Mongol empire easily. There was never a case of any other hyperpower being that dominant, it would be followed only by the British and Ottomans
@acsisters7686 Жыл бұрын
North korea
@hyonox Жыл бұрын
@@acsisters7686 wtf 🤨
@navid8437 Жыл бұрын
Iranians proud for Hachaemenid Empire 🇮🇷❤️🤍💚😍
@GyanTvAmit11 ай бұрын
😂islamic invaders invade your persia but still you people worship their god😂😂lol
@andreicristian957511 ай бұрын
Well I can tell you Hachaemenid is not proud of today's Iran.
@Elizabeth20-4 ай бұрын
haha true@@andreicristian9575
@insideworld1830 Жыл бұрын
It's fascinating to see how the balance of power shifts throughout history. Each century brings new challenges and opportunities, leading to different countries rising to the top. It's important to note that military strength is just one aspect of a country's overall power and should be considered within the context of economic, political, and social factors as well.
@chiiesa Жыл бұрын
Yes exactly so why is britain who was the fastest moving technological power not leading the 18th century ?
@widodoakrom3938 Жыл бұрын
Britain lost against USA in 18th century beside in term of land area and economy Russia seems like bigger than Britain in 18 century
@Deano-Dron819 ай бұрын
@@chiiesaaMy question is, why are you still asking?
@circle2778 ай бұрын
wow!
@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv6 ай бұрын
@@widodoakrom3938james Hargreaves, michael faraday, Geoffrey chaucer, henry Bessemer, Edward Jenner, James watt forever
@shaaravguha3760 Жыл бұрын
There are so many countries missing from this list: - Tang (They literally controlled over half the worlds wealth and you decided to give the dub to a fledgling roman republic...) - Ming (similar reason to tang) - Spanish empire (This one is a bit more debatable as the ottomans were strong, but in the end the Spanish had a better navy and far more influence) - Mauryan empire (during its peak it had the largest military, economy, navy, etc) - Maratha (similar reason to maurya) - France (Napoleon) etc (You filled up a lot of spots with the ottomans and romans. Obviously the ottomans would be worthy of atleast 1 century and the romans of 3 but they weren't always as powerful as they were during their peaks so putting them up there for so long isn't right)
@ComradeHellas Жыл бұрын
I agree that 18th century should have been France, 17th century Spain and Ming also should have been counted for the 15th century, the Ottomans could stay in their spot for the 16th century. I also agree that Tang could squeeze in during the Roman period. Maurya was also strong enough to make it probably. But the Marathas were never powerful enough, the Mughals and the Qing were powerful Empires but they crumbled in front of the British.
@mng8680 Жыл бұрын
Thats because ancient Chinese dynasties arent well known by the general masses, his list is based on the opinions of random people online and not by historians well versed in world history. Even schools in western countries generally dont teach much about ancient Chinese history so its understandable people dont know them.
@DOLIWAL Жыл бұрын
Ageee
@ProtectorOfDemocracy1 Жыл бұрын
@@ComradeHellas I agree but ottomans had the most devastating defeats in 16th century.
@bilbobaggins5938 Жыл бұрын
Tang China wasn't existent during the same centuries that the Roman Republic was. The Tang dynasty began ruling China centuries after the Roman Republic had ended.
@alexanderaugustus1650 Жыл бұрын
The fact that the Roman Republic and Roman Empire were the strongest for 6 centuries straight is insane to think about
@retrogamermax8287 Жыл бұрын
Rome in it's heyday pretty much owned the known world or at least most of it.
@mayankraj9249 Жыл бұрын
so true
@hakinadedeji Жыл бұрын
Technology had not advanced... knowledge was primitive, so why won't a nation rule unquestionably for 6 centuries
@alexanderaugustus1650 Жыл бұрын
@@hakinadedeji Yeah facts my fault The Roman Republic and Roman Empire during those 6 centuries were filled with nothing but primitives who knew nothing about how to advance in math, science and architecture. What was I thinking? Silly me
@shaaravguha3760 Жыл бұрын
@@retrogamermax8287 Not really, their stats were pretty close to what the Chinese had going on (their population was smaller though and their economy was also a bit smaller)
@user-qv6qk5uy1p Жыл бұрын
Rome and Ottoman Empire:💪
@Bloxfruit_53432 ай бұрын
Bro you mean romania oh man heck ya bruh Rome was against prophet Muhammad (sa),do you know they even start war against prophet Muhammad (sa) but muslim win,ottomans are sigma they capture Constantinople now known as istanbul
@alielhajj7769 Жыл бұрын
Unpopular opinion: the chinese dybasties should have appeared for many centuries but we akwaus neglect it because it’s history was almost separate and unaffected by the history of Europe and the middle east, plus maybe the civilization of the native Americans could have made it to the list also
@Deepak_Dhakad Жыл бұрын
And no one gave fuck about india which had 1/3rd of earth population bruh. Maurya empire , Gupta empire , Delhi sultanate , and Mughal empire.
@widodoakrom3938 Жыл бұрын
Sorry for native America but they didn't deserve on this list
@andreicristian957511 ай бұрын
Chinese will make the list in a few decades, after the fall of USA.
@PortugalZeroworldcup7 ай бұрын
Mayans were doing well before Christ till they had to give up human sacrifices
@luv_sic6 ай бұрын
Who? Zhou, Tang? West always was stronger...
@retrogamermax8287 Жыл бұрын
Shouldn't the Spanish Empire been the strongest power in the 16th Century on this list?
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
Nope Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish Empire, Ottomans defeated them despite a Holy League alliance winning 2 of the 3 major engagements against Spain (Preveza & Djerba)
@buddy7874 Жыл бұрын
@@nenenindonu only here you deny the fact that Spain was at war with the whole of Europe. in that chtsl and Ottomans, and won.
@eduardovieirinha9697 Жыл бұрын
People always value Spain and forget Portugal. Both Portugal and Spain were the most powerful and with most territories in the 16th century. Especially when they formed the Iberian Union
@Emmi5542. Жыл бұрын
Ottoman, Timurid and Seljuk are Turk, and also Huns
@pelao1558 Жыл бұрын
@@buddy7874 Spain still had more allies than the Ottomans
@AlphaMind12 Жыл бұрын
Proud of being Persian (Achaemenid Empire) Cyrus the great and Dariush the great ❤
@sanexpreso2944 Жыл бұрын
The Spanish empire literally connected the whole world, it was the first global power, it brought cocoa, potatoes, corn, pineapple and many other foods to Europe, it made the first circumnavigation of the world, it established trading posts in America, Asia and Europe, it defeated the Ottomans in Lepanto, but it is not here
@simonesantucci4714 Жыл бұрын
We could say the same abot the Dutch empire that in the 17th century had the most powerful and richiest private societies of the whole time and did some of the things you said. Power is also about military, in fact both of them lost against England, if I'm not wrong, but surely in 16th century should have been the Spanish empire there. Anyway in both the centuries they put the Ottoman Empire. Considering also other video we can say that the admin is not objective (Mohammed more influent that Jesus? Are we joking?), his name is Timur so here you have the explanation
@JoseGarcia-qb1qu Жыл бұрын
The first global empire was Egypt; Ethiopia & others in the midle east then came the europeans ( Spain & others)...when the Europeans went to Americas for the first time they met already some blacks & arab descendents there...
@WalkingSpain Жыл бұрын
You are absolutely right, in the 16th century the Spanish empire was economically more powerful than the Ottoman empire, militarily it is possible that they were more equal. Although I am Spanish it may seem that what I say is chauvinism but it is a fact.
@atakaninat1811 Жыл бұрын
The span of the Spanish empire is not as effective as the span of the Ottoman empire. One is South America and North America. The other is Asia Europe Africa.
@atakaninat1811 Жыл бұрын
@@WalkingSpain The Ottomans own the most important trade routes. Since the Spanish empire could not reach India, it traveled from the west instead of the east. Ottoman Asia Europe Africa. Spaniards only north and south america.
@TheWiseKara Жыл бұрын
The Great Rashidun Caliphate 🇸🇦 , Umayyad Empire, Abbasid Empire, The Great Seljuks, The Great Ottomans 🇹🇷 , Timurid Empire, Mughals 🇮🇳
@Dheeraj-y4f6 ай бұрын
except for mughals,some part of ottomans rest all empires were rulling empty deserts
@user-cq8yo7zb9t4 ай бұрын
Mughals is Uzbek not India
@uyihloughar4 ай бұрын
Not Mughal is Mongol - turk becouse misprouncation count Mongol to mughal@@user-cq8yo7zb9t
@Aviator7273 ай бұрын
@@user-cq8yo7zb9t we know but they ruled india
@user-cq8yo7zb9t3 ай бұрын
@@Aviator727 if I said Britain 🇮🇳 would it be better than Britain 🇬🇧 then?
@mmdkeo9501 Жыл бұрын
The Achaemenid Empire 🔥
@ArminRad666 Жыл бұрын
😎🇮🇷
@RamtinHG Жыл бұрын
Two first centuries 😎🔥
@zambi2 Жыл бұрын
جانم فدتی ایران
@andreicristian957511 ай бұрын
And the the muslims took over and it all went to shit.
@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv6 ай бұрын
Beautiful Persian flag in fifth century
@kaldirdimgobegi Жыл бұрын
Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
@shoaibahmed7548 Жыл бұрын
Ofcourse 👍👍
@Kevin-yo8jq Жыл бұрын
True but the British empire is probably the most influential empire to ever exist.
@user-so7bg6cp6wАй бұрын
@@Kevin-yo8jq بريطانيا لعبت دور أساسي في اهم الاحداث التاريخية الحديثة من الثورة الصناعية و عصر الاستكشاف و الحربين العالميتين و حروب نابليون كما أن له دور أيضا في الحرب الباردة بين أمريك و روسيا و إسقاط الشيوعية و الاتحاد السوفيتي
@Kevin-yo8jqАй бұрын
@@user-so7bg6cp6w I wish I wasn't on my phone so I could translate this.
@jredubr Жыл бұрын
What is the source? What was the criteria? There are some picks that are so awful that it’s even hard to think someone acquainted with history developed this video.
@user-iw8ne4pd3h Жыл бұрын
Source is history books.criteria are territories conquered,army power,economy,time of reign
@sincreatividad6651 Жыл бұрын
I miss the Spanish empire and the Chinese dynasties
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish, Spain got dominated despite a Holy League alliance losing 2 of the 3 major engagements against Turks (Preveza & Djerba) this while the Spanish were a naval force while Ottomans a land one
@theshadow- Жыл бұрын
@@nenenindonu this is a lie. Go to study more and say less unsense.
@MarulitoMcarty Жыл бұрын
@@nenenindonu what about Lepanto?
@kinkel23 Жыл бұрын
@@nenenindonu you lies, but you don´t know it.
@Axel77430 Жыл бұрын
You were in that age?
@Ar10ahmed Жыл бұрын
Proud to Be Muslim and Ummati of Muhammad SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WASALLAM (PBUH) 🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦
@njnikusha Жыл бұрын
🕋☪️🤮🤮💩🤮🤮🕋☪️🤮
@ahmedabdellaoui1628 Жыл бұрын
@@esemre25 what 7 century othman arab timurid ans seljuk
@shaaravguha37605 ай бұрын
@@Ectooooo Tbf it is a bit hard to say that the ottomans were dominant in those years considering they consistently lost to both the spanish and french (they had their share of victories too). It was more a 3 way power struggle where there were 3 equal powers all fighting each other for dominance (the spanish and the french fought each other just as much as they fought the ottomans, in fact that's the reason that the ottomans were able to pick off so many smaller countries. It was because the spanish were distracted with the french.)
@defneagle.779 Жыл бұрын
Achaemenid military had a strong structure of units.
@azim1 Жыл бұрын
6 yüzyıl boyunca süper güçmüşüz vay be
@hamid_sahari Жыл бұрын
🤣 Iran 🇮🇷 is the best
@Gerceksuriyeli Жыл бұрын
@@hamid_sahari Source:The Rock's Beatiful hair
@Furkan_Pilevne Жыл бұрын
@@hamid_sahari 🇮🇷=💩🏳️🌈🗑Iran Gay
@buddy7874 Жыл бұрын
3, Seljuks were objectively weaker than Byzantium
@aria-ib9fn Жыл бұрын
@@hamid_sahari nope
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
It was reinforced later on as the militarily superior Turkic dynasties of the Ghaznavids , the Great Seljuks and their successors came to rule much of the eastern and central Islamic lands . The poetic differentiation of the Turk signifies the extent to which this demographic constituent of the medieval Islamic world retained a distinct identity and image , even as it incorporated itself by degrees into the cultural , social and religious matrices of the Iranian and Arab lands .
@makutas-v261 Жыл бұрын
You are a mountain western chinese savage
@Hermes19hnsj Жыл бұрын
@@makutas-v261 Ok bro. You are %100000000 accurate that's why all Turks admitted this, because they can't deny your massive argument 🤓🤓
@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv6 ай бұрын
@@makutas-v261Turkish/ greek / thai/ Egyptian cuisine>>>>> Chinese
@user-vj7fr7cp3k4 ай бұрын
And as far as I know, when Columbus discovered the American continent in 1492, I learned in history class that the Ming Dynasty of China's Tanou ship was 20 times the size of Columbus' ship 100 years before that, and it is true that the Ottomans were powerful, but I don't think they were more powerful than the Qing Dynasty at the time. And I know that the Holy Roman Empire had a weaker military power than Korea's Goryeo. 30,000 troops are also a lot, but Goryeo is a country that mobilized 300,000 troops. Please don't manipulate it.
@user-vj7fr7cp3k4 ай бұрын
@@橘予猫 Personally, I hate China very much, but I think we have to admit it. At the time, the Qing Dynasty had the largest population in the world, accounting for 30% of the world's GDP, and its army was capable of mobilizing 1 million troops for expeditions, but the largest expeditionary force of the Ottoman Empire was. 200,000 people. This is considerably smaller than the war between Goguryeo and Sui Dynasty, which was one of the wars between ancient Korea and China.
@user-vj7fr7cp3k4 ай бұрын
@@橘予猫 There is a record that the Sui Dynasty mobilized an army of 1.13 million troops and attacked Goguryeo in 612, but lost. However, there was no record of a war on such a large scale in Europe until World War I.
@ahmedhamada1250 Жыл бұрын
During the 16th century, the Spanish empire was the most powerful As for the 20th century, it was a bit contested between the Americans, the British and the Germans in the two first decades and later the Soviets would enter the game. But generally speaking the USA were clearly the hegemonic superpower of the 20th century.
@Gatao_2020 Жыл бұрын
Hegemonic only became after the collapse in 1991. I would say that the Soviets and the Americans should be on the list of the 20th century, both were extremely powerful
@raphael3620 Жыл бұрын
America became strong on 21st century after collapse of Soviet union
@Gatao_2020 Жыл бұрын
@@raphael3620 I agree
@abert1313 Жыл бұрын
Насчёт Испании в 16 веке - справедливо. Империя, над которой никогда не заходит солнце". Открытие и захват Америки, Филиппин, Южной Европы, Нидерландов, контроль над Францией.
@Gatao_2020 Жыл бұрын
@@abert1313 Bro, I'm Latin em I also speak english. But Russian? God, bro. That's enough
@Bashchavush Жыл бұрын
Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."
@user-dj7vx4em3z Жыл бұрын
Egyptian Empire🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬 The 18th and 19th dynasties, the Skinnen Ra dynasty and the Ramesside dynasty Fatimid caliphate Ayyubid Caliphate Mamluk Caliphate.
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
@@user-dj7vx4em3z Fatimids, Ayyubids and Mamluks were not Copts
@Emmi5542. Жыл бұрын
Merhaba kardeşim tamamen haklısın bu yorumu ingilizce yazacak kadar İngilizcem var fakat bunu biraz erindim evet o zamanlar Türkler dünyayı yönetse de burda medya çok önemli şuan medya süpergüç America ve İngiltere'nin altında bu yüzden biizm tarihimizi bertaraf etmeye çalışıyorlar ama o yıllarda böyle dünyanın her tarafından insanların yazışıp görülebileceği şeyler olsaydı her yerde Türkler övülecekti yani.
@Emmi5542. Жыл бұрын
Medyanın bu dönemki devletlerin kontrol altında olması çok kötü
@wankawanka3053 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@atakaninat1811 Жыл бұрын
The Ottomans own the most important trade routes. Since the Spanish empire could not reach India, it traveled from the west instead of the east. Ottoman Asia Europe Africa. Spaniards only north and south america.
@sto4552 Жыл бұрын
Spaniards Europe, South America, North America*
@omerfarukozdemir1790 Жыл бұрын
my friend, if the Ottomans had not missed the geographical discoveries and the industrial revolution, they would have remained the greatest power until the 20th century.
@CesarSPizarro Жыл бұрын
You have no idea about the story. Spain controlled almost all of continental Europe, the Philippines, and many more parts of Asia. The Spanish faced the Japanese, with a great disadvantage, and won. They had much more influence than the Ottoman Empire, the best military tactics among other things. They created new routes, with much more importance for Europe than those controlled by the Ottoman Empire. If the Spanish empire had been weaker than the Ottoman empire, today Europe would be Muslim.
@kasadam85 Жыл бұрын
@@CesarSPizarro Naval defeats didn't bring the collapse of the Empire, losing land battles did. If Spanish was as powerful as you're saying, they'd not fear facing the Ottomans on land and pass through Egypt by force rather than stretching trade network incredibly long.
@allahisthe_devil Жыл бұрын
They lost British empire. And now gonna die by earthquake 😂
@animangaweeb85015 ай бұрын
Love how this guy is so anti-Indian he excluded every single Indian kingdom from this list
@animangaweeb85015 ай бұрын
5th century AD: hunas lost to guptas in India and they didn't even have elephants 3rd century BC : alexander came to India, shat his pants and didn't have the guts to cross the gangetic plains to fight the Nanda Empire
@dfdf-rj8jr4 ай бұрын
I'm not following how the USSR was stronger than the USA in the 20th century if the USSR collapsed lol
@WeoXCY3 ай бұрын
You're probably uneducated
@fudora37642 ай бұрын
@@WeoXCY mind explaining?
@WeoXCY2 ай бұрын
@@fudora3764 I can't see my own comment 💀
@fudora37642 ай бұрын
@@WeoXCY darn. can u explain tho im up for a debate
@WeoXCY2 ай бұрын
@@fudora3764 I'm too, but i can't see my own shit. I do not remember what i wrote. The only thing that i can state is that i believe that USSR is the strongest country and nation in 20th century
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
The great historian Ibn Khaldun also argues in his “Introduction to History” (or The Muqaddimah) that nomadic peoples, the Turks foremost among them, were the most energetic and martial of peoples and that imperial dynasties and regimes emerged from such groups until they became corrupted and softened by civilization and luxury, which resulted in a loss of martial energy and group solidarity. This analysis is very true because as the Abbasid caliphate started to lose its power and influence in the mid-ninth century most of the dynasties that emerged to control the various regions of the Muslim world were founded by Turks, either tribal nomads or former slave soldiers. Ibn Khaldun even attributes the victory of the Muslims over the Mongols to the martial power and energy of the Turks, who formed the elite ranks of the Mamluk armies that defeated the Mongols on several occasions as they attempted to advance into Syria and Egypt between 1260 and 1323.
@REALALIENDUDE Жыл бұрын
😀
@timkaz8793 Жыл бұрын
So called Mongol Army were mostly consisted of Eastern turks, who were not yet Muslims by the time. Among them there were some ancient Mongol tribes too, but not the majority
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
@@timkaz8793 yeah
@makutas-v261 Жыл бұрын
"history enjoyer" yeah, ERDOGAN'S history I bet
@makutas-v261 Жыл бұрын
Your so called turkic ethnicity are just the mountain barbarians of the chinese west 🤠
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
''Why are so many Spaniards bothered that Spain isn't here? It is true that the Spanish empire had strong periods, but the golden age of the Ottoman Empire was stronger than Spain both economically, politically and geographically. Capture of Algiers (1516) Ottomans won Algiers expedition (1541) Ottomans won Capture of Béjaïa (1555) Ottomans won Siege of Coron, Ottomans won Battle of Djerba, Ottomans won Battle of Formentera, Ottomans won Raid of the Balearic islands (1558) Ottomans won Siege of Castelnuovo, Ottomans won Fall of Tlemcen (1518) Ottomans won Conquest of Tunis (1574) Ottomans won Battle of Preveza, Ottomans won at the same time, the Ottomans were alone in Preveza. But the enemy army Venice, Papal States, Genoa, Spain, Mantua, Malta, Portugal[1][2][3] All of them was part of Holy League but Ottomans won against them. Also remember Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian helmet . It was an elaborate headpiece designed to project the sultan's power in the context of the Ottoman-Habsburg rivalry. Meaning The four floors of the Crown also represent Solomon's goal of world conquest-reigning the North, the South, the East, and the West-as well as the Pope's famous triple crown and the Holy Roman Empire two years ago. It was a reference to Charles V, who was crowned as the German Emperor.🙂.''
@Letnistonwandif Жыл бұрын
Spanish conquest of Oran 1732) (Humilliating defeat for thé ottomans) Spanish conquest of Oran 1509 (Spanish Victory) Battle of Alborán (Humilliating defeat for ottomans) Battle of Cape Celidonia (extremely humilliating defeat of ottomans) Battle of Cape Corvo (Another humilliating defeat for ottomans) Battle of Girolata( Another victory of spain) Great Siege of Malta( This one was with allies but the ottomans still had more soldiers and they got massacred) Holy League 1535 (Another victory for Spain and his allies still the ottomans had allies too) Capture of Mahdia 1550 (Humilliating defeat for ottomans) Sack of Mahón (Humilliating defeat of barbarrosa by Charles V) Siege of Oran 1556 (Spanish victory) Sieges of Oran and Mers El Kébir (Humilliating ottoman defeat) Ottoman invasion of Otranto (Humilliating defeat for ottomans they surrended even if they were 18 000 compared to 2100 christian forces) Ottoman-Habsburg wars( Spanish hasburg victorie tooking back Hungrary) Siege of the Castle of Saint George (Spanish victory) Conquest of Tunis 1535 (Spanish victory) Siege of Vienna 1529 (One of the most humilliating defeats of ottomans) Siege of Castelnuovo (Even if this was an ottoman victory i wanted to show that even if the Spanish soldiers were outnembered 1 to 6 they still managed to kill more than half of the army this shows that mallority of the battles that ottoman won it was because they had so much more numerical advantage) Conquest of Tunis 1574 (This battle its another example of what i was talking about outnembering and still getting fckd) And battle of lepanto 1571 (another humilliating defeat for the ottomans by the Spaniards) Sitio de Orán y Mazalquivir 1563(Thé most humilliating defeat for thé ottomans 1500 Spaniards vs 100 000 Ottomans and Jannisaries and It ended in an Décisive Spanish Victory. Almost thé entire Ottoman army slaughtered. Toma de Mahdía (1550) Jornada de Túnez
@Letnistonwandif Жыл бұрын
It seems like you lost a few tho
@pedroguiraosanchez Жыл бұрын
Spain won ottomans in The battle of lepanto
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
@@pedroguiraosanchez preveza > lepanto
@pattyguy Жыл бұрын
@@Letnistonwandif @Letniston wandif it is about 16th century, not 18th century" "ottoman-habsburg wars" not even conclusive, you truly just wanna expand your list, the result was both dynasties getting heavily weakened "Siege of Vienna 1529" you idiot, 1683 is a devastating defeat, 1529 barely affected ottomans, Suleiman just withdrew because bad weather conditions in siege. Siege of Castelnuovo "Muhh, Spanish outnumbered ottomans" 🤓literally no one asked and numbers arent always accurate "Battle of Lepanto 1571" probably the only true thing in your non-sense hot trash "Holy league 1535" ??? "Conquest of Tunis" you lost it back lol "Sack of Mahon" LOL idiot, it is ottoman victory, "sack" "Spanish Conquest of Oran 1509" Ottomans did not even partipicate in that war, it was with Tlemcen (which wasnt connected to ottomans back then) "Battle of Cape Celidonia" The numbers are most likely inaccurate, the possibility of Spanish victory with that amount is pretty low, but yeah it wasnt devastating lol "Battle of Alboran" HUMILIATING DEFEAT? LOL??? THAT BATTLE WAS SO SMALL
@iamyourfather4270 Жыл бұрын
The fact that Roman Empire eventually fell simply proves that even the biggest and most dominant powers atm will inevitably fall after a point
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
10-7 centuries BC = Neo Assyrian Empire 6. century AD = Turkic Khaganate 7-9 centuries AD = Tang China 12. century AD = Khwarezmian empire
@MetaJuggernaut Жыл бұрын
tang dynasty is bs. China never ever be the strongest country
@sidequestenjoyer7037 Жыл бұрын
The strongest country in the 6th century was China
@1sultan189 Жыл бұрын
7,8,9 were the caliphates as they were bigger, had the best economy, center of the world in knowledge, strongest military, strongest currency, strongest legacy.
@sarveshkumarsinha9628 Жыл бұрын
@@1sultan189 lol, only area ,economy is nope
@shaaravguha3760 Жыл бұрын
@@1sultan189 You must be on something. The tangs economy is uncertain but the lowest estimates anyone has ever thrown out was 40% of the world GDP with the highest being around 80%... The entire middle east at the time only accounted for around 7% while India was a bit higher at around 10-15%
@selfiekroos1777 Жыл бұрын
This list is highly debatable
@alparslan698 Жыл бұрын
It's fairly accurate but it's debatable
@DevRaj-ry2th3 ай бұрын
@@alparslan698actually it's not. I'll give an example if you want. The user name you have "alp arslan" Wasn't the most powerful man in 11th century. There were others. For example Rajendra chola. The great king if tamils who decimated 2 great empires and several kingdoms. A pioneer in advanced naval combat who's ships ruled the global sea trade. He conquered the lands between Arabian sea and phillipines. Maintained an army of 1,500,000 infantry, 125,000 cavalry, 12 thousand elephants. All spread across his massive empire. And you think alp arslan, a seljuk who couldn't even raise an army of 100,000 was more powerful than rajendra? If you think I am exaggerating the numbers, these numbers weren't given by indian historians. They were written down by a Chinese general. That is the problem with you people. You only know your history.
@NK236Ай бұрын
@@DevRaj-ry2th😂😂😂😂😂 plz stop 🙏 Hindus haven't done . It was only Ashoka their biggest one in Asia thou he bhuddist
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
Turkic peoples were undoubtedly the most strong and powerful ethnicity in history
@abert1313 Жыл бұрын
И получили под жопу от России.
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
@@abert1313part of Slavs got ruled by Turkics for 1500 years kiddo😂
@abert1313 Жыл бұрын
@@Nomadicenjoyer31 не ври. Этногенез тюрок меньше тысячи лет. Тем более, если и были тюрки пятьсот лет на Балканском полуострове, то русские их били последние триста лет.
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
@@abert1313 The South Slavic tribal groups moved south and southwest from their Pripet homeland, eventually entering the Byzantine-controlled Balkan Peninsula as either allies of or refugees from the invading Turkic Avars during the second half of the sixth century. Their search for a new, permanent homeland proved successful. Today their descendants solidly inhabit virtually all of the northwestern, central, and southeastern regions of the Balkans. Turks comprise a third ethnic component of the Balkan population. Although today numerically small-a little over 1 million people (about 2 percent of the total population) they have played a role in shaping the history of the Balkans far beyond their numbers. In late antiquity the rolling plains of the Danube and Prut rivers in the Balkans' northeast served Turkic tribes from the Eurasian steppes as an open door into the heart of the peninsula and the riches of the Eastern Roman Empire. Huns and related tribes swept through the Balkans in the fifth and sixth centuries, followed by the Avars and their allies in the sixth and seventh. Among these latter were the Bulgars, who established a state south of the Danube. Unlike the Avars, whose settlements in the Balkans proved transitory, the Bulgar state persisted in the face of concerted Byzantine pressures. By the ninth century the Bulgars were challenging the Byzantine Empire for political hegemony in the Balkans, but by that time they also were well on the way toward ethnic assimilation into their Slavic-speaking subject population. The conversion of the Turkic Bulgar ruling elite to Orthodox Chris-tianity at midcentury opened the gate to their rapid and total Slavic assimilation. Within a hundred years of the Bulgar conversion, most traces of their Turkic origins had disappeared, except for their name-the Bulgars had been transformed into Slavic Bulgarians Oğuz, Pecheneg, and Cuman Turkic tribes appeared in the Balkans between the ninth and eleventh centuries. Most of them eventually suffered an ethnic fate similar to the Bulgars and left little lasting impression, although the Gagauz Turks of Bessarabia, a region lying east of the Prut River (now known as Moldova), and some Turks living today in the eastern Balkans may be direct ethnic descendants of those medieval Turkic interlopers. Additionally, the Ottoman Turks' five-century rule over most of the Balkans established numerous scattered enclaves of Turkish- speaking groups throughout much of the southern portion of the peninsula, with a heavy concentration in the southeastern region of ancient Thrace.
@ozzy82nick Жыл бұрын
What you mean Turkic? You talking about Mongols that came near Europe? Why you call them Turkic? Why not Chickenic?
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
The Turks were considered as the best warriors due to their horsemanship and skill in archery. Kaushik Roy., n.d. Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400-1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships (Bloomsbury Studies in Military History). p.24. The Turks too , the great warriors of the steppes , were almost haughty in the assumption that they inherited the jihad fighting spirit of the tradition and carried it half - way into Europe . Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective p.94 The Seljukian Turks had had some great warriors ; the period of their power was during the eleventh and twelfth centuries ; they had taken the place of the Arabs as the great Moslem power of the east , though an Arab caliph still nominally reigned at Baghdad . The Divine Aspect of History Volume 2 p.324
@borhanuddin8447 Жыл бұрын
The turk suddenly become strongest after they accepted Islam. Same thing happened with Arabs. After accepting Islam super power of the world. Too bad now, they are not following proper islam now. That's why not Super power now.
@pattyguy Жыл бұрын
@@borhanuddin8447 "Too bad now, they are not following proper islam now. That's why not Super power now." uh not really buddy
@wankawanka3053 Жыл бұрын
Mongols and russians laughing in the corner
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
@@wankawanka3053 Most Mongol army was made up from Turkic peoples and 1/4 of Mongols are from Turkic tribes kiddo🤣 even today LOL The name Mongol appeared first in the eighth-century Chinese records of the Tang dynasty, but only resurfaced in the eleventh century during the rule of the Khitan. At first, it was applied to some small and insignificant nomadic tribes in the area of the Onon River. In the thirteenth century, however, the name Mongol grew into an umbrella term for a large group of Mongolic and Turkic tribes united under the rule of Genghis Khan. It is not clear what the Mongols called themselves in their own languages. In fact, the specific origin of the Mongolic languages is unclear. Some linguists have proposed a link to languages like Tungusic and Turkic, which are often included alongside Mongolic in a hypothetical language group called “Altaic languages”, but the evidence for this is rather weak.
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
@@wankawanka3053 Slavic history is better than Hellenic but Turkic is better than both combined LOL
@patriciogarcia3105 Жыл бұрын
And the Spanish Empire?
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish Empire, Ottomans defeated them despite a Holy League alliance winning 2 of the 3 major engagements against Spain (Preveza & Djerba)
@shaaravguha3760 Жыл бұрын
@@nenenindonu That's an incredibly narrow minded thing to say. You're telling me an empire (the ottomans) famed for its land armies is stronger than a navally focused empire (the spanish) just because they beat them in some land wars?
@lafidemoda Жыл бұрын
@@nenenindonu Lepanto war, nothing else to say...
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
''Why are so many Spaniards bothered that Spain isn't here? It is true that the Spanish empire had strong periods, but the golden age of the Ottoman Empire was stronger than Spain both economically, politically and geographically. Capture of Algiers (1516) Ottomans won Algiers expedition (1541) Ottomans won Capture of Béjaïa (1555) Ottomans won Siege of Coron, Ottomans won Battle of Djerba, Ottomans won Battle of Formentera, Ottomans won Raid of the Balearic islands (1558) Ottomans won Siege of Castelnuovo, Ottomans won Fall of Tlemcen (1518) Ottomans won Conquest of Tunis (1574) Ottomans won Battle of Preveza, Ottomans won at the same time, the Ottomans were alone in Preveza. But the enemy army Venice, Papal States, Genoa, Spain, Mantua, Malta, Portugal[1][2][3] All of them was part of Holy League but Ottomans won against them. Also remember Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian helmet . It was an elaborate headpiece designed to project the sultan's power in the context of the Ottoman-Habsburg rivalry. Meaning The four floors of the Crown also represent Solomon's goal of world conquest-reigning the North, the South, the East, and the West-as well as the Pope's famous triple crown and the Holy Roman Empire two years ago. It was a reference to Charles V, who was crowned as the German Emperor.🙂.''
@isgodtnt7292 Жыл бұрын
2rd strongest in (15~17)c
@drllama2953 Жыл бұрын
The Spanish empire and the Han and Tang Dynasties were all really powerful and deserved to be on here
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish Empire, Ottomans defeated them despite a Holy League alliance winning 2 of the 3 major engagements against Spain (Preveza & Djerba)
@rarescevei8268 Жыл бұрын
@@SRcontinentesoficial the spanish were better in terms of navy and influence, the ottoman land army was superior
@shaaravguha3760 Жыл бұрын
@@nenenindonu If we're putting the Brits above the French then we're putting the spanish above the ottomans. The ottomans had a better land army while the spanish had more influence and a better navy...
@ComradeHellas Жыл бұрын
agreed
@FBI.capturo.gente.rara. Жыл бұрын
@@nenenindonu Who had more territory?
@PersianImmortal1 Жыл бұрын
So you forgot the over 800 years of Sassanid And Parthian Empires reign or are you biased? The Sassanids & Parthians 🇮🇷 humiliated Rome left and right, defeated and killed their kings and generals multiple times.
@yaqubleis6311 Жыл бұрын
Sassanid Empire and Parthian Empire were Rome biggest nightmare There have been a total of 33 wars between Iranians and Romans. Total wars:33 Persia: 21 victories over Rome Romans:7 victories over Persia Useless wars:5 Rome lost 75% of time vs Iran 😂😂😂 and also name a Parthian or Sassanid king killed or captured by Romans? none name a Roman Emperor or highest official killed or captured by Iranians ? 1. Crassus 2. Valerian 3. Gordianus 4. Philip the Arab
@yaqubleis6311 Жыл бұрын
Sassanian Empire was definitely more powerful than Rome in some centuries
@sagamaster124 Жыл бұрын
exacto si pusieron al imperio macedonico que no duro mas que mi abuela, deberian poner a los sasanidas
@sagamaster124 Жыл бұрын
@@yaqubleis6311 exacto.
@PersianImmortal1 Жыл бұрын
@@yaqubleis6311 Exactly 💯
@kaldirdimgobegi Жыл бұрын
While Rome's hostility to Turks dated back to late antiquity particularly against Tengrist Oghuric entities like the Bulgars, Avars, Huns, the arrival of Seljuks marked the begin of a new front against a distinct Muslim powerhouse conquering their way into Anatolia
@kaldirdimgobegi Жыл бұрын
For instance , the Turks are frequently referred to as a " warrior race .
@wankawanka3053 Жыл бұрын
Mire like "the uninvited guest" -russians
@kaldirdimgobegi11 ай бұрын
@@wankawanka3053 ?
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
Later in the Middle Ages the Turks arrived , those great warriors and conquerors . The Byzantines lost Asia Minor to them and were unable to prevent them from crossing to Europe . The Ottoman Turks conquered the entire Balkan region to the Danube and even beyond , crowning their successes with the capture of Constantinople in 1453 , an event that stunned the western world . They occupied most of Hungary ; Vienna was under threat . Where would they stop ? The Christian world , both western and Byzantine , had certainly every reason to fear Islam .
@muhammadabdulkareem4595 Жыл бұрын
That true
@user-vj7fr7cp3k4 ай бұрын
Hello, I'm Korean. Isn't this too European standard? When studying Korean history, we teach that when China invaded Goguryeo in Korea in 612, they attacked Hangul with an army of 1.13 million troops. There was never a time in the history of the Islamic Empire when an army of 1 million troops was mobilized, but isn't this too fabricated?
@pandaren_brewmaster2 ай бұрын
Wow, I didn't know about that battle. Cheers from Turkey.
@ricardomilos146927 күн бұрын
Да у вас там вся история на клочке туалетной бумаги поместится
@@nikostheofanidis9970 Turkic history > Germanic history > Hellenic history
@Mariyanthi Жыл бұрын
Apparently ,no one was exactly a superpower in 9th 10th abd 11th centuries BC .. They were the dark ages of antiquity !
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
THE TURKS AND THE WEST. Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."
@ysnm13 Жыл бұрын
Vay Kral ne arıyorsun buralarda.😉
@sergeplays7322 Жыл бұрын
Vay vay Turk Du inches anum ay gandon😂😂
@sidequestenjoyer7037 Жыл бұрын
Nobody cares turk bot
@user-ih2br5ue1m Жыл бұрын
and in the end , what happened to Turkey ? The sick man of Europe
@shaaravguha3760 Жыл бұрын
All the way to the gates of Vienna. And then they lost...
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
@andreicristian957511 ай бұрын
From empire to 3rd world country in a century tops their achievement list.
@MattUK36 Жыл бұрын
16th and 17th centuries the Ottoman empire over the Spanish Empire, the first global empire? What an absolute joke. I'm sorry but 👎🏻 from me
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
How on earth were the Spanish stronger than the Ottomans when they were dominated despite a Holy League alliance losing 2 of the 3 major engagements against Turks (Preveza & Djerba) this while the Spanish were a naval force while Ottomans a land one 😂
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
Ottomans conquered major powers like the Mamluk Sultanate and the Kingdom of Hungary whereas Spain conquered some isolated primitive entities like Aztecs and Incas :D but u claim the latter to be stronger
@makimaninkopegi3845 Жыл бұрын
Maybe not 17 but in 16th centiury the Ottomans were the strongest state maybe the spaniards at sea but they have no chance on land.
@yaqubleis6311 Жыл бұрын
17 century Spanish Empire was definitely stronger but the persons that created this video is definitely Turkish or something because he make no sense
@Lacteagalaxia Жыл бұрын
Extreme stupidity of course ; zer0000000 ..... in hustory lol or xenophobe?🤣
@witnnileUnity Жыл бұрын
it must be spanish empire instead rus empire. Also, 6 Turkic empire in 20 centuries is amazing.
@Enes-qv1tf Жыл бұрын
Ottoman empire and Timurid empire are Turkish states. 🇹🇷❤️
@Enes-qv1tf Жыл бұрын
Huns are also Turks.
@temirbug_han Жыл бұрын
Huns & Selçuk & Mongol
@Enes-qv1tf Жыл бұрын
@Cobra-67 Huns are Turks.
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
The Arabs themselves, divided and fragmented, were being increasingly challenged by Turkic steppe warriors who were militarily superior to the commercially minded urban populations of the region. The Arab-Muslim expansionary movement that had begun with Muhammad's first conquests in the early part of the seventh century, had proceeded with fits and starts before it came under pressure from external menaces and had started to wane by the tenth century. But, if conquest had all but ceased, Arabic culture and language was continuing to expand both east and south into sub-Saharan Africa. At the same time, Persian culture was making a comeback of sorts, while the Turks were rapidly gaining a steady foothold among the elite of the Arab armies. In time, this Turkish military presence would soon prove indispensable and it would logically translate into political power.
@tvoyunderdog Жыл бұрын
19th century - Napoleon Empire.
@gurnish9741 Жыл бұрын
@adolfmeyer1103 but the century bears the name of napoleon
@kerimahmedli4637 Жыл бұрын
@Adolf Meyer Why then America showed?
@TheVampirbat Жыл бұрын
@@gurnish9741 но Наполеон проиграл России)
@gurnish9741 Жыл бұрын
@@TheVampirbat yes but easy when you just run away
@Dheeraj-y4f6 ай бұрын
Napolean bare ruled for 10-20 years , it cant be counted for global power for a century
@isma_life Жыл бұрын
Every 100 years there is new Strong Power Roman with Ottaman Empire: hehe
@milanchovanec5551 Жыл бұрын
22nd century Slovakia 🙂 🇸🇰 ♾
@ComradeHellas Жыл бұрын
hahahahahahha
@milanchovanec5551 Жыл бұрын
@@ComradeHellasjust laugh, you communist 💀 ⚔ 💣
@DOLIWAL Жыл бұрын
🤣
@max-greg Жыл бұрын
What is that?
@milanchovanec5551 Жыл бұрын
@@max-gregfiction ☯️
@sigkoudis Жыл бұрын
Macedonian flag is wrong. Ancient Macedonia and Alexander the Great haven't any relation with the county North Macedonia. People from there are Slavs. Ancient Macedonians were Greeks. There is a region in northern Greece that is called Macedonia and is the descendant of Ancient Macedonia.
@sagamaster124 Жыл бұрын
no existe descendencia, todos ellos son turcos xd
@nikolaigrudev6126 Жыл бұрын
Съвремените Гърци нямат нищо общо със Елада и древните Гърци! Съвремените Гърци са пришълци от Северна Африка и Анадолска Азия. Съвремените Гърци са дошли заедно със Османците на Балканският полуостров през 14 век и Англия я създава като държава през 1830 година след войните със Османската империя. За да създаде имидж съвременните Гърци крадат Античната История на Елините,като дават пример и на други измислени Нации да го правят за бъдещето като Македония,Украйна,Италия ( която няма нищо общо със Римската империя),Румъния,Египет...
@ahmetdursunkurtАй бұрын
Said a greek
@realmadrid7304 Жыл бұрын
Buyuk Amir Temur 🇺🇿👑
@user-cg2tw8pw7j Жыл бұрын
Uzbeks want to talk to you
@ASWAR9622 Жыл бұрын
You can't call anyone "great"
@josephstalin8543 Жыл бұрын
@@ASWAR9622 he's great according to that time's standards
@ASWAR9622 Жыл бұрын
@@josephstalin8543 Read about Cyrus the great, then you will understand what great means
@user-tj6lc1em4s6 күн бұрын
temur the killer
@pinkiroy4294 Жыл бұрын
Maurya dynasty from India 🇮🇳 was also one of the strongest
@osmanbey286 Жыл бұрын
Never exist 😂🤣😂🤣
@fatih.1453 Жыл бұрын
😁
@soshankodasbappi7920 Жыл бұрын
@@osmanbey286 search and find you slumdog......2300bc most powerful empire......2001 crist. Chola empire who won Indonesia Malaysia Maldives srilanka south India.......720 christ Bhoj dynisty defeat Arab for 20 times go and search
@Guarbanglamaharajishaannandi Жыл бұрын
@@osmanbey286 maga turu la said you it never existed lol then how does the buddhism religion came lol???? From space???
@IceBear09 Жыл бұрын
I think the same but maurya dynasty does not have that much high Gdp and growth like mughal empire at Aurangzeb time......
@user-sk9gj7nq4c Жыл бұрын
From Russia with love
@bananus2255 Жыл бұрын
how sweet
@sagamaster124 Жыл бұрын
mi amor
@aria-ib9fn Жыл бұрын
Turkic empires were the most powerful ones✨💪
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
😏
@DeaNEse Жыл бұрын
No?
@aria-ib9fn Жыл бұрын
@@DeaNEse yep
@KhanLikeNo0ther Жыл бұрын
🇺🇸This 1 Will Remain Most Powerful Of Every Time
@wankawanka3053 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 then why most of the word doesn't speak turkish?
@lyricsesraa Жыл бұрын
Of course, the Ottoman Empire
@allahisthe_devil Жыл бұрын
They lost British empire. And now gonna die by earthquake 😂
@Anyonymus123 Жыл бұрын
They were meme material
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
The resulting Peace of Passarowitz witnessed the advent of ' the period when Europeans became militarily superior to peoples who in the past had been their equals or superiors , most notably the Turks ' ( Black , 1994 , p . 14 ) .
@Gloriaimperial13 ай бұрын
The strongest empire of the 16th-17th centuries (at least until 1650) was the Spanish. The Turks were unable to conquer Vienna in the 16th and 17th centuries. The Spanish empire could wage a simultaneous war against 5 European powers, and defeat them at the same time (France, England, Protestant Germany, the Netherlands and the Turkish empire), in addition to having annexed Italy, dominating the great powers of Western Europe. , while at the same time we had land in 100 countries on five continents. Spanish emperor in Germany, Spanish king in England, capture of the French king, annexation of Portugal, Spanish NATO in Italy... 30 million km2. France was the greatest power between 1650-1815, not Türkiye. From 2050-60, China will be the world's leading power. The British Empire was no longer the great power in 1945. Yes from 1815-1945.
@Emmi5542. Жыл бұрын
According to the right sources, the races that dominated the world the most in history were the Romans and the Turks.
@OmiDJamshidzad Жыл бұрын
Very nice video, but in the 2nd century BC to the 7th century AD, the Parthian and Sassanid empires were as powerful as the Roman empire, and throughout history, both fought many wars with each other and were roughly equal. Rome won some wars against Iran, but Iran also won equally against Rome Too; It cannot be said that Rome was an absolute power.
@widodoakrom3938 Жыл бұрын
7th century belongs to Arab caliphate or tang dynasty
@OmiDJamshidzad Жыл бұрын
@@widodoakrom3938 yes but after persian empires and roman empires
@widodoakrom3938 Жыл бұрын
@@OmiDJamshidzad in term economy tang dynasty is the richest empire at 7th century
@OmiDJamshidzad Жыл бұрын
@@widodoakrom3938 i don't know about richest empire or dynasty at that era but about power and civilization it is clear, 2nd persian empire was the best
@user-zh4yf5lj6s Жыл бұрын
@@widodoakrom3938 الخلافة العباسية انتصرت على سلاله تانغ في معركة تالاس
22th Century china 23th Century china 24th century china 25th ?
@kenanehmed6445 Жыл бұрын
Ottoman 🇹🇷♥️🇦🇿
@Lacteagalaxia Жыл бұрын
the only video in youtube that sais nonsense lol; against absolutely all the historians loooolll ; look at absolutely any internet source for exemple wiki emglish ; more powerfull country in 16 century:SPAIN; lol you were a regional power non trans- oceanic world superpower like Spain
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
@@Lacteagalaxia Ottomans > Spain
@njnikusha Жыл бұрын
🕋🕋☪️💩🤣🤮🤮🤮🤣💩☪️🕋☪️🤣
@allahisthe_devil Жыл бұрын
They lost British empire. And now gonna die by earthquake 😂
cengiz han türk kesen bir moğoldu anlayın şunu artık!
@temirbug_han Жыл бұрын
@@Timurid1370 Cengiz Han doğduğu yer Moğol Aşiretlerin fazla olduğu yerdi lakin çinli Elçiye dediği bilgilere göre Göktürk sülalesinden gelen Şato Türklerinden olduğunu belirtmiş. Cengiz Han ilk kuruluş zamanında Merkit, Kerait, Kırgız, Nayman ve Uygur başta olmak üzere pek çok Türki halk ile kuruluşu gercekleştirdi. Türki halklara iyi davrandı lakin kendisine itaat etmeyen Harezm Türklerinin 10/9 unu katletti ordusundaki çoğunluğu Türk olanlarla. Cengiz Yasalarına itaat eden müslümanlara kurban yardımı bile yaptı. Ona çok saygı duyan profilinde ki Emir Timur dur.
@jackfrye17853 ай бұрын
the video is made by a central asian guy (possibly a muslim?). thus, the bias towards central asian and muslim empires.
@sadeceensar1615 Жыл бұрын
turkhis empire 🤙
@shirlzitting647 Жыл бұрын
Hey, where's part 2? You've only covered a third of world history.
@gabelli1998 Жыл бұрын
Y el imperio español? JAJAJAJAJA eres un meme
@sagamaster124 Жыл бұрын
meme es usted, el imperio otomano lo supera y le gano´varias veces. el imperio de las austrias español estaba en decadencia desde la batalla de las comunas
@gabelli1998 Жыл бұрын
@@sagamaster124 ya... Claro, casi toda América, filipinas, las demás indias orientales... Seguro que sí.
@pedroguiraosanchez Жыл бұрын
@@sagamaster124 españa derrotó a los otomanos en la batalla de lepanto …… poseía media europa y casi toda america
@sagamaster124 Жыл бұрын
@@pedroguiraosanchez España no existía, era una confederación en la península.
@sagamaster124 Жыл бұрын
@@gabelli1998 Rusia es más grande que EEUU, decime quien es superior. El mayor Territorio de la monarquía hispanica estaba casi despoblada.
@jitrawarrior3153 Жыл бұрын
This video literally forget that Ancient Chinese Empire ever exist
@elifelgun9996 Жыл бұрын
Ottoman Empire and Great Seljuk Empire 💪💪💪 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
@lethabomogopodi4540 Жыл бұрын
Remember when Britain was the most powerful nation
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
In contrast to those Iranian officials who claim that the Turks in Iran were actually originally Persians, the late IRGC Commander Qassem Suleimani claimed that the descendants of Turkic dynasties that live in Iran are not Iranian. Suleimani claimed: "Turks are aliens and non-Iranians. For hundreds of years (during Turkic rule in Iran), Iran had no history. Non- Iranians like the Seljuks invaded and ruled Iran."74 Shaffer, B. (2023) Iran is more than persia: Ethnic politics in Iran. Berlin: De Gruyter.
@younas258 Жыл бұрын
Proud of Carthage
@jobniak Жыл бұрын
You don't have any relationship to Carthage. You are Arab, but Carthaginians were Phoenicians.
@younas258 Жыл бұрын
@@jobniak First, in terms of ethnicity, we are Amazigh and not Arabs with some additions from Western Asia and South Europe. Second, you can look for a study of the United States Stanford University on several Carthaginian mummies that show that they do not carry any Phoenician genes.The reason for this is that when the Phoenicians came their number was few and mixed with an indigenous population
@ahmedabdellaoui1628 Жыл бұрын
@@younas258 no north africa today are mostly arabs an cartage was Phoenicians and stop talking bulshit about us study cartage was destroyed and her people killed and slaved and you bebers not amazigh was traitors who helped the romans go to see other history to steal it because u dont have any history berber just other nations colonise you land
@Mariyanthi Жыл бұрын
@@jobniakBoth Phoenicians and Arabs are Semitic ya know.. All those ancient cultures of MENA were cousins with each other and their languages were similar !
@tjnholmes3 ай бұрын
I saw the spelling of century and knew I couldnt take this video seriously.
@parham6317 ай бұрын
Iran for ever❤️🦁💚
@alesanteorias464 Жыл бұрын
Y el Imperio Español? El imperio donde no se ponia el sol.
@roadbone19414 ай бұрын
El vídeo es una estupidez, España era obviamente una superpotencia y más poderosa que los otomanos. Los españoles literalmente tenían un imperio global, mientras que los otomanos no. De hecho, donde vivo (estado de Washington) solía ser parte del Imperio español.
@alesanteorias4644 ай бұрын
@@roadbone1941 Aca Texas también.
@ramazanceylan377217 күн бұрын
@@roadbone1941Spanish Empire also power a empire as long as Ottomans however I dont think so rather than power in 17.16.15
@lokmandoruk5334 Жыл бұрын
Eskiden super gucmusuz simdi kimseye sonumuz bile gecmiyor nereden nereye
@ramazanabay2163 Жыл бұрын
He lan 400 yıl süper güçmüşüz amk
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
The Achaemenids and Sassanids got destroyed by a Hellenic and Arabic tribe respectively Parthians had their capital countless times sacked by Romans and post Islamic Persia was basically a playground for Arabs, Turks, and Mongols as we all know
@josephstalin8543 Жыл бұрын
There's no parthian, Sassanids and post islamic persia in this video
@based-iranian Жыл бұрын
This is literally coming from the same dude that supports islamic republic and also is a pan-turk why tf should we listen to you???
Spanish Empire would have been the right one for the 16th/17th century
@kaw4182 Жыл бұрын
Antiquity was the era of the two great powers, the Han Dynasty and Rome.
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
And many nomadic Germanic/Turkic empires :)
@kaw4182 Жыл бұрын
@@Nomadicenjoyer31 Definitely it is true. We can say that The Xiongnu made The Han build the Great Wall. And then Germanic people made The Roman army stronger.
@rome316ae3 Жыл бұрын
Also Mauryan Empire
@wankawanka3053 Жыл бұрын
Rome being the strongest for 6 centuries 💪
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
They ruled your ancestors of course😂
@TiestoCalvinHarris Жыл бұрын
@@Nomadicenjoyer31and now Ariana grande and Lionel Messi does 🇮🇹🌏🌎
@turkuntorunu226 Жыл бұрын
Turkısh Empires 🇹🇷
@KadirH_0 Жыл бұрын
Türk devletleri uzun süre hüküm sürmüştür Ottoman Empire 17 16 15 Timur Empire 14 Selçuk Empire 11 Huns 5
@widodoakrom3938 Жыл бұрын
15. yüzyıl Ming hanedanına aittir.
@ye-kf5gg Жыл бұрын
Achaemenid Empire the first superpower in the world 🇮🇷❤
@borhanuddin4289 Жыл бұрын
Roman and Roman Republic super power for like 6 centuries. And Muslim empire was super power of WORLD for like 7 centuries. Arab caliphate (2), Seljuk(1), Timurid(1), Ottoman (3)
@cadi5685 Жыл бұрын
Timurid wasnt islamic lol, Timur massacred Muslims
@TheVampirbat Жыл бұрын
Давай христиан посчитаем, клоун?
@widodoakrom3938 Жыл бұрын
Han/Qin, Mauryan empire, sasanid empire be like: are we a joke to u?
@rome316ae3 Жыл бұрын
This list is inaccurate
@garciaromerohouse6747 Жыл бұрын
España fue un imperio y no aparece
@latinhellas6383 Жыл бұрын
The Roman Empire reached its zenith from around 31 BC, when Octavian wrested control of Egypt from the Ptolemies and his rival Marc Antony, to around 226 AD under Severus Alexander, when the Persians succeeded the Parthians and posed a serious threat to Rome's eastern provinces. Rome held the line there, more or less, until around 614 AD, but in the meantime it lost much of the north and west to the Germanic invaders. The US became the main global power in the aftermath of WWII and reached its zenith in the 1990s when it eclipsed the broken Soviet Union. As for the 21st Century, we are still in very early days and it's a long way even to 2050; so far the US' military adventurism in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and who knows where else next could consolidate its hegemony or be a pitfall to a serious setback. We just don't know right now. Good Luck!
@nocturnalrecluse1216 Жыл бұрын
The American hegemony ain't going anywhere.
@arnaucano2615 Жыл бұрын
So..the spanish empire where do you left it?Lepanto's Battle, Cartagena, San Quintín?..
@ancient_Iraqi_Mesopotamian Жыл бұрын
Ancient Mesopotamia(Iraq)🇮🇶 Babylon🇮🇶Sumer🇮🇶Akkad🇮🇶Assyria🇮🇶 ❤️❤️❤️💪💪💪
@temirbug_han Жыл бұрын
Sumer Proto Turk 🇹🇷
@mistercumalot6026 Жыл бұрын
Roman Empire the strongest all time hands down🥇👑👍
@widodoakrom3938 Жыл бұрын
Hoax
@PortugalZeroworldcup7 ай бұрын
🇮🇹
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
Turkic peoples were always powerful❤❤❤
@sidequestenjoyer7037 Жыл бұрын
No you weren’t you’re irrelevant for most of history
@eren-kf9ro Жыл бұрын
Kral bütün yorumda sen varsın. Masayı boş bırakmamısın . Adamsın seviliyorsun
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
@@eren-kf9ro 👁️👄👁️
@eren-kf9ro Жыл бұрын
@@papazataklaattiranimam 👁️👃🏻👁️
@Letnistonwandif Жыл бұрын
are you a woman
@gonzalosujarguillen8638 Жыл бұрын
XULO TAS SALTAO EL PRIMER IMPERIO GLOBAL DE LA HISTORIA, EL IMPERIO ESPAÑOL, CUALQUIER IDEA QUE NO SEA QUE DEBE DE ESTAR ME SOBRA
@gonzalosujarguillen8638 Жыл бұрын
siglos 16 17
@gonzalosujarguillen8638 Жыл бұрын
en primera mitad del s 17 España y Portugal estaban unidas en la Unión Ibérica, sus imperios estaban unidos, casi na
@gonzalosujarguillen8638 Жыл бұрын
@MUHAMMAD SAIF aro o el macedonio por la fruta
@AW-zk5qb Жыл бұрын
Lmao this list is insane. The US was clearly the most powerful country in the 20th century. The Soviet Union was never even an equal of the US during the Cold War much less stronger, and the US ended the 20th century as the sole superpower and was clearly the most powerful nation (when taking everything, from military to economy to cultural influence, into account) since 1945. Also, The France was the most powerful nation in the 18th century with Britain and France battling over the 17th and 18th centuries for dominance and Spain was the most powerful nation in the world in the 16th century. I know there has been a push to try to pretend that Europe wasn't dominant from 1500-1900s before the US took over, but it's just a fact that they were
@srmagicpanda9606 Жыл бұрын
@@AW-zk5qb Yep
@fadhillahkemal3302 Жыл бұрын
I just can't believe the roman ruled for 6 century stright and destroyed to pulp by germanic tribe .
@tellllllksi8 ай бұрын
Achemanid🇮🇷👑🦁🌞💪👑
@atribhattacharyya2631 Жыл бұрын
Please correct the spelling of "Century" in every slide..
@wiyiwiyiwiyiwiyiwwiyiwiyiw1274 Жыл бұрын
USA>USSR
@aslanthelion3116 Жыл бұрын
The strongest empire is the Arab and Islamic empire, and whoever has doubts should refer to history
@jskkabyle9458 Жыл бұрын
I agree with you 👌
@yaqubleis6311 Жыл бұрын
Abu Muslim destroyed the Umayyad caliphate in 3 years 🤣🤣🤣 search battle of zab
@yaqubleis6311 Жыл бұрын
Abbasid caliphate were vassal of Buyid Empire
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
@@yaqubleis6311 they ruled joke Iranians😂😂😂
@Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын
@@yaqubleis6311 The Arabs themselves, divided and fragmented, were being increasingly challenged by Turkic steppe warriors who were militarily superior to the commercially minded urban populations of the region. The Arab-Muslim expansionary movement that had begun with Muhammad's first conquests in the early part of the seventh century, had proceeded with fits and starts before it came under pressure from external menaces and had started to wane by the tenth century. But, if conquest had all but ceased, Arabic culture and language was continuing to expand both east and south into sub-Saharan Africa. At the same time, Persian culture was making a comeback of sorts, while the Turks were rapidly gaining a steady foothold among the elite of the Arab armies. In time, this Turkish military presence would soon prove indispensable and it would logically translate into political power.
@jeremyyeh48718 ай бұрын
No any East Asian empires? This is really unreasonable.
@kaldirdimgobegi Жыл бұрын
The Turks have constantly been an imperial people. They have made a habit of empire building, and although none of their structures have attained the imposing dimensions of the Mongol achievement, many of them have been far more lasting. The maps show at least a dozen states of the first rank which have been constructed by Turkish peoples, and another dozen built by Turkish leaders, sometimes by themselves, sometimes with the assistance of a military aristocracy of their own race.
@andreicristian957511 ай бұрын
Great to know your current aspirations but first you need to learn how to build structures that don't fall over your people at the first earthquake, and then maybe you'll be worthy to compete with the great Ottomans.
@g.g558111 ай бұрын
@@andreicristian9575this is not subject.That guy gave a perfect info. What is the point between hatay and turks empires.
@andreicristian957511 ай бұрын
@@g.g5581 understand no english good you. ok?
@andreicristian957511 ай бұрын
@@g.g5581 Empire building, i.e. a murderous past of invading and killing neighboring nations, is not something to be proud of.
@andreicristian957511 ай бұрын
@@g.g5581 Ottoman sultans even killed their own brothers, that's how bloodthirsty they were. Just bottom of the barrel level of scum.
@Christian_Sannino Жыл бұрын
Rome ruled for 6 centuries
@rome316ae3 Жыл бұрын
Fake
@saikrishnak8631 Жыл бұрын
8 centuries straight II BCE to VI CE , X and XI centuries