The RTX 4060 is the strongest argument to buy AMD

[@WePromiseJetpacks]

You should order them by how much they cost that way its easier to compare performance and then leave them in that spot!

[@58rr]

This

[@philipboggs3372]

This is a great idea.

[@richmotz304]

100%, that would help drive home where a lower card could be punching above it's class and what not.

[@BreakingStubad]

This

[@WutrUduin]

I concur.

[@thecanuck11]

I ended up buying a 6750xt earlier this year when my 780 died. I never expected it to stack up this well against the new Nvidia releases though.

[@gokublack8342]

The last 6000 series amd GPUs (minus 6500) are really good value

[@thecanuck11]

Absolutely!

[@brandonzanzig3200]

I just bought an asrock phantom 6750xt a couple weeks ago for $340. Best purchase decision I've made in years. It runs everything in 1440p at well over 100 frames, most of the time capping my 120hz display. Overclocked it to 2850mhz core. It's a beast.

[@666haes]

i got 2 of them in crossfire an much more powereffient (all 6000series have crossfire it's build in)

[@volvoshh]

​@@666haesthere are no games that support Crossfire!

[@buckminst]

I bought an Arc A750 LE for $210 a month-ish ago, not for gaming but for general use and streaming to use the AV1 hardware encoding/decoding eventually. I give Intel credit where due, for a first _real_ attempt at a discrete GPU the hardware is pretty good, especially in RT. And the drivers have definitely improved. Having 3 contenders in this category is fantastic, we need more of it.

[@russbailey420]

100% agree! Constantly hearing of the improvements that each new driver is bringing in both gaming and multimedia applications! As Jay said in this video actually pretty excited to see what Intel brings to the table in the next generation.

[@MrRaphaelLippi]

Sucks the Intel Arc is not selling here in Brazil.

[@ritammukherjee8623]

@angleisthebest yeah but a750 is decent at gaming than a380 if you want someday.

[@VintageCR]

@NoodleAsian and yet... the pros of the A770 16GB variant compared to the 6700 XT: 6.45 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. 142 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. 4GB more VRAM. 1500MHz higher effective memory clock speed. 201.4 GTexels/s higher texture rate. 176GB/s more memory bandwidth. 64bit wider memory bus width (256bit). 4500million more transistors The 6700 XT pros compared to the A770 16GB: 221MHz faster GPU clock speed. 181MHz faster GPU turbo speed. Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) in the mean time intel is still cooking its driver to perfection. im assuming this is going to outperform the 6700 XT in the future.,

[@dolfandon]

As others have said, ordering them by price and having the position static would really be a great visual of how they stack up in a cost per performance way.

[@danieledwards2149]

I think it would be easier to track a specific card's performance if they stay in place throughout the tests. I bought a 6700xt a year ago and it has been great!

[@ravenwings7945]

I got this same card for 500$ from amd and its kicking ass. Gets hot I did redo the thermals and dropped its temp by 30°

[@eldorito777]

Oh nice, I'm looking at getting one myself, although I may wait to see what Intel's second generation looks like...

[@smiteshmohanty5573]

What cpu did you guys pair it with

[@extenos]

@@ravenwings7945$500? i thought it was closer to $300-400

[@foreverrockinout]

@@extenosnot a year ago. Now it is

[@monsG165]

AMD 6000 series is absolutely an amazing set of products now. The 6950XT if you can still get your hands on it is a card that will live another generation easily.

[@variety5061]

I bought the 6950XT despite every PC nerd in my life saying not to. I love it so much; it runs everything I play amazingly well, even undervolted.

[@thegreator]

Very weird now to buy high end gpu from other company to fight with low tier gpu from this company.

[@Stedera]

@@variety5061 amd is okay for sure if you don't have enough money to get some quality

[@eddwar8597]

Why not the 7000 series?

[@adamblyth9972]

​@ArtemasDz so this is the userbenchmark alt account I guess...

[@Flambaa]

I am watching this while on the toilet

[@rschana100]

TMI

[@royconestoga7326]

Same.

[@M9Vendetta]

Same!

[@BTacticsTV]

On the toilet then you need iFixIt!

[@Azhureus]

Same here, taking a big dump.

[@CampbellMC90]

I like the idea of leaving them all in the same spot, it would also allow for a simple animation showing the bars grow or shrink, a bit more fluid than just static images switching.

[@tj_2701]

Maybe use faint thin vertical lines matching the end if the bars so it's easier to tell which bars are longer.

[@perjohanaxell9862]

You could also keep a shadow of the score from the previous screen to make it really clear.

[@quwarq]

And/or a tiny green/red shade filling up / draining in the bars when they are gaining/losing percentage compared to the others, to show the change compared to the previous page.

[@misatzu]

@@tj_2701 If you can't tell the difference by just looking at the bars and need visual aides to figure out the difference, then that means they're basically equivalent - or, as Steve likes to call it at any possible occasion, "functionally identical".

[@tj_2701]

@@misatzu my aim was more about making it easier to tell at a glance, because Jay usually includes the actual numbers too so if you pause the video you can compare and read the actual difference. But you're right about if the bars are close to the same length there isn't any real difference.

[@terryadams7778]

I like the idea of keeping the cards in the same spot on the charts. For me, it would make the chart progression much easier to follow as a viewer. Great review as always Jay. Appreciate your frank and real world views on things like this. Respect.

[@PWNHUB]

7:32 no one ever gets mad because AMD has been in every major console for year upon years, which means the games run better on a larger portion of hardware. Nvidia dominates PC gaming, but that isn't but a small fraction of year to year game console sales.

[@bjgaspar]

I like the idea of ordering by price and keeping that static

[@Jayztwocents]

Good idea... I had initially thought about ordering by naming to keep it simple but order by price is a great idea.

[@jhonedoe3734]

​@@Jayztwocentsgreat idea, by real actual amazon/new egg price

[@Narq_gg]

that's what i was just thinking

[@crazylocha2515]

​@@Jayztwocents Despite any post launch re-pricing shenanigans, the more I think about it, the more I like the (launch) static price stack. It just makes sense.

[@TeodorSpiridon]

@@jhonedoe3734 I think you might have stumbled onto a genius idea for a product. If you had a system that could scrape a few big retailers daily and use the mode price as the indicative price when looking up comparative performance/dollar charts dynamically, it would cut through a lot of the noise.

[@KK-ef1ow]

I vote for keeping the cards in the same slots and letting the data ranges vary Edit: The problem with graphing by price is that prices fluctuate, which may invalidate the ranking of them in the first place.

[@FlippyGuitar]

same here

[@09Creeperboy]

Same here.

[@fridaycaliforniaa236]

+1

[@Ineluki_Myonrashi]

Same here.

[@CarlosRivera-jv8xd]

Same here.

[@KEVLAR-db3ke]

Thank you for putting the older 20 series on the graphs. Considering a lot of people have 20 or older series cards it really does show how much performance you gain with an upgrade. Also selling ones older card really needs to be put into perspective for some people, though im not sure how you could show that as a tuber. I sold my 2070 to buy a 4070 and that combined with the performance gain really did make the price worth spending. I do love seeing the intel cards work their way back onto everyone's charts.

[@Harzexe]

I own 2070 Super and it's awesome card for 1080p gaming. With RT disabled almost all modern games run well above 60 or even 100 fps and some games still run above 60 fps with RT Low. If you are planning to stay at 1080p for a year or two more, there is no need to upgrade the gpu yet. At least if you own 2070 or 2080 but 2060 still should be enough for 60 fps non RT gaming.

[@KEVLAR-db3ke]

@@Harzexe it was a great card but I have become an RT fanboy... It really is amazing and I won't ever go back lol it's just a better experience for me.

[@yukeyyashiro4806]

I like the idea of the names for the gpus staying static and the graphs moving, that way if we are just looking at maybe set cards in the list we can know where they land in each test might be a bit easier for a viewer but if not you can always change up the style at a later date. After all never hurts to try something new

[@Secret_Takodachi]

I live 30 minutes from the Microcenter near Boston. I understand why you don't include their prices, they're a goddamn angel of a store. Because they force you to come into a physical location to get their deals, they eliminate bot scalpers and enforce customer purchase limits to eliminate human scalpers from exploiting their deals. God Bless MicroCenter. You truly live within a more evolved community if you live within driving distance of one.

[@andon9561]

Love the video! I vote for leaving the cards in a set order, easier to quickly decipher where a card stands with each new benchmark

[@jasonjazzz5]

cards staying in the same spot by price sounds like a really good idea. worth trying it once at least and pointing it out as you get to the charts just to make sure people know

[@iamme659]

I bought a 6700xt back during holiday sales and it's really a very solid card for the price, especially at current pricing. It lacks in RT compared to it's Nvidia counterparts but it is great at rasterization. I would recommend at the mid level 10 times out of 10.

[@shryko]

I have debated getting a newer low end card, and part of me regrets buying low end (when I purchased a card last year)...

[@brandonzanzig3200]

Picked up a 6750xt for $340 a couple weeks ago. I would also reccommend this card to anyone looking for a cheap upgrade without building a new rig. This thing holds 2850mhz core and 3010mhz memory. It's an absolute beast.

[@CleonofAthens]

Its ray tracing is becoming better than the 3070 in newer titles because the 3070 8gb ran out of vram lol. But honestly whats good 4gb going to do anyways?

[@ge69rh]

Great review, I knew a year ago when everybody was going nuts about the 6800xt, that the 6700xt was going to be a standout. Also I would say keep the cards in the same spot in order of price.

[@Toxofox]

Hilarious! Earlier this year, I wanted to upgrade my 2060Super. The 4000 series seemed too expensive and too bulky for both my budget and my PC case! Ended up splashing on a 6700XT. Fiddly to get it to perform as intended with Adrenaline, but once you find the sweet spot, what a little beast this GPU is! Glad I took the correct decision back in March!

[@bigfatpanda99]

This market for $300 cards is really interesting. I’m glad AMD is bringing cards out there with good performance for reasonable prices. I’ve been recommending my friends these AMD 6 series cards because of how good they are. They feel like the 10 series NVidia cards with good performance for reasonable price that will last a long time. I went from Vega 64-> 6900xt this holiday season cause the value ~$600 seemed good for me over 6950xt or 7xxx cards. Unless someone wants high end 4k performance there’s really no reason to buy NVidia

[@introduxium]

Just got the RX-7600 from XFX, overclocked version. My old 1080 ti was on the brink of dying (couldnt update drivers, crashes from time to time), and as i dont play that much anymore i went with the RX-7600. Very happy with the performance so far, gained a few fps in the games i play and a bit better performance in 3DMark. And for the price, it was totaly worth it.

[@Cooe.]

The RX 7600's a totally solid card and the 6nm (that part's SUPER important w/ how bonkers expensive TSMC 4/5nm is) Navi 33 die is fucking CHEEEEEAP to manufacture! After all of the old Navi 23 (RX 6600/6600 XT/6650XT) stock still sitting on shelves sells through I fully expect it to slowly drift down towards around $200 to become that proper Polaris replacement the market has been DESPERATELY waiting for. (The exact same way that Navi 31 stock has slowly moved towards ≈$900/$750 for the RX 7900 XTX/XT as old Navi 21 stock finally sells out.)

[@introduxium]

@@Cooe. I live in Sweden so the prices for the cards you write about in dollar costs 30-50% more for us. Its expensive like hell to buy hardware in Sweden atm sadly. I paid $349 for my RX-7600, thats like $100 more then prices at Newegg. 6600 and up are also more expensive here then in USA/Canada.

[@joshuaslack4520]

Sorry people tend to shoot the messenger, Nvidia really is putting a target on any content creator that talks about them for better or worse. Thanks for keeping us informed!

[@Eric_Von_Yesselstyn]

I never had any hopes for the 4060. With that said I will NOT buy a GPU from AMD, it's been since 2013 since they had a real competitor to Nvidia.

[@_jn0298]

Trying to convince a nvidia user to buy other cards is like convincing a apple user to buy an android

[@nathanav1634]

Thing is, 1080p isn't some static res, 20 years ago 800x600 was the norm, for many years it became 1024x768... Resolutions increase over time as panels improve. 1080p was the norm for much of the 2010s, I'd argue 1440p will become the standard for the mid/late 2020s, GPU manufacturers need to switch from 1080p (mid) vs 1440p (upper) to 1440p (mid) vs 4k (upper). The failure to recognise this by making the 60 series 12gb VRAM as standard is a woeful design misstep. For the sake of £20 of additional VRAM, they've destroyed a product line IMO.

[@mikew8214]

I prefer ordered fastest to slowest on charts. I switched to AMD a year ago. I was worried about AMD drivers and its UI. I was pleasantly surprised that it was actually better!

[@jasonpozo9395]

I'm sure a lot of Old AMD users were affraid because AMD's Catalyst software was horrible to use. I did the switch to AMD two Gens ago and I am quite impressed, the software is really good. Drivers still need a bit more polishing but are pretty good, amongst some friends we Joke about the 22.05.1 driver version if something goes wrong lol

[@mjkittredge]

drivers have worked flawlessly for me. And the Adrenalin software is a great utility

[@1vaultdweller]

@@jasonpozo9395 AMD had issues with its drivers for years. They mostly fixed those with Adrenalin software and the RX 7000 series

[@JestaX_52]

Just picked myself up a 6700xt for my first build so these charts really cement that I picked a solid card 👍

[@2528drevas]

I now have a 6700XT in my Home Theater PC and on my Samsung Q80 at 120Hz it games very nicely at medium to high settings. I have a 6900XT in my gaming PC, but I got it new for a really good price. The 6700 XT is solid. You made a good choice.

[@LudwigHorsecock]

The amd non-aib model had terrible thermals. Any issues on yours? What model?

[@mjkittredge]

@@LudwigHorsecock my sapphire nitro 6700xt runs cool and quiet, no issues

[@OptimousePrime]

Dont blame you Jay the way the GPU Market is currently :( but appreciate the review!

[@drunkhusband6257]

What do you mean the way it is currently? It's the same as it was 5 years ago

[@nadienadie9256]

@@drunkhusband6257 anger towards gpu companies has indubitably gone waaaay up since the start of the pandemic, especially seeing the idiotic shit nvidia has pulled.

[@drunkhusband6257]

@@nadienadie9256 lol nvidia hasn't done anything, the prices are because of retailers. You people need a course on basic economics and leveled inflation.

[@xthelord1668]

@@drunkhusband6257 retailers you say? explain me then NVIDIA's bogus MSRP's of this generation and what they promise for said MSRP's retail is on a downfall in terms of pricing so ask NVIDIA when will they snap back into reality and normalize their cards pricing and set aside DLSS,RT and frame gen because they are features they are not mandatory piece of hardware like VRAM for example

[@drunkhusband6257]

@@xthelord1668 I bet you love little boys too don't you?

[@mattf9096]

I feel like if you're gonna keep the cards in the same order for the charts you should have a number ranking next to each name as a quick reference. The best performer often stands out on the chart but the middle ones can get muddy depending how close they are.

[@greengenesis]

The efficiency is one of the few reasons for a 4060 BUT unfortunately it is NOT as efficient as advertised on paper... they removed the shunts from the pcb so the actual power draw can't be controlled exactly. RESULT actual power draw is more like 130 than 115. SECONDLY, idle power draw as of right now is 50 watts. Yup you read that right for some reason it is not clocking/volting down properly and draws a whopping 50 watt in IDLE....

[@mike_nelson]

Paused the video to say this: Jay you look stressed man, I hope you are taking care of yourself. I don't know what issues are happening behind the scenes or what algorithm results or watch through rates are, but remember this: You got here through talent (as I'm sure you know but just putting it out there). On the video, great content bro.

[@markwoodsher6469]

Love that you included the 2060 Super. Bought mine 2 years ago and it's still going strong! I'm not wedded to Nvidia either, so your honest reviews are really helpful. Oh and keep the charts as they are, best to see the performance data in descending order. Thanks Jay!

[@MimmyJorgan17]

I bought my 2060 Super about that long ago as well for some VR and concur it's still a viable card. Recently picked up a 2080ti for ~$300 and it's also been amazing, esp with the extra RAM and larger bit bus. I'd rather pay a fellow gamer for a card than NGreedia.

[@MimmyJorgan17]

@@burrfoottopknot I feel ya. I had a 960 before I got the 2060 super. Paid pandemic pricing for a used one ($400) but almost 3 years and still amazing. Shows how far NGreedia has fallen when a 60s card from 2019 has 8gb and 256 bit bus compared to a 4060 with the same ram and 128....

[@MimmyJorgan17]

@@burrfoottopknot also, 3gb is tough to rough out for an extended period of time. Are you happy with your purchase?

[@Generationalwealth94]

​@@MimmyJorgan17I mean people are still playing games with the 750ti, I think my 4GB 1650 Super is going to last me a hell of a long time if I can't afford to upgrade it 🤣🤣

[@Jay_the_Caffeinator]

I agree with some others here. ❤ Keep the cards in price point and just move the charts around. Hopefully it won't be harder to do.

[@rickh8380]

I bought the Arc A770 16gb LE card a few months back. It's more than enough for my needs. When the drivers are updated, it's like getting a slightly newer card with more performance.

[@sakumisan]

Imagine buying a piece of hardware they don't have have fully implemented and hoping it gets better

[@xjax8519]

GoW5 and "old" games dont work (((

[@s0mveraa]

@@sakumisan Imagine being one of those people who comments with the word Imagine first.

[@k.a.stensson]

@@xjax8519 Yeah.. that's a BIG downside and dealbreaker

[@R1Spam]

I don't think I've ever commented on this channel, but I just wanted to say thank you for recommending the RX 6700xt. I nearly bought a 3060ti (cos Nvidia) and this video stopped me from doing it.

[@FBHSswimmer2006]

I like the idea of the cards staying where they are instead of being reordered all the time. It will make it easier to read and keep track of where they fall with the different games.

[@luigiistcrazy]

I'm really happy to see that Intel is slowly catching up. If it continues like this, it might not take long and I'll get an Intel GPU (if the price/performance is right)

[@prelude2disaster]

Considering it's them dipping their toes in, they've done really well with driver updates to make the cards more competitive. I'm interested to see what they do in the future too

[@JakeJupiter]

Agreed. It'll be interesting to see how far along their gpu's come with each new gen.

[@JayeEntityConcord]

Personally I like the charts structured as they are currently. To help with readjusting to where the card now lays within the charts, you could colour code them so nVidia would be Green, AMD would be Red and Intel would be Blue. That way you can easily narrow down your search a whole lot quicker. Keep up the great vids by the way :)

[@bubba966]

Why saying that the A770 is over $700 when you're looking at 3070 prices (which are over $700 in that part of the vid)?

[@olivemartini0011]

Thanks for factoring in today's pricing, Jay! It's sometimes hard to follow these as far as "which one should we actually buy?" So that's helpful!

[@GaltJohn2008]

I bought a 6700 XT 3 months ago off Facebook marketplace for $220. I'm very happy with the purchase. This video just makes me even happier with the choice I made.

[@arrowverde1173]

Probably I prefer stationary card positions and changing graphs. Also, thank you for validating my choice on the 6700xt I bought last month lol.

[@brandonroeder2461]

I bought one of those too, and have no regrets.

[@no1baggiefan]

Bought mine last November and I'm still laughing

[@Gortok1]

@@no1baggiefan same

[@midoribushi5331]

I bought my 6700xt last year and am loving this card!

[@Vathrex]

I was torn between a 3080 and a 6800 XT. Everyone said to go for the 3080, but the 6800 XT was cheaper and had 6 more gigs of VRAM, so I went with that. This card runs my games at 4k max settings flawlessly. I sometimes use more than 12 gigs of Vram, so a 3080 wouldn't have worked for me. Not even the very expensive 12-gig variant would have worked. I do not regret my decision at all

[@OperatorPuski]

6700xt up to 6950xt can be solid performers for another few years imo depending on what you need them to do.

[@death3443]

I like playing, ETS 2, BeamNG, and flight Sim. RTX40XX really makes me not want to upgrade my 1080 and 4790k. Could you recommend the 6700xt for that on 1440P?

[@gokublack8342]

@death3443 Idk about 6700xt but the 6950XT is only slightly under the 3090 Ti Edit: Mainly because Nvidias DLSS and RT are more efficient than AMDs.

[@death3443]

@@gokublack8342 cheers mate

[@tylerdurden783]

2:46 These are prices for the 3070, not the A770.

[@danilolima8898]

Going for a RTX 4060 today. Reasons: prince difference in my currency is much greater, my current 500W PSU wouldn't allow me to put any other option without fearing it would fail and my energy bill will be considerably lighter on my pocket.

[@madtrainman1]

Thanks for the content as always Jay. I've just upgraded from a 1060 6GB to a 6950XT, and built a new PC after waiting ages for prices to come down. Generational changes aside, the xx60 class of card really isn't what it used to be in my opinion. A 128-bit bus says it all and it's such a shame as for a long time I was intending to upgrade to a newer xx60 GPU.

[@droopysloopy]

Personally i like to have the cards always in the same place, i think that is easier to compare. Also the A750 is starting to look good price/performance wise. Maybe battlemage will be my next gpu.

[@RAZGR1Z]

Thanks for the video Jay. I think it could be helpful to put the details of the settings somewhere on the chart slides. Like the frame gen and DLSS stuff so you don't have to spend time clarifying those points and also so if people share screenshots of those charts there's more context for people.

[@sammiller6631]

@RAZGR1Z Fake frames and DLSS stuff is worthless if it's only implemented in a handful of AAA games with multimillion budgets.

[@yeettmaples5064]

​@@sammiller6631normal dlss 2/upscaling is in most games even from indie studios although dlss 3 isn't amazing right now its a good idea but it is only in about 20 games (all triple a and mostly sponsored by Nvidia) definitely shouldn't be the thing Nvidia relies on though, also below 60fps base frame gen causes significant imput latency although over 60fps base you are getting less latency then you get with fg+reflex off (about 30-40ms for me compared to about 20ms without fg) overall though cool concept but it needs work (which may require newer hardware 5th gen tensor, second gen optical flow cores ect) and developers need to embrace it which is happening albiet very slowly

[@artisan002]

Re: The option of reordering the cards or keep them in their positions, I imagine it would be handy to either keep them fixed or settle on an easy way to highlight the card we should be focusing on. Resorting to transitional animations would also help with either case, so as to keep our attention where it belongs. Seeing the performance go up and down while the card stays put is one way. Or, flip to the new graphic, have everything sorted hierarchically, but have the subject card conspicuously slide up or down the stack to it's ranking for that particular benchmark.

[@HappyDude1]

Yes keep the card titles in the same place for the chart

[@jamminwithmatt5313]

I was hoping while watching you would say the 6700xt because it is the best bang for buck by FAR atm. I bought the 6750XT only because it was £20 more on sale than the 6700xt. I can tell you it's a great card and is sooooo good at 1440p. I'm about to get the 5800x3d to go with it as it's down to £269.99 in the UK.

[@byronservies4043]

I'm already happy your limit the number of cards in the charts so it is actually possible to read the labels, and I think leaving the cards in the same place would be helpful. Certainly worth a try.

[@herbertbarron4068]

Jay and crew, love the videos. Keep up the great work.

[@pilgrim33]

Do you have any advice, please? What card do you recommend to replace a GTX 1080 Ti? Up to US$1K.

[@TonyChan-eh3nz]

7900xtx, from sapphire, then powercolor and xfx

[@AAbattery444]

Honestly, I'm still sitting on my 2080 ti that I got at the beginning of the pandemic right before the GPU Market went to shit in 2019. Back then, Jay, you told me that I shouldn't replace my 2080 ti for a 3070 and you were absolutely right about it. Honestly, this card still holds up just fine for all my 1440p gaming needs. I honestly have to thank Nvidia because I have zero incentive to switch cards and this is the perfect card for my needs right now. I would have liked to buy a 3080 or a 3080 ti but they were unavailable. I would have liked to buy a 4080 or a 4090 if the pricing made sense but it doesn't. So thank you Nvidia for giving me a reason to not buy any of your graphics cards because the ones that you sold four years ago are more valuable than the ones you are selling now. I'll update my rig to a 50 or 60 series when the pricing makes sense and when I get actual value from the product that I'm getting. Meanwhile, Nvidia, I also have to thank you for giving AMD time to catch up and improve their cards' Ray tracing performance. Because once their ray-tracing performance improves on AMD cards, I have no reason to buy another Nvidia card again and I'll be jumping ship.

[@marcinkarpiuk7797]

Check 7900xtx vs 4080 raytracing on newest drivers, i was suprised how good it works

[@Steven-ex3ne]

Definitely like the idea of cost per frame charts like other sites do. It brings the point of testing into a concise chart.

[@TheRealDlo]

We appreciate the hard work Jay

[@jamie1224]

I swear the second these videos come out, the prices go up everywhere I go to buy.

[@neyouno]

i really wonder why the rx 6700 is not covered in any of these comparisons. It has 10 GBs is faster than the 6650 XT by a considerabe amount and trades blows and in a lot of spots surpasses the 7600. And price wise it's really really good

[@stevenanderson3205]

I just bought a RTX PNY XLR8 3 fans RGB 4060 and i love it never gets hotter than 60c and for some reason the image on youtube looks much better than my AMD cards i have a 5700xt a 6600 a 6600xt and 2 6700xt and for some reason 6700xt's are not working very frustrating.

[@TonyChan-eh3nz]

Did you try a fresh install of windows with DDU?

[@stevenanderson3205]

@@TonyChan-eh3nz Yes i did.

[@stevenanderson3205]

I just bought a new graphics card but thanks for the advice.A RTX 4060 amazing card and i have AV1 now.

[@cr1spy_sea_m4n]

Funny. I had to buy new PC parts 2 days ago and wanted something compareable to my main PC (rtx3070, R5 5600x). I decided against Nvidia because of the crazy pricing and low memory and got a rx 6700xt instead.

[@poog6256]

I literally did the same thing as you lol. I’m building a PC in a dead Xbox 360 and needed a small card and landed on a 6700xt, wanted it similar to my main as well.

[@cr1spy_sea_m4n]

@@poog6256 That sounds like a cool project. Do you have to go ITX to make it fit, or is mATX small enough?

[@ComputerProfessor]

What a joke. Keep holding out and make them drop their prices. 8gb of VRAM/bus and performance isn't enough for this price! Prices should be the following: RTX 4060 TI 16gb $250 RTX 4060 TI $199 RTX 4060 8gb $150 RX-7600 $140-$145

[@Leonard_Lewis]

It would be really interesting to see the variation of the DCP Latency on the GPUs.

[@Zinkhal1]

23:15 well both is kinda weird tbh ... new irganized is just like "where the hell is card x now?" if you want to see a specific card but seeing the performance difference i think the "sorted" one are better but yeah there is "too much" to sort it for ... i personal would even be interested in stuff like "watt" same with heat could be interessting ... but overall i would say just give it a try and wait for the feedback .. for me its hard to tell if i even would prefer one kind of order in that case

[@SideswipePrime606]

So, I bought a 1050 ti at launch (I was building my PC at the time, so it came out at the right time). It did me perfectly fine since I owned it. Ran anything I threw at it and could usually hold 60 fps. However, I ran into really bad frame drops while playing Sonic Frontiers, and it hit me that I would also get really low framerates in FF16 when that comes out. So, I felt now was the time to upgrade. It was a tough pick, as the 4060, 3060 12 GB, and the 6700 XT are all roughly the same price. I ended up going with a 6750 XT, since after the rebate it'd cost me the same amount as the 3060, or even some 6700 XTs. I'm glad GPU Prices have dropped since 2020. It really doesn't seem like there's a better price-per-performance than the 6750 XT for the mid-range right now. Sure it's a last-gen card, but I don't think the current-gen performance uplift is worth the price. I'll just need to upgrade my 6700k at some point, as that's gonna be a bottleneck now.

[@the_hamrat]

I'd be very interested in seeing how this stacks up to the venerable 1080ti

[@phiphedude7684]

1080ti is only slightly slower than 6600xt so use that as a reference

[@Sergmanny46]

If you have an 1080ti card don't bother buying another. Unless it's starting to die/outdated drivers/crashing. The xx80 ti series until the xx90 series came out were the strongest cards you could buy and won't flop out regardless of upscaling/cache/ shenanigans simply because they have a lot of hardware to do about any task you ask them to do. Which is why even though it is almost a 7 year old card by now, it still stays at the top 50 fastest cards in the world. xx80 ti performance stays the same in 90% of cases, which is what gamers really care about anyways. No one cares about ray tracing, Ngreedia. If you were to buy previous gen 80ti, aka the 3080ti, it's going to cost you 1250$, which I wouldn't ever recommend even if Ngreedia was pointing a gun at my head. 4080ti isn't even available yet, but I don't expect it's price any lower than 1500$ (and that's being optimist), which is fun because you might as well buy the 4090 for 1600$ at that point. Buy the 4060 Ti at 400$. You are definitely getting a faster card than the 1080ti, but then we would be ignoring this video's advice for price/performance. TL;DR Price/performance wise, 6700XT at 320$ or the 6750XT at 360$ is the way to go. Cheaper, more vram, performance stays consistent. But Intel's A750 at 240$ or A770 at 380$ should be considered too.

[@Maradiaga23]

I like the cards being reordered based on results for each chart. What I've seen others do to help with readability is to highlight the card being reviewed and any other card being talked about in the script

[@kay8d]

Thanks for making me feel even better about my decision. I bought an RX 6700XT last month

[@patrickmcphee8113]

In the video I think it's much easier to see comparisons if they are static. Have to pause to locate everything I'm interested in if they move around.

[@chrisgunther109]

Color the names to the left with their company colors. (AMD red, Nvidia green and Intel blue.) It will make it easier to see which card is moving where at a glance.

[@Xenoray1]

damn how the 60 series has fallen, i cant imagine the pain for people buying them back then and waited so long for a new revision of the card.. gg amd i guess

[@Starfals]

Meh, this is probably the last nail in the 40 series coffin.

[@FunktasticLucky]

​@@Starfalsdoubt it lol. Nvidia is killin it on these cards.

[@Nite-Lite-Gamers]

Ive always wondered why people say that, at the end of the day, they bought them at their price and enjoyed months with the cards. If we keep waiting you end up never buying, there always going to be something around the corner should it be a price drop or the next gen card. My friend has an RX480 and has always been waiting. At the end of the day, some people use the waiting as an excuse not to buy until it just dies.

[@Starfals]

@@FunktasticLucky Not here, 0 sold and they are stockpiled until the roof. Every 40 series card is barely selling. I guess it depends on the country but still. 30 series are really hot right now. Many cards are sold on a daily basis, same for AMD cards.

[@FunktasticLucky]

@@Starfals yeah I was in microcenter and they had a lot of 4070s and a couple 4080s. The 4080 founders wasn't selling at the best buy but I mean who is gonna pay 1200+ when you could just get a 4090 for several hundred more? That's how I ended up with my 4090 founders.

[@kaaz9581]

The crappy AMD software is the strongest argument to buy Nvidia

[@dkthomas77]

How much is the 3060TI? Being a bit faster than 6700xt It would be placed second in almost all the tests..

[@bradbrowatzke7236]

Maintaining the position of each card is definitely easier to reference and absorb than their standings in each category. A secondary criteria for the initial sort in each video could be implemented and caviated at the beginning to the video or marked at the top of the chart. Chasing a particular card up and down the charts wastes focus as well.

[@luckyrichardson1677]

I think it makes sense to order them by generation / by name / release date, possibly add their *at time of recording* cost as small print under the name. That way you have the relevant information, the order won't change between stats/tests and can help eliminate any pausing on our side - the viewers side. Not sure if pauses affect the algorithm or not.

[@Roman-wv4rd]

2:48 I didn’t get it u were talking about Intel arc 770 but showing RTX 3070 … what’s going on there confusing

[@DraconianEssence]

Man I'm glad I went with the 7900XT. Came from the GTX 1080 (8 Gig card), and boy the HUGE night and day difference is amazing! Was pretty disappointed with the 40X series Nvidea cards. Was originally was going to grab the 4080 (16 gig card) but after everything that came out, I decided to get the 7900XT. Glad I did!

[@kentsnyder8664]

Since you asked, going ph to graph, keeping the cards in the same order, and then seeing the graph lines change makes more sense to me.

[@aleksandarvuchkov9154]

My preference - want to see the top performer on top. Have no issues going through such list. If you have 20 cards on the chart than it makes sense to leave the positions fixed

[@SergioDaSilva777]

Leaving the order in the same spot is easier to follow. Otherwise, you can colour code by brand colour for a faster pickout when watching at normal speed.

[@YetMoreCupsOfTea]

The thing to remember with going team red too is that if you have a Ryzen CPU, you can leverage SAM for a bit of extra oomph.

[@mbrj3idi830]

Not necessary amd cpu, you can use resizable bar feature with intel cpu (10th gen and newer). I have inte cpu and amd gpu and it does give a boost in most games, but some games don't like it and you get some stutter, good thing that Adrenaline gives the choice to disable it, not necessary from bios.

[@Clint_the_Audio-Photo_Guy]

I have the 6750 XT, and play everything on Ultra at 1440p, and it's smoother than a baby's butt. I'm not sure what I'm missing with all these high-end cards. The only game that stresses my PC out any, is Cyberpunk, and that's mostly just noticeable with the heat coming out of my CPU cooler. The graphics are still great.

[@Themisterdee]

Not overly bothered about what goes where tbh. Its the scaling that breaks relevancy . filling a screen for sub 50 fps is the problem. if you should go the static route then vertical bars would be easier to follow.

[@johnbernhardtsen3008]

I got the A750 gpu, installed it earlier today on my B550 Aorus Elite mobo and R7 5700x with 32gb 3600mhz ram!its almost melting the gpu somehow even with an 850w psu!getting a RX6600 tomorrow to have my best gaming set up ever! I had hoped that the A750 would work nice with the R7 5700x cpu on Premiere Pro, sadly the 5700x got no igpu to enable the gpu to render at all!

[@rodmorgan7041]

I noticed people suggesting to put them in order of price, but that doesn't work in all countries. Unfortunately 😕

[@Blue967]

2:48 i own a Gainward Pheonix 3070 Nvidia Graphics card. Bought it with 610 $ price comparision because currency conversion between countries. My first 8GB Gpu. That is my biggest regret not spending a little more for 6800 from Amd. Either way wasting an entire month salary on that freaking card.

[@cosineaudio]

Prices have definitely come down a bit, but still astronomical here in the UK. I have been planning the past few weeks and had my sights set on a 6700/50XT, so I enjoyed the video, confirming the conclusions I’d made. But since the more rapid drop, prices have already gone back up a bit again- Between £350-410 for a 6700XT. What confuses things more is that I have seen 4060TIs going for as low as £360-380. They never make it easy 😃

[@matthewschultz7745]

I would agree the cards should stay the same with the bars moving. Makes it easier to see at quick glance.

[@D3ntNL]

SInce you ask for feedback on the ordering. Order it from top to bottom. just highlight the cards you are reviewing in a different colour. That way the position does change (which is indeed annoying) just it makes it a lot easier identifiable.

[@couriersix2443]

I got a 3060ti a year ago for well under MSRP, and sure it's an 8GB card but the 3 total (unoptimized af) games that seem to be a problem for 8GB cards aren't games I play lol. Also a 256-bit memory bus really does wonders 😉 but just off the top of my head, I play Cyberpunk frequently at 1080p/high native res or 1440p/high using DLSS Quality (1080p is for when I'm mirroring to my bedroom TV when my wife wants to watch me play) and it rarely uses above 4.5-5GB of VRAM. FPS is in the ballpark of 70-144 (monitor refresh rate cap) depending on how intensive things are. Running a R5 5600 @ 4.6Ghz all-core via PBO OC + 32GB 3200Mhz RAM

[@Rejectile]

In the video you showed a bunch of 3070's when talking about the A770 being over 700 dollars, don't know if it was an error or just a mix-up. At least here in Europe you can buy an Intel A770 for 370-400euros and they are readily available.

[@BMurray999]

I preffer if you leave them in one spot cauee i always gotta pause to check what card is were everytime a new graph pops up. In my opinion i would label them as highest card of the same brand to lowest. So like 4090. 4080. 4070 an so on an then amd 6900. 6800, 6700 an then leave them in place so its super easy to read

[@supfpv]

stack them in order of price so a gpu can move position only if a change in price has influenced it. then people can look at the gpu within their budget and look at performance to make a purchase choice

[@alexthethu]

It’d definitely be more effort, but a quick animation showing the cards move position from the last position they were in while ordering by performance could highlight the shifts in performance the cards see across different benchmarks.

[@isaiahfurrow7414]

How does the 6750 XT card compare to the 6700 XT ? A couple recent videos have confirmed my thinking and we are definitely looking at the 6700 xt and 6750 xt now for our first GPU.... we have 2 Ryzen 5000 series CPUs with integrated graphics running right now and are finally ready for a GPU...

[@michaelcittadino4157]

Jay, watched this video today. Nice performance comparisons, however I am curious where you got your pricing from. I looked on both Amazon and Newegg and, on both retailers, the 6700XT was about $350 to $400+ with most in the 400+ range.

[@118Shadow118]

For the charts, maybe color code them? Like red for AMD, green for Nvidia and blue for Intel (and 1080p/1440p/4k could just be lighter or darker). That way it would be easier to tell them apart at a glance

[@alasyth]

I would prefer to have the chart layouts stay static and not reorder per test. Some sort of at a glance highlight of colour for AMD/NVIDIA/Intel could be useful too.

[@Fatal_Inertia]

I bought my 4060 at $285 USD from Newegg, and at that price it was considerably cheaper than the 7600 XT and performed better than the base 7600 in titles that I play for not much more. Was a no brainer for me at the time. I wouldn't buy the 4060 at anything more than $300 though. The 3 fan 4060 cards aren't really worth the extra money because my 4060 2x never runs hotter than 65C. With the Geforce automatic tuning it runs at 5895Mhz and did quite well in the user benchmark test, and in MSFS paired with a 5700X3D I was getting around 85FPS on high settings.

[@creedus4909]

I think a graphic or animation to show the differences would be very helpful as there's no visual indicator to follow for each graphics card etc.