribal due to Shot in the Dark.

[@waynebennett745]

I've got a "Shot In The Dark" question: They WORD it as "you have 1/6 chance of getting it right to become safe (& only have 1 time all season to play it)". Now, what if 6 people played their SITD at the same TC....would 1 win & 5 lose OR could all 6 be immune? In other words, does the SITD chances apply to everyone INDIVIDUALLY...or, as I questioned above, is it done as a group? *Yes, I know the chances of 6 ALL doing SITD at the same TC are very minute, but it COULD happen. 🤔

[@Roachn8r]

How I understand it is that if there are 6 or few people who are eligible to be eliminated (so from Final 7 onward and on the initial starting tribes), there are 6 total scrolls, with only 1 of them being safe. Any tribal council where there are more than that (so from the Mergatory Tribal onwards, minus any split Tribals), there are now 12 scrolls, with 2 being safe. So either way, the math works out to 1/6. So, at this Final Several Round, for example, there would only be 6 scrolls.

[@saltnsauce7238]

If this happens then Jeff gets to leave and then the players vote for who the new host will be.

[@jordanramsey4619]

To be honest they would probably just rig it so that the shot in the dark person draws not safe. That or everyone is immune and they do a double elimination

[@thenic3stguy]

Great concept!

[@tmmaster6904]

i fee like the answer's pretty simple, nobody goes home and it's a double elimination for the next vote

[@JimmyVermeer]

I think the only fair thing to do in this scenario would be to hold another immunity challenge. I hate the idea of anyone being eliminated without at least having a chance to play for immunity. It could be fire making, but instead of just eliminating the last person to finish, give immunity to the first person to finish, and then everyone else is fair game.

[@PokeShadow77]

Iminate 2 next week

[@zanderphis3331]

What if they just sent the host home.

[@thomaswalters597]

Or they would send two people home next time.

[@markeldcarter]

I think it would be cool to have an impromptu challenge at tribal where the worst performer is eliminated. so maybe a puzzle and the last one to finish goes home.

[@KristianYeager]

I think drawing rocks would be the most likely outcome if that ever happened. Yes, it would piss the super fans off, but I think the casuals would love to see it! 🥳

[@mariahazcueta3621]

I’m a super fan and this would be epic. Devastating for someone’s game but they use it in a deadlocked vote

[@LouisianaCityboi]

Has Survivor ever done a double elimination before??

[@hexzinggaming5040]

Simple they just send two people home next time at tribal council.

[@ericgrimes341]

Lets be honest. They would draw rocks

[@Luka.5064]

If that ever happens I would go since everyone is immune that means no one is immune and have them vote again or something idk. Ohhhhh, that’s literally what I said 6:01

[@mostunicorn]

they could simply vote out 2 people next time

[@lastdayonearthmysteryman4849]

I think rocks is the most likely option! Jeff be like well you are immune so we’re going to rocks! I think the immunity necklace will still make you safe! So at this tribal council four people draw rocks!

[@blakedorian1]

Great vid!!

[@rubixium]

whoever plays it last goes home

[@jmagicd9831]

You left out another idea: First come, first served - Anyone who entered tribal with immunity keeps it. - Once only one person is left eligible for votes, that person is eliminated. (possibly with an idol in their pocket) - Just like after votes are read, an eliminated player cannot then use their idol/advantage. (This would have to supersede any kind of super idol such as Tony's from Cagayan) - Staying in the game requires being decisive about the need to use your idol/advantage before other players can. -In most cases, idols and advantages are considered played the moment the object is handed over to Jeff since players have historically been able to hesitate or back out until parting with their idol/advantage. - If there were to be a scramble to hand idols/advantages to Jeff, the first to state their intent to use their idol/advantage wins out. (This is to prevent tribal from turning into a footrace. First to decide should win out) Example: Suppose back in Game Changers, that Cirrie also had an idol and was the last eligible for votes as happened in the game. She would be considered eliminated with an idol in her pocket the moment the third idol is played.

[@XanderMatthews-nv9zf]

So it is literally just a sprint to get to Jeff first? That is really dumb to be completely transparent

[@jmagicd9831]

@@XanderMatthews-nv9zf Did you read the part where stating the intent to play an idol would count if it turned into a sprint? Also that would not happen unless everyone walks into tribal knowing that advantage-geddon II is about to happen. In reality, someone is probably playing their idol first, and then the next person to feel in danger plays theirs, and so on and maybe the last few people are racing to shout Jeff's name as the outcome becomes clear. I suppose those last people could just get sent to fire to avoid any controversy. The point is to reward players who read the game correctly to know they need to play something over players who don't

[@XanderMatthews-nv9zf]

@@jmagicd9831 yea but in hypotheticals like the one stated in the video, Sami’s vote out, once his SITD works there are no valid votes and it would in fact just go by how quickly everyone played their advantages

[@jmagicd9831]

@@XanderMatthews-nv9zf Well whoever understands that and stands up first gets to stay in the game, and whoever doesn't is out by default with an idol in their pocket

[@beanswater]

Just eliminate 2 next round. Seems like it's pretty easy to resolve this.

[@MynameisnotGraey]

Couldn’t they have no-one go home, then a double elimination next time

[@mies1mies]

you could do that everryboddy go's to the next round but in the next round 2 will fall of

[@chasespake9271]

Double elimination next tribal.

[@creativecityis]

they rigged the shot in the dark! (who would know if they did)

[@raheemfielder-bey998]

I definitely think the shot in the dark is riggible by production if this happens. There’s no wayyy they would allow this to happen and extend out the game when they could easily just do this.

[@dash595]

Your storytelling is perfect, you should seriously invest in a better microphone you have potential to be a great KZbinr I was very shocked when the video ended and I saw you had less than 100 subscribers

[@Roachn8r]

@@dash595 Thanks! I have a pop filter arriving in the mail tomorrow, so I hope that that helps a little bit. I have a ton of ideas, I just hope I have the time to actually follow through on most of them.

[@zpsurvivor]

great video, 43 is underrated. i think a cool way they could handle this would be to go ahead and read the votes, but none would count, and then hold a revote where everyone is vulnerable including the immunity winners

[@JamesMeyer2]

I don't ever expect for this to happen in that literally everyone gets immuned. However, if it ever does happen, I'm predicting an impromptu immunity challenge that could be done at Tribal Council. Maybe it could be a trivia challenge of some kind.

[@theggamer2824]

We were also Close in Game changers

[@albertert116]

can i comment while it's live or is youtube glitched???

[@rosebuzd]

If I were a producer I’d make it a 7 way firemaking challenge & I’m not joking 😭

[@TheLoserface45]

What if they all did stay immune and then the next round 2 people get voted out and they know that leaving the current tribal

[@Roachn8r]

@@TheLoserface45 Yeah, that is probably the most logical thing to do. I didn’t think about that at the time.

[@sargeamigo123]

This is a cool video topic! I wondered if they would say that just idols and the shot in the dark are negated, meaning Karla, Owen, and Cody would remain safe, while the other four, who all played something during tribal, become vulnerable.

[@maapauu4282]

Why is the idol shown by a taonga pounamu?

[@mr.pencilsharpener8004]

Honestly, I think they’d just rig it. Sami hands Jeff his “safe” scroll (which production knows is safe), then when Jeff goes to open it, he swaps it for a “not safe” scroll behind the podium.

[@cyrilmateo6865]

I think actually it would be first come first served, which is kinda lame but would be fair and still sticks to the elimination schedule. It's basically the tier system but the tier is based on when immunity is granted. So, the IC immunities are granted first (Karla and Owen), then the pre-vote advantage immunity (Cody), then the SITD (Sami, because it's before reading of the votes and before advantages/idols are played), and after that it's whoever gets up and plays their idols first. Say Jesse gets up first and saves himself and Gabler. Even though Karla might have had the intention to play her idol for Cassidy, she wasn't fast enough / hesitated too long and Jesse beat her to it, eliminating Cassidy. It would suck the first time especially for the person who is the most hesitant to play their idol as they may not know this would be the outcome. But afterwards, players would be more aware of this scenario and know how to take action. Then the next evolution from that would be a tied race to Jeff - what if the last two unimmune players get to Jeff around the same time? Then it may come down to a kind of talk, or maybe even a plea deal with Jeff, or their advantages/idols cannot be played because it results in a stalemate, so they keep their advantages/idols, but now everyone knows, and yet they are still vulnerable to be voted out. Anyway there's always a chance at the beginning for everyone to be immune at a TC - if everyone plays SITD and miraculously becomes immune.

[@drewlmao]

My gut tells me they would essentially restart tribal council. Whoever won the necklace gets to keep it, but the idols and advantages played no longer work. They technically negated the first round of votes, but they don't carry over to the revote. Unlike a normal revote, it doesn't matter who any of the previous votes were for, everyone just votes again as if the first vote never happened and the idols were simply thrown into the fire.

[@miker6402]

Can anyone tell me what this is or where I can find it? It looks like a new reality show, but the video doesn't explain how it is played. It only says how you can be safe. Kind of confusing though

[@Roachn8r]

@@miker6402 The show is Survivor. It’s a reality-competition show that has been on since 2000. The easiest way to watch is on Paramount+, which has all 46 seasons. My apologies for any confusion. I just assumed that anyone who clicked on the video was already somewhat familiar with the show.

[@miker6402]

@@Roachn8r 2000! I wasn't born until 2016. Mom and dad don't let me watch TV so maybe that explains why I haven't seen it. Can I watch it on KZbin because I sneak and watch my sisters ipad whenever nobody is around or they are busy, or if I give her $5 she lets me use it sometimes

[@gregorygorham9793]

Cheat.... he used his roll but had no control over what came up....

[@dashkataey1740]

I would have everyone immune. The next day Jeff comes down to camp to talk to everyone about what happened the night before and they’re trying to decide what to do. He plants the seed that the possibility of a double elimination is in consideration making the immunity challenge so much more important. Everyone is worried about the double elimination and make their plans and such. At tribal council, everyone does their vote and someone gets eliminated. After the elimination, Jeff tells everyone that the producers decided not to do a double elimination tonight and everyone is sent back to camp. Everyone sighs a breath of relief etc. Then when they do tribal council, everyone votes and the person who gets voted out has their flame extinguished but Jeff then says to them to have a seat with the jury cause someone else is getting voted off. Would flip the script in a lot of ways and might get the contestants lulled into a false sense of safety plus it would make for excellent tv.

[@gordonfitzgerald5935]

Best option: No one is immune, but the twist is the JURY votes a player to go home.

[@deleted-something]

Lmao

[@gcart8534]

Survivor is so dead