The Strongest Countries in Every Century

[@WorldData_3D]

Which empire was the most powerful?

[@hyonox]

ottoman empire and mongol empire

[@acsisters7686]

First

[@nenenindonu]

Mongol empire easily. There was never a case of any other hyperpower being that dominant, it would be followed only by the British and Ottomans

[@acsisters7686]

North korea

[@hyonox]

@@acsisters7686 wtf 🤨

[@navid8437]

Iranians proud for Hachaemenid Empire 🇮🇷❤️🤍💚😍

[@GyanTvAmit]

😂islamic invaders invade your persia but still you people worship their god😂😂lol

[@andreicristian9575]

Well I can tell you Hachaemenid is not proud of today's Iran.

[@Elizabeth20-]

haha true​@@andreicristian9575

[@insideworld1830]

It's fascinating to see how the balance of power shifts throughout history. Each century brings new challenges and opportunities, leading to different countries rising to the top. It's important to note that military strength is just one aspect of a country's overall power and should be considered within the context of economic, political, and social factors as well.

[@chiiesa]

Yes exactly so why is britain who was the fastest moving technological power not leading the 18th century ?

[@widodoakrom3938]

Britain lost against USA in 18th century beside in term of land area and economy Russia seems like bigger than Britain in 18 century

[@Deano-Dron81]

@@chiiesaaMy question is, why are you still asking?

[@circle277]

wow!

[@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv]

​@@widodoakrom3938james Hargreaves, michael faraday, Geoffrey chaucer, henry Bessemer, Edward Jenner, James watt forever

[@shaaravguha3760]

There are so many countries missing from this list: - Tang (They literally controlled over half the worlds wealth and you decided to give the dub to a fledgling roman republic...) - Ming (similar reason to tang) - Spanish empire (This one is a bit more debatable as the ottomans were strong, but in the end the Spanish had a better navy and far more influence) - Mauryan empire (during its peak it had the largest military, economy, navy, etc) - Maratha (similar reason to maurya) - France (Napoleon) etc (You filled up a lot of spots with the ottomans and romans. Obviously the ottomans would be worthy of atleast 1 century and the romans of 3 but they weren't always as powerful as they were during their peaks so putting them up there for so long isn't right)

[@ComradeHellas]

I agree that 18th century should have been France, 17th century Spain and Ming also should have been counted for the 15th century, the Ottomans could stay in their spot for the 16th century. I also agree that Tang could squeeze in during the Roman period. Maurya was also strong enough to make it probably. But the Marathas were never powerful enough, the Mughals and the Qing were powerful Empires but they crumbled in front of the British.

[@mng8680]

Thats because ancient Chinese dynasties arent well known by the general masses, his list is based on the opinions of random people online and not by historians well versed in world history. Even schools in western countries generally dont teach much about ancient Chinese history so its understandable people dont know them.

[@DOLIWAL]

Ageee

[@ProtectorOfDemocracy1]

@@ComradeHellas I agree but ottomans had the most devastating defeats in 16th century.

[@bilbobaggins5938]

Tang China wasn't existent during the same centuries that the Roman Republic was. The Tang dynasty began ruling China centuries after the Roman Republic had ended.

[@alexanderaugustus1650]

The fact that the Roman Republic and Roman Empire were the strongest for 6 centuries straight is insane to think about

[@retrogamermax8287]

Rome in it's heyday pretty much owned the known world or at least most of it.

[@mayankraj9249]

so true

[@hakinadedeji]

Technology had not advanced... knowledge was primitive, so why won't a nation rule unquestionably for 6 centuries

[@alexanderaugustus1650]

@@hakinadedeji Yeah facts my fault The Roman Republic and Roman Empire during those 6 centuries were filled with nothing but primitives who knew nothing about how to advance in math, science and architecture. What was I thinking? Silly me

[@shaaravguha3760]

@@retrogamermax8287 Not really, their stats were pretty close to what the Chinese had going on (their population was smaller though and their economy was also a bit smaller)

[@user-qv6qk5uy1p]

Rome and Ottoman Empire:💪

[@Bloxfruit_5343]

Bro you mean romania oh man heck ya bruh Rome was against prophet Muhammad (sa),do you know they even start war against prophet Muhammad (sa) but muslim win,ottomans are sigma they capture Constantinople now known as istanbul

[@alielhajj7769]

Unpopular opinion: the chinese dybasties should have appeared for many centuries but we akwaus neglect it because it’s history was almost separate and unaffected by the history of Europe and the middle east, plus maybe the civilization of the native Americans could have made it to the list also

[@Deepak_Dhakad]

And no one gave fuck about india which had 1/3rd of earth population bruh. Maurya empire , Gupta empire , Delhi sultanate , and Mughal empire.

[@widodoakrom3938]

Sorry for native America but they didn't deserve on this list

[@andreicristian9575]

Chinese will make the list in a few decades, after the fall of USA.

[@PortugalZeroworldcup]

Mayans were doing well before Christ till they had to give up human sacrifices

[@luv_sic]

Who? Zhou, Tang? West always was stronger...

[@retrogamermax8287]

Shouldn't the Spanish Empire been the strongest power in the 16th Century on this list?

[@nenenindonu]

Nope Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish Empire, Ottomans defeated them despite a Holy League alliance winning 2 of the 3 major engagements against Spain (Preveza & Djerba)

[@buddy7874]

@@nenenindonu only here you deny the fact that Spain was at war with the whole of Europe. in that chtsl and Ottomans, and won.

[@eduardovieirinha9697]

People always value Spain and forget Portugal. Both Portugal and Spain were the most powerful and with most territories in the 16th century. Especially when they formed the Iberian Union

[@Emmi5542.]

Ottoman, Timurid and Seljuk are Turk, and also Huns

[@pelao1558]

@@buddy7874 Spain still had more allies than the Ottomans

[@AlphaMind12]

Proud of being Persian (Achaemenid Empire) Cyrus the great and Dariush the great ❤

[@sanexpreso2944]

The Spanish empire literally connected the whole world, it was the first global power, it brought cocoa, potatoes, corn, pineapple and many other foods to Europe, it made the first circumnavigation of the world, it established trading posts in America, Asia and Europe, it defeated the Ottomans in Lepanto, but it is not here

[@simonesantucci4714]

We could say the same abot the Dutch empire that in the 17th century had the most powerful and richiest private societies of the whole time and did some of the things you said. Power is also about military, in fact both of them lost against England, if I'm not wrong, but surely in 16th century should have been the Spanish empire there. Anyway in both the centuries they put the Ottoman Empire. Considering also other video we can say that the admin is not objective (Mohammed more influent that Jesus? Are we joking?), his name is Timur so here you have the explanation

[@JoseGarcia-qb1qu]

The first global empire was Egypt; Ethiopia & others in the midle east then came the europeans ( Spain & others)...when the Europeans went to Americas for the first time they met already some blacks & arab descendents there...

[@WalkingSpain]

You are absolutely right, in the 16th century the Spanish empire was economically more powerful than the Ottoman empire, militarily it is possible that they were more equal. Although I am Spanish it may seem that what I say is chauvinism but it is a fact.

[@atakaninat1811]

The span of the Spanish empire is not as effective as the span of the Ottoman empire. One is South America and North America. The other is Asia Europe Africa.

[@atakaninat1811]

@@WalkingSpain The Ottomans own the most important trade routes. Since the Spanish empire could not reach India, it traveled from the west instead of the east. Ottoman Asia Europe Africa. Spaniards only north and south america.

[@TheWiseKara]

The Great Rashidun Caliphate 🇸🇦 , Umayyad Empire, Abbasid Empire, The Great Seljuks, The Great Ottomans 🇹🇷 , Timurid Empire, Mughals 🇮🇳

[@Dheeraj-y4f]

except for mughals,some part of ottomans rest all empires were rulling empty deserts

[@user-cq8yo7zb9t]

Mughals is Uzbek not India

[@uyihloughar]

Not Mughal is Mongol - turk becouse misprouncation count Mongol to mughal​@@user-cq8yo7zb9t

[@Aviator727]

@@user-cq8yo7zb9t we know but they ruled india

[@user-cq8yo7zb9t]

@@Aviator727 if I said Britain 🇮🇳 would it be better than Britain 🇬🇧 then?

[@mmdkeo9501]

The Achaemenid Empire 🔥

[@ArminRad666]

😎🇮🇷

[@RamtinHG]

Two first centuries 😎🔥

[@zambi2]

جانم فدتی ایران

[@andreicristian9575]

And the the muslims took over and it all went to shit.

[@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv]

Beautiful Persian flag in fifth century

[@kaldirdimgobegi]

Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.

[@shoaibahmed7548]

Ofcourse 👍👍

[@Kevin-yo8jq]

True but the British empire is probably the most influential empire to ever exist.

[@user-so7bg6cp6w]

​@@Kevin-yo8jq بريطانيا لعبت دور أساسي في اهم الاحداث التاريخية الحديثة من الثورة الصناعية و عصر الاستكشاف و الحربين العالميتين و حروب نابليون كما أن له دور أيضا في الحرب الباردة بين أمريك و روسيا و إسقاط الشيوعية و الاتحاد السوفيتي

[@Kevin-yo8jq]

@@user-so7bg6cp6w I wish I wasn't on my phone so I could translate this.

[@jredubr]

What is the source? What was the criteria? There are some picks that are so awful that it’s even hard to think someone acquainted with history developed this video.

[@user-iw8ne4pd3h]

Source is history books.criteria are territories conquered,army power,economy,time of reign

[@sincreatividad6651]

I miss the Spanish empire and the Chinese dynasties

[@nenenindonu]

Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish, Spain got dominated despite a Holy League alliance losing 2 of the 3 major engagements against Turks (Preveza & Djerba) this while the Spanish were a naval force while Ottomans a land one

[@theshadow-]

@@nenenindonu this is a lie. Go to study more and say less unsense.

[@MarulitoMcarty]

@@nenenindonu what about Lepanto?

[@kinkel23]

@@nenenindonu you lies, but you don´t know it.

[@Axel77430]

You were in that age?

[@Ar10ahmed]

Proud to Be Muslim and Ummati of Muhammad SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WASALLAM (PBUH) 🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦

[@njnikusha]

🕋☪️🤮🤮💩🤮🤮🕋☪️🤮

[@ahmedabdellaoui1628]

@@esemre25 what 7 century othman arab timurid ans seljuk

[@shaaravguha3760]

@@Ectooooo Tbf it is a bit hard to say that the ottomans were dominant in those years considering they consistently lost to both the spanish and french (they had their share of victories too). It was more a 3 way power struggle where there were 3 equal powers all fighting each other for dominance (the spanish and the french fought each other just as much as they fought the ottomans, in fact that's the reason that the ottomans were able to pick off so many smaller countries. It was because the spanish were distracted with the french.)

[@defneagle.779]

Achaemenid military had a strong structure of units.

[@azim1]

6 yüzyıl boyunca süper güçmüşüz vay be

[@hamid_sahari]

🤣 Iran 🇮🇷 is the best

[@Gerceksuriyeli]

@@hamid_sahari Source:The Rock's Beatiful hair

[@Furkan_Pilevne]

​@@hamid_sahari 🇮🇷=💩🏳️‍🌈🗑Iran Gay

[@buddy7874]

3, Seljuks were objectively weaker than Byzantium

[@aria-ib9fn]

@@hamid_sahari nope

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

It was reinforced later on as the militarily superior Turkic dynasties of the Ghaznavids , the Great Seljuks and their successors came to rule much of the eastern and central Islamic lands . The poetic differentiation of the Turk signifies the extent to which this demographic constituent of the medieval Islamic world retained a distinct identity and image , even as it incorporated itself by degrees into the cultural , social and religious matrices of the Iranian and Arab lands .

[@makutas-v261]

You are a mountain western chinese savage

[@Hermes19hnsj]

@@makutas-v261 Ok bro. You are %100000000 accurate that's why all Turks admitted this, because they can't deny your massive argument 🤓🤓

[@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv]

​@@makutas-v261Turkish/ greek / thai/ Egyptian cuisine>>>>> Chinese

[@user-vj7fr7cp3k]

And as far as I know, when Columbus discovered the American continent in 1492, I learned in history class that the Ming Dynasty of China's Tanou ship was 20 times the size of Columbus' ship 100 years before that, and it is true that the Ottomans were powerful, but I don't think they were more powerful than the Qing Dynasty at the time. And I know that the Holy Roman Empire had a weaker military power than Korea's Goryeo. 30,000 troops are also a lot, but Goryeo is a country that mobilized 300,000 troops. Please don't manipulate it.

[@user-vj7fr7cp3k]

@@橘予猫 Personally, I hate China very much, but I think we have to admit it. At the time, the Qing Dynasty had the largest population in the world, accounting for 30% of the world's GDP, and its army was capable of mobilizing 1 million troops for expeditions, but the largest expeditionary force of the Ottoman Empire was. 200,000 people. This is considerably smaller than the war between Goguryeo and Sui Dynasty, which was one of the wars between ancient Korea and China.

[@user-vj7fr7cp3k]

@@橘予猫 There is a record that the Sui Dynasty mobilized an army of 1.13 million troops and attacked Goguryeo in 612, but lost. However, there was no record of a war on such a large scale in Europe until World War I.

[@ahmedhamada1250]

During the 16th century, the Spanish empire was the most powerful As for the 20th century, it was a bit contested between the Americans, the British and the Germans in the two first decades and later the Soviets would enter the game. But generally speaking the USA were clearly the hegemonic superpower of the 20th century.

[@Gatao_2020]

Hegemonic only became after the collapse in 1991. I would say that the Soviets and the Americans should be on the list of the 20th century, both were extremely powerful

[@raphael3620]

America became strong on 21st century after collapse of Soviet union

[@Gatao_2020]

@@raphael3620 I agree

[@abert1313]

Насчёт Испании в 16 веке - справедливо. Империя, над которой никогда не заходит солнце". Открытие и захват Америки, Филиппин, Южной Европы, Нидерландов, контроль над Францией.

[@Gatao_2020]

@@abert1313 Bro, I'm Latin em I also speak english. But Russian? God, bro. That's enough

[@Bashchavush]

Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."

[@user-dj7vx4em3z]

Egyptian Empire🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬 The 18th and 19th dynasties, the Skinnen Ra dynasty and the Ramesside dynasty Fatimid caliphate Ayyubid Caliphate Mamluk Caliphate.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@user-dj7vx4em3z Fatimids, Ayyubids and Mamluks were not Copts

[@Emmi5542.]

Merhaba kardeşim tamamen haklısın bu yorumu ingilizce yazacak kadar İngilizcem var fakat bunu biraz erindim evet o zamanlar Türkler dünyayı yönetse de burda medya çok önemli şuan medya süpergüç America ve İngiltere'nin altında bu yüzden biizm tarihimizi bertaraf etmeye çalışıyorlar ama o yıllarda böyle dünyanın her tarafından insanların yazışıp görülebileceği şeyler olsaydı her yerde Türkler övülecekti yani.

[@Emmi5542.]

Medyanın bu dönemki devletlerin kontrol altında olması çok kötü

[@wankawanka3053]

😂😂😂

[@atakaninat1811]

The Ottomans own the most important trade routes. Since the Spanish empire could not reach India, it traveled from the west instead of the east. Ottoman Asia Europe Africa. Spaniards only north and south america.

[@sto4552]

Spaniards Europe, South America, North America*

[@omerfarukozdemir1790]

my friend, if the Ottomans had not missed the geographical discoveries and the industrial revolution, they would have remained the greatest power until the 20th century.

[@CesarSPizarro]

You have no idea about the story. Spain controlled almost all of continental Europe, the Philippines, and many more parts of Asia. The Spanish faced the Japanese, with a great disadvantage, and won. They had much more influence than the Ottoman Empire, the best military tactics among other things. They created new routes, with much more importance for Europe than those controlled by the Ottoman Empire. If the Spanish empire had been weaker than the Ottoman empire, today Europe would be Muslim.

[@kasadam85]

@@CesarSPizarro Naval defeats didn't bring the collapse of the Empire, losing land battles did. If Spanish was as powerful as you're saying, they'd not fear facing the Ottomans on land and pass through Egypt by force rather than stretching trade network incredibly long.

[@allahisthe_devil]

They lost British empire. And now gonna die by earthquake 😂

[@animangaweeb8501]

Love how this guy is so anti-Indian he excluded every single Indian kingdom from this list

[@animangaweeb8501]

5th century AD: hunas lost to guptas in India and they didn't even have elephants 3rd century BC : alexander came to India, shat his pants and didn't have the guts to cross the gangetic plains to fight the Nanda Empire

[@dfdf-rj8jr]

I'm not following how the USSR was stronger than the USA in the 20th century if the USSR collapsed lol

[@WeoXCY]

You're probably uneducated

[@fudora3764]

@@WeoXCY mind explaining?

[@WeoXCY]

@@fudora3764 I can't see my own comment 💀

[@fudora3764]

@@WeoXCY darn. can u explain tho im up for a debate

[@WeoXCY]

@@fudora3764 I'm too, but i can't see my own shit. I do not remember what i wrote. The only thing that i can state is that i believe that USSR is the strongest country and nation in 20th century

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

The great historian Ibn Khaldun also argues in his “Introduction to History” (or The Muqaddimah) that nomadic peoples, the Turks foremost among them, were the most energetic and martial of peoples and that imperial dynasties and regimes emerged from such groups until they became corrupted and softened by civilization and luxury, which resulted in a loss of martial energy and group solidarity. This analysis is very true because as the Abbasid caliphate started to lose its power and influence in the mid-ninth century most of the dynasties that emerged to control the various regions of the Muslim world were founded by Turks, either tribal nomads or former slave soldiers. Ibn Khaldun even attributes the victory of the Muslims over the Mongols to the martial power and energy of the Turks, who formed the elite ranks of the Mamluk armies that defeated the Mongols on several occasions as they attempted to advance into Syria and Egypt between 1260 and 1323.

[@REALALIENDUDE]

😀

[@timkaz8793]

So called Mongol Army were mostly consisted of Eastern turks, who were not yet Muslims by the time. Among them there were some ancient Mongol tribes too, but not the majority

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

@@timkaz8793 yeah

[@makutas-v261]

"history enjoyer" yeah, ERDOGAN'S history I bet

[@makutas-v261]

Your so called turkic ethnicity are just the mountain barbarians of the chinese west 🤠

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

''Why are so many Spaniards bothered that Spain isn't here? It is true that the Spanish empire had strong periods, but the golden age of the Ottoman Empire was stronger than Spain both economically, politically and geographically. Capture of Algiers (1516) Ottomans won Algiers expedition (1541) Ottomans won Capture of Béjaïa (1555) Ottomans won Siege of Coron, Ottomans won Battle of Djerba, Ottomans won Battle of Formentera, Ottomans won Raid of the Balearic islands (1558) Ottomans won Siege of Castelnuovo, Ottomans won Fall of Tlemcen (1518) Ottomans won Conquest of Tunis (1574) Ottomans won Battle of Preveza, Ottomans won at the same time, the Ottomans were alone in Preveza. But the enemy army Venice, Papal States, Genoa, Spain, Mantua, Malta, Portugal[1][2][3] All of them was part of Holy League but Ottomans won against them. Also remember Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian helmet . It was an elaborate headpiece designed to project the sultan's power in the context of the Ottoman-Habsburg rivalry. Meaning The four floors of the Crown also represent Solomon's goal of world conquest-reigning the North, the South, the East, and the West-as well as the Pope's famous triple crown and the Holy Roman Empire two years ago. It was a reference to Charles V, who was crowned as the German Emperor.🙂.''

[@Letnistonwandif]

Spanish conquest of Oran 1732) (Humilliating defeat for thé ottomans) Spanish conquest of Oran 1509 (Spanish Victory) Battle of Alborán (Humilliating defeat for ottomans) Battle of Cape Celidonia (extremely humilliating defeat of ottomans) Battle of Cape Corvo (Another humilliating defeat for ottomans) Battle of Girolata( Another victory of spain) Great Siege of Malta( This one was with allies but the ottomans still had more soldiers and they got massacred) Holy League 1535 (Another victory for Spain and his allies still the ottomans had allies too) Capture of Mahdia 1550 (Humilliating defeat for ottomans) Sack of Mahón (Humilliating defeat of barbarrosa by Charles V) Siege of Oran 1556 (Spanish victory) Sieges of Oran and Mers El Kébir (Humilliating ottoman defeat) Ottoman invasion of Otranto (Humilliating defeat for ottomans they surrended even if they were 18 000 compared to 2100 christian forces) Ottoman-Habsburg wars( Spanish hasburg victorie tooking back Hungrary) Siege of the Castle of Saint George (Spanish victory) Conquest of Tunis 1535 (Spanish victory) Siege of Vienna 1529 (One of the most humilliating defeats of ottomans) Siege of Castelnuovo (Even if this was an ottoman victory i wanted to show that even if the Spanish soldiers were outnembered 1 to 6 they still managed to kill more than half of the army this shows that mallority of the battles that ottoman won it was because they had so much more numerical advantage) Conquest of Tunis 1574 (This battle its another example of what i was talking about outnembering and still getting fckd) And battle of lepanto 1571 (another humilliating defeat for the ottomans by the Spaniards) Sitio de Orán y Mazalquivir 1563(Thé most humilliating defeat for thé ottomans 1500 Spaniards vs 100 000 Ottomans and Jannisaries and It ended in an Décisive Spanish Victory. Almost thé entire Ottoman army slaughtered. Toma de Mahdía (1550) Jornada de Túnez

[@Letnistonwandif]

It seems like you lost a few tho

[@pedroguiraosanchez]

Spain won ottomans in The battle of lepanto

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@pedroguiraosanchez preveza > lepanto

[@pattyguy]

@@Letnistonwandif ​ @Letniston wandif it is about 16th century, not 18th century" "ottoman-habsburg wars" not even conclusive, you truly just wanna expand your list, the result was both dynasties getting heavily weakened "Siege of Vienna 1529" you idiot, 1683 is a devastating defeat, 1529 barely affected ottomans, Suleiman just withdrew because bad weather conditions in siege. Siege of Castelnuovo "Muhh, Spanish outnumbered ottomans" 🤓literally no one asked and numbers arent always accurate "Battle of Lepanto 1571" probably the only true thing in your non-sense hot trash "Holy league 1535" ??? "Conquest of Tunis" you lost it back lol "Sack of Mahon" LOL idiot, it is ottoman victory, "sack" "Spanish Conquest of Oran 1509" Ottomans did not even partipicate in that war, it was with Tlemcen (which wasnt connected to ottomans back then) "Battle of Cape Celidonia" The numbers are most likely inaccurate, the possibility of Spanish victory with that amount is pretty low, but yeah it wasnt devastating lol "Battle of Alboran" HUMILIATING DEFEAT? LOL??? THAT BATTLE WAS SO SMALL

[@iamyourfather4270]

The fact that Roman Empire eventually fell simply proves that even the biggest and most dominant powers atm will inevitably fall after a point

[@nenenindonu]

10-7 centuries BC = Neo Assyrian Empire 6. century AD = Turkic Khaganate 7-9 centuries AD = Tang China 12. century AD = Khwarezmian empire

[@MetaJuggernaut]

tang dynasty is bs. China never ever be the strongest country

[@sidequestenjoyer7037]

The strongest country in the 6th century was China

[@1sultan189]

7,8,9 were the caliphates as they were bigger, had the best economy, center of the world in knowledge, strongest military, strongest currency, strongest legacy.

[@sarveshkumarsinha9628]

@@1sultan189 lol, only area ,economy is nope

[@shaaravguha3760]

@@1sultan189 You must be on something. The tangs economy is uncertain but the lowest estimates anyone has ever thrown out was 40% of the world GDP with the highest being around 80%... The entire middle east at the time only accounted for around 7% while India was a bit higher at around 10-15%

[@selfiekroos1777]

This list is highly debatable

[@alparslan698]

It's fairly accurate but it's debatable

[@DevRaj-ry2th]

​@@alparslan698actually it's not. I'll give an example if you want. The user name you have "alp arslan" Wasn't the most powerful man in 11th century. There were others. For example Rajendra chola. The great king if tamils who decimated 2 great empires and several kingdoms. A pioneer in advanced naval combat who's ships ruled the global sea trade. He conquered the lands between Arabian sea and phillipines. Maintained an army of 1,500,000 infantry, 125,000 cavalry, 12 thousand elephants. All spread across his massive empire. And you think alp arslan, a seljuk who couldn't even raise an army of 100,000 was more powerful than rajendra? If you think I am exaggerating the numbers, these numbers weren't given by indian historians. They were written down by a Chinese general. That is the problem with you people. You only know your history.

[@NK236]

​@@DevRaj-ry2th😂😂😂😂😂 plz stop 🙏 Hindus haven't done . It was only Ashoka their biggest one in Asia thou he bhuddist

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

Turkic peoples were undoubtedly the most strong and powerful ethnicity in history

[@abert1313]

И получили под жопу от России.

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

@@abert1313part of Slavs got ruled by Turkics for 1500 years kiddo😂

[@abert1313]

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 не ври. Этногенез тюрок меньше тысячи лет. Тем более, если и были тюрки пятьсот лет на Балканском полуострове, то русские их били последние триста лет.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@abert1313 The South Slavic tribal groups moved south and southwest from their Pripet homeland, eventually entering the Byzantine-controlled Balkan Peninsula as either allies of or refugees from the invading Turkic Avars during the second half of the sixth century. Their search for a new, permanent homeland proved successful. Today their descendants solidly inhabit virtually all of the northwestern, central, and southeastern regions of the Balkans. Turks comprise a third ethnic component of the Balkan population. Although today numerically small-a little over 1 million people (about 2 percent of the total population) they have played a role in shaping the history of the Balkans far beyond their numbers. In late antiquity the rolling plains of the Danube and Prut rivers in the Balkans' northeast served Turkic tribes from the Eurasian steppes as an open door into the heart of the peninsula and the riches of the Eastern Roman Empire. Huns and related tribes swept through the Balkans in the fifth and sixth centuries, followed by the Avars and their allies in the sixth and seventh. Among these latter were the Bulgars, who established a state south of the Danube. Unlike the Avars, whose settlements in the Balkans proved transitory, the Bulgar state persisted in the face of concerted Byzantine pressures. By the ninth century the Bulgars were challenging the Byzantine Empire for political hegemony in the Balkans, but by that time they also were well on the way toward ethnic assimilation into their Slavic-speaking subject population. The conversion of the Turkic Bulgar ruling elite to Orthodox Chris-tianity at midcentury opened the gate to their rapid and total Slavic assimilation. Within a hundred years of the Bulgar conversion, most traces of their Turkic origins had disappeared, except for their name-the Bulgars had been transformed into Slavic Bulgarians Oğuz, Pecheneg, and Cuman Turkic tribes appeared in the Balkans between the ninth and eleventh centuries. Most of them eventually suffered an ethnic fate similar to the Bulgars and left little lasting impression, although the Gagauz Turks of Bessarabia, a region lying east of the Prut River (now known as Moldova), and some Turks living today in the eastern Balkans may be direct ethnic descendants of those medieval Turkic interlopers. Additionally, the Ottoman Turks' five-century rule over most of the Balkans established numerous scattered enclaves of Turkish- speaking groups throughout much of the southern portion of the peninsula, with a heavy concentration in the southeastern region of ancient Thrace.

[@ozzy82nick]

What you mean Turkic? You talking about Mongols that came near Europe? Why you call them Turkic? Why not Chickenic?

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

The Turks were considered as the best warriors due to their horsemanship and skill in archery. Kaushik Roy., n.d. Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400-1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships (Bloomsbury Studies in Military History). p.24. The Turks too , the great warriors of the steppes , were almost haughty in the assumption that they inherited the jihad fighting spirit of the tradition and carried it half - way into Europe . Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective p.94 The Seljukian Turks had had some great warriors ; the period of their power was during the eleventh and twelfth centuries ; they had taken the place of the Arabs as the great Moslem power of the east , though an Arab caliph still nominally reigned at Baghdad . The Divine Aspect of History Volume 2 p.324

[@borhanuddin8447]

The turk suddenly become strongest after they accepted Islam. Same thing happened with Arabs. After accepting Islam super power of the world. Too bad now, they are not following proper islam now. That's why not Super power now.

[@pattyguy]

@@borhanuddin8447 "Too bad now, they are not following proper islam now. That's why not Super power now." uh not really buddy

[@wankawanka3053]

Mongols and russians laughing in the corner

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@wankawanka3053 Most Mongol army was made up from Turkic peoples and 1/4 of Mongols are from Turkic tribes kiddo🤣 even today LOL The name Mongol appeared first in the eighth-century Chinese records of the Tang dynasty, but only resurfaced in the eleventh century during the rule of the Khitan. At first, it was applied to some small and insignificant nomadic tribes in the area of the Onon River. In the thirteenth century, however, the name Mongol grew into an umbrella term for a large group of Mongolic and Turkic tribes united under the rule of Genghis Khan. It is not clear what the Mongols called themselves in their own languages. In fact, the specific origin of the Mongolic languages is unclear. Some linguists have proposed a link to languages like Tungusic and Turkic, which are often included alongside Mongolic in a hypothetical language group called “Altaic languages”, but the evidence for this is rather weak.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@wankawanka3053 Slavic history is better than Hellenic but Turkic is better than both combined LOL

[@patriciogarcia3105]

And the Spanish Empire?

[@nenenindonu]

Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish Empire, Ottomans defeated them despite a Holy League alliance winning 2 of the 3 major engagements against Spain (Preveza & Djerba)

[@shaaravguha3760]

@@nenenindonu That's an incredibly narrow minded thing to say. You're telling me an empire (the ottomans) famed for its land armies is stronger than a navally focused empire (the spanish) just because they beat them in some land wars?

[@lafidemoda]

@@nenenindonu Lepanto war, nothing else to say...

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

''Why are so many Spaniards bothered that Spain isn't here? It is true that the Spanish empire had strong periods, but the golden age of the Ottoman Empire was stronger than Spain both economically, politically and geographically. Capture of Algiers (1516) Ottomans won Algiers expedition (1541) Ottomans won Capture of Béjaïa (1555) Ottomans won Siege of Coron, Ottomans won Battle of Djerba, Ottomans won Battle of Formentera, Ottomans won Raid of the Balearic islands (1558) Ottomans won Siege of Castelnuovo, Ottomans won Fall of Tlemcen (1518) Ottomans won Conquest of Tunis (1574) Ottomans won Battle of Preveza, Ottomans won at the same time, the Ottomans were alone in Preveza. But the enemy army Venice, Papal States, Genoa, Spain, Mantua, Malta, Portugal[1][2][3] All of them was part of Holy League but Ottomans won against them. Also remember Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian helmet . It was an elaborate headpiece designed to project the sultan's power in the context of the Ottoman-Habsburg rivalry. Meaning The four floors of the Crown also represent Solomon's goal of world conquest-reigning the North, the South, the East, and the West-as well as the Pope's famous triple crown and the Holy Roman Empire two years ago. It was a reference to Charles V, who was crowned as the German Emperor.🙂.''

[@isgodtnt7292]

2rd strongest in (15~17)c

[@drllama2953]

The Spanish empire and the Han and Tang Dynasties were all really powerful and deserved to be on here

[@nenenindonu]

Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish Empire, Ottomans defeated them despite a Holy League alliance winning 2 of the 3 major engagements against Spain (Preveza & Djerba)

[@rarescevei8268]

@@SRcontinentesoficial the spanish were better in terms of navy and influence, the ottoman land army was superior

[@shaaravguha3760]

@@nenenindonu If we're putting the Brits above the French then we're putting the spanish above the ottomans. The ottomans had a better land army while the spanish had more influence and a better navy...

[@ComradeHellas]

agreed

[@FBI.capturo.gente.rara.]

@@nenenindonu Who had more territory?

[@PersianImmortal1]

So you forgot the over 800 years of Sassanid And Parthian Empires reign or are you biased? The Sassanids & Parthians 🇮🇷 humiliated Rome left and right, defeated and killed their kings and generals multiple times.

[@yaqubleis6311]

Sassanid Empire and Parthian Empire were Rome biggest nightmare There have been a total of 33 wars between Iranians and Romans. Total wars:33 Persia: 21 victories over Rome Romans:7 victories over Persia Useless wars:5 Rome lost 75% of time vs Iran 😂😂😂 and also name a Parthian or Sassanid king killed or captured by Romans? none name a Roman Emperor or highest official killed or captured by Iranians ? 1. Crassus 2. Valerian 3. Gordianus 4. Philip the Arab

[@yaqubleis6311]

Sassanian Empire was definitely more powerful than Rome in some centuries

[@sagamaster124]

exacto si pusieron al imperio macedonico que no duro mas que mi abuela, deberian poner a los sasanidas

[@sagamaster124]

@@yaqubleis6311 exacto.

[@PersianImmortal1]

@@yaqubleis6311 Exactly 💯

[@kaldirdimgobegi]

While Rome's hostility to Turks dated back to late antiquity particularly against Tengrist Oghuric entities like the Bulgars, Avars, Huns, the arrival of Seljuks marked the begin of a new front against a distinct Muslim powerhouse conquering their way into Anatolia

[@kaldirdimgobegi]

For instance , the Turks are frequently referred to as a " warrior race .

[@wankawanka3053]

Mire like "the uninvited guest" -russians

[@kaldirdimgobegi]

@@wankawanka3053 ?

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Later in the Middle Ages the Turks arrived , those great warriors and conquerors . The Byzantines lost Asia Minor to them and were unable to prevent them from crossing to Europe . The Ottoman Turks conquered the entire Balkan region to the Danube and even beyond , crowning their successes with the capture of Constantinople in 1453 , an event that stunned the western world . They occupied most of Hungary ; Vienna was under threat . Where would they stop ? The Christian world , both western and Byzantine , had certainly every reason to fear Islam .

[@muhammadabdulkareem4595]

That true

[@user-vj7fr7cp3k]

Hello, I'm Korean. Isn't this too European standard? When studying Korean history, we teach that when China invaded Goguryeo in Korea in 612, they attacked Hangul with an army of 1.13 million troops. There was never a time in the history of the Islamic Empire when an army of 1 million troops was mobilized, but isn't this too fabricated?

[@pandaren_brewmaster]

Wow, I didn't know about that battle. Cheers from Turkey.

[@ricardomilos1469]

Да у вас там вся история на клочке туалетной бумаги поместится

[@arro6451]

21st USA/China 20th USA/British Empire 19th France/British Empire 18th Qing/France/British Empire 17th Spanish/Mughal/Ottoman Empire 16th Ming/Ottoman Empire 15th Ming 14th Yuan/Timurid Empire 13th Mongol Empire 12th Song/Jin 11th Song/Seljuk Empire 10th Abbasid/Fatimid Caliphate 9th Abbasid Caliphate/Tang 8th Umayyad Caliphate/Tang 7th Tang 6th Sassanid Persia 5th Gupta Dynasty/Sassanid Persia 4th Roman Empire 3rd Roman Empire 2nd Roman Empire 1st Han Dynasty BC1st Han Dynasty BC2nd Han Dynasty BC3rd Maurya Dynasty BC4th Macedonian Empire BC5th Achaemenid Persia BC6th Achaemenid Persia BC7th Neo-Assyrian Empire BC8th Neo-Assyrian Empire BC9th Zhou BC10th Zhou BC11th Egypt BC12th Shang BC13th Shang BC14th Hittites BC15th Egypt BC16th Egypt BC17th Old Babylonian Empire BC18th Xia BC19th Egypt BC20th Ur III Dynasty

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

14th and 15th = OTTOMAN

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

Seljuks > Songs

[@azizbeknarzikulov1660]

12 kharazmian empire

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

@@nikostheofanidis9970 Turkic history > Germanic history > Hellenic history

[@Mariyanthi]

Apparently ,no one was exactly a superpower in 9th 10th abd 11th centuries BC .. They were the dark ages of antiquity !

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

THE TURKS AND THE WEST. Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."

[@ysnm13]

Vay Kral ne arıyorsun buralarda.😉

[@sergeplays7322]

Vay vay Turk Du inches anum ay gandon😂😂

[@sidequestenjoyer7037]

Nobody cares turk bot

[@user-ih2br5ue1m]

and in the end , what happened to Turkey ? The sick man of Europe

[@shaaravguha3760]

All the way to the gates of Vienna. And then they lost...

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.

[@andreicristian9575]

From empire to 3rd world country in a century tops their achievement list.

[@MattUK36]

16th and 17th centuries the Ottoman empire over the Spanish Empire, the first global empire? What an absolute joke. I'm sorry but 👎🏻 from me

[@nenenindonu]

How on earth were the Spanish stronger than the Ottomans when they were dominated despite a Holy League alliance losing 2 of the 3 major engagements against Turks (Preveza & Djerba) this while the Spanish were a naval force while Ottomans a land one 😂

[@nenenindonu]

Ottomans conquered major powers like the Mamluk Sultanate and the Kingdom of Hungary whereas Spain conquered some isolated primitive entities like Aztecs and Incas :D but u claim the latter to be stronger

[@makimaninkopegi3845]

Maybe not 17 but in 16th centiury the Ottomans were the strongest state maybe the spaniards at sea but they have no chance on land.

[@yaqubleis6311]

17 century Spanish Empire was definitely stronger but the persons that created this video is definitely Turkish or something because he make no sense

[@Lacteagalaxia]

Extreme stupidity of course ; zer0000000 ..... in hustory lol or xenophobe?🤣

[@witnnileUnity]

it must be spanish empire instead rus empire. Also, 6 Turkic empire in 20 centuries is amazing.

[@Enes-qv1tf]

Ottoman empire and Timurid empire are Turkish states. 🇹🇷❤️

[@Enes-qv1tf]

Huns are also Turks.

[@temirbug_han]

Huns & Selçuk & Mongol

[@Enes-qv1tf]

@Cobra-67 Huns are Turks.

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

The Arabs themselves, divided and fragmented, were being increasingly challenged by Turkic steppe warriors who were militarily superior to the commercially minded urban populations of the region. The Arab-Muslim expansionary movement that had begun with Muhammad's first conquests in the early part of the seventh century, had proceeded with fits and starts before it came under pressure from external menaces and had started to wane by the tenth century. But, if conquest had all but ceased, Arabic culture and language was continuing to expand both east and south into sub-Saharan Africa. At the same time, Persian culture was making a comeback of sorts, while the Turks were rapidly gaining a steady foothold among the elite of the Arab armies. In time, this Turkish military presence would soon prove indispensable and it would logically translate into political power.

[@tvoyunderdog]

19th century - Napoleon Empire.

[@gurnish9741]

@adolfmeyer1103 but the century bears the name of napoleon

[@kerimahmedli4637]

​@Adolf Meyer Why then America showed?

[@TheVampirbat]

​@@gurnish9741 но Наполеон проиграл России)

[@gurnish9741]

@@TheVampirbat yes but easy when you just run away

[@Dheeraj-y4f]

Napolean bare ruled for 10-20 years , it cant be counted for global power for a century

[@isma_life]

Every 100 years there is new Strong Power Roman with Ottaman Empire: hehe

[@milanchovanec5551]

22nd century Slovakia 🙂 🇸🇰 ♾

[@ComradeHellas]

hahahahahahha

[@milanchovanec5551]

@@ComradeHellasjust laugh, you communist 💀 ⚔ 💣

[@DOLIWAL]

🤣

[@max-greg]

What is that?

[@milanchovanec5551]

@@max-gregfiction ☯️

[@sigkoudis]

Macedonian flag is wrong. Ancient Macedonia and Alexander the Great haven't any relation with the county North Macedonia. People from there are Slavs. Ancient Macedonians were Greeks. There is a region in northern Greece that is called Macedonia and is the descendant of Ancient Macedonia.

[@sagamaster124]

no existe descendencia, todos ellos son turcos xd

[@nikolaigrudev6126]

Съвремените Гърци нямат нищо общо със Елада и древните Гърци! Съвремените Гърци са пришълци от Северна Африка и Анадолска Азия. Съвремените Гърци са дошли заедно със Османците на Балканският полуостров през 14 век и Англия я създава като държава през 1830 година след войните със Османската империя. За да създаде имидж съвременните Гърци крадат Античната История на Елините,като дават пример и на други измислени Нации да го правят за бъдещето като Македония,Украйна,Италия ( която няма нищо общо със Римската империя),Румъния,Египет...

[@ahmetdursunkurt]

Said a greek

[@realmadrid7304]

Buyuk Amir Temur 🇺🇿👑

[@user-cg2tw8pw7j]

Uzbeks want to talk to you

[@ASWAR9622]

You can't call anyone "great"

[@josephstalin8543]

@@ASWAR9622 he's great according to that time's standards

[@ASWAR9622]

@@josephstalin8543 Read about Cyrus the great, then you will understand what great means

[@user-tj6lc1em4s]

temur the killer

[@pinkiroy4294]

Maurya dynasty from India 🇮🇳 was also one of the strongest

[@osmanbey286]

Never exist 😂🤣😂🤣

[@fatih.1453]

😁

[@soshankodasbappi7920]

@@osmanbey286 search and find you slumdog......2300bc most powerful empire......2001 crist. Chola empire who won Indonesia Malaysia Maldives srilanka south India.......720 christ Bhoj dynisty defeat Arab for 20 times go and search

[@Guarbanglamaharajishaannandi]

@@osmanbey286 maga turu la said you it never existed lol then how does the buddhism religion came lol???? From space???

[@IceBear09]

I think the same but maurya dynasty does not have that much high Gdp and growth like mughal empire at Aurangzeb time......

[@user-sk9gj7nq4c]

From Russia with love

[@bananus2255]

how sweet

[@sagamaster124]

mi amor

[@aria-ib9fn]

Turkic empires were the most powerful ones✨💪

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

😏

[@DeaNEse]

No?

[@aria-ib9fn]

@@DeaNEse yep

[@KhanLikeNo0ther]

🇺🇸This 1 Will Remain Most Powerful Of Every Time

[@wankawanka3053]

😂😂😂 then why most of the word doesn't speak turkish?

[@lyricsesraa]

Of course, the Ottoman Empire

[@allahisthe_devil]

They lost British empire. And now gonna die by earthquake 😂

[@Anyonymus123]

They were meme material

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

The resulting Peace of Passarowitz witnessed the advent of ' the period when Europeans became militarily superior to peoples who in the past had been their equals or superiors , most notably the Turks ' ( Black , 1994 , p . 14 ) .

[@Gloriaimperial1]

The strongest empire of the 16th-17th centuries (at least until 1650) was the Spanish. The Turks were unable to conquer Vienna in the 16th and 17th centuries. The Spanish empire could wage a simultaneous war against 5 European powers, and defeat them at the same time (France, England, Protestant Germany, the Netherlands and the Turkish empire), in addition to having annexed Italy, dominating the great powers of Western Europe. , while at the same time we had land in 100 countries on five continents. Spanish emperor in Germany, Spanish king in England, capture of the French king, annexation of Portugal, Spanish NATO in Italy... 30 million km2. France was the greatest power between 1650-1815, not Türkiye. From 2050-60, China will be the world's leading power. The British Empire was no longer the great power in 1945. Yes from 1815-1945.

[@Emmi5542.]

According to the right sources, the races that dominated the world the most in history were the Romans and the Turks.

[@OmiDJamshidzad]

Very nice video, but in the 2nd century BC to the 7th century AD, the Parthian and Sassanid empires were as powerful as the Roman empire, and throughout history, both fought many wars with each other and were roughly equal. Rome won some wars against Iran, but Iran also won equally against Rome Too; It cannot be said that Rome was an absolute power.

[@widodoakrom3938]

7th century belongs to Arab caliphate or tang dynasty

[@OmiDJamshidzad]

@@widodoakrom3938 yes but after persian empires and roman empires

[@widodoakrom3938]

@@OmiDJamshidzad in term economy tang dynasty is the richest empire at 7th century

[@OmiDJamshidzad]

@@widodoakrom3938 i don't know about richest empire or dynasty at that era but about power and civilization it is clear, 2nd persian empire was the best

[@user-zh4yf5lj6s]

@@widodoakrom3938 الخلافة العباسية انتصرت على سلاله تانغ في معركة تالاس

[@victorgzyx7557]

22th century_China🇨🇳 23th century_India🇮🇳 24th century_Nigeria🇳🇬 25th century_DR Congo🇨🇩

[@aianchik2873]

nonsense

[@user-dj7vx4em3z]

😆😆😆😆

[@Emmi5542.]

26th century_OHİO👽

[@silivrisoguktur1776]

Congo?

[@CelestiCore]

22th Century china 23th Century china 24th century china 25th ?

[@kenanehmed6445]

Ottoman 🇹🇷♥️🇦🇿

[@Lacteagalaxia]

the only video in youtube that sais nonsense lol; against absolutely all the historians loooolll ; look at absolutely any internet source for exemple wiki emglish ; more powerfull country in 16 century:SPAIN; lol you were a regional power non trans- oceanic world superpower like Spain

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@Lacteagalaxia Ottomans > Spain

[@njnikusha]

🕋🕋☪️💩🤣🤮🤮🤮🤣💩☪️🕋☪️🤣

[@allahisthe_devil]

They lost British empire. And now gonna die by earthquake 😂

[@temirbug_han]

Turkic; Ottoman Ottoman Ottoman Timurid Tatarid (Genghis Khan Turk!) Seljuk Huns

[@Timurid1370]

cengiz han türk kesen bir moğoldu anlayın şunu artık!

[@temirbug_han]

@@Timurid1370 Cengiz Han doğduğu yer Moğol Aşiretlerin fazla olduğu yerdi lakin çinli Elçiye dediği bilgilere göre Göktürk sülalesinden gelen Şato Türklerinden olduğunu belirtmiş. Cengiz Han ilk kuruluş zamanında Merkit, Kerait, Kırgız, Nayman ve Uygur başta olmak üzere pek çok Türki halk ile kuruluşu gercekleştirdi. Türki halklara iyi davrandı lakin kendisine itaat etmeyen Harezm Türklerinin 10/9 unu katletti ordusundaki çoğunluğu Türk olanlarla. Cengiz Yasalarına itaat eden müslümanlara kurban yardımı bile yaptı. Ona çok saygı duyan profilinde ki Emir Timur dur.

[@jackfrye1785]

the video is made by a central asian guy (possibly a muslim?). thus, the bias towards central asian and muslim empires.

[@sadeceensar1615]

turkhis empire 🤙

[@shirlzitting647]

Hey, where's part 2? You've only covered a third of world history.

[@gabelli1998]

Y el imperio español? JAJAJAJAJA eres un meme

[@sagamaster124]

meme es usted, el imperio otomano lo supera y le gano´varias veces. el imperio de las austrias español estaba en decadencia desde la batalla de las comunas

[@gabelli1998]

@@sagamaster124 ya... Claro, casi toda América, filipinas, las demás indias orientales... Seguro que sí.

[@pedroguiraosanchez]

@@sagamaster124 españa derrotó a los otomanos en la batalla de lepanto …… poseía media europa y casi toda america

[@sagamaster124]

@@pedroguiraosanchez España no existía, era una confederación en la península.

[@sagamaster124]

@@gabelli1998 Rusia es más grande que EEUU, decime quien es superior. El mayor Territorio de la monarquía hispanica estaba casi despoblada.

[@jitrawarrior3153]

This video literally forget that Ancient Chinese Empire ever exist

[@elifelgun9996]

Ottoman Empire and Great Seljuk Empire 💪💪💪 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

[@lethabomogopodi4540]

Remember when Britain was the most powerful nation

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

In contrast to those Iranian officials who claim that the Turks in Iran were actually originally Persians, the late IRGC Commander Qassem Suleimani claimed that the descendants of Turkic dynasties that live in Iran are not Iranian. Suleimani claimed: "Turks are aliens and non-Iranians. For hundreds of years (during Turkic rule in Iran), Iran had no history. Non- Iranians like the Seljuks invaded and ruled Iran."74 Shaffer, B. (2023) Iran is more than persia: Ethnic politics in Iran. Berlin: De Gruyter.

[@younas258]

Proud of Carthage

[@jobniak]

You don't have any relationship to Carthage. You are Arab, but Carthaginians were Phoenicians.

[@younas258]

@@jobniak First, in terms of ethnicity, we are Amazigh and not Arabs with some additions from Western Asia and South Europe. Second, you can look for a study of the United States Stanford University on several Carthaginian mummies that show that they do not carry any Phoenician genes.The reason for this is that when the Phoenicians came their number was few and mixed with an indigenous population

[@ahmedabdellaoui1628]

@@younas258 no north africa today are mostly arabs an cartage was Phoenicians and stop talking bulshit about us study cartage was destroyed and her people killed and slaved and you bebers not amazigh was traitors who helped the romans go to see other history to steal it because u dont have any history berber just other nations colonise you land

[@Mariyanthi]

​@@jobniakBoth Phoenicians and Arabs are Semitic ya know.. All those ancient cultures of MENA were cousins with each other and their languages were similar !

[@tjnholmes]

I saw the spelling of century and knew I couldnt take this video seriously.

[@parham631]

Iran for ever❤️🦁💚

[@alesanteorias464]

Y el Imperio Español? El imperio donde no se ponia el sol.

[@roadbone1941]

El vídeo es una estupidez, España era obviamente una superpotencia y más poderosa que los otomanos. Los españoles literalmente tenían un imperio global, mientras que los otomanos no. De hecho, donde vivo (estado de Washington) solía ser parte del Imperio español.

[@alesanteorias464]

@@roadbone1941 Aca Texas también.

[@ramazanceylan3772]

​@@roadbone1941Spanish Empire also power a empire as long as Ottomans however I dont think so rather than power in 17.16.15

[@lokmandoruk5334]

Eskiden super gucmusuz simdi kimseye sonumuz bile gecmiyor nereden nereye

[@ramazanabay2163]

He lan 400 yıl süper güçmüşüz amk

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

The Achaemenids and Sassanids got destroyed by a Hellenic and Arabic tribe respectively Parthians had their capital countless times sacked by Romans and post Islamic Persia was basically a playground for Arabs, Turks, and Mongols as we all know

[@josephstalin8543]

There's no parthian, Sassanids and post islamic persia in this video

[@based-iranian]

This is literally coming from the same dude that supports islamic republic and also is a pan-turk why tf should we listen to you???

[@user-un5ph8rv3c]

2023-1991: USA/PRC/Russia 1991-1945: USA/Soviet Union 1945-1918: USA/Great Britain 1918-1870: USA/Great Britain/German Empire/Russian Empire/France 1870-1816: Great Britain/Russian Empire/Prussia 1816-1790: France/Great Britain 1790-1600: Spine Empire/Portugal/ Ottoman empire 1600-1400: Оttoman empire/Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth(50/50) 1400-1350: Byzantine Empire 1350/1200: Mongolian Empire/Byzantine Empire 1200/900: Byzantine Empire 900/630: Arab Caliphate 630/0: Roman Empire/Byzantine Empire.

[@Inferno.176]

Spanish Empire would have been the right one for the 16th/17th century

[@kaw4182]

Antiquity was the era of the two great powers, the Han Dynasty and Rome.

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

And many nomadic Germanic/Turkic empires :)

[@kaw4182]

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 Definitely it is true. We can say that The Xiongnu made The Han build the Great Wall. And then Germanic people made The Roman army stronger.

[@rome316ae3]

Also Mauryan Empire

[@wankawanka3053]

Rome being the strongest for 6 centuries 💪

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

They ruled your ancestors of course😂

[@TiestoCalvinHarris]

​@@Nomadicenjoyer31and now Ariana grande and Lionel Messi does 🇮🇹🌏🌎

[@turkuntorunu226]

Turkısh Empires 🇹🇷

[@KadirH_0]

Türk devletleri uzun süre hüküm sürmüştür Ottoman Empire 17 16 15 Timur Empire 14 Selçuk Empire 11 Huns 5

[@widodoakrom3938]

15. yüzyıl Ming hanedanına aittir.

[@ye-kf5gg]

Achaemenid Empire the first superpower in the world 🇮🇷❤

[@borhanuddin4289]

Roman and Roman Republic super power for like 6 centuries. And Muslim empire was super power of WORLD for like 7 centuries. Arab caliphate (2), Seljuk(1), Timurid(1), Ottoman (3)

[@cadi5685]

Timurid wasnt islamic lol, Timur massacred Muslims

[@TheVampirbat]

Давай христиан посчитаем, клоун?

[@widodoakrom3938]

Han/Qin, Mauryan empire, sasanid empire be like: are we a joke to u?

[@rome316ae3]

This list is inaccurate

[@garciaromerohouse6747]

España fue un imperio y no aparece

[@latinhellas6383]

The Roman Empire reached its zenith from around 31 BC, when Octavian wrested control of Egypt from the Ptolemies and his rival Marc Antony, to around 226 AD under Severus Alexander, when the Persians succeeded the Parthians and posed a serious threat to Rome's eastern provinces. Rome held the line there, more or less, until around 614 AD, but in the meantime it lost much of the north and west to the Germanic invaders. The US became the main global power in the aftermath of WWII and reached its zenith in the 1990s when it eclipsed the broken Soviet Union. As for the 21st Century, we are still in very early days and it's a long way even to 2050; so far the US' military adventurism in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and who knows where else next could consolidate its hegemony or be a pitfall to a serious setback. We just don't know right now. Good Luck!

[@nocturnalrecluse1216]

The American hegemony ain't going anywhere.

[@arnaucano2615]

So..the spanish empire where do you left it?Lepanto's Battle, Cartagena, San Quintín?..

[@ancient_Iraqi_Mesopotamian]

Ancient Mesopotamia(Iraq)🇮🇶 Babylon🇮🇶Sumer🇮🇶Akkad🇮🇶Assyria🇮🇶 ❤️❤️❤️💪💪💪

[@temirbug_han]

Sumer Proto Turk 🇹🇷

[@mistercumalot6026]

Roman Empire the strongest all time hands down🥇👑👍

[@widodoakrom3938]

Hoax

[@PortugalZeroworldcup]

🇮🇹

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Turkic peoples were always powerful❤❤❤

[@sidequestenjoyer7037]

No you weren’t you’re irrelevant for most of history

[@eren-kf9ro]

Kral bütün yorumda sen varsın. Masayı boş bırakmamısın . Adamsın seviliyorsun

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@eren-kf9ro 👁️👄👁️

[@eren-kf9ro]

@@papazataklaattiranimam 👁️👃🏻👁️

[@Letnistonwandif]

are you a woman

[@gonzalosujarguillen8638]

XULO TAS SALTAO EL PRIMER IMPERIO GLOBAL DE LA HISTORIA, EL IMPERIO ESPAÑOL, CUALQUIER IDEA QUE NO SEA QUE DEBE DE ESTAR ME SOBRA

[@gonzalosujarguillen8638]

siglos 16 17

[@gonzalosujarguillen8638]

en primera mitad del s 17 España y Portugal estaban unidas en la Unión Ibérica, sus imperios estaban unidos, casi na

[@gonzalosujarguillen8638]

@MUHAMMAD SAIF aro o el macedonio por la fruta

[@AW-zk5qb]

Lmao this list is insane. The US was clearly the most powerful country in the 20th century. The Soviet Union was never even an equal of the US during the Cold War much less stronger, and the US ended the 20th century as the sole superpower and was clearly the most powerful nation (when taking everything, from military to economy to cultural influence, into account) since 1945. Also, The France was the most powerful nation in the 18th century with Britain and France battling over the 17th and 18th centuries for dominance and Spain was the most powerful nation in the world in the 16th century. I know there has been a push to try to pretend that Europe wasn't dominant from 1500-1900s before the US took over, but it's just a fact that they were

[@srmagicpanda9606]

@@AW-zk5qb Yep

[@fadhillahkemal3302]

I just can't believe the roman ruled for 6 century stright and destroyed to pulp by germanic tribe .

[@tellllllksi]

Achemanid🇮🇷👑🦁🌞💪👑

[@atribhattacharyya2631]

Please correct the spelling of "Century" in every slide..

[@wiyiwiyiwiyiwiyiwwiyiwiyiw1274]

USA>USSR

[@aslanthelion3116]

The strongest empire is the Arab and Islamic empire, and whoever has doubts should refer to history

[@jskkabyle9458]

I agree with you 👌

[@yaqubleis6311]

Abu Muslim destroyed the Umayyad caliphate in 3 years 🤣🤣🤣 search battle of zab

[@yaqubleis6311]

Abbasid caliphate were vassal of Buyid Empire

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

@@yaqubleis6311 they ruled joke Iranians😂😂😂

[@Nomadicenjoyer31]

@@yaqubleis6311 The Arabs themselves, divided and fragmented, were being increasingly challenged by Turkic steppe warriors who were militarily superior to the commercially minded urban populations of the region. The Arab-Muslim expansionary movement that had begun with Muhammad's first conquests in the early part of the seventh century, had proceeded with fits and starts before it came under pressure from external menaces and had started to wane by the tenth century. But, if conquest had all but ceased, Arabic culture and language was continuing to expand both east and south into sub-Saharan Africa. At the same time, Persian culture was making a comeback of sorts, while the Turks were rapidly gaining a steady foothold among the elite of the Arab armies. In time, this Turkish military presence would soon prove indispensable and it would logically translate into political power.

[@jeremyyeh4871]

No any East Asian empires? This is really unreasonable.

[@kaldirdimgobegi]

The Turks have constantly been an imperial people. They have made a habit of empire building, and although none of their structures have attained the imposing dimensions of the Mongol achievement, many of them have been far more lasting. The maps show at least a dozen states of the first rank which have been constructed by Turkish peoples, and another dozen built by Turkish leaders, sometimes by themselves, sometimes with the assistance of a military aristocracy of their own race.

[@andreicristian9575]

Great to know your current aspirations but first you need to learn how to build structures that don't fall over your people at the first earthquake, and then maybe you'll be worthy to compete with the great Ottomans.

[@g.g5581]

​@@andreicristian9575this is not subject.That guy gave a perfect info. What is the point between hatay and turks empires.

[@andreicristian9575]

@@g.g5581 understand no english good you. ok?

[@andreicristian9575]

@@g.g5581 Empire building, i.e. a murderous past of invading and killing neighboring nations, is not something to be proud of.

[@andreicristian9575]

@@g.g5581 Ottoman sultans even killed their own brothers, that's how bloodthirsty they were. Just bottom of the barrel level of scum.

[@Christian_Sannino]

Rome ruled for 6 centuries

[@rome316ae3]

Fake

[@saikrishnak8631]

8 centuries straight II BCE to VI CE , X and XI centuries

[@kingezhsepo]

20th century - US Early middle ages - China