THE TALENT CODE by Daniel Coyle | Core Message

1-Page PDF Summary: lozeron-academ...
Book Link: amzn.to/2ryMFmz
Join the Productivity Game Academy: productivityga...
Animated core message from Daniel Coyle's book 'The Talent Code.'
This video is a Lozeron Academy LLC production - www.ProductivityGame.com.

[@mylearningcompass]

I have read the Talent Code 4 times. This video summary nails the essence of the book. I would add the matter of "Talent Whisperers" - the teacher or coach who guides in the deep practice.

[@AmonsRealm]

Anthony Pfeiffer it’s been a while since I’ve read the book. But it talked about even more than the video like myelin, deep practice, motivation etc.

[@KishaMiles1]

You found and broke down a book that I've been looking for for 4 years. I have 3 year old twins and the goal is business owners, who understand the value of a Christ centered home, life, & business. Now I have the steps to turn my wishes into reality. Can't wait to get this book. Please don't stop doing this.

[@AkashKumarPhD]

Summary of The Talent Code 1. Revelatory moment 2. Environmental reinforcements 3. Primal cue to belong

[@benshore9407]

Did you just do summary of a summary of the book, so meta.

[@Bulbophile]

6:32 so sad, especially in the internet age

[@catbat06]

@@Bulbophile Why is it sad? From my perspective it's very exciting. Specialist forums or subreddits can offer this to almost everyone without physical limitation.

[@thetruthbetweenthelines8521]

I am very happy I watched this summary/core message because I have this book on my list for a very long time and for some reason I postponed reading it. Great work! This will be my last book for 2018!

[@balmore.hidalgo]

Loved it thanks

[@Kaizen_Equinox]

There r many copying u....But I like your speed, dramaless delivery, compact content....Keep it up bro .Om ,🙏

[@hamadwaqar3948]

brother your videos are so helping! your channel made me so productive!

[@Stewart5225]

Great video !! Thank you Mr Lozeron

[@kthozhuvanur1568]

Excellent review of the book!

[@zemach4422]

The point is solid,what you think is what you summon, If one will never believe he can be at the top 100% he will never get there, Law of attraction says that what your mind set is thinking on thats what you attract, Think positively everything around you will seem positive, Think and be sure that you can get to the top and you will reach there,might take some time but if you keep up you definitely can reach anything with patience and hard work

[@vpdisco]

Thanks for saving me the audible credit. This is interesting but all these allegories have been used in numerous self development books.

[@dajael]

A Masterful review of a book!!! Your graphics and opinions married perfectly in this video! ✌

[@alexanderSnilsson]

This will have to be my evening treat! Thanks!

[@37prakhar]

Best book I have come across so far..

[@MotiveVideoBook]

wow the whiteboard animation technique is so beautiful.

[@chenmargalit7375]

Great work ! I'll only add that I think u shouldn't ONLY see this as a tool for others (my students, my children, the team I coach) but for oneself. Most of ur followers are not leading others, but r surly leading themselves.

[@ethangoodman893]

Hey great video, if you haven't already could you do a breakdown on how you study and analyze each book you read? I am sure many of us would benefit from such a video! Thanks and all the best.

[@rahulbhati9748]

"Geniuses are made not born"

[@futurez12]

I'm of that opinion when it comes to roughly equal natural physical abilities. However, it would be ridiculous to say that Danny DeVito could've become as good a basketball player as Michael Jordan had he trained the same way with the same coaches, parents etc. There's just no way that would've happened. Same for swimmers with naturally short limbs, or for bodybuilders who are naturally very skinny. You just can't compete against people who work as hard as you but also have a born physical advantage over you. I suspect the same holds true for mental abilities too, but it's harder to say whether or not one is born intelligent. Though I suspect that to be true also. That's not to say one can't dramatically improve their abilities at something, because they clearly can. However, I doubt it will compensate for inappropriate genes in whatever field you're in when it comes to competing against people with the hard work and dedication, but also with the absolute best mixture of genes for what they're trying to do.

[@tpmash]

Beautiful and the PDF is much appreciated! You’ve revolutionized my reading habits and my library 📚too! THANK YOU 🙏🏽

[@ij9375]

This is so valuable ❤

[@adyasharout496]

I love your videos. It would be great if you can make a list of books we can read in 2019. Thank you

[@yaasir5920]

“Human gene is not change but human believes is change”

[@Chandasouk]

I often watch these videos and then check out the books later at the library

[@DK-ul3lo]

Same

[@YoungDen]

Bingo

[@tpmash]

Yip

[@harshdeepsingh8211]

Best channel ever

[@scott1357901]

Thank you very much for this video, very very valuable

[@DrOnumba]

One word; BELIEF!

[@omotoshooluwadare9300]

Billions brought me to check the book out here.

[@GrowthMindsetChannel]

Just subscribed, love it! Thanks :)

[@isipwater]

TY!!!!!

[@veronicaolivares9150]

Thank you for sharing!!!

[@DuncanNyakundi2023]

Absolutely good stuff! keep up

[@freeinhimprisonministry328]

Thnk you for sharing once again

[@ramalbrown2572]

You earned this subscribe sir

[@syedmajid3202]

Thanks for video!

[@ahmedalhisaie7698]

thanks a lot for your effort, you are amazing

[@PrakharKVerma]

Change your environment, change your life.

[@tpmash]

Underrated comment👌🏽

[@futurez12]

Good video, but FWIW I think the three chess girls were born with higher than average intelligence. Their father was a very intelligent man, probably their mother too (I don't know), and chess is a very cognitive sport, so, IMO, they already had the raw tools to do well at it. I'm sure if you gave the same training to someone with less intelligence they wouldn't do as well. Likewise, I'm sure pretty much anyone with the same or higher intelligence would do as well, or better. Also, I don't think Judit got so good because she felt she had to "catch up" with her sisters (although that could've been a factor). I suspect it was more that she had ready-made competition anytime she wanted it with her two other sisters. She could get into a high level game almost immediately, and she had siblings that provided her with high level discussion about chess who also happened to have similar goals to her. She also had her very own siblings achieving the things she wanted to achieve, showing her it was possible. Very few people have that at such a young age. There's also the fact that her dad had gone through the training process with his other two daughters and had refined it, so she had a more developed program than the other two girls.

[@feralaca123]

My country has produced some of the *finest players in soccer history* : Maradona, Distefano, Messi, Sivori... so many. Or recipe? *keep them poor*, limit their access to education and even clean water. *Give them a ball* and tell them that there is no other way to escape. Do that and you will get the best of the best. But remember, if you enjoy seeing Messi play, there are thousands of kids that couldn't make it.

[@dustinneathery9492]

Awesome

[@feedmebooksallday4775]

Great video

[@mouadsouilhi2782]

I love you vidéo, they helps a lots.

[@nickough]

Confusing video that is at 'cross purposes' to the true ethos of the talent code. Although I appreciate the effort. The essence (and truth!) of the book is ‘anti-talent’ (and other books of similar science). It is that 'talent' is a myth and that actually hard work and practice produces the illusion of ‘talented’ people. 'Talent' is a mis-represented label that people (who haven't aquired similar skills to those that are 'allegedly' talented) give to a person (with the skill) to explain the higher level of skill. Belief in ‘talent’ produces de-motivation and a fixed mind-set that restricts development in many skills. No skill is pre-ordained. NB: believers in ‘talent’ probably won’t read much further than this, because if you believe the science of practice in skill aquisition, you only have yourself to blame for not getting better at anything. It’s a hard truth of life, and believing in talent just makes things easier for most people. What The Talent Code does show is this: The science, physics and neurological processes involved in aquiring ALL human skill prove that 'practice' not inate/natural born talent decides skill level in ANY activity. All human learning requires brain signals to make the person 'mimic' what they have been taught or shown (think baby from birth aquiring the skill of walking, talking, eating toilet training etc). The progressive, relentless, practice of these skills produces strong brain/action connections (using myelin to re-enforce these connections) and improves skill - that's why very high level skills take nearly 10 years - comprehensive speech, langauge etc take that long. No science has EVER proved any human to be born with a 'natural' supreme/better skill level at anything - we all start from a clean sheet -birth dis-abilities excluded. We are basic computers that need to be programmed. The social, familial, cultural and environmental factors presented to children at birth and in our infant, primary years produce different opportunities, methods, beliefs, likes, dis-likes and aquired physical/mental skills. Dependent on exposure and opportunity factors for any of the relevant activity/skill. This produces a wide array of skill levels in children at all manner of activities - sport, school subjects, music, problem solving, chess - everything! Labelling of these children as ‘talented’ or ‘not talented’ at any given skill starts at a very young age and this produces a new set of problems - especially for people trying to aquire skill. Praise, nurturing and encouragement produce emotive responses that make children WANT to practice more, and thus they continue to learn and improve. None support/praise produces negative response that de-motivates, thus practice may stall or stop. The amount of hours practice required to produce ‘excellence’ in any skill is approx. 10000 hrs. Although, most everyday adult tasks can be reasonably performed without this level of proper/deliberate practice. Although people forget the acquired skills that most have already obtained from ‘deliberate practice’ throughout their life when considering ‘talent’. For instance, standard Western educational achievements require 12-13 years of school ‘practice’ (before college) to graduate/pass exams - that will equate to at least 8000 hrs) Of course many people aquire (less important?) skills with much less ‘practice time’, particularly for leisure activities - sport or hobbies, art music etc, (but also for employment/jobs), so if they are exposed to someone who has practised for many more hours than them in any given discipline they may feel they are less ‘talented’, based on ‘natural talent’ mind sets, they will fall into the ‘talent’ myth/vicious circle and probably be de-motivated about their own ‘talent’ and falsely believe that they don’t have what it takes to achieve similar. However, science proves that if they practice enough they too can aquire a very similar level of skill. To produce the inspiration and motivation to continue for 10000hrs is the real ‘missing link’ that separates high achievers from those who are not so good at any particular skill, and most experts at any given skill have commited to this practice for years - ten years on average. The book focuses on ‘hot-beds’ that produce world class performers, and the research finds that children (and adults) who are committed to learn (and practice) any skill become very, very good at the particular skill. It also finds that opportunity, motivation and good coaching are the essential elements. However, the parallels with learning and progression in ALL walks of life are the most important aspects of the book. The KIPP schools in the US provide opportunity, support and constant affirmation for children from social backgrounds that do not generally provide the most ‘opportunistic’ circumstances for educational/life learning. Over 6/7years these schools provide constant opportunity and encouragement for progression in education/school. They consistently produce college entry educational standards from children, who may well have been ‘labelled’ as under achievers, non-talented or not born for x,y or z, had they remained in a different school (and thus been exposed to other influencing/de-motivating factors). They consistently prove the theory of practice, progression and skill acquisition beyond what most people ‘believe’ they are capable of. So, if you’ve got this far, remember the essence of progress at all levels (for any skill) is ‘deliberate practice’ - building things in small increments with effort and repeat trying/exertion. This produces better brain signals/pathways and co-ordination in the skill. Trying to do something that is ‘just out of reach’ or is the next step up, (whatever your level) is the best way to practice and produce improvement - BUT you WILL fail at it many times before you can do it properly or with ease. That is a basic requirement of learning! The essential element for success is determination and repetition, and commitment to keep trying to progress. Just keep trying! The presence of ‘good teachers’ or coaches with the pre-requisite knowledge to impart to students is also very important (although not essential depending on motivation of the individual). The difference between getting better or not is ‘giving up completely’ or believing that ‘talent’ is holding you back or has pre-disposed you to ‘being rubbish’ at the skill. Otherwise, you CAN become great at what you want to be great at. Believe the science! Talent is overated!

[@Danyruddy7]

I found you summary so helpful. I'm interested in acquiring new habilities, one at a time. If you could share me another similar (or deeply better) book I would really appreciate it. Anyway, thank you for taking the time to write the summary.

[@motivationalstories7712]

awesome ideas..be productive

[@HusainVlogs1]

This is nice page

[@shiva_tharun]

Thank you very much!! Amazing video.. do you have a Podcast?

[@raedm9244]

Good video. Good presentation. Just requested the pdf summery.

[@bi2u4787]

Very Helpful review👍

[@Genesis--me8ud]

The root of success is failure but do we have time ?

[@dinorexgx]

Thanks so much for. This. I'd give out three likes if I could. Joined the notification squad

[@charlesjsescoto]

❤️

[@bradyfractal6653]

Isn't the word "Talent" being misused in place of the word "Motivation" throughout this entire video?

[@ishanverma1087]

Guys buy this book, this video is just an intro : amzn.to/2LA7OG1

[@mtnsaray]

It's like how Michael Scott promised to the kids that he's gonna pay their tuition which made them study hard to get into the college. Huh.

[@ric_clicks9195]

😂😂😂 yeah

[@atulbhardwaj90]

On the flip side, how incredibly stressful and traumatic it would be for the 90percent of little kids that didn't make it coz it was just not for them. They would be scarred for life.

[@husainrampurawala3031]

Thats what Kota is

[@advancetotabletop5328]

My Talent Code :P 1. Revelatory Moment : Blood sugar above 166. ): 2. Environmental Reinforcements : Tracking calendar. 3. Primal cue to Belong : I’d like to be alive, thanks. :P What’s your Talent Code? (:

[@iche9373]

"Competition Is for Losers." - Peter Thiel

[@LaGeRcs]

Can you explain?

[@LaGeRcs]

You writed so explain if you can how you understand

[@iche9373]

@@LaGeRcs My explanation www.wsj.com/articles/peter-thiel-competition-is-for-losers-1410535536

[@mmaltese32]

Great video, but you have a small typo: Bannister broke 4 minute mile on May 6, 1954 not Aug 7.

[@prig3473]

You have missed myelin concept author explained that should also be included.

[@SYWPiano]

Wait, isn't the most important part about the book is the discussion of myelin?

[@thematrix303]

Hey are you familiar with the topic of myelin?

[@Salamaleikum80]

Question: Does the author accept or discards the fact that talent excists?

[@TheREDBiRDRampage]

Can u do a review for the book never split the difference by Chris boss next????

[@nrependradimree6973]

Talent is not grown it is indeed born. Had the daughters of the chess-dad not taken interest in chess then what would have happened? You might have encountered several kids in schools who are always around books, their mother and father keep on making them read but as they are interested in something else they won't grow into the forced talent one is shoving down them by merely changing the surrounding. The example of South Korea and USSR is also debatable in a similar context. If we will go by the notion this book states then why do people say to follow one's passion and success is in a profession which interests you. If a student fails repeatedly in his exams then will filling his/her walls with books and forcing quizzes on him/her will make any difference or asking him/her the thing which interests him and an advice to work in that direction will? Those Korean Golfers went to Golf because that sport attracted them, an innate attraction towards it. According to this book, a wrestler can become a shooter if he tries hard, which in turn can be possible but it doesn't prove that talent is not born.

[@chh8860]

Roger Bannister broke the 4-minute mark in the mile on May 6,1954 ... not August. And it took 3 years for a total of 17 runners to break the 4-minute mark, not 'in the month after ...". If you really read the book, and didn't rely upon someone else's notes, you would know that.

[@rafaeloj2163]

Man, write a book, please.

[@phoenixrising164]

Its been 13 years since Usain Bolt ran 100m in 9.58 sec wondering why no one beat that record yet.. as per the roger bannister story shouldn't this have been achieved?

[@KimberlyLetsGo]

Premises is great. But that man's 3 daughters had their fate already picked out by their dad. There was no natural interest from the girls to want to do chess. They, actually, didn't get a choice in the matter. Where the KIPP students, at least they can pick their college and what they are going to study.

[@Anwar-AT]

awesome summary as usual. Would love if you could update the animation software used.

[@charlieng3347]

Not sure if this is a good idea

[@frankcampitelli249]

I have read the book and the most important aspect of the book was right up front in the first part of the book and you never mentioned it in the summery. It is how and why myelin is formed and what it is. If you don't understand how the brain works, yes maybe your "take away" are the stories that stick out. I found the stories irrelevant however they all contribute in some way myelin formation to a higher degree. I suggest you go back and read the book as I think you skimmed over the first part of the most important part. NO MYELIN=NO TALENT And everyone that reads this, spare me the hate replies until you look up Shwann cells and oligodendrocytes and what they do. You will then see the point I'm making.

[@welovelibraries4556]

This book misses the point - why did Apple become one of the greatest talent pools under Steve Jobs but has done absolutely ZERO under Tim Cook with the same “talent”. The key to talent pools is having ONE leader who is creating the environment for the talent to excel & the same leader makes sure there is a recruitment and filtering system to create & maintain the pool. BTW chess is a horrible measure of genius because there are a finite number of moves & a solved list of counter moves. It’s why computers were programmed to beat all humans relatively easily and very early on. BTW genius HAS been proven repeatedly to be born. The mistake people make is thinking genius = success when in fact research has shown it’s way down the list. And often not even on the list. 😎 yw

[@welovelibraries4556]

R-Type Jobs is easy to grasp for some of us

[@Pneumanon]

"In 1991 at age 15, Judit became the Youngest Grandma in history".

[@verne8997]

*grandmaster (if anyone else was wondering)

[@Daedrex]

If only I was a woman

[@linoazzurro]

I call it welfare!, on the white man's dime.