Oliver Cromwell is simply the human personification of the phrase: Either you die a hero or you live long to see yourself become a villain
@jozebutinar446 ай бұрын
He was a villain at the moment he rebel he was like a lucifer who wanted to be god but he was cut down to the pit
@TravisLoneWolfWalsh6 ай бұрын
He never was a hero
@moraesneto95086 ай бұрын
@@TravisLoneWolfWalsh There are two of us who believe in this then... But the fact is that he believed he was a hero, but his actions showed what he really was.
@uberfeel5 ай бұрын
He never was a hero at the beginning, he was nothing but a power hungry sociopath who destroyed english history and legacy.
@jodofe48794 ай бұрын
Except that Cromwell never was a hero. He suffered from severe depression in the late 1620's and early 1630's as a result of personal troubles and disputes and came out of it with a case of extremely radical Puritanism and a god complex. Cromwell believed he was chosen by divine providence to drag all of England along with him in his personal redemption arc. The guy was such a massive narcissist he makes Donald Trump look like a normal person.
@Sonny-m1f18 күн бұрын
Straight fire. Charles's part is sublime. "Know caitiff!!" In my son i live, the black prince called by soooome. Strawhead did this song perfect for me.
@ferretman67907 ай бұрын
Cromwell is the definition of: “you became the very thing you swore to destroy”
@ballgang3677 ай бұрын
"Have i ever told you the tragedy of Cromwell the Covetous?"
@chriswashingtonbeats7 ай бұрын
same as napoleon if i remember correctly?
@ferretman67907 ай бұрын
@@ballgang367 it’s a British legend
@jodofe48794 ай бұрын
Not from Cromwell's own perspective. Cromwell believed from the very beginning he was chosen by God to lead England and rid it of all sin (according to his own extremely radical Puritan interpretation of sin) and bring about the second coming of Jesus Christ. The guy was an extreme narcissist with a god complex. It was never about republicanism or anti-monarchism for him. Cromwell had nothing against the concept of a monarchy. Charles I just so happened to stand in the way of his divine mission. This is also why Cromwell kept dismissing parliaments and just ruled as a military dictator. He was never a genuine supporter of a parliamentary system, parliament just was a tool for him for seizing power that was discarded as soon as it had served its purpose and was no longer useful to his divine mission.
@SpindacreАй бұрын
He was always dreadful though tbf.
@AtlasGamingTX7 ай бұрын
As always, AMAZING!!
@jamesbhollingsworth54523 ай бұрын
The first verse seems to be sung in the person of Cromwell. The second, of Charles I. The third, the people of England, or Charles II speaking of himself.
@Sonny-m1f2 ай бұрын
Charles the third should have been Charles Edward Stuart aka Bonny Prince Charlie. 🦄⚔️🏴⚔️🦄
@mikeor-2 ай бұрын
@@Sonny-m1f We already have a real Charles III.
@borquespawpaw8674Ай бұрын
@@jamesbhollingsworth5452 I believe first verse is Charles II, second is Cromwell, and 3rd is the People of England.
@Longshanks16907 ай бұрын
Was Charles II really called the Black Prince during his exile? If so, that’s honestly a pretty clever throwback to the medieval Black Prince, evoking the idea of a true King deprived of his throne as the realm is left in anarchy instead. (Just with Charles being deprived by circumstances whereas the original died)
@Imperial_Britannia7 ай бұрын
It’s not very clear, but I’m pretty sure some called him it during the interregnum.
@AtlasGamingTX7 ай бұрын
Isn’t that just prince Zuko from ATLA?
@dmvs-bt1hk7 ай бұрын
It was because he had a Sicilian grandmother if recall and thus his skin was blacker than the norm, plus he was 6+ foot, when he escaped at Putney they put up posters for a "tall black boy".
@gustavusadolphus60977 ай бұрын
We wuz King Charles II and shieet @@dmvs-bt1hk
@jonathanoates12986 ай бұрын
When Titus Oates invented the Popish Plot in 1678 he claimed that the Catholic plotters referred to Charles II as being 'a black bastard' for it was claimed that his father was a black man, not Charles I. Nonsense, needless to say. In England in the 1650s the state put about propaganda that Charles II was utterly debauched; a myth scotched by Professor Ronald Hutton's excellent and far from uncritical, biography of Charles II.
@MrCreeperYT_Official5 ай бұрын
I hove hearing these historical songs from obscure eras (at least to me). I'm an American so I didn't learn about Cromwell or the Commonwealth in school. May history never be censored!
@Sonny-m1f2 ай бұрын
These songs opened up a whole new world of history an why are country is the way it is.
@Hedgehogz856Ай бұрын
I’m American and we’re being taught it in school right now
@HangrySaturn29 күн бұрын
I'm American and I was taught this in my history.
@Sonny-m1f23 күн бұрын
@@HangrySaturnI certainly wasn't in public school.
@HangrySaturn23 күн бұрын
@@Sonny-m1f Me neither. I was homeschooled.
@Dayborne3 ай бұрын
Never forget what they did to our King, may it never happen again.
@Sonny-m1f29 күн бұрын
Audentior Ibo! 👑 🦁⚔️🏴🏴⚔️🦄
@FranzJosephI.7 ай бұрын
Long live the King! May Cromwell and his traitors rest in Hell!
@bladez22076 ай бұрын
Cromwell was true of heart, fought and won against a corrupt king who sought to make himself above the law of the land. The world has the peasants from the Fens for democracy.
@mohi66997 ай бұрын
A chill ran down my spine at the black prince part.
@wor53lg504 ай бұрын
And why is that, care to explain?..
@TheofficialSirenheadr7 ай бұрын
God save the king
@Weezerand...7 ай бұрын
God didnt save charlie 1 from headlessnes or charlie 3 from cancer 💀
@TheofficialSirenheadr7 ай бұрын
@@Weezerand... good thing I said “King” not Charles😊👍
@oddish43526 ай бұрын
History is written by the victors... but sometimes victory takes the long way around. As happened here.
@jonathanoates12985 ай бұрын
History is written by anyone who cares to write it. Jacobite history is usually written by the losers.
@oliversherman24147 ай бұрын
God Save The King! 🇬🇧🏴🏴🏴
@chriswashingtonbeats6 ай бұрын
why? what makes him any different from you? If anything, you are probably far greater than some man who claims superiority based on divine right! wake up man!
@oliversherman24146 ай бұрын
@@chriswashingtonbeats American?
@chriswashingtonbeats6 ай бұрын
@@oliversherman2414 na just british youth lol
@oliversherman24146 ай бұрын
@@chriswashingtonbeats well then you should know that it's just an expression we use
@chriswashingtonbeats6 ай бұрын
@oliversherman2414 I know but I disagree with it bro. Isn't God save Britain, or God save the people better?
@geekmachine6665 ай бұрын
🫡may Charles I fare good in heaven
@shrekusmenelusgargamelus60007 ай бұрын
Movies names?
@Imperial_Britannia7 ай бұрын
Cromwell (1970) To Kill a King (2002) and majority of clips of Charles II are from two series, The First Churchills and New Worlds.
@ferretman67907 ай бұрын
@@Imperial_BritanniaThank you
@quasicroissant4 ай бұрын
In every description you keep saying that these songs are actually from the 17th century but I find that to be very doubtful. Do you have a source for that?
@Imperial_Britannia4 ай бұрын
Most of these songs are actually from the 17th century, if the song is an anachronism or has no clear date I’ll state it in the description. Here’s a link to the original ballad: ebba.english.ucsb.edu/printballad.php?i=BL_669f_14_022_2448x2448.jpg
@quasicroissant4 ай бұрын
@@Imperial_Britannia Asked and answered. Thank you, I appreciate it
@monsieurmarcusvipsaniusagrippa7 ай бұрын
can you do Tranent Muir?
@echobravo74997 ай бұрын
😭😭😭
@Royalnavycommunity1-67 ай бұрын
Pack all Truobles in Your Old Kit Bag. Make that song
@Imperial_Britannia7 ай бұрын
I already have, and that song is from 1916. Not WW2.
@Royalnavycommunity1-67 ай бұрын
Cool video but you need make more videos about ww2
@avus-kw2f2137 ай бұрын
WW2 Is overrated
@avus-kw2f2137 ай бұрын
9th
@AvaT427 ай бұрын
🇨🇦 I did not like this song, the tune of it was terrible. It was a macabre happening though so, I suppose it fit.
@oddish43524 ай бұрын
There was plenty more of the same when Charles II returned. While he gave a pardon to most who served Cromwell's government, those who had signed his father's death warrant were hunted down, and about half a dozen of them were executed in a particularly nasty way.
@antiepix95552 ай бұрын
I mean, it was meant to sound sad, mournful, with a tune that sounds off and abnormal to symbolize the insanity and irrationality the Calvaliers believed that the country plunged into.
@justsomepassionateguy2 ай бұрын
@@antiepix9555 Nothing super irrational. They supported the Royal Casque, which’d just been torn down in favor of some Parliament, it’d be natural to think that the entire country was going to fall apart, especially after so much dissolution and dissent. Forby, doesn’t matter what no Man thinks, as needless to say, Cromwell, a complicated man, was far from a good lad. No surprise there, every revolutionary in history can be considered cruel and evil. The Irish’d remember how he slaughtered Catholics without second thought, having heeded Protestant narratives. New Model Army? Sure. Heroic heroic? Not really. Christmas, Puritanism, Friend of the Poor v. Divine Right of Kings Highbrow. You get the point. Charles may have been delusional, but the same can be said for any man in history with too much premier power than he can properly handle with cogency and sanity.