The Salafi Fallacy - Abdal Hakim Murad

[@MarufSajjad]

By the grace of Allah, I have passed this phase. I was such an arrogant, Allah saved me. May Allah increase our ilm. May Allah guide us all to the siratul mustakim. Ameen

[@ayojanul]

Same feeling tho

[@taufeeqshakur9262]

Maruf Sajjad alhamdulillah..Allah saved me too..

[@optimystic5839]

Maruf Sajjad I can say the same for myself. It is sad because many of my friends are in this mindset and they just don't want to reason. I hope Allah guides us all.

[@لاإلهإلااللهومحمدعبدهورسول-ت6ط]

Maruf Sajjad Which phase are you referring to? What did Allah save you from exactly? Ameen, May Allah increase us in beneficial knowledge and aide us in acting upon that knowledge. May Allah give us hearts that have taqwah for Him, Ameen.

[@catotheelder9524]

What were you saved from??

[@a-rmohamed1167]

The difference between the salafi and the rest of the world is aqeedah.,with the majority of the world following Ashari/Maturidi/Tahawi.What I find amazing is that salafis declare kufr on those following Ashari/Maturidi aqeedah but use the books of Imam Nawawi.,Imam Qurubi,Ibn Hajar Asqalani,and other scholars who were all Ashari in their aqeedah.

[@sanaullasharief5319]

+A-R Mohamed -----------------There are two stages in the scholarly development of Abul Hasan Ashari, early and late.

[@a-rmohamed1167]

+sanaulla sharief It is public knowledge he was first of the mutazilite ,then formulated the aqeedah of ahlus sunnah and as Sheikh Yusuf Qardawi said "The world is Ashari".We are forbidden to declare kufr on another group unless it violates a basic belief of Islam.(eg another prophet after ours)The salafis/wahabis who declare kufr on Asharis beware--its a boomerang and hits you right back in the face(based on hadith)

[@hammadahmad6312]

Salafis are Athari in Aqeedah, which is an accepted School of Aqeedah, but the problem is them not accepting the others and calling them Mushriks. Unlike Traditional Sunnis, who accept the acceptable Ashari, Maturidi, Tahawi and Athari Schools. Same goes with their Fiqh, they are rooted in Hanbali Fiqh which developed over time to what we see as Salafi Fiqh, basically Hanbali Fiqh can also be called Salafi Fiqh. Again, their Fiqh is acceptable. But the problem is not accepting the other Fiqhs and just plain bashing them instead of having proper academic discussions.

[@muhammadjoshua7464]

@@hammadahmad6312 not really, Imam at tahawi is also an athari but He doesn't say Allah has parts or contained with directions. I think the current Salafy aqeeda is more resembling the dhahiri (literalist) or mushabbih (anthropomorphist)

[@Zeczam]

We're the sahabah ash'ari or maturidi? Just out of interest.

[@zanek9695]

You do not need to watch a youtube video nor do extensive research to get to the conclusion that Salafis are not on the Haqq or the path of the Prophet (saw), you simply need to spend upwards of five minutes with one or two of them in a room. Everything about their manners and personalities is in stark contrast to the prophetic tradition they expertly rant about. And no, I'm not a "Sufi", rather simply someone who is studying the deen and committing to the fundamentals of our faith and communicating my personal observations.

[@maxmudxareed1345]

your studing and your using stereotpes . what a prodox .

[@أهلالسنةهمأهلالإسلام]

Zane Khan Sufi they're not understandings Quran and the suna Islam to follow quran and the suna nothing to do with the Sufi Sufi philosophy comes from Hindo and Boda and nothing to do with Islam. Islam to follow quran and the suna. Sufi philosophy is nonsense and far away from Islam.

[@catotheelder9524]

This isn't true. Salafi are not bad people, they are not arrogant.

[@ssa3101]

CatoTheElder * Yes they are. I had some salafi friends in high school. They were always condescending and arrogant towards me because i try to follow tassawuf.

[@ariatobub7699]

Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best people are those of my generation, then those who come after them, then those who come after them. Then, there will come people after them whose testimony precedes their oaths and their oaths precede their testimony.” That is simply what following the salaf means, following the three generations means you do everything accordance to the sunnah and how they understood and practiced it...

[@ERSpro]

I agree with this brother. With that being said, technically no matter what methodology you adhere to we are all "salafis" from a purely linguistic point of view. As the word salaf just describes those who came before us. Abu hanifa, malik, shafii, hanbal etc., were merely following there salaf, which led to the development of methodologies.

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

What was the issue you found with the Manhaj of the Salaf as Saleh?

[@ZackariahFitness]

Yes, we are followers of the Salaf. Though we do not call ourselves Salafi, since this term is usually referred to the Salafi movement.

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@ZackariahFitness are you referring to Fiqh or aqidah?

[@ZackariahFitness]

@@Hashim_Naysapuri well the salafi movement covers both usul al fiqh and Aqeedah

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@ZackariahFitness I'm aware of that. You said your a follower of the Salaf as Saleh. I'm asking Fiqh or aqidah?

[@DC-wp6oj]

Very well said. It is absolute madness to just pick up a book and say here you go it says it here so thats what you must do. Ignorants leading ignorants.

[@nabilyasin2088]

also a bit mad to say you can seek help from the dead dont you think

[@abusumayah9540]

But who actually says that? The Salafi ulamah certainly don't rather they earn against this!

[@nabilyasin2088]

@@abusumayah9540 no ya akhi my comment was towards these people who are against salafiyyah. الحمد لله على نعمة السلفية.

[@DC-wp6oj]

@@nabilyasin2088 i agree it is mad to seek help from the dead. Thats not the debate here.

[@nabilyasin2088]

@@DC-wp6oj you seem like you’ve seen this first hand, wanna tell me what book was used in that scenario?

[@unnanointedonesufi]

"there's no greater arrogance than saying only I can interepet it and everybody else is wrong" You can clearly experience this arrogance just by talking to Salafis. ..

[@abusumayah9540]

But Salafis don't say this. Salafi scholars say to pick up the Qur'aan and interpret it yourself while being unqualified is haraam. We say that we should take our understanding from the sahaabah and that we should return issues back to the scholars. Stop spreading lies.

[@okyoky405]

@@abusumayah9540 what you are talking is their jargon. they cite from sahabah in some area of ilm but in other area they stop at Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab. Even, they interpret from their own point of view. They are cherry picking. Im former of salafism, i found some contradiction between their jargon and their act. and the way they cover up MBAW history is disgraceful. And this makes me suspicious. But I know, most of salafi followers will not be interested in reading the history of the beginning of their creed. They like come in 21 century, if they found any opinion, argumen, statement from other recent or previous scholars that isnt same with their point of view, they will violate them instantly. Arrogance is the core and the fuel of this creed. Because i have experienced and watched on its followers.

[@ibrahimsiali2419]

@@abusumayah9540 They don't say it, they act it. By simply calling themselves 'Salafi', when they are not actually of the first three glorious generations, they seek to give themselves a veneer of authority and superiority that is mostly baseless. In reality, they should be called pseudo-Salafi. It is ironic enough that their references (like Albani and crew) are further from the salaf (in time, place, and thought) than the traditional authorities of the four schools. Also, I have yet to find a self-proclaimed salafi that can quote scholars who actually were members of the salaf (like Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri, Urwah ibn Zubayr, etc.)

[@MAli99923]

The Salafi Fallacy? The salafis say: We take the Quraan and the Sunnah with the understanding of the salaf. So, therefore this title: The Salafi Fallacy is misleading

[@kappachino3431]

@@MAli99923 Yeah sure brother, lot of them didn't even know what salaf is. what is salaf and kholaf that is real question, what is salaf mean, what generation considered as salaf. you can ask them

[@MoinMPatel]

A salafi is one who doesn't follow any imaam or anyone's teachings, rather deceives himself that he will use the Qur'an and sunnah to learn things himself. Knowing, that the ulamaa before us had given their life to teaching us the same Qur'an and sunnah, it's madness to say we would go directly to the Qur'an and learn for ourselves

[@MoinMPatel]

@ابو أسلم البربري nice language from a Muslim guy. I am talking about the salafi sect nowadays and not the salaf, the earlier ones. They, like ibn wahhab, call everyone else kaafir, if they have varying opinions form them.

[@Dr.ShadAli]

"Imam Abu Hanifah said to Abu Yusuf, and Imam al-Shafi'i to al-Rabi', and Imam Ahmad to his son Abdullah, and Imam Malik to Ibn al Qasim, that: "When a Hadith is authentic, abide by it and leave my opinion." And then the layman thought that this was directed towards him." Sh. Muhammad Wail al-Hanbali (h)

[@fisher9943]

Source 🥺 please

[@1eV]

Doesn't matter if they ever said such a thing or not. We would still throw away anyone's opinion if it goes against sunnah

[@Dr.ShadAli]

@@fisher9943 Sorry don't have it. I think shaykh said it in his khutbah.

[@fisher9943]

@@1eV ok layman-wannabe-mujtahid

[@1eV]

@@Dr.ShadAli of course. That's the only correct thing to do.

[@ImranAli-tm3rq]

NO salafi goes straight to the Qur'an and Sunnah, they refer to the scholars and researchers who refer to Qur'an and Sunnah and the salaf (first 3 generations)!

[@yislam786ify]

That's what he's referring to. Salafi is now used as a modern word in a hijacked form unfortunately

[@OH-pc5jx]

I think the Sheikh would take issue with restricting yourself to the first three generations and neglecting the following dozens of generations of wisdom - he is a specialist in particular in medieval Islamic thought

[@boretobe]

No, salafi today will only refer from Ibn Katheer, Ibn Taymiyah, Ben Bazz, al-Bani, Uthaymeen in reality they are very shallow-minded

[@reiali3290]

And anyone who follows a madhab does the same thing.

[@MichiganTroopers123]

@@reiali3290it’s been 3 years since you posted this and inshallah you’ve grown more wisdom than that of when you posted this comment

[@najomar153]

Abdul hakeem murad is the most eloquently spoken speaker who possesses great & sound knowledge. If you don't like his talks then DO ONE. But don't leave disrespectful comments about somebody who is so dear to many Muslims

[@ahmur50]

(part 5) Apply this situation to a non-Islamic context. Imagine you want to hire someone to be a biology teacher at your school. When you ask a prospective employee for their credentials, where they graduated from, what degrees they have, and so forth, they tell you “No, no, no, this is the twenty first century! I read through some textbooks and watched some video lectures online! Indeed, this is sufficient!” Surely, you must agree that this claim is ridiculous!

[@abdelhakyac7285]

absolutely right

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

That's a ridiculous analogy

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@abdelhakyac7285 Then you have no understanding of Islam.

[@JJ_Jack_Gittes]

Hashim, you are ridiculous in your counter reply. The comment above is absolutely correct.

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@JJ_Jack_Gittes We follow the Salaf as Saleh because the Prophet pbuh said they are the best. Our whole understanding of islam comes from them. The books they have written contain all of this. Where as Sufism, ashariyyah and maturidiyyah came later on.

[@IslamTube86]

May Allah guide us all..

[@petergreen5337]

Ameen

[@سآياباْشيشانياس]

آمين!

[@TheWorldisTemporary]

Ameen

[@belief799]

Or do u mean may the ulamah guide us all because apparently Allah can't do that Himself?

[@mohamedumar4497]

Masha Allah, what an articulate brother. I never really knew him but I am gonna listen more.

[@MuhammadAbdullah-cj6nx]

Same

[@HarrySmart]

He’s the head of the dept of Islamic studies at Cambridge University

[@learningadab]

A recent conversation with the shaykh: kzbin.info/www/bejne/opKpfYOBj6eIkKc

[@redman6790]

Bid’ah ka buq abowe

[@darwinistdelusions6504]

Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “I have left you with two matters which will never lead you astray, as long as you hold to them: the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of his Prophet.” Source: al-Muwaṭṭa’ 1661 Grade: Sahih

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

The Qur'an and Sunnah as the best generation understood it.

[@Hezbollah313]

Yet in every other narration he says Quran and Ahlulbayt

[@darwinistdelusions6504]

@@Hashim_Naysapuri 👍

[@darwinistdelusions6504]

@@atillacoskun How do you take it?

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@Atilla Coşkun Did the Salaf as Saleh take it literally?

[@aishahalmusawa5131]

Many of the sufis are Habaibs whom descendents of Prophet Muhammad s.a.w.Who follows the Prophet's legacy

[@sanaullasharief5319]

+Aishah Almusawa--------Being from 'ahle e bayt' does not mean they are infallible.--------Many of the sufis of Indian subcontinent and central Asia were from Nishapur of Iran and were Shias.

[@aishahalmusawa5131]

+sanaulla sharief the habaibs are ahlusunnah waljamaah & i'm one of the descendant we follow his legacy

[@aishahalmusawa5131]

Ahli bayt all are from arab blood not persians iran

[@sanaullasharief5319]

Aishah Almusawa ----------My question was , does being ahle bayt makes them infallible , they can not make any mistake, they are 'masoom '?

[@aishahalmusawa5131]

Only prophets are masoom protected by Allah

[@saiqal3568]

Wonderfully expressed. Much gratitude and blessings to whoever uploaded this!

[@mercenaire2013]

"Ahl al-Sunnah consist of three groups: the textualists (al-Athariyya), whose Imam is Ahmad ibn Hanbal, the Ash`aris, whose Imam is Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari, and the Maturidis, whose Imam is Abu Mansur al-Maturidi and they are all one sect, the saved sect, and they are Ahl al-Hadith.

[@Deaxon1]

It's not a sect, fool, it's like a school of thought

[@graiant]

+mercenaire2013 methodology a filter to understand islam as it was brought by the prophet peace be upon him , any group sect that uses names denomination is by nature anti ahlu sunna!

[@mercenaire2013]

+shiane mehdi Why do you quote from sunni book,give a a quote from your own books with a hadith mutawaatwir and the asmaa-ul rijaal are thiquaat.

[@Deaxon1]

You guys are making deen so complex you ignoramuses. Schools of thought are fine, they don't change what we believe in such as the pillars of iman and the pillars of Islam. Schools of thought is nothing but opinions that go against each other. SECTS are different beliefs that all (sects) claim they are the true believer.

[@GreasyVid]

+mercenaire2013 wahhabis r kufar and are not part of ahul sunna neither is ibn taymiyyah

[@Kinderlieder-Kindergeschichte]

continuing: Ash-Shafi'i said: "If the hadeeth is saheeh, then ignore my words. If you see well established evidence, then this is my view." Imam Ahmad said: "Do not follow me blindly, and do not follow Maalik or al-Shaafa’i or al-Thawri blindly. Learn as we have learned.” And he said, “Do not follow men blindly with regard to your religion, for they can never be safe from error."

[@thewolf1801]

LOL who was Imam Shafii RA speaking to? Was he speaking to illiterate ignoramuses, or was he speaking to his students, who themselves were Ulema? please don't take his words out of context not every tom dick and harry can make ijtihad lol

[@mrfarax4944]

@@thewolf1801 i think the salafi fallacy got to him

[@muadsaleh1061]

The Wolf exactly

[@josefineforsberg5807]

@@thewolf1801 you remind me of a jew following the rabis

[@Dr.ShadAli]

"Imam Abu Hanifah said to Abu Yusuf, and Imam al-Shafi'i to al-Rabi', and Imam Ahmad to his son Abdullah, and Imam Malik to Ibn al Qasim, that: "When a Hadith is authentic, abide by it and leave my opinion." And then the layman thought that this was directed towards him." Sh. Muhammad Wail al-Hanbali (h)

[@aapelbuet]

Very unfortunate to see people just throwing arguments without any authentic reference! Curious mind wants to know what kind of scholarship you guys have while criticizing Abdal Hakim Murad?

[@mhmd_old7]

That his entire argument is bulit upon philosophy, he refers to the scholars (being at a specific time period). But if you open up a book on history or scholarship, you'll see all sorts of devaints pop up. So you end up with a need for an earlier source to refer back to, which is the Salaf (3 generations from the Sahabah to their followers to their followers' followers). Otherwise if you interpret it differently, it makes kuffar zanadiqah like the Jahmiyyah to be followed. It makes even simple innovators to be followed as scholars and taken from being made equal to the actual reliable scholars. Now what he says is quite opposite to that, in the case that he doesn't talk about following the Salaf themselves directly (when they had scholars and books and teachings). He talks about following the 4 Imams of the Madhahib and later scholars. Which is complete nonesense of course purely from a fiqh perspective due to there being no evidence of the obligation to follow them. The Asha'irah on the other hand whom he mentions in the video base their aqeedah on philosophical interpretations of the Quran and Sunnah. Which again, has no basis whatsoever in the Quran or Sunnah and is simply innovation.

[@livegood6204]

This is not Against Salafi rather it's in support if you listen attentively. Here he is saying not to bypass the understanding of the earlier generations i.e. (Salaf us Saalih) which is the main call of As-Salafiyah. Which is the Qur"an the Sunnah upon the understanding of the Righteous predecessor (Salaf us Saalih). An whosever rejects this call should fear Allah the Almighty as He says "And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger after the right path has been shown to him, and follows a path other than the believers way. We shall keep him in the path he has chosen, and burn him in Hell - what an evil destination." Surah An-Nisaa Ayat 115

[@Ceironftw]

That's not what he's saying

[@ibbydread6092]

You just heard what you want to hear. He said if you’re a layman and not a scholar who are you to reject the ijma of the ulema the four madhabs.

[@karimb972]

Buti: “If a Muslim sees a proof for something in the books he reads, is that a sufficient reason to disregard the madhhabs that contradict his understanding, even if he doesn’t know their evidences?” Salafi: “It is sufficient.” Buti: “A young man, newly religious, without any Islamic education, reads the word of Allah Most High “To Allah belongs the place where the sun rises and where it sets: wherever you turn, there is the countenance of Allah. Verily, Allah is the All-encompassing, the All-knowing (Qur’an 2:115), and gathers from it that a Muslim may face any direction he wishes in his prescribed prayers, as the ostensive purport of the verse implies. But he has heard that the four Imams unanimously concur upon the necessity of his facing towards the Kaaba, and he knows they have evidences for it that he is unaware of. What should he do when he wants to pray? Should he follow his conviction from the evidence available to him, or follow the Imam who unanimously concur on the contrary of what he has understood?” Salafi: “He should follow his conviction.” Buti: “And pray towards the east for example. And his prayer would be legally valid?” Salafi: “Yes. He is morally responsible for following his personal conviction.” Buti: “What if his personal conviction leads him to believe there is no harm in making love to his neighbor’s wife, or to fill his belly with wine, or wrongfully take others’ property: will all this be mitigated in Allah’s reckoning by “personal conviction”? Salafi: [He was silent for a moment, then said,] “Anyway, the examples you ask about are all fantasies that do not occur.” Buti: “They are not fantasies; how often the like of them occurs, or even stranger. A young man without any knowledge of Islam, its Book, its sunna, who happens to hear or read this verse by chance, and understands from it what any Arab would from its owtward purport, that there is no harm in someone praying facing any direction he wants-despite seeing people’s facing towards the Kaaba rather than any other direction. This is an ordinary matter, theoretically and practically, as long as there are those among Muslims who don’t know a thing about Islam. In any event, you have pronounced upon this example-imaginary or real-a judgement that is not imaginary, and have judged “personal conviction” to be the decisive criterion in any event. This contradicts your differentiating people into three groups: followers of scholars without knowing their evidence (muqallidin), followers of scholars’ evidence (muttabi‘in), and mujtahids.” Salafi: “Such a person is obliged to investigate. Didn’t he read any hadith, or any other Qur’anic verse?” Buti: He didn’t have any reference works available to him, just as you didn’t have any when you gave your fatwa on the question of [threefold] divorce. And he was unable to read anything other than this verse connected with facing the qibla and its obligatory character. Do you still insist that he must follow his personal conviction and disregard the Imams’ consensus?” Salafi: “Yes. If he is unable to evaluate and investigate further, he is excused, and it is enough for him to rely on the conclusions his evaluation and investigation lead him to.” Buti: “I intend to publish these remarks as yours. They are dangerous, and strange.” Salafi: “Publish whatever you want. I’m not afraid.” Buti: “How should you be afraid of me, when you are not afraid of Allah Mighty and Majestic, utterly discarding by these words the word of Allah Mighty and Majestic [in Sura al-Nahl] ‘Ask those who recall if you know not’ (Qur’an 16:43).” Salafi: “My brother,” he said, “These Imams are not divinely protected from error (ma‘sum). As for the Quranic verse that this person followed [in praying any direction], it is the word of Him Who Is Protected from All Error, may His glory be exalted. How should he leave the divinely protected and attach himself to the tail of the non-divinely-protected?” Buti: “Good man, what is divinely protected from error is the true meaning that Allah intended by saying, “To Allah belongs the place where the sun rises and where it sets . . .”-not the understanding of the young man who is as far as can be from knowing Islam, its rulings, and the nature of its Qur’an. That is to say, the comparison I am asking you to make is between two understandings: the understanding of this ignorant youth, and the understanding of the mujtahid Imams, neither of which is divinely protected from error, but one of which is rooted in ignorance and superficiality, and the other of which is rooted in investigation, knowledge, and accuracy.” Salafi: “Allah does not make him responsible for more than his effort can do.” Buti: “Then answer me this question. A man has a child who suffers from some infections, and is under the care of all the doctors in town, who agree he should have a certain medicine, and warn his father against giving him an injection of penicillin, and that if he does, he will be exposing the child’s life to destruction. Now, the father knows from having read a medical publication that penicillin helps in cases of infection. So he relies on his own knowledge about it, disregards the advice of the doctors since he doesn’t know the proof for what they say, and employing instead his own personal conviction, treats the child with a penicillin injection, and thereafter the child dies. Should such a person be tried, and is he guilty of a wrong for what he did, or not?” Salafi: [He thought for a moment and then said,] “This is not the same as that.” Buti: “It is exactly the same. The father has heard the unanimous judgement of the doctors, just as the young man has heard the unanimous judgement of the Imams. One has followed a single text he read in a medical publication, the other has followed a single text he has read in the Book of Allah Mighty and and Majestic. This one has gone by personal conviction, and so has that.” Salafi: “Brother, the Qur’an is light. Light. In its clarity as evidence, is light like any other words?” Buti: “And the light of the Qur’an is reflected by anyone who looks into it or recites it, such that he understands it as light, as Allah meant it? Then what is the difference between those who recall [Qur’an 16:43] and anyone else, as long as all partake of this light? Rather, the two above examples are comparable, there is no difference between them at all; you must answer me: does the person investigating-in each of the two examples-follow his personal conviction, or does he follow and imitate specialists?” Salafi: “Personal conviction is the basis.” Buti: “He used personal conviction, and it resulted in the death of the child. Does this entail any responsibility, moral or legal?” Salafi: “It doesn’t entail any responsibility at all.” Buti: I said, “Then let us end the investigation and discussion on this last remark of yours, since it closes the way to any common ground between you and me on which we can base a discussion. It is sufficient that with this bizarre answer of yours, you have departed from the consensus of the entire Islamic religion. By Allah, there is no meaning on the face of the earth for disgusting bigotry if it is not what you people have” (al-Lamadhhabiyya (b01), 99-108). Buti concludes the story by saying: I do not know then, why these people don’t just let us be, to use our own “personal conviction” that someone ignorant of the rules of religion and the proofs for them must adhere to one of the mujtahid Imams, imitating him because of the latter’s being more aware than himself of the Book of Allah and sunna of His messenger. Whatever the mistake in this opinion in their view let it be given the general amnesty of “personal conviction.” like the example of him who turns his back to the qibla and is his prayer is valid, or him who kills a child and the killing is “ijtihad” and “medical treatment” (ibid. 108). www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/nuh/buti.htm

[@dennissepulveda6118]

First off, the video is misleading because he didn't say anything specifically targeting Salafis. He was making a general observation. Now if he was making a comment against salafis with those remarks, then he's making a strawman of the salafi position since no reputable salafi out there would say we understand the Quran and the Sunnah according to our own intellect and understanding, and that our understanding is more correct that the traditional scholars. In fact, it's the salafis who stress the importance of going to the understanding of the earliest 3 generations to understand the Quran and the Sunnah, and sticking to that understanding as much as possible. So if that's the case, then that's such a lie and misrepresentation of salafism

[@abdallah2018]

The Prophet (pbuh) did say that his ulama/ummah would never agree on faulty consensus. Proves all of those wahhabis/salafis/neo-kharijis wrong right there

[@dropbearzz]

Exactly, he also said the scholars are his inheritors but these Najdis want people to bypass the scholars and delve into areas they have no expertise in. It’s utterly nonsense and destructive, hence the chaos and barbarism you see in the Muslim world today.

[@andypham6335]

Wahhabism isn’t a real thing...

[@thereligionofabraham]

Yea and is the rest of the other sunni sects united?

[@bjxneet]

are there any new lecture from him? he is one of my favorite speaker. funny that he is a brittish muslim but hes a fantastic da'i

[@yahyaeromosele6006]

Allah blessed this man, for keeping it plain and simple, unlike "the saved sect" that gives fatwas I never heard in my life.

[@1eV]

How many fatwas have you heard in your life?

[@ibrahimsiali2419]

Whenever a group of Muslims have the guile to declare themselves the "saved sect", it should be clear that they are wrong.

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@ibrahimsiali2419 No group in ISLAM is gonna believe and proclaim that they are following the WRONG path. LOL 😂🤣

[@hananbhat5187]

Alhumdulilah i started following hanafi mazhab few years ago.

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

Hanafi is regarding Fiqh. Manhaj of the Salaf as Saleh, is to take the interpretation of the best generations.

[@hananbhat5187]

@@Hashim_Naysapuri ya hanafi is regarding fiqh as well as aqeedah if u read preface pages Aqeedah tahawiya by imam Tahawi he clearly mentions that these Aqeedah are of imam abu hanifa too. So we basically take our aqeedah too from imam abu Hanafi. He is a salaf

[@JJ_Jack_Gittes]

Hashim is legitimately ignorant because Hanafi IS A SALAFI BY DEFINITION. ABU HANIFA IS A TABI'EEN (FOLLOWER OF THE COMPANION). HASHIM, REPENT TO ALLAH BEFORE YOUR DEATH.

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@hananbhat5187 Yet the majority of hanafis follow maturidi aqidah.

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@JJ_Jack_Gittes Abu Hanifa NEVER transmitted from a companion, therefore he can't a Tabieen. Majority of hanafis follow the maturidi aqidah, which is a deviant aqidah.

[@knightowl787]

The most important principles and teachings of Islam are very clear in the Quran and don't require commentary. It provides very clear guidance for daily living. But it definitely helps to have the commentary and insights of the scholars. So it isn't either..or but the middle way between extremes as advocated in the Quran. Use your own understanding AND the teachings of the scholars. Allah says in the Quran the religion of Islam is meant to be easy to understand and practice: 2:185 Allah desires ease for you and not hardship; 4:28 Allah desires to lighten things for you, for the human being has been created weak.

[@zk116]

That's a missuse of the blessed verses of the noble Qur'an. And extreme arrogance to say that we (AS INFALLIBLES) can understand Quran without tafseer. With tafseer of the scholars, hadith are used from the prophet to understand the scripture. Some verses are clear others are more ambiguous. However it is arrogance to assume we can understand Quran whithout scholars, as the scholars take their understanding from the hadith of the prophet.

[@ibbydread6092]

Quran also says ask those who know ie those with ilm ulema. You left that verse out of your argument

[@Era_Of_Awakening]

The prophet taught us how to differentiate between Khawarij and even hypocrites. it's not by what they say rather by what they do.

[@MhmdRdam]

Is this about salafiyyah? Because salafiyyah is about interpreting the Quran and sunnah according to the methodology of the salaf.

[@boras3547]

Assalamo aleykom, I love you in God. In Sahih Muslim [1847, chapter of obligation to stay with the majority (Jamaa) in period of fitna], the Prophet warns us about the predicators that invite people to hell and that we must stick to the majority of the Muslims. It has been narrated on the authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said: People used to ask the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) about the good times, but I used to ask him about bad times fearing lest they overtake me. I said: Messenger of Allah, we were in the midst of ignorance and evil, and then God brought us this good (time through Islam). Is there any bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. I asked: Will there be a good time again after that bad time? He said: Yes, but therein will be a hidden evil. I asked: What will be the evil hidden therein? He said: (That time will witness the rise of) the people who will adopt ways other than mine and seek guidance other than mine. You will know good points as well as bad points. I asked: Will there be a bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. (A time will come) when there will be people standing and inviting at the gates of Hell. Whoso responds to their call they will throw them into the fire. I said: Messenger of Allah, describe them for us. He said: All right. They will be a people having the same complexion as ours and speaking our language. I said: Messenger of Allah, what do you suggest if I happen to live in that time? He said: You should stick to the main body of the Muslims and their leader. I said: If they have no (such thing as the) main body and have no leader? He said: Separate yourself from all these factions, though you may have to eat the roots of trees until death comes to you and you are in this state. In Sahih Bukhari : Volume 9, Book 88, Number 206: Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman: The people used to ask Allah's Apostle about the good but I used to ask him about the evil lest I should be overtaken by them. So I said, "O Allah's Apostle! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (i.e., Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes." I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted (not pure.)'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "(There will be) some people who will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of some others." I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, (there will be) some people calling at the gates of the (Hell) Fire, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the (Hell) Fire." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language." I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state." حَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى، حَدَّثَنَا الْوَلِيدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ يَزِيدَ بْنِ، جَابِرٍ حَدَّثَنِي بُسْرُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ الْحَضْرَمِيُّ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ أَبَا إِدْرِيسَ الْخَوْلاَنِيَّ، يَقُولُ سَمِعْتُ حُذَيْفَةَ بْنَ الْيَمَانِ، يَقُولُ كَانَ النَّاسُ يَسْأَلُونَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم عَنِ الْخَيْرِ وَكُنْتُ أَسْأَلُهُ عَنِ الشَّرِّ مَخَافَةَ أَنْ يُدْرِكَنِي فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا فِي جَاهِلِيَّةٍ وَشَرٍّ فَجَاءَنَا اللَّهُ بِهَذَا الْخَيْرِ فَهَلْ بَعْدَ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ ‏"‏ نَعَمْ ‏"‏ فَقُلْتُ هَلْ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ مِنْ خَيْرٍ قَالَ ‏"‏ نَعَمْ وَفِيهِ دَخَنٌ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قُلْتُ وَمَا دَخَنُهُ قَالَ ‏"‏ قَوْمٌ يَسْتَنُّونَ بِغَيْرِ سُنَّتِي وَيَهْدُونَ بِغَيْرِ هَدْيِي تَعْرِفُ مِنْهُمْ وَتُنْكِرُ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ فَقُلْتُ هَلْ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ مِنْ شَرٍّ قَالَ ‏"‏ نَعَمْ دُعَاةٌ عَلَى أَبْوَابِ جَهَنَّمَ مَنْ أَجَابَهُمْ إِلَيْهَا قَذَفُوهُ فِيهَا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صِفْهُمْ لَنَا ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏"‏ نَعَمْ قَوْمٌ مِنْ جِلْدَتِنَا وَيَتَكَلَّمُونَ بِأَلْسِنَتِنَا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ فَمَا تَرَى إِنْ أَدْرَكَنِي ذَلِكَ قَالَ ‏"‏ تَلْزَمُ جَمَاعَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَإِمَامَهُمْ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ فَقُلْتُ فَإِنْ لَمْ تَكُنْ لَهُمْ جَمَاعَةٌ وَلاَ إِمَامٌ قَالَ ‏"‏ فَاعْتَزِلْ تِلْكَ الْفِرَقَ كُلَّهَا وَلَوْ أَنْ تَعَضَّ عَلَى أَصْلِ شَجَرَةٍ حَتَّى يُدْرِكَكَ الْمَوْتُ وَأَنْتَ عَلَى ذَلِكَ ‏"‏ ‏. (صحيح مسلم 1847 / باب الأَمْرِ بِلُزُومِ الْجَمَاعَةِ عِنْدَ ظُهُورِ الْفِتَنِ وَتَحْذِيرِ الدُّعَاةِ إِلَى الْكُفْرِ)

[@sofiashums7327]

After you have listened to this brother-in-Islam*s statements in this video, my suggestion to you all is to refer to the ayat/verses in the Quran where Allah Almighty states that He gives of His Wisdom and understanding to whomsoever He chooses and then decide for yourself the authenticity of this Brother*s statements in this video. Allah Almighty is the final and only Judge. This is what should concern us all. A thorough and sincere reading of the Quran might help us realize that we will be judged by Allah SWT based on our words, actions, thoughts and intentions. While our words and actions are easier to assess and analyse, our thoughts and intentions are complicated and unknowable to us. It is only Allah Almighty who can truly know them and judge them. We all need to educate ourselves the best way we can and then make our choices in life. And we need to fear the Creator of the Worlds every moment of our lives on Earth.

[@MAli99923]

The Salafi Fallacy? The salafis say: We take the Quraan and the Sunnah with the understanding of the salaf. So, therefore this title: The Salafi Fallacy is misleading

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

Jazak Allah Khair for your comments. These sufis like to cover there deviant aqidah by accusing salafis.

[@muzammilahmad6111]

@@Hashim_Naysapuri wrong, sufis are from ahlusunnah firstly and secondly salafi by definition is ahlusunnah wal jamaah pseudo salafi movment is in relation to muhammad ibn abdul wahhab influenced by ibn taymiyyah

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@muzammilahmad6111 Sufis are innovators. What did ibn taymiyyah & Muhammad ibn abdulwahab state that goes against the Salaf as Saleh?

[@fencalmari5609]

Does loads of things Salafies say that the Salaf did not say? Loads of things interpret that they did not interpret in the same way.

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@fencalmari5609 Please state specific examples?

[@ByChoiceMuslim]

My understanding of Sufism is not same as yours. Your scholars most of the time do not attack traditional Sufism. They criticize certain practices and call it Sufism, which in reality has nothing to do with Traditional Sufism.

[@AbooLayth]

To be fair, perhaps his grossly uninformed, or rather misinformed, thoughts regarding this issue are not his fault entirely. I'm sure there are some Salafi's that have rubbed him the wrong way, just as there are Muqallideen (if I can even use that term to define the opposite of Salafi's - as if Salafi's don't make taqleed, they do) who haven't helped in this ongoing and ancient discourse. And Allah Alone is the giver of Tawfeeq.

[@b80379038]

And the meaning of 'waseelah' here is obedience and seeking nearness [to Allaah] and the meaning in the language is something which leads to that which is desired. So that which leads to the Pleasure and the Paradise of Allaah is a waseelah to Him. This is the legislated waseelah mentioned in His, the Most High's saying: "Seek the means of approach to Him" [al- Maa'idah (5):35]

[@LifeGuru1000]

And then this; A) God is the teacher of Quran: Quran 55:02 B) God perfected and completed the message: Quran 5:03 C) Easy remembrance and understandability of the message: Quran 54:17 D) God declared the end of the message with the words "This day”: Quran 5:03 E) God explained the verses in detail: Quran 11.01 and 17:12 F) The responsibility of explaining it has been taken by God Himself: Quran 75:19 Not to mention the Hukum to use our God given faculties of observation, reason and logic :)

[@user-mm3yk3uq4g]

How does this contradict anything Shaykh Murad said? 1400 years of Ulama and tens of thousands of Islamic scholars who passed throughout history discussing and analyzing issues, by dealing with these verses and the explanations of the Prophet saws and his companions and by using their God given faculties; certainly understand the Qur'an and the Sunnah better than newly appeared movements like salafis

[@MKTElM]

The consensus is that Islam is Universal and for all times and peoples. The Qur'an and Sunna have laid down 'principles' and set down 'guiding limits' . It is our responsibility to apply those principles and the limits they impose on our present day situation wherever we are . Rigid imposition of tenth Century interpretations will clash with our present reality . Let us consider that for every generation ... the Islamic Message is presented anew , without the shackles of what the scholars of old have burdened it with . Let every generation apply the tenets of faith as their collective conscience dictates .

[@sandan7397]

الإسلام هو ما كان عليه محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم و فهمه صحابته رضي الله عنهم وطبقوه لا فلسفات أهل الكلام و تخاريف المتصوفة .. الإسلام نزل بلسان عربي مبين. وهناك من يحاربه لابسا جبة الإسلام.

[@طابورابوشخاطة]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: تركت فيكم ما ان تضلوا بعدي أبدا؛. كتاب الله وسنتي ، وسنة الخلفاء الراشدين المهديين من بعدي عضوا عليها بالنواجذ. ودين وشريعة الإسلام هي إتباع كتاب الله عز وجل وسنة رسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم والتوحيد (.توحيد الربوبية.وتوحيد الألوهية وتوحيد الأسماء والصفات) حتى لانقع بفتنة الفرق الضالة أمثال: القدرية والجهمية والمعتزلة والرافضة والصوفية والاشعرية الخ. لأن هذه الفرق انحرفت عن هدي النبي محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم. والفرقة الوحيدة التي قالها بأنها تتبع الكتاب القرآن والسنة والتوحيد وشريعة دين الإسلام هي اهل الإسلام اهل السنة والجماعة الفرقة الناجية إنشاء الله .لحديث الرسول عليه الصلاة والسلام: سوف تفترق أمتي على ثلاث وسبعين فرقة كلها في النار....وقال عليه الصلاة والسلام : ما أنا عليه وأصحابي.( يعني اهل الإسلام اهل السنة والجماعة المتقين المؤمنين من الذين يتبعون الكتاب القرآن والسنة والتوحيد ) وليس غيرهم .

[@arcanumviator]

Like Imam Malik rh said: The those who successors will be guied only with which those who predecessors were guided to right. İbn AbdilHadi, İrshâdû's-Salik,1/227

[@yosuf815]

This man’s arguments are based on presuppositions that do not apply to the Salafis. Salafis do not discard the scholars, as he is saying. So either the maker of this video is a liar and is claiming the speaker is talking about Salafis, or the speaker lacks knowledge about the Salafi position in which case he would not be qualified to speak. Another point is that the speaker says the Quran and Sunnah has different interpretions, which we agree with it. And that is why we follow the interpretation of the Salaf. This is even more evidence to prove that either he is not talking about Salafis, or does not know the Salafi position if he is indeed speaking about Salafis.

[@maturidiwesley4107]

There is no such thing as the “interpretation of the salaf” this applies to both aqeedah and fiqh

[@1eV]

@@maturidiwesley4107 nice joke.

[@ibrahimsiali2419]

@@1eV There is no such thing. The Salaf cannot be considered a coherent and unified school of thought, because they also differed amongst themselves. As Sheikh Muhammad al-Bouti once put it: "The Salaf are not a school of thought, but a blessed epoch".

[@1eV]

@@ibrahimsiali2419 who cares about what that supporter of killer of Muslims say?

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@ibrahimsiali2419 "The Salaf cannot be considered a coherent and unified school of thought" Are to preferring to fiqh or aqidah?

[@albrunawi7511]

In his last sermon, the Prophet sallallahu alaihi wassalam have been reported to have said: "All those who listen to me shall pass on my words to others and those to others again; and may the last ones understand my words better than those who listen to me directly. " Thus the possibility of this doa being fulfilled today and thus contradicts what brother Abdul Hakim is saying cannot be overruled. Wallahu a'lam.

[@user-tn1oh3he8c]

If he means ibn baz and ibn uthaymeen I can assure you bud they know enough and about 1000 times more than u will ever know

[@fbng]

And the previous generation of Ash'aris and Maturidis know 1000 times more than Bin Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen.

[@shokzz1532]

⁠@@fbngnone of the 4 imaams were maturidis or asharis.

[@shadowstorm5261]

@@fbng they are professionals in philosophy so yeah they can invent and lie more

[@mhmd_old7]

The Asha'irah have gone down a rabbit hole they can't climb out of. Abdul Hakeem Murad who himself has studied under them is now claiming that those "A'imah" of his are the earliest generations, which is complete nonesense. We have the books of the Salaf fully preserved for us, their aqeedah, their manhaj, the Quran and Sunnah all preserved, yet when the Asha'irah or hanafiyyah have an Ijma' on something, now that's infallible? Llike this has to be the biggest lie ever.

[@Jehan99100]

I love brother Murad and he has much knowledge but on this point here I must disagree with him. The Prophet (saw) warned us of a time when "ulama" will come and mislead the ummah. How can we know if we are being mislead if we blindly follow scholars and not question? Islam never had a clergy, we never had an exclusive group who speaks on behalf of God. I have nothing but respect for our past scholars, but they not infallible. This is why we should gain knowledge so we also can know the truth.

[@zaki8122]

2:57 Taqleed indeed is a sign of ignorance. You dont follow anyone blindly excpet the Prophet. When the Scholars quote something you have every right to ask for proof rather than taking it on face value.

[@zaynabkalufya9925]

There are the 4 Salaf Imams - and among these 4 there are 2 Imams who are leading in the Knowlagde of Kalaam and Aqeedah - Imam Hanafi and Imam Shafii... Imam Maturidi got his knowlagde of aqeedah from Imam Hanafi and passed it on with references from Imam Hanafi - Imam Ashari got his knowlagde from Imam Shafii and passed it on with references from Imam Shafii.... Now they say that Asharis/Maturidis are not Ahlul Sunnah, so they mean Imam Hanafi and Shafii are not Ahlul Sunnah too??? -.-'

[@tsgillespiejr]

Zaynab Kalufya Strange, isn't it...

[@mahmoudm9541]

+Zaynab Kalufya exactlly

[@MsB1ANCA]

+Zaynab Kalufya Imam Ashari being a student of Imam Shafi does not mean he agreed with him on every point. So not accepting one of his students does not necessarily mean you are dismissing Imam Shafi.

[@tsgillespiejr]

***** One of his many teachers, yes.

[@tsgillespiejr]

***** The Qur'an disagrees with me about who someone's teachers were (which is a fact of history)? LOL what?

[@usman60606060]

The commonest reason why the anti-madhhab view develops is because they do not realise the depth of our religious tradition (Google: "Understanding the Four Madhhabs"). Especially those who grow up in non-Muslim country, who view the Islam of their fathers as 'cultural' and 'backward', and who are impressed by Saudi-trained, English-speaking 'scholars' (a word thrown around too often these days). If we just realised the legacy of our religion, we would cling onto it with our back teeth.

[@stephenconnolly1830]

The essence of the problem of the modern Salafi movement is its utter focus on ONE theological principle - the avoidance of Shirk. Unfortunately, by doing so Muhammad Ibn Wahab made an idol (Shirk) out of Shirk.

[@ibrahimsiali2419]

Yeah, and that's only if you define shirk by MIAW's overly-broad criteria for shirk. Who knew that detracting so radically from the accumulated wisdom of scholars would so easily lead one astray?

[@nadimbaksh5988]

what a nonsense saying

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

@@ibrahimsiali2419 MIAW books regarding aqidah are based on the Qur'an and Sunnah. His book were written to combat grave worship.

[@aidaroosabdulkadir2967]

Greetings Everyone, I've a query to professor Murad. Well, Allah Almighty says in surat Alkahf الكهف, verse 29: "وقل الحق من ربكم فمن شاء فليؤمن ومن شاء فليكفر..." My query is that why we, "believers", if applicable, struggling to invite people, around the world, to believe in a religion? Why don't we leave it to God's will, as per the verse's interpretation,? Personally, if someone declares his/her conversation into Islam in a mosque, I keep totally silent, I do say nothing, I do not say congratulations because I believe it's a very personal relationship between the Creator and His believer. Is that right? Thank you very much. Texas, USA

[@Ofcourseitdoes]

Yaa Allah, bless and preserve the person who recorded and uploaded this, and ultimately bless and preserve the Sheikh and increase him with goodness in this world and the next.

[@قرأنالكم-ب9ك]

The Shaikh is not right about what he said. The behavior of some so called "Salafists" doesn't represent the entire Manhaj "approach". This approach has been known since the times of Sahaba may Allah be pleased with all of them. Since the time Anas Bin Malek radiya Allah anhu said: if the prophet peace be upon him comes now among you, he will recognize the Salat "prayer". It is the Manjah that has been taken later on from Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal and his school, passing by Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Tameyah and his great student Ibn Alqayyem. and for those dear brothers who would like to follow the truth, it's very good not to be judgmental, some "Salafi" brothers have the problem of Ujb "arrogance" but many Sufi brothers have the problem of going too far away from Quran and Sunnah. Allah made his Noble Quran easy for ALL Muslims. and he has said it many times in Surat Al-Qamar: "And We have certainly made the Quran easy to remember. So is there anyone who will be mindful?". Use your heart to connect to Quran and Sunnah and ask Allah for Hidaya "guidance" and don't forget me from your du'a :)

[@fletcher9328]

Couldn't have put it better myself! Too many ignorant Wahabi/Salafis. There destroying Islam!

[@machinegunkely4417]

Allhumdu lillah for Qur'an and sunnah , Allhumdu lillah for salafiyaahh allhumdu lillah for hidayah

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

Jazak Allah Khair for your comment. These sufis like to cover there deviant aqidah by accusing salafis.

[@machinegunkely4417]

@@Hashim_Naysapuri wa jazkum akhi

[@fountainofspeech1379]

Alhamdullilah, may Allah reserve you, Brother

[@ByChoiceMuslim]

"Now, following his example (s) takes two forms: outward and Inward. The outward form is in such matters as Prayer, fasting, alms, pilgrimage, Jihad, and the like. The inward form is that your prayer be characterized by a connection with God and your recitation of Quran by reflection upon him. So when you perform an act of obedience such as prayer or recitation and find neither connection nor reflection.....

[@oghanchi]

وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمُ اتَّبِعُوا مَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ قَالُوا بَلْ نَتَّبِعُ مَا أَلْفَيْنَا عَلَيْهِ آبَاءَنَا أَوَلَوْ كَانَ آبَاؤُهُمْ لَا يَعْقِلُونَ شَيْئًا وَلَا يَهْتَدُونَ ﴿۱۷۰﴾

[@realtype2009]

Look at how misleading this video is when compared to the content. Now, let us ask an honest question here. Which salafi uses his own understanding, or proclaims to use his understanding and then holds it above that of the ulama? And if you found a salafi doing that, can this behavior be attributed to salafiyya. The answer is no. The salafi methodology entails going back to the understanding of the Quran and sunnah according to the first three generations. (Sahaba, tabi'een, tabi'tabi'een.)

[@kemalcalsr7591]

And what is everyone else doing? How can you claim that Salafis are going to back to the origins where all the rightful madhabs aim to find and preserve the what is come down from the first generations? Madhabs try to apply Islam to our lives as well as possible. There is huge work and effort shown by the classical Ulama so that people can live Islam in any age, any place, in different conditions. You deny all this when you say just the so called Salafis are the ones trying live like the Salaf would. No, all ahlul Sunnah try to do that. Salafis just don’t like what the tradition says. The traditions is however built on many sincere enlightened Ulama, who lived and breathed for Islam, and did achieve unimaginable things.

[@Nomad314]

However, the Quran was not revealed for only the ulema, it was revealed for all of mankind. Scholars are human, they can be influenced by different cultures, and they do make mistakes. There are often differences of opinions. To completely disregard a wise & insightful interpretation by someone who does not have the official label of ‘alim’, in preference for someone who does, is hierarchical blind faith.

[@realtype2009]

Which of the salafi ulama degrade the work of Imaam Abu Hanifa, or Imaam Malik, or Imaam Shafi'i or Imaam Ahmad ibn Hanbal? Which of them say that they are disregarding any of the works of Muhammad ibn Sireen, or Imaam Annawawi ot Sheikh al Islaam ibn Taymiyyah in order to formulate some new understanding according their own interpretations? This is just pure non-sense.

[@shafeequeahmed4272]

I have not seen yet a single Dua in Qur'an and Sunnah regarding Tawassul and Istighasa as it is traditionally understood among hundreds of Duas, except only once, where it says, Ya Hayyu Ya Qayyum, bi rahmatika ASTAGHEETHU. Can anyone with more knowledge or any scholar like Sheikh Hamza Yusuf or Sheikh Umar Abdullah guide me and show me one single Dua containing Tawassul and Istighasa from Qur'an or Sunnah..

[@shafeequeahmed4272]

@Logic03 It's been 4 months and till now no one was able to answer my question, which proves the case beyond the shadow of any doubts. Most of them are Rabbana, Rabbi, Allahumma innee asaluka or Audhu bika. The rest is Ya hayyu Ya Qayyum, La ilaha illa anta etc..

[@ahmur50]

(part 1 out of many, please read through though) A quick look through the comments here reveals that what the Shaykh is speaking about is a lesson the Muslims are in dire need of understanding. It is extremely frustrating that the modern Muslim believes he does not need the tradition of the madhabs or the scholars. We say “It’s the twenty first century, we have immense resources available to us, and we can read for ourselves.”...

[@ahmur50]

(part 6) I do not know where this modern, cursed mentality arose from. Perhaps it is a result of modern individualist philosophies, and the encouragement to be ‘independent’ thinkers. Regardless, the root cause is a lack of humility, and an egotistical elevation of ourselves to the ranks of the learned. Or do we think that Mufti Google-Shaykh al Islam, as my Shaykh jokingly termed it, is sufficient for us to grasp our deen? Allah protect us from this ignorance, and guide us to the right way.

[@sam7748]

Salafis lack the hallmarks of true Muslims--mercy and compassion.

[@mughal_r9374]

And ilm

[@mostafahassan6909]

Two primary fallacies here: 1. The claim that Salafis say that lay people can just go open the Quran and hadith books and draw whatever conclusions suit them. I'd like to see any Salafi scholar quoted saying such nonsense. 2. Acting as if the scholars agreed on everything, so that going back to the evidence by learned scholars and students of knowledge, who studied the opinions of these scholars and their evidences, and passing a judgement is not necessary. This obviously isn't the case, so I don't get this emotional fanaticism.

[@abdelhakyac7285]

modern salafism is a fallacy....... from beginning to end...... from the theory that we can discuss to the practice we all witnessed the horrible results with our own eyes and through history....... problem is that arrogance, that supreme arrogance they have...... nearly everyone of them, its like part of their aqeedah to think themselves far superrior to any other human being..... when you tell them go read Ibn Bishr, go read Ibn Ghannam, its your own nadjdis historians , and see how Muhammad ibn Abdulwahab began his horrible quest, see what they preached and how they applied it...... read, its not some western enemy historians, its not asharis.... its your own historians that talks proudly about their deeds.... they cant even do that....... and come and try to reason aqeedah with you knowing that they are the first to forbid reasoning and questioning the meaning of text!!! its mind blowing.... mind blowing

[@mostafahassan6909]

@@abdelhakyac7285 Can you tell me, with concrete quotes and evidence, what exactly Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab did or said that was so terrible?

[@abdelhakyac7285]

@@mostafahassan6909 wallahi its tiring ..... people think that some dudes had nothing to do, and then at some point decided, let's troll an islamic figure, who now? perhaps with slander we will get to hell quicker!!! ..... look, after hours and hours of debate on that subject....i will tell you one thing, we need to be fair and go read nadjdi historians, not orientalists, not asharis historians, not shia historians...... nadjdi historians , their own historians, when they quote the history, they were proud of it...... they cant lie they cant misrepresent themselves, they cant talk ill of themselves.... problem is, that history is catastrophic..... Go read Ibn Bishr and Ibn Ghannam.... and come back and then we debate.... when of them books is called "unwan elmajd fi tarikh najd"

[@mrty5213]

Lol Al Albani literally wrote a book on it that caused so much shubuhat in Syria that a scholar literally had to pen a refutation to him on such a useless topic. Also he compared Hanafi fiqh to the Bible

[@brianwhite4974]

the bin baaz albani salafees are the khawaril Ali (ra) slayed 3000 of them in a battle where they said prior to it that they would have taken Aysha as a slave, that when Ali layed them to waste by the help of Allah. May Allah rid this ummah of these agents .

[@hasanaliqadri6840]

Goldy Samson. Aameen

[@bones4464]

Goldy Samson where can I find this information. Is there a specific book about the major and minor incidents that occurred after the tragic death of our Prophet peace and blessings be upon him? I.e. the Rashiduun and Umayyad era.

[@manke7830]

Goldy Samson no they're not. They aren't even accepted by the khawaaridj.

[@catotheelder9524]

This is nonsense. They do NOT believe in takfir, which defines the khawarij

[@harooncopeland8107]

Goldy Samson whoa, that's a bold statement. The salafi scholars are nothing like the khawarij. The khawarij are shia, isis, Al Qaeda etc. And Al Qaeda and Taliban are some of the biggest Sufis in the world!

[@letstalksomeball921]

what’s said about this is that someone who locks knowledge would get a feeling of certainty that people who are salafi/atari views the 4 madhahabs as useless or back words and are calling towards following 5-6 scholars in saudi yemen jordan of the 20/21th century . no being a salafi is being a sunni is being a muslim because all ur trying to do is obey Allah and his messenger with understanding of the first 3 generations of islam. U can be a hanafi/athari u can be a shafi’i/athari such as many of the scholars of the past were. My honest advice to anyone that’s sincere is only do in islam that which is attributed to Allah messenger

[@Thycid]

Wait a minute...saying that all Salafis engage in implicit shirk and are backbiters...is backbiting as well!!!

[@supermarvelgainz]

Backbiting is justified if you are speaking against a person of misguidance in order to bring haq to the ummah and spread the truth.

[@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp3913]

@@supermarvelgainz woah woah, where did you see a salafi backbiting an 'alim? The best ulama were the salaf

[@supermarvelgainz]

@@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp3913 Go study son.

[@mughal_r9374]

@@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp3913 that heretic nasir albani did

[@thereligionofabraham]

@@mughal_r9374 finally ive come accross u again u cruel person

[@chadomar6464]

Allah (swt) says in the Quran: ( 17:36 ) And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight and the heart - about all those [one] will be questioned. Obviously, nowadays, many people have become scholars, it is very easy to talk about Islam anything else. It is for this reason the warning comes directly from Allah (swt), giving an entire responsibilities our ears, what they hear, our hearts what they adore to worship other than Allah (swt) and finally our eyes what they see. All these senses quoted in this verse are in our charge, we will be questioned on them on the day of Resurrection, and of course punished for the wrongdoing for oneself and for others, by muddling people to lead them misleading, if that is the case. ( 47:19 ) So know, [O Muhammad], that there is no deity except Allah and ask forgiveness for your sin and for the believing men and believing women. And Allah knows of your movement and your resting place. The true knowledge that Allah (swt) wants to inculcate us in this verse , is that of the Tawheed, the uniqueness of God, to be able to stay in the right line without deviating to the right or to the left,and the salafs are champion in the matter,no one can compete them;even you false scholar.

[@hasan1429]

People are lying about Salafiyyah... I think this whole video refers to the neo salafis. Although I don't call myself a salafi, salafiyyah is the only real path today...

[@ByChoiceMuslim]

How do you follow the Prophet? Based on Hadith? Who said these Hsdiths are authentic?

[@mahamahdi469]

Salafi and sunni are synonyms... just saying. Both mean the exact same thing: following the quran and sunnah from authentic sources. Please research before you speak. If you have a problem with the quran and original sunnah, you have a problem with Muhammed saw. Since he was the one who told us to hold on to the quran and sunnah.

[@fa9eelh]

actually the words of the authentic hadees says "quran and ahlul bayt" but of course following sunnah is important.

[@ByChoiceMuslim]

Salafism: Group 1 - If you find opinion of a Madhab that goes against Sahi Hadith, you should follow the Sahi Hadith but still respect the scholars that held opinion. Group 2 - Following anyone else understanding part from the messenger is Shirk, and if anyone does not accept MY Interpretation is an Innovator, Kafir... Group 3 - If you don't follow the understanding of my scholars who are from the saved sect then you are innovator and you are following a path that will lead you to hell.

[@erwinsmith5381]

اللهم صل وسلم على سيدنا ومولانا محمد عبدك ورسولك النبي الأمي وعلى آله وصحبه وسلم

[@paulsanders7641]

u know there are alot of terms mentioned besides muslim in the qur'an right? like mutaqeen saliheen muqarabeen?

[@themyoify]

I didn't hear any 'salafi' word mentioned by the speaker.

[@faizyusuf2470]

He did, "the traditionalist"

[@reiali3290]

He didn’t have to

[@MoinMPatel]

A salafi is one who doesn't follow any imaam or anyone's teachings, rather deceives himself that he will use the Qur'an and sunnah to learn things himself. Knowing, that the ulamaa before us had given their life to teaching us the same Qur'an and sunnah, it's madness to say we would go directly to the Qur'an and learn for ourselves

[@izharcohen4572]

If i was he, i will say "wahabi" then

[@adamelzanaty]

ASA But then what do you say when the salafi say we refer to our "traditionalist" scholars? (if there is such a thing in the Salafi school of thought). Doesn't that put us in the predicament that they also have strong grounds for their opinions and rulings?

[@stephenconnolly1830]

There is a Salafi school of thought, but it is entirely modern and based on one key theological principle, the avoidance of Shirk. This, in itself, verges on idolatry, particularly as there is little to no nuance or conciliation toward other divergent opinions/traditions. Fi Amanillah

[@mahamedjmal2536]

there is no slafie school of thought.

[@ibbydread6092]

mahamed jmal they wish there was though. It seems to be AlAlbanis plan to make Salafiyya a fifth and superior madhab

[@TariqAli-fg2cg]

He hammered the nail!

[@sammas7422]

*Except the shirk Allah knows best I think he may have made a mistake by accident Allah knows best

[@paulsanders7641]

the sufis are the sadiqeen suluha and muqarabeen mentioned in the qur'an. muqarabeen means those brought close to Allah. Seeking the face of Allah is matlub in islam and mentioned in the qur'an. the qur'an says rush to the dhikr of Allah. and also make it in abundance. dhikr is matlub. the problem is u hate dhikr and u like argumentation. a religious conversation with a salafi only lasts a few hours before arguments start. everythings bid'ah sunnah, just a bunch of extremists.

[@mahamedjmal2536]

i don't think salfies have a problem with this video it's an agreement.

[@ibbydread6092]

mahamed jmal I know salafis who refuse to follow a madhab and they are not scholars . How so arrogant to claim they know better than the four imams while they only take their rulings from Salafi scholars.

[@abusumayah9540]

Exactly! Salafis are always warning from this approach.

[@beluga2520]

@@ibbydread6092 Not all matters req people to refer to the 4 Imams. Most of the Islamic practice in people's day to day life are well articulated in Quran and Hadith for us to understand. It's only the complex matters where one should refer to the 4 imams. Done! What's the fuss about?

[@maherzain434]

Then you're applying your own subjective understanding and interpretation of the quran and sunnah and that's where the issues lies ​@beluga2520

[@ETSCross]

Yes he said that but he was talking to the other Ulama, not the common people! Do we have the knowledge to pick and choose what we want to follow?

[@rejoanbary2155]

his whole position is based on argument of authority.

[@habibyusufzai9642]

LOL and...

[@nabilyasin2088]

@@habibyusufzai9642 basically all this man cares about is what a 'pious' sufi imam said about such and such ayah and it goes as such. we salafis do not speak about that which the 3 golden generations talked spoke about nor do we add anything new they didnt do

[@habibyusufzai9642]

@@nabilyasin2088 do you think he said anything wrong?

[@FinalBoss429]

@@nabilyasin2088 the salaf never added organs to the concept of Allah. Audhubillah.

[@liby254]

@@FinalBoss429 SubhanAllah, how does one even type such a comment?

[@yahyaeromosele6006]

If you can name a time, or a single instance, when any of the 4 imams had rullings contrary to what the prophet(saw) said or did, or what any of the companions said or did I am all ears.

[@Taab1578]

This is so wrong😂 please talk to some salafi ulema

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

​​​​​​​@Kaiser Cheemhelm II At 01:11 he is assuming Salafis are going against ijma ( consensus) by performing ijtihad individual. THIS IS NOT TRUE We believe IJMA ( consensus) to be a daleel after Qur'an and Sunnah.

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

​@Kaiser Cheemhelm II The Salaf as Saleh are the greatest generation as the Prophet pbuh said. Asharis are considered outside Ahlul Sunnah by Salaf as Saleh due to them being based on ilm ul kalam. Hence why people upon the manhaj of the Salaf as Saleh ( Salafis ) are critical of Asharis in modern times.

[@Taab1578]

@Kaiser Cheemhelm II he called it backbiting saying someone is wrong. He also called itjihad shirk

[@ByChoiceMuslim]

But of course all three groups claim to follow the Quran and Sunnah according to the Salaf.

[@aliay2743]

Beautifully said, thank you people and politics infinitely fallible

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

The Prophets pbuh statements are INFALLIBLE

[@ByChoiceMuslim]

He is probably not referring to only one Ulma but rather referring to Ulemas from school of thought who came up with ruling which are considered Valid.

[@nuaymanibnmikaeel5747]

Salaam all. I would like to point out something about the folks who follow or claim to follow the Salafi Manhaj. The nature and character of the "salafis" can be very different depending where you are. If you are In the UK for example, 100% of the Salafi Masajid, are Madkhali, who have horible manners, they spend every breath "refuting" all who dont live up to their standard in countless you tube vids etc, they back bite the Ulema and call it Jarh wa al-Ta'dīl, and their aqida is closer to the Murjiyya than the Salaf. In the USA, I have yet to meet one single Madkhali (at least not anywhere i have been, and in fact most here dont even know what that is)

[@Hashim_Naysapuri]

The Madkhalis are a minority in the UK

[@mnajoke6275]

Wow opened my eyes. Why should be interpret the Quran and sunnah when we have pious people to do it for us

[@atravellerindunya4433]

Who are you telling to follow traditions? Salafis follow the consensus of Ahle Sunnah wal jamah from the very beginning. You don't even have any hadith to support your blind faith in your Fiqh traditions but there are several ahadith to prove the Ijmaj (consensus) of the scholars of Ahle Sunnah wal jamaah and Alhamdulilah we follow it far better than you do.

[@paulsanders7641]

how can salafees be the one that preserve islamic scholarship while the "scholars" say things that are unsourced and incorrect about sufi tariqats. not only that that wasn't the views of ibn taymiyya. the only thing u people have in common with ibn taymiyya are certain views. as for actual deen practice and heart you're very far off from ibn taymiyya.

[@dudextra]

A really good explanation ma-sha'Allah. JazakAllah for whoever uploaded this.

[@DaggerSecurity]

I am not certain from the clip that he is talking about the salafis. Also, salafis rely on ulema of the past as well. So I am confused as to why people as interpreting this as an indictment on Salafis

[@mystsoul8871]

It is shirk because, they claim to possess absolute knowledge of the ruling of God and His Messenger. They give God a direction and a form. The pious predecessors would attribute the opinion to themselves. They were people that knew God and His Messenger. They knew that no one’s understanding or intellect could encompass God’s religion. Now them psuedo-salafis aka wahhabis have monopoly on the religion. They are people of innovation(their rulings are based on personal convictions), going against the consensus. Dont let them fool you with "We follow the quran and sunnah" it is deceptive. They claim to understand the way, when they dont even get their knowledge through a chain of transmission that goes back to the Messenger(PBUH). But most of all they are dangerous to the Sha'ria. They take people out of the religion, they dont love the Messeger, they worship a cruel God, they worship the rules, they like anger, they like blood. they wear the religion on their sleeves, They are Hijackers!

[@hassanh4512]

The only thing to do in a YT comment section is to throw insults or argue aimlessly until someone starts throwing insults.

[@sayiraashrafi185]

Alhamdullilah shaykh, you flung the truth at them with eloquence and now they will be biting their tongues for falshood by its nature is bound to self destruct.

[@mrRooster_1]

So grave worshipping is Islam. And doing almost everything against what Allah & his messenger (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said is Islam??? Because that's what the other non Salafi sects do all the time. So be careful what you call falsehood.

[@mrRooster_1]

The only one who will be biting their tongue will be you when you see the truth in afterlife.

[@LifeGuru1000]

When God says I am your teacher and I will explain everything to you then believe that and not the sect speak of "People can misinterpret many things", people can misinterpret the "explanation" of the so called "scholars as well and do it all the time. Question everything. God given faculties of reason and logic and unlike the third parties review methodology.

[@saadiaqahtani]

There are many sellouts amongst the recent scholars.

[@josefineforsberg5807]

and even past scholars, men will be men

[@arnoutis2938]

Indeed

[@AbuMoosaa]

Before backbiting or slandering Salafis or Salafi Islam, go do your homework. Allah has commanded us to follow the revelation with the understanding of the Sahabah. And all the Ulamah who followed strictly and that includes Imam Abu Haneefah. This is Salafi Dawah. Follow the Aqeedah and Manhaj of the Salaf as Salih upon belief knowledge, statement and actions. Be a true Salafi. Anyone who opposes this path though he is a Muslim but is an Ahlul Bidah.

[@AlGhazali505]

Love shiekh Murad ❤️

[@harissyed3149]

I agree with his point and he right that Salafi’s often go to far and too extreme. I myself was susceptible to this, until I realised that Islamic jurisprudence is far more complicated and nuanced than to just ignore the concept of Madhabs entirely. However, in my experience the criticism of this brother is not entirely aimed at Salafi’s, as most of the Salafi’s I know also recognise the value of Mathabs. However, I will admit that it is still a problem of general understanding among many Salafi’s, who mistakenly think that they are free from Madhabs, while following scholars who themselves are Hanbali.

[@mohammedharis9588]

Do you even know the definition of Salafi? It seems so may people here are Jaahil on the manhaj of the Salafiyah

[@harissyed3149]

Mohammed Haris Well I am very familiar with the works of Shaykh Al Albani, Ibn Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen if that’s what you are asking? I’ve also read Shaykh Rabee (although he is more fringe in Saudi, only popular in the west) and Shaykh Yahya Al Haajooree, etc. What exactly that you think I am ignorant of?

[@mohammedharis9588]

@@harissyed3149 Akhi Wallahi I'm sorry I misread your comment. One thing I would like to say is that when Sheikh Saleh Al Uthaymeen Rahimahullahu Ta'ala defined Salafiyah it never went against the following of a madhab. Forgive me for misinterpreting your comment. Many people who haven't studied the aqeedah of the Salafiyyun often have a misconception that the Salafis don't follow a madhab and do takfir 24/7. BarakAllahu Feek

[@harissyed3149]

Mohammed Haris Totslly agree bro- the issue is with the Salafi’s not the salafi scholars. People like Abu Khadeejah & Co in the west totally misrepresent them. When I was in that Spubs crowd you thought the scholars were free of madhabs because we had read Sifatu Salat An Nabi lol. When I started reading outside of Spubs translations I realise how extreme and narrow minded they were subhanallah. Allah help us, glad to meet you bro allah preserve you IA.

[@mohammedharis9588]

@@harissyed3149 Ameen. BarakAllahu Feek

[@syifarocks]

some people think they have better knowledge than syaikh abdul hakim murad, they should learn more

[@MKTElM]

That would surprise me . He is a scholar , and a very astute and capable one at that . I am amazed at how he managed to encompass the vast literature of Islam . But to my mind , Islam is not about amassing knowledge or knowing more ...

[@sammas7422]

@yout tube anyone thinking sufis are grave worshippers or scholar worshippers is a blatant ignorant and has no idea of the reality at hand

[@GarethBryant15]

Salafīs aren't Anti-Madhab by the way. That-Pontification/Claim is simply Anti-Salafism Rhetoric. All of the `Ulamā'/Muslim Religio-Scholars which Salafīs follow are connected to Madhāhib/Religio-Legal Schools.