I’m in complete awe of Dr,Abdal Hakim Murad, always refreshing to hear him speak. MashaAllah
@zadramm14 жыл бұрын
are you Muslim or interested in Islam ? but what he is saying in this 8:40 mints is not really exactly right ! if you like we can talk through !
@asfandmajeed98913 жыл бұрын
Totally agree
@AC-mp7cx2 жыл бұрын
@@zadramm1 bruh what
@DopePatriot11 жыл бұрын
Ahlul Bait. Sunni's love both Sahaba and Ahlul Bait. Alhamdulillah
@alialii80505 жыл бұрын
Sunnis love those that oppressed ahlulbayt so your statement is pretty contradicting if you ask me..
@angelofdeath77395 жыл бұрын
how can you love the sahaba when many sahaba turned againt the ahlul bayt
@angelofdeath77395 жыл бұрын
@@alialii8050 Jazakallah
@admireable045 жыл бұрын
D Patriot u love ahle bait (as) while u love enemies of ahle bait (as) so at the end ur love to ahle bait (as) will not be acceptable for sure because u respect the enimies of ahle bait (as) and also not only respect u follow blindly those who r enimies of ahle bait (as) for example BANO UMAYYA (LA) and BANO ABBASI (LA)
@aboutthat14405 жыл бұрын
Your warped view of the Sahaba may Allah swt be pleased with them all, is not only incorrect. It is evil. A evil lie presented by Abdullah saba to disunite the Ummah. Thankfully most of the Ummah didn't fall for the lies. Your fake imams that you claim to be infallible. Disagree on issues. Your claims are ridiculous as well as evil. May Allah swt guide us all to the Jaquan.
@IslamOnDemand13 жыл бұрын
@ByChoiceMuslim We just need to be VERY careful about making accusations. Shia, like sunni, are diverse in beliefs, opinions and practices. Sure I agree, if anyone believes (or does not believe) in something which puts them outside the fold of Islam, then they are as such. BUT just because someone identifies themselves as "shia" does not NECESSARILY do the same. Do you see my point? It behooves us to give our brothers and sisters the BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT. I think the Prophet (P) would agree. :)
@aboutthat14405 жыл бұрын
Nope you just murder maim and kil Muslims. All zionists are demonic.
@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo65434 жыл бұрын
@From A Dark Room shias are a neo pauline pagan sect in origin saying Ali is a god and pushing civil wars made by ibn saba like how paul does that with Jesus!
@WeldAzzaba4 жыл бұрын
@Willi Which book? Is it the Quran?
@WeldAzzaba4 жыл бұрын
@Willi Thanks for the info. I am curious about this author, a "Great" Sunni scholar, who writes a book that "pushes away" 5 Million people to become sectarians i.e. Shia. This person, if your info is correct - and I do not doubt that, does/did not uphold the message of the Quran and Sunna as he created a schism / division in Islam. I would have applauded his effort in bringing back these 5 Million Muslim to the main fold of Islam with its two main pillars: The Quran and the Prophet's (SAAWS) Sunna. Ali (RA), the 4th Khalipha, did not preach and urge anybody the follow him instead of God's Holy book - The Quran and the Prophet's (SAAWS) Sunna. Had this or another author(s) focused on the contradictions of the Shia sect principally, he or they would have a good deed in bringing the Muslim Umma UNITED. With All of My Respects - NO insult, direct or implied, meant.
@WeldAzzaba4 жыл бұрын
@Willi Salam and Happy Ramadhan to you as well.
@sybillabank23734 жыл бұрын
In complete admiration of Dr Abdal. It took me to the end of this video to learn what I failed to know over 10 years. If someone in the past had said to me abortion is halal before 16 weeks I would have been appalled by them. Just goes to show how ignorant of knowledge I am. May Allah SWT increase brother in knowledge and application. Ameen.
@786toqs5 жыл бұрын
Not a bad explanation of the sectarian differences, fairly objective and wholesome.
@missuscarmen2 жыл бұрын
It is entirely incomplete in terms of ignoring the precipitating factor at Ghadr al khumm. Sunnism is the sect, the 'branch' if you will and those that follow the 12 imams are the trunk...the actual original root stock.
@ibrahimmustafa24812 жыл бұрын
@@missuscarmenAnd your source for this claim is: " trust me bro "
@zahragovindji69463 жыл бұрын
Dr. Abdal thank you so much for your very informative video. We are a group of Ex-Ismailis Aga Khanis'that have formed a Dawah team and would humbled if we could reach out to you for your feedback on some of the blasphemous content that is being preached by some of the Ismaili Aga Khani missionaries. Please help us in our struggle. Jazak Allah Khairan
@human0_0skull2 жыл бұрын
As salamu alaikum sister, in fact, this channel is not that of Dr. Abdal Hakim. His channels are Cambridge Muslim College and Cambridge Central Mosque, I think you can reach him there. May Allah reward you for your dawah.
@rethinkingismailism-englis20182 жыл бұрын
@@human0_0skull Jazak Allah Khairan I surely will.
@human0_0skull2 жыл бұрын
@@rethinkingismailism-englis2018 Wa iyyak.
@snakejuce2 жыл бұрын
@@rethinkingismailism-englis2018 Blows my mind how anyone is ign0rant enough to ever follow those non-muslim cults who scam the heck out of people. What a time to be alive.
@adrianaadnan77045 жыл бұрын
May Allah give u a long blessed life.amen
@IslamOnDemand13 жыл бұрын
@ByChoiceMuslim Is it possible you are making a sweeping generalization? ALL shia don't accept those narrations?
@samilamine950 Жыл бұрын
there's something that I should say is that the difference between sunna and shia are doctrinal and not only in jurisprudence and caliphate.
@hashmo1018 жыл бұрын
al-Ma'mun had asked Ali al-Ridha (as) several questions, one of which was as follows: - "What is the proof for the Caliphate of your grandfather, Ali ibn Abi Talib? - "The verse of our selves," The Imam replied. This is in reference to 5:55 in the Holy Quran. Who did the Holy Prophet take with him to the event of Mubahila to represent equivalency to himself? Of ALL the companions who were available at the time? Who was then honoured by Allah SWT by being referred to as the 'self' of the Holy Prophet in 5:55?
@طالبعشق-ض8ث4 жыл бұрын
Link to complete talk pls!
@adamcrume10 жыл бұрын
Not all of Christianity has a unified hierarchy with a supposedly perfect head. Roman Catholics have the pope, but most Protestant churches have loose associations or hierarchies that are more practical than doctrinal.
@alnotbiggaytho71244 жыл бұрын
He's probably referring to the 2 biggest groups in England, Catholics and the Anglican Church.
@shaamanplatinum11 жыл бұрын
If the idea of infalibility of the imams came about in the third century after Hijra, then why did the Prophet (sawas) refer to him as such? If he was not infallible, how could the Prophet have said legitimately, "Those who are friends of Ali follow me, and those who oppose Ali oppose me."
@shaamanplatinum11 жыл бұрын
No, but the people who they follow did. Imam Hasan and Imam Hussein (a.s) were murdered by Mu'waiyah and Yazid, and yet the two are revered by many Sunnis. More still, Abu Bakr made Fatima (a.s) angry - The Prophet said, "The one who makes Fatima angry angers me. And the one who angers me angers Allah." Not only did he do this, he took the khilafat from its rightful successor - Imam Ali. The Prophet addressed the muslims after his first and only Hajj not long before he died, proclaiming 'Man kuntum Mawla, Aliyyun mawla." or 'For who ever I am the Mawla (guardian, master) Ali is his Mawla." The khilafat who taken from the Commander of the Faithful THREE times before he recieved it, in which time Islam had become its near antithesis - an Empire, forcibly converting entire lands to acquire territory... Which was haraam. Aisha, the youngest wife of the Prophet, went to WAR with Ali, along with her allies Mu'awiyah, Amr bin Aas, and generally the whole clan of Bani Umayya. Remember the saying of the Prophet that I quoted which you replied to. These people are revered by the sunnis. I am not saying the sunnis are somehow evil. There is no way. They are merely ignorant of our Islamic history, and follow their scholars without question. To follow the people who warred with Ali, and indeed the people who were always at war with the Ahlulbayt of the Prophet in its entirety, is to oppose them.
@shaamanplatinum11 жыл бұрын
He didn't hate him. I suggest first you read Nahjul balagha (the writings of Imam Ali) and second understand that the Prophet never appointed Abu Bakr his successor, yet appointed Imam Ali (a.s.) on multiple occasions.
@shaamanplatinum11 жыл бұрын
You have six sahih books in Sunniism, correct? Among those is tirmidhi. If you are sincere, I suggest you look at these lists and conduct your own research: shiachat . com /forum/topic/234981753-ghadir-khum-in-authentic-sunni-books/ shiachat . com /forum/topic/77175-hadith-al-ghadeer-with-sunni-refrences/
@shaamanplatinum11 жыл бұрын
Are you referring to the treachery in Saqifa?
@shaamanplatinum11 жыл бұрын
He was with the rest of rasulullah's family, performing his funeral rites. He wasn't even told about the meeting in saqifa.
@Daniel-uq1yp3 жыл бұрын
He clearly likes leaving out important bits of information... you know... like ghadir khumm
@chill17794 жыл бұрын
My four question to you brother. Answer in Yes or No 1. Do Mohammad PBUH had a daughter? 2. Is she is the siddiqah? 3. Did she a.s went to the court of first Khalifa? 4. Did she a.s got what she asked for??
@jocelynburrell445 Жыл бұрын
Question reguardless will we or who ever living The Prophet pbuh and those mention in the Quran we have will be same book or will the book said with Allah show up
@shariqf815 жыл бұрын
Hazrat Fatima R.A married Hazrat Ali R.A well before he became Caliph, Please rephrase; 4:12 of the video.
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
It is just Fatimah (ra) and Ali (ra), there is no "hazrat": we worship Allah, not human beings. Shias are so dumb.
@loveforjustice28214 жыл бұрын
@@dauphin003 shias do not worship Ali and fatima. I have shia friends and i know thats not true.
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@loveforjustice2821 They are not your "friends", they are lying to you. Or, at best they are completely ignorant of their own creed.
@loveforjustice28214 жыл бұрын
@@dauphin003 ive had them around me for years n im sure they are not lying...ive attented their lectures n mosques
@loveforjustice28214 жыл бұрын
Yes they do love them intensely..i can say that
@mirrorreflection34794 жыл бұрын
It would be good to give sources as many would deny some of the aspects as "not mainstream" within the groups mentioned ...
@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص4 жыл бұрын
read a book أصول المذهب الشيعي الاثنى عشري المؤلف ناصر القفاري minhaj alsanat Ibn Taymia منهاج السنة لابن تيمية Sunnis infer from the origins of Shiite books to respond to them
@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص4 жыл бұрын
Differences Between Shias & Sunnis - Sheikh Fahd al Muqrin and Sheikh Uthman Al Khamees kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGemnWmAedlqppI
@mirrorreflection34794 жыл бұрын
@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص Brother there are numerous books and lectures out there which anyone can direct anyone else to... I only requested the respected sheikh in this video to provide references when giving such academic lectures because we like to hear from him.
@missuscarmen2 жыл бұрын
@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص Read Nahjul al Balagha and after you do that, you will have no choice but to return to the trunk of the tree: the 12 Imams starting with Ali, pbuh and ending with the Mahdi,
@amberkhan92384 жыл бұрын
May Allah swt reward you accordingly ameen
@ibukhari913 жыл бұрын
@SalamToMohammed Who said cursing Abu Baker (RA) or Umee Farooq(RA) makes you kafir (non muslim)? Any Hadees about that?
@mach1one5 жыл бұрын
Truthfears Guilty Lie!
@azizaali61135 жыл бұрын
Shia's r kuffars that's a fact.
@IslamOnDemand13 жыл бұрын
@ByChoiceMuslim Who said that?
@Avicena-tf5uj5 жыл бұрын
Makes an objective commentary on Islamic sects, infinite’s internet war in comment section....
@dortoka5 жыл бұрын
Also for the Shia who say that the decedents of the prophet SAW are infallible: Donald Trump is a decedent of the Prophet SAW, does this make him infallible?
@aliraza443155 жыл бұрын
Only the 12 are infallible apart from the prophet and Bibi Fatima you jahil. Read before you make such COOL statements
@marlobarksdale24244 жыл бұрын
@@aliraza44315 what about prophet nuh son he was a non-moslem
@tazboy19344 жыл бұрын
@@marlobarksdale2424 do u know who is the ahlul bayt?
@marlobarksdale24244 жыл бұрын
@@tazboy1934 who cares ! our deen not based on them
@ZainabZehra7862 жыл бұрын
@@marlobarksdale2424 read sahih bukhari and learn who the ahlulbait are before making such ignorant statements
@thebrummieyorky4 жыл бұрын
Great talk thank you.
@MohsinAli-lw8zq7 жыл бұрын
When were the sunni sects formed?
@rayanredha6234 жыл бұрын
There is not such a thing as sunni who follows sunnah of the prophet (sawaws). Sunni sect were formed many decades after the prophet and they are the follower of the sunnah of banu umayah not the prophet (sawaws). Shia is the only true follower of the prophet and true Sunnah which is narrated without lie through his "itrah" i.e. imamat. Shia is mentioned many times by the blessed prophet himself. All other things you here are just dicursive dominant discourse implications and are not true.
@alansarfoods4 жыл бұрын
We love Hazrat Ali may Allah be pleased with him but we don't manipulate scripts like you people to prove what is not there. We accept word on Allah and His messenger as it should be without incorporating worldly doctrine into the divine message. Pure Islam is with whom who interpret Quran and Hadith as it was by Companions of Prophet Muhammad SAW
@rayanredha6234 жыл бұрын
@@alansarfoods This is and absolutely illogical and empty claim you made with plenty of misinformation, which if it is not deliberate (concuction) it due to lack of knowledge. Let me make it more clear to you if you are after the TRUTH. If you are after the truth it will make you thinking and understand the truth and remains you and your conscience. 1-it is rediculous to claim: " i love harat Ali (a) but...". This is hipocracy of saying versus your action. You cant love Ali aa well as yazid or muawiyah. If you do you are a MUNAFIQ and dont hesitate that. This type of nonsense is distributed by Wahabis and children of ibn teymiyah who dont know anything about true Islam. YOU CAN'T LOVE IMAM HUSSAIN AND ACT IN ARMY OF YAZID. Even the priest of BAQARA understand that. 2- if your love for Ali (a) is not fake then you have to follow what he said and what he did too. As it is exactly what the prophet (sawaws) said. Al-haqq ma3aal-Ali wa Aliyun ma3a al-haq. 3-in the book of sunni brothers there are a lot of concuction, manipulation, extrapulations, LIES and deceit. Look at Bukhari. It is more than 90% Lies. This happened due to dominent discursive discourse who were in charge since the death of our prophet who manipulated and deviated Islam (except at Ali (a) time. Hence: 4-What you are following is neither QURAN nor SUNNAH of the prophet. But you are following the sunnat umawyiah and wrong interpretation of the Quran. 5-Whereas True Shia folliw the true sunnah and true interpretation of Quran. 6-this is the age of information. No longer deviated children of banu umayyah can manipulate Islam. WE DON'T ALLOW THEM. WE EXPISE THEIR LIES. 7- I am happy to assist you to understand THESE NAKED FACTS. If you wish i can teach a fact or two to your teacher too. But only if you are after the Truth. 8- In any case. The light of ahl beyt is shining day by day. Only blinds do see or feel it.
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@rayanredha623 There is no such a thing as "true Shia." Right there, you lost the debate. Shias are dangerous sects basesd on lies.
@rayanredha6234 жыл бұрын
@@dauphin003 replied few times it wipes out after a minute
@mekka1713 жыл бұрын
The thing is that we are closer to the shia then we will ever be from the people who claimed to be muslim and sunni and doesnt act according to Islam or the sunnah. We share a background knowledge of our religion, its a good base for a dialogue , either way... sure they are things we feel has sunni , that are unacceptable to us , because they fall on the blasphemy category or the innovation category ... our conduct with the shia , should be one of compassion they have been lead astray not lost
@andrewbryce27074 жыл бұрын
Can you have compassion with a Shia who abuses the companions and the wife of the prophet (saw). How about the Shia who say the current Qur'an is not the real one and pages were ripped out. Shia need to stop this before expecting any compassion.
@DodokiChan4 жыл бұрын
@@andrewbryce2707 Salam alaykum. Please stop spreading myths about shias not believing in the current Quran. The Shias believe in the whole of Quran. We do not abuse the companions or the wife of the Prophet (saw). The narrations(hadith) accepted by the Shia School of thought is different than the four sunni schools. Difference in hadith acceptance gives different descriptions of the various companions and their acts in history, that's why shias sometimes don't have a good image of some of the caliphs. The shia school of thought believes are this: (1) Tawhid, Belief in oneness of God; (2) Nubuwwat, Belief in the Prophets; (3) Qiyamat, 'Belief in the Day of Judgement. (4). 'Adl, Justice of God (5) Imamat, the successorship of the Prophet.
@andrewbryce27074 жыл бұрын
@@DodokiChan wa alaikum salaam. videos I see of twelver clerics abusing the companions and Aisha are fabrication? The clerics saying the Qur'an has missing pages all a fabrication. The Shia who don't do this I have no problem with. you are my brother as you don't! You are lying to yourself if you don't believe twelver clerics are doing this though. The videos are available to watch
@DodokiChan4 жыл бұрын
@@andrewbryce2707 I don't know what type of shia cleric your talking about, I'm aware that someone called Yassir habib does that but he's not someone one should associate with the rest of the clerics. Also there are tons of information about the shia school of thought, please research before you ask if the twelver clerics believes in the fabrication of Quran. WE DON'T, We believe that someone who does that is out of the fold of Islam too.
@andrewbryce27074 жыл бұрын
@@DodokiChan ammar nakshawani has been filmed cursing the companions. Azhar Nasser has been filmed doing similar things.
@marmfruit5 жыл бұрын
Why would anyone with common sense accept that Ali (RA) should automatically be the next khalifah upon the Rasul's (S) death JUST bc they're related? Multiple blood relations of the Prophet (S) were not Muslim sadly. So why does bloodline get so much importance? And why are there so few Shi'a than Sunnis? Are you saying Allah would just let the majority of Muslims from the Prophet's (S) time be so erroneous? Stop being so angry and just ask Allah for guidance. None of this crap matters, only our relationship with Allah and getting to Jannah does. It's purely ego that makes ppl want to fight about whatever their mommy and daddy taught them is the truth. ASK ALLAH FOR GUIDANCE AND DO YOUR RESEARCH.
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
These Shias are idiots, ready to swallow any lie. Even Ali gave to his sons (after he remarried) the names of Abu Bakr and Omar: is this that someone against the first Caliphs would do? You Shias seriously need to use your brains instead of recycling blasphemous lies.
@jaaferalemara81243 ай бұрын
lol this is the most flawed logic ever. Ali a.s is divinely appointed by Allah swt, we don’t just follow him because he’s the prophets(s) cousin. We follow him based on merit, on being the first male to accept Islam, never running from battle, being the most knowledgeable, and more. Furthermore he never bowed to an idol in his whole life, it is illogical that God would entrust his religion to former idol worshippers. This is like allowing an ex convict become the president of a nation, yes they can rehab and become good people but to put them in control of the affairs of the people after what they’ve done is illogical. Also the numbers game is probably the most ignorant point you’ve made in your life. Most people are not Muslim, so does that mean Islam is false? Even within Islam, there are 4 denominations of Sunni Islam, does that mean the majority one is following the correct law and the rest are all incorrect?
@sask35214 жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter what you are, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and the last prophet. You are a Muslim. Allah says he will sort out the disputes we had amongst each other. We are all Muslims, no matter which tradition thinks they are right.
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
And what happen if you worship people (Ali, Hussein) instead of Allah? If you believe that Gabriel made "a mistake" when he brought the revelation to the Propphet (saw) instead of Ali? These are principles of the deviant Shia sect. Not mentioning the crazy stories about "12 imams" who are alllegedly superior in attributes to the prophets. There is a reason why after all these centuries Chiism remains a minority: people are not stupid.
@sask35214 жыл бұрын
In every muslim sect we have added information, after the Quran was written. what happens when we take them as the words of the prophet, when they weren't? Don't single out Shia please, because sunnis themselves follow different books and sayings. Like God made a mistake by issuing 50 prayers a day then after Mohammed pleaded with him he reduced it to 5. So God changes laws on prayer because a man asked him to? And I can go on and on. We love Christians and Jews so much, and we believe in interfaith dialogue but when it comes to each other and our secterian differences we call each other non believers? Again we may have differences but it does not make us non muslim. The differences we see were inspired by zionists, orientalists and western colonial powers who dug up information to divide and conquer muslims by highlighting differences. These differences were never a problem during Ottoman rule or for that matter most of the Islamic golden age. These ideas of hate and intolerance are the result of power hungry people who wish for people to hate and destroy each other on fabled ideas that were never a Muslim one to begin with. No one called himself a Sunni or Shia at the time of the prophet. These are differences that we may not agree on but in the end we are still Muslim. Don't let others insite hate in you. I am going to stress that if you believe in the Quran, we may not all be scholars, but if you do believe it, you are a Muslim. Period!
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@sask3521 The noble Quran was not "written" but revealed. Sunnis, that is Muslims, follow the noble Quran, the science of ahadith, and the consensus [ijma] of the theologians. "God made a mistake"??? Are you serious? Do you really think that with you ridiculous, pea brain, you are going to question God's' plan. Do yourself a favor: keep silent, and get an education.
@sask35214 жыл бұрын
So the Quran was never written? Common sense, it was written after it was revealed. I can tell English is not your native language. We don't have writings of the Quran? Who is the pea brain here. God made a mistake is what you said in the beginning with Ali, I am adding that sunnis believe this also. Tell me something. How many times a day did Jesus and Moses pray? I can tell English is not your language you have a hard time reading things according to context. "consensus of the theologians''. We don't use this word in Islam, A theologian can be an atheist, or Christian or any religion. Use the right word. There is a verse in the Quran that tells us what to believe, the angels, the books sent (not hadith books) but those sent before, prophets, God is one and the day of judgement. As far as I know every muslim sect believes in this.
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@sask3521 Please do not patronize me about my excellent command of the English language. You have the right to be an idiot, don't think that everyone else is. Now, I'll say again what I wrote the first time: the noble Quran was REVEALED. Only after the Prophet (saw) passed away the revelations was TRANSCRIBED, not written. Can you that mushy thing in your head grasp the the difference between, for instance, writing a novel, and transcribing an account? There are NO mistake in the noble Quran, it is blessed and untouched. Then despite close attention to your weak response, you seem to be digressing in further idiotic comments about prayers, with obviously not even the shadow of knowledge and understanting of the topic itself. And the very suggestion that "God made a mistake" is evidence enough that not only are you ignorant but blasphemous (yep, look it up in a real dictionary) as well. The principles of faith [aqidah] require that Muslims believe in the angels, the scriptures, the divine will [qadr], the unseen [ghareeb], and the Day of Judgment [qiyamah]. As for the Shia sect(s) they believe in whatever dumb fables they've made up. But I am afraid that I lost you.
@harismehmoodsatti69245 жыл бұрын
Shias is totally different relegion about islam
@mustafaaldarraji28075 жыл бұрын
Harismehmood Satti143 wow you’re so stupid
@zakback99375 жыл бұрын
Mustafa Al Darraji if so, prove how it isn’t.
@arfameraz59515 жыл бұрын
Plzz..I am a sunni muslim..stop spreading this idiocity ...anyone who believes in Allah is muslim
@raad81505 жыл бұрын
Most Shia are Muslim
@786humaira15 жыл бұрын
@@raad8150 shia are probably better in learning understanding and practising Islam. Look how all others getting beat up by war Mongers.
@DarioHaruni3 жыл бұрын
What about the Zaydis?
@clacly4044 жыл бұрын
*99.99℅ of Algerians are Sunni Maliki There is small group of people called the mozabites they live mainly in Ghardaia south of algeria, their madhab is ibadi*
@kroozi4 жыл бұрын
Ibadis are modern day kharijitis
@jamalbradley11513 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah, the sheikh has great insight but I believe he is a bit misinformed about the people of Oman being kharajite. They may be descendants of the khwarj but the contemporary Omani people follow the Ibadhi madhab. It's definitely not the same as the khwarj of close to 1400 years ago.
@hashmo1018 жыл бұрын
In Sahih of al-Bukhari: Narrated Jabir ibn Samura: I heard the Prophet saying, "There will be twelve commanders (Amir)." He then said a sentence which I did not hear. My father said, the Prophet added, "All of them will be from Quraysh."
@holdshiftt2run3085 жыл бұрын
Where is the number? Which book of Al-Bukhari is it in? If you can't properly reference it, don't use it.
@hashmo1015 жыл бұрын
HoldShiftt2Run Sahih al-Bukhari (English) Hadith: 9.329, Kitabul Ahkam. Sahih al-Bukhari (Arabic) 4:165, Kitabul Ahkam. Hadith #6682 (numbering of al-‘Alamiyyah)
@adamahmadbey7144 жыл бұрын
10 shia imam wre nt even caliphs
@IslamOriginal144 жыл бұрын
@@holdshiftt2run308 Sahih Bukhari #9.89.329 & Tarikh Bukhari vol 8 #3520 (Yunus ibn Abi Ya fur) Narrated Jabir ibn Samurah: I heard the Prophet saying, "There will be twelve Muslim rulers." He then said a sentence which I did not hear. My father said, "All of them will be from Quraysh." Sahih Muslim #20.4477-84 and Sharh Sahih Muslim of Nawawi 12:201 Jabir ibn Samurah narrates: The Messenger of Allah said, "The affairs of the people will continue to be conducted well as long as they are governed by twelve men/caliphs among them." Then he said something that I could not follow. I said to my father, "What did he say?" He said: He has said, "All of them will be from the Quraysh." Also in: Sunan Abu Dawud #4279-81 Sunan Tirmidhi #2223 (certifies as hasan-sahih) Musnad Hanbal (32 traditions) #3781, #3859, #20824, etc. Mustadrak Hakim #6586, #6589 Kanz al-Ummal #30929, #33848-61, #39657 Ibn Abbas, who quoted the Prophet as saying, "There will remain twelve rulers (amirs) and then the Hour will come." Majma al-Zawaid #8967, #8968 (certified authentic) Fath al Bari #6796 Tarikh ibn Kathir 6:215, 6:221, 6:278-9 Tarikh al-Khulafa 16-18 Ibn Masud was asked, "O Abu Abd al Rahman, did you ask the Messenger of Allah how many khalifs this nation will have?" He said, "Since I have come to Iraq, no one has asked me this but you. We asked the Messenger of Allah this question, and he said, 'Twelve -- the same number as the chiefs of the [twelve tribes of the] Children of Israel.'" (Certified as authentic). Fara id al-Simtayn of Juwayni pg. 160. Yanabi al-Mawaddah 3:281-3, 3:284-5, and 3:380-1 In Yanabi al-Mawaddah 3:284-5, regarding the 12 Imams "According to Jabir ibn Abd Allah al Ansari, the Messenger of Allah siad my executors are 12... the first of them is the chief of the executors (sayyid al awsiya), the father of the imams Ali, he his two sons, Hasan and Husayn, so stick to them and do not allow the ignorance of the ignorant to deceive you... when the time of Husayn passes, the imam will be his son Ali, entitled Zayn al-Abiden. After him will be his son Muhammad, entitled al-Baqir. After him will be his son Jafar, called As Sadiq. After him will be his son Musa, called al Kazim. After him will be his son Ali, called al Rida. After him will be his son Muhammad, called al Taqi or al Zaki. After him will be his son Ali, called al Naqi and al Hadi. After him will be his son Hasan, called al-Askari. After him will be his son Muhammad, called al Mahdi, al Qaim, and al Hujjah. He will go into occultation and then come out. When he comes out, he will fill the earth with righteousness and justice the same way it was filled with oppresion and injustice. The patient oness during this occultation will be blessed with the blessings of the pious for their love of these imamas. Allah has described them in His Book, where He says, 'a guide for the pious--those who believe in the unseen.' Faraid al Simtayn pg. 160: Abd Allah ibn Abbas said: I heard the Messenger of Allah say: "I and Ali and Hasan and Husayn and the nine of the offspring of Husayn are pure and protected from sin."
@jaaferalemara81247 ай бұрын
@@adamahmadbey714this is like a Christian saying Muhammad (s) isn’t a prophet cuz they don’t believe in him 🤣 just because the community doesn’t recognize them doesn’t mean they aren’t the imam.
@merza47235 жыл бұрын
Where is he????
@Ismael___607Ай бұрын
under your bed
@yaakobismail45959 жыл бұрын
All the successors of the Prophet were not having any body guard because they assumed the citizens were behaving well.Abu Bakar was stern with people who claimed to be false prophets because thay would cause division amongst muslims. Because of loose safe guarding of safety of lives of these successors the enemies took full advantage of situation.Until the time of Othman ,Othman refused the protection of Ali because according to him let be if Allah wanted it to be so.Muawiyah was not happy with this situation because Ali was unable to do anything about it.That was how I think ruling was based on family succession.
@shahidzaidi2688 жыл бұрын
Although named after two great Prophets yet showing no sign of intelligence, Imam Ali (a.s.) able to do anything by the Will Of Allah, if a person is believer will understand an ignorant shall say quote 'Ali being unable' unquote, I pity them.
@sinaa.21022 жыл бұрын
I found Lewis where’s Clark
@AhlulBidahExposed11 жыл бұрын
There are many statements from the Imaams of hadeeth from the time of the Salaf where they called individuals "dajjals" Will you also accuse them of takfeer?!
@tarkanyilmaz69056 жыл бұрын
And the Alevis live In Turkey. A branch of Shia sect following Ali .They dont practice salah therefore they dont go to mosque. Instead they practice Islam in Cemevi. (Pronounced Djem house) a sort of mesjid. In their rituals an instrument called saz (baglama) is played accompanied by religious singing and dances male and female all together. So another reason for you not to generalise Muslims. Be very specific what kind of Islam or Muslims are you are criticising or praising.
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
There so many sects of Chiism that they cannot even agree among themselves with their fabrications and deviance.
@chill17794 жыл бұрын
all of the sects of islam brothers because all of other imams i.e. imam hanif, jmam shafi etc are the students of sixth Imam Jaffer Sadiq a.s of shi'ite
@Realni9215 Жыл бұрын
Assalamu aleikum dear sheikh i wish that our muslim history is such simple and uncomplicated. Like u explained.
@firoxh11 жыл бұрын
Shia follow Mohammad (sawa) and his close Family who live with him more spend time from others and always Messenger of Allah Sobhanahu love Khadija his wife Fatima his Daughter Ali brother in law and husband of Fatimah and Hasan and Hossain Grandsons of him.
@angelofdeath77395 жыл бұрын
@Truthfears Guilty You are a khawarij aren't you
@funkzy29755 жыл бұрын
Truthfears Guilty u serious?
@adamahmadbey7144 жыл бұрын
shiyas worship ali and imams give them the titles of allah, jst like christians did with jesua as an maryam as
@captainhd97414 жыл бұрын
Maryam Mohd You cannot use Sunni hadith to try and tell a Shia that Imam Ali had sons called Umar. If Sunni Islam follows Sahaba that changed and no longer remained truthful then obviously these hadiths will become problematic. You don’t say “Islam is the right religion because the Quran says it” no first you have to prove that the Quran is right to prove what it says is right. If Shias are right about Ahlulbayt then of course this will change a lot of things.
@captainhd97414 жыл бұрын
Adam Ahmad Bey When did Shias worship Imam Ali?
@never-say-die2 жыл бұрын
Ali is the son-in-law and Abubakr the closest friend. This comment is biased towards shi'a because Abubakr was the father-in-law. May Allah guide us all in the right path.
@AbuMoosaa5 жыл бұрын
There is a general sense in the meaning of Sunni, i.e. they are not Shia(particularly Rafidah) And there is a specific sense in the meaning of Sunni, i.e. they are those who strictly follow Rasool sallallahu alaihi wa sallam and his Sahabah radhi Allahu anhum. General sense of Sunni includes all types of Muslims (Khawarij, Ashari, Marturidi, Soofis, etc)....in the specific sense the Sunnis are Salafis, Ahlus Sunnah, Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama'ah, Ahlul Hadeeth, Ahlul Athar, Firqatun Najiya, Taifatul Mansoora...these are revelation and legislated names for those who strictly follow Rasool sallallahu alaihi wa sallam and Sahabah radhi Allahu anhun. In Aqeedah and Manhaj. In belief, knowledge, statements and actions.
@nayansiddique92245 жыл бұрын
By Rejecting and Condeming Salafs and their teaching ? like tabei imam abu hanifa(imam of fikh) , tabei imam hasan basri (imam of tasawuf/sufism) , tabe tabei imam malik, shafei ,, first gen imam of Aqaid like imam abul hasan Ashari and imam abu mansur maturidy who documented and defended the Aqida of ahl e sunnah wal jamah from the innovated aqida (firka) Khawareji, Shia, Qadari, Mutajila , Murjia etc.. the words of identity of different firka's names like Salafi,Shia, Ahl e hadith etc are also innovation the only name written in hadith is Ahl e Sunnah and Jamah and specifically Sunnis are Ahle Sunnah ..
@jocelynburrell445 Жыл бұрын
All of this came after The Day have completed My favor given Islam .
@ahmeda952 жыл бұрын
Firstly, the main split between shias & Sunnis was a divinity/ religious one rather than a political one. Shias believe that the successorship of Imam Ali AS was determined by God, as in the Quran God says to the Angels “I have appointed my “Calipha” on earth” (when referring to Adam PBUH. In other words, Shias believe that the role of Calipha is not one which selected by people, rather, it is one which is selected by God, as there has never been a time in the prophetic history where a Calipha of God was “elected” by man. Secondly, the Prophet PBUH emphasized the successorship of Imam Ali AS in Ghadeer Khum, when he said “whoever I am their moula (leader), Ali is now their Leader”, at the time which the verse Of the Quran was revealed stating that the message was now completed in its entirety. So the first point is that this has always been a religious dispute, even though there was a political component to it (in that we believe the people seized the opportunity after the Prophet PBUH death, to gain benefit politically). Secondly, in regards to “accepting some of the hadiths”… that is not accurate as we believe and accept hadiths as part of our belief. However, we do not consider the Sunni books (the Sahih 6) to be a hijah upon us, and there are other books of hadiths which we accept, and have been passed down for many generations and authenticated. So we do accept hadiths, just not the ones other schools claim to be “sahih”. Thirdly, all of our Imams are deriving their knowledge from the sunnah of the Prophet PBUH. Meaning, when they tell us a hikma (ruling) or an interpretation of something; they are speaking on behalf of the prophet (as they are his successors). Everything they know comes from the Prophet & Allah swt. Prime example would be Imam Jafar AS, who was the teacher of the Sunni Scholars who founded the main Sunni methabs (Maliki, Hanafi, Hanbali, etc). Yes we do go to the Imams for the rulings and teachings, however they are the successors and they teach from the sunnah for the Holy Prophet. Decent explanation, however to make it seem like the Shia are some fringe element is pathetic. We are extremely prominent in Canada, UK & USA. And in the Middle East, you will find significant Shia communities in Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq, Lebanon, Iran, & even UAE along with many other places. Shias do make up 15% of the Muslim population, however Sunnis have many factions within themselves. The Maliki’s, and the Hanafis, and the Hanbalis, cannot all be counted as one, considering they have significant differences in their methabs.. the split between these methabs would make them also 15% - 10% for each. Then you have the Wahabis who also claim to be Sunni, however make up about 1% but are living off of this “Sunni majority” thing lol. Numbers and statistics can be deceiving, and so we should try to be careful in how we throw them around. Salamalaykum
@missuscarmen2 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU my brother Shia. When I see these kinds of things that ignore the event at Ghadr al Khumm, I almost have to plug my ears because they begin to hurt. Peace to you.
@lebanesegooner Жыл бұрын
@@missuscarmen islam is not crying and hurting your bodies and imagining meanings that are not there. May allah guide you to the path of ahlul bayt and al haq , Imam abu hanifa and malik bin anas the founders of the maliki and hanafi schools were students of jaafar al sidiq (as) Come back to the way of prophet muhammad (SAW) who told us that his ummah will not unite on falsehood.
@kasimshaikh3750 Жыл бұрын
Khadeer Khum event didn't automatically make Ali as Khalifa like Shias like to claim. Prophet left it upon the Ummah to decide the Khalifa. Ofcourse people were split and there were differences in opinion. But the Barakaah during the Khilafah and Absolute success of Abu Bakr and Umar itself is huge and significant indication that they were the rightly guided.
@kasimshaikh3750 Жыл бұрын
As for split between Sunnis I don't think you understand the difference between the different Imams you need to study much more on the topic.
@lebanesegooner Жыл бұрын
@@kasimshaikh3750 lol according to twelver shias only 4 sahabas from the thousands understood ghadir khum , and they all became murtad and kaffir. Wallahi if they read their made up stories after the death of al hassan al askari (as) , they call it zaman el heera (زمن الحيرة) , which made them come up with concepts of al ghayba alsughra and al ghayba al kubra..... religion built on hate of people that imam ali married his daughter to , named his sons after fought under their caliphates etc..
@rsdwdyouown11 жыл бұрын
@sunnahproduction I said those who neglect the prophet household there's some Sunnis that don't neglect them and if its about number prophet was always out numbers by the others and what was Saudi
@jeremyranta21487 жыл бұрын
So do shi'a believe in both the return of the hidden imam and of the missiah at the end of time, or just one?
@AliForTruth7 жыл бұрын
Jeremy Ranta no brother, we Shia believe that Imam Mahdi will come back and fight the oppressors of the world and then Jesus (a.s) will come down and kill the dajjal (system)
@jeremyranta21487 жыл бұрын
oh thanks, i didn't know that
@AliForTruth7 жыл бұрын
Jeremy Ranta no problem
@asifmuhammed6115 жыл бұрын
Nice lecture well explained 👍👍
@ministryofcoders13567 жыл бұрын
Btw Sunnis believes in Imam Mehdi a.s. as well, and believes same as Shia that he will arrive in the end of time and Jesus a.s. will perform his prayer behind Imam mehdi a.s.
@jocelynburrell445 Жыл бұрын
What ever came we are the Now Word Hadith word in the Quran
@eccosabanovic15894 жыл бұрын
..i just do not understand fractions of any kind, in existence, considering that Quran is very straightforward and explicit about fractions/sects...whats wrong with holding on to The Book, as it is?? .. I just dont get those 'scholars' within various fractions....
@BlackJack-lg3vx4 жыл бұрын
Ecco Sabanovic yea but everyone can have their own explanation of Quran but we Sunni Muslim believe that only the prophet and his companions and their companions understood it best. And the explanation of Quran is the explanation of the prophet. And that’s where Hadith comes from. We have to stick to both to be on the straight path. Hopefully this helps you. May Allah guide all of us .
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
Exactly, we have the noble Quran, the scientifically documented sunnah of the Prophert (saw): why do the Shias need to make up stories and lie all the way? Even their ablutions and prayers are twisted, that's how sick this sect is.
@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص4 жыл бұрын
Differences Between Shias & Sunnis - Sheikh Fahd al Muqrin and Sheikh Uthman Al Khamees kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGemnWmAedlqppI
@Shia.Ahlulbayt3 жыл бұрын
@@dauphin003 How sick? How sick is your sectarian hatred. For starters in sahih bukhari and sahih muslim it says follow the quran and the ahlulbayt not quran and sunnah. The whole foundation of sunnah is based on a false argument. You know why ablutions and prayers are different because Khalifah made changes and this is even documented in sunni hadiths. Umar introduced the crossing of arms in prays. This why maliki's who are sunni don't cross their arms because the prophet never did. The quran doesn't say to wash feet even famous sunni scholar ar Razi admits (O you who believe! when you rise up to prayer, wash your faces and your hands as far as the elbows and wipe your heads and your feet to the (two) ankles. 5:6) Imam ar-Razi declared: “The evidence of those, who thought that wiping the feet was obligatory, was based upon the two kinds of reciting the phrase (and your feet) mentioned in the verse of wudu’. Ibn Katheer, Hamza, Abu Amr an Aasim recited the phrase in genitive and Nafi’, ibn Aamir and Aasim recited it in accusative. Reciting it in genitive determined that (your feet) was coupled to (your heads) and then as it was obligatory to wipe the head it would be obligatory to wipe the feet. As for reciting it in accusative, it also determined that it was obligatory to wipe the feet because the saying (and wipe your heads) made (your heads) as object and (your feet) was coupled to (your heads) so both of them were objects of the verb (wipe)”
@Shia.Ahlulbayt3 жыл бұрын
The interpretations of the quran is not straight forward. The Prophet said to take the interpretation of the quran from him and his ahlulbayt. Quran even warns in it that verses can be taken out of context. The sunni claim the prophet said to follow the quran and sunnah. Problem is in their 2 most authentic books sahih bukhari and sahih muslim you will find it say quran and ahlulbayt but you won't find it saying quran and sunnah. If that is their most authentic book doesn't have basis of how they gather the evidence for their beliefs it is a problem. That is an understandment. Question why don't they follow the quran and the ahlulbayt? They claim they do but the khalifah made changes which they will openly admit and they follow these changes. So they aren't following what the prophet asked. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nV62qmmagL2seck
@ThirdEye00775 жыл бұрын
Let me ask one question.... did Ali (ra) ever complained or revolted on the issue of so called "Right of succession ".? . did any of the later descendants of Ali (RA) wrote on this... i am a sunni who believes Ali (Ra) is a Perfect Man.. please enlighten me..
@rayanredha6234 жыл бұрын
Yes, Ali (as) did contest any successor apart from him. But abu bakr and umar they wanted to kill all the household of the prophet who were reject the coup of abu bakr. If you read khubah that hazrat Fatimah said in front of abu bakr you will face such an eloquent defence of Imam Ali's right of successorship. You can also read direct words of imam Ali in council of 6 and elsewhere. There is no man after the prophet has even an iota of legitamcy to be successor of the prophet EXCEPT ALI. There is no way that even today with all the fake narations concocted into Sunnis book in favour of 3 cailifs, any of the Sahaba can be compared with Ali (a), especially those who usurped the right of succession from ali by coup de tat in thaqifa of bani saaida. Mostvimportantly, The prophet (sawaws) himself, many times CLEARLY emphasised that Ali is my succesor right after me.
@ThirdEye00774 жыл бұрын
@@rayanredha623 but Ali (Ra) was also a caliph... i can not reach into a conclusion unless there is a live debate between supreme Shia and sunni clerics.. plus i cannot agree with Shias who degrede and abuse Ayisha Ra.. because nabi kareen Sa was with her during his last times
@rayanredha6234 жыл бұрын
Brother, We shall not mix few issues together. You brought up in your last excerpt 3 main issues. 1. "But Ali (as) was also Calif...". It is not the matter that Ali (as) became Calif 25 years after the death of the Prophet (sawaws). The matter is that there should have not been any other Calif before Ali and BUT ONLY ALI. (.... anta khalifati min ba3di..) ( just after me.) In the other hand abu bakr, umar and uthman have usurped Ali's pisition by force and deceit and due to their ill intention and extreme lack of knowledge have deviated from the true pathway of islam and the prophet. 2. "Debate between top sunni and shia scholas..." A. The great Sunni scholars now a day will always refuse to have a debate. Because they know the sect they are following is not based on truth and proper Islam. And if they debate they do it with an unknown grade zero shia mulla who has no experience or knowledge to answer them. B. There were and still are open invitation to the sunni great scholars for debate from Shia scholars, but Sunni schollars ignore it. C. In past there were debates in this matter and great sunni schollars in the debate when found the truth they were guided to become a true Muslim (shia ithna ashari). Example of past debates: ▪︎ is a book transcript of one of great shia schollars with 5 or 6 prominent sunni scholars in shiraz many years ago. It is called "shabhaye bishaboor" it has taken place for at least 10 nights and jury were compering it. If you are really after the truth then read it. There is re-enacted film of it on youtube as well. ▪︎ Another example is debate of imam Reza (as) with all greatest scholars of the world in sunni, jews, chritians, zoroasterians etc at the court of Abbasid. a short excerpt of it is available on youtube. ▪︎ And many more 3. Shia who reject Ayisha and you don't accept coz the prophet was with her. A. It is true and rightly so that all shia reject Ayisha. B. Just because prophet was with her is no bearing here. Noah the prophet also was with her wife, hood and lut as well The Quran has declared the mishuided position of ayisha and hafsa. (Zarab allah mathalan amreata ....." is in declaring that heart of ayisha and hafsa are deviated. Check the Quranic tafasir. C. Further, Ayisha became power hunger and extremely deviated after the prophet. She also rioted against the imam Ali (as) your 4th Cailif. And according to sunni books whoever does that has a place in burning hell. There is no sign of repentence on that from her either. D. In that account the prophet warned her of 'kalab al awhab, BUT SHE IGNORED THE PROPHET'S ORDER, AND WHOEVER DOES THAT HAS A PLACE IN HELL. E. Many other things about ayisha but these points reveals the deviated stance of ayisha. F. I agree with you that we should not say swear (curse) at her, not because she doesn't deserves (she does), it but just for the respect of the prophet. But it doesn't mean we cannot discuss her deviated position academically and intellectually to reveal the truth The great schollars of shia banned curse on ayicha etc (eg khamenei, sistani, etc). Howevere, there is a very real few thousand minority who propsgate swearingvand it is not accepted by the rest of shia. Read the book by Dr Tijani (then I was guided). He was a sunni schollar found the truth and became shia. May Allah guides you to the Truth.
@ThirdEye00774 жыл бұрын
@@rayanredha623 i will discuss this.. inshaAllah
@hasundarwiche55894 жыл бұрын
Read a the sermon of shaqshaqiya from nahj al balagha
@missuscarmen2 жыл бұрын
It is such a shallow reading to base the difference on "fallibility". As well, to start the story at 200 years after the fact. The story literally started at the grave of the prophet. To ignore Ghadr al Khumm is to ignore the sectarian problems created when "sunni" diverted DIVINE power towards their own cronies. It's not just political unless a person is a luke warm muslim. Which, most are.
@lebanesegooner Жыл бұрын
first learn that its called ghaddir khum, secondly the explanation and interpretation of shias to ghaddir khum is an imaginative narrative that even Hasan ibn ali (AS) who according to you is infalable doesn't accept because he would never accept to settle for batil and tell Imam Husayn (AS) not to go if your story is to be true. Secondly, imam ali (AS) fought under the rule of the caliphs and risked his life for islam, named his kids after their names (Uthman ibn Ali, Umar ibn Ali and Abu Bakr ibn Ali who all martyred during karbala) and gave his daughter zaynab al sughra to Omar (RA) , Imam ali even married Asma bint Umais after she was widowed following the death of Ja'far ibn Abi Talib (AS), Abu Bakr (RA) married her and after the death of abu bakr (RA), Imam Ali married her (AS). They had fights? sure like brothers but were never enemies.
@missuscarmen Жыл бұрын
@@lebanesegooner Well I am in agreement. I have read all about Ghadeer al Khum, have read the mujaharat, and the Nahj al Balagha. I was muslim for many years before I read the Nahj and when I did read it, I could not resist the truth of it and it completed my understanding of Islam. I've never turned back since then and through this understanding, I have united my family under the banner of the Ahul Bayt. Thank you for your helpful guidance but I'm already there brother. Peace.
@lebanesegooner Жыл бұрын
@@missuscarmen you clearly are not in agreement when you are dodging my questions and accepting that what is in nahjul balagha is true when it was collected 4 centuries later 😂
@missuscarmen Жыл бұрын
@@lebanesegooner Ah I see. Screw off dude. You have zero understanding and furthermore, harrassment by messed up Leb dudes is not my cup of tea. Go do your sister.
@lebanesegooner Жыл бұрын
@@missuscarmen ad hominem fallacies that is what happens when your aqeedah is so weak. May allah protect the ummah from ignorants like you from the rawafidh or nawasib side. SubhanAllah shias are like christians in so many ways when faced with reality they attack the person instead of defend their own creed. As to the insults you gave me concerning my nationality this represent your akhlaq and your sect that has nothing to do with islam .
@krishammond88518 жыл бұрын
Which parts of Islam performs terrorist acts ? And what do they believe ? Where do they get there motive from?
@kamranmahfooz127 жыл бұрын
The part of Muslims who are lickers of Zionists and follow Christian agenda.
@kamranmahfooz127 жыл бұрын
Mujji Raza don't u have shame... Pitting Muslims and insulting them in answering to bloody Christian. U have made us a laughing stick.
@user-qv2vu7hm4u7 жыл бұрын
There isn't a verse in the entire Qur'an that incites terrorism
@user-qv2vu7hm4u7 жыл бұрын
The KZbin comment section is not an appropriate platform to consult for information regarding Islam. If you sincerely want answers to these questions visit your local Mosque or read a copy of the Qur'an.
@momenshakerhameed93626 жыл бұрын
Kris Hammond isis,alqaeda and talaban are all followers of Wahhabism which is a around 300 years old.
@budakpurba63027 жыл бұрын
ali also baiah towards abu bakr... all 4 khalif is a good friend to each other... theres no disputes between them... they repect and loves each others highly.. shia followers has been decieve by their ulama... abu bkr n umar graves is beside prophet Muhammad s.a.w graves in madinah...
@autumnicleaf5 жыл бұрын
@b king - 6 months or 6 years. If he did, he did.
@zawawa88174 жыл бұрын
too mant salty shia comment here wkakaka
@welaya13 жыл бұрын
@ByChoiceMuslim They are Muslim, they are one sect of the Islamic sects.
@987lllkeylll2 жыл бұрын
Not Shia but I don’t differentiate between them and sunnis. At the end we’re all Muslims
@WeldAzzaba4 жыл бұрын
Shia believe that a kingdom ought to have been started in the Islamic world after the death of Prophet Mohammed (PBUH).
@hasundarwiche55894 жыл бұрын
Not a kingdom exactly as the succeeding imam is not always the oldest son therefore it is not a matter of inheritance of position. We believe the 12 imams were chosen by Allah swt and are even alluded to in the christian holy book as 12 princes....
@WeldAzzaba4 жыл бұрын
@@hasundarwiche5589 Can you please refer me to the Quranic Surat(s) or our Prophet's (SAAWS) Hadith(s) that spells out the names of these 12 Imams? Thanks
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@hasundarwiche5589 There are NO such a thing as "12 infallible imams." This is blasphemous nonsense.
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@hasundarwiche5589 "12 imams"??? Wherefrom? Some Persian fable? You people are really crazy. You cannot even perform [wudhu] according to the sunnah of the Prophet (saw): do you think that your prayers are valid, with this stupid stone on your forehead? When did the Prophet (saw) pray like that. what are your sources? Chiism is a deviant sect (many actually, which shows how insane this is) that is based on lies and manipulative tricks.
@WeldAzzaba4 жыл бұрын
@@hasundarwiche5589 Chosen by Allah (SWT)- says who? 12 princes is Islam? what are you saying? Please use PROOF as References in the Quran when you talk about God (SWT). Anything else is pure heresy - period. Can you show us where does God (SWT) mentioned Abu Bakr, Omar Ibn El Khatab, Uthman or Ali Ibn Abu Talib? These believes are leading you away from Allah's Quran and Mohammed's Sunna (SAAWS). You are now at "legalizing" pedophilia and prostitution with YOUR concept of "Mutt'a' and what have you. I honestly believe that you are using Ali (RA) to further divide the Islamic "Umma" as you pretend to feel sorry for the murder of Hussein to "feel" sorry what your predecessors did in Betraying - yes betraying Ali (RA) and later did the same thing to his 2 sons. Ali (RA) is NOT a god or a Demi-god - your "adoration" of Ali(RA) is a pure Cult of Personality if not pure "Shirk". And please STOP using this lame excuse of you and only you - Shi'a LOVE "Ahlu El Beit" and yet you turn around and insult Aicha (Ummo El Muslimin). This is HYPOCRISY and it seems that is exactly what the right wing EVANGILANCAL CHRISTIANS want you to keep doing as it supports their "Trinity" concept and many other practices and believes.
@333Chrome10 жыл бұрын
secondly, as for me, the Intern Islam Violence is about No reason at all, But economic, theological and political Power. so, as a Christian, I hate War, but since its your War, just go on, Islam will Implode
@englishteacher31455 жыл бұрын
No dear brother! They are less than 6% in Pakistan. Mainly in cosmopolitan areas!
@shh111115 жыл бұрын
But pakistani film industry is full of them, every other artist is shia
@tahasb5 жыл бұрын
Afraid much?
@englishteacher31455 жыл бұрын
@@tahasb afraid of what? Only correcting record.
@theziggyh3 жыл бұрын
Bottom line, corruption of Tawheed was used to spawn the various sects in Islam.
@feedsunj6 жыл бұрын
What about Sufis ?
@thankfulbeliever9905 жыл бұрын
Sufism is right way of sunni. Unfortunately, many Sufi people are doing things against sharia.
@marlobarksdale24244 жыл бұрын
another misguided sect that worships dead saints similar to the Catholics
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
Sufi are lost with their innovations, but less dangerous than the Shias who tried to completely rewrite Islam.
@marlobarksdale24244 жыл бұрын
@@dauphin003 sufis are polythists also they have weird belief such as seeking blessing from graves of the dead and belief the the prophet is omnipresent
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@marlobarksdale2424 I know. Pending on which "brothehood" you study, these Sufis get more crazy. But there experience some great visibility in the West where they seek spiritual rebirth and Sufism provides them with some illusion of Islam light. This is pathetic. They don't have to study the noble Quran, the ahadith, the life of the Prophet (saw), or not even praying: they are simply "in touch" with God.
@ImperialKaiserk11 жыл бұрын
Oman is not a Khawarish country. Ibadi Islam is a moderate version of Khawarish Islam who do not believe in violence. They resemble a lot of the Sunni Muslims
@abumusab33246 жыл бұрын
The best way to learn about shia religion is to watch *anti-majos production* channel on youtube.
@irooni1006 жыл бұрын
NO ! YOU STUPID ! the best way to know about Shia is Ask Shia ! The Best to know about ISLAM ,ask Shias !
@andrewbryce27074 жыл бұрын
@@irooni100 problem is the Shia will tell you they love all the companions and don't abuse Aisha. We know There religion encourages them to lie when trying to spread the Shia religion though. Videos that expose there hatred for the companion's and Aisha should not be taken down. Too many sunni Muslims have no idea about the hatred you see from Shia towards the companions and Aisha Every week in there places of worship.
@captainhd97414 жыл бұрын
andrew bryce 1) If Sunnis do something wrong do we blame Sunni Islam or that individual? 2) If you believe Shias lie then Google for yourself if there is a fatwa by Ayatollah Khamenie saying the cursing of Aisha is haram 3) Who said Shias can lie? It is strictly forbidden to lie unless you’re life is in danger just as how I am sure you believe it is permissible to eat haram food if your life is in danger and there is nothing else to eat. Extreme circumstances usually have different fiqhi rulings. 4) If you really want to know what Shias believe you will have to speak to a Shia scholar or read a book that properly represents the views of Shias as an authentic and reliable source of information
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
The core principle of Chiism is lie and truth twisting. If you're interested in Islam follow the noble Quran and the sunnah.
@abumusab33244 жыл бұрын
@N S They are back kzbin.info Also they have website with all their videos www.anti-majos.com
@333Chrome10 жыл бұрын
in the face of recent Intern Islam violence, I am investigating the source of this conflict, so I read mr. Bernard Lewis last reissued book, and like your video its valuable information...And it seems to me, Islam is yet in Evolution, painfully so
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
B. Lewis is the number one spreader of Islamophobia in the West. He was one of Bush's advisors right before the illegal invasion of Irak in 2003.
@ImitateTheBestQueen11 жыл бұрын
Asalam alakum wa ramatullahi wabarakathu, I am from usa and found the quran to be true and studied for the truth as far as which sect is right and wrong. I recently found the right sect! The actual mehdi to come in the end times has arrived! He is known as the yamani in the shia text and the mehdi in the shia and sunni texts. Learn more at wwwhashemstudiosCom also live at paltalk in the room "ansar al imam almahdy' OBEYING THE MEHDI IS MANDATORY...femanAllah
@LoopDoc5 жыл бұрын
Mahdi Arrived-Ahmed Al Hasan I am interested.
@nawaf42764 жыл бұрын
Shia is nothing to do with islam , Shie ask Ali and Housin for help and for other things, and they believe in graves and a lot of other Shirks
@hasundarwiche55894 жыл бұрын
Its called intercession its found everywhere in the quran And we recognize the high position of the infallibles as slaves of Allah Swt but merely call upon the assistance of Allah by them who he loves the most and has blessed with infallibility.
@nawaf42764 жыл бұрын
Hasun Darwiche astgfrallah aladem Allah says ask me
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@hasundarwiche5589 False! Once again you Shia try to twist the word of Allah. Intercession is ONLY with and for Allah. You do NOT pray to or do tawaf around graves as the Shia idolaters do. Just watch the pathetic circus in Najaf, you want to puke.
@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص4 жыл бұрын
@@hasundarwiche5589 Wrong, but rather reading the origins of Shiite doctrine books Differences Between Shias & Sunnis - Sheikh Fahd al Muqrin and Sheikh Uthman Al Khamees kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGemnWmAedlqppI
@tahirzaman95384 жыл бұрын
True
@sayedazad20404 жыл бұрын
Shia is the right way of Islam... Allah,Quran,Mohammed and his descendants.. no hypocrites and those who worked to destroy Islam from Inside...
@adanomar29444 жыл бұрын
sayed azad so you are saying 90% of the Muslims are on the wrong
@marlobarksdale24244 жыл бұрын
shias are so sectarian
@sayedazad20404 жыл бұрын
@@adanomar2944 could be! That's why uma is shattered and Muslim are being killed every day everywhere yet also they carry bad name...
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
Chiism is a cancer of Islam. Nowhere will you find more lies and fanaticism than in that deviant sect.
@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص4 жыл бұрын
Wrong, but rather reading the origins of Shiite doctrine books Differences Between Shias & Sunnis - Sheikh Fahd al Muqrin and Sheikh Uthman Al Khamees kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGemnWmAedlqppI
@GoodStories-cr5cm3 ай бұрын
He skipped Karbala while talking about Shia. Amazing how’s sunnis always skip Karbala
@Unpopular-channel6 жыл бұрын
no the difference between shia and sunni is actually about genoside of Hussein all his relatives that Sunni ignore
@Mohamed-fs1kc5 жыл бұрын
Stop ignorance. Imam Hussein was never Shiaa... He was muslim and before genocide he was going to Irak - kuffah to make justice and all the followers who were waiting him in kuffah betrayed him when Yazid army came to Imam Hussein... Those who betrayed him turned to shiaa. And the army of yazid is cursed and we never coumt them from muslims
@UriPhoneCracker5 жыл бұрын
It was the Shia of Ali who betrayed Hussein RA. Your people are to blame
@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص4 жыл бұрын
Wrong, but rather reading the origins of Shiite doctrine books Differences Between Shias & Sunnis - Sheikh Fahd al Muqrin and Sheikh Uthman Al Khamees kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGemnWmAedlqppI
@bewaktembaga4984 жыл бұрын
he look like pewdiepie
@zeshaanktk22575 жыл бұрын
Very good bro
@theziggyh3 жыл бұрын
not sure about the infallibility of the 12 descendants of the Prophet (SAW). Who gave this authority? I understand the vacuum created after the Prophets death but this just smacks of shirk to me.
@hussainayed58294 жыл бұрын
The idea that Sunni islam doesn’t follow a hierarchy is simply false. A quick parsing of the hadiths they follow shows that to them the Khalifa, irrespective of who he is, must be followed and not questioned.
@BodmonBullet4 жыл бұрын
Sunna biaism brother, they always twist words
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@BodmonBullet Shia cannot tell the truth if it were staring them in the face.
@BodmonBullet4 жыл бұрын
@@dauphin003 You are the ones whos "Ahyl Bayt" had a war between each other (Battle of the Camel). Hypocrites
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
@@BodmonBullet Sorry I was not there. But if you attended the battle please explain it to us. Otherwise please keep quiet, and continue with your idol worshipping of Ali.
@BodmonBullet4 жыл бұрын
@@dauphin003 Buddy it was narrated by your own Sunnah Hadiths and everything. I can say that too about everything "Sorry I was not there", such a clown. Close your mind and stay away from the truth, allah is watching you. You Sunnas always cry when you get exposed. How do i worship Ali, you cleared arent educated nor understand Shiiaism, once again you are ignorant and uneducated to speak on this matter. Go read habibi. Do you not know the shahada for islam? One god and prophet is messenger ???
@tigerpakarmy10555 жыл бұрын
TRUE PURE.AND CLEAN.RELIGION IS ONLY ISLAM
@strengthandlove_4 жыл бұрын
lol political difference, completely false there are significant DOCTRINAL differences between shia and sunni within Tawheed itself not just the very clearly appointed Imam Ali by the prophet on many occasions and Imamah he is saying political because perhaps he hasn't studied enough the theological differences, it is far from just Fiqh and he tried to say that shias are only 90% of the world which again is completely false we are more like 20%, some estimates are at 400million, not 200million. the statistic In the middle east/asia where most of the muslims are (not the west) it's much more equal maybe 60%/40% split.
@Mi-gs3xv4 жыл бұрын
I don’t think they clearly say that he’s god so.....
@rahmtube28853 жыл бұрын
It's a pity that you call the Islamic sectarianism political. Have you ever read that how abu bakr was elected? Purely by force Was there any occasion when the Prophet (S) left for somewhere that he didn't leave a substitute in his place? Then how come he didn't leave a successor after his alleged demise?
@cheeney_64783 жыл бұрын
It started from a political perspective. Then the descendants of the prophet pbuh was glorified to an extent that exceeds human status and even propethood. Which is wrong. Also, sunnis take that, the appointment of Abu Bakr ra as the imam of the whole muslim community when he pbuh was sick is proof that Abu Bakr ra, was the rightly caliph. Just as the prophet pbuh lead all the other prophets in prayer on the night of isra miraj.
@rahmtube28853 жыл бұрын
@@cheeney_6478 Asif Barkhiya was the successor of Prophet Solomon (as) and he had immense knowledge to an extent that he brought the throne of Sheba in a split second, do you think Prophet Muhammad (S) was نعوذ بالله less than prophet Solomon in having a righteous successor? Do you think Abu bakr was superior than Imam Ali ibn Abu Taleb (as)? Why do you think the matter of succession is about having blood relationship with Prophet Muhammad (S) if that was the case then Abbas the uncle of Prophet Muhammad (S) was more deserving than Imam Ali (as) because he was old like abu bakr but Prophet Muhammad (S) didn't appoint him as his successor but rather he chose Imam Ali (as) as his successor in the Hadith of al ghadeer.
@rahmtube28853 жыл бұрын
@@cheeney_6478 I suggest you to watch this video explaining the Hadith of ghadeer: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ipqwmKajeM-oY80
@cheeney_64783 жыл бұрын
@@rahmtube2885 wrong, Prophet Sulaiman pbuh has never appointed a successor so your comparison doesn't work. Also, I never said one is superior than the other. But one which is specifically handpicked by the prophet pbuh is obviously the default choice as caliph. That's it. It's clear. Another thing to add, religiosity has nothing to do with blood relations in Islam. You see progenies that gone bad and progenies that are righteous in Islam about every prophet.
@rahmtube28853 жыл бұрын
@@cheeney_6478 You're right Prophets don't do anything to please them unless God wants them to as Qur'an says about Prophet Muhammad (S) that he doesn't say anything out of desire except what God reveals to him. And yes I agree with you blood relationship has nothing to do with leadership and it's the religiosity . My question is: If it's reliogisity then who was more qualified for leadership, Imam Ali (as) or Abu Bakr?
@nabeelkhan002 жыл бұрын
Great explanation
@fidofido50906 жыл бұрын
they have wrong idea
@hashmo1018 жыл бұрын
Hadith of the Two Weighty Things. Hadith of the Pen & Paper (Calamity of Thursday). Your real friends take part in your funeral.
@Amadeus-ms9lt6 жыл бұрын
At the end of the day, when the ummah was in chaos after the prophet's worldly departure, it was Abu Bakr who got it together. Everyone else was in disarray.
@umarsyed75385 жыл бұрын
It's time Sunni and Shia iron out their old senseless differences. in this age of information nothing can be hidden. Shia may be right about the first 3 caliphs and Fadak but they are wrong about the infallibility of imams. Return to the original Quran based teachings; and set aside historical and political aspects for just academic interest.
@adamahmadbey7144 жыл бұрын
@@umarsyed7538 shiyas not right abt 3 caliphs, those sahaba were best of this ummah you mean shiyas knw more then them, some narrattions can be rejected any time,
@IslamOriginal144 жыл бұрын
Quran says: "So ask the Ahl al Dhikr (People of Remembrance) if you do not know." Quran 16:43 and 21:7 This verse is clear that a group of people, referred to as the People of Remembrance, exist who know the correct answers to questions. It is evident the Quran is referred to as 'al-Dhikr' in a number of verses in Quran 3:58, 21:50, 36:69, 41:41, including the verse: "We have revealed al Dhikr (i.e., Quran) and We surely protect it." Quran 15:9. Therefore the Ahl al Dhikr are the people of the Quran. The Ahl al-Quran are the Ahl al Bayt of the Prophet, who are inseparable from Quran until the Day of Judgment according to the undisputed tradition of thaqalayan (referenced below). Second, and even more explicitly, the Prophet is referred to in the Quran as Dhikr, where the Quran says, "Allah has sent to you a Dhikr - a Prophet who recites for you the verse of Allah." Quran 65:10-11. Therefore the Ahl al Dhikr are the Ahl al Nabi, which is clearly the Ahlul Bayt, Quran 33:33. Tafsir Qurtubi and Tafsir Thalabi verse 21:7 relates: When the verse, Ask the Ahl al Dhikr was revealed, Ali said, "We are the Ahl al Dhikr." Tafsir Tabari and Tafsir Ibn Kathir, verse 16:43 relates that Abu Jafar al Baqir, the fifth Shia Imam, said, "We are the Ahl al Dhikr. The tradition of the two weighty items or thaqalayn is universally accepted by both Sunnis and Shia. It is famous and mutawatir. The tradition is transmitted through numerous companions through a large number of distinct chains of transmission, making it truly mutawatir. See: Sahih Muslim #31.5920-3 The Prophet said, "I am leaving among you two weighty things, one being the Book of Allah in which there is right guidance and light, so hold fast to the Book of Allah and adhere to it... The second are the members of my household (Ahl al-Bayt; Quran 33:33). I remind you of the members of my family." Sunan Tirmidhi #3788; Musnad Hanbal #11147 and #11119; and Fada il Hanbal #1382 The Prophet said: I leave for you that which, if you stick to it, you will never be misguided after me. One is greater than the other. The Book of Allah, which is a rope extending from heaven to earth, and my close family (itrah), my Ahl al Bayt. They will not separate from one another until they come to me at the fount. So watch how you succeed me (takhlufuni, form the same root as khalif) in the two." Also see the other prominent sunni works this tradition is mentioned: Mustadrik Hakim #4576 and #4711 (certifies the tradition authentic by the criteria of Bukhari and Muslim) Musnad Hanbal #11578, #19332, #19285, #21618, #21697 Kanz al Ummal #872, #873, #944, #946, #951-3, #957, #958, #1657, #12911, #36340, #37620-1, #39192 Fada il Hanbal #968, #1032, #1383 Majma al Zawa id #14957-9, #14962 (certifies the chain as excellent) Mustadrik Hakim #6272 (certifies as authentic) Sunan al Kubra Nasa i #8175 Sunan al Kubra Bayhaqi #2679, #13017, #20122 Khasa is Nasa i 93 Jami al Saghir Suyuti #2631 Khasa is al Kubra Suyuti 2:395 Fayd al Qadir #1608, #2631 Usd al Ghabah 2:16 #1165 (Hasan ibn Ali) Tarkh Ibn Kathir 5:228, 7:386 Tarikh Damishq 19:258, 41:19, 42:216, 54:92 Ibn Abi al Hadid 6:375, 9:133, 10:270, 18:43 Tafsir Ibn Atiyya, verse 55:29 Tafsir Baghawi, verses 42:23 and 55:31 Tafsir Baqa i, verse 55:31 Tafsir Durr al Manthur, verse 3:101 and 3:103 Tafsir Abu Hayyan, verse 55:31 Tafsir Ibn Kathir, verse 33:33 and 42:23 Tafsir Khazin, verses 42:23 and 55:31 Tafsir Nisaburi, verses 3:101 and 3:103 Tafsir Razi, verse 3:103 Tafsir Thalabi, verses 3:132, 33:33, and 55:31 And more.
@tasneemrauf17023 жыл бұрын
@@IslamOriginal14 yes yes you have done a lot of research but now we have to ask scholars who is included in ahlul bait.i am sunni muslim.when i read this narration i took fatwa from few scholars and they told me sunni muslims include all wives of prophet all children and all sons of prophet,s uncle including hazrat ali jaffar aqeel.we can not pay zakat sadqat to their descendents.i was told shites take hazrat ali hazrat fatima and imam hassan and hussain as ahlul bait.so yes we know all about this.
@Khaled-ik5th3 жыл бұрын
very flat definition of 'kharijites' there is a lot more into it than what is presented
@sajidmuzaffar86964 жыл бұрын
Disappionting that even a man like him believes that majority is right. For example he completely caricatures the views of kharijites and totally fails to appreciate that so called Sunni faith was ‘faith of the crown’ . Sunnis have never claimed that abu bakr was most suitable because he was most suitable. They say that he became caliph under the conditions that he did so we follow him. There is a great difference. It was touch and go in sakifa. Abu bakr himself proposed umar. He used his tribal affinity to prophet and racist idea of being a quraysh to argue his suitability over the ansaar. The same argument of proximity to prophet wouldve meant Ali or another banu hashim was more suitable. It was a clear and classic political move to capture power.
@007VitaminD8 жыл бұрын
Suni's believe the Prophet was so unwise, that he FAILED to appoint a successor. The Shia believe the Prophet was wise and DID appoint a successor. Every great leader in history appointed a successor, so why would the greatest leader (the Prophet) not appoint one? Suni logic is confusing.
@mahfuzchy43798 жыл бұрын
It was his wisdom that he did not appoint one.
@mz84528 жыл бұрын
Shias believe that Ali was such a coward that he did not take the khalifa when he knew it was his. Sunnis believe that Ali was a brave companion and had the khalifa been his, he would have taken it (like he tried against Muawiya).
@007VitaminD8 жыл бұрын
Said Mortaza Zeewari No, Shia's believe Ali was so strong with PATIENCE, that he waited until it was given to avoid conflict in the Ummah and have other nations attack the Islamic country. The Suni believe Ali is #4 even though Umar and Abubakr would have PERISHED if his wisdom was not present. Whereas Abubakr and Umar lacked this patience and wanted power the MOMENT the Prophet died astaghfirullah.
@mahfuzchy43798 жыл бұрын
Why do you guys want to divide the ummah based on past history? The ummah is under severe stress, with terrorists like isis hijacking our religion and continuous propaganda against us. At this moment, we need unity and compassion rather than fitna and division.
@007VitaminD8 жыл бұрын
Md Mahafuzur Chy No, it is you guys that are trying to divide the Ummah based on past history, ISIS call themselves Suni, not Shia. In fact it is the Shia that are trying to stop them.
@samtollman67355 жыл бұрын
Asalaamu alaykum Shaykh Murad, I appreciate your detailed intellectual talks, but you should know that the Family of the Prophet follow his sunna. So the Shia follow the sunna of the Prophet and his Family.
@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص4 жыл бұрын
Wrong, but rather reading the origins of Shiite doctrine books Differences Between Shias & Sunnis - Sheikh Fahd al Muqrin and Sheikh Uthman Al Khamees kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGemnWmAedlqppI
@ImitateTheBestQueen11 жыл бұрын
The actual final will of prophet Muhammed(dua) should be read by each muslim1) It is in the quran surah 2 ayat 180 that you must leave one 2) after reading the will of prophet muhammed(dua) it is a statement that will keep the ummah from going astray. You can read the final will of prophet Muhammed(dua) to see what the real islam is and why its important to not follow any of the wrong 72 sects. Keep learning muslims wwwSaviorOfMankindCom has the final will (you can read within about 5 minutes)
@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص4 жыл бұрын
Differences Between Shias & Sunnis - Sheikh Fahd al Muqrin and Sheikh Uthman Al Khamees kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGemnWmAedlqppI
@meerbalutch40755 жыл бұрын
You are wrong brother, you are welcome to visit Oman and see what really we are
@_timespace_4 жыл бұрын
What are you guys then
@yc94873 жыл бұрын
Salams thank you shaykh
@AhlulBidahExposed11 жыл бұрын
Who is the saved sect then? The Prophet salaAllahu 'alaiyhi wasallam said I left you on a CLEAR white plain its night is like its day none deviates from it after me except he is destroyed. Who said we throw 1250 years of scholarship out? A lie. The Aqeedah of the Asharis and Matureedis came after the time of the Salaf so how can it be the 'aqeedah of Ahlul Sunnah?
@syedabdulrehman43745 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/o5bboKWLp8ismZo Here is your answer
@abdullahimusa97615 жыл бұрын
@@syedabdulrehman4374 it's funny how the Salafis call themselves Ahl-sunnah yet they believe (knowing or unknowingly) that Allah sits on the 'Arsh wana'udhubillah. The Ash'ari and Maturidi theological schools are the intellectual powerhouses for Muslims
@kingkatiin26585 жыл бұрын
Just read what those schools believe if it goes in line with the Quran and Sunnah how can you deny them just because they have a different name?
@333Chrome10 жыл бұрын
thirdly, Islam was once a great culture, yes an empire, something really special. but now you are a worldwide Nuisance, until you get yourself Together....I wish you well, sort it out. In the meantime we, the westerm world, will sit back and watch Your Butchery
@marmfruit5 жыл бұрын
Lmao please read up on how "the west" is directly responsible for the mess the "muslim world" is in bc of their evil imperialism
@Nasreddiin6 жыл бұрын
Esshi3a is to Islam what talmudic judaism is to judaism of Moossa (Moses) and 3issa (Jesus) peace be upon them all.
@dauphin0034 жыл бұрын
Chiism has borrowed a lot from Judaism. For instance, like the Jews, the Shias do not eat shell fish, while NEVER did the Prophet (saw) mention such a dietary prohibition.
@sepasgozar.4 жыл бұрын
please don't distribute misunderstanding. the difference between Shiites and Sunnis has nothing to do with the early caliphate of Islam. the difference between Shiites and Sunnis begins with the events that led to the tragedy of Karbala. the difference between Shiites and Sunnis begins when, despite the fact that Yazid violated the laws of Islam and did not deserve to be the caliph of the Muslims, he makes himself the caliph and successor of his father with money and the power of the sword, and because Imam. Hussein (AS) does not "pledge allegiance" to Yazid Caliphate, Yazid martyr Imam Hussein (AS) and his companions in Karbala.
@fahralyacoub89703 жыл бұрын
We shias don't believe that Ali should have been the caliph. We believe that he was appointed by Allah to be the caliph
@rsdwdyouown12 жыл бұрын
When the prophet will stop *
@spiderlocyugo Жыл бұрын
There will be 12 Emirs all are from Quraish. Sahieh Bukhari 7222
@adms81695 жыл бұрын
The problem here is that he does not say Radillahuan after saying there names or saying sallallahualayhiwasallam after the prophet Muhammad name! Give your Head a shake!
@KhanKhan-tp4ch7 жыл бұрын
Absolutely unnecessary idea of successor ship.Muhammad's PBUH successor was his entire ummah not just a few one's chosen by shias.you are encouraging divide death and destruction among ummah.
@irooni10010 жыл бұрын
Sunnis must be desperate finding people like this guy to try to explain the Islam ?
@87kickz8 жыл бұрын
You sound scared of facts and reason
@kay03927 жыл бұрын
IDIOT ENCOURAGE UNITY! NOT DIVISION ONLY KAFIR WANT DIVIISION!
@Yoyoyo2245 жыл бұрын
Allah decides the successors .if you leave it people to select then you have a chaotic history as you can read. Wordly power and materialistic greed Through majority of so called khalifas who sat in the seat of the prophet were blood thirsty tyrants that you can read in history. So you end with groups like the khawarij or there modetn equivalents the wahabis from which spring ISIS and al Qaeda etc Or you follow the path which says Allah chooses the sucessors and that they are protected so they dont mislead. Theur aim is peace and harmony and the focus is the world to come. Your choice ?
@TanveerAhmed-zc6kp Жыл бұрын
Sunnis also believe in coming of Imam Mahdi near end of times.
@WeldAzzaba4 жыл бұрын
In my humble opinion, original Shia separatists wanted to distinguish themselves from the main stream of Muslims because they betrayed Ali (RA) and later his sons (Hassan and Hussein). So they lived with the "Guilt complex" and instead of repenting they chose to pass on this lame excuse that we don't like Ahlu El Beit etc. Respect is one thing; but Islam and the Prophet (SAAWS) are core issues and anything else is is important but should be secondary - period. We have still some kingdoms and monarchs who claimed their thrones (Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Morocco, Dubai, Oman, Qatar etc. who were installed in their present positions by colonial powers and we came to know their behaviors and policies when it comes to staying in power. Islam DOES NOT NEED KINGS or IMAMS, We NEED "SHURA" i.e. Democracy In CHOOSING a Khaliph.
@cometmoon44854 жыл бұрын
In my opinion, Muslims today do not need a "Caliph", whether it be elected or otherwise. Religion is a matter between people and God. That is all. There is no human mediator or authority who can claim to be "closer to God" than other humans. Such thinking is dangerous and leads to the reverence of saints and monks, as denounced in Surah 9, Aya 31-34.
@WeldAzzaba4 жыл бұрын
@@cometmoon4485 Well, I respect your opinion; but it is part of the Sunna and if it is not done; then we do have to be content with all these religious leaders which are numerous and with hundreds, if not thousands, of believes and tendencies. Remember that UNITY, be it in the word at first, is key to Islam. Just see our yearly start of Ramadhan El Mubarak and the various start date that are posted and there is no agreement on such Scientific and Natural fact; but yet we do see countries adopting political stances rather that scientific ones and that creates dis-concordance between Muslim Nations and that certainly does not look as good when we, as an Umma, are supposed to be guided with Belief in One God, Allah Subhanu, Our Prophet, Mohammed (SAAWS) and Science. Happy Ramadhan!