The Slanders Of Al-Arifi And At-Turayfi Exposed By Sheikh Salih Al-Fawzan

Al-Arifi and At-Tarefe Refuted

[@adoha7560]

These scholars still not call the indiscriminate killing of palestine a genocide . But they hasten to call fitnah if someone protest against the oppression of Israel. Subhan ALLAAH.

[@WaleeeD06]

Hiw do you know they didn't? Live with them?

[@sheikprofessional]

This video is a gem💎

[@Surayahti]

Following the hawah is attacking anyone who disagrees with you and call them names simply because they differ. Not much different from what the Shia do... Many people who claim to follow the sunnah have these ayatullahs which they refer to as if those same men aren't like them... PRONE TO ERROR. May Allah protect us from worshipping men.

[@thewaytosalvation145]

Exactly! One protects his Master even if it means betraying Islam! The other speaks the Truth even if they are imprisoned and tortured.

[@mohamedtoutouh5457]

i see that you are really lost akhy. do you even know what it is an error? are you serious? if it was an error why he continued to rebel and destroyed the muslim land after the proofs has been etablished? "The only response of the believers, when they are called to Allah and His Messenger so he may judge between them, is to say, “We hear and obey.” It is they who will ˹truly˺ succeed." an nur: 51 "On the Day their faces are ˹constantly˺ flipped in the Fire, they will cry, “Oh! If only we had obeyed Allah and obeyed the Messenger!” al ahzaab: 66 after the proof had come it isn't an error anymore. it is misguidance: "It is not for a believing man or woman-when Allah and His Messenger decree a matter-to have any other choice in that matter.1 Indeed, whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has clearly gone ˹far˺ astray." error is only possible when the clear proof hadn't come to you. and in his case, the proof came but he continued. so yes he is a misguided one and compagnon of hawah. al 'arifi continue to proned his "jihad" against the ruler because they "didn't juge with the law of ALLAH" allthough the sunnah clearly exposed him. he and qardawi and the ikhwan continued to call for their fitnah after proof had came to them until know. (1847,b) Hudhaifah bin Al-Yamãn said: "I said: '0 Messenger of Allah, we were in an evil state, then Allah brought something good, and we are in a [good] state. Will there be any evil after this goodness?' He said: 'Yes.' I said: 'And will there be any goodness after that evil?' He said: 'Yes.' I said: 'And will there be any evil after that goodness?' He said: 'Yes.' I said: 'How?' He said: 'After I am gone, there will be A 'immah (leaders) who will not follow my way and will not follow my example. Among them there will be men whose hearts are the hearts of devils in the bodies of men.' I said: 'What should I do, 0 Messenger of Allah, if I live to see that?' He said: 'Hear and obey the ruler, even if your back is flogged and your wealth is taken; hear and obey." this hadith proof that you can't rebel even if he don't juge with quran and sunnah quardawi said: "like daraqutni said, this hadith is da'ef" daraqutni make a book about certain hadith in the sahihayn, named au-Tatabbu'. wich is in pdf al hamdoulillah (in arab) on internet, he talked about this hadith in the page 181, just under my eyes; he said while talking about ONE of the chains of narrations: "[...]an nawawwi said a daraqutni said: "this is to us moursal (in this chain, the sahaba is not mentionned) aba salam didn't hear from hudhayfa." and this is as daraqutni said but the text is SAHIH by the first chain of narration[...]" after that it was clarified to qardawi, and that the hadith was sahih, he didn't stop his destroying of the land, like al'arifi and this is why he tryed to interpret the hadith after by this way to make it at any cost seems like it isn't a proof against them. where is the error? for those who doubt about the ruling of rebel against the ruler i have 3 questions: 1: i ask you even if this hadith wasn't sahih there is a whole chapter of hadith in sahih muslim who said (1846) It was narrated from 'Alqamah bin Wâ'il Al-HadramI that his father said: Salamah bin YazId Al-Ju'fi asked the Messenger of Allah "0 Messenger of Allah, what do you think, if there are appointed over us rulers who demand their rights and withhold our rights, what do you command us to do?" He turned away from him, then he asked him again and he turned away from him, then when he asked him the second or third time, Al-Ash'ath bin Qais pulled him aside and he said: "Listen and obey, for on them will be their burden and on you will be your burden." and i ask you WHERE A LEADER WHO DOESN'T GIVE THE RIGHT EXEPT TO HIMSELF IS JUDGING WITH THE LAWS of ALLAH? secound question "O believers! If you save (the cause of) Allah, He will save you and make your steps firm."47:7 where is the save of ALLAH in sirya? why after their du'a there is no more than 10 habitans in the land? where is the save in egypt? in libya? in ALL the land they passed by? third question: if this is not them by rebelling the ruler that destroyed sirya (and anyother city they passed by), who did it? the american? the other faction that enter the fitna after? then you had contradicted the sunnah (2889) It was narrated that Thawbân said: The Messenger of Allah said: "Allah drew the ends of the earth [...]. I asked my Lord not to let my Ummah be destroyed by a widespread famine, and not to let them be dominated by an enemy, that is not of them, that would destroy them utterly. My Lord said: '0 Muhammad, when I decree something it cannot be altered. I have granted you that your Ummah will not be destroyed by a widespread famine, and it will not be dominated by an enemy, that is not of them, that would destroy them utterly, even if all people from all regions were to come together (to destroy them). But some of them will destroy others and some will take others captive." muslim (2890) It was narrated from Thawbân that the Prophet of Allah came from Al-'Aliyah one day, and when he came to the Masjid of Banü Mu'âwiyah, he entered and prayed two Rak'ah, and we prayed with him. He supplicated to his Lord for a long time, then he turned to us and said: "I asked my Lord for three things, and He has given me two and withheld one. I asked my Lord not to let my Ummah be destroyed by famine, and He granted me that. I asked Him not to let my Ummah be destroyed by drowning, and He granted me that. And I asked him not to let their bad among themselves, and He withheld that from me." the prophet had said that it is not possible that the ummah will be destroyed by ennemi not among themself and like ibn al qayim said: each time the power of the ummah diminush, it was because of the rebelling against a ruler, since mu'awiya may ALLAH be pleased on him until now. "If they turn away, then surely Allah know the corruptors."2:63

[@mohamedtoutouh5457]

now that what the ikhwan are is complitely clear, some hadith on their state: muslim (1852) It was narrated that Ziyâd bin 'Ilâqah said: "I heard 'Arfajah say: 'I heard the Messenger of Allah say: "There will be Fitnah and innovations. Whoever wants to divide this Ummah when it is united, strike him with the sword, no matter who he is. ( ... ) A similar report (as no. 2796) was narrated from 'Arfajah from the Prophet , except that in their hadlth it says: "...kill him". ( ... ) It was narrated that 'Arfajah said: "I heard the Messenger of Allah say: 'Whoever comes to you, when you are united behind one man, seeking to divide you, kill him." muslim (1849) It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbâs said: "The Messenger of Allah said: "Whoever sees something from his ruler that he dislikes, let him be patient, for whoever splits away from the Jamâ'ah (main body of Muslims) by a handspan and dies (in that state), that is a death of Jâhiliyyah." ( ... ) It was narrated from Ibn 'Abbâs that the Messenger of Allah said: "Whoever dislikes something about his ruler, let him bear it with patience, for there is no one among the people who splits away from the ruler by a handspan and dies in that state, but he has died a death of Jâhiliyah." muslim (1848) It was narrated from Abü Hurairah that the Prophet said: "Whoever rebels against obedience and splits away from the Jamâ'ah (main body of the Muslims) and dies (in that state) has died a death of Jâhiliyyah. Whoever fights for no real cause, getting angry for the sake of tribalism, calling for tribalism, or supporting tribalism, and is killed, dies in a state of Jâhiliyah. Whoever rebels against my Ummah, striking righteous and wicked alike, and does not spare the believers, and does not pay attention to anyone who has a covenant of protection with the Muslims, he is not of me and I am not of him." those hadith state in the worst case, that they are kaafir, "he is not of me and I am not of him." "but he has died a death of Jâhiliyah." and the jahilyah where kafir "Whoever comes to you, when you are united behind one man, seeking to divide you, kill him." and again, the only one we are allowd to kill as muslim is the one who forsake his religion. in the best case that this is only a sin which with they had killed a thousand of innocentes muslim. ask ALLAH for guidance and stop saying falses things. "Not much different from what the Shia do... Many people who claim to follow the sunnah have these ayatullahs which they refer to as if those same men aren't like them.." "All praise is for Allah Who has revealed the Book to His servant, allowing no crookedness in it,"al kahf verse 1. no, the quran doesn't contradict EVER and we are not like the shi'a, because as we saw for your ikhwani sheikh, when ALL ayat an verses and their precise meaning is put toghether there is only one clear path and no contradiction. what the shi'a and your sheikh did was to take some part and interpret by their means and to make it seems it prooved what they want, what we do is use clear hadith and the proof they bring and not the proof we invent. the shi'a use the hadith that ibn yassar will be killed by the group agrressive, where there is a proof that compagons are kafir here? ikhwan use the verse "and those who doesn't juge by the laws of ALLAH, those are the kafiroun" but the verse is general, it is why the sentence of zina is not death, or anyother sins. and for the case of the rulers 1: they dont controle all the laws 2: you dont know if they have more information that you havn't ('ilm) about their jugment either frome quran and sunnah, or from the case they juge that you don'tm know 3: you dont know if it is by jahl that they judge by another laws, in this case they are excused, because they just doesn't know those rules. pr it is because they really preffer kafir. so this verse is not usable for their case and is not a proof that you need to rebel. so it is you rather that is like shi'a "May Allah protect us from worshipping men." here you said that we worship men, so we are kafir by basis. (60) It was narrated from Ibn 'Umar that the Prophet said: "If a man declares his brother to be a disbeliever, it will apply to one of them." ( ... ) Ibn 'Umar said: "The Messenger of Allah said: 'Any man who says to his brother: "0 disbeliever," it will apply to one of them. Either it is as he said, otherwise it will come back to him." say only the truth and bring me proof of what you said. "if anyone makes an untruthful accusation against a Muslim, he will be made by Allah to dwell in the corrupt fluid flowing from the inhabitants of Hell till he retracts his statement."Sunan Abi Dawud 3597.

[@mohamedtoutouh5457]

salaf is the only rightly guided manhaj. let us cite some known sheikhs: -ibn al uhtaymin who was the sheikh of Mecca until his death, -bin baz who was the sheikh of oum oul qura (unif of Medina), -as souhaymi and ar rouhayli sheikh of Medina and imam for the 2nd. - al fawzan sheikh of oum oul qurra, etc. => According to 'Abdallah Ibn 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with them), the Prophet (may the prayers of Allah and His salvation be upon him) said: “Certainly Islam began strange and it will become strange again like he started. He takes refuge between the two mosques like the snake takes refuge in its hole (*) » (Reported by Mouslim in his Sahih n°146) (*) That is to say that Islam will only remain as it really is in the area between the Al Haram mosque in Mecca and the mosque of the Prophet (may Allah's prayer and His salvation be upon him ) in Medina. On the other hand, in other places in life here below, either people will deny Islam completely or they will deviate from it to the point that all that will remain is the name and then the person who who clings to Islam among them will in reality be like a foreigner. (Minnatoul Moun’im Charh Sahih Mouslim vol 1 p 131) there are many signs that we are well guided, this being one of them. try to find me a sheikh between Mecca and Medina is not what you call wahhab, sheikh al Madkhali himself was sheikh of Mecca until his death, aren't these cities supposed to expel the bad and perfect the good as the prophet said in MUSLIM? not to mention the sheikhs praised by these sheikhs (mouqbil, ferkous ect..) note that the hadith is precise and that our beloved prophet sallallahou3alayhi wa salam himself said that religion would become "strange" again and the "wahhab" are rare and hated by everyone except them. i hope in your ignorance that when you say that we worship our sheikh you don't say that because of the non-scholar among us following the scholar, because if it is, wallah it isn't jahl anymore, it is injustice and lies, because YOU and absolutely EVERYBODY follow his imam if they are not knowledgable and it is from ISLAM AND TOTALLY NORMAL. i challenge you to bring one proofs of us continuing to follow a sheikh after a error. if your right, you can bring them easily. because if you dont do it and i am right and you are wrong you will be precipited to jahanam. (2674) It was narrated from Abü Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah said: "Whoever calls others to guidance will have a reward like that of those who follow it, without that detracting from their reward in the slightest. And whoever calls others to misguidance will have a burden of sin like that of those who follow ot, without it detracting from their burden in the slightest." "One protects his Master even if it means betraying Islam! The other speaks the Truth even if they are imprisoned and tortured." it is another exemple of what the shi'a does wallahi if you could imagine the injustice you bring. like i said the manhaj sahih is the manhaj of the salaf and so those who speak the truth even if being torturred by the majority is the SALAF and you would remark the injustice you bring by accusing them without proofs (betraying islam?) although they are the only sincere and truthworthy one if you where sincere in your judgement. you perfectly know that those who are percecuted are the salaf, you perfectly know what ibn taymyah ibn hanbal amd all other from the sunnah did endured. s'audi is the only land imprisoning what you called the right scholar, all the other land love cheikh qardawi and their saying of "democraty is more beloved to me that share'a" what a joke after killing ruler because of that. so the only explanation is that s'audi is the only group that judge by command of ALLAH and imprisone your cheikh because they make fasad on ard, they propage innovations and other, al hamdoulillah. sunan ad darami page 131: umar ibn al khatab flaging an innovator if i say on anyother land like the ikhwan that we don't care about innovations we need to be united like you they will don't care because it let them make their innovations, if i refute innovation against batil, all of them they will hate me and turn all against me, see what ikhwan did to mouzamil al faqiri, see how sufi, democrate, and all other sect behave against salaf and you will know how are those who oppose ahwa of poeple. everybody know how sufi and ikhwani deal with us, like you two, they hate us at the point where they doesn't see the injustice they do. 4:144 "O believers! Do not take disbelievers as allies instead of the believers. Would you like to give Allah solid proof against yourselves?" those who follow falsehood, and accept all the sect of falsehood and strive against one sect, can't be other than the misguided who allies against haqq. like all those who opposed the prophet. or like all those who oppose ibn taymyah, ibn hanbal and all caller to haqq exept between medina and mekka "O you who believe! Do not take Jews and Christians as allies; they are allies of one another. And whoever among you takes them as allies becomes one of them. Allah certainly does not guide the unrighteous. ۞ يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ لَا تَتَّخِذُوا۟ ٱلْيَهُودَ و َٱلنَّصَٰرَىٰٓ أَوْلِيَآءَ ۘ بَعْضُهُمْ أَوْلِيَآءُ بَعْضٍۢ ۚ وَمَ ن يَتَوَلَّهُم مِّنكُمْ فَإِنَّهُۥ مِنْهُمْ ۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لَا يَه ْدِى ٱلْقَوْمَ ٱلظَّٰلِمِينَ " (verse 51 in sura 5 THE SERVED TABLE / AL-MAIDAH) the fact that you hate us and not the christian, the kafir, the sufi who invoke other than ALLAH is a proof that you detest haqq. because if it was hate for ALLAH s cause you would hate the other to, but you only hate us like all the misguided hated muslim at the time of the prophet. and we, al hamdoulillah hate for ALLAH's cause all of the batil faction. (1037) 'Umair bin Hâni' said: "I heard Mu'âwiyah on the Minbar saying: 'I heard the Messenger of Allah say: "A group among my Ummah will continue to live by the command of Allah, and they will not be harmed by those who forsake them or oppose them, until the decree of Allah comes when they are still prevailing over the people." (1924) 'Abdur Rahmân bin Shumâsah A1-MahrI said: "I was with Maslamah bin Mukhallad, and 'Abdullâh bin Amr bin A1-'As was also with him. 'Abdullâh said: 'The Hour will not come except upon the worst of people, who are worse than the people of the Jâhiliyyah. They will not ask Allah for anything but He will refuse their request.' While they were like that, 'Uqbah bin 'Amir came, and Maslamah said to him: '0 'Uqbah, listen to what 'Abdullâh is saying.' He said: 'He knows best; as for me, I heard the Messenger of Allah say: "A group of my Ummah will continue to fight to establish the command of Allah, continuing to defeat their enemies and not being harmed by those who oppose them until the Hour comes upon them when they are like that." 'Abdullâh said: 'Yes, then Allah will send a wind like the fragrance of musk and with a touch like that of silk, and it will not leave any soul in whose heart is a grain of faith, but it will take it. Then the worst of people will be left, upon whom the Hour will come."

[@Numanmo]

Read about Islamic history first, the first one to Khurooj that is to rebel, has been proven by some people rebelling and against Uthman Bin Affan and even killing him during his Caliphate radiallahu tala anhu. These were the first to rebel against the rulers. And from those people extremism against the Muslim rulers started. There are tremendous number of hadees refuting them.

[@yehabashaw7374]

In the uncut full video of a meeting between Al-Arifi & the Japanese man i watched, what is apparent in his recitation of the Quran and other text to the Japanese man in a melodious way and asking him to identify the difference between the two. Here is the video in full: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYC4aYd8actreq8 A group of people calling themselves, Al-Firqah An-Najiyah, and spending their life finding faults in other Muslims' speeches in order to defame them. Shaikh al Fawzan replied with out having the context or knowing the intention of shaikh Al-Arifi-- it was a mistake given the people calling themselves, "Al-Firqah An-Najiyah" are known to use the statements of Kibar Al Ulema out of place to attack the scholars that are targetted for defamation by the rulers of the Arab countries. The way of the Salaf As-Salih has been defamed by the hands of these innovators calling themselves, "Al-Firqah An-Najiyah" .

[@AForgetfulSoul]

Worse, he added two seperate incidences, without including the context, within the question to make Arefi look worse

[@adeebiqbal]

You people are the most open liars and the most shameless of people. Using the word "Madhkali" and then claiming Sheikh Fawzan is with you. May Allah guide you or deal with you

[@munawarshahafridi7921]

Of course, we should not be Desiree and should not explain Qur'an and hadiths according to our wisdoms.may Allah give sheikh fozan jaza e Khair and of course we are benefited from you❤.

[@muhammadsalah1177]

جزاك اللهُ خيراً

[@man_on_the_moon_]

jazakumullahu khairan

[@bemindfulofurswalah]

Sheikh fawzan can be right or wrong why make his comment on aperson to be absolute right????

[@WaleeeD06]

It is simply right, arifi went against another clear hadith that talms abojt jamah and not individuals, and if you say shaykh is wrong, bring your proof we don't work on probabilities.

[@mdkhan3928]

🤦Grow up guys. He was experimenting whether a Kaafir could detect the difference between Qur'aanic verses & just made poetic verses. If this was explained to Sheikh Fawzaan, he would have given a different answer. Obviously the people running this agenda hate the Sheikh.🤷

[@Scott-Eesa]

For what purpose would he do that?

[@mdkhan3928]

@@Scott-Eesa to see if even non-Arab kufaar were affected by the recitation of Qur'aan.🤷

[@Scott-Eesa]

@@mdkhan3928 seems like a very strange thing to do. Some “scholars” are to be avoided.

[@mdkhan3928]

@@Scott-Eesa Not him IMO - that's for sure.😎

[@Scott-Eesa]

@@mdkhan3928 your opinion🙄

[@TheCleaner995]

It's perplexing if anyone claiming upon the manhaj salaf could still have a soft spot for glamorous orator like Syeikh Arifi after being made aware about his Surah At-Tuffahah. Allahul Musta'an.

[@abdullahsaquib9986]

By Allah! I admire the wisdom of all three shaikh, but i think it would far more valuable for shaikh fawzan hafizahullah to give ruling on current situation of saudi arabia

[@Scott-Eesa]

He has

[@Shaakireen8875]

هذا جهالة واضحة من المتشددين والمحبين المتعصبين المدافعين لمحمد بن سلمان. ولا شك أن هذا الملك قد ضل وأضل في سلوكه بالتسلط على الدولة.

[@hasinaakter2903]

I felt disgusted whem he was reciting his owm speech like quran Good thay these peopel are in prison otherwise they will poison people's minds. May Allah save ummah from such people. May Allah preseve sheikh Fawzan for ummah that we xan benefit from him. Aameen

[@thundafundamentalist]

Add the part where arifis supporters defended him saying the matter has been relayed and arifi himself went to shaykh Fawzan and all has been settled And then arifi said he wasn't speaking from himself but quoting imam Nawawi Shaykh Fawzan hafidhahullah checked imam Nawawis sharh and didn't find such a statement from him!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

i think your point has been refuted brfore, it siybds familiar.

[@thewaytosalvation145]

Can you explain how a muslim ruler can be Allies with Kuffar who mockAllah, Islam, Quran and the Believers?

[@Emsyaz]

​@@thewaytosalvation145 rectify yourself and your community first instead of finding fault of the rulers.

[@thewaytosalvation145]

@@Emsyaz What a surprise another Bootlicker.

[@Player_Zeesh]

@@Emsyazdidn’t Abu hanifa go against the ruler ?

[@Eljattari2008]

Always the same this sect. Sheikh rabee3 is refuted many times by scolars!? This fake salafis will never accept if rabee3 made mistakes or refuted. So brothers be aware of this sect

[@yehabashaw7374]

The Madkhalyas are the khawarij of our time who serve their masters as attack dogs against the scholars whom the tyrant rulers desire to imprison, kill or at least defame so that people would stop following their teachings. The khawarij of the old at least never lie.

[@Eljattari2008]

I cnt even repeat that! After that shamsi claimed with his arrogance that it was sarcastic?!!!!? The aya in surat tawba is clear!!

[@atharmanhaj]

Shaykh Fawzan hafidahoullah isn't a prophet and there's ikhtilaf on this hadith, some say it's about take your wealth for zakat or a debt you have to pay and hit your back for a punishment (alcohol, zina...) and not Out of nowhere, for no reason (this isn't what's meant by this hadith)

[@vgplusjr6923]

Who are you

[@talhamuhsen2147]

He’s a no one. “Some say” yet quoted no one 😂🤦‍♂️

[@atharmanhaj]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/maCVimqAds9pb6Msi=Pz_Jcummz_xJG7J8@@talhamuhsen2147

[@Scott-Eesa]

That makes no sense. Who supposedly says this?

[@AbuInayaAl-Athari-po3yj]

Who are you to say there is ikhtilaaf? There is no ikhtilaaf, whoever says this is a deviant innovator.

[@Bornhawk1]

He spoke to fawzan after all these became apparent and he clarified his intention and speech and there was peace after that.

[@johnweak5439]

dalil

[@IbnAzmi]

Can you post the video akhi

[@user-xj7mk3ql3z]

Show proof or we will reject your saying.

[@abdulhamid2000.]

Proof?

[@Eljattari2008]

Example shamsi you brothers know what he said in speakers corner???

[@yusufuabusufiyan4558]

I think your channel is meant for fitnah, not everything Fauzan says is exactly what Sunnah is, sometimes he makes mistakes and has no ismah.

[@Scott-Eesa]

But there is no mistake here

[@thewaytosalvation145]

Can anyone ask the ruling on a muslim ruler Allying with Kuffaar who mock Allah, ar-Rasul, Quran, Islam and the Believers? Can such a "Ruler" be muslim?

[@thewaytosalvation145]

Allying with Kuffaar who openly massacre muslims and bomb Masajid and try to humiliate muslims and islam.

[@abdullahtarakji]

No muslim ruler does this

[@thewaytosalvation145]

@@abdullahtarakji You must not know about Saudi Arabia. Just read their history, they were steong Allies of Britain vs The islamic Khilafah. Then later on they were Allies with America vs muslims. Then Allies with America vs Muslims in Afghanistan and later in Yemen.

[@umardahab]

Don’t ask that question before they call you a “Khārijī”

[@thewaytosalvation145]

@@umardahab So... just because they call you that it doesn't make you that. On twitter I showed a Saudi King wearing a Cross from the UK Monarchy which they award to Crusaders, still Saudi Madkhalis defend that.

[@adoha7560]

Sayidina Ibn Umar rebuking al-Hajaj أَخبَرنا مُسلِمُ بن إِبراهيمَ, قالَ: حَدَّثَنا الأَسوَدُ بن شَيبانَ, قالَ: حَدَّثَنا خالِدُ بن سُمَيرٍ, قالَ: خَطَبَ الحَجّاجُ الفاسِقُ عَلَى المِنبَرِ، فَقالَ: إِنَّ ابنَ الزُّبَير حَرَّفَ كِتابَ الله، فَقالَ لَهُ ابن عُمَر: كَذَبتَ، كَذَبتَ، كَذَبتَ، ما يَستَطيعُ ذَلِكَ، ولاَ أَنتَ مَعَهُ, فَقالَ لَهُ الحَجّاجُ: اسكُت, فَإِنَّكَ شَيخٌ قَد خَرِفتَ وذَهَبَ عَقلُكَ، يوشِكُ شَيخٌ أَن يُؤخَذَ فَتُضرَبَ عُنُقُهُ Muslim bin Ibrahim informed us saying, al-Aswad bin Shayban informed us saying, Kahlid bin Sumayr said: al-Hajaj the sinner delivered a sermon upon the pulpit saying, Indeed Ibn Zubayr distorted the Book of Allah. So (Sayidina) Ibn Umar said to him You have lied, you have lied, you have lied. He could not do that. Nor can you. Al-Hajjaj said to him: Be quiet, for you are an old man. You have become senile and have lost your mind. An old man is about to be taken and have his neck struck. (Tabaqaat Ibn Sa’d, 5316). This incident was also narrated by Imam al-Dhahabi in Siyar. Sayidina Abdullah bin Umar (May Allah Most High be pleased with them both) is publicly rebuking al-Hajaj. However, this is the case even despite the fact that (Sayidina) Ibn Umar was known to be very cautious in opposing authority. Concluding Remarks As seen above, it is well established that Sahabah and Tabieen spoke out against rulers. Consequently, it is unacceptable for people to claim otherwise. Unfortunately, people get away with misleading others due to the sectarian approach many Muslims have towards learning the Deen. Many restrict themselves to studying with a small group (The views of Sunni scholars on speaking against the rulers) of people with similar religious views. If they were to look outside that group, then they may find that some of what they have been taught is incorrect. And Allah Most High Knows Best.

[@evip3706]

Assalaam oe alaikoem everybody in this reaction, I don't know this sheikh, but I wish to say something about this video and what some people in this reaction believe in what they see. No one knows the context in which sheikh Mohamed Arifi recites the koran and recites other sentences. Let God judge the intention of this sheikh. We are in a great sin if we are judging as if we know what is in his heart. Only Allah swt knows him and me en every other individu and knows what is in our heart. May Allah swt clean our hearts and our tongue, ameen Excuse me for the bad english. Wa salem

[@julienmercurio7150]

He does not judge intentions he speaks about actions which are not allowed, your point is like someone committing some great sin and you are like guys don't condemn him you don't know the inside of his heart i mean common use your brain at least

[@evip3706]

@@julienmercurio7150 I know that actions are also important. But intentions are core of the actions. This video is a cut and paste story where the context is twisted, don't you think?

[@julienmercurio7150]

Core yeah of course but still actions are also core of the image we display of the religion, the people that killed innocents in the name of religion also may have good intentions and so they are exonerated from being punished ? The video is about behavior we aren't supposed to have, condemning actions has nothing to do with intentions, and if you listen carefully sheikh Al Fawzan mentioned that he thinks that the person that committed this action is in great danger, so no where he said that the guy will be in hell and burn for the eternity the way he chooses his words should inspire us

[@evip3706]

@@julienmercurio7150 I didn't mean that what sheikh Mohamed Arifi is saying is correct. No! I am explaining that maybe he is in a situation that we don't know or understand. That's why I say let Allah swt judge him for his actions, because we don't know his intentions. I don't agree with him to recite such false soera's !

[@evip3706]

@@julienmercurio7150 by the way, there are app's and robots that can immitate someone's voice. This may also be an explanation of his statements. Let us not take everything we hear and see as the truth. I only want to be conscious before believing something I see or hear. The context and intentions are always the most important in every situation.

[@adhandahir201]

INNAA LILLAHI WA INNAA ILEYHI RAAJIUN. You are attacking Sheikh and he has given you the correct explanation of the hadith. Wallahi you will answer Infront of Allah for calling him that. The righteous guided don't attack even their rivals like that. You have gone far, May Allah reward our scholars, May Allah forgive you.

[@Eljattari2008]

Madkhalis always talk about everyone and refute en expose. They droppee very much scholars even in there own group

[@Eljattari2008]

About prophet when some fool said filthy things about the prophet saws?

[@grizzlymac-tight]

I don't think the questioner who mentioned arifis method of reciting the qur'an, and then reciting regular speech in a melodic manner, explained the situation to the Shaykh fawzan correctly. The questioner did not mention that it was done to cause the listener to see if he will notice a difference between allahs speech and regular speech while having never heard allahs speech before. The response of sheikh fawzan sort of showed that he was under the impression that arifi did that to imitate the qur'an. Before u go around calling people misguided or w.e you need to be extremely cautious in understanding. The muslims today have no Khushu in our salah and yet we think we pray the fard and that we are guided. Subhanallah. We don't even pray tahajjud and we think we are guided.

[@muhammedmustafa7809]

May Allah reward you for understanding the deen a lot of people talking trash and garbage about al arifi and shaykh At Tarifi may Allah perserve them without looking things as they are

[@julienmercurio7150]

You can't fix stupid

[@darimtiyaz3093]

Alhamdullilah …. I also noticed that people ask questions about other scholars to Shayk Al Fawzan without giving a good description or context … Maybe or maybe not they want to incite a feud between them for pleasure … One time Shayk Fawzan even called Dr Zakir naik murtad and disbeliever simply because the questionare didnt provide context and mended the work of Dr Naik … This shows how evil people are out there

[@HATL201]

So this individual literally made up his own sentences, recited them with tajweed rules and called them "Surah Tuffaha", is this not extreme misguidance if not clear kufr? And you're making excuse for that? SubhanAllah. May Allah سبحانه وتعالى guide us all, ameen.

[@grizzlymac-tight]

@HaseebAli-yg9ql why is it kufr? Arifi was merely saying arabic in a melodic manner to show that even for a non Muslim, they recognize allahs speech. Explain what is kufr about it when u know that Arifi is a muslim and that he isn't trying to make people think his speech is Allah's speech. Plz enlighten me

[@OmarHyari2009]

He was mocking Musaylamah

[@Eljattari2008]

Whatever he say is true blind followers!!! If scholars of salaf where alive now? They would cut this sect offrf

[@abdullahiknouz]

Even sheikh Al Fawzaan (I admire him) could make a mistake. Yes? So if others make mistakes for giving them examples or giving them proofs of which he have studied or understood of it, is it not possible to take the good from the sheikh and throw the falsehood? Is it permissible to take money (or work) as a sheikh/imam from a ruler/government/dictator?

[@abdullahtarakji]

It js permissible

[@parvizdawah2641]

its not eloquent he should test the lexicon or linguist of arabic language not an average joe especially don’t speak arabic at all. la adri wa Allahu alam

[@Rad1us21]

I don't think the questioner who mentioned arifis method of reciting the qur'an, and then reciting regular speech in a melodic manner, explained the situation to the Shaykh fawzan incorrectly. The questioner did not mention that it was done to cause the listener to see if he will notice a difference between allahs speech and regular speech while having never heard allahs speech before. The response of sheikh fawzan sort of showed that he was under the impression that arifi did that to imitate the qur'an. Wallahi I am a witness to your madakhila lies against ulama, and leading people astray. Playing games with the people who believe you Kadhdhaab. May allah guide you people. I had enough with these Madakhila Murjias. Taghoot booty lickers Before u go around calling people misguided or w.e you need to be extremely cautious in understanding.

[@mmuhammadumarmahmudjanov282]

yeah and we can see that the admin of this channel is spreading fitnah willingly or unwillingly. it is obvious that they did not explain the question correctly to Shaikh Fauzan.

[@Scott-Eesa]

Don’t be a khawarij

[@Rad1us21]

Don’t be madkhali.

[@Scott-Eesa]

@@Rad1us21 so you are telling me not to follow the Sunnah of obeying the rulers? No, thanks. The Prophet ﷺ warned us against khawarij like you. He ﷺ ORDERED US to obey the rulers. So if that’s what Madkhali is, we should ALL be Madkhali.

[@Scott-Eesa]

@@Rad1us21 the Prophet ﷺ ordered us to OBEY THE RULERS. If Madkhali = obeying rulers then I’m proud to be one. You proud to be a khawarij who DISOBEYS the Sunnah?

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

he thought singing on apples is like Quran?

[@tamerjaber3771]

where did he say that?

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@tamerjaber3771 what was he doing at 2:40?

[@tamerjaber3771]

@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 the singing way in which he was talking isn't strict to Quran only. i guess he was testing if the non muslim guy could differentiate, we should watch the full video to understand.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@tamerjaber3771 in the sira Arab speaking non Muslims said I heard poetry & Quran is no poetry. Non Arabic knowing Muslims also know the difference many times. Quran has tajwid which last I checked is unique to Quran. This imam isn't making much sense. May Allah guide us away from unlearned imams and to verify with Quran and sunna.

[@-------....___]

I mean, I see in the video and the comments, people are treating Fawzan like he is Allah SWT. You are like the Jews.

[@youngbloodnba]

Lots of people have gone astray concerning the ruler because of their hawwaa. May Allaah guide them and guide us too. Sheikh ibn baz, ibn uthaymeen, sheikh fawzaan, al albani. These were people who controlled themselves and didnt get emotional.

[@shinmonbenimaru91]

And all 3 of them said you can criticize the rulers publicly. Say that to the madkhalis nowadays and look how they react.

[@Bornhawk1]

And turayfis defending of his brother in his absence is a good and praiseworthy act and part of islaam and manners. Far from any slander. Learn your deen (manners) people.

[@Eljattari2008]

What arifi said is indeed kufr and very dangerous!!!! Of course you will become murtad! No excuus

[@Eljattari2008]

Mohammed ibn hadi, tahya hajoori? Hahha only sheikh rabee3 is their 1 big leader

[@KandahariHadithLover]

Cry harder, zandeeq tears taste so good

[@loussislamic3806]

Madakhila is layer

[@thewaytosalvation145]

One protects his Master even if it means betraying Islam! The other speaks the Truth even if they are imprisoned and tortured.

[@Aisakusainn]

What kind of person are you? You seem to be sowing dispute. May Allah do not make us from the people who are "Qilaa wa qaal."

[@sarutobiotsutsuki3489]

Absolutely no, what he did is an Extremely good deed ,by exposing them & letting normal people like us know about their vileness

[@amina_ally_mahimbo]

In shaa Allah that is not what this brother intends. I remember years ago I didn’t understand the error thay Sheikh Al Arifi made but now I understand it is a serious and grave error may Allah protect us and our Imaan and May He guide us all and protect our Mashaykh. 🤲

[@Abdullah.996]

Warning people from evil is a blessed action

[@thewaytosalvation145]

One protects his Master even if it means betraying Islam! The other speaks the Truth even if they are imprisoned and tortured.

[@Theoneandonlyearthhuman]

Lol shakh fawzon better not ever take a hadeeth metaphorically or hes a hypocrite, he better take it as the hadeeth says word for word

[@thewaytosalvation145]

One protects his Master even if it means betraying Islam! The other speaks the Truth even if they are imprisoned and tortured.

[@Fatimakhan-bd8hx]

Al Arifi is shaytan

[@yehabashaw7374]

How dare you call a Muslim "Shaytan". Madkhalyas are the khawarij of our time who serve as attack dogs against the scholars whom the tyrant rulers desire to imprison, kill or at least defame so that people would stop following their teachings. The khawarij of the old at least never lie.

[@Scott-Eesa]

@@yehabashaw7374you clearly don’t know what Khawarij means

[@faraazsiddiqui1450]

Your MBS is real shaytan because he is aligning with the Zionists and RSS and allowing parties,Halloween and rave parties.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@user-me3zu8ds1t]

Sheikh terifi is the best shaykh in saudi

[@futgoat4841]

really? Bro plz say something about him! I mean say something about his Knowledge

[@fs5297]

​@@futgoat4841 he is quoted a lot by people on manhaj of khawarij

[@julienmercurio7150]

And you are the smartest person on earth

[@thewaytosalvation145]

Exactly! One protects his Master even if it means betraying Islam! The other speaks the Truth even if they are imprisoned and tortured.

[@fs5297]

@@thewaytosalvation145 they speak the truth when they say syrian war and arab spring were good? Where is the liberation such people promised the young people that if they betray the rulers they will get? That's how they destroyed thousands of people without a single good consequence! For them blood of muslims was cheap so they pandered for political gain disregarding the blood of muslims and destruction of muslim lands.